960028_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
0
INSPECTIONS

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960028
Facility Status: Active
Permit AWS960028
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Dale:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
07/14/2017 Entry Time: 08:30 am Exit Time: 10:15 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Bennie W. Barwick Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Bennie W Barwick
Phone:
252-569-1846
Mailing Address:
1498 Mark Herring Rd
Seven Springs NC 28578
Physical Address:
1362 Mark Herring Rd
Seven Springs NC 28578
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
350 10' 14" Longitude:
77° 51' 19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W.
approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt
path turning to the left (South) follow this
path to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick Operator Certification Number: 25567
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s)
Inspection Summary:
Calibration 8-29-2016
Due 2018.
Soil Report checked
Due 2019.
Waste Report N
3-23-17 2.07
6-15-17 2.35
Lagoon Sludge Survey 12-27-2016
LTZ-4.6
46%
page: 1

1
Permit: AWS960028 Owner -Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 07/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,480
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Slack 1 92/22/93 1 19.00 31.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960028 Owner -Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 07/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
00
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, -Storage & Treatment
Yes No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑0
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑M
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 07/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960028 Owner -Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 07/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of ah.actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No No
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960028 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
07/01/2016 Entry Time: 08:30 am
Farm Name:
Bennie W. Barwick Farm
Owner:
Bennie W Barwick
Mailing Address:
1498 Mark Herring Rd
Physical Address:
1362 Mark Herring Rd
Active
Permit: AWS960028 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Exit Time: 11:00am Incident#
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Seven Springs NC 28578
Seven Springs NC 28578
Facility Status: ECompliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 10' 14" Longitude: 77° 51' 19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this
path to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick Operator Certification Number: 25567
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey - via Curtis Barwick, call for details.
Calibration due October 2016.
Soil Report 1-25-2016
Waste Report N
5-4-16 1.78
2-25-16 1.48
12-28-15 2.07
10-6-15 1.51
8-3-15 1.66
page: 1

w
Permit: AWS960028 Owner -Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 07/01/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,480 3,900
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00 27.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 07/01/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960028 Owner -Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 07/01/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960028 • Owner- Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 07/01/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
MEIEJ
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ M ❑ ❑
page: 5

0
a
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960028 Facility Status:
Inpsoction Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
08/24/2015 Entry Time: 12:30 pm
Farm Name:
Bennie W. Barwick Farm
Owner:
Bennie W Barwick
Mailing Address:
1498 Mark Herring Rd
Physical Address:
1362 Mark Herring Rd
Active
Permit: AWS960028 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Exit Time: 2:00 pm Incident #
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Seven Springs NC 28578
Seven Springs NC 28578
Facility Status: NCompliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 10' 14" Longitude: 77' 51' 19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this
path to hog farm.
Question Areas:
0 Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, 8 Treat 0 Waste Application
Ej Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Re prosentativo(s)
24 hour contact name
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Nathaniel Franklin Barwick
Name
Frank Barwick
Justin K Davis
Operator Certification Number: 25567
Title Phone
Phone:
Phone
Date
page: 1

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 08/24/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report
N
8-3-2015
1.66
5-11-2015
1.41
2-11-15
2.06
11-6-14
0.89
B-14-14
1.22
5-16-14
2.27
2-26-14
1.73
Soil Report 2-21-2013
Zn<700
Cu<400
P-1<360
Lagoon Sludge Survey10-27-2014
LTZ-4.4
Thickness-5.2
Pump Intake-2.5
48%
Calibration 10-27-2014
195 GPM 192 GPM Dual Reels
page: 2

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 08/24/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,480 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Frooboard Froeboard
Diy Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00 24.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 08/24/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yos
No Na No.
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
®❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
i ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
a ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
. ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
®❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yos
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
®❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
®❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
B ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
®❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application I
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ e ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 08/24/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Vos No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
e ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
N ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
You No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
®❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ®❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 08/24/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No Na No
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ®❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
®❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
®❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
®❑ ❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
®❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
®❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
®❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
®❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
®❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
®❑
❑
page: 6

C
0 Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
960028 Facility Statu:
Inpsectlon Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
09/18/2014 Entry Time: 09:00 am
Farm Name:
Bennie W. Barwick Farm
Owner:
Bennie W Barwick
Mailing Address:
1498 Mark Herring Rd
Physical Address:
1362 Mark Herring Rd
Facility Status:
E r.... 11 a n KIM r...... 11-i
Active permit: AWS960028
❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Exit Time: 9:30 am Incident #
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Phone:
252.569-1846
Seven Springs NC 28578
Seven Springs NC 28578
J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 10' 14" Longitude: 77' 51' 19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this
path to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Frank Barwick Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested: 212013
Waste Analysis:
8-20-14= 1.22
5-22-14= 2.27
3-4-14= 1.73
12-9-13= 2.03
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfall and freeboard, S.Survey for 2013-due in 2014
Rain= 13+ inches Aug/Sept. Pasture looks Greatl
page: 1

