960046_INSPECTIONS_20171231

2 V
NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960046
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS960046
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County:
Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 08/30/2016 Entry Time: 10:45 am Exit Time: 11:25 am Incident #
Farm Name: N & W Pig Farms
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Julian B Nelms
Phone:
919-242-6327
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St
Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address: 5909 NC 111 N
Fremont NC 27830
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
350 31' 52" Longitude:
77° 54' 28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222:
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other issues
Certified Operator: Harvey L Whitley
Operator Certification Number:
16601
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent
Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Report N
6-13-16 2.11 2.25
3-31-16 2.79 4.01
1-7-16 2.54 2.52
Soil Report 1-12-2015
Zn<300
Cu<200
Calibration 2014
Due 2016
Lagoon Sludge Survey 9-18-15
Due 2016.
page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility : Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 5,600
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
43.00
Lagoon
SOUTH 05/23/94
19.00
39.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960046 Owner -Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility : Julian B Nelms Facility Number:
960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
t
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner -Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
N ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

I ,w
■ Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960046
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS960046
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Dale:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/03/2015 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 10:45 am Incident #
Farm Name:
N & W Pig Farms
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Julian B Nelms
Phone:
919-242-6327
Mailing Address:
601 E Main St
Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address:
5909 NC 111 N
Fremont NC 27830
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 31' 52" Longitude:
77° 54' 28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222
Question Areas:
® Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat . Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Sito Reprosentative(s):
24 hour contact name
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Name
Brent Mitchell
Justin K Davis
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Dale:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility : Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 09/03/15 npsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
6-22-15 1.78 1.72
3-6.15 2.16 2.44
12.22-14 2.23 2.38
8-25-14 1.33 1.44
5-27-14 2.25 2.38
3-10-14 2.40 2.66
Soil Report 1-12-15
Zn<120
Cu<100
Lagoon Sludge Survey 9-30-14
L1 L2
LTZ- 6.15 6.67
Thickness- 2.25 1.64
Pump Intake- 6.4 7.0
20% 14%
Calibration 9-30-14
page: 2

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility : Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 09/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
rd-77e - Wean to Feeder 7,000 5,085
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Froeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
44.00
Lagoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
43.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility : Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 09/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
ME][]
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
o ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
®❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑0
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
i ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑M
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ®❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

n
Permit: AWS960046 Owner -Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 09/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify .
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

0
Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility : Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 09/03/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
®❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
®❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
e ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
a El
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
. ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
i ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
®❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
®❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
®❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
®❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
®❑
❑
page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/12/2008 Entry Time:02:17 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: N & W Pia Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Julian B Nelms Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant' Integrator: Goldsboro Hoa Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'52" Longitude: 77°54'28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records -and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms
Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number : 960046
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw CoC and Permit.
WUP dated 3/13/2000.
WARs (lbsN/1000gall): 6/9/08-1.9(L1), 2.2(L2); 3/17/08-2.9(L1), 2.8(1-2); 11/13/07-2.0(L1), 1.9(L2); 6/26/07-2.6(L1), 2.6(1-2).
Soil test results (4/15/08): 1.3 tons/acre lime required (sample NW02); Znl-223, Cut-189 (sample NW04). Lime bought/applied.
2008 IRR1/2 (Corn)T4753: Field 1; (Wheat)T4753: Fields 3,4,14,15.
2007 IRR1/2 (SB)T4753: Fields 1,2,12,13. Remember to keep irrigation dates within 60 days of the most recent waste analysis date.
PAN rates met and balanced. Typical pumping rate 225 gpm.
Pumping volumes of irrigation events were consistent with changes in freeboard levels. Rainfall records were adequate.
2007 sludge survey results (12/13/07): (L1)LTZ=5.34', Thick=2.86'; (L2)LTZ=5.61', Thick=2.33'
2006 calibration results (9/22/06): 1.18" ring, 60 psi @gun. 225gpm expected, 225gpm measured. Next calibration and sludge
surveys due by end of 2008.
2007 crop yields seen (344 bu of SB, 937 bu of wheat).
Page: 2

