960006_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quaff

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960006 Facility Status:
Active
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for visit:
Routine
County N
Date of Visit
02/07/2017 Entry Time: 02:30 pm
Exit Time: 3:45 pm
Farm Name:
Craig Farm #2
Owner:
Debra L Craig
Mailing Address:
440 Selah Church Rd
Gol
Physical Address:
Landfill Rd
Go]
Facility Status:
oennit: AWS960006 ❑ Denied Access
active Or Closed Date:
1e Region: Washington
Incident 0
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Coro NC 275309729
Coro NC 27530
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 17' 30" Longitude: 78' 04' 46"
Farm Location:. U.S. 13 S_ and turn left onto Herring Road. Go 112 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd look for farm sign 112 mile on
the left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jesse Brian Craig Operator Certification Number: 992564
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Crop yield, Rainfall and freeboard records checked.
Soil Report checked.
page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner- Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 02/07/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 0
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: - --433,000 -
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
21.00
Lagoon
2HS
19.00
21.00
Lagoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
27.00
Lagoon
4HS
19.00
24.00
Lagoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
24.00
Lagoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
33.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra l- Craig . Facility Number:
960006
Inspection Date: 02/07/17 Inpsection Type-, Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
[]
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
.State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

OF
Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date:-02/07/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5.
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
EEI
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
'M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 02/07/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate boxes) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? -
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., . discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33- Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 960006
Facility Status: Active permit: AWS960006
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 0313112016 Entry Time: 08:00 am Exit Time: 10:20 am Incident #
Farm Name: Craig Farm #2
Owner Email:
Owner: Debra L Craig
Phone:
919-689-3644
Mailing Address: 440 Selah Church Rd
Goldsboro NC 275309729
Physical Address: Landfill Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35° 17' 30" Longitude:
78° 04' 46"
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. and turn left onto Herring Road. Go 1/2 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd look for farm sign 112 mile on
the left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
. Records and Documents
■ Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jesse Brian Craig
Operator Certification Number:
992564
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
Phone
Primary Inspector: Justin.K Davis
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
No Pumping since 2013.
Soil Report 8-19-2015
Zn<100.
Cu<85
page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra l-Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/31/16 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 0
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
Waste Structures -
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
29.00
Lagoon
2HS
19.00
29.00
Lagoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
29.00
Lagoon
4HS
19.00
20.00
Lagoon
5HS 10/23/98
19.50
20.00
Lagoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
31.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
0
.
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 (]
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
[]
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Cl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
r]
0 []
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22_ Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 Cl
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 950006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960005
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region:
Date of Visit: 07/22/2015 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:30 am Incident #
Farm Name: Craig Farm #2 Owner Email:
Owner: Debra L Craig Phone:
Mailing Address: 440 Selah Church Rd Goldsboro NC 275309729
❑ Denied Access
Washington
919-689-3644
Physical Address: Landfill Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 17' 30" Longitude: 78' 04' 46"
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. and turn left onto Herring Road. Go 1/2 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd look for farm sign 1/2 mile on
the left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jesse Brian Craig Operator Certification Number: 992564
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Crop Yield, Rainfall and Freeboard records checked.
Soil Report
Field 28 Cu<110 Zn<250
Field 27 Cu<140 Zn<210
page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 07/22/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 0
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
rr
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
27.00
Lagoon
2HS
19.00
27.00
Lagoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
25.00
Lagoon
4HS
19.00
24.00
Lagoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
24.00
Lagoon
6HS 10/23/98
19.50
32.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 07/22/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
[]
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c- What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑0
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
n ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
No
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number:
960006
Inspection Date: 07/22/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
N ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
NO
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0013
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Cl
Lease Agreements?
[]
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ E ❑ []
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

A
Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number:
960006
Inspection Date: 07/22/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑0
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
[]
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

A
• Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960006 Facility Status: Active permit: AWS960006
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region:
Date of Visit: 09/09/2014 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: Craig Farm #2 Owner Email:
Owner: Debra L Craig Phone:
Mailing Address: 440 Selah Church Rd Goldsboro NC 275309729
❑ Denied Access
Washington
919-689-3644
Physical Address: Landfill Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 17' 30" Longitude: 78° 04' 46"
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. and turn left onto Herring Road. Go 1/2 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd look for farm sign 112 mile on
the left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, R Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jesse Brian Craig Operator Certification Number: 992564
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jesse Craig Phone:
On -site representative Jesse Craig Phone
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone. -
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors):
Inspection Summary:
Don't need sludge survey unless hogs get re -populated
Next soil test due 2016
Crop yield complete
"Update IRR-2 Forms once waste analysis returns for August 2014 irrigation
24)'Calibration due 2014 - not completed in 2013
Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w/ irrigation
page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
.1 Inspection Date: 09/09/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations' Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 0
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
30.00
Lagoon
2HS
19.00
30.00
Lagoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
21.00
Lagoon
4HS
19.00
20,00
Lagoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
20,00
Lagoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
22.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra l-Craig Facility Number: 960006
' Inspection Date: 09/09/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
MEI
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
00
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
[]
0 []
[]
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste. Application
Yes No Na We
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
[�
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 09/09/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility : Debra L Craig Facility Number:
960006
• Inspection Date: 09/09/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ N
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
[]
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: Q3(1312Q13 Entry Time: 08:34 AM Exit Time: 09:45 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Craig,Earm #2 _ Owner Email:
Owner: Debra Srmjg Phone: [phone]fi44
Mailing Address: SnldsUgr9 LLC 2-75309729
Physical Address: Landfill Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Dogwood Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 78°04'46"
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. and turn left onto Herring Road. Go 1/2 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd look for farm sign 112 mile on the
left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jesse Brian Craig Operator Certification Number: 992564
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jesse Craig Phone:
On -site representative Jesse Craig Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
WUP 6112/06
Sludge Survey 7128/12
thickness = 5.96
LTZ = 1.2
**Sludge Survey due again in 2013**
Soil Test Setp. 27, 2012
**Due again 2013**
crop yield records reviewed
Closing down in two Weeks irrigation calibration 12/28/11
**due again 2013**
Waste Analysis N
9/22/12 = .69
5/16/12 = 1.3
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Inspection Date: 03/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 950006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Wean 11000 974
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
21,00
agoon
2HS
19.00
21.00
agoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
23.00
agoon
4HS
19.00
22.00
agoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
22.00
agoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
23.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number : 960006
Inspection Date: 03113/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No' NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe U ■ U U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, 1101311
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner . Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Small Grain Overseed
Norfolk
Wagram
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
ONOO
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
x
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/1312013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekiy Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 130110
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

■ Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/13/2012 Entry Time: 09:35 AM Exit Time: 10:05 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Craia Farm #2 Owner Email:
Owner: Debra L Craia Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 440 Selah Church Rd Goldsboro NC 275309729
Physical Address: Landfill Rd GoldsboroN-C 27530_
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Dogwood Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'17'30" Longitude: 78°04'46"
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. and tum left onto Herring Road. Go 1/2 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd look for farm sign 1/2 mile on the
left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jesse Brian Craig Operator Certification Number: 992564
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jesse Craig Phone:
On -site representative Jesse Craig Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records Soil Test 2011
WuP 6/12/2006 **due again 2012**
Cu & Zn levels w/in range
New OIC in wallet
Irrigation calibartion 12/28/11 crop yield records reviewed
**due again in 2013** mortility recrods reviewed
***woody vegetation removed from lagoon #3.***
Sludge Survey 11/2/11
**due again in 2012**
thickness = 6.28
LTZ = .95
**sludge extension on rest til 2614**
Waste Analysis N
5/10/12 = 1.3
1 /26112 = 1.7
8/25/12 = .48
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 A 983
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
23.00
agoon
2HS
19.00
23.00
agoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
26.00
agoon
4HS
19.00
21.00
agoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
24:00
agoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
24.00
Page: 3

5
Permit: AWS960006 Owner • Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 06113/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe U ■ U U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
i. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ M
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
001111
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Wagram
Soil Type 2 Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1100
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number : 960006
Inspection Date: 06/1312012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ Cl
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Inspection Date: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■ ❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■ ❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■ ❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

A
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency nn
Facility Number: 960006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960006 U Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: IN
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/25/2011 Entry Time:11:15 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Crain Farm #2
Owner: Debra L Craia
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 440 Selah Church Rd Goldsboro NC 275309729
Physical Address: Landfill Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Dogwood Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 351T30" Longitude: 78°04'46"
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. and turn left onto Herring Road. Go 112 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd look for farm sign 1/2 mile on the
left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jesse Brian -Craig Operator Certification Number: 992564
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jesse Craig Phone:
On -site representative Jesse Craig Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 6/12/06 Crop yield reviewed
New CoC in Records
OIC in records "
Waste Analysis N
6/28/11 = 1.1
11/16/10 = .39
9/3/10 = 2.1
irrigation calibration 11/3/09
"Due again in 2011 `"
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
*"Soil Test due again 2011 ""
Cu & Zn levels Win range
Sludge Survey 9114/10
Due again in 2011"'
thickness = 6.23
LTZ = .84
pump intake =1.51
"woody vegetation in lagoon 3; try to do something in spring*"
"Farm may close in May or June of 2012—
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 1,017
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1HS
10123/94
19.50
'23.00
agoon
2HS
19.00
23.00
agoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
26.00
agoon
4HS
19.00
24.00
agoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
24.00
agoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
24.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 08/26/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
.11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■" ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
Q
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections'
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ Q ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 08/25/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? V yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0000.
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? DMOO
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