0-
k
Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/18/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Feeder to.Flnish 3,600
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00
page: 2

0-
t
Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/18/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Imoacts
Yes No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NiL No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/18/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Yes No Na No
7MUNUE
❑ ■❑ ❑
❑ ■❑ ❑
Yes No Na Ne
❑ E ❑ ❑
❑ ■❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
i
page: 4

J
C
Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility : Bennie W Barwick Facility Number:
960028
Inspection Date: 09/18/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑M
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
01111
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960028 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09126/2013 Entry Time: 08:42 AM Exit Time: 09:20 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bennie W. Barwick Farm I Owner Email: vbarwicke-huahs.net
Owner: Bennie W Barwick Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1498 Mark Herring Rd Seven Sorinas NC 28578
Physical Address:
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: j C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°10'14" Longitude: 77051'19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 112 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this path
to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick Operator Certification Number: 25567
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Frank Barwick Phone:
On -site representative Frank Barwick Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/26/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
WUP 2000
Waste Analysis N
8/17/13 = 1.89
5/09/13 = 3.27
2/25/13 = 2.43
12/14/12 = 2.03
8/1 /12 = .96
Soil Test 2/21/13
L=OT
Cu & Zn levels Min range
**due again 2016**
irrigation calibration 6/29/12
**due again 2014**
Sludge Survey 9/12/12
LTZ = 5.0
thickness = 4.6
,46%
**due again 2013**
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number : 960028
Inspection Date: 09/26/2013
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,480 2,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
ry Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00 26.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/2612013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/26/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
w/ Rye Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Troup
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0011
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/26/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? O
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/26/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 1100 ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
in
Page: 7

P
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400028 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01/22/2013 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 10:40 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: B & W Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Luther Beaman Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2063 Beaman's Old Creek Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 551 Castoria Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35031'55" Longitude: 77042'55"
Take Hwy 91 North from Snow Hill, turn left at Castoria, one mile on left
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Luther F Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16499
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy Wooten Phone:
On -site representative Jimmy Wooten Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested: 9-27-2012
10-16-12 = 1.04
8-21-12 = .95
6-20-12 = 1.73
3-22-12 = 1.84
1-20-12 = 2.0
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & stocking records are complete
Caliberation is due in 2013 Sludge survey don 11/2012 at 49%
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400028 Owner - Facility: Luther Beaman Jr
Facility Number: 400028
Inspection Date: 01/2212013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,000 3,200
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Deal nod Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
IL agoon 1 08/29/94 19.00 26.00
Page: 2

3
Permit: AW5400028 Owner - Facility: Luther Beaman Jr
Inspection Date: 01/22/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Facility Number: 400028
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑■❑❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400028 Owner - Facility: Luther Beaman Jr
Facility Number: 400028
Inspection Date: 01/22/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑ .
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 1100
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ E
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
11011
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
1100
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400028
Inspection Date: 01/22/2013
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?.
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
Owner - Facility: Luther Beaman Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 400028
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Cl
11
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400028 Owner - Facility: Luther Beaman Jr
Facility Number: 400028
Inspection Date: 01/22/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherissues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality.ra►es that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over-applicatioh)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
13
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
N
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960028 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/19/2012 Entry Time: 08:45 AM Exit Time: 09:15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bennie W. Barwick Farm Owner Email: vbarwick(o)huahs.net
Owner: Bennie W Barwick Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1498 Mark Herring Rd Seven Springs NC 28578
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: j C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35010'14" Longitude: 77051'19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this path
to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Otherlssues
Certified Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick Operator Certification Number: 25567
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Frank Barwick
Phone:
On -site representative Frank Barwick
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page:.1

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 9/12/12
thickness = 5.0
LTZ = 4.6
46%
"due again in 2013"
Soil Test 11/22/11
"due again 2012"
L=.7T
Cu & Zn levels Win range
irrigation calibration 6/29112
"due again 2014"
WUP in records 10/10/00
Waste Analysis N
8/1/12 = .96
5129/12 = 2.3
2110/12 = 2.1
irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
grazed on this Farm
card in records.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Inspection Date: 09/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960028
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
M Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,480 1 3,720
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604.800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Tvoe Identifier Closed Data start Data Freeboard Freeboard
ID ry Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00 40.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number : 960028
Inspection Date: 09/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ 0110
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
1100
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
ONO
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
1100
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number:
960028
Inspection Date: 09/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
w/ Rye
Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenensville
Soil Type 2
Torhunta
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

C
Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09119/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Inspection Date: 09/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960028
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
IN
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

