960005_INSPECTIONS_20171231

2 v
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Out

INSPECTIONS-
INSPECTION-S
I NSPE-CT 0 S
I' N

0
Division of Water Resources
F-1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El
Other Agency
Facility Number. 960005
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960005
Denied Access
Iripsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 01110/2017 Entry Time: 08:15 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Gwendolyn Peecfin Anderson Phone-
919-734-5299
Mailing Address: 1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Add I ress: . 3555 Stevens Mill Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: Compliant
Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude. 35' 20'05" Longitude:
78' 09'29"
Farm lies on SIR 1008 (Stevens Mill Rd), between SR1211 (Sambo Lambert Rd) and SIR 1224 (Ferry Bridge Rd)-10 miles west of
Goldsboro.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts
Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other issues
Certified Operator: Billy Keith Hill
Operator Certification Number:
986441
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
Phone
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis N
10-5-16 1.02
7-28-16 1.05
5-27-16 1.32
Calibration 5-26-2016
Due 2018.
Lagoon Sludge Survey 5-26-2016
LTZ 4,9
Pump Intake 44
Thickness 3-8
Soil Report -taken November 2016.
page: I

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/10/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,350 7,415
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
-Total SSLW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 05/03/94 19,00 27.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/10/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
1:1
0 1:1
El
Discharge originated at:
Structure
El
Application Field
Other
El
a. Was conveyance man-made?
11
0 El
El
b, Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
El
M El
0
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
El
0 El
E]
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El
MEI
1:1
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
El
0 1:1
1:1
State other than from a discharge?
Waste CGIIeCtiGn. StoraLge & Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0 0
El
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5- Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
El
0 El
1:1
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6- Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
El
0 11
El
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
0
0 El
11
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
El
M El
1:1
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
El 0 El 1:1
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
F-1, MOE]
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
El
Frozen Ground?
R
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
El
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
page: 3

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number.- 960005
Inspection Date: 01/10/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
E]
0 El
E]
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the inigation design or wettable acre
E]
E E]
E]
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18- Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El
No
1:1
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
El
0 1:1
El
20 Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
El
0 El
El
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
1:1 0 El 1:1
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
El
Waste Analysis?
El
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
El
page: 4

� . '4
Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility : Gwendolyn Peedin Anc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/10117 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ke
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
El
Sludge Survey
El
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)*?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
El
0 El
El
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
El
0 El
El
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El
E El
El
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
1:1
0 El
El
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
El
0 1-1
1-1
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately-
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
El
E El
El
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
El
Lagoon / Storage Pond
El
Other
El
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
11
0 E]
El
CAVVWIP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
1:1
0 El
1:1
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
E]
0 1:1
11
page: 5

il
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
EJ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960005
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS960005
El Denied Access
Iripsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit.
Routine
County:
Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
0412212DI6 Entry Time: 08:20 am Exit Time: 9:50
am Incident #
Farm Name:
Donnie Peedin Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Phone:
919-734-5299
Mailing Address:
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:
3555 Stevens Mill Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status:
E Compliant El
Not Compliant Integrator:
Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35* 20'05" Longitude:
78' 09' 29"
Farm lies on SR 1008 (Stevens Mill Rd), between SR1211 (Sambo Lambert Rd) and SR
1224 (Ferry Bridge Rd)-10 miles west of
Goldsboro,
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other issues
Certified Operator: Billy Keith Hill Operator Certification Number: 986441
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date-.
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Report N
3-7-16
1.28
1-7-16
1.31
9-1-2015
0.60
6-2-2015
1.19
Calibration
10-23-2014 due 2016.
Soil Report
4-22-2013 due 2016.
Lagoon Sludge
Survey 10-8-15
LTZ. 5.1
Thickness
3.6
Pump Intake
4.4
Due 2016.
pagei 1

4
Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number� 960005
Inspection Date: 04/22116 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7.350 2,647
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Total SSLW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 05103/94 19.00 25.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 04/22/16 Iripsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1 - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El
0 El
El
Discharge originated at:
Structure
E]
Application Field
El
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
El
0 11
0
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
El
0 1:1
1:1
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
E]
0 11
El
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
E]
M El
1:1
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
E]
0 El
E]
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
El
01:11]
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
1:1
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
El
M 1:1
11
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
1:1
0 El
E]
waste management or closure plan?
7- Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
1:1
0 E]
1:1
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
E]
0 0
E]
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
El
0 1:1
11
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
El M 1:1 El
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
El M El E]
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
E]
Hydraulic Overioad?
Cl
Frozen Ground?
El
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs-?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incotporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
E]
Outside of acceptable crop window?
El -
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
page: 3

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility -1 Gwendolyn Peedin Anc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 04/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other7
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Yes No Na No
E] 01:11:1
1:1 E 1:1 El
1:1 01:11:1
El 0 El 1:1
1:1 E 11 El
Yes No Na Ne
El 01:11:1
1:1 01:11:1
0 0 0 1:1
E]
EJ
E]
page: 4

4
Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 04/22/16 Iripsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit- Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
E]
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
El
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
1:1
0 11
El
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
0
0 El
El
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
11
0 El
1:1
25- Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
01311
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
El
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26� Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
El
E El
11
27� Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El
0 El
El
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
1:1
E El
El
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
El
0 El
El
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
1:1
E El
El
(i-e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
1:1
EIJEJ
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
E]
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
E]
0 1:1
El
CAWIVIP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
El
E El
E]
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
1:1
0 E]
11
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
960005 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960005
E] Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
03/03/2015 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:55 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Donnie Peedin Farm Owner Email;
[e-mail]
Owner:
Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Phone:
919-734-5299
Mailing Address:
1672 Old Smithfield Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:
3555 Stevens Mill Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status:
Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 20'05" Longitude:
78'09'29"
Farm ties on SIR 1008 (Stevens Mill Rd), between SR1211 (Sambo Lambert Rd) and SR 1224 (Ferry Bridge Rd)—*10 miles west of
Goldsboro.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Billy Keith Hill Operator Certification Number: 986441
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Hill Phone [phone]
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis Lagoon N Compost N
2/9/15 1.44 16.8 15.0
10/2/14 0.81
7110/14 1,81
4/21/14 1.83
Soil Report 3129113=due 2016.
Calibration 10-23-14=due 2016.
Lagoon Sludge Survey 1 Of23114=due 2015.
T=5,9
PI=3_4
LTZ=5.3
Pumping Records and Rainfall checks out good.
Crop Yield=good.
page: 1

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility : Gwendolyn Peedin Ani: Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 03/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,350 7,116
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Tota I SSLW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 05/03194 19,00 21.00
page: 2

Permit. AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: , 03/03/15 Iripsection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
E]
0 El
11
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a� Was conveyance man-made?
D
M El
El
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
El
00
El
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
El
0 El
El
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
11
No
El
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
El
0 El
El
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, StGrage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
El
0 El
El
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
El
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
M El
El
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
El
0 El
El
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
El
0 El
1:1
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
El
MED
E]
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any pad of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
El
M 1:1
El
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
E] 0 El El
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
M El El
If yes, check the a ppropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
El
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
El
PAN?
El
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
El
Total Phosphorus?
F1
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
E]
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
El
Application outside of application area?
13
page: 3

Perm�t: AWS960005 Owner - Facility : Gwendolyn Peedin Anc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 03/03115 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sail Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Cert1fied Animal Waste
El
0 El
El
Management Plan(CAWMP)? -
15 Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El
N El
E)
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El
N El
1:1
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1:1
0 El
0
20. Does the facility fail to have'all components of the CAWMP readily available?
1:1
E E]
El
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
F1
Checklists?
El
Design?
El
Maps?
El
Lease Agreements?
1:1
Other? '
El
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
El
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
page: 4

