960046_HISTORICAL_20171231

NUH I H CAROLIN 'AM
Department of Environmental Qual
W)

= HISTORICAL
HISTORICAL
HISTORICAL

NCDEE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Julian B Nelms
N & W Pig Farms
601 E Main St
Fremont, NC 27830
Dear Julian B Nelms:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
October 1, 2014
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960046
N & W Pig Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Julian B Nelms, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for N & W Pig Farms, located in Wayne County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: 7000 Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS960046 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keepin forms.
orms
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone]Internet: http://www.nedenr.00v/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/waming information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: hU://www.weather.goy/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 252-946-6481. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Thomas A. Reeder
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Washington Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS960046)
AFO Notebooks
Maxwell Foods Inc

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
08/30/2017 Entry Time: 02:30 pm
Farm Name:
N & W Pig Farms
Owner:
Julian B Nelms
Mailing Address:
601 E Main St
Inactive Or Closed Date
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Exit Time: 3:20 pm Incident #
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address: 5909 NC 111 N Fremont NC 27830
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 31' 52"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Longitude: 77' 54' 28"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

r . 1
Permit: AWS960046 Owner -Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
6-22-17 1.43 1.38
2-13-17 2.76 2.23
8-23-16 1.53 1.17
Soil Report 3-16-2016
Zn<400
Cu<100
Due 2019.
Calibration due 2018
9-7-2016
Lagoon Sludge Survey 9-7-2016
L1 L2
LTZ 5.28 5.8
T 4.08 2.70
PI 7.0 5.3
33% 24%
page: 2

Permit: AWS960046 Owner- Facility : Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Weto Feeder 7,000 4,621 Wean
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
40.00
Lagoon
SOUTH 05/23/94
19.00
40.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility : Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner -Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number:
960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No No Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
01111
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner -Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/30/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl
M ❑
Cl
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0011
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 6

4
co zsIl �
Nl-
4t N&VV Pig Farms 96-46
WN
p
It
3503-1'49 88' N, 7-7054'14 54" VV
20D8 Tele Atlas
Image DigitalGlooe
elev 1-18 ft
2004
6
lb
0 '61,
Goo-qlc
Eye aft 4539 ft

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number : 960046
Inspection Data: 09/29/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2.-Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 09/29/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn,
Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner • Facility: Julian B Nelms
Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 09/29/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
❑ ■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
❑
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 09/29/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 0 0 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 0 0 0 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
N & W Pig Farms
Julian Nelms
601 E. Main Street
Fremont, NC 27830
919-242-6327
02-03-2009
This plan has been developed by:
Charlotte Jenkins
NRCS/Wayne SWCD
Wayne Center, Room 104
208 W. Chestnut Street
Goldsboro, NC 27530-4708
919-734-5281, Ext. 3
" a M Ic-�. i �. �►�. \� ,.
Developer ,
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
96-yG
WIM Ro
WC"11X2-►
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
.Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: a2:�—:Lz—
Technical Specialist Signature
------------------------ ------ --------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009
7 2009
SI iti ! iONAL OFFICE
------------------------------ - -----------
Cover Page-lt — —
RECEIVED Fbi NR l DWQ
AQUIFER pPnTFCT10N SFCTIQN
MAR 2 0 2009
-7

x
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan..
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 1,337,000 gals/year by a 7,000 animal
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3079
Incorporated
5289
Injected
5824
Irrigated
3347
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) +
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
3,347
8573
-5,226
3,424,493
-2,087,493
Year 2
3,347
9032
-5,685
3,607,640
-2,270,640
Year 3
3,347
3661
-314
1,462,170
-125,170
No
- ie:---------- In -----source---- ---ID--,-S--eans---------stan--dar----d----source-----,--U ------eans ----- user-- defin---de----e-d--------sourc--.-------------------------------------------------------------
---mme
• Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Source Page Page I of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
4753
10 PI
17.58
3.45
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
Cotton
858 lbs.
4753
10 P2
17.58
1.51
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
Cotton
858 lbs.
4753
10 P3
17.58
1.59
N/A
Craven
Corn, Grain
109 bu.
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
Cotton
736lbs.
4753
10 P4
17.58
2.07
N/A
Aycock
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
Cotton
925 lbs.
4753
10 P5
17.58
3.34
N/A
Aycock
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
Cotton
925 lbs.
4753
12 P8
9.00
1.51
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
Cotton
875 lbs.
4753
12 P9
9.00
3.26
N/A
Nahunta
Corn, Grain
122 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
Cotton
784 Ibs.
4753
16 P14
2.25
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
1
Cotton
858 lbs.
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/3/2009
PCS Page Page I of 3
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres.
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
4753
16 P15
16.17
3.60
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
Cotton
858 lbs.
4753
16 P16
16.17
4.13
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
Cotton
875 lbs.
4753
18 1`10
9.00
3.31
N/A
Nahunta
Cam, Grain
125 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4753
18 PI l
10.39
2.39
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
Soybeans, Matured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4753
19 P12
3.76
2.38
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4753
20 P13
4.37
1.64
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
Soybeans, Matured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4753
8 P6
14.11
4.01
N/A
Aycock
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
Cotton
925 lbs.
4753
8 P7
14.11
3.80
N/A
A cock
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
Cotton
925 lbs.
PLAN TOTALS: 198.35 44.24
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/3/2009
PCs Page Page 2 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
�= 2
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<_ 10
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips.(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
281995 Database Versibn 3.1 Date Printed 2/3/2009
PCS Page Page 3 of 3
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Vear 1
Tract
Field
.
Source
11)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APplic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.r(lbsd/A)
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied.
(ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrien
pphed
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4753
10 PI
SS
Norfolk
17.58
3.45
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
2/15-6/30
129
0
0
Irrig.
129
51.53
0.00
177.77
0.00
4753
10 Pl
SS
Norfolk
17.58
3.45
Wheal, Grain
59 bu.
911-4/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
84.75
0.00
4753
10 P2
SS
Norfolk
17.58
1.51
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
2115-6/30
129
0
0
brig.
129
51.53
0.00
77.81
0.00
4753
10 P2
SS[Norfolk
17.58
1.51
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/14/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
37.09
0.00
4753
10 P3
SS
Craven
17.58
1.59
Corn, Grain
109 bu.
2/15-6/30
116
0
0
irrig.
116
46.34
0.00
73.67
0.00
4753
10 P3
S5
Craven
17.58
1.59
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
9/14/30
106
0
0
brig.
53
21.17
0.00
33.66
0.00
4753
10 P4
SS
Aycock
17.58
2.07
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
2/15-6/30
144
0
0
Irrig.
144
57.52
0.00
119.07
0.00
4753
10 P4
SS
Aycock
17.58
2.07
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
121
0
0
Irrig.
61
24.17
0.00
50.02
0.00
4753
10 P5
SS
Aycock
17.58
3.34
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2/15-6/30
144
0
0
Irrig.
144
57.52
0.00
192.12
0.00
4753
10 P5
SS
Aycock
17.58
3.34
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
121
0
0
Irrig.
61
24.17
0.00
80.72
0.00
4753
12 P8
SS
Norfolk
9.00
1.51
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
0
brig.
131
52.33
0.00
79.01
0.00
4753
12 P8
SS
Forfolk
9.00
1.51
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
37.70
0.00
4753
12 P9
SS
Nahunta
9.00
326
Corn, Grain
122 bu.
2/15-6/30
129
0
0
irrig.
129
51.53
0.00
167.98
0.00
4753
12 P9
SS
Nahunta
9.00
3.26
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/14/30
110
0
0
Irrig.
55
21.97
0.00
71.62
0.00
4753
16 P14
SS
Norfolk
4.37
2.25
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
2/15-6/30
129
0
0
Irrig.
129
51.53
0.00
115.94
0.00
4753
16 P14
SS
orfolk
4.37
2.25
wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/14/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
5527
0.00
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009 WUT Page Page 1 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Re4d
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
Liquid
MamaeA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4753
16 P15
SS
Norfolk
16.17
3.60
Com, Grain
113 bu.
2/15-6/30
129
0
0
Irrig.
129
51.53
0.00
185.50
0.00
4753
16 P15
SS
Norfolk
16.17
3.60
Whea; Grain
59 bu.
9/14/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
88.44
0.00
4753
16 P16
SS
Norfolk
16.17
4.13
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/IS-6/30
131
0
0
brig.
131
52.33
0.00
216.11
0.00
"4753
16 P16
SS
Norfolk
16.17
4.13
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
brig.
63
24.97
0.00
103.11
0.00
4753
18 P10
SS
Nahunta
9.00
3.31
Com, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
132
0
0
brig.
132
52.73
0.00
174.52
0.00
4753
18 P10
SS
Nahunta
9.00
3.31
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
22.37
0.00
74.04
0.00
4753
18 PI I
SS
Norfolk
10.39
2.39
Com, Grain
113 bu.
2/156/30
129
0
0
brig.
129
51.53
0.00
123.15
0.00
4753
18 PI I
SS
lNorfolk
10.39
2.39
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
58.71
0.00
4753
19 P12
SS
Norfolk
3.76
2.38
Com, Grain
l l5 bu.
2/156/30
131
0
0
brig.
131
52.33
0.00
124.54
0.00
4753
19 P12
SS
Norfolk
3.76
2.38
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
59.42
0.00
4753
20 P13
SS
Norfolk
4.37
1.64
Com, Grain
113 bu.
2/156/30
129
0
0
brig.
129
51.53
0.00
84.51
0.00
4753
20 P13
SS[Norfolk
4.37
1.64
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
brig.
62
24.57
0.00
40.29
0.00
4753
8 P6
SS
Aycock
14.11
4.01
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2/156/30
144
0
0
brig.
144
57.52
0.00
230.65
0.00
4753
8 P6
SS
Aycock
14.11
4.01
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
121
0
0
Irrig.
61
24.17
0.00
96.91
0.00
4753
8 P7
SS
Aycock
14.11
3.80
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2/156/30
1"
0
0
brig.
144
57.52
0.00
218.57
0.00
4753
8 P7
SS
Aycock-
14.11
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
121
0
0
Irrig.
61
24.17
0.00
91.83
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,424.49
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,337.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
-2,087.49x`P
s.'<
. _
Total Applied, tons
`
0.00
Total Produced, tons
�y
0.00
. Balance, toss
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol' means user entered data.
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009
WUT Page Page 2 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
.
Crop
icar z
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
RegV
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Toss
1000 gals
urns
4753
10 PI
SS
Norfolk
17.58
3.45
Wheat Grain
59 bu.
9/14/30
123 '
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
84.75
0.00
4753
10 PI
SS
Norfolk
17.58
3.45
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
53.13
0.00
183.28
0.00
4753
10 P2
SS
Norfolk
17.58
1.51
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-0/30
123
0
0
brig.
62
24.57
0.00
37.09
0.00
-4753
10 P2
S5
Norfolk
17.58
1.51
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
53.13
0.00
80.22
0.00
4753
10 P3
SS
Craven
17.58
1.59
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
911-4/30
106
0
0
Urig.
53
21.17
0.00
33.66
0.00
4753
10 P3
SS
Craven
17.58
1.59
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
123
0
0
brig.
123
49.13
0.00
78.12
0.00
4753
10 P4
SS
ycock
17.58
2.07
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
121
0
0
Irrig.
61
24.17
0.00
50.02
0.00
4753
1 10 P4
SS
ycock
17.58
2.07
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
4/1-9/15
163
0
0
Irrig.
163
65.11
0.00
134.78
0.00
4753
10 P5
SS
Aycock
17.58
3.34
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
121
0
0
brig.
61
24.17
0.00
80.72
0.00
4753
10 P5
SS
Aycock
17.58
3.34
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
4/1-9/15
163
0
0
Irrig.
163
65.11
0.001
217.46
0.00
4753
12 P8
SS
Norfolk
9.00
1.51
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
37.701
0.00
4753
12 P8
SS i
Norfolk
9.00
1.51
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00
82.63
0.00
4753
12 P9
SS
Nahunta
9.00
3.26
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/14/30
110
0
0
Irrig.
55
21.97
0.00
71.62
0.00
4753
12 P9
SS
Nahunta
9.00
326
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
142
0
0
Irrig.
142
56.72
0.00
184.91
0.00
4753
16 P14
SS
Norfolk
4.37
2.25
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
55.271
0.00
4753
16 P14
SS
Norfolk
4.37
' 2.25
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
53.13
0.00
119.53
0.00
4753
16 P15
SS
Norfolk
16.17
3.60
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
88.44
0.00
4753
16 P15
SS
Norfolk
16.17
3.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
53.13
0.00
191.25
0.00
4753
16 P16
SS
Norfolk
16.17
4.13
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
103.11
0.00
4753
16 P16
S5
Norfolk
16.17
4.13
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00
226.01
0.00
4753
18 P10
SS
Nahunta
9.00
3.31
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
22.37
0.00
74.04
0.00
4753 18 P10 SS shunts
9.00
3.3]
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
146
0
0
Irrig.
146
58.32
0.00
193.03
0.00
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009 WITf Page Page 3 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
'
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
-
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
MmureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4753
18 PI 1
SS
Norfolk
10.39
2.39
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
brig.
62
24.57
0.00
58.71
0.00
4753
18 PI I
SS
Norfolk
10.39
2.39
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
53.13
0.00
126.97
0.00
4753
19 P12
SS
Norfolk
3.76
2.38
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
59.42
0.00
-4753
19 P12
SS
Norfolk
3.76
2.38
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00
130.24
0.00
4753
20 P13
SS
Norfolk
4.37
1.64
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1.4/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
40.29
0.00
4753
20 P13
SS
Norfolk
4.37
1.64
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
53.13
0.00
87.13
0.00
4753
8 P6
SS
Aycock
14.11
4.01
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
121
0
0
Irrig.
61
24,17
0.00
96.91
0.00
4753
8 P6
SS[Aycock
14.11
4.01
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
4/1-9/15
163
0
0
Irrig.
163
65.11
0.00
261.09
0.00
4753
8 P7
SS
Aycock
14.11
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
121
0
0
Irrig.
61
24.17
0.00
91.83
0.00
4753
8 P7
SS
Aycock
14.11
3.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
4/1-9/15
163
0
0
brig.
163
65.11
0.00
247.41
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,607-64
,X Wirer
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,337.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
Total Applied, tons
Total Produced, tons
Balance, tons
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol ; means user entered data
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009 WUT Page Page 4 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 3
.
Taut
Field
Source
m
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Tert-
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
100o
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4753
10 Pi
SS
Norfolk
17.58
3.45
Cotton
858 lbs.
3/15-7/31
76
0
20
Irrig.
56
22.37
0.00
77.17
0.00
4753
10 P2
SS
Norfolk
17.58
1.51
Cotton
858 lbs.
3/15-7/31
76
0
20
Irrig.
56
22.37
0.00
33.78
0.00
4753
10 P3
S5
Craven
17.58
1.59
Cotton
736lbs.
3/15-7/31
49
0
20
Irrig.
29
11.58
0.00
18.42
0.00
4753
10 P4
SS jAycock
17.58
2.07
Cotton
925 lbs.
3/15-7/31
75
0
20
Irrig.
55
21.97
0.00
45.48
0.00
4753
10 P5
SS
ycock
17.58
3.34
Cotton
925 lbs.
3/15-7/31
75
0
20
Irrig.
55
21.97
0.00
73.38
0.00
4753
12 P8
SS
Norfolk
9.00
1.51
Cotton
875lbs.
3/15-7/31
78
0
20
brig.
58
23.17
0.00
34.98
0.00
4753
12 P9
SS
Nahunta
9.00
326
Cotton
784 lbs.
3115-7131
52
0
20
Irrig.
32
12.78
0.00
41.67
0.00
4753
16 P14
SS
Norfolk
4.37
2.25
Cotton
858 lbs.
3/15-7/31
76
0
20
Irrig.
56
22.37
0.00
50.33
0.00
4753
16 PIS
SS
Norfolk
16.17
3.60
Cotton
858 lbs.
3/15-7/31
76
0
20
brig.
56
22.37
0.00
80.53
0.00
4753
16 P16
SS
orfolk
16.17
4A3
Cotton
875lbs.
3/15-7/31
78
0
20
Irrig.
58
23.17
0.00
95.68
0.00
4753
18 P10
SS
Nabunta
9.00
3.31
Corn, Grain
125 bu.
2/15-6/30
132
0
0
Irrig.
132
52.73
0.00
174.52
0.00
4753
18 P10
SS
Nahunta
9.00
3.31
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
22.37
0.00
74.04
0.00
4753
18 Pl l
SS
Norfolk
10.39
2.39
Com, Grain
113 bu.
2/15-6/30
129
0
0
Irrig.
129
51.53
0.00
123.15
0.00
4753
18 PH
SS
Norfolk
10.39
2.39
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/14/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
58.71
0.00
4753
19 P12
SS
Norfolk
3.76
2.38
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
131
52.33
0.00
124.54
0.00
4753
19 P12
SS
Norfolk
3.76
2.38
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
24.97
0.00
59.42
0.00
4753
20 P13
SS
Norfolk
4.37
1.64
Com, Grain
113 bu.
2/15-6/30
429
0
0
Irrig.
129
51.53
0.00
84.51
0.00
4753
20 P13
SS
Norfolk
4.37
1.64
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
24.57
0.00
40.29
0.00
4753
8 P6
SS
Aycock
14.11
4.01
Cotton
925 lbs.
3115-7/31
75
0
20
Irrig.
55
21.97
0.00
88.10
0.00
4753
8 P7
SS
Aycock
14.11
3.80
Cotton
925 lbs.
1 3/15-7/31
75
0
20
Irrig.
55
21.97
0.00
83.48
0.00
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009 WUT Page Page 5 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 3
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NuorientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres .
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
toss
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,462.17
Total Produced, 1o00 gallons
1,337.00
� $
Balance, loo0 gallons
-125.17
Total Applied, toss
Total Produced, tons
<s ,:;
0.00
Balance, tons
1-. �--R
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009 WUT Page Page 6 of 6

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
4753
10 P1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
10 P2
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
10 P3
Craven
0.40
1.0
4753
10 P4
Aycock
0.35
1.0
4753
10 P5
Aycock
0.35
1.0
4753
12 P8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
12 P9
Nahunta
0.40
1.0
4753
16 P14
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
16 P15
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
16 P16
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
18 P10
Nahunta
0.40
1.0
4753
18 PI
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
19 P12
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
20 P13
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4753
8 P6
Aycock
0.35
1.0
4753
8 P7
Aycock
0.35 .
1.0
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/3/2009 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol + means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
I.noorm Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PAN Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
17.821
35.63
53.45
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
1 8.911
17.82
26.73
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
16.70
33.41
50.11
-

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated.' The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Awa;iat,ia Waeto Stnraoa ('anar;tv
Source Name
Iswine Nurse La oon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
0
1
3
162
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
150
1
7
119
1
8
88
1
9
145
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
149
2
1
118
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
149
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119 .
2
12
88
3
1
57
3
2
29
3
3
40
----------------------------- ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Capacity Page Page I of 2

A ..na nL.lu \I/n o4n C4nre rtu (�ononifii
Source Name
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
3
4
108
3
5
175
3
6
180
3
7
180
3
8
149
3
9
138
3
10
126
3
11
121
3
12
90
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
•-------------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009
Capacity Page Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does. not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for .
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009 Specification Page 1

S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
----------I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=---------------------------------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps; reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--------------------------------------------------------------- I ------------------- ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/3/2009 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 12 P9, 18 P10
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should'be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-301bs/acre N and 20-301bs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P3
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
----------------------- •---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P4, 10 P5, 8 P6, 8 P7
Corn CP, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations shouldbe determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Apply 20-40 lbs/acre sulfur; 1/4 at planting and the remainder with the rest of the N. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn.
Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P1, 10 P2, 42 P8, 16 P14, 16 P15, 16 P16, 18 P11, 19
P12, 20 P13
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-301bs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 12 P9
Cotton CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, cotton is normally planted from April 15-May 5 when warm(above 65 F)
temperatures and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.
Avoid planting after May 20 if at all possible. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with characteristics needed for your
area and conditions: Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1 ". Adequate depth control is essential.
Recommended phosphorus and potash can be broadcast or banded at planting. Apply 20-25 lbs/acre N at
planting. Apply the remaining recommended N as a sidedress application 2 to 3 weeks after first square.
The total N needed is dependent on soil type. Apply 1.0 lb/acre actual boron either at planting or at
sidedress; or, foliar apply 1/2 lb/acre actual boron with 1/4 lb/acre applied at early bloom and the other
1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later. The boron needs to be available to the cotton during fruiting. Tissue
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the cotton. Timely
management of insects, weeds, and excessive vegetative growth are essential for profitable cotton
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P3
Cotton CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, cotton is normally planted from April 15-May 5 when warm(above 65 F)
temperatures and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.
Avoid planting after May 20 if at all possible. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with characteristics needed for your
area and conditions. Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1 ". Adequate depth control is essential.
Recommended phosphorus and potash can be broadcast or banded at planting. Apply 20-25 lbs/acre N at
planting. Apply the remaining recommended N as a sidedress application 2 to 3 weeks after first square.
The total N needed is dependent on soil type. Apply 1.0 lb/acre actual boron either at planting or at
sidedress; or, foliar apply 1/2 lb/acre actual boron with 1/4 lb/acre applied at early bloom and the other
1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later. The boron needs to be available to the cotton during fruiting. Tissue
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the cotton. Timely
management of insects, weeds, and excessive vegetative growth are essential for profitable cotton
production.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P4, 10 P5, 8 P6, 8 P7
Cotton CP, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal, Plain, cotton is normally planted from April 15-May 5 when warm(above 65 F)
temperatures and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.
Avoid planting after May 20 if at all possible. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with characteristics needed for your
area and conditions: Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1 ". Adequate depth control is essential.
Recommended phosphorus and 1/2 the potash can be broadcast or banded at planting. Apply 20-25
lbs/acre N and 5 lbs/acre sulfur at planting. Apply the remaining recommended N as a sidedress
application 2 to 3 weeks after first square. The total N needed is dependent on soil type. Also, apply at
least 20 Ibs/acre sulfur and the remaining potash at or close to sidedressing. Apply 1/2 lb/acre actual
boron either at planting or at sidedress and foliar apply 1/2 lb/acre actual boron with 1/4 lb/acre applied
at early bloom and the other 1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later. The boron needs to be available to the cotton
during fruiting. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status
of the cotton. Timely management of insects, weeds, and excessive vegetative growth are essential for
profitable cotton production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P1, 10 P2, 12 P8, 16 P14, 16 P15, 16 P16
Cotton CP: Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, cotton is normally planted from April 15-May 5 when warm(above 65 F)
temperatures and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.
Avoid planting after May 20 if at all possible. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with characteristics needed for your
area and conditions. Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1". Adequate depth control is essential.
Recommended phosphorus and potash can be broadcast or banded at planting. Apply 20-25 lbs/acre N at
planting. Apply the remaining recommended N as a sidedress application 2 to 3 weeks after first square.
The total N needed is dependent on soil type. Also, apply at least 20 lbs/acre sulfur either at planting or
at sidedressing. Apply 1.0 lb/acre actual boron either at planting or at sidedress; or, foliar apply 1/2
lb/acre actual boron with 1/4 lb/acre applied at early bloom and the other 1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later.
The boron needs to be available to the cotton during fruiting. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the cotton. Timely management of insects, weeds, and
excessive vegetative growth are essential for profitable cotton production.
•--------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 12 P9, 18 P10
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P3
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Crop Note Page Page 5 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P4, 10 P5, 8 P6, 8 P7
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, highly leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area. Apply no
more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at
this time. The recommended rate of potash should be split with 1/2 applied at planting and the other 1/2
applied when the N is topdressed in the Spring. The remaining N should be applied during the months of
February -March. The total N needed is dependent on the soil type. Apply sulfur at the rate of 5 Ibs/acre at
planting and another 20 lbs/acre with the topdress N. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing
season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are
essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P1, 10 P2, 12 P8, 16 P14, 16 P15, 16 P16, 18 P11, 19
P12, 20 P13
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 301bs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 1Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Crop Note Page Page 6 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 12 P9, 18 P10
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P3
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ------------------_-----------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Crop Note Page Page 7 of 8

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P4, 10 P5, 8 P6, 8 P7
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, highly leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 'seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus recommended for
the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Potash recommended for the. soybeans should be
applied at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of
nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early
growth and vigor. Tissue samples'can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall
nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for profitable
double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10 P1, 10 P2, 12 P8, 16 P14, 16 P15, 16 P16, 18 PI 1, 19
P12,20P13
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------: ------------------------------------------------
281995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-03-2009 Crop Note Page Page 8 of 8

NCQENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 1, 2009
Julian B Nelms
N & W Pig Farms
601 E Main St
Fremont, NC 27830
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960046
N & W Pig Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
Dear Julian B Nelms:
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Julian B Nelms, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the N & W Pig Farms, located in Wayne County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: 7000 Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS960046 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX:,919-715-05881 Customer Service: 1-877-623.6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity l Affvmadve Action Employer
OCT 2 1 2009

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.gov/er/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS960046)
AFO Notebooks
Maxwell Foods Inc

WLUWQ LaboratoEySection 11<esutts
County: WAYNE Sample ID: AB28137
River Basin Off`' f�A'� PO Number # 8G0332
Report To WAROAP 65
O4 _ _ \Q Date Received: 0312512008
Collector: W HART, y Time Received: 08:15
og.
Labworks L mID MMATHIS
Region: WaRO\v\[M'/
Sample Matrix: GROUNDWATER Date Reported: 4/3/08
Loc. Type: LAKE Report Generated: 04/03/2008
Emergency Yes/No
VsitlD
COC Yes/No
Loc. Descr.: FACILITY rat INTER HWY 111 & 222 NEAR EUREKA, NC
Location ID: WAROAPNLC Collect Date: 0312012008 Collect Time:: 15:55 Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
30,+,0 1dNOI J3F! NO-10"SYM
803Z 8 - �dV
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwqlab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
Bt-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
B3- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
B4-Filters have counts of bath >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated
B5-Too many colonies were present, too numerous to count (TNTC)
J2- Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated
Nt-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
LAB
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
NE -No established PQL
P-Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
01-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at tab.
Q2- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
Xi- Sample not analyzed for this compound
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] Page 1 of 2

Location ID: WAROAPNLC A ` WQ Laboratory Section Results
Loc. Descr.. FACILITY @ INTER HWY 111 & 222 NEAR EUREKA, NC
Visit ID _
Analyte Name
aple temperature at receli
Method Reference
POL Result Qualifier Units
Sample IU
At5Zti1 Jf
Collect Date:
03/20/2008
Collect Time::
15:55
DSAU
325/08
Approved By /Date
MMATHIS
325/08
NUT
NH3 as N In liquid
0.02
390
J6
mg/L as N
MOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10-107-06-1-J
327108
42/08
Total IQeldahl N as N In liquid
0.2
420
J6
mg/L as N
GBELK
MOVERMAN
Method Reference Lachat107-06-2-H
3131/08
4/1/08
NO2+NO3 as N In liquid
0.02
0.20
U,P,J6
mg(L as N
MOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10-107-04-1-c
327108
4/2/08
Phosphorus —total as P In liquid
0.02
50
J6
mg/L as P
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference LacIO-115-01-1EF
328/08
42/08
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
Page 2 of 2

North Carolina
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY -GROUNDWATER SECTION
Location code — -01Z00 SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLE PRIORITY •�,��^�
Court a1�� A Water Routine Lab Numbe �VI-�—i. 33�
Quad No Serial No. ❑ soil ❑ Emergency �-� Date Receive 0.302 Time: er-;'11
Let. Long. ❑ Other Rec'd By: / rom:Bus, oun , Hand Del.,
❑ Chain of Custody Other.
Report To: ARO, FRO, MRO, RROAiBWIRO, Data Entry By: Ck:
WSRO, Ianston F Fed. Trust, Central OH„ Other. Date Reported:
Shipped by: Bus, ourie Hand Del., Other: Purpose:
Collector(s): W . Date Time ' SSo.,, Baseline Complaint Complian LUST, Pesticide Study, Federal Trust, Other.
FIELD ANALYSES owner' r. tztit`cct, tt ZS (ddemal
PH 400 Spec. Cond.ar at 25°C Location or Site ouc a •• d' t act T-
Temp.lo °C Odor Description of Sampjfl i p nt5 1 -a
Appearance Sampling Metj�od �� c' Sample Interval
Fleld Analysis By: Remarks(-.�lc o -2f-0- Ne,fe c ..fir r -t ac
I ARnRATnRV ANAI VRFS O►", cot CLt...c� S VNr' -s1 7�
SOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Co ifonn: MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100mi
TOC 680 m9lL
Turbidity 76 NTU
Residue. Suspended 530 mglL
pH 403 units
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Carbonate 445 mgA_
Bicarbonate 440 mg/L
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/L
Chloride 940 mgA_
Chromium: Hex 1032 ug/L
Color. True 60 CU
Cyanide 720 mgfi-
Lab
Diss. Solids 70300 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mgA.
Hardness: Total 900 mg/L
Hardness (noncarb) 902 mg&
Phenols 32730 ugA
Specific Cond. 95 umoslem
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Oil and Grease mgA.
NH, as N 610 mg/L
TKN as N 625 mg/L
NO, + NO, as N 630 mgA.
P: Total as P 665 mgA.
Nitrate (NO3 as N) 620 mg/1-
Nitrite (NO, as N) 615 moll.
GW-54 REV. 7/03 For Dissolved Analysis -submit filtered sample and write'DIS' in dock
Ag-Sdver46566
AI -Aluminum 46557
As -Arsenic 46551
Ba-Sedum 46558
C"Wchen 46552
Cd-Cadmium 46559
Cr-Chromium 46559
Cu-Copper 45562
Fe -Iron 48563
Hg-Marcury 71900
K-Potassium 46555
Mg -Magnesium 46554
Ma -Manganese 46565
Na-Sodium 46556
NI -Nickel
Pb-Lead 46564
SO-Selanlum
Zn Zinc 46567
on arrival (°C):

V
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAYNE
IN THE MATTER OF
N & W Pig Farms
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No.
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENTS OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Theodore L. Bush Jr., Chief of the
Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. own and operate N & W Pig Farms, a
permitted/certified swine animal feeding operation in Wayne County.
B. Mr. Nelms and Mr. Whitley were issued a Certificate of Coverage AWS960046 under State
General Permit AWG100000 on October 1, 2004, effective upon issuance, with an expiration
date of September 30, 2009.
C. Condition No. I. 1. of the "Performance Standards" of the State General Permit states in part
that, "Any discharge of waste which reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except
as otherwise provided in this permit. Waste shall not reach surface waters by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyance, direct application, direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise
classified as state waters... Any discharge or application of waste to a ditch that drains to
surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as follows: (a) discharges from the ditches
are controlled by best management practices (BMPs) designed in accordance with NRCS
standards; (b) the BMPs have been submitted to and approved by the Division of Water
Quality (Division); (c) the BMPs were implemented as designed to prevent a discharge to
surface waters or wetlands; (d) the waste was removed immediately from the ditch upon
discovery; and (e) the event was documented and reported in accordance with Part 111.13. of
this General Permit. Nothing in this exception shall excuse a discharge to surface waters or
wetlands except as may result because of rainfall from a storm event more severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm."
D. Condition No. 11. 1. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Permit states that "The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application
equipment and fields shall be properly operated and maintained at all times."

E. Condition No. IL 4. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Permit states that "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no
case shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the
receiving crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any
runoff during any given application event".
F. Condition No. II. 16. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Permit states in part that the "Operator in Charge (OTC) or a designated back-up OIC of a
Type A Animal Waste Management System shall inspect, or a person under the supervision
of an OIC or designated back-up OIC shall inspect, the land application site as often as
necessary to insure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the CAWMP".
G. Condition No. III. 13. of the "Monitoring and Reporting Requirements" of the State General
Permit requires in part that the permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
following: a) Any discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands; d) Over applying waste
either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff enters surface waters or
wetlands or; e) Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
H. On March 20, 2008, The Division of Soil and Water Conservation conducted an annual
review and found that a discharge occurred into a drainage ditch at the N&W Pig Farms.
Also, visual evidence was found to indicate that the March 18, 2008 irrigation event caused
wastewater to pond in several places on a wheat field. The Division of Soil and Water
Conservation referred the discharge and ponding instances to DWQ. Once notified, DWQ
performed an onsite investigation at the facility and confirmed the presence of ponding and
wastewater in a drainage ditch. During the investigation, a facility records review supported
that irrigation activities had occurred onto 2.47 acres of a wheat crop. Wastewater runoff
traveled from the wheat field onto two lower fields, northwest of the wheat field. No
explanation was given by Mr. Nelms during the March 20, 2008 DWQ investigation as to
how the hydraulic overloading (35,810 gallons/acre) or discharge into the ditch occurred.
The Washington Regional Office was not notified by the Permittee of the state of non-
compliance.
I. N&W Pig Farms have had no previous violations in their compliance history.
J. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $579.18.
Based upon the above Findings of Facts, I make the following:
11. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. are each a "person" within the meaning of'
G. S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G. S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The above -cited discharge to a ditch violated Condition No. I. 1. of the State General Permit.
D. The above -cited failure to properly operate and maintain the land application equipment and
fields violated Condition No. IL 1. of the State General Permit.
2

e
E. The above -cited failures to apply waste at land application rates in accordance with the
CAWMP and to avoid excessive ponding or runoff violated Condition No. II. 4. of the State
General Permit.
F. The above -cited failure of the Operator In Charge (or their surrogate) to inspect the land
application site such that animal waste was applied in accordance with the CAWMP violated
Condition No. II. 16. of the State General Permit.
G. The above -cited failure to notify DWQ of a discharge violated Conditions No. Ill. 13 a, d,
and e of the State General Permit.
H. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. may be assessed civil penalties in this
matter pursuant to G. S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more
that twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person
who is required but fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a
permit required by G. S. 143-215.1.
I. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Mr. Julian Nelms and
Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., pursuant to G. S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G. S. 14313-282.1(b)(8).
J. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter
Based upon the above Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., owners of N & W Pig Farms, are
hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
For violating Condition No. I. 1. of the State General Permit for
discharging hog waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters without the
proper use of Best Management Practices and DWQ notification.
$ For violating Condition No. II. 4. of the State General Permit by failing
to apply waste at a rate in accordance with the CAWMP. The facility did
not land apply such that excessive ponding or runoff was avoided.
$ For violating Condition No. II. 16. of the State General Permit by the
Operator In Charge (or their surrogate) failing to inspect the land
application site such that animal waste was applied per the CAWMP.
$ For violating Conditions No. III. 13. a., d., and e. of the State General
Permit by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following
first knowledge of: a) the occurrence of a discharge to ditches, surface
waters, or wetlands; d) the occurrence of waste over -application, and e)
the failure of the land application system that led to the discharge.
$ 579.18 Enforcement costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
3

0
As required by G. S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have considered
the factors listed in G. S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money save by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Theodore L. Bush, Jr. Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
4

Memorandum
To: Keith Larick, Animal Feeding Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation Penmitting Compliance Unit
Through: David May, Water Quality Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
From: Mark E. Newsome, Environmental Engineer I
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Enforcement Package
N & W Pig Farms
Permit No. AWS960046
Wayne County
Date: May 6, 2008
Introduction:
N & W Pig Farms is owned and operated by Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. This facility,
located on Highway I I I South in Wayne County, began operation in 1994. The facility has the capacity to
raise 7,000 wean to feeder swine and the overall design for this facility is 210,000 steady state live weight.
Report:
On March 20, 2008 at 11:30 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received an
initial report of wastewater discharge to a drainage ditch from Mr. Martin McLawhorn, Environmental
Specialist of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. On March 20, 2008 Eric Newsome of the
DWQ investigated and determined that hydraulic overload occurred on a 2.47-acre pull of a wheat field
due to excessive spray irrigation. The extent of the overload caused wastewater to run onto two lower
terraces northwest of the wheat field. According to facility records, the north lagoon (#1) was pumped
down by 6" (approximately of 88,451 gallons) on March 18, 2008. According to Mr. Nelms, the north
lagoon solely supplied wastewater for the above -described event. Visual evidence of ponding was
consistent with the fact that applying 88,451 gallons would have exceeded the standard loading rate
suggested by the Waste Utilization Plan for this field (35,810 gallons/acre vs. 27,154 gallons/acre). In
addition, the March 20, 2008 DWQ investigation revealed that loose fittings in the irrigation supply line
discharged wastewater from this line into a farm drainage ditch. Although the waste was recovered
without it leaving the facility, it was estimated that 1,200 gallons of water were seen standing in the ditch
prior to clean up efforts beginning. No telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional
Office within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the March 18, 2008 discharge; furthermore,
no explanation was given by Mr. Nelms on March 20, 2008 as to how the overload and discharge
occurred.
Please find a table with the sample results below.
The Finding and Decisions and Assessment Factors are attached for review.

r
Conclusion:
Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., owners and operators of N & W Pig Farms, are in
violation of their permit and North Carolina General Statue 143-215.1(a) for discharging hog waste to surface
waters and/or a ditch; failing to properly operate and maintain land application equipment and fields; failing to
apply wastewater such that ponding and runoff were avoided, and; failing to notify DWQ of the non
compliance event.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the appropriate civil penalties be assessed against this subject facility, N & W Pig
Farms, located in Wayne County, owned and operated by Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr.
The Washington Regional Office recommends that penalties be assessed for the four violations'described
in the Conclusion.
0

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL OPERATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
ENFORCEMENT # NOV-2008-PC-0225
Section 1: General Information
1. Facility Name: N & W Pi Farms
arms
2. Facility or Permit No.: AWS960046
3. Parties named in assessment: Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr.
4. (Mailing) Address: 601 East Main Street, Fremont, NC 27830
5. Telephone No.: 919-242-6327
6. Location of Facility: At the junction of Hwy 222 and Hwy 1 11
7. Type of Operation: 7,000 Wean to Feeder
8. Registered Agent (if applicable): N/A
9. Registered Agent Address (if applicable): N/A
10. Date(s) of noted violations: March 20, 2008
11. Receiving Stream and Classification (if applicable): N/A
12. Regional Officer Washington Regional Office
13. Report Prepared By: M. Eric Newsome
Section II: Findings
Case Narrative: On March 20 2008 at 11.30 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) received an initial report of wastewater discharge to a drainage ditch from Mr. Martin
McLawhorn Environmental Specialist of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation, On March
20 2008 Eric Newsome of the DWQ investigated and determined that hydraulic overload occurred on
a 2 47-acre pull of a wheat field due to excessive spray irrigation The extent of the overload caused
wastewater to run onto two lower terraces northwest of the wheat field. According to facility records,
the north lagoon (#1) was pumped down by 6„ (approximately of 88,451 gallons) on March 18 2008.
According to Mr. Nelms the north lagoon solely supplied wastewater for the above -described event.
Visual evidence of ponding was consistent with the fact that applying 88.451 gallons would have
exceeded the standard loading rate suggested by the Waste Utilization Plan for this field (35,810
gallons/acre vs 27,154 gallons/acre). In addition, the March 20, 2008 DWQ investigation revealed
that loose fittings in the irrigation supply line discharged wastewater from this line into a farm
drainage ditch. Although the waste was recovered without it leaving the facility, it was estimated that
1,200 gallons of water were seen standing in the ditch prior to clean up efforts beginning. fining. No
telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional Office within twenty-four (24) hours of
becoming aware of the March 18, 2008 discharge; furthermore, no explanation was given Mr.
Nelms on March 20, 2008 as to how the overload and discharge occurred.
2. Farm and/or company compliance History: A database and file review indicates that no violations or
penalties have been assessed against this farm in the past.
3. Amount of Waste discharged (if applicable). 1,200 gallons into a farm drainage ditch.
4. Sample Results (if applicable) with locations of samples taken noted in relation to discharge point:
One sample was taken of the ponded water on the eastern edge of the wheat field for nitrogen and
phosphorus analyses Lab results showed significant levels of ammonia (390 mg/L) total kjeldahl
nitrogen (420 mg/L), and phosphorus (50 mg/L) present.

