960010_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
9
INSPECTIONS

0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Dale:
Washington
Reason for Visit: Routine
County:
Wayne Region:
Date of Visit: 08/31/2017 Entry Time:
09:00 am Exit Time: 10:10 am Incident #
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd
LaGrange NC 285517720,
Physical Address: 258 Conover Rd
LaGrange NC 28551
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
350 17' 18" Longitude: 77° 50' 20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange.
Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731)
and go - 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover
Rd (SR 1732). Farm is 4/10 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Rod Harvey Vinson Operator Certification Number: 26081
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Justin K Davis
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
6-22-17
1.33
2-13-17
1.12
9-27-16
0.87
Soil Report
8-2-2016
Due 2019
Zn<500
Cu<300
Calibration due 2018
10-22-2016
Lagoon Sludge Survey 11-27-2016
LTZ 7.2
T 4.4
PI 3.6
31%
page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner- Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 3,547
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 32.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960010
Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation ' Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

J.
Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑,
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility, fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
ED
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 6

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS960010
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 08/31/2016 Entry Time: 11:15 am
Exit Time: 12:50 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation
Phone:
252-566-3216
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd
La Grange NC 285517720
Physical Address: 258 Conover Rd
La Grange NC 28551
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35° 17' 18" Longitude:
77° 50' 20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange. Turn R on Piney
Grove Rd (SR 1731) and go - 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover
Rd (SR 1732). Farm is 4110 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Rod Harvey Vinson
Operator Certification Number:
26081
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner -Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
6-3-16 1.70
2-1-16 1.39
10-2-15 1.00
Soil Report 10-1-2015
Zn<1100
Cu<840
Calibration 2014
Due 2016
Lagoon Sludge Survey 11-1-2015
LTZ 5.3
Thickness 6.1
Pump Intake 3.9
% 46
Sludge Removal Spring 2016.
page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 T
3,960
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 50.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960010
Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
ME]
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage A Treatment
Yes -
No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner- Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Yes No No No
❑■❑❑
❑ ME] ❑
❑ ■❑ ❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No No No
❑ ■❑ ❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 6

46
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ OthorAgency
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Dale:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region:
Date of Visit: 09/08/2015 Entry Time: 09:15 am Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Owner:
Roy G Nation
Mailing Address:
222 Conover Rd
Physical Address:
258 Conover Rd
Washington
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
La Grange NC 285517720
La Grange NC 28551
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 350 17' 18" Longitude: 77' 50' 20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange. Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731) and go — 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover
Rd (SR 1732), Farm is 4/10 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
® Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
e Records and Documents other issues
Certified Operator: Rod Harvey Vinson Operator Certification Number: 26081
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Ropresontative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report
N
5.28-15
1.77
2-4-15
1.28
10-16.14
1.19
6-13-14
1.84
2-7-14
1.19
Soil Report 8-13-14
Zn<500
Cu<270
Lagoon Sludge Survey 8-6-14
LTZ-5.8
Thickness-5.6
Pump Intake-4.3
42%
Calibration 8-30-14
7.) Lagoon needs repair. Berm walls have bare spots. Erosion in multiple spots.
Repairs scheduled before 2016. Regrading and Reseeding to be done.
Refer to Brent Mitchell for update.
34.) Follow up after 2016 winter.
Check accuracy of new (2014) COC. ?Design Capacity?
page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
B Swine -Feeder to Finish 5,760 4.918
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freoboard
Lagoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 37.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
e ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
e ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
e ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
! ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
e ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yos No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ a ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ®❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

.
Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

iI
Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yee
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑0
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
®❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yos
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
®❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
O ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
i ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
e ❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 6

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960010 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
04/17/2014 Entry Time: 12:05 pm
Farm Name:
Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Owner:
Roy G Nation
Mailing Address:
222 Conover Rd
Physical Address:
258 Conover Rd
Active
Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Exit Time: 12:45 pm Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
La Grange NC 285517720
La Grange NC 28551
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 17' 18" Longitude: 77° 50' 20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange. Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731) and go - 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover
Rd (SR 1732). Farm is 4/10 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy G Nation Operator Certification Number: 18628
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner -Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
CoC in records
WuP 7/8/98
Waste Analysis N
2/7/14 = 1.19
10/24/13 = 1.19
7/1/13 = 2.16
Soil Test 8/5/13
Cu & Zn level w/in range
L=AT
"'due again in 2016"'
irrigation calibration 9111/12
"'due again 2014•"
Sludge Survey 10/26/13
"'due again 2014"
thickness = 5.3
LTZ = 6.0
pump intake = 4.3
39%
crop yield records reviewed
irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
!!!fields Ilok excellentl!!
page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection . Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,306
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 32.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Imoacts
You
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner -Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenanaville
Soil Type 2
Lakeland
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
Cl
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility : Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/08/2013 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd La Granae NC 285517720
Physical Address: 258 Conover Rd LaGrange NC 28551
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35017'18" Longitude: 77°50'20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange. Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731) and go — 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover Rd
(SR 1732). Farm is 4/10 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy G Nation Operator Certification Number: 18628
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 718/98
Waste Analysis N
7/1/13 = 2.16
4/22/13 = 1.96
1/22/13 = 2.25
8/10/12 = 1.70
Soil Test 5/3/2012
"due again 2013"
Zn & Cu Win range
L=.ST
irrigation calibration 9/11/12
"due again 2014"
Sludge Survey 8/23/12
thickness = 4.9
LTZ = 6.6
pump intake = 5.6
35%
irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
crop yield reviewed
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation FacilityNumber : 960010
Inspection Date: 08/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,538
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon 1 1 09/08/93 1 1 1 20.00 34.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 08/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
960010
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
Cl
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Lakeland sand
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number : 960010
Inspection Date: 08/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No
NA
NE
❑ ■
❑
❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
MOO
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
MOO
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Page: 6