JU Division of Water Quality
Poicility Number L 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Ja Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z -/G Arrival Time: t'- dG Departure Time: 2-: fo I County: ba�.y Region: k/4
Farm Name: )Ie a"-L.. tz 4 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: _
Facility Contact: _
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: a o = ' = Longitude: = o a
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑
Feeder to Finish
�1
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
Ia No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
gfNo
❑ Yes
PTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
FeNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 9t — 2B Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
P"No ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
P'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
?
Observed Freeboard (in): J
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
grNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
P No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ yes?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[]Yes
P No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
J Yeses
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu,
Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ElTotal Phosphorus ElFailure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
/
,IQ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
FIONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
P!rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Cy-L�jh.%G�/
Reviewer/Inspector Name ` �'P✓ I Phone: %S- %9l `YZ�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: %2i/O
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ;D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps [:3 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[:]Yes
L3"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
j2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,'No
❑ NA
NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Hw
Page 3 of 3 12128104

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960028 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/08/2011 Entry Time:08:34 AM Exit Time: 09:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bennie W. Barwick Farm Owner Email: vbarwick hughs.net
Owner: Bennie W Barwick Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1498 Mark Herring Rd Seven Springs NC 28578
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°10'14" Longitude: 77051'19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this path
to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 25567
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Frank Barwick Phone:
On -site representative Frank Barwick Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number : 960028
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 8/24/01
Soil Test 9/28/10
"Due again 2011
Cu & Zn levels Min range
L = 1.5T
Waste Analysis N
8/10/11 = 1.7
5/12/11 = 2.3
1/20/11 = 2.0
Crop yield records reviewed
Lagoon banks and bermuda looks good
irrigation calibration 9/10/10
"due again in 2012"
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
Sludge Survey 11/11/10
thickness = 4.9
LTZ = 4.7
45%
**due again in 2011"
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number : 960028
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,480 573
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
ry Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00 38.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960028
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
00110
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge? ,
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Fondling?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Small Grain Overseed
Kenansvilie
Troup sand
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■0❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
A
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
O
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey. indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number : 960028
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewMspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960028
Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS960028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/15/2008
Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Bennie W. Barwick
Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Bennie W Barwick
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1498 Mark Herring
Rd Seven
Sprinas NC 28578
Physical Address: Zion Church Rd
Seven
Sprinas NC 28578
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard
Farms
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°10'14"
Longitude: 77051'19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church
Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this path
to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick Operator Certification Number: 25567
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name
Frank Barwick
Phone:
On -site representative
Frank Barwick
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number : 960028
Inspection Date: 10115/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw CoC and Permit.
WUP signed 10/10/2000. Land listed as Tract 4907 (F1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 5, 6, 7).
WARs (lbsN/1000gall): 8/28/08-2.0, 5/27/08-2.8, 2/18/08-1.9, 10/31/07-1.8
2007 soil test results: 1.1 tons/acre lime required; Znl-326, Cut-181. Lime bought/applied per Mr. Barwick. Producer is responsible
for performing another soil analysis before the end of 2008.
2008 IRRt/2 (SG)': pulls 1-3 (tract D1), pulls 4-12 (tract 5688); (BP)'": pulls 1-7.
"#21. Be sure to record operator initials and weather codes, either on the IRR-1 or a combined IRR-1/IRR-2, for all irrigation events.
All fields in SG had one entry like this. Remember to enter irrigation times correctly on the IRR-2 (for 10/28/07, 8a-3p is 420 minutes
not 360 minutes).
"The BP calculations initially used a waste result analysis outside of the 60 day window for irrigations between 8/12/08 to 8/14/08.
However, results for a valid second analysis were received which requires PAN re -balancing. A review of these items revealed proper
application of nitrogen.
PAN rates met and balanced. Pumping volumes of irrigation events were consistent with changes in freeboard levels. Rainfall
records were adequate.
2007 sludge survey results: LTZ= 6.8', Thick= 2.8'. Farm is lagoon survey exempt until 2009.
Farm still needs to perform irrigation calibrations for two reel systems before the end of 2008, It was learned today that two systems
were used on the 2008 small grain crop to reduce the time required.
2008 crop yields seen (50 bales of CB cut). The rest of crop (and SG) were grazed
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 10/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,480 5,143
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
ry Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00 25.0(
Page: 3