Sample
Sampling Date
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus,
Location
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
Nitrites
P (111g/1_)
(mg/L)
(NO3, NOz)
m /L
East end of
3/20/2008
390
420
ND
50
wheat field
(F-1)
ND -Not Detected
5. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) recalcitrance: Mr. Nelms and
Mr. Whitley have been cooperative; efforts to clean up the discharged and ponded wastewater began
during the March 20, 2008 investigation and were completed by March 24, 2008.
6. Damage? Y/N If yes, include report from WRC: No
7. Mitigating Circumstances: None Nowhere in the April 17, 2008 facility response to DWO do the
respondents deny that wastewater ponded in the subject wheat field; nor did the facility deny that the
aluminum supply line discharged into the drainage ditch. In response to the facility's April 17, 2008
explanation of events, the WaRO questions the following theories:
1)For adjacent pulls on the same tract of the same Aycock soil type, why weren't identical ruts seen
in the investigation photo taken? What would have been the operator's reasoning for only irrigating
one null twice within a 72 hour period?
2) Althoueh the facility response states that a trace amount of rainfall contributed to runoff following
the nighttime application on 3/18, the DWO investigation on 3/20/08 saw wastewater standing
Predominantly in the southeastern corner of the wheat tract, within the wetted diameter of the gun.
Why wasn't wastewater seen in equal amounts in all directions surroundinc> the gun on an Aycock
soil type listed in the Waste Utilization Plan as having a 0-1°/0 slope? The WaRO contends that 2/10
of an inch of rain had a minimal impact on the result.
3) Along the lines of item 2, ponded wastewater was seen along a terrace, approximately 340 feet
west of what would be the north end of pull #4. Using a gun ring size of 0.96" and flowrate of
225gpm this distance could have been covered by improper operation.
8. Recommendations made to the owner/operator: Mr. Nelms was advised on March 20, 2008 to do the
following: 1) numn the wastewater from the drainage ditch into a tank and transfer the contents back
into the north lagoon (lagoon #1)• 2) Collect the ponded areas and pump this wastewater back into the
north lagoon (lagoon #1), and; 3) Seal the "washout" drain on the northern edge of the wheat field
with compacted soil or clay to prevent further runoff to the lower terraced fields.
9. Costs to the State for the enforcement procedures (Show Breakdown):
Total Staff Time (I I hours) $ 308.59
Central Office $ 100.00
Travel Cost (118.6 miles x 2 @ 0.445) $ 105.54
Laboratory Cost $ 65.05
TOTAL $ 579.18
10. Recommendations for further DWQ Action: Continue to focus on facility records and field
conditions during annual compliance inspections.
11. Other Comments: N/A

Section III: Assessment Factors required to be considered by G.S. 14313-282. 1 (b):
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation: Animal waste has the potential to deplete dissolved oxygen in
the affected water body to a point which is harmful to aquatic life. Waste water also contains
nutrients which have the potential to spawn algal growth to the point which is harmful to aquatic life.
Surface waters --the drainage ditch --did receive wastewater.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: The violations occurred March 18 through March 20, 2008.
3. The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality: The two northwest (terraced) fields served as a
vegetative filter, preventing wheat field runoff from entering the nearby Nahunta Swamp. The farm
drainage ditch was sloped such that wastewater was contained onsite until water was removed. One
waste sample was collected in an eastern area of the wheat field where ponding was observed. The
results are illustrated in the following table:
Sample
Sampling
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus,
Location
Date
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
Nitrites
P (mg/L)
(mg/L)
(NO3, NOZ)
mgL
East end of
3/20/2008
390
420
ND
50
wheat field
(F-1)
ND -Not Detected
4. The cost of rectifying the damage: The farm managers could have spent far fewer hours being
preventative (monitoringthe he spray operations) than the time they spent cleaning up the area--48 to 72
hours. Ruts created by the excessive irrigation and farm equipment have damaged part of the wheat
crop.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance: Money is saved when better management skills are
implemented to improve overall management of the facility, environmentally and productively.
Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional: Mr. Nelms and Mr. Whitley both have
an active Tvne A operator's license. What is even more interesting is that the facility response fails
to explicitly state who "the OIC" was onsite during the two alleged irrigation events on 3/15/08
and 3/18/08. Although it cannot be proven whether either of them was onsite during the event or
events, each is responsible for the consequence of the action. Therefore, it is the conclusion of the
WaRO that either: a) the decision to let the active violation occur, b) the decision to leave someone
in charge who was incanable of properly operating the system, or c) the decision to leave the spray
un running unattended was willful
The prior record of the violator(s) in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority: N & W Pig Farms has not been
cited for any permit violations prior to this event.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Total Staff Time (I I hours) $ 308.59
Central Office $ 100.00
Travel Cost (118.6 miles x 2 @ 0,445) $ 105.54
Laboratory Cost $ 65.05
TOTAL $ 579.18

Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_46 Sheet 1 of 2

Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_46 Sheet 2 of 2

N&W Pig Farms 96-46
M,

=V:�
T-4< 0/2 o
*"/02)�
-,2fe

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAYNE
IN THE MATTER OF
N & W Pig Farms
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No.
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENTS OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and
Natural ReSOLII'ce5 and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Theodore L. Bush Jr., Chicf of the
Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. own and operate N & W Pig Farms, a
permitted/certified swine animal feeding operation in Wayne County.
B. Mr. Nelms and Mr. Whitley were issued a Certificate of Coverage AWS960046 under State
General Permit AWG100000 on October 1, 2004, effective upon issuance, with an expiration
date of September 30, 2009.
C. Condition No. 1. 1. of the "Performance Standards" of the State General Permit states in part
that, "Any discharge of waste which reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except
as otherwise provided in this permit. Waste shall not reach surface waters by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyance, direct application, direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise
classified as state waters... Any discharge or application of waste to a ditch that drains to
surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as follows: (a) discharges from the ditches
are controlled by best management practices (BMPs) designed in accordance with NRCS
standards; (b) the BMPs have been submitted to and approved by the Division of Water
Quality (Division); (c) the BMPs were implemented as designed to prevent a discharge to
surface waters or wetlands; (d) the waste was removed immediately from the ditch upon
discovery; and (e) the event was documented and reported in accordance with Part I11.13. of
this General Permit. Nothing in this exception shall excuse a discharge to surface waters or
wetlands except as may result because of rainfall from a storm event more severe than the 25
year, 24-11our storm."
D. Condition No. 11. 1. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Pennit states that "The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application
equipment and fields shall be properly operated and maintained at all times."

E. Condition No. 11. 4. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the Stale General
Permit states that "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no
case shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the
receiving crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any
runoff during any given application event".
F. Condition No. II. 16. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Permit states in part that the "Operator in Charge (OIC) or a designated back-up OIC of a
Type A Animal Waste Management System shall inspect, or a person under the supervision
of an OIC or designated back-up OIC shall inspect, the land application site as often as
necessary to insure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the CAWMP".
G. Condition No. 11I. 13. of the "Monitoring and Reporting Requirements" of the State General
Permit requires in part that the permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
following: a) Any discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands; d) Over applying waste
either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff enters surface waters or
wetlands or; e) Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
H. On March 20, 2008, The Division of Soil and Water Conservation conducted an annual
review and found that a discharge occurred into a drainage ditch at the N&W Pig Farms.
Also, visual evidence was found to indicate that the March 18, 2008 irrigation event caused
wastewater to pond in several places on a wheat field. The Division of Soil and Water
Conservation referred the discharge and ponding i stances��t DW Once no Pied, WQ
erformed an onsite investigation at the facilit Wcontirnt the+t� 5 n e n� aa,�j c✓!4r' wafer
P g Y ryt a dr it afP
n. During the investigation, a facility records revtew� �k �.
" wr- Wstewater runoff traveled from the wheat �) to
onto 2.47 acres of the wheat crop. ,-R,=R�-.--T
field onto two lower fields, northwestf othe wheat field. e
wag f;aund lying
rge t; the 4`0� 'Pf b✓N
No explanation was given by Mr. rinr `'J.
Nelms during the March 20, 2008 DWQ investigation as to how the hydraulic overloading e y yQc�
(35,810 gallons/acre) or discharge into the ditch occurred. Af The 1Nt?filrVoK 41we iqq k 4Pgx c,o S
VC-r1ce was nUc- by Ike al( +4e
I. N&W Pig Farms have had no previous violations in their compliance history, r° nLe
9��4�cP
J. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $663.34.
Based upon the above Findings of Facts, I make the following:
it. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. are each a "person" within the nneaning of
G. S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G. S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The above -cited discharge to a ditch violated Condition No. 1. 1. of the State General Permit.
D. The above -cited failure to properly operate and maintain the land application equipment and
fields violated Condition No. 11. 1. of the State General Permit.
K

E. The above -cited failures to apply waste at land application rates in accordance with the
CAWMP and to avoid excessive ponding or runoff violated Condition No. 11. 4. of the State
General Permit.
F. The above -cited failure of the Operator In Charge (or their surrogate) to inspect the land
application site such that animal waste was applied in accordance with the CAWMP violated
Condition No. II. 16. of the State General Permit.
G. The above -cited failure to notify DWQ of a discharge violated Conditions No. 111. 13 a, d,
and e of the State General Permit.
Ff. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. may be assessed civil penalties in this
matter pursuant to G. S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more
that twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person
who is required but fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a*
permit required by G. S. 143-215.1.
I. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Mr. Julian Nelms and
Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., pursuant to G. S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G. S. 14313-282. 1 (b)(8).
J. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter
Based upon the above Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, 1 make the following:
DECISION:
Accordingly, Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., owners of N & W Pig Farms, are
hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
57q,19
For violating Condition No. I. 1. of the State General Perniit for
discharging hog waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters without the
proper use of Best Management Practices and DWQ notification.
For violating Condition No. IL 4. of the State General Permit by failing
to apply waste at a rate in accordance with the CAWMP. The facility did
not land apply such that excessive ponding or runoff was avoided.
For violating Condition No. 11. 16. of the State General Permit by the
Operator In Charge (or their surrogate) failing to inspect the land
application site such that animal waste was applied per the CAWMP.
For violating Conditions No. III. 13. a., d., and e. of the State General
Permit by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following
first knowledge of: a) the occurrence of a discharge to ditches, surface
waters, or wetlands; d) the occurrence of waste over -application, and e)
the failure of the land application system that led to the discharge.
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUG
3

As required by G. S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty i have considered
the factors listed in G. S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money save by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Theodore L. Bush, Jr. Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
11

Memorandum
To: Keith Larick, Animal Feeding Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation Permitting Compliance Unit
Through: David May, Water Quality Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
From: Mark E. Newsome, Environmental Engineer I
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Enforcement Package
N & W Pig Farms
Permit No. AWS960046
Wayne County
3°
Date: April/9, 2008
Introduction:
N & W Pig Farms is owned and operated by Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr..This facility,
located on Highway I I I South in Wayne County, began operation in 1994. "file facility has the capacity to
raise 7,000 wean to feeder swine and the overall design for this facility is 210,000 steady state live weight.
Report:
On March 20, 2008 at 11:30 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received an
initial report of wastewater discharge to a drainage ditch from Mr. Martin McLawhorn, Environmental
Specialist of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. On March 20, 2008 Eric Newsome of the
DWQ investigated and determined that hydraulic overload occurred on a 2.47-acre pull of a wheat field
due to excessive spray irrigation. The extent of the overload caused wastewater to run onto two lower
terraces northwest of the wheat field. According to facility records, the north lagoon (#1) was pumped
down by 6" (approximately of 88,451 gallons) on March 18, 2008. According to Mr. Nelms, the north
lagoon solely supplied wastewater for the above -described event. Visual evidence of ponding was
consistent with the fact that applying 88,451 gallons would have exceeded the standard loading rate
suggested by the Waste Utilization Plan for this field (35,810 gallons/acre vs. 27,154 gallons/acre). In
addition, the March 20, 2008 DWQ investigation revealed that loose fittings in the irrigation supply line
discharged wastewater from this line into a farm drainage ditch. Although the waste was recovered
without it leaving the facility, it was estimated that 1,200 gallons of water were seen standing ill the ditch
prior to clean up efforts beginning. No telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional
Office within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the March 18, 2008 discharge; furthermore,
no explanation was given by Mr. Nelms on March 20, 2008 as to how the overload and discharge
occurred.
Please find a table with the sample results below.
The Finding and Decisions and Assessment Factors are attached for review.
5

Conclusion:
Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., owners and operators of N & W Pig Farms, are in
violation of their permit and North Carolina General Statue 143-215.1(a) for discharging hog waste to surface
waters and/or a ditch; failing to properly operate and maintain land application equipment and Gelds; failing to
apply wastewater such that ponding and runoff were avoided, and; failing to notify DWQ of the non
compliance event.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the appropriate civil penalties be assessed against this subject facility, N & W Pig
Farnns, located in Wayne County, owned and operated by Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr.
The Washington Regional Office recommends that penalties be assessed for the four violations described
in the Conclusion.

DfVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL OPERATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
ENFORCEMENT # NOV-2008-13C-0225
Section I: General Information
1. Facility Name: N & W Pig Farms
2. Facility or Permit No.: AWS960046
3. Parties named in assessment: Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, .Ir.
4. (Mailing) Address: 601 East Main Street, Fremont, NC 27830
5. Telephone No.: 919-242-6327
6. Location of Facility: At the junction of Hwy 222 and Hwv 1 11
7. Type of Operation: 7,000 Wean to Feeder
8. Registered Agent (if applicable): N/A
9. Registered Agent Address (if applicable): N/A
10. Date(s) of noted violations: March 20, 2008
11. Receiving Stream and Classification (if applicable): N/A
12. Regional Office: Washington Regional Office
13. Report Prepared By: M. Eric Newsome
Section II: Findings
Case Narrative: On March 20 2008 at 1 1:30 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) received an initial report of wastewater discharge to a drainage ditch from Mr. Martin
McLawhorn Environmental Specialist of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. On March
20 2008 Eric Newsome of the DWQ investigated and determined that hydraulic overload occurred on
a 2 47-acre pull of a wheat field due to excessive spray irrigation The extent of the overload caused
wastewater to run onto two lower terraces northwest of the wheat field. According to facility records,
the north lagoon (#1) was pumped down by 6" (approximately of 88,451 gallons) on March 18 2008.
According to Mr. Nelms the north lagoon solely supplied wastewater for the above -described event.
Visual evidence of ponding was consistent with the fact that applying 88 451 gallons would have
exceeded the standard loading rag to suggested by the Waste Utilization Plan for this field (35,8 10
gallons/acre vs 27,154 gallons/acre). In addition the March 20 2008 DWQ investigation revealed
that loose fittings in the irrigation supply line discharged wastewater from this line into a farm
drainage ditch Although the waste was recovered without it leaving the facility, it was estimated that
1,200 gallons of water were seen standing in the ditch prior to clean up efforts beginning. No
telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional Office within twenty-four (24) hours of
becoming aware of the March 18, 2008 discharge; furthermore, no explanation was given by Mr.
Nelms on March 20, 2008 as to how the overload and discharge occurred.
2. Farm and/or company compliance History: A database and file review indicates that no violations or
penalties have been assessed against this farm in the past.
3. Amount of Waste discharged (if applicable). 1,200 gallons into a farm drainage ditch.
Sample Results (if applicable) with locations of samples taken noted in relation to discharge point:
One sample was taken of the ponded water on the eastern edge of the wheat field for nitrogen � and
phosphorus analyses Lab results showed significant levels of ammonia (390 nig/L), total kieldahl
nitrogen (420 mg/L), and phosphorus (50 mg/L) present.

Sample
Sampling Date
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus,
Location
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
Nitrites
P (mg/L)
(mg/L)
(NO,, NO2)
m /L
East end of
3/20/2008
390
420
ND
50
Wheat field
(F-1)
ND -Not Detected
5. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) recalcitrance: Mr. Nelms and
Mr. Whitley have been cooperative; efforts to clean up the discharged and ponded wastewater bed
during the March 20, 2008 investigation and were completed by March 24, 2008.
6. Damage? Y/N If yes, include report from WRC: No
Mitigating Circumstances: None. Nowhere in the April 17, 2008 facility response to DWO do the
resmondents denv that wastewater ponded in the subiect wheat field: nor did the facility denv that the
aluminum supply line discharged into the drainage ditch. In response to the facility's April 17, 2008
explanation of events, the WaRO questions the following theories: 1)For adiacent pulls on the same
tract of the same Aycock soil type, why weren't identical ruts seen in the investigation photo taken?
What would have been the operator's reasoning for onlv irrigating one mull twice within a 72 hour
period?
2) Although the facility response states that a trace amount of rainfall contributed to runoff following
the nighttime application on 3/18, the DWO investigation on 3/20/08 saw wastewater standing
predominantly in the southeastern corner of the wheat tract, within the wetted diameter of the <<� m.
Why wasn't wastewater seen in equal amounts in all directions surrounding the gun on an Aycock
soil type listed in the Waste Utilization Plan as having a 0-1% slope? The WaRO contends that 2/10
of an inch of rain had a minimal impact on the result.
3) Along the lines of item 2, ponded wastewater was seen along a terrace, approximately 340 feet
west of what would be the north end of pull #4. Using a gun ring size of 0.96" and flowrate of
225gpm this distance could have been covered by improper operation.
Recommendations made to the owner/operator: Mr. Nelms was advised on March 20, 2008 to do the
following: 1) pump the wastewater from the drainage ditch into a tank and transfer the contents back
into the north lagoon (lagoon #1); 2) Collect the ponded areas and pump this wastewater back into the
north lagoon (lagoon #1), and; 3) Seal the "washout" drain on the northern edge of the wheat field
with compacted soil or clay to prevent further runoff to the lower terraced fields.
9. Costs to the State for the enforcement procedures (Show Breakdown):
It
Total Staff Time QXhours)
S., 5 308.K5
Central Office
$ 100.00
Travel Cost (118.6 miles x 2 @ 0.445)
$ 105.54
Laboratory Cost
$ 65.05
TOTAL
$iG3�4
10. Recommendations for further DWQ Action: Continue to focus on facility records and field
conditions during annual compliance inspections.
11. Other Continents: N/A
Section III: Assessment Factors required to be considered by G.S. 14313-282.1(b):

l . The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation: Animal waste has the potential to deplete dissolved oxygen in
the affected water body to a point which is harmful to aquatic life. Waste water also contains
nutrients which have the potential to spawn algal growth to the point which is harmful to aquatic life.
Surface waters --the drainage ditch --did receive wastewater.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: The violations occurred March 18 through March 20. 2008.
The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality: The two northwest (terraced) fields served as a
vegetative filter, preventing wheat field runoff from entering the nearby Nahunta Swamp. The farm
drainage ditch was sloped such that wastewater was contained onsite until water was removed. One
waste sample was collected in an eastern area of the wheat field where ponding was observed. The
results are illustrated in the following table:
Sample
Sampling
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus,
Location
Date
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
Nitrites .
P (mg/L)
(mg/L)
(NO3, NOZ)
m /L
East end of
3/20/2008
390
420
ND
50
wheat field
(F-1)
ND -Not Detected
The cost of rectifying the damage: The farm managers could have spent far fewer hours being
preventative (monitoring the spray operations) than the time they spent cleaning up the area--48 to 72
hours. Ruts created by the excessive irrigation and farm equipment have damaged part of the wheat
orot).
The amount of money saved by noncompliance: Money is saved when better management skills are
implemented to improve overall management of the facility, environmentally and productively.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional: Mr. Nelms and Mr. Whitley both have
an active Tvoe A operator's license. What is even more interesting is that the facility response fails
to explicitly state who, "the OIC" was onsite during the two alleged irrigation events on 3/15/08
and 3/18/08. Although it cannot be proven whether either of them was onsite during the event or
events, each is responsible for the consequence of the action. Therefore, it is the conclusion of the
WaRO that either: a) the decision to let the active violation occur, b) the decision to leave someone
in charge who was incapable of properly operating the system, or c) the decision to leave the spray
,un running unattended was willful.
7. The prior record of the violator(s) in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority: N & W Pig Farms has not been
cited for any permit violations prior to this event.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
11
Total Staff Time hours)
Central Office
Travel Cost (118.6 miles x 2 @ 0.445)
Laboratory Cost
TOTAL
$ 100.00
S 105.54
$ 65.05
$ 6P-f4 5:q.iS

vt�dA7p9OG
>_ K)),
1:� C
Incident Report
-Report Number: 200801027
Incident Type: Complaint
On -Site Contact:
Category: Animal
FirsUMid/Last Name:
Julian Nelms
Incident Started: 03/20/2008
Company Name:
N&W Pig Farms
County: Wayne
Phone:
City:
Pager/Mobile Phone:
/ [phone]
Farm #:
Responsible Party:
Reported By:
Owner:
First/Mid/Last Name:
Martin McLawhorn
Permit:
Company Name:
Facility: N & W Pig Farms
Address:
943 Washington Sq Mall
First Name: Julian
Middle Name: B
City/State/Zip:
Washington NC 27889
Last Name: Nelms
Phone:
[phone]
Address 601 E Main St
Pager/Mobile Phone:
/
City/State/Zip: Fremont NC 27830
Phone:
Material Category: Estimated Qty: UOM Chemical Name Reportable City. lbs. Reportable City. kgs.
DD:MM:SS Decimal Position Method: Conversion from state coordinate plane
Latitude: +35031'52" 35.531000 Position Accuracy: Nearest 10 Seconds
Longitude:--77054'14"-77.904000 Position Datum: NAD83
Location of Incident: Wheat field at N&W Farms
Address: Farm Intersection Of Hwy I I 1 And Fhvy 222
City/State/Zip Fremont NC 27830
Report Created 04/24/08 02:48 PM Page I

Cause/Observation:
Operator failure to use irrigation reel and gun system such that
ponding and hydraulic overload was avoided.
Action Taken
Sample taken from the ponded wheal field for the following lab
analyses: nitrogen and phosphorus. A Notice of
Violation/Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement is being
prepared from the DWO-WaRO.
Incident Questions:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? Yes
Surface Water Name? farm drainage ditch
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? No
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type.
Containment? Yes
Cleanup Complete? Yes
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : No
Directions:
From WaRO take Hwy 264 West to Hwy 117 South at Fremont, take
Hwy 222 East for 5 miles and turn right (south) onto Hwy 111. Dirt farm
path is the first right-hand turn.
Comments
Visual evidence from 3/20/08 visit(photos taken) supports notion that
excess irrigation left the field and ran down into lower northwest
fields --about 100 feet away. Also the spray gun was not stopped until
approximately 1,200 gallons washed into the farm drainage ditch.
According to freeboard records the servicing lagoon was lowered 3/18/08;
this is approximately 88,451 gallons onto 2.5 acre pull (35,810
gallons/acre). No wastewater was found to have entered the Nahunta
Swamp wetlands.
Event Type Event Date
Requested Additional Information
Report Entered 2008-03-31 08:29:32
Incident closed 2008-03-31 12:00:00
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact 2008-03-20 01:54:00
Conveyance: Ditch
Estimated Number of fish?
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Groundwater Impacted : Unknown
Due Date Comment
Report Created 04/24/08 02:48 PM Page 2

Incident Start
Report Received
Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone
2008-03-20 11:30:00
2008-03-20 11:30:00
First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
DWQ Information:
Report Taken By: Report Entered By:
David L May Eric Newsome
Regional Contact:
Eric Newsome
Phone:
Date/Time: 2008-03-20 11:30:00 AM 2008-03-31 08:29:32 PM 2008-03-20 01:54:00 PM
Referred Via: Phone
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional information is needed?
Report Created 04/24/08 02:48 PM Page 3

' Official Series Description - AYCOCK Series Page 1 of')
LOCATION AYCOCK NC+VA
Established Series
Rev. WLB-AG
12/2002
AYCOCK SERIES
The Aycock series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately or moderately slowly permeable soils
Oil uplands of the Middle and Lower Coastal Plain. They formed in loamy marine sediments. Slopes
range from 0 to 6 percent. Near the type location, mean annual precipitation is 48 inches and the mean
annual air temperature is about 63 degrees F.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -silty, siliceous, subactive, thermic Typic Paleudults
TYPICAL PEDON: Aycock very fine sandy loam --cultivated.
(Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--O to 7 inches; grayish brown (10YR 5/2) very fine sandy loam; weak medium granular structure;
very friable; many fine roots; moderately acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (5 to 10 inches thick)
E--7 to 12 inches; pale brown (1 OYR 6/3) very fine sandy loam, weak fine subangular blocky structure;
very friable; few fine roots; moderately acid; clear wavy boundary. (4 to 10 inches thick)
Bt1--12 to 17 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) clay loam; weak fine subangular blocky structure;
friable; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
Bt2--17 to 30 inches; yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/8) clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable, sticky plastic; thin patchy clay films on faces of peds; gradual wavy boundary.
Bt3--30 to 50 inches; brownish yellow (1 OYR 6/8) clay loam; weak fine subangular blocky structure;
friable; slightly sticky, slightly plastic; few faint clay films on faces of peds; few medium faint light
yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) iron depletions; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bt4--50 to 75 inches; brownish yellow (1 OYR 6/6) loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable, slightly sticky; few faint clay films on faces of peds; few slightly firm brown nodules; common
medium distinct pale brown (i OYR 6/3) iron depletions; and common medium distinct strong brown
(7.5YR 5/6), and a few prominent red (2.5YR 4/6) masses of iron accumulation; very strongly acid;
gradual wavy boundary. (Combined thickness of the Bt horizon is 40 to 72 inches.)
BC--75 to 90 inches; brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) loam; massive; friable; slightly sticky; few medium,
firm and soft plinthite nodules; many medium prominent light gray (1 OYR 7/2) iron depletions, and red
(2.5YR 4/6) masses of iron accumulation; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Wayne County, North Carolina; one mile north of Fremont on U. S. Highway
117, and 200 feet west ofjunction of County Roads 1361 and 117.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness is more than 60 inches. The soil is strongly acid
or very strongly acid throughout except where the surface has been limed. The lower B and C horizons,
in many pedons, contain plinthite nodules, but no horizon within 60 inches of the surface has as much as
5 percent plinthite.
http://www2.ftw.nres.usda.gov/osd/dat/AYAYCOCK.html 4/30/2008

Official Series Description - AYCOCK Series Page 2 of 3
The Ap or A horizon has hue of 1 OYR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 2 to 4. Texture is silt
loam, very fine sandy loam, or loam.
The E horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 3 or 4. Texture is silt loam, very
fine sandy loam, or loam.
The Bt horizon has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 4 to 8. Iron depletions in
shades of brown or yellow may occur in any part of the Bt horizon except the Btl . iron depletions in
shades of gray may occur in the Bt horizon below a depth of 30 inches. Masses of iron accumulation in
shades of brown or red may occur anywhere in the Bt horizon. Some pedons have a Btg horizon below a
depth of 48 inches that has hue of 1 OYR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of I or 2. It has masses of
iron accumulation in shades of red, yellow, or brown. Texture is commonly clay loam, but includes
loam, silt loam, and silty clay loam. Thin layers of clay or silty clay are in some pedons.
The BC horizon has hue of i OYR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 3 to 8. h-on depletions in
shades of yellow, brown, or gray may occur, as well as masses of iron accumulation in shades of red or
brown. The texture range is the same as for the Bt horizon.
The C horizon, where present, has hue of IOYR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 3 to 8. iron
depletions in shades of yellow, brown or gray occur, as well as masses of iron accumulation in shades of
red, yellow, or brown. Texture is variable.
The Cg horizon, where present, has hue of IOYR to 5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of i or 2. It has
masses of iron accumulation in shades of red, yellow, or brown. Texture is variable.
COMPETING SERIES: Soil series in same family are Bewlevville, Blevins, Curtistown, Mountview,
and Silerton_ Bewleyville, Curtistown, and Mountview soils have Bt and/or 213t horizon in hue of 2.5YR
or 5YR. Blevins soils have B horizons with a bisequum clay distribution. Silerton soils have a lithologic
discontinuity with silty material 1.5 to 3 feet thick overlying clayey coastal plain sediments.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Aycock soils are nearly level to gently sloping, and are on uplands of the
Middle and Lower Coastal Plain. Slope ranges from 0 to 6 percent. The soil formed in loamy coastal
plain sediments. Mean annual precipitation is 48 inches near the type location and the mean annual air
temperature is about 63 degrees F.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These include EX mn, G..ol_.lsboro, Grantham, Nahunta,
Nohoco, Norfolk. and Orangeburg soils. Exum and Goldsboro soils are moderately well drained and are
slightly lower or fuurther from drainageways than Aycock soils. The somewhat poorly drained Nahunta
soils and the poorly drained Grantham soils are in depressions or further from drainageways on the
landscape. The well drained Nobocco and Norfolk soils are in the same landscape positions as Aycock.
The well drained Orangeburg soils are higher or nearer to drainageways than Aycock soils. In addition,
Nobocco, Norfolk and Orangeburg soils are in a fine -loamy family.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained; slow to medium runoff; permeability is moderate
or moderately slow.
USE AND VEGETATION: About two-thirds of the total acreage is used for growing cotton, corn,
soybeans, tobacco, peanuts, truck crops, and small grains. The remainder is in pasture or is forested.
Common trees include loblolly pine, longleaf pine, southern red oak, and white oak. Understory plants
include American holly, flowering dogwood, blueberry, greenbrier, and persimmon.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Coastal Plain of North Carolina and Virginia. The series is
moderately extensive.
http://www2.ftw.nres.usda.gov/osd/daUA/AYCOCK.htm1 4/30/2008

Official Series Description - AYCOCK Series Page 3 of 3
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Pitt County, North Carolina; 1969.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and soil characteristics recognized in the typical pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface to a depth of 12 inches (Ap and E horizons)
Argillic horizon - the zone between 12 and 75 inches (Btl, Bt2, 130, and Bt4 horizons)
MLRA: 133A, 153A SIR: NCO060
TABULAR SERIES DATA:
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
NCO060 AYCOCK 0- 6 58- 63 185-240 40- 57 40- 170
SOI-5 F1oodL F1oodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
N00060 NONE 4.0-6.0 APPARENT JAN-APR 60-60
SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay% -CEC-
N00060 0-12 VFSL L SIL 0- 0 95-100 4-15 2- 7
NCO060 12-80 CL SICL L 0- 0 95-100 18-35 4- 7
SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M.
NCO060 0-12 4.5- 6.0 1.-4.
NCO060 12-80 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.
Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
0- 0 0.2- 2.0 LOW
http://www2.ftw.nres.usda.gov/osd/dat/A/AYCOCK.html 4/30/2008

lof 2
V
Field Notes from 3/20/2008 of the
N&W Fann Non -Compliance Event
I (Eric Newsome) arrived onsite at N&W Farm (Goldsboro Hog Fann—Integrator) at
1:54 pm on March 20, 2008. The purpose of this visit was to investigate allegations of
hydraulic overload and ponding of wastewater surrounding an irrigation event. Driving
along the dirt path toward Farms 1 &2, there was an irrigation reel fifty-two (52) feet
ahead that was still attached to the hydrant. There was also an irrigation gun (still
attached to said reel) sitting in the northeast wheat field (NEE) of the farm. There was
one drainage ditch on either side of the farm path: the right-hand ditch ran along the
southern edge of the NEF, approximately five (5) feet from the reel; the left-hand ditch
ran parallel to the right-hand ditch, along the opposite southeast wheat field (SEF). It
could clearly be seen that the right-hand ditch (NEF) had a murky; dark colored
appearance compared to the left-hand ditch; an odor of swine waste was also noticeable.
The right hand ditch also held the metal supply line from the lagoon to the reel; this
supply line was loose in several places when shaken by foot.
Walking out into the NEF along the irrigation pull, there were two sets of ruts,
presumably dug out from the weight of the hauling tractor on the wet soil. There was
ponded wastewater in both sets of ruts: The first pair was south of the gun, with each rut
I foot wide, three inches deep, and thirty feet long (112 gallons). The second pair was
north of the gun, with each rut 1 foot wide, two inches deep, and forty-eight feet long
(120 gallons).
At 2:20 pin, I met with owner Mr. Julian Nelms and two other gentlemen (Bob, and
`Bob's Dad"). The three men began preparations to pump the right hand ditch into a
plastic tote, which would then be emptied back into the original source lagoon. During
this date, Mr. Nelms stated that the last irrigation event occurred 3/18/2008.
At approximately 3:00 pm Mr. Will Hart of the APS arrived to assist with this
investigation. First, Mr. Hart and Mr. Newsome walked the length of the right hand ditch
to detennine if any irrigation water might have escaped its boundaries. It was observed
that after about 600 feet southwest of the gun, the ditch has a swale that would prevent
water from running any further southwest. It was concluded that although this water
needs to be pumped out, it was contained and could not run on its own across any other
surfaces. A visual estimate of the water volume in this right hand ditch was 1,216
gallons.
Second, Mr. Hart and Mr. Newsome walked to the northwest side of the NEF. Visual
confirmation was made that wastewater did flow from the wheat field through a
"washout" drain. However, the two contour terraces and stubble vegetation below the
wheat field prevented flow of wastewater into the northwest tributary of the Nahunta
Swamp. A visual estimate of the total volume of ponded wastewater on the two lower
ridges was 325 gallons.