Permit: AWS96DO46 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number : 960046
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 6,721
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
47.00
agoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
37.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
Cl
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or Improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
Cl
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

a
Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian 8 Nelms
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Aycock
Soil Type 2
Nahunta
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046
Inspection Date: 06112/2008
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Cl
❑
■
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
f1LL__
Vne
Wl
rdA
AC
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Cl ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 06/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherissues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑ ■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/1112011 Entry Time:12:30 PM Exit Time: 01:05 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: N & W Pia Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Julian B Nelms Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address: 5909 NC 111 N Fremont NC 27830
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35031'52" Longitude: 77054'28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP in records 2/3/09
Soil Test 1/27/11
**due again in 2012**
Waste Analysis N
Cu & Zn levels w/in range
1 2
L = .8T
6/21/11 = 2.5 2.8
3/10/11 = 3.4 3.3
Sludge Survey
8/13/10 = 2.0 2.0
**due again in 2011**
6/15/10 = 2.6 2.5
thickness = 2.43
LTZ = 5.65
irrigation calibration 9/18/10
pump intake = 6.3
**due again in 2012**
irrigation records correspond
to rainfall and lagoon records
crop yield records reviewed
**try and keep eye on dike walls, try revegetate.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 6,728
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
43.00
agoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
43.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 0711112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Aycock
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Craven
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
In
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/08/2009 Entry Time:01:30 PM
Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: N & W Pig Farms
Owner Email:
Owner: Julian B Nelms
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St
Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address: 5909 NC 111 N
Fremont NC 27830
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator:
Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35031'52" Longitude: 77054'28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection
& Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms
Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Julian Nelms
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 10/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New COC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 9-4-09 1.7 1.5
5-7-09 1.7 1.6
3-20-09 3.3 3.0
Soil test 3-20-09 with highest lime .6 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Calibration 10-31-08 with 224.7 GPM
Crop yield complete - add corn once picked
Sludge Survey 10-31-08 #1 Thick-2.46'
LTZ-5.59'
#2 Thick-2.38'
LTZ-5.56' } Need to get pump intake measurement next sludge survey
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 10/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 5,960
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Tv De Identifier Closed Data Start Date Dealoned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
45.00
agoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
39.00
Page: 3
0
9
0

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Data: 10/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
13000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 10/0812009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Craven
Soil Type 3
Aycock
Soil Type 4
Nahunta
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 10/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues -
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 10/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/16/2014 Entry Time: 09:25 AM Exit Time: 10:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: N & W Pia Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Julian B Nelms Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address: 5909 NC 111 N Fremont NC 27830
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'52" Longitude: 77054'28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16565
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 04/16/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
WuP 2/3/09
Waste Analysis N
1 2
3/10/14 = 2.40 2.66
7/31/13 = 1.60 1.66
6/10/13 = 1.79 2.28
Irrigation Calibration 9/11/12
"'due again 2014"'
Sludge Survey 11/20/13
1 2
thickness = 1.93 2.60
LTZ = 6.10 4.76
pump intake = 7.0 6.0
18% 28%
"'due again 2014'
morality records reviewed
irrigation reocords correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
Crop yield reviewed
Soil Test 1/21/14
L = 1.8T
Cu & Zn levels Min range
"'soil test due again 2017'
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 04/16/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 4,591
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
46.00
agoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
38.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 04/16/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ IN
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 04/16/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Cotton
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Aycock
Soil Type 2 Norfolk loamy sand, 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 04/16/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ONOO
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Cl
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 04/16/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents Yes No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes No
NA
NE
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 00011
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/06/2013 Entry Time: 08:45 AM Exit Time: 09:15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: N &_W Pia Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Julian B Nelms Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address: 5909 NC 111 N Fremont NC 27830
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35031'52" Longitude: 77054'28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Otherlssues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/0612013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
OIC in records
Waste Analysis N
1 2
6/10/13 = 1.79 2.28
2/20/13 = 2.92 3.15
7/16/12 = 1.77 1.76
Soil Test 11/24/12
"due again 2013"
L=1.3T
Cu & Zn levels Min range
irrigation calibration 9/11/12
"due again in 2014"
Sludge Survey 9/11/12
1 2
thickness = 2.56 3.25
LTZ = 6.96 6.03
pump intake = 7.0 6.7
19% 25%
rainfall & lagoon records correspond to irrigation records
crop records reveiewed
extension letter for pumping on corn til August
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number; 960046
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 5,372
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
f Total SSLW: 210,000
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agocn
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
43.00
agoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
44.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number : 960046
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Craven
Soil Type 3
Aycock
Soil Type 4
Nahunta
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
ONO
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ IN
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherlssues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

u
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:, 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/23/2012 Entry Time: 09156 AM Exit Time: 10:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: N & W Pla Farms I Owner Email:
Owner: Julian B Nelms Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address: 5909 NC 111 N Fremont NC 27830
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35031'52" Longitude: 77054'28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Otherlssues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1
n

