960012_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
960012 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
09/20/2017 Entry Time: 05:30 pm
Farm Name:
Ralph Weaver Hog Farms
Owner:
Ralph N Weaver
Mailing Address:
1115 Old Grantham Rd
Physical Address:
494 Stevens Church Rd
Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Exit Time: 6:30 pm Incident #
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Goldsboro NC 27530
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 350 19' 46" Longitude: 78' 08' 37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital
to Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Slor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph Nelson Weaver Operator Certification Number: 25622
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name
Primary Inspector:,
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Report N
8-1-17 1.15
5-24-17 1.74
Soil Report 8-2-17
Due 2020
Zn<1600
Cu<1550
Calibration
Due 2018.
Name
Brent Mitchell
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
Justin K Davis Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility : Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/20/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 T
4,190
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 36.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960012 Owner -Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/20/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
00
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
n ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

a
Permit: AWS960012
Owner - Facility : Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/20/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑E
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ E ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility : Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/20/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

J
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
09/15/2016 Entry Time: 02:00 pm
Farm Name:
Ralph Weaver Hog Farms
Owner:
Ralph N Weaver
Mailing Address:
.1115 Old Grantham Rd
Physical Address:
494 Stevens Church Rd
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region:
Exit Time: 3:15 pm Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Goldsboro NC 27530
Goldsboro NC 27530
Washington
[e-mail]
919-734-0309
Facility Status: Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 350 19' 46" Longitude: 78' 08' 37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital
to Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph Nelson Weaver Operator Certification Number: 25622
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Justin K Davis
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner -Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
8-21-16 1.00
5-23-16 1.84
10-20-15 1.29
Soil Report 9-1-2014
Zn<1700
Cu<1000
Calibration 6-6-16 two reels
Lagoon Sludge Survey 7-24-2015
LTZ 5.1
Thickness 2.3
Pump Intake 4.6
% 29
page: 2

Permit: AWS960012 Owner -Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/15/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,140
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 1 39.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960012 Owner -Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No No Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility : Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

.r'
Permit: AWS960012 Owner -Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Otherlssues*
Yes No No Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 6

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
09/16/2015 Entry Time: 02:35 pm
Farm Name:
Ralph Weaver Hog Farms
Owner:
Ralph N Weaver
Mailing Address:
1115 Old Grantham Rd
Physical Address:
494 Stevens Church Rd
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Exit Time: 3:50 pm Incident #
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Goldsboro NC 27530
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: ECompliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 19' 46" Longitude: 78' 08' 37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital
to Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
E] Dischrge & Stream Impacts a Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
® Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph Nelson Weaver Operator Certification Number: 25622
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Sito Reprosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Report N
2-1-15 1.76
4-29-15 1.68
Justin K Davis
Soil Report 9-1-14
1 2 3 4 5 6
Zn< 1352 1693 1173 1610
Cu< 915 969 605 803 935 241
Calibration 4-9-15
Crop Yield 250 Hay Bails
1249 485
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility : Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012"
Inspection Date: 09/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
[] Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 1 46.00
page: 2

I
Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility : Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
.
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M' ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storaqe & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
®❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
®❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
i ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

N
Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility : Ralph N Weaver Facility Number:
960012
Inspection Date: 09/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
®❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
1 S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
i ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

0
Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility : Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 09/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No Nu
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
®❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
®❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
®❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
®❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
a ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
1101111
page: 5

0
II 0 Division of Water Quality G ���
Facility Number � - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water, Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: r!t Arrival Time: ��; Departure Time: County: I/l}�
Farm Name: � i�1�V�Jcaye'g_ �" ► I Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1 A L�PGiItP,2 Phone:
—_ r—
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Ic" { r1 ACU1l Title:
Onsite Representative: Ida& e I&
Certified Operator: Tee,, /,04 Al- 1 j.,PatA&e
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feede:
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Region:W*00
Integrator: (0�3�
Certification Number: C ti;:' pZ�
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Pullets
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [a*54o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[-]Yes VNI
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L.d "o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Z)
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: i
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentalthreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes pe /❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes O ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [JeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): NO) Ns A, / wc,,C
13. Soil Type(s): P7 D i _ `lG
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�10/
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[j iQO
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
No
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Q
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [ NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacility Number: W
jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? []Yes [;T'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [; No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Noo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes P40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P<O❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El"Nio
�o
�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. I
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Cvt, A re c s�2 cis
n'e tk ids
(„ lts-k_
9-P-N
7/5- i'1/3 /- 0`0
�Dt1 *4 oac)/13
�. -6� Jercl c�/,k r�
il(YiYI �„�tb�►�. �-�- �rYl
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
P-�
D.�
o
v
[ -6P
3a�"G
hP-w-n,�s
lCP_ V 4-l1 s
_5LA1 A29_��W" I,*--
Phone:
Date: Q
21112011