L
Division of Water Quality Q
j1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency -------- - - - ------
ry
Facility Number: 960006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960006 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
O
Date of Visit: 04/15/2008 Entry Time:0925 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Craig Farm #2 Owner Email:
Owner: Debra L Craig _ _ Phone: [phone]
�
Mailing Address: 440 Selah Church Rd Goldsboro NC 275309729
Physical Address:
W
Facility Status: ❑Compliant ❑Not Compliant Integrator: Dogwood Farms
/yy(o 8
i
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'17'30" Longitude: 78°04'46"
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. and turn left onto Herring Road. Go 1/2 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd took for farm sign.
Question Areas:
N Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
IN Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ron J Craig Operator Certification Number: 19221
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ron Craig Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jesse Craig Phone:
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
-
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra i_ Craig Facility Number : 960006
Inspection pate. 04115/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw CoC and permit.
The WUP dated 6/13/07 seen onsite differed from the older DWQ copy. A copy of the new WUP will be requested for the DWQ
WaRO.
WARS (lbs N/1000 gallon):
4/9/07 0.31
8/13/07 0.92
2/28108 1.2
*All samples are taken from the primary (0) lagoon, which is the irrigation source for their fields.*
SG cutting was seen occurring today on field #3 (T9047). Field #4 (T9047) is across the road from the farm. IRR-2 forms indicate that
pumping occurred on fields 3&4 for BH in 2007 and again on fields 3&4 for the overseed in 2008; there is a waste analysis result
pending for the 4111/08 pumping on BH (field #4). Remember to have the certified operator and owner sign the bottom of the IRR2 or
combined IRR1-2 forms. PAN rates were balanced.
2007 soil report: 1.1 T/Ac lime required (sample #1); highest Znl-80 (sample #1), highest Cut-170 (sample #2). Lime applied per Mr.
Craig.
#20. The 90-day Plan of Action (POA) was not onsite for lagoon #1 (Thick=6.1% LTZ=2.1'). Follow up contact will be made to the
Wayne Co NRCS office, as it was explained that they have prepared one for this farm. A subsequent check will be made for the POA
in the Division of Water Quality records.
#25. Although the 2006 sludge survey results have been documented in previous inspections (results written above), there was no
2007 sludge survey records onsite.
Reel and gun calibration results (11/13/07): 1.08" ring, 50psi @gun; 165gpm expected, 162gpm measured. Next calibration due
before 2010.
Rainfall records were acceptable and lagoon level records were adequate.
2007 crop yield records: 24 bales rye and 182 bales of BH.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner -Facility: Debra L Craig
Facility Number : 960006
Inspection Date: 04/1512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 1,016
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
24.00
agoon
2HS
19.00
24.00
agoon
3HS
l OY23198
19.50
41.00
agoon
4HS
19.00
25.00
agoon
5HS
1 OJ23/98
19.50
25.00
agoon
6HS
10123/98
19.50
23.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number : 960006
Inspection Date: 04115/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0000
Discharge originated at:
Structure O
Application Field n
Other D
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
n
b_ Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
D
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
D
D
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
D
D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
D
■
D
D
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
O
■
n
O
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
D
■
D
D
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management D
■
D
D
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
D
■
D
D
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
D
D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
■
D
D
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
D
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
O
Frozen Ground?
D
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? O
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Inspection Date: 04/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Nay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■ n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ■ n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■ n n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number : 960006
Inspection Date: 0411512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? [l
Maps? n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
■
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Yae
Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? D ■ n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 ■ ❑ Q
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air D Q ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Inspection Date: 04/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

k
N Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960006 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: ILVavne - Region: Washingtgn
Date of Visit: 07/24/2009 Entry Time: 12:15 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: Craig Farm #2 Owner Email:
Owner: Debra L Craig Phone: [phone]f44
Mailing Address: 440 Selah Church Rd Goldsboro NC 275309729
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Dogwood Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°17'30" Longitude: 78°04'46'
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. and turn left onto Herring Road. Go 1/2 Mile and turn left on Landfill Rd look for farm sign 112 mile on the
left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jesse Brian Craig Operator Certification Number: 992564
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
11/13/07 EXPECT 165 ACTUAL 162 SOIL SAMPLES 1117108
SLUDGE SURVEY 0=1.4(08) LIME APPLIED AS REQUIRED
6/3108 N=1.1
10/23/08 N=1.1 POA IN PLACE FOR #1 LAGOON
3127109 N=1.2
7/9/09 N=0.75
SLUDGE SURVEY IS NEEDED FOR 1,4,6 IN 2009> SLUDGE PLAN NEEDED BEFORE MOVING ANY SLUDGE- CONTACT
REGIONAL OFFICE BEFORE MOVING AS REQUIRED
TRANSFER RECORDS IN BOOK
RECORDS COMPLETE AND ORGANIZED
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig
Inspection Date: 07/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 1,010
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
23.00
agoon
2HS
19.00
23.00
agoon
3HS
10/23/98 -
19.50
28.00
agoon
4HS
19.00
23.00
agoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
23.00
agoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
28.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 07/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
DischaMes & Stream Impacts R Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
❑
0
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
moo
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
moo
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
In
■
o
o
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 07/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? 1-1
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Q
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
❑ n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n n
1& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner- Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 07/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n 0 0 n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n ■ n
Cl
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n ■ n
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ n
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ n
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n ■ ❑
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n ■ n
n
Other Issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n ■ n
n
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those Q ■ ❑ n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Q ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: Debra L Craig Facility Number; 960006
Inspection Date: 07/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Q ■ O O
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■p0
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960006 . Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960006 tJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wavne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0212612007 Entry Time:11:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Herrina Swine Inc Owner Email:
Owner: E Lewis Herring Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1123 US 13 S Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. to Herring Road 1/2 Mile S. on Herring Road to list bridge, turn in drive at Brick House behind pond & go to
farm.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Ron Craig Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Ron Craig Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
1-20-06 = 1.2
6-15-06 = .98
8-14-06 = .34
12-28-06 = .27
Soil test 4-5-06
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring Jr Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 02/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 1,000
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSLW: 433,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
agoon
2HS
19.00
26.00
IL agoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
33.00
agoon
4HS
19.00
agoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
28.00
agoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
25.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring Jr Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 02/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream ImpactS Yes No NA NE
1 _ is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treat ment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring Jr -
Inspection Date: 02/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
Cl ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility. fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Cl ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring Jr Facility Number; 960006
Inspection Date: 02/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields? .
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring Jr Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 02/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Vn Mn MA Nr-
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency -�-
Facility Number: 960006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960006 t_i Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cornpliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: 03/07/2006 Entry Time:08:20 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Herring Swine Inc Owner Email:
Owner: E Lewis Herrina Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1123 US 13 S _ Goldsboro NC g7530
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant- ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Farm Location: U-S. 13 S. to Herring Road 1/2 Mile S. on Herring Road to 1 st bridge, turn in drive at Brick House behind pond & go to
farm.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone -
24 hour contact name Ron J Craig Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jesse Craig Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring
Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/0712006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC & Permit available on site
Current WUP dated 12/10/97
Waste Analysis (For lagoon # 1 from which waste is pumped:
1/20/2006 = 1.2
9130/05 = 0.95
5/27/05 = 1.0
2/22/05 = 0.71
Soil test report dated 10/18/2005, Cu & Zn levels ok, P-1 levels high (>100) for sample 002 & 003 from field 4
Reviewed pumping records. Rebalance PAN using correct waste analysis (1.2PAN/1000gal) for the pumping on 12/21/2005 and
similarly for August 2005.
Freeboard levels recorded weekly.
Rainfall recorded. Continue to initial rains >1".
Remember to secure irrigation calibration and sludge survey by 9/30/2006
Reviewed stocking and mortality records
(21) Missing crop yield records for 2005. Producer given CROP1 form
Practice weed control and remove trash/debris from lagoons 4 & 5.
(7) Need to stabilise dike wall of lagoon #6 (isolation), by filling with clayey soils and compacting to appropriate slope (e.g. 1:3).
Page: 2