Field Notes from 3_20_08 N&W Farm Complaint
2 of 2
Finally, while Mr. Hart took an analysis sample of ponded water from the NEF, Mr.
Newsome reviewed the lagoon freeboard records. Lagoon #1 was lowered 6 inches
(11,825 cu ft or 88,451 gallons) while Lagoon #2 was lowered 12 inches (23,650 cu ft or
176,902 gallons). A 3/24/08 follow-up visit to visually check the clean up efforts yielded
positive results. There was no standing water seen: 1) in the right-hand ditch ran along
the southern edge of the NEF; 2) in the rutted areas where the irrigation gun stood in the
NEF or; 3) the two ponded areas on the contour terraces.
C:\Documents and Settings\enewsome\My DOCIIments\2008 Compaint Invs\20 Mar 08
N&W Farm2\Field Notes from 3_20_08 N&W Farm Complaint.doc

North Carolina
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DIVISION OF WATER OUALf1Y-GROUNDWATER SECTION
Location — `01ZAO
Coll OLIV12.
SAMPLETYPE SAMPLE PRIORITY
)d Water Routine
Lab Number
Quad No Serial No.
❑ sal ❑ Emergency
Date Received Time:
Let Long.
Other
ReC'd By: From:Bus, Courier, Hand Del.,
Report To: ARO, FRO, MRO, RROAQB WIRO,
❑ Chain of Custody
Other
Data Entry By: Ck:
WSRO, Wriston F Fed. Trust, Central Off„ Other:
Date Reported:
Shipped by Bus, uner and Del., Other
Colitxxor(s): (ni . Date
Purpose:
Time :SSo,., Baseline • Complaint Complia LUST, Pesticide Study, Federal Trust Other
FIELD ANALYSES
Owner r'. 3. I.C,-L"
a P%S
PH 4aa Spec. Cond.tr4
at 25°C Location or Site aw- a
l d` 7— /to%tr C-
Temp.lo °C Odor
a
Description of sampf g p nts
Mrs,
f... ".e.
'Appearance
Sampling Melrod�M 12
ma�_ P.—a r Sample Interval .
1 ARORATt7RY
Boo 310 mglL
COD High 340 milli.
COD Law 335 mglL
Califsrrm MF Fecal 31616 1100md
Cdirmm: MF Told 31504 /1oWd
TOC 660
Turbidity 76 NTu
Residue, Suspended 530 milli.
pH 403 units
Alkalinity to pH 4.6 410 mglL
Alkalinity to pH a.3 415 mgll.
Carbaate 445 mgiL
ak:arbowds 440 mg&
Carbon dioAde 405 mq&
Chloride 940 mg0_
Chromium: Hex 1032 ugA-
Color: True e0 Cu
Cyanide 720 mglL
Lab
r%r :. a r ,.Y c —
fl
Diss. Solids 70300 mgA.
Ag-Silver 46566 u /L
I O anachlodne Pesticides
Fluoride 951 mgA.
AI -Aluminum 46557 ug/L
Organophospharus Pesticides
Hardness: Total 900 mgiL
As-Arsendc 46557 UgA.
Nitrogen Pesticides
Hardness (ncr cart) 902 mglL
6a43adum 46558 U01L
Add Herbicides
Phenols 32730 u9A
Ca-Cddum 46552 m 2
PCBS -
Specific Cond. 95 uMhoslan
Cd-Cadmium 46559 u
Sullate 945 m91L
Cr-Chromium 46559 ugA-
SLdfkfa745 mgA.
Cu-0opper46562 u
Fe-kon 40583 uwtSemlvdatiie
organics
ON and Grease m91L
Hg-Mercury 71900 uWL
TPH-Diesel Range
K-Potassium 46555 m
Mg-Magneslum 46554 m
- -
Mm-Manganese 46565 urill.
Volatile Orgardas tVOA bo01e
NHs as N 610 mgA.
Na-Sodium 46556 m
TPH-Gasoline Range .
TKN as N 625 mglL
Nmkw "llit
TPH-HTEX Gasoline Range
NO= + NO, as N 630 mg/L
Pb-Lead 46564 u
P. Total as P 665 mglL
Se Selenium u
Nitrate (NO3 as N) 620 - mgA-
Zn-Zinc 46557 u
Nitrite (NO2 as N) 615 milli.
LAB USE ONLY
Temperature on arrival (°C):
GW-64 REV. 7103 Fgr Dissolved Analysis -submit filtered sample and write'DIS' in dodo

%oot IIIIIIII*II ouµunulls II OIt 'A�In M,.I'Z'Ot YS.L'L NI T.Y9SVAC.S£) 01UIgd
{ �R
1{{
A�.� i A6V'nIa1900Z
9, IX'w r
I
�i�i-Y.TF'
it
+s
tit
ON
V r t
W

Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/26/2007 Entry Time: QUO AM
Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: N & W Pia Farms
Owner Email:
Owner: Julian B Nelms
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St
Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35031'52" Longitude: 77054'28"
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection
& Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms
Operator Certification Number: 16565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
On -site representative Julian Nelms
Phone:
24 hour contact name Julian Nelms
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

y
Print Map
Page 1 of 1
Map for N&W Farm
Location of NEF
kL
kIN
is
1:12,000
Fremont
7.5-minute Quadrangle
NC SPCS E: 708988.9, N:198116.0 meters (NAD83)
Long:-77.9040000 W, L..at: 35.5310000 N (NAD83)
http://gis.enr.state.nc.us/topoviewer/gisprint.jsp 3/28/2008

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring Facility
Number:
960006
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
■
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
■
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
e
30. At the time of the inspection ;ie cility pose an air quality concern? If yes, cont2ct a reiional Air
Quality immediat
❑
■
❑
❑
representative
,SGJ � , i �
rj7 i •xv 1.
Page: 6
r. 'y
U

Permit: AWS960006 Owner- Facility: E Lewis Herring
Inspection Date: 03107/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

•
.I�\LZII:
ADJUSTABLE TRAJECTORY SRAI 50 BIG GUNS'
Development efforts in the Nelson
Big Gun® sprinkler line continue.
We are pleased to announce the
availability of the SRA150 — a
new model with an adjustable
trajectory designed to meet
varying application requirements.
Varying trajectory angle is simple,
and can be used to increase
wind -fighting ability or to avoid
obstacles such as power lines in
the field. The SRA150 is capable
of trajectory angles from 15°to45°.
Nelson engineers have designed
and integrated a clean and
simple mechanism of adjustment.
To vary the trajectory angle
simply adjust the turn -buckle
and dial in the desired
trajectory with the calibrated
scale. Maintaining the unequaled
quality and reliability of the Slow
1,'�everse (SIR) series, all of the
components of the field -proven
drive arm assembly and lower
bearing are the same as the
existing SR150, minimizing
additional parts and service
requirements. Please see the
enclosed price list for prices.
Production is limited ... contact
the Nelson factory for availability.
Applications Include:
Feed Lot Dust Suppression
* Mining Dust Suppression
• Fire Prevention
Traveler Irrigation
• Waste Disposal
Warranty and Disclaimer
Nelson Big Gun® Sprkinklers are warranted for one year from date of original sale to be free of defective materials and workmanship when used within the working
specifications for which the products were designed and under normal use and service. The manufacturer assumes no responsibility for installation, removal or
unauthorized repair of defective parts. The manufacturer's liability under this warranty is limited solely to replacement or repair of defective parts and the
manufacturer will not be liable for any crop or other consequential damages resulting from defects or breach of warranty. THIS WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY IN LIEU
OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES AND OF
ALL OTHER OBLIGATIONS OR LIABILITIES OF MANUFACTURER. No agent, employee or representative of the manufacturer has authority to waive, alter or add to
the provisions of this warranty, nor to make any representations or warranty not contained herein.
Nelson Irrigation Corp. Rt. 4 Box 169, Airport Rd., Walla Walla, WA 99362-9426 USA Tel: 509.525,7660 Fax: [phone] E-mail: nelson@nelsonirrcom Website: www.nalsonirrcom

�A S N SMI 50 BIG GUN® I o I
82%
/45e
/ 100%
/
/
/ 88%
150
Throw radius adjustment
The throw distance of the SRA150 is relative to
the set trajectory. (See graph on the left.) The
tables below provide performance data for the
150 Taper Bore Nozzle at a trajectory of 24°.
Tests were made on a 3 foot riser. Ring and
Taper Ring Nozzles are also available.
Performance data has been obtained under ideal test conditions
and maybe adversely affected by wind, poor hydraulic entrance
condilioris or otherfactors. No representation regarding droplet
condition, application rate or suitability for a particularapplication
is made herein.
150 TAPER BORE NOZZLE - 24° TRAJECTORY - U.S. UNITS
1 SOT - Specify sin when ordering
Ro_`�..
w Path
0.70" 0.80" 0.90" 1.0" 1.1" 1.2" 1.3"
o417 n7n 0117 Ann oii7 non 01417_1nn oz 17_11n 0317.11n 0317.13n
PSI
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. Fr.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. Fr.
GPM
DIA. Fr.
50
100
250
130
270
165
290
205
310
255
330
300
345
350
360
408
373
60
110
265
143
285
182
305
225
325
275
345
330
365
385
380
446
396
70
120
280
155
300
197
320
245
340
295
360
355
380
415
395
483
412
so
128
290
165
310
210
335
260
355
315
375
380
395
445
410
516
427
90
135
300
175
320
223
345
275
365
335
390
405
410
475
425
547
442
100
143
310
185
330
235
355
290
375
355
400
425
420
500
440
577
458
110
150
320
195
340
247
365
305
385
370
410
445
430
525
450
1 605
471
120
157
330
1 204
350
1 258
375
320
395
1 385
420
1 465
440
545
460
1 632
481
150 TAPER BORE NOZZLE - 24" TRAJECTORY - METRIC UNITS
1 SOT - Specify size when ordering
L A
17,8mm 20,3mm 22,9mm 25,4mm 27,9mm
9317-070 9317-080 9317-090 9317-100 9317-110
now Path
30,5mm 33,Omm
9317-120 9317-130
kg/cm'
M3/H
M
M3/H
M
M3/H
M
M3/H
M
M3/H
M
M3/H
M
M3/H
M
3,5
23,0
76,0
29,8
82,0
37,8
88,0
46,9
95,0
57,1
101
68,3
105
80,1
110
4,0
24,6
79,6
31,9
85,6
40,4
91,6
50,1
97,8
61,0
104
73,0
109
85,7
114
5,0
27,5
85,4
35,7
91,6
45,2
98,6
56,0
105
68,2
ill
81,7
117
95,8
121
6,0
30,1
89,7
39,1
96,7
49,5
104
61,3
110
74,7
117
89,5
123
105
128
7,0
32,5
95,0
42,2
101
53,5
108
66,3
114
80,7
122
96,6
128
113
134
8,0
1 34,8
99,3
1 45,1
105
1 57,2
112
1 70,8
118
1 86,3
126
1 103
132
121
138
9,0
1 36,9
104
1 47,9
110
1 60,6
117
1 75,1
123
1 91,5
131
1 110
137
129
143
Nelson Irrigation Corp. Rt.4 Box 169, Airport Rd, Walla Walla, WA 9W-9426 USA Tel: S095217660 Fax: [phone] E-mail: nelson@nelsonirrmm Wehsite: www.no6onirrcom

Yrowen#1 ticn'•
dak 150 SERIES BIG GUN® PERFORMANCE - U.S. UNITS
150 TAPER BORE NOZZLE 150T
1 SOT -Specify size when ordering
T7,
How path
0.70" 0.80" 0.90" 1.0" 1.1" 1.2" 1.3" 1.4"
9317-070 9317-090 9317-090 9317-100 9317-110 9317-120 9317-130
PSI
GPM
DIA. PT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DU. FT.
50
100
250
130
270
165
290
-205--743,
255
330
300
345
350
360
408
373
60
110
265
143
285
182
305
5-__3
275
345
330
365
385
380
446
396
70
120
280
155
300
197
320
245 340
295
360
355
380
415
395
483
412
80
128
290
165
310
210-335
260 355
315
375
380
395
445
410
516
427
90
135
300
175
320
23_
345
275 365
335
390
405
410
475
425
547
442
100
143
310
185
330
235
355
290 375
355
400
425
420
500
440
577
458
110
150
320
195
340
247
365
305 385
370
410
445
430
525
450
605
471
120
157
330
204
350
1 258
375
320 395
385
420
1 465
440
545
460
632
481
150 TAPER RING NOZZLE 150TR
150TR = Body + Cap + 1 Taper Ring
Specify size when ordering
� hrs ;' fd-/'*�
q //.11- u
tr238--
80* p'Cap
#9773se4 06286
po,. a)
Flow Path:
0.88" 0.96" 1.04" 1.12 1.2" 1.28" 1.36"
9238-022 9238-02A 9238-02A 9238_02A 9238-030 9238-032 9238-034
PSI
GPM
DIA. Fr.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DU. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA, FT.
50
135
270
164
286
196
302
233
318
274
333
319
347
369
358
60
148
284
179
301
214
317
255
334
301
351
350
367
405
378
70
159
299
194
315
—23.1
331
276
349
325
366
378
382
437
393
80
170
310
_207--330
247
346
295
364
347
381
404
397
467
409
90
181
320
20
340
313
377
368
396
429
411
495
424
100
191
329
3
35
277
366
330
386
388
405
452
423
522
436
110
200
339
243
359
290
376
1 346
397
407
416
474
433
548
446
120
209
349
253
369
303
3867
361
407
425
426
495
443
572
457
150 RING NOZZLE 160R COMPONEMS:
15oR = Body + cup +Set of 7 Rings "i3 012e71a111 062 a
Specify size when ordering f_
�_]3O : Flow Path
--i1
EIV CD �
0.86" 0.97" 1.08" 1.18" 1.26" 1.34" 1.41" 1.47"
A797_nAA A9A7_n07 A2A7.1OA A2A7-11A 69A7_12A A2117-13d 42117_ldl
PSI
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. FT.
GPM
DIA. Fr.
GPM
DIA. Fr.
GPM
DIA. Fr.
GPM
DIA. FT.
50
100
245
130
265
165
285
205
300
255
320
300
335
350
350
385
353
60
110
260
143
280
182
300
225
315
275
335
330
350
385
365
423
368
70
120
270
155
290
197
310
245
330
295
350
355
365
415
380
458
383
80
128
280
165
300
210
320
260
340
315
360
380
380
445
395
490
399
90
135
290
175
310
223
330
275
350
335
370
405
390
475
405
522
409
100
1 143
300
185
320
235
340
290
360
355
380
425
400
560
415
550
419
110
150
310
195
330
247
350
305
370
370
390
445
410
525
425
577
429
120
157
315
204
335
258
360
320
380
385
400
465
420
545
435
603
439
Dimn✓,n a. bm W .n 2r k*b , ak a.n" m/ . doe tim bwn a6aird �ndr idmY tm� mm0lme and Tor W mb../r aaoe.d M , vno� Mdimie.ndae mn6lien. m.dr lecw. W,m. N�Ooaen
C.M.A. T , — mP�- r. dre dr.pM mdlPon, milmnAr. or �limfm nba
Nelson Irrigation Corporation $48 Airport Rd Walla Walla, WA 99362 USA Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-maii: nelsontg"lnelsonirr.com Web sde: www.nekonirripgoo.com

hrww7knhh bl"'
A'A 100 SERIES BIG GUN® PERFORMANCE- U.S. UNITS
100 TAPER BORE NOZZLE IWT
100T — Specify size when ordering
'fl
0.50' 0.55' 0.60" 0.65' 0.70" 0.75" 0.80' 0.85" 0.90' 1.0'
93n9-05n 9309.055 9309.n60 9309-065 9309-070 9309-075 9309-080 9309.095 9309-090 9309-100
PSI
GPM awn
I GPM M& n
GPM Gu n
GPM aw Fr
GPM Ow n.
GPM DM. n
GPM Gu n
GPM ou n
GPM oIw n.
GPM m n
40
47
191
57
202
66
213
78
222
91
230
103
240
118
250
134
256
152
262
-
-
50
50
205
64
215
74
225
87
235
100
245
115
256
130
265
150
273
165
280
204
300
60
55
215
69
227
81
240
96
250
110
260
126
270
143
280
164
288
182
295
224
316
70
60
225
75
238
88
250
103
263
120
275
136
283
155
295
177
302
197
310
243
338
80
64
235
79
2481
94
2601
110
273
128
285
146
295
165
305
189
314
210
325
258
354
90
68
245
83
2581
100
2701
117
2831
135
295
1 155
3061
175
3151
201
3261
223
335
274
362
100
72
2551
87
2681
106
2801
123
2931
143
3051
163
316
185
325
1 212
3361
235
345
289
372
110
1 76
2651
92
2781
111
2901
129
3031
150
3151
171
3241
195
335
1 222
3441
247
355
304
380
100 TAPER RING NOZZLE 100TR
100TR m Body + Cap + 1 Toper Ring
Specify size when ordering
0.64" 0.68" 0.72'
9257.016 9257-017 9257-018
0.76" 0.80"
9257.019 9257-020
COMPONENTS:
Body Taper Ring Cap
*"56-0011#9257-i99 #6745
How Path ' —
0.84" 0.88" O.W 0.96"
9257-021 9257-022 9257-023 9257-024
PSI
GPM
DIA. Ft
GPM
DU. Fr
GPM
aIw n.
GPM
ww Fr
GPM
(" K
GPM
M. FT.
GPM
M. ri.
GPM
oIA. Fr
GPM
aIw Fr
40
67
212
76
219
86
225
98
233
110
242
125
250
136
254
151
259
166
275
50
75
224
85
231
97
240
110
250
123
258
139
266
152
271
169
279
185
288
60
83
239
94
246
106
254
120
264
135
273
153
281
167
286
186
294
203
303
70
89
249
101
259
114
268
130
277
146
286
165
295
180
300
200
309
219
320
80
1 95
259
1 108
269
1 122
278
139
288
156
297
1 176
306
193
313
214
324
235
336
90
101
268
115
278
130
289
147
299
166
308
187
317
1 204
324
1 227
334
249
345
100
107
278
121
288
137
298
155
308
175
318
197
327
216
334 1
240
344
262
355
110
112
288
127
298
143
308
163
317
183
326
207
336
226
342 1
251
353
275
364
100 RING NOZZLE 100R
1OOR m Body + Cap + Set of 7 Rings
Specify size when ordering
Complete set of 7 rings only - #6847
0.71" 0.77"
6738-071 6738.n77
COMPONENTS:
Body Ring
Cap
#9956-001 #6738-9P7
#7872
ff:]o
O
—h
,fl— Fbth
0.81" 0.86' 0.89'
0.93" 0.96"
6738-081 6738-086
6738-089
6738-093 6738-096
PSI
GPM
oa. n.
GPM
DIA. n
GPM
D w n.
GPM
oIw Fr
GPM
Duff .
GPM
ou n
GPM
M. Fr.
40
66
208
78
212
91
215
103
224
118
235
134
238
152
242
50
74
220
88
225
100
230
115
240
129
250
150
255
167
260
60
81
235
96
240
110
245
125
260
141
270
164
275
183
280
70
88
245
104
250
118
260
135
275
152
290
177
295
198
300
80
94
255
111
265
127
275
145
285
163
300
1 189
305
1 211
315
90
1 99
265
117
275
134
285
154
295
173
310
1 201
315
1 224
325
100
105
270
124
280
142
295
162
305
182
320
212
325
236
335
110
110
275
130
290
149
305
170
315
191
325
222
335
248
345
GIaM.n a. Oa�U a� Z.' pmy. ep Gun W� Oob 1m b.n cegntl vWr row 1W m�unar ma �` a aurMy an.va q wrK Fec�,ryss*c �nve mvmv o wr �sva n..an namv.
Capraim nvl� m iyrwvmm rpuie bgla mdlm. vifurAe s gyl6oim mbc.
Nebml Irrigation Corporation 948 Airport Rt Walk Walk, WA 99M USA Tel: SOMS.7660 Pox: S09M.7907 E-mail: nebon@nebonirccom Web she: wwwnalmoinigafon.com

75BGN 10/02
hvvafbnh hilaft N
P,rA§LW
F 75 SERIES BIG GUN® PERFORMANCE
U.S. UNITS - 75 TAPER RING NOZZLE - TR75 - 240 TRAJECTORY
U75 Taper Rings are ordered individually.
Specify size when ordering
0.4" 0.45" 0.5" 0.55" 0.6" 0.65" 0.7"
0.75"
0.8"
P51
GPM Du.rT
GPM DIA.FT
GPM Dtn.rT
GPM DtA.FT
GPM Du.LT
GPM Du.Fr.
GPM Du.LT
GPM Du.Fr.
Diameter (DIA) in feet and flowrate (GPM) are based on CIT (Center for Irrigation Technology) testing and some comparisons (dated 10/9/02). for
43' performance consult factory In general, throw distance is reduced --3%with each 3' drop in trajectory.
= Pressure/nozzle combinations OUTSIDE of the shaded -in areas produce a more desirable stream.
METRIC UNITS - 75 TAPER RING NOZZLE - TR75 - 240 TRAJECTORY
TR75 Taper Rings are ordered individually.
Specify size when ordering
10,2mm 11,4mm 12,7mm 14,6mm 15,2mm 16,5mm 17,8mm
19,1mm
20,3mm
Diameter (M) in meters and flowrate (I/S = liter/sec; Ms/H = cubic meter per hour) are based on CIT (Canter for Irrigation Technology) testing and
some comparisons (doled 10/9/02). For 43' performance consuh factory. In general, throw distance is reduced �-3%with
each T drop in trajectory.
Pressure/nozzle combinations OUTSIDE of the shaded -in areas produce a more desirable stream.
WARRANTY AND DISCLAIMER
Nelson Big Gun' Sprinklers are warranted for one year from date of original sale to be free of defective materials
and workmanship when used
within the working specifications for which the products were designed and under normal use and service. The manufacturer assumes no
responsibility for installation, removal or unauthorized repair of defective parts. The manufacturer's liability under this warranty is limited
solely to replacement or repair of defective parts and the manufacturer will not be liable for any crop or other consequential damages resulting
from defects or breach.of warranty. THIS WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUD-
ING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES AND OF ALL OTHER OBLIGATIONS
OR
LIABILITIES OF MANUFACTURER. No agent, employee or representative of the manufacturer has authority
to waive, alter or add to the
provisions of this warranty, nor to make any representations or warranty not contained herein.
GPM Dw.Fr.
25
42
146
50
155
S9
161
69
167
80
174
91
182
30
37
158
45
158
55
165
64
172
75
182
87
187
99
192
35
32
154
40
164
49
172
59
178
69
191
81
196
93
202
106
208
40
27
149
35
160
43
171
52
1B0
63
190
74
198
87
204
98
213
112
221
45
29
155
37
167
46
180
56
189
67
198
79
206
91
214
104
223
118
230
50
30
161
39
174
48
186
59
195
70
203
83
212
95
220
109
230
123
237
55
32
165
41
179
50
193
62
203
74
213
87
221
100
230
115
239
130
247
60
33
169
42
784
53
198
64
208
77
220
91
228
104
237
120
245
136
254
65
35
172
44
189
55
205
67
216
80
227
95
237
109
247
125
254
142
263
70
36
175
45
194
57
210
69
221
83
232
98
243
113
254
129
260
147
270
75
37
179
47
201
59
217
72
228
86
239
101
250
117
261
134
268
153
277
80
39
182
49
207
bl
222
74
234
89
244
105
256
121
266
138
274
158
283
Lyme
LA M'M
M
L/9 M'M
M
US M'M
M
US M'M
M
L/9 M'/H
M
L/S M'M
M
l/5 M'M
M
LA M'M
M
US M'M
M
1,79
2.61 9.5
41
3.17 11,4
48
3.71 13.4
49
4.30 13.5
Sl
4.91 17.7
74
3.39 20.1
Sd
1.00
2.J3 8.1
d8
2.82 I0.2
48
3.99 12.2
31
9.98 14.3
32
4.59 16.9
Sd
3.25 18.9
38
9.91 21.5
39
2.90
2.11 7.6
47
2.61 9.4
SO
9.1E 11.1
39
J.79 13.E
43
4.43 16,0
98
5.11 18.5
60
5.072 1.1
62
6.68 24.0
64
3.00
1.83
6.6
47
1.32 8.3
SO
2.8E 10.3
53
3.4E 12.1
97
4,13 14.9
59
4.88 17.E
dl
3.63 20.3
63
6.43 13.1
66
7.32 26.9
69
3.50
1.98
7.1
49
2.30 9.0
32
3.09 11.1
37
3.71 13.4
60
4.48 16.1
62
3.27 19.0
64
d.OB 21.9
67
6.95 1$.0
70
7.90 28.4
73
4.00
2.11
7.6
SO
2.67 9.6
34
3.30 11.9
S9
3.99 11.d
62
4.79 17.2
69
S.dJ 20.9
67
6.30 13.4
71
7.43 26.7
73
8.49 30.4
76
4.30
2.24
8.1
52
2.84 10.2
37
3.30 12.E
62
1.24 15.2
db
S.OB 18.3
68
3.97 21.3
71
6.89 14.8
75
7.88 18.4
78
8.9E 92,3
80
5.00
2.3E
8.5
S3
2.99 10.8
60
3.69 13.9
64
4.1E 16.1
68
S.JS 19.3
70
6.30 22.7
74
7.2E 26.1
78
8.90 2D.9
80
9.43 31.0
84
5.50
1.48
8.9
99
9.13 11.7
61
3.87 13.9
66
4.68 169
70
5.61 20.1
73
6.60 23.8
77
7.62 17.4
81
8.71 31.3
83
9.9 39.7
Bb
6.00
2.59
9.3
Sb
J.27 11.8
63
4.01 14.E
68
4.89 17.E
71
9.8E 21.1
74
6.90 24.8
79
7.9E 28.E
84
9.09 J2.7
85
10.3 37.2
87
Nelson Irrigation Corp. 848 Airport Rd. Wollo Walk, WA 99962.2271 USA Tel: [phone] Fox: 509.525J907 f-mail: [e-mail] Web site:lrMrzrtelmnirriga0an.mm

h 200 SERIES BIG GUN PERFORMANCE
® LA
Part Circle: SR200
Full Circle: F200
*1W
Trajectories: 27', 24', 21'
200R includes body, cap, &seven rings
"
*
200T includes choice of 9 sizes
Connection options include:
• 3.5" FNPT or FBSP
._..
. 4" FNPT
• Standard Metric
• Metric Flange
• UFI Flange
200 RING NOZZLE - 270
TRAJECTORY - 200R - U.S. UNITS
20OR - Specify size when ordering
COMPONENTS:
Body Ring Cap
#6025 #6027-??? #6026
E13
Flow Path
E:v 0 a) �.
1.29" 1.46"
1.56" 1.66'
1.74' 1.83" 1.93"
....� inn cn" ua
AM7-14A An27-166
6027-174 6027-183 6027-193
PSI
GPM
am. ff
GPM
ou. rr
GPM
oiw n
GPM
ow Fr.
GPM
ou. n
GPM
ow rr.
GPM
ou. ".
50
230
325
300
355
350
370
410
390
470
405
535
420
640
435
60
250
340
330
370
385
390
445
410
515
425
585
440
695
455
70
270
355
355
385
415
405
480
425
555
440
630
455
755
475
80
290
370
380
400
445
420
515
440
590
455
675
470
805
490
90
310
380
405
415
475
435
545
455
625
470
715
485
855
505
100
325
390
1 425
425
500
445
1 575
465
1 660
480
755
500
900
520
110
340
400
445
435
525
455
1 605
475
1 695
490
790
510
945
535
120
355
410
465
445
545
465
1 630
485
1 725
500
825
520
985
545
130
370
415
1 485
450
565
470
655
490
1 755
505
860
525
1025
550
200 TAPER BORE NOZZLE - 270 TRAJECTORY - 200T - U.S. UNITS
200T - Specify size when ordering
1.05" 1.1" 1.2" 1.3' 1.4"
o373-ins 9373-110 9323-120 9323-130 9323-140
How Path
1.5" 1.6' 1.75" 1.9"
9323-150 9323-160 9323-175 9323-190
PSI
GPM
ow rr.
GPM
mA Fr
GPM
ow n.
GPM
ou. rr.
GPM
ow n.
GPM
DIA n
GPM
ou rr.
GPM
ou rr
GPM
M rr
60
250
345
285
355
330
375
385
390
445
410
515
430
585
445
695
470
825
495
70
270
360
310
380
355
395
415
410
480
430
555
450
630
465
755
495
890
515
80
290
375
330
395
380
410
445
430
515
450
590
470
675
485
805
515
950
535
90
310
390
350
410
405
425
475
445
.545
465
625
485
715
505
855
535
1005
555
100
325
400
370
420
425
440
500
460
575
480
660
500
755
520
900
550
1060
575
110
1 340
410
1 390
430
445
450
1 525
470
1 605
495
1 695
515
1 790
535
945
565
1110
590
120
355
420
405
440
465
460
1 545
480
630
505
1 725
530
1 825
550
L985
580
1160
605
130
370
425
425
445
485
465
1 565
485
655
515
1 755
540
1 860
560
11025
590
1 1210
620
Dio"r.. a.bm.d an 2rhd.el.ry.eip Gulf pvla.mm�a. d.ahmb«n ehedn.d aM.ibd �aeam3earo ane mar a aawm+r m.rno w.."a,
as npwraien �i� bail amdlan vilamlk a.,alim/an ml.a -
Nelson irrigation Corporation 84 Airport Rd Walla Walla, WA 99M2 USA Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: nelsongnelsomnsom Web Sara: WwW.neisomrtiganon.mm

MAR BIG GUN® SPRINKLERS
PRODUCT COMPARISON
Series
Full -case
Parl-arse
Trajectory
Nozzle Typo
Nozzle Size
Connections
Special Options
75
F75
SR75
12-, 18', 21 °,
Toper/Ring
0.4' - 0.8'
1 1/2' FNFr or FBSP
Val"/Gun Combo
(21. 24°, 271
24. 27. 43•
(10,2mm - 20,3mm)
2' FNPr or FBSP
2 In' FNPT
ANSI/DIN Hangs (bolt -on)
'
Nelson Flange
Metric Barge
100
F100
SRI00
43', 24°, 21', 18'
Ring
0.5' - 1.0'
2' FNPr or FBSP
Valve/Gun Combo
SRNV100
Taper
(12,7mm - 25A mm)
2 1/2' FNPT or FBSP
Anodized
Taper/Rig
Slandord Flange
Anodized &
International Flange
Powder Coated
]so
Fl 50
SRI50
43', 24`, 21 °
Ring
0.7' - 1.3'
3' FNPT or FBSP
Voles/Gun Combo
Taper
(17,8mm - 33,0mm)
3 1/2' FNFT or FBSP
Anodized
Taper/Ring
4' FNIT
Anodized &
Standard Flange
Powder Coaled
International Flange
Stainless Steel
200
P200
SR200
27', 24° 21 •
Ring
1.05' - 1.9'
3 1 /2' FNPr or FBSP
Vol"/Gun Combo
Taper
(26,7mm - 48,3mm)
4' FNPT
Anodized
Toper/Ring
Standard Flange
Anodized
Metric Hangs
& Powder Goofed
UH Flange
WARRANTY AND DISCLAIMER
Nelson Big Gun* Sprinklers are warranted for one year from date of original sale to be free of defective materials and workmanship when
used within the working specifications for which the products were designed and under normal use and service. The manufacturer
assumes no responsibility for installation, removal or unauthorized repair of defective parts. The manufacturer's liability under this
warranty is limited solely to replacement or repair of defective parts and the manufacturer will not be liable for any crop or other
consequential damages resulting from defects or breach of warranty. THIS WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OFALL OTHER WARRANTIES,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES AND OF ALL
OTHER OBLIGATIONS OR LIABILITIES OF MANUFACTURER. No agent, employee or representative of the manufacturer has authority to
waive, alter or add to the provisions of this warranty, nor to make any representations or warranty not contained herein.
Nelson Irrigation Corporation 848 Airport Rd. Walla Walla, WA M62 USA Tel: [phone] Foz: 5093217907 E-mail: [e-mail] Web site, trww iteb atirrigation.rom

USPS - Track & Confirni // U/
UNITEDSTATES l l b — 1 brj2-VJ Fa ✓MS
POSTAL SERVICES Home I Help I Sign In
Track 8: Confirm FAQ_s
Track & Confirm
Search Results
Label/Receipt Number: 7007 0220 0003 1480 6545
Detailed Results:
• Delivered, April 08, 2008, 4:23 pm, FREMONT, NC 27830
• Notice Left, April 08, 2008, 11:52 am, FREMONT,. NC 27830
• Acceptance, April 07, 2008, 4:42 pm, WASHINGTON, NC 27889
`< Back } ( Reruns to USPS com Home > i
Track & Confirm
Enter Label/Receipt Number.
Notification Options
Track &Confirm by email
Get current event information or updates for your item sent to you or others by email. t Go a'
SiteMeg Contact Us Fo-ms. Gov'tervic05 JOb5 Privacy Policy Terms owe N to ional & Premier Accounts
Copyright©1999-2007 USPS. All Rights Reserved. No FEAR Act EEO Date FOIA ,,.,,;:-•,., s'�—.` .,_
Page I of I
hap://trkcnf riI.Smi.uspS.com/PTSlnternetWeb/Intei-LabelDetail.do
4/ 10/2008

Driving Directions from 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC to Eureka, NC Pagel of 2
Distance/Directions to N&W Pig Farms (96-
46)
A: 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889-3532
1: Start out going WEST on W 15TH ST toward PAUL ST. 1.2 mi
CAS1 2: Turn RIGHT onto US-264/W R BILL ROBERSON JR HWY/W 5TH ST. Continue 15.9 mi
264 to follow US-264 E.
weal 3: Turn RIGHT onto US-264 W/GREENVILLE BLVD NE. 9.8 mi
2b4
was, 4: Merge onto US-264 W via EXIT 73A toward WILSON. 20.4 mi
264
5: Take the NC-1 1 1/NC-222 exit, EXIT 53, toward SARATOGA/FOUNTAIN. 0.3 mi
O6:
Turn LEFT onto NC-111/NC-222.
5.4 mi
O7:
Stay STRAIGHT to go onto SARATOGA RD/NC-222. Continue to follow NC-222.
0.6 mi
O8:
Turn RIGHT onto TYSON DR/NC-222.
0.1 mi
O9:
Turn LEFT onto S MAIN ST/NC-1 1 1/NC-222. Continue to follow NC-1 1 1/NC-222.
5.4 mi
O10:
Turn RIGHT onto N CHURCH ST NE.
0.1 mi
O11:
Turn RIGHT onto E JONES ST NE.
0.0 mi
12: End at Eureka, NC
Estimated Time: 1 hour 15 minutes Estimated Distance: 59.29 miles
B: Eureka,
NC
Total Time: 1 hour 15 minutes Total Distance: 59.29 miles
http://www.mapquest.comhnaps/943+Washington+Square+Mall+Washington+NC+27889-... 4/9/2008

Driving Directions from 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC to Eureka, NC Page 2 of 2
-._.0P km _
oti ; 8 thel. a 4Mm:,
P�armele
Pineto01�SpartaQ` ; �a
� '43 L. 1 RearGra¢s
58
/J Wilbankslf,, Maccle3,,reld f17-1 J > <y_.. f/ A, 1
I"soh•--_._^ � 1,., � F.'.. ray i�,r
,Stokes.
i ( crr
1�_ 2 Falkland ia'
0j (
tU 8ruceti°Gr
4 veer, ,n N ,'• t
:reek y�Sarat� ( Pactolus
y �y� _.r..d \r J1 � 111106
'
t r� Y Grc t+vF1'I
y,4 ,tonsF u \..." 4 Y 4' � 4Earrn
'*...,/� ALT�) .�64 !'
01, 2641 � (
t/ Walstonbur w. ALT Simpson
" 7 A Dell Arthur `
64 or` '° '''1 Grimesland '
`r ka i '•, l9J li`{•;,,,..0 `
cOQg
E 1C) , Llzzie GT r """ % y , )Black lack
�ry1q� �3�
< ;ry yy x i, Maur 11 �4 Vr,lbjthard Be
i3 13125 /Qf y i Ayden
rp
own I ro L 12 `••• 1 �. �5,. W._._ r c 4 j
itl ' Shelmerdine
it s 58 Nockertpn
''yl °' ., � � i �,41 It _�•-.''"�' !„`•... .'
Ne:r Hope Jason ti J
p; „olhnar
QIGrifon
`" ay 1 °" 2581 Da:•rson fr� l.•- t �.'
r
,t r 1� a!'�y 3)gyp
eek� tS s,�,..,iLaGrange ti J f4 1 t 117
' /„ tort Barnwell ti'1
ri
Q2008Phil esllnc \ .) i _ LwMap Data &?048N1VTE0 or AND
All rights reserved. Use subject to License/Copyright I Map Legend
Directions and maps are informational only. We make no warranties on the accuracy of their content, road conditions or
route usability or expeditiousness. You assume all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers shall not be liable to you for
any loss or delay resulting from your use of MapQuest. Your use of MapQuest means you agree to our Terms-of,Use.
http://www.mapquest.coni/maps/943+Washington+Square+Mall+W ashington+NC+27889-... 4/9/2008

f I
N&W Pig Farms 96-46
460 230 0 460 Feet

Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_4( Sheet 1 of 2

Photorecord x 4-Farm 96 -, Sheet 2 of 2

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAYNE
IN THE MATTER OF
N & W Pig Farms
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No.
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENTS OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Theodore L. Bush Jr., Chief of the
Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. own and operate N & W Pig Farms, a
permitted/certified swine animal feeding operation in Wayne County.
B. Mr. Nelms and Mr. Whitley were issued a Certificate of Coverage AWS960046 under State
General Permit AWG100000 on October 1, 2004, effective upon issuance, with an expiration
date of September 30, 2009.
C. Condition No. I. 1. of the "Performance Standards" of the State General Permit states in part
that, "Any discharge of waste which reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except
as otherwise provided in this permit. Waste shall not reach surface waters by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyance, direct application, direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise
classified as state waters... Any discharge or application of waste to a ditch that drains to
surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as follows: (a) discharges from the ditches
are controlled by best management practices (BMPs) designed in accordance with NRCS
standards; (b) the BMPs have been submitted to and approved by the Division of Water
Quality (Division); (c) the BMPs were implemented as designed to prevent a discharge to
surface waters or wetlands; (d) the waste was removed immediately from the ditch upon
discovery; and (e) the event was documented and reported in accordance with Part I11.I 3. of
this General Permit. Nothing in this exception shall excuse a discharge to surface waters or
wetlands except as may result because of rainfall from a storm event more severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm."
D. Condition No. II. 1. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Permit states that "The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application
equipment and fields shall be properly operated and maintained at all times."