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/13/2013 Entry Time: 11:46 AM Exit Time: 12:20 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Ralph Weaver Hoa Farms Owner Email: eav0309 bellsouth.n
Owner: Ralph N Weaver Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 494 Stevens Church Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°19'46" Longitude: 78008'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver Operator Certification Number: 16600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner • Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Sludge plan & records 3/19/12 in records
sludge removed
WuP 3/13/09
Soil Test 3/13/09
L = O.OT
Cu & Zn levels Win range
**due again in 2016**
Waste Analysis N
7/21/13 = 1.80
crop yield records reviewed
irrgiation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
Sludge Survey 11/13/12
**due again in 2013**
thickness = 2.4
LTZ = 5.4
pump intake = 5.2
28%
irrigation calibration 2/6/11
**due again 2013**
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012 .
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 4,451
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Deal nod Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 48.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Stale? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
ONO
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 2
Norfolk loamy sand, 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 3
Kenansville loamy sand
Soil Type 4
Wagram loamy sand, 0
to 6 /o slopes
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
ONO
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960012 Owner • Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? O
Other? O
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on imgation equipment (NPDES only)?
o ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

n
Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NI
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
11013
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/12/2012 Entry Time: 07:45 AM Exit Time: 08:15 AM
Incident p:
Farm Name: Ralph Weaver Hog Farms
Owner Email: eav03090b .Ilso uth n
Owner: Ralph N Weaver
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Physical Address: 494 Stevens Church Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell
Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35019'46"
Longitude: 78'08'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take
Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver Operator Certification Number: 16600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 07/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
New OIC in records
WUP in records
Soil Test 1/18/12
""due again 2013""
L= OT
Cu & Zn levels Min range
Waste Analysis N
2/20/12 = 1.91
10/2/11 = .96
irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
irrigation calibration 2/6/11
""due again 2013""
"lagoon clean out 3/31/12""" hadn't pumped since then
lagoon survey clean out records reveiwed
Lagoon survey 2/8/11
thickness = 3.17
LTZ = 4.97
pump intake = 7.2
36%
"due again in 2012""
records and farm look great
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 07/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,824
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closad Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 50.00
Page: 3

Penult: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 07/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960012 Owner • Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 07/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 2
State
Soil Type 3
Kenansville
Soil Type 4
Altavista
Soil Type 5
Wagram
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1100 ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100 ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960012 Owner -Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 0711212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0110
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number : 960012
Inspection Date: 07/1212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ '■ ❑ ❑
Other.Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960013 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/29/2012 Entry Time: 11:40 AM Exit Time: 12:10 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bryant Worley Farm Owner Email: debworlevkilnc.rr.com
Owner: J Bryant Worley Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 261 Talton Rd Princeton NC 275696915
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35024'50" Longitude: 78007'40"
On SR 1227 (Oakland Church Rd), approx 1.4 mi west of Ebenezer Church Rd (SR 1234). Farm path is on the right side of the road,
before the intersection with Princeton Rd (SR 1226).
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Otherlssues
Certified Operator: James B Worley Operator Certification Number: 20058
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960013 Owner • Facility: J Bryant Worley Facility Number: 960013
Inspection Date: 05/29/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
New WUP 4/2/12
""Keep eye on lagoon level @ 25"
New WUP 4/2/12 in records
Waste Analysis N
5/1/12 = 1.9
1/4/12 = .95
7/20111 = 1.6
Soil Test 10/4/11
L=.9T
Cu & Zn levels Win range
"'Due again 2012""
irrigation calibration 9/30/11
""due again 2013""
irrigation records correspond to lagoon & rainfall records
Sludge Survey 8/11/11
""due again in 2012""
thickness = 3.0
LTZ = 4.4
pump intake = 4.1
37%
crop yield records reviewed
Page: 2

u
Permit: AWS960013 Owner - Facility: J Bryant Worley
Inspection Date: 05/29/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,849
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Tvoe Identifier Clonad Data start Data Freeboard Freeboard
agoon #1 01/28/94 19.00 25.00
Page: 3

c
Permit: AWS960013 Owner - Facility: J Bryant Worley
Inspection Date: 05/29/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Facility Number: 960013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ O ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
D
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