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
WUP in records 5/18/2000
Waste Analysis N
1 2
2/26/12 = 3.2 3.7
12/26/11 = 1.8 1.9
9/13/11 = 1.8 1.4
Soil Test 1/27/11
"due again 2012"'
L=.8T
Cu & Zn levels Win range
Lagoon & rainfall records correspond to irrigation records
irrigation calibration 9/8/10
"'due again 2012..
Sludge Survey 7/13/11
"due again in 2012"
1 2
thickness = 2.95 2.75
LTZ = 5.25 5.36
pump intake = 6.5 5.8
28% 26%
crop yield records reviewed
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 5,321
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
38.00
agoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
38.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number; 960046
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ . ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?,
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Nahunta
Soil Type 3
Aycock
Soil Type 4
Craven
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Data: 05/2312012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 0130
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
Cl
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

0
Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 1100
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

n
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/26/2007 Entry Time:08700 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: N & W Pia Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Julian B Nelms Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Integrator:
Latitude:35°31'52" Longitude:77°54'28"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Julian Nelms Phone:
24 hour contact name Julian Nelms Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number : 960046
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CDC & PERMIT 2009
WASTE ANALYSIS 6/12/06 .85 1.8
9/11/06 1.1 1.1
12/1/06 1.8 1.6
2/27/07 3.1 3.0
SOIL TEST 4117/07 WITH .8 TONS OF LIME
CV & ZN VALUES WITHIN RANGE
IRRIGATION RECORDS COMPLETE
CALIBRATION 09/22/06 WITH 225 GPM - DO EVERY OTHER YEAR (DUE IN 2008)
SLUDGE SURVEY 9/22/06 #1 THICK 2.90'
LTZ - 5.33'
#2 THICK - 1.96'
LTZ - 5.80'
CROP YIELD 2006
RAINFALL & FREEBOARD
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 1,500
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
45.00
agoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
34.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Cotton
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Aycock
Soil Type 3
Nahunta
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ Cl
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
00130
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the.facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Facility Number Date of Visit: 3/27/2002 Time: 920
p Not Operational p Below 11hre=
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: N & W Pig Farms County: Wayne .................................................. .aRQ........
Owner Name: Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr. Phone No: 919-242-6327
Mailing Address: fz0.t.E..Mai.n.St...................................................................................... ftemont-NC.......................................................... z7a3a ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative: George.P.ettus............................................................................ Integrator: Galdsbora.Hog.F.arms.......................................
Certified Operator:Julian.& ............................... Nelm ................................................ Operator Certification Number: 1650.............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry p Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ©• ©' ©" Longitude ©� ®° ®"
"Design Current,
Swine '` Capacity ' Population Poultry
® Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Number of Lagoons 0
Holding Ponds:/SolidTraps
Population Cattle - Capacity Population
�❑ Dairy
. ❑ on airy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 71000
Total SSLW 2109000
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
p Yes p No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes H No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............1..&.2............ ............ 3.,&..4............ .................................... ................................... .................
.................. ...................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............45...............................3.6...................................................

