960005_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

z V
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT

N00-aQ16-PC-00'S(b v4, , r
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 96-5 County: Wayne
Facility Name: Donnie Peedin Farm
Certified Operator Name: Keith Hill Operator Number: 986441
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
1
N
17.5
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables_ Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP. . -
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
Ca_1611y\ 11.5-mck Chn
NOD LP_.A4e,,r H%5/a o1 b. ��-a

1
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 1
line m =
749.4 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5,
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6= 749.4 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u, application window'
7256
1
Rye
2.52
50.00
126.0
OCT-MAR
7256
2
Rye
2.34
36.00
84.2
OCT-MAR
7256
3
Rye
3.47
37.00
128.4
OCT-MAR
7256
4
Rye
1.46
50.00
73.0
OCT-MAR
7256
5
Rye
1.12
37.00
41.4
OCT-MAR
7256
6
Rye
0.64
37.00
23.7
OCT-MAR
7256
7
Rye
2.65
41.00
108.7
OCT-MAR
7256
8
Rye
1.61
37.00
59.6
OCT-MAR
7256
9
Rye
0.59
50.00
29.5
OCT-MAR
7256
10
Rye
0.59
50.00
29.5
OCT-MAR
7256
11
Rye
1.30
50.00
65.0
OCT-MAR
V. 1 otal PAN available for all tlelds (sum of column t) _
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) _
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) =
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) =
tb9.0 lb. PAN
749.4 lb. PAN
769.0 lb. PAN
-20 lb. PAN

i
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 1
2- Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.5 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.5 inches
top of dike surface area according to design
d. (area at below structural freeboard elevation) 162400 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 151844 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 242314 ft3
h.-current herd # 7350 certified herd # 7350
actual waste produced = current herd # x- line g = 242314 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design Oft3
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 94733 ft3
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 420185 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1/12/2016 1.31
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line 1 = 749 lbs. PAN

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL GIVALITY
April 12, 2016
Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27530
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Freeboard Level
Donnie Peedin Farm #96-05
AWS960005
Wayne County
NOD-2016-PC-0036
Dear Gwendolyn Peedin Anderson:
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
I)h"clor
We have noted chronic rainfall events in North Carolina that are historic rainfall totals in some
areas. Thank you for your recent call regarding the freeboard levels at your facilities. On
February 5, 2016, during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR), you reported a high freeboard level (17.5 inches) in the primary lagoon.
Please be advised that failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in
accordance with the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and with Condition V.
2. of NC Swine Waste System General Permit could result in other actions being taken by the
Division in response to compliance matters.
Deficiency 1: On February 5, 2016, a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at (17.5 inches)
of freeboard at the primary lagoon. A level of (19 inches) is the maximum level allowed by your
permit and Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
Thank you for submitting a 30 day Plan of Action on February 10, 2016. Take all necessary
additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with Section 2 of your permit.
State of North Carolina G Environmental Quality I Water Resources —Water Quality Regional Operations —Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27899
252-946-6481

April 12, 2016
Donnie Peedin Farm
Cont. Page Two
Please work to ensure that your facility is managed in a way to maintain compliance with permit
and animal waste management plan requirements. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit
may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water
Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand
($25,000) dollars against any "person' who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. To minimize the
potential for any possible future compliance matters attributable to prolonged wet weather
conditions, you may wish to review your animal waste management system design, as well as the
waste plan itself, for any potentially beneficial modifications and/or improvements.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (252)-948-3939.
Sincerely,
A/r/
tf� r
David May
Water Quality Regional Operations Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: DWR-WQROS-CAFO Unit -Central Office
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDSWC - WaRO
WaRO Compliance Animal Files
JKD Files

HCDEH
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 13, 2009
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
RE: Acknowledgment of Receipt of Payment
Case No. PC-2009-0016
Farm # 96-0005
Wayne County
Dear Ms. Peedin:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 6034 in the amount of $3354.27 on
July 6, 2009. This payment satisfies in full the civil assessment in the amount of $3354.27 levied
against Gwendolyn H. Peedin and the case has been closed. If you have any questions, please call
me at [phone].
Sincerely,,.
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: David May, Washington APS Regional Supervisor
File # PC-2009-0016
APS Central Files
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION i
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 2760E
Phone: [phone] t FAX 1: 919-715-0588 FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet www.ncwatemuality.ora
i J U L 14 2009
1 ��7i i1:1'Ll l'J1Y I iL I1'/1lll�aro
^
�• ; E"� On,
YNona
Naturally
An ti 49ir -ti— hryinn rmnlnvor

4
NCDEN
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly waves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
June 3, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL — 7006 2150 0003 5467 3562
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Farm # 96-0005
Wayne County
File No. PC-2009-0016
Permit No. AWS960005
Dear Ms. Peedin:
In accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and my delegation by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, I considered the information submitted in support of your
request for remission and hereby remit $1750.00 of the civil penalty assessment. The revised
civil penalty is therefore $3354.27 ($2750.00 civil penalty plus $604.27 investigative costs).
There are two options available to you. You may choose to pay the reduced civil penalty
assessment or you may let the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil
Penalty Remissions make the final decision on your remission request.
If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check payable to the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, reference the case number on the check, and send it within
thirty (30) days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Miressa D. Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636 1
AOUIFER PROTECTION SECTION -
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636 No-jft ICc`irOl.l.na
! ocai on: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh. North Carolina 27604 Y
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919.715-0588 FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 F aturally
Internet www.ncwateMuality-org
do Fnual ,7nnnripnih+'� GftiRn�fivn G�ijnn wmnlnvor

Page 2
Donnie Peedin Farm
If payment is not received within 30 days from your receipt of this letter, your request for
remission with supporting documents and the Division of Water Quality's recommendation for
the full amount of the original penalty will be delivered to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for final agency decision.
If You or your representative would like -to speak before the Committee, you must complete and
return the attached form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Send the completed form
to:
Miressa D. Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
The EMC Chairman will review the supporting documents and your request for an oral
presentation (if you make the request). If the Chairman determines that there is a compelling
reason to require a presentation, you will be notified of when and where you should appear. If a
presentation is not required, the final decision will be based upon the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact
Miressa D. Garoma at [phone].
Sinc ely,
Coledn H: SuOins.
Attachments
cc: David May, Washington APS Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
File # PC-2009-0016 w/ attachments
APS Central Files w/ attachments

Memorandum
To: Coleen H. Sullins
Through: Miressa Garoma/Keith Larick
From: David May, Washington Regional O ice Supervisor
Date: May 8, 2009
Re: Remission Request for Gwendolyn H. Peedin / Donnie Peedin Farm
Enforcement Case PC-2009-0016
SUMMARY
A civil penalty of $5104.27 was assessed against Gwendolyn H. Peedin for failing to
apply wastewater at a rate in accordance with the CAWMP causing excessive ponding,
and discharge hog waste to surface waters without proper use of Best Management
Practices and; failing to notify DWQ of the non compliance events.
CASE BACKGROUND
December 31, 2008 -Inspection
WARO anonymously received a report of wastewater over application to crops at the
Donnie Peedin Farm. Eric Newsome of the DWQ investigated and determined that
excessive ponding occurred on a 4.05-acre oats field due to excessive spray irrigation.
The DWQ inspection revealed:
1. Seven ponded areas (1,287 total estimated gallons) that remained twenty-four
(24) hours after the original irrigation on December 30, 2008.
2. One of the areas (approximately 5 gallons of volume) was thirteen feet from
the headwaters of Falling Creek —a distance less than the twenty-five (25)
foot buffer required by the facility Confined Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
3. Laboratory results and visual evidence from Falling Creek indicate that either
wind drift or runoff from the December 30, 2008 irrigation entered waters of
the state. Chemical analyses of grab samples taken from Falling Creek,
adjacent to the spray field, indicated significant levels of fecal coliform
(>2000count/100ml), Biochemical Oxygen Demand, nitrogen, and
phosphorous.
4. No telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional Office
within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the December 30, 2008
discharge or of the waste application that exceeded limits outlined in the
Confined Animal Waste Management Plan.

December 31, 2008 - Sampling
Three surface water samples were taken along the bank of the surface water to Falling
Creek; one at the southeastern edge (A -"upstream"), the second at the southwestern edge
(B-"discharge"), and the last at the northwestern edge (C-"downstream"). Lab results
showed detectable, peaking levels of ammonia, total kjeldahl nitrogen, and phosphorus
present from samples A to C.
Sample Location
Sampling
Fecal
BOD
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus, P
Date
Colifor
(mg/1)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
Nitrites
(mg/L)
m
(mg/L)
(NO3, NO2)
(Count/
(mg/L)
100 ml
A -"Upstream"
12/31/2008
4800
140
140
170
ND*
35
B-"Discharge"
12/31/2008
7000
300
260
300
ND*
45
C"Downstream"
12/31/2008
2000
270
83
110
ND*
26
*ND -Not Detected
January 12, 2009- NOV
'A NOV was issued January'l2,- 2009 citing violations of discharge, wastewater pbnding;
buffer rule'violation and incident notification failure.
April 3, 2009 — Assessment of Civil Penalties
A civil penalty of $5104.27 including $604.27 in investigative costs was issued to
Gwendolyn H. Peedin for:
For failing to apply waste at a rate in accordance with the CAWMP... $4000.00
For failing to notify DWQ about the incident ................ ................. $500.00
Enforcement Costs.......... .......... $604.27
............................................
Total Civil Penalty ......................................... ......$5104.27
April 30, 2009 — Justification For Remission Request
All of the five factors were checked on the Justification form, and did provide a written
response:
Gwendolyn H. Peedin responded to the civil penalty assessment by acknowledging
the presence of ponding, attributing the cause to start-up conditions at the beginning
of a pull causing more wastewater to fail over a small area, and some ponded
2

wastewater moved to a depression of surface water. She also stated that the problem
is resolved by installing new irrigation system.
See the 4/30/08 remission request for more details.
OTHER PENALTY FACTORS
's_ 1Die :
A database and file review does not indicate that penalties have been assessed against this
farm in the past. However, the facility did receive a Notice of Violation issued on April
27, 2007 for failure to submit their 2006 Annual Certification Form (NPDES Permit
NCA296005).
REMISSION RECOMMENDATION FROM RO AND CO
Regional Office — The regional office recommends remission of $1750.00,
Central Office — Agrees with $1750.00 remission.
3

DWQ- - CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: PC-2009-0016 Region: WARO County: Wayne
Assessed Entity: Donnie Peedin Farm Farm # 96-0005
O Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
Notes: Permittee acknowledges presence of ponding, but asserts that run-off from site impacted an
area of standing surface water in a depression versus headwaters of Falling Creek. No other
information was provided to support such claim by demonstrating that the standing surface water
would not flow to Falling Creek. Also, no information was provided to demonstrate that the noted
area would not be considered wetlands interconnected to Falling Creek.
Surface water samples contained ammonia and TKN at concentrations up to 260 mg/L and 300 mg/L,
respectively, demonstrating that a discharge of wastewater occurred resulting in impacts to surface
water quality. Condition No. 1. 1. of the facility's permit prohibits discharges from reaching surface
waters or wetlands. Condition II. 4, prohibits ponding. Although Ms. Peedin contests the subject
waters being considered headwaters of Falling Creek, she acknowledges that both ponding and a
discharge to surface waters occurred. One assessment was made for violating Condition No. 1. 1. and
1I.4 and the permittee acknowledges that violations of those conditions occurred.
O Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
Notes: April 30, 2009 response indicates that a new irrigation system has been installed and a
new OIC has taken over irrigation responsibilities, which should prevent the reoccurrence of the
subject incident again.
There's no indication that impacted surface water was recovered and pumped back onto the fields
or into the facility's lagoon. No action was taken to prevent impacted surface waters from
migrating further from the source area.
O Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Notes: In the April 30, 2009 response, the cause of the ponding is attributed to start-up conditions
at the beginning of a pull causing more wastewater to fall over a small area at the beginning of the
pull. The condition is described as being unavoidable and inadvertent.
If the OIC has knowledge that the irrigation system performs in a certain manner upon start up, he
has prior knowledge to suggest that additional oversight should be provided to ensure that over -
application does not occur. The regional office attributes the ponding and run-off to hydraulic
over -application, regardless of whether irrigation rates were below those specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan or the irrigation system did not function properly upon
start-up.
O Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
Notes: Overall, the facility has a clean compliance history with the exception of an NOV issued
March 2007 for failure to submit the Annual Certification.

N Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Notes: Ms. Peedin indicates that she has incurred $41,789.77 in expenses to date through
installing a new irrigation system. Of that amount, over $20,000 has been paid on the balance.
Ms. Peedin indicates tough economic times and that applying penalties towards the new irrigation
system better serves environmental stewardship and will prevent re -occurrence of the subject
incident.
The regional office supports partial remission based on independent actions taken to prevent the
re -occurrence of the incident (installation and investment in new irrigation system).
Decision (Check one)
Request Denied
l.�
Date
Full Remission Partial remission Amount remitted l 7�
� 11)m " I - , ( 'a -
o een H. Su

NCDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Govemor Director Secretary
June 3, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL — 7006 2150 0003 5467 3562
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Farm # 96-0005
Wayne County
File No. PC-2009-0016
Permit No. AWS960005
Dear Ms. Peedin:
In accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and my delegation by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, I considered the information submitted in support of your
request for remission and hereby remit $1750.00 of the civil penalty assessment. The revised
civil penalty is therefore $3354.27 ($2750.00 civil penalty plus $604.27 investigative costs).
There are two options available to you. You may choose to pay the reduced civil penalty
assessment or you may let the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil
Penalty Remissions make the final decision on your remission request.
If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check payable to the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, reference the case number on the check, and send it within
thirty (30) days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Miressa D. Garoma
DWQ D1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh. North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919.715-0588 FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.nLvatemualfty.org
JUN, 5 ZQ09
,• n%!VFi�C;01d��- OF ICE
—orthiCaroliina
An r'-rnial r)n nrhi N t AfFi— i— Arnnn ::mnlnvor

Page 2
Donnie Peedin Farm
If payment is not received within 30 days from your receipt of this letter, your request for
remission with supporting documents and the Division of Water Quality's recommendation for
the full amount of the original penalty will be delivered to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for final agency decision.
If you or your representative would like -to speak before the Committee, you must complete and
return the attached form within thirty-00) days of receipt of this letter. Send the completed form
to:
Miressa D. Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
The EMC Chairman will review the supporting documents and your request for an oral
presentation (if you make the request). If the'Chairman determines that there is a compelling
reason to require a presentation, you will be notified of when and where you should appear. If a
presentation is not required, the final decision will be based upon the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact
Miressa D. Garoma at [phone].
Sinc ely,
Coledn H: SuOins
Attachments
cc: David -May, Washington APS Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
File # PC-2009-0016 w/ attachments
APS Central Files w/ attachments

Memorandum
To: Coleen H. Sullins
Through: Miressa Garoma/Keith Larick 't
From: David May, Washington Regional O ce Supervisor
Date: May 8, 2009
Re: Remission Request for Gwendolyn H. Peedin / Donnie Peedin Farm
Enforcement Case PC-2009-001 b
SUMMARY
A civil penalty of $5104.27 was assessed against Gwendolyn H. Peedin for failing to
apply wastewater at a rate in accordance with the CAWMP causing excessive ponding,
and discharge hog waste to surface waters without proper use of Best Management
Practices and; failing to notify DWQ of the non compliance events.
CASE BACKGROUND
December 31, 2008 - Inspection
WARO anonymously received a report of wastewater over application to crops at the
Donnie Peedin Farm. Eric Newsome of the DWQ investigated and determined that •. ::
excessive ponding occurred on a 4.05-acre oats field due to excessive spray irrigation: -
The DWQ inspection revealed:
L Seven ponded areas (1,287 total estimated gallons) that remained twenty-four
(24) hours after the original irrigation on December.30, 2008.
2. One of the areas (approximately 5 gallons of volume) was thirteen feet from
the headwaters of Falling Creek —a distance less than the twenty-five (25)
foot buffer required by the facility Confined Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
3. Laboratory results and visual evidence from Falling Creek indicate that either
wind drift or runoff from the December 30, 2008 irrigation entered waters of
the state. Chemical analyses of grab samples taken from Falling Creek,
adjacent to the spray field, indicated significant levels of fecal coliform
(>2000count/100ml), Biochemical Oxygen Demand, nitrogen, and
phosphorous.
4. No telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional Office
within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the December 30, 2008
discharge or of the waste application that exceeded limits outlined in the
Confined Animal Waste Management Plan.

December 31, 2008 - Sampling
Three surface water samples were taken along the bank of the surface water to Falling
Creek; one at the southeastern edge (A -"upstream"), the second at the southwestern edge
(B-"discharge"), and the last at the northwestern edge (C-"downstream"). Lab results
showed detectable, peaking levels of ammonia, total kjeldahl nitrogen, and phosphorus
present from samples A to C.
Sample Location
Sampling
Fecal
BOD
Ammonia
TKN
Nitrates,
Phosphorus, P
Date
Colifor
(mgll)
NH3 as N
(mg/L)
Nitrites
(mg/L)
m
(mg/L)
(NO3, NO2)
(Count/
(mg/L)
100 ml
A -"Upstream"
12/31/2008
4800
140
140
170
ND*
35
B-"Discharge"
12/31/2008
7000
300
260
300
ND*
45
C"Downstream"
12/31/2008
2000
270
83
110
ND*
26
*ND -Not Detected
January 12, 2009- NOV
A NOV was issued January 12, 2009 citing violations of discharge, wastewater ponding;
buffer rule'violation and incident notification failure.
April 3, 2009 — Assessment of Civil Penalties
A civil penalty of $5104.27 including $604.27 in investigative costs was issued to
Gwendolyn H. Peedin for:
For failing to apply waste at a rate in accordance with the CAWMP... $4000.00
For failing to notify DWQ about the incident ................... .............. $500.00
Enforcement Costs................................................................ $604.27
Total Civil Penalty.............................................................. $5104.27
April 30, 2009 — Justification For Remission Request
All of the five factors were checked on the Justification form, and did provide a written
response:
Gwendolyn H. Peedin responded to the civil penalty assessment by acknowledging
the presence of ponding, attributing the cause to start-up conditions at the beginning
of a pull causing more wastewater to fall over a small area, and some ponded
2

wastewater moved to a depression of surface water. She also stated that the problem
is resolved by installing new irrigation system.
See the 4/30/08 remission request for more details.
OTHER PENALTY FACTORS
A database and file review does not indicate that penalties have been assessed against this
farm in the past. However, the facility did receive a Notice of Violation issued on April
27, 2007 for failure to submit their 2006 Annual Certification Form (NPDES Permit
NCA296005).
REMISSION RECOMMENDATION FROM RO AND CO
Regional Office — The regional office recommends remission of $1750.00.
Central Office — Agrees with $1750.00 remission.
3

DWQ- - CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: PC-2009-0016 Region: WARO County: Wayne
Assessed Entity: Donnie Peedin Farm Farm # 96-0005
O Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
Notes: Permittee acknowledges presence of ponding, but asserts that run-off from site impacted an
area of standing surface water in a depression versus headwaters of Falling Creek. No other
information was provided to support such claim by demonstrating that the standing surface water
would not flow to Falling Creek. Also, no information was provided to demonstrate that the noted
area would not be considered wetlands interconnected to Falling Creek.
Surface water samples contained ammonia and TKN at concentrations up to 260 mg/L and 300 mg/L,
respectively, demonstrating that a discharge of wastewater occurred resulting in impacts to surface
water quality. Condition No. I. 1. of the facility's permit prohibits discharges from reaching surface
waters or wetlands. Condition 1I. 4. prohibits ponding. Although Ms. Peedin contests the subject
waters being considered headwaters of Falling Creek, she acknowledges that both ponding and a
discharge to surface waters occurred. One assessment was made for violating Condition No. I.1. and
11.4 and the permittee acknowledges that violations of those conditions occurred.
() Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
Notes: April 30, 2009 response indicates that a new irrigation system has been installed and a
new OIC has taken over irrigation responsibilities, which should prevent the reoccurrence of the
subject incident again.
There's no indication that impacted surface water was recovered and pumped back onto the fields
or into the facility's lagoon. No action was taken to prevent impacted surface waters from
migrating further from the source area.
() Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Notes: In the April 30, 2009 response, the cause of the ponding is attributed to start-up conditions
at the beginning of a pull causing more wastewater to fall over a small area at the beginning of the
pull. The condition is described as being unavoidable and inadvertent.
If the OIC has knowledge that the irrigation system performs in a certain manner upon start up, he
has prior knowledge to suggest that additional oversight should be provided to ensure that over -
application does not occur. The regional office attributes the ponding and run-off to hydraulic
over -application, regardless of whether irrigation rates were below those specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan or the irrigation system did not function properly upon
start-up.
O Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
Notes: Overall, the facility has a clean compliance history with the exception of an NOV issued
March 2007 for failure to submit the Annual Certification.

N Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Notes: Ms. Peedin indicates that she has incurred $41,789,77 in expenses to date through
installing a new irrigation system. Of that amount, over $20,000 has been paid on the balance.
Ms. Peedin indicates tough economic times and that applying penalties towards the new irrigation
system better serves environmental stewardship and will prevent re -occurrence of the subject
incident.
The regional office supports partial remission based on independent actions taken to prevent the
re -occurrence of the incident (installation and investment in new irrigation system).
Decision (Check one)
Request Denied
Date
1 �
Full Remission Partial remission Amount remitted 17�
aee
y
n H. Su

Y
DWQ- - CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: PC-2009-0016 Region: WARO County: Wayne
Assessed Entity: Donnie Peedin Farm Farm # 96-0005
() Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
Notes: Permittee acknowledges presence of ponding, but asserts that run-off from site impacted an
area of standing surface water in a depression versus headwaters of Falling Creek. No other
information was provided to support such claim by demonstrating that the standing surface water
would not flow to Falling Creek. Also, no information was provided to demonstrate that the noted
area would not be considered wetlands interconnected to Falling Creek.
Surface water samples contained ammonia and TKN at concentrations up to 260 mg/L and 300 mg/L,
respectively, demonstrating that a discharge of wastewater occurred resulting in impacts to surface
water quality. Condition No. 1. 1. of the facility's permit prohibits discharges from reaching surface
waters or wetlands. Condition II. 4. prohibits ponding. Although Ms. Peedin contests the subject
waters being considered headwaters of Falling Creek, she acknowledges that both ponding and a
discharge to surface waters occurred. One assessment was made for violating Condition No. 1. 1. and
11.4 and the permittee acknowledges that violations of those conditions occurred.
() Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
Notes: April 30, 2009 response indicates that a new irrigation system has been installed and a
new OIC has taken over irrigation responsibilities, which should prevent the reoccurrence of the
subject incident again.
There's no indication that impacted surface water was recovered and pumped back onto the fields
or into the facility's lagoon. No action was taken to prevent impacted surface waters from
migrating further from the source area.
() Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Notes: In the April 30, 2009 response, the cause of the ponding is attributed to start-up conditions
at the beginning of a pull causing more wastewater to fall over a small area at the beginning of the
pull. The condition is described as being unavoidable and inadvertent.
If the OIC has knowledge that the irrigation system performs in a certain manner upon start up, he
has prior knowledge to suggest that additional oversight should be provided to ensure that over -
application does not occur. The regional office attributes the ponding and run-off to hydraulic
over -application, regardless of whether irrigation rates were below those specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan or the irrigation system did not function properly upon
start-up.
() Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
Notes: Overall, the facility has a clean compliance history with the exception of an NOV issued
March 2007 for failure to submit the Annual Certification.

f
(X) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Notes: Ms. Peedin indicates that she has incurred $41,789.77 in expenses to date through
installing a new irrigation system. Of that amount, over $20,000 has been paid on the balance.
Ms. Peedin indicates tough economic times and that applying penalties towards the new irrigation
system better serves environmental stewardship and will prevent re -occurrence of the subject
incident.
The regional office supports partial remission based on independent actions taken to prevent the
re -occurrence of the incident (installation and investment in new irrigation system).
Decision (Check one)
Request Denied Full Remission Partial remission Amount remitted
Date
Colleen H. Sullins

Way, Dayid
From;,'May, David
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:49 PM
To: Garoma, Miressa
Subject: RE: Remission Cases
Penalties were assessed as follows:
$4,000 for violating Conditions 1.1 and 11.4 — discharging wastes to surface waters and ponding violations
$500 for violating 111.13 for failure to report problems
$602.27 for enforcement costs
Total = $5,104.27
The permittee based her justification for remission on
1) the assertion that impacted surface waters were not waters of the state and not the headwaters to Falling Creek
(assessment factors were wrongfully applied)
2) new irrigation design/system has been put in place with new underground hydrants and hard hose traveler
installed, plus new OIC runs operation now (promptly abated continuing damage)
3) pressure in line is low at start up causing uneven application in areas -- attributes problem to irrigation system
"issues" (violation inadvertent or an accident) — this wasn't the case, OIC made more than one pull across the
same area from what 1 recall.
4) permittee has not been previously assessed a penalty
5) Permittee has invoices for $41,789.77 for work on new irrigation system, has paid $20,000 for work completed,
and still owes money on the balance — feels money would be better spent on new irrigation system versus
penalties (penalty payment will prevent payment for remaining necessary remedial actions).
$1,750 was recommended to be remitted of the $4,000 assessment for violating Conditions L1. and 11.4. for the
following:
a) Surface water was impacted and the permittee states such in her remission request. However, the
permittee indicates that the impacted waters are not waters of the state. Impacted waters (which cover a
very large area and runs off into the woods in a wetland/wetland like area towards Falling Creek) are clearly
surface waters. Based on any issues regarding whether the impacted waters are surface waters only or
waters of the state, partial remission of the $4,000 assessment is recommended.
b) The permittee was not directed by DWQ to upgrade the existing irrigation system at the facility. Upgrades
were initiated independently. Installation of the new irrigation system was not completed until after the
subject incident occurred. The regional office recognizes that a substantial investment (—$42,000) has been
made in a new irrigation system that should be more protective of the environment than the previous
(original) version. Given the investment in the new irrigation system, which has been brought on-line since
the subject incident, partial remission of the $4,000 assessment is recommended.
$1,750 remission (based on the above two factors) on the $4,000 assessment leaves $2,250 assessed for the
discharge to surface waters and ponding violations. $2,250 could be considered more reflective of "surface
water only" impacts with ponding as an additional violation.
Please let me know if you have any questions concerning this matter or need more information.
Thanks
David May

David'Mav, Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Division of' Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: david-may@)ncdenr.gov
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Garoma, Miressa
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:57 PM
To: May, David
Subject: FW: Remission Cases
See the Peedin case question at the end of this email.
Thanks,
Miressa
Afiiessa Gar=4
,44uiferThoteetion Section
NCVENIPIWit�
1636 `►fai(Sertdce Center
A;&Yg y YC 27699
done: 919-715-6937
Tad 919-715-0588
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
From: Hardee, Ed [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:52 PM
To: Larick, Keith; [e-mail]
Subject: FW: Remission Cases
Please provide an answer to me or Coleen on the Peedin Farm Question.
Ed Hardee
Aquifer Protection Section
Land Application Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
DISCLAIMER: Per Executive Order No. 150, all e-mails sent to and from
2

this account are subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Sullins, Coleen
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:00 PM
To: Hardee, Ed
Subject: Remission Cases
Ed — I have questions on three of the remission cases:
SM Villari — are there continuing violations since December? When did the improvements get made?
Conway — Normally we remit if it was an oversight by the facility on submitting the information. Did they submit all
information or is there still missing data? I can't tell from the staff documents.
Peedin Farm — the remission recommendation from staff was for $1750. Please explain the decision making process
that arrived at that remission amount.
Thanks Coleen

' DWQ- - CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: PC-2009-0016 Region: WARO County: Wayne
Assessed Entity: Donnie Peedin Farm Farm # 96-0005
() Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
Notes: Permittee acknowledges presence of ponding, but asserts that run-off from site impacted an
area of standing surface water in a depression versus headwaters of Falling Creek. No other
information was provided to support such claim by demonstrating that the standing surface water
would not flow to Falling Creek. Also, no information was provided to demonstrate that the noted
area would not be considered wetlands interconnected to Falling Creek.
Surface water samples contained ammonia and TKN at concentrations up to 260 mg/L and 300 mg(L,
respectively, demonstrating that a discharge of wastewater occurred resulting in impacts to surface
water quality. Condition No. 1. 1, of the facility's permit prohibits discharges from reaching surface
waters or wetlands. Condition II.4. prohibits ponding. Although Ms. Peedin contests the subject
waters being considered headwaters of Falling Creek, she acknowledges that both ponding and a
discharge to surface waters occurred. One assessment was made for violating Condition No. I.I I. and
11.4 and the permittee acknowledges that violations of those conditions occurred.
() Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
Notes: April 30, 2009 response indicates that a new irrigation system has been installed and a
new OIC has taken over irrigation responsibilities, which should prevent the reoccurrence of the
subject incident again.
There's no indication that impacted surface water was recovered and pumped back onto the fields
or into the facility's lagoon. No action was taken to prevent impacted surface waters from
migrating further from the source area.
() Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Notes: In the April 30, 2009 response, the cause of the ponding is attributed to start-up conditions
at the beginning of a pull causing more wastewater to fall over a small area at the beginning of the
pull. The condition is described as being unavoidable and inadvertent.
If the OIC has knowledge that the irrigation system performs in a certain manner upon start up, he
has prior knowledge to suggest that additional oversight should be provided to ensure that over -
application does not occur. The regional office attributes the ponding and run-off to hydraulic
over -application, regardless of whether irrigation rates were below those specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan or the irrigation system did not function properly upon
start-up.
{) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
Notes: Overall, the facility has a clean compliance history with the exception of an NOV issued
March 2007 for failure to submit the Annual Certification.

(X) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Notes: Ms. Peedin indicates that she has incurred $41,789.77 in expenses to date through
installing a new irrigation system. Of that amount, over $20,000 has been paid on the balance.
Ms. Peedin indicates tough economic times and that applying penalties towards the new irrigation
system better serves environmental stewardship and will prevent re -occurrence of the subject
incident.
The regional office supports partial remission based on independent actions taken to prevent the
re -occurrence of the incident (installation and investment in new irrigation system).
Decision (Check one)
Request Denied Full Remission Partial remission Amount remitted
Date
Coleen H. Sullins

• • r •• • • 1 r �` •
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 3, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL - #7006 2150 0003 5467 2831
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Rd.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Farm # 96-0005
Wayne County
File No. PC-2009-0016
Permit No. AWS960005
Dear Ms. Peedin:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Gwendolyn H. Peedin in the
amount of $5104.27, which includes $604.27 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the
assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality. Any
continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following three items:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made to the order of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new
violation(s). Do not include the attached waiver form if making payment. ,
Please send payment to the attention of:
Miressa D Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
APO - 7 2009
OFFICE
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION One
1636 Mall Service Center, Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1636 North Carohna
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Naturally
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588 FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-677-623-6748
inteme:: www.ncwate ual' .or

�r Page 2
4/3/2009
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they
may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the
proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual
statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request forecloses the
option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation and agreement that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please
prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted, and submit
it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In determining whether a remission request
will be approved, the following factors shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the violator;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator has been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions.
Please note that all evidence presented in support of your request for remission must be submitted in writing.
The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review your evidence and inform you of his decision in
the matter of your remission request. The response will provide details regarding the case status, directions
for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management
Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee
cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request consideredby the Director..
Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough statement in support of your request
for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed "Request for Remission of Civil
Penalties, Waiver. of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts" form within thirty (30)
days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality also requests that you complete and submit the
enclosed "Justification for Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Miressa D. Garoma
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
OR
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you must file a petition for an
administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You
must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during
normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between
the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the

Page 3
4/3/2009
petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings. The petition may be faxed - provided the
original and one copy of the document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the Office of Administrative
Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms_ Mary Penny Thompson, Registered Agent
DENR
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Please mail or hand deliver a copy to:
Miressa D. Garoma
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,'NC 27699-1636
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, as evidenced=by
an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result iri this matter being referred, to the Attorney
General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil action. Please be advised that additional
penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Miressa D. Garoma at [phone].
Sincerely,
------------
�_
Veodo'�57Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: David May, Washington APS Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
File # PC-2009-0016 w/ attachments
APS Central Files w/ attachments
Susan Massengale w/ attachment

r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF WAYNE
IN THE MATTER OF
)
File No. PC-2009-0016
GWENDOLYN H. PEEDIN
)
}
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE
}
FINDINGS AND DECISION
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
}
AND ASSESSMENTS OF
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000
}
CIVIL PENALTIES
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
)
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Theodore L. Bush Jr., Chief of the
Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Gwendolyn H. Peedin owns and operates Donnie Peedin Farm, a permitted swine animal
feeding operation in Wayne County.
B. Gwendolyn H. Peedin'was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS960005 under General Permit
AWG100000 for Donnie Peedin Farm on July 1, 2007, effective upon issuance, with an
expiration date of September 30, 2009.
C. Condition No. 1, item 1 of the "Performance Standards" of the General Permit states that
"any discharge of waste which reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as
otherwise provided in this permit and associated statutory and regulatory provision. Waste
shall not reach surface waters or wetlands by runoff, drift, manmade conveyance, direct
application, direct discharge or through ditches not otherwise classified as state waters. Any
discharge or application of waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters or wetlands is
prohibited except as follows: (a) discharges from the ditches are controlled by best
management practices (BMPs) designed in accordance with NRCS standards; (b) the BMPs
have been submitted to and approved by the Division; (c) the BMPs were implemented as
designed to prevent a discharge to surface waters or wetlands; (d) the waste was removed
immediately from the ditch upon discovery; and (e) the event was documented and reported
in accordance with Part III.11. of this permit. Nothing in this exception shall excuse a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands except as may result because of rainfall from a storm
event more severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm."
D. Condition No. H. 4. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirements" of the State General
Permit states that "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CA_WMP. In no
case shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the n'uutci n tof do c-m`fpr�t� 1
1 E E- -� I� �E \'/ T
receiving crop. In no case shall land application rates result in �xWesse dmg-o an
runoff during any given application event".
APO v 7 2009
1 _ _
ji'i^1LOFFICE

E. Condition No. III. 13. of the "Monitoring and Reporting Requirements" of the State General
Permit requires in part that the permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
following: a) Any discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands, or d) Over applying
waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff enters surface
waters or wetlands.
F. On December 31, 2008, DWQ received an anonymous complaint that wastewater had been
over -applied to cropland at the Donnie Peedin Farm. On December 31, 2008 DWQ staff
investigated the alleged event and observed that ponding in different areas of oats field #8
(4.05 acres) resulting from over -irrigation. Visual evidence not only supported the indication
that the December 30, 2008 irrigations caused wastewater ponding, but also that wastewater
was applied 13 feet from headwaters to Falling Creek. Analyses of grab samples taken from
the headwaters adjacent to field #8 detected Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), fecal
coliform, and nutrients (ammonia nitrogen, phosphorous) up to 300 mg/L, 7000 count/100ml,
260 mg/L, and 45 mg/L respectively. The detected surface water pollutant levels combined
with the appearance of the surface water indicate that a discharge occurred to waters of the
State. Facility irrigation records supplied by operator Mr. Eddie Rowe show that irrigation
occurred December 30, 2008.
G. DWQ responded by issuing the facility a Notice of Intent to Enforce.
H. Gwendolyn H. Peedin does not have a valid permit for the above -described activity.
I. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $604.27.
Based upon the above Findings of Facts, I make the following:
II. ' CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Gwendolyn H. Peedin is a "person" within the meaning of G. S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G
S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.I.
C. The above -cited discharge to surface waters violated Condition No. I. 1. of the State General
Permit.
D. The above -cited failures to apply waste at land application rates in accordance with the
CAWMP and to avoid excessive ponding or runoff violated Condition No. II. 4. of the State
General Permit.
E. The above -cited failure to notify DWQ of a discharge violated Conditions No. III. 13 a, d,
and e of the State General Permit.
F. Gwendolyn H. Peedin may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is required but fails
to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by G.S.
143-215.1.
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Gwendolyn H. Peedin
pursuant to G. S. 143-215.3(a)(4) and G. S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
2

:b-
H. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Gwendolyn H. Peedin, owner of Donnie Peedin Farm, is hereby assessed a civil
penalty of:
$ 4000.00' For violating Condition No. I. 1., and No. II. 4. of the State General
Permit for failing to apply waste at a rate in accordance with the
CAWMP causing excessive ponding, and discharging hog waste to
surface waters without the proper use of Best Management Practices.
$ 500.00 For violating Condition No. III.13 of the State General Permit for failure
to report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following
events: a. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
$4500.00 Total Civil Penalty
$ 604.27 Enforcement costs
$5104.27 Total Amount Due
As required by G. S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have considered
the factors listed in G_ S. 143B-282. I (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The -amount of money save by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
AV/0
r
Date) Theodore L. Bush, r. Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
W?

May, David
From: Garoma, Miressa
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:07 PM
To: May, David
Subject: Remission request from Donnie Peedin Farm (Farm# 96-05)
Attachments: 2009 Enforcement Package 96_5.pdf; Remission - Regional Office Response
AWS960005.doc
David,
Donnie Peedin Farm (Farm # 96-05) filed a remission request regarding the civil penalty assessed against the farm for
spraying waste that caused excessive ponding and discharge. Please find attached the form for remission assessment for
the farm, fill it out and send it to me as soon as you can. I have attached copies of remission forms (PDF file) and a
response letter from Ms. Peedin. If you need additional info please let me know.
Thanks,
M iressa
Wiressa Gamma
,4quifer0mection Section
1636 wadsmice Center
R.akiy)F NC 27699
q fww: 919-715-6937
TaX 919-715-0588
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

DWQ- - CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: PC-2009-0016 Region: WARO County: Wayne
Assessed Entity: Donnie Peedin Farm Farm # 96-0005
() Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
Notes:
() Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
Notes:
O Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Notes:
(} Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
Notes:
O Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Notes:
Decision (Check one)
Request Denied Full Remission Partial remission Amount remitted
Date Coleen H. Sullins

Memorandum
To: Keith Lariek, Animal Feeding Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation Permitting Compliance Unit
Through: David May, Water Quality Supervisor �L Lei
Washington Regional Office
From: Marie E. Newsome, Environmental Engineer I
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Enforcement Package
Donnie Peedin Farm
Permit No. AWS960005
Wayne County
1zte: January 30, 2009
Introduction:
The Donnie Peedin Farm is owned by Gwendolyn H. Po din and operated by Mr. Eddie Rowe.
This facility, located on Stevens MHl Road in Wayne County, began operation in 1994. The
facility has the capacity to raise 7,350 feeder to finish swine and the overall design for dais
facility is 992,250 lbs steady state live weight.
Report:
On December 31, 2008 at 8:00 A.M., the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
anonymously received a report of wasteurater over application to crops at the Donnie Peedin
Farm. Oct December 31, 2008 Eric Ncwsoune of the DWQ investigated and determined that
excessive ponding occurred on a 4.05-acre oats field due to excessive spray irrigation. There
were seven ponded areas (1,287 total estimated gallons) that remained twenty-four (24) hours
after the original irdgation on December 30, 2008. Furthermore, one of the areas (approximately
5 gallons of volume) was thirteen feet from the headwaters of Falling Creek —a distance less
Ulan the twenty-five (25) foot buffer required by the facility Confined Animal Waste
Management Plan. Chemical analyses of grab samples taken from Falling Creek, adjacent to the
spray field, indicated significant levels of fecal coliform (>2000countl100m l), Biochemical
Oxygen Demand, nitrogen, and phosphorous. Laboratory results and visual evidence from
Falling Creek indicate that either wind drift or runoff from the December 30, 2008 irrigation
entered waters of the state. No telephonic notification was made to the Washington Regional
Office within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the December 30, 2008 discharge or
of the waste application that exceeded limits outlined in the Confined Animal Waste
Management Plan -
Please find a table with the sample results below.
The Finding and Decisions and Assessment Factors are attached for review.

