20041138 Ver 1_Complete File_20040709

o4 - II3g
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Brad Shaver
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
tk.--1 F
May 26, 2005 D 2 ( ? I 1a% n ?
L5 v L1
JUN 1 S 2005
WETLANDS AND TTORMWAT R'VANCH
Subject: Action ID No. 200200607, Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC; Uwharrie Regional
Landfill, Montgomery County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Shaver:
This letter provides the comments of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on your letter of
April 18, 2005, which supplied additional information on the subject Public Notice (PN), issued on
July 9, 2004. The PN stated that Republic Services of North Carolina, the applicant, had applied for
a Department of the Army (DA) permit to expand a solid waste facility to provide an additional nine
million cubic yards of capacity. The project area appears to be a private inholding within the
Uwharrie National Forest. There is currently an existing landfill operation on the site. The PN
considered impacts expected to occur as a result of the proposed expansion of this operation. A
Service biologist attended an on-site, interagency scoping meeting with Mr. Paul Petitgout of
Environmental Service, Inc. (ESI) of Charlotte, North Carolina, the consultant for the applicant, on
August 8, 2002.
By letter dated August 6, 2004, this office provided the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office with our
concerns on the subject PN. The additional information accompanying your letter was prepared by
ESI. This information consists of three documents. First, ESI provided you, by letter dated
November 3, 2004, with responses to the comments received on the PN. Second, by letter to you
dated March 10, 2005, ESI supplied a summary of the project need and purpose, the alternatives
considered, and efforts to minimize environmental impacts. Third, ESI prepared an updated
Wetland/Stream Preservation Plan, dated April 2005, which included all measures to be used as
compensatory mitigation.
Our earlier comments as well those given below are submitted in accordance with the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). Comments
related to the FWCA are to be used in your determination of compliance with 404(b)(1) guidelines
(40 CFR 230) and in your public interest review (33 CFR 320.4) in relation to the protection of fish
and wildlife resources. Additional comments are provided regarding the District Engineer's
determination of project impacts pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
}
2
The PN stated that proposed expansion would impact 7.04 acres of wetlands and 2,450 linear feet (lf)
of streams. An additional 285 If of streams would be impacted by four road crossings providing
access to the landfill area, for a total of 2,7351f. There would be loss of 808 If of perennial streams
and 1,9271f of intermittent streams. The recent information states that 8.0 acres of wetlands would
be impacted. This total includes 0.96 of an acre from previous impacts under a nationwide permit.
The linear extent of impacts to streams is unchanged. The March 2005 letter states (p. 8) that the site
plan has been moved and shifted as much as possible by the landfill designer to minimize the amount
of stream and wetland impacts.
The Service agrees with the statement in the March 2005 letter (p. 3) that "wetlands and other waters
of the US [United States] are extremely important ecological components of our surrounding
landscape." Our letter of August 2004 raised two concerns regarding impacts to wetlands and stream
on the site. First, the Service addressed possible efforts to avoid and minimize wetland and stream
impacts. Small bridges could be used over wetlands at road crossings to reduce fill. We also
recommended some design features for culverts. The ESI responses of November 2004 note (p. 5)
culverts would be designed to meet the criteria recommended by the Service. The only reference to
bridging wetlands is in the same paragraph and simply states that "construction of a bridge would
impact a large area for a long time." This response is unclear. Stream crossing with culverts and fill
would also represent long term impacts. The Service continues to believe that wetland losses could
be minimized and natural hydrological continuity maintained by bridging the four stream crossings
which would provide access to the landfill area. According to the July 2004 PN, the four stream
crossings represent over ten percent (285 of 2,735 If) of total project stream impacts. There is no
breakdown of the wetland losses due to stream crossings.
The second concern of the Service was the need to provide adequate compensatory mitigation. The
Summary (Section VII) of the updated plan of April 2005 provides (p. 7) a five-point outline of
wetland mitigation. Sixteen mitigation credits would be provided for the overall loss of eight
wetland acres. There would be no on-site wetland restoration. Eight credits of wetland
restoration/creation would be purchased from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement program
(NCEEP). The remaining compensatory would be provided by preservation through both on-site
preservation of 18.16 acres (for 3.63 credits, a 5:1 ratio) and the additional purchase of 4.5 credits
from the NCEEP, for a total of 8.13 credits based on wetland preservation. The plan contains a
letter, dated November 24, 2004, stating that the NCEEP would accept payment for the mitigation
requirements. The Service regrets that no wetland restoration opportunities were found on the 250-
acre site. Due to the uncertainty of the timing and location of both the restoration and preservation to
be provided by the NCEEP, we have reservations about the ability of this compensation to replace
the habitat functions and other values provided by the wetlands that would be permanently lost on the
site. However, we acknowledge that wetland compensation through the NCEEP is a legally accepted
standard at this time and that the applicant has complied with the procedures necessary to provide
this form of compensation.
A similar approach would be used to compensate for stream losses. The plan summary provides a
four-point plan for stream compensation. The applicant would purchase 808 stream credits from the
NCEEP to compensate (at a 1:1 ratio) for the loss of 808 if of perennial streams. The rest of stream
mitigation would be provided by on-site stream preservation. The plan states (p. 8) that
approximately 14,008 If feet would remain within the site after construction. The applicant proposes
to preserve these 14,0081f as part of the compensation for stream losses.

The Service recognizes the environmental value of upland buffers along streams and surrounding
wetlands. Such buffers help improve water quality and provide valuable wildlife habitat. The North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission recommended, by letter dated September 1, 2004, that 100-
foot, undisturbed, native, forested buffers should be maintained and protected along perennial
streams and 50-foot buffers along intermittent streams. The ESI responses state that buffers of at
least 50 feet would be maintained along all streams and wetlands not impacted by the project. The
wider, 100-foot buffers would not be used in all areas because "they encroach into the limited usable
areas for the landfill and associated infrastructure (generally due to topography)."
The factors limiting the use of 100-foot buffer on all mitigation areas are unclear. The November
2004 responses of ESI state (p. 9) that the proposed landfill site is in the central portion of the site
where streams appear to have been disturbed by agricultural activities. The northern portion of the
- site contains stream and wetlands that are generally of a higher quality than those proposed for
impacts. Unless the landfill would be built within 50-100 feet of a mitigation wetland or stream, it
would appear that wider buffer should be feasible. If the landfill area would be in such proximity to
a stream or wetland, a wide buffer would be especially important. The Service recommends that the
DA permit require 100-foot buffers around all wetland and stream mitigation sites. If the landfill
would be within 100 feet of a stream or wetland, the entire area should be maintained as a natural,
vegetated community.
Restrictive covenants would be used to protect in perpetuity all on-site preservation. The Service
appreciates the efforts of ESI to create a conservation easement with such established conservation
organization such as The Nature Conservancy and The LandTrust for Central NC. Since these
organizations declined to hold the conservation easement, the use of the proposed restrictive
covenants is satisfactory.
Federally Protected Species
The letter, dated November 3, 2004, from ESI addressed Service comments on federally protected
species. The letter provides a "biological conclusion" on potential impacts to five species including
the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) which has been proposed for delisting. The letter states
that no impacts are expected on the bald eagle, the eastern cougar (Felis concolor cougar), red-
cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), and smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata).
The Service appreciates the consideration of these four species and accepts the determinations
provided. However, we were most concerned about potential impacts on Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii), an endangered plant with several occurrence records near, but not directly
within, the project site. The Service recommended field surveys for this plant in suitable habitat.
The November responses state that the site has been surveyed "every September for the potential
occurrence of Schweinitz's sunflower." This period is within the recommended survey window (late
August through October) for this species. The response notes (p. 3) that as of the last survey in
September 2004, no plants of this species have been located and that the habitat on-site would be
described as marginal at best.
Based on information provided in the November 2004 letter of ESI, the Service would concur with a
determination by the District Engineer that the action is not likely to adversely affect species
designated as threatened, endangered, or their designated critical habitat. However, the requirements
of section 7 would need to be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified

4
action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected. by the identified action.
Service Recommendation
Based on the reality that solid waste must be placed somewhere, the Service believes that it is best to
consolidate disposal facilities rather than constructing many, dispersed facilities. Therefore, we are
not opposed to the expansion of the existing facility. We do, however, believe that every effort
should be made to avoid the adverse environmental impacts of the proposed expansion and that
compensation should be provided for all permanent losses of wetlands and streams. We appreciated
the opportunity to meet on-site with ESI and the responses provide to concerns of the Service and
other parties.
Overall, the Service recommends that the DA permit be issued only after the Corps has determined
that stream and wetland impacts at the four proposed road crossings have been minimized to the
maximum extent possible. It remains unclear why the crossings cannot be made with small bridges
rather than culverts and fill which impact both riparian areas and approximately ten percent of all
proposed stream impacts. We also recommend that buffers of at least 100 feet and consisting of
natural vegetation should be required, wherever feasible, adjacent to the streams and wetlands to be
preserved on the site. The Service appreciates the clear and detailed description of stream and
wetland compensatory mitigation. The two plans (wetlands and streams) satisfy our August 2004
request for the circulation of such plans for resource agency review. We are pleased that all wetlands
and streams that would not impacted by the proposed landfill extension would be permanently
protected by restrictive covenants. We note that the measures to ensure no net loss of habitat values
and other functions of the wetlands and streams in the project area comply with the provisions
establishing the NCEEP which are accepted by the Corps and the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on the responses of the applicant to our original
concerns regarding the work outlined in the subject PN. Please advise us of any action taken by the
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers. If you have questions regarding these comments, please
contact Howard Hall at 919-856-4520, ext. 27 or by e-mail at < [e-mail] >.
Sincer lY"i
Pete Benjamin
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc:
Rebecca Fox, USEPA, Whittier, NC
Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Quality, Raleigh, NC
Ken Averitte, NC Division of Water Quality, Fayetteville, NC
Shari Bryant, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, Sedalia, NC
Mr. S. Paul Petitgout, Environmental Services, Inc., Charlotte, NC
o?OF ArF,QG
r
YA
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 6, 2005
Mr. Drew Isenhour
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 2943
Hickory, NC, 28603
Re: Uwharrie Regional Landfill Facility, Mt. Gilead, Montgomery County
DWQ #04-1138; USACE Action ID. No. 200200607
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dear Mr. Isenhour:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3517 issued to Mr. Drew Isenhour of Republic Services of
North Carolina, LLC, dated June 6, 2005. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and .
Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non-discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
t
? A4
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cbk
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District, USACOE
Ken Averitte, DWQ, Fayetteville Regional Office
DLR Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Paul Petitgout, 9600-G Southern Pine Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28273
Filename: 041138Uwharrie(Montgomery)401
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Nose Carolina
Atum!!rf
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
11
Mr. Drew Isenhour of Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Uwharrie Landfill
Page 2 of 5
June 6, 2005
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 211, Section .0500 to Mr. Drew Isenhour of Republic Services of North Carolina,
LLC to fill 7.04 acre of wetlands (in addition to 0.96 acre of previous wetland impacts on this project site)
and 2,7351inear feet of jurisdictional streams (808 feet perennial, 1,927 feet intermittent) in the Yadkin
River Basin, associated with the expansion of the current Uwharrie Regional Landfill Facility in
Montgomery County, North Carolina, pursuant to an application filed by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers' Public Notice on the 9th day of July of 2005, along with additional information provided by the
applicant as well as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with respect to the public review on August 5, 2004,
October 29, 2004, March 11, 2005, April 11, 2005, and April 20, 2005.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will
not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the
State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301,
302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application, the
supporting documentation, and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and as
described in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new application for a new
Certification is required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification
and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Any
new owner must notify the Division and request the Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland
or stream fill be requested in the future, additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described
in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). If any plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a
change in stream or wetland impact or an increase in impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in
writing and a new application for 401 Certification may be required. For this approval to be valid,
compliance with the conditions listed below is required.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
nits Plan Location or Reference
404 Wetlands 7.04 (acres) Corps of Engineers Public Notice
expansion area
0.96 (acre)
previous impacts
Streams 2,735 (feet) Corps of Engineers Public Notice
808 feet perennial
1,927 feet intermittent

Mr. Drew Isenhour of Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Uwharrie Landfill
Page 3 of 5
June 6, 2005
Sediment and Erosion Control:
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401Permit Application. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
Division of Land Resources has released the project;
Continuing Compliance:
5. Mr. Drew Isenhour and Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC shall conduct construction
activities in a manner consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements
resulting from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate
requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws are
not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or federal
law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the Division may
reevaluate and modify this Certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with
such standards and requirements in accordance with 15A NCAC 211.0507(d). Before modifying the
Certification, the Division shall notify Mr. Drew Isenhour and Republic Services of North Carolina,
LLC and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC
2H.0503 and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any
new or revised conditions shall be provided to Mr. Drew Isenhour and Republic Services of North
Carolina, LLC in writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for
reference in any Permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become
conditions of the 404 Permit for the project;
Mr. Drew Isenhour of Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Uwharrie Landfill
Page 4 of 5
June 6, 2005
Stormwater:
6. Written Stormwater Management Plan (Final Plan Needed)
A final, written stormwater management plan (including a signed and notarized Operation and
Maintenance Agreement) shall be submitted to the 401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit
(2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC, 27604) within 60 days of the issuance of the 401
Water Quality Certification. The stormwater management plans shall be approved in writing by
this Office before the impacts specified in this Certification occur. You have the option of using
the Express Review Program for expedited approval of these plans. If you propose to use the
Express Review Program, remember to include the appropriate fee with the plan. The stormwater
management plan must include plans, specifications, and worksheets for stormwater management
facilities that are appropriate for the surface water classification and designed to remove at least
85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project,
unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any
permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall
be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office)
shall be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater
practices shall be made without written authorization,from the Division of Water Quality.
Mitigation
Compensatory Mitigation
The "Updated Wetland/Stream Preservation Plan for Uwharrie Regional Landfill, Montgomery
County, North Carolina" dated April 2005, combined with the purchase of mitigation credits from
the Ecosystem Enhancement Program as discussed in Condition 8, shall be implemented to
compensate for impacts to streams and wetlands. Additionally, the compensatory mitigation
plan, including restrictive covenants, must be completely constructed and implemented according
to the plans approved by this Office before any permanent building or road associated with the
project is occupied or opened. The mitigation must be maintained according to the approved plan
and permanently protected by the use of conservation easements or similar protections. Any
repairs or adjustments to the mitigation site must be made according to the approved plan or must
receive written approval from this Office to make the repairs or adjustments.
Compensatory Mitigation Required
Stream 808 feet restoration through EEP for perennial stream impacts
Wetlands 18.16 acres reservation; 12.5 acres restoration through EEP
8. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
The restoration component of your mitigation plan was proposed within your application materials as
described in the table below. We understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands
Restoration Fund administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this
mitigation requirement. The attached impact and mitigation summary may be used to make payment
to the EEP. The check should be made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Office. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning
payment into a restoration fund. For accounting purposes, the following compensatory
Mr. Drew Isenhour of Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Uwharrie Landfill
Page 5 of 5
June 6, 2005
mitigation may be requested of the Wetlands Restoration Fund to meet the conditions of the
404 Permit at the discretion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:
Credits to be purchased from
EEP River and Sub-basin Number
Wetlands 12.5 (acres) 03040104
Streams 808 (feet) 03040104
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If
modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the
modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless
such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
3517
AWK/cbk
This the 6th day of June 2005
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.

F WATFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
\Q (? William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
fq
r
bwa
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
` Division of Water Quality
North'Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, Mr. Drew Isenhour and Republic Services of North Carolina,
LLC has permission as outlined below to impact 7.04 acres of wetlands (in addition to 0.96 acre
previous impacts) and 2,735 linear feet of streams (808 feet perennial, 1,927 feet intermittent') for the
purpose(s) of the expansion of the current Uwharrie Regional Landfill Facility in Montgomery County,
North Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the
conditions listed in the 404 Permit transmittal letter. THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE
ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
LOCATION:
COUNTY
BASIN/ SUB BASIN
Uwharrie Regional Landfill
Montgomery
03040104
As required by 15A NCAC 211.0500, and the conditions of this, Permit, you are required to compensate
for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and
surface waters as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of
the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program must
be rounded to one-quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be rounded up to the nearest
foot according to 15 2R.0503(b).
Impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
404 Wetlands 7.04 (acres) Corps of Engineers Public Notice
expansion area
0.96 (acre)
previous impacts
Streams 2,735 (feet) Corps of Engineers Public Notice
808 feet perennial
1,927 feet intermittent
Mitigation:
In correspondence dated May 10, 2005, the EEP indicated that up to 16.0 acres of wetlands mitigation and
5,470 feet of stream mitigation will be conducted by EEP if necessary for the 404 Permit and/or 401
Water Quality Certification.
N
C 1.
One
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htta://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Cornensato Mitigation Required I
Stream
808 feet restoration through EEP for perennial stream impacts
Wetlands 18.16 acres reservation: 12.5 acres restoration tluouah EEP
o aro ma
aturallr?
Mr. Drew Isenhour of Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Uwharrie Landfill
Page 2 of 2
June 6, 2005
One of the options you have available to `satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is through the
payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please
sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at the address below. An invoice for
the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE
ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT
YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT PROGRAM.
Signature Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
Filename: 04113 8Uhwarrie(Montgomery)EEP
0q- ti 35
WETLANDS / 401 GROUP
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Jul O
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers 9 2004
Post Office Box 1890 WATER
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 QUALITY SECT;C)?,
Action ID No. 200200607 July 9, 2004
PUBLIC NOTICE
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC, P.O. Box 2943, Hickory, North Carolina, 28603 has
applied for a Department of the Army (DA) individual permit pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act TO DISCHARGE 150,000 CUBIC YARDS OF CLEAN STRUCTURAL FILL
MATERIAL INTO 7.04 ACRES OF JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS AND 2735 LINEAR
FEET OF JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE
CURRENT UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL FACILITY AT 500 LANDFILL ROAD,
MT. GILEAD, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, YADKIN RIVER BASIN, NORTH CAROLINA.
Mr. S. Paul Petitgout, Environmental Services Inc., 9600-G Southern Pine Blvd., Charlotte,
North Carolina 28273, is acting as agent for Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC in the
processing of this application.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant; archive
records and from observations made during site visits by representatives of the Corps of
Engineers. The applicant proposes to expand the solid waste landfill to provide an additional
9,000,000 cubic yards of capacity to the current capacity of 9,000,000 cubic yards. The project
expansion will impact two wetland/stream system complexes totaling 7.04 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands and 2450 linear feet of jurisdictional streams. In addition to the 2450 linear feet of
stream channel impacts associated with the landfill site, 285 linear feet of stream channel will be
impacted by four road crossings providing access to the landfill area.
Previously permitted impacts on this project include 0.85 acres of headwater wetlands associated
with the previous expansion of the landfill in 1995; the culverted crossing of an intermittent
stream for borrow site access impacting 0.01 acre of surface waters in 1995 and 0.1 acres of
headwater wetlands for an culverted access road crossing in 1993. Including 0.96 acres of
jurisdictional waters impacted under previous DA authorizations; the total cumulative
jurisdictional waters impacts of the landfill project will be 8 acres.
The applicant has proposed to compensate for the unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional areas
associated with this proposed project by a combination of on-site preservation, enhancement,
restoration mitigation and utilization of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement program.
No mitigation plan has been submitted to the District for review at the time of this notice.

The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant
to obtain any required State authorizations. No Department of the Army (DA) permit will be
issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by
this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certification as required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice,
that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state,
with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places (NHRP) for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed
as being eligible for inclusion therein. There are no known archaeological or historic sites or
properties that are located within the vicinity of the project that are listed or are eligible for
listing in the NRHP. Environmental Services, Inc., working on behalf of the applicant conducted
archaeological surveys of the proposed expansion project. The surveys identified sixteen
potential archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Three of these sites were
determined to be potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. A fourth potential NHRP eligible
site was identified by Environmental Services, Inc. in previous surveys conducted in 1992, 1993,
and 1994. A preservation plan for the above referenced sites has been developed and provided to
the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) for review. Acceptance by the SHPO is still
pending. A copy of the preservation plan is available for review in the Wilmington Regulatory
Field Office at 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28402. This constitutes the extent of
cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the
presence of any other resources within the project area.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed activity will
affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts,
including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest.
Evaluation of the probable impacts that the proposed activity may have on the public interest
requires a careful weighing of all those factors that become relevant in each particular case. The
benefits that reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against
its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the
conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of
the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both
protection and utilization of important resources. All factors that may be relevant to the proposal
must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation,
economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and
wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order
11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and
2
conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs,
considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For
activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a
permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply
with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding
sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the
District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies
and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the
impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal.
To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed
above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA) permit will not be
made until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives
State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDWQ considers
whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of the Army (DA)
permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the
offices of the Wetlands/401 Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 2321
Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, Nqrth Carolina 27604. Copies of such materials will be
furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
(NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650, Attention: Mr. John
Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in this
office, Attention: Mr. Keith Harris, until 4:30 p.m., August 9, 2004.
3
1// T(? .? '/ r( rv` svi ?ir / f J( X1, 7 r? was' ? ? _ V ??r J`~ W1 I U
V fi 'lee
Illy VV
"? Approximate
Project Location << 9 J ;: 7? ;;'r`y t? t1
> N4
a?? 5?? ?J `ice y J' fL r` a<^J 11A.1`V ,° fi 1 l ??'' :?? S ?'7 J
'i a ! -?? ?l i``??:} ? •a?? C!`i ? ?M ?? ate, ? ???; ?j? ?. ? ?' ? L ? ??' ??5?''' ?' ?J1, ' 1
p`F????
911 ?)?ar
t t' 1
.
If ?.J-L+.c. -?r?.5,.>_ ,..J' t.w?.? _ ?.r4-? ,.?.'t(r_IC J??.J.d...:???(?.?cr re- -. -•,.z? 'r?ti.,4
U ? r` l
0 1 2 3 Miles
0 1 2 3 41Gbmeters
Source: USGS 1:100,000, Southem Pkles, AIC
30' X 60' Topographic Series
Environmental
Services, Inc.
L
c7j

General Location Map Figure: 1
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006.01
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: March 2004
r
Vy"\??11f1 \ I`yV!
l{tx?68a
r f ; ? ; i 1 t ?- lr ,: I f / ?c_ -/_ _ ???._ fl l •! ?_i 5 1?? I1S?i6'_. ? jai .._ '
J`) `\._ 551t f.r? f ? ??. srl ?7t l??, 7? `> ????) J/It/? ????? ?• t? ? 4? t0 il,?ff,? ?.,?{\
(` 1 f X
?7;'s/?
? f ?._ J I ,? I l t ? `` 1
rl,s t Crl J \ ..T-.?\_.• J •??,??•` ??_?, ??- ?1ynl\`?.??
it ?I ?_ 1'rl / ?-. 4 `'` l` ?'\;l/ 1\?'" ,???. J,r? ?- -
1.` ? r ii ± i i f? ; 1 ?J
T
iJ.• / s U -' I `sue
t r
4 ffit 5y ?-•? `?---? ?? ? IIo (/(,> ? ? J /f (t t ? -?
t J ( 5\ l i`r l ??S4r?i-? ?f\?"'1-.? ? ? `f1/r???s; ? i ? t ? ? ? r-
31 71
?
/ . 1 1 t(, ?J lA
r i ;It 1 l14
C
?J
/ ?' <` 1 L T 1/\\\\ r 1 t /? 1 r 1' a t Ir \ t ` t ;s r:
Jr??? ?;f F I? ?-? ti } i :.I+.l? ? Jrt? % ?/??? ? }?,??? ?? alt :1111 ?--? f1,??-', ?`?1?? `? s `+(?
??'?=?•\? ?? Il ?`?,f r, ?` JVtft l ?( 1. ? -,.\? I?t,\lFn l '????? G?.h ?? ;t.,, ?i--If t ?J r?•' r\ ??? 4 •'? t
1 M v , - i! ) 1IJ ?,,
U_ L
to U11 11
??-, 7 1??r) f t ? ^,?,??r r?!l ? ? ? ? ? ? ?-l ? ,-. t?` 1 t t ?'r " t '1 ? ??/ti/
li??-;' ?t , o ?r 1i? ./'?? "? t '??+ t,f : ? ! `"?: ? :? 1 Eta .•- ?`? ?? j ?s f ?t:I ?' ? -""
`??'..? ??liti t ?7-.i ? i ?\ '?.ir /,/•S C ??. ??\) 6 f t ?>? 6A?t I? ,i.' ?ti/'. ' {?.•`l it ?.
! ! z ?TtfP 1 -r ?lJ/A? l J/
(•-?/'1/ ? .,
?.7
0 0.25 0.50 Mi
U7 0.25 0.50 Km
Sour= USGS 1:24.000, Troy
Quadrangle, 1982
Figure: 7
Environmental General Location Map
` Services, Inc. Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006.01
Montgomer y County, North Carolina
Date: March 2004
Table 1. On-Site Stream Information
Wetland and
Stream System No. Stream
Flagging
Sequence Length
(Linear Feet) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of Impact
(Linear Feet)
5 SEA 466.13 U -
5 SGA 160.79 U -
5 SEC 1,232.39 U -
5 SED 63.82 U -
4 SJH 953.05 U -
Rocky Creek SEE/SEF/SJE
SEG/SHE 2,416.30 I (portion)
new road crossing 83.16
4 SJB 353.42 I (portion) improved
road crossing 38.17
4 SJA 2,301.52 I (portion) improved
road crossing 29.97
4 SJC 357.83 U -
3 SJG 2,8.06.74 I (portion) improved
road crossing 40.44
3 SJF 724.27 I (portion)
improved road
crossing 34.01
2 SEI 582.24 I all 582.24
2 SEL 746.16 I (all) 746.16
2 SEJ 251.14 I (all) 251.14
2 SEK 148.4 I (all) 148.4
2 SEM 511.09 I (all) 511.09
Across SR 1137 SJA2 333.54 U -
6 SP/SPA/SNA 1514.72 I (portion) improved
road crossing 60.2
6 SNB 358.25 U -
6 SPA 251.58 U -
1 SBA 209.85 I (all) 209.85

TOTAL 16,743.23 - 2,734.83
Table 2. On-Site Wetland Information
Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area Impacted or
(acres) Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)
5 JE/JF 0.26 U
5 JD 0.12 U -
5 JC 0.23 U -
5 JB 1.21 U -
5 JA 0.26 U -
5 GK/GL/GM 1.02 U -
4 XA/XB/XE/XF/XG 2.11 U -
4 XC 0.06 U -
4 XD 0.04 U -
4 XK 0.26 U -
4 XL 0.20 U -
4 VJ/XO 0.05 U -
4 XH 0.04 U -
4 M 0.33 U -
4 XJ 0.16 U -
4 XN 0.05 U -
4 _._..._..._ XM/GWGI/GJ 0.20 U
4 SJD Pond 0.40 U -
4 SJI Pond 1.78 U -
3 GB 0.28 U
3 GC/GD 0.03 U -
3 GE 0.17 U -
3 GF 0.73 U -
3 GG 0.11 U -
3 GA 0.08 U -
3 PE 0.79 I ortion 0.05
3 VK/XP 0.19 U -
3 VH/VI 1.31 U -
3 JG - 1.17 U -
3 12-1995A 0.74 U -
3 PC/PD 0.04 I (portion) 0.01
3 PB 0.01 I (all) 0.01
3 PA 0.53 U -
3 VA 0.12 I (portion) 0.05
3 VG 0.47 U
3 VF 0.10 U -
3 VE 0.04 U -
3 VD 0.05 U -
3 VC 0.02 U -

Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)__
3 VB 0.46 U
2 12-1996 5.42 I (all) 5.42
2 12-1996B 0.31 U -
Across SR 1137 JA2 0.15 U -
Across SR 1137 EA 0.22 U -
6 QC 0.01 U -
6 MY/MZ 0.01 I (all) 0.01
6 PB 0.01 U -
6 PC 0.01 U -
6 PD 0.04 U -
6 PJ/PK/NG 0.15 U -
6 PE/NB 0.11 U -
6 NC 0.56 U -
6 PF/ND 0.13 U -
6 PG/NE 0.26 U -
6 PH/ZD 0.10 U -
1 MD 0.29 I (all) 0.29
1 MB 0.52 I (all) 0.52
1 MC 0.68 I (all) 0.68