6 Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 08/0812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherlssues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

p
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/11/2012 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM
Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation
Phone:, 252-566-3216
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd La Grange
NC 285517720
Physical Address: 258 Conover Rd La Grange
NC 28551
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell
Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35017'18"
Longitude: 77°50'20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange. Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731)
and go - 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover Rd
(SR 1732). Farm is 4/10 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy G Nation Operator Certification Number: 18628
Secondary OIC(s):
Phone
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner • Facility: Roy G Nation FacilityNumber : 960010
Inspection Date: 07/11/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
WUP 7/8/1998
Waste Analysis N
5/4/12 = 2.3
2124/12 = 2.3
12/2/11 = 1.4
9/16/11 = 1.8
Soil Test 5/3/12
L = 2.4T
Cu & Zn levels Win range
"due again in 2013" .
irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
irrigation calibration 5/15/10
"due again 2012"
Sludge Survey 7/6/11
thickness = 2.9
LTZ = 8.3
pump intake = 3.9
20%
"due again 2012"
"coastal looks great***
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 07/11/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 4,762
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 33.00
Page: 3

Permit: AW5960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 07/11/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: • Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 1101313
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner • Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 07/11/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAW MP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0013
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1100
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

n
Permit: AWS960010 Owner • Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 07/11/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 07111/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
FacilityNumber : 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
27. Did the.facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
in
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/25/2011 Entry Time:11130 AM Exit Time: 12110 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd La Grange NC 285517720
Physical Address: 258 Conover Rd La Grange NC 28551
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35017'18" Longitude: 77°50'20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange. Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731) and go — 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover Rd
(SR 1732). Farm is 4/10 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Rod Harvey Vinson
Secondary OIC(s):
Roy G Nation
Operator Certification Number: 26081
Certification:18628 Phone: [phone]
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 07/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inspection Summary:
New COC in reoords
Soil test 11/29/10
WUP 7/8/98
**due again 2011**
Field RN301 & RN302 high Cu and Zn levels keep eye on.
Waste Analysis N
Sludge Survey 5/15/10
3/3/11 1.8
**Due again 2011**
619/11 1.9
thickness = 1.8
12/7/10 1.3
LTZ = 9.4
pump intake = 3.8
irrigation calibration 5/15/10
12%
**Due again in 2012**
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
***Try to revegetate dike walls,
don't cut grass less than 6 inches***
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 07/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 6,020
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 40.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 07/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■ ❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 07/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Lakeland
Soil Type 2 Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
In
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 07/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
MOD
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s). and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation -Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 07/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 001111
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/07/2010 Entry Tlme:08:10 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd La Granae NC 285517720
Physical Address
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35917'18" Longitude: 77050'20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange. Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731) and go - 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover Rd
(SR 1732). Farm is 4/10 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Otherissues
Certified Operator: Robert B Mitchell Operator Certification Number: 16561
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Kevin Rowland Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 10/07/2010
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
09/03/10 = 3.0
06/21/10 = 2.9
03/26/10 = 2.6
01/28/10 = 3.2
Equipment calibration 5/2010
Sludge survey: 5/2010 = 12%
Freeboard Range:
02/14/10 = 19" - 09/19/10 = 47"
BP = 275/200, BH = 250, SG = 75
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Soil Tested:
11-2009
Records are complete and balanced out!
Looks Great!
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner • Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine.
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5.029
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777.600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 38.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number : 960010
Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Facility Number : 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

3
Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number : 960010
Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
Cl ■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960010 Owner • Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