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility : Gwendolyn Peedin Anc Facility Number:
960005
Inspection Date: 03/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El
N El
11
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
El
NE-10
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
11
E E]
1:1
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
El
0 El
E]
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
El
0 El
0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0
0 El
0
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number. 960005 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS960005
El Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 01/1412014 Entry Time: 08:30 am
Exit Time: 9:30 am Incident #
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Phone:
919-734-5299
Mailing Address: 1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 3555 Stevens Mill Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 20'05" Longitude:
78* 09' 29"
Farm lies on SR 1008 (Stevens Mill Rd), between SR1211 (Sambo
Lambert Rd) and SIR 1224 (Ferry Bridge Rd)-10 miles west of
Goldsboro.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Billy Keith Hill
Operator Certification Number:
986441
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Hill
Phone [phone]
On -site representative Keith Hill
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date,
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility : Gwendolyn Peedin Anc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/14/14 Iripsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Irrigation Calibration 10/13/12
***due again 2014—
Lagoon Survey 10/l/I 3
***due again 20114—
thickness = 3.6
LTZ = 4.7
pump intake = 4-4
WuP 10/23/08
CoC in records
OIC in records
Waste Analysis N
10/13/13 1.10
8117/13 .38
6/14/13 1.54
4123/13 1.40
Soil Test 3/29113
L = .3T
Cu & Zn levels wrin range
***due again in 2016—
crop yield record reviewed
.—send two copies of waste utlizaiton to Raleigh —
page: 2

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility : Gwendolyn Peedin Anc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/14114 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,350 7,302
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Total SSLW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 05103194 19.00 24.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/14/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
El
Application Field
1:1
Other
El
a. Was conveyance man-made?
0
M El
1:1
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
E]
M 1:1
1:1
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No No N9
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
El
0 1:1
El
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
El
M E]
1:1
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
El
M 1:1
1:1
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
0 1:1
E]
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
1:1
M 0
1:1
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
El
0 Ll
El
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Applicabon
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
E] 0 El El
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
El
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
r]
Application outside of application area?
El
page: 4

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn PeedinAnc Facility Number:
960005
Inspection Date: 01/14/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na We
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass w/
Rye Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram loamy sand,
0 to
6% slopes
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Cowarts
Soil Type 4
Norfolk loamy sand.
0 to 2%
slopes
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
1:1 0 El
E]
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El 0 El
El
16, Did the facility fait to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
0 0 El
0
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0 E El
El
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 0 El
El
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
El
E E]
El
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
El
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
El
0 El
El
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
El
Waste Analysis?
El
Soil analysis?
E]
Waste Transfers?
1:1
Weather code?
0
page: 5

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anc Facility Number:
960005
Inspection Date: 01114/14 Iripsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Crop yields?
El-
120 Minute inspections?
m
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
El
Sludge Survey
El
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0 11
0
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
0 ED
El
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El
0 1:1
El
25- Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
El
0 El
El
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
11
0 11
El
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El
0 E]
E]
Otherissues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
El
0 1:1
1:1
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
El
0 El
El
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31 - Do subsurface tile drains exist at t6e facility?
0
0 El
1:1
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
El
Lagoon / Storage Pond
El
Other
El
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
0
0 0
1:1
CAVVMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El
0 El
1:1
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El
0 1:1
1:1
page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 960005 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960005 El Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine . County: Wayne — Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01/1612013 Entry Time: 08:45 AM Exit Time: 09:45 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Donnie Peed'n Farm Owner Email: peeding0bellsouth. net
Owner: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1672 Old Smithfield Rd Goldsboro NQ 2753Q
Physical Address: 3555 Slevens Mill Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant E] Not Compliant Integrator: pre6tage UrMs Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*20'05" — Longitude: 78'09'29"
Farm lies on SR 1008 (Stevens Mill Rd), between SR1211 (Sambo Lambert Rd) and SR 1224 (Ferry Bridge Rd)--10 miles west of
Goldsboro.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat waste Appijr-ation
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Billy Keith Hill Operator Certification Number: 986441
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Hill Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Keith Hill Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: I Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 0111612013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection ReasonforVisit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
OIC card in wallet
Irrigation Calibration 10/23/2012
**due again 2014**
Lagoon Sludge Survey 5/17/12
**Due again in 2013**
thickness = 17
LTZ = 4�6
pump intake = 4.4
WUP 10/23/08
Waste Analysis N
10/09/12 = 1.23
08/25/12 = .74
6/21112 = 1.30
4/30/12 = 1.6
Soil Test 4/30/12
..soil test due again in 2013**
L = Ot
Cu & Zn levels w/in range
inigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
crop yield records reviewed
lagoon banks look good
small grain looks good
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number; 960005
Inspection Date: 01/16/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,350 2,832
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Total SSLW-. 992,250
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
3goon 1 1 1 05103/94 1 1 19.00 1 26.01
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/16/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection ReasonforVisit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 M 0 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure 0
Application Field 0
Other 0
a. Was conveyance man-made? 0 M 0 0
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
U M
U U
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
11 M
11
0
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential'adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
D M
0
0
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
El M
0
11
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
11
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
0 M
0
0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
El M
C1
0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0000
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0 0
0
0
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0 0
11
13
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0 M
0
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? 0
Hydraulic Overload? 0
Frozen Ground? 0
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? 0
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/16/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? 0
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? 11
Total Phosphorus? Cl
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? 0
Outside of acceptable crop window? 0
Evidence of wind drift? E)
Application outside of application area? 0
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
w/ Rye Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type I
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Cowarls
Soil Type 4
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 5
Wagram loamy sand, 0
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management 00011
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 E 0 0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 000 0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 N 0 0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 000 0
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 0 N 0 0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 0 E 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/16/2013 Inspection Type:. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps? 0
Lease Agreements?
Other.) 0
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 0 E 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
0
Weekly Freeboard?
0
Waste Analysis?
C-)
Soil analysis?
0
Waste Transfers?
0
Weather code?
0
Rainfall?
0
Stocking?
0
Crop yields?
0
120 Minute inspections?
0
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
0
Sludge Survey
0
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0 000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
0 N
0 C)
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0 E
0 0
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
11 000
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon 0
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

k
Permit: AWS960DO5 Owner - Facility; Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Inspection Date: 01116/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 960005
ReasonforVisit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0 E 0 D
0000
28. Did the facility fail to propefly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 0000
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional 0 M 0 0
Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility W11 to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, 0000
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? 0 M 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
11 0 0
11 0 U
11 0 0
Page: 7