PREVIOUS
IMPACTS 0.96 I (all) 0.96
+
TOTAL TOTAL 22.33 - 9.0.0
Note: The impact numbers include 0.96 acres of jurisdictional wetlands that were
impacted previously under the Nationwide Permit Program.
'"`""'
TEM I
..,. - '??ir 1 ? r ' ;,?f/ -.fit, ?? ;;,?.,•_.'; , ?_ ,; „" ? - i
... ?l>j1`hr r? ? \ \` r,ry,?'? 1 v^ t\l ?_.. x rv / ?"? rt ' r' .:•• ?.?.•?
if ?, , r ? V /`t J ?^p /?VY??jTf? '/ ? ? ??????r/?? ? Mww. M. W. ?.?•K,r?w.
1 1! .i /? ' r ? r a? ny
.+r.S ..o.+ ,; f/ ??? .M.. •r
acnu+o/s1RErd. SYSTEM 6
t l ? C\f J' ? - ,-?? ??,, ,1?? .t •:L1 li:''J,ilr) ???- {',?/ili? s ??,' ^'°? : H/.\ ?,.?, tl? ,J
-...1? ) ?'/ `.. / "1.1 1. , l ? ? Sri ?\.+ y? - •' +? ?j
= :.,? i •1 / r /-%/JJ 1 w. t t,}h{ ?i I l?. > •• r111?\???71?9/?? y.rii ?,i __ `?. -?,?y?„ '! o ?
,'?? !i - ) ! ??l+irrr,// .?" ?'?I°?,Till. l *"iJ! .:- ?-..\ ,rlrtl??.•..? ? ?'"_ swa?•a..,'.,tia? - , ?,.??; ??i );1•,.
. _?;/ /?:??Utt /TI,t. ,i i ? S"?.>?>'/) '? / - ? ;\ 'z':,i? i' •a ??,. - '-`ar`= .""yc' M1J? hl,
\ ti ' I?. ? li'/ N . / "•.?:•:'`ieyl:ylyyy}? \ -,?.;? ,;t l ? ?? .
.x....... =.
are. = I ?? .:i..1? i?,? xw
r,".t?..???rld ?? ?', . i, \.? t ,? ?_.' < .•,..
at:ltlwG(rssmEaN JII:, '? \? r ,/: uv^_ i s,
I=?i:lf ". ? .. ?:J:•i:.w.•:`'`•.'; 1llC ii?.'r"^•••.'^-.
T.'1?1 t ?•.' /!.. ., :-... )?/t.. ?•..a all;:.
VEMANO/SiRFAN SYSTEM (•. :(} ?, r..: i ' ,/I ?t).i\\?; ? !`:'..
? n::: ?- t
0 WI SYSTEM a aEMRD/SiRF+1N SYSTEM J!
d Ro}at rr.a
W. ME
Pd M.o
r Wttmd Enhmw•n.nt
L k"
9 ® W.0.nd/sI- I.Paat
A-
d Pl*-11*"
A-
Rnlar.ibn N.o
St.- G.. '
I
FIGURE'!. U•hardo Eavlranmantal
LandRll layout
rAlIUIT rl.AiYa - VV -Q-w nc
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
Manwtur co . wR o.Rax.
HODGES. HARBIN, NEWBERRY
do TRIBBLE, INC.
A1161 1- R+ev161q .e. YLlaotRr af. - alt 3.5
we 1 n16 W oaO:dttD1 :- .z1-"
wo,i Ra tao.ym-a. ow vwa?-wn
m" t•, 3001 EET 1 OF 1
MIE FEBaU.Rt, -O
I
. r
DELINEATED
WETLANDS (TYP.)
/ 72" HEADWALL
85 L. F. 72" `V INV.=626.00
CMP AND 36/ / 36" HEADWALL
CMP INV.=628.00
72 HEADWALL ` p
INV.=629.00 rn)
36 HEADWALL'.; 0 /
INV.=631.00
i
62 .58.
\X LEGEND
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR \ r
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR 640
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
CENTERLINE OF ROAD -
EDGE OF WETLANDS _..w?......n.,.......r?. ..... ,.? .. /
CENTERLINE OF STREAM - 626,3
PROPOSED PIPE
PROPOSED HEADWALL{
GRADING PLAN - STREAM CROSSING N0. 1
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
FCR
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF
NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
UMTOOMMY COUNTY, NCM CARD"
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
0 50 100 & TRIBBLE, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 285
s 478 743-7175 MA ON GEORGIA 31201
PROD. NO. 1001-340-01 DWG. STR1-C EDIT 11-12-02
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE ,. _ ?.
DATE NOVEIABER, 2002 SHEET 1 OF 1
k?
I
HEADWALL
INV.=616.00
x

1
W
DELINEATED
WETLANDS (TYP.)
LEGEND

HEADWALL
INV.=615.04
I
I
0 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
96 L.F. 108"
cm p --
GRADING PLAN - STREAM CROSSING NO. 2
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
fm
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
MO MO ERY =MiY. MORIII CUtO MA
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 265
478 743-7173 MACON GEORGIA 31201
PROD. NO. 1001-340-01 DWG. STR2-0 EDIT 11-13-02
SCALE 1• 5o SHEET 1 OF 1
DATE NOVEMBER, 2002
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR 640
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
CENTERLINE OF ROAD ``-
EDGE OF WETLANDS
CENTERLINE OF STREAM
PROPOSED
PROPOSED PIPE
HEADWALL
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR

STRUCTURAL
630 630
620 620
HEADWALL (IYH.)-,l
610 610
„
PROPOSED CAP OF STR M
SECTION A
1"=100' HOR., 1"=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #2
STRt-P
t1-13-02
\ \ ?-
\ ?'`? \ \ \ \ DENSE TREES-
7
\ \ \ \\ HEADWALL
- - -- \
\ \ \ --,L \
\ \. (3)-9 x9 CONCRETE "1.
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ BOX CULVERTS
\
\ \ \\ \ `?.` 60 L. F.
LEGEND
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR 560 ?-
EXISTING 2 CONTOUR HEADWALL\
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR 560- (NV:=557.50 _
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
CENTERLINE OF ROAD -\ \\ \???? • , • \
EDGE> OF WETLANDS ` \ \ \\ \ ??. NOTE. TOPO INFORMATION TAKEN
STREAM BOUNDARIES \ \\\ \ \ B
FROM AERIAL Y EI DATED MAPPING LED
PROPOSED CULVERT
PROPOSED HEADWALL \ CRADMO PLAN - STREAM CROSSING NO. 3 - ROCKY CREEK
EXISTING TREEUNE \ UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
RR \\ \ REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
O \\ \ \ MOIMCIIERY CMMTY. NORTH CAROLINA
I 0 t 50 100 \\` `?\ HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
\\ ,? & TRIBBLE, INC.
CONSULTING ENOMMS 484 MOLURRY 8T. - BTL 288
\\ 478 749-7175 MACON GEORGIA 91201
` GRA jt.... SCALE i FEET PROd NO. 1001-340-01 DW(L STR3-G EDIT 1,12-19-02 p
-__ \\ DATE DECEMBER. 2002 SHEET OF s}
i d .
L
580 580
MAX PI I
560 560
HEIDWALL MR-"-J-
550 „ -
BOX ERT " 550
x9 eON
BURIED
540 540
530 530
PROFILE VIEW
1"=50' HOR.. 1"-10' VERT.
EET-'- 2 OF-41

171

'X10, C
OX CUL
9LF.
O
?D
r
LEGEND
DCISTING 10' CONTOUR 560
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR-------560 --
PROPOSED 2', CONTOUR
EDGE OF WETLANDS
STREAM BOUNDARIES •??
PROPOSED CULVERT
PROPOSED HEADWALL ,
O. 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
CD
Ln

CO

I IN' . 573.0 0 I
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS ('iYP.)
?I?IIII
NOTE: TOPO INFORMATION TAKEN
FROM AERIAL MAPPING COMPLETED
BY El DATED 12-20-20?'o? ? ? ? ? ? ? GRADING PLAN - 5TREAAI CRNa 4
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
fOII
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
CGNOULTSW 6N0/E>al{ 464 MU100011Y OT. - OTL 966
(4 f 748-
PR" NO. 1001-340-01 DMO. SiRX-4 EDIT 4-06-04
seta 1• MEET 1 OF 4
Ott0 ST
RUCTU 5 90
ROADWAY FILL
PROPOSED GRADE
580 580
570 HEAD ALL '? -- 570
ROPOSED 3x10' EXISTI GROUND
3OX-CULVER 0 (E-OF -STREAM
SECTIO A
1 "=100' HOR.. lm=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #4
STR4-P'.
4-05-04
MEMORANDUM a
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Ken Averitte
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Patel Rawls
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Uwharrie Regional Landfill Facility County Montgomery
Project Number 04 1138 County2
Recvd From APP Region Fayetteville
Received Date 8/13/04 Recvd By Region 8/23/2004_
Project Type landfill expansion
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland' Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
O Y O N 13-25-30-( FC 30,715.
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y DQ N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 352030 Longitude (ddmmss) 795830
Comments:
Prior to issuance, applicant must demonstrate ability t4rovide adequate mitiaati?on (1:1 Wetland
creation or restoration + stream impacts). Also, co flicting numbers reappear in narrative and
application. Are stream impacts 2239 I.f. or 2735 I.f. ?? Both #s are used, although 2239 is in
application- An explanation is warranted (unless it's there and I overlooked it). Storm water plan in
app, appears to be for construction phase, i.e. part of sediment and erosion control plan.
Approval of Certification should be contingent on inclusion of condition requiring minimum of 1:1
restoration/creation for WL and appropriate (?)I.f. of stream mitigation- lus submittal of approvable
storm water plan, (The submitted plan may actually remove 85% TSS, considering the size of the
basins. However, the proposed design has a perforated riser which will result in a normallyd[y pond.
) Approval of permanent storm water plan should be rp erequisite to, or at least a condition of, any
401 certification,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28273
704-523-7225 • FAX [phone]
www.esinc.cc
8 April 2005
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Montgomery County, North Carolina
NC DWQ Project #: 04-1138
Dear Ms. Karoly:
p /;ZL r=n
APR 1 1 2005
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
In response to your letter dated March 28, 2005, requesting additional information for the
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification to construct the above referenced project,
Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI) is pleased to provide you with the information you requested.
MITIGATION
The Uwharrie Landfill project will utilize a combination of the Ecological Enhancement Program
(EEP) and development of on-site preservation areas to satisfy mitigation requirements. The EEP
has accepted the project, and the approval letter from the EEP is included as an attachment to the
Updated Wetland/Stream Preservation Plan, which is attached to this letter for your review.
Specific details related to potential on-site mitigation opportunities are also included in the
attached Updated Wetland/Stream Preservation Plan and are summarized below.
• Approximately 18.16 acres of wetland preservation
• Approximately 14008.40 linear feet of stream preservation
Specific details related to the purchase of mitigation from the EEP is included in the attached
Updated Stream/Wetland Preservation Plan and are summarized below.
• 12.5 total credits will be purchased from EEP (8.0 credits will be purchased to meet the 1:1
ratio criteria for DWQ, and an additional 4.5 credits will also be purchased to supplement the
onsite preservation mitigation in order to reach an overall mitigation ratio of 2:1.
JACKSONVILLE • ST. AUGUSTINE 9 COCOA • JUPITER • DESTIN 0 SAVANNAH • ATLANTA • RALEIGH 0 CHARLOTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
8 April 2005
Page 2
Should you have any questions or comments, or need any additional information, please feel free
to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Paul Petitgout
Vice President
Copy: Ken Averitte - NCDWQ - Fayetteville Regional Office
Brad Shaver - USACE - Wilmington District
Attachments
y
UPDATED
WETLAND/STREAM PRESERVATION PLAN FOR
UWHARRIE ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFILL
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 2005
Prepared For:
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
CONOVER, NORTH CAROLINA
Submitted To:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Regulatory Branch
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street
Suite 714/Systel Building
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Prepared By:
ENVIRONEMNTAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28273

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1
II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS I
.....................................................................
Soils......... 1
Water Resources 2
Plant Communities.----- 2
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest 2
Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest 3
III. WETLAND AND STREAM RESTORATION 3
...............................................
IV. WETLAND AND STREAM ENHANCEMENT 3
............................................
V. WETLAND AND STREAM PRESERVATION 4
Method of Preservation 4
Wetland/Stream System 3----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- 4
Wetland/Stream System 4---------------------------- 4
Wetland/Stream System 5......... -.... -...... -..... ---------------------- •---•------ ----------------------
Wetland/Stream System 6............................................................ ......................
Wetland/Stream System across SR 1137 ....................•............._. ..........__..__..._. 5
Wetland/Stream System - Rocky Creek 6
Buffers 6
VI. NORTH CAROLINA EEP UTILIZATION 6
VII. SUMMARY .. ....................................................................................................... 7
APPENDIX A
Figure 1- General Location Map
Figure 2 - General Location Map
Figure 3 - Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Layout
Table 1- Revised Onsite Stream Information
Table 2 - Revised Onsite Wetland Information
APPENDIX B
Email Correspondence from Conservation Organizations
APPENDIX C
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program - Acceptance Letter

I. INTRODUCTION
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC, (aka Uwharrie Environmental, Inc.) and the
Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, propose to construct an expansion to the
landfill facility located adjacent to the existing landfill on a 250-acre site located in western
Montgomery County, North Carolina (Appendix A - Figures 1 and 2). More specifically,
the public/private partnership facility is located near the intersection of Landfill Road and
NC 24/27 approximately five miles west of the Town of Troy, North Carolina.
The Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion is proposed to expand the existing landfill
to ensure a viable repository for municipal solid waste in the region. The permitted landfill
provides ±9,000,000 yds3 of airspace and the proposed expansion will provide an additional
±9,000,000 yds3 of capacity. Expansion of the site will provide an additional nine years of
disposal life for a total of approximately 20 additional years of continuous operation.
The purpose of this document is to propose stream and wetland areas for preservation to
help offset unavoidable impacts resulting from the landfill expansion. Unavoidable impacts
include; 2,735 linear feet of stream channel (808 linear feet perennial stream channel) and
8.0 acres of jurisdictional wetland area. Mitigation for the 2,735 linear feet of stream
channel and 8.0 acres of jurisdictional wetland area will be accomplished through the
utilization of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and the
preservation of 14,008.40 linear feet of stream and 18.16 acres of wetlands. The EEP
program allows clients the opportunity to pay into a fund that goes toward wetland and
stream restoration. The EEP has stated that it would be able to provide wetland and/or
stream mitigation for this project.
H. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed preservation areas are located within the Uwharrie Environmental Landfill,
which is in the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The landscape is
characterized by rolling hills with moderately steep slopes. Elevations within the landfill
range from approximately 750 feet MSL in the southern portion of the site to approximately
600 feet MSL near Rocky Creek (USGS Troy 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, 1982) (Appendix A -
Figure 2).
Soils
There is currently no published soil survey for Montgomery County, although production of
one is under way. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) has identified two
non-hydric soil series which occur in the project study area: Herdon and Georgeville. Both
soils consist of well drained, moderately permeable soils that originated in residuum
weathered primarily from Carolina slate or other fine grained rocks of the Piedmont
uplands. Both soils generally occur on gently sloping to moderately steep areas. No hydric
soil series have been identified in the vicinity of the project area by the NRCS.

Water Resources
Two major cataloging systems are used in North Carolina to identify surface water drainage
areas: one developed by USGS and the other by DWQ. The project site is located within
USGS's 8-digit cataloging hydrologic unit 03040104
(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp`/`-pdf/cataloging unitspdf). The DWQ system places the site
in sub-basin 03-07-15 of the Yadkin River Basin and the Site Index Number (SIN) is 13-
25-30-(0.3) (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.html).
The property contains several unnamed tributaries of Rocky Creek. These tributaries
consist of first order streams that are intermittent to perennial in nature. The current
condition of the first order streams suggests that they are intermittent in nature. A total of
16,743 linear feet of streams occur on the site including Rocky Creek (This does not
include approximately 1,580 linear feet of Rocky Creek where the applicant has control of
only one bank of the creek). The current site plan calls for filling of approximately 2,735
feet of stream channel and 8.0 acres of jurisdictional wetlands (including previously
permitted wetland impacts) to facilitate construction of the landfill expansion (Appendix A
- Figure 3).
Rocky Creek and its tributaries located on the project site are assigned best usage
classification of C (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/rei)ortsWB.html). Class C
waters are freshwaters protected for fishing, aquatic life propagation and survival, wildlife,
and secondary recreation, which includes wading, boating, other uses not involving human
body contact with water where such activities take place on an infrequent, unorganized, or
incidental basis.
Plant Communities
Only two general plant communities have been identified within the landfill site: Mesic
Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) and Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest,
with disturbed variants of the two communities. These plant communities represent
assemblages of plant species which vary according to soil type, topographic position, past
land use, and level of human disturbance. Descriptions of these communities are provided
below.
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest - Mixed mesic hardwood forests are generally
found on slopes and well drained, small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This
community type is abundant on the landfill site, although logging and conversion
to pine dominated plantations have resulted in the loss of the pure form of this
forest type. Dominant tree species include: Yellow poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), Northern red oak (Quercus rubra), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The
shrub layer includes such species as red maple (A. rubrum), dogwood (Corpus
florida), and American holly (Ilex opaca). Herbaceous species consist primarily
of Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides) and heart-leaf (Hexastylus
arifolia).
2

Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest - Piedmont/low mountain alluvial
.forests are found along small stream systems within the piedmont and low
mountains. Piedmont/low mountain alluvial forest is common on the project
site. Dominant tree species include: tulip poplar, red maple, and Northern red
oak. Dominant shrubs include American holly and ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana). Herbaceous species include Christmas fern and river oats
(Chasmanthium latifolium).
The disturbed areas of both forest types have generally been converted to pine dominated
plantations during silvicultural operations over the past 30 years.
III. WETLAND/STREAM RESTORATION
Several options to provide compensatory mitigation for the proposed impacts associated
with Uwharrie Landfill expansion were evaluated. The most desirable option would have
been on-site mitigation opportunities that may have provided as mush as 2,300 linear feet of
stream restoration. Associated with the stream restoration, approximately 6.0 acres of
wetland restoration could have been provided through the implementation of a Priority One
stream restoration on Wetland/Stream System 5. The Priority One stream restoration would
have aided in re-hydrating adjacent areas by raising the base elevation of the stream to the
elevation of the adjacent floodplain instead of leaving the stream in the current incised
channel (approximately 3 feet deep). The Priority One restoration would have taken place
by blocking or filling the existing channel to prevent the stream from re-diverting into the
incised channel. The stream would then be moved from the incised channel into remnants
of the channel that were abandoned due to channelization activities that occurred years ago.
During field studies of Wetland/Stream System 5, it was determined that Priority One
stream restoration could not be done on the incised channel. The channel was located in a
narrow floodplain, leaving no room to move the stream from the incised channel without
having to cross it several times. Furthermore, the area was found to have soils with a very
high content of fractured rock. Soils with high contents of fractured rock cannot be
properly sealed, and therefore any attempts to restore the system could result in a loss of
base flow, rendering the restoration attempts a failure.
IV. WETLAND/STREAM ENHANCEMENT
Another option to provide compensatory mitigation for the proposed impacts associated
with Uwharrie Landfill expansion were on-site wetland and stream enhancement.
Wetland/Stream System 3 provided opportunities for enhancement. However, even with
wetland systems adjacent to the stream channel and poor existing vegetation, enhancement
was not feasible. The only factor that could have been enhanced in this system was the
vegetation. With this knowledge, it was our professional opinion that enhancing the
vegetation would have caused more destruction than allowing the system to undergo natural
succession.
3