V
n
0 Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:_ Routine County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/20/2009 Entry Time: 10A5 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd
La Grange NC 285517720
Physical Address: 258 Conover Rd
La Granae NC 28551
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35°17'18" Longitude: 77050'20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange. Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731) and go - 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover Rd
(SR 1732). Farm is 4110 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert B Mitchell
Operator Certification Number: 16561
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis;
9-11-09 2.4
7-9-09 4.2
4-9-06 3.1
1-29-09 2.2
soil test 9-2008 calibration 2008 sludge survey 2-2009
Looks Good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,760
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Tvoe Idantiflar rinanA nnte c#sw ns6e n..e �......w e...s......a nw.........� e___�___.
agoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 30.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Via It: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
,❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 01111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960010 Owner • Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)'
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page:4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/20/2009 Entry Time:10A5 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 222_Conover Rd
La Granae NC 285517720
Physical Address: 258 Conover Rd
La Granae NC 28551
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35017'18" Longitude: 77050'20"
Take Hwy 70E from Goldsboro toward La Grange, Turn R on Piney Grove Rd (SR 1731) and go - 1.2 miles. Turn L on Conover Rd
(SR 1732). Farm is 4/10 mi on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert B Mitchell
Operator Certification Number: 16561
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis;
9-11-09 2.4
7-9-09 4.2
4-9-06 3.1
1-29-09 2.2
soil test 9-2008 calibration 2008 sludge survey 2-2009
Looks Good,
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,760
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 30.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
M
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
Cl
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
Cl
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 10/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/30/2008 Entry Time:0215O PM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: goy G. Nation Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 222 Conover Rd La Grange NC 28551
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°17'18" Longitude:77°50'20"
South side of NCSR 1732, approx. 1.5 miles south of Hwy. 70 East of Goldsboro
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Roy G Nation
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment
Other Issues
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
M Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 18628
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 06/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw CoC and Permit.
WUP dated 7/8/1998 and signed 6/22/1999.
WARs (lbsN/1000gall): 4/25/08-3.7, 1/28/08-3.1, 10/29/07-2.3, 7/5107-2.0
Soil test results (4/23/07): 0.4 tons/acre lime required; Cu and Zn within acceptable ranges.
2008 IRR1/2 (CB): Pulls B-K; no SG in 2008.
2007 IRR1/2 (CB): Pulls B-K.
All PAN rates met and balanced. Typical pumping rate 275 gpm. Pumping volumes of irrigation events were consistent with changes
in freeboard levels. Rainfall records were adequate.
2007 sludge survey results (8/24/07): LTZ= 10.6', Thick= 0.7'
2007 calibration results (5/5/07), 2 reels: (#56700053250WB) 1.18" ring, 275gpm expected, 272.8gpm measured;
(#55100043250WB) 1.18" ring. 275gpm expected, 272.5gpm measured.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 06/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 5,131
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 45.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 06/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Cl
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Cl ■
Cl
Cl
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
Cl
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
6. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 06/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Lakeland sand
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ Cl ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number : 960010
Inspection Date: 06/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
❑
Checklists?
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0110
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
E
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 06/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0
13
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0
11
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
r
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency -------- _-------- ____
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/27/2007 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Owner: Roy G Nation
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd
Physical Address: 222 Conover Rd La Grange NC 28551
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°17'18" Longitude: 77050'20"
South side of NCSR 1732, approx. 1.5 miles south of Hwy. 70 East of Goldsboro
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy G Nation
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Name
On -site representative
Brent Mitchell
24 hour contact name
Brent Mitchell
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18628
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/27/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2007
Waste Analysis 4-12-07 2.1
1-29-07 2.5
10-24-06 2.1
Calibrations 5-5-06 with 273.5 GPM
Sludge survey extension till 2007
Soil test 4-24-06 with highest lime 1.7 tons } applied lime
Cu and Zn values within range
Rainfall and freeboard complete
Irrigation records complete
Crop yield 2006
'Need to establish vegetation on outer lagoon bank
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/27/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 3,900
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Tvne Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 35.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 04/2712007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/27/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Kenansville
Soil Type 2 Lakeland
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
Cl
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/27/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
Cl
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 04/27/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
�-j Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ---------------------------------
Facility Number: 960010 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/10/2006 Entry Time:09:05 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Roy G Nation
Mailing Address: 222 Conover Rd Laarange NC 28551
Physical Address:
Phone: [phone]
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
o
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35 17 18 Longitude. 77 5020
South side of NCSR 1732, approx. 1.5 miles south of Hwy. 70 East of Goldsboro
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert B Mitchell Operator Certification Number: 16561
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/10/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
• CoC & Permit available in notebook
• WUP dated 6/22/1999
" Waste Analysis:
7/13/06 = 2.4
4/18/06 = 3.8
2/07/06 = 2.8
11/9/05 = 2.1
• Soil test report dated 4/24/06, Needs to put out lime as recommended. Cu & Zn levels ok.
• PLAT completed 6/18/04, low ratings for all fields.
• Sludge survey exempt until 2007, letter dated 2/28/06, Need to place copy in notebook.
• Irrigation calibration completed 5/5/06, Reel 1 = 273.5 GPM, Reel 2 = 272.8GPM, Reel 3 = 272.5GPM
• Reviewed crop yield, stocking and mortality records
• Annual Certification for 2005 available
• Reviewed waste application records, complete and balanced with Weather codes and inspection initials completed. Need to sign
Operator's signature (Owner is deceased).
` Lagoon levels recorded with rainfall and initials for structural check. Drops in levels in March and August 2006 are consistent with
pumping events.
(9) Please continue to practice weed control on fields with patches of weeds, though Coastal is in good standing.
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number : 960010
Inspection Date: 08/10/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,760 4,200
Total Design Capacity: 5,760
Total SSLW: 777,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 09/08/93 20.00 48.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/10/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar9p-
es & Stream ----._.m ..Im acts Yes No NA NE
--- ..... - -----------
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage $ Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
■
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296010 Owner • Facllity: Roy G Nation
Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/10/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Lakeland
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: .5