u
Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 10/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
110
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the Integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 10/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑.
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Troup sand
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the Irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ Cl
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 10/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Inspection Date: 10/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960028
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency --------------------------------
Facility Number: 960028 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Inactive or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/18/2007 Entry Time:11:49 AM Exit Time: Incident M
Farm Name: Bennie W. Barwick Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Bennie W Barwick Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: Zion Church Rd Seven S rg_ings NC 28578
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: 6AC- rr; e..
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35010'14" Longitude: 77051'19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this path
to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
a Waste Collection & Treatment
jj Other issues
Certified Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Frank Barwick
24 hour contact name Frank Barwick
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
a Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 25567
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 10118/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw permit (AWG100000) and CoC (AWS960028).
Saw waste plan signed 10/10/2000.
Reviewed stocking records.
Reviewed IRR1/IRR2 forms from 4/2006-present.
#21. Has one test result (2.0 IbsN/1000gal) used out of the 60 day window on two tracts: #TD1 (pulls 1-3); #5688 (pulls 4-12).
Farm has a lagoon sludge survey exemption letter that states the next survey is to be done before the end of 2007.
Note: The PAN limit for pulls 8-12 (tract 5688) of Bermuda Pasture is 170 Ibs/Ac and not 200 Ibs/Ac as indicated in the IRR2s. This
did not keep the PAN limits from being violated.
Saw the irrigation calibration records for 12/16/2006:
a) Hobbs (1.18" nozzle) <15% variance on the WD
b) OCMIS (1.02" nozzle) <15% variance on the WD
Next calibration is due in 2008.
Rainfall records are acceptable. Although crops are typically grazed, there were 2007 crop yields available (46 bales of BH were
harvested).
Still needs to perform a soil sample analysis for 2007. Saw 10/30/2006 results --highest lime required was 2AT/Ac; highest copper
and zinc indices were 459 and 586 respectively. Continue to monitor these levels.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
W Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,480 4,083
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
ry Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00 31.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960028 Owner- Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960028 Owner- Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960028
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Troup sand
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

I
io
Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number:
960028
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

I
Permit: AWS960028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherissues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 960028
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency --------------------------
Facility Number: 960028 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01/17/2006 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time:
Incident M
Farm Name: Bennie W Barwick Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Bennie W Barwick Phone: [phone]
zcz 561 -s/qi
Mailing Address: 1498 Mark Herring Rd Seven p_rinas NC 28579 So-/8 YL
Physical Address:
Facility Status: M Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35010'14" Longitude: 77051'19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this path
to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
CertlFled Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick Operator Certification Number: 25567
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Frank Barwick Phone:
24 hour contact name Frank Barwick Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: —
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 01/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Rain gauge installed
PLAT results received dated 10/26/2005, P-rating = 3-9m (low)
CoC & Permit available on site
WUP dated 10/10/2000
Preparing to pump as soon as weather gets dry
Waste Analysis:
9129/05 = 1.5
6/1/05 = 2.3
3/10/05 = 2.1, 2.4
Waste Sample taken early this year 1/2006 and sent to Raleigh, awaiting results
Reviewed IRR1 & IRR2 records, complete and balanced.
Rainfall recorded and initialed
Lagoon levels recorded weekly. Drops in levels consistent with irrigation events
Sludge survey exempt until 2007. Letter dated 8/23/05
Irrigation calibration completed 8/11/05, 191GPM
No crop yield records available since fields are grazed
Reviewed stocking records
Vegetation on dike well maintained
Farm is well managed
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 01/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,480 4,799
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
ry Stack 1 02/22/93 19.00 24.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296028 Owner- Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 01/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
ONOO
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload? -
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296028 Owner • Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 01/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to Incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Troup
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: NCA296028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 01/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
Cl
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
E
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA296028 Owner- Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Inspection Date: 01/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960028
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960028 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/03/2005 Entry Time: 02:15 PM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Bennie W. Barwick Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Bennie W Barwick
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1498 Mark Herring Rd
Seven Springs NC 28578
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
j C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35010'14" Longitude: 77°51'19"
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South) follow this
path to hog farm.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Q Waste Collection & Treatment
Q Waste Application
Q Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Nathaniel Franklin Barwick
Operator Certification Number: 25567
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
On -site representative Frank Barwick
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Kevin Rowland - Washington
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
10/5/04 Soil Report: lime required - fields have been limed in November
- Farm is in good shape/records neat and orderly.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296028 Owner -Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 03/03/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
O Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,480 4,480
Total Design Capacity: 4,480
Total SSLW: 604,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboarc
Dry Stack 1 26.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Data: 03/03/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Disr•.hargec_ & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes
❑
No NA
M ❑
NF
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NE
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑
0 ❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not propedy addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
0 ❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
0 ❑
❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
0 ❑
❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA
NF
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
(Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 03/03/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Annlir;; inn Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Troup
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑
0 ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
M ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Documents
❑
Yes
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NE
Records and
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
00
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stacking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
M ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
MCI
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296028 Owner - Facility: Bennie W Barwick
Facility Number: 960028
Inspection Date: 03/03/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Rerords and Documents Yes Nn NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ M
Otherlssuec Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality ❑ M ❑ ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ O O
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ O
❑ M ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
NPDES Permit Holder
n
From: Scott Vinson
Environments Engineer
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2004
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted
at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this
inspection and keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC'_H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the-Certified-Animal-irasteManagementElan; Q) the farm operation`s waste management system is beingoperated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
general NPDES permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed every year and submitted to the Division of
Water Quality in Raleigh as well as the Regional Office by March 1. Please be reminded that the information for
the "Annual Certification Form" is based on a calendar year.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Section
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Section
Attn : ScottVinson
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
A survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons is required annually. Contact your local extension office for
guidance on performing and recording the sludge accumulation survey.
All waste application equipment must be tested and calibrated at least once per year. The results must be
documented on forms provided by, or approved by, the Division.
The Permittee must maintain monthly stocking records for the facility and make the records available for review
by the Department and EPA.
(p Precipitation events must be monitored and recorded by type (rain, snow, etc.) and amount.
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP (lagoon
design). At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that
provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the
following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, rain fall, freeboard, animal
stocking and mortality, past inspections, applied commercial fertilizer, waste application equipment calibration,
sludge survey, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility
owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three (3) years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land aoolication rates exceed the
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given aoolication.
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252.946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Facility Number: 96-28 Date of Inspection 5/26/2004
.Required
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling .
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Does facility require a follow -tip visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
N Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
N No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form []Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Facility Number: . 96-28 Date of Inspection 5/26/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes N No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes N No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes []No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
test 10/9/03 with up to 1.7 T/ac lime required and has
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
by Southern States. Cu-Zn within guidelines.
7/30/03 with 1.8 lbs N/1000 gal; 11/10/03 with 1.6; 2/16/04 with 1.9. (Make sure to pull another waste sample before July 1 to
May 7 applications of 2004.)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vi so Entered by:, Portia Peaden .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date �G y
12112103 Continuer!

