960005_HISTORICAL_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

HISTORICAL
Fit1ST0^ICAL
HISTORICAL

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
October 19, 2016
MEMORANUDUM
To: Animal Waste Technical Specialists
Animal Operation Permit Holders
From: Jon Risgaard, Section Chief S
Water Quality Regional Ope ection
Re: Application Window for Bermuda - Extension
PAT MCCRORY
Go,emor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Due to heavy rainfall events in North Carolina in recent weeks, and additional impacts from Hurricane
Matthew, which necessitated Executive Order No. 107 — Declaration of a State of Emergency, many
animal waste lagoons are still at or near their freeboard limits. Animal operations are no longer able to
apply waste on their Bermuda crops due to expiration of the associated application windows.
By and through this memo, the Division of Water Resources (DWR) will further extend the application
window for Bermuda grass until October 31, 2016 for all North Carolina counties, provided the site has
not experienced a frost prior to that date.
Please refer to the attached memo for the conditions of this extension.
If you have any questions related to this extension and how it may apply, please contact J.R. Joshi at
[phone].
State of North Cuolina I c,.wooraental Quality I Wa(er Resources
1636 Marl smvice Center I Raleigk North Carolina 27699-1636
919 707 9219

Water Resources
L NVIROMMEm TAL QUALITY
October 11, 2016
MEMORAINE.IDUM
To: Animal Waste Technical Specialists
Animal Operation Permit Holders
From: Jay Zimmerman, Director -,99'
Division of Water Resources
Re. Application Window for Bermuda
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S_ JAY ZIMMERMAN
Due to heavy rainfall events in North Carolina in recent weeks and additional impacts from Hurricane
Matthew, which necessitated Executive Order No. 107 -- Declaration of a State of Emergency, many
animal waste lagoons are at or near their freeboard limits. Animal operations are no longer able to apply
waste on their Bermuda crops due to expiration of the associated application window on September 30,
2016.
By and through this memo, the Division of Water Resources (DWR) will allow the application window
for Bermuda to be extended until October 22, 2016 for all North Carolina counties, provided the site has
not experienced a frost prior to that date.
The following conditions apply to this extension. Please be sure to follow all of these conditions in order
to avoid a violation of your Animal Waste Permit:
1. This extension applies only to Bermuda crops with an application window that expired on
September 30, 2016.
2. The owner of the animal operation must have the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) amended by a
Technical Specialist to reflect the extended application window. The owner must keep this
temporary amendment with the WUP for review during the farm's annual inspection.
3. The application of waste during this extended period shall not exceed the specified PAN rates for
each field.
4. The extended application window must end no later than October 22, 2016 and is valid for this
year only.
For animal operations that are interested in other land application windows extensions, consult with a
licensed agronomist in accordance with Appendix 1.20 of the 9"' 1217 Guidance Document.
If you have any questions related to this extension and how it may apply, please contact JR Joshi at (91.9)
807-6341.
State of Nwh Carolina I Eaniroorrteptal Qu31i.y I Water RASOVIV e
1636 XUR service Center 1 Rsteigh. Noah Carolina 27699.16M
919 707 9219

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 12, 2016
Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27530
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Freeboard Level
Donnie Peedin Farm #96-05
AWS960005
Wayne County
NOD-2016-PC-0036
Dear Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson:
PAT MCCRORY
(ia+.rnnr
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
,4.rnan
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Dinvw,
We have noted chronic rainfall events in North Carolina that are historic rainfall totals in some
areas. Thank you for your recent call regarding the freeboard levels at your facilities. On
February 5, 2016, during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR), you reported a high freeboard level (17.5 inches) in the primary lagoon.
Please be advised that failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in
accordance with the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and with Condition V.
2. of NC Swine Waste System General Permit could result in other actions being taken by the
Division in response to compliance matters.
Deficiency 1: On February 5, 2016, a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at (17.5 inches)
of freeboard at the primary lagoon. A level of (19 inches) is the maximum level allowed by your
permit and Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
Thank you for submitting a 30 day Plan of Action on February 10, 2016. Take all necessary
additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with Section 2 of your permit.
Stare of North Carolina I Environmental Quality 1 Water Resources —Water Quality Regional Operations —Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889
757-946-6481

April 12, 2016
Donnie Peedin Farm
Cont. Page Two
Please work to ensure that your facility is managed in a way to maintain compliance with permit
and animal waste management plan requirements. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit
may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water
Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand
($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. To minimize the
potential for any possible future compliance matters attributable to prolonged wet weather
conditions, you may wish to review your animal waste management system design, as well as the
waste plan itself, for any potentially beneficial modifications and/or improvements.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (252)-948-3939.
U
� v • ti �� L, � r,�rz �'
IV (,1- ,41: .L
Sincerely,
I 9
David May
Water Quality Regional Operations Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: DWR-WQROS-CAFO Unit -Central Office
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDSWC - WaRO
WaRO Compliance Animal Files
JKD Files

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27530
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
April 5, 2016
Subject: Freeboard Level
Donnie Peedin Farm #96-05
AWS960005
Wayne County
NOD-2016-PC-0036
Dear Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson:
We have noted chronic rainfall events in North Carolina that are historic rainfall totals in some
areas. Thank you for your recent call regarding the freeboard levels at your facilities. On
February 5, 2016, during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR), you reported a high freeboard level (17.5 inches) in the primary lagoon.
Please be advised that failure o maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in
accordance with the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and with Condition V.
2. of NC Swine Waste Systet General Permit could result in other actions being taken by the
Division in response to com haq7atters.
Thank you for sub ing a 30 day Plan of Action, it was received by the Division on February
10, 2016. Tak I ne es ary additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with
Section 2 of vo n i
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Reson--Water Quality Regional Operations —Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481

April 5, 2016
Donnie Peedin Farm
Cont. Page Two
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Justin Davis at (252)-948-3942 or
me at (252)-948-3939.
Sincerely,
David May
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: NCDSWC-WaRO
WaRO Compliance Animal Files
jkd Files

,_V
AIF%A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Dear Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
October 1, 2014
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960005
Donnie Peedin Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for Donnie Peedin Farm, located in Wayne County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 7350 Boar/Stud-
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder. Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS960005 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone]Internet , http://www.ncdenr.gov/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Atfrtnalive Action Employer — Made in pan by recycled pacer

1 ' - J
If your Waste Utilization Plan ( WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: http:/Iwww.weathergov/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 252-946-6481. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Thomas A. Reeder
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWGI00000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Washington Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS960005)
AFO Notebooks
Prestage Farms Inc

HENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natu~al
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 1, 2009
Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Subject:
Dear Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson:
Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960005
Donnie Peedin Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Wit b -
Plan (CAWMP) for the Donnie Peedin Farm, located in Wayne County, with a sime animal; capacity of '
no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 7350 Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS960005 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit_ Please pay careful attention to the
record keeyinlr and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keening forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forts.
1636 Mal Service Center. Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1636
Location, 2728 Capital Blvd.. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 On...
Phone. [phone] FAX [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 N on h C arc) (i rlal
Internet: www.ncwaterqualEty.org
An Equal Opoownity, , k foneuve Action Employer
a

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.eov/er/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS960005)
AFO Notebooks
Prestage Farms Inc

17 (o - oo '
' 16VASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Brian Tingen Company
Thursday, October 23, 2008 QUO GS / /)aunr., - rAf�,
Producer: Gwen Anderson
Farm Name:
Telephone # :
Type of Operation
DONNIE PEEDIN FARMS
3555 STEVENS MILL RD
GOLDSBORO.NG 27530
(919) 734-5M
Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals : 73W hogs design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
y ;on
APR 0 6 2009
AP
The waste- from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations_ Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc_)
7350 hogs X 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year =13965 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
7350 hogs X 2-31bs PAN/hogs/year =16905 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and sulace application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE &CLASS- CROP YIELD L OS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE NIACRE USED TIME
7256
1
WAGRAM 0-6%
BH
5.5
275
0
0
0
3.52
968
apr-sep
SEP-MAY
7256
1
AGRAM 0-6%
SG
1
100
3.52
352
7256
- 10
KENANSVILLE ALL
SG
1
100
4.1
410
SEP-MAY
7256
10
KENANSVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
4.1
1127.5
APRSEP
7256
- 11
COWARTS 1-5%
SG
1
100
0
3.72
372
SEP-MAY
7256
11
COWARTS 1-5%
BH
5.5
275
0
3.72
1023
APRSEP
7256
- 12
COWARTS 1-5%
SG
1
100
0
3.31
3311
SEP-MAY
7256
12
COWARTS 1S%
BH
5.5
275
0
3.31
910.25
APRSEP
7256
2
WAGRAM 0-6%
SG
1
100
_
0
3.6
360
SEP-MAY
7255
2
WAGRAM 0-6%
BH
5.5
275
01
3.6
9W
apr-sep
7256
3
WAGRAM 0-6%
SG
1
100
0
3.72
372
SEP-MAY
7256
3
WAGRAM 0-6%
SH
5.5
275
0
3.72
1023
apr-sep
7256
4
KENANSVILLE ALL
SG
1
100
0
0
3.86
386
SEP-MAY
7256
4
KENANSVILLEALL
BH
5.5
275
3.86
3.03
1061.5
apr-sep
7256
5
NORFOLK 0-2%
SG
1
100
0
303
SEP-MAY
7256
5
NORFOLK 0-2%
BH
6.5
325
0
3.03
984.75
MAR-OCT
7256
6
NORFOLK 0-2%
SG
1
100
0
2.73
273
SEP-MAY
7256
6
NORFOLK 0-2%
BH
6.5
325
0
2.73
887.25
apr-sep
7256
7
KENANSVILLE ALL
SG
1
5.5
100
275
0
3.52
352
SEP-MAY
7256
7
KENANSVILLE ALL
BH
0
3.521
968
APRSEP
7256
- 8
KENANSVILLE ALL
SG
1
100
0
3.8
380
SEP-MAY
7256
8
KENANSVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
3.8
1045
APRSEP
7256
9
KENANSVILLE ALL
SG
I
100
0
2.25
225
SEP-MAY
7256
9
KENANSVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
225
618.75
APRSEP
7256-
HW1
WAGRAM 0-6%
SG
1
100
0
0.62
62
SEP-MAY
7256
HW1
WAGRAM 0b%
BH
5.5
275
0
0.62
170.5
APRSEP
7256
- HW2
WAGRAM OS%
SG
1
100
0
1.16
116
SEP-MAY
7256
HW2
WAGRAM 0$%
BH
5.5
275
0
1.16
319
APRSEP
7256
- HW3
NORFOLK 0-2%
SG
1
100
0
1.58
158
SEP-MAY
7256
HW3
NORFOLK 0-2%
BH
6.5
325
0
1.58
513.5
APRSEP
7256
HW4
KENANSVILLE ALL
BH
5.5
275
0
1244
341
APRSEP
7256
- HW4 IMNANSVILLE
ALL
SG
1
100
0
1-241
124
SEP-MAY
7256
- HW5 JKENANSVILLE
AlL
SG
1
lobol
0.871
871
SEP-MAY
7256
HW5 IKENANSVILLE
ALL
BH
5.51
275
01
0.871
239.25
APRSEP
TOTALS. 17853.3
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
Page 2

some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Pape 3

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
There are no Acres Leased
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals-
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
"Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS LBS NIUNIT
[BH HYBRID BURMUDAGRASS-HAY TONS 50
SG I SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED AC - 50

ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1 46.63 17,8531
TOTALS: — - .46.63 17,8531
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 16,805
—BALANCE -948
*** This number must be less than or equal 10 0 in order to fully uh¢e the animal vmste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 2719.5 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for' 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2_ Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOL TYPE CROP RATE fnIk) AMr (id)
7256
-1,-2,-3,-IM,-HW2
WAGRAMO-6%
WAGRAM Of%- --
SG
0.60
`1
7256
1, 2, 3, HWI, HW2
BH
0.60
'1
7256
-5, -6, --Hw3
NORFOLK 0-2%
NORFOLK 0-2% -- -----
SG
0.50
- 0.50
•1
7256
5.6. HW3
BH
*1
7256
0,--4,-7,-4,-9,-41W4,
KENANSVILLE ALL
SG
0.60
*1
7256 -
10, 4, 7, s, s, HW4, HW5
KENANSVILLE ALL
BH
0.60
'1
7256
7256 -
--11,-12
-- ` 11,12
COWARTS 1-5%
SG
BH
0.00
0.00
`1
COWARTS 1-5%
'1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 5

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to property dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to property dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of
management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate fitter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Stantard 393 - Fitter Strips and Standard 390 Interim Riparian Forest- Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive
to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following_
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
0-7

component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a 'technical specialist'.
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for
five (5) years_ Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years.
Page 8

• Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
t Liquid Systems
n__- n

_ NAME OF FARM: DONNIE PEEDIN FARMS
OWNER i MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked_
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs_
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: Gwen Anderson p
SIGNATURE: 2�1�4 � DATE: /0—1 _� -O f)
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
.�G:GiT ^ fplease print
�i SIGNATURE: f l DATE: 10 .. C .&- 053
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: BRIAN TINGEN
AFFILIATION: PRIVATE TECHNICAL SPECIALIST
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 404 PEAKBRANCH RD
SNOW HILL, NC 28580
[phone]
SIGNATURE:/ DATE: Io'23-d$
Dann 4n

Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Gwen Peedin
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro NC 27530
919-734-5299
Existing Feeder to Finish swine
7350.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
7350 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 13965 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
7350 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 16905 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
--
or
- -
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
7256
4
WaB
BH
5.5
275
17.7
4867.5
I
APR-SEP
7256 -4 1 SG 1 50 1 17.7 885
I SEP-MAY
7256 5 1 Re I BH 5.5 275 1 7.12 1958
I APR-SEP
7256 -5 1 SG 1 50 1 7.12 356
I SEP-MAY
-256 6 1 Re I BH 5.5 275 1 26.77 7361.75
I APR-SEP
7256 -6 1 SG 1 50 1 26.77 1338.5
I SEP-MAY
7256 7 1 NOA I BH 6.1 305 1 4.42 1348.1
I APR-SEP
7256 -7 1 SG 1 50 4.42. 221
1 1 l i I I I I i SRp .VA_V
7256 8 1 NoB I BH 6.1 305 1 4.05 1235.25
I APR-SEP
7256 -8 SG 1 50 1 4.05 202.5
I SEP-MAY
END
I
TOTAL119773.6
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
OTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
--
or
-----
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
645
1
WaB
W
40
80
38.1
3048
SEP-APR
645 -1 WaB SB 25 72 28 38.1 2743.2
JUN-SEP
15
645 2 WaB W 40 80 1 13.2 1056
SEP-APR
,45 -2 1 WaB SB 25 72 28 13.2 950.4
JUN-SEP
15
645 5 1 WaB BH 5.5 275 1 15.0 4125
APR-SEP
645 -5 1 SG 1 50 1 15.0 750
SEP-MAY
TOTAL112672.6
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseedincx .
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
60.06
19773.6
66.3
12672.6
126.36
32446.2
* BALANCE
-15541.2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
»tilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2719.5 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 13597.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 45.325 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 108.78 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and

ANINAL WARTS UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
645
1
WaB
645
2
WaB
645
5
WaB
645
-1
WaB
645
-2
WaB
645
-5
7256
4
WaB
7256
5
Ke
7256
6
Ke
256
7
NoA
jApplication
RatelApplic. Amount
crop
(in/hr)
(inches)
W
.6
*1
W
.6
*1
BH
.6
*1
SB
.6
*1
SB
.6
*1
SG
.6
*1
BH
.6
*1
BH
.6
*1
BH
.6
*1
BH
.5
*1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
7256
I I
1 8 I NoB
I
I BH
I l
I .5
7256
I I
I -4 I
I
I SG
I I
I .6 I
7256
I I
I -5 I
I
I SG
1 I
I .6 I
7256
I --6 I
I SG
I .6 I
7256
I !
I -7 I
I
, SG
I I
I .5 I
7256
I I
( -8 I
I I
I
I SG
I
I
I .5 I
I I
*1
*1
*1
*1
*1
*1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILISATION PLAN
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
THIS WUP HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT WETTABLE ACRES BASED ON 75%
RULE.
WHERE DOUBEL CROP SOYBEANS ARE USED THE REALISTIC YIELD EXPECTATION
IS REDUCED BY 7 BUSHELS (28 POUNDS). SOYBEAN RESIDUE SHOULD BE
CREDITED WITH 20 POUNDS CARRY OVER OF NITROGEN TO THE NEXT CROP.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:Donnie Peedin (#96-5)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Garen Peedin
(Please print) �,�, ,�
Signature:6Date: 12-1- qg
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please Print)Patricia S. Gabriel
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-731-1532
Address (Agency): 208 W. Chestnut St.
Goldsboro NC 27530-4708
Signature: ,w �� Date: -9

lk�: j3
ro
't
"iif JOP,
40
[Donnie Peedin Farm
15D4 ft
- - 1 1
35'20'11 63" N 78'08'57 65" VV
rIu
C.)
L 2008 Tole Atlas
lmage,,�, 2009 DigitbiGlobe
elev 131 ft
IF AMON-140M
A
Google -
Ralph. Weaver F
-Eye ad- 5517 ft

11661 noja
agoio ioia 600Z o a69w1
$oily alai 800Z 0
-96 LuJed uipaad 31uu0p',.�
ma's\
� 1
N1..61 *M60AL N .60 S0,0Z,9E
0 9b£ I.

11 LOV L ;19 QAg
aj$ooD
11 SEl AJJO M..9L M60AL N.10 40.OZo19E
li 91;s
jgalglimbic 600z _; o6ewl
SOW Dial RON 17,
0
900-96 wiled uipaad Oluuop
.b - `

0
.sj 2008 Tefe Atlas
Image f: 2009 Dig+ta Globe
199 It
r�
Google '
35°20'00.58" N 78°09'37 82" W elev 130 It Eye ait 846 It ar )

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Nor li Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007
Gwendolyn H Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960005
Donnie Peedin Farm
Animal 'Waste Management System
Wayne County
Dear Gwendolyn H Peedin:
In accordance with your application received on 20-Feb-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Gwendolyn H Peedin, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Donnie Peedin Farm, located in Wayne County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 7350 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition Ill.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used fpo record_ keepffigand _repofthig. Please
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring col ions in this ermit,�
J U N 2 7 2001
N Carolina
,atmally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwater trahtv.om Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
[phone]
Ra1e�2� ' Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service. [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to MRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 252-946-6481. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
t,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wayne County Health Department
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS960005

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Rem 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
X Sim ,ia
P. Received bye( N C. Date of Delivery
34VE 1 f� -F -6 7
D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑ Yes
if YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
Eff Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail_ 9 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Et" Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from servicefab" — 7007 0220 0003 1486 1483
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
1

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class Mail .
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender. Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources//Aquifer Protection
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
11 I I III I I Ili III 111rl 11111 l I I I I 1 I III I1 � Ill r I I r III 111111111 llr It

OF W AD Michael F. Easley, Governor
mot pG 'William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
O `C
Division of Water Quality
May 2, 2007
CERTIFIED MAII,
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
(7007 0220 000314861483)
Gwendolyn H. Peedin
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Re: Request for Information
Sludge Survey Report
Donnie Peedin Farm
NCA296005
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Roesch :
Your Animal Waste Management General NPDES Permit contains a condition
that addresses the sludge survey requirement for the lagoon(s) at your animal
feeding operation.
Your NPDES Permit Number NCA296005 Condition M.16, on page 10 states:
"All facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this permit, shall conduct
a survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons within one (1) year of receiving
the COC and every year thereafter. This survey shall include but not be limited to
a sketch showing the depth of sludge in the various locations within each lagoon.
This survey shall be submitted as part of the facility's annual report in the year it
was conducted..."
Our records indicate that the Division has not received the sludge survey results
for the year 2006 from your facility and your facility had not been previously
exempted based on prior surveys. The form was due March 1, 2007. To avoid
possible enforcement action for a violation of your permit, please submit the
results by May 18, 2007 to the following address:
Miressa D. Garoma
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
t
Carolina
urally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatMurality.oM Location: 273 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpporlunitylAiflmadve Acton Employer 50% Recyde&lD% Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Gwendolyn Peedin
Page 2
5r3r2om
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you
the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State
Statue or permitting requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 252-948-3939.
Sincerely,
David May
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office Regional
Office
cc: File 96-05
Prestage Farms, P O Box 438, Clinton, North Carolina 28329
APS Central Files