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation Facility Number: 960010
Inspection Date: 08/10/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
Cl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
Cl
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6 .

Permit: NCA296010 Owner - Facility: Roy G Nation
Inspection Date: 08/10/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Type of Visit O. Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access I
Facility Number 96 10 Date of Visit: 10-Z9-2004 Time: 940
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted N Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .................................................................... County: \' Aynt............................................... \'.FARO........
Owner Name: RQy..G..................................... KIIII.Q11 ......................................................... Phone No: 2S2-Sbbr.321G....:......................................................
Mailing Address: 2A2..CAnttxe.r.RQAd..................... .................... ...................................... ....................................................... 2;3SS.1..:...........
Facility Contact: ..........................Title:............,:. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: .GcRAlrl;c.ft tus............................................................................. Integrator: t'raldshoroAA.t;Farms....................... I...............
Certified Operator: Roy .G..................................... NAtioin ................................................ Operator Certification Nuinber:18628 .............................
Lneation of Farm:
iouth side of NCSR 1732, approx. 1.5 miles south of Hwy. 70 East of Goldsboro
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F-3-5--1 • 17 4 18 L{ Longitude 1 77 Is 1 50 1, 1 20
146
Design. Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
N Feeder to Finish
5760
❑ Non -Layer
I
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
59760
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
777,600 .
❑ Boars
Number.of Lagoons
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ 0
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a.lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 40"
r yr vnz Continued

r_.
Facility Number: 96-10 Date of Inspection 10-29-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes N No
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Aoolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Excessive Ponding [:]PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge.pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments; (referto question..#) sExplain any;YES;answers;and/or any,: recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility, to better explain s►tiiations. (use additional pikes -as necessary) ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Records available
Waste Analysis: 9-13-04 = 2.6 Ibs
6-14-04 = 1.7lbs
3-31-04 = 2.4lbs
1-20-04 = 3.2lbs
10-10-03 = 2.3 Ibs
Soil analysis - deep sample - dated 6-16-04 (PI = 20) Need soil samples for this year (2004); 4-17-03, 4-30-020
4-27-01,5-03-00.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard, rainfall, crop yields, weather codes records are kept.
Need to secure the most current mortality/ stocking records.
Has PLAT been completed? If so please put paperwork in the book.
Irrigation calibration completed - 2-8-04 - Need to have calibration signed by calibrator
IReviewer/Inspector Name ;Lyn B. Har son. I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
r2vt21n?
Continued

Facility Number: 96-10 Date of Inspection 10-29-2004
Required Records & Documents
21.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? .
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No ..
❑ Yes
®No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
ludge survey dated 1-30-04 = 1.2' of solids and 10.2' free of solids.
uggest to record lagoon integrity inspections after each > 1.0" rainfall events and monthly inspections on the
eeboard and rainfall form.
ontinue to practice weed control and establish vegetation on bare spots on the dike wall.
. grain has been planted in one field and will be planted in other fields soon.
'you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481 or me directly 252-948-3842.
12112103

` .. Division of Sy and On Water Conservation
.
< ; Division of Water Quality
O Other AgenC
Type of Vlslt O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 10 Date of Visit: 12-23-2003 Time: 807
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .................................................................... County: W.gy.11C ............................................... W..RR ........
OwnerName: Roy..G..................................... Nalioll ......................................................... Phone No: .................,..,......................................
MailingAddress: 4Q7 HVr.ix M,$1................................................................................ G.aldboxo... Mc .......... ........................................... Z.7.53.0 ..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Ggjarge.Pgttus............................................................................. Integrator: G.Q dskoxo..UogZalr u......................................
Certified Operator:Roy...G..................................... NAtion ............................................... Operator Certification Number:3.8621J.............................
Location of Farm:
iouthside of NCSR 1732, approx.1.5 miles south of Hwy. 70 East of Goldsboro A
IV
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 17 18 Longitude 77 50 20
Design Current
Swine-. Canneity Pnnulatien
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
5760
5340
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design , Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 5,760
Total SSLW 777,600
I Number of Lagoons I 1 10 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Areaj I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps � JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 23"
nCIA 2m, .f... a