t
0 Division of Water Quality
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 960005 — Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960005 E) Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne — Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0211012011 Entry Time: 08:50 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm Owner Email: [)eeding0bellsoutlh. net
Owner: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1672 "1 Smithfield Rd Qgldsboro NC. 27530
Physical Address: 3555 Stevens Mill
Facility Status: E Compliant [] Not Compliant Integrator: E!restoge Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'20'05" — Longitude: 78'09'29"
Farm lies on SR 1008 (Stevens Mill Rd), between SR1211 (Sambo Lambert Rd) and SIR 1224(Ferry Bridge Rdy-10 miles westof
Goldsboro,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator. Billy Keith Hill Operator Certification Number: 986441
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Hill Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Keith Hill Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Ronnie T Smith
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 0211012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Anaylsis: N
soil 3122/10
10/08110 .99
took 2011 aoil samples hadn't got results
8/07110 1.5
back.
6111/10 1.8
Cu & Zn levels wlin range.
4/11/10 1.7
Do you have drain tiles? No
Sludge Survey: 319/2010
SG drilled in; coming up
LTZ = 4.4
irrigation calibration done 8/9/10
thickness = 3.9
Irrigation and lagoon records correspond
pump intake = 4.4
rainfall records good.
Bermuda 2 cuttings
new CoC in records.
01C card in records.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Inspection Date: 02110/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960005
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7.350 7,469
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Total SSLW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed FreebGard
agoon I 1 1 05/03/94 1 1 19.00 IF
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number : 960005
Inspection Date: 02/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 11 M 11 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure El
Application Field 11
Other 11
a. Was conveyance man-made? 11
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 0 0
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO) 00011
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a 0 M 0 0
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
11
0 0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
0
0 0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andfor managed through a waste management 0
0 0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0 0130
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0 M
0 D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
11 000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0 MOO
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? 0 M 0 0
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? 0
Hydraulic Overload? 0
Frozen Ground? 0
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? 0
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 02/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? 13
Is PAN > 100/6/10 lbs.? 0
Total P205? 0
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? 0
Outside of acceptable crop window? 0
Evidence of wind drift? 0
Application outside of application area? 0
'crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Wagram
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 4
Norfolk loamy sand, 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 5
Cowarts
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
C) a 0 0
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 0 0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
0 0 0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0 0 0 0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 E 0 0
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0 0 0 0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0 0 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 02/1012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
WUP?
0
Checklists?
11
Design?
0
Maps?
11
Other?
0
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0
000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
C1
120 Minute inspections?
0
Weather code?
D
Weekly Freeboard?
0
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
0
Waste Analysis?
11
Annual soil analysis?
0
Crop yields?
11
Stocking?
0
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
11
m D D
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 0
0 E 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
E 0 0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0
E 0 D
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
0
E 0 0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0
0 E 0
Otherlssues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
0
E 0 0
29, Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those D 0 0 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 02/1012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 11 M 0 0
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0000
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspecUon with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
If yes,.check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
0000
0000
0 M 0 0
11
0
0
Page: 7

0
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Facility Number: 960005 — Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960005 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routing County: Wayne — Region: Washington
Date of Visit: . 12114/2011 Entry Time: Q8:42 AM Exit Time: Q9:35 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm Owner Email: peedingCcDbellsouth. net
Owner: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1672 Old Smithfield Rd Q!2lj5borp NC 2752Q
Physical Address: 3555 Stevens Mill Rd GoldsboLo_ NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant F1 Not Compliant Integrator: Prestaae Farm§ Ing
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*20'05" — Longitude: 78*09'29"
Farm lies on SIR 1008 (Stevens Mill Rd), between SR1211 (Sambo Lambert Rd) and SR 1224 (Ferry Bridge Rd)-1 0 miles west of
Goldsboro.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Billy Keith Hill Operator Certification Number: 986441
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Hill Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Keith Hill Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: I

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number; 960005
Inspection Date: 12/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
irrigation calibration 8/9/10
**due again 2012—
Sludge Survey 9/2712011
**due again in 2012**
thickness = 3.7
LTZ = 4.6
pump intake = 4.4
New WUP 10123/08
Waste Analysis N
9/29/11 = .83
8/12/11 = 1.5
5/ 13/11 = 2.3
irrigation records correspond to rainfall &
lagoon records
soil test 41512011 crop yields reviewed
Cu & Zn levels Win range —small grain overseed coming in good"
L - 1.5T
**due again in 2012** —counts. as 2012 inspection —
lagoon banks to houses good vegetation
**keep eye on far side watch for erosion try and reseed —
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Facility Number: 960005
inspection Date: 12/1412011 Inspection Type: Compliance. Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
I W swine - Feeder to Finish 7,350 7,678
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Total SSILW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 05/03194 19.001 34,00]
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 12f1412011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream 1mpaCtS_ Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 0 0 0
Discharge originated at
Structure 11
Application Field 0
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? 0000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
U
U
U
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
0
00
2. Is tlher� evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0
0
00
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
11
M
00
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
11000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
U
M
U
L-1
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
11
E
0
0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
In
m
o
o
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
m
U
0
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
0
0
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? 0
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 12/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
E)
Application outside of application area?
0
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
wl Rye Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram loamy sand, 0
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 2
Cowarts
Soil Type 3
Kenansville
Soil Type 4
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0
E
Cl
rl
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
000
0
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
0
0
0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0
0
U
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
000
0
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Pennit readily available?
0
0
0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0
0
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 12/14/2011 Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit; Routine
Records and Oocuments Yes No NA NE
WUP? 0
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
In
0
0
n
0
0000
Waste Application?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
0
Waste Analysis?
1­1
Soil analysis?
0
Waste Transfers?
0
Weather code?
11
Rainfall?
n
Stocking?
0
Crop yields?
n
120 Minute inspections?
1­1
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
El
Sludge Survey
0
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0
000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
0
a 0 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
000
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
0
E 0 0
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
n
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
n
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960005 Owner -Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Inspection Date: 12/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960005
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
0
0
0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
rl
0
0
Otherlssues
Yes No
NA
NE
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 0 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional 0 N 0
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e,, discharge, U 000
freeboard problems, over -application)
31 � Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? D M 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon /Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
1­1
El
0 a 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 M 0 0
Page: 7

i ision of water Quality
Facility Number UK] —=I Scivision of Soil and Water Conservation
C) Other Aaeucv
Type of Visit .Efcompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 12rRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I qt Y.11 :] Departure Time: County: !225mll Region: h1"1z'4
Farm Name: _6�m W41
k Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0 =6 =6 Longitude: = 0 =' = 11
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population WetPoultry Capacity Population
1 0 ayer I I I
ONon-Lay r I I I
El Wean to Finish
El Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
'73f-6
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feedcr
El Farrow to Finish
-
El ciats
0 Boars
Other
10 Other I
Dry Poultry
El Layers
El Non -Layers
D Pullets
El Turkeys
I Turkey Poul ts
I
I
10 Other
I ___ I
Discharaes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
El
Dairy Cow
El
Dairy Calf
El
Dairy Heifer
El
Da Cow
El
Non -Dairy
El
Beef Stocker
El
Beef Feeder
0
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: =
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached wateTS of the State (gallons)?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
El Yes PI'No [I NA 0 NE
• Yes
K'No
[I NA
[1 NE
• Yes
PNo
EINA
El NE
0 NA
[:1 NE
El Yes
EI'No
El Yes
Pfqo
0 NA
El NE
El Yes
ZNo
El NA
El NE
12128104 Confinued

[Facitit�Number: 94—
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
El Yes
ZI No El NA El NE
a- If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
El Yes
Jallo El NA El NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier: 37
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Yes
ONo [:1 NA [:1 NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
0 Yes
RTNo [:1 NA [] NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
El Yes
ffNo 0 NA D NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
D Yes
ONo 0 NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
D Yes
PJ'N. [I NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
El Yes
Ej`No [INA [:1 NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0Yes
eNo El NA El NE
El Excessive Ponding [:1 Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
DPAN [:IPAN>10%orl0lbs E]Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift DApplication Outside
of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
E]Yes
eNo
El NA
El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
E]'No
El NA
[:1 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?E] Yes
ONo
El NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
WNo
[:1 NA
0 NE
18. Is there a tack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 Yes
ZINo
0 NA
El NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 77T 2?7— 7,770
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7,12_/o
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