V. WETLAND AND STREAM PRESERVATION
The following areas are proposed to be preserved in perpetuity to aid in the offset of
wetland and stream impacts associated with the permitting of Uwharrie Environmental
Landfill expansion (Appendix A - Figure 3).
Method of Preservation
The applicant has pursued several land trusts/governmental entities to hold a conservation
easement on the proposed preservation area. Those entities include: (1) the Nature
Conservancy, (2) the Land Trust for Central North Carolina, and (3) Montgomery County.
The Nature Conservancy and the Land Trust for Central North Carolina have both declined
to hold the conservation easement and Montgomery County is unable to hold the easement
because the county owns several parcels that make up the landfill property. Email
correspondence from the Nature Conservancy and the Land Trust for Central North
Carolina are included in Appendix B. Additionally, Montgomery County is in a
public/private partnership agreement with Republic Services of North Carolina to operate
the Uwharrie Landfill. Therefore, we believe that the only viable option for preservation of
the mitigation area in perpetuity is for the land to be placed in a restrictive covenant.
Wetland/Stream System 3
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 7.44 acres of
wetlands and 3,531.01 linear feet of stream. The system enters the property along the
western property boundary and runs northeast across the property into Rocky Creek.
Additionally, there will be improvements made to an existing stream crossing to allow for
better access to remote areas of the site (Impact = 74.45 ft.). This area will not be included
in the preservation proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System 3 will total approximately 7.44 acres of
wetlands and 3,456.56 linear feet of stream. There will be one improvement to a stream
crossing resulting in a total of 74.45 feet not included in the stream preservation length.
Preservation areas in System 3 will be protected in perpetuity through the utilization of a
restrictive covenant to help offset impacts resulting from landfill expansion.
Wetland/Stream System 4
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 5.68 acres of
wetlands and 3,965.82 linear feet of stream. The system enters the property along the
western property boundary north of System 3 and runs northeast across the property into
Rocky Creek. Additionally, there will be improvements made to an existing stream
crossing to allow for better access to remote areas of the site (Impact = 68.14 ft.). This area
will not be included in the preservation proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System 4 will total approximately 5.68 acres of
wetlands and 3,897.68 linear feet of stream. There will be one improvement to a stream
4
crossing resulting in a total of 68.14 feet not included in the stream preservation length.
Preservation areas in System 4 will be protected in perpetuity through the utilization of a
restrictive covenant to help offset impacts resulting from landfill expansion.
Wetland/Stream System 5
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 3.10 acres of
wetlands and 1,923.13 linear feet of stream. The system enters the property along the
northern property boundary and runs east across the property into Rocky Creek. There are
no areas in this system that will be set aside for stream crossings. Therefore, all areas of
System 5 will be included in the preservation proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System 5 will total approximately 3.10 acres of
wetlands and 1,923.13 linear feet of stream. Preservation areas in System 5 will be
protected in perpetuity through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to help offset
impacts resulting from landfill expansion.
Wetland/Stream System 6
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 1.39 acres of
wetlands and 2,124.55 linear feet of stream. The system enters the property from the
northeast property boundary and runs south across the property into Rocky Creek (Figure
2) Additionally, there will be improvements made to an existing stream crossing to allow
for better access to remote areas of the property (Impact 60.2 ft.). This area will not be
included in the preservation proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System 6 will total approximately 1.38 acres of
wetlands and 2,064.35 linear feet of stream. There will be one improvement to a stream
crossing resulting in a total of 60.2 feet not included in the stream preservation length.
Preservation areas in System 6 will be protected in perpetuity through the utilization of a
restrictive covenant to help offset impacts resulting from landfill expansion.
Wetland/Stream System across SR 1137
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 0.37 acre of
wetlands and 333.54 linear feet of stream. The system is located on the portion of the
property across SR 1137 (Closed portion of Montgomery County Landfill, Figure 2).
There are no areas in this system that will be set aside for stream crossings. Therefore, all
areas of System 5 will be included in the preservation proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System across SR 1137 will total approximately
0.37 acres of wetlands and 333.54 linear feet of stream. Preservation areas in System across
SR 1137 will be protected in perpetuity through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to
help offset impacts resulting from landfill expansion.
5
Wetland/Stream System - Rocky Creek
LocationlDescription: This preservation area consists of approximately 0.31 acre of
wetlands and 2,416.30 linear feet of stream. The system consists of Rocky Creek and three
small wetland areas adjacent to Rocky Creek near the first phase of the landfill (Figure 2).
Additionally there will be a new stream crossing installed to allow for passage across
Rocky Creek (Impact = 83.16 ft.). This area will not be included in the preservation
proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System-Rocky Creek will total approximately 0.31
acre of wetlands and 2,333.14 linear feet of stream. These preservation areas will be
protected in perpetuity through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to help offset
impacts resulting from landfill expansion.
Buffers
A minimum 50 foot buffer will be protected adjacent to each of the above proposed
preservation areas. In some instances, the buffer may actually be larger than 50 feet.
VI. NORTH CAROLINA EEP UTILIZATION
After visiting the site with both the USACE and DWQ and discussing the site limitations, it
was determined that the purchase of EEP credit and preservation of all undisturbed areas on
site were the most practicable alternatives for wetland and stream mitigation. In
discussions with both USACE and DWQ, the following requirements were stipulated by
both USACE and DWQ: 1) the overall mitigation ratio for the project would be 2:1,
meaning that 16 credits of wetland mitigation would be required to offset the 8 acres of
wetland impact anticipated from this current Individual Permit action and past Nationwide
Permit actions, 2) 1:1 Wetland Restoration can be achieved by purchasing EEP wetland
credits and 2) 1:1 Stream Restoration for all perennial stream impacts can be achieved by
purchasing EEP stream credits.
The 1:1 wetland restoration/creation requirement (DWQ) will be accomplished by
purchasing 8.0 credits (acres) from EEP. The onsite wetland preservation areas will
generate 3.63 credits (at a 5:1 ratio). The remaining 4.5 credits will also be purchased from
EEP in order to round out the required mitigation.
A 1:1 stream mitigation ratio will be required to offset all perennial stream impacts. Stream
mitigation for all perennial stream impacts will be accomplished by purchasing 808 credits
(linear feet) from EEP. Additionally, the remaining streams on site will be preserved. The
preservation of 14,008.40 linear feet of stream will provide 2801.68 credits of stream
mitigation (at a 5:1 ratio for preservation). This will more than satisfy the compensatory
stream mitigation requirements for this project.
6
All of the areas proposed for preservation will be protected in perpetuity by a restrictive
covenant in order to protect the site from future impact.
VII. SUMMARY
In order to fully understand the mitigation breakdown for this project, the following
summary is provided.
General Conditions - Wetlands
Previous Impacts under Nationwide Permit Program: 0.96 acre
Impacts Proposed under current permit application: 7.04 acres
Total Impacts that require mitigation: 8.00 acres
Total wetlands delineated on site: 25.20 acres
Wetland acres permitted in the past: 0.96 acre
Total wetlands on the site: 26.16 acres
Wetland Mitigation (overall wetland mitigation ratio of 2:1)
8.00 acres of impact require 16.00 credits. of mitigation
• 8.00 credits of restoration/creation must be purchased from NC EEP to meet state
conditions of a minimum 1:1 ratio.
• The remaining 8.00 acres of mitigation will be provided through a combination of on-site
preservation of wetlands and the purchase of additional restoration credits from NC EEP.
• 26.16 acres (total wetlands on site) - 8.00 acres (wetlands impacted through current and
past permits) = 18.16 acres of wetlands available for preservation.
• 18.16 acres of preservation at a 5:1 ratio provides 3.63 credits of additional mitigation credit
(18.16/5 = 3.63).
• With 3.63 acres of mitigation provided through on-site preservation, the permittee would be
required to purchase an additional 5 acres of mitigation from NC EEP to satisfy the overall
requirements of a 2:1 mitigation ratio.
Summary
8.00 credits of restoration/creation purchased from NC EEP
+ 3.63 credits of mitigation provided from 18.16 acres of preservation (5:1 ratio)
+ 4.50 credits of additional restoration purchased from NC EEP
16.13 credits of wetland mitigation provided
7
General Conditions - Streams
Total stream impacts that require mitigation:
Total stream impacts for the proposed project:
Total streams delineated on site:
Total streams impacted on site:
808 linear feet (perennial)
2,734.83 linear feet
16,743.23 linear feet
- 2,734.83 linear feet
Total stream length available for preservation
14,008.4 linear feet
Stream Mitigation
808 linear feet of restoration required to offset 808 linear feet of perennial stream impact
• 808.00 credits of stream restoration must be purchased from NC EEP to meet state
conditions of a minimum 1:1 ratio for perennial stream impacts.
• The remaining stream mitigation will be provided through preservation of streams onsite.
• 16,743.23 linear feet (total stream length on site) - 808.00 linear feet (perennial stream
impacts) -1926.00 linear feet (intermittent stream impacts) = 14,008.40 linear feet of
stream available for preservation.
• 14,008.40 linear feet of preservation at a 5:1 ratio provides 2,801.68 credits of stream
mitigation through preservation.
Summary
808.00 credits of stream restoration purchased from NC EEP
+2,801.68 credits of mitigation provided from 18.16 acres of preservation (5.1 ratio)
3,609.68 credits of stream mitigation provided
Wetland and Stream Preservation areas on this project are intended to help mitigate for the
impacts that will occur due to the expansion of the Uwharrie Environmental Landfill.
However, the primary mechanism of mitigation for those impacts will be provided by
utilizing the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). This program allows
clients the opportunity to pay into a fund that goes toward wetland and stream restoration
within the same drainage basin. The EEP has stated that it would be able to provide
wetland and/or stream mitigation for this project (Appendix Q.
In order to comply with the 1:1 wetland and stream restoration requirements set forth by
these agencies, 8.0 credits will be purchased to offset 8.0 acres of wetland impacts and 808
credits will be purchased to offset 808 linear feet of perennial stream impact.
To further offset impacts, our client will preserve all areas that will not be impacted. The
total amount of preservation to take place will be for approximately 18.16 acres of wetlands
8
and 14,008.40 linear feet of stream. The onsite preservation will generate 3.63 acres of
wetland credit and 2,801.68 linear feet of stream mitigation credit. These areas will be
protected in perpetuity through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to help protect the
site from future impact.
9
APPENDIX A
Figure 1- General Location Map
Figure 2 - General Location Map
Figure 3 - Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Layout
Table 1 - Revised Onsite Stream Information
Table 2 - Revised Onsite Wetland Information
- 4'?••??.. y tom:(L ,n_l 1r.`"`:l-rr???v'J?V 'C1'?`,'?.i
f{???' > .t f{?, }`l `+ rr r S (f?? v ?rr7s \? .,?? f' ?ri ?..
???1??1? ?. r?? Cylr % ? ? ,"?.. .r,?" , +=?`:( ?^'+ f????l` ? i• "" ?' , ^ u ..
V
j
?L?.. ,-a,^'?.' {?> p?F; S?l,}1r _c, (? ???? ? f ,'? U ` ,? s` . ',mow.. e .-r' 'S'r ???'`J??'? ? ` ? ?
Y!'-?- ?, `'< J',,1 J ?ir:? ?{'(' if . ? ?"'F' 7 ?1''? < t?• c a,`!" l> ???( r y.. ? ?lL:
?.????, ti ? ?.'`? ? `r...?" ?, iJ iv`r '?'1 sj/S f?? Il !1 a - \.? f?, /-?`?i 1 rr ???ti
rz,
Project Location
tpM',?,? •'?f,? U ? ? }S`S ,`?5? J1 ,. 5J` tS' '` ?•`:, r ?f??f ? r (•'
Ii "_.i?' ``S? ?It?? ° ?' ? ``•.s ` t?v.%': z -?.N • v `?t ??... try ? ._-.r"{ L'?;fC?? ,"?-?
'? /? / *1`?.?`lsl+,N t. ?' I ??r ? : 'I A f :1f"! •?? t![? },• {? C " ?yeC ? t ?, f?`?t• ' ?? , ? _? ?' ?,f?J,
,
} of n} ,`r, [? ` ,a J} ?3
?LR,4? Y ,?r?' G'L r, `?? , s ?? r f ,? ?,v I ?n ? r? ? J?,? ??rh=? L" f? ?` ?,??ir "'.1"'
?+4e ?"s ?E 's? „'q ? ? ? ? , ' J ?I ? ?? ? J Le ?Q r ; t?r?;??'' r' 1•' ? ? r }?,...`?1 r!.
? i 1':'f J ,?;'l/i ?5?? ? Lr.{• ' 1 LL ?? ?--r'' (?S6 r ??le"? ? ,y Ott t ? "'?.?1/"L?i? .r ?? \? .?, T J v r
:G ` (?t=? fnn??? C`sj S>t.., 4_ 1??1•) -] C?? r? .^..? '.ua 1?'?„?/,•?lr'R V f '
?t f?>' a? t ''f ? t ? ?? ?? a N Iy? ?r`2Z.?'-. ,5? ?'.'?N i s,,, 'ti{, n•--• Diu ?? '"".? t`-,---
c„ ?-,,??. ! ,J(? , p ? ? o • J .? 21? ""y^d ? w °C.ti".'fYt 7?/? ?" 5.1?"' `-? ? } ? c + l? ? n 1`-• r ??"??r r?i ? yil ' ???4??`,` ??n???;.t? ?,t`? • 1 Cl ?. t y , ??' ., ?-' '•_.,- _ i, ?`
t- ? 1 ? ' t r ' ? `?^? ;.' ? ?y'??,rt,' --•? t ? +.Y 3' r?C'" ?. s ? y . ?//'?7 ? .. ,?
J? ? •f ?`t lt) ?y? t i'',.?y//?/fem.'. ?? .t t"j ?'Y, •. '? ! ?.y?l ? ? ?l .-? ??` i ,? Z'' r'; [._....
1 ?•.r` -.i--=
rAl}
)ACS n P .. C? arLf"T_ ??? L '((iFttr i? 1f ^o l yj? ( (l??yl`$ l / 1111 ?, c?
fi
t?(A +Lr ?? ,?+' ?J??J i r L r c } r? ?'? r c o Uv?? f G? / 1f
1 1.k\ Zi ?^ ?S`?` 1,. i?.`..r g ?; 1 'S}`,+Y? :?.? ?/ '? r .S i ?q r f, (v.'?y? t'?, , • ..,....
ir, S' ??}\L;1\J;'f; J ?.1/ff 11 rrl Z?A,?? l/ Wit, t/("z !??(t??1?/j 9'•
if c' ?`? i? `?? , ?t Z?'' cc 4 " v r ?, „^-' ? u1?:?` t/.r,//?"? ` l '' •V,,?t,?l?l.-•
l.tr yr (?; ?r?rr ?ra,1`?'r1? ??J, )v ?'t ?n ' , J S s V- V JIr11 \ \' r
lr?7??!{/q?? `"ti"t ?-?? -? ._% ??, fr ? 'Jij?.^ ?`?' ?••* ~``r},?•,'?j??41
??ti + _ ? ??R"21/r ? N?? +"?? ? ? "?+ Y???y},? '.`c.?`i?••h-l)if 9 1 r.\• ??s".J?S?„ - f t ".. ? ?- ? ?``tl??l? t`-'-'6;_?.1?
£~ :. ?S •\\?t : ``??2 n?- 'E:1 (+'U;, t tt?, '" ?` 1;1`lti ?f ;- c' ?=?? /?/'1??5.
.?,Z!/r:j• h? I,rr' _ ? ?`„ Vr?? 4 r, i S-'`. ar',?8,? y? ! e ra ?,??`S(?'7 CeC cz,
. , ,i' 3 ?,_??-'?'" ?_ ? \ ,? J ^t` =r},,j?i/? j? `i ? ? r t ? 5 ?? ??? -??A??
?`?.? 14 ,t'- pp ?"Gy Z?-?`. i.r?SJ?.i`?'???lL l?l". ?`1 X11 ` ?T, ? ? SY+,`e i????,T_, ,;?-..•,. ? .t 2 ? y? +•L., ?)-?.,,. '
rl ,.. ??? ?i,?2 S'':,?: _4.1Jt}y 4 ? I?????\?. ^'? ` ?' ?4 r•{?y'??•?,rJ' ? n ?r ?. ,?.;?y ? •a?S
14 ?•)f • * ^ +' r ? '1., `.1 _ ., . "?`_ } cr•, i? S J al i a `.? .f .c. 14?.
0 1 2 3 Mlles
0 1 2 3 4 Ialometers
Source: t1SGS 1:100,000, Southem Pines, NC
30' X 60' Topographic Series
General Location Map Figure: 1
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Services, Inc. Project: ET01006.01
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: April 2005
?. f' j7 1 ! spy !r t ?//1 3-, jy 1 /))1I/
3??? Jr r'VA???. ? ? __,.?? ? 1s?4 ,?"'• j?f 3 ` - v`
I , :? t'rt i / , • t-.??.?' Sttt {J-
?"?- if
1 / // (i c- 1. ( j } .?'f,f%""?_._. ? f a 55l`i !-. \ \\ r` ( C -?'?' ? `? ? j ?(y J! ? i ) 1 ?• r /??
A?J'--'
i
,-1`
lr/f YJ frl? ?y.?(\ } r t1 t,'c11'?+rl'i???t\ ??`\? ` ?J'!? ) a 1 ;? \? l? ?+l ?vr ??r Y
_ t i ftI I ?x r •'"?• ??'??f ri?? ?? Sf? viA? r tVV ?,\
t f/i f t% - ?t ?r
rf J.
? i !' \ Y ( r' x --f •'r ? .._. i J - cl /? -_`?..t-.t i f ; _'?t, '1 lrrt?/
.-.? i/! ? I i • ? . ... f . („n ) t ?\ . ? rf Jh° ?? ..,? J + 1 .^? + \Y s r ?'_?,
,(,'87Yt ? } 1 ,lSQif,-.? \t?Q.!',I? ? 1f?+: rI ??;?:.f\ / r t tf
1 t \ ! . /, J ?f f'i r ,tomv f ti T \ 1dr fi ?/ ??? 11 ?1 'T
I `v
~•---" `(-? ?L,` t' 7 l? - f!f',1?, /?`??tr. ??? .,- li\ `?.;---1„?\1L '`?J•!fr-t `?_ ;Il,?/? t? ??,: Its
_-%f
J? C ????oh° `? i?1 i t ?_ _ / ti J; :? ?? t ?`?1_1 ??d'?i f i t? \\? ri-
01
11
.( yir \ 6A° ?? •!!!?l` ?... )`. , '{ r? r?'? ^ 1, ?t l3;?
`J )i J
v _ ? ! ?, -.,? -, ••? `e 'i } 1 / ' fir +? t?\ °r , `l s Y '1i l ?f j J i?1 ? ^...? 545
N lit l
?v ?i ,? ; r . ? ? t ti trr^ f/` i yro } < Y ? ? 1 - ?.
-.?? r+?n.
Ji?S
}JY rj.' f ?# S , i \ o \ ? ?l }+ + • rr y? \ ti / ! ( /t }?--?` Y
,? ? .-..-.\\:\? rtrl !? {. r•}-? ? i ? J? t C??? y?l'. V i ??/ tr ?,f? ' ? ?I ? ?{ ?:e?t ` J \ ?r I
f+t, \ ?irr i -i r Jf 1 CL) ! J s t i t \ !',
f i V'11
'i'
=Y?+3r?,\ /1)fJJf)? ff ?t ,? R,r/ ?} J`v+id,~ ?1t} ? _'tlli'\ t ?T ?/: /5`'ar /l i? i ?' jt °? ?`
i t -t i (l, o ? r /i, t ? i?'J "'''ti L•- 'y \ ; 1 .. ? i ?? .? } ,? . ,? Y? `??f l / . S ( l ?1?-` ?.. ' ?;
fr ?? ? ?{y ) Ilse ,._. j>? `? . 'y 3 ? i ; T t .?? 1??`:• ?`ti? 1 ';r ?•/ ? 1 ?,
`'`•?/???, ?`1 f'????.'?f ?? il???\ 1 { ' ?Xx '11??/??r?
y? ? XV °? ;` -/? , )/t ? ? `+J ) '1? ?S t ` 'ff ?•' ? ' ?t r ? ??`; ? ?-v^ ? ? ')? .. ? f f/,-- % ? f
. 1
- 1 \
i .._ ,
?????t ?•• I :,.J71?r jJ r? !f/ 1 'l? ?A v 1 /?( i t
r t?n?
°l r r" + r e 71
0 0.25 0.50 MI
"M 7
0 0.25 0.50 Km
Source: USGS 1:24,000, Troy, NC
Quadrangle, 1982.
General Location Map Figure: 2
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Project: ETO1006.01
Date: April 2005
.ta.- ;aot
1
y 1
3 I
WETLAND/STREAM
SYSTEM 4
.as- +
WETLAI
Y?
+ + A +.
i
r
+ + +'
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 3
+ + +1
. snag + + +
(
t
p\TC Or PWII . 11/I M
w, or wwTTa VI\rIK1
+ T:O.TyI wlt.vw Tr4 W rUT
,gaTNT.L MTU. tour m D-lt skit.
K.TWiI ur--m
TW a...i', M.. W wt yr.icN N KI WY1 -.11 hKnvw tlar, trers+
rr wMp... wr.Yr. Ip...rr1 \ TraMI. Yc
K M W+r+. Nfjw1 14 W. Ib.a\sWI tawar• wrq c-
-d pRojm F ftse s IsM-ISY4
KI rgtCT . IOOIEE\
VMTCI TVp4...MC IMaw.ilOl
KI K 1Y Y01t KCtM\
I.P
!1101 .GIM. IWW6
+
., h
r 1>.... t•?Yr
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 6

Project Area
Wetlond/Stream Impact
¦ Area
Wetlond Preserwtion
Area
Stream Crossings
Figure 3. Uwharrie Environmental
Landfill Layout (Mitigation Plan)
INITIAL GRADING PLAN
FACILITY PLANS - COMPLETED SITE
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
HODGES, HARBIN. NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 285
478 743-7175 MACON, GEORGA 31201
PRO1 NO. 1001-303-01 OwG. U-X2-MET EDIT 2-23-01
?"? 1- ' 300 SHEET 1 OF 1
Table 1. Revised Onsite Stream Information
Wetland and
Stream System No. Stream
Flagging
Sequence Length
(Linear Feet) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of Impact
(Linear Feet)
P = perennial
I= intermittent
5 SEA 466.13 U -
5 SGA 160.79 U -
5 SEC 1,232.39 U -
5 SED 63.82 U -
4 SJH 953.05 U -
Rocky Creek SEE/SEF/SJE
SEG/SHE 2,416.30 I (portion)
new road crossing 83.16 P
4 SJB 353.42 I (portion) improved
road crossing 38.17 P
4 SJA 2,301.52 I (portion) improved
road crossing 29.97 P
4 SJC 357.83 U -
3 SJG 2,806.74 I (portion) improved
road crossing 40.44 P
3 SJF 724.27 I (portion)
improved road
crossing 34.01 P
2 SEI 582.24 I (all) 582.24 P
2 SEL 746.16 I (all) 746.16 I
2 SEJ 251.14 I (all) 251.14 I
2 SEK 148.4 I (all) 148.4 I
2 SEM 511.09 I (all) 511.09 I
Across SR 1137 SJA2 333.54 U -
6 SP/SPA/SNA 1514.72 I (portion) improved
road crossing 60.2 I
6 SNB 358.25 U -
6 SPA 251.58 U -
1 SBA 209.85 I (all) 209.85 1

TOTAL 16,743.23 - 2,734.83
Note:
Total stream length on site is 16,743.231f
Total stream impact on site is 2,734.831f
Total stream remaining after impact (stream to be placed in preservation): 14,008.40 if
Total perennial stream impact on site is 807.991f
Table 2. Revised Onsite Wetland Information
Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)
5 JE/JF 0.26 U -
5 JD 0.12 U -
5 JC 0.23 U -
5 JB 1.21 U -
5 JA 0.26 U -
5 GK/GL/GM 1.02 U -
4 XA/XB/XE/XF/XG 2.11 U -
4 XC 0.06 U -
4 XD 0.04 U -
4 XK 0.26 U -
4 XL 0.20 U -
4 VJ/XO 0.05 U -
4 XH 0.04 U -
4 XI 0.33 U -
4 XJ 0.16 U -
4 XN 0.05 U -
4 XM/GWGI/GJ 0.20 U -
4 SJD Pond 0.40 U -
4 SJI Pond 1.78 U -
3 GB 0.28 U -
3 GC/GD 0.03 U -
3 GE 0.17 U -
3 GF 0.73 U -
3 GG 0.11 U -
3 GA 0.08 U -
3 PE 0.79 I (portion) 0.05
3 VK/XP 0.19 U -
3 VH/VI 1.31 U -
3 JG 1.17 U -
3 12-1995A 0.74 U -
3 PC/PD 0.04 I (portion) 0.01
3 PB 0.01 I (all) 0.01
3 PA 0.53 U -
3 VA 0.12 I (portion) 0.05
3 VG 0.47 U -
3 VF 0.10 U -
3 VE 0.04 U -
3 VD 0.05 U -
3 VC 0.02 U -
Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)
3 VB 0.46 U
2 12-1996 5.42 I (all) 5.42
2 12-1996B 0.31 U -
Across SR 1137 JA2 0.15 U -
Across SR 1137 EA 0.22 U -
6 QC 0.01 U -
6 MY/MZ 0.01 I (all) 0.01
6 PB 0.01 U -
6 PC 0.01 U -
6 PD 0.04 U -
6 PJ/PK/NG 0.15 U -
6 PE/NB 0.11 U -
6 NC 0.56 U -
6 PF/ND 0.13 U -
6 PG/NE 0.26 U -
6 PH/ZD 0.10 U -
1 MD 0.29 I (all) 0.29
1 MB 0.52 I (all) 0.52
1 MC 0.68 I (all) 0.68

PREVIOUS
IMPACTS 0.96 I (all) 0.96

TOTAL TOTAL 25.20 - 8.00
Note: The impact numbers include 0.96 acres of jurisdictional wetlands that were
impacted previously under the Nationwide Permit Program. This 0.96 acres will be added
to the 25.20 acres of wetlands delineated under the current effort to give a total wetland
acreage for the site.
Total Wetland acreage for the site: 26.16 acres
Subtract 8.0 acres (total impacts: including previous and currently proposed impacts)
Total Wetland Acreage Remaining (to be placed in preservation): 18.16 acres
APPENDIX B
Email Correspondence from Conservation Organizations
Paul Petitgout
From: cbanks [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 2:45 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Montgomery County conservation easement
JTClass: white
JTState: filtered
Dear Mr. Benton,
Thank you for contacting The Nature Conservancy.
Unfortunately, we will not be able to hold the conservation easement in Montgomery County.
While I'm sure it is a laudable project, I feel it would not further our mission.
Please contact the LanclTrust for Central North Carolina.
Contact Info
Email: jason(a)-landtrustcnc.org Web: www.landtrustcnc.org
Address: PO Box 4284, Salisbury, NC 28145-4284
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
They may be able to assist you in this project.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Carrie
Carrie Banks
Conservation Assistant
The Nature Conservancy
4705 University Drive, Suite 290
Durham, NC 27707
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
email: cbanks-)-tnc.org
----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Benton [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:30 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Montgomery County conservation easement
Ms. Banks,
Following our recent phone conversation, I wanted to present the information to you for a potential conservation
easement located approximately 5 miles west of Troy off NC 24/27 in Montgomery County, NC.
The area consists of a 50-75 foot buffer around several unnamed tributaries to Rocky Creek and associated riparian
wetlands, totaling approximately 20-40 acres (actual size currently unknown).
The project is associated with a permit action for the expansion of Uwharrie Environmental, an active landfill. There
may be certain stipulations placed on the easement by the landfill owner regarding access, safety issues, etc.
3/1/2005
If you would, please provide us with a response to this request at your own convenience. If you should have any
questions, please don't hesitate to give us a call.
Thanks
Jeff Benton, Project Scientist
Environmental Services, Inc.
9600-G Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
[phone] / Fax [phone]
Mobile [phone]
3/1/2005
Paul Petitgout
From: Paul Petitgout [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 8:15 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: FW: montgomery county property
JTCIass: white
JTState: filtered
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Redding [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:33 PM
To., [e-mail]
Subject: montgomery county property
Paul,
Thank you for contacting The LandTrust for Central NC in regards to your project in Montgomery County. Unfortunately,
at this time, our Board of Directors has decided that the project is outside of our current mission. If you should have any
further questions for me please do not hesitate to call.
Thanks,
kevin
Kevin Redding
Associate Director
The LandTrust for Central NC
3/7/2005
..r 1.,'
APPENDIX C
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Acceptance Letter
Eceistem
PROGRAM
November 24, 2004
Paul Petitgout
Environmental Services, Inc.
9600-G Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject: Project: Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
County: Montgomery
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and wetlands impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that the
decision by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not-assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the.
responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with
this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to
forward copies of the 404 Permit/401 Certification to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program in order for an invoice to
be generated:
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated November 19, 2004 the stream and riparian wetlands
restoration that is necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the
following table. Tlie maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated below.
. Stream Wetlands Riparian Riparian Buffer
Impacts _ 1 2,735 1 8.0 I
I Mid on Maximum 1 5,470 1 - 16.0 1
The riparian wetlands and stream mitigation will be provided as specked in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the above referenced project in Cataloging Unit 03040104 of the Yadkin
River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Department of
Transportation signed July 22, 2003.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
cc:. Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Brad Shaver, USACOE-Wilmington
Ken Averitte, DWQ Regional Office-Fayetteville
File
cerely,
J Zs B. Stanfill
Strategic Planning Supervisor
EStDYGK?:.. F ... PYatectU29 Our ltate-
ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 / 919-733-5208 / www.nceep.net
?o? WA
T X94
?O G
> -i
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cyndi Karoly
FROM: Amanda Mueller
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT: Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, NC (DWQ #
04-1138)
DATE: April 26, 2005
Upon review of the document, "Updated Wetland/Stream Preservation Plan for Uwharrie
Environmental Landfill, Montgomery County, North Carolina: April 2005" several questions or
concerns arose.
1. The wetland preservation consists of a large number of small wetland areas. This
may be beneficial because of the association of the wetlands with streams. However,
it is a possible question as to the benefit of preserving such small areas and their
ability to withstand any future impacts.
2. Wetland/Stream systems 3, 4, 6, and Rocky Creek all have proposed new stream
crossings or stream crossing improvements that will be taking place. They are not
counting those crossing areas in their preservation credits, but is it allowable to
provide preservation credits for streams that are or will knowingly be fragmented by
stream crossing work.
3. Wetland/Stream system 3 is adjacent to the proposed land fill expansion area. Is
there any concern with the water quality of that stream being impacted by the fill
material at the site, and/or does that in any way affect its ability to be used as a
preservation area.
4. Wetland/Stream system 5 may have portions of the stream that meander off of the
applicant's property (it is unclear on my figure). If the stream does meander off site,
does this allow for possible impacts to those sections of the stream and would that
negate preservation on the site?
5. They have proposed to place the areas under restrictive covenant instead of under
Conservation Easements. Is that allowed?
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need any further assistance or clarification.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] Internet http:/-h2o.enr.state.nc.u5!ncwetlands
N ` C
oarolina
Ntunilly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cc? WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO BOX 1890 .?? t•
WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890
April 18, 2005
Regulatory Division ao@ @???? n
Action ID No. 200200607 APR 2 0 2005
DENR - WATER (1UALITY
WETLANDS AND STORIMWATER BRANCH
Mr. Howard Hall
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Dear Mr. Hall:
On May 3, 2004 this office received an individual permit application from Republic Services
for Department of the Army authorization to impact 7.04 acres of Section 404 wetlands and 2735
linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel adjacent to Rocky Creek, a tributary to Little River
which ultimately flows into the Pee Dee River, associated with the construction of the Uwharrie
Regional Landfill Expansion, located at 500 Landfill Road, west of Troy, Montgomery County,
North Carolina.
During the first round of comments, there was common theme from each response letter
concerning review of the mitigation plan. Therefore, I am sending the latest updated mitigation
plan (dated April 2005), most recent copy of the alternatives analysis (dated March 10, 2005),
and the original responses to the first round of comments (dated November 3, 2004). I hope that
these documents will provide you the necessary information to adequately understand the scope
and impacts proposed for the project. More importantly, I hope these documents will provide you
the information needed to understand their attempt to offset the proposed impacts.
I am forwarding all the supportive documents for your review and comment and I would
appreciate being made aware of your comments and or concerns, in writing, on or before 30 days
from receipt of this correspondence.
I am responsible for processing the application. If you have any questions, you may call me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Enclosures
Brad Shaver
Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Republic Services of NC
Attention: Mr. Drew Isenhower
Post Office Box 2943
Hickory, North Carolina 28603
Mr. S. Paul Petitgout
Environmental Services, Inc.
9600-G Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
s. Cyndi Karoly
ivision of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina. 27604-2260
'Vfl?
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200200607
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO BOX 1890
WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Ms. Shari Bryant
Post Office Box 129
Sedalia, North Carolina 27342
Dear Ms. Bryant:
April 18, 2005
ag@gVq
APR 2 0 2005
..'r'
DENR - WA.. AC ..
WETLANDS AND STOFWATER BF 404

On May 3, 2004 this office received an individual permit application from Republic Services
for Department of the Army authorization to impact 7.04 acres of Section 404 wetlands and 2735
linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel adjacent to Rocky Creek, a tributary to Little River
which ultimately flows into the Pee Dee River, associated with the construction of the Uwharrie
Regional Landfill Expansion, located at 500 Landfill Road, west of Troy, Montgomery County,
North Carolina.
During the first round of comments, there was common theme from each response letter
concerning review of the mitigation plan. Therefore, I am sending the latest updated mitigation
plan (dated April 2005), most recent copy of the alternatives analysis (dated March 10, 2005),
and the original responses to the first round of comments (dated November 3, 2004). I hope that
these documents will provide you the necessary information to adequately understand the scope
and impacts proposed for the project. More importantly, I hope these documents will provide you
the information needed to understand their attempt to offset the proposed impacts.
I am forwarding all the supportive documents for your review and comment and I would
appreciate being made aware of your comments and or concerns, in writing, on or before 30 days
from receipt of this correspondence.
I am responsible for processing the application. If you have any questions, you may call me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Brad Shaver
Regulatory Specialist
Enclosures Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
'T
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Republic Services of NC
Attention: Mr. Drew Isenhower
Post Office Box 2943
Hickory, North Carolina 28603
Mr. S. Paul Petitgout
Environmental Services, Inc.
9600-G Southern Pine Blvd.
/Chn lotte, North Carolina 28273
Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 2760472260
fly-113B

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO BOX 1890
WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890
April 18, 2005
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200200607
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4
Ms. Becky Fox
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960
Dear Ms. Fox:

, k?9 gw[al
APR 2 0 2005
. WATER
WETLANDS BRANCH
LDANDS AND STORMWATERI
On May 3, 2004 this office received an individual permit application from Republic Services
for Department of the Army authorization to impact 7.04 acres of Section 404 wetlands and 2735
linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel adjacent to Rocky Creek, a tributary to Little River
which ultimately flows into the Pee Dee River, associated with the construction of the Uwharrie
Regional Landfill Expansion, located at 500 Landfill Road, west of Troy, Montgomery County,
North Carolina.
During the first round of comments, there was common theme from each response letter
concerning review of the mitigation plan. Therefore, I am sending the latest updated mitigation
plan (dated April 2005), most recent copy of the alternatives analysis (dated March 10, 2005),
and the original responses to the first round of comments (dated November 3, 2004). I hope that
these documents will provide you the necessary information to adequately understand the scope
and impacts proposed for the project. More importantly, I hope these documents will provide you
the information needed to understand their attempt to offset the proposed impacts.
I am forwarding all the supportive documents for your review and comment and I would
appreciate being made aware of your comments and or concerns, in writing, on or before 30 days
from receipt of this correspondence.
I am responsible for processing the application. If you have any questions, you may call me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Brad Shaver
Regulatory Specialist
Enclosures Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
.74- _
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Republic Services of NC
Attention: Mr. Drew Isenhower
Post Office Box 2943
Hickory, North Carolina 28603
Mr. S. Paul Petitgout
Environmental Services, Inc.
9600-G Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
I or . Cyndi Karoly
ivision of Water Quality
th Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260