a
Permit: AWS960013 Owner • Facility: J Bryant Worley
Inspection Date: 05/29/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Winter Annual
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wickham sandy loam, 2
to 6% slopes, erod
Soil Type 2
Goldsboro
Soil Type 3
Rains
Soil Type 4
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to,have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960013 Owner -Facility: J Bryant Worley
Inspection Date: 05/29/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■
❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960013 Owner - Facility: J Bryant Worley
Facility Number: 960013
Inspection Date: 05/29/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/30/2012 Entry Time: 12:55 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM
Incident #:
Farm Name: Ralph Weaver Hop Farms
Owner Email: eav0309 .bellsouth.n
Owner: Raloh N Weaver
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Physical Address: 494 Stevens Church Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell
Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°19'46"
Longitude: 78°08'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take
Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver Operator Certification Number: 16600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
OIC in records
Waste Analysis N
2/2/14 = 1.98
7/21/13 = 1.80
Soil Test 1/20/13
Cu & Zn levels w/in range
L = O.OT
***due again 2016*'*
"Irrigation calibration due again 2014'
Crop yield reviewed
Sludge Survey 11/23/13
thickness = 2.6
LTZ = 5.0
pump intake = 4.6
32%
***due again in 2014'*"
irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
***dike walls good vegetation***
***Sludge Survey due every year'**
`*`irrigation calibration due every two years`*'
Page: 2

Identifier
Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 04130/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 2,456
Waste Structures
Type
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon Ti- 05/05/93 19.00 38.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
Cl
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960012 Owner • Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk loamy sand, 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 2
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Kenansville
Soil Type 4
Wagram loamy sand, 6
to 10% slopes
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
11000
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherissues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

c
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/01/2011 Entry Time:10:25 AM Exit Time: 11:10 AM
Incident #:
Farm Name: Ralph Weaver Hog Farms
Owner Email: eav0309 bellsouth.n
Owner: Ralph N Weaver
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Physical Address: 494Stevens Church Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell
Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35019'46"
Longitude: 78008'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take
Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver Operator Certification Number: 16600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011
Inspection Summary:
New WUP in records 8/2/99
new coc in records.
Waste analysis N
7/13/11 1.9
5/31/11 2.4
1/26/11 2.0
crop yield records reviewed
sludge Survey 2/8/2011
thickness = 3.17
LTZ = 4.97
pump intake = 7.2
36%
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
soil test 2/2/11
**due again 2010**
L=OT
Zn & Cu levels in over
over 1,000 in field #2
irrigation calibration 2/6/2011
**due again in 2013**
irrigation records correspond to rainfall
and lagoon records.
***sludge survey due again 2012***
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,192
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
05/05/93
19.00
44.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑0
to —111111i■]
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
0000
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0000
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

1
Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk loamy sand, 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Kenansville
Soil Type 4
Wagram loamy sand, 6
to 10% slopes
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? 0
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ 000
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

0
Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M
❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/01 /2011 Entry Time:10&25 AM Exit Time: 11:10 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Ralph Weaver Hog Farms Owner Email: eav0309QUellsouth.n
Owner: Ralph N Weaver Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 494 Stevens Church Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35019'46" Longitude: 78008'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd, turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver Operator Certification Number: 16600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New WUP in records 8/2/99 soil test 2/2/11
new coc in records. '"due again 2010"
L=OT
Waste analysis N
Zn & Cu levels in over
7/13/11 1.9
over 1,000 in field #2
5/31/11 2.4
1/26111 2.0
irrigation calibration 2/6/2011
"due again in 2013"'
crop yield records reviewed
irrigation records correspond to rainfall
and lagoon records.
sludge Survey 2/8/2011
thickness = 3.17
LTZ = 4.97
pump intake = 7.2
36%
"'sludge survey due again 2012"`
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Facility Number : 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,192
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
fps Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboar
igoon 1 05/05/93 19,00 44.01
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Stale? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e,/ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion; seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Applicatlort Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960012 Owner • Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Applicatlon
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Cl
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk loamy sand, 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Kenansville
Soil Type 4
Wagram loamy sand, 6
to 10% slopes
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number : 960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960012
Inspection Date: 08/01/2011
Records and Documents
Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
IN
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
0
Page: 7

r
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/06/2010 Entry Time:09:15 AM Exit Time:
I4,177T11111: ino Y Y - . - mr- . r, -
Owner: Ralph N Weaver
Incident #:
Owner Email: eav0309 bellsouth.n
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°19'46" Longitude: 78°08'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16600
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number : 960012
Inspection Date: 10/06/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit; Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: Soil tested:
09/28/10 = 1.8 112010
O6/08/10 = 2.1
03/09/10 = 2.3
BH = 305, BP = 205/230, C = 137, W = 144, SB = 140/160, SG = 75/100
Equipment Calibration 2010
Sludge Survey 2010 = 35%
Freeboard range:
2/9/10 = 18" - 9/12/10 = 48"
Looks Great!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 10/06/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,846
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 35.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number : 960012
Inspection Date: 10/06/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4
9