September 1, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MS. GWENDOLYN H PEEDIN
DONNIE PEEDIN FARM
1672 OLD SMITHFIELD ROAD
GOLDSBORO, NC 27530
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
SEP - 1 2006
1
WASHINGTON REGIONA, OFFICE
DWO
Subject: Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool
Donnie Peedin Farm
Permit Number NCA296005
Facility 96-5
Wayne County
Dear Ms. Peedin:
The Division's records show that a completed PLAT Form has NOT been submitted for this facility. If
our records are in error please resubmit the completed PLAT Form for this farm.
There is a condition in your Animal Waste Management General NPDES Permit addressing the
completion of the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool for your animal feeding operation upon
notification by the Division of Water Quality (Division).
Your NPDES Permit Number NCA296005 Condition 1.6 states:
"If prior to the expiration date of this permit either the state or federal government
establishes Phosphorus loss standards that are applicable to land application activities at a
facility operating under this permit, the Permittee must conduct an evaluation of the facility
and its CAWMP under the requirements of the Phosphorus loss standards to determine the
facility's ability to comply with the standards. This evaluation must be documented on
forms supplied or approved by the Division and must be submitted to the Division. This
evaluation must be completed by existing facilities within six (6) months of receiving
notification from the Division.
The method of evaluation is the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) developed by NC State
University and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. PLAT addresses four potential loss
pathways: leaching, erosion, runoff and direct movement of waste over the surface. Each field must be
individually evaluated and rated as either low, medium, high or very high according to its Phosphorus
loss potential. The ratings for your farm must be reported to DWQ using the attached certification form.
The PLAT forms must be kept as records on your farm for future reference.
The Division's records show that you received the notification to conduct PLAT on January 9, 2004. To
avoid possible enforcement action for a violation of your permit, The Division of Water Quality requests
that the following items be addressed:
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.nCwaterauality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAffinnative Acton Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Noe Carolina
Niurally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 'Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Submit justification for not responding within 180 days of receipt of the PLAT notification
letter.
Consult with your technical specialist and submit a written schedule for completing the PLAT
evaluation.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in a civil penalty assessment for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to
levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
Please provide this office with a written response on or before September 30, 2006.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me by email at
[e-mail] or by phone at [phone] or you may contact the Washington Regional
Office at [phone]. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Duane Leith
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: _
Facility File 96-5

�0F W A 7F�P
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. director
Division of Water Quality
December 1. 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Gwendolyn H Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring NPDES General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation NPDES General Permits, which expire on
July I, 2007. Due to changes in federal rules, facilities that do not discharge nor propose to discharge may choose whether or not to
retain coverage under an NPDES General Permit. Copies of the draft animal waste operation NPDES general permits and the State
Non -Discharge General Permits are available at hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ans/afou/downloads.htm or by writing or calling:
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number. [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under one of these two types of general permits, you must submit an application for permit
coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a `Reauest for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring
NPDES General Permit_' The application form must be completed and returned by January 2, 2007. Please note, you must include
two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact the
Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221.
Sincerely,
Ted L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - 960005
Prestage Farms Inc
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: www,newaterouality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh., NC 27604
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedlt 0% Post Consumer Paper
Telephone:
Fax L
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
No Carolina
(919) tura!!y
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

Ms. Gwendolyn H Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
April 30, 2009
Miressa D Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Subject: File No: PC-2009-0016
Farm # 96-005
Wayne County
Request For Remission
To Whom It May Concern:
I am requesting a remission of the civil penalties assessed against me and am providing
the following justification, per the factors utilized in considering remission.
(a) For violating Condition I.1. and II. 4 of the State General Permit for failing to
apply waste at a rate in accordance with the CAW MP causing excessive
ponding, and discharging hog waste to surface waters without the proper use of
BMP's.
Eddie Rowe, my OIC, applied the swine effluent at proper agronomic rates over an
irrigation pull of 680 feet in length. Eric Newsome, the DWQ investigator, agreed that
the pull was dry with the exception of the first 50 feet of the pull, where there was some
ponding, which the pictures and evidence supports. However, this ponding did not
discharge to waters of the state. In actuality, some of the ponding did move to a
depression of surface water, which is not headwaters of Falling Creek, and is certainly
not located within 13 feet of Falling Creek. Additionally, Mr. Rowe talked with David
May, the Washington Region Supervisor and Mr. Newsome on January 26, 2009 and set
up a meeting for January 30, 2009 on the site to discuss the Notice of Violation. When
he called back on the 29"', he was told that they would not be coming out to the site. I
find that to be very unprofessional and offered us no opportunity to discuss the action
with them prior to the Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement moving forward.
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation.
Since the incident, a new irrigation design has been put in place, new underground
hydrants have been completely installed and new hard hose traveler installed. A new
OIC has also taken over the irrigation responsibilities at the farm. His name is Keith Hill,
Operator Certification # 986441. 1 think this will ensure that this type of incident will not
happen at this facility again.
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident.
RECEIVED I DES I)VYQ h
AQUI�-�nTFt
MAY 0 5 2009

As mentioned in section (a), the ponding occurred in the first 50 feet of the ' dion
pull. This was a result of the purging of the line as the pressure is slowly bu on the
line, and the stream is not yet in the flan spray that is typical when the press ; at
normal for the irrigation event, thus resulting in larger droplets and more vole failing in
a smaller area of the pull area, thus being inadvertent and unavoidable.
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous vi ns.
Neither the owner (s), not the operator in charge have been assessed civil F fes for
any prior violations.
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining nt ;ary
remedial actions.
I am finishing up the completion of installation of the new irrigation system, as -Vell as
some fine grading, and new irrigation equipment. I have not made the final payments on
all of this work, but I have invoices for $41,789.77 to date. I have already expended over
$20,000.00 for work completed. I believe that my money being spent to have a new,
certified irrigation design, with underground and hydrants, and new equipment will better
serve environmental stewardship, and prevent any future potential situations such as
what occurred on December 30, than to pay $4,000.00 to the State. I would hope that
you would view this in a similar manner. Everyone realizes what very tough economic
times we are currently in, and I am no different. The swine industry is suffering through
a very tough time.
I have made and continue to make concentrated and sincere efforts to improve the
manure management on my farm. This was an isolated incident. Mr. Rowe has handled
the land application on my farm for 13 years, and we have never experienced any
problems. I would hope you would take all of that, as well as the previous information
into consideration, as you consider my remission request.
Respectfully submitted,
r
Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAYNE
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
GWENDOLYN H. PEEDIN
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC-2009-0016
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $5104.27 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality dated April 3, 2009, the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an
adminisitative hearing in *the above -stated matter anal does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the 3o day of A PR i L. 200q .
S NATURE
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: PC-2009-0016 County: Wayne
Assessed Party: Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Permit No. (if applicable): AWS960005 Amount Assessed: $5104.27
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
" Reguest For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing-, and Stipulation of
Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors Iisted below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the--civi-I-penalty assessment--document--Pursuant to-N.£i6-.S. §_ 143B-282:1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to yourcaseand provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
J (a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
yr (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
V (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
v (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
✓ (e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (Le,, explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION (attach additional pages as necessary):

ATF3-1�
AWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
May 5, 2009
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
SUBJECT: Remission Request
Farm # 96-0005
Wayne County
File No. PC-2009-0016
Permit No. AWS960005
Dear Ms. Peedin:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request, on May 5, 2009, for remission
of the civil penalty levied against the subject facility. The Director of the Division of
Water Quality will review your evidence and inform you of her decision in the
matter of your remission request.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
cc: David May, Washington APS Regional Supervisor
File # PC-2009-0016
APS Central Files
Sincerely,
V�p
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
�I
=-7
.. _ ; �.j�;tONALOFFIC'-
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION One
rw 1636 Mall ee Center Ral6gh, worth Carolina 2799 s36 N---777►►►orthCarolllla
Locatm 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh,North C roina 27604 lltlll"llj�l�
Phone: [phone] t FAX [phone] FAX [phone] ! Customer Servim 1-8r7 623-E743 s%/
Intemet. www.nmatemualiity.om

Ms. Gwendolyn H Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
April 30, 2009
Miressa D Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Subject: File No: PC-2009-0016
Farm # 96-005
Wayne County
Request For Remission
To Whom It May Concern:
I am requesting a remission of the civil penalties assessed against me and am providing
the following justification, per the factors utilized in considering remission.
(a) For violating Condition 1.1. and 11. 4 of the State General Permit for failing to
apply waste at a rate in accordance with the CAWMP causing excessive
ponding, and discharging hog waste to surface waters without the proper use of
BMP's.
Eddie Rowe, my OIC, applied the swine effluent at proper agronomic rates over an
irrigation pull of 680 feet in length. Eric Newsome, the DWQ investigator, agreed that
the pull was dry with the exception of the first 50 feet of the pull, where there was some
ponding, which the pictures and evidence supports. However, this ponding did not
discharge to waters of the state. In actuality, some of the ponding did move to a
depression of surface water, which is not headwaters of Falling Creek, and is certainly
not located within 13 feet of Falling Creek. Additionally, Mr. Rowe talked with David
May, the Washington Region Supervisor and Mr. Newsome on January 26, 2009 and set
up a meeting for January 30, 2009 on the site to discuss the Notice of Violation. When
he called back on the 29`h, he was told that they would not be coming out to the site. I
find that to be very unprofessional and offered us no opportunity to discuss the action
with them prior to the Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement moving forward.
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation.
Since the incident, a new irrigation design has been put in place, new underground
hydrants have been completely installed and new hard hose traveler installed. A new
OIC has also taken over the irrigation responsibilities at the farm. His name is. Keith-kiM
Operator Certification # 986441. 1 think this will ensure that this type of incident will not
happen at this facility again.
i
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accide . t. j
J
RECEIVED i OE"� QWQ
SFCiIOH
AGIU��R aRn1�c'.
MAY 0 5 2409

As mentioned in section (a), the ponding occurred in the first 50 feet of the irrigation
pull. This was a result of the purging of the line as the pressure is slowly built up on the
line, and the stream is not yet in the fan spray that is typical when the pressure is at
normal for the irrigation event, thus resulting in larger droplets and more volume falling in
a smaller area of the pull area, thus being inadvertent and unavoidable.
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations.
Neither the owner (s), not the operator in charge have been assessed civil penalties for
any prior violations.
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
I am finishing up the completion of installation of the new irrigation system, as well as
some fine grading, and new irrigation equipment. I have not made the final payments on
all of this work, but I have invoices for $41,789.77 to date. I have already expended over
$20,000.00 for work completed. I believe that my money being spent to have a new,
certified irrigation design, with underground and hydrants, and new equipment will better
serve environmental stewardship, and prevent any future potential situations such as
what occurred on December 30, than to pay $4,000.00 to the State. I would hope that
you would view this in a similar manner. Everyone realizes what very tough economic
times we are currently in, and I am no different. The swine industry is suffering through
a very tough time.
I have made and continue to make concentrated and sincere efforts to improve the
manure management on my farm. This was an isolated incident. Mr. Rowe has handled
the land application on my farm for 13 years, and we have never experienced any
problems. I would hope you would take all of that, as well as the previous information
into consideration, as you consider my remission request.
yRespectfully submitted,
V
Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAYNE
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
GWENDOLYN H. PEEDIN
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC-2009-0016
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $5104.27 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality dated April 3, 2009, the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative bearing in nhe above -stated matter and does ssti'pniade that the facts- are as alleged iri the
assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the 30 day of A PR i L
ADDRESS
Nil
TELEPHONE
S (INATURE
r
M_

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: PC-2009-0016 County: Wayne
Assessed Party: Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Permit No. (if applicable): AWS960005 Amount Assessed: $5104.27
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearine, and Stipulation of
Facts " form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the -civil penalty assessment -document —Pursuant to N :6.S. §-1A3B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
✓ (a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrond lly applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
v (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i. e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
V (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
✓ (e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION (attach additional pages as necessary):
!,' AY - 7 2009
-- ---- . - _ OFFICE:

r 4-
Memo
To: David May
From: Eric Newsome
CC:
Date: February 2, 2009
Re: Meeting w/ Eddie Rowe Concerning Donnie Peedin Farm NOV/NRE
At 10:00 am Mr. David May and Eric Newsome of the Aquifer
Protection Section met with Mr. Eddie Rowe, operator of the Donnie Peedin
Farm (facility #96-5). Mr. Rowe explained that he has been operating the
farm for the previous thirteen years without a violation of this type. The field
in question (#8) was, according to Mr. Rowe, irrigated in two pulls on
12/30/2008 at a linear cart rate of 547min. Furthermore, Mr. Rowe contends
that such a cart rate only applied 1 2/10 total inches of waste water on field #8
during that period —an amount close to the 1" guidance of the farm Waste
Utilization Plan. According to Eddie Rowe the surface water described as
"headwaters to Falling Creek" is something other than a perennial stream.
Although he admits there is water standing year round, the source of said
surface water could be impacts from wildlife (e.g. beaver dam). Photos
supplied by Mr. Rowe were given to Mr. May and Newsome to support his
claim that the surface water is not connected to further confluences of Falling
Creek. In some of the pictures were a line of utility poles claimed to separate
the affected surface water from farther northeast runs. Lastly, Mr. Rowe
stated that he has taken water samples from the affected surface water and
is preparing to challenge Division of Water Quality lab results for BOD5 , fecal
coliform, and nitrogen.
In response to the statements of Mr. Rowe, the central issue stems
from the description of the surface water as a tributary or as a perennial
stream. The seven ponded areas on field #8 clearly meet the permit
definition of excessive, as they remained visible twenty four (24) hours after
the irrigation event. The General Non -Discharge permit for the facility
doesn't require a definite length of time for a body to become surface water.
Furthermore, the permit describes surface water as any, "surface
accumulation of water, whether public or private, or natural or artificial...".
Inspection photos taken by Mr. Newsome 12/31/08 indicate the area as likely
an area of surface water created by groundwater influences (i.e. wetlands).
This too is covered in Permit Condition 1.1. "Performance Standards" as a
prohibited area of discharge. Thus it is believed that the Notice of Violation
(NOV)/Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement (NRE) should stand.
1

ME
WAY N E COUNTY FOR F SA USE ONLY 1 inch equals 496.150917 feet
Disclaimer: Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and
attached maps) for exact wetland boundaries and determinations, or contact NRCS.

Memorandum
To: Keith Larick, Animal Feeding Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation Permitting Compliance Unit
Through: David May, Water Quality Supervisor L m
Washington Regional Office
From: Mark E. Newsome, Environmental Engineer I
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Enforcement Package
Donnie Peedin Farm
Permit No. AWS960005
Wayne County
Date: January 30, 2009
Introduction:
The Donnie Peedin Farm is owned by Gwendolyn H. Peedin and operated by Mr. Eddie Rowe.
This facility, located on Stevens Mill Road in Wayne County, began operation in 1994. The
facility has the capacity to raise 7,350 feeder to finish swine and the overall design for this
facility is 992,2501bs steady state live weight.
Report:
On December 31, 2008 at 8:00 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
anonymously received a report of wastewater over application to crops at the Donnie Peedin
Farm. On December 31, 2008 Eric Newsome of the DWQ investigated and determined that
excessive ponding occurred on a 4.05-acre oats field due to excessive spray irrigation. There
were seven ponded areas (1,287 total estimated gallons) that remained twenty-four (24) hours
after the original irrigation on December 30, 2008. Furthermore, one of the areas (approximately
5 gallons of volume) was thirteen feet from the headwaters of Falling Creek —a distance less
than the twenty-five (25) foot buffer required by the facility Confined Animal Waste
Management Plan. Chemical analyses of grab samples taken from Falling Creek, adjacent to the
spray field, indicated significant levels of fecal coliform (>2000count/100ml), Biochemical
Oxygen Demand, nitrogen, and phosphorous. Laboratory results and visual evidence from
Falling Creek indicate that either wind drift or runoff from the December 30, 2008 irrigation
entered waters of the state. No telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional
Office within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the December 30, 2008 discharge or
of the waste application that exceeded limits outlined in the Confined Animal Waste
Management Plan.
Please find a table with the sample results below.
The Finding and Decisions and Assessment Factors are attached for review.

Conclusion:
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin, owner of the Donnie Peedin Farm, is in violation of the permit and
North Carolina General Statue 143-215.1(a) for discharging hog waste to surface waters; failing
to apply wastewater such that ponding and runoff were avoided; failing to maintain buffer strips
as specified in the facility's CAWMP near land application areas and; failing to notify DWQ of
the non compliance events.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the appropriate civil penalties be assessed against this subject facility,
Donnie Peedin Farm, located in Wayne County, owned by Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin. The
Washington Regional Office recommends that penalties be assessed for the four violations
described in the Conclusion.
3

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL OPERATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
ENFORCEMENT # NOV-2009-PC-0019
Section I: General Information
1. Facility Name: Donnie Peedin Farm
2. Facility or Permit No.: AWS960005
3. Parties named in assessment: Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin
4. (Mailing) Address: 1672 Old Smithfield Road, Goldsboro, NC 27530
5. Telephone No.: 919-734-5299
6. Location of Facility: Stevens Mill Road
7. Type of Operation: 7,350 Feeder to Finish
8. Registered Agent (if applicable): N/A
9. Registered Agent Address (if applicable): N/A
10. Date(s) of noted violations: December 31, 2008
11. Receiving Stream and Classification (if applicable): Falling Creek, Class C
12. Regional Office: Washington Regional Office
13. Report Prepared By: M. Eric Newsome
Section II: Findings
1. Case Narrative: On December 31, 2008 at 8:00 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (DWO) anonymously received a report of wastewater over application to crops at the
Donnie Peedin Farm. On December 31, 2008 Eric Newsome of the DWO investigated and
determined that excessive ponding occurred on a 4.05-acre oats field due to excessive spray
irrigation. There were seven ponded areas (1,287 total estimated gallons) found to have
remained twenty-four (24) hours after the original irrigation on December 30, 2008.
Furthermore, one of the areas (approximately 5 gallons of volume) was thirteen feet from the
headwaters of Falling Creek —a distance less than the twenty-five (25) foot buffer required
by the facility Confined Animal Waste Management Plan. Chemical analyses of grab
samples taken from Falling Creek, adjacent to the spray field, indicated significant levels of
fecal coliform (>200count/100ml), Biochemical Oxygen Demand, nitrogen, and
phosphorous. Laboratory results and visual evidence from Falling Creek indicate that either
wind drift or runoff from the December 30, 2008 irrigation entered waters of the state. No
telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional Office within twenty-four (24)
hours of becoming aware of the December 30, 2008 discharge or of the waste application that
exceeded limits outlined in the Confined Animal Waste Management Plan.
2. Farm and/or Company Compliance History: This facility had one Notice of Violation issued
on April 27, 2007 for failure to submit their 2006 Annual Certification Form (NPDES Permit
NCA296005).
3. Amount of Waste discharged (if applicable): (Drift) into Falling Creek. Approximately 5
gallons seen thirteen feet from water's edge.

Sample Results (if applicable) with locations of samples taken noted in relation to discharge
point: Three surface water samples were taken along the bank of the surface water to Falling
Creek; one at the southeastern edge (A -"upstream"), the second at the southwestern edge (BM
"discharge"), and the last at the northwestern edge (C-"downstream"). Lab results showed
detectable, peaking levels of ammonia, total kjeldahl nitrogen, and phosphorus present from
samples A to C.
Sample
Sampling
Fecal
BOD
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus,
Location
Date
Coliform
(mg/1)
NH3 as N
(mgfL)
Nitrites
P (mg/L)
(Count/100ml
(mg/L)
(NO3, NO2)
(mg/L)
A -"Upstream"
12/31/2008
4800
140
140
170
ND
35
B-"Discharge"
12/31/2008
7000
300
260
300
ND
45
C"Downstream"
12/31/2008
2000
270
83
110
ND
26
ND -Not Detected
5. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) recalcitrance:
Operator Mr. Eddie Rowe explained his reason for the 30 December 2008 irrigation events as
a means to lower lagoon levels in advance of weekend storms. Further irrigation events were
halted, to allow for natural infiltration of wastewater. No more applications can be made to
this oats crop, as the 50 lb/acre limit has now been met —Per submitted IRR2 form.
6. Damage? Y/N If yes, include report from WRC: No visible damage other than to the oats
crop. With regard to the surface water, no damage was seen as no aquatic animals were
visible. However, lab results indicate that water quality was impacted and impaired.
7. Mitigating Circumstances: None. This is the facility's first offense with regard to any
operational or maintenance issue. Future plans with the farm are to redesign their irrigation
system to underground piping. This should assist with proper gun placement.
8. Recommendations made to the owner/operator: Mr. Rowe was advised to continue with
plans for using underground ound piping; the facility was also asked to consider using fresh water
from the tributary to irrigate this crop, particularly on the field fringes near the water. This
might avoid bringing the gun too_ close to the 25' buffer.