E. Condition No. II. 4. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Permit states that "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no
case shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the
receiving crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any
runoff during any given application event".
F. Condition No. II. 16. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Permit states in part that the "Operator in Charge (OIC) or a designated back-up OIC of a
Type A Animal Waste Management System shall inspect, or a person under the supervision
of an OIC or designated back-up OIC shall inspect, the land application site as often as
necessary to insure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the CAWMP".
G. Condition No. III. 13. of the "Monitoring and Reporting Requirements" of the State General
Permit requires in partthat the permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
following: a) Any discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands; d) Over applying waste
either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff enters surface waters or
wetlands or; e) Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
1-I. On March 20, 2008, The Division of Soil and Water Conservation conducted an annual
review and found that a discharge occurred into a drainage ditch at the N&W Pig Farms.
Also, visual evidence was found to indicate that the March 18, 2008 irrigation event caused
wastewater to pond in several places on a wheat field. The Division of Soil and Water
Conservation referred the discharge and ponding instances to DWQ. Once notified, DWQ
performed an onsite investigation at the facility to confirm the violations and to sample a
ponded area of the excessive irrigation. During the investigation, a facility records review
supported visual evidence that excess wastewater (no fewer than 88,451 gallons) was pumped
onto 2.47 acres of the wheat crop. Furthermore, wastewater runoff traveled from the wheat
field onto two lower fields, northwest of the wheat field. Finally, the irrigation supply line
was found lying submerged in wastewater within the aforementioned drainage ditch; the
supply line was loosely connected at several fittings. No explanation was given by Mr.
Nelms during the March 20, 2008 DWQ investigation as to ]low the hydraulic overloading
(35,810 gallons/acre) or discharge into the ditch occurred.
L N&W Pig Farms have had no previous violations in their compliance history.
J. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $663.34.
Based upon the above Findings of Facts, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. are each a "person" within the meaning of
G. S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G. S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The above -cited discharge to a ditch violated Condition No. I. 1. of the State General Permit.
D. The above -cited failure to properly operate and maintain the land application equipment and
fields violated Condition No. II, 1. of the State General Permit.
2

E. The above -cited failures to apply waste at land application rates in accordance with the
CAWMP and to avoid excessive ponding or runoff violated Condition No. 11. 4. of the State
General Permit.
F. The above -cited failure of the Operator In Charge (or their surrogate) to inspect the land
application site such that animal waste was applied in accordance with the CAWMP violated
Condition No. IL 16. of the State General Permit.
G. The above -cited failure to notify DWQ of a discharge violated Conditions No. III. 13 a, d,
and e of the State General Permit.
1-1. Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr. may be assessed civil penalties in this
matter pursuant to G. S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more
that twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person
who is required but fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a
permit required by G. S. 143-215.1.
I. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Mr. Julian Nelms and
Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., pursuant to G. S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G. S. 14313-282.1(b)(8).
J. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter
Based upon the above Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
DECISION:
Accordingly, Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., owners of N & W Pig Farms, are
hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
For violating Condition No. 1. 1. of the State General Permit for
discharging hog waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters without the
proper use of Best Management Practices and DWQ notification.
$ For violating Condition No. II. 4. of the State General Permit by failing
to apply waste at a rate in accordance with the CAWMP. The facility did
not land apply such that excessive ponding or runoff was avoided.
$ For violating Condition No. 11. 16. of the State General Permit by the
Operator In Charge (or their surrogate) failing to inspect the land
application site such that animal waste was applied per the CAWMP.
$ For violating Conditions No. III. 13. a., d., and e. of the State General
Permit by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following
first knowledge of: a) the occurrence of a discharge to ditches, surface
waters, or wetlands; d) the occurrence of waste over -application, and e)
the failure of the land application system that led to the discharge.
$ 663.34 Enforcement costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
91

As required by G. S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have considered
the factors listed in G. S. 14313-282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money save by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Theodore L. Bush, Jr. Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
M

Memorandum
To: Keith Larick, Animal Feeding Operations Pennitting and Compliance Unit Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation Pennitting Compliance Unit
Through: David May, Water Quality Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
From: Mark E. Newsome, Environmental Engineer I
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Enforcement Package
N & W Pig Farms
Permit No. AWS960046
Wayne County
jo
Date: April/ 2008
Introduction:
N & W Pig Farms is owned and operated by Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr..'['his facility,
located on Highway I I I South in Wayne County, began operation in 1994. The facility has the capacity to
raise 7,000 wean to feeder swine and the overall design for this facility is 210,000 steady state live weight.
Report:
On March 20, 2008 at 11:30 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received an
initial report of wastewater discharge to a drainage ditch from Mr. Martin McLawhorn, Environmental
Specialist of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. On March 20, 2008 Eric Newsome of the
DWQ investigated and determined that hydraulic overload occurred on a 2.47-acre pull of a wheat field
due to excessive spray irrigation. The extent of the overload caused wastewater to run onto two lower
terraces northwest of the wheat field. According to facility records, the north lagoon (# I) was pumped
down by 6" (approximately of 88,451 gallons) on March 18, 2008. According to Mr. Nelms, the north
lagoon solely supplied wastewater for the above -described event. Visual evidence of ponding was
consistent with the fact that applying 88,451 gallons would have exceeded the standard loading rate
suggested by the Waste Utilization Plan for this field (35,810 gallons/acre vs. 27,154 gallons/acre). In
addition, the March 20, 2008 DWQ investigation revealed that loose fittings in the irrigation supply line
discharged wastewater from this line into a farm drainage ditch. Although the waste was recovered
without it leaving the facility, it was estimated that 1,200 gallons of water were seen standing in the ditch
prior to clean up efforts beginning. No telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional
Office within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the March 18, 2008 discharge; furthermore,
no explanation was given by Mr. Nelms on March 20, 2008 as to how the overload and discharge
occurred.
Please find a table with the sample results below.
The Finding and Decisions and Assessment Factors are attached for review.
5

Conclusion:
Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr., owners and operators of N & W Pig Fauns, are in
violation of their permit and North Carolina General Statue 143-215.1(a) for discharging hog waste to surface
waters and/or a ditch; failing to properly operate and maintain land application equipment and fields; failing to
apply wastewater such that pending and runoff were avoided, and; failing to notify DWQ of the non
compliance event.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the appropriate civil penalties be assessed against this subject facility, N & W Pig
Farms, located in Wayne County, owned and operated by Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr.
The Washington Regional Office recommends that penalties be assessed for the four violations described
in the Conclusion.
2

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL OPI?RATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
ENFORCEMENT # NOV-2008-PC-0225
Section I: General Information
l . Facility Name: N & W Pi Farms
arms
2. Facility or Permit No.: AWS960046
3. Parties named in assessment: Mr. Julian Nelms and Mr. Harvey L. Whitley, Jr.
4. (Mailing) Address: 601 East Main Sheet, Fremont, NC 27830
5. Telephone No.: 919-242-6327
6. Location of Facility: At the junction of Hwy 222 and Hwy I 11
7. Type of Operation: 7,000 Wean to Feeder
8. Registered Agent (if applicable): N/A
9. Registered Agent Address (if applicable): N/A
10. Date(s) of noted violations: March 20, 2008
11. Receiving Stream and Classification (if applicable): N/A
12. Regional Office: Washington Regional Office
13. Report Prepared By: M. Eric Newsome
Section 11: Findings
Case Narrative: On March 20 2008 at 11.30 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) received an initial report of wastewater discharge to a drainage ditch from Mr. Martin
McLawhornEnvironmental Specialist of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. On March
20 2008 Eric Newsome of the DWQ investigated and determined that hydraulic overload occurred on
a 2 47-acre pull of a wheat field due to excessive spray irrigation. The extent of the overload caused
wastewater to run onto two lower terraces northwest of the wheat field. According to facility records,
the north lagoon (#1) was pumped down by 6" (approximately of 88,451 gallons) on March 18 2008
According to Mr. Nelms the north lagoon solely supplied wastewater for the above -described event.
Visual evidence of ponding was consistent with the fact that applying 88,451 gallons would have
exceeded the standard loading rate suggested by the Waste Utilization Plan for this field (35,810
gallons/acre vs 27,154 gallons/acre) In addition the March 20, 2008 DWQ investigation revealed
that loose fittings in the irrigation supply line discharged wastewater from this line into a farm
drainage ditch Although the waste was recovered without it leaving the facility, it was estimated that
1,200 gallons of water were seen standing in the ditch prior to clean up efforts beginning. No
telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional Office within twenty-four (24) hours of
becoming aware of the March 18, 2008 discharge; furthermore, no explanation was given by Mr.
Nelms on March 20, 2008 as to how the overload and discharge occurred.
Farm and/or company compliance History: A database and file review indicates that no violations or
penalties have been assessed against this farm in the past.
3. Amount of Waste discharged (if applicable). 1,200 gallons into a farm drainage ditch.
Sample Results (if applicable) with locations of samples taken noted in relation to discharge point:
One sample was taken of the ponded water on the eastern edge of the wheat field for nitrogen
phosphorus analyses Lab results showed significant levels of ammonia (390 mg/L) total kjeldahl
nitrogen (420 mg/L), and phosphorus (50 mg/L) present.

Sample
Sampling Date
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus,
Location
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
Nitrites
P (mg/L)
(mg/L)
(NO3, NOZ)
m /L
East end of
3/20/2008
390
420
ND
50
wheat field
(F-1)
ND -Not Detected
5. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) recalcitrance: Mr. Nelms and
Mr. Whitley have been cooperative; efforts to clean up the discharged and ponded wastewater began
during the March 20, 2008 investigation and were completed by March 24, 2008.
6. Damage? Y/N If yes, include report from WRC: No
Mitigating Circumstances: None. Nowhere in the April 17, 2008 facility response to DWO do the
resoondents deny that wastewater ponded in the subject wheat field; nor did the facility deny that the
aluminum supply line discharged into the drainage ditch. In response to the facility's April 17, 2008
explanation of events the WaRO questions the following theories: ])For adjacent pulls on the same
tract of the same Aycock soil type why weren't identical ruts seen in the investigation photo taken?
What would have been the operator's reasoning for only irrigating one gull twice within a 72 hour
erg
2) Although the facility response states that a trace amount of rainfall contributed to runoff following
the nighttime application on 3/18 the DWQ investigation on 3/20/08 saw wastewater standing
predominantly in the southeastern corner of the wheat tract, within the wetted diameter of theme
Why wasn't wastewater seen in equal amounts in all directions surrounding the gun on an Aycock
soil type listed in the Waste Utilization Plan as having a 0-PY0 slope? The WaRO contends that 2/10
of an inch of rain had a minimal impact on the result.
3) Alone the lines of item 2 ponded wastewater was seen along a terrace, approximately 340 feet
west of what would be the north end of pull #4. Using a gun ring size of 0.96" and flowrate of
225gpm this distance could have been covered by improper operation.
S. Recommendations made to the owner/operator: Mr. Nelms was advised on March 20, 2008 to do the
following: 1) nump the wastewater from the drainage ditch into a tank and transfer the contents buck
into the north lagoon (lagoon #1)• 2) Collect the ponded areas and pump this wastewater back into the
north lagoon (lagoon #1) and• 3) Seal the "washout" drain on the northern edge of the wheat field
with compacted soil or clay to prevent further runoff to the lower terraced fields.
9. Costs to the State for the enforcement procedures (Show Breakdown):
Total Staff Time (14 hours) $ 392.75
Central Office $ 100.00
Travel Cost (118.6 miles x 2 @ 0.445) $ 105.54
Laboratory Cost $ 65.05
TOTAL $ 663.34
10. Recommendations for further DWQ Action: Continue to focus on facility records and field
conditions during annual compliance inspections.
11. Other Comments: N/A
Section III: Assessment Factors required to be considered by G.S. 14313-282.1(b):

The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation: Animal waste has the potential to deplete dissolved oxygen
the affected water body to a point which is harmful to aquatic life. Waste water also contains
nutrients which have the potential to spawn algal growth to the point which is harmful to aquatic life.
Surface waters --the drainage ditch --did receive wastewater.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: The violations occurred March 18 through March 20, 2008.
3. The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality: The two northwest (terraced) fields served as a
vegetative filter, preventing wheat field runoff from entering the nearby Nahunta Swamp. The farm
drainage ditch was sloped such that wastewater was contained onsite until water was removed. One
waste sample was collected in an eastern area of the wheat field where ponding was observed. The
results are illustrated in the following table:
Sample
Sampling
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus,
Location
Date
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
Nitrites
P (mg/L)
(mg/L)
(NO,, NOD
m /L
East end of
3/20/2008
390
420
ND
50
wheat field
(F-1)
ND -Not Detected
4. The cost of rectifying the damage: The farm managers could have spent far fewer hours being
preventative (monitoringthe he spray operations) than the time they spent cleaning up the area--48 to 72
hours Ruts created by the excessive irrigation and farm equipment have damaged part of the wheat
crop.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance: Money is saved when better management skills are
implemented to improve overall management of the facility, environmentally and productively.
Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional: Mr. Nelms and Mr. Whitley both have
an active Type A operator's license. What is even more interesting is that the facility response fails
to explicitly state who "the OIC" was onsite during the two alleged irrigation events on 3/15/08
and 3/18/08. Although it cannot be proven whether either of them was onsite during the event or
events each is responsible for the consequence of the action. Therefore, it is the conclusion of the
WaRO that either: a) the decision to let the active violation occur, b) the decision to leave someone
in charge who was incapable of properly operating the system, or c) the decision to leave the spray
Lin running unattended was willful
The prior record of the violator(s) in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority: N & W Pit; Farms has not been
cited for any permit violations prior to this event.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Total Staff Time (14 hours) $ 392.75
Central Office $ 100.00
Travel Cost (118.6 miles x 2 @ 0.445) $ 105.54
Laboratory Cost $ 65.05
TOTAL $ 663.34

v W-
Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_46 Sheet 1 of 2

a a,
Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_46 Sheet 2 of 2

Off. %NA r,^X?
© ' r [LUr
Incident Report
Report Number: 200801027
Incident Type: Complaint
Category: Animal
Incident Started: 03/20/2008
County: Wayne
City:
Farm #:
Responsible Party:
Owner:
Permit:
Facility: N & W Pig Farms
First Name: Julian
Middle Name: B
Last Name: Nelms
Address 601 E Main St
City/State/Zip: Fremont NC 27830
Phone:
Material Category: Estimated City: UOM
On -Site Contact:
First/Mid/Last Name: Julian
Company Name: N&W Pig Farms
Phone:
Pager/Mobile Phone:
Nelms
/ [phone]
Reported By:
First/Mid/Last Name: Martin McLawhorn
Company Name:
Address: 943 Washington Sq Mall
City/State/Zip: Washington NC 27889
Phone: [phone]
Pager/Mobile Phone: /
Chemical Name Reportable Oty. lbs. Reportable Qty. kgs.
DD:MM:SS Decimal Position Method: Conversion from state coordinate plane
Latitude: +35031'52" 35.531000 Position Accuracy: Nearest 10 Seconds
Longitude:--77054'14"-77.904000 Position Datum: NAD83
Location of Incident: Wheat field at N&W Fanns
Address: Fann Intersection Of Hwy I I I And Hwy 222
City/State/Zip Fremont NC 27830
Report Created 03/31/08 07:34 PM
Page I

M
Cause/Observation:
Operator failure to use irrigation reel and gun system such that
ponding and hydraulic overload was avoided.
Action Taken:
Sample taken from the ponded wheat field for the following lab
analyses: nitrogen and phosphorus. A Notice of
Violation/Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement is being
prepared from the DWO-WaRO.
Incident Questions:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? No
Surface Water Name?
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? No
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type.
Containment? Yes
Cleanup Complete? Yes
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : No
Event Type
Incident closed
Requested Additional Information
Report Entered
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact
Event Date
Directions:
From WaRO take Hwy 264 West to Hwy 117 South at Fremont, take
Hwy 222 East for 5 miles and turn right (south) onto Hwy 111. Dirt farm
path is the first right-hand turn.
Comments:
Visual evidence from 3/20/08 visit(photos taken) supports notion that
excess irrigation left the field and ran down into lower northwest
fields --about 100 feet away. Also the spray gun was not stopped until
approximately 1,200 gallons washed into the farm drainage ditch.
According to freeboard records the servicing lagoon was lowered 3/18/08,
this is approximately 88,451 gallons onto 2.5 acre pull (35,810
gallons/acre). No wastewater was found to have entered the Nahunta
Swamp wetlands.
2008-03-31 08:29:32
2008-03-20 01:54:00
Report Created 03/31/08 07:34 PM
Conveyance:
Estimated Number of fish? 0
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Groundwater Impacted
Due Date
Unknown
Comment
Page 2
4

Incident Start
Report Received
Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone
DWQ Information:
Report Taken By:
David L May
2008-03-20 11:30:00
2008-03-20 11:30:00
First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
Report Entered By: Regional Contact:
Eric Newsome Eric Newsome
Phone:
Date/Time: 2008-03-20 11:30:00 AM 2008-03-31 08:29:32 PM 2008-03-20 01:54:00 PM
Referred Via: 'Phone
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional information is needed?
Report Created 03/31/08 07:34 PM Page 3

IWIA
T��
/VW cq�,j
Nit5 ckih,44,—
ct'lll�

T,
l V ' .
�19 �38
A d&4
5.
�wi
r3ooewd $

A
MRO,
lof2
Field Notes from 3/20/2008 of the
N&W Farm Non -Compliance Event
I (Eric Newsome) arrived onsite at N&W Farm (Goldsboro Hog Farm —Integrator) at
1:54 pm on March 20, 2008. The purpose of this visit was to investigate allegations of
hydraulic overload and ponding of wastewater surrounding an irrigation event. Driving
along the dirt path toward Farms 1 &2, there was an irrigation reel fifty-two (52) feet
ahead that was still attached to the hydrant. There was also an irrigation gun (still
attached to said reel) sitting in the northeast wheat field (NEF) of the farm. There was
one drainage ditch on either side of the farm path: the right-hand ditch ran along the
southern edge of the NET, approximately five (5) feet from the reel; the left-hand ditch
ran parallel to the right-hand ditch, along the opposite southeast wheat field (SEF). It
could clearly be seen that the right-hand ditch (NEF) had a murky, dark colored
appearance compared to the left-hand ditch; an odor of swine waste was also noticeable.
The right hand ditch also held the metal supply line from the lagoon to the reel; this
supply line was loose in several places when shaken by foot.
Walking out into the NET along the irrigation pull, there were two sets of ruts,
presumably dug out from the weight of the hauling tractor on the wet soil. There was
ponded wastewater in both sets of ruts: The first pair was south of the gun, with each rut
1 foot wide, three inches deep, and thirty feet long (112 gallons). The second pair was
north of the gun, with each rut 1 foot wide, two inches deep, and forty-eight feet long
(120 gallons).
At 2:20 pm, I met with owner Mr. Julian Nelms and two other gentlemen (Bob, and
`Bob's Dad"). The three men began preparations to pump the right hand ditch into a
plastic tote, which would then be emptied back into the original source lagoon. During
this date, Mr. Nelms stated that the last irrigation event occurred 3/18/2008.
At approximately 3:00 pm Mr. Will Hart of the APS arrived to assist with this
investigation. First, Mr. Hart and Mr. Newsome walked the length of the right hand ditch
to determine if any irrigation water might have escaped its boundaries. it was observed
that after about 600 feet southwest of the gun, the ditch has a swale that would prevent
water from running any further southwest. It was concluded that although this water
needs to be pumped out, it was contained and could not run on its own across any other
surfaces. A visual estimate of the water volume in this right hand ditch was 1,216
gallons.
Second, Mr. Hart and Mr. Newsome walked to the northwest side of the NEF. Visual
confirmation was made that wastewater did flow from the wheat field through a
"washout" drain. However, the two contour terraces and stubble vegetation below the
wheat field prevented flow of wastewater into the northwest tributary of the Nahunta
Swamp. A visual estimate of the total volume of ponded wastewater on the two lower
ridges was 325 gallons.

r
Field Notes from 3_20_08 N&W Farm Complaint
2 of
Finally, while Mr. Hart took an analysis sample of ponded water from the NEF, Mr.
Newsome reviewed the lagoon freeboard records. Lagoon #1 was lowered 6 inches
(11,825 cu ft or 88,451 gallons) while Lagoon #2 was lowered 12 inches (23,650 cu ft or
176,902 gallons). A 3/24/08 follow-up visit to visually check the clean up efforts yielded
positive results. There was no standing water seen: 1) in the right-hand ditch ran along
the southern edge of the NEF; 2) in the rutted areas where the irrigation gun stood in the
NEF or; 3) the two ponded areas on the contour terraces.
C:\Documents and Settings\enewsome\My Documents\2008 Compaint Invs\20 Mar 08
N&W Farm2\Field Notes from 3_20_08 N&W Farm Complaint.doc

b �ih I�rS'� gyp- pt
-Y o �,jI I -,))e2

35 31 5-, -77 54 28

• �� /t/a>'�cP oY- %Y(°t:pj�lq rne,,�la;,tr'
I N Il-r;'l� Pettnit Nu;
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCI
SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT
QL�-1-
-7Y-a,.(-E��rn.SM
K 14 f- S+r.
This General Permit is issued pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes 143-215 et seq., may apply to any
swine facility in the State of North Carolina, and shall be effective from October 1, 2004 until September 30,
2009.
All activities authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this General Permit.
Holders of Certificates of Coverage (COC) under this General Permit shall comply with the following specified
conditions and limitations.
1. PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS
0
Any discharge of waste that reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as otherwise
provided in this General Permit and associated statutory and regulatory provisions. Waste shall
not reach surface waters or wetlands by runoff, drift, manmade conveyance, direct application,
UVO
I
ytb �Q
direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise classified as state waters.
,fie J
The
waste collection, treatment, storage and application system operated under this General
Permit shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non-discbarge system to prevent the
discharge of pollutants to surface waters or wetlands. , Application of waste to terraces and
grassed waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to surface
waters or wetlands.
Facilities must be designed, constructed and operated to contain all waste plus the runoff from a
25-year, 24-hour rainfall event for the location of the facility. A facility that has a discharge'of
waste that results because of a storm event moresevere than the 25-year, 24-hour storm will not
be considered to be in violation of this General Permit if the facility is in compliance with its
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and this General Permit.
Any discharge or application of waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters or wetlands is
prohibited except as follows: (a) discharges from the ditches are controlled by best management
practices (BMPs) designed in accordance with NRCS standards; (b) the BMPs have been
submitted to and approved by the Division of Water Quality (Division); (c) the BMPs were
implemented as designed to prevent a discharge to surface waters or wetlands; (d) the waste was
removed immediately from the ditch upon discovery; and (e) the event was documented and
reported in accordance with Part M.13. of this General Permit. Nothing in this exception shall
excuse a discharge to surface waters or wetlands except as may result because of rainfall from a
storm event more severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm.
2.
No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established for the
receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 2B, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the North Carolina Administrative Code.
June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
3. The facility's COC and its CAWMP are hereby incorporated by reference into this General
Permit. The CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and
standards (federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design and certification of the
facility.
The Pernvttee must assess, on an ongoing basis, the effectiveness of the implementation of the
CAWMP. The Permittee must make "major changes," "revisions," or "amendments" to the
CAWMP, as defined in Section VII, "Definitions," of this Permit, in order to address any
changes needed to maintain compliance with the facility's COC and this General Permit. "Major
changes," "revisions," and "amendments" to the CAWMP must be documented, dated, and
included as part of the CAWMP. "Major changes " and "revisions" to the CAWMP shall be
submitted to the appropriate Division Regional Office within thirty (30) calendar days of the
"major change" or "revision." "Amendments" are not required to be submitted to the Division
Regional Office unless specifically requested by the Division. If field, riser or pull numbers are
changed, an explanation shall also be submitted and include a description of how the new
numbers relate to the old numbers. Any violation of the COC or the CAWMP shall be considered
a violation of this General Permit and subject to enforcement actions. A violation of this General
Permit may result in the Permittee having to take immediate or long-term corrective action(s) as
required by the Division. These actions may include but are not limited to: modifying the
CAWMP; ceasing land application of waste; removing animals from the facility; or the COC
being reopened and modified, revoked and reissued, and/or terminated.
4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average design capacity from that
authorized by the COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and the COC prior to
modification of the facility.
5. During the period of this General Permit, the Division of Water Quality may notify the
permittee to conduct an evaluation of the facility and its CAWMP to determine the facility's
ability to comply with the NRCS nutrient management standard as it relates to phosphorous. The
Division will make its decision as whether to notify permittees based on experience gained
through the NPDES permit implementation. This evaluation will not be required until such time
as the permittee is notified to conduct the evaluation by the Division of Water Quality. The
evaluation must be documented on forms supplied by or approved by the Division and must be
submitted to the Division. This evaluation must be completed by existing facilities within
twelve (12) months of receiving notification from the Division.
No COC will be issued to any new or expanding facility to operate under this General Permit
until the applicant has completed and submitted a phosphorous loss assessment to determine if
the new or expanding facility can comply with the NRCS phosphorous standards. This
assessment shall not be a basis for denial of a COC to operate under this permit unless that
demonstration of compliance is a Statutory requirement for COC issuance.
6. If prior approval is received from the Director of the Division of Water Quality (Director),
facilities which have been issued a COC to operate under this General Permit may add treatment
units for the purpose of removing pollutants before the waste is discharged into the
lagoons/storage ponds. Prior to any approval, the Permittee must demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the Director that the new treatment unit will not interfere with the operation of the existing
treatment system and that a process is in place to properly manage and track the pollutants
removed.
2 June 4, 2004

Pertnit Number AWG100(100
7. If prior approval is received from the Director, facilities which have been issued a COC to
operate under this General Permit may add innovative treatment processes to the systems on a
pilot basis in order to determine if the innovative treatment process will improve how the waste
is treated and/or managed. Prior to any approval, the Pertnittee must demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Director that the innovative treatment process will not interfere with the
operation of the existing treatment system and that a process is in place to properly manage and
track the pollutants removed.
8. For all new and expanding operations, no collection, treatment or storage facilities may be
constructed in a 100-year flood plain.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied within 100 feet of any well with the exception of monitoring
wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be established on a case by case basis by
the Division.
10. Existing swine dry lots may remain in wetlands as long as the wetlands uses are not removed or
degraded as a result of the swine. The swine however may not be confined within 100 feet of an
adjacent surface water or a seasonally -flooded area. The swine also must not cause a loss of
more than 10% of the existing tree canopy. Where trees do not exist, the area must be managed
to include crop rotation.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and fields
v shall be properly operated and maintained at all times.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be applied upon
areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving crop. In
no case shall land application rates result i cessive ponding or any runoff during any given
application event.
5. Animal waste shall not be directly applied onto crops for direct human consumption that do not
undergo further processing (e.g., strawberries, melons, lettuce, cabbage, apples, etc.) at any time
during the growing season, or in the case of fruit bearing trees, following breaking dormancy.
Application of animal wastes shall not occur within thirty (30) days of the harvesting of fiber and
food crops for direct human consumption that undergoes further processing.
6. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This requirement
does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively growing.
7. Pesticides, toxic chemicals and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal waste
collection, treatment, storage or application systems.
3 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
8. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be discharged
into the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and application system. Washdown of stock
trailers owned by and used to transport animals to and from the facility only, will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional volume.
Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA approved according to their label, will not
harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards listed in 15A NCAC 2L
may be utilized in facilities covered by this General Permit. Instruction labels are to be followed
when using cleaning agents and soaps.
9. Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the facility shall
be done in accordance with the facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's Statutes and regulations.
Disposal of dead animals whose numbers exceed normal mortality rates associated with the
facility shall also be done in accordance with the facility's CAWMP and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division's Statutes and regulations provided that: 1) burial of such animals shall be done in
consultation with the State Veterinarian of the NCDA&CS Veterinary Division's Statutes and in
compliance with NCDA&CS regulations; 2) all such burial sites must be mapped, and the dates
and numbers of the animals buried by type must be recorded; and 3) the map is submitted to the
appropriate Regional Office Groundwater Section within 15 calendar days of burial.
In the event of a state of emergency declared by the Governor, disposal of dead animals shall be
done in accordance with requirements and guidelines dictated by the State Veterinarian
according G.S. §106-339.4. The Division may require groundwater monitoring when there is
massive burial of animals. All burial sites of such animals must be mapped, and the dates and
numbers of the animals buried by type must be recorded.
10. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste lagoons/storage ponds
to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the structures.
11. A protective vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen lagoon/storage
pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping elevation), berms, pipe
runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation
shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond embankments. All trees shall be
removed in accordance with good engineering practices. Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be
accessible, and, vegetation shall be kept mowed.
12. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed in
accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary, provisions
must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
13. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to, tires,
bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
14. The facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate animal waste
application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement, for the use of the
necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator capable of providing adequate
waste application.
15. The Permittee shall designate a certified animal waste management system operator with a valid
certification to be in charge of the animal waste management system. The waste management
system shall be operated by the OIC or a person under the OIC's supervision.
4 June 4, 2004

Permit Number ANVG100000
16. In accordancewith 15A NCAC: 8r .0203(b)(2), the Operator i Charge (OIC _ r a designated
back-up OIC of -a Type A Animal Waste Management ystem hall inspect, or a person un er
the supervision of an OIC or designated back-up OIC shall ins ect, the land application site as
often as necessary to insure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the
CAWMP. In no case shall the time between inspections be more than 120 minutes during the
application of waste. A record of each inspection shall be recorded on forms supplied by, or
approved by, the Division and shall include the date, time, sprayfield number and name of the
operator for each inspection.
The Permittee may assert as an affirmative defense in any enforcement action alleging
noncompliance with the requirements imposed in this condition that such noncompliance was
due to circumstances beyond the Permittee's control. A notation shall be made on the form
indicating the inspection affected by such circumstance and an explanation setting forth the
circumstances claimed to have been beyond the Permittee's control shall be submitted with the
form.
17. The Director may require any permittee to install, operate and maintain devices on all irrigation
pumps/equipment designed to automatically stop irrigation activities during precipitation. ]'his
decision will be based on the facility's compliance history for irrigation events.
18. The Director may require any permittee to install and operate flow meters with flow totalizers
based on the facility's violations and/or incomplete or incorrect record keeping events.
19. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause the mist
to reach surface waters or wetlands.
20. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas and land application areas.
21. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen or snow covered
at the time of land application.
22. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events.The Permittee shall consider
pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste and shall document the
weather conditions at the time of land application on forms supplied by or approved by the
Division.
23. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3 Soil Test
Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater than 3,000 (213
pounds per acre).
24. All waste application equipment must be tested and calibrated once in the first two years after
issuance of the COC and then at least once every two years thereafter. The results must be
documented on forms provided by, or approved by, the Division.
25. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation from a
technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece of equipment is
being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications, no technical specialist
approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the gallons per minute (gpm) capacity
is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the replacement involves disturbing the
lagoon/storage pond embankment.
26. Crops for which animal waste is land applied must be removed from the land application site and
properly managed and utilized unless other management practices are approved in the CAWA4P.
5 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
An inspection of the waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and runoff control
measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure proper operation but at
least monthly and after all storm events of greater than one (1) inch in 24 hours. For example,
lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage,
damage by animals or discharge.
2. Monitoring and Recording Freeboard Levels
a. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings.
The waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by or approved by the Division.
The Director may require more frequent monitoring and recording on lagoon levels based
on the facility's compliance history for freeboard violations.
b. The freeboard levels of lagoons serving any facility which experiences freeboard
violations in any two consecutive years following the issuance of this General Permit, or
as determined necessary by the Director, shall be monitored and recorded as follows:
In addition to the facility's existing lagoon waste -level gauges, automated lagoon/storage
pond waste -level monitors and recorders (monitored and recorded at least hourly) must be
installed on all treatment and storage lagoons covered by a COC issued under this General
Permit to measure and record lagoon freeboard. This equipment must be properly
maintained and calibrated in a manner consistent with manufacturer's operation and
maintenance recommend This automated equipment must be in place no later than
ninety (90) days following notification from the Director. The Director may determine
that installation of automated waste level monitors is not required if the Permittee can
demonstrate that preventative measures were taken to avoid the violations and that the
violations resulted from conditions beyond the Permittee's control.
If an automated level monitor(s) becomes inoperable, the Permittee shall:
i. report the problem by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as soon
as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
problem; and,
ii. make any needed repairs to the equipment as quickly as possible, and take and
record daily lagoon levels at the same time every day until such time as the
automated equipment is placed back into operation.
C. The Director may require new or modified waste -level gauges at any facility if he
determines that the existing gauges are not adequate to accurately indicate actual lagoon
levels, or the various lagoon levels required to be maintained by this General Permit or the
facility's CAWMP.
3. Monitoring and Recording Precipitation Events
a. Precipitation events at facilities issued a COC to operate under this General Permit shall be
monitored and recorded as follows:
6 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWGI00000
A rain gauge must be installed at a site that is representative of the weather conditions at
the farm's land application site(s) to measure all precipitation events. The precipitation
type and amount must be recorded daily for all precipitation events and maintained on site
for Department review. Daily records do not need to be maintained for those days without
precipitation events.
b. The Director may require that an automated rain gauge and recorder must be installed on
site to measure and record all precipitation events. This equipment must be properly
maintained and calibrated in a manner consistent with manufacturer's operation and
maintenance recommendations. This automated equipment must be in place no later than
ninety (90) days following receipt of notice from the Director.
If an automated rain gauge(s) becomes inoperable, the Permittee shall:
report the problem by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as soon
as possible, but in no case more than twenty four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the problem; and,
ii. make any needed repairs to the equipment as quickly as possible, and take and
record all rainfall events until such time as the automated equipment is placed back
into operation.
4. A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and zinc,
shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste in accordance with NCGS
143-215.10C(e)(6). As of the effective date of this General Permit, the Statute requires that the
analysis be conducted at least annually.
5. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with recommended laboratory
sampling procedures as close to the time of application as practical and at least within sixty (60)
days (before or after) of the date of application. Every reasonable effort shall be made to have
the waste analyzed prior to the date of application and as close to the time of waste application as
possible. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
6. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic loading
rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also record removal of
solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on -site or record the off -site location(s).
These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
7. A record shall be created and maintained of all transfers of waste between lagoons/storage ponds
on the same site not typically operated in series. Such record shall include at least the identity of
the lagoon from which the waste was transferred, the identity of the lagoon receiving the waste,
the date and time of transfer and the total volume of waste transferred.
8. The Permittee must maintain monthly stocking records for the facility and make the records
available to Department of Environment and Natural Resources (Department).
9. If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the waste collection, treatment, storage and
application systems (including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the
Pertittee is required to make notification in accordance with Condition II1. 13. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
7 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of the
volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters or
wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of the
volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates and
times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the discharge is
expected to continue.
C. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused by a
precipitation event, detailed information from the on -site rain gauge concerning the inches
and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken to
prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition 1I1. 5. above.
10. A copy of this General Permit, the facility's COC, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP and copies of all records required by this General Permit and the
facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three (3) years. Records include but are not limited to: soil and waste analyses, rain
gauge readings, freeboard levels, irrigation and land application event(s), past inspection reports
and operational reviews, animal stocking records, records of additional nutrient sources applied
(including but not limited to sludges, unused feedstuff leachate, milk waste, septage and
commercial fertilizer), cropping information, waste application equipment testing and
calibration, and records of removal of solids to off -site location(s). These records shall be
maintained on forms provided or approved by the Division and shall be readily available at the
facility (stored at places such as the farm residence, office, outbuildings, etc.) where animal
waste management activities are being conducted for the life of this General Permit, unless
otherwise specified in this General Permit.
11. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the Permittee shall
provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and reports related to the
operation of the animal waste management system. Once received by the Division, all such
information and reports become public information, unless they constitute confidential
information under NC G.S. 132-1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as
specified in Chapter 132 of the General Statutes.
12. The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not limited to
groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond levels and plant
tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of such waste upon the
surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring, including its scope, frequency,
duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems, shall meet all applicable Division
requirements.
13. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as soon as
possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following events:
�y discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
b. Any discharge that poses a serious threat to the environment or human safety or health.
C. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to that
required in Condition V. 3. of this General Permit.
d. Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff
enters surface waters or wetlands.
e. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
f. Any failure of the waste treatment and disposal system that renders the facility incapable
of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
g. A spill or discharge from a vehicle transporting waste or sludge to the land application
field which results in a discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
h. A spill or discharge from a vehicle transporting waste or sludge to the land application
field which results in a discharge that poses a serious threat to surface waters or wetlands.
i. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat to the
environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours, contact
must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also File a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office within
five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report shall outline
the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to ensure that the problem
does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not be waived by the Division
Regional Office.
14. The Director may require any permittee to file an annual certification report based on the
compliance history of the facility. If required, the report must be filed on forms provided by the
Division.
15. The Director may require facilities to submit additional reports and/or certifications based oil the
facility's compliance history.
16. In the event of a discharge of 1,000 gallons or more of waste to surface waters or wetlands, the
Permittee must issue a press release to all print and electronic news media that provide general
coverage in the county in which the discharge occurred setting out the details of the discharge.
The press release must be issued within forty-eight (48) hours after it is determined that the
dischargehas reached the surface waters or wetlands. A copy of the press release and a list of
the news media to which it was distributed must be kept for at least one (1) year after the
discharge and must be distributed to any person upon request.
9 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
17. In the event of a discharge of 15,000 gallons or more of animal waste to surface waters or
wetlands, a public notice is required in addition to the press release described in Condition III 13.
The public notice must be placed in a newspaper having general circulation in the county in
which the discharge occurred and the county immediately downstream within ten (10) days of
the discharge. The minimum content of the notice is the name of the facility, location of the
discharge, estimated volume of waste entering state waters, time and date discharge occurred,
duration of the discharge, identification water body that was discharged into including creek and
river basin if applicable, actions taken to prevent further discharge, and a facility contact person
and phone number.
18. If a discharge of 1,000,000 gallons of wastewater or more reaches surface waters or wetlands, the
appropriate Division Regional Office must be contacted to determine in what additional counties.
if any, a public notice must be published. A copy of all public notices and proof of publication
must be sent to the Division within thirty (30) days of the discharge.
19. All facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this General Permit, shall conduct a
survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons within two (2) years of receiving the COC and
every year thereafter. This survey shall include but not be limited to a sketch showing the depth
of sludge in the various locations within each lagoon. This survey frequency may be reduced if it
can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Division that the rate of sludge accumulation does
not warrant an annual survey.
If the sludge accumulation is such that it is greater than the volume for which the lagoon was
designed or the accumulation reduces the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the
volume for that which the lagoon was designed, a sludge removal or management plan must be
submitted to the appropriate Division Regional Office within ninety (90) days of the
determination. The plan shall describe removal and waste utilization procedures to be used.
IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
The Penmittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the presentation of
credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in accordance with reasonable
and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this General Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept tinder the
conditions of this General Permit;
C. Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control
equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this General Peril -lit; and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance,
any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The issuance of a COC to operate under this General Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the
responsibility for compliance with all applicable surface water. wetlands, groundwater and air
quality standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
10 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
2. The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
facility's CAWMP. At a rrinirnum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not
exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus
an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall be no violation of this
condition if: (a) there is a 'storni event more severe than a 25-year, 24-hour event, (b) the
Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at least one (1) foot of structural
freeboard.
In addition to the above requirements, for new and expanding farms with lagoon and storage
pond designs completed after September 1, 1996, storage must also be provided for the heavy
rainfall factor for the lagoons/storage pond. In case of lagoons/storage ponds in series that are
gravity fed, the 25-year, 24-hour storm event and/or the heavy rainfall factor storage requirement
for the system may be designed into the lowest lagoon/storage pond in the system. However.
adequate freeboard must be designed into the upper lagoons/storage ponds to allow sufficient
storage to prevent the waste level from rising into the structural freeboard while the storm water
is draining into the lowest lagoon in the system.
3. Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this General Permit until properly
closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the "Natural
Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure of Waste
Impoundments," March 2002 or any subsequent amendment, the containment basin shall not be
subject to the requirements of this General Permit. The Permittee must submit a letter to the
Division to request rescission of the COC by providing documentation of closure of all
containment basins.
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and submittal
of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the address identified on
the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.
4. This General Permit allows for the distribution of up to four cubic yards of manure per visit to
individuals for personal use. The Permittee provide the recipient(s) with information on the
nutrient content of the manure. Distribution of greater quantities must be to individuals or
businesses permitted to distribute the waste, or to be land applied to sites identified in the
Pernuttee's CAWMP.
5. The Permittee must inform the recipient(s) of his/her responsibilities to properly manage the land
application of manure. Record keeping for the distribution of manure up to four (4) cubic yards
per visit to individuals for personal use is not required.
6. The annual permit fee shall be paid by the Permittee within thirty (30) days after being billed by
the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly constitutes grounds for revocation of its COC to
operate under this General Permit.
7. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner agreements,
which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation of its COC to operate
under this General Permit.
8. A COC to operate under this General Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for
the facility to change ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of
Change of Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate. This request will be
considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
11 June 4,2004