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 10/06/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Cl ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number : 960012
Inspection Date: 10/06/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
❑
■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey.as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
In
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number : 960012
Inspection Date: 10/06/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 10/14/2009 Entry Time:10:50 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Ralph Weaver Hog Farms Owner Email: eav0309 bellsouth.n
Owner: Ralph N Weaver Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 494 Stevens Church Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35019'46" Longitude: 78008'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro. 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver
Operator Certification Number: 16600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ralph Weaver
Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-13-09 = 2.0
6-1-09 = 2.7
2-17-09 = 3.1
10-21-08 = 1.8
soil tested 3-2009 sludge survey 2009 Caliberation 2009
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 10/14/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 2,500
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Tvoo Identi lar Clnuerl nnta qt.A nate neei....ed v..kti .m Ak.e—sa o.eew..a.a
agoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 38.00
Page: 2

If
Permit: AWS960012 Owner- Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 10/14/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Ap lication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Data: 10/14/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ .❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page:4

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 10/14/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall 6 monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960012 Owner- Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Data: 10/14/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page:6

i
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ____________—_—____--_
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/1912008 Entry Time:01:08 PM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Ralph Weaver Hog Farms
Owner Email:
Owner: Ralph N Weaver
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Physical Address: 494 Stevens Church Rd _ Goldsboro
NC 27530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro
Hog Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°19'46"
Longitude: 78°08'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take
Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver Operator Certification Number: 16600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw CoC and Permit.
WUP dated and signed 8/2/1999. 'Field 5= Field 2&3, *Field 6= Field 3 Pull 6, *Field 7= Field 1 Pull 7, *Field 8= Field 1 Pull 8, *Field
9= Field 3 Pull 9, `Field 10= Field 3 Pull 10, `Field 11= Field 1 Pull 11, "Field 12= Field 1 Pull 12.
WARs (lbsN/1000ga1I): 4/23/08-2.9, 1/31/08-2.6.
Soil test results (3/18/08): 0.7 tons/acre lime required (sample 2); Znl-913, Cut-542 (sample 1).
2008 IRR1/2 (BH): 'Pulls 1, 2, 3, & 5.
*All PAN rates met and balanced. Typical pumping rate 138 gpm. Pumping volumes of irrigation events were consistent with changes
in freeboard levels. Rainfall records were adequate.
2007 sludge survey results (2/6/08): LTZ= 5.42', Thick= 2.47'
2007 calibration results (5/5/07): 0.86" ring, 45 psi @gun. 137gpm expected, 138gpm measured.
Crop yields seen (6/7/08= 46 bales of BH cut).
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number : 960012
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 4,690
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 42.00
Page: 3

c
Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?. (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
Cl
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
011111111111100
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960012 Owner • Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number : 960012
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk loamy sand, 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3.
Wagram loamy sand, 6
to 10% slopes
Soil Type 4
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 5
Norfolk loamy sand, 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
❑
❑
Cl
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960012 Owner • Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
O
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
❑
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
❑
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
❑
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
Cl
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑
■
Cl
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 06119/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewAnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Page: 7

0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency -------------------------------
Facility Number : 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit:
NCA296012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/13/2007 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Raloh Weaver Hog Farms
Owner Email:
Owner: Ralph N Weaver
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1115 Old Grantham Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Physical Address: 494 Stevens Church Rd Goldsboro
NC 27530
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°19'46"
Longitude: 78°08'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver Operator Certification Number: 16600
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
On -site representative Ralph Weaver Jr
Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Ralph Weaver Jr
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296012 Owner- Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 04/13/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2007
Waste Analysis 3-29-07 4.1
1-2-07 2.2
11-13-06 1.4
Calibrations 6-10-06 with 137 GPM
Soil test 2-1-07 with highest lime .8 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Crop yield complete
Sludge survey 2-7-07 thick-2.33' LTZ-5.57'
Irrigation records complete - make sure to use current waste analysis
Freeboard and rainfall complete
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 04/13/2007
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 26.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296012 Owner • Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 04/13/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 04/13/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
loamy sand
Soil Type 3
Wagram
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
Cl
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑.
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 04113/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Cl
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
Cl
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 04/13/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