9. Costs to the State for the enforcement procedures (Show Breakdown):
Total Staff Time (8 hours) $ 224.43
Central Office $ 100.00
Travel Cost (90.1 miles x 2 @ 0.470) $ 84.69
Laboratory Cost $ 195.15
TOTAL $ 604.27
10. Recommendations for further DWQ Action: Continue to focus on facility records and field
conditions during annual compliance inspections.
11. Other Comments: N/A
Section III: Assessment Factors required to be considered by G.S. 14313-282.1(b):
The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation: Animal waste has the potential to deplete
dissolved oxvgen in the affected water bodv to a noint which is harmful to aauatic life at the
point of discharge as well as downstream. Waste water also contains nutrients which have
the potential to spawn algal growth to the Doint which is harmful to aquatic life. Surface
waters of Falling Creek did receive wastewater.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: The violations occurred on December 30, 2008
between the hours of 12:00 pm and 7:30 pm. The ponding was considered severe.
Contaminant concentrations were very high.
3. The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality: The presence of wastewater could be
seen in the surface water, but the exact volume discharged could not be directiv determined.
Analytical results at the point of visible turbidity (labeled point "B"—Discharge) show
significant levels for ammonia, total kjeldahl nitrogen, and phosphorus. The level of fecal
coliform was well above the 200 count/100 ml standard for class C surface water.
Sample
Sampling
Fecal
BOD
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus,
Location
Date
Coliform
(mg/1)
NH3 asN
(mg/L)
Nitrites
P (mg/L)
(Count/100m1)
(mg/L)
(NO3,
NOZ)
(mg/L)
B-"Discharge"
12/31/2008
7000
300
260
300
ND
45
ND -Not Detected
The cost of rectifying the damage: The farm operator could have spent far fewer hours bein
Dreventative (monitoring the sDrav operations) versus the notential of a monetary
enforcement penalty that encompasses inspection hours, central office and laboratory hours.
Ruts and ponding created by the excessive irrigation and heavy farm equipment have
damaged part of the oats crop. The discharge is not attributed to any equipment failure
requiring repair. No expenses were incurred during abatement measures.

5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance: Money is saved when better management.
skills are implemented to improve overall management of the facility, environmentally and
productively. No money was saved through hydraulic over -application.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional: Mr. Eddie Rowe works under
the Type A operator_ license of Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin, meaning:, they both are responsible
for properly perating the farm irrigation system. Since spray field operations at this farm
have occurred for thirteen years without incidents it is believed that this discharge was not
intentional. It is the belief of the inspector that Ms. Peedin (or her surrogate) failed to
monitor the gun and correct it during veriods of improper operation.
7. The prior record of the violator(s) in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority: The Donnie
Peedin Fann has not been cited for any permit violations, under their current State Non -
Discharge permit, prior to this event.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Total Staff Time (8 hours)
Central Office
Travel Cost (90.1 miles x 2 @ 0.470)
Laboratory Cost
TOTAL
10
$ 224.43
$ 100.00
$ 84.69
$ 195.15
$ 604.27

Breakdown of the Laboratory Costs
Notice of Violation/Notice of Recommended Enforcement
Donnie Peedin Farm 96-0005
Procedure
No of Samples
Cost/Sample
Total Cost
Ammonia as N in liquid
3
$ 14.00
$ 42.00
Total Kjeldahl N as N in liquid
3
$ 16.39
$ 49.17
Nitrite/Nitrate as N in liquid
3
$ 18.37
$ 55.11
Total Phosphorous
3
$ 16.29
$ 48.87
Grand Total
$ 195.16
Breakdown of Lab Costs 29Jan2009

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAYNE
IN THE MATTER OF
Donnie Peedin Farm
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
File No.
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENTS OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I,
Theodore L. Bush Jr., Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin owns the Donnie Peedin Farm, a permitted/certified swine
animal feeding operation in Wayne County.
B. Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin was issued a Certificate of Coverage AWS960005 under
State General Permit AWG100000 on July 1, 2007, effective upon issuance, with an
expiration date of September 30, 2009.
C. Condition No. I. 1. of the "Performance Standards' of the State General Permit states
in part that, "Any discharge of waste which reaches surface waters or wetlands is
prohibited except as otherwise provided in this permit. Waste shall not reach surface
waters by runoff, drift, manmade conveyance, direct application, direct discharge or
through ditches not otherwise classified as state waters ... Any discharge or application
of waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as
follows: (a) discharges from the ditches are controlled by best management practices
(BMPs) designed in accordance with NRCS standards; (b) the BMPs have been
submitted to and approved by the Division of Water Quality (Division); (c) the BMPs
were implemented as designed to prevent a discharge to surface waters or wetlands;
(d) the waste was removed immediately from the ditch upon discovery; and (e) the
event was documented and reported in accordance with Part III.13. of this General
Permit. Nothing in this exception shall excuse a discharge to surface waters or
wetlands except as may result because of rainfall from a storm event more severe than
the 25-year, 24-hour storm."

D. Condition No. II. 4. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State
General Permit states that "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the
CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the
nutrient of concern for the receiving crop. In no case shall land application rates
result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given application event".
E. Condition No. II.20 of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State
General Permit states that the permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other
equivalent practices as specified in the facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure
storage areas and land application areas.
F. Condition No. 11I. 13. of the "Monitoring and Reporting Requirements" of the State
General Permit requires in part that the permittee shall report by telephone to the
appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours
following first knowledge of the following: a) Any discharge to ditches, surface
waters, or wetlands, or d) Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in
the CAWMP or where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
G. On December 31, 2008, The Division of Water Quality received an anonymous
complaint that wastewater had been over -applied to cropland at the Donnie Peedin
Farm. An investigation on December 31, 2008 of the alleged event revealed that
ponding in different areas of oats field #8 (4.05 acres) resulted from over -irrigation.
Visual evidence not only supported the indication that the December 30, 2008
irrigations caused wastewater ponding, but also that wastewater was applied 13 feet
from headwaters to Falling Creek. Analyses of grab samples taken from the
headwaters adjacent to field #8 detected Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), fecal
coliform, and nutrients (ammonia nitrogen, phosphorous) up to 300 mg/L, 7000
count/100ml, 260 mg/L, and 45 mg/L respectively . The detected surface water
pollutant levels combined with the appearance of the surface water indicate that a
discharge occurred to waters of the State. Facility irrigation records supplied by
operator Mr. Eddie Rowe show that irrigation occurred December 30, 2008.
H. The Donnie Peedin Farm has had one Notice of Violation issued on April 27, 2007
for failure to submit their 2006 Annual Certification Form (NPDES Permit
NCA296005).
I. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $604.27.
Based upon the above Findings of Facts, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin is a "person" within the meaning of G. S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G. S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.

C. The above -cited discharge to surface waters violated Condition No. I. 1. of the State
General Permit,
D. The above -cited failures to apply waste at land application rates in accordance with
the CAWMP and to avoid excessive ponding or runoff violated Condition No. 1I. 4.
of the State General Permit.
E. The above -cited failure of the Operator In Charge (or their surrogate) to apply animal
waste such that a twenty-five (25) foot buffer is maintained between the land
application site and perennial waters violated Condition No. II.20. of the State
General Permit.
F. The above -cited failure to notify DWQ of a discharge violated Conditions No. III. 13
a, d, and e of the State General Permit.
G. Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.
S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more that twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a
permit required by G. S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Ms. Gwendolyn
Peedin, pursuant to G. S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G. S. 14313-282.1(b)(8).
I. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the authority to
assess civil penalties in this matter
Based upon the above Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin, owner of the Donnie Peedin Farm, is hereby
assessed a civil penalty of:
For violating Condition No. I. 1. of the State General Permit for
discharging hog waste to surface waters without the proper use of
Best Management Practices.
For violating Condition No. II. 4. of the State General Permit by
applying waste that caused excessive ponding.
$ For violating Condition No. II. 20. of the State General Permit by
failing to maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as
specified in the facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage
areas and land application areas.
3

For violating Conditions No. I11. 13. a., and d. of the State General
Permit by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours
following first knowledge of a) the occurrence of a discharge to
ditches, surface waters, or wetlands and d) the occurrence of waste
application in excess of the limits outlined in the CAWMP.
$ 604.27 Enforcement costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G. S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G. S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Theodore L. Bush, Jr. Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality

WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE - APS SECTION - PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Site Name: Donnie Peedin Farm 96-5 Incident/Permit Number: AWS960005
Site Location: Goldsboro, NC Site Town/City: Goldsboro, NC
Photographer. Photographer
E Newsome Lr E Newsome
r ! ,rt ��� "• ;,�,' f : �'y��ia+u` �
Date:y Date,!
12131/2008 7 t4;.' 12/31/2008
Photo Location: T'oF= Photo Location:
(Pic#1) Oats crop from field 8 (as _ . 1 II Second ponded area of field 8
described in farm's IRR2 form); '``` „ l aj• with cart tracks in it. Area is 15'
held listed as #3 in the farm's q , west of the first pair of tire ruts in ."•''
Waste Plan. picture 1.
Photo Direction: Photo Direction:
facing west from the dirt path and }
the row of hog houses furthest Picture taken facing south, with
tracks running east -west.
from hog lagoon.
Comments: Comments:
The oats crop has two ruts thatu4 r ti yM
each measured 160' long, This picture will be called picture P/ �' ' kjlw"'"
believed to have been created by #2. '
over -irrigation.
Photographer. K .r "r `. r' . " k Photographer, �(inQ mw
E Newsome n:'� E Newsome z'
Date: Date • �r . aa- x
x� ,e: �,ky�. a,' � � r : i ":r ;•e�`' � " �i? rM3"r'�2�`.�'�'t��` ' �,r
l213l/2008 i► ^{ rye[ 1213112008
Photo Location y.' r° 4 rj ',�'' �4R36t: Photo Location:
rtD e
Another ponded area of field 8— ,t�17,
north/northwest of picture 2 and f , (Pic#4) Westernmost edge of fiel
closest to treeiine.
8.
Photo Direction J Photo Direction:
facing west/northwest toward
Facing west/southwest
headwaters of Falling Creek.
Comments: Comments:
i
This picture will be tatted picture This picture shows ponded area(in foreground) measured as 13'
#3from Fading Creek headwaters
(top of picture).
Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_005 Page 1 of 1

612-
Com
cem
-JN

� .:, � bra "" v {�p•„' ..: yl ;fR �•� � � �4., 1'}'ius. .f..ab'w�_ t
/
�W M
w,
(1008 �
l
[• t
1

�wf :,gra���n' sH
�� '" � +�
F
� xryfFy

tic

I n �.

WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE - APS SECTION - PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Site Name:
Donnie Peedin Farm 96-5
IncidentlPermit Number:
AWS960005
Site Location:
Goldsboro, NC
Site Town/City:
Goldsboro, NC
Photographer:
t
Photographer''`'°"
#G' �"
a
E Newsome'
x�(
E Newsome
Date:
�.".
Date:
h
12/3112008
", LR wr,
1213112008
Photo Location:
)
Photo Location.
Pic#1 Oats crop from field 8 as
( ) p (
Second ponded area of field 8
described in farm's IRR2 form);
; .
with cart tracks in it. Area is 15'
field listed as #3 in the farm's
f;
west of the first pair of tire ruts in
kF
Waste Plan.
`
r
' f
picture 1.
Photo Direction:
,
Photo Direction:
facing west from the dirt path and,
the row of hog houses furthest
Picture taken facing south, with
from hog lagoon,
,
tracks running east -west.
T
Comments:
The oats crophas two ruts that
Comments:
each measured 160' long,
This picture will be called picture
believed to have been created by
#2.
over -irrigation
Photographer:
E Newsome
Date:
1213112008
Photo Location:
Another ponded area of field 8—
north/northwest of picture 2 and
closest to treeline.
Photo Direction:
facing west/northwest toward
headwaters of Falling Creek.
Comments:
This picture will be called picture
#3.
Photographer:
E Newsome
Date:
12/31/2008
Photo Location:
(Pic#4) Westemmost edge of fiel
a.
Photo Direction.
Facing west/southwest
Comments:
This picture shows ponded area
(in foreground) measured as 13'
from Falling Creek headwaters
(lop of picture).
Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_005.xls Page 1 of 1
tiA;

Cem 11 a •
• . eBMI
��— 136 0
Cemt
1"i ILn `
J�
. konnie Pee n•Farrr�6_5 _
2: Field 8 (Oats j
ree
�Ihg•
134
133
as , tooh. Ir�

,f
PITt �
n ,.., � - �'�+'� ..4 i � i �i�,�'`r�by,,yti,�k './•. �f'4;a' � � •+ � � �' ra � �� �-.�. , ki—
I{ c
i! ;, ' .. �� lj-.• 4° , ..r 1'�'?d�, . �"�� lbw•+ ' 'f f' :.h "k
,
•�4•rt. � 1 F;� 1 �•��` � ,iy�r- } � J� �.>v - y'' f�' - .
� ��r, -. s I+',�' S � _r. ✓_.' ' �'. '} d '...
32/31 /2008
J
C , r 1 ��. a .,: d✓ • . qA � 11, � � xi! AI... ,y;� M � 1 �� � � � .r- i
•Pel,•t �,C,'� r,� r i. �^1:�4rin `."1sI•�'� ;+',t7br+� / Y.* '"�'a<
,f. �F c,�e�ji�' ��(- J. .,. T - •�� "av,� iSk�.* �<01' � �+4i� %:14 n;
i SW :i`1, t } �K. y•A f ~ ..

sooi/Is/
(�
1-
y
n
J r'
800Z l8 l l74
_
I
l
Zt1
r
t"

�F WATFR Michael F. Easley, Goverpor 4
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary e
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
O <
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
Gwen Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA296005
Donnie Peedin Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Wayne County
Dear Gwen Peedin :
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on February 20, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Gwen Peedin , authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS960005 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Donnie Peedin Farm, located in Wayne County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 7350 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keening?
and monitoring conditions in this permit. The Devices to Automatically Stgp Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Ouality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1st of each year.
IV:RV
NCDENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Intemet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
Zde -/
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wayne County Health Department
Washington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA296005
Permit File AWS960005
NDPU Files

r � t
R tt
ANIMAL WASTE IITILIZATION P7�AN
Producer: Gwen p"din
Location: 1672 O44<jFmithfield Road
Goldsbord NC 27530
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 7350.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste' utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
7350 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 13965 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
7350 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 16905 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
7256
4
WaB
BH
5.5
275
17.7
4867.5
I
APR-SEP
7256 -4 1 SG 71 50 17.7 885
I I SEP-MAY
7256
5
Ke
BH
5.5
275
7.12
1958
I
I
1
APR-SEP
7256
-5
SG
1
50
7.12
356
1
I
1
SEP-MAY
7256
6
Ke
BH
5.5
275
26.77
7361.75
I
I
1
APR-SEP
7256
-6
SG
1
50
26.77
1338.5
1
I
1
SEP-MAY
7256
7
NOA
BH
6.1
305
4.42
1348.1
I
I
1
APR-SEP
7256
-7
SG 1
50
4.42
221
1
I
SEP-MAY
7256
8
NOB
BH
6.1
4.05
1235.25
I
I
1305
APR-SEP
7256
-8
SG
1
50
4.05
202.5
I
SEP-MAY
END
I
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
TOTAL119773.6
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some pants o� North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
645
1
WaB
W
40
80
38.1
3048
SEP-APR
645 -1 WaB SB 25 72 28 38.1 2743.2
JUN-SEP
15
645 2 WaB W 40 80 1 13.2 1056
SEP-APR
645 -2 WaB SB 25 72 28 13.2 950.4
JUN-SEP
15
645 5 1 WaB BH7.5 275 1 15.0 4125
APR-SEP
645 -5 1 SG 1 50 1 15.0 750
SEP-MAY
END
TOTAL112672.6
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of oix to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
Die r/i1 e 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
60.06
19773.6
66.3
12672.6
126.36
32446.2
* BALANCE
-15541.2
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
IDS ns• '�

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2719.5 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 13597.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 45.325 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 108.78 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 8

4 � �
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
I Field
Soil Type
645
1
WaB
645
I I
12 I
WaB
645
I I
5 I
WaB
645
.I
WaB
645
I
I -2 I
WaB
(Application RatelApplic. Amount
crop I (in/hr) I (inches)
I
SB
I
SB
645
I -5
I
I SG
7256
14
I
I WaB
I
I BH
7256
15
I
I Ke
I BH
7256
16
I Ke
I BH
7256
17
I NOA
I BH
.6
*1
I
.6
I *1
I
I .6
I
I *1
I
.6
I
I
I *1
.6
I *1
.6
I
I *1
I
.6
i
*1
I .6
I *1
.6
I *1
I
.5
I
I *1
Page: 9

7256
I 8
7256
I -4
7256
I
I -5
7256
i
I -6
7256
I
I -7
7256
i
I -8
I NOB
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
BH
I I_
I .5
SG
i .6 I
SG
I I_
I .6
SG
I I_
I .6
SG
I I_
I .5
I SG
I .5
I I_
*1
*1
*1
*1
*1
*1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
vaeye 2 IL

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
THIS WUP HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT WETTABLE ACRES BASED ON 75%
RULE.
WHERE DOUBEL CROP SOYBEANS ARE USED THE REALISTIC YIELD EXPECTATION
IS REDUCED BY 7 BUSHELS (28 POUNDS). SOYBEAN RESIDUE SHOULD BE
CREDITED WITH 20 POUNDS CARRY OVER OF NITROGEN TO THE NEXT CROP.
Page: li

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 1.0 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See 'Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 14

� � T
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:Donnie Peedin (#96-5)
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals -are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
5
Name of Facility Owner: Gwen Peedin
(Please print)
ui
Signature:&E,,hDate:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Patricia S. Gabriel
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-731-1532
Address (Agency): 208 W. Chestnut St.
Goldsboro NC 27530-4708
Signature: /x'k Date: - ckck
Page: 15

Nil
AUG-@5-2@03 11:11 AM
P_01
`To , P, r Zz.
Qo
pw ►�
w�.e�
i t^^'ti'1 t v-.r
rov r
Ao
�y r [s ue
A-59-' 1' I O J (
p -4o J • J 1
1 V
1• 1 -�A, /fi v C. V
p�
�•.-s
- 1 �'ca; ©war- 1►
fJ�ro b lc,., ,- r-x.�►.
ov. mac- 3 j Lf-, S, ) 3 , J �fi, 1 s
"Try re&,-"�x— J;- 17 mAle-
re-pa,�. do no-t-

POW iRR-g
Trm
FIMd Flat (Poo trim)
Farm ON
Owntra Adch
Lagoon UgWd Itrlgetlon FI@Ws R000nd
One Form for ERdi FWW pw (>R CWW
Fadby Numbor �
ft"
Ingttltt Opntl�t
Adat w
opwawt mww F _ I -0.3
�0111 WNW umboMtn phn
Crop r$m Rtaamr W" MN
t wIng Ub,*W •
III a LM 1.0 ® 0 M m of iin oil
wr�i�ss�ns�
owmft
Oplrow CKMO" A
- Wartihert'.WM "im. PG-" am*. a -chug, R-Reln, "Wwoulk w-4Nndlt
POW +o tM >Rlaion mutt Irrtltt to alpnlry that inaptcllont � bortr�s4d st heal wnay i20 miraults
D
c
m
C>I
N
m
m
w
N
D
3

Memo
To: David May
From: Eric Newsome
CC:
Date: February 2, 2009
Re: Meeting w/ Eddie Rowe Concerning Donnie Peedin Farm NOWNRE
At 10:00 am Mr. David May and Eric Newsome of the Aquifer
Protection Section met with Mr. Eddie Rowe, operator of the Donnie Peedin
Farm (facility #96-5). Mr. Rowe explained that he has been operating the
farm for the previous thirteen years without a violation of this type. The field
in question (#8) was, according to Mr. Rowe, irrigated in two pulls on
12/30/2008 at a linear cart rate of 547min. Furthermore, Mr. Rowe contends
that such a cart rate only applied 1 2J10 total inches of waste water on field #8
during that period —an amount close to the 1" guidance of the farm Waste
Utilization Plan, According to Eddie Rowe the surface water described as
"headwaters to Falling Creek" is something other than a perennial stream.
Although he admits there is water standing year round, the source of said
surface water could be impacts from wildlife (e.g. beaver dam). Photos
supplied by Mr. Rowe were given to Mr. May and Newsome to support his
claim that the surface water is not connected to further confluences of Falling
Creek. In some of the pictures were a line of utility poles claimed to separate
the affected surface water from farther northeast runs. Lastly, Mr. Rowe
stated that he has taken water samples from the affected surface water and
is preparing to challenge Division of Water Quality lab results for BOD5 , fecal
coliform, and nitrogen.
In response to the statements of Mr. Rowe, the central issue stems
from the description of the surface water as a tributary or as a perennial
stream. The seven ponded areas on field #8 clearly meet the permit
definition of excessive, as they remained visible twenty four (24) hours after
the irrigation event. The General Non -Discharge permit for the facility
doesn't require a definite length of time for a body to become surface water.
Furthermore, the permit describes surface water as any, "surface
accumulation of water, whether public or private, or natural or artificial...".
Inspection photos taken by Mr. Newsome 12/31/08 indicate the area as likely
an area of surface water created by groundwater influences (i.e. wetlands).
This too is covered in Permit Condition 1.1. "Performance Standards" as a
prohibited area of discharge. Thus it is believed that the Notice of Violation
(NOV)/Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement (NRE) should stand,
1