ace i y Number: 96-46 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
H No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
N No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
g No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
g No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑Yes
®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
g No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
U No
12. Crop type Corn Cotton Soybeans Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
g No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
g No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
g No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
g No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
g No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
g No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Pen -nit readily available?
❑ Yes
g No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
g No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
g No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
g No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
g No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
g No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
g No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
g No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
g No
In No violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no Further correspondence about is vise .
Comments�(refer�to question#) ExplamYany YES answers and/or any, recommendations or any'other comments
J m �.
Use drawings bf flicil►ty to betteraexplasituations (use additional pages, as necesasary) Notes
13 Feld Co Final
Recor s available for review.
Waste analysis: 3/21/02 - NL = 2.4 lbs.; SL = 1.41bs.; 12/19/01 - NL = 3.0 lbs., SL = 3.6 lbs.;
10/4/01 - NL = 2.1 lbs.; SL = 1.7 lbs.; 7/3/01 - NL = 2.9 lbs., SL = 2.3 lbs.
Soil analysis for 2001 (dated 1/30/02) available.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required.
Vegetation on dike wall is well managed. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn ,B.";Hardison "'entered by Ann T ndail
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: -e Date:

O5103101
Continued
•Facility Number: 96_46
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
I
ounds are well kept.
tecords are well organized.
f you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us at 252-946-6481.
'Vl

(Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other Cl Denied Access
Facility Number 96 46 Date of Visit: 12-09-2003 Time: 1450
0 Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: N..&..W..FiiglArrns........................................................................................ County: W..gyjkC ............................................... W..aRla........
Owner Name: dluliarl.Neltira.&.................. H.L.M..hillal.jr.................................... Phone No: 9j9:-2.42.-,fi3Z7 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 6U1.,.lYlaltx.Sty............................................... Fr ......................................................... VIM
Facility Contact:
.......................................... Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:&y.d.Nllins................................................................................. Integrator: Goldshox.Q..UQgXarma......................................
Certified Operator: Ju JAIIA ................................. Nelms................................................ Operator Certification Number:16,56,5 .............................
Location of Farm:
Intersection of NC Hwy. 11 l and NC Hwy. 222. �
41
® Swine [3 Poultry [I Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 • 31 52 Longitude 77 ' S4 28
Design Current
Swine_-- rnnneity Pnmilatinn
® Wean to -Feeder
7000
3500
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 7,000
Total SSLW 210,000
I Number of Lagoons 0 ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other --
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [_-]No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify D WQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes []No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Stricture 1 Stricture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .... NelmaJ.&.2.... .... Nelms.3..&A.................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 50" 29"

V.VVJ/V1
Facility Number: 96-46
Date of Inspection 12-09-2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
- Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
- (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes
49:. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation; freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
® No
N No
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No -
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
*�r ,ark „ �;: ,, u , „ E4 ° lam` n i:'YES answers.and%"I ' "";drecoinhiendations or'' °an'" other o erifl i ;l ti{I
Commen'tsp�r >ertoquestiona#) { xR a y any 1 y g mm
ll"nP.
`nm•..g"f,gvilfi�'�P"�t2 '- I.Mt,' a"11':M"R_ { KIT. �;rzIMV.�'I :na,'�u{;ITfN Y u YI.. W.I i"yeT mu .:..e�r�. Y .AsoA Pry'.:^I Ali bi...nq.u«��n h i�'ylllla,`;INla ludA li„n . ,,n.'�l''w
@Llse drawui,gsof facr7tty to betteraexplatntsituattons(useHaddttionalpagesias>aecessar�y).aa!uA
[I Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Iw' Rti�tW.p �sfd.i7h.,t
n n`I WVI,na "Jir IIN ,k,•n�-blyrli rvt fG si. '(r�9�i J'PI !�I iir�wr trio; w�,_z�'.rn m{mt*ir.-b.^',r mlawnu'Me��iw. s^p'I!,
Records available for review.
Waste Analysis: Nelms 1 & 2 Nelms 3 & 4
10/29/03- 3.50lbs 3.70lbs -
7/31/03 2.30lbs 2.40lbs
..•5/30/03 2.201bs 1.80lbs
3/10/03 3.401bs 3.60lbs
1/6//03 3.10lbs 2.60lbs
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn�B�ila isoa.�.,, � '�r�... ; r ��, � �� w�,�i
� . r � h:,..:�.,:. S � , , III I ,,I 11'4�Ir� .,..'n, ;'v ,I��h•e,!�>unti sti to���r�wl{�,,tr
_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

