960008_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual
W)

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

■ Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑
Other Agency
Facility Number:
960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960008
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit
01/10/2017 EntryTime: 10:15 am Exit Time: 11:05 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Double T Farms Owner Email:
Owner.
John K Thornton Phone:
919-689-3730
Mailing Address:
971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address:
971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status:
Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farts:
Latitude: 35° 16' 17" Longitude:
78° 10' 18"
Located on the east side
of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Edgar G Thornton Operator Certification Number: 19240
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thomton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 01/10/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Analysis N
HL1 HL2
10-10-16 0.54 0.60
7-22-16 1.03 1.01
4-29-16 1.52 1.43
Calibration 9-1-16
Due 2018.- - — — —
Lagoon Sludge Survey Due 2017
6-9-2016
(1-4) (5-8)
LTZ 4.4 4.4
Thickness 4.2 4.3
Pump Intake 4.6 4.6
Soil Report due 2018.
page: 2

Permit: AWS960008 Owner -Facility: John K Thomton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 01/10/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
El Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
- - -- - - -- Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1-4
04/13/93
19-00
37.00
Lagoon
5-8
06/13/94
19.00
32.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thomton Facility Number. 960008
Inspection Date: 01/10/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed.pits, dry stacks and/or -wet stacks)__ ___
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number:
960008
Inspection Date: 01/10/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
_
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
.
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thomton Facility Number:
960008
Inspection Date: 01/10/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 6

J 1 y
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960008 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS960008
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
04/20/2016 Entry Time: 08:30 am
Exit Time: 9:45 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Double T Farms
(honer Email:
Owner:
John K Thornton
Phone:
919-689-3730
Mailing Address:
971 Grantham School Rd
Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address:
971 Grantham School Rd
Mount Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status:
0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35` 16' 17" Longitude:
780 10' 18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John K Thornton Operator Certification Number: 19241
Secondary OIC(s):
OnSite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

r1 t
Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 04/20/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
12-29-15
1.30
1.02
8-26-15
1.03
0.79
5-26-15
0.99
1.50
1-5-2015
0.85
1.28
Soil Report 11-9-2015
Due 2018.
Calibration 11-1-2014
Due 2016.
Lagoon Sludge Survey 10-8-2015
Due 2016.
(5-8) (1-4)
LTZ- 4.5 4.5
Pump Intake- 4.6 4.6
Thickness- 4.2 4.1
page: 2

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 96000E
Inspection Date: 04/20/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 5,953
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1-4
04/13/93
19.00
29.00
Lagoon
5-8
06/13/94
19.00
34.00
page: 3

+, %
Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 04/20/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges $ Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
MEI
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑0
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 04/20/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑0
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

AV • • #
Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 04/20/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
- .�
-�-❑—❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
-❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 6

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960008
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
03/02/2015 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:30 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Double T Farms Owner Email:
Owner:
John K Thornton Phone:
919-689-3730
Mailing Address:
971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address:
971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Preslage Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 16' 17" Longitude:
78" 10' 18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Edgar G Thornton
Operator Certification Number: 19240
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
Phone
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Lagoon Sludge Survey 12/22/14 due again in 2015. (1-4)
(5-8)
Calibration-11111114 Big Pivot&Little Pivot T=5.2 4.9
New permit on hand. PI=3.9 4.1
Waste analysis N LTZ=4.7 4.6
1/7115 0.85 1.28
9/10/14 0.96 0.99
5/19114 1.31 1.30
2/7/14 1.42 1.62
Rain records -checkout.
Pumping records -good.
page: 1

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 03/02/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 2,926
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1-4
04/13/93
19.00
24.00
Lagoon
5-8
06/13/94
19.00
24.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960008
Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 03/02/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 03/02/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 03/02/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Yes No Na Ne
El
El
11
11
❑ N ❑ ❑
❑ ■❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ E ❑ ❑
❑ ■❑ ❑
❑ ■❑ ❑
page: 5