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 2S Date of Visit: 5/26/2004 Time: 3:40
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ........................................................................ County: W.gy.1)g ............................................... V ARQ........
Owner Name:)3>:mmlg..................................... Rgx.Hkk...................................................... Phone No: 9].9-S.k4.:b141...........................................................
Mailing Address: 149A.Maxk.Ro.r. xng.Rd.............................:...................................... &YR. i.5RKinga-SIG.............................................. ;8.5.7.8 ..............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator: J..C.Homard.k';3 rms.............................................
Certified Operator:NathLoniel..Fx.ujakliu.......... Bar vidi.Ar..................................... Operator Certification Number:Z55.6.7 .............................
Location of Farm:
3egin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South)
.'ollow this path to hog farm. T
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ]0 14 Longitude 7? 51 19
Design Current
Swine rnnnrity Pnnutntinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4480
4800
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 49480
Total SSLW 604,800
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b..If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify .DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 32
12112103 Continued

,L.
F W ATF
,�
Michael aslev1
CEO
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
�-
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Scott Vinson
Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recornmended by the soil analysis.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested, not a requirement. to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 208 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: aRO Files
SAV Files
Ray Collier, J.C.Howard Farms
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Facility Number Date oTVisit: 4/16/2002 Time: 12:00 pm.
p o Operational p Below res o
N Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: •••••••••••••••••••••••••
Farm Name: Bennie W. Barwick Farm County:..W.ayne................................................ .W.a.RG........
Owner Name: Bennie Barwick Phone No: 919-569-6141
Mailing Address: 3.49RMark.Herring.Rd.................................................................... Sexcn.Springs... C.............................................. 28578 ..............
FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title: ............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative: Ray-Collier,.Frank.Barmick.............................................. Integrator: XC.Howard.F.arms..............................................
Certified Operator: Nathaniel.F.ranklin......... Barwick.dr,.................................... Operator Certification Number:255.67 .............................
Location of Farm:
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travelW. approx. mile there will.be a clay dirt path turning to the left (So&
follow this path to hog farm.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle p Horse Latitude =■ =, =64 Longitude =■ =` =44
e-��Deugn;�<<,Current�2ta ,.,T �a Des►gCurrent
x � ,
Swore. ti r4 U Capacity*YPopulat�oni g Poultry ; Cattle Ca acit Po ulat�on ;t
F ,Capacity4Popula[ion, . Y p.,
..,, ..�, .� ,,. »� c v e ti ,. „,..,,:, a. ,nti +. p..
_
a`
i;
ray. ❑ t er
4
_ �..
191d �,d .k t'.l1 Si t1'10 r' M .f
", s �* �} �� +Total Design Capacity 414 80
�,TotaI.SSLW 6049800
i ,kH;
�. {i
4`
f•1�W � rT� �. &:;' iA 3 ••live+.. ��i..��.._ti.�$•Vi�, yx�.`��. �,�.�•e•ti...��J..
... ... .• .. ..
,..
..,
NumberofLa oons
g
u ur a ram resen Lagoon Area Spray �e Area '
❑ s ce s p g ❑ p y
Holden Pond
s /Soh& Tra s' o Liquid as a Management g
p ❑ q h Ys em
.. ,
r0
❑ can to ceder
® ee er to mis
❑ arrow to can
❑ arrow to ee er
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... 25 ................ .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................