County: WAYNE
River Basin NEVI
Report To WAROSP
Collector: E NEWSOME
Region: WARD
Sample Matrix: SUrfaaewater
Loc. Type: RIVER/STREAM
Emergency Yes/No
COC Yes/No YEAS
Location ID: 96-DPA
Sample ID: AB39131
pF \NArfiq PO Number # 9wo028
O� Oq Date Received. 0110612009
Time Received' 08:20
ti
Labworks LoginlD SMATHIS
Date Reported: 1/22/09
Report Generated: 01/22/2009
VisitlD
Loc. Descr.: DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 RIGHT MOST END OF TRIBUTARY
Collect Date: 12131/2008 Collect Time:: 13:04 Sample Depth VVV
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www-dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
Bt-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
NE -No established PQL
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
83- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated P-Elevated POL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
B4-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated Q1-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
65-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC) 02- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
J2- Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
JU- Samples analyzed for this compound but nQLdetected3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated x+"ts'9
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated X1- Sample not analyzed for this compound
L
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value r _...-.t-1 1� I r� 7., j
f.
2 7 2009
:; JAIL
LAB :.i, l' JA Pd
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] ',Page ,t,;of 2Y-

NC DWQQ Laboratory Section Results
Location ID; 96-DPA
Loc. Descr.: DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 RIGHT MOST END OF TRIBUTARY
Visit ID
Sample ID AB39131
Collect Date, 1213112008
Collect Time:: 13:04
ICAS # Analyte Name
PQL
Result Qualifier
Units
Analyst/Date
Approved By !date
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
2.2
'C
HPARKER
SMATHIS
Method Reference
116109
117109
NUT
NH3 so N In liquid
0.02
140
mg1L as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10.107-06-1.J
V9109
1/16109
Total Igeldahl N as N In liquid
0.2
170
mg/L as N
MOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lachetl07.06-2-H
116109
1122f09
NO2+NO3 as N In liquid
0,02
0.02 U
mg1L as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference LocIO-107-04.1-c
119109
ill6109
Phosplwrus_total as P In liquid
0.02
35
mg2 as P
GBELK
CGREEN
Method Reference Lec10-115-OI-IEF
1113109
1122/09
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

i a
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMI )
COUNTY `1lA Ile- PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPO
RIVERBASIN ❑ AMDIENT STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT �!
REPORTTO: ARO FRO MRO RltaR WiRO WSROTS
AT BM
Other COMPLIANCE ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Shipped by: Bea Courier, (air, otr her ❑ EMERGENCY
COLLBCFORIS): . AI e" GWdI Q �
Eallmaled BOD Range: 0.5/3.25/25-65140.130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: ?A stA.%'C-
Seed: Yes❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes❑ No❑ al k �1
....RP.MARKSr '�` 1f7S+�CA,wa _ ,i d I_ wl_ti L. L..t ✓✓l
1
190D5310
mg/L
2
COD High 340
mg/L
3
COD Low 335
mg/L
4
ColiNrnc MF Fecal 31616
/I00m1
5
Collrorm:MPTotal 31504
/IOOmI
6
Colilbrm Tube real31615
/I001111
7
Colifbim Peal Strep 31613
/IDOmi
8
Residue: Total 500
mg/L
9
V01e111e 505
mg/L
10
Fixed 510
mg/l.
I I
Residue: Suspended 530
mg/L
12
Volatile 535
mg/L
13
Fixed 540
mg/L
14
pH 403
units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436
miVL
16
Acidity to pli g.3 435
mg/L
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415
mWL
78
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410
mg/L
19
TOC680
mg(L
20
Turbidity 76
NTU
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a 70953 pg/L
Color: Tree g0 PI -Co
Color:(pli ) 83 ADMI
Color:pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cy"Ide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Pormaldehyde71880 nrg/L
urea" and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardnen Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95
MBAS 39260 mg/L
Pheno1s32730 pg/L
Suirale 945 mg/I.
Sulnde745 mg/L
I W
..r.r.rr.. nury
Lab Number:
Date Received; Time:
Rec'd by-. 140 From: Bug outier I land Del.
DATA ENTR BY: C .
DATE REPORTED:
A tl L I T S B I C W GNXX
NH3 as N 610 mg(L
TKN as N 623 mg/L
2 plum NO3 as N 630 mg/L
AtoOfP:
Total u P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 665 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
Cd-Codmlum 1027 pg/L
Cr-Cluomlum;Tota11034 Pg/L
Cu-Copper 1042 1rdL
NI -Nickel 1067 p g/L
Ph -Lead 1051 poll.
Zn-Zinc 1092 Plitt.
Ag.Silver 1077 pg/L
AI -Aluminum 1105 poll.
Be -Beryllium 1012 pg/L
G-Cnkium 916 moll.
Co-Coball 1037 PBtL
Fe -Ion 1045 IrgIL
U-Lithium 1132 )rg/L
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Menganese 1055 Pg(L
Na-Sodium 929 mg/L
Anenic:Totel ID02 I. SIL
Se-Selenlum 1147 Irg/L
Hg-Mercury 11900 Pg/L
Organochlodne Pesticides
Organophosphonn Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Dase/Neulral Extractable Organics
Aeld Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle req'd)
Phyloplanklon
L 66 Uee Onlr
Tem emtureonarrival: o�
a I Point %
Gnduclance at 25"C
Waler Tem ture'C
D.O. mall,
10H
I Alkalinity
Acidity
Alr Te enlurs "C
It8.3 pit4.5
144.5 pit9.3
2
14
0
300
400
2244 431
2243 82242
10
Salinity 56
Precipitation (in/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
I Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity
Mean Stram Depth R.
Stream W Wth R.
80
45
32
6
.351
1350
35
64
4

county: WAYNE
River Basin d!' EU
Report'To 1NAROSP
Collector:
E NEWSOME
Region:
WARD
Sample Matrix:
Sudacewater
Loc. Type:
RIVERISTREAM
Emergency YesINo
Sample ID:
PO Number #
Date Received:
Time Received:
Labworks LoginlD
Date Reported:
Report Generated:
VisitlD
COG Yes/No YES
Loc. Descr.i QONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 POINT SOURCE 1
Location ID, 96-DPB Collect Date: 12131[2008 Coliect Time:: 13:15 Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwqlab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
B1-Countable membranes with <20 colonies, Estimated
62- Counts from all filters were zero.
B3- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
64-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20: Estimated
B5-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC)
J2- Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination: Estimated
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample, Estimated
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
LAB
AB39132
9W0029
01106/2009
08:20
SMATHIS
1 /22109
01/22/2009
b :� ) n I
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
NE -No established PQL
P-Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
01-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt -at -lab:'=
02- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject torch"ang� �I f ln;?try� nterGi)I�iityl
�ieCe U- Samples analyzed for this compound but Pqt
X1- Sample not analyzed for this compound ct>
JAJ
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] Page 1 of 2

NC (DWQ Laboratory Section Results
Location ID: 96-DPB
Loe'Uescr.: " DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 POINT SOURCE
V TID
Sample ID
AB39132
Collect Date:
12/31/2008
Collect Time::
13:15
CAS # Analyte Name
PQL
Result Qualifier
Units
Analyst/Date
Approved By /Date
Sarnple tempeteturo at rwelpt by la
.2
'C
HPARKER
SMATHIS
Method Reference
1/6/09
117109
NUT
NH3 as N In liquid
0.02
260
mglL as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference La00.107.06-1-J
1/9/09
1116109
Total IQeldahl N as N In liquid
0.2
300
mg/L as N
MOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lachat107-06-2-H
1/8/09
1122/09
NO2+NO3 as N In liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mg/L as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10-107.04-1-c
1/9109
1/16/09
Phosphorus —total as P In liquid
0.02
45
mg/L as P
GBELK
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10-115.01.1EF
1/13109
1/22109
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY V ' A n 1lf— PRIM�
RIVER BASIN Gatga- ❑ AMnIEN1'
REPORTTO: ARO FRO MRO RRO E>tOWSROT3
nrBM
12/
COMPLIANCE
Other
Shipped by: Du ,C urfo Other
COLLECI.OR(S): G , % ILW
Bsllmaled DOD Range:0-3/5-25/25-65/40-130or 100 plw
Seed: Yee❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes❑ No❑
I
DODS 310 mg/L
2
COD High340 mg/L
3
COD Low 335 mg/L
4
Colilbrrre MF Fecal 31616 /100MI
3
Coll form MrTolel31504 1100m1
6
Celirornc Tube Pecal31615 /I00nd
7
Colllbrrm Fecal Sump 31673 Mond
8
Residue: Total 300 mg/L
9
Volatile 503 mWL
10
FixedSlO mgfL
I 1
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
12
Volatile 535 mg/L
13
Fixed 540 mg/L
14
pit 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
16
Acidity to pH 1.3 435 mg/L
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
is
Alkalinity to pH 4.3 410 mg/1•
19
TOC 690 mg/L
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
❑ EMBROENCY
MA .E =
STREAM
❑ LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
EFFLUENT
❑ INFLUFNT
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a 70953 pg/L
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color.(pl1 ) 83 ADMI
Color:pR 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fruwida 931 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71810 mg/L
crease and Olh 556 mg(L
Herdnew Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond, 93
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 pglL
Sulfide 945 mg/l.
Sulfide 743 mg/L
Is]
9 w 00�q
For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number
( ✓
Date Received: DI-
- 0 Tim 0
Ree'd by: a
DATA ENTRY BY:
From: Bu ours-1•land Del.
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
r
H3 es N 610 mg/L
TKN as N 623 mg/l.
QO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 663 mg/L
PO4 as P 663 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 6% mg/L
Cd-Cadmium 1027 I'wL
Cr-ClromiuMTota1 1034 pg/L
Cu-Copper1042 pg/L
NI -Nickel 1067 pg/L
Pb-Lead 1051 Itg/L
Zn-Zinc 1092 pg/L
AM -Silver 1077 pg/L
AI -Aluminum 1105 V0-
Be-Beryllium 1012 Pg/L
Ca-Colclum 916 mg/L
Co -Cobalt 1037 pg/L
re -Iron 1045 pg/l-
LI-Lkhium 1132 pg/L
Mg-Mogneslum 927 mg/L
Mn-Mmpneae 1055 pg/L
Ne-Sadlum 929 rnWL
Araenlc:Total 1002 pg/L
Se -Selenium 1147 pg/L
HI -Memory 71900 pglL
Orpnochlorine Pesllelde
Orpnophosphonn Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Best/Neutral Extractable Orpnles
Acid Extractable Orpnks
Purgeable Organles (VOA bottle req'd)
Phyloplankton
La use Only
Temperature on arrival: l�
Sampling Point%
Conductance at25TC
I Water Tem lurs C
DAmg/L
PH
Allallnity
Acidity
Akre rsture'C
118.3 PH4.3
iH4.3 PH9.3
2
74
0
300
400
2244 431
i2243 82242
20
Salinity %.
Precipilotion (in/day)
Cloud Cover'/.
Wind Direction (Deg)
Siream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Vetoaity Mean Stream Depth A.
1
Stream Width R.
80
t5
12
36
1351
1350
35 64
4

County:
WAYNE
River Basin
NEU
Report To
WAROSP
Collector:
E NEWSOME
Region:
WARD
Sample Matrix:
Surfacewater
Loc. Type:
RIVER/STREAM
Emergency Yes/No
COG Yes/No
YES
Location ID. 96-DPC
Sample to:
PO Number #
Date Received:
Time Received:
Labworks LoginlD
Date Reported:
Report Generated
VisltlD
Loc. Descr.: DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 LEFT MOST END OF TRIBUTARY.
Collect Date: 12/3112008 Collect Time:: 13:31 Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
AB39133
9W0030
0110612009
08:20
SMATHIS
1/22/09
01/2212009
l I�3 I
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
B1-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
NE -No established PQL
62- Counts from all filters were zero.
P-Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
B3- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
Q1-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
B4-Filters havecounts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated
B5-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC) Q2- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
J2- Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated PQL- Practical analyzed
forth Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
U-Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected — --
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated
XI- Sample not analyzed for this compound
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimatedr-
N 1-The component has been tentatively Identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated valueTT
i
d
LAB 1 ;i" CF
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]

Locatlon ID: 96-DPC NC DWQ Laboratory Section 12esufts
Loc. Diper.: DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 LEFT MOST END OF TRIBUTARY
Visit ID
Sample ID
AliJtI133
Collect Date:
1213112008
Collect Time::
13:31
CAS # Analyte Name POL Result Qualifier Units Analyst/Date Approved By /Date
Method Reference
1/6109 117109
NUT
NH3 as N In liquid
0.02
83
mglL as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10.107-06.1.J
1/9/09
1116109
Total Igeldahl N as N In Ilquld
0.2
110
mWL as N
MOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lechat107-06.2-H
118109
1/22/09
NO2+NO3 as N In liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mg1L as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference LacIO-107-04-1-c
119109
1116/09
Phosphorus sotal as P In liquid
0.02
26
rnglL as P
GBELK
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10.115.01.1EF
1113109
1122/09
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 (919) T33.3908 Page 2 of 2

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMI)
COUNTY &f✓ P.8201U SAMPLFTYPE G
RIVER BASIN Q,Y�51./ ❑ AMBIENT 0<.EAM ❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RR IRO WSRO TS
AT BM
DOW, COMPLIANCE ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Shred by: Bus riot IoR, "Other " ❑ EMEROENCY ❑ ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S): �• f�a(il+Sdwtii
Eslimakd BOD Range: 0.5/5.25/25.65/40.130 or 100 pIto STATION LOCATION: �aai G
Seed: Yea❑ No ❑ Chlorlmtad: Yes❑ No❑
. REMARKS: I( l�►Wr'UNe�erw � O�•d( (/rr '%iMl L..
90bo3o
6m1n1, 11.. nNrV
Lab Number: (3'/
Date Received: —
-OTime O
Rec'd by:
DATA ENTRY BY:
From: Bus -to land Dcl.
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
96 'Lac It Isl I'a8 I r I it, I3( IO$ I r 3Z✓ I I A H L I T S B I C ONXX
I
SODS 310 mg/L
2
COD High 340 mg/L
3
COD Low 335 r.IVL
4
Collrorm;MFFecal3t616 /100.1
3
Collform: MPToted 31304 /IOOmI
6
Colironm Tube Real 31615 1100nd
1
CollformFealStrap 31613 /IOoml
I
Re.Wur. Tad 500 mall.
9
Voh111e 503 myL
10
Flxedslo mg/L
I 1
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
12
Volatile 535 myL
13
Fixed S40 myL
14
PH 403 unite
15
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mg/L.
16
Acidity to PH 8.3 435 mg/L
17
Alkalinity to PH 8.3415 mg/L
IB
Alkalinity to PH4.5410 mg/L
19
TOC 680 myL
20
Turhldlly 76 NTU
Chloride 940 myL
Chi a 70953 PyL
Color: Tnre 80 PI -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Colonpit 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluarkle 951 myL
Formaldehyde 71880 myL
Droste and Oils 336 mg/L
Hardness Tole) 900 myL
Specific Cord. 95
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phanols32730 pyL
Sulrale 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 myL
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN a. N 625 mg/L
02 plus NO3 as N 630 myL
P; Total as P 665 mWL
PO4 as P 665 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
Cd-Cadmium 1027 pyL
Co-CbromIum;Tota11034 pyL
Cu-Copper 1042 pyL
NI -Nickel 1067 pg/L
Pb-Lnd 1051 pg/L
Zn-Zinc 1092 PSIL
AS -Silver 1077 PS/L
AI -Aluminum 1105 Pg/L
Be -Beryllium 1012 ItyL
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/L
Co -Cobalt 1037 Pg/L
Fa -Iron 1045 it yL
LI-Lithium 1132 IIyL
Mg -Magnesium 927 myL
Mo-Manpnese 1055 pg/L
Na-Sodlum 929 milli.
Areenie:Total 1002 Pg/L
Se -Selenium 1147 PWL
fig -Mercury 71900 Pg/L
Orgemochlodne P.0cidea
Orpnophosphons Perlkides
Acid Herbicides
Bose/Neutral Extractable Orpnlcs
Ae1d Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle mq'd)
Phyloplankton
Lob Use Only
Temperature on arrival:
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25'C
Water Te hue'C
D.O. L
PH
Allailingy
Acidity
Ak Te nlum'C
118.3 PH 4.5
pI44.3 PH 8.3
4
0
300
400
12244 431
82243 82242
0
Salinity %.
Precipilellon (Iwday)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidily Severity
Wind Velocily
Mean Stream Depth R,
Stream Width R.
80
5
2
6
1351
1350
35
64
4

A
'' .
N ��Q Lathorato Section �I'esutts
County. WAYNE
>>
Sample ID:
AB39100
River Basin
�V�fAT
PO Number#
W0801067
12131/2008
Report To WAROAP
O�
Date Received:
r
W
Time Received
16:16
Collector: E NEWSOME
a
Labwo" LoginlD
MSTARR
Region. WAR O
Date Reported:
1/29109
Sample Matrix: Surfacewater
Loc. Type. RIVERISTREAM
Report Generated
01129/2009
Emergency Yes/No
VisitlD
COC YeslNa YES
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPA � � � � foq
Location ID: 96-DPA Collect Date 12131112008 Collect Time. 13:00 Sample Depth jjJJ
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
61-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
B3- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
B4-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated
85-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC)
J2- Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
WARD
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
NE -No established PQL
P-Elevated PQL due to matrix Interference and/or sample dilution
01-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
02- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
X1- Samole not analyzed for this compound
C
.I P.
FEB
- 4
2009
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] kage 1 of 2
L OrFi%E

1 NC 1D WQ Laboratory Section Results Sampie w AbJtIIUU
Location ID: 96-DPA Collect Date: 12/31/2008
Loc. D%scr.: 96-DPA Collect Time:: 13:00
Visit ID
CAS # Analyte Name
PQL Result Qualifier Units
Analyst/Date
Approved By /Date
Sample temperature etreceipt by lab
2. 'C
MSTARR
HPARKER
Method Reference
12/31/08
115/09
BOD, 5-Day In liquid
2.0 140 04 mg/L
MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA52109
112109
126109
ColHorm. MF Fecal In Bquid
1 4800 CFU/100m1
MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA9222D•20th
12/31/08
1113/09
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

i
1,
DIVISION OF WArERQUALITY WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (UMI)
Coumy EB=rf
PIVEA OA51H AV 1 t--
RUPOUTOI ARO PftO MRo RRO Wa;to Wilto W;ttu S AMm[Nt srxBAM ❑ Brl1 Ut:Nr
ATOM VCOMMJANCH ❑ LArx ntF1. wr
9�
Shippedby:O fr.(x n.. cl h?ABROEh!(Y ❑ [sruARY
cc
Dnln�elul SOD RaeRe 0 SrS-23rtS 6L/a1)Qm IOp pW% STAiIOH LpcAn M
,- I d. 11.. riki Y
Leb Numb W mo J 0 6 7 F
Date Rmeived: 413 d T_lrn I L : I co
Rcc'd by-, From+ Bu3-Courier4 (a d DO.
DATA ENTRY Y; CK
DATE RP.PORTED:
ea Ilr eoint%
oondocumea! 'C
Wtr TMgmture le
n_a.. 1.
lilt
Alk6sFn
cidilr
Ak Talm raWre t;
ai1i l41k5
1(1„S
P1(IJ
2
9
Hu
4w
2744 431
2241
112242
0
Seliaity 16
Pw dim (wdey)
Cbod Cow %
Wiwi V;ecl m (Oe-
_
311am F1m' Scrcr4y
1 wbidiiy sanlRy
Wind V
ly
Won Sulam Dvmh IL
slrwm N'1�Rh (L
10
S
2
)SI
I]SO
3S
61
4