VJ/VJ/Vl
Facility Number: 96-10
Date of Inspection 12-23-2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes
® No '
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
C.0 ,a.w s ..,. ya�E�tlt�r r.,tek o� ,. nti , �i pv r.++ ry;m
omments*(ehifer,to+rquestiont#) t�Expla►many�l'ES,answers,and/,or,any, recommendations;or�rany,'othericomments r iq arsrivY n +: ,
3 a.r�
`Usedrawings�of�facility[tosbetter ezpl'airi�situaMons^ (use additional pagesras necessary) "»s
❑Field COPY ❑ Final Notes
y11_iy;��y[Ak �i u
IM�i,1Ud.l l„il�i �f�3t� 4 '1 I:: f.: I
uliyI�V.�.1W.J`l'N[SA�nA rv�fl�.l4 '14t'I�H4U..�i'I.� IIIik��l1�.iY�� rtl ..l t .�. i:. . .�.. ..:' i. ���. �I �l. v. 1 , , r . r!Y v::¢f :.I.NTt ..,.
Records available for review.
Waste Analysis: 10/10/03 2.30 lbs
7/31/03 3.10lbs
5/27/03 3.10lbs
3/12/03 3.901bs
12/27/02 2.90lbs
Soil analysis for 2003 available. No lime required.
_
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn 13i1kH idi on
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1 Z- Z3- D'3

05103101
Facility Number: 96-10
Date of Inspection 12-23-2003
Continued
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land -application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are kept weekly on a clip board but hadn't been transferred to the approved forms for the last 2
weeks.
Rainfall records are also kept on the clip board.
Suggest to thin out the booklet by removing the blank records.
The lagoon level is high for this time of year. Irrigate only when conditions permit and do a better job at
managing the lagoon levels during the summer months.
# 17 - The new permit (dated April 9, 2003) is not in the records (booklet) - Get the permit and Certificate of
Coverage (COC) and put with the records ASAP.
S. grain has been planted and emerging.
Need improvement on overall management of the lagoon level and records.

I
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 10 e � Date of Visit: 4I16/2002 Time: 900
...:....._ ,.. �.,:.::._. 0 Not Operational 0 Vetoes' Tiareshol<l
Permitted M Certified Conditionally Certified FI Registered 1➢;tte Last Operated or Above Threshold : ............
Farm Name: Rax..G� lYatin�a.�etane.Faetnt..................................................................... County: W..jty.jjC ............................................... W, .a.1.tQ........
OwnerName: Ray..G..................................... Nation ......................................................... Phone No: 919r.7.35-.6Z61 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 4117A.Huthan.St................................................................................ Goldstiox.m.NC ..................................................... 17.530 .............
Facilitycontact: ..............................................................................Title:..........,..................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative:Geerrge.l',ettlus............................................................................. Integrator: .Goldshoxa.Hog.F,at:ma.......................................
Certified Operator: Roy..G..................................... MoMpin ............................................... Operator Certification Number:,18.62&:............................
Location of Farm:
of NCSR 1732, approx. 1.5 miles south of Hwy. 70 East of Goldsboro
35 ° ' i
® Swine ❑ ❑ Latitude Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse _ 17 ..._.... 18
Design Current
bwme Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 5760 5400
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
a
IV
Longitude 77 ° F _50 20 Le
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca acity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer—
, In Dairy
❑ Non -Layer InNon-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 5,760
Total SSLW 777,600
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes iQ1 No
Discharge originated aC ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is obsetl ad, tsas the eonvepaatce matt-uxnde? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h, [1'disohargo is obs rs'ed, did it r aclt VJatc r of tho Slab'? (If a'es. nnlifi' D\�'Q) ❑ Yes ❑ No
C. If diseharac is ob owed, nhat is the esliinated llm\ in gal/nain'?
d. Dons discharge bNpas a lagoon sys(cm? (lf vcs, uulik U1tl%Q)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
'N.4a'Jo `._4d4!:t:(att r4:
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav
Slraoture I Structure 2 41r'ucture ; Structure 4 Slrttcture 5
Identifier:
...............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ................................... ................................... .................................... ....................................
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes W No
Sirucltu'c 6