OS/03/01 Continued
1 Facility Number: 96-46 Date of Inspection 12-09-2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
- or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) _ ❑ Yes ® No _ . -
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
. �.i"th o4pi,,
Soil analysis for 2003 available but these samples were collected in 2002. Plan to collect 2003 samples before
the end of year.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
REMINDER -
"Make sure to use the most current waste analysis in teh computations.
** Recheck the recorded lagoon levels for 12-4-03 and 12-15-03 --Cause today is 12-9-03
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required:
Vegetation on dike wall is well established.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481.
T

(Type of Visit OQ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 46 Date of Visit: 10-13-2004 Time: 1146
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 17 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above. Threshold: ..........
Farm Name: N.sYt....W.Fig.F,arlms........................................................................................ County:W..axne........... .......... _...................... WaRQ ........
Owner Name: Julian.)`ielms..&.................. D, ..W..lxitle3:..dr................................... Phone No: 91,9:2.42:b.317_....... _.................... _....... _................
MailingAddress: 6Q1.. ,.Main.Sta....................................................................................Ercmunt... NC .................................... _....... ......... .1.7.83.0..............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Julino..N.elms............................................................................... Integrator: G.Rldsktllr HD.gf.arms.......................................
Certified Operator:,Juliaa.B................................. Ndius ................................................ Operator Certification Number:].6S.6S..............................
Location of Farm:
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
I�
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 31 52 " Longitude 77 • 54 28
Design Current .
Swine Canarity Pnnnintinn
® Wean to Feeder
7000
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity,Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I I[--] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 7,000
Total SSLW 210,000
Number of Lagoons 1 2 1 Subsurface Drains Present 11 1 Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: [ILagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
.Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .....1.&.2.N.orth..... .....3..&A..South..... .................................... ................................... ............................... _.........
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): 46" 50"
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 96-46 Date bf Inspection 10-13-2004' • -
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level El Yes ®No
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
[]Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 30(
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Records available
Waste analysis 1 & 2 North 3& 4 South
8-5-04 1.4 lbs 1.5 lbs
6-2-04 1.91bs 2.7 lbs
3-5-04 2.2 lbs 2.5 lbs
10-29-03 3.5lbs 3.7lbs
Soil analysis dated 2-19-04 & 2-5-03
Lime was put out @ recommended amounts.
[rrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Irrigation calibration dated 3-26-04 @ 224.9 gpm
Freeboard levels are recorded.
Farm is well managed.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. IWdison A. 1
any recommendations or a_ny ot_he� co_mme_nts
pages as necessary):.:.' M Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12112103 // Continued

Facility Number: 96-46 Date of Inspection ]0-13-2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form []Rainfall []Inspection After 1 ",Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards throubh March 31, !boo
1. if this facility can comply with its existing -permit -arid CAWMP.itmust do so. _
2. Temporary Addition ofNew Sprayfields (*) (Check appropriate boxes.)
0 A. acres of cropland. List crop types used:
0 B. acres of hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
0 C. acres of pine woodland added @ 60 lbs PAN / acre added.
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
Q A. Application window extended for acres of perennial grass until first killing frost.
Q B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
4. PAN Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
-A.A- PAN application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for LID acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
0 B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B.
5. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
XA. Prior to December 1, 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec. I" .)
0 B. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6. Required -Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses.
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
B. Timely hirvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. Irrigating during periods of warmer weather.
7. Reouired - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Ponding Potential -
A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall.
8. The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAW1,,2, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters.
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must include a map or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility Number I � - `t _ lv
/V / P�q trvmS u_c.
Facility Name -
J'tic; �� i3• N�./Ms �� u. Pis
Facility Owner / Manager Name (PRI T) Technical
,S—(p-eeccia ist Name (PRBI T)
F ciiry Owner / Manager Shmarure "cal Specialist Signature
Date /0 `cZ 9 — /C S Date Zq NOV Iq
This document must be filed at the SWCI3 office and be attached to the facilities CAWMP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
(*) New tempotany spraybelds m . meet applicabie buffer and setback requirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands.'
11/10/1999