Permit Number AWG100000
9. A COC to operate under this General Permit is effective only with respect to the nature and
volume of wastes described in the application and other supporting data. The Permittee shall
notify the Division immediately of any applicable information not provided in the permit
application.
10. If the Permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this General Permit after the
expiration date of this General Permit, the Pernttee must apply for and obtain a new COC.
Renewal applications must be filed at least 180 days prior to the expiration of the General
Permit.
11. The issuance of a COG to operate under this General Permit does not prohibit the Division from
reopening and modifying the General Permit or COC, revoking and reissuing the General Permit
or COC, or terminating the General Permit or COC as allowed by the appropriate laws, rules, and
regulations.
12. The Director may require any person, otherwise eligible for coverage under this General Permit,
to apply for an individual permit by notifying that person that an application is required.
13. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A NCAC 2H
.0225. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance
Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division in addition to the
penalty provisions applicable under the North Carolina General Statutes.
VI. PENALTIES
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this General Permit; the facility's
COC; the facility's CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an
enforcement action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal
waste management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties and injunctive relief.
2. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this General Permit. Any permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action; for
permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit
coverage renewal application.
3. It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would have been
necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the
conditions of this General Permit.
VII. DEFINITIONS
25-year, 24-hour rainfall or storm event means the maximum 24-hour precipitation event with a
probable recurrence interval of once in 25 years, as defined by the National Weather Service in Technical
Paper Number 40, "Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States," May 1961, and subsequent
amendments, or equivalent regional or state rainfall probability information developed therefrom.
Agronomic rates means the amount of animal waste and/or other nutrient sources to be land applied to
lands as contained in the nutrient management standard of the USDA Soil Conservation Service
Technical Guide Section IV or as recommended by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services and the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service at the time of certification of
the Animal Waste Management Plan by the appropriate technical specialist. .
12 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
Amendment to the CAWMP means a change and/or addition to a part(s) of the plan, and requires that
the change and/or addition adhere to current applicable standards. The following are examples of
amendments to the CAWMP:
• In an existing CAWMP, a change in crops and/or cropping pattern that utilizes 25% or less of the N
generated is considered a plan amendment. Additional acreage needed to facilitate the change in
crops and/or cropping pattern is permissible and considered part of the amendment.
• The addition of winter crops and/or interseeded perennial crops are considered amendments to an
existing CAWMP when the operation does not require additional acreage and/or crops for N
utilization, and does not exceed the 25% criteria stated above.
• When a CAWMP cannot meet N utilization requirements due to land lost to irrigation inefficiency
(useable versus total acres), then the CAWMP may be amended to increase available acreage and/or
change the crop for N utilization. This is the only exception to the 25% N criteria for plan revision.
• Inclusions of emergency action plans, and insect, odor and mortality checklists are considered
CAWMP amendments.
• Including additional acreage for land application beyond what is required in the existing CAWMP is
considered a plan amendment.
Animal feeding operation means a lot or facility (other than an aquatic animal production facility)
where the following conditions are met: (i) animals (other than aquatic animals) have been, are, or will
be stabled or confined and fed or maintained for a total of forty five (45) days or more in any twelve (12)
month period, and (ii) crops, vegetation, forage growth, or post -harvest residues are not sustained in the
normal growing season.over any portion of the lot or facility. Two or more animal feeding operations
under common ownership are considered to be a single animal feeding operation if they adjoin each
other, or if they use a conunon area or system for the disposal of wastes.
Ditch means any man made channel for the purpose of moving water off a site to the surface waters.
Excessive Ponding means any area of the application field where visible liquid waste is ponded on the
surface of the land application site more than four (4) hours following the application of waste.
Excessive ponding also means any areas where the ponding of waste has resulted in crop failure.
Groundwaters means any subsurface waters, as defined in 15A NCAC 2L .0102.
Land application means the application of wastewater and/or waste solids onto or incorporation into the
soil.
Major changes to the CAWMP means changes in the number of animals, type of operation (feeder to
finish'to wean to feeder), retrofit of a lagoon, installation of a new irrigation system, and similar type
changes. Recertification is only required for major changes to the CAWMP. Major changes to a facility
must first be approved by DWQ. The new CAWMP and the certification shall be submitted with a
request that the COC be amended to reflect the changes. The facility may not make the changes until a
new or amended COC has been issued.
13 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
Revision to the CAWMP means a change to an entire CAWMP to meet current applicable standards. A
CAWMP must be revised if the operation cannot utilize all N nitrogen generated by the animal
production in accordance with the existing CAWMP, except for the specific conditions noted in the
CAWMP amendment criteria as previously defined. For an existing CAWMP, a change in crops and/or
cropping pattern that utilizes more than 25% of the N generated by the operation is considered a plan
revision. Any change to an existing CAWMP, whether an amendment or revision, must be signed and
dated by both the producer and a technical specialist for the new CAWMP to be valid. A revision of the
CAWMP does not require recertification.
State Waters means all surface waters, wetlands, groundwaters and waters of the United States located
in the State.
Surface Waters means any stream, river, brook, swamp, lake, sound, tidal estuary, bay, creek, reservoir,
waterway, or other surface body or surface accumulation of water, whether public or private, or natural
or artificial, that is contained in, flows through, or borders upon any portion of the State of North
Carolina, including any portion of the Atlantic Ocean over which the State has jurisdiction as well as any
additional Waters of the United States which are located in the State.
Waste means manure, animal waste, process wastewater and/or sludge generated at an animal feeding
operation.
Wetlands means areas that are inundated or saturated by an accumulation of surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions, as defined in 15A NCAC 2B .0202.
This General Permit issued the I IIh day of June, 2004.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
ott, 4'� , Director
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AWG100000
14 June 4, 2004

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Y
October 1, 2004
Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr
N & W Pig Farms
601 E. Main St.
Fremont NC 27830
0
Z �
Dear Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.:
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960046
N & W Pig Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water -Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Julian
Nelms & H.L. Whitley; Jr., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS960046 which expires.October 1,
2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the N & W Pig Farms, located in Wayne County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 7000 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining. the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification, to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
rthCarolina
Wurally
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr,state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit .
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or.penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting. the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
JZ/V VV
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS960046
APS Central Files

Permit Number AWG100000
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT
This General Permit is issued pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes 143-215 et seq., may apply to any
swine facility in the State of North Carolina, and shall be effective from October 1, 2004 until September 30,
2009.
All activities authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this General Permit.
Holders of Certificates of Coverage (COC) under this General Permit shall comply with the following specified
conditions and limitations.
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as otherwise
provided in this General Permit and associated statutory and regulatory provisions. Waste shall
not reach surface waters or wetlands by runoff, drift, manmade conveyance, direct application,
direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise classified as state waters.
The waste collection, treatment, storage and application system operated under this General
Permit shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the
discharge of pollutants to surface waters or wetlands. Application of waste to ten -aces and
grassed waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to surface
waters or wetlands.
Facilities must be designed, constructed and operated to contain all waste plus the runoff from a
25-year, 24-hour rainfall event for the location of the facility. A facility that has a discharge of
waste that results because of a storm event more severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm will not
be considered to be in violation of this General Permit if the facility is in compliance with its
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and this General Permit.
Any discharge or application of waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters or wetlands is
prohibited except as follows: (a) discharges from the ditches are controlled by best management
practices (BMPs) designed in accordance with NRCS standards; (b) the BMPs have been
submitted to and approved by the Division of Water Quality (Division); (c) the BMPs were
implemented as designed to prevent a discharge to surface waters or wetlands; (d) the waste was
removed immediately from the ditch upon discovery; and (e) the event was documented and
reported in accordance with Part II1.13. of this General Permit. Nothing in this exception shall
excuse a discharge to surface waters or wetlands except as may result because of rainfall from a
storm event more severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm.
2. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established for the
receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 2B, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the North Carolina Administrative Code.
June 4,2004

Permit Number AWG100000
3. The facility's COC and its CAWMP are hereby incorporated by reference into this General
Permit. The CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and
standards (federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design and certification of the
facility.
The Permittee must assess, on an ongoing basis, the effectiveness of the implementation of the
CAWMP. The Permittee must make "major changes," "revisions," or "amendments" to the
CAWMP, as defined in Section VII, "Definitions," of this Permit, in order to address any
changes needed to maintain compliance with the facility's COC and this General Permit. "Major
changes," "revisions," and "amendments" to the CAWMP must be documented, dated, and
included as part of the CAWMP. "Major changes " and "revisions" to the CAWMP shall be
submitted to the appropriate Division Regional Office within thirty (30) calendar days of the
"major change" or "revision." "Amendments" are not required to be submitted to the Division
Regional Office unless specifically requested by the Division. If field, riser or pull numbers are
changed, an explanation shall also be submitted and include a description of how the new
numbers relate to the old numbers. Any violation of the COC or the CAWMP shall be considered
a violation of this General Pen -nit and subject to enforcement actions. A violation of this General
Permit may result in the Pennittee having to take inunediate or long-term corrective action(s) as
required by the Division. These actions may include but are not limited to: modifying the
CAWMP; ceasing land application of waste; removing animals from the facility; or the COC
being reopened and modified, revoked and reissued, and/or terminated.
4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average design capacity from that
authorized by the COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and the COC prior to
modification of the facility.
5. During the period of this General Permit, the Division of Water Quality may notify the
permittee to conduct an evaluation of the facility and its CAWMP to determine the facility's
ability to comply with the MRCS nutrient management standard as it relates to phosphorous. The
Division will make its decision as whether to notify permittees based on experience gained
through the NPDES permit implementation. This evaluation will not be required until such time
as the permittee is notified to conduct the evaluation by the Division of Water Quality. The
evaluation must be documented on forms supplied by or approved by the Division and must be
submitted to the Division. This evaluation must be completed by existing facilities within
twelve (12) months of receiving notification from the Division.
No COC will be issued to any new or expanding facility to operate under this General Permit
until the applicant has completed and submitted a phosphorous loss assessment to determine if
the new or expanding facility can comply with the NRCS phosphorous standards. This
assessment shall not be a basis for denial of a COC to operate under this permit unless that
demonstration of compliance is a Statutory requirement for COC issuance.
6. If prior approval is received from the Director of the Division of Water Quality (Director),
facilities which have been issued a COC to operate under this General Permit may add treatment
units for the purpose of removing pollutants before the waste is discharged into the
lagoons/storage ponds. Prior to any approval, the Permittee must demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the Director that the new treatment unit will not interfere with the operation of the existing
treatment system and that a process is in place to properly manage and track the pollutants
removed.
2 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
7. If prior approval is received from the Director, facilities which have been issued a COC to
operate under this General Permit may add innovative treatment processes to the systems on a
pilot basis in order to determine if the innovative treatment process will improve how the waste
is treated and/or managed. Prior to any approval, the Permittee must demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Director that the innovative treatment process will not interfere with the
operation of the existing treatment system and that a process is in place to properly manage and
track the pollutants removed.
8. For all new and expanding operations, no collection, treatment or storage facilities may be
constructed in a 100-year flood plain.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied within 100 feet of any well with the exception of monitoring
wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be established on a case by case basis by
the Division.
10. Existing swine dry lots may remain in wetlands as long as the wetlands uses are not removed or
degraded as a result of the swine. The swine however may not be confined within 100 feet of an
adjacent surface water or a seasonally -flooded area. The swine also must not cause a loss of
more than 10% of the existing tree canopy. Where trees do not exist, the area must be managed
to include crop rotation.
1I. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and fields
shall be properly operated and maintained at all times,
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be applied upon
areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the, optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving crop. In
no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given
application event.
5. Animal waste shall not be directly applied onto crops for direct human consumption that do not
undergo further processing (e.g., strawberries, melons, lettuce, cabbage, apples, etc.) at any time
during the growing season, or in the case of fruit bearing trees, following breaking dormancy.
Application of animal wastes shall not occur within thirty (30) days of the harvesting of fiber and
food crops for direct human consumption that undergoes further processing.
6. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This requirement
does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively growing.
7. Pesticides, toxic chemicals and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal waste
collection, treatment, storage or application systems.
3 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWGI00000
8. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be discharged
into the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and application system. Washdown of stock
trailers owned by and used to transport animals to and from the facility only, will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accotntnodate the additional volume.
Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA approved according to their label, will not
harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards listed in 15A NCAC 2L
may be utilized in facilities covered by this General Permit. Instruction labels are to be followed
when using cleaning agents and soaps.
9. Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the facility shall
be done in accordance with the facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's Statutes and regulations.
Disposal of dead animals whose numbers exceed normal mortality rates associated with the
facility shall also be done in accordance with the facility's CAWMP and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division's Statutes and regulations provided that: 1) burial of such animals shall be done in
consultation with the State Veterinarian of the NCDA&CS Veterinary Division's Statutes and in
compliance with NCDA&CS regulations; 2) all such burial sites must be mapped, and the dates
and numbers of the animals buried by type must be recorded; and 3) the map is submitted to the
appropriate Regional Office Groundwater Section within 15 calendar days of burial.
In the event of a state of emergency declared by the Governor, disposal of dead animals shall be
done in accordance with requirements and guidelines dictated by the State Veterinarian
according G.S. §106-339.4. The Division may require groundwater monitoring when there is
massive burial of animals. All burial sites of such animals must be mapped, and the dates and
numbers of the animals buried by type must be recorded.
10. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste lagoons/storage ponds
to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the structures.
11. A protective vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen lagoon/storage
pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping elevation), berms, pipe
runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation
shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond embankments. All trees shall be
removed in accordance with good engineering practices. Lagoordstorage pond areas shall be
accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
12. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed in
accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary, provisions
must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
13. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to, tires,
bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
14. The facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate animal waste
application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement, for the use of the
necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator capable of providing adequate
waste application.
15. The Permittee shall designate a certified animal waste management system operator with a valid
certification to be in charge of the animal waste management system. The waste management
system shall be operated by the OIC or a person under the OIC's supervision.
4 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
16. In accordance with 15A NCAC 8F .0203(b)(2), the Operator in Charge (OIC) or a designated
back-up OIC of a Type A Animal Waste Management System shall inspect, or a person under
the supervision of an OIC or designated back-up OIC shall inspect, the land application site as
often as necessary to insure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the
CAWMP. In no case shall the time between inspections be more than 120 minutes during the
application of waste. A record of each inspection shall be recorded on forms supplied by, or
approved by, the Division and shall include the date, time, sprayfield number and name of the
operator for each inspection.
The Permittee may assert as an affirmative defense in any enforcement action alleging
noncompliance with the requirements imposed in this condition that such noncompliance was
due to circumstances beyond the Permittee's control. A notation shall be made on the form
indicating the inspection affected by such circumstance and an explanation setting forth the
circumstances claimed to have been beyond the Permittee's control shall be submitted with the
form.
17. The Director may require any permittee to install, operate and maintain devices on all irrigation
pumps/equipment designed to automatically stop irrigation activities during precipitation. ]'his
decision will be based on the facility's compliance history for irrigation events.
18. The Director may require any pernlittee to install and operate flow meters with flow totalizers
based on the facility's violations and/or incomplete or incorrect record keeping events.
19. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause the mist
to reach surface waters or wetlands.
20. The Pennittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas and land application areas.
21. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen or snow covered
at the time of land application.
22. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall consider
pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste and shall document the
weather conditions at the time of land application on forms supplied by or approved by the
Division.
23. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3 Soil Test
Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater than 3,000 (213
pounds per acre).
24. All waste application equipment must be tested and calibrated once in the first two years after
issuance of the COC and then at least once every two years thereafter. The results must be
documented on forms provided by, or approved by, the Division.
25. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation from a
technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece of equipment is
being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications, no technical specialist
approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the gallons per minute (gpm) capacity
is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the replacement involves disturbing the
lagoon/storage pond embankment.
26. Crops for which animal waste is land applied must be removed from the land application site and
properly managed and utilized unless other management practices are approved in the CAWMP.
5 June 4, 2004

Permit Number ANVG100000
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
An inspection of the waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and runoff control
measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure proper operation but at
least monthly and after all storm events of greater than one (1) inch in 24 hours. For example,
lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage,
damage by animals or discharge.
2. Monitoring and Recording Freeboard Levels
a. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings.
The waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by or approved by the Division.
The Director may require more frequent monitoring and recording on lagoon levels based
on the facility's compliance history for freeboard violations.
b. The freeboard levels of lagoons serving any facility which experiences freeboard
violations in any two consecutive years following the issuance of this General Permit, or
as determined necessary by the Director, shall be monitored and recorded as follows:
In addition to the facility's existing lagoon waste -level gauges, automated lagoon/storage
pond waste -level monitors and recorders (monitored and recorded at least hourly) must be
installed on all treatment and storage lagoons covered by a COC issued under this General
Permit to measure and record lagoon freeboard. This equipment must be properly
maintained and calibrated in a manner consistent with manufacturer's operation and
maintenance recommendations. This automated equipment must be in place no later than
ninety (90) days following notification from the Director. The Director may determine
that installation of automated waste level monitors is not required if the Permittee can
demonstrate that preventative measures were taken to avoid the violations and that the
violations resulted from conditions beyond the Pennittee's control.
If an automated level monitor(s) becomes inoperable, the Permittee shall:
i. report the problem by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as soon
as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
problem; and,
ii. make any needed repairs to the equipment as quickly as possible, and take and
record daily lagoon levels at the same time every day until such time as the
automated equipment is placed back into operation.
C. The Director may require new or modified waste -level gauges at any facility if he
determines that the existing gauges are not adequate to accurately indicate actual lagoon
levels, or the various lagoon levels required to be maintained by this General Permit or the
facility's CAWMP.
3. Monitoring and Recording Precipitation Events
a. Precipitation events at facilities issued a COC to operate under this General Permit shall be
monitored and recorded as follows:
6 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
A rain gauge must be installed at a site that is representative of the weather conditions at
the farm's land application site(s) to measure all precipitation events. The precipitation
type and amount must be recorded daily for all precipitation events and maintained on site
for Department review. Daily records do not need to be maintained for those days without
precipitation events.
b. The Director may require that an automated rain gauge and recorder must be installed on
site to measure and record all precipitation events. This equipment must be properly
maintained and calibrated in a manner consistent with manufacturer's operation and
maintenance recommendations. This automated equipment must be in place no later than
ninety (90) days following receipt of notice from the Director.
If an automated rain gauge(s) becomes inoperable, the Permittee shall:
i. report the problem by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as soon
as possible, but in no case more than twenty four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the problem; and,
ii. make any needed repairs to the equipment as quickly as possible, and take and
record all rainfall events until such time as the automated equipment is placed back
into operation.
4. A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and zinc,
shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste in accordance with NCGS
143-215.10C(e)(6). As of the effective date of this General Pennit, the Statute requires that the
analysis be conducted at least annually.
5. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with recommended laboratory
sampling procedures as close to the time of application as practical and at least within sixty (.60)
days (before or after) of the date of application. Every reasonable effort shall be made to have
the waste analyzed prior to the date of application and as close to the time of waste application as
possible. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
6. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic loading
rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also record removal of
solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on -site or record the off -site location(s).
These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
7. A record shall be created and maintained of all transfers of waste between lagoons/storage ponds
on the same site not typically operated in series. Such record shall include at least the identity of
the lagoon from which the waste was transferred, the identity of the lagoon receiving the waste,
the date and time of transfer and the total volume of waste transferred.
S. The Permittee must maintain monthly stocking records for the facility and make the records
available to Department of Environment and Natural Resources (Department).
9. If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the waste collection, treatment, storage and
application systems (including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the
Permittee is required to make notification in accordance with Condition III. 13. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
7 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of the
volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters or
wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of the
volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates and
times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the discharge is
expected to continue.
C. Cause of the discharger A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused by a
precipitation event, detailed information from the on -site rain gauge concerning the inches
and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken to
prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition III. 5. above.
10. A copy of this General Permit, the facility's COC, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP and copies of all records required by this General Permit and the
facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three (3) years. Records include but are not limited to: soil and waste analyses, rain
gauge readings, freeboard levels, irrigation and land application event(s), past inspection reports
and operational reviews, animal stocking records, records of additional nutrient sources applied
(including but not limited to sludges, unused feedstuff leachate, milk waste, septage and
commercial fertilizer), cropping information, waste application equipment testing and
calibration, and records of removal of solids to off -site location(s). These records shall be
maintained on forms provided or approved by the Division and shall be readily available at the
facility (stored at places such as the farm residence, office, outbuildings, etc.) where animal
waste management activities are being conducted for the life of this General Permit, unless
otherwise specified in this General Permit.
11. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the Permittee shall
provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and reports related to the
operation of the animal waste management system. Once received by the Division, all such
information and reports become public information, unless they constitute confidential
information under NC G.S. 132-1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as
specified in Chapter 132 of the General Statutes.
12. The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not limited to
groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond levels and plant
tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of such waste upon the
surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring, including its scope, frequency,
duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems, shall meet all applicable Division
requirements.
13. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as soon as
possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following events:
i7 Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
8 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
b. Any discharge that poses a serious threat to the environment or human safety or health.
C. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to that
required in Condition V. 3. of this General Permit.
d. Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff
enters surface waters or wetlands.
Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
f. Any failure of the waste treatment and disposal system that renders the facility incapable
of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
g. A spill or discharge from a vehicle transporting waste or sludge to the land application
field which results in a discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
h. A spill or discharge from a vehicle transporting waste or sludge to the land application
field which results in a discharge that poses a serious threat to surface waters or wetlands.
Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat to the
environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours, contact
must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office within
five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report shall outline
the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to ensue that the problem
does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not be waived by the Division
Regional Office.
14. The Director may require any permittee to file an annual certification report based on the
compliance history of the facility. If required, the report must be filed on forms provided by the
Division.
15. The Director may require facilities to submit additional reports and/or certifications based on the
facility's compliance history.
16. In the event of a discharge of 1,000 gallons or more of waste to surface waters or wetlands, the
Permittee must issue a press release to all print and electronic news media that provide general
coverage in the county in which the discharge occurred setting out the details of the discharge.
The press release must be issued within forty-eight (48) hours after it is detennined that the
discharge has reached the surface waters or wetlands. A copy of the press release and a list of
the news media to which it was distributed must be kept for at least one (1) year after the
discharge and must be distributed to any person upon request.
9 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
17. In the event of a discharge of 15,000 gallons or more of animal waste to surface waters or
wetlands, a public notice is required in addition to the press release described in Condition III 13.
The public notice must be placed in a newspaper having general circulation in the county in
which the discharge occurred and the county immediately downstream within ten (10) days of
the discharge. The minimum content of the notice is the name of the facility, location of the
discharge, estimated volume of waste entering state waters, time and date discharge occurred,
duration of the discharge, identification water body that was discharged into including creek and
river basin if applicable, actions taken to prevent further discharge, and a facility contact person
and phone number.
18. If a discharge of 1,000,000 gallons of wastewater or more reaches surface waters or wetlands, the
appropriate Division Regional Office must be contacted to determine in what additional counties,
if any, a public notice must be published. A copy of all public notices and proof of publication
must be sent to the Division within thirty (30) days of the discharge.
19, All facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this General Permit, shall conduct a
survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons within two (2) years of receiving the COC and
every year thereafter. This survey shall include but not be limited to a sketch showing the depth
of sludge in the various locations within each lagoon. This survey frequency may be reduced if it
can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Division that the rate of sludge accumulation does
not warrant an annual survey.
If the sludge accumulation is such that it is greater than the volume for which the lagoon was
designed or the accumulation reduces the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the
volume for that which the lagoon was designed, a sludge removal or management plan must be
submitted to the appropriate Division Regional Office within ninety (90) days of the
determination. The plan shall describe removal and waste utilization procedures to be used.
IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the presentation of
credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in accordance with reasonable
and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this General Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this General Permit;
C. Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control
equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this General Permit; and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance,
any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of a COC to operate under this General Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the
responsibility for compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air
quality standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
10 June 4,2004

Permit Number AWGI00000
2. The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not
exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus
an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall be no violation of this
condition if. (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25-year. 24-hour event, (b) the
Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at least one (1) foot of structural
freeboard.
In addition to the above requirements, for new and expanding farms with lagoon and storage
pond designs completed after September 1, 1996, storage must also be provided for the heavy
rainfall factor for the lagoons/storage pond. In case of lagoons/storage ponds in series that are
gravity fed, the 25-year, 24-hour storm event and/or the heavy rainfall factor storage requirement
for the system may be designed into the lowest lagoon/storage pond in the system. However,
adequate freeboard must be designed into the upper lagoons/storage ponds to allow sufficient
storage to prevent the waste level from rising into the structural freeboard while the storm water
is draining into the lowest lagoon in the system.
3. Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this General Permit until properly
closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the "Natural
Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure of Waste
Itnpoundments," March 2002 or any subsequent amendment, the containment basin shall not be
subject to the requirements of this General Permit. The Permttee must submit a letter to the
Division to request rescission of the COC by providing documentation of closure of all
containment basins.
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and submittal
of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the address identified on
the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.
4. This General Permit allows for the distribution of up to four cubic yards of manure per visit to
individuals for personal use. The Permittee provide the recipient(s) with information on the
nutrient content of the manure. Distribution of greater quantities must be to individuals or
businesses permitted to distribute the waste, or to be land applied to sites identified in the
Permittee's CAWMP.
5. The Permittee must inform the recipient(s) of his/her responsibilities to properly manage the land
application of manure. Record keeping for the distribution of manure up to four (4) cubic yards
per visit to individuals for personal use is not required.
6. The annual permit fee shall be paid by the Permittee within thirty (30) days after being billed by
the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly constitutes grounds for revocation of its COC to
operate under this General Permit.
7. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner agreements,
which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation of its COC to operate
under this General Permit.
8. A COC to operate under this General Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for
the facility to change ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of
Change of Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate. This request will be
considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
11 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
9. A COC to operate under this General Permit is effective only with respect to the nature and
volume of wastes described in the application and other supporting data. The Permittee shall
notify the Division immediately of any applicable information not provided in the permit
application.
10. If the Permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this General Permit after the
expiration date of this General Permit, the Permittee must apply for and obtain a new COC.
Renewal applications must be filed at least 180 days prior to the expiration of the General
Permit.
If. The issuance of a COC to operate under this General Permit does not prohibit the Division from
reopening and modifying the General Permit or COC, revoking and reissuing the General Permit
or COC, or terminating the General Permit or COC as allowed by the appropriate laws, rules, and
regulations.
12. The Director may require any person, otherwise eligible for coverage under this General Permit,
to apply for an individual permit by notifying that person that an application is required.
13. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A NCAC 2H
.0225. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance
Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division in addition to the
penalty provisions applicable under the North Carolina General Statutes.
VI. PENALTIES
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this General Permit; the facility's
COC; the facility's CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an
enforcement action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal
waste management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties and injunctive relief.
2. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this General Permit. Any permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action; for
permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit
coverage renewal application.
3. It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would have been
necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the
conditions of this General Pernut.
VII. DEFINITIONS
25-year, 24-hour rainfall or storm event means the maximum 24-hour precipitation event with a
probable recurrence interval of once in 25 years, as defined by the National Weather Service in Technical
Paper Number 40, "Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States," May 1961, and subsequent
amendments, or equivalent regional or state rainfall probability information developed therefrom.
Agronomic rates means the amount of animal waste and/or other nutrient sources to be land applied to
lands as contained in the nutrient management standard of the USDA Soil Conservation Service
Technical Guide Section IV or as recommended by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services and the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service at the time of certification of
the Animal Waste Management Plan by the appropriate technical specialist.
12 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
Amendment to the CAWMP means a change and/or addition to a part(s) of the plan, and requires that
the change and/or addition adhere to current applicable standards. The following are examples of
amendments to the CAWMP:
• In an existing CAWMP, a change in crops and/or cropping pattern that utilizes 25% or less of the N
generated is considered a plan amendment. Additional acreage needed to facilitate the change in
crops and/or cropping pattern is permissible and considered part of the amendment.
• The addition of winter crops and/or interseeded perennial crops are considered amendments to an
existing CAWMP when the operation does not require additional acreage and/or crops for N
utilization, and does not exceed the 25% criteria stated above.
• When a CAWMP cannot meet N utilization requirements due to land lost to irrigation inefficiency
(useable versus total acres), then the CAWMP may be amended to increase available acreage and/or
change the crop for N utilization. This is the only exception to the 25% N criteria for plan revision.
• Inclusions of emergency action plans, and insect, odor and mortality checklists are considered
CAWMP amendments.
• Including additional acreage for land application beyond what is required in the existing CAWMP is
considered a plan amendment.
Animal feeding operation means a lot or facility (other than an aquatic animal production facility)
where the following conditions are met: (i) animals (other than aquatic animals) have been, are, or will
be stabled or confined and fed or maintained for a total of forty five (45) days or more in any twelve (12)
month period, and (ii) crops, vegetation, forage growth, or post -harvest residues are not sustained in the
normal growing season over any portion of the lot or facility. Two or more animal feeding operations
under common ownership are considered to be a single animal feeding operation if they adjoin each
other, or if they use a common area or system for the disposal of wastes.
Ditch means any man made channel for the purpose of moving water off a site to the surface waters
Excessive Ponding means any area of the application field where visible liquid waste is ponded on the
surface of the land application site more than four (4) hours following the application of waste.
Excessive ponding also means any areas where the ponding of waste has resulted in crop failure.
Groundwaters means any subsurface waters, as defined in 15A NCAC 2L .0102.
Land application means the application of wastewater and/or waste solids onto or incorporation into tite
soil.
Major changes to the CAWMP means changes in the number of animals, type of operation (feeder to
finish to wean to feeder), retrofit of a lagoon, installation of a new irrigation system, and similar type
changes. Recertification is only required for major changes to the CAWMP. Major changes to a facility
must first be approved by DWQ. The new CAWMP and the certification shall be submitted with a
request that the COC be amended to reflect the changes. The facility may not make the changes until a
new or amended COC has been issued.
13 June 4, 2004

Permit Number AWG100000
Revision to the CAWMP means a change to an entire CAWMP to meet current applicable standards. A
CAWMP must be revised if the operation cannot utilize all N nitrogen generated by the animal
production in accordance with the existing CAWMP, except for the specific conditions noted in the
CAWMP amendment criteria as previously defined. For an existing CAWMP, a change in crops and/or
cropping pattern that utilizes more than 25% of the N generated by the operation is considered a plan
revision. Any change to an existing CAWMP, whether an amendment or revision, must be signed and
dated by both the producer and a technical specialist for the new CAWMP to be valid. A revision of the
CAWMP does not require recertification.
State Waters means all surface waters, wetlands, groundwaters and waters of the United States located
in the State.
Surface Waters means any stream, river, brook, swamp, lake, sound, tidal estuary, bay, creek, reservoir,
waterway, or other surface body or surface accumulation of water, whether public or private, or natural
or artificial, that is contained in, flows through, or borders upon any portion of the State of North
Carolina, including any portion of the Atlantic Ocean over which the State has jurisdiction as well as any
additional Waters of the United States which are located in the State.
Waste means manure, animal waste, process wastewater and/or sludge generated at an animal feeding
operation.
Wetlands means areas that are inundated or saturated by an accumulation of surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions, as defined in 15A NCAC 2B .0202.
This General Permit issued the 1 Ith day of June, 2004.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
41-!/\ I _ U� , Director
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AWG100000
14 June 4, 2004

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Goldsboro Hog Farms, Inc. t�
Monday, March 13, 2000
Producer: Julian Nelms/ H.L. Whitley,Jr.
Farm Name: NaW Pigs
601 East Main Street
Fremont,NC 27830
Telephone # : [phone]
Type of Operation : Wean to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals : 7000 pigs design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1 of 1

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
7000 pigs X 0.4 tons waste/pigs/year =.2800 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
7000 pigs X 0.48 Ibs PAN/pigs/year = 3360 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCE
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD LEIS AW COMM ACRES LEIS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE N/ACRE N/ACRE USED TIME
4753
• 1
AYCOCK0-1%
W
60
144
01
5.58
803.52
SEP-APR
4753
1
AYCOCK0-1% I
C
1301
142.5
201
5.58
795.15
MAR-JUN
4753
1
AYCOCK 0-1%
SB
451
180
01
5.58
1004.4
APR-SEP 15
4753
1
AYCOCK0-1%
CO
750
190
0
5.58
502.2
APRAUG
4753
10
NORFOLK 2-6%
W
55
132
01
4.46
588.72
SEP-APR
4753
10
NORFOLK 2-60/6
c
100
105
20
4.46
468.3
MAR-JUN
4753
10
NORFOLK 2-6%
SB
35
140
0
4.46
624.4
APR-SEP 15
4753
10
NORFOLK 2-6%
CO
650
78
0
4.46
347.88
APR-AUG
4753
11
NORFOLK 2-6%
W
55
132
0
1.37
180.84
SEP-APR
4753
• 11
NORFOLK 2-6%
C 1
1001
105
20
1.37
143.85
MAR-JUN
4753
11
NORFOLK 2-6%
SB
351
140
01
1.37
191.8
APR-SEP 15
4753
11
NORFOLK 2-6%
CO
6501
78
01
1.37
106.86
APR-AUG
4753
12
NORFOLK 2-6%
W
55
132
0'
3.09
407.88
SEP-APR
4753
12
NORFOLK 2-6%
C
100
105
201
3.09
324.45
MAR-JUN
4753
12
NORFOLK 2-6%
SB
35
140
01
3.09
432.61APR-SEP
15
4753
12
NORFOLK 2-6%
CO
650
78
01
09
241.02
APR-AUG
4753
13
NORFOLK 0-2%
W
60
144
0
2.78
400.32
SEP-APR
4753
• 13
NORFOLK 0-2%
I C
110
117.5
20
2.78
326.65
MAR-JUN
4753
13
NORFOLK 0-2%
SB
401
160
01
2.78
444.8
APR-SEP 15
4753
• 13
NORFOLK 0-2%
c0
7001
84
0
2.78
233.52
APR-AUG
4753
• 14
NORFOLK 2-6%
W
55
132
0;
3.4
448.8
SEP-APR
4753
14
NORFOLK 2-6%
C
100
105
201
3.4
357
MAR-JUN
4753
14
NORFOLK 2-69%
SB
35
140
01
3.4
476
APR-SEP 15
i 4753
14
NORFOLK 2-6%
c0
6501
78
0
3.4
265.2
APR-AUG
4753
15
NORFOLK 2-6%
W
55
1321
01
3.81
502.92
SEP-APR
4753
15
NORFOLK 2-6%
C
100
1051
201
3.81
400.05
MAR-JUN
4753
• 15
NORFOLK 2-6%
SB
351
140
0
3.81
533.41APR-SEP
15
4753
15
NORFOLK 2-6%
i CO
6501
781
0
3.81
297.181
APR-AUG
4753
16
NORFOLK 2-6%
CO
650
:7
0
0.78
60.84
APR-AUG
4753
16
NORFOLK 2-6%
C
100
105
20
0.78
81.9'
MAR-JUN
4753
16
NORFOLK 2-6%
W
1 551
1321
01
0.78
102.961
SEP-APR
4753
16
NORFOLK 2-6%
SB
35
140
0;
0.78
109.21APR-SEP
15
4753
17
NORFOLK 0-2%
i C
i 1101
117.51
20j
6.19
727.325'
MAR-JUN
4753
�• 17
NORFOLK0-2%
W
60
144i
0'
6.19
891.36;
SEP-APR
4753
I• 17
NORFOLK0-2%
I SB
1 401
1601
0'
6.19
990.4;APR-SEP15
4753
17
NORFOLK 0-2%
j CO
700
841
0i
6.19
519.961
APR-AUG
4753
18
NORFOLK 0-2%
I C
1 1101
117.51
20
4.68
549.9
MAR-JUN
4753
18
NORFOLK 0-2%
i w
1 601
144;
0;
4.68
673.92
SEP-APR
1 4753
18
NORFOLK 0-2% SB
1 40:
160'
0.:
4.68
748.8iAPR-SEP
15
4753
�• 18
INORFOLK0-2% j CO
1 7001
84;
01
4.68
393.121
APR-AUG
4753
I" 19
NORFOLK 0-2% j C
110
117.5'
20!
2.02
237.35:
MAR-JUN
1 4753
1 19
'NORFOLK 0-2% W
60:
144
0!
2.02
290.881
SEP-APR
j _4753
1- 19
INORFOLK 0-2% SB
1 40; 160, 0
2.02
3231APR-SEP 15
Page 2 of 2