u�ivJiut
Facility Number: 96-10
Date of Inspection 4/16/2002
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Wrile A rlickAlion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Bermuda Pasture Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & IP4cu11c,1te
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively ceitified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require 6 follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
9 No
Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes 1Z No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes jgl No
❑ Yes n No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 15ZI No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes 0� No
25. Were anv additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes R No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): D Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
ecords available for review.
'ante analysis - 2/28/02 = 3.7 lbs.; 12/6/01 = 4.41bs.; 8/29/01 = 1.7 lbs.
)il analysis - up through 4/27/01 - available. Make sure to pull samples for this year.
ligation records are complete and balanced out.
reeboard levels are recorded weekly as required.
egetation on dike wall is well established.
?rayfields are in good shape. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. ardison entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Sianature: i ��_/� ,, Date: q-,Z� 2-G �

r -
05/03/0I Continued
Facility Number: 96-10 matte of Inspection 4/16/2002
Odor Asmes
26. Does the discharge pipe fiom the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
is suggested to clean up the areas where the cows have been fed.
you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us at 252-946-6481.
❑( Yes ® No
F1 Yes X No
❑ Yes R1 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [ No
[I Yes ❑ No
J

of Visit O• Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 10 Date of Visit: 5/ISR001 Time: 930 Printed on: 6/18/2001
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 8Ry_ii. lyatisW Sxvatte Eatatl ... _. _ _ ._.. » .._ _. County:
Owner Name: Rux.G._ _ .._ _ .». _ ._._ NatioA. _ ... _...__.._ _._..._.__...._. Phone No: 919-7.3"2G1..........._._....__.. _ ._....»....._.....»...
Mailing Address: 4A71Y.Helmran.St_.......__.._.... _........ __...__..._..._........ _..... __.. oldsltem:.NC..._................................................. Z7530 ....
FacilityContact: .»... __. _.........»....__ _.�.... _...... ...._. Title:.___._»....» . ...................._.»........._. Phone No:.................. ......_.....................
Onsite Representative: $teutD�itchRjl..G�pcge Pexkue. .___..__...._.__.._._...... Integrator: ! 9k6homn.Hug.Eatiota...._......._......._...............
Certified Operator: BAY..A..._... .._... _.................. Lulljam........... _._... ........ _...... .._.. Operator Certification Number:11fi2,$.............. .............
Location of Farm:
Southside of NCSR 1732, approx. 1.5 miles south of Hwy. 70 East of Goldsboro A,
®Swine []Poultry [--]Cattle [:]Horse Latitude 35 • 17 18 K Longitude 77 • 50 6 20
Design Current
owme Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 5760 5760
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ,C
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity- Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JLJ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 5,760
Total SSLW 777,600
Subsurface Drains Present 11C Lagoon Area �❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? . ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ._.........»........_......._.....__...._..._.....__......_.........»..__..................................._._............................................................ .. . ............... .........
Freeboard(inches): ............... 42............... ........................... _.».....».»...»....:.........................................................................................

Facility Number. 96-10
Date of Inspection 5/15R001
Printed on: 6/18/2001
C:onalyled
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Bermuda Pasture Small Grain Overseed Coastal Bermuda (Hay)
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
S No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
S No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
S No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
S No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes S No
violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You win receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Records available for review.
Waste analysis: 4/12/01 = 4.4 Ibs; 2/1/01 = 4.0 Ibs; 10/24/00 = 3.2 Ibs
Soil analysis up through 2001 - available.
Question about the PAN allowance on Lakeland soils. Have your Technical Specialist re-evaluate the
PAN allowance in the waste utilization plan.
Irrigation records are well organized, complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required. SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Sitinatur

b5103101
Con&erred
Facility Number. 96-10 Date of Inspection 5/15R001 Printed on: 6/18/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
rounds are well kept.
9getation on dike walll is well established.
Drayfields are in good condition.
you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.

Facility Number 96 ]0 Date of Visit: 6/21/2000 Time: 11:15 AM Printed on: 6/23/2000
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted A Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: iiQy..fi.11lttlf►.Ru.S�itO�e.kOirtO.................................................................... County:lFOYfle............................................... V!'aItQ........
Owner Name: IZtly..li.................................... Natti.Ru.......................................................... Phone No: 4].4r.73S.:162b1...........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
..................................................
Mailing Address: 407....U.C.rMain.51................................................................................ Gaidsitorm... NG.................................. ................... V..530..............
Onsite Representative:(aectrgR.Pg.t1us............................................................................. integrator: G.Ridsitux.R..UQgkat[us......................................
Certified Operator:RQY.G..................................... NA119.n........................... :................... Operator Certification Number:j.&.0.28 .............................
Location of Farm:
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 17 18 - Longitude 77 • 50 20 °
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
911111I
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Ca acit Po ulation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 5,760
Total SSLW 777,600
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps =� �No Waste Managen
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
Lagoon Area Io Spray Field Area j
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
Identifier: ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 33