NC DENRIDWO Laboratory's Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: FAamoo Sample ID: A Report To WaRO Priority: Compliance
Sample Type: other Collector: E. Newsome Region: WaRO
Station Location: Donnie Pender Farm - upstneam County Wayne
Dateltime collected: 12131I08 1:00PM Dateltime Reed 12/31108 4:16 PM Dateltime analyzed: 1/2/09 10:011 AM
Affected Parameter(s)4
Analytical Area 1IYaROI ab•'
_-.--....-....................:::........................................
The following anomalies occurred -,Check all that apply):
Samples
(Enter "x" in all applicable boxes) Quality Control (Enter "x in all applicable boxes)
Improper container used Instrument failure - no reportable results
VOA vials with headspace Analyst error - no reportable results
Nsurro
Sulfide samples with head lace cites
Samples not received, but . sled on Beldsheet None added
Samples received, but not .sled on fietdsheet Recovery outside acceptance limits
Mislaboled as to tests, pre ^rvatives, etc- DSplke recovery
Holding time expired BNone added
Prior to receipt in lab Recovery outside acceptance limits
After receipt in lab Failed to meet criteria for precision
Insufficient quantity for an.- ✓sis Internal standards
Sample exhibits gross nor .omogeneity Blank contamination
Sample not chemically pre erved pro�p-ely �7 QC data reported outside of controls (e.g., CICS, LCS)
pH out of range - Rece I pH -►1 Incorrect or non compliant procedure used
improper chemical SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
Residual chlorine present i, sample approval
Color interference invalid instrument calibration
Heavy emulsion formed dr ing extraction HElevated detection limits due to: (See below )
Sample bottle broken in Is - no reportable results
X" Other(,,(-cify), EV@ENCE, Toxickirpreseotinfalmpk: `
Comments:
Evidence of TOXICITY press nt in Sample Thts: iiagenerally characterized by a.- - nificarlt.increa '
lit tt a BOD v 'tie_as the sap-�fe COnCentratlQn decreases. The reported value 18 calculated from
jild,ic�idst dl,uhor represent ng the maximum loading potential.and should be consxiejed an .
_
t3eated Val e
Corrective Action:
More _
Data qualifiers L.sed: ,See Qualifie :odes on web hftg.11h2o.enr.state.nc-us/labrindex.htm
G4 Ev dense a ,.xicity was pre$ This is generally merited;by a stgriificant'incrilase in the BOD value as the
sampl• concentration decrease$ e.reported value is 010* W from he:highestditution representing the maximum;
loading potential and should be cc. _idered an estimated value : -
Notifirilciihe:; :red? X-1Ye F-]No Person contacted: Eric Newsome - Date: 112612009 -.
Farm _ _•ILL ,. Starr Date: 11----- 9
Lead CheimstlS.:,:ervisc s Reveev �iti ): '
�BIC::,i+EF :1ETAL5 � � PEST.......[]SVGA ........E] VOA ----.-0 Other ................
Branch -.lead ReJ a (initial)_ � QA(QC Review (in I): � Logged into database by (initial) :

County:
WAYNE
River Basin
Report To
WAROAP
Collector.
E NEWSOME
Region:
WARO
Sample Matrix:
Surfacewater
Loc Type:
RIVERISTREAM
Emergency Yes/No
CDC Yes/No
YES
Location ID: 96-DPC
4F WA_rf�,
� r
C •[
VisitlD
Loc. Descr.: 96-OPC
Collect Date: 12/31/2008 Collect Time:: 13:27
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Sample ID
PO Number#
Date Received:
Time Received.
Labworks LoginlD
Date Reported:
Report Generated'
9C
Sample Depth
AB 39102
W0801069
12131/2008
16:16
MSTARR
1 /29109
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
B1-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
NE -No established PQL
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
B3-Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated P-Elevated PQL due to matrix Interference and/or sample dilution
134-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated 01-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
B5-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC) Q2- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
J2- Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated X1- Sample not analyzed for this compound
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
WARD
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
01129/2009
aC1, 049
Cf
FEB - 4 2009
OFFICE

Location ID: 96-DPC
_ ;n Deacr.r 96-DPC
I
NC 1DWQ Laboratory Section results
Sample ID
AB39102
Collect Date:
12131/2008
Collect Time::
13:27
CAS # Analyte Name PQL Result Qualifier Units Analyst/Date Approved By /Date
Method Reference
12/31/08
115109
BOD, S-Day In liquid
2.0 270 04 moll. VISTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHAS2108
1/2109
1/26/09
Conform, MF Fecal In liquid
1 2000 CFU/100ml MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA9222D-20th
12/31/08
11131M
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 1919) 733.3908 Page 2 of 2

1
DIVISION OP WATER QUALMY WAIMP, QUALITY -FIELD -LAB FORM (DMI) For Lab th. ONLY
COMM
EPJORIDC
,BAb(SAM115
G
R1y9R"ASIN
AA4DIEf1t
�STRLrAM
LJ ElFLUQrT
RIWORT'IO: ARV no MRO lUtu WrRO WWO WSROT�
AT BM
COAtPL1ANC8
[] LAKE
❑ fNFI(tflFrr
011Kr
4
swilnsdbr:Bn r, di
<iMOR O¢NCY
0 N37'6hRY
COI].6CT0 v
EmkrIW DOD Asep: a I-11S-0140.I30 or 100 p1m
JTATION LOCATION B ^41 <-�T
(•�
seed: Y.r[J No ❑ Ckkrkrated Yaa[] Ne❑
_ _. _ _ _ I h,
. -.._� a
/ A:.: s.'L4.
_,. _ L . .
31 oY r°—r"i
�• 01or4k 940
CS1 a logs]
1
10173 J IQ
2
COoNF1k340 -W-
I
Low 133 mall.
Ce4lramc M4 Faw111614 /low
S
Ceorwrm MPTde131SW /10end
6
CallrmM Tuba Foal 31013 /IOOmI
7
Collk*mVocal Sh31673 J10ow
ap
e
Re>ad.. Taal Soo marl
4
Vaiulk SOS m11L
10
Plad 310 RWL
I I
Reeldue: Suq*A&d SID nypi.
12
Vokilk 13S mWL
1]
Fiaed $40 fi1/L
14
p11 401 _ aRirr
1
'
noway to pis 4.3 436436 Iay(
16
ACWY to gI 11-1433 WWL
17
3 MWL
Ii
AIWI-kyloptl4.54t0 "40.
19
6e T000 m@fL
26
Tmbldky 76 NTU
Cob; True 10
tn.C-
Cabr.(IAI 3 43
ADAn
ca-4417.6 lu
ADMI
Cyankle 724)
MASrm
Fri,k IS I
PS'L
r'errWIdehyde nm
mWL
Ote m e-d Olk SS6
meM1.
I lwdom Total 900
mWL
Specific C" 45
MBAs 31260
MI/L
P44nolr 37730
p 6/L
ee 94 310111 S
mil.
SWOdr 743
IRA
LAb Number W 0
a b
DoleRe"lved:
D 'nme: %
RWd b :
ENTRY
DATA BY:
Fmm:1lue-Cvurkr-I lend Del.
CK
DATE 11SPORll ,
lot "A
fl "►— P
A' It L
T s s
c o91xx
Hill as N 610 nr6/L
IJ-LRNrue 1112 pot
TKN m N 625 1W.
M1-MvyWlufi 922 mA.
NO2 Pm NOS a N 630 marl.
M"anpum IOSS PIVL
PI T_W o P 663 m &
J_. I
{
I
N--Sadkxn 929 merL
PI34 inPW MO.
Anenle:Togl IMI 11A,
P. [Ska4drede4 P666 R11IL
3--9ekdam 1141 11A,
N1•Mmetry Ilm ptll
Cd•CldedulR IV27 pVL
Orsel-re4ibr(erpa kidn
CI-ClrernibmTeyi IOII PVL
OFP^T�6wr Pealkkln
CL{opper IN2 PWL
AeldIk+bkkkl
Dem7kire111iilr*mbkOrgmk3
Acid EvrKhkbk Ckpn"
t'rryeeMeOrllanir+(VOA k•rir :• —' _
Fq�tgink n
M-Nwttl1067 e/l,
l bderd ION 11A,
7�i1ec 1e92 PWL
Ap99m 1077 pe'L
AI-Alamkmre 1103 q�l,
—' �!-,
ho-erryteeln 1012 FVL
G-C-kiaet916 mdL
C*-CobeR 1031 _— `_5'C
is-kva1045.�.'y'`_`rl'..
q(jau
rcI�......-
_
19.3 y.0r..
2
0
300
400
44 431
Strom M. $aver }r T-ri,Fr�i*p ya •zrs
Selkthy !I.
Prealpkat m (WA&y)
' td��'A
Wrild l3kedine (11re1
3
2
SI _ . .. ._
t:V
. I

j
NC DENRIDWQ Laboratory's Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number. I AR39102 Sample ID: B Report To: W&RO Priority'
Sample Type: other Collector., E. Newsome Region_
Station Location- Donnie Perlder Farm - down stream County
DateRime collected: 12/31/08 1:27PM Dateltime Rec'd 12131108 4:16 PM Dateltime analyzed:
Affected Parameter(s): - J9D0 .
Analytical Area: WaRQlab. _........................................
The following anomalies occurred (Check all that apply):
USamp
r
IeS (Enter'x" in all applicable boxes)
Improper container used
VOA vials with headspaoe
Sulfide samples with headspace
Samples not received. but listed on fieldsheet
Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
Misiabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
Holding time expired
Prior to receipt in tab
After receipt in lab
Insufficient quantity for analysis
Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
Sample not chemically preserved pro peri
IpH ou+ of range - Record pH -►�
Improper chemical
Residual chlorine present in sample
Color interference
Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
Sample tothe broken in lab - no reportable results
herig)ecify) EitcCaf.Taxra#Y.4 �
Comments:-
EYl enc - of TOXIC ( present frt S�IR1�[e�'�3i
ih BOD Val u:,� as t sample ccir t f a
h hi g, est dI ut on a sel t> e°Qli rttrir�m
s _
"gmated value. _
U
C
112l09 10:00 AM 1
Quality Control (Enter "x" in all applicable boxes)
Instrument failure — no reportable results
Analyst error — no reportable results
L—Jsurrogates
DNone added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Spike recovery
®
None added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Failed to meet criteria for precision
Internal standards
Blank contamination
QC data reported outside of controls (e.g_, QCS, LGS)
Incorrect or non compliant procedure used
L_J80P intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
Invalid instrument calibration
Elevated detection limits due to_ (See be;bw.)
t eportt*d va Ue is rta16 kilfted:frorr�, -
L-ntial and sfl - Kbe csld an
Corrective Action:
Z11One
Data qualifiers u::'d:
G4�Evidence of to: :it
6' i#le concentra- n
loadinq potential ami
;See Qualifier Codes on web h11h2o.enr.state.nc.usllablindex.htm
rn+as present. This is gene lly Characterizedfry a sigrttfteant lncre in, the BQD lue a lilt
ecreases. The repode4v0lue tsraiculat d irfyrrt-htepmen 9.ttte nWltnut
ould be considered an estirtlated Value
Notificat_cn Rcaa. ? XIYeS F]No Person contacted: Eric IVewtrome Date 1:Mr o9
Form cowplct ;:, ° M: _ k A Starr aLl Date: 112WO09
LeadChQmisVSup;--i%or'sRuvivw.':nitials):
DBIOCHE?o ✓METAL F] PEST OA Q VOA Other
Branch Head Revi ;initial) QA1QC Review (i ilia[): _.. gged into database by (initial)
1

0
County:
WAYNE
River Basin
Report To
WAROAP
Collector:
E NEWSOME
Region,
WARO
Sample Matrix.
Surfacewater
Loc.Type
Effluent
Emergency Yes/No
COC Yes/No
YES
! Location ID: 96-DPB
�Q�brr UlAr�g��
VisitlD
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPB
Collect Date: 12/31/2008 Collect Time:: 13:13
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Sample ID:
PO Number #
Date Received:
Time Received.
Labworks LoginlD
Date Reported
Report Generated.
Sample Depth
AB39101
Wa601068
1213112008
16:16
MSTARR
1 /29109
01 /2912009
flD_(�l09
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwqlab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
B1-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
NE -No established POL
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
63- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated P-Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
B4-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated Q1-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
135-Too many colonies were present, too numerous to count (TNTC) 02- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
J2- Reported value Failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated X1- Sample not analyzed for this compound
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
FED - 4 21Pp9 ! '
WARO
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] Page I of 2

Location ID: 86-DPB
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPB
Visit ID
XC DWWQ Laboratory Section 12esufts sample tU At%Jt11U-
Collect Date: 12/3112008
Collect Time:: 13:13
CAS # Analyte Name
POL Result
Qualifier
Units
Analyst/Date
Approved By /Date
Sample temperature at recelpt by lab
2.1
T
MSTARR
HPARKER
Method Reference
12/31/08
1/5/09
SOD, 5-Day In liquid
2.0 300
G4
mg/L
MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA5210B
1/2109
126109
Colifonn, MF Fecal In liquid
1 7000
B4
CFU/100m1
MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA9222D-20th
12/31/08
1/13109
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

DIVISION OF WATER QUA1,11Y WATERQUAL" FIELD -LAD FORM (DMI) Par LAb Use ONLY
COUNTY '* /l (�j
RIVER DAMN
(;PORTIQAROFROM ❑ AMDIENT 3T)IEAM nj Err7-UF]4T
R Ro Rao WeRv w'rro wsnD 15
AT M
AT K l COMPLIANCE LAKE ❑ INFLUENr
Shiplrctl by: D Ca Itrr
❑ rm4FaLauvcY r-I EszvARY
Lab Number: l0f"oow f a
Deli Received- i �I�� Time:
Rec'd b ; Frone: Bua Courier-1 land Ml,
DATA F?NTPY E3Y: CK.-
DATE? REPORTED:
EalimakJ am Rener: "s-73/23-65140.130 or 100 pion
FrAT_ION LOCATION: A r ?
//���� /JLL
NI�taLlrrl, E,"'
riel �• ✓! fur
Stet: Yr tQ Ne ❑ Chl o ow; w ❑ t4.0
RLMAR k
ILlil,df'7r e'"n.
_�
L it r;} Y
Sratbn N
DOe rkald
Time Deli!
DAM EM
Time Fnd
Depth DM IM DDM VOW Typc
Compasub . Type
�s
�I7V�P
Z �!
,01
12- j!
riY
av�-(�_
«-
A II L
T 5 0 C t7 GNXX
/
!
[A
r4r 1
I
U05 310 mail,
2
COD IRah 340 rrrd/L
3
0 L.mr 333 ma/1,
4
Coureeac MF Few 316w 110ow
3
CelirwrnMF7da131304 /100ral
6
Coilrorm Tube Nca131613 13MMI
7
Cuurortm Fecal Mrcp 31673 l OMI
a
REQLK--Told300 Mr/L
9
Volarur SOS ma/L
I0
.
P;04J 3t0 VWL
11
Reakk1e: Swper•7rd 530 1 tWL
1I
Vulatila 535 maA.
I]
Plstd 540 n1g/L
14
Of 403 oalle
is
AciditylopH4.54)6 MOIL
16
Ach iry to piI t.] 435 MWL
17
Alkslinity 10 p!1 a.] 415 ma/L
IfI
AMR16410 PR 4.5 410 mglL
19
Ti7CGE0 mg/L
39
1
Twbidity 76 NTU
0,krridt "a men.
Chl s 74933 p afL
Cotar; Tn a Be M-Co
Color(ptl ) a3 ADMI
Co4014r11 Mf 22 ADWI
Cyanide 770 ma/L
FlNMW* 931 man.
Fwmsldehyda71Ee0 mgfL
01esw rrd 011f 556 marL
ILvdrmsTdal900 L
Speclfle Coed. 9s
KBAS 382M mill,
Phemb 3]730 Pa/L
svira(e 943 man.
Svlrrde 743 tnerL
NH3 r1 N 619 ma/E.
TY•N a N 625 mall
N07_Pko NO) op N 6.10 mgA
P: Tvv1 a P 663 rna/L
PO4 s1 P 665 mafl.
P: DwgIMd eI P M6 mg/L
Cd-Cadmium 1077 pp/L
CY•Clrpndum;Tora1 10" NaA-
CwCoppel 1042 0ZfL
_
Ni-wwc rl 1067 pel-
Pb.Lmd 1031 1'WL
Zn•7]ne f092 POL
AS.Silem 10Ti pg+L
AFAlcmirmm 11% pall
Be•Beryiliunl 1012 7r lyL
+�
CoXvieivm 916 mpli
Co-Ce611 10)7 PWL
Felton 1043 pall.
l.l.l.i4hlum 11)I pa`I•
MY-Melprninm 9I7 man.
Mo-Msnpnae IU33 pKIL
Na-Sadlum 929 rap+L
Anenlc:Totel (002 parL
—
So•Selrnium 1147 pg1L
ffs-Mercery 7190a pA,%
Urpr chtnrioe MCICIM
Orp mphatpllwrm Pedklder
V
Aakt Iirlhle. Jks
DoWNeandi 6xuacubk Orssrrkt
Acid Elrrrklebla Uipwiet
Purvw.OrpaicsIVOAboikreq d)
Phyrot+4nkhfn
Loh We Only
Tempenturc an ertivol: ad J
Se 1 PainlK
Conafoeartrced2s"C
CVwet T nde'C
0.0, 0A
it
W..� Alkeirsitr
Ac
AMTert4telslwe'C
d1 aj p114.3
14 4,s pact A3
0
300
400
R1244 431
11241 112242
0
Sad n y !L
Prcaipkation (iddey)
Clow Covet Ya
Wind okedlon (VcK)
Stream Flow SevcrAy
TrN%wy $ateriry
Wfv Vchic iy
lien swam Depth R.
Sham Width rL
60
S
2
d
1)51
133a
]3
b4
4

NG DENR/DWQ Laboratory's Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: AB39101 Sample ID: B
Report To: WaRO Priority- Compliance
Sample Type: other Collector: E. Newsome Region: WaRO
Station Location: Donnie Pender Farm - source
County Wayne
Datettime collected; 12l31108 1:13PM Datetime ReCd
12131f08 4:16 PM Datehime, analyzed: 11210910:00 A
Affected Parameter(s):
Analytical Area: WiRdtab
.---------•• .... ......:.... _. ............
I-------- -----------------
The following anomalies occurred (Check all that apply):
[]Sampies (Enter ">t" in all applicable boxes)
Quality Control (Enter "x" in all applicable boxes)
improper container used
Instrument failure — no reportable results
VOA vials with headspace
Analyst error — no reportable results
Sulfide samples with headspace
Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
Surr ates
None added
Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Misiabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
Spike recovery
Holding time expired
None added
3
Prior to receipt in tab
Recovery outside acceptance limits
After receipt in lab
Failed to meet criteria for precision
Insufficient quantity for analysis
Internal standards
Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
Blank contamination
Sample not chemically preserved pro rl
GC data reported outside of controls (e.g., OCS, LCS)
pH out of range - Record pH ►�
Incorrect or non compliant procedure used
improper chemical
SOP intentionally modified with CIA and Branch Head
Residual chlorine present in sample
approval
Color interference
nInvalid
instrument calibration
Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
Elevated detection limits due to: (See below.)
Sarnole bottle broken in lab - no reoortable results
I
utnertspecif�): eqw
Comments: —!LL
Evidenoe of TOXICITY-
ir,f the;BOD value as the
he highest dilution. reor(
est hated value.,
Corrective Action:
Ira><pa►Ytare;®ntnlsampte:_,.,._�. --
G4 Evidence of toxicity was present -This is generally charactefized by -a significantin6rease in -the BOD value as the -
sample concentration decreas 6-iL Thg rapottedvalue is calculated _from he highest ditutotti nepresei>ting the maximum
loading potential and should be considered an estimated vdTue.
Notification R€quired? X yes No Person contacted: EricNewvsame Date- it2612009-
Form completed b Mark A Starr Date: 1/26/2009
Lead ChemietlSupervisors Review (initials):
F—IBtOCHEIvt METALS PEST OA VOA Other
Branch Head Review {initial): ©A10C Review (ini 'al): ,�ogged into database by (initial):

AUG-05-2003 11:11 AM
19 P. 01
:>
'� Pµ�. ��
1a-3p ��
w� �•��� Otis
40
1 �'1-rs3 f1
ptA +4�
d (�a✓. w
3,k-, S, i31 11t, 1,5-
G!10)1l,-Ao,ati,al, a
-Tr..l
Ss T 41.3 v ) r1 1-
1/ A
0-1" I -Z A ✓10'-
,,�,�,, - K .},0 3-}s r�i'
�.,�- �""^�`
�-. ►,✓;ice a b,A

U.
FDgr IRR-2
Tru
FW Ma (Wdw 8"l)
Farm ON
Ommem Adds
Owwy Pharr
la0oon LgWd Inipatlon Fields Remd
One Form bn So& Fleld per Crop Oycle
FadptyNM Mbw i
l►►lQ� OpMfar
Inipr6on OprMa'a
A & W G � �►au�en
Ow wr p phone0 I •fl3 0
I'14111:rMM Iltillsdonl efian
Crop Typo mm m www pm
Loading Ub+S" a
III rat ra to 0 nn r" rat na AM nn
now
M- MMME
mfm�
Oww% iftrawro
o
Oprraw CKNONOM 8
• VM*Wcode.: dean, M410*ter. a-Cla . R-RePt. t3-SWiAlIA w•wledy
PW9= corn*ft *A ra IooWAMMIllira mint WdW to atpnlly that Wispedorm wane bw#WAd at W" evuy 120 mhxies.