Division of Water,Quality :?
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
I Dote. of Visit 1 4-17-2001 Time: 131K Printedon: 6/12/2001
Faciliti Number 96 4ti f
0 Not Operational 0 BelowThresholJ
I Permitted 9 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operate) or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: DJ.& W Pik.FuauS...................:.................................................................... County: W..aJ:Re
...........................................
....W..aQ........
Owner Name: dlttian.Nelm A .................. JLL.W..bj&Y..& .................................... Phone No: 91Q-242-1G32Z..............................................
Mailing Address: 6Q1.E..Main.S.t.............................. FremnttL C.........._...............:.............................. 27.8 U..............
Facilitv Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:.Gett['pXP.ettjus............................................................................. integrator: Guldslaom.Hog.F.arms.......................................
Certified Operator:JILtiAn..................................... ]Yid ma................................................ Operator Certification Number:.1656S.............................
Location of Farm:
,'Intersection of NC Hwy. I 1 and NC Hwy. 222. — 1
® Swine [:]Poultry ❑ Cattle [:]Hose Latitude ; 35 i• ` 31 52 j Longitude 77 �• ; 54 28
Design Current
Swine Capacih` Population
I® Wean to Feeder
7000
?
❑ Feeder to Finish
Ii ; Farrow to Wean
i
�❑Farrow• to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry, Cattle onhuaon Capacityoua
I❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver ❑Non -Dairy i
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 7,000
Total SSLW 210,000
Number of Lagoons 2 IN Subsurface Drains Present
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Manager!
Disehar,,es ai Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischar,_e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharg: is obscix e:d. was the eon\'eyance man-made,.,
b) 1 disebarac is observed. did it rcloh Watar of tile State? 111 ves. notil I DW( )
�. ]f nI sJ11i1rRE' is Obse:•1'Cd, whit? is th,--;:sliiiiawd t10R in i;11!niill .�
d. Doer: dlsct,harid b\1,::ss a la20011 sl'slctt;" 11i \"C ❑otifc y1%VQC
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
Area 19 Spray Field Area
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
Ejj No
❑ Yes
® No
n/a
❑ Yes
ENO
❑ Yes
9 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impact, to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes Q No
tt aste Coilectimr & Trcarmem.
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? L7 Spillway El Yes No
Strucure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Sirucuu•cli
1 denl ifier:
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
r..,.:
I no:ud inlarss):.............. a9................. ..............43'°

U.),(J.),bi Conrinutd •�.
Facility Number: 96-46 Date of Inspection 4-17-2001 Printed on: 6/12/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie%trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6..Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hvdraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
❑ Yes
® No
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
S No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Z No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[Q No
Reuuired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readiy, available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
L7� No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
Q No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Qi No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
19 No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? I
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #)ExP lam an YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Y
titter explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
IIae drawrrige of facibty to b ❑ Field Copy ®Final Notes
* Records available for review.
* Waste Analysis: 1-5-01 = 2.9 & 2.8 lbs, 10-9-00 = 1.6 & 1.6 lbs.
* Soil Analysis up through 2000 available.
* Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. HOWEVER, need to use the most current wsate sample analysis in
the computations. any event after 12-10-00 should use the waste sample from Jan. 2001.
* Grounds are well kept.
* Vegetation on dike wall is well established
Reviewer/InspectorNsme Lyn B. Hardison '
Reviewer/Inspector Sienature:
Date: li-

05103101
Continued
Facility Number. 96:i6 Date of Inspection 417-2001 Printed on: 6/12/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
.® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
❑Yes
❑ No
AddMonal Comments and/or. Drawings: , . -
Records are well organized.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required.
'If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me @ 252-946-6481, ext 318. **