Facility Number: 96-28 Date of Inspection
• 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
N No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
H No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
N No
12. Crop type Bermuda Pasture Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
U No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22,
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
U No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this
W N M1 V, i
Comments,(refer.,forquestronn#)'f.!Ezplam anylYES'ans'ivers;and/orany_ recommendat�ons+or any,other,comm8nts t ry ,
,:�t� az�'fi=i^+dxt:rf uv,'�:r' {nf •J�a.,1 reL r in ?�V "'IRK
Use�deawings facihty.to ation ' '
of betteriexplain situ (use addttionaI geConecessapy) d bpi
yyt:gryM+ i,,t 1 Flrrip. �K ft d:.l.'u$ 1,,? ; �, ;t'r 5f' u:,{w,p'•) ,j '1'`)❑Field COPY ❑Final Notes
'SvjISFNZjivr5LI�1?l.r.��v'4I.>a
Fzry{;�F ,ra . . ,
rnniytlMi 3¢F: z4 Rw•1 i. k; ,..xji+ :.u.)A .bua✓TI.Ltl[9 �!, .: w"4,'i. v;::, ."d -Ntisf y=.t Al K ir.'•'.
'•al,,{;;i'.Au:Li�L$..ljl:'}SH$rMu#I.S�r...$�.lvhRl�'a13.'w.`I'i. E"dd^J!R� ��-iYn� CY {.�.IC4Y!.�°i
Waste analysis dated 2 1 02 with 2.21 s N 1000 gal. for J.C. Howar s Farm.
* Waste analysis dated 10/30/01 with 1.1 lbs N/1000 gal. for J.C. Howards Farm.
* Soils analysis dated 3/l/02 with lime applied.
* Has started laying rock between houses; looks good.
* Records are well maintained and farm is well managed.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vinson entered 6yfAnnkTyndall i
A k 't{.:.4 � . H :r 1,.:. 0. i, i.T .A•I. }� h x .1 ' �' � i! t. °,.v i It ', L . �i i�f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

O5103101 Continued
iry
Facility Number: 9628 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
13 Yes
13 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
®No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No

A`
Facility Number Date of Visit: 9/17/2001 Time: 13:10 Printed on: 10l3/2001
p Not OperationalBelow Thre o
E Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Bennie W. Barwick Farm County:..W.ayiae................................................ .W.aR.Q........
Owner Name: Bennie
Barwick
Phone No: 252-569-6141
Mailing Address:.1491I..Mark.Herring..Rd.................................................................... Sexen.Springs... NC.............................................. 28578 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative: F.rank.Rarwirk.......................................................................... Integrator: J.C.Roward..Farms.............................................
Certified Operator- Bennie..W...:...........................faarm.Lk........................................... Operator Certification Number: 07.666 ........................
.a
low this path to hog farm.
ng
I&
g Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle p Horse Latitude =• 0' =46 Longitude =• 06
="
Swine
In
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to mis
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ arrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number,:ofl:agoons t I❑ suosuriace urams
Holding'Eonds / Sohd Traps„ f] o Liquid Waste
0
+'Ci
4,480
604,800
pray ieTA
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes g No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes g No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes g No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? na
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes g No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes g No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes g No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes g No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
\ Freeboard (inches): ...............3.1...........................................................................................................................

lFacility Number: 96_28 Date of Inspection r7f772im Printed on: 10/3/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Bermuda Pasture Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
-... .---- _...... .., _,... .._ _-_.
b) Does, the facility need a wettable.acre determination? _ ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
®No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
®No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONO
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
p
No violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. Vou will receive no further correspondence about
is visi .
❑ 1 iew copy [7
:ecorcls availame Tor review.
Vaste analysis 7/23/01 = 1.6 lbs.; 6/4/01 =1.9 lbs.; 1/17/01 = 2.2 lbs.; 8/1/00 = 2.1 lbs.
soil analysis - 2001 available; lime was applied.
rrigation records are complete and balanced out.
reeboard records are kept as permit requires.
3rounds are well kept.
✓egetation on dike wall is well established. SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: p (%

O5103101
Continued
Facility NumbeF7
9 _11 Date of Inspection
Printed on: 10/3/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®Ne
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®Ne
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®Ne
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
e. buildings.
wance" .
❑ Yes ❑ No