-r. � '�003 Teic Atlas
Image —` 20C9 Digita[G lobe
1346 It
I 1 1 "P.4
35'20'05 09" N 78'09'13.19" W
elev 119ft
,v4 4 udimp-,
r 2-0, 1 -
Eye a,t 494 1 It

t?KESiA6F
Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000
1. If this facility can comply with its existinS-permit-and CAWMP it must do so.
2. Temporary Addition of New Sprayfields (*) (Check appropriate boxes.)
[] A. acres of cropland. List crop types used:
[J B. acres of hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
[] C. acres of pine %voodland added @ 60 lbs PAN / acre added
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
[] A. Application window extended for acres of perennial grass until first killing frost.
0. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to 1 acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
.4. PA Application Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
PAN application increased up to 200 Ibs per acre for acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
J,B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for L nacres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B.
f. -
5. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
0 A. Prior to December 1', 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event. (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec. I' .)
[JIB. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
Y
y
6. Required - Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses.
A. Use of higher sing rates,
B. TimeIy harvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. Irrigating during periods of warmer weather.
7. Required - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Ponding Potential.
A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall.
S. The owner / manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface waters.
Anv discharge is a -6olation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must hiclude a map or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility Number
Facility Owner N anaser ame (P 'T) f
Facility Owner / Manager Signature J
Date--
DoNN>>= PEO)t?J FARM
Facility Name
�. G L E n1 N C. L t F TO N
.! Technical Specialist Name (PRIN'T)
Technical Specia ist Signature
Date— i 1 I Z(o I% l
This document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CANN'MP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
(*) New temporary sprayfields must meet applicable buffer and setback requirements. Waste must not be applied to wetlands_
1 111 WI QQQ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Donnie and Gwen Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Dear Donnie and Gwen Peedin:
-,own
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 1, 2000
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Donnie Peedin Farm
Facility Number 96-5
Wayne County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Martin McLawhorn on 6/16/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your
facility that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of
the following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "Y'.
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Martin McLawhorn the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Martin McLawhorn, at 943 Washington
Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you
have any questions please contact Martin McLawhom at [phone]. If within 90 days
you are unable to provide Martin McLawhorn with the information you are
automatically required to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by
Category 2 below, within 180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2 -
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Washington Regional Office
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Donnie and Gwen Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Dear Donnie and Gwen Peedin:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 96-5
Wayne County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere
Z
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Washington Regional Office
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 28, 1998
Mr. Alton P. Cox
Alton P. Cox Farm
329 Dobbersville Rd.
Goldsboro. NC 27530
A��
I D E N R
E F 1998
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DWQ
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment Receipt Letter
Alton P. Cox Farm
Farm# 96-029
Case No. AL 97-005
Wayne County
I101 7-7 iurwei3.'�
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 4788 in the amount of
S500.00 received from Alton P. Cox on August 27, 1998.
This payment satisfies in full the civil assessment levied against Alton P. Cox Farm
and this case has been closed. Payment of this penalty in no way precludes further action
by this Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 581.
Sincerely,
Jeff Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
SLlky
cc: Washington Regional Office
Enforcement/Compliance Files
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%, recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environs
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.,
Donnie and Gwen Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Dear Donnie and Gwen Peedin :
�11IUW E
J U L L 3 1998
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DWQ
t-H
June 26, 1998
D
�f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS960005
Donnie Peedin Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Wayne County
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on September 9, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we
are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Donnie and Gwen Peedin , authorizing the
operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in
accordance with General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this
system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Donnie Peedin Farm,
located in Wayne County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 7350 Feeder to Finish and the
application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS960005 dated September 9, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any
specific conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow
coverage under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition II.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition Ill.l
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition III.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS960005
Donnie Peedin Farm
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wayne County Health Department
Washington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

r �w
f a
State of North Carolina 4f4
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 441ed
Non-Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please .
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered. .o
Jc
Application Date: 19 7 ;10n U r'
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have read the following list of requirements by signing your initials in the space provided next tot�dch i
item. p
Applicants Initi:.? Ct
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit- Animal .I
P _-+
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application D�
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farms name: Donnie Psedin Farm 2. Print Land Owner's name: Donnie Peedin (] wen 1 {� eP_J�R
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: 1672 Old Smithfield Rd
City: Goldsboro NC Zip: 27530
Telephone Number: 734-5299
4. County where farm is located: Wavne
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identifigd): _-, X, 10 03 — /y /h, le r We-5-1 4166 %ar_
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): 1� o n n , e C , UJ I u S _ i !� m I�1 �E14,5 c
7. Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): USDA-NRCSPresm-ae Farm
EEI
WASHINGTONEOFFIng
SEP 1 2 1997
D. E. M.
FORM: AWO-G-E 2197 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: —96-1
2. Operation Description: Swine opcm ion
7350 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? 0 yes; 0 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals 'Type of Cattle No. of AniMals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
6'Fieder to Finish ' 35 0 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Tvpe of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 67.40 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP): Lr-
4. Number of Lagoons: I ; Total Capacity: I Y-q 2 U 7V Cubic Feet (0)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (0)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YES or NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or O (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S (C�ERTIFICA�TION:
I, e)rj Vj (� { eA 1 Yl {1 ALV OIN (Land Owner's name listed in question II.2), attest that
this application for � _ / o qni e Ceck, rn + G uJ� \ p E-oft n
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be retuurrneed to me as incomplete.
Signaturel�(
Q 1 , s—Igr 9-I
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, Q QYx /\ ? t l') c i 0 ivy e C `l (Manager's name listed in question 1I.6), attest that this
application for Lea w r : c i�e�� ice. i < ,, P
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature �lXiNi ro C,% Date .� — a0 — 97
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2197 Page 2 of 3

17 wo
%q loco
M kill MAC
7 !pm
19
:T. 7114
lilt Utz 117
--%nib
♦ i No, "Jim um
s 0 it. cil 21
%
1293 13
as 'A
1109 1210 A
"a" illODIN lip, 11
1304 lips 1116
Fop e lip Ch,
.1 ill? Id 6raq A.n
6
I pop!Ili illl '0- DuDtry 1"Z [in
lill'Orlp?, tilt
Clftk its? jilt U
list
1-3 till 19"
...... --'Pm % lw tilt
lip 1.0
kiln 1124 193 lilt la 1172
kr bllls 1124
1194
1"4
35-1s. . list '
Ill. 11M UH I? All its
Ck .-s
Alips 1.0
Jill?
lilt.
uLMNI�lot 16 hsn
33 l
OLE A
.11
.6
Low IHI U.—irpwVil
Uffi-
tQ
-10 l"yOP If I MOUNT I'll Ctil, 933 .
Lli Z 4 POP. A IPA 11 Way—
,Fs- IF Its
Pitt
till
4 K—
I 1119 c W .1.7 C—e
lilt 2211 0 IV L ills r M1
Luz Mr.,
iui lilt f -WO—R-rilEA S T r0N
un
TO COLIPT[y ROAD Whi,11111115 CAPE
,lips. lips IR04 1991. Hill!l9Sy..lQItL,1911403
lip A
+ 117 35,70,
40
P
AvED ROAD$
AGE ROADS
990.
N

,;
v `
�LLLvMM'�'yy►.,, �\•���
�� t,v, n�'�N�''�",�'wk`t%+r�: r'++} y�;,ii .0 ``in .., 1qs•
t \ 4
I
Ir'-

NAME: DONNIE FEEDIN
COUNTY: WAYNE
TYPE OPERATION: 7350 FEEDER• -FINISH
TOTAL REQUIRED VOLUME
TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME AVAILABLE
ESTIMATED:
VOLUME OF LAGOON EXCAVATION
1424031 CU FT
14422474 CU FT
_34092 CU YDS
VOLUME OF EXCAVATION FOR CLAY LINER 342 CU YDS
TOTAL EXCAVATION
VOLUME OF FAD FILL
VOLUME OF DAM
TOTAL FILL
CUT - FILL RATIO
34434
CU
YDS
147?4
CU
YDS
8876
':U
YDS
36-70
CU
YDS
1_45 .1
TOTAL VOLUME OF CLAY NEEDED 342 CU YDS
TO LINE LAGOON ---------
�,L
,A*5.
WHERE SM (SANDY) MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED VEREXCAV.ATE
1.8 FEET AND BACK:FILL WITH COMPACTED SC !SANDY CLAY)
MATERIAL.
-5
,PZ3CL�►SS

!T TO COUN" ROAD M
U .JRRt . im 12U 1L
1
APED ROADS
W&
TAO! ROADS.
1990.

Operator:DONNIE FEEDIN
County:
WAYNE
Distance to nearest residence (other
than
owner):
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT
(ALW)
0 sows (-Farrow to
finish)
x
1417
lbs.
0 sows (farrow to
feeder)
x
522
lbs.
7350 head (finishing
only)
x
135
lbs.
0 sows (farrow to
wean)
x
433
lbs.
0 head (wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs.
Describe other :
Date: 05/03/94
120cs feet
_ 0
lbs
= 0
lbs
- 992250
lbs
- 0
lbs
- D
lbs
0
Total Average Live Weight = 99225E_3 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 992250 lbs. ALW x Treatment V+o l ume (CF) / l b . ALW
Treatment Vo1ume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 992250 rabic feet
_. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
SLUDGE ACCUMULATION NOT COMPUTED
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet AT OWNERS REQUEST. REMOVE SLUDGE
AS NEEDED.
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet) ---------------------
Inside top width (feet) ----------------------
Tap of dike elevation (feet) -----------------
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)-------------_
Freeboard (feet) -----------------------------
Side slopes (inside lagoon) ------------------
Total design volume using pr-ismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
3.0 .3.0 3.0 . 0 554.0
AREA OF TO. '
LENGTH * WIDTH =
554.0 284.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH 488.0 218.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
560.0
2?0.0
52.0
40.0
1.0
_.0 ?
WIDTH DEPTH
294.0 11.0
157336 ( AREA OF TOP)
106384 ( AREA OF BOTTOM)
521.0
25i.0
523084 (AREA
OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT.
= CAREA TOP
+ (4*AREA MIDSECTION)
+ AREA BOTTOMS * DEPTH/6
157336.0
52y 084.0
106384.0 1.3
Total Designed Volume Available = 1442474 CU. FT.
3

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
560.0 290.0 162400.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 162400.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. AL", 1.37
Volume = 992250 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 1812510 gals. or 242314.2 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush; system. Flush system,s that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet per CF
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 94733.3 cubic feet
34

5D. Volume of 25 year - 224 !-tour storm
Volume = 7.0 2 i aches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 94733.3 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
242:'14
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
9473-r`
cubic
feet
5D.
-74733
cubic
feat
TOTAL 431731 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
eCiipt*rary storage 18t.% days
Rai nfa l in excess of e':.aporation===========% 7 inches
--tic year - 2-1 hour r:�i ri fs.7. �- __-- _=-rc-_ y0 inches
i
-Side 10 feet
inside top lei f;] =%= ___= 4==-=c==___ =_= _-____- : 5`t_?..0 '*e.s t
Triside top �itZ== ==_=W290uO feet
T +.7(:'r ro ' d i T.. e e l e Y aI:10n =__ __=__=_____=_ ___ =___. 52 . t= feet
larn:=i:1 4i1a_ far}
1 _
�LLd{•(i..y =Lin Y F
R_ of lm _ _ 1442474 cu. ft.
be•_son-�, . high Wa.tiertab1e _?evatIon �GHWT}= 414.D� r f= t
Z. -op ' umpi ng e;.ev'. _ _=-------------------- 48.0 feet
Must be Or = -to the SH i T e le.y . __--__ 4N.D n
- ^- . ,, feet
s` US—t- be or = to min. req. treatment e i . `•� . 0 feet
Requi red minimum treatment vol;_lmc====-_ ____= 992250 cu. ft.
V
rOlLi,it�_:* at Stop Pumping e14va iun-'_===__= _=_->
S_ _____
..,t•�Ert Pumping rley._==_____________W===-____•.: +c_,a� ret=�
Must be a bottom of freeboard ?i 25 yr. r ainfal l
P'Ictual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==::' 1_47741 cu. ft.
Volume at start Pumping cu. ft.
Requ i_reid volume to be (1UftYp2�==-_____=__-__- w _;704-0 -u ft.
tctUa l vo l u ,me Planned to be PL,Mped=====_=_===> ._,4079 r rU . f + .
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==" 1.3 feet
7. DESIGNED BY: 't� APPROVED GY: .gul.
DATE: 51e3/90 BjATE:
NOTE : GEE ATTACHED WASTE UT i L i z AT i ODM PLArl�l
COMMENTS:.t' CA,1► 711ati A�Nj� rleC 1/oLra
u
W■
C.f .ems! Ct�r/ T/�-4'� �4,r" u]or li.T�i�4dIICs
OfrC Ce 0-i-e C'f-

r
SHEET 1 OF
r OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center p4VOt, guns, and :raveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1l2 its capacity -to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces he concentration of the initial
asu'� 5 to entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fr-edh water should not
be used for fleshing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 50.3 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 48.0 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 337048 cubic feet or
2521115 gallons.
A

SHEET 2 OF 2
The recommended maximum amount to apply pp / per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
h. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not Pump within 200 feet of a
esi ence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste sha11 be app ied in a
mannner of to reach other pi7o?erty and pihlic right-of-ways. was
—� Q � D C 4.ls.d ao'aa s r
9. The Clean Wat r Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment; Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management{ has the responsibility/ for enforcing this law.

SHEET 1 OF 2
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
FOUNDATION PREPARATION:
The foundation area of the lagoon embankment and building pad shall be
cleared of trees, logs, stumps, roots, brush, boulders,sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
the lagoon and pad area should be stripped and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas. After stripping, the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT:
-----------------------------------
The completed excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of material such as sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
o inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches in thickness when loose and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
equipment or standard tamping roller or other equivalent method.
Compactions will be considered adequate when fill material is observed
to consolidate to the point that settlement is not readily detectible.
NOTE THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF LINERS IN THE LINER
SECTION OF THIS SPECIFICATION. The embankment of the lagoon shall be
installed using the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include 5 percent for
settlement. Dikes over 15 feet in height and with an impoundment
capacity of 10 acre-feet or more fall under the jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
from the constructed height to the downstream toe of the dike.
Precautions shall be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
LINER: THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE 1.8 ft.
*t40TE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATES OR WHEN UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPIr. CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over -
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be back filled
as specified to grade with a SCS approved material (ie - CL,SC,CH).
REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.
r,

a SHEET 2 OF
Sail liner material shall come from an approved borrow area. The
minimum water content of the liner material shall be optimum moisture
content which relates to -that moisture content when the soil is kneaded
in the hand it will form a ball which does not readily separate. Water
shall be added to borrow as necessary to insure proper moisture content
during placement of the liner. The moisture content of the liner
material shall not be'less than optimum water content during placement.
The maximum water content relates to the soil material being too wet
for efficient use of hauling equipment and proper compaction. Proper
compaction of the liner includes placement in 9 inch lifts and
compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum AST11 D698 Dry Unit
Weight of the liner material. When smooth or hard, the previous lift
shall be scarified and moistened as needed before placement of the next
lift.
The single most important factor affecting the overall compacted perme-
ability of a clay liner, other than the type of clay used for the
liner, is the efficient construction processing of the compacted liner.
The sequence of equipment use and the routing of equipment in an estab-
lished pattern helps assure uniformity in the whole placement and
compaction process. For most clay soils a tamping or sheepsfoot
roller is the preferable type of compaction equipment.
The soil liner shall be protected from the discharge of haste outlet
;pipes. This can be done by using some type of energy dissipator(rocks)
+or-iusing flexible outlets on waste pipes.
Alternatives to soil liners are synthetic liners and ben,tonite sealant.
When these are specified, additional construction specifications are
included with th. s Construction Specification.
CUTOFF TRENCH
--------------
A cutoff trench shall be constructed under the embankment area when
shown on a typical cross section in the plans.. The final depth of the
cutoff trench shall be determined by abservation of the foundation
materials.
VEGETATION:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be seeded
to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after construc-
tion according to the seeding specifications. Topsoil should be placed
on areas of the dike and pad to be seeded. Temporary seeding or mulch
shall be used if the recommended permanent vegetation is out of season
dates for seeding. Permanent vegetation should be established as soon
as possible during the nest period of approved seeding dates.
REMOVAL OF EXISTING TILE DRAINS
When the drains are encountered, the rile will be removed to a minimum
of 10 feet beyond the Outside toe of slope of the dike. The tile
trench shall be back:filled and compacted with good material such as
SC, CL, or CH.
0

Sl++tr 7
Ctal. U2. o
'Cl-EN G-538 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
1— 5-70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
LA C�6-"
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED JMXD SITE
DisTmcr
DATE.•
• • SHEET NO.•
CROPLAND-ACRESWATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS
WOODLAND -ACRES TOTAL -ACRES 2Q&D-CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVATIO;�IST
WIN
�m
n■■
■■E
n
■E
,
■■■\\■■■
■C!■■\■■■
■■■■i■■
..
on
■■ni■■■NU■■■■■
MEMO
■
MEN
■■■■■■®■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■NMENIM
■n■■nn■■■n■■nn
■■■■■■■■■■■■■n■■■E■■■
e
=■■■
■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■n■■ii■an■■■■n■■
■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■n■■I®■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
•
MIME
��■i�■jai®i■�®e�s�®i■i■�■�o�■�■�■■�■■�■�■
®e�■���ei®imi�ei©ir�i■i■ice■i■i■i■■i■i■i■i■
���■i�n�■�■imp
of®i■i■.®iei®i■i■�■in■i■i■
®®
■�®�®�®�®����iMINIMIE
R®I®I®M■M■MIMM
r .L-L1; L,
1 13 1 13
/D

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW -Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
g - gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels
s - sand
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs-very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
sl--sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand -gravel mix
fsl-fine sandy loom
SP - Poorly graded sands
1- loam
SM -Silty sand
gl - gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
si-silt
ML - Silts; silty. v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
sit -silt loam
CL -Clays. of lour to medium plasticity
cl -clay loam
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl -silty clay loam
MH -Elastic silts
scl -sandy clay loam
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
c -clay
L Suitable material for embankment ent is available a Yes o No (Indicate whow loonies on tho aketrh an
reois� tiQ.i -
REMARKS:
2. Explain hazards requiring special attention in design (Seepage, a vw...oct et j
GENERAL REMARKS;
24
26
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 6.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED AS FOLLOWS:
0.0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 1 TO NOVEMBER 30
FEBRUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
0.0 LBS. RYE GRAIN AT 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
0.0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS AT 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 15
48.0 LBS. HULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT S LBS./ACRE
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0.0 LBS. UNHULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 10 LBS./ACRE
SEEDING DATES: JANUARY i TO MARCH 30
0.0 LBS. RYE GRASS AT 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
6000.0 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
12.0 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
600,0 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A .3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

. f .
i .
U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR tM LAGOONS
Landowner Do14M /C PIA--n 1 d
Community or Group No.
County WAYNE
Conservation Plan No.
Lagoon
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of kp a Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation
Length of Flood Pool Sao Ft.
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Lst. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use ; Improvements : Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. % Ft. Ft.
1 3600`
2 .
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach Nw . Sudt,,a( &Rc-Ac4 Po50 $4o DArf c-w- a
�A(
Hazard Classification of Z= 0 b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V1
By
name
e
M
Concurred By a_ n-i/ ,0 C
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date
Date
!Z

INSTRUCTIONS
All dams built with technical assistance from the Soil Conservation Service
must have a hazard classification assigned by the person responsible for
approving the design. Most farm ponds, except in borderline cases, can
be classified after a complete field investigation without assuming failure
and making breach studies. This data sheet is to be used for recording
the information obtained through field studies and for documenting the
hazard classification. Where there is a possibility for loss of life or
major property damage from a dam failure, an approved breach routing
procedure is to be used. (Consult with the area engineer.)
Hazard classifications of dams are made by evaluating the possibility
for loss of life and the extent of damage that would result if the dam
should suddenly breach --that is --a section of the dam be suddenly and
completely washed out. It is to be assumed that a wall of water will be
released equal to the height of the dam. This flood wave will be reduced
in height as it moves down the flood plain. The wave height (depth of
flooding) should be evaluated for a sufficient distance downstream until
the estimated flood level will not cause significant damage to improvements,
such as homes, buildings, roads, utilities, reservoirs, etc. The breach
flood level will be reduced depending on the valley storage, slope, and
openess of the flood plain; however, in a narrow steep valley slopes
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
evaluation is to compare available valley storage (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
evaluated with a judgment estimate made of the flood wave height at all
critical points downstream.
Should there be any questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
the area engineer should be consulted before making design commitments.