Continued on back
Facility Number: 96-10 Date of Inspection 6/21/2000 Printed on: 6/23/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Bermuda (hay & pasture) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
U No•yiolatiotis:ordefcien:cie$•were:noted:d:uiing•thisvisit::Yotl:will:receivenoftirther:•:-
. -. • correspondence aboilf this.visit.. . .... ..:.:::...
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
Records available for review.
Waste samples pulled quarterly: 4/14/00 = 5.2 lbs.; 2/2/00 = 4.3 lbs.
Soil analysis: 2000, 1999, 1998 - available. Not sure if lime has been added.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out; very well kept.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
During hurricane season, the lagoon level went to about 18". The regional office was notified. The
lagoon level improved within a week.
SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name Ll
EdisonEntered byAnn Tyndall

Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 96-10 Date of Inspection 6/21/2000 Printed on: 6/23/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
ie area behind the lagoon that had flooded doesn't appear to have been affected with respect. to
Dughing or erosion.
you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.

m 'I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and -
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 13, 1999
Mr. Roy G. Nation
Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
407 N. Herman St.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLIIVA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Roy G. Nation Swine Farm
Facility No. 96 -10
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Nation:
On June 24, 1999, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced
facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or rnmoffi
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone]., end. 321.
Sincerely,
�-`--
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist H
cc: George Pettus, Goldsboro Hog Farms
Wayne County SWCD Office
,,*aRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

I& rcounne p Comptamt p ronow-up of 1)WQ inspection O Mollow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered 113 Not 0peratwna Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Roy .G..Nation.Stwine.Earm..................................................................... County: Wayne WaRO
OwnerName: Roy..G..................................... Natian ......................................................... Phone No: .735-.62,61....................................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 40.7.A.Hermaa.St................................................................................ Galdsbara..NC...................................................... Z753ja ..............
Onsite Representative: Alberto.Caatanetlo,Cbarles.lCorbclt,Gea,.Eett".... Integrator:Goldsbora.Hog.Farms.......................................
Certified Operator:Liay..G.................................... Nalijail ............................................... Operator Certification Number: 186Z8.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©•©, Longitude ©0 ®6 ®
estgn, current:-' estgn Current estgn .'= ur.rent,:
'Poult ,>
apacity ,Population tY Cap'acity'populatitm : !Cattle Capacity, ;1?opulatioh
❑ can to Feeder
® ee er to tins
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Fmts
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
0
Discharges
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [3Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............33....................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
Continued air back

I
I
0
act t y um er.i 96-4 Date of Inspection 6/24/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Small Grain Coastal Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No

3/23/99
act tty Number: 96_10
Odor Issues
Dale (if Inspection
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ig No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
i
4y,.i S ,Fn l r
f
Y.
I.
_ •
....
l �
r
,

.. _. - — ---------
IBM
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
NFE3 DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspectionu
19 tcuunne p t,ompiamt p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWU review p Otner
-Facility Number
Date of Inspection
__ - ate
_ -- --- __----
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: G Registered p Applied for Permit
N Certified p Permitted - -
10 Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Roy G. Nation Swine Farm County: Wayne ................................................ kl!att0........
Owner Name:RoyaG.:::"..::.::..:.::.:.:::.:.::... Nation:.........................:: .... ........ ............:.. ..Phone No: .7.35-b251....... ..... ...... ...::.:::::............. .. .... ........ ........-_ ............
Facility Contact: Charles.lCorIldt............................................Title: F-arm.Manager-...................... ....... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 40.7..N.Her.man.St................................................................................lGaldsbiarn-.NIZ........... :.......................................... 27530 ..............
Onsite Representative: Charles.Carhett....................................................................... Integraton lGaldabum.Hog.Farms........................................
Certified Operator:Roy..G..................................... Nation ................................................ Operator Certification Number:1808 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©•©6 ®" Longitude ©• ®� ®�
t=eneral '
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes N No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes 13 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach -Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) - - p Yes j3 No - - - --- -
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p'No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No"
4/30/97
maintenance/improvement?