WETLAND/STREAM
cn? cur YSTES cucr cur. I , c"p. .
•g \\\\?11?\/rii=? r +e w.r a ? y? + + + + + + + +
3111}1/ / r'???I ! 1s\\\? X11 \ ? _ /y mar/
\ 1111?ri ?\ ,r \ \\
noTmu.m Wrxar
arc or
IKTE •? { ?? %/ Or SljlKTT
+ + + + + + + (yy y!v-ryp?T
rJ 1 ?? 1 r" l 1 ljjf ( wnzwT D.M ca:a aacwn caa.
vgteK 4M xW W
- / W
IM rryrrMC rr w rs Ia•[N AI q ..n+i rppvq Mawr ap, GPI.
r ! /! Sr rr NrY..W+t r+Mn L T-' Inc
/ WEN !/ I M IrinrnY Yps.l .MI. IYntrrr ci-Ky rr. Wti
J vRS5D0 } Stream Crossin T
IV PAW r C
.r>• ;? ?% JJr + + + + + + + + j,r ? r>a KI KAIK r M
tfJ \111111 ??// / '/? 4? \; l c°P' Ted. ? -car
I\ ur Stream Crossing (
I' i} ....
' rt WETLAND STREAM SYSTEM 6
?,7l1 \ \\?\\\ \ q!i "?
v>r '1
?,? I flfllr 1 i" 4!1 ??it ?? ?? -? ? 111vvvv? 1 «.c„??, v???? i1 r:/
/jilllll!/11!{ fr/?lrJ rii ! i11 / I r y?v vv??v? ,? ?v _ ?",;? Stream Crassinq
\ ? kj!!? Jr??l?I'Ill?llJJjl • G ??,\?? \\ ? ? ?:li??1? 1111 $?? ?-?'? \ c??; i
0ua15aGT DxAI 1 I i \ \ ??_ ? = 11 _ \ _ J it O
r
gg 1 /r \\ !ff y . f I 1 _ _ ?`? %V sEix \l; T
l f DG,I _ sT
?? r ? v ! 1 I}I \\?- s.-.I 11 v..a is ? 1//^?y
1w
?I\1?r;1?i \tv // ?yf111ii1, v v V1 \ v ` vv.
.: + + !ream oss?n ( iglGxa,%/%. J' j'n \\.a\ /l t"U11! ? ? \\ ? \\\??\ D
WETLAND/STREAM I/I . -- AJ ?yii k ! LAA?r f/11116 /? ;? - V?? l
SYSTEM 4 r?a, ?? ???1 i 1 ?? \?'('. 1 1ilil ' \ r MAN
!? J \!\\1 1111 } ?--1y Q wk ` •, 20tl5
!1 / ? ? . 111{! 1 i a = II ? I}j1111111\
flr / Al t l1kvI v 1t v s ?I ,/ I I Ill!/1111 OENR- WATER
1I ?` \11 . v? i P ,rNpg QLLAUTy
s + + ? JllR)ICTIOxAL PR/hfl!
wETLANOS TYP. ?:? iMPACtED '°" T\llll 11{ ? lv _ I { ?a.-i/gk}!iB(f ?AFI?{
t1WETtCTED (. r'?,ttt11 '_:_ 1 ?f/!!!J!? Project Area
- ti ?%?/i a? ?///lj ? rvvvri> / I i I?jJI 'a • S 1!? , - r? iirgll/J1
Pend Area
.... + + A ?? illf??l ?l?Iflyd +? ???1111 ! _A {t It? ?? I? c/r. Wetland Enhancement
Area
Weaond/Streom Impact
a l?? \`v vF i ,,,111 r _ ' 111 (11!!! / Area
h ? 7 ?. ? ? ??` lijl ///Jt a O ?. \ llttll 1 r
r ?I \\?? \ p? ?.4, 11/?/i ..r?? / • a I/!LI / !? Wetland Preservation
. ,. + + r /v? + ??A\V??V\w11111\?!/1 ..iir + + v- / jJ /I v j Area
+
6 ;/' ?ll`f A ?lV? Y1ttn?\ t"e'??? ?i,. ll !// r? „?? ?1Ai1A 111VAAV\lt1 111 ? l J rd p/tL; Wetland/Stream Restoration ation ation Area
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 3 ?, • ?W' I /!/i 1 . f t (lf, ?l 1 Stream Crossings
I N .. !rA'r 13`?111)Il } 1 - ^, ./" / ii y/%?? \\v1? l?Illlflr ?
.nr• + + + r I 1\\\\?,, ?/ .?//??"" ????w`. l!??-= ?? /!/ ?/air ? ?$?ll , llh
N In,
y1111?jlt l fry / r ',( J??\0?='rii?r;Nii/? C_ - ?>
\111 JC ?;rrr ? U,/r./L,.? \. ==?
\1?y '-_jF ???? ?\\\11111??I`IIIl T ?/! ? \ I U?a????dr?????/i1?!!(11f 1111 ?-_ \ ?
..r. + + + + \ 1111 N1 .I( r1J. fl !;"?E•?711<r 0 ??lfri /i 1! ?i 1 \?\\ \\
I / '`? j 1t}ltll} N _?`- 'L/a/l ,?l??ii!? J(!1/?v/i4 yi -?w\py\ \11111j11
N iS'?? l 1111 ?\v: '°' r %I!J // ?"?\\?\\ !r ? r ?i,\\\\\\ 1 ly
0\l<Iri /rr I IP
/'?gn111}Illrf/lf ??j1!«"??\?jl?//„A ? •?l,?l?j!![1 J
J11l JI I"
jS C
1 1?1I
f llfflUl A AA 1 ^? ?l/K///i ??lVV\V??? !?\p1 ! !%//(?!
INITIAL GRADING PLAN
.... r _ . + + C \
STREAM - I !? 1)/(, 1l\1?\1\\ \?_ FACILITY PLANS -COMPLETED SITE
WETLAND/
.. ?, . , . ....... SYSTEM 2 _ I)? // fll v ?VA111 h {,
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM I w I IIII!!!/f UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
44J !! % REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
.... nr... »......, ...............?_.,. s- ,
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
?\ -
rw6,. r,nm .,A- & TRIBBLE, INC.
Tar rar r..r r..r r,;. r.r am
cva.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 265
478 743-7175 MACON. GEORGIA 31201
PRON. NO. 1001-303-01 DWG UWH12-WET EDIT 2
FIGURE 3. Uwharrie Environmental
Landfill Layout. DATE FEI' . 300'
BRUARY. 2004 HEET 1 OF 1
AT F9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
6426 o William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7r„ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-I Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 28, 2005
DWQ Project # 04-1138
Montgomery County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Attn: Drew Isenhower
Post Office Box 2943
Hickory, NC 28603
Subject Property: Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Isenhower:
On March 11, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received additional information on
your application dated November 11, 2003 to impact 7.04 acres of wetlands and 2,735 feet of
streams to construct the proposed landfill. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Mitigation and/or preservation
DWQ prefers the on-site mitigation rather than participation with EEP unless the on-site
location is determined by DWQ staff to be nonviable after a site visit. In any event, with
1:1 restoration/creation and the remainder of DWQ's mitigation done thru preservation,
then 30 acres of wetland preservation (rather than 18 acres) will be needed.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Ken Averitte of the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office. If we do not hear from you
within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will
consider the project as withdrawn.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: http-//h2o enr state. nc.usiftwetlands
None Carolina
?turallrff
?, An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Page 2 of 2'
March 28, 2005
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. John Domey
at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss
this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
CBK/bs
cc: Ken Averitt, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Paul Petigout, Environmental Services, 9600-G Southern Pine Blvd., Charlotte, NC
28273
Filename: 04-1138 Uwharrie Regional Landfill (Montgomery) On Hold
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 28273
704523-7225 • FAX [phone]
www.esinc.cc
10 March 2005
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Montgomery County, North Carolina
ESI Project No. ET01006.01
Dear Ms. Karoly:
QRQ7:4KNoeIR P
MAR 1 i 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WET MW AND STORMWATER BRANCH
In response to your recent letter request for additional information for the Individual 401 Water
Quality Certification to construct the above referenced project, Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI)
is pleased to provide you with information pertaining to the following areas:
STORMWATER
During a meeting with Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele and Mr. John Dorney that took place on 19
August 2004, stormwater issues, as they relate to landfills, were discussed. Specific issues
discussed in that meeting dealt with the fact that landfills in North Carolina are required to design
and submit engineering plans to the Division of Solid Waste every 5 years. For the Foothills
Landfill, located in Caldwell County, NC, it was agreed that the engineering plans would include
the stormwater management plan and the operation and maintenance agreement. Therefore, we
propose to include, as a permit condition, that the stormwater management plan be reviewed and
accepted on a 5-year basis prior to re-authorization of the Solid Waste permit for the Uwharrie
Landfill. We feel that this is a fair and equitable way to handle the issuance of the 401 Water
Quality Certification, as well as guarantee the protection of the waters of the State of North
Carolina. Additionally, we discussed this proposal during a brief phone conversation on Monday,
March 7, 2005.
In order to expedite review of the proposed stormwater plan for the Uwharrie Landfill, the
following information will be included as a part of the package for review by DWQ.
• Signed and notarized operation and maintenance agreement
• A worksheet for each BMP
• Copies of plans and specifications, including:
Development/Project name
Engineer and firm
d?
1
JACKSONVILLE 0 ST. AUGUSTINE 0 COCOA • JUPITER 0 DESTIN 0 SAVANNAH • ATLANTA • RALEIGH 0 CHARLOTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
10 March 2005
Page 2
- Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands and streams delineated
- Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage areas delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
MITIGATION
The Uwharrie Landfill project will utilize a combination of the Ecological Enhancement Program
(EEP) and development of on-site preservation areas to satisfy mitigation requirements. The EEP
has accepted the project, and the approval letter from the EEP is included as an attachment to the
Wetland/Stream Preservation Plan, which is attached to this letter for your review.
Specific details related to potential on-site mitigation opportunities are also included in the
attached Wetland/Stream Preservation Plan and are summarized below.
• Approximately 17.98 acres of wetland preservation -- d
• Approximately 11,558 linear feet of stream preservation
Should you have any questions or comments, or need any additional information, please feel free
to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Paul Petitgout
Vice President
?-1 c??
?- 19°`
aG
C0?-
Attachments
s.
WETLAND/STREAM PRESERVATION PLAN FOR
UWHARRIE ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFILL
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 2005
Prepared For:
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
CONOVER, NORTH CAROLINA
Submitted To:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Regulatory Branch
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street
Suite 714/Systel Building
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Prepared By:
MAK
Y 2005
M?qD R - WAT
-"""ANDS';W 'T'tRITY
CH
ENVIRONEMNTAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28273
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
................................................................................................
II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS 1
Soils 1
-------•----•-•---
Water Resources ........................ 2
Plant Communities 2
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest 2
Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest 3
III. WETLAND AND STREAM RESTORATION 3
IV. WETLAND AND STREAM ENHANCEMENT
3
V. WETLAND AND STREAM PRESERVATION 4
Method of Preservation 4
Wetland/Stream System 3............................................................. ......................
Wetland/Stream System 4 ................ 4
Wetland/Stream System 5............................................................ ......................
Wetland/Stream System 6............................................................ ......................
Wetland/Stream System across SR 1137____________________________________ _____________________ 5
VI. NORTH CAROLINA EEP UTILIZATION 6
VII. SUMMARY
APPENDIX A
Figure 1 - General Location Map
Figure 2 - General Location Map
Figure 3 - Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Layout
APPENDIX B
Email Correspondence from Conservation Organizations
6
APPENDIX C
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program - Acceptance Letter
I. INTRODUCTION
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC, (aka Uwharrie Environmental, Inc.) and
the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, propose to construct an
expansion to the landfill facility located adjacent to the existing landfill on a 250-
acre site located in western Montgomery County, North Carolina (Appendix A -
Figures 1 and 2). More specifically, the public/private partnership facility is located
near the intersection of Landfill Road and NC 24/27 approximately five miles west
of the Town of Troy, North Carolina.
The Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion is proposed to expand the existing
landfill to ensure a viable repository for municipal solid waste in the region. The
permitted landfill provides ±9,000,000 yds3 of airspace and the proposed expansion
will provide an additional ±9,000,000 yds3 of capacity. Expansion of the site will
provide an additional nine years of disposal life for a total of approximately 20
additional years of continuous operation.
The purpose of this document is to propose stream and wetland areas for
preservation to help offset unavoidable impacts resulting from the landfill
expansion. Unavoidable impacts include; 2,735 linear feet of stream channel (808
linear feet perennial stream channel) and 8.0 acres of jurisdictional wetland area.
Mitigation for the 2,735 linear feet of stream channel and 8.0 acres of jurisdictional
wetland area will be accomplished through the utilization of the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). This program allows clients the
opportunity to pay into a fund that goes toward wetland and stream restoration. The
EEP has stated that it would be able to provide wetland and/or stream mitigation for
this project.
H. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed preservation areas are located within the Uwharrie Environmental
Landfill, which is in the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The
landscape is characterized by rolling hills with moderately steep slopes. Elevations
within the landfill range from approximately 750 feet MSL in the southern portion
of the site to approximately 600 feet MSL near Rocky Creek (USGS Troy 7.5
Minute Quadrangle, 1982) (Appendix A - Figure 2).
Soils
There is currently no published soil survey for Montgomery County, although
production of one is under way. The Natural Resources Conservation Service
(MRCS) has identified two non-hydric soil series which occur in the project study
area: Herdon and Georgeville. Both soils consist of well drained, moderately
permeable soils that originated in residuum weathered primarily from Carolina slate
or other fine grained rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Both soils generally occur on
gently sloping to moderately steep areas. No hydric soil series have been identified
in the vicinity of the project area by the NRCS.
Water Resources
Two major cataloging systems are used in North Carolina to identify surface water
drainage areas: one developed by USGS and the other by DWQ. The project site is
located within USGS's 8-digit cataloging hydrologic unit 03040104
(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/pdf/cataloging_units.pdfJ. The DWQ system places
the site in sub-basin 03-07-15 of the Yadkin River Basin and the Site Index Number
(SIN) is 13-25-30-(0.3) (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.html).
The property contains several unnamed tributaries of Rocky Creek. These
tributaries consist of first order streams that are intermittent to perennial in nature.
The current condition of the first order streams suggests that they are intermittent in
nature. A total of 16,743 linear feet of streams occur on the site including Rocky
Creek (This does not include approximately 1,580 linear feet of Rocky Creek where
the applicant has control of only one bank of the creek). The current site plan calls
for filling of approximately 2,735 feet of stream channel and 8.0 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands (including previously permitted wetland impacts) to facilitate
construction of the landfill expansion (Appendix A - Figure 3).
Rocky Creek and its tributaries located on the project site are assigned best usage
classification of C (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.html). Class
C waters are freshwaters protected for fishing, aquatic life propagation and survival,
wildlife, and secondary recreation, which includes wading, boating, other uses not
involving human body contact with water where such activities take place on an
infrequent, unorganized, or incidental basis.
Plant Communities
Only two general plant communities have been identified within the landfill site:
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) and Piedmont/Low Mountain
Alluvial Forest, with disturbed variants of the two communities. These plant
communities represent assemblages of plant species which vary according to soil
type, topographic position, past land use, and level of human disturbance.
Descriptions of these communities are provided below.
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest - Mixed mesic hardwood forests are
generally found on slopes and well drained, small stream bottoms on
acidic soils. This community type is abundant on the landfill site,
although logging and conversion to pine dominated plantations have
resulted in the loss of the pure form of this forest type. Dominant tree
species include: Yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Northern red oak
(Quercus rubra), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The shrub layer includes
such species as red maple (A. rubrum), dogwood (Cornus Florida), and
American holly (Ilex opaca). Herbaceous species consist primarily of
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides) and heart-leaf (Hexastylus
arifolia).
2
Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest - Piedmont/low mountain
alluvial forests are found along small stream systems within the piedmont
and low mountains. Piedmont/low mountain alluvial forest is common
on the project site. Dominant tree species include: tulip poplar, red maple,
and Northern red oak. Dominant shrubs include American holly and
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana). Herbaceous species include Christmas
fern and river oats (Chasmanthium latifolium).
The disturbed areas of both forest types have generally been converted to pine
dominated plantations during silvicultural operations over the past 30 years.
III. WETLAND/STREAM RESTORATION
Several options to provide compensatory mitigation for the proposed impacts
associated with Uwharrie Landfill expansion were evaluated. The most desirable
option would have been on-site mitigation opportunities that may have provided as
mush as 2,300 linear feet of stream restoration. Associated with the stream
restoration, approximately 6.0 acres of wetland restoration could have been
provided through the implementation of a Priority One stream restoration on
Wetland/Stream System 5. The Priority One stream restoration would have aided in
re-hydrating adjacent areas by raising the base elevation of the stream.to the
elevation of the adjacent floodplain instead of leaving the stream in the current
incised channel (approximately 3 feet deep). The Priority One restoration would
have taken place by blocking or filling the existing channel to prevent the stream
from re-diverting into the incised channel. The stream would then be moved from
the incised channel into remnants of the channel that were abandoned due to
channelization activities that occurred years ago.
During field studies of Wetland/Stream System 5, it was determined that Priority
One stream restoration could not be done on the incised channel. The channel was
located in a narrow floodplain, leaving no room to move the stream from the incised
channel without having to cross it several times. Furthermore, the area was found to
have soils with a very high content of fractured rock. Soils with high contents of
fractured rock cannot be properly sealed, and therefore any attempts to restore the
system could result in a loss of base flow, rendering the restoration attempts a
failure.
IV. WETLAND/STREAM ENHANCEMENT
Another option to provide compensatory mitigation for the proposed impacts
associated with Uwharrie Landfill expansion were on-site wetland and stream
enhancement. Wetland/Stream System 3 provided opportunities for enhancement.
However, even with wetland systems adjacent to the stream channel and poor
existing vegetation, enhancement was not feasible. The only factor that could have
been enhanced in this system was the vegetation. With this knowledge, it was our
professional opinion that enhancing the vegetation would have caused more
destruction than allowing the system to undergo natural succession.
V. WETLAND AND STREAM PRESERVATION
The following areas are proposed to be preserved in perpetuity to aid in the offset of
wetland and stream impacts associated with the permitting of Uwharrie
Environmental Landfill expansion (Appendix A - Figure 3).
Method of Preservation
The applicant has pursued several land trusts/governmental entities to hold a
conservation easement on the proposed preservation area. Those entities include:
(1) the Nature Conservancy, (2) the Land Trust for Central North Carolina, and (3)
Montgomery County. The Nature Conservancy and the Land Trust for Central
North Carolina have both declined to hold the conservation easement and
Montgomery County is unable to hold the easement because the county owns
several parcels that makes up the landfill property. Email correspondence from the
Nature Conservancy and the Land Trust for Central North Carolina are included in
Appendix B. Additionally, Montgomery County is in a public/private partnership
agreement with Republic Services of North Carolina to operate the Uwharrie
Landfill. Therefore, we believe that the only viable option for preservation of the
mitigation area in perpetuity is for the land to be placed in a restrictive covenant.
Wetland/Stream System 3
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 7.44 acres
of wetlands and 3,531.01 linear feet of stream. The system enters the property
along the western property boundary and runs northeast across the property into
Rocky Creek. There will be a minimum buffer length of 50 feet set aside in the
middle of System 3 to allow for improvement to an existing stream crossing
(maximum 100 ft.) This area will not be included in the preservation proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System 3 will total approximately 7.44 acres
of wetlands and 3,431.01 linear feet of stream. There will be one improvement to a
stream crossing resulting in a total of 100 feet not included in the stream
preservation length. Preservation areas in System 3 will be protected in perpetuity
through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to help offset impacts resulting from
landfill expansion.
Wetland/Stream System 4
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 5.68 acres
of wetlands and 3,965.82 linear feet of stream. The system enters the property
along the western property boundary north of System 3 and runs northeast across
the property into Rocky Creek. There will be a minimum buffer length of 50 feet
4
set aside just upstream from Rocky Creek in System 4 to allow for improvement to
an existing stream crossing (maximum 100 ft.) This area will not be included in the
preservation proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System 3 will total approximately 5.68 acres
of wetlands and 3,865.82 linear feet of stream. There will be one improvement to a
stream crossing resulting in a total of 100 feet not included in the stream
preservation length. Preservation areas in System 4 will be protected in perpetuity
through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to help offset impacts resulting from
landfill expansion.
Wetland/Stream System 5
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 3.1 acres of
wetlands and 1,903.13 linear feet of stream. The system enters the property along
the northern property boundary and runs east across the property into Rocky Creek.
There are no areas in this system that will be set aside for stream crossings.
Therefore, all areas of System 5 will be included in the preservation proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System 5 will total approximately 3.1 acres
of wetlands and 1,903.13 linear feet of stream. Preservation areas in System 5 will
be protected in perpetuity through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to help
offset impacts resulting from landfill expansion.
Wetland/Stream System 6
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 1.39 acres
of wetlands and 2,124.55 linear feet of stream. The system enters the property from
the northeast property boundary and runs south across the property into Rocky
Creek. There will be a minimum buffer length of 50 feet set aside just upstream
from Rocky Creek in System 6 to allow for improvement to an existing stream
crossing (maximum 100 ft.) This area will not be included in the preservation
proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System 6 will total approximately 1.39 acres
of wetlands and 2,024.55 linear feet of stream. There will be one improvement to a
stream crossing resulting in a total of 100 feet not included in the stream
preservation length. Preservation areas in System 6 will be protected in perpetuity
through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to help offset impacts resulting from
landfill expansion.
Wetland/Stream System across SR 1137
Location/Description: This preservation area consists of approximately 0.37 acre of
wetlands and 333.54 linear feet of stream. The system is located on the portion of
the property across SR 1137 (Closed portion of Montgomery County Landfill, see
5
Figure 2). There are no areas in this system that will be set aside for stream
crossings. Therefore, all areas of System 5 will be included in the preservation
proposal.
Preservation Details: Wetland/Stream System across SR 1137 will total
approximately 0.37 acres of wetlands and 333.54 linear feet of stream. Preservation
areas in System across SR 1137 will be protected in perpetuity through the
utilization of a restrictive covenant to help offset impacts resulting from landfill
expansion.
VI. NORTH CAROLINA EEP UTILIZATION
After visiting the site with both the USACE and DWQ and discussing the site
limitations, it was determined that the purchase of EEP credit and preservation of all
undisturbed areas on site were the most practicable alternatives to wetland and
stream mitigation. In discussions with both USACE and DWQ, the following
requirements were laid out for use of the EEP program; 1) 1:1 Wetland Restoration
can be achieved by purchasing EEP credits and 2) 1:1 Stream Restoration for all
perennial stream impacts can be achieved by purchasing EEP credits. One to One
Wetland Restoration will be accomplished by purchasing 8.0 credits (acres) from
EEP, while 1:1 Stream Restoration for all perennial stream impacts will be
accomplished by purchasing 808 credits (linear feet) from EEP. The wetland/stream
preservation areas set aside by this plan, will be protected in perpetuity by a
restrictive covenant in order to further offset the impacts of the proposal activities.
VII. SUMMARY
Wetland and Stream Preservation areas on this project are not intended to mitigate
for the impacts that will occur due to the expansion of the Uwharrie Environmental
Landfill. The primary mechanism of mitigation for those impacts will be provided
by utilizing the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). This
program allows clients the opportunity to pay into a fund that goes toward wetland
and stream restoration within the same drainage basin. The EEP has stated that it
would be able to provide wetland and/or stream mitigation for this project
(Appendix C).
USACE has a wetlands policy based on "no net loss" of function, and generally
requires mitigation to offset wetland impacts greater than 1 /3 acre and stream
channel impacts greater than 500 linear feet. DWQ mitigation requirements are
coordinated with USACE.
In order to comply with the 1:1 wetland and stream restoration requirements set
forth by these agencies, 8.0 credits will be purchased to offset 8.0 acres of wetland
impacts and 808 credits will be purchased to offset 808 linear feet of perennial
stream impact.
6
To further offset impacts, our client will preserve all areas that will not be impacted.
The total amount of preservation to take place will be for approximately 17.61 acres
of wetlands and 11,558.05 linear feet of stream. These areas will be protected in
perpetuity through the utilization of a restrictive covenant to help offset impacts
resulting from landfill expansion.
7
APPENDIX A
Figure 1 - General Location Map
Figure 2 - General Location Map
Figure 3 - Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Layout
??'y'?I C:ny? r:'°(?ct f' ?^?' yJ1??, ,K ???? ii:``, ` f•.'._ r? Zvi t
1 try 1 ? tf 1 t ? \, ' .f • , ?Jpl Z "/ ?? ? ?,\?/f-?u (? f f_•''?\ ? ? ..?
t?E` \, `"?.,??g?.,t?tti ??tJ?..,'`T _?fi' ???i r j.? ?i?? ? t/?-??? -? rn ,,11`?,f "'?'?\ v ?' ^? ? 9
rv?Jr?>?
ua ?J) ??itL.F ?l. 6' U?? y 4 (ttl
off ,...
n?
q, P
W.IFp
FS ? ?? 7L^t v c,. -? `? . ''?? ?, i 1 !'V? 1 ??lrt??? °• r i.?'h?,'? '.t ?'?" tt `...u3 ri. /?'?^? ?? ? ?. ??
1 Y. ` C' \.n i r ..?1. -l:l ! ice' }'1 `, .•S? r i
Approximate
??,?
Project Location
r1j
-'U ???j? J ' ?7.? ??iS ? ? lic. ry (,•? ?f , ? l,?r?,;? S? `' \ 1 z ?j???„'c1? i
,:1' Wit; ?'rTJ',. f'?}"??-'` ? ?,',?S t?.?` v_'0.r?`\?,,. < a .' Sf`'l (i?'` ??:
JR?VJ. Lt' ?sjt?Qy? ! ?Cl~o?`/ P?v. f 4 S{ x C?'C`f?L J?c? r . ern t?i lr??JvY r{? ; 1`
Lf-,.?
f
n'?+ / fr ?', i "JSS iC??t1t ?s e' ?`' ?? ? -',.*('?.•. ?, a ?.0 <'?2? ! ?1z'.?./'rh.7 b?:' l 1???
?\ l ]1¢?h? .ivy r 1l?" °ti ?y ,so ?./ c
? ?f f.' _o-: k? ! r f ?'-. 2•S I O., ti` ? ?? ?i,C-?' ,f? ?? 1. .... ?' Z"Z ST tom../'
AU,
` /°?C t'J t!
?? f ?.r
;l •. /y _ r? ;?p1!`?Yntn?.v! ? C?? j S1r1..?,1 ?t i ?--` ? 1 ???? ?~? v `') ? Z ? ?' C>I r?''-M /r ,?L ? ? u h ti t?? T?-'raY? U ? ?7
?J?? lI?$fSe 2 c 1\1` J5"^? ??3 ?? y1'r? i•' ,t. r
?? ??'j ?V`r??? t+ 4 ? E ? ,, ?L':??.,r??.\ r ? ?. ?. fti ,?}?? ?"{?-??? ?r?`"?^r-? ? 1 R a? !_
< }?° r, ty `,Y il; ?1?` M"r- , v ? l
4S'
?f? ?? V??n.;, y- \~ll? • c c 7?rv?Cij. t ?t, ?',,,, `:- ?f,},M1, S ??r?\r;:? \.:.b ? Y` ?tr_.
S_° `?? t??? G ,•'- } <.,
61??``2
\'\i t ^_ .l J? G' % /"• d ? f) `.rh`:` ? A.t15 r.'L...I' ?„?r i1? t^
f?
! Irn,,-ti(( ?YA`:?. ??"c??\?,rl ` ?H??l>?4: \?j'y"?f? Z f?,.;? ,\???.-? v{..?' ;vrc t'' ?l l ' ? -Gj )1,? j l/J,? \ ` ;"tom ?I??l i? r?fi) ????C_:^ti,(V?
<;. UII \ ? "7'? i ` ?? i V ?i ti i l t ?1?rt ?{ !i' f i ???+? t? .? / i K tt? ?,
?'` iv??^^D
ja tr tiv? (? .'V `r ar??? (?41? K
! r ` N i
/?h `S ? ?1`?/ Y ? t?? t?1t? ? ??.,i,? 'CGS :f ???+ ,,yl?trt? ? ?. ??(^?.?yt'L•E,?;1 ;f?` ??f?tc
, ram„ CC7 ?\. ?' ?`? . ?l"Q ? s" ?1• : ??+ti? ?j y ?' ? /! J4 ? i 2?1?^' ? ,? { S?! (? r°,? i rF'??tk,?'f?.
''
' W1 ? `-• .K'?p? ? t . t?N \ ? ?1.?,' 1r }t1 1 ? (1t, 4 F,. { '? l..> ,.! y r `.,-,_`? Cjr r { Y? .3?3 `` C ti'.
??1 ?1 ? ? <,(?4 ° `' ?JJJ___???,,,-))):? ti - -??ti?., ?(?? ! r1? ? ?: \ s d )! •?J ? ..J} ?.1. ?. S . ? r?1,?` > r ? ?Z.S ? j
? \ ft
t f- „1?4 r r?. ;?`?1 V^'?f !lug ?rr,i ac?J?A tSt: ril Y R„?,? yi 1/'i?'{!A `°`, "?fl
I&W
j X \ Llal/ 1 1!
_ .. ? r ..< .?., _ ..? .7? /`/75.3 S1'WJA
0 1 2 3 Miles
0 1 2 3 4 biometers
Source: USGS 1:100,000, Southern Pines, NC
30' X 60' Topographic Series
General Location Map Figure: 1
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Project: ETO1006.01
Date: Jan 2005
0 0.25 0.50 MI
0 0.25 0.50 Km
Source: USGS 1:24,000, Tray, NC
Quadrangle, 1982.
i
cq4w
General Location Map Figure: 2
Environmental
Services, Inc. Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Project: ET01006,01
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: January 2005
Lw- L
APPENDIX B
Email Correspondence from Conservation Organizations
Page 1 of 2
,i -
Paul Petitgout
From: cbanks.[[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 2:45 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Montgomery County conservation easement
JTClass: white
JTState: filtered
Dear Mr. Benton,
Thank you for contacting The Nature Conservancy.
Unfortunately, we will not be able to hold the conservation easement in Montgomery County.
While I'm sure it is a laudable project, I feel it would not further our mission.
Please contact the LandTrust for Central North Carolina.
Contact Info
Email: iason _landtrustcnc.org Web: www.landtrustcnc.orq
Address: PO Box 4284, Salisbury, NC 28145-4284
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
They may be able to assist you in this project.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Carrie
Carrie Banks
Conservation Assistant
The Nature Conservancy
4705 University Drive, Suite 290
Durham, NC 27707
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
email: cbanks tnc.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Benton [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:30 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Montgomery County conservation easement
Ms. Banks,
Following our recent phone conversation, I wanted to present the information to you for a potential conservation
easement located approximately 5 miles west of Troy off NC 24/27 in Montgomery County, NC.
The area consists of a 50-75 foot buffer around several unnamed tributaries to Rocky Creek and associated riparian
wetlands, totaling approximately 20-40 acres (actual size currently unknown).
The project is associated with a permit action for the expansion of Uwharrie Environmental, an active landfill. There
may be certain stipulations placed on the easement by the landfill owner regarding access, safety issues, etc.
3/1/2005
Page 2 of 2
If you would, please provide us with a response to this request at your own convenience. If you should have any
questions, please don't hesitate to give us a call.
Thanks
Jeff Benton, Project Scientist
Environmental Services, Inc.
9600-G Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
[phone] / Fax [phone]
Mobile [phone]
3/1/2005
Message Page 1 of 1
Paul Petitgout
From: Paul Petitgout [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 8:15 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: FW: montgomery county property
JTClass: white
JTState: filtered
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Redding [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:33 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: montgomery county property
Paul,
Thank you for contacting The LandTrust for Central NC in regards to your project in Montgomery County. Unfortunately,
at this time, our Board of Directors has decided that the project is outside of our current mission. If you should have any
further questions for me please do not hesitate to call.
Thanks,
kevin
Kevin Redding
Associate Director
The LandTrust for Central NC
3/7/2005