t
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960008 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS960008
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
02/19/2014 Entry Time: 08:45 am Exit Time: 9:15
am Incident #
Farm Name:
Double T Farms
Owner Email:
Owner:
John K Thornton
Phone:
919-689-3730
Mailing Address:
971 Grantham School Rd
Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address:
971 Grantham School Rd
Mount Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35` 16' 17" Longitude:
78' 10' 18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream
Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
John K Thornton
Operator Certification Number:
19241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Gene Thornton Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Gene Thornton Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Coc in records
New WuP 1/7109
Soil Test 2/18/13(for 2012)
"'due again 2015—
Cu & Zn levels w!n range
L = in some fields
Waste Analysis N
HLt HL2
10/21/14 = .87 1.08
7/2/13 = 1.67 1.78
3/19/13 = 1.83 2.04
new one in Raleigh
Sludge Survey 10/2/13
1-4 5-8
thickness = 4.4 3.8
LTZ = 4.2 4.9
pump intake = 4.7 4.4
45%
"'Sludge Survey due again 2014"'
"'Renewal permit package coming in mail; be sure to send two WuP in packet"'
crop yield reviewed
Irrigation calibration
"'due again 2014"'
page: 2

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 5,769
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1-4
04/13/93
19.00
24.00
Lagoon
5-8 06/13/94
19.00
5.00
0
page: 3

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No No Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑0
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No Me
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960008
Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/19/14
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Troup
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility : John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/19/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Cl
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑0
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
1101111
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01/1312013 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 10:40 AM Incident #:
Farts Name: Double T Farms Owner Email:
Owner: John K Thornton Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farts: Latitude: 35016'17" Longitude: 78010'18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Edgar G Thornton
Operator Certification Number: 19240
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Gene Thornton
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Gene Thornton
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 01/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis N
HL1 HL2
11/15/12 = .82 1.61
12/9/12 = 1.6 2.0
7/16/12 = 1.30 1.37
New WUP 1/7/09
Lagoon Sludge Survey 10/8/12
1-4 5-8
thickness = 4.4 3.7
LTZ = 4.2 5.0
pump intake = 4.7 4.5
45%
"Sludge Survey due again 2013"
Current soil in Raleigh for 2012
10/25/11 Soil Test
L =0t
Cu & Zn levels w/in range
"due again in 2013"
Irrigation calbration 9/6/2012
"due again in 2014"
Coc in Records
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960008 Owner • Facility: John K Thornton
Inspection Date: 01/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 5,442
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1-4
04/13/93
19.00
agoon
5-8
06/13/94
19.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thomlon
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 01/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
11000
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
ONO
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by.the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS966008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 01/1312013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
w/ Rye Overseed
Crop Type 2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Troup
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Cl ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW5960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thomton
Inspection Date: 01/1312013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ 000
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑.
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Page: 6

permit:AWS960008 Owner -Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 01/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0000
0
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
-FaciL'ly Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: j Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Q� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Physical Address: ` _ ,
Facility Contact: p�,�p �►.(f( K Yn Title:
11
Onsite Representative: h�Q/t- r-- -t1
Certified Operator: � � JW�n
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
to Finish
to Feeder
- to Finish
v to Wean
v to Feeder
vto Finish
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Region: Wh?% o
Integrator: p9 4xq'e
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
nl Pnnttr Canarity Pnn.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes D No 0 NA NE
[:]Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E2"*No
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA ONE
❑ NA 0 NE
0NA EjNE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility, Number: AL_- jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _ 30
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
QNo❑ NA ❑ NE
I 110 ❑ NA ❑ NE
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
U o
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes —LZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: (G jDate of Inspection: ks
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZOO
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
eck
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, ch❑Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
g9,5
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes VVNX❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Tes-j- laVz5ji _ �n i Jig/job
ciy k 20 (2
Cup Zrj t4, t s w/h rAI%e- I
` 1i-GI'nes5 — 1H13
43
VV'V'
r�A►ln-1� � � a � t�co-R.�s jar, 2 �.. `f
Cg . S f�mci 4-o rr n �,4 v n re- s 14c ,., 6&,ks � j
ihs��c 1 h s 2 Doi 2 � A �- k4f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ^�—
Date: vC
2/4/2011