PaC111ty Number: 96_10
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? - --- -- - - -
p Yes a No
E3 Yes a No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
a No
Structures (Laeoons and/or Holdine Ponds)
`
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? •--=------ -•_ - -
- --. --- O yes
a No - --- - ----
Freeboard (11): Structure.]- ,. _ Structure 2 - _. __.:Structure 3n- Structure-4,�;-;,, ,,:,,Structure 5- ,,_ - Stru6tuie-6r m,
..2.92........................:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
a No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures bbserved? "' - u ' ':'
- " 17 Yes
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? -• _ ..
0 Yes
ENO -- ••- — .•- -
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.-Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
'p Yes -a No-:---
Waste Aoalication -
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
a No -
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... CjaasW.B,ermuda.Crxass,.::.. Small.Gcain.(Whhheat,.Barle....... :.:....:...:.:.......::.......:.......:.::...:.:.......:.::::.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the' Rnis al Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? . _:.
,; p Yes '.®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? - ` .
p Yes;
-®No -
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
a No
-19. Is there a lack -of available waste'application-equipment? V —
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
a No.
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
a No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan -readily available?
p Yes
a No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
' p Yes ,
®No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes , a No
'Comments( refetues�tio�zExplainlahy Y,ESfaaswers and/orany recom5tteniliiUonsso ' any other mments aa,'" .
Use d�rtl�yrpgsof faeilit�tobetter:ezplaipituatioiiisii aiiditionaypes as ne Asa '
h», *� .,?J8;:3w ,. 4,.,„L:.•,.
t r�, a S C• a i.. f I`"+ A >v g,f;+ }i a v �' n-f^ Wii7 'aati a. ..i v9e —
•' Kr aY' ' t.»1 aS' ': u a,t ra 4' y, wf �'. r ll �Y *mob . h ti �'+.;�•%(�� 1ttiti,+ . sj4"ih ..a%
t T-bl$ e t � �� •' 7 t. >_a a Y bey i f r1 t +"• �.'t i 'k ul { G � r �' i I a T ..iY we,lii i �i• Y .i�5i: y ( y4 r Ix xi Y
e tract assignmenflt'imWUP�dt °4 nogmateh elactual�croP.P.1r►giPa#em�ielcls'wl �2 1,Ya FFF6 an1parE ally"ini'giaz�glandt `�
°` asCr• ',' �-- S' 3 F1°,++:t,`tta� s.. w x J S i Pk' ,r "t.�
8y; Theifield m Sib% 1 el a
aP a,fynhay(SGXfletd4nnpl °'i 6r�ye'il�
'equate aereage� 1g`" %` 3 �yY• a 5y �'A�'s �'F^., "3- ,fi1•N'{� `'
������i.R1�l'Y
?: t s . ] a A 4' .# to e A 1• �a .y y'�.t° as �i v l
J l z' r^"rd�,�o—L—±i��..,. -
W...v i V .�' t �' 7 ri I t i 1 MA+ Tm b ra n:
}.dor„msect�&,ortautyaeheclu�ts�npUfiff'ed outipMr�fCorbeti'ad"vtsedivxlD'fill��`ouk,-
- P � Y'k'r ��• Y� ilff 6 t 4�d e��,� d� rr .- �-^4'�i°ti� ..,{��+:.Y� f Y ^cYn Y 1 `�• a �� lk. r --_
t
r•�Y�rh i +L c�
7�i,J04
4di n i - ]Z:. ;
x C. •�, t1 it:;(.�° y J+ «`fo- �"rn 7� a.,s�y1 9..x�pt " r-.rw�w-.:.i..•.-
�a.y
l .:.'.-+�wy_L.i__�. n,., Y .ilad ��-.�Ue Y:j,.,;$._.,.'➢t.7-ttit_.. +.: '° f1.���.ti�.� ' ''�� i`._X'u..3 7
r e,• //gyp _
Reviewer/Ins ector Name ohn" lYl' rFi, erard, .,-,T—'""" P ('i. a t
....YJ .. .�.,.� _ _ ewwaN�..a2.x ..k}� 'M W', FL�hWNW.WJkYN.. ♦JWaifik:�
'_- ..- 1—w. ...
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:Ll� Date
e

kaCility NumYe—r--96--I—O--1
Date of Inspection

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.r�—
sc%- 1ao
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: 3 , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: �.dy N PJTIO(!�] Psa
Mailing Address: '121 pA.1dyP(/? ti 2p.U�
County: �_
Integrator: 2 Phone: c711
On Site Representative: fN hone:
Ph"ysical Address/Location:
Type or operation: swine �— Poultry Cattle
^_ Tn Caracits : � 76Q No. of Animals on Site:
EM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACN Fri
Latitude: SS- 1-7 143 Longitude: -7-2 /-Z)_';LOElevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) © or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or
Was any erosion observed? Yes, or(sr /
Is adequate land available for spray? < e�r No
Is the cover crop adequate? e3>r No 4•9,9 aC01015 "
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? cni�l or No 100 Ft from Wells? C4 or No
Is the al waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes o No'
Is animal waste end applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes o 0
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by an -made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management record (volumes of Manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific c eage with cov r crop)? or No
Inspect ignature
CC: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Sack of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two lLXa`--*-N M �
Sketch:
NJ" \,� RP rC-/j 2 wl ,+ �