. W.pTj�',p
>;
t� Y
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional
Date: October 8, 2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the.fann_is complying with requirements:of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217 Scnatc Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation`s waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or nmoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit therefore, these items must be implemented:
(P The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed die level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour stone event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
(p An analysis of the liquid anneal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/sod analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/nnanager in chronological and legible form for a
muninum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff daring any given application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested not required, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
(p The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by properly
managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the responsibility to certify
monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can result in a letter of reprimand,
suspension of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or meat 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files (inspection fornn only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946.9215 (Fax)

Facility Number 96 Zg Date of visit: 6/13/2000 Time: 1315 Printed on: 8/1/2000
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Ucx mik..V!',,.BAr.w di..FArm........................................................................ County: WAyaC ............................................... \.N,aR�,?........
Owner Name: 8kmmik..................................... jQAr.:lkai...................................................... Phone No: 252.-
.S.fiq.-
&J.41 ...........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 149A.Marklitiring.Rd.................................................................... S.eY.kA.SRl:ltlgs..N.............................................. Z$5.7.8..............
Onsite Representative: fjrAjjk.HjrRYlklc.......................................................................... Integrator:d.C..UD.W td.l grMS .............................................
Certified Operator:B,@ttdllg_W ............................... 13mt7xlClt........................................... Operator Certification Number:j,76G6 .. .............................
Location of Farm:
Begin at the E. end of Zion Church Rd. travel W. approx. 1/2 mile there will be a clay dirt path turning to the left (South)
folllow this path to hog farm.
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �! �` �� Longitude �• �� O�
.
Design Current' Design .Current Design�`-_Currenf
awme . Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 4480 4000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry Ca actCapacity:Population Cattle,.,.
1. Po ulation-
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other I
_:-
Total Design Capacity 4,480
Total SSLW " 604,800
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area
10 Spray Field Area
Ho dmg Ponds / Soltd,TTaps- '; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharrecs & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24

5/00 Continued on back
Facility Number: 96-28 Date of Inspection 6/13/2000 Printed on: 8/1/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Bermuda C. Grazed Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes IN No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ® No
22:. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
•No•violations:or deft:iende$•were:noted:dUi*ing•thtsi vi$it::You:will receive n . itirtlier'
eorresondence abairt tltis:visit:::...:::::::..::...:::::::...::...: .
Records available for review.
Waste analysis: 10/18/99 = 1.9 lbs.; 5/1/00 = 2.4 lbs.
On the soil analysis, please put the year on it.
Suggest to keep records via Excel spreadsheet. Contact your Extension Service Person for a copy.
No overapplication noted since last inspection.
Note the nitrogen allowance change for grazing.
I SEE PAGE 3 I T
Reviewer/inspector Name Lyn _ son _ ' y Entered by.Ann

ReViewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: S/DO
Facility Number: 96-28 Date of Inspection 6/13/2000 Printed on: 8/1/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes S No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes S No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes S No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes S No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes S No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes S No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes S No
' In
Generates - 10304
2 BCG 1748
SG 460 Presently revising waste plan.
3 BCG 3379.3
- SG 719.0
1 BCG 2356.0
SG 620.0
9282.3 lbs. of N/yr.
"* Make sure that your new waste plan has this correction.
Prepare yourself for the hurricane season.
If you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Sinn

Facility Number (, Q Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 8 30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Registered ® Certified 0 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
..........................
FarmName: ............... c '(i"irv� ck 171V M ...................................................... .................................................................................................... County:.................. `7
OwnerName: .......... 6en.^..l&............ .1..rIclk................................................................. Phone No:....................................................................... ............ ................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: .............. r?'.-......,.,... Lk
Certified Operator;,..,......,., .' ,.,....,, V �., �C �
.......... ..................
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
Integrator: ............:�...c 0'%"2
Operator Certification Number; .............•..•........................
Location of Farm:
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude = a==46 Longitude =• 0I ={{
���
Design - Current :
Designs Current
Design Cucrent��
Svnne� .
�Capacity,Population ,Poultry
Capacity. Population Cattier rn-` Capacity�Population",','
rte
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer1
10Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
`i q g J
ILI
Non -Layer
1
10 Non -Dairy I;`.
n
❑ Farrow to Wean
arrow to Feeder
❑ Ft
❑ Other
r
„.
❑ Farrow to Finish
;Total Design Capacity`,`"
❑ Gilts
❑Boars
. ;Tota155LW.:
Number of Lagoons
Molding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
ID Spray Field Area
M
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
9 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 1� No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 14 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes IgNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes I,No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: qb — 2� 1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
No
Structures (Laiwons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):.......... 3..................... .................................... ................................... .................................... ....................................
....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
M No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
19 No
(If in excess of WI MP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .+ �:w2.................. S.C�........................................................................................:...........................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
(V No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
19 No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
1N No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
ffiNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
19 No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
®-Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
U No.violitioits or defidencies.weren&6d-during this:visiL You:will receive ito fiiriher,:
etirrespotidepce Ahouf Phis:visit: :
2 1' NW4 TA5CA OCor C0,4,11
y4Q'L PA"3F1ly CG' 1,51,
N� #ekW vr�5ae CVAIystf
cke'U'S1
7/25/97
+a %++x gw�c°y�r»�:• R»r f s+!r^z s+s p
Reviewer/Inspector Name i
ex
Y ^` s itt . $ ;$'aa :'3':'F, .} '.'.`.' ^ 1 § f drt Ei '.0 a d }5 C
E» i3i'3 °Sd ita 4..-„ .! T, ii�'}r }v.T+\.•§. A
m. .. E o-n.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /I Date: 10 -