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960008
Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS960008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02110/2011
Entry Time:12730 PM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Double T Farms
Owner Email:
Owner: John K Thomton
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 971 Grantham
School Rd Mount
Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address: 971 Grantham
School Rd Mount
Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status: N Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage
Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°16'17"
Longitude: 78010'18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Edgar G Thomton Operator Certification Number: 19240
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name
Gene Thomton
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative
Gene Thomton
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thomton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Anaylsis: 1 2 soil test 10/28/10
10/15/10 1.0 .80 Cu and Zn levels Win range.
06/04/10 2.0 1.8 Lime = .9T
02/17/10 1.5 1.4
Drain Tiles? No
new CoC in Records
irrigation calibration 10/11/10
crop yields look good
irrigation and lagoon levels correspond; rainfall records good
3 Cuttings of BH; SG - grazed
Sludge Survey 10/11/10
Lagoon #2
Lagoon #3
LTZ=4.9
LTZ=4.1
thickness = 3.8
thinkness = 4.5
pump intake = 5.7
pump intake = 4.9
sludge lagoon #1 46%
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 3,283
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon
1-4
04/13/93
19.00
34.00
agoon
5-8
O6/13/94
19.00
37.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thomton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
0000
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Troup
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No NA NE
❑
0000
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

I
Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thomton
Inspection Date: 02/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑D
❑ ■ ❑ D
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
ONOO
Page: 7

Facility Number K I C�
B Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
PrRoutine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: G Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ��,sP Region: Aver
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name rev / //C' AAA Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
LJ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = U =1 = « Longitude: = o [= 1 [= 11
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
j ❑ Layer
�I ❑ Non -Layer
Other
❑ Other I_I
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
l
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes O'No
❑ Yes
dNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
CJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: CQ, Date of Inspection 'YG
r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ;2'1�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: � L
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes J2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ; No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes feKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name L !+•7 G Phone• /�%7 il" 4'2�>G
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: % F —/ C
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 9 — CA� Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes .2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes L? No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ;E�go ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes g<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 0�<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes K
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
ev
5' -y >'<�.sY�,
❑ Yes eNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ; N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes YJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

E Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/13/2009 Entry Time:01 Q0 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #:
Farts Name: Double T Farms Owner Email:
Owner: John K Thornton Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35016'17" Longitude: 78010'18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John K Thornton Operator Certification Number: 19241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Gene Thornton Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Sludge survey 5/27/08 James Lamb 0=5.1 1-4=4.6
Irrigation Cali - EFR 400 actual 400
Ring size EFR 197 gpm
Soil test - 2/18/08 - 2009 - samples due this year
Waste analysis - records are complete
6/23/09 1 N=2.1 2N=2.1
3113/09 1N=2.2 2N=2.1
10/31/08 1N=1.3 2N=1.0
7/9/08 1N=1.8 2N=1.6
Lagoons are well managed and show good vegetation
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 07/13/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 2,693
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Cinsad nata Start nat. neer..aaa
5,880
793,800
agoon
14
04/13/93
19.00
-------------
34.00
agoon
5-8
06/13/94
19.00
40.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Inspection Date: 07/13/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
D
■
D
D
Discharge originated at:
Structure
D
Application Field
D
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
■
D
D
D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
■
D
D
D
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
■
D
D
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
■
D
D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
D
■
D
D
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
D
■
D
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
D
■
D
D
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
D
■
D
D
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
D
■
D
D
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ D
D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D ■ D
D
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
D ■ D
D
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
D ■ D
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
D
Hydraulic Overload?
D
Frozen Ground?
D
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
D
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thomton
Facility Number:
960008
Inspection Date: 07/13/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
PAN?
Q
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
0
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
rl
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
O
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Cl
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
Q
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 07/13/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
[I
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
fl
Rainfall?
fl
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
IN
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
❑
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
0 mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 07/1312009
Otherlssues
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0000
❑❑❑❑
❑❑❑❑
Page: 6

a
■ Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency ______________________
Facility Number: 960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960008 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/11/2008 Entry Time:03:12 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Double T Farms Owner Email:
Owner: John K Thornton Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address:971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status: n Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'16'17" Longitude: 78°10'18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
W Records and Documents
Certified Operator: John K Thornton
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 19241
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Gene Thornton Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Gene Thornton Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Gene Thornton Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Eric Newsome Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Online search of NCDA&CS website verified that 11 soil samples were being processed as of 2/5/2008. This is in response to an
inquiry as to the status of 2007 soil samples taken and submitted for analysis.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/11/2008
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 4,142
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total SSLW: 793,800
Closed Date Start Date Designed Observed
Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1-4
04/13/93
19.00
34.00
agoon
5-8
O6/13/94
19.00
36.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? n ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
Checklists? n
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
■
o
In
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n
■
n
Page: 3