Conclusion:
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin, owner of the Donnie Peedin Fame, is in violation of the permit and
North Carolina General Statue 143-215.1{a} for discharging hog waste to surface waters; failing
to apply wastewater such that ponding and runoff were avoided; failing to maintain buffer strips
as specified in the facility's CAVVW near land application areas and; failing to notify DWQ of
the non compliance events.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the appropriate civil penalties be assessed against this subject facility.
Donnie Peedin Farm, located in Wayne County, owned by Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin. The
Washington Regional Office recommends that penalties be assewed for the four violations
described in the Conclusion.
6

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANTM A,L OPERATIONS
ENFORCEMENT CASE REPORT
ENFORCEMENT 4 NOV-2009-PC-0019
Section 1: General Information
I . Facility Name: Donnie Peedin Farm
2. Facility or Pennit No.: AWS960005
3. Parties reamed in assessment: Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin
4. (Mailing) Asidress: 1672 Old Smithfield Road, Goldsboro. NC 27530
S. Telephone No.: 919-134-5299
6. Location of Facility: Stevens Mill [toad
7. Type of Operation: 7,350 Feeder -to Finish
8. Registered Agent (if applicable): N
9. RegiAered Agent Address (if applicable): NiA
10. Datc(s) of noted violations: December 31. 208
11. Receiving Stream and Classification (if applicable): Egg Q�eek,Clas§ C
12. Regional Office: Washington Regional Office
13. Report Prepared By: M. Ede Ne ome
Section 11: Findings
Case Narrative: On December 31, 2008 at 8:00 A,Nt, the North Carolina Division of Water
tuality W anonmgqsly received are wtewatg over n2liggiRn to croo at the
r 31, 2008 BriQ hiewNgMiq of the DWO investigged
determimd that excessive 22adina occurred on a 4.05-acre oats field clue to excessive Strrav
irrigation. Them nacre seven Bonded areas U..287 vital estimated gallons) found to bate
nwowd twenty-four ! 4 hours after the, ri 'nLd ini"fi n on December 30. 2008.
FurTlts<tmom one of the areas (approximately 5 izallous of volume) was ihineen feet f rem the
w F C Im than - v foot buffer
by dr, facility Confined Animal Waste Managennent Plan. Chemical apses of grab
less agent to the feel cant 1 0
Leo! cohf9z:ai (>200count/100inll. Bioc cm at Oxygen I mauud. niirogm and
ph4 h—}ryas. Labo=m)! results and visual evidence from Falling Creek indir_aia that either
wind- ddit or rungff fs= the December 30, 2008 irrigation entered seaters of the state. No
te�glxtnic notification was ode to the W&c&in=n &tonal Office vsitliin ny—e -four l24),
hours of hc-oping aware of the ernber 30 2©08 disc a or of the waste golication that
exceeded litnits outlined in the Coofned Animal Waste Management Plan.
2. Farm and/or Company Compliance History: ihis facility had one Ngt ,qe of Violation iMN4
on April 27, 2007 for failure to submit their 2006 Annual Certification Form (NPDFS Permit
NCA2950051.
3. Amount of Waste discharged Of applicable): (Drift) into Fulling Creek, Antzmximately 5
gallons seen thirteen feet from crater's cdge_

4. Sample Results (if applicable) with locations of samples taken noted in relation to discharge
point: Three surface water swnWes were taken along the bank of the wrf= water to F_allintt
Greek: one at the southeastern edg, t�A"upstream'''). the second at ft southwestm edge B-
` diseltarge" , and the last at the nonhwestern edggg jG- downstrea '). Lab nmilts showed
detecAable. veakinu lavels of arnmorti& total kieidahl nitrogen. and Dhosnhorm nresent from
smnples A to C.
Sample
Sampling
Fe"
BOD
Ammonia
TKN
nitrates,
Phosphorus,
II. estion
Date
Colifww
(mg,/1)
I 'NH3 as N
(mom)
Nitrites
P (nm91B,)
(Cauntf100®1
(mkt-)
(NO3, N022)
A"Upstream"
11/31/10011
4800
140
140
110
ND
35
i B-"Discharge"
12/31/2008
7000
300
260
300
ND
45
C"Downstream"
12/31/2008
2000
270
83
110
ND
26
ND -Not Detected
5. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) recalcitrance:
Qpratt2r Mr. Eddie Rowe explained his reason for the 30 December 2008 irrigation events as
lower lUon LeMig in 4dyocg of weckcad e n
Wtell to allow & uatur infiltration o vs to tor. No ore a lione be made to
this gg.0 crop_ as the 50 lb/acre limit has now been met Per submitted MR2 form.
6. Damage? YIN If yes, include report from WRC: No visible ilmnage other than to the oats
crop. With regard to the surface water, no damag`a was seen as no anuatic animals were
visible. However, 1 b ults indicate that water uaii acted red.
7. Mitigating Circumstances: None, This is the faeil' 's fint offensc-wilh re to
opmftdoaal o m4jaknancc issve,ims, with the form are to re&sism their ' a ' n
system to underground pioi am This should assist with QLgM gun placement.
8. Recomrnendalions made to the owner/operator: Mr, Rowe was advised to coxttinue with
plans for using_untffVound piping, the facility was also asked to consider using<frcsh water
fromthe tributary to irrigate this crap, particularly on the Meld fringes near the water. This
mi t avoid bringing the gg_n too close to the 25' burr.

9. Costs to the State for the enforcement procedures (Shaw Breakdown):
Total Staff Time (8 hours) $ 224.43
Central Office $ 100.00
Travel Cost (90.1 miles x 2 @a 0.470) S 84.69
Laboratory Cost $ 195.15
TOTAL $ 604.27
10. Recommendations for further DWQ Action: ue to foQu§ou facility d
conditions during annual comnliance inVg&tions.
I]. Other Comments: `/A
Section III: Assessment Factors required to be considered by G.S. 143B-282.1(b):
l . The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation: Animal waste has the potential to deplete
dimlydimlyed oxygen in the cot 1ti ter bLAI to a ' which fitl to ua 'c ltf
mint I1 0 . Waste water A •� njigiots whigh hav
the potential to suawn algal growth to the point which is harmful to aquatic Life. Surface
waters of Falling Creek did receive wastewater.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: Tye violatiota.4 MWjpd gp Dece _, r 30, 2M
bit —wee tbehnt rs Qf 12:0(} term and 7:34 tam. The tmndina was considergd severe.
Contaminant comentrations were very hiuh.
3. The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality: The RM5mjjg of wastewater svuld be
seen in the surface water, but the exact volume discharged could not be directly determined.
IZkaL ms-WIA 4 jU RgiLn vialMe W&idity flabelo"W--DischgMej show
siltniftaarrt levels for ammonia., total kioldahl nitrogem and phm*Qrus. The lcycl of fecal
coliform yvgs well above, fte 200 count;100 ml standard &r claw C surtsrc water.
Semple
Samplima
Fecal
ROD
"s'Mmenin
TKN
ibkmtea,
lPhoupt3vrws,
Location
Mir
Col ferm
(njo)
Nfi3 es N
(m )
E Nltri w
p (mg(L)
t�o�4tatr�tl
(mg/L)
E (N031
N0 )
B-" $Di"harge"
12MU2D0S
7000
300
1
260
300
ND
45
ND -Not Detected
4. The cost of rectifying the dsrnage: jhp farm r ui vc far ewer hours hgiqg
tareventative (monito6m the spay crnerations) versus the Rgtential of a moncu wy
cdw.emmt Mmift that encompasses itsection hours, central ace and lalsoraloty hours.
Ruts c e ve jW&gtto_q 4qd havy &M 2qWpMMt have
damaged uart of the coats cron. The discharge is not attidbuted to any gquipment failure
tin ir. No ex tomes w re incurr dart at eut rn ures.
9

5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance: Money is saved when better manarcement
1s ge jmylemertted to ii mmve overall msnattemeztt of the facility, environmentally and
m- uctively. No money -vas saved thrQvah hyrh~aulic over-ttypnli on,
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional: Mr,_ d& Rq works tinder
the Tune A ot�erator license of Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin, mngnip they both are rmyoasible
Or MR!zd-x opp-Malz ft farm irfiggiojae Sino spm fLtw o =ions at IWS farm
have occurred for thirteen years without incident, it is believed that this discharge was not
intentional. It is the lx lief of the in,50r-a r that Nis. Peedin Cgr her surrogate) failed to
monitor the gun and correct it during periods of im mMpar operaiion
7. The prior record of the violator(s) in compl,,ing or failing to cornPIV with programs. over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority: The Donnie
Peed Ft?l m bas trot beer► citod for any permit violations, unc!�r ftk nt State
Non-
Discharin Vgmpjt, prior to thisevent.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcentent procedures:
Total Staff Time (8 hours) $ 224.43
Central Office $ 100.00
'Travel Cost (90.1 miles x 2 @ 0A70) $ 84.69
Laboratory Cost $ 195.15
'1<OTAI . S 604.27
10

f
SreqWavm of fiho Lab_mt ry Cu5ia
-
-
P4of ca ofviohl uanmafto of R---Cmi..;iiardod 2-410P—fit
Rrnrtcr�a ss in tact - 3
14.00
�
42,06
'real f=� ti �N as N in i�ctid
is 39
�_
4�9.17
lei Iiri4 N ftrate aSN±ft) 1..- 3
--
- — 18.37
S
55,11
-
Tn*el Phm cx'aus
18.2
_ 43.8
Grand Tool s
imis
Breakdown of Lab Costs 29Jan2GO9

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NOIRTx CAROLTNA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF WAYNE
File No.
IN THE MATTER OF )
uric Peedin Form )
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENTS OF
} CIVIL PENALTIES
FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE
GENERAL PERMIT AWG 100000
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I,
Theodore L. Bush Jr., Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), make the following,
FMINGS OF FACT:
A. Ms. "Gwendolyn Peedin owns the Donnie Peedia Farm, a permitted/Certified swine
animal feeding operation in Wayne County.
&. Ms. Gwendolyn Poedin was issued a Certificate- of Coverage AWS960005 under
State General Permit AWGIOWN on July 1, 2007, effective upon issuance, with an
expiration date of September 30, 2009.
C. Condition No. I. 1. of the "Performance Standards" of the State General Permit states
in part that, "Any discharge of waste which reaches surface waters or wetlands is
prohibited except as otherwise provided in this permit. Waste shall not reach surface
waters by runoff, drift, rnammade conveyance, direct application, direct discharge or
through ditches not otherwise classified as state waters ... Any discharge or application
of waste to a ditch that drains to surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as
follows: (a) discharges from the bitches are controlled by best management practices
Q3MPs) designed in accordance with MRCS standards; (b) the BN IPs have been
submitted to and approved by the Division of Water Quality (Division); (c) the BMPs
were implemented as designed to prevent a discharge to surface waters or wetlands;
(d) the waste was removed immediately from the ditch upon discovery; and (e) the
event was documented and reported in accordance with hart 111.13. of this General
Permit. Nothing in this exception shall excuse a discharge to surface waters or
wetlands except as may result because of rainfall from a storm event more severe than
the 25-year, 24-hour storm."

D. Condition No. II.4. of the "Operation and Maintenance Requirernen&' of the State
General Permit states that "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the
CAWMP. In no ease shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the
nutrient of concern for the receiving crop. In no case shall land application rates
result in excessive pending or any runoff during any givers application event".
E. Condition No. H. 20 of the `Operation and Maintenance Requirements"of the State
General Permit states that the permittee shall maintain buyer strips or other
equivalent practices as specified in the facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure
storage areas and land application areas.
F. Condition No. i1I. 13. of the "Monitoring and'Reporting Requirements" of the State
General Permit requires in part than the permittee shall report by telephone to the
appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours
follmAng first knowledge of the following: a) Any disc large to ditches, surface
waters, or wetlands, or d) Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in
the CAWMP or where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
G. On December 31, 2008, The Division of Water Quality received an anonymous
complaint that wastewater had been over -applied to cropland at the Donnie Pemiin
Farm. An investigation on December 31, 2008 of the alleged event revealed that
ponding in different areas of oats field #8 (4.05 acres) resulted from over -irrigation.
Visual evidence not only supported the indication that the December 30, 2008
irrigations caused wastewater pending, but also that wastewater was applied 13 feet
from headwaters to Falling Creek. Analyses of grab samples taken from the
headwaters adjacent to field 48 detected Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), fecal
coliform, and nutrients (ammonia nitrogen, phosphorous) up to 300 mglL, 7000
countl100m1, 260 mg/I, and. 45 mg/L respectively. The detected surface water
pollutant levels combined with the appearance of the surface water indicate that a
discharge occurred to waters of the State. Facility irrigation records supplied by
operator Mr. Eddie Rowe show that irrigation occurred December 30, 2008.
H. The Donnie Peedin Farm has had one Notice of Violation issued on April 27, 2007
for failure to submit their 2006 Annual Certification. Form (NPDES Permit
NCA296005).
I. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $604.27.
Based upon the above Findings of Facts, I make the following.
H. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin is a "person" within the meaning of G. S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G. S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.

C. The above -cited discharge to surface waters violated Condition No. I. 1. of the State
General Permit.
D. The above -cited failures to apply waste at land application rates in accordance with
the C.A.WMP and to avoid excessive ponding or rutnoffviolated Condition No.11. 4.
of the State General Permit.
E. The above -cited failure of the Operator In Charge (or their surrogate) to apply animal
waste such that a twenty-five (25) foot buffer is maintained between the lased
application site and perennial waters violated Condition No. II.24. of the State
General Permit-
F. ne above -cited failure to notify DWQ of a discharge violated Conditions No. III. 13
a, d, and c of the State General Permit.
G. Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.
S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more that twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a
permit required by 0. S. 143-215.1.
H. The StaWs enforcemcnt costs in this matter may be assessed against Ms. Gwendolyn
Peedin, pursuant td G. S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G. S. 143B-292.I(bX8).
I. The Chief of the Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, has the authority to
assess civil penalties in this matter
Based upon the above Findings of Pacts and Conclusions of Uw, I make tine following:
II1. DECISION:
Accordingly, Ms. Gwendolyn Peedin, owner of the Donnie Peedin Farm, is hereby
assessed a civil penalty of
$ For violating Condition No. I. 1. of the State General Permit for
discharging hog waste to surface waters without the proper use of
Best Management Practices_
S For violating Condition No. 11. 4. of the State General Permit by
applying waste that caused excessive potnding.
For violating Condition No. it. 20, of the State General Permit by
failing to maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as
specified in the facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage
areas and land application areas.

For violating Conditions No. III. 13. a., and d. of the State General
Permit by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office. as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours
following first knowledge of. a) the occurrence of a discharge to
ditches, surface waters, or wetlands and d) the occurrence of waste
application in excess of the limits outlined in the CAWMP.
604.27 Enforcement costs
S TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G_ S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G. S. 143B-21I2.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the pt:blic
health, or to private property resulting lTom the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violatinnt;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage,
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willivlly or intentional;
(7) The prior record of the violator in camplying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Con nnission has regulatory- authority,
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date)
Theodore L. Bush. Jr. Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
4

Photorecord z 4 Farm 96_005 Page 1 of 1

..,.. C ^a �. ,! i41 , i '1_. Y. x-.lu-r� *v t�.kl�l�l' t3 !" },! ,.f •, ! _,;� � ' �' �' �1� � //._._.,,,.- µ�, ! A'r'". n .'rah � .r ,.Ss�r- i, .. � JJjj r ,� ,
J; 'k 1 13i Ej 4
1•�,I, j.l�,11i�� Is,� Ir -�,�,, '' �i' , ,�,'4,ti,'"+"S ', r �: �..1 �, �'. � '� _,�� I �:I
�� it k.� r � � �' ;�'� � • !",,�i',:''�': � t� -�'�I t�; � E-� 3 a•
Cem + �'
�t. ' S s �� � E •' ;.I del SF � - .. � � .
L , Fr S 1 ry. ,ti i • �, { ,
nnne Pee n Farm36_5
2: Field 6 (Oats;
alilhg., ree
�;` '._ ,' ' �h� - /fj '� '. � •� t ^"*•tip' _ ,..��,Ir,,,;...,/'., - �.�
134
�1
21i '�Y'3f�ItAEbn�.lillflCJi'i. r i'u�h. 1� ..�.. ,. yi., ,.•M-t»�.\; t7'

I

,��,
�a
t �
ja t,
1 5.
1�
3
�y
i
j'}
w`�
3 Y ) �
R � '.
�
9 �`14 �.
���� �k trF
` ➢�g� 1'r �
q
t,
t A
k5�
A
a
S4
a�
Y�d• �.l�i .
C+20081 GiaY�tltle F i un
alb Imago.('2009`�[?IgItalGlobQ{'.� q
n
35"~20'00,56" N 78°09'37.62" W clov 130 tt
G.oOQ, L
Eye alt 846 It

tU` Laborato ectron t esufts
County;
WAYNE
Sample ID:
A839131
'River Basin
►
4F YfApF9
PO Number a
9W0028
Repon To
WAROSp
a
Date Received:
01/06/2009
�_
>
Time Received:
08:20
Collector:
p
Labwaks LoginlO
SMATHIS
Region:
i11fARU
Date Reported:
10-2109
Sample Matrix.
Surfacewater
Loc Type-
RIVERISTRE—AM
Report Generated
01I22/2009
Emergency Yes/No
VlsillD
COC YeslNo
YES
Loe. Descr.: I I 4 F
A
1 Q J
I
Location ID;
96-DPA
Colect Date; 1213112008
Collect Trnte:t 13:04
Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of tw0 cr more determinations
N3•Estimated concentration is < POL and sMOL
81-Countable membranes with <20 colmies; Estimated
B2- Counts fiord all filters were zero NE -No established POL
P-Elevatea POL due to matrix intedefence ar4or sample dilution
t3.7- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
&e-Fibers have counts of both }60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated 01-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
BS-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC) 02- Molding time exceeded following receipt by tab
J2- Reported value tailed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated POL- Practical Quantitat,on Limit subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
J3-The sampte matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated Q- Samples analyzed for this compound but pot.deteGed . tl
wv: ��--�3•r'
Jr -The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated X1- Samp a not analyzed tOr this cemppy7rdw.,,
N t-The oomponenl has been tentatively identlfted based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value i -t!• - � `� {-_=� � � i �
LAB itt 1 _j
Laboratory Section» 1623 Malt Service Center, Raleigh. NC 27699.1623 [phone]

NC {DWQQ La6oratory Section Results Sample 10 As39131
Location ID: WDPA Collect Date: 1251=08
Loc. Dow.: DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 RIGHT MOST END OF TRIBUTARY Collect Tlme:: 13:04
Visit ID
GAS p Analyte Name POL Result Ouoliller Units Analyst/Date Approved By /Date
Method Reference
1 6%
inm9
NUT
NH3 as N In OgWd
0.02
140
mglL as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference Loc10.107.06.1•J
11909
111"
Total IQeidaid N as N In Squid
0.2
170
myL as N
MQVERMAN
CGREEN
Metrroa Reference Ladleti07.06&2-N
law
:R2r09
NO2+NO3 es N In IlquW
0,02
0.02 U
mWL. as N
MA,AYI
CGREEN
Method Reforence LaC10-107-W-c
119W
III"
PhosphorUs total as P In liquid
O.02
35
mgll. as P
GBELK
CGREEN
Method Relmence UK W-115-01•IEF
IffivS
1:22+09
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Melt Service Center, Rafelgh, NC 27699-1623 (919) 733�3909 Page 2 of 2

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY MELD -LAB FORM (Dh41)
COLSNTY WaAe, PiugpjI]C Vjxjml
RIVER DASIN ,{�, ❑ AMBIENT STREAM ❑ BTFLUENT
IMPORT I D: ARO FRO MRO RR aR W;ILO WSRO TS
AT BM
COMpUANCE ❑ LAKE ❑ fNFLUE}ri
Shipped B Corfncr, R, O1hn
❑ IEMEltOFNCY
COLLELT0R(5): _ AI o/n! Crvv�4-
I
DOW 310 MA&
I
Chloritk 94D milt.
2
COD High 340 mVL
CAI a 70953 111/1.
1
COO Low 333 mg/L
4
Collrorrsf: MF Fee4316t6 1100m1
5
Cull farm: MFTowl31S01 11001n1
Coba:Troe 80 11•Co
6
Colirotm: Tubo Neal 31635 110Dm1
Cnitvy ll ) 43 ADMI
7
Couratrsc real Stfcp 31673 Mortal
ColarrH 1.6 82 ADMI
8
Raaldw TotJ M mgtL
C"aide 720 mg/L
9
Valatila505 mStL
Fiuorlda95i mg1L
10
Fixed 510 OWL
Formaldehyde 71630 afg/L
I I
ReOduc: Suspended S10 mg7L
urrose and 0111556 mg%L
12
Volollh:535 mg/1.
Hardness Tou19D0 mg/L
13
Mxtd 540 nm
Speeirk Cond.95
14
pH 403 rmiq
WAS18260 mill
is
Acidly to pH 4.5 436 mg1L
Pheno4 32730 Fit/L
16
AcIdily to plc 83 433 OWL
Svlhla 943 mr/L
17
AlbalkAytopH8.314E5 ma(L
SWnde745 mglL.
18
AIk&fkhytopH4.54f0 mg(L
19
TOC 680 mill_
20
Tmbid(iy 76 NTU
Iry ODa
fr.. r'k I f.. nmf V
i_71b Nuntber:ft��r
�
Date Received: nine:
'
Rec'd by: Franc: Bug ourier I Innd D1d.
DATA ENTR BY: C .
DATE REPORTED:
L/fNHllas
N 610 mill
TKN as H 625 M#L
tg)2 phis NO3 as N 630 mg1L
P; 1'0101 n P 665 mg(L
"n P665 mSIL
p: OFnalred as p 666 m#L
C ,Cadfdvm 1027 Ifg'L
Cf-0nmiurnJ oul 1034 p g/L
CU-Capper 1042 ItIVL
Ni -Nlcke 11007 p ill.
Pb•Leed 1031 0tfL
Zn,z. nc I U92 pill.
Ag•Si1Kr 1071 pgrL
AbAlumiavm 1103 111/1.
Bc-Bcryiliurn 1012 pgJL.
G•Cakium 916 mg(L
CO•COIN11 1037 pg(L
Fo.lmn 1045 1,siL
U•Lilhium 113) ifg/L
hlg.Magrxslum 927 mg1L
Mn•Morfpnese 105% pen.
No•Sadhlm 929 mg/L
AntnieJetal t007 pg/L
Se•5eknium 1 L47 p8/L.
11 g• Mercury 7 i 900 p gtL
Organ7chiarine rnticides
Organophosphunn Pntlrwel
AM llabkwn
Oasen4cuhal Ertroctable Organks
Acid Eetnct4ble Orgaain
pwgaable Orgo nk t (VOA bollk mq'd)
rhytaptenklon
L11l7 Use Unlr
Tem etsllure on 4ninfl; 0-'
Son li Foinl %
Corductarlce of 23*C
1Y8taf Tem ture'C
D.O.m I_
RH
Alksllnay
Acidity
Ali 1'e cnlun'C
ii 0.3 p1L 4.5
14 0 p11 6J
2
144
300
400
32244 431
32243 02242
70
Salinily %.
Pretipkalla0 (it>'day)
Clow) Con, 'A
+vile) (ivaclion (Ocg)
Slrtath flow Severity Ttlfb dily Seeerily
SYirtd Vclocily
hte■n Sitcom Uep1h R.
Stseam 1Yw R
i0
is
32
6
1351 13"
35
64
4