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Bennie Barwick
© •�
NC®ENR
NORTH C^MOLINA oeP^RTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT ANO NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
May 14, 1998
Bennie W. Barwick Farm
1498 Mark Herring Road
Seven Springs, North Carolina 28578
SUBJECT: Notice of Referral - Bennie W. Barwick Farm (Facility No. 96-28)
Dear Mr. Barwick:
RECEIVED
WASHINGTON OFFICE
MAY 1 5 1998
D. E. M.
Please find attached a copy of the Operation Review conducted at the Bennie W. Barwick Farm in Wayne County.
This Review was taken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OD. Take time to review the comments made during the
site visits. All corrective actions or repairs should be completed in a timely manner or prior to stated deadlines (if
issued).
During the Review, it was determined that waste had been over applied to certain spray fields above loading rates
listed in the waste utilization plan. Since it is improper to apply waste above recommended nitrogen loading rates,
this operation review along with supporting documentation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for further
investigation. G.S. 143-215.10E requires me to notify the Division of Water Quality and the owner/operator of this
observed violation.
In an effort to minimize the over application of nitrogen, the loading rate for the next crop in the crop cycle (coastal
be needs to be reduced by the amount over applied to the small grain cover crop. Irrigation records should
be corrected accordingly. Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental
regulations, animal waste must be applied at the rates expressed in a farm's Waste Utilization Plan.
As discussed during the Review, the existing plan shows coastal bermuda - hay as a receiving crop as opposed to
coastal bermuda - grazed (actual practice). The Wayne Soil & Water District Office was contacted after the Review
to determine if this was a typographical error when the plan was revised in 1997. Staff at the District Office
indicated that this listing was not in error and agreed that the plan requires revision. The Review form was
corrected accordingly (please refer to comments for item #16). You are encouraged to either revise the Waste Plan
to reflect actual harvesting patterns or alter harvesting patterns to match receiving crops listed in the Plan. The
Wayne County Soil & Water Conservation District Office can assist you in correcting this situation.
The Division of Soil & Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with these Reviews. Should you have any
questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at 252-448-1775.
Sincerely;
Scott Jones
Environmental Specialist II
cc: -Wayne County Soil & Water Conservation District
Ray Collier, J. C. Howard Farms
Carl Dunn, DWQ-WARO
DSWC-WARO Files
Post Office Box 40, Trenton, North Carolina 28585-0040 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

C
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: B.etu►ie..W.Barivick.F.artn........................................................................ County: Wayne WaRO
Owner Name: B.e►u►ie.................................... Barwick ..................................................... Phone No: 252-569-614.1..........................................................
Facility Contact: Rc u►ie.Barwick............................................Title: owner................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 1498.Mark.HcrxingRd.................................................................... Sexen.Springs..NC............................................... 28578 ..............
Onsite Representative: Hcuuir„Zarwick,.Ray..lCo1Iier.............................................. Integrator: L.C.11owar.d..Fat'tns.............................................
Certified Operator:Henaie-W.............................. Barmirk............................................ Operator Certification Number: 1.7.666.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude O* 0' O« Longitude 0* 0' O°'
I&
es►gn U.urrent,Design urren Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Fm►s
p Gilts
❑ Boars
General
❑ Layer 1 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 on-on-
a►ry
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 49480
Total SSLW
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
not applicable
❑ Yes ® No
Cl Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on back

4
acifiy Number: 96_28 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? []Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: #1
Freeboardft : 21L............. ..............................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
® Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ..... Coastal.Llermuda-Grass....... Sma.11.Grain.(Wpheat».Barley,............................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops diner with those designated m l�re Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
® Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
For
Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
Cl No
p...
o.vto Ions.or ierencies-were.nn e . during,, thisvisit.,. You. will .reeeiventr ur
er.•.
•:.:........e....
6ti�;t...visit::.:.:.:.:.:.:.;•:•:•;•:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::•:•:•:•:•:•
Reviewer/[nspector Name 'Scott'Jones 1""�. , " "" ."T,Y j,, 7 „n f/ter �^F=7 7i " 77
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. .4k Date: S CDn 9