✓��.a LL. V a�
MIC RESOURCES .. - • • •••h "'""'
NA ` NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHI
7� '�� 101 7� �55 760 2 260 000 FEET 78
Ins
f
79 Ind
kl
n �/
n6 11� / / x 76 '` �'• 5
41
' . \
Cerrr
v
oat �,+ : p,
i Ram
r
-Ste ns
Cem =+ —
• o
p • 'c �� ` ~_ �� . - - Cem•.
HR 41
_ tee" _ J •ram �•. . � _ �',� �^ � 19•,\,' � `�—\—
"7 F ' ! - �� `��•,.:_ ' .� is �— i ' 1 { 1J �\\
/ f 1, • v ; \j\\�
OR
P ` rHfff I y� ♦ /39 9 '. ^. R.
�_if,S

Donn►E Per6Din
llJray�n� Co,
TYPICAL, VIEW OF A ONE -STAGY LAGOON SYSTEM
u
Confinment Building Top Width -1_
Settled Top Elevation 5,2,o
F r PAD SZ.7s Pipe Invert Elevation
ss 3 =�
Pit ►: ! SS 3 I SS 3 t
► TREATMENT
►► LAGOON
_► Depth = 1m.3
r' Pipe (Needs to, be adequately
support ed )
Bottom Elevation 4o.o s
NOTE: RIP -RAP, FLEXIBLE PIPE OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL MILL BE
PLACED AT PIPE OUTLETS TO PREVENT EROSION OF CLAY LINER

5
FILL !
AVERAGE GROUND I
SANDY MATERIAL VARIABLE
NO CLAY I
1.9 FEET THICK
CLAY LINER
SANDY CLAY -CLAY
TYPICAL. CROSS_SFLCPION OF
LAGOON OONSTRUCTION WITH
PARTIAL -CLAY LINER
1.19FEFT THICK CLAY LINER
(MINIMUM)
EXCAVATE THIS AREA AND
BACKFILL WITH CLAY
EXCAVATE
(''f'f•AuK
pOnni¢ NEDin
WAynE Co.
i
I
FILL
AVERAGE GROUND
I ,
3 VARIABLE SANDY MATERIAL
_ _r NO CLAY
1.8 FEET THICK
CLAY LINER
SANDY CLAY -CLAY
/Vofe: �
or sr de/ f cAe 4
a Sa Pc r07Gd 4rr-!.A ly�iaSe �IYC�tS
ADDITIONAL'EXCAVATION DUE TO LINER:
AVERAGE DEPTH TO CLAY 31 X 1.8 FEET TIIICK X DIS'TANCE
9 Z 3 + CUBIC FEET = 3 4 Z, CUBIC YARDS
NOTE: MIEN AREAS OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL ARE ENCOUNTERED, THEY WILL NEED TOIBE EXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF 1.8
FEET BELOW GRADE, BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED WIT11 A SCS APPROVED MATERIAL (SC, CL, C11).

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Soi! Comervetion So"ico
MC•ENG-4O
Rev. 7/91
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT
NAME: Bonn ► E. Pe EDIn Date: S f o 3
County; WA11n C
Address:
L LE%QrA G OD f
iI DE SLOPE TO I /
�0 W r / /
AVE. TOP ELEV. a 1
.�l1910 SECTION
iry` -�o.
1 t
AVE. BOTTOM ELEV. /
1 LEnGTM r
(Saw beck for what calaalaticm)
Use of facility: WAsre ,-e-1ArMEnr LA6O0
Capacity: /0-78-3705 Gallons I -f �-.z Y- 7 Y- _ Ft3
Soil Type: NSA e N,gz
Bench nark Description /),a L in _L1GHr _ PO4e- LoGB"rE0 SOUTH EA57_ OFF
STATcrI & ©+0 0 APe06 . 3 p FC5'r
Bottom
Normal Liguid Level
Storage for normal Precip..
Maximua Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm Storage
Crest ESW
Max.F1ow Depth
Freeboard
Top of Dam
Elev.
`!O. o
Elev.
60.3
(+)
Ft.
Elev.
50.3
(+)
.7
Ft.
Elev.
Elev.
-52. o

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owners name--:DONNIE RFj5W PEEDIN County:WAYNE
Mail Address-:GOLDSBORO
Type of production unit ----:FEEDER - FINISH
Number of animal units-----: 7350
Type of waste facility -----:Anaerobic Lagoon
Temporary storage period---: 180 days
Method of application ------:IRRIGATE
Amount of animal waste produced-----------------: 13965 tons/year
Amount of plant available N produced by animals-: 16905 lbs./year
Commercial N to apply on planned acreage--------: 0 lbs./year
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your swine operation. The plan is based on the
soil types, crops to be grown, and method of application for
your particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil testE
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced f
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value c
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on tY
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of tY
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize
Soil types are important as they have different infiltratioi
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not"be applied tc
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do i...._
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.

Page 2
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract Field Soil Crop
Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Code
/Acre /Unit
Used
Apply
606 1 CrC2 C
5.2 50.00 8.1
2106
MAR-OCT
606 1 NoA C
6.1 50.00 5.0
1525
MAR-OCT
606 1 Ly C
5.5 50.00 4.0
1100
MAR-OCT
606 1 Ke C
5.5 50.00 3.0
825
MAR-OCT
7256 58 Ke C
5.5 50.00 8.0
2200
MAR-OCT
7256 5RCrC2 C
5.2 50.00 1.4
364
MAR-OCT
7256 5A NoB C
6.1 50.00 2.0
610
MAR-OCT
7256 4 Ke C
5.5 50.00 4.0
1100
MAR-OCT
7256 3 Ke C
5.5 50.00 3.6
990
MAR-OCT
7256 2 Ke C
5.5 50.00 4.0
1100
MAR-OCT
7256 1 WaB C>.5
50.00 _.3
2557.5
MAR-OCT
7256 1 NoB C
6.1 50.00 6.0
1830
MAR-OCT
7256 1 Ke C
5.5 50.00 5.0
1375
MAR-OCT
7256 1 Tr C
4.5 50.00 4.0
900
MAR-OCT
----- ----- ----- -----
----- ----- -----
Total 67.4
-----
18583
------
Available Nitrogen
(includes commercial)
16905
Surplus Or Deficit
-1678
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
I=Oats-bu.
B=Bermudagrass(graze)-tons J=Rye-bu.
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons K=Small grain(graze)-acre
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
E=Corn(silage)-tons
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
W=Wheat-bu.
G=Fescue(graze)-tons
Y=Fescue(pasture)-tons
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
Z=Bermudagrass(pasture)-tor.

Page 3
If more commercial fertilizer is used than shown in this plan,
then additional acres of land may be needed. A three to fifteen
feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all
ditches in fields that receive animal waste.
Additional comments:
r
w°�s=-���C, ��a�l _rNE►s_�� E cfl wc��l i�r�eP1622orl_ s
�G�br�_��N��y�fa ,P,�i.Pb�T 13au�D�e�G� _1l%L4tc,,,l�.��c,� Q�_�'J1�G_1e�11L?��i�_✓-'.�CM�
�.� Z� ��1�a �c_R�►1�!li�c.�d �� b�,,p�D�lT�t .1�_ SiJ��mA7� s�1�� �,��'• f'c�A„�.�.
Prepared by: Title: Date: 442Si441
Concurred in by: 1 cry- Date: 5,4 V
Producer
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff
occurs.
Date :!K 4y
Pro ucer
Technical Specialist: 'b 1LJ Date: /=1r9)r-
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
In L

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ADDITIONAL LAND WHERE WASTE MAYBE APPLIED
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
or
-
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
7256
1
WaB
BH
5.5
275
24.3
6682.5
I
APR-SEP
7256 I-1 I JSG 1 I30 I 124.3 I1215
I 1- I SEP-MAY
7256 3 Ke BH 5.5 275 3.6 990
I I I I I APR-SEP
-3 G I1 I50 I I3.6 1180
I IISEP-MAY
END
I
TOTAL19067.5
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
645
5
WaB
BH
5.5
275
11.88
3267
APR-SEP
645
SG 1
1-5 1 150
1 111.881594
SEP-MAY
645
2 W
JWaB 140 180
1 115.2 11216
SEP-APR
645
--2 SB 25 72
28.0
JWaB
115.2 11094.4
JUN-SEP
15
645
1
JWaB JW 140 180
1 112.0 1960
SEP-APR
645
SB 25 72
28.0
1-1 JWaB
112.0 1864
JUN-SEP
15
END
TOTAL
7995.4
-
Indicates that this field is being overseeded
(i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain,
etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed
through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants
should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine
inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to
a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc,
is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised
not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in
the season (i.e.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
27.9
9067.5
39.08
7995.4
66.98
17062.9
* BALANCE
-157.9
Page: 5

1-13 1 A NU
0.
12
41
tpl...

. {v rar
~ x
CY,, .
m m
••■ i • 4i�. N; ksNtA �\ +. F` % '�C �..a_: ii!y •...� ., r ,. •,t '' !. �� S•F..( .,...K' / s, �4 N �;i'
A i > t y
�lr I 4
� na tt 1� K 'r �Fg,� K J +'Q! i t•
w • 0 Z 1, i•UPt ;. fS �( , Z la •�,7!. , ' m tt r Y ('� h
�`r
w •� 1
Ow �_ t� ��lVt Hl•� ll ? i.5^a ,00 I
ccl
Wo
IF
t �` � � � .t{ :. ' �} '� ' i z `y �}yr+'"�'" �}ih Y t �; ,. d t •,� ! ,� Z •, u� ��;d�'.
1`�{''. w o tj. �.�i "I1r Y�, �i .�c�, .. \tM (: ••r �,Ni ;�.� y, jLf 1� •• .gnt�yr ��'�+,y. :ty�,af, 'k^r�
� k e '''* "fit e w:' � r+i}v �. 'ix��'� r,��y„�y,�T�4 tt � � y,l � ■.y;. *x � , hi i ..,, Lsi
FJ� 72
� �1'

Attachment B
Page 1 of 3
}
North Carolina Agricultural crtension Service
Agh-Waste Management
Bic7ogit zl =zd _A„TiC -'. r=g.;:�g Non* Cama= St=�-- Unftx
gar.: sa.��ac , A-U—r'= AM r- L-A r I CS
OF TAIm dv..=ra_-cos ItA,--M-
James C. Ba--kr--*
Soaped lot i== sanade=
a. : --= laaded =r=ader, collet= aboi.-- 2 Zbs o; ra---e �-
d:^�a=== locaz=vas using
1-1- =Z=rars
a. CaUeet about 2 lbs o= mar.=s ter the rr:�nr8
avoid =g bedd;.: g na arials a=d uzi..g „m=s--T' = c colisc:.p_s.
B - 14 =- "d Y-'==s S3.z�--p
_. 'rode=-sloc:ad-f; oa_ pit
a.. Z=tand a 1/2' ===a=a C candL'4r apen on ba it a L5 i==z
-2==e to pit floor.
b. Seal type: end of conduit (e.g., by placi=g a t�n over and
of cauaxd.r) r-.-yroing ===a that has e=7-p-ad lover a :d, --=Ova
and a=t7 s1-zr-7 i:.ra pl.as z--lc bucket or ==eral? is can-.ai=e= .
c. Take sabsa=las :L-= 5 or mare or at- least 1 guar--.
d. 104- and add abotzZ 3/4 pint P, sable a==2 .ae;.
i.-:. r'.x-er•'_or szo=zge baste or rank
a. " mko sure ===& bas beet veil '^ —4 virh a II -quid = - z
edagper-ag:ratar pt p or proper l er ag=razz:.
b. iaka ste=a=las f--m about- 5 pit loaat ors, from agi:3:..or pm. --a
or == =..� =a saraade: and placa :.a a plat.. c bucket.
* P;n=assor and xansim Spec-4 21 ; Gt-, Biological and Ag c.:l: - al F=g:nee=tng
Depa�ent, ?ia:.� Ca--ali:.z S=ra Rals--gh, NC.

Attachment B
Page 2 of 3
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a no:metalIic sample container.
C. Lagooa Liqmid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tasks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on and of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend battle 10-15, away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within V of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Liter
i. House liter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estiaate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 liter subsamples at locations proportionate to
Item a. E.g., if 20% of lit.-ar of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsampie there and the
other 4 subs—les from r—ire r of floor S=face.
c. At each location, collect lit tar from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the.bucket, mix, and add
about 2-3 Ibs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" inta pile.
b- Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample cat.aines and seal.
Z::�"-

A
II. 'CA P3 PARAT20N AM 73ANS723
Attachment B
Page 3 of 3
A.. Place sample into an expandable container that cam be sealed. Rinse
residues £_om container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or .Neat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, fra—e, or =ens+er to lab quickly.
C. hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample =aasfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing mata=_.al such as
newspaper, boa or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also avaLlable. Contacts:
i. A&L Easter Ag=irslzn-al Lab, Inc. iii. PQ17faam Packv=s Corp.
7621 7hitenine Bead 2320 S. Foszar Avenue
Richmond, VA Z3237 _ Gheel'_ag, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scienti_ic Co.
3215 Vinton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: (919)876-Z351
iv. NdSCO
901 3anesv lle Avenue
For A`Id son, RI 53538
Ph: (414)563-Z446
F. P=i4a:.e analyt;cal labs are available, bur. sample analyses are costly.
G. Tha NCDA provides this serrice for North Carolina residents.
L. Address: North Ca=ol-Tma Deaa--czen= of Agr c-s1t•..re
Agronomic Division
I'Iant/ti7aste/SoIu=!x+ Advisary Sec_ion
Blaze Ridge Bead Cep"
P.O. Box Z7647
Raleigh, NC Z761-1
I [phone]
At=: Dr. Bay Campbell
U. Forward $4 along with the sample_
iii. Include the fDllov ng ident=firatian informat±an with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, er-c.)
b. Livestock usage (swine-nursarq, fini.sai=g; L.zrkey-breeders,
broodenccuse, grower, number flocks grown on liar; ezc.)
c. pasta type (dai--y-lot scraped ma=azre, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slu_•-~y, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, srockpile
iv. Roue analyses performed on all samples: N, P. R, Ca, Mg, Na,
S , 76, an, Za, CU, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DX, 'ro, Cd, Ni, Pb
Z�

OH-Ver-1.44
f
US Department of Agriculture
,Soil Conservation Service
CROSS-SECTION DATA
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
ID C31*4 PA 11= 1=' E= E ID I F%4
in
WAYNE County, North Carolina
Designer : GLENN CLIFTON Checker
Date : 05/03/94 Date
Job Number 585
LAGOON EXCAVATION
TEMPLATE DATA:
Beginning Elevation = 40
Beginning Station = 1+37
1+37 to ^+ 0
+00 to 3+00
3+00 to 4+00
4+00 to 5+00
5+00 to 6+00
6+00 to 6+47
SECTION NUMBER 1
Centerline Station 1+.37
ORIGINAL DATA:
C\3CL218/3
C\3CL218/3
C\.3CL28/3
C\.3CL218/3
C\3CL218/3
0.00000 ft/ft
0.00000 f t / f t
0.00000 f t/ f t
0•00000 ft/ ft
0.00000 fit/ft
0.00000 ft/ft
400.0 / 49.9 500.0 / 47.3 600.0 / 45.2 700.0 / 45.0 800.0 / 44.
SECTION NUMBER 2
Centerline Station 2+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
400,0 / 49.7 500.0 / 46.5 600.E / 46,1
SECTION NUMBER -
Centerline Station 3+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 49.5 500.0 / 47.3 600.0 / 47.6
I SECTION NUMBER 4
Centerline Station 4+00
700.0 / 46.8 800.0 / 44.8
700.0 / 47.4 800.0 ! 46.5 tt
-ji
II
Z-7

LAGOON EXCAVATION (continued) 05/03/94 Page 2
t .
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 50.0 500.0 / 48.9 600.0 / 48.0 700.0 / 46.8 900.0 / 44.7 ,
SECTION NUMBER 5 ~
Centerline Station 5+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 I 51.1 500.0 / 49.4 600.0 / 48.4 700.0 / 47.2 800.0 / 45.5
SECTION NUMBER 6
Centerline Station 6+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 50.3 500.0 / 49.2 600.0 / 48.8 700.0 / 48 . o 800.0 / 46.8
SECTION NUMBER 7
Centerline Station 6+47
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 49.5 500.0 / 48.6 600.0 / 48.4 700.0 / 47.5 600.0 f' 46.2
ZK

ON.Ver-1.44
US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
PLANNED
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
ID C3 P4 P4 I [-= F• E E= ]D I P4
in
WAYNE County, North Carolina
Designer
: GLENN
CLIFTON Checker
Date
: 05/03/94
Date
Job Number 585
LAGOON EXCAVATION
EXCAVATION *
**
FILL **
Bot
Left Right
Off-CL
; CL Dist Area Volume
Area
Volume
Width
SS SS
(fit)
; Sta (fit) (SgFt) (Cu.Yds)
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
218
3:1 3:1
516.0
; 1+37 1297.9
0.0
63 3272.6
0.0
218
3:1 3:1
516.0
; 2+00 1507.2
0.0
100 9409.8
0.0
218
3:1 3:1
516.0
3+00 1806.9 ;
0.0
10` % 16151.0
0.0
218
3:1 3:1
516.0
; 4+00 1833.4
0.0
100 23159.2 ;
0.0
218
3.1 3:1
516.0
; 5+00 1951.0 ;
0.0
100 30603.3
0.0
218
3:1 3:1
516.0
6+00 2O69.0
0.0
47 34091.6
0.0
218
3:1 3:1
516.0
6+47 ; 1938.2
0.0
z(

-+ M
OH-Ver-1.44
US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
CROSS --SECTION DATA
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
ID(:)r4hl I FEE F=•EFEE n I r4
in
WAYNE County, North Carolina
Designer : GLENN CLIFTON Checker
Date : 05/03/94 Date
Job Number- 586
PAD FILL
TEMPLATE DATA:
Beginning Elevation = 55
Beginning Station = +20
+20 to +50
+50 to 1400
1+00 to 2+00
2+i 0 to 2+40
2+40 to 2+70
2+70 to 2+80
2+90 to 3+0 _i
3100 to 4+0x0
4+00 to 4430
4+30 to 4+55
SECTION NUMBER 1
Centerline Station +20
ORIGINAL DATA:
D/4CL400/4
0.00000
ft/ft
D/4CL400\4
-.00250
ft/ft
D/4CL400\4
-.00250
ft/ft
D/4CL 400\4
0.00000
ft/ft
D/4CL400\4
-.05000
ft/ft
D/4CL4 0\4
0a00000
ft/ft
D/4CL400\4
-.00250
ft/ft
D/4CL400\4
-.00250
ft/fit
D/4C'L400\4
-.00250
fit/ft
D/4CL 40ON4
0.00000
it/it
100.0 / 49.7 200.0 / 51.2 300.0 ! 53.1 400.0 / 55.1 500.0 / 55.2
600.0 / 55.2
SECTION NUMBER 2
Centerline Station +50
ORIGINAL DATA=
100.0 / 49.8 200,0 / 51.2 300.0 / 52.9 400.0 54.4 500.0 / 54.7
600.0 / 54.8
SECTION NUMBER 3
Centerline Station 1+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 50.0 200.0 / 51.3 300.0 / 52.8 400.0 / 53.8 500.0 / 54.2
600.0 / 54.4
3v

FAD FILL (continued) 05/03/94 page 2
SECTION NUMBER 4
Centerline Station 2+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 50.4 200.0 /. 51.6 300.0 / 52.2 400.0 / 52.4 500.0 / 53.3
600.0 / 53.6
SECTION NUMBER 5
Centerline Station 2+40
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 50.2 200.0 / 51.4 300.0 / 51.9 400.0 / 52.8 500.0 1 52.8
600.0 / 53.0
SECTION NUMBER 6
Centerline Station 2+70
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 50.2 200.0 / 51.3 300.0 / 51.5 400.0 / 51.1 500.0 / 52.1
600.0 / 52.3
SECTION NUMBER 7
Centerline Station 2+80
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 50.2 200.0 / 51.3 300.0 / 51.5 400.0 / 51.1 500.0 / 52.1
600.0 / 52.3
SECTION NUMBER 8
Centerline Station 3+Oo
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 50.2 200.0 / 51.2 300.0 / 51.4 400.0 / 51.0 500.0 / 52.0
600.0 / 52.0
SECTION NUMBER 9
Centerline Station 4+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 50.1 200.0 / 49.7 300.0 / 49.5 400.0 / 50.0 500.0 / 51.1
600.0 / 50.
SECTION NUMBER 10
Centerline Station 4+30
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 49.4 200.0 / 48.7
600.0 / 50.0
300.0 / 49.0 400.0 / 49.6 500.0 / 50.6

• S
i
FAD FILL ( continued) 05/03/94
page 3
SECTION NUMBER 11
Centerline Station 4+55
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 48 ..9 200.0 /' 48.1 300.0 / 48.6 400.0 / 49.4 500.0 / 50.2
600.0 / 49.7
3z