County;
Sample ID:
A1339132
River Basin
r
WAROSP
OF \NAj'�R
Q�
PO Number C
9W0029
Report To
�11
Date Received:
011OW2009
F NQ=MF
>_
Time Received:
08:20
a C
Labworks LogirllD
SMATHIS
Region:
VARO
Date Reported;
i1221tKJ
Sample Matrix'
SurfaCewatar
Loc Type
RIVER/STREAM
Report Generated:
010212009
Emergency YeVNo
COC YeslNa
Visi11D
b
Loc. Doscr.: DONNIEPEEDIN FARM FIELD a P01NT SOURCE
`—']�. ��'
I
Location ID:
96-DPB
Colloct Date 1213V2008 Collect Time:: 13:15
Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
5or a mom detaged desaip w of Ittese quahfler codes refer to %wm.d g1ab.Crq under Stan Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinalion8
NJ -Estimates concentration ,s < POL and >1y1DL
BI-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
NE•No established PQL
82- Counts from all frhers were zero,
83- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated P-Elevated PqL due to matrix interference andlor sample dBu'ion
84-Fitters have counts o1 both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated q1-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt m tab.: '-- `"
q2• Hording time exceeded foliovnng receipt by lab =�
B5-To0 many colones were present: too numerous to count (TNTC)
PqL- Pract apt quantitatian Limit-sub{act to cFSS
�no IOlin, run
fatet ser sat+ t i
J2• Reported value d to meet OC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated �• 'p��a' ,stm yI ! t
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but fat Qatitlsd�-
J3-The sample main% interfered vnth the atOty to make any accurate determination; Estimated
X 1- Semple not analyzed for this compound ,
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly Chemically preserved sample, Estimated 1 ,
N 1-Tha Component has been tentatively identified based on mass Spectral library search and has an estimated value
LAB v f 1
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mall Service Conter, Ralnl9h, NC 27699-1623 [phone] Page 1 of 2
1 ,
i•

Looatlon ID:
Loc. Doscr.:
Visit ID
96-DPB -VC D"WQ La6oratory Section Resufts
98-OP
DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 POINT SOURCE
Sample 10 AB39132
Collect Data, 12131r2008
Collett Time:; 13:15
GAS 0 Analyte Kama
PUL
Result Uuahlter
Units
Araly3VUata
Approved By 1Dete
gaimple Wmparature at receipt by lab
172
'C
HPARKER
SMATHiS
Mattmd Referents
16"
U7M
NUT
NH3 a5 N In liquid
0.02
280
fng1L as N
h1A,IAY1
CGREEN
Mafhod Rclerenme Lat10-l07-0b•1•J
119"
to 6"
Total *IdaN N as N in IlgsAd
0.2
300
rngil- as N
µOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lacharl0l-W2•M
IGV9
1122M
1402+NO3 83 N In liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mo+L as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
rrplhod Reference LaC10.107-04.1-c
1+gNg
5/161D9
Phosoxxw total as P in 100 1
002
45
mg& as P
GBELK
CGREEN
MethodRelenmce LACILi1t5-0IAEF
V13109
Ir22109
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mall SmIco Center, Raleigh. NC 27699.1623 (9191733.3900 Page 2 of 2

i
A
DIVISION/I.OF WATER QUALM WATBR QUALITY FIMD-LAB FORM (DMI)
COUNTY Y ' L4�1,Adf £31OPU-AMPLaTYPC-
IUVEROASIN &A64- ❑ AMn1F,N7' O/ST PAM n F.PFLU[NT
nEPORTTO:ARGFRO M110ARU(an0 dtOW5ROTS
A'r u M
COMpUANCB LAKE INFLUENT
Otlea
ShkVcdbp Carrie ha
❑ FMERQENCY a3TUARY
COI.I.L�:1OR(S� C ,.... _. o .+�
Eltin.0d 001) Raga: 0LSJ5.15ns,6S140-130or IM plot STATION LOCATION: _ _Daytni G 1Y ZA4% Ta1nt E"'gd 4.41
21ted; YmrJ►b❑ Oloslatsad: Ywt1Na0 { �-Ft`
ItPMAA1C4. Ar. A d e.Ie� i"P-3 - 4,-%..-. .r is lee,4 )� F..,.
i
0005 310 m1/l.
2
COO I Ugh 340 mgfL
1
_ .
COD L4rw 313 tr w%
4
MUM. MF F d 34616 na%w
5
wrsm:MPTOW315M 110913111
6
CbalbrM 7'*9 PI ad3Id15 1fO1ed
7
13dW= feat" 31573 flow
1
Reriae'TW 500 m17IL
9
Vo6Nlk 503 tnSIL
10
Fiacd $10 m#L
I1
ncildue:Swprndcd330 mVL
12
VoWileMs mVL
13
Fixed540 ma/L
14
pl( 403 galls
Is
Acidity to pN 4.5 436 mgfl.
16
AeMAy to p111.3 435 mgfL
17
Alkalhlhytopt11.341$ mWL
11
AEIkalGtlryropl►4.St10 mafl-
19
TOC690 myL
20
Turbidity70 NTU
v
■
�1 O
CTtw 940 mg/L
LTIa 70"] pgfL
Color: Im 10 p1.Co
C01w;wl ) 83 ARMI
Colorpll7.612 ADMI
Cymlda 770 mg/L
r(aoetda 957 mVL
'm Wehyde 71110 m91L
Orate ctd 0111 556 mg(L
ltardrim To/a) 900 m#L
Spaclrk Cond.95
MBAS 30260 mVL
Phenols 32730 pg7L
Sullkta 943 mafL
Suinde 745 MWL
w ao�g
C.., 1 .A Ila 11N1 V
Lab Number:
Date Received: f
G Ti,0
Rec'd by, 90
DATA ENTRY 13Y:
From: Bu -Cauti -I land Del.
CK:
DATB REPORTED:
A I1 L I T S s 1 C (a) anlxx
1U n N 6l0 MIVL
1'KN III 625 MIA
07 Phu M03 u N 630 M&L
P: Total n P 663 mgfL
PO4 n P 663 m#L
P: D'nsoNM n P 666 mg(L
Cd-Cadoduru 1027 It1/1.
Ct•ChromlwMTatal 1034 p ail.
Ctr•COMM 1041 pg3L
NLNkket 1067 Wall.
Pbdead 1051 pg/l,
Zn•7ine 1092 pg/L
Apsilta loll pa/L
ALAlamimirn IT05 pgfL
Be.8mirpum 1012 P61
CS.Cekium 916 mg(L
Co - Cobalt 1037 pBfL
re -Iron 1045 pall.
U-Lkhiwn 1132 psk
Mg•M.F.I m921 ma/L
Mr,Msnpnm 1055 p1A.
Na•Sodlum 929 my/L
Arlenk:Total 1001 pa(L
Se•Seltniam 1147 PIA
11i-Mercu7 11900 liA
Orpilochlorbte PtttkMts
Orpnophwphonn Pertkk3n
Acid llctbkkea
BatdNeuml EatrecUble Organics
Acid Ectractable Orinniet
Pwgesble Orgaaks t, V OA bank teq'd)
Mylopbnkion
Lob We00)Y `1
Tcm tetule an esrfvsl: p t
41i Po1N %
Cooddetance a] 25T
WMerTem tun'C
D.O, in#L
PH
Alkalinity
A�Id,ll
Ak Te Won IC
I ¢3 pit 4.1
114,5 pH.32
4
0
3W
400
2244 431
2243 $2
0Salinity
SL
Pregiphfion (inh6r)
Cloud Cover %
1%ind Duertion ( a)
Stream Flwv Severity
Turbidity Sercrfry
141nd Veloc ly
ru Stream Dgdh n,
So"m Wk1th 0.
1e
5
2
16,
1
1 50
33
64
4

County
WAYNE
River Basin
FM
Report To
WAROSP
Collector
E_HEWSOME
Region
WARD
Sample Matrix;
Surfacowater
Loc. T?pe
RIVERISTREAM
Emergency YesINO
GOC Ye&iNo
X0
Location ID 06.OPC
N("1U'61/U Layoratory-Jectzorc westats
Semple ID: A839133
�(A Vf A rE9 PO Number 0 9w0030
O O� Date Received: 01106r2009
y Time Received: 08:20
C S Labwarks LoginlD SMATHIS
Date Reported: 1122109
Report Generated. 01/2212009
Vrsitio
Loc_ Doscr.: DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD a LEFT MOST END OF TRIBUTARY I
Collect Dale. 1213112008 Collect Time% 13:31 Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinahions
81-Countable membranes w th <2C colonies; Estimated
N3-Estimated conwntration is < PQL and >MDL
NE -No astabi shod PQL
82• Counts from all filters were zero,
BJ- Gountai;te merrttiranes with More than ti0 or So CO3pnes: Estimated
P-Elevaled POL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
64-fdters have counts of both >60 or EO and < 20; Estimated
CI -Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
02- Holding lime exceeded following receipt by lab
85-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTG)
J2• Reported value failed to meet OC criteria for either precision or accuracy. Estimated
PQL- Practical Quanthation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
d3-The sample matfic intertored with the abilityto make any accurate determination; Estimated
U- Samples analyzed for trios compound but not detected
J6-The lab analysis is was from an un eservod or improperly
pr pr party chemically preserved sample; Estimated
XI• Sample not analyzed for this compound
.,. .__.......y-..-.-..�.,•-..•
--
NI-The component has been tentatively idenhfied based on mass spWraI Iibrary search and has an asumsted vatue
�,j
� f..f
�S V.•i�tl
� �.��JT
LAB
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 (919) T33.3903 Pape 1 of 2 4

WC (DWQw Laboratory Section Results
Location 10: 96-DPC
Loc. Dow.: DONNIE PEEDIN FARM FIELD 4 LEFT MOST END OF TRIBUTARY
Visit ID
Result Ouallfior Units
o wap"Dim
Metnoe Reference
Sample ID
AC;1y1"
Cotfecil Date.
12/3112008
3
Collect Time-*;
1
13:31
RPAI
IV09
Approved BylDate
SMA HIS
1Rt09
NUT
NH3 as N In ligtdd
0.02
93
m911- as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Melhed Reference Lnc16107•(16-f •J
1.1701
tF16M
Tool IQeldetd N as N in I1qu1d
04
110
mgfL as N
MOVER!.1AN
CGREEN
Method Reference LeUne110746.2.M
lam
W21M
NO2+NO3 as N In Uquld
0.02
0.02 U
mg/L as N
N.AJAYI
CGREEN
Mairkod Reference Lac10.107-04.I•c
111909
1116M
Phosplton�tatat as P In IkMd
0.02
26
mg/L as P
GBELK
CGREEN
MethodFlateence Lac141t5-01•IEF
1!131co
t1z"
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

oO3o
DIWS ON OF WAM QUALn Y WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (17M[j ray ►Ab Use ONLY
uxrr Q!
CHi�1ua
SAMIPLEIIE G
19
R3VER BASIN Q �,51./
❑ AMBIENT
►REAM ['J r-►FLUt:NT
Reronr7v:AROFRO A4noRR tRowsnors
AT BM
2/1OMPLIANCB
CJ LAKE � INFLUENT
Other _
Shlppedby:Bvs amp u7,0thp
EMEROENCY
ESTUARY
Lab Numbcr;--
Dole Received:
Titre o
Ret'd by:
DATA ENTRY BY:
From: 13us• ourier land DO,
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
—
COLL.GCrOR S : .Su�4� /
&ti11ac7ed > O Rap c 40}S�S4139 ar 100 pt� STATION LOCATION: D , « ,' f rPri
Ism ehimindedt Yoowrj
REMARKS: r( w "a a .+ w " d i -,v
Stulnu+l bate Begin (PYAm Tkm Been bare Eml Thm $n4 Depth DM DO DOM Value Type Corrgmsite Saryp(e
SI p 3Z A H L T s B C o anlxx
I
GODS 310 mRR.
2
COD High 340 MIX
3
COD Low 335 mg/L
4
Cal)rorm: MF rm131616 /100ml
3
Callru m: M) Totoi MW41 /100ml
6
Llolif0mu Tube recal31611 1100ml
7
Calirotm revel Strap 31673 /IOOmI
9
Re4idttr"Tolal300 mg/L
9
Vckliln505 UWL
10
Fixed 510 mg/L
I I
Res"; Swpanded $110 moil.
12
WWI* 533 mo/L
I
riaod 340 mgn.
14
PH 403 uniu
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mofL
16
AcWly to pl1 8.3 435 moll.
17
Alkillnlly to pH 1,3 41$ mglL
Is
AlkafkaytopH4.5410 moll,
19
TOC680 mg/L
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chlor1de940 ��mglL
Chi a 709S] _�..•__ rt7JL
Color: True W Pt -Co
Colon(PH ) 83 ADMI
C91or:pH 7.4 62 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mglL
Flucride 951 mglL
Fasruldehytie 71660 mfL
Orem arrd (Nh l56 mgA,
ILardrtersTotal 900 mg/L
Spec(Re Cond, 95
MBAS 39260 mg1L
Phcrwh 32730 pA
Suirste 941 mgJL
Sollde 741 mdL
NH3 n N 619 mglL
TKN u N 621 rnglL
plus NO3 as N 630 mg1L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PU4 to P 665 mg11.
P: Dissolved is P 666 mo/L
Cd-Cadmhm 1077 11#1.
Cr-Chmmhm:Toul 1034 FIIVL
Cu-Comet 1012 pg/L
Ni•Nkkel 1061 pg/L
Pb Lad 1031 pVL
Zn-Zim 1092 prjl.
A;.Sara 1077 p01.
ALAlumlmim 1103 itgfL
Be -Beryllium 1012 p g/L
Ca-Caklum 916 mg(L
Co•Cowl 1037 pgrl.
Pe4roo 1045 p�IL
IJ-Uhlum 1132 pOL
Mg-M4pte3iem 927 mglL.
Mn-Msnpnese 1055 mS&
Na-Sodhttn 929 mgrL
Amen icTolal I D02 1t SA-
Se-Seltnlum I N7 pg�L
fig-Memury 71900 pg/L
Orprachlodne Pertkido
Orgonophmphotus Pesrlddrs
Acid Hetbicides
BasumeutraI Fimmub'mOrpaks
Acid DirwisblcOrpnks
Ptngeebk Orgtnirl (VOA bollie mq'd)
��
Phyroplsatton
Lab Use on,
Tem emiurc on arrival;
solmislirm Wo X
I Corducunce al 25T
WakrTcm hut'C
D.O. mpYL
lvH
I AlWinity
Acidity
Ak Tr mttre'C
1118.3 PH 4.5
1114.5 PH 8.1
)4
0
303
400
12244 411
124) S2241
20
salinity 16
Precipliallon ()Nday)
cloud Covol %
Wad Dkectasn (Deg)
Sulam Floo, Sevtrily I Turbidity Severity
W lyd v6xAy
Mean Simom Drprh O.
Sbvam IYW]h 11,
190
S
32
36
13M 1350
3S 1 1
64
4

`
Q: LaboratotySection &surts
County: WAYNE
Sample ID
A839100
River Basin
�pF VJA r9
�iy
PO Number a
W0801067
Report To wAROAP
�p�
Date Received,
1213112003
r? r
Time Rece vep
16 16
Collector E NEW5OME
a -C
Labworks LogWD
MSTARR
Regltm: WAR o
Sample Matrix: Sudacewater
Date Reported
1129109
Loc. Type; RPIEWSTREAM
Report Generated
t91129P1009
Emergency Yes/No
COC Ye5rN0 YES VtstIID
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPA �- 1 a g log
Location ID: 96•DPA Collect Date: 1=1=06 Collect Time:. 13:00 Sample Depth
Sample Oualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwqlab.org under Staff Access
A-Volue reported is the average of two or more oeterminations
N3-Estimated cortcantration is - PQL and >MDL
Bt•Countable membranes with <20 colonies, Estimated
NE -No lStaWisnld PaL
82• Counts from all filters were zero
P-Elevated POL due to matrix interference andlor tamale dilution
83- Countable mempraneS wilh more than fi0 of 80 Colonies; Estimated
01-Holding time O-Ceeood prior to receipt at lab
84•Filtars have counts of both �60 or 60 and < 20, Estimated
02- Holcing time evcaeded Ibtiowing receipt by lab
85-Too many eoWnies were present, too numerous to count (TNTC)
ppL. Practlral Quantiiation L�rni1•SubjaCi to Change due to instrument Sensitivity
Reponed value tarred to meet QC criteria for ecner precision or accuracy; Estimated
Samples anaiy2ed for this compound but not detected
J3-Tne sampto mettle mtertereC with the att3ltty to make any accurate determination; Estimated
maied
'
XI - Sample not analyzed for this compound
J6-The lab analysis was from an unoreservad or improperly chemical
H preserved sample; Esfimatic
Nt-The component has been terrailvely identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value i , " ; (d;�
WARD
Laboratory Soetion» 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] page I of 2

TIC (f,(. _'"�Q Laboratory
Section i�,ESiLIrS Sample At5Jy1UU
Location 10 96-DPA
Collect Date: 1213112009
Loc. Dascr.: 96.OPA Collect Time.: 13:00
Visit ID
GA5 C Analyte Name
PoL Result Qualifier Units
Analyst/Dale
Approved By 7Oate
EWFOO temperawre at pt by lab
2,1 C
MSTARR
HPARTER
No[hadRofwmv
1N3I=
115VOS
SOD. 5-Day In llquld
2.0 140 G4 mgn.
LtSTARR
ESTAFFORD
L1OOVA Rtferonce APHAS2109
i2,09
t/ &D9
C49form. MF Feral In liquid
1 48W CFLN100rn1
MSTARR
F.SfAFFORO
Ltefhod Reference APHA9222O.20h
120IMS
2:1 ]109
Laboratory Soctlon» 1623 Mail Service Center. Raleigh. NC 27699.1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2 i

n
'v nooo
DIVISION Or WATIA QUALITY WATCR QUALEEY MC-LU,LAB romm (uA'Ti)rw I.nLhruIILY
El MIX .AS FULTY11 Lab Numb G t,J05sO 10 67
atvra nASIN lv+r v _ ❑ i
/ W1 n ccescd: 3� 7inrc J (s - I (�
AMnI[i1r lIiHHH a�l srrtclr,Nr Dale R
--• _ ,
nerOttr,O; AItU 1 RO Mxo npv w.pl? wrt/) WSuu 13 Itcc'd it . rrt3ll1: Gus-C guticr•I fend D-01-
AT1u1 VATAENTRY Y: CK:
C\7IdRlARC,t 0 hICC Q TNFt.tJl;N7
Uitm DATE; IWORTM
Shyped6T Q t ❑ Ib•IE M.WL-v (7j vC1UrlRY
C(113,fL40R S . � �A•1Ii (.YK.� _ /� /{ y.� f % / j
f'Atim.lyd LiOffU�^�7R1rn6c:6YS•]SR7•Gy10.1)O or tOp DWIf7''''11 Sf�A ,.,F 10lf lt7LtiT10 N; A��— �1.�••1��r�, �/rr� rir.K�T� r�'�a'it�/r+5r -�1 ���rl�4,J�Lti! -}r� 1�!✓I%,
snk V.n- -.4. ❑ OtaF.1oL Y-O N.0 ( /• I �� _1
POWS, ►S: r� s cae'ti,--ZrT4
Sul:ao0 ILer 11e11A ! lme Otero A; Um. Fnl lru I imee f:nd Llcpim 1l11 5 A - N. FIpc I;rgm+t S.ttF+l.F
/�"f ,1 (jr o Iu'-':��is L
I pppl )10 �• mRrl. C1.Iarkk 140 -- nyA. .4113 or N0I9 _ ____�.� n+tn•
Iigh 340CIA. Chi r 711151 I,li t• T W4 or N all mL11,
Ats '`OOtm )]s T.......0. 11!11 phi NW I t 1f 612 .~~..—�cq.
L'rliram: nl r F w ):616 rl(ttf+l •� ►; 1 pt.l a P $45
5 1'.blum OF 1ot$ 3t." IMW Gloat: Iran 61 1111Co !W n r651 inr/L
6 Cotihvnc Tub. 1'.nl316I1 •'��'-11M.1 -` cukgydl ) It AU411 r: Uicolr.d.c l' b64 ---_� -rL
1 fall0nar P..al Su@ j I673 ••—._••_Yv !I Wml Cob.Tll ?A II AUI.n .••
a R.vid-: ToW 5W maA_ Cyr..;& 720 mplL Cd•c dm.m 1071 _...._.....�._....__�pa'L.
9 Val -Irk 30) ne(1. floa16. pit m&lL _.._ CI•Cllmmhan;iu1.11014 pd1.
10 rlred 510 ny7'1, ramnb3. t)* 71930 —•• ma?L CY•C•0(1+n II317 W ppC
it R-Wd Smpr..lyd li0 _.._ maA. ORr.r OW U1:. 554 --� myl, ul•Nki.I IRFT •_••—�— uj/�
11 valuik 533 -�n-WL I IirrtSxrl Tala14O0 ^� mVIL fbls.d 1011
11 Firt11 AO mor, somilk cond. (1) _ 2 ±K- 20 ��� p61•
14 7-
13M&Y to pit4.S 416 W Kcin1.31730 rd . Ag-slw r let) Tart.
16 A4Fd11r to pll 9.1431 T % Snif f. 941 myl1. AFAWminum 4101
17 ,.� A allnllyapll a.) 611 Awl. Sd1(w ics,..,........_..___.., mgfL �. n.•lkr)t!Iwn 1011
li ARllwiq to pN 41410 _�...�.�........ ��, �,.._.._..._��_ ,._.__......-- � l►•Ckkiib11 pI6
r9 ,o a nd1 tbcabrr lal) Pan.
70 rmlridity t6 ^�_� f; I u Fi_Iion 1041 re
LI•I•iTy.rrn 1111 �--- .y� pat
Na•Ak arrtlun 91 ! mtrL
Mw•nLnpnno E073 get
N.•5n.lh.re 919 - _ _ _
�� JtI'1-
A,mk: I ant 1001 r aL
I-Srhri.r.I1111 I'N"
�Ila•hkrsb•l
—
71900 pa'1-
.__.�
lktrwenbeinr r,,i- n v
11r e.nt}rhmphernn h..t1•:In (
1`
Arid lleebkole
tltleTlr arlFiI tb llbk(hpwln
MW Umwcubir Utpok.
hrar" Qp.r, (1'UA bMtk .9'd)
Llb Utc (11!lZ
re g ture en wlrel::
F M'fG
1s'c
wo. 1im_pen l-�r'C
0.0— 11
p11
~� AIW --- _ _ _ _ Ark" - �� AY I re tatw�
at ea pit 4,3 Al 4 5 pi11,7
16
D
Tm
<w
27,14 I)V )7_4)12241 0 _
Sacm Elm. 5r..ru7 1ur%pWT Se..dtl N'i W veb.•rl Mr.a 3—.m 13,p h It Slmm IL'IAh 1l
546ii..—..
f atetBiUiot(Nday)
l7oud Corry %
_