Diviswn of Water-QualitY
O Drvtswn of Soil and Water Conservation,
• 'tf "x fir/ i�Jr O1UtIteCA 'S Y ' 4 yr r ., Nm•.tt✓ 2 m:,, r��+a c.. �h sew !
. NF- ./. 1, :/. G �a N3n .µ�. .� 5n F ky,/'•y �*, J i F
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine. O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
r g Date of Visit: 6 29-2000 Time: ]O55 Printed on: 2232001
Facility Number 96 46 P@
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionalh' Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Faun Name: N..&..W...P.ifi.Fatrna........................................................................................ County: W..al:pe............................................... W..a$lD........
Owner Name: duliatt.MelttlS..&................... H,L.WhitJe3:..dr...................................... Phone No: 919.:292 Q2I..........................
.................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: 6QI.E,.Main..S.L................................................................................... . FremMA..NC......................................................... 17..830: ............
Onsite Representative: dulizaNrIms..Geittrge..Pettlus............................................... Integrator: fa0LdS60rq.Hug.FatmS.......................................
Certified Operator:.Iuliati.2................................. Ntttma ................................................ Operator Certification Number: 16565 .............................
Location of Farm:
Intersection of NC Hwy. III and NC Hwy. 222. �
® Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 31 52 Lonoitudc 77 • 54 28 «
Design Current Design Current :r Design . ,. CurrentSwine .'
Ca acity PO ulation Poultry Canacity` Ponulation .' Cattle-:,.'Cannrkv 'v....:dgr. .
® Wean to Feeder
7000
6800
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
1❑ Boars
_
I
Number of" "goons 2 Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area g ® ® Spray' rield Arcs
Holding Ponds !,Solid Trapa,'�� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
pi
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
JR No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Ii'discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
® No
' i b. If discharge is observed_ did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Y
❑Yes
®No
c. b' discharge is observed. what is the estimated flora• in galhnin?
n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sysiem? (Ifyes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
L% No
2. I. ere evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?'
❑ Yes
®No
3. Wet. there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
®No
Wa. to oilection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
St No
Structure 1 Sln:eture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Slruenire 6
1 den t if i er:............1.4..2........................3.&..4..................................................................
.......................................................................................
.
tr: nsilcrd fmcnes):...............42...............................4S...................................................
i
t

5/00 Continued on back
Facilitv Number.• 96-46
Date of Inspection 6-29-2000 printed on. 2/232001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plea? ° El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Reouired
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Z No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ VAR checklists, design maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
9, No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively wed operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as requited by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
Z No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhaspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
19 No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
P :No violations tir'deficiencies were rioted during this visit:' Ytiti will:receive no further:
correspondence about this visit..' ...'
* Records available for review. A,
* Wate samples are collected quarterly,
* Soil analysis up thru 1999 available. Secure a sample by Dec. 2000.
* Revises WUP daed 3/00 - written on actual wetted acres and by pulls.
* Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
* W. Nelms signed up for the extra lb (200) option and 35 % reduction of last waste sample collecetd (provided by
DWQ). The irrigation events that occurred prior to Dec. 10. 1999 & the signing of the TRO followed this option then
discontinued after the TRO.
' Reviewer/InspectorNeme >r_ , , rc' "S
-" 75""

I Kexiewer/Inspector Signature: Date: —5100I
Facility Number. 96-46 Date of Inspection 6-29-2000 Printed on: 223/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fau(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
The lagoon levels remained within compliance thru/out 1999 hurricane season and after.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as well as rainfall.
The grounds are very well kept, keep up the good work.
you have any questions, contact me @ 252-946-6481, ext. 318.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. Q
ScS 0'9
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEgTION SIT VISITATION RECORD
Date: /-`�S , 1995
Time: �C}M
Farm Name/Owner: 4 W 'r'I V el
Mailing Address: i �yp�-r e 3j<
County: �PS-fW '-
Integrator: Q Qdt ; Phone:
On Site Representative: ecse M Phone:
Physical Address/Location: iI
Es�M &�- 511-1
$-sS2
CxT A.
Type or Operation: Swine' Poultry - Cattle
nip+ r_-.city; ASZC� No. of Animals on Site:
SDC'�
DEM Certification Np.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: 3J ° S s Longitude: �� �* _Z,&_ Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) (9D or No
Actual Freeboard: A Ft e5 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oroo
Was any erosion observed? Yes o�d'
Is adequate land available for spray? (0 or No A6 Acd1e3
Is the cover crop adeq
Crop(s) being utilized:
or No �C CLCAQ) q-,
6,r7T.JA�kno✓
Does the facility meet SC mmInimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? ( Yet dr No 100 Ft from Wells? Yes r No
Is the aa.Lmal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or No
Is animal waste"=� applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b an -made ditch, flushing
system, cr other similar man-made devices? Yes o
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management recor s volumes of manure,
land applied, sp ay irrigated on specific sage with c er crop)? es r No
Inspector Nafe '211ignature 7
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments S Sketch on Back of Sheet

ra
oml abed
axoOax xoisVzisin 7119
waa
W..