r
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ___________
Facility Number: 960012 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/03/2006 Entry Time:01:25 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Ralph Weaver Hog Farms
Owner: Ralph N Weaver
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 494 Stevens Church Rd Goldsboro NC 275309779
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35019'46" Longitude: 78008'37"
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry Hospital to
Falling Creek. Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ralph N Weaver
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16600
On -Site Rep rosentative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Ralph Weaver Jr Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Ralph Weaver Jr Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
• Annual Certification for 2005 available on site
• Sludge survey exempt until 2007, letter dated 416/05
• PLAT completed 2/9/04, No field received high rating
• Irrigation calibration completed 6/10/06, 138GPM
• CoC & Permit available on site
• WUP dated 8/2/1999
' Waste Analysis:
6/21 /06 = 3.1
5/24/06 = 3.2
2/17/06 = 3.5
• Soil test report dated 3/13/06, Max. lime = 2 Ton required. Producer has applied a ton/acre on 7/10/06.
• Crop yield for 2006 Coastal Bermuda Hay available
• Reviewed waste application records:
- See technical specialist to include narrative on split application, deadline to pump on
Coastal, and Last day to harvest Rye.
- #11. Producer pumped on Coastal in September 2005, and also on Rye in Nov. 2005 even though he is on a split application on
overseed. Do not pump on Coastal after 8/31, and if split applying, apply 50lbsN/acre from 9/15-10/31 and another 50lbsN/acre in
Feb -March.
Lagoon levels an rainfall recorded with weather codes and initials.
V. Try to fill channels/tioles created by wave action on inside of dike wall with crushed rocks or good soil material and grow grass
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296012 Owner- Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 2,880
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 05/05/93 19.00 33.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges $Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Cl
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Stora a &Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
u
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
■
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Kenansville
Soil Type 4
Wagram
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
Records and Documents
_ ............._. ._.. .
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver Facility Number: 960012
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherlssues
.._. _....-.._._1.._.._.._. _.........
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
IN
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: NCA296012 Owner - Facility: Ralph N Weaver
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960012
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Date of Visit: 10-27-2004 Time: 1214
Facility Number 96 12
o Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted N Certified i] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: IAIRb.W.eAyzr..Hog.k:arms...................................................................... County: V. AYo.C............................................... WARO ........
OwnerName:RAlAb.&................................ Ne var........................................................ Phone No: 919A.89A43.5.................. ................. I.......................
Mailing Address: 494.51cy=.C.hulri;.b.Rd................................................................... Qaidsb r.0...N.C..................................................... 2.7.53.0 ..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Geo:rgti.POtus............................................................................. Integrator: Gis.RlliSbo�o.Df0.��AlC1ms.......................................
Certified Opera tor:Ralph.N................................. We>i.Y. r............................................ Operator Certification Number:166.00 .............................
Location of Farm:
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry 3w,
Hospital to Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 19 46 " Longitude 78 • F 08 ' 37
Design
Current Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Population .
❑ Wean to Feeder
JE1 Layer
❑ Dairy
N Feeder to Finish 5760
❑ Non -Layer
ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
5,760
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
777,600
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Dischart=_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [] Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d..Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes El No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....................................................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 36"
- . •- - •- - ranthrued

Facility Number: 96-12
Date of Inspection 10-27-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No.
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?, ❑ Yes 19 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within;24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
#) Explain any.YES aosw
Use drawings of facility to be
Records available
e analysis: 9-27-04 - 2.4 lbs
d/or any recommendations or any othercominents
ional pages asmecessary): : ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
7-15-04 - 2.4 lbs
5-13-04 - 2.4 lbs
2-3-04 - 3.8 lbs
10-29-03 - 2.1 lbs
analysis - 6-9-04, 7-9-03, 7-26-02
was put out in July 2004 - deep soil samples - 6-9-04
ge survey completed 2-13-04 - 5-36' free of solids and 2.34' of solids
ation calibration completed - July 23, 2004 @ 138.5 gpm with 0.85" ring.
ation records are complete and balanced out.
board, rainfall, crop yields, weather codes and mortality/stocking records are kept.
Reviewer/InspectorName LynB.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