Permit:. AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,000 973
Total Design Capacity: 1,000
Total SSI-W: 433,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1 HS
10/23/94
19.50
23.00
agoon
2HS
19.00
23.00
agoon
3HS
10/23/98
19.50
25.00
agoon
4HS
19.00
23.00
agoon
5HS
10/23/98
19.50
23.00
agoon
6HS
10/23/98
19.50
34.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960006 owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 0=712006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field .❑
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ n n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ n ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
n
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
o
■
o
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
n
Cl
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Hering
Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application -
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Orangeburg
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16_ Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring Facility Number : 960006
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
Design?
Maps? n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? - E D ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
D
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
D
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
D
■
D
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
D
■
D
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q
n
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
D
D
D
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? D ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those D ■ D D
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960006 Owner - Facility: E Lewis Herring
Facility Number: 960006
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewCnspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
Q
C1
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl
■
n
n
c
Page: 7

d
Facility Number
0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: �`� :;� Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: r'Owner Email:
Owner Name: t G" Phone: q hi A
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: Facility Contact: -V l j Title: Wn.-t,�� Phone No: gI e1ll
Onsite Representative: Integrator: is
Certified Operator: � Operator Certification Number: `17.Z /
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o = . = Longitude: = ° = 6
e- M / i "` lZ ew(!>-
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Fe der to Finish
Ckfarrow to Wean "ICJ
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dat Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o
2</
El NA
El NE
❑ Yes
, _
IYJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Nuhtber: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2'N' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �� 1i s�3L'j� L'&—
Spillway?: yBS Ves WAS 4
Designed Freeboard (in): ! /q
Observed Freeboard (in): o2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes L;d'IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) ,��
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes i0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Ltd No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [�Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? /
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifi [:]Application Outside of Area
12. CroP t'Pe(s) ��/�r�- G f ;1 /Sig
13. Soil type(s) KA
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendationsA94?0
other
Use drawings of facility to bettere Aexplain Situations. (usd _
Irk No
.❑ NA
❑ NE
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
El NE
��o
li_� N o
❑ NA
❑ NE
IRNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
p, 00 ,� ,tom �-
�1 ,77- sow; n
Reviewer/Inspector Name G�/j,�s ��� z J Phone: 'Z-5—zle�q $- Z
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? I�f es, check
Yes
El NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists El Design El Maps IYJ Other
f'0
#1 J
61�,%b4'
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application [I Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections E] Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
L7 No❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[,D I No NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
ElR Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ( c ',,;, s;V
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes ❑//No ElNA ElNE
ElYes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ONA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
9<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
L-►J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
2<E
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
53<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
M4
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: /._ .e e L n ,.._ �„�Ii—m n <'
�f d1 *'�_3 C7 qf3) ar- -l- -(n"4k
�ai A�-J �;r-TO Sf�t) - •tL✓osg n'0j .4lr--
_ 14V44Is
J�z 7 W
0 h
41
saw c✓r�,t Qr ��°� r �`/!�-, ° I3�L!„-P-., g� i`�"`•�
l
M4.4C Stirr S•t%(yr� &--­(x4-L �<__
12128104

• Reaullremeint a Nondischa a NPDES
1. Annual Certiflcatio/
(including sludge eveluatio Due March 1 each'year
& Ma
Z. PLAT N/A.at this time Due .1BD days after
r�eivinnotification letter'
3. Sludge evaluations First one due. by 9.30.06
(required for all structures} Required annually after first Required annually'
one. is completed
First one due by 9.30.06
4. Calibrations ' ' Required every other year Required annually .
after first one is comoieted
S. Retain records 3 Y§ars 5 ears
Submit major changes with Submit any changes with
5. 'Waste plan changes explanation to regional explanation to regional
DWQ within 30 caie d DWQ. with! n, 10. working
days da'vs
',,Date
of report must be,
Date of report must be
7. Waste analysis V
within 60 days before/after.
within 60 days before/after
al3plIcation"event -od'
apolication event
"
B: Soil sample analysis Ll
Re uired annually
1 Required annuals
I
* H requirement
lime needed < 1 ton/acre
1 time neede3 t 1 ton acre
1
* Zinc Indexes
500 for peanuts (pH>6.0)
500 for peanuts (pHZ6.0)
must be less than
3000 for all crops H46.0
300.0 for all• crops H46.0
i
* Copper indexes
must be less than
3000 fob all.crops
3000 for all crops
I
9. Deep soil sample analysis "
N/A unless PLAT required
I Report d== < i year old
and by cer-:Ifted lab for PLAT
;
? 0. Weekly waste level
( Required
i
Required
records
_11. Daily_ rainfall records
Required
TRequired__
_
12,, Initlais &:date;verifying y
..
; q;'
wastesystem,was checked(..It4i
t ,
R,egUl.red �i,---t�
Required) i, -;« I
.after �preclpitation��1':0.•ir.3ch
+
and at least -monthly1
i
13. Crop yield. records
Required
i Required t
14. Stocking & mortality
Required
Required
records
15, Transfer records when
Required .
Required
applicable
16, Weather codes & initials
for 120 minute Irrigation "
, Required
i Required
system check (top, records) -
Last revised 5.3.05 - Compiled by DSWC