APPENDIX C
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Acceptance Letter

Paul Petitgout
Environmental Services, Inc.
9600-G Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
O LV1.l IL
,,em
en
PROGRAM
November 24, 2004
Subject: Project: Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
County: Montgomery
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and wetlands impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that the
decision by the NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the
responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with
this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to
forward copies of the 404 Permit/401 Certification to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program in order for an invoice to
be generated.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated November 19, 2004 the stream and riparian wetlands
restoration that is necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the
following table. The maximum amount of miti ation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated below.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Riparian Buffer
(ft)
Impacts 2,735 8.0
Mitigation Maximum 5,470 16.0
The riparian wetlands and stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the above referenced project in Cataloging Unit 03040104 of the Yadkin
River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Department of
Transportation signed July 22, 2003.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
cerely,
J s& Stanfill
Strategic Planning Supervisor
cc:. Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Brad Shaver, USACOE-Wilmington
Ken Averitte, DWQ Regional Office-Fayetteville .
File .
R,"tOrutg:.. E ... ProtEGtGK,GJ Oar ftat& ICDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1 61 9 / 919-733-5208 / WWW.nceep.net
r
T
. i ft
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 - 8960

r---m 0 16 r=
NOV 1 5 2004
Colonel Charles R. Alexander
District Engineer
ATTN: Mr. Brad Shaver
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
SUBJ: Uwharrie Regional Landfill
Action ID: 200200607
Dear Colonel Alexander:
WETLANDS MD ST A R BRANCH

This letter is in reference to the Uwharrie Regional Landfill proposed project described in
the above referenced Public Notice (PN) dated July 9, 2004. The applicant proposes to place fill
material into 7.04 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 2735 linear feet of stream channel for
expansion of the existing Uwharrie Regional Landfill facility. Onsite mitigation and utilization of
the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has been proposed for mitigation for
the project impacts.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4 has reviewed the project
information contained in the PN and has the following concerns with the project, as proposed.
EPA is concerned with the magnitude of the proposed impacts. The PN contains no information
as to whether the project plan reflects the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative
and what efforts the applicant has made to avoid and minimize wetland/stream impacts.
The applicant proposes to mitigate for these impacts with a combination of onsite
preservation, enhancement, restoration and utilization of EEP. There is no specific mitigation
proposal or plan presented in the PN for EPA to be able to evaluate the proposed mitigation. We
recommend that as much of the impacts, as possible, be mitigated with onsite
restoration/enhancement/preservation.
Based on the above discussion, we conclude the project, as proposed, is not approvable
at this time. For EPA to be able to adequately review the project, we would need to see
information concerning an alternatives analysis as to why this is the least environmentally
"damaging alternative and a mitigation proposal for any wetland/stream impacts. We look forward
to reviewing these materials if the applicant supplies additional project information.
I
t
2
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact Becky Fox at [phone] or fox.rebecca@
epa.gov.
Sincerely,
Ronald ?-?-' ?'' alak, Chief
Wetland egulatory Section
cc: USFWS, Raleigh
NCDWQ, Raleigh
NCWRC, Sedalia

Cc List:
cc'--.. -Mr. John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Mr. Howard Hall
US Fish and Wildlife Service
PO Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Ms Shari Bryant
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
PO Box 129
Sedalia, North Carolina 27342
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200200607
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO BOX 1890
WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890
October 19, 2004
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
-37
?STKIP; Of-,t,
y? 5?
-11-ARY
UltNl.
(?? 1(UNE IN WA1l ??•
tart roe
OCT 2 9 2004
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Reference the enclosed application from Environmental Services Inc. on the behalf of
Republic Services of NC for a Department of the Army authorization and a State Water Quality
Certification to discharge fill material into 7.04 acres of Section 404 wetlands and 2735 linear
feet of jurisdictional stream channel adjacent to Rocky Creek, a tributary to Little River which
ultimately empties into the Pee Dee River, associated with the construction of the Uwharrie
Regional Landfill Expansion, located at 500 Landfill Road, west of Troy, Montgomery County,
North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for
certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act. We have determined that a water quality certification is required under the
provisions of Section 401, which is under the same law as Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification has been obtained or
waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days after receipt of a
request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on
the request, or asked for an extension of time, by December 19, 2004, the District Engineer will
deem that waiver has occurred.
-2-
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments may be addressed to me
at the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Owl ?JL?-
Brad Shaver
Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Enclosure
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28273
704523-7225 • FAX [phone]
www.esinc.cc
29 April 2004
Ms. Angie Pennock
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: Individual Permit Application
& Modified Environmental Assessment
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Dear Angie:

Enclosed, please find one bound and one unbound copy of the individual permit
application and supporting modified environmental assessment document for the
aforementioned project. Should you have any questions, please give me a call (704) 523-
7225 or email ([e-mail] .
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
r
i
GI...?
S. Paul Petitgout
Assistant Vice President
Enclosures
JACKSONVILLE 0 ST. AUGUSTINE 9 COCOA • JUPITER • DESTIN 0 SAVANNAH • ATLANTA • RALEIGH 0 CHARLOTTE

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
/33 CFR 3251 Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Depertment of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations anal Reports; 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suits 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shall be."subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344, Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information Is voluntary, however, if Information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issues.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the Distrf t Engineer., having 'uriadiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that Is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE ,RECEIVED I4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
l?FMS RF1 nW Tn RA-MS I Fn RV.. ADOI in nun ' 0\ '7
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8 l1T?iOR12ED
'S NAl AND TITLE
AGENT

Drew Isenhower ,
ranao"arwrem&eld)
,
S. Paul Petitgout
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Republic Services on NC, LLC Environmental Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 2943 Hickory, NC 28603 9600-G Southern Pine Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28273
T. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business ` (828} 464-2414 'U.-Business-' (704) - 523-7225
-11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, Environmental Services, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
himish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
l1- /?-03
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (seekwnxt"w1
Uwharrie Regional Landfill - Expansion #2
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN of.,,lr;,? hw
UT of Rocky Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Montgomery North Carolina
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS rv.A rmw)
Uwharrie Regional Landfill
500 Landfill Road
Mt. Gilead, NC 27306
[phone]
COUNTY STATE Attn: Mr. Ken Lowder - Site Manager
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, rseeinsorrcrionsl
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From the City of Troy, NC: Take NC Highway 24/27 West towards the City of Albemarle, NC for
approximately 4 miles. Turn right onto Landfill Road (there is a large Uwharrie
Environmental, Inc. sign at the intersection of Landfill Road and NC 24/27). Proceed
approimately 1.5 miles and the landfill entrance and scalehouse will be on the right.
18. Nature of Activity (oewdpoon of proiea jnau a sa teetwes)
I
The activity consists of the placement of clean fill into approximately 7.99 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands (this includes all previous permitted acreages) and 2239 linear feet
of jurisdictional streams.
19. Project Purpose Mesalbe the raison or pwpase of the profeat, see incur ctrorul
See Attached Page Marked Block 19.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
in order to be able to construct a landfill expansion with the purpose of extending the life
of the current landfill without having to construct an entirely new facility.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards
The activity involves the placement of approximately 150,000 cubic yards of clean structural
fill material for the purposes of constructing an expansion of the current landfill
facilities.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled fsaein &.donsl
±7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
±27!,R.S'linear feet of jurisdictional streams
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes
No L.L.J IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins-the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here, `
please attach a supplemental list).
See Attached Page Marked Block 24
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AUCM-T i Trt ArrnuvAL- IUtNUMCATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NC SHPO Concurrence N/A 5/11/01 6/29/01 N/A
`Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
appiic lion is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
dut orized snt o the applicant.
- -a J l1• Il•o?
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATU E OF GENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing some to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $ 10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.'
Application for Department of the Army Permit (33 CFR 325)
BLOCK 19
Project Purpose
The overall purpose of the project is to expand a municipal solid waste landfill to enable the
existing facility to continue operating the Uwharrie Environmental Landfill site and Recycling
Center. Without the landfill expansion, municipal solid waste generated in the local/regional
service area will need to be trucked to alternative sites, which will significantly increase the cost
of landfilling regionally generated waste, or new landfill sites would need to be identified and
permitted. Additionally, the recycling complex located on the Uwharrie Landfill site was sited
here due to its proximity to the existing landfill.. If the landfill is prohibited from expanding and
waste is transported to other facilities, the recycling complex will likely default due to lack of
incoming waste at the site. Economically, it would not be feasible to transport recyclable
materials from another facility to the current recycling facility or to try and relocate the recycling
facility to another location. The recycling facility is only cost effective if it is located adjacent to
a permitted municipal solid waste landfill. Additionally, there would be the possibility that . -
electric power could be generated using the methane produced by the existing landfill and the
proposed landfill as a new renewable energy resource.
BLOCK 24
Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the
Waterbody.
It-should ke_notc1that the applicant is the only property owner-whose-property adjoins-the',
waterbody (i.e. the waterbodies proposed for impact are wholly contained on the applicants
property.
However, names and addresses of all landowners adjacent to the property held by the applicant
are provided as information to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
LANDOWNERS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY HELD BY THE APPLICANT
1. Applicant
Uwharrie Regional Landfill
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC.
P.O. Box 2943
Hickory, NC 28603
Lot Numbers: 0110, 1354, 2786, 4952, 7551, 6058
2. County
Montgomery County Board of Commissioners
102. East Spring Street
.Troy, NC 27371
Lot Numbers: 0440, 0770, 3280, 5456, 8012, 8736, 9814
3. Michael W. Kelly
1258 NC 109
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 0045

4. Sur-Shaw and Ko Vang
Route 3, Box 2009
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Numbers: 0375, 6207, 6430, 8999
6. Gary Wayne Cook
126 Honey Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 0478
8. John and Sue Lewellen
459 Nance Farm Road
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Numbers: 0651, 1637
10. Douapao and Sheng Pha Vang
288 Vang Drive
Mount.Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 3900
12. Xao and lei X. Vang
253 Vang Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 6234
14. 81a Shona ..... . .
265 Vang Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 7718
16. Phothisane T. and Nancy S. Vanh
842 Landfill Road
Mourn Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 6611
18. Gary A. Hunsucker
24601 Canton Road
Albemarle, NC 28001
Lot Number: 1717
20. John Robert Loftin
1271 Albemarle Road
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 2201
22. Kelly L. and Emir Coltrane
911 Uwharrie Street
Asheboro, NC 27203
L.ot Number: 9631
5. Thurman A. Chriscoe
227 Gap Road
Seagrove, NC 27341
Lot Numbers: 0482, 1196
7. Warren R. and Francis J. Greene
679 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Numbers: 0549, 0839, 0852
9. Bee C. and Ger Y. Vang
226 Vang Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 1169
11. Teng and Sheral S. Vang
265 Vang Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 6013
13. Kaha and Kia Vang
196 Kaha Lane
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Numbers: 7125, 8314
15. Tou and -;kffd li Vaiig
301 Vang Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number 8895
17. W.D. and Velvin Kelly
1258 NC Hwy 109
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number. 1273
19. Bowater Timber 2, LLC.
c% Jordan Properties, LLC.
P.O. Box 98
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number. 2155
21. Doyle M. and Faye M. Atkins
2497 Lovejoy Road
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number. 3745
23.Odus D. Smith, et. al.
c/o O.D. Smith, Jr.
316 Maner Road
Kings Mountain, NC 28086
Lot Number. 2376

24.•William D. and Brenda W. Kirk
797 Landfill Road .
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 2833, 9884
26. Timothy D. and Gina. P. Lefler
811 Landfill Road
Mount _Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Numbers: 2963, 3972
28. Thomas A. and Mandy L. Wooten
408 Nance Farm Road
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 3229
30. Roger L. and Barbara Hunsucker
149 Honey Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Numbers: 3847, 8780
32. Dennis N. and Gail G. Luther
665 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 4112
34. Albert S. and Jane Funsucker "
3004 Love Joy Road
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 5642
36. Darrell Lynn Hurley, et. al.
305 Nance Farm Road
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 6893
38. Edmond Phillip Greene
694 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead; NC 27306
Lot Numbers: 8155, 9383
40. Sandra R. Parsons
125 A Whittie Lane
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 8731
25. Darrell L. and Pamela P. Hurley
694 Strider Road
Troy; NC 27371
Lot Number: 2850
27. Danny and Frances Loftin
829 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 3149
29. Vera. W. Morris
8426 Doughton Drive
Bahama, NC 27503,
Lot Number: 3478
31. V.A. Green, Jr.
675 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 4017
33. Lonnie Gibson
731 landfillRoad
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Numbers: '4939, 7073
35. Martha McIntyre _ ...., .. _ .. _
728 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number. 6610
37. Barry L. and Rebecca B. Stegall
306 Nance Farm Road
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 7225
39: Todd S. Lemonds
113 Johnia Court
Thomasville, NC 27360
Lot Number: 8262

MODIFIED ENVIRONEMTNAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE
UWHARRIE ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFILL EXPANSION
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
In Support of an Individual Permit Application
Section 4041401 of the Clean Water Act
Prepared for:
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Conover, North Carolina
Prepared by:
ENVIRONEMTNAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Tel [phone] Fax [phone]
MARCH 2004
MODIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE
UWHARRIE ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFILL EXPANSION
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC, (aka Uwharrie Environmental, Inc.) and the
Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, proposes to construct an expansion to
the existing landfill facility located adjacent to the existing landfill on a 250-acre site
located in western Montgomery County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). More
specifically, the public/private partnership facility is located near the intersection of
Landfill Road and NC 24/27 approximately five miles west of the Town of Troy, North
Carolina. Mr. Drew Isenhour is the applicant and Mr. Ken Lowder is the on-site project
manager. Hodges, Harbin, Newberry and Tribble, Inc., Consulting Engineers (HHNT) of
Macon, GA is the Engineer of Record for the project. Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI)
of Charlotte, North Carolina is the environmental consultant assisting HHNT with natural
resource issues and permit acquisition.
The Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion is proposed to expand the existing
landfill to ensure a viable repository for municipal solid waste in the region. The
permitted landfill provides 19,000,000 yds3 of airspace and the proposed expansion will
provide an additional ±9,000,000 yds3 of capacity. Expansion of the site will provide an
additional nine years of disposal life for a- total of approximately 20 additional years of "
continuous operation.
Uwharde Environmental, Inc., will be submitting a permit application to the US Army
Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requesting authorization to impact approximately 2,735
linear feet of first and second order stream channel and 7.04 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972 (33 USC 1344).
Additionally, the permittee will be responsible for mitigating for approximately 0.95-acre
of jurisdictional wetland area that was permitted previously under the Nationwide Permit
Program of the US Army Corps of Engineers (total cumulative wetland impact of 7.99
acres). This permit action will also require a Water Quality Certification from the State of
North Carolina through the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) (NCGS 143-215) pursuant
to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
The purpose of this document is to provide an evaluation of three general criteria which
will be considered as part of the permit process: 1) the relative extent of the public and
private need for the proposed activity; 2) the practicability of using reasonable alternative
locations and methods to accomplish the objective of the proposed activity; and 3) the
extent of the effects which the proposed activity is likely to have on the environment in
and around the area of the proposed. This document is intended for use by ACOE and
DWQ as the basis for determining the applicant's compliance with the Section 404 (b)
(1) guidelines and other Section 404 permitting requirements, and Section 401 water
quality certification.
2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
2.1 Overall Purpose and Function of the Project
The overall purpose of the project is to expand a municipal solid waste landfill to enable
the existing facility to continue operating the Uwharrie Environmental Landfill site and
Recycling Center. Without the landfill expansion, municipal solid waste generated in the
local/regional service area will need to be trucked to alternative sites, which will
significantly increase the cost of landfilling regionally generated waste, or new landfill
sites would need to be identified and permitted. Additionally, the recycling complex
located on the Uwharrie Landfill site was sited here due to its proximity to the existing
landfill. If the landfill is prohibited from expanding and waste is transported to other
facilities, the recycling complex will likely default due to lack of incoming waste at the
site. Economically, it would not be feasible to transport recyclable materials from
another facility to the current recycling facility or to try and relocate the recycling facility
to another location. The recycling facility is only cost effective if it is located adjacent to
a permitted municipal solid waste landfill. Additionally, there would be the possibility that
electric power could be generated using the methane produced by the existing landfill
and the proposed landfill as a new renewable energy resource.
2.2 Need for the Project
Based on current use levels for the Uwharrie Landfill and Recycling Complex, the need
for a landfill expansion has been demonstrated. Use of the landfill facility has increased
steadily over the last few years, shortening the expected life of the current landfill
footprint. In order to proactively plan for future growth of Montgomery County- and
surrounding areas within the service area of the existing facilities, expansion of the
existing landfill site must be considered early in the solid waste and growth processes in
order to allow adequate time for review of all of the environmental, physical, and socio-
economic issues that need to be addressed. With a shortening of the proposed life of
the existing footprint, planning for expansion must begin now to ensure a viable/reliable
site for landfilling that meets all of the expected goals of both the regulatory agencies
and the applicant.
3.0 ALTERNATIVES
Headquarters of the US Army Corps of Engineers (HQ-USACE) guidance from 22 April
1986 requires that alternatives be practicable to the applicant and that the purpose and
need for the project must be the applicant's purpose and need. This guidance also
states that project purpose is to be viewed from the applicant's perspective rather than
only from the broad, public perspective. The essential point of the HQ-USACE policy
guidance of 22 April 1986 is that under the Section 404 (b)(1) Guidelines, an alternative
must be available to the applicant to be a practicable alternative.
3.1 Alternative Analysis Criteria
The following criteria were examined during the analysis of alternatives for the project: 1)
Availability of Property; (2) Demographic (Population) Information; 3) Proximity to
Highways/Infrastructure; 4) Geologic Information; 5) Hydrogeologic Characteristics; 6)
Presence/Absence of Wetlands/Waters of the US; (7) Presence/Absence of Endangered
and Threatened Species; and 8) Presence/Absence of Cultural Resource Issues. Other
2
criteria examined also included, the proximity of the sites to airports, the proximity of
nearby drinking water sources, and other criteria related to the permitting of subtitle D
landfills.
3.1.1 Availability of Property - Three sites were included in the analysis of
alternatives for the proposed expansion of the Uwharrie Environmental Landfill. Each of
the four sites evaluated was determined to be available for purchase at the time of the
proposed expansion planning.
3.1.2 Demographic (Population) Information - One major goal of siting a new
landfill or expanding an existing landfill facility is to reduce or eliminate the burden on
any/all neighborhoods and communities. The simplest method of achieving this goal- is
to site facilities away from population centers to the greatest extent possible. All of the
alternatives reviewed are a minimum of one mile from any population centers within
Montgomery County.
3.1.3 Proximity to Highways/Infrastructure Vehicles must be able to quickly access
the project site to prevent detrimental impacts to the local traffic patterns. Adjacency to
primary county roads and state highways are undeniable positive attributes of any
proposed project site. Additionally, weight restrictions on secondary roads may prevent
access to the site by potential users. It is important for patrons who may travel long
distances to be able to find the facility with ease and without utilizing secondary roads
which may have weight restrictions. Only one of the four potential alternative sites
meets this criteria (the alternative adjacent to the existing landfill facility).
3.1.4 Geologic Information - When new or .expansion landfills are proposed, the"
geology of the proposed site is very important. Site stability from the standpoint of the
presence/absence of fault zones, seismic impact zones or unstable areas is extremely
important in determining the potential for safety issues resulting from potential land shifts
that may compromise the integrity of the landfill facility. Based on the review of the
Geologic Map of Montgomery County and the Seismic Impact Zone Map for the
Southeastern United States by HHNT, it appears that the four alternative locations are
free from any potential geologic fatal flaws that would exclude them from potential use.
3.1.6 Hydrogeologic Information - Additionally, the hydrogeology of a particular site
is also a very important siting characteristic. Generally, the piedmont consists of fairly
localized aquifers which tend to be recharged in the higher elevations of the local
topography and discharge into the lower ends of the local topography. The four
alternative sites, as well as most areas within Montgomery County, exhibit acceptable
hydrogeologic characteristics for the siting of a landfill or landfill expansion.
3.1.6 Presence/Absence of WetlandMaters of the US - Wetlands and other waters
of the US are extremely important ecological components of our surrounding landscape.
Whenever possible, the applicant has attempted to locate sites where impacts to these
important systems could be avoided to the greatest extent possible. Based on initial
observations, it should be noted that all of the alternative sites contain jurisdictional
waters of the US as defined by the US Army Corps of Engineers and the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality. Due to the general size requirements for landfills to be
considered viable ventures, impacts to jurisdictional waters of the US can be expected in
most instances and are expected to occur on all of the proposed alternative sites.
3
3.1.7 Presence/Absence of Threatened and Endangered Species - In addition to
wetlands and other jurisdictional waters of the US, endangered and threatened species
are also an important component of the ecological systems present in Montgomery
County. Based on the review of both Federal and State listed species, there is potential
habitat for endangered and/or threatened species on all of the alternative sites.
3.1.8 . Presence/Absence of Cultural Resource Issues - There exists the possibility
that there are relevant cultural resources located on all of the proposed alternatives.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act states that projects requiring a
federal permit must undergo review to define the presence of any significant historic or
pre-historic resources that may be located on the proposed site. Potential exists on all
of the proposed alternatives for the presence of cultural resources.
3.2 Alternative Property Search . .
A search for alternate properties was conducted by HHNT as a part of the Solid Waste
permitting requirements. Properties needed to be of sufficient size (>200 acres) and
needed to be available for purchase to be considered viable. Four properties were
located in Montgomery County which satisfied both of our pre-qualified search
parameters. It should be noted that three of the tracts are located south and southeast
of the city of Troy, and the fourth location consists of several tracts adjacent to the
existing Uwharrie Environmental Landfill.
3.2.1 Alternative Location One - Alternative one consists of a site that is located
approximately two miles south of NC 24/27 and approximately two miles south of the city
of Troy, NC (Figure 3). The property is available for purchase and is situated in a rural
setting just south of the city limits of Troy. This area is somewhat populated due to two
small communities located-nearby (Caplise and Onvil). Access to the site is considered
poor due to the absence of adequate access to primary highways. In fact, the primary
access corridor would probably come through the city of Troy. Other secondary roads
that access the site would likely have weight restrictions that preclude the use of those
corridors. Additionally, new infrastructure would need to be constructed on this site
(recycling facility, scalehouse, lechate tanks, roads, etc. (cost: ±$7,000,000)) to utilize
the site as a landfill. From a geologic/hydrogeologic perspective, this site meets all
requirements and has acceptable characteristics. This alternative site contains several
acres of wetlands and approximately 15,000 linear feet of jurisdictional streams on site.
Based on the size of landfill footprint that would be required to meet the project goals
(because there is no existing landfill adjacent that would allow vertical expansion volume
while reducing land requirements to create the total volume needed), a majority of the
jurisdictional areas on site would likely be impacted in some fashion. Mitigation for both
stream and wetland impacts would be limited due to the size of the project because the
project would consume the majority of the property. No. threatened or endangered
species are located on site and only one species (Schweinitz's sunflower), is located
within one mile of the project site. No adverse effects are expected to any threatened or
endangered species if this site is utilized. Cultural resources have the potential for being
located on the site based on its proximity to water and the topography of the area, and
the patterns of use in the area.
Based on the information contained above, this site would not be considered a viable
alternative. The factors which limit the sites ability serve as a viable landfill site
candidate are: (1) jurisdictional impacts would be significant; (2) onsite mitigation
4
opportunities would be severely limited due to the area required for the project; (3)
access issues make utilizing this site unfavorable; and (4) infrastructure improvements
would be costly.
3.2.2 Alternative Location Two - Alternative two consists of a site that is located
approximately three miles south of NC 24/27 and approximately three miles southeast of
the city of Troy, NC (Figure 4). The property is potentially available for purchase and is
situated in a rural setting just south of the city limits of Troy. This area is somewhat
populated due to four small communities located nearby (Caplise, Onvil, Troy, and
Biscoe). Access to the site is considered poor due to the absence of adequate access
to primary highways. The primary access corridors would most likely come through the
cities of Troy and Biscoe. Other secondary roads that access the site would likely have
weight restrictions that preclude the use of those corridors. Additionally, proximity to the
local airport may preclude the use of this site. FAA regulations potentially limit the
placement of landfills within five miles of an airport. New infrastructure would need to be
constructed on this site (recycling facility, scalehouse, lechate tanks, roads, etc. (cost:
±$7,000,000)) to utilize the site as a landfill. From a geologic/hydrogeologic perspective,
this site meets all requirements and has acceptable characteristics. This alternative site
contains several acres of wetlands and approximately 16,000 linear feet of jurisdictional
streams on site. Based on the size of landfill footprint that would be required to meet the
project goals (because there is no existing landfill adjacent that would allow vertical
expansion volume while reducing land requirements to create the total volume needed),
a majority of the jurisdictional areas on site would likely be impacted in some fashion.
Mitigation for both stream and wetland impacts would be limited due to the size of the
project because the project would consume the majority of the property. No threatened
or endangered species are located on site and ' only orie -species (Schweinitz's
sunflower), is located within one mile of the project site. .. No adverse effects are
expected to any threatened or endangered species if this site is utilized. Cultural
resources have the potential for being located on the site based on its proximity to water
and the topography of the area, and patterns of use in the area.
Based on the information contained above, this site would not be considered a viable
alternative. The limiting factors which limit the sites ability serve as a viable landfill site
candidate are: (1) jurisdictional impacts would be significant; (2) onsite mitigation
opportunities would be severely limited due to the area required for the project; (3)
access issues make utilizing this site unfavorable; (4) proximity to the local airport; and
(5) infrastructure improvements would be costly.
3.2.3 Alternative Location Three - Alternative three consists of a site that is located
approximately three miles south of NC 24/27 and approximately three miles southeast of
the city of Troy, NC (This site is adjacent to alternative two) (Figure 5). The property is
potentially available for purchase and is situated in a rural setting just south of the city
limits of Troy. This area is somewhat populated due to four small communities located
nearby (Caplise, Troy, Onvil, and Biscoe). Access to the site is considered poor due to
the absence of adequate access to primary highways. The primary access corridors
would most likely come through the cities of Troy and Biscoe. Other secondary roads
that access the site would likely have weight restrictions that preclude the use of those
corridors. Additionally, proximity to the local airport may preclude the use of this site.
FAA regulations potentially limit the placement of landfills within five miles of an airport.
New infrastructure would need to be constructed on this site (recycling facility,

soalehouse, lechate tanks, roads, etc. (cost: t$7,000,000)) to utilize the site as a landfill.
From a geologic/hydrogeologic perspective, this site meets all requirements and has
acceptable characteristics. This alternative site contains several acres of wetlands and
approximately 16,000 linear feet of jurisdictional streams on site. Based on the size of
landfill footprint that would be required to meet the project goals (because there is no
existing landfill adjacent that would allow vertical expansion volume while reducing land
requirements to create the total volume needed), a majority of the jurisdictional areas on
site would likely be impacted in some fashion. On-site mitigation for both stream and
wetland impacts would be limited due to the size of the project because the project
would consume the majority of the property. No threatened or endangered species are
located on site and only one species (Schweinitz's sunflower), is located within one mile
of the project site. No adverse effects are' expected to any threatened or endangered
species if this site is utilized. Cultural resources have the potential for being located on
the site based on its proximity to water and the topography of the area, and patterns of
use in the area.
Based on the information contained above, this site would not be considered a viable
alternative. The limiting factors which limit the sites ability serve as a viable landfill site
candidate are: (1) jurisdictional impacts- would be significant; (2) onsite mitigation
opportunities would be severely limited due to the area required for the project; (3)
access issues make utilizing this site unfavorable; (4) proximity to the local airport; and
(5) infrastructure improvements would be costly.
3.2.4 Alternative Location Four = Alternative four consist of four separate tracts that
adjoin the existing Uwharrie Environmental Landfill and`-Recycling 'Center property,
located on Landfill road, approximately one mile north of NC 24/27 and approximately 5
miles west of the city of Troy, NC (Figure 6). These properties are currently available
for use as a landfill, and are situated away from residential areas in the county. This
area is sparsely populated. Access to the site is considered excellent because the site
is within one mile of a primary highway system (NC 24/27), and the secondary road used
to access the site (Landfill Road) does.not have any weight restrictions. Additionally,
the infrastructure for the existing landfill can be utilized for an expansion if the expansion
is located here. From a geologic/hydrogeologic perspective, this site meets all
requirements and has acceptable characteristics. This alternative site contains
approximately 16 acres of wetlands and 12,000 linear feet of jurisdictional streams on
site. However, the proposed expansion would only impact approximately 8 acres of
wetlands (including previously permitted wetland impacts) and 2,300 linear feet of
streams. On-site mitigation for both stream and wetland impacts is feasible if this
location is selected.. No threatened or endangered species are located on site and only
one species (Schweinitz's sunflower), is located within one mile of the project site. No
adverse effects are expected to any threatened or endangered species if this site is
utilized. Cultural resources have been located on this site, but all areas of interest are
capable of being preserved in situ without affecting the expansion of the landfill site.
Based on the information contained above, this site would be the preferred alternative
because this site meets all of the conditions set forth by the applicant and avoids
impacts to all environmental resources to the greatest extent possible while maintaining
-the project's goals. Where impacts are unavoidable, the permittee has devised a
methodology to mitigate for those impacts in a way that is beneficial to the site and to the
surrounding environment.
6