Facility Number: 96-12 Date of Inspection 10-27-2004
Reauired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WIJP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑'Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑Yes
®No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
® Yes
®No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
®No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
® No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ®No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
AddrtionahGommerits and/or Drawings:
Suggest to record lagoon integrity inspections (i.e. lagoon OK) after > 1.0" of rainfall on the freeboard and rainfall 1±1
'you haven't had the PLAT Assessment completed by your Technical Specialist, please consult with them as soon
s possible. The PLAT requirements is due now.
'you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481 or me directly @
52-948-3842.
Weaver was unable to be present for the inspection due to a doctors visit. However the findings were
the onsite rep.
12112103

iType of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 12 Date of Visit: 12-29-2003 Time: 1113
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated orAbove Threshold.. .........................
Farm Name: &1pIx..xAyEx..DOg.FArms...................................................................... County: W...sty M...............................................1'YaI3i2........
Owner Name: RalAlx.N .....................................1<saxes:....................................................... Phone No: 439-bfl2r. 93S...........................................................
Mailing Address: 49.4.5x9y.0►1S.Cbur.Cb.Rd................................................................... GmIdshom... !1C..................................................... 2.7.53.0 .............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Ralpb..!'faexcr............................................................................ Integrator: ('acsldskOx0.FL4gFstxxus......................................
Certified Operator:Ralpb..lei................................. V.F'iwer............................................ Operator Certification Number:16b0D.....................
Location of Farm:
35111216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry
Hospital to Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left. k_�
® Swine [3 Poultry [3 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 19 46 Longitude 78 • 08 37
Design Current
Swine ranantfv Pnnulofinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
5760
5481
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Ca acit Population
El Layer [I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 5,760
. Total SSLW 777,600
I Number of Lagoons' �.: ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area -..
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps �` .. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spi'_lwaay ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 36"
ncinamI

VJ/VJ/Vt
Facility Number: 96-12
Date of Inspection 12-29-2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? '
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
l UMUMCV
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [ ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Coastal Bermuda (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation; freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
1p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this'visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
)rds available for review.
to Analysis: 10/10/03
7/31/03
5/27/03
3/12/03
12/27/02
analysis for 2003 available -
1.10 lbs
2.40 lbs
3.00 lbs
2.20 lbs
1.00 lbs
lime was put out in Dec. 2003.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name°y
n._•;f�''°.y-"y."ciC.'+_�•r r}.u�,•r..�'''li3 '.:vr.r..titiis^rs.a.-.
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: _ Date 1,2 .2z1-0

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: 96-12 7
Date of Inspection 12-29-2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
rigation equipment was calibrated in July 2003.
rigation records are complete and balanced out.
-eeboard, rainfall,mortality and stocking records are kept.
grain has been planted and emerging.
he farm is well managed.
egetation on dike wall is well established.
on't forget to submit the annual certification form to Raleigh by the end of March 1, 2004.
on't forget to complete the Sludge Survey by April 9, 2004.
verall, the farm is well managed.
.I

Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Ti Bate of Visit: 4/1712002 Time:
Facility Nutnher 96 12 1350
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
E„ Permitted �'� Certified E' Conditionally Certified '''" :+ Registered spate Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Rahtll.WeaYexHn� axltt....................................................................... Countv:..a3:rte............................................... WO�iQ.:..
Owner N:tmc: Ralph.lY.....................................RAtm....................................................... Phone No: 919-bB9-24,35.......................................................
Mailing Address: 494.Stcyeas.ChMreh.Rd................................................................... Goldshox.Q..NC ..................................................... 17.530.............
FacilityContact:..............................................................................'Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Ralph..�'►.'asyer..GemrgcXetWs............................................ integrator:. G.Oldshox.o.l-log.Faa:ms.......................................
Certified Operator: Ralph.N................................. W.gayer ............................................ Operator Certification Number: ,16.60.0.....................,
Location of Farm:
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry A, !
Hospital to Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left. i
......._...._..... _....____._.. __._._._._...__............. Q ` 1----_..__.4 ..__...,_...__..__..._. _...._.....+
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 1 35 s_ 19 ; 46 Longitude 78 I®i 08 37 i«
Design Current
swme _ Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 5760 5300
❑ Farrow to Wean
_❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry_ Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dany
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 59760
Total SSLW 777,600
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
U7°.e Liames d-, :9t mill lli➢ i:Af t�.
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
J❑ Subsurface Drains Present 11❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area 1
No Liquid Waste
f.)isohargc arigutatuf al: ElLagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If disohar2a is observed, was tine uonvevaucu mans -made''
b. If discharge is obscivcd. did it reach Water of the State? (Il'yes. notity DWQ)
C. If di.seharge is observed. what is the estimatod floe' in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypa , a latoon systcm? (Ifyes, uolily DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[] Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
y_ z,v;;Yr. C'aAilcctia:n .k Trc'aimeotr
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Cl Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 4 Structure 5 SU'LCtUrc 6
ldeutifier:.................................................................
....... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Fn.ebsard (iuchcs):...............3.6...............................................................................................................................................................................................