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ______________________
Facility Number: 960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01/08/2008 Entry Time:07:48 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Double T Farms
Owner: John K Thornton
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35016'17" Longitude: 78010'18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John K Thornton
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 19241
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Gene Thornton Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Gene Thornton Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Inspection Date: 01/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inspection Summary:
Facility Number : 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Saw Permit (AWG100000) and CoC (AWS960008). WUP signed 6/6/06. This farm uses one center pivot system and one Cadman
reel and gun system; the documented flowrates for each system are between 200-400 gpm for the center pivot and 200 gpm for the
Cadman system.
Waste Analysis Reports (in IbN/1000 gal):
HL#1-Lagoon #1, HL#2-Lagoon#2
12/13/07 (HL#1)=1.8; (HL#2)=1.6
07/02/07 (HL#1)=2.4; (HL#2)=2.2
03/15/07 (HL#1)=2.6; (HL#2)=2.4
12/04/06 (HL#1)=1.1;(HL#2)=1.0
IRR-2 amounts of N applied are balanced with respect to the current WUP; PAN limits have been met.
Recorded rainfall records are adequate and irrigation events are consistent with recorded freeboard levels.
#21. Soil test results for 2007 have not been received from NCDA&CS as of this inspection date. Per Mr. Gene Thornton (back up
operator and facility contact during this inspection), the samples were collected and shipped in December 2007. Will follow up.
2007 sludge survey results:
HL#1: LTZ=4.7', Thick=3.9'
HL#2: LTZ=5.3', Thick=3.4'
(Next survey is due in 2008, exemption notwithstanding).
2006 calibration results:
Cadman reel and gun (70psi@gun, 196 gpm measured; <10% variance from expected flowrate)
Center pivot (40psi@nozzle, 400 gpm measured; <10% variance from expected flowrate)
(FYI: Cadman reel is shared with facility #96-37. Next calibrations due in 2008).
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 01/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 4,142
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1-4
04/13/93
19.00
34.00
agoon
5-8 -
06/13/94
19.00
36.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number : 960008
Inspection Date: 01/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts I Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? E) ■ n n
Discharge originated at
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ■ n n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number : 960008
Inspection Date: 01/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Millet
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Wagram
Soil Type 3
Kenansville loamy sand
Soil Type 4
Troup sand
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■ n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Inspection Date: 01108/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ n n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
n
n
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 01/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
0 M 0 n
n■nn
n■nn
Page: 7

4
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ *Other Agency
Facility Number: 960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/28/2007 Entry Time:12:30 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Double T Farms
Owner: John K Thornton
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 283656907
Physical Address: 971 Grantham School Rd Mount Olive NC 28365
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°16'17" Longitude:78°10'18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx: 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John K Thornton Operator Certification Number: 19241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Gene Thornton Phone:
24 hour contact name Gene Thornton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Madene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
12-04-06 = 1.1 1.0
7-20-06 = 1.7 1.6
4-19-06 = 2.2 2.5
2006 soil sample in the records
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 4,892
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1-4
04/13/93
19.00
36.00
agoon
5-8
06/13/94
19.00
33.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
1
Inspection Date: 02/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ In
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
Cl
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

0
Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Millet
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 02/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
0
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
Cl
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 1101111
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: John K Thornton
Inspection Date: 02/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
A L �
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ____--------- ____
Facility Number: 960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296008 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/21/2006 Entry Time:08:25 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Double T Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Keith D Thornton Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 218 Harper House Rd Newton Grove NC 28366
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35016'17" Longitude: 78010'18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John K Thornton Operator Certification Number: 19241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Gene Thornton Phone:
24 hour contact name Gene Thornton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 03/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC & Permit available on site
WUP revised 3/10/2006 to include field 1(tract 7415) and field 2(tract7415)
Waste Analysis:
Date #1 #2
10/25/05 1.6 1.4
7/11/05 3.1 2.7
Soil sample report dated 1113/06, does not include new fields added in the revised waste plan. Please take soil sample from new fields
1 & 2 before any waste application on these fields .
Irrigation calibration for center pivot & hose reel completed for 2005. Remeber to complete one for 2006.
Sludge survey completed 3/29/05, sludge = 3.8' and LTZ = 4.9'
Please complete one for 2006.
Rainfall recorded and initialed where >1"
Lagoon levels recorded weekly. No irrigation since 9/30/2005. Producer plans to irrigate soon. Please pull waste sample to cover any
pumping
PLAT completed 5/14/04, rating low for all fields
Crop yield, stocking and mortality records available
Spray fields in good shape.
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296008 Owner • Facility: Keith D Thomton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 03/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 6,011
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
T--. lAnn}lfier . Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1-4
09/01/93
19.00
31.00
agoon
5-8
06/13/94
19.00
31.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 03/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Cl ■ n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
In
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■ n n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■ n n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ n n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ n n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■ n n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes,
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■ n n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton
Inspection Date: 03/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
In
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
fl
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Millet
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Wagram
Soil Type 3
Troup
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving. crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land -application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste, application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 5