1
WASTE ANALYSES (PAN ibs/100.0 gal:)
Date PAttE_, Da PAN.
Dade .. PAN --
Date-
. PAN
PAN,.`
Date PAN
--:—Date
TD�
Pate'
PAN
Date
PAN
Date'. PAN__ _ _
Ip�
Date
PAN
Date
PAN-*.-;.,
Date PAN
ID,I.+
Date,
PAN
Date
PAN
Dates _ „ PANS,
ID,—
Date
PAN _
Date '
PAN
Date —PAN.
SOIL ANALYSES last Report.Dated • Highest liming T/acre
Copper and zinc Indexes within.acceptable range (check)
WASTE LEVEL DROP IN STRUCTURE
Structure, ID. Date of drop for preceding week � Dropped by inches
Dropped consistent with application events, and/or transfer records (check)
Structure iD Date of drop for preceding week— Dropped by inches
Dropped consistent with application events anal/or.transfer records (check)
WUP dated
STRUCTURE DESIGN INFORMATION
Structure ID_____
Design date
Storage Time
days • .
Structural freeboard= inches
25 year/24 hr.-storm=
inches.
Second storm
if applicable = Inches E
Red zone =
. inches
Stop pump =
.__.__✓lnches
Structure ID--Desigh date
Storage Time • days
Structural freeboard= inches
25 year/24 hr storm= inches
Second store if applicable = inches
Red zone =.'Inches
Stop pump = . inches
Structure ID Design date
Storage Time days
Structural; free bo&d= - inches
25 year/24 hr•storm-winches ,'.,
Second storm If applicable. =inches ;
Red zone = Inches
Stop pump = ;lriches
Structure ID Design date
Storage Time .__✓_.days • .
Structural freeboard= lnches
25 year/24 hr storm= lnches
Second storm if applicable nchar
Red zone = - Inches
Stop pur►p = Inches

p cility96-6
Subject: Re: Facility 96-6
From: "Miressa D. Garoma" <mir-essa.garonia@ncmalLnet>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:21:53 -0400
To: Eric Newsome <Eric.Newsome a ncmail.net>
Eric,
I have not received sludge reduction POA from Craig farm.
Miressa
At 06:35 PM 4/22/2008, you wrote:
Hi Thomas and Miressa,
Have either of you by any chance seen a 90 day plan of action form in your files for a Craig Farm #2 (facility no. 9676)? It might be listed
under the name of "Herring Farm". Apparently they had a sludge survey test on 8/30/2006, with 6.1 ft of sludge thickness and 1.2 ft of
liquid treatment zone depth.
Thank you,
Eric
"It behooves every (one) to remember that the work of the critic is
of altogether secondary importance, and that in the end, progress is
accomplished by the (one) who does things." -Theodore Roosevelt
Miressa D. Garoma
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
NC Dept of Environment & Natural Resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
[phone] office
[phone] fax
I of 1 4/24/2008 10:07 AM

WKI�L
N
E
L
u
c I ..
L
1

Op Review 2007 (Craig Farm #2, 96-6)
*Sludge survey dated 8/30/06. 6.I' LTZ 1.2'
44.Applying- micro to reduce sludge. Need to be in compliance by 2009. Permit ends
2009. Need to complete 90 days sludge reduction plan- send copy to WARO-DWQ
*Irrigation col. Reel from Craig #1. Place copy in records.
*Planning to add new Coastal Bermuda Field to WUP.Contact tech spec.
*Lime applied 2006. Receipt in records
*Transfer records waste reviewed
*Reviewed crop yields
*There have been no irrigation events on CB up to this inspection.
*Reviewed stocking records
*Rainfall recorded daily
*Lagoon levels recorded weekly.
Lat=

Division: of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation _
= O Qther.Agency -
Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 6 Date of Visit: 7-7-Z004 Time: 815
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted N Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name: ....................................................................................... County: W..aYje.......
WAR .......
OwnerName: E Davis ................................. Hlr1 ximg..dk............................................... Phone No: 9]9- 9- 4 G.................................. .........................
MailingAddress: 11z3.U.S.13..5......................................................................................... Ga1d5bQX.Q. JC............................ .. Z.7.53.Q ..............
Facility Contact:ROA&TOJI&....................................................... Title: 1pmem.................................. .................. Phone No: 91.9:€.89-21Q.(..............
Onsite Representative: RoA1.CCtlllg.................................................................................... Integrator:)k'IeAClxll�l].Sx l �rcl.ka�'tI1S.R1 �[QI h..........
—Certified 0peraloL:,QA,1, _ ..._..................1CA ................................................. Operator Certification Number:192,2�.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: U.S. 13 S. to Herring Road 1/2 Mile S. on Herring Road to Ist bridge, turn in drive at Brick House behind
pond & go to farm.
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� Uµ
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity population Cattle
Cavacitv Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
JE3 Layer
I
I
I[] Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
I
j[] Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
1000
[3 Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finishj
Total Design Capacity
1,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
433,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 6
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inclies): 27" 27" 31" 21" 21" 22"
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 96-6 Date of Inspection 7-7-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
N No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Au Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Records available
Waste analysis - most current @ NCDA lab.
Make sure to check with P. Herring for a soil test dated 2003 - last one available was dated 2002
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
Awaiting next waste analysis and when the results come back the Nitrogen will be balanced out then.
o irrigation events since 2002 until June 2004. Prior to March 2004, the farm held just over 50 % of the design.
Grounds around the farm is well managed.
Ouestions 31-35 -NA
you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481.
Reviewer/Inspector Name L}
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
B. Hardison
Date:
12112103
Continued