Facility Number: 96 —12
Date of Inspection 4/17/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental; threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any shutures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Was>te Antrlicat9ou
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Continued
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Yes
Efl No
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Bermuda Pasture
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Z No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Document/+
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WIT, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes 0 No
Yes to No
❑ Yes LA No
❑ Yes ® No
[j Yes 11 No
Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): [� Field Copy ❑Final Notes
[records available for review.
Waste analysis - 4/2/02 = 3.5 lbs.; 1/8/02 = 2.3 lbs.; 8/30/01 = 2.8 lbs.
Soil analysis up through 2001 - available - Make sure to pull samples for this year - lime was put out last year.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required.
Vegetation on dike wall is well established.
Sprayfields are in good shape. (SEEPAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyu B. Hardison I entered by Ann
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

05(01101 Continued
Facility Number: 96-12 ]Date of Inspection 4/17/2002
Odor Is:srrey,
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fau(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes M No
Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [Z; No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 9 No
Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an or rawmgs:
The records are well organized. 6
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us at 252-946-6481.

4F W ATFR
Michael F. Easley
`0 OG Governor
rWilliam G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
.{ Department of Environment and Natural Resources
K Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison ,�
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date: June 29, 2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoonststorage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
W Soil analysis is required annually.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving, crop or result in runoff during any given application
() All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
q) It is suggested, not readred, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.' You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
(p The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by properly
managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the responsibility to certify
monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can result in a letter of reprimand,
suspension of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: -iVaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Facility Number 96 12 Date of Visit: 6/5/2001 Time: ]030 Printed on: 6/20/2001
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified (3 Conditionally Certified E3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: RAIpb:.Weayrr..blog.Farms...................................................................... County: Wayne............................................... WaltO........
Owner Name: RalAlx.N................................ Wtea........................................................ Phone No: 91.9- 435...........................................................
Mailing Address: 49.4.51eYuLs..C.h.Ur.d..Rd................................................................... Gmidshozo...N.C..................................................... 2.7.S3.Q..............
Facility Contact: .................
............................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Rateh..W.Oaver..G.(:Qxge..P..CttuS........................................... Integrator:fr.RldsklOx.O.FJtIgFaF[fLS.......................................
Certified Operator:,alph..N................................. W..ea rr............................................ Operator Certification Number:a.(6.00.....................
Location of Farm:
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.) 10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry
Hospital to Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 1 35 • 19 46 41 Longitude 78 • F 08 37
Design Current
Swine rnnnnity Pnnnlo4inn
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
5760
5760
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number vULagoons
Design Current. ; 'Desigri":,`.` _Current'"
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca aci Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 5,760
Total'SSLW 7779600
10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEI Spray Field Area
Q No Liquid Waste Management
Discharges & Stream Impacts .
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.)
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
i
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
n/a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure , Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................ ......... I..............
...........
Freeboard (inches): 38
05/03A11 -- rnn/%qued

0510.3107
Continued -
Facility Number: 96-12 Date of Inspection 6/5/2001
Printed on: 6/20/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) - Small Grain Overseed Bermuda Pasture
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes I@ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
2 L Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit -771
Field •"
❑ Copy ❑Final Notes
Records available for review.
Naste analysis: 3/27/01 = 3.8 Ibs; 9/29/00 = 1.7 lbs. Awaiting next results.
>oil analysis up through 2000 available. Lime was put out last fall.
rrigation records are complete and balanced out.
=reeboard levels are recorded as required.
/egetation on dike wall is well established.
,over crops are in great shape. SEE PAGE 3
IV
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B.,#ardison entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:,�ti,�j C Date: 4-- 6— C i

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: 96-12 Date of Inspection 6/5/2001 Printed on: 6/20/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
o date, hadn't sprayed on coastal yet.
verall, the farm is very well managed.
you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.