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 03/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
■
n
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
n
n
26. Did the facility fail to. have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
■
n
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Cl
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA296008 Owner- Facility: Keith D Thornton
Inspection Date: 03/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n ■ ❑ n
n■nn
n■nn
Page: 7

l
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960008 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296008 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/01/2005 Entry Time:08745 AM Exit Time: 10700 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Double T Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Keith D Thornton Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 218 Harper House Rd Newton Grove NC 28366
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant n Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude:35'16'17" Longitude:78°10'18"
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment ! Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John K Thornton Operator Certification Number: 19241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative John Thorton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
10/25/05: 1=1.6, 2=1.4
07/11/05: 1=3.1, 2=2.7
03/18/05: 1=3.1, 2=3.0
Soil test to be taken for 2005
Irrigation calibration dated 7/8/2005
Lagoon sludge survey dated 3/29/2005
Reviewed IRR1 and IRR2 records.
Rainfall data recorded and initialized where > 1"
Freeboard levels match with irrigation records
Try getting some vegetation in bare areas on dike
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 12/01/2005
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,880 5,809
Total Design Capacity: 5,880
Total SSLW: 793,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1-4
09/01/93
19.00
40.00
agoon
5-8
06/13/94
19.00
39.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton
Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 12/01/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
IF,
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
IF,
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
.NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton
Inspection Date: 12/01/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
1-1
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Wagram
Soil Type 4
Troup
Soil Type 5
Norfolk
Soil Type 6
Goldsboro
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
o ■
❑
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton Facility Number: 960008
Inspection Date: 12I01/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
In
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Cl
■
n
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
n
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
El
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
■
n
n
Otherlssues IYes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA296008 Owner - Facility: Keith D Thornton
Inspection Date: 12t0112005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherissues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960008
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 6

Date of Visit: 4-27-2004 1 Time: 940
Facility Number 96 8
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
N Permitted ® Certified [3Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: Mable.'l .Far'.tps................................................................. ....... County: WAym ............................................... !'. ARO........
OwnerName: Kd1b........................................ :T.hAKmton................................................... Phone No: 9a.9.89-3.3b3...................................::......................
Mailing Address: 93.1-Grantbam.&h9.11 Rd............................................................... r4Q)XILCOlixe-NIC ................................................. 28.3.6.5 .............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: .Creme.Tho rmion.......................................................................... Integrator: .restage.FArms.....................................................
Certified Operat6r:,Tol11A.K................................... Tb1un1Q.0............................. ............ Operator Certification Number: a.9Z4d....................... ......
Location of Farm:
cated on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104. +
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Latitude 35 • 16 17 " Longitude 78 • 10 18
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Po uI tion
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Finish
5880
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
o Wean❑Other
WFeeder
o Feedero
Total Design Capacity
5,880771
Finish
Total SSLW
793,800
Number of Lagoons,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............Rant............ ............Back.......................................................................................................................
.................................. ......
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): 31" 39"
rvr�mt
Continued