'Facility Number: 96-6 Date of Inspection 7-7-2004
Reauired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ AnnuaI Certification Form
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
[Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12112103

Facility Number 96 6
Date of Visit: 9-6-2002 1 Time: 0
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified
13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Malmo Sim Im
County: Wayjw__________ W ARO _
Owner Name: R I awis NRr�to..L�
— Phone No: 912=M-2416 ._.....
Mailing Address: 1123 US 13 S
NC _-- 27530.......
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone No: _.
Onsite Representadve: Ig3da Arming
_ Integrator pt=iwn
Certified Operator. Sto 1_ HerrhM
Operator Certification Number. 20455 _.......
Location of Farm:
?arm Location: U.S. 13 S. to Herring Road 1/2 Mile S. on Herring Road to 1st bridge, turn in drive at Brick House �behind-
xmd & go to farm.
M Shine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �° �� Longitude �• �' ��
Design Current _Design : Current Design z Current -
Swine Canacdv Poonlalion Poultr9 _Canacrtv Ponulatronr Cattle Canacrtv=Ponulation_
❑ Wean to Feeder
-
[I Feeder to Finish
M Farrow to Wean
1000
700
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ cAts
❑Boars
Other
Total De di
Capacity- 1,000
d SSL __ 433,000
lvpm`ber of j�goons 6 . 1❑ Subsurface Drams Present H❑ Lagouu Area
Holding Ponds 1 So6dfiraps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
10Spray Frelrl Area ,'
5 Y {
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
M No
Discharge originated at -. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes'
❑ No
b. If discharge is obsen•ed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
M No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
M No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: .. 1 2 _--- 1 - 4 5
6_... _........
Freeboard (inches): _. _._ ___-- ---- 33------ --- 41 ___... 23'._.------ _._._..- ? _�
__ ._--_-41..........
....

Facility Number. 96--6 Date of Inspection FiZ2002
Cuntuiueu
5- Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Cie/ trees, severe erosion.
_ _ seepage, etc.)
6_ Are there strocttires on -site which -are not p�perlp aMdressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yea, and the situation poses an
_ immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW Q)
7. Do any of the structures need cefmmprorvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9_ Do am stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Ak►piication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelmiprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes ® No
[:]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes lR No
❑ Yes ® No
11 Do the receiving crops differ ,%ith those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility Wk adequate acreage for hand application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre dsieermination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a hick of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP,"checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(id discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
2 ; - Did Reviewer4nspector fail to dismn reviewImspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
V►:4 ,
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or defkie cks were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
o1s:ter an aulEaimi Mtn o]CY^r eooin ns or aiwote>F—"
ages as necessary): ❑ Field - Copy ❑ Final Notes
:orris available for review.
Herring farms the land and pulls the soil samples. Must continue to obtain copies of the results for your records.
irrigation needed this year therefore no records_ The houses are flushed with recycle wastewater,
aboard levels are recorded weekly as required
:orris are organized
itinue to address the bare spots on the dike wall.
Tt
Reviewerflnspector Name iyn B.Aaidison
Reviewerdnsaector Signature: Date:

05103101
Continued
Facility Number. 96-6 Date of Inspection iZ2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or belois
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Is there any evidence of cvmd drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt
❑ Yes
® No
roads building sttuclme, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
0 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
�.sOEM
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481.
ZIM�
- -3 G

_t
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: 8:00 am Printed on: 10/4/2001
9/11l2001
p Not Operational p Below'I lireBelow's o
Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Herring Swine Inc County:..W.ayne................................................ .WA.KO.......
Owner Name: E. Lewis Herring, Jr. Phone No: 919-689-2416 (W)
MailingAddress: 1123-ES13.Snath.............................. ........ :......... _........ I..................... Goldsbaro..NC...................................................... Z75311..............
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative: Lewis.Herring........................................................................... Integrator: DogwnoAFArins.............................................
.......
v.rr+ ................... Operator Certification N._mber;2n455...... ..... ............
Location of Farm: -
ZarinLocation: U.S. 13 S. to Herring Road 112 Mile S. on Herring Road to Ist bridge, turn in drive at Brick House e m
iond & go to farm.
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� �« Longitude =• �° O
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to mis
® Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ ayer I❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 1 1❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,000
Total SSLW 433,000
I Number of Lagoons 6 1❑ Juusuriace crams Present IIp Lagoon Area Ip spray view Area I I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ o Liquidys Waste Management em
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes g No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? na
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... .......... Recycle .......... ......... Recycle.... ...... ....... ..Recycle.......... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... 2-7............... ............... 2I................ .............. .29................ ............... 20................ ............... 20............ :.................... 4.4 ...............