F/
Facig� Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes XN"'o 0 NA F-1 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes P<o El NA El NE
the appropirate box. El VrUP 0 Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0 Yes
VerNo
0 NA El NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers [] Annual
Certification
El Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections El
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[:1 Yes
E!rNo
El NA [:1 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
ONo
[I NA [] NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
E]Yes
ONo
El NA D NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pen -nit? E]Yes ��No [INA El NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? Yes 0"N-o [I NA [I NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Yes ETNo [I NA [:1 NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
El Yes
PrN"'o
[I NA [:1 NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[I Yes
ONo
[I NA El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
0 Yes
ZNo
0 NA [:1 NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
0 Yes
ZNo
El NA [I NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
OlNo
0 NA El NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

no
;u Division of Water Quatity
IFacility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
E: () Other A—nev
TypeofVisit J&Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other El Denied Access
7 1 Arrival Time: kylle
Date of Visit: I Z-26'419 Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: ge�n cf-4!* Owner Email:
Z
Owner Name: —
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0 =1 Longitude: = 0 = g = As
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population WetPoultry Capacity Population
[:1 Layer I
10 Non -Layer I
El Wean to Finish
El Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder,
El Farrow to Finish
El Gilts
El Boars
Other
JEJ Other
Dry Poultry
ElLayers _
El Non -Layers
El Pullets
Li Turkeys
urkey Poults
ID Other
Dischames & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure ElApplication Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
El Dairy Cow
El Dairy Calf
El Dairy Heifer
El Dry Cow
El Non -Dairy
El Beef Stocker
0 Beef Feeder
,E] Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b, Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
El Yes 21�o [:INA [:1 NE
El Yes
RfNo
EINA
El NE
E]Yes
;EI'No
EINA
El NE
:J
EINA
E] NE
El Yes
2YNo
El Yes
ONo
[:1 NA
El NE
E]Yes.
E�No
El NA
El NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Condnued

j Facility Number.V — 67,6;- 1 Date of Inspection F f r,�,
Waste CoRection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes [2<o [:3 NA 0 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes A'No El NA D NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in)� t 2-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes ONo [INA D NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes P?fqo DNA D NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ;20yes ONo El NA D NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes gNo 0 NA D NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require D Yes ONo D NA [:1 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
0 Yes );1*110 D NA El NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes.,�No [:1 NA [:1 NE
El Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
DPAN [:IPAN>10%orl0lbs El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window []Evidence of Wind Drift DApplication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
D Yes ONo
El NA
0 NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D Yes E!fNo
D NA
[:1 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?E] Yes _VNo
El NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes No
El NA
D NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 Yes ZN o
[:1 NA
D NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facWty to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
IReviewer/Inspector Name I Z I Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date:
— �Ie — 4;:�
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Y4' Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [:]Yes ONo [:INA [:1 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [I Yes J2fNo EINA El NE
the appropirate box. [:1 WUP El Checklists [1 Design El Maps 0 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes jErNo 0 NA El NE
[I Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification
El Rainfall D Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I " Rain Inspections El Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0 Yes ZrNo
D NA
El NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
0 Yes ONo
0 NA
El NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0 Yes ;2rNo
[I NA
[:1 NE
25,
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
C]Yes PNo
0 NA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
0Yes WNo
[I NA
El NE
27,
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes ;;KNo
El NA
0 NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
E]Yes ;3No
D NA
El NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
E]Yes VeKNo
[I NA
El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
0 Yes ONo
El NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
D Yes j2rNo
El NA
El NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
E]Yes FZ(No
[:1 NA
[I NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
C]Yes fi!(No
El NA
[__1 NE
Aditional Comments and/or Drai
t
SVI* son'� —0 V,
Wzjle c/7d,,p5 C-1 - t c 1-o
?— "7j�
i,711- t1r
fA-11 L
'P'7 *:;� �e'# j /,-
Page 3 of 3 12128104

e
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 960005 Facility Status: AgAive, Permit: AWS960005 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/12/2009 Entry Time:01 aOO PM Exft Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Phone: 919-724-&299
Mailing Address: 1672 Old Smithfield Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 3555 Sstevens Mill Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: E Compliant [D Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'20'05" — Longitude: 78*09'29"
Farm lies on SR 1008 (Stevens Mill Rd), between SR1211 (Sambo Lambert Rd) and SR 1224 (Ferry Bridge Rd)-10 miles west of
Goldsboro.
Question Areas:
N Waste Application Otherissues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Eddie Rowe Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Eddie Rowe Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Aquifer staff made a site visit as follow up to NOV/NOI that was issued in Ap�il 2009,
Date:
A new sub surface irrigation system was indeed in place. The back field had just been spriged with bermuda.
The area of ponding was observed and it does not appear on land to be the headwaters of Failing Creek. It was in a
depression/ponded area that possibly would only reach Falling creek by infiltration into groundwater. It is apparent that in the wet
seasons water does indeed pond in the area just outside of the field and is a stormwater runoff area. It has some characteristics of a
wetland.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Inspection Date: 05112/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Stnictures
Type
Facility Number: 960005
Reason for Visit: Routine
Identifier Closed Data Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon I 1 1 05103/94 1 1 19.00 1 7
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 05112/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0 N 0 0
improvement?
11 - Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
0
Frozen Ground?
0
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
11
PAN?
Q
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs-?
0
Total P205?
0
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
0
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
0
Crop Type 1 Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management 13 0 0 0
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 11 N 0 0
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 05/1212009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 11 0 0 0
1 S. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment? 0 M 11 C)
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 11 0 0 0
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 0 0 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
M At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0 0 0 0
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 m D 0
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 0 M 0 11
33- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 0 0 0
Page: 4

0 Division of Water Quality
r-1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency ----------------------------------
Facility Number: 960005 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960005 I Denied Access
— L
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit; Routine Co unty: Wayne . Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01/25/2008 , Entry Time:08:23 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm
Owner: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address., 1672 Od Smithfield Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 3555 Sstevens Mill Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant F� Not Compliant Integrator: Prestage Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: .35'20'05" Longitude: 78'09'29"
-7-4, /
SIR 1008, 10 miles west of Goldsboro 3�;'. 3
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts waste collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 986447
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Hill Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Keith A Hill Phone:
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number : 960005
Inspection Date: 01/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
419. Facility had current copy of their permit (AWGII 00000) but needed current CoC. Gave facility an extra copy -
Upon entry, some of the BH fields were seen with flags on them. The facility plans to "spot" spray herbicide to control growth of
sandspur weeds.
WUP signed 1211/1999.
WARs (lbsNI1000gal):
11/07/06� 1.2
04102/07: 2.9
08/06/07: 1-5
2008 Soil Test Results (Contractor is Waters Lab):
0 Ton/Ac lime required; highest ZnI-260, Cul-260
IRR2 records seen for fields #6 and #8.
#9. Fields described as #4A, #4B, and #4C on the IRR2s are actually in the WUP as three pulls on Field no. 6; Ptease amend the
IRR2s to show this.
#9. Fields 4-7 were identified in their WUP; however, they need to show all fields and wetted acres clearly in their aerial map.
Rainfall records were acceptable. Lagoon freeboard levels were consistent with pumping events.
Saw 2007 crop yields: 186 bales 131-11 (field #6), 32 bales BH (field #8).
In the fields are rye, which is currently breaking through. According to Mr. Rowe, the plan is to irrigate within the next two weeks.
#21. Remember to initial IRR2s for irrigation events greater than 120 minutes: Events on 4/9, 4110, and 8110107 were three hours
each.
Irrigation system calibration (11115/07): 11.34" ring used, 50 psi @gun-301 gpm measured flowrate (<10% flowrate variance).
1012107 sludge survey� Thick=32, LTZ=5. V
Flage: 2

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number : 960005
Inspection Date: 01125/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,350 8,031
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Total SSILW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k goon 1 1 1 05/03194 1 1 19-00 1 24.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number : 960OG5
Inspection Date: 01125/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field F-1
Other F1
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) D 0
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
D
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
0
w
0
0
discharge?
Waste Collection, Stora�g.2_& Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
F1
0
0
0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
F]
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
0
000
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0
000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
000
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
m
D
C I
C 1
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
U
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu-, Zn, etc)? F1
Page: 4
0