Facility Number: 96-8 Date of Inspection 4-27-2004 "
5. Are there any imme=diate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes IN No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments; (refer to question Explain any YES answers or any other comments =
Use drawings of facility to:better'eap!am situations:(use additional pagesias necessary) , 0 Field Copy ❑Final Notes
-cords available for review.
A analysis - sent to NCDA on 12-11-03, results dated 2-2-04 **these reults are for the year 2003**
.AT is being addressed - ddeep soil samples came back P-I = 0
'aste Analysis: # 1 (HL1) # 2 (HL2)
1-5-04 = 2.7 lbs 2.8 lbs
8-13-03 = 1.9 lbs 1.9 lbs
6-2- 03 = 3.6 lbs 3.6 lbs
2-19-03 = 3.5lbs 2.51bs
waiting the most recent sample that was sent to NCDA 4-22-04
rigation calibration completed on 9-16-03
ludge survey completed.
enter pivot has been bought and just beginning to be used.
pray fields are in good shape.
IReviewer/Inspector Name .Lyn B: Hardison I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 96-8 Date of Inspection 4-27-2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑Yes ®No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ®No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes ®No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ®No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ® No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ® No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes ®No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ® No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
rl 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Facility Number Date of Visit: 6/6/2002 Time: 1100
p Not Operational p Below'I hrBelow'es o
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Double T Farms County:.W.ayne................................................ .WaRo........
Owner Name: Keith Thornton Phone No: 919-689-3363
Mailing Address: 9.31.Grantham..School.Rd............................................................... Mount.Alive...NC................................................. 283.65 ..............
Facility Contact: Gene..Thornton..............................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: 919-.689-3.7311.......................
Onsite Representative: Keith.&.Gene..Thornton....................................................... Integrator: Prestage.Farms.....................................................
Certified Operator:drxhnS.................................. Thornton......................................... Operator Certification Number: 19.2AI .............................
Location of Farm:
cated on the east side ol NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with
v
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©• ®, ©11 Longitude ®• ®' ®
' Design ,I Current Design Current Design Current
Swore. Capacity Population Poultry ` "Capacity: Population Cattle'; 'Population
4 .Capacity
p can to Feeder
[3 Layer
p, any
w'
® Feeder to mis
[3Non-Layer
p on- airy
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
? p ter
:.Total Design Capacity 51880
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
=
Total SSLW 7939800
❑Boars
Number of Lagoons
_ ': ❑Subsurface rams resen p Lagoon Area p pray ie Area
Holden Ponds / Sohd Tra s
g, P ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? E3 Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field 13 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ Fr.aat............ ............ Rack ............ .................. .................. ............ ......---------------- ..........................
Freeboard (inches): ...............3.1...............................40...................................................

ace ity um er: 96-8 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 13 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? O Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
O Yes
p Yes
p Yes
N No
® No
®No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
p Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
ig No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
In No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visitYou will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
p rieia copy p
Waste analysis - 4/10/02 - #1 = 2.5 lbs & #2 = 2.2 lbs; 9/12/01 - #I = 1.5 lbs & #2 = 2.3 lbs.
Make sure to pull soil samples for this year.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
Continue to practice weed control on dike walls and in sprayfields.
Minimize the cows' access to lagoon walls to prevent pipe breakage and vegetation from being over grazed.
(CONTINUED ON PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name I3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: -7 ..i Z )444Z_J...' , Date:

O5103101 Continued
Vacility Number: 96_8 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below (3 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No

Facility Number Date of Visit: 8/23/2001 Time: 1-00 am Printed on: 10/3/2001
p Not Operational p Below Threes o
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Double T Farms County:.W.ayne................................................ WaR.O........
Owner Name: Keith Thornton Phone No: 919-689-3363
Mailing Address: 93.1.Gran.tham.Schoo.I.Rd. ............................................................... !!'bunt.Olive...NC....................................... .......... 283.65 ..............
FacilityContact: Gene.T.hornion..............................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: 919. 689:3.7311.......................
Onsite Representative: G.eae.Tharatnn......................................................................... Integrator: Prectaga.F.arins.....................................................
.....__T-6...:.. F.._.._I \perntar ':.: ti�nntana-lV� n: �.•�:�T01A1
l.e.•t•a••.Y vil�.•uay.uY•LLJY..................................aJL4LNLvlJ......................................... v •u �• ��.• • •.0 •vu u••••.•.A.IrrzA.............................
Location of Farm: ---
ILocated on the east side of NUSH 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with
I�
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©o F' Longitude ®o ®�«
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Number of;Lagoons ;: _.
_ Cattle
p ter
Total Design -Capacity 5,880
Totahsow 793,800
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min? na
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..... I ...... E ont........................ Back ............ .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............10...............................21................