3.2.5 No Action Alternative
A "No Action" alternative is considered to be one that avoids all wetland and surface
water impacts. Due to the constraints dictated by site topography and land-grading
requirements, this project cannot be down-sized or shifted to avoid all jurisdictional areas
and still satisfy project purpose and need. Additionally, due to the necessary area
needed for the landfill expansion and its attendant features, it would be extremely
difficult to locate a different site where no jurisdictional areas occur.
A "No Action" decision at this location would likely result in the closure of the Uwharrie
Environmental Landfill and the Recycling Center. The dissolution of the public/private
partnership between Montgomery County and Republic Services of North Carolina, Inc.,
and subsequent closure of the Uwharrie Environmental facility would place a severe
strain on the ability of other landfills in the area to absorb the inflow of expected waste
generated by the closure of the Uwharrie site. The "No Action" alternative is not capable
of. achieving the basic purpose and need of the proposed project and, therefore, cannot
be considered a reasonable alternative.
3.3 Minimization Alternatives
The project engineer has been working closely with the applicant and with ESI to
minimize stream and wetland impacts on the preferred alternative site. Due to regional
and local topography and earthwork necessary for site preparation, the proposed project
will impact jurisdictional wetlands and streams anywhere that it is placed on the subject
property- .`The-cdirentfy proposed site for the landfill expansion' and all'of the attendant
features utilize an area on the central portion of the site. The. streams in this portion of
the site appear to have been previously disturbed by agricultural activities. The northern
portion of the site generally contains streams and wetlands that are of a higher quality
than those proposed for impact.
Total stream channel impact as currently proposed is 2,735 linear feet. Approximately
14,008 linear feet of stream channel will remain undisturbed or will be used for
mitigation. The site plan has been moved and shifted as much as possible by the landfill
designer to minimize the amount of stream and wetland impacts. Further attempts to re-
configure the project layout would result in not meeting the projects purpose and needs.
An alternative resulting in reduction of the size of this project would not meet project
purpose and need. Optimal project size is based on development costs versus
projected revenues. Market research has determined the optimal project size, and a
reduction in size would jeopardize the economic viability of this project.
There are no reasonable on-site alternatives to the current site plan. Moving the
proposed construction to a different part of the site would also result in stream and
wetland impacts. Siting of the landfill expansion away from the current landfill would
require a much larger footprint to provide the same volumes" as an expansion plan
adjacent to the existing landfill (vertical expansion capabilities). In addition, the streams
on the northern portion of the property are generally of a higher quality than those on the
southern portion of the site, where some previous disturbance is evident. Steps to
minimize stream and wetland impacts have been taken where possible.

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
This section presents existing environmental conditions of the proposed project site and
discusses environmental impacts anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion site has been visited several times by ESI
personnel from January 1999 to the present in order to evaluate existing conditions and
to document physical and biological resources. Additionally, ESI personnel were
involved in the initial Section 404 Permitting on the original landfill site during 1992-93,
and are extremely familiar with the entire landfill project area.
The site is located near NC Highway 24127 approximately 5 miles west of Troy, NC.
Total size of the site is approximately 250 acres. The proposed expansion site has been
proposed in an area that is adjacent to the existing Uwharrie Environmental Landfill site,
which is in a highly disturbed state (Figure 7).
4.1 Physical Resources
4.1.1 Physiography, Topography, Geology, and Land Use
The study area is located within the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina.
The landscape is characterized by rolling hills with moderately steep slopes. Elevations
within the study area range from approximately 750 feet MSL in the southern portion of
the site to approximately 600 feet MSL near Rocky Creek (USGS Troy 7.5 Minute
Quadrangle, 1982) (Figure 7).
4.1,2 Regional'Geology"-
The crystalline rocks of the Piedmont Province occur in belt like distributions (Horton &
Zullo 1991). According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina, 1985, the Piedmont
province is divided into five distinct belts: (1) the "Inner Piedmont Chauga Belt", (2) the
"Charlotte and Milton Belts", (3) the "Carolina Slate Belt", (4) the "Raleigh Belt", and (5)
"Eastern Slate Belt". Montgomery County lies almost solely within the Carolina Slate
Belt. In the southern portion of the county, Triassic rocks, predominately shale and
Cretaceous sediments of the Tuscaloosa formation occur (Schipf 1961)
Rocks of the Carolina Slate Belt in the Albermarle-Troy-Asheboro Region are slightly
deformed and metamorphosed. The dominant structures are open folds plunging
southwest and regional metamorphism is chlorite or biotite grade (Horton & Zullo 1991).
4.1.3 Soils
There is currently no published soil survey for Montgomery County, although production
of one is under way. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has.
identified two non-hydric soil series which occur in the project study area: Herdon and
Georgeville. Both soils consist of well drained, moderately permeable soils that
originated in residuum weathered primarily from Carolina slate or other fine grained
rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Both soils generally occur on gently sloping to .
moderately steep areas. No hydric soil series have been identified in the vicinity of the
project area by the NRCS.
4.1.2 Water Resources
Two major cataloging systems are used in North Carolina to identify surface water
drainage areas: one developed by USGS and the other by DWQ. The project site is
located within USGS's hydrologic unit 03040104 (Seaber et al. 1987). The DWQ system
places the site in sub-basin 03-07-15 of the Yadkin River Basin and the Site Index
Number (SIN) is 13-25-30-(0.3)(DEM 1994) (DENR 2002).
The property contains several unnamed tributaries of Rocky Creek. These tributaries
consist of first order. streams that are intermittent to perennial in nature. The current
condition of the first order streams suggests that they are intermittent in nature. A total
of 16,743 linear feet of streams occur on the site including Rocky Creek (This does not
include approximately 1,580 linear feet of Rocky Creek where the applicant has control
of only one bank of the creek)(Table 1 - Appendix A). A total of 25.20 acres occur on
the site (Table 2 - Appendix A). The current site plan calls for filling of approximately
2,735 feet of stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands (including
previously permitted wetland impacts) to facilitate construction of the landfill expansion
(Figure 8).
Rocky Creek and its tributaries located on the project site are assigned best usage
classification of C. Class C waters are freshwaters protected for fishing, aquatic life
propagation and survival, wildlife, and secondary recreation, which includes wading,
boating, other uses not involving human body contact with water where such activities
take place on an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental basis.
Water quality is assessed by DWQ through several programs, including benthic macro=
invertebrate monitoring, fish community structure, and aquatic toxicity monitoring. Three
benthic macroinvertebrate stations were monitored in 1989 along Rocky Creek
downstream from the project site. Water quality was rated as "Good" to "Fair" and was
substantiated by the macroinvertebrate results (DENR 2002). Fish community structure
was sampled in Rocky Creek in 1996 resulting in a "Fair" rating (DENR 2002). Overall,
benthic macroinvertebrate and fish community structure indicated "Good" water quality in
Rocky Creek. However, both point and nonpoint source pollution contributed to a Poor"
bioclassification of the lower reaches of this stream (DENR 2002).
Water quality and pollution abatement are very important issues in the development of
this project. Measures are being undertaken to attenuate stormwater runoff. The
proposed project will include stormwater detention basins designed to handle
stormwater runoff from the project site. The stormwater management plan is being
developed by HHNT to comply with state stormwater rules and regulations. Best
management practices, including stringent erosion and sediment control measures, will
be implemented during construction to minimize impacts to downstream water quality.
4.2 Biological Resources
4.2.1 Plant Communities
Only two general plant communities have been identified within the project site: Mesic
Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) and Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest
(Schafale & Weakley 1990) and disturbed variants of the two communities. These plant
communities represent assemblages of plant species which vary according to soil type,
9
topographic position, past land use, and. level of human disturbance. Descriptions of
these communities are provided below. Scientific nomenclature is typically in
accordance with Radford et al. (1968).
4.2.1.1 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest - Mixed mesic hardwood forests are generally
found on slopes and well drained, small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This community
type is abundant on the project site, although logging and conversion to pine dominated
plantations have resulted in the loss of the pure form of this forest type. Dominant tree
species include: Yellow poplar (t_iriodendron tulipifera), Northern red oak (Quercus
rubra), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The shrub layer includes such species as red
maple (A. rubrum), dogwood (Corpus florida), and American holly (Ilex opaca).
Herbaceous species consist primarily of Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides)
and heart-leaf (Hexastylus arifolia).
4.2.1.2 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest - Piedmont/low mountain, alluvial
forests are found along small stream systems within the piedmont and low mountains.
Piedmont/low mountain alluvial forest is common on the project site. Dominant tree
species include: tulip poplar, red maple, and Northern red oak. Dominant shrubs include
American holly and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana). Herbaceous species include
Christmas fern and river oats (Chasmanthium latifolium).
The disturbed areas of both forest types have generally been converted to pine
dominated plantations during silvicultural operations over the past 30 years.
4.2.2 Wildlife
The location of the project site is in a generally rural setting in the central piedmont
between Troy and Albermarle. One benefit the site has is that its eastern boundary is in
close proximity to the Uwharrie National Forest, thus allowing for a very large natural
area for any on-site wildlife to utilize.
4.2.2.1 Terrestrial Wildlife
The project site is known to contain both game and non-game species. Resources used
to research species distributions and habitat requirements include text by Webster et al.
(1985); Simpson (1992); and Martof et al. (1980).
Game species known or expected to occur on-site include: white-tail deer (Odocoileus.
virginianus), wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), raccoon (Procyon lotor), eastern
cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), and grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). Non-game
species expected to occur on the site include: oppossum (Didelphis virginiana), smokey
shrew (Sorex fumeus), eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), and striped skunk (Mephitis
mephitis).
Additional avian species observed or expected to occur on-site include species
commonly occurring in forested and disturbed areas of the region. These species
include: common crow (Corpus brachyrhynchos), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), red-
tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), eastern screech owl (Otus asio), great horned owl
(Bubo virginianus), downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), pileated woodpecker
(Dryocopus pileatus), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), caroling chickadee (Parus
10
carolinensis), tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor), American robin (Turdus migratorius), and
northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis).
4.2.2.2 Aquatic Wildlife
Wildlife species associated with the areas in and around the aquatic ecosystem consist
primarily of salamanders and benthic macro-invertebrates inhabiting the areas in and
around the on-site streams. No specific studies were conducted for the purpose of
identifying or classifying the benthic macro-invertebrates.
4.3 Cultural Resources
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites,
structures, or artifact deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are
those sites that are eligible or potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places. Evaluations for cultural resources are required whenever a Section 404
permit application is submitted to ACOE. Evaluations of site significance are made with
reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (33 CFR 60) and in
consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO).
Mr. Scott Seibel, a Registered Professional Archaeologist with ESI, conducted a
preliminary cultural resources assessment to determine if any known cultural resources
are located on or in the vicinity of the project site, and to assess the potential of the
project site to contain significant cultural resources. Research was conducted at the
North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) and the World Wide Web site of the
National Park Service (NPS).
4.3.1 Executive Summary of Cultural Resource Evaluations
Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) conducted an intensive archaeological survey of the
proposed expansion of the Uwharrie Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSWL) facility in
Montgomery County, North Carolina to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (Seibel et al. 2001; NHPA 1966, as amended). This survey, which took
place during February and March 2001, resulted in the recording of 16 archaeological
sites, three of which (31MG1679/1679**, 1689, and 1690) are considered eligible for
listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). Previous
expansion areas were surveyed by ESI in 1992, 1993, and 1994 (Smith 1992, 1993,
1994). One of the archaeological sites (31MG1004) recorded during these earlier
surveys is also considered eligible for the National Register. All of the other
archaeological sites recorded during the aforementioned surveys were considered not
eligible for listing in the National Register and therefore do not require any additional
consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO).
Clearance for the proposed expansion was granted by the NC SHPO predicated on the
avoidance and preservation of sites 31 MF1004, 1679/1679**, 1689, and 1690. A plan to
preserve these four sites in place was submitted to the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office on November 26, 2001. Copies of the NC SHPO's correspondence
and a copy of the preservation plan for site 31M171004, 1679/1679**, 1689, and-1690 are
included in Appendix B.
11
4.4 Jurisdictional Issues
4.4.1 Wetlands and Surface Waters _
Within the project site, wetlands and surface waters are subject to jurisdictional
consideration under the Section 404 program as "Waters of the United States" (33 CFR
328.3). Jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters were delineated in November and
December 2000. The streams and wetlands were.surveyed and platted by Wright and
Fields. Land Surveying following delineation. The streams proposed for impacts were
reviewed by Ms. Angie Pennock of ACOE.- On-site streams comprise first and second
order channels. Figure 9 and 9a depicts the on-site jurisdictional surface waters and
wetlands. Approximately 2,450 feet of Rocky Creek also occur on the project site;
however only one road crossing is proposed for Rocky Creek. Additionally, Uwharrie
Environmental, Inc. controls both banks of Rocky Creek on only 2,450 feet of the total
4,030 feet of Rocky Creek adjacent to the property.
Stream characteristics were evaluated for use in classifying the streams according to
Rosgen (1996). The classification stratifies streams into comparable groups based on
pattern, dimension, profile, and substrate characteristics. Based on the site plan, a total
of 16,743 linear feet of stream channel occurs on the project site (Appendix C/also
Figure 8). Of this total, approximately 2,735 linear feet are proposed for impact by the
project. Of the 2,735 linear feet of impact, approximately 285 linear feet is impacted
through either the improvement of three existing stream crossings or the construction of
a new stream crossing across Rocky Creek (Appendix D). The remainder of the impacts
is attributed directly to the construction of the landfill expansion. Streams proposed for
impact on the subject property were characterized at Level I of the Rosgen hierarchy of
stream classification. Level one consists of the characterization of the stream into
particular types based on the dimension, pattern and profile of the. stream reach. Stream
classifications were performed on the streams proposed for impact by a team of
scientists led by -Mr. Paul Petitgout of ESI. Mr. Petitgout has completed all four levels of
the Rosgen courses as taught by Mr. Dave Rosgen of Wildland Hydrology, Inc.
The streams are labeled according to the flag sequence used during the delineation (i.e.
SEJ, SEK, SEL). Individual flag numbers are included with each stream label; however,
each location is not necessarily within an impact zone. The different locations merely
serve to give a more accurate description of the stream. channel as a whole.
Measurements of the streams proposed for impact were not collected for the Level
classification. Additionally, pebble counts and other substrate evaluations were not
conducted in the streams proposed for impact due to the. consistent nature of the
substrate. The substrate in these streams consists primarily of gravel and sand
producing a riffle-pool morphology in some sections and a step-pool morphology in other
sections. Some areas also contain head-cuts with boulders where small waterfalls have
formed. The steepness of the gradient in certain locations and the degraded nature of
the channels across most of the stream reaches proposed for impact made ascertaining
bankfull in the field extremely difficult. To verify the field estimation of bankfull, estimates
of cross-sectional area were compared to regional curves of drainage area versus cross-
sectional area Table 3 contains the characteristics of the streams proposed for impact.
12
Table 3. Classification of streams proposed for impacts.
Stream Locations
Parameter SEI SEJ SEK SEL SEM SBA SJA/
SJBc SJGc SJF` SPA" RCS
Channel G G G G1C G C G G G/C C B
Type a
Approx. 582 251 148 746 511 210 68 40 34 60 83
Im act b
a Rosgen Classification of Stream Type
b Impact amount in linear feet of channel
c Road Crossing Impacts
4.4.2 Stream Descriptions
Stream to be impacted by the -proposed landfill expansion activities were generally very
low quality first and second order streams that have been degraded over time by
agricultural and forestry activities over the last 20-50 years. A Rosgen classification of
the stream reaches proposed for impact would generally place these streams into a "G
Stream Type," which is characterized by a reach that is highly entrenched, a low
width/depth ratio and can be somewhat sinuous. These streams are generally referred
to as small "gullies." However, there are some short reaches of B and C Stream Types
intermingled with the G Stream Type.
4.4.3 Federal Protected Species
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially
Proposed (P) for such listing, receive protection under the Endangered Species Act of
1973 (16 US 1531 et seq.). The most recent list prepared by the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) is dated May 31, 2002. This list indicates that four endangered
species and three threatened species potentially occur in Montgomery County. These
species are:
Common Name
Bald Eagle
Eastern cougar
Red-cockaded woodpecker
Schweinitz% sunflower
Smooth coneflower
Scientific Name
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Fells concolor cougar
Picoides borealis
Helianthus schweinitzii
Echinacea laevigata
Federal Status
Ta
E
E
E
E
a - Proposed for delisting, but the bald eagle will remain protected under the Migratory
Bird Act (16 U.S.C 703-711) and Bald Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d).
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) records in Raleigh. NC
reveals that none of these federally listed species is known to occur on the project site or
within a one-mile radius (except for Schweinitz's sunflower). A literature search was
conducted by ESI to determine suitable habitat requirements for each of these species
and a survey for these habitat types was then conducted on the project site. A
13
description of these species, habitat preferences, and biological conclusions are
provided below.
Bald Eagle - The bald eagle is a large raptor with a wingspan greater than 6 feet. Adult
bald eagles are dark brown with white head and tail. Immature eagles are brown with
whitish mottling on their tail, belly, and wing linings. Bald eagles typically feed on fish
but may also take birds and small mammals. In the Carolinas, nesting season extends
from December through May (Potter et al. 1980).
Bald eagles typically nest in tail, living trees in a conspicuous location near water and
forage over large bodies of water with adjacent trees available for perching (Hamel
1992). Preventing disturbance activities within a primary zone extending 750 to 1500 ft
outward from a nest tree is considered critical for maintaining acceptable conditions for
eagles (USFWS 1987). USFWS recommends avoiding any disturbance activities,
including construction and tree-cutting, within this primary zone. Within a secondary
zone extending from the primary zone boundary out to a distance of 1 mile from a nest
tree, construction and land-clearing activities should be restricted to the non-nesting
period. USFWS also recommends avoiding alteration of natural shorelines where bald
eagles forage, and avoiding significant land-clearing activities within 1500 ft of roosting
sites.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect No impacts to bald eagle populations are
expected as a result of this project since no large bodies of water are in close
proximity to the project.
Eastern+Cougar - The eastern cougar is a possibly extinct eastern subspecies of the
widespread mountain lion species. This species was possibly extirpated from North
Carolina by the late 1800s, although recent sporadic sightings have been reported from
remote areas of the mountains and coastal plain (Lee 1987). Mountain lions are large,
long-tailed cats; adult males may measure 7 to 9 feet total length with females averaging
30 to 40 percent smaller (Handley 1991). Adult mountain lion tracks measure
approximately 3.5 inches (Lee 1987).
Recent specimens of mountain lion taken in North Carolina and elsewhere in other mid-
Atlantic states have proven to be individuals of other subspecies that have escaped or
been released from captivity. The eastern cougar requires large tracts of relatively
undisturbed habitat that support large populations of white-tailed deer (Webster et al.
1985):
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect. No impacts are expected to eastern
cougar populations since it is believed to be extirpated from North Carolina.
Red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) - This small woodpecker (7 to 8.5 inches long) has
a black head, prominent white cheek patch, and black-and-white barred back. Males
often have red markings (cockades) behind the eye, but the cockades may be absent or
difficult to see (Potter et aL 1980). Primary habitat consists of mature to over-mature
southern pine forests dominated by loblolly (Pinus taeda), long-leaf (Pinus palustris),
slash (Pinus elliotii), and pond (Pinus serotina) pines (Henry 1989). Primary nest sites
for RCWs include open pine stands greater than 60 years of age with little or no mid-
story development. Nest cavity trees tend to occur in clusters, which are referred to as
colonies (USFWS 1985). Foraging habitat is comprised of open pine or pine/mixed
14
hardwood stands 30 years of age or older. Pine flatwoods or pine-dominated savannas,
which have been maintained by frequent natural fires, serve as ideal nesting and
foraging sites for this woodpecker. Development of a thick understory may result in
abandonment of cavity trees. The woodpecker drills holes into the bark around the
cavity entrance, resulting in a shiny, resinous buildup around the entrance that allows for
easy detection of active nest trees (Henry 1989). No real potential nesting and foraging
habitat for this species is present within the project area. NHP records do not indicate
any occurrences of this species within 3.0 miles of the project area.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No impacts are expected to RCW nesting or
foraging habitat.
Schweinitz's Sunflower - Schweinitz's sunflower is an erect, un-branched,
rhizomatous, perennial herb that grows to approximately 6 feet in height. The stem may
be purple, usually pubescent, but sometimes nearly smooth. Leaves are sessile,
opposite on the lower stem but alternate above; in shape they are lanceolate and
average 5 to 10 times as long as wide. The leaves are rather thick and stiff, with a few
small serrations. The upper leaf surface is rough and the lower surface is usually
pubescent with soft white hairs. Schweinitz's sunflower blooms from late August to frost;
the yellow flower heads are about 0.6 inches in diameter. The current range of this
species is within 60 miles of. Charlotte, North Carolina, occurring on upland inter-stream
flats. or gentle slopes, in soils that are thin or clayey in texture. The species needs open
areas protected from shade or excessive competition, reminiscent of Piedmont prairies.
Disturbances such as fire maintenance or regular mowing help sustain preferred habitat
(USFWS 1994).
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No impacts are expected to Schweinitz's
sunflower, due to the lack of potential habitat on site.
Smooth coneflower - This species is a stiffly erect, rarely branched perennial that
grows up to 1.5 m (5 ft) tall. Basal and stem leaves are large, glabrous, lanceolate to
narrowly ovate blades reaching 15 cm (3 inches) in length. This coneflower blooms from
late May to July, producing solitary, purple, tubular or cone-shaped flowers (Kral 1983).
This species grows in calcareous, basic, or circumneutral soils on road sides, clear cuts,
and power line right-of-ways where there is abundant light and little herbaceous
competition. Fire-maintained woodlands also appear to provide potential habitat for the
coneflower. Shading of road sides by adjacent forest trees and routine mowing reduce
the suitability of road sides within the study corridor for this species. NHP records
indicate that this species has not been documented within 1.0 mile of the study site.
Disturbed areas in the site are regularly maintained, by mowing, providing little or no
opportunity for growing of this species. No specimens were noted during field surveys.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No impacts are expected to smooth
coneflower, due to the lack of potential habitat on site.
4.4.4 Federal Species of Concern
USFWS also tracks a category of species designated as "Federal species of concern"
(FSC). The FSC designation provides no federal protection under the ESA for the
species listed. Ten species with the FSC designation are listed for Montgomery County
15
pursuant to the June 16, 2000 list. NHP records do not document any of these species
on the project site or within a one-mile radius of the project site.
4.4.5 State-listed Species
Plant and animal species which are on the North Carolina state list as Endangered (E),
Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) receive limited protection under the North
Carolina Endangered Species Act (GS 113-331 et seq.) and the North Carolina Plant
Protection Act of 1979 (GS 106-202 et seq.). NHP records show that no state-listed E,T,
or SC species have been documented within a one-mile radius of the project site (with
the exception of Schweinitz's sunflower, which has been discussed above). This project
is not expected to adversely affect any known populations of state-listed species.
5.0 MITIGATIVE MEASURES
5.1 Mitigation Requirements
ACOE has a wetlands policy based on "no net loss" of function, and generally requires
mitigation to offset wetland impacts greater than 1/3 acre and stream channel impacts
greater than 500 linear feet. DWQ mitigation requirements are coordinated with ACOE.
The proposed Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion will result in unavoidable
impacts to 2,735 linear feet of stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
The majority of the impacted reaches are small, first and second order channels.
Mitigation will be required for the 2,735 linear feet of stream channel impact. Mitigation
will also be required'for 7.99 acre wetland impact. The:permittee therefore proposes to
mitigate for all unavoidable losses of streams and wetlands in accordance with guidance
received from the regulatory agencies.
5.2 Mitigation Site Search
The applicant has three options with regard to providing compensatory mitigation for the
proposed impacts. The first option is for the permittee to find suitable areas for stream
and wetland mitigation either on-site or nearby. The permittee would be responsible for
implementing and monitoring mitigation activities under this option. Onsite potential for
both stream. and wetland mitigation have been located and reviewed by the regulatory
agencies. However, wetland mitigation is not abundant on site and may not provide
enough wetland restoration to satisfy the minimum 1:1 ratio (wetland restoration to
wetland impact) required by the State.
The second option is to utilize the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) [formerly the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP)]. This program
allows the permittee to pay into a fund that goes toward wetland and stream restoration.
This payment to EEP serves as the permittee's required mitigation upon acceptance by
EEP. Informal communications with EEP have been completed regarding use of the
fund for this project. The EEP is active in the Yadkin/Pee Dee River basin and EEP
mitigation projects currently exist in the basin. The EEP has stated that it would be able
to provide wetland and/or stream mitigation for this project (based on acceptance by the
regulatory agencies).
16
The third option is for the permittee is to utilize portions of the first two options in order to
meet the compensatory mitigation requirements. Stream mitigation potential is located
on site and the permittee should be able to meet or exceed the stream mitigation
requirements. Wetland mitigation can also be accomplished on site. However, the
permittee may not be able to provide the 1:1 ratio (wetland restoration to wetland impact)
required to satisfy the State's mitigation requirements. The permittee would propose
purchasing wetland mitigation from the EEP to satisfy the State's mitigation
requirements while utilizing the remaining on-site wetlands and streams to satisfy the US
Army Corps of Engineers requirements. Onsite potential for both stream and wetland
mitigation have been located and reviewed by the regulatory agencies.
5.3 ' STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
The proposed Uwharrie Envioronmental Landfill expansion will result in unavoidable
impacts to 2,735 linear feet of stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
The majority of the impacted reaches are small, first and second order channels.
Mitigation will required for the 2,735 linear feet of stream channel impact. Mitigation will
also required for the 7.99 acres of wetland impact.
Potential mitigation for both jurisdictional wetland and stream impacts has been located
on-site for all of the unavoidable impacts associated with the expansion of the landfill, as
well as, the previous impacts permitted under the US Army Corps of Engineers
Nationwide Permit Program. Mitigation for the impacted wetlands will consist of wetland
restoration, wetland creation, wetland enhancement and wetland preservation. Stream
mitigation will consist of stream restoration and stream preservation.
Above, three options are listed. The following will detail the specifics of each of the
options in order to better understand the mitigation strategies proposed by the permittee.
5.3.1 Option 1
The first option is for the permittee to find suitable areas for stream and wetland
mitigation either on-site or nearby. The permittee would be responsible for implementing
and monitoring mitigation activities under this option. Onsite potential for both stream
and wetland mitigation have been located and reviewed by the regulatory agencies.
Specifically, on-site mitigation opportunities may provide as mush as 2,300 linear feet of
stream restoration. Associated with the stream restoration, approximately 6.0 acres of
wetland restoration will be provided through the implementation of a Priority. One stream
restoration. The Priority One stream restoration will aid in re-hydrating adjacent areas
by raising the base elevation of the stream to the elevation of the adjacent floodplain
instead of leaving the, stream in the current incised channel (approximately 3 feet deep).
The existing channel will be blocked or filled to prevent the stream from re-diverting into
the incised channel. The stream will be moved from the incised channel into remnants
of the channel that were abandoned due to channelization activities that occurred years
ago. This plan is thought to have a high probability of success due to the presence of
adjacent wetlands in all of the other sub-basins located on the property. Stream
restoration will follow the Natural Channel Design methodology (Rosgen 1996).
In addition to the stream. and wetland restoration, stream preservation will also be
provided. Approximately 11,708 linear feet of stream will be protected in perpetuity
17
r through either restrictive covenants or easements. This constitutes the remainder of the
linear footage of stream located on the site.
Additionally, along Stream and Wetland. System 3 (Appendix C), approximately. 6.15
acres of wetland enhancement will be conducted through the planting of overstory
species. Recent harvesting in the area has reduced the number and quality of overstory
species within this stream and wetland system. Species such as yellow poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), American elm (U/mus americana), green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana) will be planted to restore the
natural Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest (Shafale and Weakley 1990).
Finally, 8.44 acres of wetland preservation will be offered and protected in perpetuity
through either restrictive covenants or easements. This constitutes the remainder of the
wetland acreage located on the site.
Proposed Mitigation Ratios for the proposed mitigation is as follows.
Wetland Restoration: 2:1 ratio for 6.0 acres = 3 acres of mitigation
*fulfills 6.0 acres of restoration to satisfy the State 1:1 ratio requirement.
Wetland Enhancement: 4:1 ratio for 6.15 acres = 1.53 acres of mitigation
Wetland Preservation: 6:1 ratio for 10.62 acres = 1.77 acres of mitigation
6.3 acres of mitigation can be satisfied on site, requiring the permittee to
purchase 2.0 acres of mitigation from the EEP. This will also satisfy the State's
minimum 1:1 ratio requirement.
Since there is not enough wetland restoration to satisfy the minimum 1:1 ratio (wetland
restoration to wetland impact) required by the State. The permittee would propose to
use the EEP to satisfy the remainder of the wetland restoration required to meet the
State requirements.
The entire on-site wetland and stream mitigation plan will be discussed fully in an
addendum to this Environmental Assessment document.
5.3.2 Option 2
The second option is to utilize the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) [formerly the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP)]. This program .
allows the permittee to pay into a fund that goes toward wetland and stream restoration.
This payment to EEP serves as the permittee's required mitigation upon acceptance by
EEP. Informal communications with EEP have been completed regarding use of the
fund for this project. The EEP is active in the Yadkin/Pee Dee River basin and EEP
mitigation projects currently exist in the basin. The EEP has stated that it would be able
to provide wetland and/or stream mitigation for this project (based on acceptance by the
US Army Corps of Engineers and the NC Division of Water Quality).
Proposed Mitigation utilizing the EEP as the sole source of mitigation is as follows.
7.99 acres X $24,000 = $191,760
18
2,735 Linear Feet X $200/If = $547,000
Total Mitigation purchase: $738,760
The permittee would propose to reduce the dependence on the EEP, by allowing the
EEP to provide only the wetland mitigation portion at a cost of $191,760 and protecting
all of the linear footage of stream remaining on site in perpetuity (14,008 linear feet of
stream preservation) in order to offset the impacts to stream systems on site. This
would reduce the cost of mitigation paid to the EEP (Total $191,760). Additionally, all of.
the wetlands on site would be protected in order to enhance the adjacent protected
streams.
5.3.3 Option 3
Option 3 could take many forms, but would basically rework components of the first two
options in order to meet the expectations of the regulatory community.
6.0 CONCLUSION
6.1 Proposed Project Benefits
Landfill expansion planning has begun on the proposed Uwharrie Environmental Landfill
located in Montgomery County, North Carolina on approximately 250 acres located near
NC 24/27. The development of this landfill expansion will extend the capability of this
facility to receive and dispose of municipal solid waste for approximately the next 20
years. At current Usage-levels, the existing landfill will reach its capacity soon:- Planning
has begun to expand the landfill to extend its useful life and, to ensure a viable, safe
disposal service for the facility service area. Without this expansion, the Uwharrie
Environmental Landfill and Recycling Center will be forced to close, placing a burden on
those that reside in Montgomery and surrounding counties.
6.2 Summary of Environmental Impacts
Proposed environmental impacts will consist of approximately 2,735 linear feet of first
and second order, stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
Approximately 14,008 linear feet of stream channel will not be disturbed as a result of
this proposed project. A stormwater management plan will be developed for this site as
a - part of the solid waste permitting requirements and will include detention basins
designed to protect water quality for receiving waters. No hazardous material issues
have been identified that preclude the intended development and use of the property.
The proposed Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion is not expected to adversely
affect any known significant archaeological or cultural resources. Additionally, this
project. is not expected to adversely affect known populations of federally protected
species, federal species of concern, or state-listed species. Wildlife displaced from the
project area do not represent populations of rare or unique species.
An evaluation of alternatives meeting project purpose and need shows that Section 404
jurisdictional areas can not be avoided. Alternate sites that would provide all .the
necessary components for this project are not currently available based upon alternate
site search results. The proposed project will result in unavoidable impacts to 2,239
linear feet of stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Compensatory
19
mitigation is proposed for unavoidable stream channel and wetland impacts. Mitigation
alternatives have been identified and conceptual mitigation plans have been developed
that provide for the replacement of impacted resources.
7.0 REFERENCES
Amoroso, J.L. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North
Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NC Department of Environment, and Natural Resources, Raleigh.
85 pp.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 1994. Basinwide Assessment Report: French Broad
River Basin. NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Raleigh, NC. 198 pp.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 1998. Basinwide Assessment Report: French Broad
River Basin. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
NC. 203 pp.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 2000. Basinwide Water Quality Plan: Yadkin River.
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC. XXX pp.
Hamel, P.B. 1992. Land Manager's Guide to the Birds of the South. The Nature
Conservancy, Southeastern Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 437 pp.
Handley, C.O., Jr. 1991. Mammals-. . Pp. 539-616 in: K. Terwilliger (ed.). Virginia`s - -
Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium. The McDonald and
Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, VA. 672 pp.
Horton, J.W. and V.A. Zullo. 1991. The Geology of the Carolinas. The University of
Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN. 406 pp.
Lee, D.S. 1987. Felis concolor True, Panther. Endangered, Threatened, and Rare
Fauna of North Carolina: Part I. A Re-evaluation of the Mammals. Occasional
Papers of the North Carolina Biological Survey 1987-3. 52 pp.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians and
Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. The University of North Carolina Press,
Chapel Hill, NC. 264 pp.
Massey, J.R., D.K.S. Otte, T.A. Atkinson, and R.D. Whetstone. 1983. An Atlas and
Illustrated Guide to the Threatened and Endangered Vascular Plants of the
Mountains of North Carolina and Virginia. Southeastern Forest Experiment
Station, Asheville, North Carolina. 218 pp.
Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb's Wildflower .Guide. Little, Brown, and Company,
Boston, MA. 490 pp.
Palmer, W.M. and A.L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. The University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 412 pp.
20
Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell, and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 408 pp.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Inc., Pogosa
Springs, CO. 365 pp.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation; NC Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC. 325 pp.
Seaber, P.R., F.P. Kapinos and G.L. Knapp. 1987. Hydrologic Unit Maps. US
Geological Survey - Supply Paper 2294.
Seibel, S., G. Di Gregorio, and G.S. Smith. 2001. An'Intensive Cultural Resource
Assessment Survey of the Uwharrie MSWL Expansion, Montgomery County,
North Carolina. Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.
Simpson, M.B. 1992. Birds of the Blue Ridge Mountains. The University of North
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 354 pp.
Smith, G.S. 1994. Addendum to A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey for the
- - -- - -
- Proposed Expansion of 'the - Montgomery County Landfill, Montgomery County,—
North Carolina. Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.
Smith, G.S. 1993. Addendum to A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey for the
Proposed Expansion of the Montgomery County Landfill, Montgomery County,
North Carolina. Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.
Smith, G.S. 1992. A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey for the Proposed
Expansion of the Montgomery County Landfill, Montgomery County, North
Carolina. Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1997. Natural Resources
Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Haywood County, North Carolina. 276 pp.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Habitat Management
Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region. U.S. Department of the
Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 8 pp.
USFWS. 16 June 2000. _ Update of Protected Species Lists for Counties of NC. Web
Address: http://nc-es.fws.gov.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). Troy, NC 7.5-Minute Quadrangle.
Webster,- W.D., J.F. Parnell, and W.C. Biggs, Jr. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas,
Virginia, and Maryland. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
255 pp.
21
Ur y