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 01/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No -NA NE
PAN? F1
Is PAN > 10%/10 lb&? f-1
Total P205? FI
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? F1
Outside of acceptable crop v�indow?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
wl Rye Overseed
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansvilie loamy sand
Soil Type 2
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Norfolk loamy sand. 2
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 4
Wagrarn loamy sand,
10 to 15% slopes
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0E
0
D
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D
0
D
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
0
0
0
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0
0
D
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0
F1
D
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did -the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0
0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0
0
If yes, check the appropriate, box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number ; 960005
Inspection Date: 0112512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? F1
Checklists? In
Design? F-1
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
171
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0
0
0
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
0
000
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0
0
2& Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
0
0
27. Did the facility fait to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0
0
a
0
Otherissues
Yes
No
_1NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or C�AWMP?
0
NO
0
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
0
N
0
0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

. I -P
Permit: AWS960005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson Facility Number : 960005
Inspection Date: 01/2512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
V­ ?J� FJA 1d;;
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss revIew/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 0 0 M
0 0
0 C
DODO
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 960005 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296005 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0312912006 En"Time:0272OPM Exit Time: Incident M.
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Gwenoolyn H Peedin Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1672 Old Smithfield Rd Goldsboro NQ 27530
Physical Address:
Facility Status: F� Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: .35*20'05" Longitude: 78'09'29"
SR 1008, 10 miles West of Goldsboro
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Hill Phone:
On -site representative Keith Hill Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 03/2912006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Routine
Inspection Summary:
Sludge survey completed 2/14/06, sludge thickness = 3.3', LTZ = 5.0'
Irrigation calibration completed 918/05, 303GPM. Please complete one for 2006.
COC & Permit available in notebook.
WUP dated 12/111999
Waste Analysis:
3128106 1.1
3/4105 2.8
Remember to pull soil sample for 2006.
Irrigated on Oats on 2/8/06, 2128/06, 3113106 and 3120/06. Irrigation records complete. Weather codes and inspection initials
completed.
Lagoon levels recorded weekly - Drops in'levels are consistent with pumping events
Precipitation recorded and initials completed
Vegetation on dike wall is in good condition.
Remember to complete PLAT and send copies of both PLAT and regular topsoil sample test for 2006 to DWQ-Washington.
#23. Producer (Eddie Rowe) says he had a signed a paper for someone to be on farm during the period of irrigation. Please send
copy of such document to me or install rainbreaker before next inspection.
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin
Inspection Date: 03/29/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960005
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,350 6,979
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Total SSLW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon T, . 1 05103194 1 i 19.001 25700
%r
Page: 3

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 03129/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Streann Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n lo o o
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
M
L-1
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
0
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does dis charge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D.
0
0
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
0
E)
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
D
o
D
0
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
ID
m
D
El
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
F1
5. Are there any immediate threats to,the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
E
F1
rl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management D
D
D
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
D
D
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
o
0
D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
m
0
improvement?
Waste Applicat
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
00
D
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
Do
D
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
171
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 03/29/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste App!�icaticm Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? n
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? F1
Application outside of application area? F1
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop'Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagrarn
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Norfolk
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 0
0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
D 0
17. Does the fa cility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n D
0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Ll El
1)
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
D.m 0
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
n
Page: 5

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin Facility Number : 960005
Inspection Date: 03/2912006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit; Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
Design?
D
Maps?
Other?
ri
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0
EDO-
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
rl
120 Minute inspections?
0
Weather code?
171
Weekly Freeboard?
171
Transfers?
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > I inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
0
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22� Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
23. If selected, did th e facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
N
El
0
0
24- Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Cl
El
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
D
m
0
0
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator i n charge?
0
0
0
El
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0
0
0
E
Otherissues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n-
0
0
0
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead 'animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
0
0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
0
N
0
0
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6 -

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin
Facility Number : 960005
Inspection Date: 03129/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspeefion
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
11
E
0
E)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit. by same agency?
C)
M
M
F1
4
I Page: 7

I
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 960005 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA296005 - 0 DeniedAccess
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne . Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/2OL2005 Entry Time: 12:42 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Gwendolyn H Peedin Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1672 Old Smithfield Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:
Facility Status: N Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*20'05" Longitude: 78*09'29"
SR 1008, 10 miles west of Goldsboro
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Hill Phone:
On -site representative Keith Hill Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 12/2012005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC available on site WUP dated 1211199
Waste Analysis:
3/4/05 = 2.8
6/23/05 = 3.7
10/20/05 = 1.0
Reviewed IRR2 records. (No IRR1 records)
Weather code and inpection initials completed
Lagoon levels recorded weekly
Drop in lagoon levels consistent with irrigation records
Rainfall data recorded and initialled where > 1"
Irrigation calibration completed on 9/8/05, 303GPM
Sludge survey completed on 5125/05, sludge = 3.2', LTZ 5.1'
Crop yield records available
Stocking & mortality records available
Producer is working on PLAT
Soil test dated 4/8/05, Cu and Zn levels ok
Vegetation on dike well maintained
Good record keeping
Oats (Winter annuals) planted
Page: 2

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin
Inspection Date: 12120/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960005
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
swine -Feeder to Finish 7,350 7,936
Total Design Capacity: 7,350
Total SSLW: 992,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon .— . . - F 1 05103/94 1 1 19 - O�O
Page: 3

a
Permit: NCA296005 'Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 12120/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
DisClharq_!�s & Stream lmp.�!cts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 N 0 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? M
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 M 0 U
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0
D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
D
m
D
0
discharge?
Waste Collection, -Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
M
It yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
F1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
11
D
D
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management D
D
0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
0
El
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
El
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
m
-1
L
C1
improvement?
Waste Appliration
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
D
m
D
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? F1
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, et6)? n
Page: 4

Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin
Inspection Date: 12/2012005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960005
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
In
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
F1
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
o
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wagram
Soil Type 2
Kenansville
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Norfolk
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0 E 0 0
Plan(CAWMP)? - . i
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n o o
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 0 0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0 N 0 0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 m 0 0
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0 E 0 11
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0 E 0 D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? El
Page: 5

0
Permit. NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin Facility Number : 960005
Inspection Date: 12/2012005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? 171
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
C1
n
n
D N U 0
If yes, check the appropriate b6x below.
Waste Applicabon?
F1
120 Minute inspections?
El
Weather code?
ri
Weekly Freeboard?
F-11
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after > I inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
0
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
F1
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0
E
0
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? 0
El
E
C1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El
m
0
13
Ypq
Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0 0 0
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 0 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time.of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 11 0 0
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

W
Permit: NCA296005 Owner - Facility: Gwendolyn H Peedin Facility Number: 960005
Inspection Date: 1212012005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
^,L.-- Yes Na NA NE
31 � Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 M 0 0
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? 0 m 0 D
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
El m El D
Page: 7

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other O Denied Access
Facility Number 96 5 Date of Visit: 4-30-2004 Time: L 1355
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
N Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: RQUAxeY9e011x.Earml................................................................................. County: W..ayjke ............................................... WARP........
OwnerName: G.wsxt....................................... Irv.0 iA......................................................... Phone No: 734:3299 ....................................................................
Mailing Address: I172.Q1d. latitlhi elsl.lid.................... :.............................................. GAd5bQr.Q..N.0 ..................................................... Z.753.0 .............
FacilityContact: Eddle.Ro xg....................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: E.dldie.RQ.W.e................................................................................. Integrator: r1:eSlage.f;aLrW5....................... ..............................
Certified Operator:E.d.&....................................... KQW.0 ................................................. Operator Certification Number:16062.............................
Location of Farm:
3111008, 10 miles west of Goldsboro A6
® Swine ❑Poultry ❑Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 ' 20 OS Longitude 78 • 09 29
Design Current
Swine rnnarity Ponnintinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
7350
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Nuinber.of Lagoons 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 7,350
Total SSLW 992,250
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
-b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................... .
Freeboard (inches): 29"
12112103 Continued

