310035_2018 Compliance inspection_20180308

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number F-TT-1 - 1{5 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: AAoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
V
Farm Name: �al_ _ A 4AA V— !� Owner Email: �
Owner Name: I Y lY5 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: I _ Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �l t ktul P'kY-r s Integrator: �]
Certified Operator: DtW_'(E, &nnm Certification Number: ('1
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er I I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I I INon-Layer I I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca acity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets I lBeefBroodCow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Pouets
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Ix No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DW R) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes E2)�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: U 2-1 2,1 LA 't 31 W
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): qA �1 _ _
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EYNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ApWication
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [:] Evidence 10-fWiind� �Drift
/ ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Wn 6 O 10,_�� ��f f v
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reauired Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes4No
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

[Facility umber: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ YeskNo
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List strcture(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphors loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [.1 IqA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 1
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes I Y7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 777""
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ElLagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
`Y
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes EZ�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
GYh� 2(t21 �h' 6n - Les , llut
M c9l ,
4W kW Vj l[ter -I1� dish �p�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: tit jr: e 2- Phone: 734 /
ij
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: g (F
Page 3 of 3 4/201 S