NC DENRIDWO Laboratory s't Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
tBb Number: I AR39100 Sample 10, A Report To: WtILRO priomyf:
Sxzmpta Type: other Collector : I- Ntas =M Region:
SteWn Location: Obnnle Petsddt FOMI . u s.rreBrYl COUMY
Dateltime collected. 12131f08 1:00PM Datellime Reed 12/31108 4:16 PM Date/time analyzed:
AffectedParameter{9}: ...............r_..`�aD .. ..f�,� Zf..?-.w.:Y... .
Analytical Area: WaROI`afi-' o
The follotivirxt anomalies occurred ;Check all That apply):
[]sampies (Enter -x" in all apr'�cable boxes)
Improper container used
VOA Asls with headspace
Sulfide samples with hear ,ace
Samples not remwod. but sled on fteldsheet
Samples received, but not .sled on feldsheel
Mislat,i:icd as to tests, prc. •-rvalives. etc.
Bolding time expired
Prior to receipt in lab
After receipt in lab
lnsuff,cient quantity for am- �:sis
$arnplc exhibits gross nor -omogeneity
Sample not chemically pre _-rved pr erop ly ypl I out of range - Rece r pH -�
Irr,proper Chemical
Pesidi:al chlorine present r- sample
Color interference
Heavy emulsion (ormed du ing extraction
_5anrale bottle broken in is . no reportable results
X" Other t ;zify►: EIADENCE, roxicitypreseol:insam*
Comments: -
compunm
P=- I
112109 10.00 AM I
Quality Control (Enter "x- in all applicable boxes)
Instr ment failure - no reportable results
Ana►yst error - no reportable results
$urrp ales
None added
Recovery outside acceptance Irmo
�Sprke recovery
None added
Reowery cutttfds accOptarice limMe
Falled to mml crtteria ftlf pi afgon
Interred standards
pt ft contemiruNfon
OC data reponild outside of contrG(s twq . OCS. LCS)
Incur z or non eomp9mit V=odum used
SOP intentionafly modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
Invalid instrument calibration
Elevated detection limits dve to: l5ee netaw J
Evidence of TOXICITY presort in Sample. Ttiisis generally characterized.by a significant increase
ih-jt e BOD vc ue:as the san•.r31e concentration.decreases. The reported Value is-raWculated from
tee higtiest dilution repre5ent:ng the.maxtrrttim Loatitr►g potential.and should be.Wnsidered an
estiirt3ted value.
Corrottive Action;
Data vtjaiifier;� :odes on vmb_htta-11h2o.enr-Stale.nc.us/tab/index.htm
G4;�v:,deflce o` t-.xicity vvas pi'esc This -is generally characteiUed'•by_a sipificant-increase in•the BOD value? as the
tmP
eotcanrrtion decreases_ ve reportedeslJmit6a,V­a6fi1*­_
vale K calculated trorti hetiighest,diiutton r! plyesenting the maximum-.
g potenttal _nd sh-auld be cc=idered"an "
Notifr: iTi^n Pi-: -.,e d? FEYc
[--]No Person contacAed- Eric Newsome Date, 112&2009
Form :-.mF'•-l.
. td.
Star
...... 1.
Dale tl25iZ0©°
2612 ..........
Lead Cnem�s!'�.:,xrvis�,r's
Revic,
�
1151.^;1l IF1.; .......
El : 1•:1ETAt_S
I PE ST .......
E]SVOA � YOA Olhcr
Branch ricaa rev%:,
.......
.v (wiiiat) f OA10C ReAirw (inrt t) Logged info database by (initial) : iE j

County:
WAYNE
River Basin
Report To
WAROAP
Collector:
E NEWSOME
Region:
WARO
Sample Matrix:
Sutfacewater
Lac. Type:
Effluent
Emergency YeslNO
COC YeslNo
YES
Location tD: 96.OPB
e \NA)'�q
VistgD
Loc. Descr.: 9 P
Collect Date: 12131MOB Collect Trme.: 13;13
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Sample tD;
PO Number it
Date Received:
Time Received
Labworks LoginlD
Date Reported:
Report Generated
Sample Depth
A839101
W0807068
12/3112008
16:16
MSTARR
1129109
0 t 129r2009
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentratron i5 < POL and>MDL
81-Countable membraneswilh <20 colonies: Estimated
NE -No established POL
82- Counts from all idlers were zero. P-Elevated POL due to matrix interference andlor sample dilution
B3- Countable membranes w th more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
01-F{ddrng time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
BCFihers have Counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20: Estimated
02• Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
B5-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC)
POL- Practical Ouantitauon Limit -subject to cnange due to instrument sensitivity
J2- Reported value failed to meet OC criteria for either precision or accuracy, Estimated
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability 10 male any accurate deta urination, Estimated X Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly Chemically preserved sample: Estimated 1- Sample not analyzed for this
his compound
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value 7
FED —4
WARD
a
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] µ Page t ofl2

1311200
�rC DWQQ Laboratory Section Results Comore it) W/2001
Location ID: 96•DPB Correct pile 12Q8
Loc. Descr,: 96-Dp8 Coact Ttme ' 13:13
Visa ID
CAS c Analyze Name POL Result Guallfier Units AnatysVDato approved By IDate
Otemperulure51receiptbylab 2.1 Ic MSTARR HPARKER
k MW Relerence IMIA16 I/57o8
SOD, 5•)eyInilquld 2.0 300 G4 mgfL MSTARR [STAFFORD
MOLRod RMarente APMA52140 12d9 i2t;44
CrNltorm, MF FeW In liquid 1 7000 B4 CFUI100m1 MSTARR ESiAFFO RD
Molp'ne Reference APHA42220-20h 12l31r08 1113W
l
Laboratory Soctlon» 1623 Mail Service Cantor, Raleigh, NC 27659.1623 (919) 733-Ma Page 2 of 2

v
I
DIVISUNUfWATER QUALM WATER QUAI.ITI'Fir-LD•LABFORM (DM 1) r" Wl U,lofrY
cOtJ.rry ^� nCR1Qiii?:L 5�1 PF Qt I oV�
Leib Number:
p.IVCKDASIN V Usstltcc<i�id:1 f'jjg' 7imc:
❑ AMO:i?T STREAM 13 6lTLUfNI'
iti2poarifl:AaU rttu Mao nRo w,ao %,;nitj waao is Rc_c'd b Raw: Elu3•Cavlier llnnd DCL
A'r11M lo/cOkPUANCB ❑ LAXn ❑ I:IrLUGpir DATA CN MY DY: CK:
DATE nr_.mR•rrr)
O MIFJIUW:CY ■ ❑ ESIUARY
r�rimtttJMrJA.n[e't}3/c•13/23.65146•l�o.lCCo��0ylu� Srti71O7:1.UCAiii},y_ �,y�� j�['J(,{t� �-+-ice �P ai� ,�a7�C•l/
Se J: Ve❑ No❑ (ylvirupnl: Ya{••••1 H.❑ `W - A .. . t i r .�. _ y�_-�9 �• .J i / ! . i —_
_`_��~�••.�_.�
L,7D Ilgh 740
malt.
Ul�trl)S
mat.
_
Collrwmr MF Fnnl Il6lE
+
lisped f
�.W.A-��
CnliJarac Jdr Tdd JI Y3,
/S00rrJ
eRi;r� TeAe 14casilnle
� Ilea:,
_.
Colihwrs I'eca! Vtrp)I61J
!1Q'Li pi
ara.tt,e Toal SQD �
rnrlT.
vaweltr :9} IrxA.
-OIL
p r.Huc: Sotfetw.d ti:1
� mlJ9.
yahl'rla 531 _..
my1.
pl,tds40
r.CIL
p!f 40.1
anh,
AcW;ty 19p114,3 UG
maR.
A Kfy a pfl 13 M
MIA
A!14k7 iq t. p11 1.1 415
Ahnl Tally to pN 4.5 41 a
tPali,
TOC 680
m�7.
TalAdity 76
NTU
i7llirot 940 ot[:1.
(3:1, TD731 p[IL
rPkr; imt CU A{s
Cukx:Tp!! 1 n) Ar>MI
CtOw , n 7.6 E7 AD1A
Cy*4;& 710 trWL
11.rcrG1+93i mar
fi rn td hy671[io
Orr.» r l oih 556 nn i
Ibnfna+Tool 000 MJ01.
Sp.cin. c.,4 93
►fBASNYM OWL
phcra+hl7)JO pill.
- —
-
Sa09c945 md1
:w::iJt. T,S aa2
—f
Jirli�;i:dia
T I;T7,tNL77 �� �� ma/L
1•il! pla, Ili7} n N 3t0 �� mTJL
P:1-1 pC.I tn�
•,�•
Pf), .. p f43l� mfR•
"'.�'�._. ._.M11.
P: II ., p (.?A
Cd Ck14— 1(M pR/L
r,r.Cpnud:.m;7 �1 ION pEl1.
J.._.
NiWifIICOP y i'ili
M head M;
71f•71r�r 71141 -• pan.
A a.Silvre 1017 ___� pNL
A1.Alulafr.uln !! 01 p[�.
_
JN•Httyltlunr ta11�� _ paA.
f:a.flltam 916 MAI
pN
P..troa IR,3 ea,
t.i. 1, etlitrm 11)I
_•
.AI[.A4.ptetiovt 917 Z.
\e•.•�IA.rrpRetr lull p#A
_3
W. Swttam 974 to PR.
�-__
�•
�..
Mrdc;lga! k007 p[rl,
I(a•Merrw 71 on ptL
OMAn tk}lei,' F41lk6k+
Vet.+><yw.phat+hrtkWn
At kl Nl r 40 Kki - -
— --
ntriNe;tmlftuscubl.Olpnirt
-
A, id E.tr.elW, t)rpnie, E
Pt e.lfk Arpnkl (1'OA WflemgY11
phytr�4,Jlm
1.4h Ulc 0�
Te tn9tureop 9ninl: 1
Sa l i`ailu X
CRrxaarr. a 27'C
Warn I.rn(er,tttr: T
U.��I.
tl
_....�_. �� Alial4.ur _
_ �,_ Atid�„
AY 1'<tlpcnlm. C_
pi14.5
a tJ' PH -3
0
:T
400
I:.6, 411
127u 11241
S4:1.hyy }.
rwipialWr.JW4a7)
aw—
ww N'ml.a(Ura)
Su um l Jpw 3, nritJ Ta""y Se my
wiod ve- dy
ten Steen. Depth JL
Wtn w5WW
,a
1
7
6
M 350�M
.,,T
4

f
MC DEM1dfII3WQ Laboratot a Umple Anonwily Report (SCR)
Lab Number. A L!9161 SsmprEs ID: B ltoport To: WGRO Priority' Comet
Smote Type: odw C Cacuir: E. Newwme Region: WaRO
Shahan Looattan: bmu%W Pendet Farm - source County Wayne
Datenrme collected: 12/31108 1:13PM Dat"me Reed
12131/08 4:16 PM Datettime analyzed: VMS 10:00 AM
Affected Parameter(s): - �1.0f r
Analytical Area: WaRO Lab:
------
The fe4ovMng anomaties occurred (Check. all that apply):
Qsamples
(Enter'x- in all applicable boxes) ❑
QUallty Cantr+ol (Enter's w in all epplcabl* bmrss)
Improper Conlaiiier used
Instrument failure - no reportable results
VOA vials with headspace
Analyst error -• no reportable results
Sulfide samples wish headspace
Samples not received, but fisted on field$heel
SuPit"-,O-ne added
Samples received. but not listed on fietdsheet
Recovery Wakle tloceptw%ce t mHo
hiislabeled as to tests. preservatives, etc.
Spire recovery
Holding time expired
F-lNoie
added
Prior to receipt in lab
Recaysry O AStd8 Qmemnm tftrtits
After receipt in lab
Faaed to mom rx6teria far ptedstott
Insufficient quantity for anatysis
lrOnTal slandards
Sample exhibits gross non-harnogeneity
Bku* Loaltaminadon
Sample not Cher„ icaey preserved ern it
CC date reported outside of canirola (e.g . QCS. L,CS)
pH out of range . Record pH -p-
lrttvrreCt or non ecin (fl aM prti7oadtre Mod
Improper chemical
SDP lntentlonally modded wtth OA and Emrich Iwd
Resiaual chlonne present in sample
approval
CCuor inletfcrence
Invalid instrvrnant cdlbr> Wn .
Heavy emidsion formed during extraction
Elevated det6Ctibfl litn(ts dire to: Dates.
Sample bottle broken in tab - no reportabts results
X
Other
i:•EvfDEIVGEofTaxieitypreseMinsample_,-.
P P 9; t �Y. cterizedby t el significanIncrease
Evidence of TOXICITY resent,in Sam- le This is eneral chars
in t#te;80D value as the satnpte cancentratlon-decreaises-. _The reported value is calculAted-.fcotm_`-
he highest dilution ceprese�riting,ttte maidmum;lpading potential and sitt�titd be considered and
esgmait —Ci value. �
Corrective Action:
Data qualifiers used: iSee Ova}eier Cafes an web http 11h2o.enf to a nc usAgbfi dex-him
G4-Evidence of toxicity was present ThIs•Is gt#t'ierMty characterized by a significant increase in the BOD value as the
sample concentration decreases. The reported°value is calculated from he highest dilutW representing the.mlaximurn
loading potenbal and should bli considered an estimated value.
Notification f'equt ed? Eyes [:]No Person contacted- Eric NeiMome Date- 1126120D9 -
Form comptet_a L;• Mark A Starr Date: 1/26/2009
Lead Chemi5uSupervisor's Review (Initials):
�BtOCHEt�I ?.iETr.LS t D PEST pA n VQA Dther ............
Branch Head !tcv:rvr i rinial): r • =o QNoC Review poi ol) �gged Into database by (milial)

rD' LaboratoLySection Wesutits
County: WAYNE
Sample ID:
AB39102
River Basin
OF IMA )r
�T_
PO Number C
W0801069
Report To INAROAP
`Da
Date Received:
12131r200a
> Z;
Time Received;
16:16
Collector: E NEWSOME
Q "<
Labworks LoginlD
MSTARR
Region: WARD
Dale Reported;
1729109
Sample Matrix: Su acmotpr
LOC. Type: RIVERISTREAM
Rer-on Gerwaied:
D1i2912009
Emergency Yes/No
CG�C Yes1No 7�
Vi5iI10
Loc. Doscr.: 0,0- DPC
Location ID: 96-DPC
Collect Data: 17f3 V2009 Collect Time:: 13:27
Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwgiab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations N3-Estimaled concentration is < POL and >I fDL
Bi-Countable membranes with <20 colonies: Estimated
NE -No estaWishod POL
82- Counts from all fillers were zero. P-Elevated POL due to matrix Interference andlor sample dilution
83- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies, Estimated
BA -Filters have counts of spin >50 or 80 and < 20: Estimated 01-Hoiding time a}caeded prior to receipt at lab.
65-Too many colonies were presets; too numerous to count (TNTC? 02- Holding dme exceeded fottowing receipt by lab
PQL- Practical Quanlitation Limit -subject to change duo to insirumeni sensitivity
J2- Reported value failed to meet OC criteria for either precision or accuracy, Estimated
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
J3-Tne sample matrix interfered min Ire ability to make any accurate detorminatwn; Estimated
X1• Sampta not analyzed for this Compound
Je-The lab anafyvs was from on unpresetved or improperly chemically preserved sample, Estimated
jN1-The compatient has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated vatue
VAR0
L,d*mwry �t �� 4c s r . i:c cr. I tpltl,4t>r ft ( Y8,3.3t�a5
D�q
L� FEU 4
f

NC OWQ Ga6oratory Section Wssufts Sample to A839102
Location ID: 86-DPC Collect Dale: 12/311209()
Lot. peso.: 96-DPC Collect Time:: 13:27
visit to
i CJi5 A Analyto Name PQL Result Qualifier knits Analysmale Approved By Cato
Method Reterenee 1261108 115M
SOD, SDayln4gutd 2.0 270 04 nvL MSTARP. ESTAFFORD
Heated Re erence APHA52109 lf2,% 1126M
Co1bhht,MFFetal InIlatdd 1 2000 CFU1100ml MSTARR ESTAFFORD
Method Relrren o APHA=0.20th 1? 31108 W13M
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mall Service Center, Ralelgh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