lFacility Number: 96-5 _ _ I
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (1[f any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses on
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures tack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Apolication
10 . Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
C] Excessive Ponding [I PAN [I Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground El Copper and/or Zinc
El Yes
19 No
0 Yes
9 No
9 Yes
0 No
0 Yes
F-1 No
0 Yes
CK No
El Yes
19 No
El Yes
ONo
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Soybeans, Wheat .
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [I Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
1 7. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storag
ge pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
-Use- diwwi�jji of facility to better: ej�pla'n si
Records available for review.
Waste Analysis: 3-11-03 = 3.3 lbs
8-1-03 = 0.97 lbs
1-22-04 = 1.3 lbs
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes El No
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes 19 No
D Yes El No
0 Yes 19 No
El Yes N No
0 Yes [9 No
'answers.and/o -ot er commenti.-_
YES �ndatio'nm_o,r.any` 6-
e
i on 7pagesasne
-ions.1use.-a ai cessarY):_..-,i[3 Field Copy E]FinalNotes
oil Analysis: 10-3-03 - Lime has been put out
-rigation records are complete and balanced out.
'he records have been stolen however the records can be replaced. Get the lagoon design from the county office.
7 - Need to improve the vegetative cover on the dike wall ASAP Need to mow more often and address the weed
opulation
'he permit was stolen as well - If you can not get a copy for the the County, I will send a copy.
'he present (Eddie Rowe) OIC has not been designated - Need to submit an OIC designation form to Raleigh ASAP.
Revimer/Inspector Name 'LynB.HarAts"Pn.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Condnued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Reauired Recor'ds & Documents
2 1. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
El Yes
19 No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Manageme nt Plan readily available?
. (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
0 Yes
0 No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes
19 No
[I Waste Application [I Freeboard E] Waste Analysis [I Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
0 Yes
IN No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
0 Yes
[9 No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
0 Yes
NNo
27. Did Reviewer/Inspcetor fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
[I Yes
[9 No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
M No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
D9 No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under aNPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
H Yes
0 No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[] Yes
0 No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes
19 No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
0 Yes
19 No
34. -Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
0 Yes
0 No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
0 Yes
N No
E] Stocking Form F_] Crop Yield Form [j Rainfall [I Inspection After I " Rain
[] 120 Minute Inspections [] Annual Certification Form
1[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
'or. 's
d/ win
Additibnal'C6 an -Dri
8 - Need to keep the path where the aluminum pipe that stretches across the creek maintained - Kept shrubed,
mowed, etc. This will provide better inspection by the OIC and owner.
Need to have the mortality and stocking records available for inspection. Presently the records are kept inside each r
f you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481
12112103

Type of Visit t7 Compliance Inspection Q Operation review Q Lagoon Evaluation 3
0
y
iReason for Visit ©Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other [I Denied Access F
!°Dll i,v v 4; 6/6/Z002 Tir�ie� 800
Foci? t Number 96 5 ? , -
Q Not Operational 0 Below Teire-041old
Permitted ?r= Certified Conditionally Certified fA Registered Date Last Operated or Alllit'e Threshold: .........................
Fprni Name: DnDBkrCgdin_FAr n................... County: Wayne....................... .. WaRa...
................................................................ ..................... .....
0%ime: Name: Daauuie.MW.G.W.CM............. Pjmd n.......................................................... Phone No: 919::7.3.4-5299 ..........................................................
' aili «d A ddre s: 16t72.Qld. nnitlxfxeW_Rd.....----•.................. --- Gotdstinx-aNC......_............................"-'.............. 27.531i.............
Facility i.[ coact. D.0ju ie.W..iM ................................Tifie:.QJLC...................................................... P11 f;rae No; 91%.7354809 ......................
On.,41M RepresetilaIMI.............................................................................................................. Integrator: Prestage.Earms......
s':r tiiiZii c.+ iLra sstoe _
1AMIclitifln iii Farin:
SR 1008,10 miles west of Goldsboro
r�
Operator C"crtii ii: iitilbii Number: 19 �•
. . ............................
®c 4,lnA ❑ Poultry ❑ ��til4 '❑ uorsa lLatitficir, ._. x35 20 _ ' _—.05 Longitude � 78 ' 4 9 _ 29—'-'
j
TL
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
} Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
0 Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
❑ Dairy
ICK Feeder to Finish
7350
1
Non -Layer
!
Non -Dairy
i ❑ Farrow to Wean
I
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Other
9
l
[#Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
7,350
i
LE] Gilts
Total SSLW
992,250
E❑ soars
i Number of Lagoons 1 LI Subsurface Drains Present 1 ❑ Gagm)n Area ❑ Spray Field Ares,
!
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I[] No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? u Yes N No
Di-1chii i_w, urfl-,iiilii#:d at: ❑ Lagoon V Spray Field ❑ Other
ir.r_�i. e , 'Yes J
�. I �lischgrae iS obser ed. was ilie (:#rove—'ance IilaL-iliauG[ Y6S i� NO
r. l--...- L'.7 1. 1-', !' 3. .: i•i,.a q rTe . 1�lI?c
ii, 1, •liii;ua, •1i: iS (ili�s:i'1'c:' . u,u ii ii:iii:•u �v<1iCi' Ue t„i..3,atc;. tiF i`c:ti. iiiii" N r,) vV QCl yes Ie-I NO
4, ii ui3#;uae uJ is (ifiSi:i i`Z;ii. ii liii i. -ia tilt, t:SiiiCiiii�d ,,#iii iEi �iil/ifiiii•�
d. -Doe-; discharfac; Mlliiis a iut•cfuu :�;lc in? {lf ies, iiuiil� liA'v`�j
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
1T i oii(�iiGtli�
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillwav
Struct t- 2 striicliire Sir!! t(irC a !�111!cln c
s_rl, e,iil;�i:
Ej
Yes Ej No
Yes g No
Yes ' No
Yes nM No
Structure 6
Freeboard (iiieiics):...............2.7............................................. ......
.................................... .................................. . .........

Facility Number. 96 — 5 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed.9 (ic/ trees, severe erosion, []Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? 13 Yes C? No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or envirommental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement9 Yes [I No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require mainterrancelimprovement? 0 Yes 0 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and mhihnum liquid level
elevation markings? 0 Yes 9 No
Waste ApLIlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? 0 Excessive Ponding 0 PAN [] Hydraulic Overload 0 Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Wheat Soybeans
13., Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 0 Yes S No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes [I No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes 0 No
C) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? El Yes 0 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 0 Yes IR No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? [] Yes 9 No
Rcumirvd Revoribi & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? E] Yes 0 No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 0 Yes M No
19, Does record keeping need improverneur? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 0 Yes E] No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? E] Yes 19 No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? Yes Ig No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) C] Yes IR No
23. Did Reviewer/laspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Yes J@ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes 19 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWIMP? E] Yes 0 No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this vistL You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
Comments (refer to'4uesfioa*)'-_ Explain'any Answirskind/oir anY.reconime -diti6ns or"an* other co'nm'e
Use drawings of facility to better. explain - situations. (pse additional pages: as necessary):
Field Copy n Final Notes
ffice was locked and no one on site - could not review records.
The vegetation on dike wall is 'in need of attention. There are lots of weeds on the top and the down slopes of the
,alls. Need to keep the weeds to a minimum and keep the waUs mowed on the inside and down slope as the top has
,en mowed.
'eed to address the weeds in the bermuda fields.
laste analysis 8/15/01 = 1.7 lbs.
ee Comments on third page
Reviewer/Inspector Name LynB..Hardison— --entered by-Airm Tyndall -
Reviewer/Insvector Siernature: Date:

05103101 Confinued
ate .a s pe
Vacilfiy Number: 96 C�ion F-616—/2-00-2--1
Odor Ivities,
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid sulface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance prob lems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
.32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
1.7.1 Yes El No
I I Yes No
E! Yes No
0 Yes U',j No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No