4753
19 NORFOLK 0-2%
CO
700
84
01
2.02
169.68
APR-AUG
4753
2 AYCOCKO-1%
w
60
144
0!
2.2
316.8
SEP-APR
4753
2 JAYCOCK0-1%
C
130
142.5
20'
2.2
313.5.
MAR-JUN
4753
2
AYCOCK 0-1%
SB
45
"' 180
0
2.2
396
APR-SEP 15
4753
2
AYCOCK 0-1%
CO
750
90
0;
2.2
1981
APRAUG
4753
3 JAYCOCK0-1%
w
60
144
01
2.2
316.8!
SEP-APR
4753
3
AYCOCKO-1%
C
130
142.5
20,
2.2
313.5
MAR-JUN
4753
3
AYCOCK 0-1%
SB
45
1801
0;
2.2
396APR-SEP
15
4753
3
AYCOCKO-1%
CO
750
901
oi
2.2
1981
APRAUG
4753
4 JAYCOCK0-1%
-
w
60
1441
0=4.95
712.81
SEP-APR
4753
4
AYCOCKO-1%
C
130
142.5
201
4.95
705.3751
MAR-JUN
4753
4 JAYCOCK
0-1%
SB
45
180
Oj
4.95
891
APR-SEP 15
4753
4
AYCOCK 0-1 %
CO
750
90
Oj
4.95
445.5
APRAUG
4753
5
AYCOCKO-1%
w
60
144
Oi
5.58
803.52I
SEP-APR
4753
5
AYCOCKO-1%
C
130
142.5
20,
5.58
795.15j
MAR-JUN
4753
5
AYCOCK 0-1%
SB
45
180
Oi
5.58
1004.4,APR-SEP15
4753
5
AYCOCKO-1%
CO
750
90
0'
5.58
502.2I
APRAUG
4753
6
AYCOCKO-1%
C
130
142.5
201
4.95
705.375
MAR-JUN
4753
" 6
JAYCOCK 0-1 %
w
60
144
0;
4.95
712.8
SEP-APR
4753
6
AYCOCKO-1%
SB
45
180
01
4.95
891iAPR-SEP15
4753
• 6
AYCOCK0-1%
CO
750
90
01
4.95
445.51
APRAUG
4753
7
AYCOCK 0-1%
w
60
144
01
0.82
118.08j
SEP-APR
4753
7
AYCOCK 0-1%
C
130
142.5
201
0.82
116.85
MAR-JUN
4753
7
AYCOCK 0-1 %
SB
45
180
01
0.82
147.6'APR-SEP
15
4753
7
AYCOCK 0-1%
CO
750
90
Oi
0.82
73.8i
APRAUG
4753
8
INAHUNTA ALL
w
451
108
01
1.66
179.28:
Sep -Apr
4753
8
INAHUNTAALL
C
1201
130
201
1.66
215.81
MAR-JUN
4753
8
NAHUNTA ALL
SB
45
180
01
1.66
298.8
APR-SEP 15
4753
• 8
INAHUNTA ALL
CO
675
81
01
1.66
134.461
APR-AUG
4753
9
JAYCOCK 0-1 %
w
60
144
OI
2.23
321.12',
SEP-APR
4753
9
JAYCOCK0-1%
C
1 130
142.5
20: 2.23
317.775
MAR-JUN
4753
1• 9
JAYCOCK0-1%
SB
45
180
Oj 2.23
401.41APR-SEP15
4753
9
JAYCOCK 0-1%
CO
1 7501
90;
Oi 2.231
200.71
APRAUG
r fihtml�IYFZIl
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 3 of 3

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEAS
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
There are no Acres Leased
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
. rono UNITS LBS N/UNIT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
CO
COTTON
POUNDS
0.12
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
Page 4 of 4

TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND
ACRES Las AW
N USED
(TABLE 1 62.751 16,155
TOTALS: 62.751 16,155
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 3,360
BALANCE-12,795
*" This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 532 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids.'The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.58 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT Pirl n SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (inlhr) AMT (inches)
�4753v
-13,'17,'18, *19
NORFOLK 0-2%
C,
0.50
'1
4753
'1,'2,'3,'4,•5,'6,'7,*9
AYCOCKO-1%
CO
0.35
'1
14753
11,02,'3,'4,'5,'6,'7,•9
AYCOCKO-1%
SB
0.35
'1
14753
•1,'2,03,'4,'5,'6,'7, *9
AYCOCK 0-1%
W
0.35
'1
14753
'8
NAHUNTAALL
C
0.40
'1
4i53
48
NAHUNTA ALL
CO
0.40
'1
4753
.1.$2,-3,'4,'S,'6,'7,•9
AYCOCKO-1%
C
0.35
'1
4753
08
NAHUNTA ALL
W
0.35
'1
4753
'10, •11,'12, •N, •15, •16
NORFOLK 2.6%
W
0.50
'1
14753
•13,•17,'18,'19
NORFOLK0.2%
CO
0.50
'1
4753
'13,'17,'18,'19
NORFOLKO-2%
SB
0.50
1
.4753
'13,'17,'18,'19
NORFOLK 0.2%
W
0.50
'1
14753
'10,'11,•12,'14,015,•16
N6RFOLK2-6%
C
0.50
'1
4'53
'10,'11,'12,•14,-15,-16
NORFOLK2-6%
CO
,4753
'10,'11,'12,'61,-15,•16
NORFOLK2-6%
SB
0.50
'1
Page 5 of 5

4753 'g NAHUNTAALL SB 0.40 '1
" This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 6 of 6

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This WUP has been amended to reflect wettable acres by irrigation pulls. The most current
FSA map (660 scale) available was used.
The computations on the maps and D-1 with supporting documentation
all correlate to the WUP.
On the fields with corn/wheat/soybean/cotton rotation, the residual nitrogen from the
soybeans has been deducted from the following corn crop and is shown in the COMM N/
ACRE column.
Page 7 of 7

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade.
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application..Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to 'Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
Page 8 of 8

and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 9 of 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems •---- .
Page 10 of 10

NAME OF FARM: N&W Pigs
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACI TY OWN ERJ,ulianNelms/ H.L. Whitley,Jr.
SIGNATURE: vJ_ I 0 DATE:
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
please print -
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: A.J. Linton
AFFILIATION: Goldsboro Hog Farms
ADDRESS (AGENCY): P.O. Box 10009
Goldsboro, NC 27532
[phone]
SIGNATURE: �d��I DATE: DO
Page 11 of 11

Landowner/Operator Name:
Address:
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
601
f- 1
r t M oy\ k- y ICJ C_1
1IS-A14 - fn32-1
County. W C. V h e—
Date: 3 — 13 — 4( '
'-N.". 1 �
r
Fleldi
Number
Approxlmete
Maxtmum
Useable Size
omild2
(acres)
Soll Type
Slope
(%)
Cro (s)
Maximum
Appllcallon
Rate3
"r
Maldmun
Aprucallon
perbrleallon
Cycle3
(Inches)
Comments
1
3.,-g
G
1 4—
t Ofh Wh U �c'c
u.37
i
;—c e-4q7f3
11
a , -1O
H
tt
/t It W If
y.qy
It
it
,r V v tt
tl
It
I t
rr II tt w
It
6
t_r C7
It
rl
If II i t
tt
ct(^� k
-
corn.3�
/
i0
LI•t'I
''A
r Gi?o .
_�
N k ll
wJo
See attached map.
ZTotal Geld acreage minus required buffer areas.
3Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section ll G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: T,\;c,\ Weemsey I Ty, County: WC, Vie-
Address: 661 EC-0- M&,;,\ S�rev,+
Frer.%ov%� Air- 3.183a Date: 3 -13 -6d
Telephone: °tkei- a Na. - 1, 3a-j
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
,.
Field'
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
orneld2
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(0/o)
-
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
(Whr)
Maximum
Application
perrrrleatlon
Cyele3
(Inches)
'
Comments' �.
13
• "18
otFo k
0-
cc>n wke�, s Co
. SD '
as L
1
3. o
tt
a-ro
'i
.(
It
h .... N l
tl
16
g
a
/1
N 1l K
v
1
1q1
(o•l
t
u
bt
1a
�-1•(o
N
!t
w ll K
N
1
O
t
ll
w V tt K
w
j
See attached map:
ZTotal Geld acreage minus required buffer areas. .
31Zefer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section 11 G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
N&W Pigs
Effective width = 240
Wetted diameter = 300
Nozzle size = 1.18
Operating pressure @ gun = 80
Total acres covered with traveler (wettable)
Hydrant Number
Effective length
Effective Width
Acres
Tract4753
1
900
270
5.58
2
400
240
2.20'
3
400
240
2.20
4
800
270
4.95
5
900
270
5.58
6
900
240
4.95
7
300
120
0.82
8
250
150
0.86
350
100
0.80
9
650
150
2.23
10
300
200
1.37-
500
270
3.09
11
500
120
1.37
12
500
270
3.09
13
450
270
2.78
14
550
270
3.40
15
300
240
1.65
350
270
2.16
16
200
170
0.78
17
1000
270
6.19
18
850
240
4.68
19
400
220
2.02
Total 62.75

�r
V
,�.:�• _.. ;:� Wit-}o�� •• ', ,� ��1.,..''�.
3
Imo; � •j� _ ,
ti
'. ��;Arlo I
�f.. �) ''t ,ram 1�✓�• '✓�rJ
, I' •S� 1 ' � r " •
ej

a
�71 �
�14
0 `j: a ..-•+` f" i a , �S-•� '� S•hr I t • f R'�iy• A
rJ yy; y, r v, 1 'A 1tiC „� \�, ♦tI,h.L?, . '�
�-1Ss�-.�y.-.���'',.<I °; a %1� ,,rz._:`i'. ':,, •�d ^,�-^ �.•^, ,� ��;
va
11.01
Lid
i �1.114♦Tc, y,.� r�. ..� (�`1 ?�., _ � �•♦J rn �ry :'+lf�y�. ., '- I�1 ,kr�
l^f��♦ ,il ' J ' ` ca ic�, _ r �� i�r •: �� [ C � �1 �. r F : :� �� � 'y(•`�: `?;
. b `}~' I.t� �' J\1 — 1•J•4GoiiD'� l ",j1 Cs,+ur�l ..ei.
\•,, �.Af
5V1, 4
��'` �� 11 � „ -�?' '{� ��^/ .� •c:.. %tv .:: .\\ ��\ ��,�r�\ V'1J,'�:�, ..♦.y: ^�•Ar..fir +♦ h. •..
f ♦ _ \O � ^ R f �, �Ir a \ , �� ,/ I ��� /./'� � \ � 1 t"a�. ^�_�, � IIy d��
y" p\y Ll
INk.
r ,
L�. '4< \ '� `'r /. ♦ in �� • �iiSiiiUUU \. \7 \i. \Q� .0 \„(.�� {� �• � Y.•\Y�
r�. '',1. \` +(♦\ ,y '.7ir. f, t': ;i� 2, m11
EPE
1 �t`� ,d � � �;` + _ r K k���i > �. z.fi �+'� {\ ti� `1. ;...ate t' \`�tf � :.•y;� r� �`=
.e -t.'.
g���r�,�1 1 ��,�, t'.5��, { �{' 4 .Y � ;.`i r• t � � f•C •1 � �' '4, �7 �'t: ' .a
Tit G
1 ,,1
v �� �` Inl .. l i1� \ '�Gi s' r31 �i4`''• .r:� /li '�
• - 1. ,; �.� ` .,. `, �`' �1'y�• 1�� '�„ l r/�'i,�}���r\v:. W11t!'iJ�-.+.` a'A�1n ,41 hjfy 4 .,'

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
nll 1
May 1, 2003
Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.
N & W Pig Farms
601 E. Main St.
Fremont NC 27830
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960046
N & W Pig Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
Dear Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs.the
Division of -Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Julian
Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS960046 which expired on April
30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the N & W Pig Farms , located in Wayne County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 7000 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have anew Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to gate
under this permit convey anv property rights in either real or personal property. I �k
NCDE WNR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper -

0
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC: is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning - ..
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
Z:�
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Washington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS960046
NDPU Files

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency -------- _____________
Facility Number: 960046 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960046 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/17/2006 Entry Time:10746 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: N & W Pia Farms
Owner: Julian B Nelms
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 601 E Main St Fremont NC 27830
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Intersection of NC Hwy. 111 and NC Hwy. 222.
Phone: [phone]
Integrator:
Latitude:35°31'52" Longitude:77°54'28"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Julian B Nelms
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):. Name
On -site representative Julian Nelms
24 hour contact name Boyd Nelms
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16565
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC & Permit available on site
` WUP dated 3/18/2000
Waste Analysis:
Date #1 #2
6/12/06 0.85 1.8
11/7105 1.3 1.2
` Soil test report dated 2/2/06, Lime applied as recommended.
` Reviewed waste application. records - complete and balanced with weather codes and inspection initials.
` Cup waters & pressure regulators installed have helped reduced the amount of water going into the lagoons, resulting in less
pumping.
` Lagoon levels recorded. Drop of about 3" in levels in the first week of August 2006 in lagoon 1. (from 37" - 40") is attributed to
recycling lagoon water. Suggest indicating on forms such activities that result in significant changes in the levels. Other changes are
consistent with pumping & rainfall events.
` Rainfall recorded with initials for events > 1".
` Need to record crop yield for 2006 - wheat, soybeans and corn.
` Irrigation calibration and sludge survey to be completed by 9/30/06.
` Stocking and mortality records from GHF available through June 2006.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 7,000 7,000
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Tuna Idantiflar Clewed Date Start Date Desianed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
NORTH
05/09/94
19.00
35.00
Lagoon
SOUTH
05/23/94
19.00
38.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 08117/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
01113
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Coll .... _...._..._ ....
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
fl
■
0
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Aycock
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Nahunta
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Cl
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms Facility Number: 960046
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
-.............................. ...... ._.._._.........__......----------.
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherissues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960046 Owner - Facility: Julian B Nelms
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? .
Facility Number: 960046
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.
N & W Pig Farms
601 E. Main St.
Fremont NC 27830
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960046
N & W Pig Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
Dear Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Julian
Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS960046 which expires October 1,
2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the N & W Pig Farms, located in Wayne County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 7000 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 20Q9. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification. to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keening
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
I
Aquifer Protection Section Animal Feeding Operations Unit One
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 NmIli C.9rol111 A

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or, penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least,180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting. the staff member listed below for information on. this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located_in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely, A
-I L/-
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS960046
APS Central Files

WATF9
Michael F. Easley, Governor
O�
0
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
0
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.
N & W Pig Farms
601 E. Main St.
Fremont NC 27830
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960046
N & W Pig Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
Dear Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Julian
Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS960046 which expires October 1,
2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the N & W Pig Farms, located in Wayne County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 7000 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification, to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section -Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 I I OCT 5 2004 NOnrthCarOhna
IPhone: 919-733-3221 I FAX: 919-71M5881 Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Aatmmllry
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer. Paper. i
lY6SNING'' .R.`,� la tl

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field. -
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located.in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS960046
APS Central Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
March 13, 2000
Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.
N & W Pig Farms
601 E. Main St.
Fremont NC 27830
1 • •
A;W X
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LMAR 16 2000 l.J
WASHINGTON REGIOt1AL OFFICE
DY�tI
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960046
N & W Pig Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
Dear Julian Nelms & H. L. Whitley, Jr.:
In accordance with your application received on August 6, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr., authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from N & W Pig Farms, located in Wayne County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 7000 Wean to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

F)
Certificate of Coverage AWS960046
N & W Pig Farms L
Page 2 °
1
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is,,made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Dianne Thomas at [phone] ext. 364.
Sincerely,
J<err T. Stevens \�
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wayne County Health Department„
Washington Re gional-Office, Water -Quality Section__
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

ANL`SAI. WASTE NANAGMM%jT PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR NEW OR EXPANDED PEED �`ry+��9.1 it
`.
Please return the completed foss to the Division of Environmental 2iaaagem � {�•
the add=see an the reverse side of this form. !UI
Name of fa (Please print):
e �rvt 5 SEP 151994
Address:
�QFM nv17- N1' ?79O Phone No • TER QUALITY
County- �,J
NC °1A^'Mla�lG.B-Rfi�.C.H
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:,2 :2/- dK /3j 3L .a (required);.
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.,�j 311
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): 'h Q v
Design capacity (number of animals): o '�7 -1 0-7
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.): 0 v
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaasaaamaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F '.0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Serlice and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to i5A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria -have -.been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical S ecialist (Please Print) :`�J�1 Cr19 S 6'4(7�• c' /
Affiliation: .S' r? Sc S
Address (Agency): el 0S GI
a-/ Phone No.
�/,P'
S. CLtr,VQL Sl`-. a ICIS ,o NL _ /r/r,
Signature: Date: `4_l i r r
a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaasaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanama
Owner/Haaager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Land er (Please Print) : JU-It"Aa 13.
Signature*— Date:
Name of X=ager, if different from owner (Please print):_.
9, 9-9V
Signature: . Date:
Nota: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer. ,Z
DEM USE ONLY:AC_VdW#00_1
9�-LAO

ANTM%?- WASTE XANAGE =T PLAN CERTIFICATION POR NEW OR =2ANDED FEEDLOT
^ Please retu= the completed foa to the Division of Eaviro=natal Maaag
the address on the reverse side of this farm.
`Name of f ase rm (P"1�print) : /yP�NI S C aw �: c� %/� r' ,Sq 151994
Address: ry V4 9
,C/1r/NcM% 7 ne No.: I -jc12-•!e•517��:'
County: WA, C �"
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude: / (required).
please attach a copy of a county road map with location i3dentified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): ?,L,!� 2
Design capacity (number of animals): '3560
Average size of operation•(12 month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): _2/•
aanavaaaaaanaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaamaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanaaasaaa
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation. Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 25.0217 and
15A NaC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-haue_.been_yerified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical
Affiliation:
Address (Agency);,
d•YJa LG.U,C NC71�F U01r,(,
Signature: /�,y!1 Date: G/� /�%
a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamaaaaasaaaasaaaaa saasaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasa
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understandthat there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a,storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of -.the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Lan Owner (Please Print) S�tC AnJ /�• IJ2 )/^ S r+
Signature _ A — Date:
Name of Manaveerr, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature \ 1 ,. Q R - ( �`f�^~'L Date: 9� 9
Note: A chang in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer. ��L7v� 173
DEM USE ONLY:ACNEW#
q�0-y7�
.Q Qvku-IV
IING ERnND-14
3s5 SZ ? Z
-77.`0te
2

�J61 Llfi w�
L S I O N
3
O
U N
T y
n
1st.
Lilly
♦ 1XR
ILY LMlUNllu
ill
v.,;.
4
H Llii
•
1-0 • .aQ
L719
O
)
]�
1
;t. I71 (
Ilg
'>u 111)
e
/
_01J96
ro
rJ
,I
'!
a LM
w
11QZ !'ii• .v d�
`>'
G19°i _ <
~ Lb
s ♦ 119i >
yt/ \ •.i, jI -
gA+ V LmLIU
',"; �:1:. .
IFJ.L
1712 ...a .s II/L IOI. I]]e 1� •> j'
'IU 1171 -e Illl
171L UtLILL
.9 11! `\ 11d1
4L.Y �.� ♦U
•' �� a�VASCA •�� is ! •1 JI
p
Z :..
Llii T
e >"."` y•
101.
:� m]'_.
9 11L 1 b
? .1 11l.4Q .
��
tlla
tx 1•> lHmiy U42 _ dl`i
• ]}}
to
Mill
0
Lill b '
.a .b i .�tll3 .11L1
LUL
.NM°iL: 7 Lel1
!
iti
i{ ;tr v lil! 11IL
.9 5 ! 11SL IIe29
11lL 19Z
'
a I
72v
Euvlv9 •. J \\
U
v
lll! v
Llii Iril
11a hWl°
`t Luz
/
Lug
•'
,.IztvLtt '12.ii L71i
o ' Fon 'J
�%.~•�777 4I n
Rk9 u
pl. ae} 5P
!} Ili
4
I1u l—_
C'SHrmdai ! ) .9 L131
!ffiL
.r
J 1114
.baltll
n v �.
� 'o (.I
L � - j
v ryr Iv9 y 1$'I
�•
!
117Z
v 1 =J•]D_—
IIIS 'v •e
.
~ ( � '. L72L \
I]7i
Mt. Corolvl " t� Oak v l`
']'
'v L17 lull_
•
C'moaA t
lLi, ! ab IM
17I1 UII • t R L73q i:i
! 1.9 11
4 .� Ills Iw ._ >•. 1L71 1 I W
Ills
D Rom
y / CA. s
Q
1 v \
I I f� Z
Laxpb '
!o v
117Z Gold,bw.
Es°"'
L71i
:!. S wayn9
.W9riepvl
•� it •"o W
RIVER IlLI .I ♦V O
4 t Airpp 1.1 Po191vlIv '= LSL• 1.9. r '� 4
Y}I�L-1
oALXZL
a° L LE 4
r.r 119L p5
v IL>] 7 1
-117!IL[
Ill! '� L r I.w. •lLi ! .:''
ILL v 171d!
'i•:: •r
117i ? r117
.i. Vr
171
i J
j •`1 III
lUJ
LQl 13 to SHOW Hu
b, .] ♦ I,I
`
s
LM
`
I I]
.U!
LOB ppO ,p
wC
p p
�LZU
\
)° .1.op] 6,1
Lanprtwr
9rb•
Illy' I>8LM
I
4 iHW l51
AV'
♦4
\
r 1,]q
F.
}
yyL 1L91 ♦ JZ9! 77hJ�
PAS i'J t'
♦ �IJJI - I>➢p 1103IM
t
V
I ,Ildlt iltl 1 i ' - "
9
I ]e' •
' 4" 1y
: 1. 89L �
� ..] 1
a \ Cu '''
'1
r 1 • Ibl]
1ria��
" �•q• ".::\w'yje'' IS
Q lilt
:ia�r1. ..J
r!}' �
"5
7.
SOUM �
� wipslohc!. "
`�
•
'`'I„ .•
.b1LL J l L Ivrblarv� .
. .
.
t
• m7 c.� fyo
rler
rJ Fy
I
au .9 r
�b 9 A
LDSB
LM Iml •- ��'
t
1Z1!
IIIi "
i vµ
^I^rW- IIIIHwI 'k
Ti IW] " [ t\
W FMC9IPM
/
',• !�� I yyy
1I.72
• } Ivn I t
IVHIMAC Fi/SF
x*<Ns Q
Ilr
is 1.0
•
^
190T
t ) C.myCh 1 r qlR
171.0�
.
\
• .4f
G
e ;
r -'

Animal Facility and Permit Data
rmit Number: AWS960046 Printed: 8/9/99
Owner: Julian Nelms Region: Washington
Farm Name: N & W Pig Farm
Street: 601 E. Main St.
City, State: Fremont NC Zip: 27830
Telephone: [phone]
Facility Contact: Julian Nelms & H. L. Whitley, Jr.
State Reviewer: Dianne Thomas
Type of Application: Existing / General / Original
Date App Rcvd: 8/6/99
End Stat App: 11/4/99
Date Reviewed:
Date Withdrawn:
Date Returned:
Date Denied:
Date Issued:
County: Wayne
Lat:35.5311 Long.77.9078
Type of Operation: Swine
Reg Comm Reqs:
Reg Comm Rcvd:
Add Info Reqs:
Add Info Rcvd:
Ot Ag Com Pegs:
Ot Ag Com Rcvd:
Comments:
a4AU . jr- +✓ram 5 s �r -
.�;r c VD I K� 5A,2j^ ib 5 m� s . `i�i.is ;t"
XZS X �. P` S IDi`� b 4o4ry -
C cat i�
c-�
6-
�VIV,.
C�
TJD''TFMKI-�.TJ-AcSOND
00 XSCXXCIO KXY.X XXXXXC>O
4 C) x X x X t Zia GDi� flh L`�!

__ ��i'•. United states
,1� 1 Oecartment of
` AgICUOUre
Soil
Conservation
Service
GPERATOR: Nelms 111
l�v e'?
WA�C ' i sec
� IlA- LION
puG p 61999
Non-pischa�98 Pel�l�'ng
?lease review the attached plan and specifications care.°ully. Recain
this plan for your use and records. It is strongly recommended that you,
ycur concractor, and Soil Conservation Service personnel are in agreement
as *co how the wa'ste lagoon is to be constructed. The Soil Conservation
Service personnel will meet with all concerned parties and walk over the
lice to explain all flags and markings. It is important that everyone
understand what is expected so that final construction meets plans and
specification and the Job can be certified for payment (if cost -sharing
is involved).
The pad dimensions and grades are the best estimate. The BUILDER or
CONTRACTOR is RESPONSIBLE for final layout and design of the pads. The
Soil Conservation Service personnel will assist in a limited capacity,
as ics major concern is the proper design and construction of the waste
treatment lagoon.
The -actual amount of material required for pads and dam may vary from the
estimates. The design.will attempt to balance cuts and fills as close as
possible. If additional material is required after construction is complete
on the lagoon, the concractor and owner will negotiate an the price and
locacien of borrow area. .
NOTE: Design Requirement:
Estimate of Excavation
/de3 93 cu.4C. = cu. yds.
cu.fc.= cu.yds.
Estimate of Pad b Dike: cu.ft. _2 cu.yds.
/13 :L_ Ration
Job Class M_ 5 15
Oa to %1
Designed By
ame
Design Approva
$o:l Cor�se�vaf.:rSeiru:cA
0 Tne sod CGn]e/viGpn SHv:ee
re in iteGI :n•
oe^.Lim emnt of AgficYltur♦
C
g
Date
hec�ee/or Jer;�."sd bye
hewe �f bee n a �J

E I
8
set i7Et
S 10 N
3„
^
O
Worlar \'.
LWGain
\-
U11
1142
a .tR. e dF•0 y
!L! -� LQ - ]3']S'
222 i ]
LUZ J 1141
I.l
9
LERI j" : IyU9
IUP
4
I I J 7 y�•J
I--7 •
LU
1.0
ILI
p' �1314
I
%
17oR 7 I.o 1341 .S mix "i I �>
I .
^
?Lm
,p URI '
L1➢L ]'m
BmIVA ,e
e �]
o
u
t
�
'.i
,1 \ v;.R j't.e ;ii E. Lo
✓ r.e
?° . S'R' L
!i: .? � I
•
=� T FRFMONTr: Li43
u77U•.
ll
1� I 1-
1 ..�
.,
?
p . U1 a
LL \ 1ls! r s
Giii:... a is
..�
_ r::,.�:.
�.J
un
EUREKA ... 17 Z
ror. sos ;?1 ii�
LUZ
v�.
ft
un
T ! U3 _ L!L s
4b']]e
-
,>
rAs 'x u
I . ;i; I
\' ) 1.7�C -
L77L I.x Pik,*
xxx
-
) 1 III .n
9
I.I
1 -&!
�ahun]a n
1 a
4q)
.I W s U]r p I/
Nahunfa;�j i T 1111 a 1115
r3 _ ".n .v 11L LW 1
v J
Swamv _ I ;]
'\ in,
in I
l`31 L111 >LM LUI^LW/
On
- !2L
L701 u LI ♦I
- %KEVILLE LL- o I Ifil
91p _
Faro 1.] !I
.12
Pik. � Uli :
__
�? Av L51
e ,_
>
ltt 3J7 u
:.I
Cr rroodr1 34 l .9
LM
h .�•
]5']0'
.•�11J,
�
1t11 \
`aWhib � »' -'�"
+.a
I a I
13 U, ',
\ ll
•` U
/ MI. Carmel
�
'•/ ♦7 OCh i
a
v ;0 l\
1!I
Uzi
r 1, 'i% Crouroodr 6 1.L7 s f OI.13 '\
p
\ 4! I
-
'J1v
_ UAL ^
LEL I.e lU�
N -�Ii1J I W
U]; !
t U4
L "
'_
♦b U , Uii"
Lill
'
b`
JMf.��?
I] :/ oal -
L+f
�7 �7 _ L
x.]
ao.
Um Ch. I]u U]L
Goldrboro
III
EKprn
I
<o
:r:
^'>`
I.o9 !71S
Mlni9ipal
L51i1 ,.
RIVERUJ
- L Airport PafUon >I
. I
U-
'� 11
.] YIjjY uw
.
7 ,•,
1]f AL,
w
I
LEZ
,o L 7All
TLE r ..,
160Y ._
t
uu LL7j
117E ,v
11I4 .17lL ^ x
^ .x L ^
a N Ll34 a .5 . •e
77 Isee II11R
e
Ch.
1574
I?7P '
�
3 U ro SNOW
x
HILL --
I
a L
1701
rat Ballmi ��S
\
] ? d
L31
setA i
ROSEWOOD q
,,
3
!]3d
IS
rem
I
I
IUNIK.
>0 ceAfx fq
IDr.
LvnOrbn
, .�
1 1L]R v .�
J
.9
`) GOLDSBORO
t 1 wd N IUMN CEISx hlUsq�..
,,• .::r URe.
.7:: ..1,... `: A\b
/
h 1 "�
\
'� 75°t3?_
Raw r 1•397
1.�
♦,> � t':'I
LEU
,<�'d.
�:.\.
f
li• li; IRI] B9NIe1
Y;F r, •ve.
I] >D'` il�- .... R�
` ]� 1
�%iQ/Z • .x , ,\ I]Ie 1r • .
lsi
]o U^•
ML\'
J 1401
I >� L3
r ♦],5 .e 1I33 1RR] r
Ie I SeyrOwn
Air Fpo9 Bau Iwx �NI
Io 5.0
\\ 1 ry EI , p , ♦• ♦
Carey
' IUtiRI 73'x0'
� y OIL. 1]Ir .I�4i r. \
I. e,O ]y1y

0
Operator:JulianNelms,#1,N County: Wayne
Date:
5/23/94
.Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1000
feet
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 head (finishing only) x 135
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean) x 433
lbs. =
0
lbs
3500 head (wean to feeder) x 30
lbs. =
105000
lbs
Describe other :
30
lbs
Total Average Live
Weight =
105030
lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 105030 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb.
ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW =
1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 105030 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)--------------------- 115.0
Inside top width (feet)---------------------- 220.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)----------------- 42.5
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)------------ 31.5
Freeboard (feet)----------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)------------------ 2.5 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 110.0 215.0 10.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
110.0 215.0 23650 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
60.0 165.0 9900 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
85.0 190.0 64600 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
23650.0 64600.0 9900.0 1.7
Total Designed Volume Available=163583.33 CU. FT

'5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
115.0 220.0
25300.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 25300.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 105030 lbs. ALW/135 lbs ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 191854.8 gals. or 25649.0 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system or excess water. Flush systems
that recirculate the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallon
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 14758.3 cubic feet
5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 14758.3 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
25649
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
14758
cubic
feet
5D.
14758
cubic
feet
TOTAL 55166 cubic feet

6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period____________________>
180
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation=====______>
7.0
inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall__________________>
7.0
inches
Freeboard___________________________________>
1.0
feet
Side slopes_________________________________>
2.5
: 1
Inside top length___________________________>
115.0
feet
Inside top width____________________________>
220.0
feet
Top of dike elevation_______________________>
42.5
feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation__________________>
31.5
feet
Total required volume_______________________>
160196
cu. ft.
Actual design volume________________________>163583.33
cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
37.5•feet
Stop pumping elev.___________----------------
38.8
feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.====______>
37.5
feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
37.5
feet
Required minimum treatment volume=====______>
105030
cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====_______>
105487
cu. ft.
Start pumping elev----------
40.8
feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall===>
148825
cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation=====______>
147424
cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped________________>
40407
cu. ft.
Actual volume to be pumped__________________>
41936
cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner hen required==>
1.6
feet
7. DESIGNED BY: rYG��� Qj • APPROVED BY:
DATE: 5-23-q� DATE: ,S1-23�qj�
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

• SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 40.8 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 38.8 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 40407.4 cubic feet or
302247.1 gallons.

SHEET 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SHEET 1 OF 2
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
FOUNDATION PREPARATION:
-----------------------
The foundation area of the lagoon embankment and building pad shall be
cleared of trees, logs, stumps, roots, brush, boulders,sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
the lagoon and pad area should be stripped and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas. After stripping, the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT:
-----------------------------------
The completed excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of detrimental amounts of sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches in thickness when loose and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
equipment or standard tamping roller or other equivalent method.
Compaction will be considered adequate when fill material is observed
to consolidate to the point that settlement is not readily detectible.
NOTE THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF LINERS IN THE LINER
SECTION OF THIS SPECIFICATION. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include 10 percent for
settlement. Dikes over 15 feet in height and with an impoundment
capacity of 10 acre-feet or more fall under the jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
from the constructed height to the downstream toe of the dike.
Precautions shall be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
LINER: THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE 1.6 ft.
-------------------------------------- ----------------
NOTE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATE OR WHEN AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW ARE
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over -
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be backfilled
as specified to grade with a SCS approved material (ie - CL,SC,CH).
REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.

SHEET 2 OF 2
Soil liner material shall come from an approved borrow area. The
minimum water content of the liner material shall be optimum moisture
content which relates to that moisture content when the soil is kneaded
in the hand it will form a ball which does not readily separate. Water
shall be added to borrow as necessary to insure proper moisture content
during placement of the liner. The moisture content of the liner
material shall not be less than optimum water content during placement.
The maximum water content relates to the soil material being too wet
for efficient use of hauling equipment and proper compaction. Proper
compaction of the liner includes placement in 9 inch lifts and
compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum ASTM D698 Dry Unit
Weight of the liner material. When smooth or hard, the previous lift
shall be scarified and moistened as needed before placement of the next
lift.
The single most important factor affecting the overall compacted perme-
ability of a clay liner, other than the type of clay used for the
liner, is the efficient construction processing of the compacted liner.
The sequence of equipment use and the routing of equipment .in an estab-
lished pattern helps assure uniformity in the whole placement and
compaction process. For most clay soils, a tamping or sheepsfoot
roller is the preferable type of compaction equipment.
The soil liner shall be protected from the discharge of waste outlet
pipes. This can be done by using some type of energy dissipator(rocks)
or using flexible outlets on waste pipes.
Alternatives to soil liners are synthetic liners and bentonite sealant.
When these are specified, additional construction specifications are
included with this Construction Specification.
CUTOFF TRENCH:
-------------- ir /',-���.��
A cutoff trench shall be constructed under the embankment area when
shown on a typical cross section in the plans. The final depth of the
cutoff trench shall be determined by observation of the foundation
materials.
VEGETATION:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be seeded
to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after construc-
tion according to the seeding specifications. Topsoil should be placed
on areas of the dike and pad to be seeded. Temporary seeding or mulch
shall be used if the recommended permanent vegetation is out of season
dates for, seeding. Permanent vegetation should be established as soon
as possible during the next period of approved seeding dates.
REMOVAL OF EXISTING TILE DRAINS
-------------------------------
When tile drains are encountered, the tile will be removed to a minimum
of 10 feet beyond the outside toe of slope of the dike. The tile
trench shall be backfilled and compacted with good material such as
SC, CL, or CH.

SCS-ENG-578 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rev. S-78 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
. LgC�oorl
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED P8NO SITE
•
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS
CROPLAND— ACRES PASTURE— ACRES
WOODLAND —ACRES. •
i SKETCH OF PROPOSED • . . VolINGS WERE MADE (Appr= wale 111 _feet)
Local# reference Point In center line at dam and identify on sketch.
m®
■■®�■■`���■■
■■■®■■■■
M.
MMI
■■■■■
■
n
IMME■■■■■
■■■
IMMERNME�■■■MiNE®■■■■
■■
■■�■■■■■��®®®®■■
��■MIN
EMENUME
■■INSIME
■■MO■
■�
■■■■■■■
____�
■■■
■■■
■��■■■■■■
■■■■
■�®■■��■�■I■�■■�■
■■■■■�■■■■■■■E■■■■I■■■■■■■■
o■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■w■■■■■■■
■®■■■■■■rE■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■e■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
.
BORING NUMBER AND PROFILE
Make and 1;sf dam -site and spillwav bonnos tint - then ponded area and borrow pit bortngs - separate with vertical red line.
(Continued on back where ner4fry) Show water table elevations on d4m.site borfngs.
61

SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 2.5 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED AS FOLLOWS:
150.0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 1 TO NOVEMBER 30
FEBRUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
75.0 LBS. RYE GRAIN AT 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
150.0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 15
20.0 LBS. HULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 8 LBS./ACRE
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0.0 LBS. UNHULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 10 LBS./ACRE
SEEDING DATES: JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
0.0 LBS. RYE GRASS AT 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
2500.0 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
5.0 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
250.0 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)_
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

U. S. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service September 1980
File Code: 210
o a'N
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAB
Landowner . Nelms County W�n le.
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No_
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam Ft. Length of Flood Pool 2.2 b Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 3-Jb-R 4
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev.:Est. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope Land Use : Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Pl.ain
Ft. Ft. %. Ft. Ft.
. Wuoc:S
1 oo .
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach Nose. S,ddw &e*.ck, paws No da., fo
:4e oe atoPer4,7 Aojordd tk6.1 • 7D Xr:6e,l/
AX_ 11 1
Hazard Classification of 4Bae b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I,(D, III, IV, V)
A
By
name
f4-
itle
Concurred By
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed
Date ,5/;23/ V
Date

I, � �"qa J
� 11
job
Cem
\\I��••�\\Cem / \r`�.--\ 1Wmer Swemp �\
• l �Jl,� /_ /l \� a Cem • l/
Cem
r
S �
/ Eur
125
30
r
o v� 1 Of -----
'6tD
IJ „fit? ` ,1� .y f
A i_�
VI I
it
Its
''\• ` It\ a II'
1523
it
n - 1536 em i�� J :� \ ✓ —\�//; .11L �;
J�J
�C~' 1 e t II✓�
u xy
Va
M �• - if as "CS
\` � �,. ( 7 t �� �;t•t ,�Ft '�'1. rx 4ti�;.�'l� 'ail ' �y�C�•�
It
v
Edmunds�n
ii `c i Crg Broads
/27
it ..2 J,�_ act . r •• ' I - • ��_„
it ~! ��� '�\ • ,N11�10�—GF Ot0G1G.E °V MV Ev, 11[GfG N. VI.GM

MAY 5, 1994
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owners name--:JULIAN NELMS County:WAYNE
Mail Address-:PIKEVILLE
Type of production unit ---- :WEAN -FEEDER
Number of animal units-----: 7000
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Temporary storage period---: 180 days
Method of application ------ :IRRIGATE
Amount of animal waste produced-----------------: 2956 tons/year
Amount of plant available N produced by animals-: 4690 lbs./year
Commercial N to apply on planned acreage--------: 0 lbs./year
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your swine operation. The plan is based on the
soil types, crops to be grown, and method of application for
your particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.