DIVISION OF WAT1•R QUAUTY WA11:R QUALITY F1110.LAB FORM (I)M1) po<1,I:Slr.vxl.r
cvvNrr
1W r Mum B&FA'l.k.LYIU �
,uvexRAs1N Gl,�-c.!�
----❑ A6lultxr s171rAM [] r•.FFIaJlarr
RPMf1T1V: Allo rRV Mao ILRO W.RO VINO WMkOTS /
AT HM C�" INrl.VUN[
cnu1�.lAntce LAKE
or1k,
S>.lprrd l7:N C r F.MMOF3rCY U 01VARY
L'rt 6r.iel Utk3- ft.r.p:aSrS-131xs•6kIN•I]O rw lwptw lrllnoy LCJCAnoN:
e^enl: Yn1r„ jtm.0 o1&k*.rk Y,0 N.❑ 1f•�
itr�4.D [)op lkalnj>�6f1 1iw. Ur11• fhk IN _ 11" End L* 6 Uhl UU C/IIM 4i
� L7 31
Lab Number: (OW02010.6a
Dala Aecel�ed: 0 8' Time: I I,- I b
Reed b . From: Bts-Cout[cr-1 lend Del.
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
QATH REPORTED:
IZ 13t a� I -!1/ Z ;1- 10S 7 I f A It L T S B 1C
5tj7
CS.Ia� 9<0
h
I
I:
I;
21
I;
WI I
17
fl
�19
70
i ,olnalo � �ti
t fti7[J �[yh 1m �� nay[.
I C LorrJSS m6,4.
rotlrwnc Mf r•.<.131ata rlm�l
.r Coa fb,m W1 Tyr.131101 1100"r
—_ Cvlifam Tvk liad31613 f100m1
Cone t r<c.1 swm 31673 110c"d
Rr,61an: Tort 300 "Wl.
-- V.6u04 301 nWL
1'hcd 3Y0 pvrL
Rn14ue; svrpersird 3l0 mBA.
V.&Ak 131 rnSl1, -
Fiad 340 mpl.
_ p11 Yll _ tmiu
Atiddy to pl1T3 416 -vt
M;"7 b p 123 133 W91L
AN limit? topll0.1411�-
Alkd6by69pl14.5410 mfn,
�— TUC6ao weft.
Twbid:1y74 MU
Cola: Tn:t to
., Cblor�lAf j Ll
(:a1ur�1! 1.6 el
C)-NM. 120 �-
I1w.kk: 931 �—
Ia JitApk7tow
oretre.od Uih Sid
I l.nitalt Tow 900
Srwlfk- I:uA. 93
Pkcooh )7710
WIkk 4.S
SvMde 743
it "l
t, Ca
ADMI
m f'1.
r/10 10 ti 510 -- r —� -jvL
+ TKN inHWS tq0.
Nqr p6n NO) o N 610 -OIL
pr 1.kt n r 663 marC,
rot n r 03 md[.
P. Dl soled" p 666 raT/L
T 04•C1d.drw IOY1 po•3.
0•0.omk-cloa.11934 FVL
_ ChCaI{�IM]
W14idti.1 1067 p6JL
11.1n4101i p61L
_ 7X411e 1091 p 0L
As-sd.,r 1017 veL
A 4Alutni..r. 1! OS pal.
G•Crkivw 916 ���•-- T�Uw�
IJd,ahhre 1112 �
M J.k4Qwlurrt 9f i ���
N. Sodlwn 979
Anoie.Tnt.l 1001
Ae9rtrrrkm I f l7
kij•M JI?W
f 4 p�rm61nx6�� PnIN Idn
t*nnv%*Q4wat rt=nrytt
Ac61 I kd:kMn
tkmfNeaaTlUlr"blrorpaka r
A<W @tlr.tk6k C)tpn in I
Cola: Tn:t to
., Cblor�lAf j Ll
(:a1ur�1! 1.6 el
C)-NM. 120 �-
I1w.kk: 931 �—
Ia JitApk7tow
oretre.od Uih Sid
I l.nitalt Tow 900
Srwlfk- I:uA. 93
Pkcooh )7710
WIkk 4.S
SvMde 743
it "l
t, Ca
ADMI
m f'1.
r/10 10 ti 510 -- r —� -jvL
+ TKN inHWS tq0.
Nqr p6n NO) o N 610 -OIL
pr 1.kt n r 663 marC,
rot n r 03 md[.
P. Dl soled" p 666 raT/L
T 04•C1d.drw IOY1 po•3.
0•0.omk-cloa.11934 FVL
_ ChCaI{�IM]
W14idti.1 1067 p6JL
11.1n4101i p61L
_ 7X411e 1091 p 0L
As-sd.,r 1017 veL
A 4Alutni..r. 1! OS pal.
G•Crkivw 916 ���•-- T�Uw�
IJd,ahhre 1112 �
M J.k4Qwlurrt 9f i ���
N. Sodlwn 979
Anoie.Tnt.l 1001
Ae9rtrrrkm I f l7
kij•M JI?W
f 4 p�rm61nx6�� PnIN Idn
t*nnv%*Q4wat rt=nrytt
Ac61 I kd:kMn
tkmfNeaaTlUlr"blrorpaka r
A<W @tlr.tk6k C)tpn in I
IJd,ahhre 1112 �
M J.k4Qwlurrt 9f i ���
N. Sodlwn 979
Anoie.Tnt.l 1001
Ae9rtrrrkm I f l7
kij•M JI?W
f 4 p�rm61nx6�� PnIN Idn
t*nnv%*Q4wat rt=nrytt
Ac61 I kd:kMn
tkmfNeaaTlUlr"blrorpaka r
A<W @tlr.tk6k C)tpn in I

rl
t]
NC DENR/DWQ Laborutor es Sample Anomaly Rgwrt (SAR)
Lubmm*er I A939102 I Son*- der. B Riapod To: 1iWAO Priority: Compliance
Swap% Typo: other coldectw, : E. Pie Region: WaRO
Station Location: Donnie PenFarm - dawn stream County Wayno
Date/time collected: 12131108 1:27PM ❑atert,me Rec'd 12 31= 4:16 PVA dateffime arxslyzed: 1l2/08 10;00 AM
Affected Parameterts):_ _
AnaIVUcal Area: W RO'Lati
The following anorralies occurred (Check al! that appift
❑Sales {Enter "x' in all applicable boxes) ❑ Quati`ty Con&ol (6reer V in eft opprcab€e bowe)
Improper container used
VOA vials with headspace
Sulfide samples with headsp3ce
Samples riot received. but lisled on fieldsheel
Samples received, but not fisted on fietdsheet
Mis6•31tiekct as to tests, preservatives. etc.
Holding lime expired
Prior to r=ipt in tab
After receipt in lab
Insufficient quantity for analysis
Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
Sample not chemically preserved prope
IpH on•. of range • Record pH -W
Improper chemical
Residual c:ttorine present in sample
Color inic: terence
Heavy esiulsion formed during extraction
Sample t:uttle broken in lab - no reportable resul
thertyctii-;=EV{pENGEot.Toxsc+typresenl -ertn
Comments:, r :k, 7 "T?°r'
H)nsbuma,rd fallum - no reportable resuts
Analyst error - no reportabte results
surr d186
LjfdOI:B elided
Recovery outside acceptance ftmltl3
❑Space retnveiy
❑None added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Failed to meet criteria for precision
Intand wAndards
Starlit ca+ttammstwn
OC data reported outside of Controls (e.e., QCS. WS)
fnrarreCl or nan compliant procackwe used
SOP fntenikwcany modi9ed wM GA and Wanch Head
eppravef
RfrilmW intRunwit callbrOon
Bated AatCGion Ikttffs due to: [Soe DeAvw.d
Y
Etrtdence of TOXICITY resent.tn Sam � � § i�general chara<feriAw- a s �I�caf�tlncrease
p Pl IY t�I► l9
�f' h SOD vat,v� as�he.sarnpI cont4r',trai►on de x ses The reported value: is caiculateci from
he tighesi diiuiirt'repesenttf the tr�xlrntm ioaiiing pateftfial:and should be cansiifereci an
estimated valui-.
Coirecf3ve Action:
-None
F
Data qualifiers u•.. d: (See Ousurier C.raes a~ wto a hil
(34-Evidence of t:: -Itly was pres(_-r.t._This is generaffy,c
sample ccncentrv; n detresses. one reported v3tue is
x_
ioading potential an,," shotdld•be considered an e5#tn ate
tedzed by, a significant inereage in the SOD value as.the=
Iaied from he highest dittrttsyn ie`presenrng the maadmutn_
Notificalccil RcgE: ' X❑Ycs ❑No Person Contacted: Eric Newsome Date. 12612M
Form cUir: ;Ir:ic t . ....................;IT r . Dale:.... if2612009....
toed Ctrornistisup,. : isor'S R9view ?iruti&tg}:
❑SJOCHEti METALS ❑PEST A ❑ VOA ❑ Other
Brandt Head Revit'.= Onitlal): QA;QC Revtew (i 'flap: gged into database by (initiaf)
*!;
�Az6 Al) _

County:
WAYN
River Basin
Report To
WAROAP
Collector:
E NEWSOME
Region:
WARO
Sample Matrix:
Surfacewater
Loc. Type:
E uen
Emergency YeslNo
COC Yes/No
YES
Location ID: 96-OPB
�o�ap�
� r
O '[
VisitlD
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPB
Collect Date: 12131/2008 Collect Time:: 13:13
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Sample ID
PO Number#
Date Received:
Time Received:
Labworks LoginlD
Date Reported:
Report Generated:
Sample Depth
AB39101
W0801068
1213112008
16:16
MSTARR
1129/09
01/29/2009
f �� i o
cl
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwqlab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
B1-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
NE -No established PQL
82- Counts from all filters were zero.
B3- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated P-Elevated PQL due to matrix interference andlor sample dilution
B4-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated 01-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
BS-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC) 02- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
J2-Reported value tailed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit-subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated X1- Sample not analyzed for this compound
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value --• - --•-----•••- ••- -- ••--•- —t
WARO
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
j.
Ii`,•;
FEB - 4 2009
t
Page _1 of.2 V i

Location ID: 96-DPB
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPB
Visit ID
PVC DWQ Laboratory Section Results
Collect Date:
Collect Time::
1213112008
13:13
CAS # Analyte Name PQL Result Qualifier Units Analyst/Date Approved By (Date
Method Reference
12/31/08
115109
BOD, 5-Day In liquid
2.0 300 G4 mglL MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA5210B
112109
1/26109
Conform, MF Fecal In liquid
1 7000 134 CFU/100ml MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA9222D-20th
12/31108
1113/09
I
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 21699-1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

f
y
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALr Y MELD -LAB FORM (I)MI) rorl.abUssONLY
Cowry IA', Maw -Ty
RIV[R BASIr4
❑ AMDEt74T SI3tGAM ❑ CFFLLI171T
REPORT IO: APO M0 MRO PRO WaRO WuRO W5110 TS
AT HM
I Other COMPUANCS ❑ LAKE ❑ iNmuvrr
Shipptdbr.nu to lap 8Mfi1tOE7rCY
r7 ESTUARY
Lab Number:
Dalt: Rccclvc4: } 09 Tlmc: 116-11(1
FLec'd b : Front: Bus-CDuiier-fland MI.
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
` DATF REPORTED:
Coo 1x-fT,RLk 1�IEtY C wti .� _
M44mattsl U00 R-RE:0 S/S-7S/25 4314a 1J0 orlog pi'm S_T_ AT10H LOCATION: ��� �, AOCIiL -a /rye of S: t lie"
Seed: Yes0N*C1 tJalrflnutd: Va❑Na❑-
�=MhRKS: iiti'a'°� �„/'lS'k"L� lylyda•^Y^ s"ti �7l"`�,�z'2]''k^S7."`.^_�J ?V�r�'"✓ -
_ - PW 12, 3� � $ _C�� �L� R ov 31 L T 9 AC � CNXX
I
QU5 310 mYrL
2
!-
CUD 114h 340 rtg%L
3
__.. D Law 335 mg/L
4
ColHutm' MF Fecal 316M FIOOm!
S
CallfotacMFTora1J1501 11004
6
Colirurac Tube Nat) 31613 1"Coml
7
CallAwm Feat Steep 31673 110Nat
&
RuMueTotal 500 rrK/r.
P'
VOW%- $03 rng/I
S1i
MAW 310 mom,
Rnldue:9uWprvhd SJO tap/t,
13
Vulstila333 tpglL
I]
Plaed MO mi/L
14
pit 40) anR3
13
Acidity b plf 4.5 436 ma1L
16
Acidly 1a pit M 435 mgA.
17
Alialinity 10 pii 1.3115 mgr4
18
fAlimlivillyla
pH 4.5 410 1I1�1L
19
ITOC680
m82L
10
TwliWlty76 HTU
C31kxide 940 mgn.
W a 70953 ppJL
_
Cb101: Tnrc 10 14-Co
CeSOr:(pll ) 1.) Avoid
Cv3or:pN7,582- AW41
Cyoni&..720 mg/l,
Flwmkta 93 i mall.
Fm+. ddehyda?1990 mgfL
attaa end 0111 S5& -91L
lhr4rtetaTofal960 rrtgtl
Specific Cood. 95
MBAS 132W mill,
phtwla i3730 1101
Sulfate 945 mCfL
SulCda 745 mIfL
NHJ at N 610 mill,
TY.N et N 625 .—_ ..... malL
002_pint N0J as N 610 myR.
P; Total m p 665 MIX
P 34 at P G65
P: Md.I J is P 666 I i*L
Cd.Cadmlam 1(m ytg1L
Cr-ChMMi mjOlaf 1014 111/I.
(A Copps 1041
�_~
Ni-k-mkrl 1667 It�l.
rlrls3d IOSt pptL
Zn•71tw 1092 pa/L
Aa•5ilv" 1077 pg+L
A4Mumlrwm 1105 pa1L
Hc•Btrytllunt 1012 1'vrL
Cs -Calcium 916 mr/L
Co•Coh.h 1037pin-
rt.ltan 1045 P9A-
Li.l,i{hlum 1132 S�FR•
Mg -Magnesium 927 mgrl
hlo-hiaWrma I053 1�tS2
Na-Sodlum 9)9 mrtrL
Ammk:Totst (002 pill.
Se-Sa teniom I t47 p 1Y L
NI•McwOry 71900 pRR-
Otlp> hluri=P,3o0am
Orlt►�tuphaptrtnta PcNirldn
A.W Iltiblekka
UmeNeulral rattsdable Orpnk1
Acid £etraetahle Orpnief
Ptaacnbk at 1palm (VOA bolt lereq•d)
- --�----•-
Phytopludmn ., .
Lob We Onir ri `
Temperalutc ott arrival:
fsanvifis 1'oin1K
Canalucrattc d 23"C
SV01�Tengasnae'C _
O.O,m
il
�i Aika k
Ae h
AkT'tmperalaa'C
.11 1.3 P11.4.5
II 4.5 pI-
4
0
300
4110
12244 431
37243 11342
0.
Sa: nlly 7Lt
Placlpkalian (itddey)
Claud Cover ys
Wind vuectiva tuclo
Stream Flow ScrCrity Turbi+lity Saretity .
Wind Vclocliy
Sty+ Stsevm Depth A.
Strum Wkoh M
10
5
12
6-.' .
1J31 135o
35
64
4

NC DENRIDWQ Laboratory's Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
I Lab Number: I AB39101 Sample ID: B Report To: WaRO Priority: Compliance
Sample Type: other Collector: E. Newsome Region: WaRO
Station Location: Donnie Pender Farm - source County Wa e
Dateltime collected: 12/31/08 1:13PM Date/Gme Recd 12131/08 4:16 PM Dateltime analyzed: 112105 10:00 AM
Affected Parameter(s): -
Analytical Area: 1NaRO tabt'
The following anomalies occurred (Check. all that apply):
FJSampies (Enter "x" in all applicable boxes)
improper container used
VOA vials with headspace
Sulfide samples with headspace
Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
Holding time expired
Prior to receipt in tab
After receipt in tab
Insufficient quantity for analysis
Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
Sample not chemically preserved pro erl
pH out of range - Record pH
Improper chemical
Residual chlorine present in sample
Color interference
Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
Other ispecio.
Comments:
€videnbi of TOXI
Quality Control (Enter Y in all applicable boxes)
Instrument failure — no reportable results
Analyst error — no reportable results
Sun ates
None added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Spike recovery
BNone added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Failed to meet criteria for precision
Internal standards
Blank contamination
QC data reported outside of controls (e.g., GCS, LCSy
Incorrect or non compliant procedure used
SOP intentionalty modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
nInvalid instrument calibration
Elevated detection limits due to, (See below.)
esulmaten value
_ 4._..._ __ r..
. -
Corrective Action:
NOnE'
_ y
- Y
S
Data cluatifiers used: ;See Qualifier Codes on web ® htt://h2o.enr.state,ne.usllablindex.him
G4-Evtderice of toxicity was presentSThists gerleially dha_radie' , by aislgnant in, cr+tiase tit ills 130Q value as the __.
Aential md.should be.
Notification required? X Yes No Person contacted EncNewsome Date 1r2612g139 .
Form completed by, Mark A Starr Date: 1/26/2009
Lead Chemi_bvsupervisors Review (inniitials)-
F-]BIOCHEtv1 FRE7ALS_.F - Peso OA D VOA Other --•----------
Branch Head i oview (initial): QAJQC Review (in- 'aq: Bogged into database by (initial) : ?

County:
WAYNE
Sample ID:
A839100
River Basin
�pF W�►7Rp
PO Number #
W0801067
Report To
WAROAP
�O
Date Received:
11213112008
`n r
Time Received:
16:16
Collector:
E NEWSOME
0 Y
Labworks LoginlD
MSTARR
Region:
WARO
Date Reported:
1/29109
Sample Matrix:
Surfacewate►
Loc. Type:
RIVERISTREAM
Report Generated:
01/29/2009
Emergency Yes/No
COC Yes/No
YES
VisitlD
Q k)q
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPA
UUU
J1
I rI
Location ID:
96-DPA
Collect Date: 1213112008 Collect Time:: ' 13:00
Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org'under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
84-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
NE -No established PQL
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
P-Elevated POL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
B3- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
BA -Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated 01-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
02- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
BS-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC) pQL_ practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
J2- Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
X1- Sample not analyzed for this compound
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated `— - m " ^' "'""'""j I"�" "" " "�—.•
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value 'I "`l� 1, CJ _ 41J / L
I� .t FEB - 4 2009 rJ
WARo _: 4
.LOFFICE
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] agea4-of 2-,...

XC DWQ Laboratory Section r1�esufts sample ID A839100
Location ID: 96-DPA Collect Date: 1213112008
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPA Collect Time:: 13:00
Visit ID
GA5 # Analyte Name PQt Result Qualifier Units AnalysOate Approved By /Date
Sample temperature at receipt by lab 2.1 T MSTARR HPARKER
Method Reference 12/31108 115109
BOD, 5-Day In liquid 2.0 140 G4 mglL MSTARR ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA5210B 112109 1126109
ColMorm, MF Fecal In liquid 1 4800 CFUI100ml MSTARR ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA9222D-20th 12131/08 1113/09
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone]
Page 2 of 2

1j
V.
DIVISION OIL WATER QUALITY WATER QUALMY MELD+LAB rpRm (i Nf Q
COMM ya t M(3$ Tl SAA1ft.li3]1'1: /-1
IUVF-R AASIN 4,y W _ r�I
REPORTTO:AAUFMtlMR0RRO W.RO WGtO WSI:OTs —t-� AMIgCNT S'fRtiwM [� GrmUr:NT
AT BM
2/Ci)MPIJANCC C3 I.AK]s ❑ tNFLL1rNT
qa=
ShipPcdip^& (f dQv_.
ram_/ Cl E}AGRW:NI`Y G I?57'UARY
CCTI.I,CCL( Rfl 'e '5,
Oolwekd HOD iv Ole; or 100p1u4 y SPA71tlH LpCATIDk � n��Z- +� ��rn >"r• 1
Ser.k Yt*0 N0 0 Cblain4laf: YerO Na❑
Cidorkk 940 ml
C>tl � TO➢S3 pill.
Cblurs True 80 lid o
Colorgpli ) 11 ADMI
[a", H ?A 12 AAMI
Cjvnidc 720 m&A.
Fluoride 911 me&
P-ormald4hyrk 7 t810 m1/L
r3re444 WJ OR$ $56 tn11L
Ihni t Taw M
Spank Card, 95
MIIAS A260 -91L
Phenrdt 37710 pp/l.
5u11Mf4 94S m#L
5ulfkk 745 In1/1
r... 1 .A ii nFt! V
Lab Humbep vjo250 t Ll
17a�c Rixci�sd: � � Tlta���
Itce'd bb : Ram: Bus-Courier-fland Dcl.
DATA EN'PRY Y; CK:
DATE RP.POR'TBD:
NIC u N 510 4 mllL
TrJ4 44 N 023 - mlfL
NU} phu NO3 u N 630 meA.
1- 3 o1a1 n P 661 mlr7.
PU4 a r 665 mrjL
P: C)hwlvad p P 666 m&X
Cd-C4dmivm 1021 Pyl.
CF.Chmnuum:Tole l 1014 p WL
I.Ell-CO
at 1041 Is
NI•Nkk4!11061 uo{l,
P6.1xid 10$I pp'i.
Zn•75% I W-1 II r"L
AI-Silier 1017 pet
At -Aluminum I10S $owl•
Be-1krylllunl1012 is .
C4•C4kium916 mp4.
Ce-Cob4p 3037 pp7L
re-Irm 104$ peL
:! . r We-.*)
CLI.Nhinm 1137 _ ppT-
LIZ-hSrlrortium 911 m1IL
Mn•Manpnere 103$ pdL
N4.Sodhtm 979 m1ll,
Ant4kTgnl 1001M psi.
9e—sRk-duee 1147' oan-
HI•M.Mury 719M Ng11•
Orppmehlorine rcrrkidn
Orpnophcdphurw rntkidn
Adid Huhic7lar
paibl4tulal Eerroeubk Orsanlcl
-
Acid CACFTrUblcthP0ICc
Pwra0lc Orlenicv (VOA bo(le mg'd)
b f Q
Te ernlureonertiral: r
n Painl %
CbWocumc 41 23T
W4kr 7'an tUM
O.O. met.
off
Allul_k
d0v
di8-3pi14.5
71145
P111.3
2
4
0
3w
400
11744 431
U4
12242
0
Salinity K.
11eeip641ion(ilvd4y)
Ond Covor74
Mad 044tt on (Del)
Sitcom M; Sercrliy
Tarb3dily 5owiiy
tVfnd Ye
Iq
ldr4n Srrmem DePih pp.
$beam Witilh fL
10
S
2
1331
1350
3S
64
4

t ..r
NC DENRIDWQ Laboratory's Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: I A839100 S<,mple ID: A Report To: WaRO Priority*
Sample Type: other Collector: E. Newsome Region:
Station Location: Donnie Pender Fenn - upstrream Gounty
Dateltime collected: 12/31108 1:00PM Dateltime Re_c'd 12131108 4:16 PM Dateltime analyzed'
Affected Parameter(s): 0
D .-�- -
tx
Analytical Area: 1NaR0 Lab - The following anomalies occurred ;Check all that apply): ........................................
Samples (Enter "x" in all app5cable boxes)
Improper container used
VOA vials with headspace
Sulfide samples with head- -race
Samples not received, but ::sled on fieldsheet
Samples received, but not :sled on fieldsheet
t•Aislatioled as to tests, pre:-r:rvalives, etc -
Holding time expired
3gPrior to receipt in lab
fter receipt in lab
Insufficient quantity for arw c-sis
Sample exhibits gross non :omogeneity
Sample not chemically pre raved properl
pH out of range - Rece -I pH -►�
Improper chemical
Residual chlorine present ri sample
Color interference
Heavy emulsion formed du!;ng extraction
Sampje bottle broken in la - no reportable results
X';+ Other(,pecifv EVIDENCE Toxidtypiesentrn58mple
Comments:
Adence.of "i OXICITY iresc-tit In Sample :Thts
in ifi BQD vGaue_as the san--le Concentra�tlol�
e ighest dllutlorl represent ng the maxtmur lc
oWated_ .alL,l=_ Y ;
Corrective Action:
done
J.
a
Data nuatiftem used. ;See Qualifit odes on web @
G4-E1ri:Jerice of l,,xicily was piesc hls +s genei
sampl•- concernraiicrl decreases ie reported matoadtng �atential zriti.should-be cr td6 'an est
Compliance
WaRO
Wayne
IM09 10:00 AM
Quality Control (Enter "x" in all applicable boxes)
Instrument failure — no reportable results
Analyst error— no reportable results
S rroclates
None added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Spike recovery
BNone added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Failed to meet criteria for precision
Internal standards
Blank contamination
QC data reported outside of contf-ols (e.g., QCS, LCS)
Incorrect or non compliant procedure used
SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
Invalid instrument calibration
Elevated detection limits due to: (See bei'ow.)
ih2o.enr.state.nc. usAabrindex.htm
rid by a;stgnl , nt ihcretase to the BOD value: as #he•=
ated cram he hlghestdihldon cepresti�ng the maximum:.
Notificalic:n Rc-,; :red? FlYe: E]No Person contacted_ Eric Ne-wTsame -Date 112G/2t708. . '
Form -:::mp` ic: _: .;t: Ivt_ A Starr Date' 112------ $
Lead Choiristlwuj crvisq s Reveev iiti ):
L..JBt�;;tlEPa I:IETALS PEST ........ aSVOA........ ❑ VOA .......E Other ................
Branch lead Re:=i::.v (initial): 61U QA)0C Review (init 1); S Logged into database by (initial) : 1__