•
` C 1? / Sir ? ??`Y ?????
'
,? ? ??? ?J~
1,
- ?F
??
v ?.f4 Approximate
/jf J
a
1 t } ,- IrF
`' Project location
.

r•" .hS?'?T' o C ??• 1/+7S .. - '??~r? ` ..? •r//_Z o. ?f?.t'. <.; e.;?r LS,

4 i 1 n
Lei a
?
°'31
? ^ (' u? y? rli
,?
i
e
y 1
?L;l
rrr?
.?
-`" `, ,
' '? t
^ ?f °?1 •
'
? `vim` t
?
%?
?'
?

t
+
f ?
:? , ?
}
°
$
144
?
_.
4.., ?
?
`
?
L?Xj
?1pnO ( ? ?D ? ? ? ?1( .y ? aN
!. ti ? tp
?R y I? /)) ,77 1
' ? m ? ? ? cam- ?6 J •? C`?r ?`- •' < ?r c ` t `'1 rf ? ?--_? '='??. ??
5 r ?J C t ?. r U
n.M.. ? ?''t +?' ? t tf ? i, ? ? ? ,? ? ? 451 _? -.,1,?,• ,? r? ? .,°? ?,_ , ???
;oaf: h \, .,z?r ?
tr
•
z
'`'
%a
°f?:i L ? -
-
'
f
•.
-,? s S-
- - ?`
?n 1 :?
`-
.. a? - lit'
_ ?1G?[ V JJ
0 1 2 3 Miles
1 2 4 glometers
Sauce: USGS 1:100,000, Southem Pules, NC
30• X 60• Topographic Series
General Location Map Figure: 1
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Inc. Project: ET01006.01
Services
,
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: March 2004
i 1 L ;` 7 ' ` so !" ( ?1 \! I r f?? ! } 7? I f / C\?F r ---? / 4
.? r ? / ??? ?? ? ? 4 i ? ire ? 1 _ -??{ ?',? ?? ?/ ? ? ?? ? ? i (?_
\ -i + V? l ? o'-\ ? ??? r 1 ? ?? ? s / ?? i a' t rm`I t ?? ? :nr
t it '6 t ?v,rJ 1t
?6g;, X 4
%'• ? ,,, , 1 ,..,? 1, ;' \ .,? ? //? ,.
17', 77- 77?
U A J f r- ' ? f /f J- ? ? /
:Gnu ?:J '?' t O?f? _I? ?/`', ?t . ??.1? ?i1,) ft?7??'`',," ,,.irro f,•? `",?1 '!'\? r - `
!. '){ {?y5 ''?? l 1
,665 A
/., I r\\ ?'- .1?? ?, '•.: ?, ?) il/` r .tv ll?.•_'f:lkr? ^?? .?-?\??nf? ?\?/? i? ?i l1})•? 1, 'I('- i r ? ?`??C ?--
,
,1 ,+? , ? ?( t ti-? , l??1? /,??4 .tt,? 1 ? v_-?e, 1. v? // _ ?- t ( ?•--?f .. . ?', ? i,Y f??X/ )\ 1, t ?? ? ? ?i ?r' c. ,? 1 r r ': i ili
M s ". ? •')? ? ti,?? f? ? y ?`` ? ?? . i ? ? l ?il?s???(?l t? ? -? 1`yZ?. ?`lC` ,-5r / . ??f
l r, - 1 r ?'`?; ?•' ti ?SS{ .fin L?l J l*?? :? j 4??4?. \ \
41 1
} C? f , 7 11, o a, /
, I, S???1?? t ??? ?ir?_ ., ?l ? ?; ' . ?•hC1r1 ??'? ? ? I?`?J t ? f ?/ \' ? 17 L _ 1 ? ??`
? ''n ?? 7S[ if t J ? 1 ?;? ? 1 ?? / ' ?} ! ?' 1? •J i I - ? ( ? ?f / 1 ) J ` t
? (t= ;'.."1 1 1? • ?I ? ??t -J7f` 1 ) 1 ??\ ??? ? 7 1??,?,'? rl r ? '?IIF?.=?'?-_ /? ? `"^ -"`? a?J ? )1???1 i ??, ?? j? ,? Cr
?? ? 1 l; ? ?l?,i? `? i ? ? f.. ,?-' •% i /?.?'i' ?+t>r ??v s j?C?'??L?) ? ?`1 ? 1 `?I ??• \.J ? ? /
'lit
1)//?? 'ttl} 1\? ` 1 ,-',i ? -? 1?--? ? ? ?? ? ?'^?'? ? ? \?1?t ?1 ?Ilt' ? ?? ?_ r-?f ?i / ??• o
i r; Ci ; / ? ' :' r C? + ?-,.i•-•.J , ? '' ll ^' ? ?-.? f ? , ? {•
????./' ?ij ???? ? ?i IC? ?/jr? / ',?? ?? ? ii ` ?? 1`` `?'•??, f? p i 37 ?J 1 ~ } ?+ ' S',?.-? /l? xt??(? ? Jul
?` ? ,'/t; i ?' `( rr f \_`i f ? ??:., l J'•-- 1 IJ ? `yi'`? /'' 1? r !'•? \ ? ?l_7.+ n. - •c-- ti- ?i?l
x,.`J11?-
0 0.25 0.50 MI
0 0.25 0.50 Km
Source: USGS 1:24,000, Troy
Quadrangle. 1982
General Location Map Figure: 7
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Project: ETO1006.01
Date: March 2004
0 0.25 0.50 MI
0.25 0.50 Km
Source: USGS 1:24,000, Troy, NC
Quadrangle, 1982.
i
General Location Map Fire' 2
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Project: ETO1006.01
Date: March 2004
L
_..
is
L—oadNticlpj,

\7 , I t7?e ` ,az 1 ?r
1
I ? ? r i t i tar ? \'\?, O
? J ? 0 1 ? o? ?uoo
1L ? I , I [ ,1 O
u 1377 I Nk,k I "'1767 , p
a 1349
UOFNS ° I 1 1361 2, m
`l MOUNTAIN , Ii:Fr s
az ? v, n u y ,s,s 1378
? , q J i i wet ? ,1
p07 ?, love
7 I , t
e1N0tE U70 1715 f54 I .383
p F F MOOMT G I , ,
I ,se I
as ' am
UMARRIE 1167 716 i
1
YYILDLI a o6..mr . s° .
y 11" r 1713
v
O O
? O O
O L
..}. 0 1.0 2.0 mien
' .o z.o o Im
rt Source: Montgomery C-n* Road Map,
AREA I i I ` NCDOL 2003
\ y p & 13- r a 1377 v M- `
i
' t
MOUNTAIN O Atemative Site 4 130
Altemative Site 2 '
,. I
UOUNTM
„M ! ••?'_
MSCOE 4 ?
ItR V :.? ° / •-'f J a y 70tlWMIQ •?
? tfa t r ? ? ' !
113 ++ "? , 1
OBtlS
o MOUTMN r
,,,, IIII_ _ „W, to + ,
- IIII=IIII= a : ' an 1567A 1 y
N T I ONA L -IIII
\ War
a NORSE Altemative Site 3 RrvaR TROUGH 2! , ,SM
0 MOUNTAIN A f AOj / I ?' t, ? '1
04 ` 1? 1%0
ita u % 1574 1l41 ? e
~ID? -
0 1134
:a
'e ? tie 1546
r 1 • 1§?0 ?' L 1 12
t, / / f
a rr K+? ` y?
tt i
It 1 x e , r 161! 1UI
Its 1. J
SISTER ar ,? G1700A
MOU AIN 1132 ++3+ V ,/ C
4 a n 1171 1?1 llll J ,. 14N a ?7
?®? ? ? L lea ? ? ? ? G
m, eta • T sr
gi a +? , u
Altemative Site 1 ISO*
Lelbe ,,: IwOr , , , 1547 z
117 ,tom 1611
Y n1 . a i t7a,r• r
21
1 H "a ? "-!Q "` f O R E S T °? s
i. -
, y
1t 7s
1 ?° ,116 •1i ' ' 1527
C
O V
(/v? o
?w C)
r-
OOZ
-
>EU
C
C0(D
Q ul 0rn
W }
,E c
po
L?
C yy?
Wcon
r
v
0 °o
o
C
O
2.0 Ln-Aft 41 R M."]
oad
c
0
cc
TO
wC3
_U
mop
moo
U
C:o?
Qw o
m
m}
? G
?s
O yy'
W rA

.
:A
Previously Surveyed ` ,???,x''ilJ
(Smith, 1992,1994)
;,' }Ij, `a !rte%% ?{ )?i' `;?`? i(1 .f ';' • ;??''. 14 Proposed Project Limits
Scale ,? ..•?"t j; 1 ? : ?)_ J; i _ 1 / ?q4'd
O 025 0.50 Mi
O 0.25 0.50 Km Vi 5 Quadrangle, 1 94 Troy I
;_ r)
r
N Y;r 31.E??a .. ?tt 7 ?; / `'• ?tliZ???k//' !„ / t ?`: )' ?/ i a•
_..h'?.Nz ;s..<,
-1 1 ..'';:L=5, ?._ ?, . - ;,ia? ?.1a ?/ n/'1 ! •--`u/J r, _ ..,? ,. I tt i ! \?t ,. r_?j? '... .:
Figure: 1
Environmental Site Map
w - Uwharrie MSW Landfill Project: ER00-066
Services, Inc. Troy, Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: November 2000
APPENDIX C
8.5" x 11" Site Plan Sheets Depicting the Grading Plan
and Impacts Within the Proposed Expansion Area
-ni no6Aocation.dwa
C-3C.- Q-3-
CD

M

e?

uM w
uc
a+.c
a-.cs

.., 1 Q 1
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-1
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
ETO1006/locationAm
Match Line Sheet 2A

M
a?
a?
s
In
a)
c
J
t
U
O

Ninety (90) percent of the.-.elevations-determined-from the solid line contours of this topographic nap hasan° ^ -- t=" '- '
accuracy with respect to true elevation of one-half (1/2) contour Interval or better and the remaining ten (IO)
percent of such elevations are not In error by more than one contour Interval. In densely wooded areas
where heavy brush or tree cover fully obscures the ground, the contours are shown as dashed lines. They
have been plotted as accurately as possible from the sterescopic model, while making full use of spot
elevations obtained during ground control surveys and spot elevations measured photogrammetrically In
places where the ground Is visible.
This map was compiled by BEI Aerial Mapping, using photogrammetric methods. Contours portrayed as
dashed or broken lines represent areas of dense vegetation and should be considered approximate. This map
has not been field verified. Prior to use as a basis for design and/or construction, it should be field verified.
MAP COMPILED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF TERRY L. BECKON, PLS pL-4209
THIS MAP COMPLIES VITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
AND THOSE STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY & REMOTE SENSING
E 1708000 E 1708500 E 1709000 E 1709500
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-1A
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
rTnan^annn.}inn A-
Match Line Sheet 3A
w'
x
b
/ ? \ 692
42.
3
l

+ + Strearn Crossing 1

6 7
WETLAND STREAM m
N
SYSTEM 4
f
l C
J

+ + 9
3 JURISDICTIONAL
653 0
.
x 68a+ WETLANDS TYP.
x

\ S 678.5

x
+ _.. _ . , +..... .. 79 s.
680.8
m

7
{- -1- + ' +' J C
TR'EAM TYP. f

WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 3 ,,.

Proposed Expansion Area Figure: G2A
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: X01006
Environmental
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

`' V l y 63

x 67 sun % 635.08 613.39 60.9-7' 62951
MW

611.2
675 76WETLAND/STREAM
SYSTEM 5
7

?92 6
8.
688 1 6
Ll 65. 7 -
68 \\
683.58
689. 0
67
679. 675.12 6770 674.53
URISDICTIONAL 676.93 Stream Cros
WETLANDS (TYP.) - 677.4
?? 678.
? in
m
M
?
677.06 a>
al.

677.2
J
J
X1
1
l`
/ 667.
'.'.520 44'.
'.
6591 ,? \

TR
N 671
?•
SE
DE
679, 2 _,
665 7 7213 Tj

9
/
69L
?
rn
4 693
JVA Match Line Sheet 2A
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-3A
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: Ero1006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
=rninnnAnratinn riwn

-W A
/,A re
""" Match Line Sheet 2B
'? "?• ?• ? J?? 695:95•..

..::. . .. . ...
•
-
%
7
? '::??'?"? ::.:?\',, ??+•? . .

...
737.2 -f- 25
?. ?.
¦ a 4b1
Q
...
39.41
724,
?
a?
L 40.4
•?\ in
J
L
+V
733k?
r O
?
+ +
WETLAND/STREAM
SYSTEM- . 2._ . _
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 1
E 1710000 E 1710500 E 1711000 E 17111500
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: G1B
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
C I V ? vv?n w..w,......... y
Match. Line Sheet 36 • •?• /
1 .: •
?
.
? (((?r
JURISDICTIONAL ';; .•' 1\? --_
)
1•;•'?
?'::'
'
REAM TYP
.
;
..
.
:.....
ST
t
/
f •
f
'
?
642
1 :
I
* •
'
?.-
1l,, f :....:
???1 .' • ( ?'' ..?.:.? /N 581000

N :.:..
LVn)
%
K
- 7
-: .....
.r 111 ``
4
...
.S
....{1}PACTED..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.. ..
M-A

p.:'.'.'. '

:.z3T86 . ' ' ' .... .

'.'737 .. ... \ •,•o : q
01

Match Line Sheet 1 B "• " • -?^ '. .. :.'.6..
Figure: G2B
Proposed Expansion Area
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: E701006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
IUw,,?. ... ......a
619.2
4
,
61688
3
+61`/.5 -
1 617.96 61? 8

/617.4 ,

35
61 440 4
4
REES
E
DENS
F
17
435
/ .12
648. 64

?
(n
-

4
// _
651.
_
c (
.636.7 61L244
x 64 ?
' U
M
t
U
O _665.4
7 i / /
// / J Q)
N

63 1
q,
^? v

651.83
651.80
643.46
cn
in #2 / / s d
/
/ 655.7 '
/ 655 I '+'

s a

\ •64
5.15
` r?
. +
• 91 l
610.

?h " " `S1f0
`• 61000
•?' •?'
.
'.
.
.
.
..
+
cu
'
Match . .'.
Line Sheet 26 ?
Figure: C-36
Proposed Expansion Area
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: Er01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
a_
crninnRAnratinn dwn
r. .'. .:.".:.':: Match Line Sheet
6 :.
.......
....::
.:.' :::
:
:........?5.?......'
?: ? ??? .. ? ......_..:.. ? .. ? .fir;
a?
C
n
X,

?....,..?. y.,.. .... .....
:.......
... - .'•655:0 45b? 6.'..' :' f ..?
' J ' ' '•'b58:t1 '?.. .
..... : .#:.:....
G
E 1712000 E 1712500
Err
I?Z
?3 15 041
N-V
J ?? 36 5.4???\ v ?? \\
I?
E E
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-1c
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

Match Line Sheet 3C
TREES 88'.
"
? ?JURISDICTIO AL \ o
WETLANDS TYP. i.
\ 22-
ASIN NO
\ .
.

T
? `j
Et7SE S ?

Q'.

M Q 0

U
N
=

746. N

t
Cf)
V
J
U 7? :

t?
.'.•?9'•

45.
\
Z65

?
.. ... .... .. . ....:... ...
32.78 R73
_. r......' .... •- - 743.89
.......... ... .731.

.. ........

...

-694.71
4
?? _ x¢23.44
....
'
%
.
ou . 3

.. 9
q • 0
• 690.

9

. .686: ...:.. .. .. ... ... .... - '. ... '
..' ..... .?.. .: .': ...:...: .' . ". .'
Match Line Sheet 1
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-2C
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
C J U I UV UJ I-Lw. I.-U
E 1712000

651.96
6 .

M
N
N
L
U)
M
? N
C
N
N
L
V) - J

U
U
C
.J O
:2
L

E 172000 E 172500 E 173000 E 171350

r6
0
.643.
644 69.41 w 649 37? 6

DENS SS
It E 7135
IM U Match Line Sheet 2
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-sc
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Environmental
?. Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
= I U1 UU0/1"CILw1 i.Uwy
Match Line Sheet D

SE?T ?P::
7 " ME
/11 V
W/ M21-11

?All.
INV
/
l 1
l
I
)
?

W

N /
/
IIl
i/ ? IIIN I
l
?

77
R

E 17L4000 E 1714500 E 1715000 co
X47 S
l
PR J.
SC L
DA E
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-1 D
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: E701006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
ninnnAncatinn rlwn
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-2D
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
=To1 oo6pocawn.awg
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Proposed Expansion Area
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Figure: C-3D
Project: ET01006
Date: Dec 2003,

Match Line Sheet 2E
0
CD
L
N
C
J
L
U
O '
INITIAL GRADING PLAN
FACILITY PLANS -- COMPLETED SITE
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL -
UBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
8c. TRIBBLE, INC.
S LTING ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 265
743-7175 MACON, GEORGIA 31201
J. N0. 1001-303-01 DWG. UWHX2-WET EDIT 2-23-04
L 1 " = 300' SHEET 1 of 1

E FEBRUARY, 2004

Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-1E
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc.. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
E701006Aocation.dwa

I/ Match Line Sheet 3
I
A

l N SB1004-
0
N
N
N
L
V

'
N
Project Area
L

U
...... ... ....
O
" -
Pond Area
:;:•:•: ;: Wetland Enhancement Area
•; ;.;:;•;•;•; (Stream Preservation)
Wetland/Stream Impact
Area
Wetland/Stream
Preservation Area
Wetland/Stream
Restoration Area
Stream Crossings

1
M h Line Sheet
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-2E
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
GTM nnRAnnntinn. rlwn
V 14
DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY, 12/20/2000
DATE ?F SUBMITTAL: 1/18/2001
CONTOUR INTERVALi TWO (2) FEET
HORIZONTAL DATUM, LOCAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
VERTICAL DATUM, NAVDB8
N
N
This topographic base map was produced by BEI Aerial Mapping, Peachtree City, Georgia

for Hodges, Harbin, Newberry & Tribble, Inc.
of the Uwharrie Regional MSWLF, Montgomery County, North Carolina
r HHNT PROJECT # 1001-102-01
o BEI PROJECT # 1001206
UPDATED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
FROM DECEMBER 23, 2002 RECEIVED
FROM BEI AERIAL MAPPING
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
55( 0 E 1716000
N 5820*
STREAM SYSTEM 6
ETLAND
/
W
N 5815*
Match Line Sheet 2L
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-3E
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
APPENDIX D
Plan, Profile, and Cross Section Views of the 4 Stream Crossings
DELINEATED
WETLANDS (TYP.)
1
72" HEADWALL
85 L.F. 72" INV.=626,00
CMP AND 36/ 36 HEADWALL
CMP INV.=628.00
72 HEADWALL" I p
INV.=629.00
36" HEADWALL,
INV. =631.00
.62 ,58
LEGEND £
P
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR 640
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
CENTERLINE OF ROAD -
EDGE OF WETLANDS T...<.. ..?,....,w? ?..?.,. 't
CENTERLINE OF STREAM ----- _626.3
PROPOSED PIPE n.,PROPOSED HEADWALL
0 50 100
i
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
o /
Iz-
GRADING PLAN - STREAM CROSSING NO. 1
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
FM
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
mmommr emm" NORM Cma"
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 285
478 743-7175 MACON GEORGIA 31201
j.... PROD. NO. 1001-340-01 DWM STRi-G EDIT 11-12-02
SCALE 1. 50' SHEET 1 OF 1
DATE NOVEMBER, 2002

STRUCTU AL

640 640

630
630

620 620

A ND 36" CMP 2 OF 72
X-?FyqT
NI('. GROUND
F STREAM

SECTION A
1"=100' HOR., 1"=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL.
STREAM CROSSING #1
STR1-P
ti-72-CZ

660 660

0
S
640 BASE
ROAD 640

STREAM E EVATION
Fa AT INVERT
620 72" CMP-1 2" 620
36" CMP-TOP BURIED
OF IPE LEVEL
WITF I 7211

600 600

STREAM CROSSING #1 LOOKING EAST AT INLET
1"=100' HOR., 1"=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL

J

t=j
STREAM
r) LEA/El
IN TW -7>"
STREAM CROSSING #1 LOOKING WEST AT OUTLET
1"=100' HOR., 1"=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
- .. X-5ECT7

660 Q 660

6" STONE
640 64 0

620 620
2" CMP-12"
BURIED

600 600

L_ ?