W A
F" WRFa
Michael F. Easley
:f Governor
r— William G. Ross, Jr-, Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory Thorpe, Acting Director
V7
Division of Water Quality
November 21, 2001
Mrs. DonniePeedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27530
SUBJECT: Animal Compliance Evaluation Site Inspection
Donnie Peedin farm
Facility No. # 96-5
Wayne County
Dear Mrs. Peedin:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is viewed in DWQ database)
conducted on August 23, 2001 at the refercticed facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington
Regional Office, Please read this inspection and keep it with all other documents pertaining to your animal
operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 21-1-0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal Waste Notanagement. Plan and/or General Permit; (2)
determine whether the -A-aste utilization plan is based on total or actual wetted acres'. (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records
are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, andtor runoff. The following deficiency was noted. during
the inspection-
7here is a noticeable trend in the freeboard recordswhere the levels increase regularly without any rainfall. Over the
past several years, the freeboard levels have been observed as marginal- It is suggested to evaluate the overall
operation and mairiteriance of the irrigation activities and the water usage. Since. the 1999 hurricanes, the Division
implemented a policy that supports condition III, item 6 (e) and condition V, item 3 of the General Permit and the
Division will not give permission to pump. It is suggested to consult with your Technical specialist for guidance.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
general permit therefore these items must be implemented
T The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWNW. At a
minimum. maximum -*N29e level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the,] evel that pro-0des
adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hours storm event plus an additional foot of structural fireeboard
T Soil analysis is required annually
T The following records are required: rainfall and lagoon level data, off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair,
vmstclsoil analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be matntained by the facility
owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years-
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAVVNIP. In no case shall land arylication rateE exceed
the Plant Available Nitroven MANI rate for the receivine cror) or result in runoff durine anv eive amlication
(p In accordance with you w"e utilization plan, the irrigation application events should not exceed the hvdraulic
loadirig as specified per the soil type and in no case should an irrigation event exceed one inch per
q) Keep lagoonststorage ponds free of foreign debris including, but not limited to tires, bottles. plastic products,
light bulbs, gloves, syririges or any other solids waste.
(p Tle lagoon areas should be " mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible- High grass does not allow
you to conduct a thorough inspection of the lagoon area for seepage, rodent darnage, etc.
(p It is Wgusled not to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management
plan- You viifi need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215(Fax)

Page Two
Donnie Peedin farm
# 96-5
Tbank you for your assistance and cooperation during the hispection. If you have any questions, please contact me at
2521946-648 L ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincere]
L m sc
yn B. son
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Wayne NRCS
NU�5Ae�� NCCES
.WSRO Animal Compliance File
LBH files

Facility Number Date of Visit: 8/23/2001 Time: 9:15 am Printed on: 10/3/2001
p of Operational p HelowThreshold
� Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ••••••••................
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm
Owner Name: Donnie and Gwen Peedin
County: Wayne ................................................ .W..Aw........
Phone No: 919-734-5299
Mailing Address: 16.72.01d.Smith.field.Rd...................... _................................. ......... GoJdsbnm..NC ..................................................... 27.5311....-----.....
Facility Contact: Donnie_W.iggs.......... - .....................................Title: 01C ...................................................... Phone No: 9.19-.7.35-880Q.......................
Onsite Representative: Eddie.Rawe................................................................................. Integrator: P.r &t,age-F:axms...................
Certified Operator: Wank ................................... .1'V.iggs................................................ Operator Certification Number: 19438.......................
..._..
Location of Farm:
miles west of Goldsboro
IV
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©• ®' ®" Longitude
Swine_
--esign°n tncrent ==: - "-` :- •-`-llesign -��turren#". --' -- -Design `� : Currerit::
Capacity ` PopuEatioa: , Poultry ` • Capacity:Population " Cattle _ Capacity .Popu
lation
p airy
to Finish p Non -Dairy
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder
p arrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
p Layer
p Non -Layer
p Other
Total Design Capacity
,Totalr.SSLW
7,350
1
992,250 1
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: [] Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin? na
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? � Yes ®No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... 22 .. ................ .................................. ....................... .. ......................................................................................................................
p Layer
p Non -Layer
p Other
Total Design Capacity
,Totalr.SSLW
7,350
1
992,250 1
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: [] Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin? na
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? � Yes ®No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... 22 .. ................ .................................. ....................... .. ......................................................................................................................
p Other
Total Design Capacity
,Totalr.SSLW
7,350
1
992,250 1
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: [] Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin? na
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? � Yes ®No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... 22 .. ................ .................................. ....................... .. ......................................................................................................................

acr ity Number: 96-5 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 10/3/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; severe erosion, I7 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an p Yes ® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN I] Hydraulic Overload IJ Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) . Small Grain Overseed Wheat, Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
p Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
g No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no turther correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer toque5on #}ExRlam any YFS answers a nio any=recommendations or :any athe� commeats _ _F
Exp
�— r
Usei=awmgs offactlrty to betfer ezplatn<srtuatroQs (use,adittonal Rages as necessary) Field Co Final Notes
-
Records available for review.
Waste analysis - 4/2/01 = 2.5 lbs.; 8/15/01 = 1.7 lbs.
Soil analysis - 9/29/00 - available - lime has been applied.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
Need to obtain 3rd party agreement with landowner ( Mrs. Hollowell).
Bermuda fields are in good shape. SEE PAGE.3
Reviewer/Inspector Name LyuB Hardrsnn r =* enter'edbAnnTyndatl —
,�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

OSif3/Oh y Continued
Facility Number: 96_5 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 10/3/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to -discharge at/or below 13 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? [3 Yes E3 No
t—U]MULIC.LW ILLMNS Wt;, UU SpULS OMLLIKU W[lll v « h_ -
, .;: x. sc, :2 .! ...cam .c. z
It is suggested to reduce the water usage to the house unless if -is necessary There is,artrerid�in.tlie:freeboard
ecords that the levels increase regwarly,without'rainfall event-:: It is suggested to _evaluate how kriuch:water is
ed and tfitrts'really.necess . q (F6r.6 ple ,Are the`spnnklers left on between groups_ of-anitnals-to'help
clean thehouse?, Are tliese sprinklers: left on for aaonger:penod of time than necessary?)
f you have any quesrions, contact your TeclinscaalSpectahsYor me at 252 946-6481, extension 318
n,., e .a '-t'�{s"�.7 - .,.'`
t'T �sY.. \_3 {.T K Y rti' 1' ♦ <F' Y
- a r � . 's n,---�i� �-1-^a :ra arc f ° -2� �� r .<�+F�.•�-- -'x -. v it "` (.4 y
! wlz
>
if
L'
k i K :1 k- J ? { )_..7., i '''-\^' ■ l.T -"i .� ° -
w s `,_'t,',� ffi �x �-a - ,�v <t e� - ...asic�`..t � -�e•� s r`�—. c'.:' - e -c. .sf ., 1.a' -." ,...-z....
--
...t. 1�' -1r n'.a*--{ as ...zc � � ..c -�• " � r�-.^`f- -:- �__.�`- f 7 — - - -
�s. ,�.a�• .tom,.", `-�„_ -.•+ _� ,..`..� - - - - - - -
'•4-.. -Ykid- �ry y :• ^:ti " Y : { 'a�.:.i ...1Le;-M-.i` Hs?,. - 'i. �/ �" # r 1 7. -. .,.� +� r � t - _
-..>'-<
- ; ""` •r'.s.-t.1'� r- `s f kti �t ��tt'y`ft _
r : sa�sf�; �: 4. �� _'1-- .� '".'=r •wf� � �-+� f: ct• "T '_� 'x s� �{� �4 1ti4.'F-P "*r- - - ^ -. .. - .., -
r
•:' :_,- ! ..�` - .r '- - gip. �.. % � �. �,"� < �;.,. � �H.""') t sf�-{i � ..yc� � -.