ON-Ver-1.44
US
Department of
Agriculture
+
Soil
Conservation
Service
PLANNED
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
x v M r1411 E=
F• EF= I? a rW
in
WAYNE County,
North Carolina
Designer
: GLENN
CLIFTON
Checker
Date
: 05/03/94
Date
Job Number 586
PAD
FILL
Top
Left Right
Off-CL ;
CL
Dist
** EXCAVATION
Area Volume
#*
FILL
Width
SS SS
(ft) ;
Sta
(ft)
; (SgFt) (Cu.Yds)
; Area
(SgFt)
Volume
(Cu.Yds)
400
4:1 4.1
150.0
0+20
0.0
i 628.0
400
4.1 4:1
150.0 ;
0+50
30
0.0
0.0
;
939.4
; 1062.9
400
4.1 4:1
150.0 ;
1+00
50
;
0.0
0.0
;
2657.0
792.1
400
4:1 4:1
150.0 ;
2+00
100
;
0.0
0.0
;
5867.4
941.6
400
4.1 4:1
150.0
i +40
40
0.0
0.0
;
7312.4
10i �9. 1
400
4.1 4.1
190.0 ;
2+70
30
;
; 0.0
0.0
;
82.17.3
619.7
400
4.1 4:1
190.0 ;
2+80
10
;
0.0
0.0
8446.9
619.7
400
4.1 4:1
'
190.0 ;
3+00
20
0.0
;
8916.7
; 0.0
648.9
400
4.1 4:1
189.0 ;
4+00
100
;
t> ��
�
12169.9
0.0
' 1107.8
400
4:1 4:1
189.0 ;
4+30
30
0.0
13510.2
0.0
1304.7
400
4:1 4:1
187.0 ;
4+55
25
;
; 0.0
0.0
;
14794.2
; 1468.8
3-3

OH-Ver-1.44
US Department of Agriculture
,Soil Conservation Service
CROSS—SECTION DATA
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
r prepared for
n0Mr4 a 1= FD•r=-:En I 1%4
in
WAYNE County, North Carolina
Designer GLENN CLIFTON Checker
Date 05/O3/94 Date
Job Number 587
TEMPLATE DATA;
Beginning Elevation = 52
Beginning Station = 0+00
0+00 to +56
+56 to 1+56
1+56 to 2+56
2+56 to 3+56
3+56 to 4+46
4+56 to 5+32
5+32 to 6+0-o
6+Oe to 7+ >8
7+08 to 8+08
8+08 to 8+34
8+34 to 9+10
9+10 to 10+10
10+10 to 11+10
11+10 to 12+10
12+10 to 13+10
13+10 to 14+1 i �
14+10 to 14+46
14+46 to 15+76
15+76 to 16+87
16+87 to 17+57
SECTION NUMBER 1
Centerline Station 0+00
ORIGINAL DATA;
700. 0 / 45.0 300.0 / 44.3
SECTION NUMBER, 2
Centerline Station +56
ORIGINAL DATA:
700.0 / 46.8 800.0 / 44.8
DAM FILL
D/3CI_.12 \•3
0=00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12\3
0.00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12\3
0,00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12\3
0.00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12\3
0-00000
fit/ft
D/.3CL12\3
0.00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12\3
0.00 00
ft/ft
D/3CL12\3
0.00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12 \.3
0,00000
ft/ft
D/3CL 2 \3
ca•f_J(� 000
ft/ft
D/=CL12\3
0,00u000
ft/ft
D/-3CL12 \3
0,00000
ft/ft
D/.3CL12\3
0,00000
ft/ft
D/.3CL1^\3
O_O0000
ft/ft
D/3CL12 \-3-.
0.00000
ft/fit
D/:3CL12\3
0.00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12\3
0.00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12 %3
0.00000
ft/ft
D/3CL12\3
0.00000
ft/ft
D/7-CL12\3
0.00000
ft/ft
-3V

DAW FILL (continued) 05/03/94
SECTION NUMBER 3
Centerline Station 1+56
ORIGINAL DATA:
700.0 / 47.4 800.0 /, 46.5
SECTION NUMBER 4
Centerline Station 2+56
ORIGINAL DATA:
700.0 / 46.8 800.0 / 44.7
SECTION NUMBER 5
Centerline Station 3+56
ORIGINAL DATA:
700.0 / 47.2 800.0 / 45.5
SECTION NUMBER 6
Centerline Station 4+56
ORIGINAL DATA:
700.0 / 48.0 800.0 / 46.8
SECTION NUMBER 7
Centerline Station 5+32
ORIGINAL DATA:
700.0 / 47.5 800.0 / 46.2
SECTION NUMBER 8
Centerline Station 6+08
ORIGINAL DATA:
600.0 / 48.0 700.0 / 47.0
SECTION NUMBER 9
Centerline Station 7+08
ORIGINAL DATA:
600.0 / 48.8 700.0 / 48.0
SECTION NUMBER 10
Centerline Station 8+08
ORIGINAL DATA:
600.0 / 49.2 700.0 / 48.1
page 2

DAM FILL (continued) 05/03/94
SECTION NUMBER 11
Centerline Station 8+34
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 49.5 500.0 /? 48.6
SECTION NUMBER 12
Centerline Station 9+10
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 50.3 500.0 / 49.2
SECTION NUMBER 13
Centerline Station 10+10
ORIGINAL DATA:
400. (-') / 51. 1 500.0 / 49.4
SECTION NUMBER 14
Centerline Station 11+10
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 50.0 500.0 / 48.9
SECTION NUMBER 15
Centerline Station 12+10
ORIGINAL DATA:
400 . t=) / 49.5 500.0 f 47.8
SECTION NUMBER 16
Centerline Station 13+10
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 49.7 500.0 / 46.5
SECTION NUMBER 17
Centerline Station 14+10
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 50.1 500.0 / 47.8
SECTION NUMBER 18
Centerline Station 14+46
ORIGINAL DATA:
400.0 / 49.4 500.0 / 47.8
page L
�(

DAM FILL (continued)05/03/94
SECTION NUMBER 19
Centerline Station 15+76
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 45.1 100.0 P 44.7 140.0 / 45.2
SECTION NUMBER 20
Centerline Station 16+87
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 43.8 200.0 / 46.8
SECTION NUMBER 21
Centerline Station 17+57
ORIGINAL DATA:
120.0 / 44.3 200.0 / 44.8
page 4
i
t
37

OH-Ver-1.44
•
Top
Width
12
12
12
12 y
12
US Department of Agriculture
.Soil Conservation Service
PLANNED
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
J D 0 [NJ 1'4 g E 1=-1=1= ]E> 11 4
in
WAYNE County, North Carolina
Designer : GLENN CLIFTON Checker
Date : 05/03/94 Date
Job Number 587
Left Right Off-CL
SS SS (f t )
3:1 3:1 765.0
3:1
3.1
3:1
-:1
12 3:1
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
_:1
:1
•;ti : i
:1
3:1
-:1
3:1
3:1
..:1
3:1 767.0
3:1 770,0
3:1 766.0
:1 770.0
:1 770.0
3:1 670.0
3:1 670.0
3:1 670.0
3:1 468.0
3:1 468.0
:1 468.0
:1 468.0
3:1 468.0
-:1 468.0
CL
Sta
0+00
0+ 56
1+56
2+ 56
3+ 56
4+56
5+=
6+08
7+i e
8+08
8+=4
9+10
10+•10
11+10
12+10
13+10
DAIS FILL
** EXCAVATION **
;
**
FILL **
D-st
;
Area
Volume
Area
Volume
£ft)
;
t
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
;
,
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yd3)
0.0
3
258.7
56
;
0.0
489.9
0.0
213.7
100
0.0
t
1153.5
t
0.0f
147.3
100
0,0
;
18 •..7 i :J4
. 4
t
�
216.E
100
;
0.0
t
2572.9
_ l,0
E
183.3
100
0.0
t
3155.9
'
0.0
i
T i
t
0.0
3561.2
0.0
;
156.5
76
;
0.0
;
3957.7
t7•0
!
125.2
100
t
0.0
4354,8
E
0.0
89.'
100
0.0
s
4674.6
t
0.0
,
t
8=.4
26
0.0
;
4747.5
'
0.0
;
68.1
76
;
0.0
;
4912.6
i_].0
f
49.2
100
0.0
t
5077.6
'
t
0.0
,
40.0
100
0.0
s
5253.6
0.0
57.6
100
i
0.0
;
5527.7
0.0
;
87.7
100
;
0.0
!
5917.2
E
0.0
122.6
100
i
0.0
i
6297.3
3r

DAM FILL
(continued) 05/03/94
Top
Left
Right
Off-CL
CL
Width
SS
SS
(ft)
Sta
' 12
3:1
3:1
468.0
14+10
12
3:1
3:1
468.0
14+46
12
3:.1
3:1
78.0
15+76
12
3:1
3:1
125.0
16+87
12
3:1
3:1
144.0
17+57
page 2
** EXCAVATION
**
**
FILL **
Dist
Area
Volume
Area
Volume
(ft)
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
0.0
82.6
36
0.0
6411.4
1
0.0
88.6
130
0.0
7209.2
0.0
242.8
111
0.0
8217.9
0.0
247.9
70 i
0.0
8875.7
0•0
259.6
39

"j.
U.S.D.A.4 SCS-CPA-026 1. Name and Address of Person r
Soil Gonservation Service (June 91) D a nn i r- act r J c e_ d rJ
• HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND t t.-t 2 O to S rn 1t ' e.CA
CONSERVATION DETERMINATION o I d-s b a ro /v L •2-7573 0
4. Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determination 15. Farm No. and Tract No.
3G5 �fl g
SECTION I - HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND
Date of Request
W -S- 9�
County
W
�6
6. Is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land determination? Yes In No
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
7. Are there highly erodible soil map units on this fans? Yes No
8. List highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any
crop year during 1981-1985.
9. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any crop year during 1981-1985; and were not
enrolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
10. This Highly Erodible Land determination was completed in the: Office ED Feld
M1 • . ,l4l111!Xlbl
FIELD NO-(s)
TOTAL ACRES
11. Are there hydric soils on this farm? Yes ® No ❑
`='
a
12. Wetlands (W), including abandoned wetlands, or Farmed Wetlands (FW) or Fanned Wetlands Pasture (FWP).
Wetlands may be farmed under natural conditions. Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture may be
/
fanned and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23, 1985, as long as they are not
CJ
abandoned.
13. Prior Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23, 1985. The use, management,
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions unless
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment.
14. Artificial Wetlands (AW). Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions.
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MW). These wetlands are to be farmed according to the minimal -effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made.
16. Mitigation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetland
converted between December 23, 1985 and November 28, 1990.
17. Restoration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after
November 28, 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
18. Restoration without Violation (IRS". A restored wetland converted between December 23, 1985 and
November 28, 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPM. Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production,
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a violation to be in good faith and the
wetland has been restored.
21. Converted Wetlands (CW). Wetlands converted after December 23, 1985 and prior to November 28. 1990. In any
year that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
22. Converted Wetland (CW+year). Wetlands converted after November 28. 1990. You will be ineligible for USDA
program benefits until this wetland is restored.
23. Converted Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,
cranberries, vineyards or building and road construction.
24. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incorrect determination
by SCS.
25. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are considered
maintenance and are in compliance
with FSA_
26. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance and if
installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CW). See item 22 for information on CW+year.
27. The wetland determination was completed in the office ❑ field qc.and was delivered)] mailed23 to the person on /r /2Z /23
28. Remarks. O/►l /S /!t c v,+-/� .h4 d r� fi G �� .�'� %V,& t so AE cut ,U&&A-/
�1, � 0. ° W � � ►'V`n� f}►'\cl f1� i n �.�+w) .- �� r�� t�� • yio,ri � GJ cry
29. 1 certify that the above determinat s correct and adequate for use in determining 30. S' tune of SCS District Co ervationist 31. Date
eligibility for USDA program benefits, and that wetland hydrology. hydric soils, and
hydrophytic vegetation under normal circumstances exist on all areas outlined as /
Wetlands Farmed Wetlands.
etlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture. 710� �) -4
AaWManee and programs or the soil conservation service svausbts without regard id rice, religion, tbior, sir, age, or handleaw.
SCS Copy 1�zo
=3i

-- _ •ram:.. -y-
.�
U.S.D.A.I _ SCS-CPA-026
Soil Oonservation Service (June 91)
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND
CONSERVATION DETERMINATION
4. Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determination
Name and Address of Person 2. Date
Dot^ rt rc- ?,I Pe-,- J r'J !
KFR 5 8- S/3 3. Count
(;,,Us b s ro d d •C. 27 5-30
S. Farm No. and Tract No.
i95c--S I (, f 11 T- 7256
SFCTInN I- HIGHLY FRCIDIRLE LAND
of Request
t sl 93
7 40 f:
'
6. Is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land determination? Yes gl No ❑
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
7. Are there highly erodible soil map units on this farm? Yes No ❑
8. List highly erodible fields that. according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any
crop year during 1981-1985.
9. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any crop year during 1981-1985: and were not
enrolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
10. This Highly Erodible Land determination was completed in the: Office Field
CFnTIr1N II - WFTL ANn
FIELD NO-(s)
TOTAL ACRES
11. Are there h dric soils on this farts? Yes C6 No (]
12. Wetlands (W), including abandoned wetlands, or Fanned Wetlands (FW) or Farmed Wetlands Pasture (FWP),
f !T- 44, 4)
Wetlands may be farmed under natural conditions. Fanned Wetlands and Fanned Wetlands Pasture may be
}'fop(,
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23,1985, as long as they are not
.Z4
_6T-72
abandoned. -
6
13. Prior Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23,1985. The use, management,
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions unless
%
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment
14. Artificial Wetlands (AW). Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions.
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MW). These wetlands are to be fanned according to the minima! -effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made.
16. Mitigation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wettand
converted between December 23,1985 and November 28,1990.
17. Restoration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after
November 28, 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
18. Restoration without Violation (RSW). A restored wetland converted between December 23,1985 and
November 28, 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production,
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined aviolation to be in good faith and the
wetland has been restored.
21. Converted Wetlands (CW). Wetlands converted after December 23,1905 and prior to November 28,1990. In any
year that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
22. Converted Wetland (CW+year). Wetlands converted after November 28, 1990. You will be ineligible for USDA
program benefits until this wetland is restored.
23. Converted Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,
cranberries, vineyards or building and road construction.
24. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incon ct determination
by SCS.
I 25. The planned ateration measures on wetlands in fields
with FSA.
considered maintenance and are in compliance
26. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance and If
installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CM. See item 22 for information on CW+year.
27. The wetland determination was completed in the office ❑ field ❑ and was delivered mailed❑ to the person on
26. R/e/m1arks./S dog••.•_- �rS��- F.^¢ !d /� 2� 3� 5�� S - o✓� T-� i�.?As6 "�� 7-
4'), 41� Cam, r tU m I eon o....L q i n
0 i eany� )
29. 1 certify that the above determination is correct and adequate for ux rn determining 30. S" re of SCS District Conservationist 1. Date
eligrophy far USDA program benefits, and that wetland hydroiogy. hydrrc sortr. and - 0�
hydrophytic vegetation under narmal circumstances exist on. oudintd as
Wetlands Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture.
Assistance and programs or aw Solt Conservation Swvk o avallowe wfthm regard to race, rellylary color, sin, age, or ArMkap, -.
SCS COPY
mi �i

l5k,
I J2.2.4
Ale
ic
J3•
01

U.S.L.A1 0 SCS-CPA-026 1. Name and Address of Person 2. Date of Request .
Soil C.3aservation Service (Jame 91) Dc r` n- Ea.� eC ,
e.
I county
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND �'� •01J,� 1 Ra
CONSERVATION DETERMINATION b ono N< �27 S 3 c) W
4. Name of USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determination 5. Farm No. and Tract No.
A sc s' I ufQ T_ -7,7 _sa.
SFCT1nN 1 - HIGHL V FRODIRLF LAND
6. Is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land determination? Yes ❑ No ❑?
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
3 ,
7. Are there highly erodible soil map units on this farm? Yes ❑ No ❑
`, ..
8. List highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any
crop year during 1981-1985.
9. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any crop year during 1981-1985; and were not
enrolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
10. This Highly Erodible Land determination was completed in the: Office ❑ Feld ❑
_
CFr`TInN n - wpm ANn
FIELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
11. Are there hydric soils on this farts? Yes ❑ No ❑
*
: =_y^y
12. Wetlands (W), including abandoned wetlands, or Fanned Wetlands (FW) or Fanned Wetlands Pasture (FWP).
Wetlands may be farmed under natural conditions. Fanned Wetlands and Fanned Wetlands Pasture may be
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23,1985, as long as they are not
abandoned.
13. Prior Converted Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23, 1985. The use, management,
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions uriless
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment.
14. Artificial Wetlands (AW). Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions.
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MW). These wetlands are to be farmed according to the minimal -effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made.
16. Mitigation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetland
converted between December 23, 1985 and November 28, 1990.
17. Restoration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after
November 28. 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
18. Restoration without Violation (RSW). A restored wetland converted between December 23,1985 and
November 28, 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are converted for purposes other than to increase production,
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a violation to be in good faith and the
wetland has been restored.
21. Converted Wetlands (CW). Wetlands converted after December 23, 1985 and prior to November 28,1990. In any
year that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
22. Converted Wetland (CW+year). Wetlands converted after November 28, 1990. You will be ineligible for USDA_
program benefits until this wetland is restored.
23. Converted Welland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,
cranberries, vineyards or building and road construction.
5
t1
(�
24. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incorrect determination
by SCS.
25. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are considered maintenance and are in compliance
with FSA.
26. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance and if
installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CW). See item 22 for information on CW+year.
I27. The wetland determination was completed in the office M field Ga and was delivered[] mailed to the person on
28. Remarks. n W N A 0t rwt �e 1 C-I
29. 1 certify that the above determination is correct and adequate for use in determining 30. Signature of SCS District Conservationist I31. Date
eligibility for USDA program normal
and that wetland hydrology, hydric soils.
hydrophytic vegetarian under normal circumstances exist on all areas outlined as <\��.C�. ,S`� 1Y'
Wetlands. Farmed Wetlands. and Farmed Wetlands pasture -
Assistance and programs of the Soil Conservadm Ssrvfoe avauaw wdfww regard to race, raf/glom color, sa; age, a f 'kap.
SCi S COPY
(

Qu
. . . . . . . . . .
...........
cool", -
Al
An

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Donnie Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Dear Donnie Peedin:
AA'KT
C)EHNR
September 9, 1997
WASH NG O,,4F13 OFFICE
SEP 1 2 1997
D. E. M.
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960005
Donnie Peedin Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Wayne County
In accordance with your application received on March 31, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 96-5, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached).
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Donnie Peedin Farm, located in Wayne County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than 7350 Feeder to Finish and the application to a minimum of 67.4 acres of land as specified in
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
In accordance with General Statue 143-215.10C, Animal Waste Management Plans shall include
the following components:
- A checklist of odor sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- A checklist of insect sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- Provisions set forth for acceptable methods of disposing of mortalities.
- Provisions regarding emergency action plans.
Your existing Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must include the above elements, by
December 31, 1998. Documentation of the certification must be available to inspectors onsite. Submittal
of the amended certification statement shall be required upon renewal of your permit coverage in 2001.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely
i
/4"A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wayne County Health Department
Washington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Farm Number: 96-5
Dear Sir/Madam:
A4
[D FEHNF1
April 8, 1997
WASHIft TONE0FRCE
199714
D E. al.
Subject: Farm No. 96-5
Additional Information Request
Donnie Peedin Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Wayne County
The Permits and Engineering Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. It has been observed that name of
land owners in section I1.2 (Donnie Peedin and Gwen Peedin) are not consistent with that in section W
(Donnie Peedin Farm) and with that in our database (Donnie Peedin). If land owner's name has changed,
please file an official name change form (attached), redo permit application accordingly, and re -submit by
May 8, 1997.
Please reference the subject farm number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, and submitted to my attention at the address below. Please note that failure
to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date may result in your application
being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 540
or 364. Alternatively, send me an e-mail Oohn [e-mail]).
Sincere
Joh Jallah, Ph.D.
Soil Scientist II, State Engineering Review Group
cc: Washington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 24, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT. REQUESTED
Donnie Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Farm Number: 96-5
Dear Donnie Peedin:
A&14
C)EHNF1
WASH NOTOINeOFFICE
FEB 2 4 1997
D. E. M.
You are hereby notified that Donnie Peedin Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has thirty (30) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section
19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified
by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified
date. Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit
the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions
for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call Andy Oakley at [phone]
extension 533 or Carl Dunn with the Washington Regional Office at [phone]
5L��
VA. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File
Washington Regional Office
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Donnie Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Donnie Peedin Farm
Facility ID#: 96-5
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Peedin:
1 ® t
Q F—=N
RECEIVED
WASHINGTON OFFICE
NOV 1 9 1996
D.LM.
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Pres�,r., or
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Washington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
��f� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 M 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

�- Cart Tracks
i
Ponded Areas
0
R
arc -
466
• 'r ded Area -
�~1`Sampling Points

.A
Donnie Peedin Farrn 96-005
N
,,
Ponded Areas
1492 1t
I 1 1
35"20'13.66" N 78°09' 18.06" W
ar tia -.
� 3
Image 'D 2009 DlgitalGlobe
US Census Bureau
Q 2009 Tele Atlas
elev 1301t
GOO*
Mt 5390It