"^ Ir
Facility Number: 96_8 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 10/3/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes U No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
...... b).Does_the_facilityneed.a wettable_acre determination?_ _. .... _._. _ ....... _ ... _ ........_ ._ ._._ __. _ ❑ Yes__ ❑_No,,,_
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
Ip No violations or deticiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no turtner correspondence apout tors visit.
7
irds available for review.
to analysis - 6/27/01 = 2.5 & 2.5 lbs.; 5/7/01 = 3.3 & 3.2 lbs.
analysis - 10/00 - available; lime has been applied.
ation records are complete and balanced out.
board levels are recorded weekly as required.
-tation on dike wall is well established.
yfields are in good shape. SEE PAGE 3
7
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyw&.H dison-.: entered b .-Ann T ndall -
�y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
40-k-,()"

^ O5103101
Continued
Facility Number: 96_8 Date of Inspection
Printed on: 10/3/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No

o f w.?r6,�
>'
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional
Date: October 8.2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2)the. arir is corru tying w1u� ,cup, reir�eri;,o` u.e state ;Zules:15 N .^.G 2H.0217:_$CriBtc Bill 1217an d L'ie Certi.Fteu' A i , a
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit. therefore, these items roust be implemented:
q) The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus; Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
(p The following records are required off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land atmlication rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during anv given atmlication.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
q) It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
(p The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by properly
managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the responsibility to certify
monitoring and reporting information The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can result in a letter of reprimand
suspension of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1.2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or meat 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946.9215 (Fax)

w
-]Facility Number 96 g Date of Visit: ]0/11/2000 Time: 1030 Printed on: 10/27/2000
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .... _....... _.........
FarmName: Daulble.'l:.Fuju............................ _.... __.......... ........ _._................ _......... County:\lOYtlt........................................... _.. \l'tiAQ........
Owner Nang: Kr lttl........._............_.............. lhxtnukQlu _... __....... _... _....................... Phone No: 919 fifl9-3 b................._.................._....__...........
Facility Contact: f. elle.T.haratu.................................... _...... Title: ........... .................................................... Phone No: 919-b$1:37.3Q.1SIxRFl........
Mailing Address: 931 faramkhjju0..SC,hARl.kid..........._._.................. _............... _....... UQuult.Alin..NC................................................ Z8365..............
Onsite Representative: GGAI.7hQrjltAtl.........._....._..................... _ ....... ........................ Integrator: Erujage.FArms.....................................................
Certified Operator:,Jpjhm, ,,,, �jXQr'0tAA......... _........ _. ..... Operator Certification Number:19 41,
__. .............................
Location of Farm:
Located on the east side of NCSR 1006 approx. 0.8 miles north of its intersection with NCSR 1104. r
T
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 16 17 k Longitude 78 • 10 18 u
Design Current
Swine capacity- Po ulatio
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 5880 5880
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
- Numberof Lagoons : C
Design , Current - _Design—, CtiIT
ire»t:. .
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle : , Ca aci '-Po ulatiou•_
❑ Layer 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other I=
-Total Design Capacity 59880 J.
Total SSLW 793,800
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps_ ❑ No Liquid Waste Man
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Stn-•Cture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .........:...A1...............................2..............................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 49 45
cmn

5100 Continued on back
Facility Number: 96-8 Date of Inspection 10/I1/2000 Printed on: 10/27/2000
5, -Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
I I. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15: Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. -Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19:-Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(id/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
�To yio[atioiis:or _deficiencies were.....during• this °visit:: Yon: wiR reeeive no further
correspondence abniit this -visit. :...:... ......... ......... .........
.....
;ords available for review.
ste analyses are within permit requirements.
I analysis through 1999 available; awaiting 2000 results.
lation records are complete and balanced out.
)y of permit was available where it wasn't during DSWC inspection.
nfall is recorded.
oon levels are as low as the design allows **good shape**
all grain is being planted. Most fields have been planted. SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn Hardiso,,n':p ` Entered by Ann
rndall

' Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00 1
Facility Number: 96-8 Date of Inspection ]0/11R000 Printed on: 10/27/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is tkiere any evidence of wind driftduring land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 0 Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 0 Yes ® No
30. • Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31:.Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? [I Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Grounds are well kept.
Overall, the farm is well managed.
Keep up the good work.
If you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.
I
sinn