�tr
2 (L DM Laboyatoa ,S'ection 12esults
County:
WAYNE
Sample ID:
A839102
River Basin
�e V1Arp,
PO Number#
W0801069
Report To
WAROAP
Q Gy
Date Received:
12/3112008
�_
Time Received:
. 16:16
Collector:
E NEWSOME
-i
Labworks LoginlD
MSTARR
Region:
WARD
Data Reported:
1129I09
Sample Matrix:
Surfacewater
Loc. Type'
RIVERISTREAM
Report Generated:
0f12912009
Emergency Yes/No
COC YeslNo YES MOO ��/^�•• ('� 1
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPC 0 P
e � t
Location ID: 96-DPC Collect Date: 1213112008 Collect Time:: 13:27 Sample Depth
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
BI-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
132- Counts from all filters were zero.
B3- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies;- Estimated
B4-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated
BS-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC)
J2- Reported value failed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
WARO
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
NE -No established PQL
P-Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
01-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab,
Q2- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
X1- Sample not analyzed for this compound
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone]
D) W E`
FEB - 4 2009
L•-Page.l.nf.2._-
Inr ^ J: u i" L OFFICE

Location ID. 96-DPC
Loc. Descr.: 96-DPC
Visit ID
M 1DWQ Laboratory Section Results
Sample 10
AB39102
Collect Date:
1213112008
Collect Time::
13:27
GAS # Analyte Name
PQL Result Qualifier Units
Analyst/Date
Approved By !Date
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
2.1 °C
MSTARR
HPARKER
Method Reference
12/31108
115109
BOD, 5-Day In liquid
2.0 270 G4 mg[L
MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA5210B
1009
1126109
Conform, MF Fecal In liquid
1 2000 CFU/100ml
MSTARR
ESTAFFORD
Method Reference APHA9222D-201h
12/31108
1/13109
1'i Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone]
Page 2 of 2

DIVISION OVWATrRQ(lAL[7Y WATER QUAU*ry"nr D-L.A0FORM(I)MI)• rprl.tbUwONLY
oc7uNry /V Rfttma 1AMl!V-TYi% C
i[IYUR11A5IN ❑ AMI1t13/t' SrirGAM t1 %IROE-'1FT
9t;M T IV: ARO FAO MRO RRO W%RO VAHO WS(kClTS
ATI M — olfPLIANCIS ❑ LARL' ❑ INFI,Uk NT
adrcr }
Sfilppcd47: Mi r, ��t IeM[Rt11'NGY CSYUARY
W-1ad000R.ope:0-VS-)5aJ-o14a-130or'Knplus --- 9TAMNLOCA_T10N: j/eAAj-C—
—}
Seed: Ym❑No❑ CLkeMers& Ya❑[4e❑ II
t�L'AAKS: M• riii�t ai _Ar
4-
SNrine A Dols rH01p fM l) Time ISegio beu
1
2
3
—4
J
6
7
IN
9
!0
CMwi& 940
I1t)1 .110 "%rL
('00lligh340 �— mall,
CALa70!153
L Law 3)3 mg11.
r
�—
Col1f.1AFF.wt J1616 /l0thal
Colirpira: NIFTO-131*4 W IIo0m1
C.1a: True 80 —�
Cb[iratac'fube ptn171613 IIOOmI
Cobrtldl ) 03
C`n IK.,m: I'm.] Shgs 31673 /1410mi
C Awvl1 7.6 42
11,31drw: Told S00 f"gtL
Cyonku 124
vol W. $05 tr*L
11—id. 931
Fixed 510 Ma/L
f wvmldellyds I 18 90
] I
12
Ir
14
is
16
I7
ig
�t9
20
—
lz kld—: Saq n&d 310 =WL
Y
—
tlreste tad OIh 5S6
Yohllkc 333 ma/L
Ilerdosal 1'oW OW �T
�—
Fixed$40 ma/L
—
SPMI(IcCord,93
^—
pll 403 Y unite
MUA.S 302M
_
Ackl+ly to Pri 4.5 4] 5 rhyL
Plm ph )2710
—
Acidity m pil a-34J5 Mari,
Sulrota 945
Alksitnkylppit 8.3A15 mgri,
Sulrrde7435
—
AIk4lioky(ppi14.5410
TOC $80 mall.
Tu6ldlly16 NTO
Lab Number: ( W Q
Q V C7
Dale Recelmd:
0 a Tinie:
Rec'd b :
DATA ENTRY BY:
from; Bus-Courier-1 land Dcl.
CKS
DATF. REPORTED:
2WNC 3ry Oeprh OA! D13 Di1M V4hwT)r+ (:ogMh. 5sepFo?'ype
1 T" I' A It L T S 9 C O CrNXX
man. _ :llll n N610 ~^ mY/L U-1,0dum I Ill vWt
PEh. TKN n N 625 teg/1. 1611.0,4 Ium977 mya.
^_ N401 plat NO3 n N 630 Ma/L M"*ftgaone tol$ _.. pall.
Pt Teta1 ae r Mi mall, ?#*,Sal .929 mO L
PI-Cn P54 n P 665 Mtn. Aneolc:Twsl 1002 Psa.
AP1,11 P:IfiitpiKdn P666 mgA. Se.9eln ,nn 1147 14L
AtSMI
IIE_Memo7 119M Ps(L
--- -
rngJL
C*4,c dmium 1027 POOL
[hrenrhlarint Pef1lckhi
mgaL
0-Chrom6m:Toa11014 PVL
l7raeegthmp6Mtst f4eflrldet
rnO'1,
CU•Clmper 1012 P`I[.
�.
MOIL
dF'HwAel 1067 pVL
Acki IitAkldei _
MOIL.
ml .d loll PWL
Za-Zinc 1092 OWL-
ossdNeyuvt WrombleOrpn ki
Ackl Q t m%ble 0rea.i
mgll•
F'urgn@IeL`lgoniearv()t �.'i^
L_....
i e_i1 L ti L � � »•� =..,.
i r c' r :,'.. cn
mg(L
Al-Alamlmrm 1105 i Sl.
mg'L
lic-13crylllumLOLL
CwColrk 107.' —.—.._ L
Fc-taw 1045 ' d r r
Sal th Pp+N 7k "Ce of 23V
Worec TcMpMtWvc
a,U, -WL
1PH
_....,�. A2kelki T~�._.....•^
41U y:iA.
I
O
300
407
57244 431
Slreem Fla. ; sve:l4 � 7ul4Aitl'o et j
541ir1ily %.
Ptselpkaiion Eidd.y)
C1ao! Corer 3i
wo oi",Zo (NO)
d0
As
12
36
1351
I

IN
NC DENR/DWQ Laboratory's Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number. I AB39102 Sample ID-. B Report To: WaRO Prionly:
Sample Type' other Collector: E. Newsome Region_
Station Location: Donnie Pander Farm - down stream County
Dateltime Collected: 12/31108 1:27PM Dateltime Reed 12131108 4:16 PM Dateltime analyzed:
Affected Parameter(s):GD .%............
Analytical Area: VYaRO€ab _ - - .....................................
The #ollowinq anomalies occurred (Check all that apply):
Samples (Enter "x" in all applicable boxes) El
Improper container used
VOA vials with headspace
Sulfide samples with headspace
Samples not received- tKit listed on fieldsheet
Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
Misiabelcd as to tests, preservatives, etc.
Molding time expired
Prior to receipt in lab
After receipt in lab
Insufficient quantity for analysis
Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
Sample not chemically preserved propel
pH nut of range - Record PH ♦�
lmprooer chemical
Residual chlorine present in sample
Color inteJerence
Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
Sample t cIlle broken in lab - no reportable results
Comments:
TOM
112109 10:00 AM I
Quality Control (Enter "x" in all applicable boxes)
Instrument failure — no reportable results
Analyst error — no reportable results
Surrogates
UNone added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Spike recovery
BNone added
Recovery outside acceptance limits
Failed to meet criteria far precision
Intemai standards
Slank contamination
QCdata reported outside of controls te.g-, QCS, LCS)
Incorrect or non compliant procedure used
SOP intentionally modified with CIA and Branch bead
approval
l
valid instrument calibration
evated detection limits due to: (See belorv_1
he highest dlluf;�n r�ptesentfn the maunmt�rnf�fladin pofen6al and should !3 constdered an ,
estimated va{ur>. a ,,
Corrective ACtiov:
Data qualifiers u ::'d: (see QuWler Co-3e5 an web @ htt :11h2o.enr, state. nc.usllablindex_htm
134 f=vltience of to: sty, vvas'present.'-This is 066raoy charactet9zed by a stghificant tnt;reaseati the BOD value as the'
sample cone ntr _ n decfeases. The reported value es cculatecl from hs highest dtlrlttion reRrrSentrng the rnaxlmum;..
loading potenbal.should be c^risider6d an estimated --value
Notification i2�qi: ::? A Ycs �No Person contacted EricNevr§ome Date 112G112ti09
Form carr;.ly; i PY4: -k A Swrr Date. 1126 204g
Lead Chcrnist+Suit:: .isor's Reviv- !initials):
0810CMERI METAL; n PEST -- -- aA Q VOA Other -
Branch Head Revir:: :ni6aq' QAJGC Review ( itiat}_ gged into database by (initial) -
-... tf� )?

QF WA TF9 Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 _ Y
Coleen H_ Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
January 12, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7007 0220 0003 1480 6576
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27530
RE: Notice of Violation 1 Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
NOV-2009-PC-0019
Donnie Peedin Farm
Facility Number 96-5
Permit Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960005
Wayne County
Dear Ms. Peedin:
This letter is to notify you that the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. The recommendation concerns violation of conditions in your Swine
Waste Management System General Permit, Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) and North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 15A NCAC 2T Section .1300.
The referenced facility, the Donnie Peedin Farm, is located on Stevens Mill Road (SR-
1008) in Wayne County, North Carolina. On December 31, 2008 at 8:00 A.M., the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received a complaint of wastewater having been
over -applied to cropland, which is inconsistent with the practices outlined in your Confined
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). On December 31, 2008 Eric Newsome of the
DWQ investigated and determined that ponding seen on your oats crop (field #8, 4.05 acres)
was the result of excessive spray irrigation from December 3.0, 2008. Further, IRR-2
information supplied by your operator indicates that the observed ponding remained twenty-
four hours after the recorded events began —consistent with the permit definition of "excessive
ponding". During the inspection date of December 31, 2008 there were no precipitation events
to have contributed to the localized areas of ponding on field #8. Based on the findings,
violations were identified related to the December 30, 2008 irrigation events.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet: www.ncwater uali .or One
943 Washington Square Mall Phone [phone] NorthCarohna
Washington, NC 27889 Fax [phone] Naturally
An Equal OpportunitylAffinnative Action Employer - 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
January 12, 2009
Donnie Peedin Farm
Page 2 of 3
In addition, the December 31, 2008 DWQ investigation revealed that a ponded area of
waste water was thirteen (13) feet from the headwaters of Falling Creek. A discharge to
waters of the State is attributed to improper irrigation within the standard 25' buffer and to wind
drift. The specific violations are as follows:
Violation 1. Permit Condition. I, number 1- An unauthorized discharge or waste application
occurred since irrigation wastewater was allowed to reach surface waters via
runoff and/or drift.
"Any discharge of waste that reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited
except as otherwise provided in this General Permit and associated statutory
and regulatory provisions. Waste shall not reach surface waters or wetlands by
runoff, -drift, manmade conveyance, direct application, direct discharge or
through ditches not otherwise classified as state waters"
Violation 2. Permit Condition II, number 4- Ponding was present at the time of inspection.
"Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case
shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern
for the receiving crop. In no case -shall land application rates result in excessive
Ponding or any runoff during any given application event"
Violation 3. Permit Condition II, number 20- Your CAWMP (signed December 1, 1999)
indicates that swine waste facilities other than those sited on or after October 1,
1995 shall not apply waste closer than 25 feet to perennial waters (see Standard
393—Filter Strips). Waste water was seen 13 feet from the headwaters_ of Falling
Creek.
"The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as
specified in the facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas and land
application areas".
Violation 4. Permit Condition lll, number 13a- states that the Permittee shall report by
telephone to the Division Regional Office no later than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of "over applying waste either in excess of the limits set
out in the CAWMP or where -runoff enters surface waters or wetlands". Condition
Il, number 13 further states the Permittee shall also file a written report to the
appropriate Division Regional Office within five (5) calendar days following first
knowledge of the occurrence. This report shall outline the actions taken or
proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to ensure that the problem does
not recur. The subject incident was not reported to the Washington Regional
Office.

iV Es. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
. January 12, 2009
Donnie Peedin Farm
Page 3 of 3
- On January 12, 2009 this office received a written response explaining circumstances
surrounding the December 30, 2008 irrigation events. Should you wish to comment further on
this matter, please provide this office with a written explanation of the violations within 10 working
days after receipt of this Notice to:
Mr. David May
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is deemed appropriate,
your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his
consideration.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in your
Certificate of Coverage (COC), the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation
of your COC, or penalties in accordance with the North Carolina General Stature 143-215.6A
through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties and injunctive relief.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at 252-948-3939, or
Eric Newsome at 252-948-3942.
Sincerely,
David May
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: Charlotte Jenkins, Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Randy Barefoot, Prestage Farms
NCDSWC WaRO
Aquifer Protection Animal Central Files
WWRO Compliance Animal Files
VbIEN Files

WAIncident Report
Report Number: 200900089
Incident Type: Complaint
On -Site Contact:
Category: APS - Animal
First/Mid/Last Name: Eddie Rowe
Incident Started: 12/31/2008
Company Name:
County: Wayne
Phone:
City: Goldsboro
Pager/Mobile Phone: [phone]
Farm #: 96-5
Responsible Party:
Reported By:
Owner.
First/Mid/Last Name:
Permit: AWS960005
Company Name:
Facility: Donnie Peedin Farm
Address:
First Name: Gwendolyn
Middle Name: Peedin
City/State/Zip:
Last Name: Anderson
Phone:
Address 1672 Old Smithfield Rd
Pager/Mobile Phone: /
CitylState/Zip: Goldsboro NO
27530
Phone:
Material Category: Estimated Qty:
UOM Chemical Name Reportable Qty. lbs. Reportable City. kgs.
DD:MM:SS Decimal
Position Method: Map interp by digital or man.extraction
Latitude: +35°20'05" 35.334700
Position Accuracy: Nearest 10 Seconds
Longitude:--78°-9.2T-78.158000
Position Datum: Unknown
Location Of Incident: Donnie Peedin Farm
Address: 3555 Stevens Mill Rd
City/State/Zip Goldsboro NC
27530
Report Created 01/12/09 02:41 PM Page I

Cause/Observation:
Several ponded areas were discovered upon inspection of the
ryegrass pull that straddles fields 3(4.25 Ac) and 4 (26.77 Ac), as
labeled in the most recently filed Waste Utilization Plan. Photos
taken show ponded ruts consistent with marks that would be left
from a irrigation gun and cart system. Also, photos evidence
what was counted as five more ponded areas west of the nits;
the ponded area furthest west along the pull was walked off as
being 13' from the surface water of a tributary to Falling Creek.
Grab samples taken for fecal coliform, BOD, Nitrogen, and
Phosphorus from the tributary all revealed levels well above the
detectable limits; the typical surface water standard for fecal
coliform in class C waters (200l100ml) was exceeded in all three
sampling locations. Furthermore, a the tributary had a dark,
turbid appearance consistent with lagoon waste from a feeder to
finish operation.
Action Taken:
A Notice of Violation/Notice of Recommendation to Enforce is
being prepared by the WaRO against the Donnie Peedin Farm,
Incident Questions:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? Yes
Surface Water Name? Falfing Creek
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? No
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type.
Containment? Unknown
Cleanup Complete? Unknown
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : No
Directions:
From the WaRO, take 264 West to Hwy 117 South into Goldsboro. At the
junction of 117S and Hwy 581 (Ash Street) turn right. Head west on Ash
St beyond Cherry Hospital and drive another 6 miles farm path is on the
left after you pass Ferry Bridge Rd (SR-1224).
Comments:
It is the conclusion that a waste irrigation event on 30 Dec 2008 was
improperly performed such that the agronomic rate for the ryegrass was
exceeded and water ponded on the field. Furthermore, visual and
chemical analyses indicate that wastewater irrigation entered surface
waters of the State, in violation of the State Non -Discharge permit
requirements. A phone conversation 31 Dec 2008 with operator Eddie
Rowe revealed that an irrigation event occurred on 30 Dec 2008,
around lunchtime in an effort to water the crop in advance of weekend
storms. Since Mr. Rowe indicated he was out of town on the date of this
investigation, Mr. Rowe was asked by Mr. Newsome to fax records of the
farrrti s IRR112 forms, rainfall and freeboard records for the last two weeks
to the WaRO. A follow up call to Mr. Rowe was made 8 Jan 2009 by Mr.
Newsome to again request these records, as no fax had been received
since the 31 Dec 2008 request. Mr. Rowe declared that he would indeed
fax the items to Mr. Newsome by Sunday, Jan 11 2009.
Conveyance: Other
Estimated Number of fish?
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Groundwater Impacted : Unknown
Report Created 01l12109 02:41 PM Page 2

Event Type Event Date Due Date Comment
Requested Additional Information
Incident closed 2009-01-12 12:00:00
Report Entered 2009-01-08 08:49:00
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact 2008-12-31 08:30:00
Incident Start 2008-12-31 08:00:00
Report Received 2008-12-31 08:00:00.
Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date.
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
DWQ Information:
Report Taken By: Report Entered By: Regional Contact:
David L , May Eric Newsome Eric Newsome
Phone:
DatefTime: 2008-12-31 08:00:00 AM 2009-01-08 08:49:00 PM 2008-12-31 08:30:00 AM
Referred Via: Phone Phone
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional information is needed?
Report Created 01/12/09 02:41 PM Page 3

Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_005 Page 1 of 1

c,
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
o�aF w a rF9pc
Dee Freeman, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
January 12, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7007 0220 0003 1480 6576
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27530
RE: Notice of Violation / Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
NOV-2009-PC-0019
Donnie Peedin Farm
Facility Number 96-5
Permit. Certificate of Coverage No. AWS960005
Wayne County
Dear Ms. Peedin:
This letter is to notify you that the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. The recommendation concerns violation of conditions in your Swine
Waste Management System General Permit, Certified Animal Waste Management, Plan
(CAWMP) and North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 15A NCAC 2T Section .1300.
The referenced facility, the Donnie Peedin Farm, is located on Stevens Mill Road.(SR-
1008). in Wayne County, North Carolina. On December 31, 2008 at 8:00 A.M., the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received a complaint of wastewater having been
over -applied to cropland, which is inconsistent with the practices outlined in your Confined
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). On December 31, 2008 Eric Newsome of the
DWQ investigated and determined that ponding seen on your oats crop (field #8, 4.05 acres)
was the result of excessive spray irrigation from December 30, 2008. Further, IRR-2
information supplied by your operator indicates that the observed ponding remained twenty-
four hours after the recorded events began --consistent with the permit definition of "excessive
ponding". During the inspection date of December 31, 2008 there were no precipitation events
to have contributed to the localized areas of ponding on field #8. Based on the findings,
violations were identified related to the December 30, 2008 irrigation events.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet; www.newaterguality.ori One
943 Washington Square Mail Phone [phone] NorthCarolina
Washington, NC 27889 Fax [phone] Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

7
Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
January 12, 2009
Donnie Peedin Farm
Page 2 of 3
In addition, the December 31, 2008 DWQ investigation revealed that a ponded area of
waste water was thirteen (13) feet from the headwaters of Falling Creek. A discharge to
waters of the State is attributed to improper irrigation within the standard 25' buffer and to wind
drift. The specific violations are as follows:
Violation 1. Permit Condition I, number 1- An unauthorized discharge or waste application
occurred since irrigation wastewater was allowed to reach surface waters via
runoff and/or drift.
"Any discharge of waste that reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited
except as otherwise provided in this General Permit and associated statutory
and regulatory provisions. Waste shall not reach surface waters or wetlands by
runoff, -drift, manmade conveyance, direct application, direct discharge or
through ditches not otherwise classified as state waters"
Violation 2. Permit Condition 11, number 4- Ponding was present at the time of inspection.
"Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case
shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern
for the receiving crop. In no case -shag land application rates result in excessive
Ponding or any runoff during any given application event'.
Violation 3. Permit Condition 11, number 20- Your CAWMP (signed December 1, 1999)
indicates that swine waste facilities other than those sited on or after October 1,
1995 shall not apply waste closer than 25 feet to perennial waters (see Standard
393—Filter Strips). Waste water was seen 13 feet from the headwaters of Falling
Creek.
"The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as
specified in the facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage'areas and land
application areas".
Violation 4. Permit Condition 111, number 13a- states that the Permittee shall report by
telephone to the Division Regional Office no later than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of "over applying waste either in excess of the limits set.
out in the CAWMP or where -runoff enters surface waters or wetlands". Condition
II, number 13 further states the Permittee shall also file a written report to the
appropriate Division Regional Office within five (5) calendar days following first
knowledge of the occurrence. This report shall outline the actions taken or
proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to ensure that the problem does
not recur. The subject incident was not reported to the Washington Regional
Office.
0

Ms. Gwendolyn H. Peedin
January 12, 2009
Donnie Peedin Farm
Page 3of3
On January 12, 2009 this office received a written response explaining circumstances
surrounding the December 30, 2008 irrigation events. Should you wish to comment further on
this matter, please provide this office with a written explanation of the violations within 10 working
days after receipt of this Notice to:
Mr. David May
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is deemed appropriate,
your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his
consideration.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in your
Certificate of Coverage (COC), the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation
of your COC, or penalties in accordance with the North Carolina General Stature 143-215.6A
through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties and injunctive relief.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at 252-948-3939, or
Eric Newsome at 252-948-3942.
Sincerely,
/NNr �JA'4_
VV v
David May
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office .
Cc: Charlotte Jenkins, Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Randy Barefoot, Prestage Farms
NCDSWC-WaRO
Aqwifer Protection Animal Central Files
%XaRO Compliance Animal Files
MEN Files

�O�o�, INA7R$pG
a
Incident Report
Report Number: 200900089
Incident Type: Complaint
On -Site Contact:
Category: APS - Animal
First/Mid/Last Name: Eddie Rowe
Incident Started: 12/31/2008
Company Name:
County: Wayne
Phone:
City: Goldsboro
PagerlMobile Phone: / [phone]
Farm #: 96-5
Responsible Party:
Reported By:
Owner:
First/Mid/Last Name:
Permit: AWS960005
Company Name:
Facility: Donnie Peedin Farm Address:
First Name: Gwendolyn
Middle Name: Peedin
City/State/Zip:
Last Name: Anderson
Phone:
Address 1672 Old Smithfield Rd Pager/Mobile Phone: !
City/State/Zip: Goldsboro
NC 27530
Phone:
Material Category: Estimated Qty: UOM
Chemical Name Reportable Qty. lbs. Reportable Qty. kgs.
DD:MM:SS Decimal Position Method: Map interp by digital or man.extraction
Latitude: +35°20'05" 35,334700 Position Accuracy: Nearest 10 Seconds
Longitude:—78°-9'29"-78.158000 Position Datum: Unknown
Location of Incident: Donnie Peedin Farm
Address: 3555 Stevens Mill Rd
City/State/Zip Goldsboro NC 27530
Report Created 01/12/09 02:41 PM Page I

Cause/Observation:
Several ponded areas were discovered upon inspection of the
ryegrass pull that straddles fields 3(4.25 Ac) and 4 (26,77 Ac), as
labeled in the most recently filed Waste Utilization Plan. Photos
taken show ponded ruts consistent with marks that would be left
from a irrigation gun and cart system. Also, photos evidence
what was counted as five more ponded areas west of the ruts;
the ponded a rea furthest west along the pull was walked off as
being 13' from the surface water of a tributary to Falling Creek.
Grab samples taken for fecal coliform, BOD, Nitrogen, and
Phosphorus from the tributary all revealed levels well above the
detectable limits; the typical surface water standard for fecal
coliform in class C waters (200/100ml) was exceeded in all three
sampling locations. Furthermore, a the tributary had a dark,
turbid appearance consistent with lagoon waste from a feeder to
finish operation.
Action Taken:
A Notice of Violation/Notice of Recommendation to Enforce is
being prepared by the WaRO against the Donnie Peedin Farm.
Incident Questions:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? Yes
Surface Water Name? Falling Creek
Did the Spill result in --a Fish_IG P No -� � -
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type.
Containment? Unknown
Cleanup Complete? Unknown
Directions:
From the WaRO, take 264 West to Hwy 117 South into Goldsboro. At the
junction of 117S and Hwy 581 (Ash Street) turn right. Head west on Ash
St beyond Cherry Hospital and drive another 6 miles fans path is on the
left after you pass Ferry Bridge Rd (SR-1224).
Comments:
It is the conclusion that a waste irrigation event on 30 Dec 2008 was
improperly performed such that the agronomic rate for the ryegrass was
exceeded and water ponded on the field. Furthermore, visual and
chemical analyses indicate that wastewater irrigation entered surface
waters of the State, in violation of the State Non -Discharge permit
requirements. A phone conversation 31 Dec 2008 with operator Eddie
Rowe revealed that an irrigation event occurred on 30 Dec 2008,
around lunchtime in an effort to water the crop in advance of weekend
storms. Since Mr. Rowe indicated he was out of town on the date of this
investigation, Mr. Rowe was asked by Mr. Newsome to fax records of the
farm's IRR1/2 forms, rainfall and freeboard records for the last two weeks
to the WaRO. A follow up call to Mr. Rowe was made 8 Jan 2009 by Mr.
Newsome to again request these records, as no fax had been received
since the 31 Dec 2008 request. Mr. Rowe declared that he would indeed
fax the items to Mr. Newsome by Sunday, Jan 11 2009,
Conveyance: Other
Estimated Number of fish?
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft No Groundwater Impacted
Unknown
Report Created 01/12/09 02:41 PM Page 2

Event Type
Event Date Due Date
Requested Additional Information
Incident closed
2009-01-12 12:00,00
Report Entered
2009-01-08 08:49:00
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact
2008-12-31 08:30:00
Incident Start
2008-12-31 08:00:00
Report Received
2008-12-31 08:00:00
Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I.
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name
DWQ Information:
Report Taken By:
David L May
Phone First Name M.I.
Report Entered By:
Eric Newsome
Comment
Last Name Contact Date
Last Name Contact Date
Regional Contact:
Eric Newsome
Phone:
Daterfime: 2008-12-31 08:00:00 AM 2009-01-08 08:49:00 PM 2008-12-31 08:30:00 AM
Referred Via: Phone Phone
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional information is needed?
Report Created 01/12/09 02:41 PM - Page 3

Photorecord x 4—Farm 96_005 Page 1 of 1

o�CF W AT_,Y1
r
April 27, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
(7007 0220 0003 1486 1070)
Gwendolyn H Peedin
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Re: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent
Animal Facility Annual Certification Form
Donnie Peedin Farm
NPDES Permit No. NCA296005
Wayne County
Dear Ms. Peedin:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have an animal waste management system
NPDES permit pursuant to NCGS 143-215.1 and Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, you have
been found to be in violation of your permit.
The General NPDES Permit, Condition 11I.12 states:
"An annual certification report shall be filed with the Division's Central Office and
appropriate Regional -Office by March 1 of each year for the previous year's activities on
forms provided by the Division. If the facility was not in compliance, the annual
certification must be. used to summarize all noncompliance during the previous year,
actions taken or actions proposed to be taken to resolve noncompliance and explain the
current compliance status of the facility."
As of today, DWQ has still not received the Annual Certification Form for this farm.
Required Corrective Action:
Please respond to this request by filling out the attached Annual Certification Form for the year
2006 as required by your NPDES permit. To avoid possible enforcement action for a violation
of your permit, return by May 1 W h, 2007 to the following address:
Caroura!!7lina rat
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.or¢ Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Ado Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: (9t9) 715-6048
Customer Service: [phone]

April 27, 2007
Page 2
Gwendolyn Peedin
Miressa D. Garoma
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the
Director of the Division of Water Quality if the Annual Certification Form is not completed and
returned by May W. 2007. The Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil
penalty of not more than $25,000 per day per violation. Information submitted will be reviewed
and, if enforcement is still deemed appropriate, will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statue or permitting
requirement.
Please note that, if you recently requested future coverage under the State Swine Waste
Management System General Permit or have already received coverage under the State Swine
Waste Management System General Pernut in 2007, submittal of the 2006 Annual Certification
Report is still required.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact either our
Washington Regional Office at 252-946-6481 or Miressa D. Garoma at [phone].
Sincerely,
David May
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
cc: Facility File 96-005
APS Central Files
Prestige Farms Inc.
Division of Soil and Water, Washington Regional Office
Wayne Soil and Water Conservation District

July 19, 2002
Ms. Gwen Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro, North Carolina 27530
RE: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Compliance Review
Donnie Peedin Farm
Facility No. # 96-5
Wayne County
Dear Ms. Peedin:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
This letter is to notify you that facility # 96-5 is in violation of its CAWMP and North Carolina Administrative
Code Subchapter 15A .0217. Ms_ Hardison from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an onsite compliance review on June 6, 2002 at your facility in Wayne County. A copy of the inspection
report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H0217, Senate Bill 1217,
and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being
operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no
signs of seepage, erosion. and/or runoff. The following violation was noted during the inspection.
n The most current irrigation records were not available for review. After speaking to Eddie Rowe over the
telephone, it was understood that he would mail the irrigation records to this office for review. To date, I have
not received these records. The records must always be readily available for inspections. This office made an
effort to work out an optional agreement to review the necessary records.
The following deficiencies were noted and need to be addressed and improved:
m The lagoon walls need to be addressed for the abundant weed growth. In accordance with condition II, item
10 of your General Permit, you are required to maintain a protective cover on all lagoon embankments
(outside toe of embanlanent to maximum pumping elevation) and berms. Trees, shrubs and other woody
vegetation shall not be allowed to Grow on the lagoon/waste storage pond embankment. Lagoon/waste
storage Rand areas shall be accessible and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
The weeds in the Bermuda fields need to be addressed In accordance with condition U, item 2 of your
General Permit, a vegetative cover shall be maintained on all land application fields and buffers in accordance
with the CAWMP. It is advised to improve the facility's crop management practices, by removing the crop at
the appropriate times, practice weed control, follow the lime recommendations from the soil analysis. If
needed, contact your Area Agronomist for guidance.
Please provide this office with the irrigation records from fall 2001 /winter 2002 to present date, every waste
analysis since 8-15-2001 to present, every soil analysis from year 2000 and freeboard levels from August 2001 to
present; and an explanation on how the weeds are or have been addressed on the dike wall and in the spray fields and any
new practices/procedures that will be implemented onsite to prevent further violations within ten (10) working days from
receipt of this Notice. Please be advised that if these violations/deficiencies continue and/or your response is not
considered adequate, you will receive a Notice of Violation.
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fmx)

,q- —,-
Cont. Page Two
July 19, 2002
Donnie Peedin Farm
# 96-5
It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that the aforementioned
violations/deficicncies and any other problems that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible. For additional
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions concerning
this matter, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext. 212, Lyn Hardison at ext.318.
Sincerely,
r
Lyn B Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
Prestage Farms
Mike Regans, NCCES
Donnie Wiggs, 701 Ebenezer Church Road, Goldsboro, NC 27530
NCDSWC-WaRO (w/out attachments)
Non -Compliance Group (w/out attachments)
DWQ Central Files
---WaRO Compliance Animal Files
LBH Files

Facility Number Date of Visit: 6/6/2002 Time: 800
p Not Operational p JdelowThres o
p Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Donnie Peedin Farm County: Wayne ................................................. aRO........
Owner Name: Donnie and Gwen Peedin Phone No: 919-734-5299
Mailing Address: 4.6.7.2.01d.S.milb.Meld.Rd................................................................... GWdcb.om..NC............................. ....... .------ .......... 7.S31t..............
Facility Contact: Donnie.W.iggs.................................................Title: 01C...................................................... Phone No: 919x7.3 .8HQd.......................
Onsite Representative: ..................................................... .................................................... Integrator. Priatage.Earms.............................................. .......
Certified Operator: Dunnie C..............................W.iggs ................................................ Operator Certification Number: 19.438......... ....................
Location of Farm:
miles west of Goldsboro i
N Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©a ®' ®44 Longitude ®& ®4 ®«
p, Design Current a Design Current De`s�gn Current
Swine t Capacity Population xPoultry - Capacity Popula4on� Cattle t` CapacNty , ;Population
.0
,z p Non -Dairy
4
s
`CapacE6r ; 7,350
otal SS W, ? 992,250
Number of Lagoons =
p u sur ace rams resen p Lagoon rea p pray �e rea
Holding Poads /.Solid Traps p o iquiWaste ManagementSystem
p can to Feeder
�
p Layer
® Feeder to finis
'=�
p Non -Layer
parrow to can
:<;� .. .... ...:...._.....,_.::_ _.�..;;.,. ....�:::
p Farrow to Feeder
p Other
n �
� Total Desl
�� "'7` � T
p Farrow to Finish
Q Ci11tS
❑Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes Ig No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches) 27.............................................................................................................................................
: .....................................................................

facility Number: 9G-5 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 13 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ' p Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses as
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
8. -Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes H No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload p Yes p No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Wheat Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ® No
Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
Cl Yes p No
Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this vise
;Comments refer to uesttoi E% lam an ,YES answersand/or an recommendations or an other comments
•rti-��§iffi_j�.�
xawinF ,�� .,
',Use drgs`of fato�better explam�situations (use:addihonal pages as necessary) � �x-='�'�~ $=°�=�-- � = -
{-rY p Field Cop p Final Notes
�- a. (.. c=�u �-r2�.9'^��'t a L- ::�k�iR%1'd� . k f� -1 7'o..gd•$it _ �...... .�'.��.c Y...{`, ��>� si���s v _t`£.0 v �X .:'�-.E^ J'.. _i,� -E t4.a{_ __ .4..:.".
Office was locked and no one on site - could not review records.
A
The vegetation on dike wall is in need of attention. There are lots of weeds on the top and the downslopes of the
walls. Need to keep the weeds to a minimum and keep the walls mowed on the inside and downslope as the top has
been mowed,
Need to address the weeds in the Bermuda fields.
Waste analysis 8/15/01 = 1.7 lbs.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B Hardison entered by Ann:-vndall
-.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: _ �,�

ate of North Carolina
apartment of Environment
id Natural Resources
ivision of Water Quality
ames B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Sill Holman, Secretary
(err T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DONNIE AND GWEN PEEDiN
1672 OLD SMITHFIELD R-D
GOLDS13ORo NC 27530
Dear Donnie and Gwen Peedin :
ul�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANC NATURAL RESDURCES
De �, EIS
DEC 2 2 2000
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Donnie Peedin Farm
Permit Number: AWS960005
Wayne County
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10G, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 9/9/1997.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 9/9/2000 - 9/8/2001 is $300.00. Your payment was due 11/412000.
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4), and G.S. 143-215.1 (6) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-2 15.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to S 10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions. please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Washington Regional Office
Wayne County Health Department
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled J 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
epartment o Environment - and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
December 21, 1998
Mr. Donnie Peedin
Donnie Peedin Farm
1672 Old Smithfield Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feeding Operation Compliance Inspection
Donnie Peedin Farm
Facility No. 96-5
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Peedin:
On September 2, 1998, Randy Barefoot of Prestage Farms and I of the Division of Water Quality
from the Washington Regional Office conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance
Inspection at your farm in Wayne County. A copy of the inspection report is attached for
your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, Certified. Animal Waste Management Plan and General Permit;
(3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction
or a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage,
erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
1. In accordance with condition III, item 4 of your General Permit you are required to
analyze the animal waste as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This condition had not
been met for the January, February and April irrigation events.
2. The coastal hay needs to he harvested more often. At the time of the inspection, the
hay was beginning to lie over. Good crop management is very important to the
value of the crop and nitroizen uutake.
In addition to the aforementioned deficiencies, it is important that you determine the wetted
acreage in each irrigation pull and map these patterns out in relationship to your waste
management plan. The IRR-2 records can be kept by irrigation pull and the computations
completed by wetted acres.

--Cont. Page Two-
- - Donnie Peedin Farm - - - - -
Facility No. 96-5
December 21, 1998
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve these
aforementioned deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as soon as possible. For
additional assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist. Nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have
resulted or may result from these deficiencies. Failure to comply with your Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan and General Permit could result in civil penalty assessment and/or
revocation of your General Permit.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further
questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call at [phone], east.
318.
Sincerely,
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
cc: Randy Barefoot, w/ Prestage P.O. Box 438 Clinton, NC 28329-0438
Wayne County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO (w/out attachments)
Compliance Group (w/out attachments)
WQ Central Files
WaRO
V
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
"'
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

10 ttouttne 0 L ompjamt 0 rottow-up of uwV inspection 0 rouow-up of uawt_ review 0 utner
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit ■ Permitted 13 of Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: DopxtieZeedin.Farm.................................................................................. County: Wayne WaRO
Owner Name: Donnieand.GWjM............ Eeedi.n........ _............................................... Phone No: 9.19.7.73.4-5299 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title: ...... Phone No:
.........................................................
Mailing Address: 1b.7.2-01d.Smtilliftelyd.Rd................................................................... GWd&bjam..NC ..................................................... 2753.0 ..............
Onsite Representative: Randy..Bart"faoi........................................................................ Integrator: pxjstagr_Fat:►ns..................
...................................
Certified Operator:Dann>e.f............................... Wiggc................................................ Operator Certification Number: 194.18.............................
Location of Farm:
•®� �" Longitude Latitude ©
r estgn Uurren 7 estgn urren - � estgn r urren
f Swine 4i44, . ` C:apacity Population Poultry'
Capacity Population Cattle Capact Po ulation
v w ayer
F:
- p airy
p on- ayer
=: p Non - Dairy
_ -r
Other
�=- _: �
-_
- � ate. �=-_
- -
-
_ . _. ,
Total Des Ca aci . -
_ P 13'�
s _ >
r -
y Total SSLW
W
Number of ]lagoons / TiolsLng Ponds° p u
i
sur ace rains resent 13 agoon rea p pray se —re a—
t : [3 o LiquidWaste Management ystem
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p arrow to Wean
p arrow to Feeder
p Farrow to F
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes g No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? {If yes, notify DWQ) l7 Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 0 Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97 Continued on back

--=-8.7-Area_here-iagoo-ns-or storage_pond&i _site wwhich--iiee� 1o_fie"properly
� structures (Laaoons,Hoiding Ponds. Flush Pits; etc.)-
--9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):.............. 2-0...... _... ...................... ........ ........ ...... ............................. ........................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
I I - Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)-
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes B No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type .._.Coz9dB=muda..Grass....... Smallckainj.4.)&aaeat'Barky........... Wheat.and.suyhcan.....................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated m the' Anu)al Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes . ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19.' Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
o; U ow. or desiden4des,v�eIq-04gte , . �1 gt V s t: • btt reiwive aid t-t• er
�oiies�ianderice about ifiis isit:....... .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
p Yes ® No
B Yes p No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: g J z" . Date: ?_ q�A