iType of Visit - @ Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other [] Denied Access
Facility Numbe� Date of Visit: Time: �� Printed on. 11/1/2000
FO Not Operational 0 Below Thresholdi
0 Permitted M Certifx�d [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _.. . . . .... . .....
Farm Name: UQUAkIrudill.Farm ... . ........................................................... . ................ County: W.AYAC . . ............... . ............... . ......... WARO__....
Own:�.� Name: Mumituad..G.wift ............. Esvdin . ........ ............................................... Phone No: 73.4.-5299 ................................... . . . . ....... . .................
Facility Contact: D.QMdCMj= ................................................ Title: .011C ..... ................................................ Phone No: 9
7
M?�;,-';Ig A_'�ress: 1,0.72.01d.5mitifidd-Rd ................. ......... . ..................... - ..... . ..... G.Qlfton .. N.0 ..................................................... 2753.0 .............
Onsite Representative: Edjdje..RQWr, integrator:p.r
. . ...................................................... . ............ . ..... . .... cstagcY
.arms ...................
. .......... . ....... . ........ . .
Certified Operator: Dojuj&..C,.W.jggs .............. Jami.g.c 39
_Wiggs ............ . ....... ...... Operator Certification Number:M_43&J94 ... . .........
Location of Farm:
SR 1008, 10 miles west of Goldsboro
Oswine E3Poultry []Cattle
Lati F-35-1, F-2—o--1
01-lorse tude
F6�5 F-7-8--1
Longitude
C-
Design Current--.-,-. e�igv' urrent beiign: turrei
Ca" cit
pa _y
ti
��pu& on Nultry. Capacity
Population ttlle,� DaCi0:P6jDUMt16U:,.
0 Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
FDairy
Feeder to Finish
7350
7000
10 Non -Layer
I
1
10 Non -Dairy
I
Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
10 Other I
10 Farrow to Finish
"Li
-'Total
Design Capacity, r 7,350
Gilts
Total SSLW, 992,250
Subsurface Drains PresE2t 110 Lagoon Area
Z__�PTZ
ftl.-Sblii ra 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
d T P-S
I[] Spray Fiel��,,l
MSC111irges & Stream Lrn,2RELs
-1 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0 Yes 9 No
Discharee oricrinated at: [] Lagoon E] Spray Field 0 Other
a. If dischaT,
ge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
Ej Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0 Yes 9 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notil�y DWQ)
0 Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
D Yes 19 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [:] Yes ZNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
0 Yes 10 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ........ . .......................... ..................................... ................................... .................................... ...............................
Freeboard (inches): 24

5/00 Continued on back
Facility Number: 96-5 Date of Inspection lononoo© Printed on: 11/1/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste A lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
►l 1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type . Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Soybeans Wheat
13. 'bdthe receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
1-8.-Bees4te facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP', checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
6tati6us: or :deficiencies were Hoted :dbl ing• this Wt:Noa: will _receive no itarther :
i.-.-COrreSDo,nde'n'ce*a*boitithi's'v'*n'it'-'-'-.'-'.-'-'.
;ecords available for review.
Vaste analysis: 1/11/00 = 1.6 Ibs; 4/12/00 = (2.3 & 2.2); 8/17/00 = 1.7 & 2.0
'oil analysis up through 1999 available. Make sure to secure a sample for this year 2000.
reeboard levels ate recorded weekly.
We to Notice of Referral on lack of freeboard, an onsite review was conducted within a few days after
/13/00, and the freeboard was 20°.
'here was some confusion as to how to read the marker.
SEE PAGE 3
Fevi
ewer/Inspector Name tI j
TT.. a...

fie4iewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00]
fability Number: 96-5 Date or inspection FIT/2-0/2-00-0-1 Printed on: 11/1/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pip� from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 0 Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 0 Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt [I Yes 0 No
fGa4�, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 0 Yes 19 No
30--,:Werq��y major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 0 Yes H No
31. Do the -animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 0 Yes 19 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes [] No
MOW -
The marker should be read by: the red indicates 19" down to the bottom of the coupling. (See
illustration on original record).
bo-&� of cmo'
The hay bale in the field needs to be removed ASAP.
Land has been cleared and there are plans to add it to the waste utilization plan with row crops.
Do not apply onto this land until it is added to the WUP.
Continue to lower the lagoon to prepare for the winter months.
The lease agreement with Jean Halloweels has expired as of 1/10199.
If you,have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.

r
Farm Status: 0 Registered p Applied for Permit .
■ Certified - p Permitted = -'
in Not Opera Bona Date Last Operated: `-- - -
- - - County: Wayne .:................................................ aRi1........
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm �. -- . - _" ---- - --.
- Phone No: _ - --
Owner Name: Donni>w.::................................ Peedia.:.:..::.............................................. �.�4S29Q..:.........:::.�:.:......................................:...... .'
Facility Contact:..Iamie.'!'iggc...................................:............. Title: kaxm.Manager..................... Phone No: .
Mailing Address:. Lb.7.2..0ld.Smilb ield.Rd.................................... - Goldabarnt..NC..............................:.. 2�3t1.::.: ..::
................................ ...................
Onsite Representative: damin.W' Integrator: Priata F.arms.......................................................
Certified Operator:Donnie.0 ............................... Biggs..:::... ............................... Operator Certification Number:J9438 ............................. _ ..
Location of Farm: - - -
Latitude ®' ®" Longitude : �• ®'. ®"
General.
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
- — -- Discharge originated at: p Lagoon -p Spray Fietd p Other,
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes .p No
b. If discharge is observed, -did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) - - - p Yes -p No --
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? _ p'Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No .
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/hblding ponds) require p Yes ® No - y
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97

Vacility FuMber- 96_5 _
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? - p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? __ _�__.__ _ �_ p Yes_®No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
®No __ ___ _
Freeboard (ft): _ , z Structure 1 Structure 2 _ . Structure 3 Structure 4
-Structure 5 -
Structure 6
:..:...:208...........................................:............................................... ......................... ....::.........
.................................... ...... ...... -
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? f ^- -' -
— - _ p Yes
-® No -
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ` ' =--
-- _ - - - 'p Yes
®No -
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?.- : _ . _._ __. _ _
...Y ..p Yes
_® No P _
- (If any of questions 4-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
_ _..
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
-
13. 'Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? -- -_ _ _
. ___ .._ _ _ . _ ._ ®yes
p No - -
Waste Application -
- 14.- Is there physical evidence of over application?
.. p Yes .
®No
_...
(If in excess of WW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
.• .. _. .
_
15. Crop type ...... Cnastal_Denmztda.Grass ............................... -- _.--
...................................
-
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes
®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? - -
- p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p.Yes.
® No }:
`W 19.=Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?Yes®
No_=
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
_ 'p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No =
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan'readily available?.
p Yes
-® No-
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
N No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? _. -® Yes ' p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
77
- - r- Date:- %L�LIiTM

Facility Number: 96_5 Date of Inspection

Farm N
Mailing
County:
Integrat
On Site
Physical
ire-, Immediate Attention:
Facility No. -2 =—
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
-AM I
DATE: 6---Zd 1995
Time:
W. kq' M W P-M V.
N 0 i[N 5 9 in FAWS kliw1mali till
MAT 0
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: :2 Number of Animals on Site: Z2 C�s
w-'bEM Certification Number: ACE— DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude- Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
or No Actual Freeboard: 'E�
(approximately I Foot + 7 inchesx�Oe �-Ft. inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon s e d? Yes or No
( )9 Yes or(ISI�) Was any erosion obse
Is adequate land available for, s ra ?(IDor No Is the cover crop adequa e No
1'W /A 4�6�
Crop(s) being utilized f4
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray inigated on specific acreage with cover cmp)? Y No
dditional Comments:. 4 L ooza a== C cfQ 'c C- j
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
If

= F---7