h ^ �5✓6 ,'+�'x2✓i/w.vTla"•t�t� Dh78Wn Of.WatCr J
O Divinion of Soil and Water Conservation " '
O
y�� r
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
f Facility Number 96 12 Date of Visit: 7-25-20110 Time: 1102 Printed un: 223/2001
i
r_
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: Ralf►ix.Wea):Rr.]iog> alms....................................................................... County:W..ay:ne............................................... WaRID........
Owner Name: UlphX...... _............... ........ .W.eava....................................................... Phone No: 919.482.:24 5...........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:.................
Mailing Address: 499.S1exem.Churcli.Rd.................. -............................................... f oMfillO.nR..I�lIC..................................................... 27.530.............
Onsite Reprcsentatiye: Ralph3?l'rayet..GMr=P.eJWS............................................ Integrator: GoldshormHogfatans.......................................
Certified Operator:Ra,1p.It.N................................. W- kiwer............................................. Operator Certification Number: 16.60.0.............................
Location of Farm:
SR 1216 (Stevens Church Rd.)10 miles S.W. of Goldsboro, 2 miles from Grantham. Take Stevens Mill Rd. from Cherry —
Hospkal to Falling Creek Rd. turn left go 1 mile - turn left on Stevens Church Rd. 0.3 miles on left.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 19, F--4--67 {I Longitu do 78 • F 08 37 Lf
Design a:Currcnt=". Design Currei
..
Swine: :::: Ca achy Po lulation .,
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 5760 5760
Design Current
ILj iNon-ualry 1 1 1
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JEI Other .
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts TotalDestgn Capacity 5,760
❑Boars Toi9dSSLW,; 777,600
3?oultryCa acityl Po ulatio
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Laver
Number of Lagoons JE3Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Fuld Area
Holdmg Ponds! Solid Trapa ?C� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees d Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. uotiA-DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/inin? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a laeoon sy;Slem'? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3: Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Stnicture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............4Q..............................................................................................................
............. .................................... ....................................

5100 Continuedoon uaak
FacilitvNumber. 96-12
Date of Inspection 7-25-2000 Printed on: 2/23/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes 91 No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ves, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
No violations;or:deficiencies were noted during thisvisit:; Yod will:receive nb farthe'r
correspondence about this.vist.' •' ....: :...::::::::::::::::: ; :::.:: .
Records available for review.
Waste analysis - 7-7-00 = 2.0 lbs; 5-10-00 =1.8 lbs; 3-3-00 = 2.7 lbs; 10-21-99 = 1.6 lbs. Meets the requirements.
Soil samples are collected annually. 2000 available. Plans to apply lime this year.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Records are well organized.
The lagoon levels are recorded weekly as well as rainfall. Cont. Page 3
Reviewer/InspectorName c .1� ts..� L...-. ,`�F tt Ell

xevteweritnspector signature: Date: 5/00 I
._.
Facility Number. 96-12 Date of Inspection 7-25-2000 printed on: 2/232001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure. and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporaty cover?
# 32 - n/a Pit house
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
During the hurricane season (1999), the farm was well managed. The lagoon level remained within permit
;quirements. The surrounding area had approx. 30 inches of rainfall for the month of September 1999.
Overall the farm is well managed.
The vegetation on the dike walls is very well established.
The cover crop in the fields are in good shape.
If you have any questions, contact me @ 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
IV

J'
MW
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 22, 1999
Mr. Ralph Weaver
Ralph Weaver Hog Farms
494 Stevens Church Rd.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
CDENRNORROLINA
ENVIRONMENT ANO NATURAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Ralph Wcaver Hog Farms
Facility No. 96 -12
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Weaver:
On July 7, 1999, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced
facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely, (/�� ��
S . �iLo ti
Daplme B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: George Pettus, Goldsboro Hog Farms
Wayne County SWCD Office
v/WaRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Jr
19 nvuuoe p 9.ompiamt p ronow-up of uwy inspection p ronow-up of review p utner
Facility Number Date or Inspection
'rime ni' Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered 113 Not Ope;;Z;Fn;g Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Ralph.\'i'.caver..Hag.Farma...................................................................... County: Wayne WaRO
OwnerName: Ralph.N................................. Weaver ...................................................... Phone No: 9.19A89.r2.435 ..........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................:.Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 494.Stexetts..Church.lid.................................................................... Galdsbora..NC...................................................... 27530 ..............
Onsite Representative: Ralph....eaxer.,.George.P.ettus........................................... Integrator:Galdsbora.Hog.F.arms.......................................
Certified Operator: Ralph.N. ............................... Weaxer.............................................. Operator Certification Number: 166J10.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude ®• ®, ©,,
esign"'
,Current estpurren
P. ntyCapactty—PopulationCapit q
Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to tms
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............38...................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
Continued on back

aci ity Number: 96_12 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 13 Yes S No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (pasture) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? , ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ®Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No

3/23/99
act ity um er: 96_12 Date of Insu•clion
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
p Yes
® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No
f � I
� y
J