Page 2
• The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Yield Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month to
No.
-----
-----
No.
-----
-----
Type
-----
-----
Code
-----
-----
/Acre /Unit
----- -----
----- -----
-----
-----
Used
-----
-----
Apply
------
------
4753
10
AyA
F
700
0.12
1.0
84
APRIL-AUG
4753
10
AyA
D
120
1.25
1.0
150
MAR-JULY
4753
20
NoB
F
650
0.12
0.5
39
APRIL-AUG
4753
20
NoB
D
100
1.25
0.5
62.5
MAR-JULY
4753
20
Na
D
120
1.25
0.5
75
MAR-JULY
4753
20
NoA
F
700
0.12
0.8
63
APRIL-AUG
4753
20
NoA
D
110
1.25
0.8103.125
MAR-JULY
4753
10
AyA
F
700
0.12
4.0
336
APRIL-AUG
4753
10
AyA
D
120
1.25
4.0
600
MAR-JULY
4753
10
NoB
F
650
0.12
1.0
78
APRIL-AUG
4753
10
NoB
D
100
1.25
1.0
125
MAR-JULY
4753
8
AyA
F
700
0.12
6.0
504
APRIL-AUG
4753
8
AyA
D
120
1.25
6.0
900
MAR-JULY
4753
18
AyA
F
700
0.12
1.0
84
APRIL-AUG
4753
18
AyA
D
120
1.25
1.0
150
MAR-JULY
4753
18
NoB
F
650
0.12
1.5
117
APRIL-AUG
4753
18
NoB
D
100
1.25
1.5
187.5
MAR-JULY
4753
19
NoA
F
700
0.12
0.6
52.92
APRIL-AUG
4753
19
NoA
D
110
1.25
0.6
86.625
MAR-JULY
4753
19
NoB
F
650
0.12
0.5
39
APRIL-AUG
4753
19
NoB
D
100
1.25
0.5
62.5
MAR-JULY
4753
12
Na
F
675
0.12
1.5
121.5
APRIL-AUG
4753
12
Na
D
120
1.25
1.5
225
MAR-JULY
4753
12
NoA
F
700
0.12
1.5
126
APRIL-AUG
4753
12
NoA
D
110
1.25
1.5
206.25
MAR-JULY
4753
12
NoB
F
650
0.12
1.5
117.78
APRIL-AUG
4753
12
NoB
D
100
1.25
1.5
188.75
MAR-JULY
-----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
Total
-----
43.3
-----
4884
------
Available Nitrogen
(includes
commercial)
4690
Surplus
Or Deficit
-194
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
B=Bermudagrass(graze)-tons
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
E=Corn(silage)-tons
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
G=Fescue(graze)-tons
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
I=Oats-bu.
J=Rye-bu.
K=Small grain(graze)-acre
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
W=Wheat-bu.
Y=Fescue(pasture)-tons
Z=Bermudagrass(pasture)-tons

Page 3
If more commercial fertilizer is used than shown in this plan,
then additional acres of land may be needed. A three to fifteen
feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all
ditches in fields that receive animal waste.
Additional comments:
--------------------
-------------------- ----- -------------------------------------
Prepared by: Title: Date:
Concurred in by: �—�,� %��.',,� Date:
Producer
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff
occurs.
Producer
Technical Specialist:.li
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
Date:
Date:S

I on
"i)got/
4 '1$
na
Jo .. ....
110
16 %
6.0
j
It
Zjb
OO"
,.. NMI'
9v
Al 4.14113��
g1r
j�m I *,;
- - - - - - 49

Attachment B
?age 1 of 3
North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service
A -Waste Management
aiotag t and tlnor ciL�.aa1 s s Ncriis C=a= sty
OF T A4i] b-211=caTTeN aa"'V�
.lames C. Bark—*
A.. semi-Sol;d zat e
_. Scraped direct?y, :-cm lot into sxeacer
a. Frain loaded spreader, collet= about 2 lbs of m==a = m
d-_lar=.- 1oca^_aas using novae-n" ; c callae=ate.
+=. F+oa storage
a. Collect abont 2 lbs oi' mxrm -e .nm uncle: the ssrr-=ace c=st
avoiding bedd-l.:g materials mad usZ aoraarallic collectors.
B. Lgt:d Ka==a Sla-rp
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. :..and a 1/20 noszzeeta�?is conduit open on both ends into
=a==e LO pit floor.
b . Seal tipper and of condt:it (a. g. , by placing a th%:mb over end
of coma-=) sapping maap=e that bas entarad lower end, remove
and empr7 sl--ry into plasmic bucket or aozaeralLc comza er.
c. Iaka ssbsamples from 5 or more loch'.o=m or a= least l qua:_.
d. !!i= and add about 3/4 pint to nor=etallic sale coarai.ner.
U- 'cz=e =or ssorage basin or tank
a. 'Make sure manse bas bee= well m: xed wits a L-'quid m==,-a
chopper -agitator pump or propeller ag'_tatar.
b. iaka subsamples from about 5 pit loeatiors, :rpm a#=to= ptap
or .ran mate spreader and place in a plas.::c bucker.
* Professor and Extension Soecia14st, Biological and Ag culZtral Bagi=eeriag
Depa*meat, North Carolina State Universi--7, Raleigh, NC.

Attachment B
Page 2of3
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a noffieta"Tic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
U. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on and of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bot-.le within 1' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to notmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
L. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of Ltter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and the
other 4 subsamales from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect 1i6.er from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about 2-3 lbs li—�-er to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 2-gallon freezer bag and seal.
U. From stockpile
a. Take suhsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mi.x, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.

II. SA. n-1 P3=PA2ATION AND MANSF3
Attachment B
Page 3 of 3
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or =eat in any other way.
B. Pack sample i.-: ice, refrigerate, freeze, or cansfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample t`ansfer.
D. L mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
L. A&L Eastern Agricaltzral Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packars Corp.
7621 ahitepine Rnad. 2320 S. roster Avenue
Richmond, VA Z2237 _ 'heeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: (31Z)398-0110
ii. Fisher Scient'."ic Co.
3315 Ainton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
iv. NASCO
901 Janesv4-11e Avenue
Fort At'si^.son, W1 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
L. Address: North Carolina Depa-treat of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box Z7647
Raleigh, NC Z7611
Ph: [phone]
At=: Dr. Ray Campbell
U. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; .:srkey-breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown an litter; ete.)
C. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped mazarra, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slu^_y, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, R, Ca, Mg, Na,
S, Fe, sa, Za, Ca, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, wo, Cd, Ni, Pb

a y��iW Ji+�% •r •lF I;n •,l1 iL.�r. li ir''iu: `'!I +•' �,�a�`�;�:".� •�i''
i',t'"'Z� 1" •is � '�` .N."� J'w �'1 *4—'.3.'t:+ ��=a: '-r5\ +. �'�''r
i r�,;1�:,jf 1. n T��y:.;y�•'rni.:{.1 u- 1...;f! .,, • l':•Yr .�`.
♦ ,I .l L ,, ♦ �ij i :• i,.2, •1.1.t�P... .a •%�t T�1'!'l�'�t{ ter.
�M 1„d Ai._ .r ••l�l hflfl • r, rJ'I� v!f SLLY u[1.� 'i',
Jj
41,
[` � .�'t� •' `� {`�r`-�t'� pia"." : 'in�'.�r�' �r1i'�'�•'-� •
n , • �. ' Y . !• t fi ,_ R`SV•��•a W r�k •il• y�Rr yti.lj. �S.'-i •. al
7 ,2 • 1 1 ..y rT r .r� • ��` )r• 4 a, P ,4lrS,f. �_,fi 1"�'�^.,�,�+%
• j 1• ,°� f•. I"� a`-•tT •fr 'af'rnC .Y>F�•J� f r p
•° tt�p.���IP/��.'':�a � `�A rl �s y�fly `�i:... � •\yi`•r
KS
Tr1 T Syr-+ .'rt'r��i%♦"�`�
{
L
'
(
•i, �) 1 a l
r L ♦ r
♦ it ' I )Ti .�-t' -r .F _ �•••li , �r
r •+ r rt t•t ."i Bpi �, 7�'IT�)i.�L �.
VIA AV +•'I �i
h �•
, I
IY°'.,. !� -. {..11' I•_.!a1, •11♦. `�/ ��
rW•,• * • , . r ;y a r"1 1r1 . ! �/ 1, • , • N.1.
;T'..
�rayf +`���a .r' ♦ r.`��_! �r �w � 'Y IL rt� 1/Z `Ki� ~�`�' rc: .. Cr��.
' w ,. ♦• ', 1 LL.,it a tT� t. . -FX
' � it Maf r y' r { ��,; of fr��•'
•'� 1 ,Y/.: ,.tn it i�,• •• III
r \i �..4 >'• �� r •It + ttt
11•.�r Lr 1. r { }} , iL�• L • r..�s.y� •�• .± r r(�'1
',,Rj•.�.u..c!`�.J -lwt /`11�iw /,{fy �` r...7i I: i • �t:'� h )� r.-.r• y T •t.t `•, +ter Y'
'iMh!N,�•]t..xl.'�,'�, •,�•yalf,1l��'�1•^ '°.i \ �,
/ •:, ►rnr• � I. . f`r. fly 1•� �•' •a t • .. a Y,'• .•
! • J l,rr /Y ♦ L �r.Y �.� nw1'r!-., Ir ♦ .�f r. 41 •� �.� i r

S u rvM vvi A ¢. y o RTC 1 SITE )
ii
CUT (E%GAVATIoN>
L.acoo.,j 4) 9
'TA Ds 444. 13
/o-rAL- 5143G. 37
L.AGlooal 1, q 53, I Z
I�Ap AeEA 1 -7 17 a Qa
SUB TOTAL
LESS 6„Ccwe. PAPS
�2@ 4&'x tas')
Io-rAL
I: CUT - ILL. �ATIO
it
1. $4- : I.00
cY
4-zb-9d-

Fi«
AeEA - SITE
LAyCIO #-I
4-_20-94
1
(DES 1(�14 `C I/
J
Avy
STA
... ENO ACEA
SF
END Ar,CEA
SF
�1
D/S
Fr
✓ocJM
CF
o+t%
... - o _
::
225.4v
7-Z
419 58. So
O +3 8
;.. 450. go
454.15
12
5;449.80
0+60
278. TS
8
22.30.00
9q.7o
zo
1,a 94.00
O t78
49 .40
9 9.7s
s9
s8z�.2s
1.137
98.oS
z
2o59.os
PASS
iE) 98,oa
39S.10
7
Z�6q.4o
/-f65
G43.4o
734.80
/2
S1817.60
1477
776.2b
358.1
48
Igroze,ga
Z+249
—O—
:521 73 . Zo c1=
cY

-FIL.L- AeEA
- S1%E
IFLD4.. PADS
zz-`%f
<�r3/yN aC/
Avf
STA.
'END Aeec.
o
EN AeEA
1ST.
•//
►/ OLUMe
(SF)
(5F)
(FT)
C F)
0428
O
'73.2
So
o45o
IdG.oS
163.f.z s
4-s
73�3, IZ
O-+9 S
... i 81. Zo
90.Go
1413
-
�+SZ
-o -
1 ol•TO
I�
I$30, 60
47D
Zo3.4D
2�7. 325
4r,
1ILI ZgG•95
Z4-1(o
33r. z5
Z+(o7
-D-
33� I-79. $S CF
"I
.I
��i
l
i�i
i
-

CUT Yo Lu.he - SrTE
5TA ... ENG AP -GA
(S F'
0+55
-O-
o+7g
1710. 45
1 +37 ...
1 o 1 (o. 55
IO-
Avy.
EA SF FT)
855. 7 Z5 2-3
1 ro ro 3..5o 59
8 08, 77.5 2!
27
/eo, 9 73.7 7
1341 790. 46 ex
d- 99 z. z¢ cY

•
11
1:
•
•
ICI
I:1
CUT �/Ot-o^1E - S17£ I
l3LDJ'PApACEA
J
l�-26'94
Avc,,
57A
... END ACEA F-%j D Ar-EA
3> ST.
VOLUME
D410
- p-
... 41.Izs
I4
S"7S.iS
0+ 24-
SZ.Z S
... 41. 1 z S
(o
Z4b, 7s
O+3o
-O-
1+I3
-O-
VX*
279. 2267
Z3
64! ZZ, 10
14 3 S
SS8 4S
... 279, 22 5
17
4-74 , SZ
...
Pj 99I,5D eF
' Z7
_
4-44, 13 CY
u�
..I

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
SOIL
CONSERVATION
SERVICE
---------------
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME------------------------
--' ----------
------------------------
9/' W _63z- __zy-
TELEPHONE--------
9/9
A41A -'q)z7 Slop
LOCATION
LU_
AAl--------------
------------------
SIZE OPERATION—A-9-CQ-----
-Ma-eSrL%-----
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY
PRODUCER 1570t —FT.
IS SITE WITHIN 100—YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES----- NO-- --
If yes, SCS cannot provide assistance.
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LINE" X
PERENNIAL STREAM? YES----- NO ----
If no, site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION
OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES----- NO-Y---
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board
about required permits. Permits must be obtained prior
to design approval.
Are utilities in construction area? YES----- NOS --
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual
and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be
attached to site evaluation.)
Page 1

r
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY
NON -CROPLAND? YES----- NO----
IIf yes, producer must complete a Form AD-1026.
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES---- NO-,& -
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF
ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE
ALTERED UNTIL PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS,
US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT.
(A copy of AD-1026 and CPA-026 should be attached to
site evaluation.)
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT
PRESENT? YES---- NO ----
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE
PLANNING AREA OR WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN
ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA? YES---- NO-Q--
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE
PLANNED AREA? YES---- NO-X--
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT
FARMLANDS IN THE OPERATING UNIT? YES- NO ----
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES---- NO-X-
If yes to any of these questions, refer to form NC-CPA-16
for policy sources. The form does not need to be
completed.
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER...........
........PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION? YES--)-- NO ----
........POSSIBLE EXPANSION OF TREATMENT
VOLUME FROM 1 CU.FT. UPWARDS TO
3 CU. FT./LB. OF ANIMAL? YES-'�-- NO----
........PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH
WATER TO AT LEAST 1/2 OF THE
CAPACITY? YES---_ NO ----
........USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE? YES-�-- NO ----
Page 2

WASTE MANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND
APPLY WASTE? YES-y - NO ----
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO
MORE LAND? YES---- NO ----
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER,
CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON LAND
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE? YES---- NO ----
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.)
SOIL INVESTIGATION -- VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION
SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES- NO------
ISA CLAY LINER REQUIRED? YES------ NO -------
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSITE? YES------ NO ------
QUESTIONABLE --- -----
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED? YES--X-- NO------
(Attachsoil investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
SITE APPROVED YES -A-- NO------ CONDITIONAL--------
COMMENTS�si�- yJ --Az__-s� _ �aNsb---�S��s--�z-- ---
&k�t�t-_z��id-------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID AS LONG AS THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF LAGOON CONTINUES IN REASONABLE TIME
PERIOD. UNDUE DELAYS OR HESITANCY IN CONSTRUCTION MAY
REQUIRE THAT SITE EVALUATION BE INVALIDATED.
SIGNATURE—U------- A--- DATE-!- — 4
Page 3

r f .1%1 �^
U.S.D.A. SCS-CPA-026 1. Name and Address of Person 2. Date of Request
SO4 Conseriatiort-SMIl fte (June 91)
✓tA�/ b• iM-r
3. County
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND ° l
1 CONSERVATION DETERMINATION .2-7 83 U
4. Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determination 'Ar 5 L S 5. Farm No. and Tract No.
/7.2$ 7= V 7, 3
1 V CIN/ ... G 1 AMIN
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
6. Is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land determination? Yes CK No ❑
7. Are there highly erodible soil map units on this farm? Yes ® No ❑
1 +-' 1
v
8. List highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any
crop year during 1981-1985.
9. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any crop year during 1981-1985; and were not
enrolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
10. This Hinhly Erodible Land determination was completed in the: Office ❑ Field
u 4Ms
'A lisle y.„
CGf•TI/1\I 11 MOVI Akin
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
11. Are there hydric soils on this farm? Yes (6 No ❑
12. Wetlands (W), including abandoned wetlands, or Farmed Wetlands (FW) or Farmed Wetlands Pasture (FWP).
Wetlands may be farmed under natural conditions. Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture may be
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23, 1985. as long as they are not
abandoned.
13. Prior Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23, 1985. The use, management,
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions unless
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment.
14. Artificial Wetlands (AW). Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions.
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MW). These wetlands are to be farmed according to the minimal -effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made.
16. Mitigation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetland
converted between December 23, 1985 and November 28, 1990.
17. Restoration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after
November 28, 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
18. Restoration without Violation (RSW). A restored wetland converted between December 23, 1985 and
November 28, 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production,
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a violation to be in good faith and the
wetland has been restored.
21. Converted Wetlands (CW). Wetlands converted after December 23, 1985 and prior to November 28, 1990. In any
year that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
22. Converted Wetland (CW+year). Wetlands converted after November 28, 1990. You will be ineligible for USDA
program benefits until this wetland is restored.
23. Converted Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,
cranberries, vineyards or building and road construction.
24. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incorrect determination
by SCS.
25. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are considered maintenance and are in compliance
with FSK "
26. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance and it
installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CW). See item 22 for information on CW+year. ,
27. The wetland determination was completed in the office ❑ field I and was delivered ❑ mailed❑ to the p
28. Remarks. Ub`
/UGS C(,J2tCiGnr. d S cr`� ?- q? 33 / F: C /VX .21 f . 2--
29. 1 certify that the above determination is correct and adequate for use in determining 30. g ature of SCSDistri Cons
eligibilityfor USDA program benefits, and that wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and
hydrophytic vegetation under normal circumstances exist on all areas outlined as
Wetlands Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture.
Assistance and programs of the Soil Conservation Service available without regard tfoci, religion, color, set, age, or ham
i ( SCS Copy (
tionist/t 31. Date
If

J
7NG • , MONr
N,
PIKE

MR)m
-f:� W
P-
I I
[_ l W fU Cl (aJ R) C1 I w
CJl i1J
W f - C�O[-.0I(-j ro G1,&) W \ W W
-r
G1 C,.) C1 CA fl0 KIJ IZ) Cl Ct) CO� 0 \C W
CJ(y) Ul
CD
CPi \ bo
r w -4�
-f' PJ I w La W
Aq
1
-I
J
-7 -
Ul
CY�D
-'- �
CJI
UJ `fl
—F� o
UI
p

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
. bpgtFRQc F� �
glJ�,s L�
Producer: Julian B. Nelms 6 H. L. Whitley JrQ 6i9
o���
Location: 9�
601 E. Main Street
Fremont NC 27830
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Wean to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals: 7000.00 pigs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and.
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
7000 pigs x .40 tons waste/pigs/year = 2800 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
7000 pigs x .48 lbs PAN/pigs/year = 3360 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
4753
8
AyA
CO
750
75
10.27
770.25
I
MAY-JUN
4753
4753
4753
4753
4753
4753
4753
4753
10
12
AyA
21 1AyA
IO
I750
175
I 112.451933.75
MAY-JUN
CO
650
65
6.75
438.75
I
I
I I
MAY-JUN
CO
675
67.5
2.53
170.775
I
I
1
MAY-JUN
CO
700
70
12.07
844.9
I
I
1
MAY-JUN
CO
650
65
7.27
472.55
I
I
1
MAY-JUN
CO
700
70
2.40
168
I
I
1
MAY-JUN
CO
650
65
2.43
157.95
I
I
1
MAY-JUN
CO
750
75
2.85
213.75
I
I
1
MAY-JUN
I
TOTAL14170.67
- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
may require farmers in some -parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
CO
COTTON
POUNDS
.1
TABLE 1
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
59.02
4170.675
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2 0 0
TOTAL 59.02 4170.675
*** BALANCE-810.675
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 532 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 2660
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per.acre, you
will need 8.86666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 21.28 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts'of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
jApplication
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
(in/hr)
(inches)
4753
10 I
AyA
I CO
.35
*1
4753
112
NoB
CO
.5
*1
4753
15
Na
CO
I .4
*1
4753
16
NoA
CO
.5
*1
4753
118
NoB
I CO
.5
( *1
4753
19
NoA
CO
.5
*1
4753
20
NoB
CO
.5
*1
4753
21 I
AyA
CO
.35
*1
4753
8 I
AyA
I CO
I .35
*1
Page: 8

'r
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
IN ANY GIVEN YEAR NO MORE THAN 58% OF THE ACRES CAN BE PLANTED TO
COTTON (34 ACRES).
Q(A a,-O, N � .
Lzoner
Technical Specialist
DATE: December 2, 1999
DATE: December 2, 1999
qbm�
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly.to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
4753
8
AyA
C
130
142.5
20
10.27
1463.47
I
MAR-JUN
4752
I10
IAyA
IC
I
1130
1142.5
120
112.4511774.12
MAR-JUN
4753
12
NoB
C
100
105
20
6.75
708.75
I
MAR-JUN
4753
15
Na
IC
I
1120
1130
120
12.53
1328.9
MAR-JUN
4753
16
NoA
C
110
117.5
20
12.07
1418.22
I
MAR-JUN
4753
18
NoB
C
100
105
20
7.27
763.35
I
MAR-JUN
4753
19
NoA
C
110
117.5
20
2.40
282
I
MAR-JUN
4753
20
NoB
C
100
105
20
2.43
255.15
I
MAR-JUN
4754
21
AyA
C
130
142.5
20
2.85
406.125
I
MAR-JUN
END
I
TOTAL17400.1
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
Page: X310

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
may require farmers in some -parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: X411

• ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
-END-
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 59.02 7400.1
Page: 12

• ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2 0 0
TOTAL 59.02 7400.1
*** BALANCE-4040.1
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page; X613

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 532 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 2660
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 8.86666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 21.28 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: )I14 .

• ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts'of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
jApplication
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
(in/hr)
(inches)
4752
10
AyA
I C
.35
*1
4753
12
NoB
I C
.5
*1
4753
15
Na
C
I .4
*1
4753
16
NoA
C
.5
*1
4753
18 I
NoB
C
.5
*1
4753
19
NoA
I C
( .5
*1
4753
20
NoB
C
.5
*1
4753
8
AyA
I C
.35
*1
4754
21
AyA
C
.35
*1
Page: X 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 4 16

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
4754
8
AyA
W
60
120
10.27
1232.4
I
SEP-APR
4753
15
4754
4753
15
4753
4753
15
SB
45
152
1561.04
I
I28
I10.27
JUN-SEP
W
60
120
12.45
1494
I
I
I I
I
SEP-APR
SB
45
152 28
12.45
1892.4
I
I
I I
I
JUN-SEP
W
55
110
6.75
742.5
I
I
I I I
I
SEP-APR
SB
35
112 28
6.75
756
I
JUN-SEP
4753
55
110
2.53
I15
INa
li
SEP.APR
384.56
4753
-15
Na
SB
45
152
28
2.53
I
JUN-SEP
15
1448.4
4753
16
NoA
W
60
120
12.07
I
1
SEP-APR
1593.24
4753
-16
NoA
SB
40
132
28
12.07
I
JUN-
SEPT 15
4753
799.7
18
NoB
W
55
110
7.27
I
1
SEP-APR
4753
1814.24
-18
lNoB
JSB
135
1112 128
17.27
Page: )§ 17

• ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
15
C
SEPT 15
4753
4753
15
19 NoA
-19 INoA
20 INoB
-20 NOB
4753 I-
15
END
1I
I 160 1120 I
I
SB 40 132 28
I
II55 110
SB 35 112 28
I
IJUN-SEP
I2.40 1288
SEP-APR
2.40 316.8
JUN-
2.43 1267.3
SEP-APR
2.43 1272.16
JUN-SEP
W 60 120 2.85 342
I I I I I SEP-APR
SB 45 152 28 2.85 433.2
I I I I I JUN-SEP
TOTALI14916.2
- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4 18

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
SB
W
SOYBEANS
WHEAT
BUSHELS
BUSHELS
4
2
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 59.02 14916.24
Page: 19

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2 0 0
TOTAL 59.02 14916.24
*** BALANCE-11556.24
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: ]j 20

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 532 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 2660
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 8.86666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 21.28 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: )f 21 .

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts'of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
jApplication
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
(in/hr)
(inches)
4753
112
NoB
W
.5
*1
4753
115
Na
I W
I .4
*1
4753
16
NoA
W
I .5
*1
4753
18
NoB
W
.5
*1
4753
19
NoA
I W
.5
*1
4753
20
NoB
W
.5
*1
4753 121
AyA
I W
.35
*1
4753
-10
AyA
SB
.35
*1
4753
-•12
NoB
SB
.5
*1
4753
-15
Na
SB
.4
*1
Page: 16 22

r
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NoA
4753
--16 ..
4753
-18
1
NOB
4753
-19
NoA
4753 I -20
SB
SB
SB
NoB I SB
4753
-21
AyA
1
4753
-8
I AyA
1
4754
110
I AyA
4754
8
1
I AyA
1
SB
I—
SB
W
W
.5
.5
.5
.5
.35
.35
I .35
.35
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: $ 23

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
WHERE DOUBLE CROP SOYBEANS ARE USED THE REALISTIC YIELD EXPECTATION
IS REDUCED BY 7 BUSHELS (28 POUNDS). WHERE CORN IS PLANTED AFTER
SOYBEANS, THE SOYBEAN RESIDUE IS CREDITED WITH 20 POUNDS CARRY OVER
OF NITROGEN.
PRODUCER HAS MULTIPLE WASTE PLANS TO REFLECT NITROGEN NEEDS WHEN
CROPS ARE ROTATED.
Page: U 24

• WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 3M 25

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REOUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on.soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking.
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,.
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into.the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 12 26

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: M3 27

0
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:N&W Pig Farm (#96-46)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Julian B. Nelms & H. L. Whitley Jr.
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Mana er(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Patricia S. Gabriel
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-731-1532
Address (Agency): 208 W. Chestnut St.
Goldsboro NC 27530-4708
I1
Signature: ;y Q Date: �k - T8- 9Q
Page: M3 28

Emergency Action Plan
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operations are leaking, overflowing, or
running off the site. You should NOT wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to
consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This
plan should be available to all employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and breaks can happen at any
time.
1) Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to problems are listed below:
a) Lagoon overflow:
• add soil to the berm to increase the elevation of the dam
• pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate
• stop all additional flow to the lagoon (waterers)
• call a pumping contractor
• make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon
Note: These activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded the temporary storage level.
b) Runoff from waste application field:
• immediately stop waste application
• create a temporary diversion or berm to contain the waste on the field
• incorporate waste to reduce further runoff
c) Leaking from the waste distribution system-
. • pipes and sprinklers:
© stop recycle (flushing system) pump
a stop irrigation pump
3 close valves to eliminate further discharge
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
• flush system, houses, solids- Separators:
© stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
OO make sure no siphon effect has been created
(D separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
d) Leakage from base or sidewall of the lagoon. Often these are seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks:
• dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back
into the lagoon.

® if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals
and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
46 other holes may be likewise temporarily plugged with clay soil.
Note: For permanent repair measures, lagoon problems require the
consultation of an individual experienced in their design and installation.
2) Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a) Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b) Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c) Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
3) Contact appropriate agencies.
a) During normal business hours, call your DWQ regional office: [phone] ; after
hours, emergency number: [phone]. Your phone call should include: your name,
facility, telephone number, the details of the incident, the exact location of the facility,
and the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions, what
corrective measures have been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b) If the spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call the local EMS:
731-1413.
c) ` Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department: 731-1174
d) Contact CES: 731-1520
local NRCS office: 731-1532
and your integrator: _
4) Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
5) Contact contract pumping and/or irrigation equipment companies:
a)
ff
c)

6) Contact dirt moving and/or heavy equipment companies:
a) Wilson Brothers 919-778-1580
b)
c)

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause IIMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of solids (0 Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
Cl Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where Goµ -J/
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation 9Maintain vegetative control along banks of —
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent //owa4 C3 f•`j O`�Y"'
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along walees edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed Spillage O
O
Feed Storage • Accumulations of feed residues p
Cl
Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize die
accumulation of decaying wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 V /�
day interval during summer; I5-30 day interval
during winter).
Reduce erroislure accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewers.grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
/ . ^ - November 11. 1996, Page I

Site Specific Practices
Source Cause
Animal Holding Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes O
BMPs to Control Insects
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
El
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
•
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed). %
Dry Manure Ilandling • Accumulations of animal wastes 0
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systems
day interval during summer 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
J
application or disposal.
/ V
O
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
O
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
�. C -November 11, 1996, Page 2

e -.
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
IIMPs to Minimize Odor
Site Specific Practices
Fanustead
• Swine production
1A Vegetative or wooded buffers;
/Kecouunended best management practices;
1+�+
2( Good judgment and common sense
Annual body surfaces
• Dirty manure -covered animals
Dry floors
Floor surfaces
• Wet titamure-covered floors
Ef Slutled floors;
d Walerers located over slotled floors;
❑ Feeders at high end of solid floors;
❑ Scrape manure buildup from floors;
Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits • Urine; Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge, n u r=)K
• Partial micrgbialdecomposition urscrape; l.�ek A&i4-s
❑ Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; Fan maintenance; C% be eater �crea�s
Dust .t-'1 Eflicient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust
Q Washdown between groups of animals;
❑ Feed additives;
❑ Feeder covers;
❑ Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush lank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of lanks Willi / V/1q
anti -siphon vepls
Flush alleys • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Underfloor flush Willi underfloor ventilation ��
conveyance
Pit recharge points • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Extend recharge Imes to near bullmn of pits �/�
liquid while pits are filling Willi anti -siphon vents
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump lank covers
filling and drawdown z I
vuuiue wan collection . • Agitation during wastewater 0 flux covers
or junction boxes conveyance
AMOC - November 1 I, 1996, Page 3

Me
HMPs to Minimize Odor
coo of urampipes at a Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; orProper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; H/Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation 61( Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation when.pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
Site
IR/ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • Iligh pressure agitation; Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles • Wind drill Minimum recommended operating pressure;
fd Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon A114-
Storage lank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface • Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers; ld—
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids; /� 1
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface
• Partial microbial decomposition,
❑
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
• Mixing while filling;
level;-
• Agitation when emptying
❑
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge
• Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets
• Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
surfaces
drying
Cl
Soil incorporation within,18 lirs.;
��A
�T
❑ Spread in Ili in uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition ❑ Proper disposition of carcasses �ev 1 •'ae( er`�/ar,`
Dead animal disposal • Carcass decomposition ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits; // pits ❑ Proper localion/coustruction of disposal pits All)#
• [complete combustion ❑ Secondary stack burners
/V
A' . `C - November 1[, 1996, Page 4

49
/ Fl
Source Cause BMI's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around • Improper drainage; &r Grade and landscape such dial water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads 0 Farni access road maintenance �d
public roads from farm 1Y
access
Additional Information:
Available From :
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EDAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recliarge - Lagoon Treatment ; EDAE 128-88
NCSU - DAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EDAE 129-88
NCSU -UAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EDAE 103-83
NCSU - UAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Facl Slneet
NCSU - UAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; Pill-33
NCSU - Swine Extension .
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual
NC Pork Producers Assoc ,
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5

Mortality Management Methods
(check which tnethod(s) are being implemented)
O Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In 'the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a.size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. ("Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

4, . .
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: N & W Pig li M Farms
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Julian Nelms & I*XXX-4 XXXI .-XXX H. L. Whitley, Jr.
1.3 Mailing address: 601 E. Main St.
City, State: Fremont NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-242-6327
1.4 County where facility is located:
Zip: 27830
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Intersection of NC Hwy. 1 I 1 and NC Hwy. 222.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Goldsboro Hog Farms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: _
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 FacilityNo.: 96 (county number); 46_ (facility number).
2.2 Operation Desc it p iot n: Swine operation
W n to Feeder
7000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Qyes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 96 - 46

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
•
system):1Qo;Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 59
2.4 Number o s s agoontorage ponds (circle which is applicable): 2
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? 5/23/94
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
5/23/95
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
,
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 96 - 46

4,
Facility Number: 96 - 46
Facility Name: N & W Pig Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CEIRTIIFICWT.ItON: Jr
I, Julian Nelms & IXXHxi? xMxxXXiKl W (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for N & W Pig Farms (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package wA be returned to me 0,s incomplete.
Signatur (
v & // Date 7/28/99
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in.question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 96 - 46

_
2 R4
Qi•, h I - n,.. SUS ,� "'.• 4-}Cr+.
lisaIm
Q2 li9! P S� .• 11•L2 '� 7 ,~J 1 _ _. xl ."a.`'
•e '13lZJ. 1101 L2 Lill O4 1i..% '.tr::_•i�
1>!9t Lug
'
a n 1.0 1"1 ` Worory c
aranCh
a
A. m
wt _ 1.6 a LIU
[07,; cr
! tt
y
•[ F -1.6 1.0_ - -
Sig
9AONT�,: r..i J34i 15V 1 a
. 1,736
132)
��;;.• ,� n 132, a .:� POP. 303 ;yr
t ' •1 'e qy •''•.' 1;77
j3 M I
222 :! 6 Ill A G
1 al 1 137� ,y
.B 1 I..iZ4 I.%as. 1b'70 15 9 1
_? 334 I V
.a 1�13a .8 2.1
Swamp
\ -
I 1387 jJahunta l o i}30
LUZ do _ Faro 'S
1.3 /I
. 1543 �oj • Is33 4.1�.3 ifl
r PPOPP.6162 Sa3 \0 .p '� 1056'••I .
i 0
al a 9 '^ 1Sii •e '7 •J I. !.iZ 1532
1237 T3,T1 .• e. White -"r o 1414 1 b
he 1 Mt. Carmelt� Oak J 1' i0 \ " 161 I 3 ! Ch. 17359
Crossroads
1_i 1.9 .r: a�L.j 1534 1.4 153a I.PP U=U I W
! t 0a Isu 7: o 1 1532
/At. tsu
j - 1
t7 ° Carmel a .� I11 \' ,_ 1375 23 �\ 8rLlric _ -+ Z .
m
71 * lit? Goldsboro
Wayne�• _ _ W
.2lunlun cipal • i. t.9 :t� ri IL yam.¢
1614/;> Airport Patetovm I •11
IW
IS45t \ t� 374 •s 1.173 I
i I
I 1572
•• ry 1./ a>i� _ t m .9 u 11! ,6 1777l2,ip 156E
? .3 ` .1 a 7 1 S6 y .S 7e Imp
_
f .? —i es3 1639 a'4
.2 r 16�! 3 + PAp • t! 2 t 3 TO SNOW HILL—+
1 7
111 \5 1372 ,\ Ian
% 1701
3st 1703 v •1
tt 1 \ 17 I < Tr 7 Porto
Langston a . j .9
JZp,t a 1706 '� 35.25'
t. \ 1� , Hood 1 1734 1705
I
JAJ Swamp 1e36 0 %I .
re-
1 • " �':i' nt...;.•.:*,^ \\ 12 ! •.,: �fi 2' . I 12 \ BeMlel ,�
t3 70• .:. ;a:�?�•.� t►•� 1Z93 �1 `2 �o 171e \� '
J .' „•s • IQ 'f• 1ZQ2
13
a
a Au e
BUS. ss,'. ..r^%`.,: •. 1825
70 133
rJ V :•ey4` 'v J : 11e03 .S;..
•It ^ > • I .6 F71 a e .7 j L Parlatown )
I Y L
1 _.. _+:�:_ \ ..m11II111 �a •a 1 oI .- 'i1714 ,. __.'•�

"'TIT
u,
f�rr `�� �1�4►1
#'i
b`
N
41''
5.-..✓
1
I
'io�.:1t SIP
W
y
F 'I
:
R

United States
Oecanment at
Agriculture
Sod
Canaervattan
service
OPERATOR: /VrM 5# .�-
RECEIVED
WATM nl Irl 1TV qFr T ION
IAUG 0 61999
K!on-Diethcma Pamilhing
Please review the attached plan and specifications care`ully. Retain
this plan for your use and records. It is strongly recommended that you,
your contractor, and Soil Conservation Service personnel are in agreement
as 'to-hcw the waste lagoon is to be constructed. The Soil Conservation
Service personnel will meet with all concerned parties and walk over the
site to explain all flags and markings. It is important that everyone
understand what is expected so that final construction meets plans and
specification and the job can be certified for payment OF cost -sharing
is involved).
The pad dimensions and grades are the best estimate. The BUILDER or
CONTRACTOR is RESPONSIBLE for final layout and design of the pads. The
Soil Conservation Service personnel will assist in a limited capacity,
as .its major concern is the proper design and construction of the waste
treatment lagoon.
The actual amount of material required for pads and dam may vary from the
estimates. The design.will attempt to balance cuts and fills as close as
possible. If additional material is required after construction is complete
on the lagoon, the contractor and owner will negotiate an the price and
location of borrow area. .
NOTE: Design Requirement: .14S393 tuft. = cu.yds.
Estimate of Excavation: cu.ft. = DO.Z cu.yds.
Estimate of Pad b Dike: cu. ft. = 9 9 cu.yds.
II)-� - Ration /qJ�
Job Class
Da to n
Designed By Y OV.A� • LV LAA-Lb-"—( n
Name IL
Design Approval -yawl __. lJ/j ...-�
Name
ate
kkcca. JM'F
�,,,� fl rid ��I I Jc� Lu W^e s h•,.ve Na4 beeeo cl ar,� or UerT
0 Cris soa Consa�ztwn Sormco
4 an aCRnC'r of :no
C otartmrnt of A(;ncuflYt*

_
s
1
~ ~' •��
1� Ily 73�33
1i2�, 1lg2
6HLM
►
by 1 --��
g
LM
5� \ 1•iJ.2y 1 1 1
�±9.1 1102• 1.2
1.0
,D Ilu
q ie 1 I ./
+•
`�
Lift lios
IA 1M ,5 �� h •" i .?
l2,A
.I rr ♦y
1.0
Watery
1.503
n 5 7 a •�y�
9 Branch .8
,6
'so3
'' �
L�t2_F°� _ i 1
_ 1.6 �I
1306
17
�
1119
EMONT�:�
s ::�i
I�z3
� •D .• 31.4 I t—
. 1,770
8 1
.. ,;;'�• .� •�
w
Mt a .:� POP. 303
127
i�
F/•S
v 1s3� �52e ifi
222
:! 6
I11 a O
.H 1338
Ilu I�g
1526 ?? 1529 1
`•
1m-
1787
r
Swamp
\ -�-
I Nahunta
a
\`(I - .' IS30
Para 'J
ry
PIKEVILLE I .1�.
7 �
1• J �1
G�/.• "--Ism �
"• a
POP. 662 1•P
, I Oe-'
• S
..
..
H h
133,1 .8
.7 608
1— ,__ 1_34 153; !t1
.46
4.,White ':�— 15
Mt. Carmel
h
',r thr
Oak
Crossroads
_
1545
S
C
-
Imo! 1.4 Il7l ..yA
I 11
ISII •: '
P L . I
No
17 Carmel 7
1543
1
2.3 L
a
Cx
117Z
nl u1n
Fj
-
•.• Goldrboro
Jt
-
'�'
Mr//
2 Wayne
i Mmicipol
tL
: t.9;t' ° (• - -
_
,y;
N 1614 Airport Potato" - 1771
t37
l 11
a
I.I 1 l
'1 i0
lL
,
1574
1
•. h •2 /•� lq�Z t
1572
m .9 4
't' •6 I » m Isae I
...
J y
V
1.i
•3 2 ,J TO SNOW HILL •—+ ..,
1374 + PAP
i
111
1.5
!
1372 ~
I
P
73•
,1 1709
el \ ,1 ^, . 1701 ..
Fax
a4
i—� ♦. .IL
11
170! '3
I
I < Ldngston
.7
I
Parka
I
.••iysa - .:.,:1 URA,
\ \
_
• S► 1
1702
17077 JZa } 1706 15025'
.\\
• rJ \
I37
/ ,
1
:a
Hood 1744 I�oS
9!3 Swamp 183 \
.1
h�' i �G 7G t:•':1
/
1.
17036 `Iesl 1A .2\ .0 1. \^ .
�•' •:j rnt •::'
\
b ! .1; 11� .� ♦ ISI \ Bethel ..i` ..
•.,:./.:,
17 s•r:;h t�
` I
194 171t3 1�7 .2 •D \ 1716
All
°FAQ`
is
^
� • , v
'...':!.
AV
1
I7I A
BUS .^•;.,;. �
n it
�.
-
..:.�•
`
•� r
tl ,6 171I J Parkstown�
`
Pr4an t.
ner
IIII(
1714 D
1717 i .:;1714
173 i 1#10.
�.
♦171
LDS6 d''
1712
Newsome .