s ) -
ace i y Number: 96-6 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 10/4/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes H No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN p Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans. Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? (3 Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre -determination? �. 13 Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
©No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
LNo violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility:#o better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary). © Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Records available for review.
Soil analysis - could not find 1999 results. Make sure to obtain a copy of these results (annually) from Pat Herring.
Hadn't irrigated this year, therefore, no irrigation records or waste analysis. Change in lagoon level in lagoon I
Wastewater is transferred from #1 & 92 to 93 which is used as recycle water. 45 lagoon is connected to 44; both are ,
recycle.
Vegetation on dike wall is well established. SEE PAGE 3
Z.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B 1 ardison entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/inspector Signature: l Date: /n—_D r

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: 96_6 Date of Inspection Printed on: 10/4/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes O No
Croplandis tended by Pat Herring.
May want to irrigate this year to lower lagoons to prepare for winter months.
Continue to address the weeds and high vegetation along the inside of dike wall.
Practice weed control upon need.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.
'Vl

. {. OF \NAT�A
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
>_ Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
tr
Washington Regional
Date: October 8, 2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general. these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
��.� l' 1 5 TCC A 2 1 C 12 7 and tin fi
(G) fire farm i5 CDu—r�riYlrig with requirements of life State RuaeS 1 1;.,nC H.OG 17, JCnatC Bnfl 1 , �,. C Cer�..ed Amoral
Waste -Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit therefore, these items must be implemented:
The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoonststorage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year. 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
qr An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
qr Soil analysis is required annually.
(p The following records are required off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/sod analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land gWlicatton rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
() The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by properly
managing supervising and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the responsibility to certify
monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her ditties can result in a letter of reprimand,
suspension of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1.2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit O• Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 10/18/2000 Time: 1150 Printed on: 10/27/2000
96 6
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
E Permitteo X Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: Herrin Smat.110.t................................. .................................................... County:!'!'.aYne........................... .................... WARf,?.......
Owner Name: L.U.w.is....... ..................... Hrjrrimg..dx.............................................. Phone No: 419-fi&9- 91k.(t?Rxltl.................. _.... ............ _..
32�ili`yContact: ............... _..... .... ... _...... .................................... _.. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ........... ................... ..... _... ......
Mailing Address: 11.23_IJS_13 . ............................................ G.QldSb.O.cQ...N.0....................................... 2.Z53lL...... ....
Onsite Representative: 1RXY lS.11e[IAn ............... _..... _..... _............. _.................. ._.... Integrator: A.O>; iY0Ql1.k Arms ..........
........................... .........
Certified Operator:,5teXen_....__...... ._................ Rvrfing..................... .................... .. Operator Certification Number
Location of Fsrm:
arm Location: U.S. 13 S. to Herring Road 1/2 Mile S. on Herring Road to 1st bridge, turn in drive at Brick House behind
and & go to farm.
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �° �� Longitude �• �� ��
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine CaDacitv Po ulation
Poultry
Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
i Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
1000
665
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity 1,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW 433,000
❑ B
I
Number of Lagoons © ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps E= ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Discharges o. Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in oal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Trep=ment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........$imaty..1._.... ..... Srcondary..2_... ..... SecandaLy.3..... ............ Small ............ ............ Small ............ ............Small............
Freeboard (inches): 27 27 28 30 30 57

5100 Continued on back
Facility Number: 96-6 Date of Inspection 10/18/2000 Printed on: 10127/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc_)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? _
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) Thin facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21.'Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
0 Nd.violations or :defieiencies were noted dui-ing•this vigit:: Y00 will reeeive no further
correspondence about this.visit. ::::::::::::::::.:::::::::: :::
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Records available for review.
Farm has more storage capacity than needed.
Hadn't needed to irrigate this year - no waste samples needed.
Soil analysis up through 1999 (dated 116/00) available. Make sure to secure another one by December
14- W W V.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
The records are well organized.
The grounds are well kept. SEE PAGE 3 �.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn Hardison Entered by Ann Tyndall

' Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: 96-6 Date of Inspection 10/l8/2000 Printed on: 10/27/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.
Lagoon setup below:
3 �
sino

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. E. Lewis Herring, Jr.
Herring Swine Inc.
1123 US 13 S.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
070.0?VA
,a4qj
Ap-
CAE R
NORTH CAROLI NA Dee- .RTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANO NAkruFRAL RE:scxjRGES
January 24, 2000
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Herring Swine Inc.
Facility No. 96 - 6
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Herring, Jr.:
On December 2, 1999, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced
facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kepi; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
(--:� . CLKo�,,,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Wayne County SWCD Office O
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, Forth Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Facility Number 96 6 Date of Inspection 12/2/99
Time of Inspection ]0:20 AM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not OperationalOperationall Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Rcrring.S.viae.Inc....................................................................................... County: lJayne....................................... ........ WAQ.......
Owner Name: E,..1.w.is................................. H rrinl; Lr................................................ Phone No: 4a.9-b89- 91.b...........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: I123.US..I..S......................................................................................... GoldsboroN.0 ..................................................... ;.7.53.0 .............
Onsite Representative: BtIddy..W.QrIeX........................................................................... Integrator: A9$rio.Qf1.korlAls
................. ............ ........ ....... .......
Certified Operator:StQX.f.I1..L................................ kludog....................... ..................... Operator Certification Number:ZO.4SS........................
......
Location of Farm:
Farm Location: U-S. 13 S. to Herring Road 1/2 Mile S. on Herring Road to 1st bridge. turn in drive at Brick HnuSe behind +
Latitude 0• =, =- Longitude =• =1 O-
Design Current
Swine Cnnnrity Pnnulntinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
1000
650
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population - Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,000
Total SSLW 433,000
Number of Lagoons © ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar2cs & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... 24 ............... ............... 2.4 ............... .............. 43 ............ ...... 3.1 ........... ............... 3.1 ................ ........ 43
................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 12/10/99