Operator:Julian Nelms#2S County: Wayne
Date:
5/23/94
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1000
feet
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 head (finishing only) x 135
lbs. =
0
lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean) x 433
lbs. =
0
lbs
3500 head (wean to feeder) x 30
lbs. =
105000
lbs
Describe other :
30
lbs
Total Average Live
Weight =
105030
lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 105030 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb.
ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW =
1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 105030 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)--------------------- 115.0
Inside top width (feet)----------------------- 220.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)----------------- 41.5
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)------------ 30.5
Freeboard (feet)----------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)------------------ 2.5 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 110.0 215.0 10.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
110.0 215.0 23650 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
60.0 165.0 9900 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
85.0 190.0 64600 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. _ [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
23650.0 64600.0 9900.0 1.7
Total Designed Volume Available=163583.33 CU. FT

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
115.0 220.0
25300.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 25300.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 105030 lbs. ALW/135 lbs ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 191854.8 gals. or 25649.0 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system or excess water. Flush systems
that recirculate the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallon
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 14758.3 cubic feet
5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 14758.3 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
25649
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
14758
cubic
feet
5D.
14758
cubic
feet
TOTAL 55166 cubic feet

ripsol
J4l4.:_i
Temporary storage period____________________>
180
Rainfall in excess of evaporation=====______>
7.0
25 year - 24 hour rainfall__________________>
7.0
1.0
Side slopes_________________________________>
2.5
Inside top length___________________________>
115.0
Inside top width____________________________>
220.0
Top of dike elevation_______________________>
41.5
Bottom of lagoon elevation__________________>
30.5
Total required volume_______________________>
160196
Actual design volume________________________>163583.33
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
34.3
Stop pumping elev.____________---------------
37.8
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.====______>
34.3
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
36.5
Required minimum treatment volume=====______>
105030
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====_______>
105487
Start pumping elev._________________________>
39.8
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall===>
148825
Volume at start pumping elevation=====______>
147424
Required volume to be pumped________________>
40407
Actual volume to be Vumped__________________>
41936
Min. thickness of soil line hen required==>
1.6
days
inches
inches
f eet
: 1
feet
f eet
feet
f eet
cu. ft.
cu. ft.
f eet
feet
feet
feet
cu. ft.
cu. ft.
feet
cu. ft.
cu. ft.
cu. ft.
cu. ft.
feet
7. DESIGNED BY:ftrR�L�+61A,,APPROVED BY:
DATE: S' Z3 9 � DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 39.8 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 37.8 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 40407.4 cubic feet or
302247.1 gallons.

2
SHEET 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SHEET 1 OF 2
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
FOUNDATION PREPARATION:
-----------------------
The foundation area of the lagoon embankment and building pad shall be
cleared of trees, logs, stumps, roots, brush, boulders,sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
the lagoon and pad area should be stripped and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas. After stripping, the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT:
-----------------------------------
The completed excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of detrimental amounts of sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches in thickness when loose and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
equipment or standard tamping roller or other equivalent method.
Compaction will be considered adequate when fill material is observed
to consolidate to the point that settlement is not readily detectible.
NOTE THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF LINERS IN THE LINER
SECTION OF THIS SPECIFICATION. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include 10 percent for
settlement. Dikes over 15 feet in height and with an impoundment
capacity of 10 acre-feet or more fall under the jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
from the constructed height to the downstream toe of the dike.
Precautions shall be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
LINER: THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE 1.6 ft.
NOTE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATE OR WHEN AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW ARE
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over -
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be backfilled
as specified to grade with a SCS approved material (ie - CL,SC,CH).
REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.

SHEET 2 OF 2
borrow area. The
optimum moisture
Soil liner material shall come from an approvedirate. Water
relates to that moisture content
readilyesepa re content
e
soil is kneaded
when th
minimum water content of the liner ure con nt to
content which ro er mots
added to borrow as necessary to insure P P
in the hand it will form a ball which
shall be The moisture content of the placement.
during Placement of the liner• optimum water content during too wet
material shall not be less than oP proper compaction. Proper
hauling equipment and p P
being
The maximum water content relates to the Soil n 9ainchalifts and it
for efficient use placement
of the maximum ASTM D698 Dry n
compaction of the liner includes P the previous lift
compacted to at least 90 percent When smooth or hard lacement of the next
Weight Of the liner material.
shall be scarified and moistened as needed before P acted perme-
lift. the overall compacted
other than the type of clay used for
le most important factor affecting acted liner.
The sing liner, of the comp
ability of a clay rocessingof equipment in an estab-
liner, is the effiuiementouseranditheprouting lacement and
The sequence of eq P in the whole P sfoot
s as uniformity a tamping or sheep
lished pattern help For most clay soils,
process- action equipment.
compaction P e of comp
roller is the preferable type
e discharge of waste outlet
r shall be protected from thpe of energy dissipator(rocks)
by The soil lineusing
some ty
pipes• This caon waste Pn be done pipes.
ite or using flexible outlets
l liners are s P
on
cddi
included with this Construction Specification.
sealant.specified,When these are P
CUTOFF TRENCH: i 0
The final depth of the
the_ plans. the foundation
toff trench shall be constructed under the embankment area when
A °U typical
cross sec obervation of
shown on a tyP
cutoff trench shall be determined by
materials.
VEGETATION:
soon as possible after d betruc-
sed embankment and other
esCOnstructed arelsshoull be see
All exposed a of vegetate ss -oi
to the planned tYP specifications.
seeding or mulc
to the seedaagto be seeded. etation is out of seaso
tion according permanent veg
on areas of the dike and P vegetation should be established as soc
shall be used if the Qermanenomme tdvegp seeding dates.
dates for seeding• the next period of approved
as possible during
REMOVAL OF EXISTING TILE DRAINS
loe of tile will be removed to a mini
the dike. The tile
When tile drains] there eoutside rthe toe of s
trench shall be bith good material such as.
of 10 feet bey
ackfilled and comp
or, r.L. or CH.

SCS-ENG-538 U. S. OEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rev. 5.70 SOIL, CONSERVATION SERVICE
. LP.�oori
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
DATE COUNTY
• • SHEET NO. WORK
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMEM
CROPLAND —ACRES —ACRES PASTURE —ACRES:
WOODLANED ------ A_C_R_E'9_=Wf-VAL_ ACRES M�s
SKETCH OF PROPOSED . • :- `0112� WERE MADE (Appro
Locale reference Point n center line of dam and Identifu on sketch.
■�■■■(11■■■■■■■■■■tit■■■■■■■
■�®■i���iiii�ii®��iiii■
■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
m®
■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■
mom■■
■■■■
.i®■■■
■■■■■■■
■■■■ice■
■■■
i■
■■■■■■i©■■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■E■EM■■■■■■■■
REEM■■IMMI®®■■■■■■■■■■IM■
■■■■e�■m■■■■■
■■■®■■
■■ail■■■■■■■ne
MINIM■
■■■■■
■■
■����■■■�
BORING NUMBER AND PROFILE
Make and Ust dam -site and spillway borings fint - then ponded area and borrow pit bartngs - separate with vertical red line.
lContinued an ba 44.0"ossary) Show water table elevations on dam -site borings.
©�©i
r�©�ioiaoimimimMimi®imimimimioi®ioi©
!1�®I®I■Ill■I®Ili■.■I■I■I■I■I■ICI■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■
®®I�I�lei�l®i
I
��I■I�I�I■I■I�I�I�I■ICI■I■I■le
®�I■I®I®I■I■I■;■Iilil■I■
■I■I■Iil■I■Iilil■I
2,7
LBORI�LG�_MADE SIGNATURE & TITLE

SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 2.5 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED AS FOLLOWS:
150.0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 1 TO NOVEMBER 30
FEBRUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
75.0 LBS. RYE GRAIN AT 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
150.0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 15
20.0 LBS. HULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 8 LBS./ACRE
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0.0 LBS. UNHULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 10 LBS./ACRE
SEEDING DATES: JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
0.0 LBS. RYE GRASS AT 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
2500.0 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
5.0 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
250.0 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
Landowner Nelms #1
Community or Group No.
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR UW LAGOONS
County WAYNE
Conservation Plan No.
Lagoon
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dicta 41 Ft. Length of Flood Pool ZZ 0 Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 3-I(0-�i�
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Est. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use ; Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft.
1
Loy o uo
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach V6e)e s" jAt-,U Rrob e- i -use s No a&0C-r k
U
Hazard Classification of f4m (Q b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, (0, III, IV, V)
A
name
,0. c
tiff
Concurred By
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date -6 1123 j 9 �
Date

-4
N
Edmundson
11 . 7 - j Ll
1535
174
to
Cem

MAY 5, 1994
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owners name--:JULIAN NELMS County:WAYNE
Mail Address-:PIKEVILLE
Type of production unit ---- :WEAN -FEEDER
Number of animal units-----: 7000
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Temporary storage period---: 180 days
Method of application ------ :IRRIGATE
Amount of animal waste produced-----------------: 2956 tons/year
Amount of plant available N produced by animals-: 4690 lbs./year
Commercial N to apply on planned acreage--------: 0 lbs./year
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your swine operation. The plan is based on the
soil types, crops to be grown, and method of application for
your particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.

Page 2
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month to
No.
No.
Type
Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
4753
10
AyA
F
700
0.12
1.0
84
APRIL-AUG
4753
10
AyA
D
120
1.25
1.0
150
MAR-JULY
4753
20
NoB
F
650
0.12
0.5
39
APRIL-AUG
4753
20
NoB
D
100
1.25
0.5
62.5
MAR-JULY
4753
20
Na
D
120
1.25
0.5
75
MAR-JULY
4753
20
NoA
F
700
0.12
0.8
63
APRIL-AUG
4753
20
NoA
D
110
1.25
0.8103.125
MAR-JULY
4753
10
AyA
F
700
0.12
4.0
336
APRIL-AUG
4753
10
AyA
D
120
1.25
4.0
600
MAR-JULY
4753
10
NoB
F
650
0.12
1.0
78
APRIL-AUG
4753
10
NoB
D
100
1.25
1.0
125
MAR-JULY
4753
8
AyA
F
700
0.12
6.0
504
APRIL-AUG
4753
8
AyA
D
120
1.25
6.0
900
MAR-JULY
4753
18
AyA
F
700
0.12
1.0
84
APRIL-AUG
4753
18
AyA
D
120
1.25
1.0
150
MAR-JULY
4753
18
NoB
F
650
0.12
1.5
117
APRIL-AUG
4753
18
NoB
D
100
1.25
1.5
187.5
MAR-JULY
4753
19
NoA
F
700
0.12
0.6
52.92
APRIL-AUG
4753
19
NoA
D
110
1.25
0.6
86.625
MAR-JULY
4753
19
NoB
F
650
0.12
0.5
39
APRIL-AUG
4753
19
NoB
D
100
1.25
0.5
62.5
MAR-JULY
4753
12
Na
F
675
0.12
1.5
121.5
APRIL-AUG
4753
12
Na
D
120
1.25
1.5
225
MAR-JULY
4753
12
NoA
F
700
0.12
1.5
126
APRIL-AUG
4753
12
NoA
D
110
1.25
1.5
206.25
MAR-JULY
4753
12
NoB
F
650
0.12
1.5
117.78
APRIL-AUG
4753
12
NoB
D
100
1.25
1.5
188.75
MAR-JULY
Available Nitrogen
Crop codes: Crop -unit
Total 43.3
(includes commercial)
Surplus Or Deficit
A=Barley-bu.
B=Bermudagrass(graze)-tons
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
E=Corn(silage)-tons
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
G=Fescue(graze)-tons
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
4884
4690
-194
I=Oats-bu.
J=Rye-bu.
K=Small grain(graze)-acre
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
W=Wheat-bu.
Y=Fescue(pasture)-tons
Z=Bermudagrass(pasture)-tons

Page 3
If more commercial fertilizer is used than shown in this plan,
then additional acres of land may be needed. A three to fifteen
feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all
ditches in fields that receive animal waste.
Additional comments:
--------------------
- ------------------- ----- -------------------------------------
Prepared by: Title: Date:�l�
Concurred in by: ,mot Date: �'• S q�/
P oo ii cer
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff
occurs.
Pro ucer
Technical Specialist:
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
Date:
Date J`11 191

[..,.+._•4��'�•.,���?�j3tl t1�x ',`{.\�.�, .i j- 1 t-'"1 •V iLr+M r ,
t �,,. `w � _ „�tA ���.[��i�ATI'w �c ` "1 �•I�� �F�ti •i F .�` � - � � .J�j—�'�"`, r �' a �ty.
�j�a .yam}•��dl•� '�+, i j"_' � � q Y',•Llyr � .n`� r ,rt •i. it
et1 I`�� +' it's••'/ } ,.,`r l l , i ,Yi7/•... „
1 a".� ,,,,+ . t • �4� l° 'l \
\ i\ `I,�Fgk I Ir•},iru 1+Y j.'., t., F'$
3 >�'� -"4 �,►��i- 0 V•. -r
S I 011 I Y, t ♦'1► ` �*trt.k� 7� � ���\ �I �i-o��,, � `��ti ,,,r t � � i �.
11 Ir�II f r[� s • .. � '+� � 1$lyf, , \.� � ''F+. � r}�!+•,i� ��f{?N'y�ph��.',�.S'I�j� ^(. jj •'
r. �iy l.D �'S .� < +.'.t 3 \ SIT �' v�•A' �'r N'W,T♦u �. G71�\
.I r i :4�`•:.s.� � � \ I.�', ,G,�'n)i.,i �'�`f'+'F"tyyS. •y , Z` /
r � w rx ��r t P t ��jt v. + •
t
t ,.�',.ti �•'f•� •, .t r .' `�'l�'N!•py�T C�jy-t.� P ,y L � .' R
q.,`. •"� . Y.i ,r, .,,�4�i''�y�rZ'... ��71:`+1: . t —•ir F �, Rat 1�'t'IY4;{.� ... `.
r'';., , `�• ` - '+'�j'"`�' " II
��+ Ito
50
��' � ti �.' L ,: i.•• r `; � =� 1 �,,rop'I�L�CY�r Y/i a'r�
4
„`"�.�j'"+a� �' �` • � � . ,*Ij 1.7�r ��5 � �' .1rl.f�•��I lil
W�
�."' _� t [t, � ,i1 � � I Er` ,�- � — _ — •y)+ :'AbCHyr,��.. is
w.hu �h'•l" 4.,a ' ,7. �+.i:, � (r !1 I Ari,�t1�,� .
�3�4'�` ,•� � ' M �_ 0 � �`� }%rlr.�N� 1 II'ht,�;i�����,I�Y '1 � � s
`�"x°'{"��w'4 a"�t�4�y[y�«: �R.'•��� �,1!y ��''�''C". Y �{}1 � '+� � �;, ,,I„,., ,�' •�.,^��1 �`1 '1✓ ��.a �`� �'.,� .
ly j," ti . { o' !. . • f� ��- `+ y7♦ may. y; \' C`f'• I SnLT.'S�. �! 'QUA .+r •+ `
H • ICE' - .�'t+°�9 ,,S��crck ` i + � l t.. 4 . t I' y � l vO�t ✓�'i! F r
1.• • •,��,�"• v'�,�`t�' • } "'. -<y.. :[, s v ' + . i � � `�.Sr• � i1f y.. L ����; 3��' 'I'r, Y
�J`'•`rr`i:�S+T°�`'�' F, f a+� ��yie • I:i/ h / l,.r Y -1 t � .(• N �M. r'.

oil
so
rrr

Attachmenc B
?age 1 of 3
North Carolina Agricultural extension Service
AQi
-Waste Maagement,n'
Biciogi=l =d �Qr^ �'- Lngiae ring North Cana Sty Li.-�crsz�y
USr SAM"=G, AMZss-S
James C. 3a=ke-*
I . S&VUn
A.. Se 4 -So1l' d Lot 'S=—n-a
-- Sc=aped di-ectl7 f_-= lot i= r=aader
a. : r loadad spreader, collec= about 2 lbs o= m
d:. Je-ear 1oca=-l'oas using
r t . won s:o=ge
a. Collect about 2 lbs o_ =neia^ the s.==acs c:s:st
avoiding bed';^,-=ata^lals and usi..g mm= r='"c colieca=s.
3- L:arid Ma==a Slp_-y
_. U=de=-slotrad-f nor pit
a. Zm=and a 1/2' noaneta�,is condi:'t open oa both ear's into
to pit floor.
b. Seal =mer erd of ccpdi:it (e.g., by placing a thi — over end
of c . t) t--zpzing mi rtrre that has e=arad lover end, reaove
and emDt7 sl•^7 into plas.c bucket or =or3eta114c can -miner.
C. Take svbsamples 10n 5 or sore loca�oas or at least 1 cs:a -.
d. v;T and add about 3/4 pint to aoae=="4c sarple can^aiae=.
U. 2zta _or storage bass.= or tank
a. 'Make sure mapure has bee= well assail vi=h a 1_' quid --e
cscpper-agitator p== or prope.l?er agitate=.
b. Take sabsamales frog about 5 pit locations, L-om agitator p=p
or from may^--e spreader a=d placa is a plasmic bucket.
* Professor and ztaasioa� Specialist, `
ecialist, 3iological and Ag c,:l. gal `nginee=g
Depa�e=t, north Ca-ol=a State University, Raleigh,. NC.

Attachment B
Page 2 of 3
c. M.ix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Iagocn Liquid
L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from 'Flow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetaL'ic sample container.
U. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) an end of 10-25' pole.
b. Extend battle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge battle within 1' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
L. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
Floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., i_` 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and .the
other [6 subsamoles from reT:,;,lder of floor surf -ace.
c. At each location, collect liar from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about 2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.
rt

Actachmenc B
Page 3 of 3
IN
II. SA'M P3rPAB.ATION AND TRANS=
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. TO mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
L. A&L Eastern Agrictltr-rat Lab, Inc. iii. P0177-00am Packers Corp.
7621 Ghitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Gheeling, II. 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
U. Fisher Scient'r-:ic Co.
3315 Vinton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
i4. NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
For Ats zson, AI 52538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this ser-rice for North Carolina residents.
L. Address: Nor..h Carolina Depa-went of Agricsltnre
Agronomic Division
P:aat/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
?.0. Box Z7647
Raleigh, NC Z7611
AttZ: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (.7.rine-nurser7, finishing; :rkey-breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown an litter; etc.)
c. 'Waste type (dairy -lot scraped ma==a, liquid slu-.y; s-.ripe-pit
slu^y, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples:
v. Additional analyses performed upon request:
N, P, E, Ca, `1g. Na,
S, Fe, Mn, Za, Ca, B
DX, 1o, Cd, Ni, Pb

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
-----------------------------
SOIL
CONSERVATION
SERVICE
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME------------------------
s------
-----------
-1✓s --I� ---
TELEPHONE- 9L
9/9 Ryz'y)z7 Slap
LOCAT ION��
A-4-Al --------------
-------------------
------------------
SIZE OPERATION-A-2-CO-----
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY
PRODUCER /:;7'2t -FT.
IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES----- NOY---
If yes, SCS cannot provide assistance.
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LINE" X
PERENNIAL STREAM? YES----- NO ----
If no, site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION
OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES----- NO-y--
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board
about required permits. Permits must be obtained prior
to design approval.
Are utilities in construction area? YES----- NO x --
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual
and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be
attached to site evaluation.)
Page 1

WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY
NON -CROPLAND? YES--C.-'� NO ----
If yes, producer must complete a Form AD-1026.
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES---- NO-k -
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF
ADDITIONAL PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE
ALTERED UNTIL PRODUCER RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SCS,
US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT.
(A copy of AD-1026 and CPA-026 should be attached to
site evaluation.)
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT
PRESENT? YES---- NO- � -
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE
PLANNING AREA OR WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN
ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA? YES---- NO-4;-4--
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE
PLANNED AREA? YES---- NO-X--
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT
FARMLANDS IN THE OPERATING UNIT? YES- NO ----
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES---- NO--L-
If yes to any of these questions, refer to form NC-CPA-16
for policy sources. The form does not need to be
completed.
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH' PRODUCER...........
........PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION? YES--"-- NO ----
........POSSIBLE EXPANSION OF TREATMENT
VOLUME FROM 1 CU.FT. UPWARDS TO
3 CU. FT./LB. OF ANIMAL? YES-"-- NO----
........PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH
WATER TO AT LEAST 1/2 OF THE
CAPACITY? YES- x - NO ----
USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE? YES-�-- NO ----
Page 2

WASTE MANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND
APPLY WASTE? YES- - NO ----
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO
MORE LAND? YES---- NO ----
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER,
CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON LAND
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE? YES---- NO ----
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.)
SOIL INVESTIGATION -- VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION
SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES-NO------
ISA CLAY LINER REQUIRED? YES------ NO-x---
IF YES, IS CLAY AVAILABLE ONSITE? YES------ NO------
QUESTIONABLE--------
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED? YES--X-- NO------
(Attachsoil investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
SITE APPROVED YES--x-- NO------ CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS�1 �- --Aajed---45L-f&-}s��sb---1--���s----2ea----
---------------------------------------------------------
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID AS LONG AS THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF LAGOON CONTINUES IN REASONABLE TIME
PERIOD. UNDUE DELAYS OR HESITANCY IN CONSTRUCTION MAY
REQUIRE THAT SITE EVALUATION BE INVALIDATED.
SIGNATURE
DATE 3=A_gy--
Page 3
if

U.S.D.A. SCS-CPA-026 1. Name and Address of Person 2. Date of Request
Soil aonservetrerr9ERlfCe (tune 91) tie-% At ' 9S%
3. County
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND
i00 (3 c / p2s
CONSERVATION DETERMINATION .27 Q 3 U C.+,i °-�
4. Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determination n S L S 5. Farm No. and Tract No.
�f
/ .2$
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
)`' `F+
6. Is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land determination? Yes Z No ❑
7. Are there highly erodible soil map units on this farm? Yes ® No ❑
1'` - s
= .j
8. List highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any
crop year during 1981-1985.
9. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any crop year during 1981-1985: and were not
enrolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
in This Hinhly Fmclihle Land determination was completed in the: Office ❑ Field
cCMTIr\\I 11 1A1GT1 Akin
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
11. Are there h dric soils on this farm? Yes [8 No ❑
12. Wetlands (W), including abandoned wetlands, or Farmed Wetlands (FW) or Farmed Wetlands Pasture (FWP).
Wetlands may be farmed under natural conditions. Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture may be
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23. 1985, as long as they are not
abandoned.
13. Prior Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23, 1985. The use, management,
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions uriless
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment.
14. Artificial Wetlands (AW). Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions.
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MW). These wetlands are to be farmed according to the minimal -effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made.
16. Mitigation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetland
converted between December 23, 1985 and November 28, 1990,
17. Restoration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after
November 28, 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
18. Restoration without Violation (RSW). A restored wetland converted between December 23, 1985 and
November 28, 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production,
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a violation to be in good faith and the
wetland has been restored.
21. Converted Wetlands (CW). Wetlands converted after December 23, 1985 and prior to November 28, 1990. In any
year that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
22. Converted Wetland (CW+year). Wetlands converted after November 28, 1990. You will be ineligible for USDA
program benefits until this wetland is restored.
23. Converted Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,
cranberries, vineyards or building and road construction.
24. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incorrect determination
by SCS.
25. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are considered maintenance and are in compliance
with FSA.
26. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance and if
installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CW). See item 22 for information on CW+year, r - -
27. The wetland determination was completed in the office ❑ field X and was delivered❑ mailed❑ to the p
28. Remarks. /e (,Juo ��L 616-1
29. 1 certify that the above determination is correct and adequate for use in determining 30. A ature of SCS Distri Cons
eligibilityfor USDA program benefits, and that wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and
hydrophyric vegetation under normal circumstances exist on alt areas outlined as
Wetlands Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture.
Assistance and programs of the Sol! Conservation Service available without regard Uplici, religion, color, sax, age, or ham
( l j SCS COPY f I (
v�BtPs�•
tionist 31. Date
r.
( ( i

•
• Sumr►iAey C.sou
---Irk SITE)
-EA2TNWOCIC, - NELM5 #2$
CUT (--EXCAVAT/ o t4
4, 259 . 3Z
�Z�. s�
-To TA L 5, 00 Z, 14 c..Y.
1F-iuL_
# I 2�798.G I
Z 1, 2 53.80
3 5co
--------------
TOTAL. 4�S1iB,97 C.Y.
C ess 4;"Conc. Pads
�z@ 46'x►3s')
TOTAL.
CUT - FILL 7—Arjo
- 230 cY
4t 269.97 CY
I.+-1 : 1.0
4 -15-4
0

04&8-
34-4. -7 5
O -+qo
1 -+4-7 SS
2z
57
6IG, 1-15 107
2+ 5� 590. So
295. 25 I Z
2+6� -O-
2T =
4-15-44
-rsa¢. so
371 9 43.4-8
4;5I 9 30.-T2-
31 543.00
CF
16, 001.70 aw
141 259, 32 r-Y

#_2 CUT
4-Is-94
045o
0
3,00
20
Go,00
0+50
(0,Oo
6.4o
17-
7G. 8o
0+6Z
(0.80
13.85
28
3 87. So
o490
20.90
18,45
57
I o 5 1. 65
1447
Ic,.00
8,00
lo7
gs�.oa
24674
-o-
71432.Z5 cF
ZZ = 9a, 08 c.Y

�� sl'9zz
Qg'(:267( 92
SZ'O)Z
oc�'O)b
of - oo-p
r
ZS 'LoZ 10-
IF ZS '9s Sal
oo•olS
i
LZ—
-o
05'L
80f S
z�
sb'0
09'L
ZStZ
$Z
0O'/Z
�StZ
56'8�
L'bt I
L5
SZZ'ZG
05'sZ
obt O
of
5L'Z)
9Z# sw-)sry_ lnD G#

:*4 Cur - �E�MS #25
I+oo
p
+4-T
32.00
2+54
76.00
2+8Z
(05,00
2494
73.o0
3+08
90.00
3+27
D
4-15;-q4
16.00
47
-75Z.00
5 5, 00
107
5 8 8 5.00
't1,50
28
ZI002.00
69.00
12
SZS.00
81.Sa
14
45.00
19
85S00
I I, 46 3. oo cF
' 27 = 424. 56 cy

#� -FL.c- - ELMS 2 g
0+24
ZS. 81 S to Z 58,-75
O+3D 5/,75
277.00 20 5 s40 .00
O LSD 502 .ZS
Qo.00 IZ 5880.00
046 Z 477.75
3o9,-7Z5 Z8 8(o44,3o
0
O+qD )39.70
141,Z-75 57 $ 394.(�8
14-47 154.8s
l 7$, 475 ! o7 I ql oq6. SZ
ZfS� ZoZ.lo
383. 32 S 2 8 Ion 7 33. t o
-Z 6 s s
�Oq . 455 1 Z -71 3 13. 1 o
482. 35 14 (o� 752.90
3+08 310.40
ISS.Zo 1q Z�948.80
3+Z7 -0-
7s, 5� 2.45 cF
�27 = z. Cal C-Y

iia 08's sz II
�-.:) sS'ZS 8 'IEe
(3o' 65 I 'S
08 ' Ss I I
00'c)O 6 '0 I
o0•c:;-o61-z
,�6-5I- -P
bl
5ZI 'LI
-pl
5Z5'�p81
pbtZ
ZI
5Z's9Z
OL'1 bZ
ZS+Z
SZ
Z
oo'SIZ �
gsfZ
Lo I
o0'85 I
oo'8b
L�+I
LS
Qo'6 y
-O-
obt0
I
#

4
HELMS #Z�
O
1+47
-71,zo
Z+54-
2-�SZ
l00.45
2 4-
52.40
340$
-O-
3 S, roo
8.375
83,00
7GAZi
Z(O.Zo
471
l07
m
I?-
/4
--27 =
I,(a "73.20
T3144. IZ
Z,3 z 4. o0
9i7.10
341to.so
12 597.ZZ cF

O
�54
-+- 456 ,6
SITE #2
JULIAN NELMS et al HOG FARM
WAYNE CO„ N.C.
SCALE 1 `50'
h
P
93
49,94
'T
/Zol 2 2
ABvi 9
NIP
G
F,

YEN
0
'3s o
�'\ BENCHMARK
R.R. SPIKE IN 24' GUM
N �•P• ELEV. 52.40 1 ASSUMED 1
® Zl� `°/ ^Yr •o
f' lu1ll/
I
I, A NOTARY PUBLIC OF WILSON COUNTY AND STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA, CERTIFY THAT RICHARD R.
HERRING, A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, PERSON-
ALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME THIS DAY AND ACKNOW-
LEDGED THE EXECUTION OF THE FOREGOING INSTRU-
MENT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL STAMP OR
SEAL, THIS DAY OF 19— .
NORTH CAROLINA, WILSON COUNTY
THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE OF
AND
NOTARY PUBLIC IS CERTIFIED TO BE CORRECT.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PRESENTED FOR REGIS-
TRATION AND RECORDED IN THIS OFFICE IN
PLAT BOOK , PAGE . THIS
DAY OF , 19 — A.D.,
AT O'CLOCK M.
c
Nahun
May p
o 25
t'�.. NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES,
P.
h
REGISTER OF DEEDS, WILSON COUNTY
RY .

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
N & W PIG FARMS
601 E. MAIN ST.
FREMONT NC 27830
Attn: Julian Nelms & H. L. Whitley, Jr.
Dear Julian Nelms & H. L. Whitley, Jr.:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT, OF
ENVIRONME T..A O-_ AT_L,1R.gL F.,SQU�tCFyS
U
November 2, 1999 1 LSS J LSS tl IISS^
NOV - 5 1999 i
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DWQ
Subject: Application No. AWS960046
Additional Information Request
N & W Pig Farms
Animal Waste Operation
Wayne County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by December 2, 1999:
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists the cropping options of cotton, corn and wheat and soybeans. If
you were to choose to grow only cotton in one year, this would give you plenty of Plant Available Nitrogen
(PAN) uptake but you would only have two months out of the year to irrigate from your lagoon. This would
not work with the 180 days storage in your lagoon. While it seems unlikely that only cotton would be
grown in one year, it is an option. Please contact your technical specialist and have a statement added to the
narrative of your WUP that estimates the percentage of acres that will be in cotton in any given year. Please
also ensure that this percentage will allow for enough months of irrigation from the lagoon.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before December 2, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call meat [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Washington. Regional Office, Water_Quality_ j
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.
N & W Pig Farms
601 E. Main St.
Fremont NC 27830
Dear Julian Nelms & H.L. Whitley, Jr.:
1 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
' --- F
JAN 1 1 2000
—J
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
�04Y0
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 96-46
Wayne County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
cc: Washington Regional Office
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Anirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
li

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 22, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Julian lqe ms
N & W Pig Farm
601 E. Main St.
Fremont NC 27830
Farm Number: 96 - 46
Dear Julian Nelms:
���•*A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
U
J U N 2 3 1999
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DWO
You are hereby notified that N & W Pig Farm , in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Carl Dunn with the Washington Regional Office at [phone].
cerely, f
f
/,-/
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Washington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

t
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 12, 1999
Mr. Julian Nelms
N & W Pig Farm
601 E. Main St.
Fremont, NC 27830
NCDENR
ENvsRONMENT ANC NATURAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
N & W Pig Farm
Facility No. 96 -46
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Nelms:
On June 15, 1999, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced
facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management.
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there arc no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: George Pettus, Goldsboro Hog Farms
Wayne County SWCD Office
WaRON/
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

r
A
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
H Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
❑ Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 9G 4G Date of Inspection G/15/99
Time of Inspection 1:10 PM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted ®Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: NA.W. Pig.Farm.......................................................................................... County:...ayne............................................... WaRO........
Owner Name: Julian ...................................... Nelttts........................................................... Phone No: 9.19.:242-63.2I...........................................................
Facility Contact: d.ulian.N0ms................................................... Title: .(twoor................................................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 6.1I1..T,.Main..S.1 ...................................................................................... Froinaat..NC......................................................... 17.83A..............
Onsite Representative:.GP.(ir.gc.k0t.us............................................................................. Integrator: Gt11tl&kurct.ling.FatnzS.......................................
Certified Operator:,Iuliaa.D................................. Nelms................................................ Operator Certification Number: .lb.5b5.............................
Location of Farm:
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... `
lntarsteetann.ut l![C.Hw.y .111..antl..N.C.lit}:..222.........................................................................................................................................................................
................. ............................................. .I..................... .................. .. ...................... .......... ................ ........:::
Latitude F3579F3711 F 52 f( Longitude 77 • 54 287 K
Design Current
�wme Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder 7000 5250
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Po ulation
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity L
Total SSLW [
is Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Manaucment Svstem
misenarees ac stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
7,000
210,000
spray Field Area
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............3.1..............................35............................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 96-46 Date of Inspection 6/15/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Crop type Cotton Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
t-� •N- violations: nr:def eciericies were: noied:dui-inj this •visii::'I'oti •rivtll: receive : 6' iurftier
'•'•torre's tiAd�nceabtititis.v..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'�'�'�'�'�'�'�'�'�':'�'�':'�':':':'.:•.•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
14. Facility exempt from WA Determination due to 75% exemption. Copy of WA sheet will be mailed with final copy of A,
9. Irrigation records well maintained (with nitrogen balance). Current waste and soil analyses.
Odor BMP's implemented at this facility.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:Qni�n , l'u Q nrI� Date:

4
Facility Number: 96-46 Date of Inspection 6/15/99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during ]arid application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
yroads, building structure, and/or public property)
3
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
t
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

35 31 52. -77 54 28
owl' -

USPS - Track & Confirm�L _ y Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES
RQ�TQt SERVICES Home I Help, I Syn In
Track & Confirm FA
Qs
Track & Confirm
Search Results
Label/Receipt Number: 7007 0220 0003 1480 6545
Detailed Results:
• Delivered, April 08, 2008, 4:23 pm, FREMONT, NC 27830
• Notice Left, April 08, 2008, 11:52 am, FREMONT, NC 27830
• Acceptance, April 07, 2008, 4:42 pm, WASHINGTON, NC 27889
< Back j Return to USPS.carn Here >
Track & Confirm
Enter Label/Receipt Number.
Notification Options
Track & Confirm by email
Get current event information or updates for your item sent to you or others by email. G>
Site Plop Cont@ciuS Fob Qttvl&fv e4 jobs Private Pol> cy Terms of Use National & Premier Acc9nnts
Copyright© 1999-2007 USPS. All Rights Reserved. No FEAR Act EEO Data FOIA
http://ti-kciifrm l .snii.Lisps.com/PTSliitenietWeb/Intei-Labe]Dctail.do 4/10/2008