Printed on 12/10/99
Facility Number: 96-6 Date of Inspection 12 2/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding. ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0. N.6. iotations:or defic.iencies•Were:noted:duiriiigthis visit. 'Ydt :will-reeeive lair further
.. corresp ondence, about this visit.
1. No irrigation events due to design capacity of lagoons and current population.
8. Freeboard records available for review.
. Mr. Herring is planning to remove the fallen trees along two lagoon dike walls.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
`S13�-��' .JSs2. - _"fi4i 'tea �1' .�'�•-• :_ _ _ _ Yy.'. � _ 4. _
eviewer nspector ame D hn )6 Gallom _ -„ ttereil by�Auip Tynda F
Reviewer/luspector Signatur • _ g Date: k--,)--7_ZXX30

Printed on 12/10/99
Facility Number: 96-6 Date of Inspection 12/2/99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporwy cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
J
Printed on 12/10/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary 1
DEHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Section
January 8, 1996
Mr. E.L. Herring
1123 US Hwy 13 South
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27530
Subject: Animal Waste Lagoon
Facility No. 96-6
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Herring:
On September 21 and December 29, 1995 I inspected the lagoons
serving your hog farm for the purposes of evaluating the compliance
of the swine waste treatment and disposal operations with the
established rules and requirements. You were present during both of
my visits.
The evaluations consisted of inspecting the lagoons which
treat the waste from approximately 6,500 animals in order to
determine (a) compliance with freeboard requirements (the lagoon
water level in relation to the lowest point of the dike wall), (b)
the erosion severity of the lagoon dikes and (c) the presence of
illegal devices such as discharge pipes.
During both visits it was observed that the lagoons had
sufficient freeboard. Animal waste lagoons are required to maintain
a minimum of nineteen inches of freeboard. Your lagoons had
approximately 2-feet of freeboard or better.
The purpose of my second visit was to follow up on a report
that hunters had discovered a discharge pipe leading from one of
your lagoons. On my December 29th visit I did find such a pipe.
The pipe was obscured from sight during my first visit due to the
presence of heavy vegetation. Such a pipe requires a permit.
The pipe was clogged with dirt, solids and weeds and had not
discharged in quite some time. It is doubtful that it could
discharge unless it were cleaned out first.
This letter is written to acknowledge my visits and our
conversation regarding the pipe. You agreed to remove that portion
of the pipe that could be removed without disturbing the dike and
that you would fill the remaining portion of pipe with concrete and
cap it. —
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. E.L. Herring
January 8, 1996
-You are reminded that it is a violation of North Carolina
General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the surface waters
(farm ditches, creeks streams, etc) of the State without a permit.
The Division of Environmental Management has the authority to levy
a fine of not more than $10,000 per day for the unpermitted
discharge of wastewater into the surface waters of the State.
Please note that in order to prevent an overland discharge while
spray irrigating, a buffer of twenty-five feet must be maintained
from any drainage system (ditch, swale, canal, stream, etc.).
I will reinspect your facility in the future. Until then,
should you have any questions in regard to this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Barry Adams
Environmental Chemist
cc Lundy Packing Inc.
Patricia Gabriel, NRCS
Dianne Wilburn
WARO AFO files

w 4
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. q4'--- �
!3"c S � o�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA ONS SITE VISITATION RECORD �
Date: 5�� l K
( , 1995 1
Time: ;
n-7 - C__scitl ' No. of Animals on Site: 60n
Wi DEM Certification No. • CE D M Certification No.: ACNEW �^
Latitude: ��� .1 Longitude: LT_ - ( ( Elevation: Ft
circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approxim tely 1 Ft + 7 in) to or No
Actual Freeboard: TO Ft � Inches Low-,4 o�
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or
Was any erosion observed? es or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No `_2 COAJ'n' /
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS m$nimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Per do 100 Ft from Wells? Ye r No
Is the nimal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes o
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acr ge with cov ropy? Yes oxN
'F_� r—) i-, Z P V )�IA
nsp c..cr N me Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

Id ri) d
PI H tl
W H X
(D W
H C
E H
o M
H
H
H
N
z

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: - v2 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: QAALkJ1Ri�lw �J %`'�'�- la"c,
Mailing Address: _ cr /U
County: -01�
Integrator. ; Phone:
On Site Representati e: Phone.J7 yo
Physical Address/Lccaticn: ,'atec4 S ! -2
Type of --'Operation: Swine"_ Poultry Cattle
^=-:..- Ce,L_city: G,�j No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification No : ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: 1� eC( Longitude: -��� , Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) <Cebor No
Actual Freeboard: Ft Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or Jo
Was any erosion observed? Yes or io
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes r No
Is the cover crop adequate? es or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Yes r No 100 Ft from Wells? No
No
Is the al waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or No
Is animal waste and applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes olcNo
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state
sys ;em, cr other =_imilar�man-made devices? Yes c
r
man-made ditch, flushing
Do(fd�'he f'dcility maintain adequaf-e waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acre e ith cover rop . Yes or No
4
Inspectcr NaAe 5i nature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Sack of Sheet
OA 919
W

♦ V
DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Sketch:
-
�l
�eve� I
IN
� U
L
4-/