L 30 L 133HS zooz '213eMON 3Lra
'` 3w*3S
1g33 NI 31VOS OIHdV O r
zozir I lim 3vvi OMa to-ora-toot *ON •road ` 1-IVMGV3H 03SOdOdd
tozta V r )w Noovw 9uc-art 9ur
99Z •3LS - US AHMSI 1W rBr SMNION3 ONILIMNOO
'ONI '31881211 V 00 L OS 0 3dld 03SOdO2Jd
,k8838M3N 'N188VH 'S3000H I WH3211S 30 3NIld31N30
vwnm t ym UmmANNIOMIM SONV i3M 3O 3003
Oll 'dNIl021b'O HIMON 30 SMIAUM Onend38 I -?? - GMJ 30 3NI-1831N30
mu an01N00 Z 03SOdMid
TUONb'1 MSW lYNO1038 31NNvHmn 01v9 dnIOiNOO O L (13SOd0?Jd
Z 'ON ONSSOW W103SLS - NVtd ONnM dnO1NOO Z ONIISIX3
-VO'SL9='ANI
TVMOd3H

2jnOlNOO O L ONIISIX3
aN?511?
•
- -------------
OZg('d)ll) SONYl13M
N O31V3NI-13G

I-

----? d W0
.90L '3'l 96
1
00'9 L9=*ANI
l3b'M0V3 H
a '•
o.X
LO

?J
I

STRUCTU RAL

630 630

620 620

610 610

VIP OF STR EAM

SECTION A
1"=100' HOR., 1"=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #2

TRt-P
ii-73-02
650 650
o
6" STONE c? -W? BASE 630 630
SI&Q0 All INVERT
610
610
108" CMP 12"
590. 590
STREAM CROSSING #2 LOOKING EAST AT INLET
1"=100' HOR., 1"=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL.

11-SECT2
11-18-D2

650 650
c

a

630 C" STONE
ROAD BASE 630

STREA M ELEVATION
610 = . 61 0
„ "
BURIED

590 590

STREAM CROSSING #2 LOOKING WEST AT INLET
1"=100' HOR., 1"=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
X-SECT2 I
11 18 -l
\ \ \ \ ENSE 7?REES - _
\ \ ' ? \ \ HEADWALL `'`? -? -- - ?-- --- ? ?' \ -?
\ \ \ ?\ NV.=556.50 \
(3) 9"x9' CON
\', \ \ \ \ \BOX CULVERTSCRETE .
\ F. LEGEND
XISTING 10' CONTOUR 560 -- ? ?O \
XISTING 2 CONTOUR \\ HEADWALL- \
'ROPOSED 10' CONTOUR-560- \ '\\\\ IW.=557.50
'ROPOSED 2' CONTOUR \\ \ \\? \ \
.ENTERLINE OF ROAD
AGE OF WETLANDS \ \\ \ \X NOTE. TOPO INFORMATION TAKEN
TREAM BOUNDARIES \ \\ \ \ FROM EI DATED MAPPING COMPLLEE E-D
BY 12
-
20 2000
'ROPOSED CULVERT `\\ \ \\ \\
ROPOSED HEADWALL , \ ?\ \ GRADING PLAN - =CROSSING NO.3 - ROCKY CRUX
XISTING TREELINE \ UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
?` ?? \\\ \? REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
' ? \ \\ NaNrcaERr COtMiY. NQtAi cAAnawA
I \\ .`?
50 HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
0
100 \\ ,? & TRIBBLE, INC.
CONSULTBIG ENOWEER6 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 286
MOd N0 m1001-340-01 DWG. SYR3-01 IM 12-19-02
' GRAPHIC SCALE I FEET ?\ 6cALE 1• soy
SHEET DECEMBER, 2002 1 OF 4
\\
f'

580 580
PROPOS GRADE
570
560 560
M
EAC
5
50 - 550 BOX Q BURIED
540 540
530 530
PROFILE VIEW
1 *-50' HOR., 1 "=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #3
iNg- P. SHEET 2 OF 4
. )
STR
5 LOOKING
F AT INLET
1 *-50' HOR., l m=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
SHEET 3 OF 4
580
6" STONE
560
5 X-3-9'x9 CONCRETE
5a
FILL
STREAM CROSSING #3 LOOKING WEST AT OUTLET
1 *=50' HOR.. 1"=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
SHEET 4 OF 4
171

10'
J 1
0
0
LEGEND
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR 560
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR-56 =-
PROPOSED 2', CONTOUR
EDGE OF WETLANDS
STREAM BOUNDARIES
PROPOSED CULVERT
PROPOSED HEADWALL , 40
0 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0
Ln

?o
6

HEADWALL
IN}.I5I `00
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS (TYP.)
II1ilII
NOTE: TOPO INFORMATION TAKEN
FROM AERIAL MAPPING COMPLETED
BY El DATED 12-20-2000
GRAMG PWI - 51REAM cROSSMC Na 4
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
CONOULTNO amalgam 404 MULBERRY 6T. - STE 106
(4 742-7175 CC
PROD. NO. 1001-340-01 DNn, STRX-4 E'D(I' 4-05-04
SCALE 1" - nir

SECTION A
1 "=100' HOR.. 1 *=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
-- STREAM CROSSING -4 _ _
MR4-P
4--05-04
nn»?
e,evo-
t:amo-
NE111W0/SIREAM
SYSTEM 4
n xcav> aear.
aooa-
•2a6.
r rwa
nmoa

FIGURE S. UW
Landfill Layout.
WE 6 nOTOPAP V-IMV M
eR 6 eeen/4 Vl/eM
Can= o at'Aw Te (v fm
IO®RIL Ulm IIIII aROMiE 3fefa
WRTC& 3M ?
pe w..y ••Pa Nn INFO* hWbwc
b e,yq. N.W eabry & TAW, Ii
r U++rM1 Yp? err, e-4. orb. o.r.
xert ?am= a M41MA
n Isar a ntlf
IrNID iM'Ee1Y1i wwo=
m eie eanR
n= ED
na n rasa nwn
?r
WEILAND/STREAM SYSTEM 6
-4
e "
Pro)W Area
Pond Area
Wetland Enhancement
Aroa
Wetland/Streom Impact
Area
Wetland Preeervatbn
Area
Netlard/Stream
teetoratlon Area
Stream Crossings
NRML CPAaNO PLM
,CILITY PLANS - COMPLETED SITE
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
3LIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
MONTGOMERY CMWW. NORTH CAROUNA
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
ND ENGINEM 484 MU KRRY ST. - SIE 2&'
-7175 YACOGEDRMA 3120
1C7-703-01 DWG IAWOt2-NET off 2-23-0
1• - 300' ?rI1EET 1 of 1
I'MRIMRY, 2004
f
__590 590
8" ONE
ROAD BASE
580 5
STREAM ELEVATION
574.0 AT INVE
570 3'x10' CON RETE 570
BOX CUL
560 560
STREAM CROSSING #4 LOOKING
SOUTHEAST AT INLET
1 "=100' HOR., l m=20" VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
X-SW14
4-05-04
590 -590
8" STONE
ROAD BASE
580
580
LEV
Sx10' CONCRETE
BOX CULVERT
560 560
STREAM CROSSING #4 LOOKING
NORTHWEST AT OUTLET
l m=100' HOR.. 1 "=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFIL

I(?'19?p5 ?p?
(sc ?e? ec(
i
a Ovid clte.
i
au}7 y???yP •? L
uzr ..6ePe F •nr F9D •A iLS •6od L!t MOOB P••0
t e r. / Puo/l AN YA
Zly shod P pu3 C Pu3 077 '0yAwo 9JA7N 81L7,7 t(0;DyY
0 n .Sf' sla
b
Fl£ •WoB pwp N + F V Mb eePl F •'pY lOV W0•e c» ettn 46 /o "OARS a/l4od•Jl j
.fj1r .Lvua6Juo/r : PuO84* 89661-Z1 1010 li c 3 Pue/J9M Bd .8 s °?4 0t9 •60d 6Zl -Y-5 P-0
/ r a0Y OOD can \ 1"91 a`
1 t8l 06od
-o P-
?•as !3s °„ F "Y ton Ln °y? r cs4wwufw •
li 997u "" p?R4x aa/od ., = "VAN "009 &8L 4008 POSO
74i
A *Z.ZGC9 N G ?? P?•1•R46 Y9 °c1? a' M•Ktn?cunN .fa/w,7 °ruq+ L°P?S oro0
U04 zcs?? eat C9LV ILY `? WM1f/70' % uei o, R 1 b/bs Pup
good sows
91111
1 swpw,g %lcOJ
lpi :PUnOd F "I' t[?, 46.8 Wntw. F MY 9L7 9 0 , ?q "1! f T
p? t tl •:.1 OIY, Y%6r-Zl Sul Pdw IT f3 i< lqq wa ?4 env r s bn 4? i p W. it9 \'\\ ? epNld c ? es u?i s a s t/c ?v?•e 1 w,;e_ w
7 aul? F .wr 6[v r "r z0v 99ro1 1 0 *a ;wi
can r eDn dTr pwd" 3d ?JS WV edid awl JA LCAUA s le9c •ur Om U / ?+ ol•Ll- 1 L0 e?jd awl
We P ^•i
:44 -4T Id wOOAS 001 c 7 OZrz9 .1 -pine 1e o9czz J! lf•tLZ
.... ------
Loq.a wcf .tztuti s
,t/c :paned i ?., ?•?l Pu3 .af9gQ- L) WOL _ 1! ?_
?13
Ir Bptl 9 .11 09'09 L 'S?l.
ig b "°r [J r awu\ •4d awl /:n 4 e9 8:?e
i3 3 ?e9Z? PWR411 !.Y' 4 e Lq peoo•tgls F •.nY OZD 098 46i8 tall
PFtl? Y 61v •!d owls Pu0R4N /?/Lp W / ecal .0•? U+ ` ?j`(
?IF3e n\ es 46.50 ' V,9% CV/1N :Puroe JR7/JLl 4500 _ con apov?i >i Lype ro •,O
I? ca07 IB•e row Cl6fS 9•a
j MOM uo4 p03 e01t1 F "Y m 1 £L 5 u;p . t/f
.t/C :Puna! tech tW:l eqr li 9 :1 4608 P-fl4* KY COO -0
uon
edld awl L 1411
p"011" tVM uJS 175 Pbu'te1 .- 9at1? M ,99A9,OZ N N s
O*z shad ew aooB P°10 \Pu3 F uoY 9!\ y .' F "Y Otb " of
- ,'v u
o/N f 0009Ntp °/ cwn n 9 PuOR4M /'X /may' P"3
bpiaii X
Ocol Puod O'S :7
1
n
LwwnugN
wn4wrW J 1r $ 1
-F "Y Irv
Puo846 !Y\ I t? / F w'Y 90 i7
00111
\ nail

;- .Z :Punod
O-_.-.-._._
il
LO^fZt b
? F •oY tOD
ec ?t?
? Pu3 °jlh Pw8
forte
uul
l 4M OX
?
\ 1! Zt'O
_
.
3 ? F •wY LUb
Pu3
- P
/J4N fLY sp zt
n
F •AY tov ? Z
zczn
ban
041 'IL •4d
0O-0 - _ 1? f6'lZOI
.t -0uwj _ 3 9C S 9.------
r -.-.-.
euil
OI P
P
9"
t0rl aVPA
J! 00'18Z pu3
1, I
\ *-/;46 Ox

P?• li F
t

608 tszn )

P
L
/
u0y
?•aa
K.Sr LOtB 1 t ?g
Le6't L`C 4648
ML'P?II
awn
F ?Y ADD Pa3
W."S im UT11

. We :On•d
c
e Loow
w ,F
?Pw i •?Y 9ZD
60 ?
P-/74N AX / P?
1e01
t[.atl ••sl
u6i
l
e
cl
C9 OWN Hui :punoe F •nY W7 •? / Lta? ices
u JS 03S ~ OMI? F •nY OZD
I aoN alas 3xi
6
Ptb
ext , -Dean
°a"'
O
R46 7r
w Z9Z •,?B P••o ?
vNnoavo !6F s
? m ?
e
cm Lnn
"Y 117 Q,
u°9w••7 u49"
00 F wY go v
P 846 YX
% A
•?. ? .7•an7n0? c ?^S?'
4
F•VV 9ZV r

°
P?84M
M
--_
(
_____---- -? ztn F,i r Arl
.I - I PaO/14M B`
_ d r •?Y 1017 c
•yPn x11
09f s6o up•?iS 035 b
98r 4009 ~
n

g
e
e con
U"41411 s?wy'
'a//,0 P/o Oil q,? J
aeiogll :11 f "Y rev
soupyj n
t`? °
Pug/Mff "
\ `
R'
y
gtT
u16e8
?
Wn
A F f1bY 9ZD

>I••cu ,0 11wq L?
1, ` PuO J ! pu3 `
W e4d w
, 06.
1 Lill /
46.8 ;< 1°Y 2117 Pu/7411 ! i
tin •07? PW/J46
.
9 Un rW74
.VO nn \
.r/c rye-
I
?17? -°I6. nn ?-
-- Cr an 1
\ '°
P3 WBe
>1
---- a oo el - \ 3 .ncrL9 s , 99191 Je 9z19 °`?

8 e
, Pa3 \
an
? con
J-d lrrolr
P
3
s
tlzL ?
9c
i ? et71L ;° ;e
61t
4 oe P"a a id 91 fil 1 uc0i Y [FD Me? pu?i 3.9C.1s99
. 'JS o3s
L c7z9
e
,
•pw"7 (01u6 PPo, nil
J+ 99'
•
1
p
l
U 9c
wv9
u JS YOS yunoe
1 m
Bt w^?tJ Pull 11 e `
col Del iwu:nwW
ry•ceuo0 ue:pcq
89L shod
6/F 4VO8 P•°0 1 F ?Y 8!D L 9171
"?,s Y3S 1., 0161. P 1 L0 loud euwe wcl
Iwi :punoe

1
-Z Eo sup •0 a spwu07 yJ/uS.PPo1
N v1S
L01
'
'YOOZ 'Ot .(0
IY w 031YOdn :p amiuu OF9 ARS Y ;OW909 Rld
a nN M?-+Od
'1002 .(m
^c4ee nc4i Rjonuol' 4 '906Z-Sld 'OPI•le T sowogi Aq paAa,,unS
' 018 i60d 10F YOOB poop
Zl9 06od C9Z 4008 Pw 'LL9 960d C9Z 1008
' Sul ?°JD'«oB

tic OBod *Be )fOOS '9Z 060d 9LC 11008 sowcepa pse0
'
. SIN
o4pco0 41JON
Liun00 A( uwBlwp '844susoi eW04-n Puo ,foci
tell POOL, ti0PWOOS •0•N )0 *Pit 4Wu mil 6wp paloool 8611-docd
1OOfO.Td MUMIT104TA113 aF.raollrn ()` 8171?.?

'3'1'1 `VNI'I02IVD HZ2ION 30 SHDIA2IHS DI'IHAda2i
UM '0'N ',ko& 01
qry
U3nan
a YI
,ravJ>s s uo 9
P /jN ON
s
sm3U
V iH0laM
f MIS
)0 00010 04) u+oce . A
Match Line -
,Ames Conley Nuneueker
and e*h
Beorrke hens Nuneuatwr
Deed Boat 129 Pogo 540
land: Y
spar. Man
sari
L770 Uwe
L15M ! 1 End
End Lh L767
Or NbOatd v B
a73 Acre t 3 uQ
t NbOond
047 Awe t
$a

L153
•1?
9
a
I 6{pe
tld
• `?
-
End
1 of
w
f Sanaro R. Pored
R 364
:W U A
?7e Un3
a JO A
?
ondd A. Poo Faun. 1' cre
ars t
J
Dodd Boat M7
a?kan
e 600 t147
Pa and
End
R
g
I OC/CD Nbf/ond V£ Nbffand
?• -- QaT Acre t U14 Q04 Awe t
f See Entargsment or
llet2a74ds CE CC CD
f
'
A
e

ca/vD
vc crD '? cr
Q05
f
L
?
W

b
W Abilmd
CB Nbr/and aa2 Awe t
028 Ape zt - land: 1/2'

'
N ee'te'46' w Iran Reber
FT

NORTH e91O' ban Rod Acrd t
V46
CAROLINA
End I
GRID NORTH s 64ro9st• w
2 Iran. 3/4'
NAD 53 7401 FT I Men pipe
I
Xoo lb & IWf
4
X I Martha Mdnt}re
I 0"d Bear J52
? r
Ya)
Dodd Boat B4 I Pogo 625
Poge 633 I it $

I I S?
z
Legead i
O ....•, denOtN mOfIURIMto found I
a• ut ae noted on plat 1
NOTE No. 1: Acreages shown for the various
stream. do not include mac where the trmM Ve 4 X01
enters wetland rite..
NOTE Na 2: No harizontol control within 2000 feet Ealnond Ph#P Greene
Dead Boat 2J5 Poge 224
Deed Boat 237 Poge 2J I
400 0 400 I ?''
Scale is in Feet V.A. aear7R .t & wit
1 n= 400r Echo Loh Cibsan Cnene
Geed Boat 173 Page 5T1
This boundary ofstheejurisidictionyof Section ofatheyClan W ter Act
as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there Is a
change In the law or our published regulations, this determination of
Section 404 Jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the
1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Name
Republic Serwcss of
North CarWhay LLC
Deed Boat 407
'P'r sm
Tract Na 1
SEx Sfrocrn JAI? 4 Match Line
QOf Aore t 11104
2 FT Wide A170 Am Sa Streern
SEM Sfrscrn Begin A i4 QOJ Acre Q02 Acre t M13 * 2 Fr wide
* 2 Fr wide
+AU zt i1zs, Montgomery County
SF? St, [W*0 7 E71d QO, Ace t 14 Y A760 Page 452
2 I T 12-1996 NbOcr7d
At2e 542 Ape t
Farad:
tan ban rents
post
Found: Auz At17 ¢ Found: 4'x4'
i soon. at Ai4
tat 3 Are $ Concrete
Stone pie A141 Att5 Found: No6ument
- ---.?_AMP AnA 61x1 Pips
A'7ez.. -- ??e6DU Found:
Aln
N uz - - R
.1 7 A1114 Aal t At6! AIOe ??? Nawmen'
A1707n te0 1At ?-
Al A' Manfgcrnary Cow7ty SBA 9611and
74 6 3 Dried Boor Jf6 eN?' n a
At A201 A? Mq ha 1B29 App t MA? r//0 d I iN h
Al At
10 b A1.3 1.t ?tM N e,L ?•W All al d
I A 47 $ MC Iibf/and U
.r71 a2
JW A113 A'le6 IN add A".*
r r N
I ?h ro
Found: Fau1M: r
1' Iron pipe Iran in ,tans N
29.99 FT from He
PK Nal comer Fw-ch 2*
_ o N T43'S6' E 1100.00 Fr Aluminu7n
L1
0•L3_L? d, `L,`-.\o ,M? `~ uaturnente
?C Secondary •?•y,r?N' S?
FornlsAy PK Nols located AID Nttf.7d
. N 022426' E '•? Center of road, nee a29 Ate f ,
39.26 FT Paved over.
~?\ 3/4' I ee
Aloe
EA N
Q?? Acre
crd t Rspub/k Sertdees of Montgomery County
ye / a North Cardho, LLC P-Pdrfy
J?J a1??ta` Deed Boat 407 D.B. 166 Pg. 2J7
PogtsN8M 221.44 Acres t
row P 1/2'
(Mnt-oawr)
30.15 Fr ban
canter Spie
Raid
split"
66.12 F1
N M*M'4e' E
282.te rT
J42 %fland.
Q15 Acre *
Found: 3/4'
Swam lean Pee
In Stone Pit
,? I/ U U /? 1 Duund Aloe NC9R 1197
11
4Wf.;`? 11E BEARING
L172t s 7a33 5o w z10 011FFT
Tl ' L1722 S 709516 W [05.01 FT
W- L172 S 7031 22 W 99.80 FT rv? O
p• LJ. L1724 4 5 69Y1 31 W Iy,J
UK N 27015 .3B Fr
W 30. FT
ReloWle Sw ores of
A Ca 0 EEC
Deed Boat 417
Pogo 514
Cr "Ilmd
Q17Acre
t y` J
{r Wield
Repuh6c Serwcee of
Narfh Ccrdhq LLC
o«d Bear 4n
Pops 5?4
Shoot No. Two of Ten I A? 1'L3-2606
,N ? A/onf9gney CoLVrty NORTH CAROLINA
"'? Deed Boat 166 MONTGOMERY COUNTY
5?A22?trsan Pogo ?Jf Tt{61Ttltft//
?ti /
I, Thomas J. Flelda, certify that this plat was
prepared from an actual survey done by me in
e,? f_ 54? f Jan-Fe1 and Is in all respects correct
(fa• to the bast of my knowledge and belief. The
? ?• t f? rdapartatio of precision as calculated by latitudes and
ures.(5 1:10.000'+ This plat was
S?..ru. prepared in accordance with Board Rule .1600
„ Witness my original signature and official stamp
5 ? '.' ZN.? : OU this the 10th day of - May 2004
Figure 9
Job No. 2001-1a, 2002-68• k 2002-248
JE JF. Wetlan d
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L29 S 20'41'51' W 14.71 FT
L30 S 16'04'36' E 15.05 FT
L31 S 4335'20" W 19.38 FT
L32 S 02'33'51" E 15.60 FT
L33 S 05'17'22" W 15.58 FT
L34 S 54'51'23' W 21.87 FT
L35 S 66'05'40" W
L36 S 84'05'43' W
L37 N 8358'02* W
L38 S 75'08'01" W M
L39 S 37'52'39" W
L40 S 4522'38' W

L41
S 25'49'30" W 17.39FT
L42 S 62'31'35' W
L43 S 6623'08" W 15.47 FT
L44 S 56'34'13" W 16.63 FT
L45 N 61'34'18' W 15.52 FT
L46 S 47'11'35' W 17.05 FT
L47 S 21'35'41' W 18.83 FT
L48 N 89'45'55" W 22.46 FT
L49 N 39'41'32" W 23.11 FT
L50 N 6699'53' W 20.53 FT
L51 N 51-21'09" W 21.44 FT
N 61'05'52' E 18.03 FT
N 82'04'07" E 18.38 FT
N 83'30'07' E 27.17 FT
N 65'35'59" 20.37 FT
J N 7255'36' E 23.29 FT
N 7896'33" E 20.17 FT
N 5921'41' E 17.03 FT
L59 N 4492'38' E 21.26 FT
L60 N 3529'39' E 13.80 FT
L61 N 51'55'10" E 17.08 FT
L62 N 61'06'36' E 14.40 FT
L63 N 44'57'13" E 17.02 FT
L64 N 53'04'00" E 14.99 FT
L65 N 4390'08" E 12.39 FT
L66 N 39'30'26" E 9.76 FT
667 N 3591'50" E 14.72 --
SEA Stream JD Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L68 S 2722'38" E 21.24 FT
L69 S 0824'50" E 16.43 FT
L70 S 79'42'02" E 24.32 FT
L71 S 8720'17" E 48.13 FT
L72 S 4823'40" E 20.65 FT
L73 S 79'48'01' E 42.28 FT
L74 S 8022'31" E 32.79 FT
L75 N 85'05'23" E 2297 FT
L76 S 1797'46" E 35.72 FT
L77 S 35'40'00' 15.32 FT
L78 S 47'59'22" E 20.75 FT
L79 N 79'08'54' E 27.99 FT
L80 N 36'55'36' E 33.41 FT
L81 N 2526'40' E 27.76 FT
L82 N 14'34'23' W 27.80 FT
L83 N 23'30'24' W 30.53 FT
L84 S 1893'03' E 25.03 FT
L85 S 16'55'30" E 33.81 FT
L86 S 2692'17' W 31.91 FT
L87 S 3624'56' W 40.28 FT
L88 S 84'43'01" W 41.55 FT
L89 N 61'39'46" W 22.40 FT
L90 N 2391'28' W 25.52 FT
L91 N 3923'49' W 29.99 FT
N 8622'58' W 37.88 FT
82'30'57' W 40.85 FT
4798'59' W 25.60 FT
86'07'09' W 40.06 FT
70'48'14" W 41.28 FT
17'44'20' W 22.57 FT
2520'01" W 25.44 FT
US43-?51'07'
43'51'07" W 9.04 FT
74'56'24' W 12.74 FT
85'07'47" W 19.74 FT
63'37'08" W 31.05 FT
5891'58" W 18.28 FT
5892'51" W 33.98 FT
77'00'00' W 27.02 FT
6921'49' W 42.50 FT
L107 N 56'05'13' W 37.15 FT
L108 N 50'32'09' E 4.73 FT
SGA Stream
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L624 S 34'45'46" E 26.14 FT
L625 S 3221'19" E 8.62 FT
L626 S 5135'05' E 37.47 FT
L627 S 44'35'04" E 24.50 FT
L628 S 50'46'08" E 34.08 FT
L629 S 33'51'47" E 29.98 FT
SID Stream
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L323 S 71'03'41" E 42.20 FT
L324 N 59'38'08" E 28.19 FT
L325 N 1018'12" E 4.87 FT
L326 S 70'49'04' W 21.58 FT
L327 N 72'34'56' W 35.68 FT
Sheet No. Three of Ten
Wetland SEE SEF SJE SEG SEH Stream SEE SEF SJE SEG SEH Stream SJA Stream
EARING LENGTH
WL UNE BEARING
LENGTH
continued
LINE BEARING LENGTH

'31'49' W 18.48 FT
2
L383 S 50'37'34" E 50.72 FT
UNE BEARING LENGTH
1-502 S 65'46'55" W 18
19 F
'17'03" W 19.18 FT L384 S 45'1429' 34.93 FT L457 S 21'24'52' E 33.43 FT .
1-503 S 50'45'08" W 33.62 FT
'07'35" W 29.57 FT L385 S 12'13'54' 40.54 FT L458 S 12'09'10' W 30.71 FT 1-504 S 48'48'04" W 40
23 FT
N 65'18'40' W 24.23 FT
' L386 S 20'20'39' 30.61 FT L459 S 22'54'06' W 3221 F7 .
1-505 S 43'06'15" W 4244 F7
L113 S 32-00
41 " W 13.87 FT L387 S 56'17'39' 70.15 FT L460 S 4357'10' E 36.53 FT 1-506 S 53
L114 S 4553'41" W 24.07 FT
' L388 N 55'59'39' 53.77 FT L461 S 80'41'57" E 49.57 FT 1-507 S
L115 N 84'38
37' W 16.16 FT L389 S 00'12'46' 26.28 FT L462 N 22'08'04' E 37.60 FT 1-508 S 28'28'26" W 34
72 FT
1-116 S 73'09'50' W 18.94 FT L390 S 01'40'12' E 47.01 F7 L463 S 43'36'23" E 39.45 FT .
1-509 S 00'16'51 ' W 16
63 FT
1-117 N 25'36'49" W 15.23 FT L391 S 1237'25' 64.35 FT 1-464 S 38 28'21" E 2231 FT .
47 FT
S 3539'58' W 39
1-118 N 03'54'17' W 19.07 FT
' L392 S 02'01'12' E 39.83 FT L465 S 16'16'42' E 48.72 FT .
1-511 S 42
1-719 N 17'40
43" W 14.10 FT L393 S 15'53'38" E 39.49 FT L466 S 3753'43" E 42.50 FT L512 S 44'11'26' W 38
73 FT
L120 N 34'18'15' W 14.35 FT L394 S 0651'19' 54.40 FT L467 S 59'00'42" E 36.37 FT .
L513 S 43'35'12' W 49
05 FT
L121 N 52'45'07' W 12.99 FT L395 S 25'1434' E 30.49 FT L468 S 18'19'45' W 49.59 FT .
L514 S 58'31'40' W 41.58 FT
L122 N 54'0 '26' W 16.28 FT L396 S 5148'13' 43.93 FT L469 S 08'05'37' E 92.75 FT L515 S 64'48'03' W 56
51 FT
1-123 N 03'5437" W 23.01 FT
' L397 S 79'19'28' 32.07 FT L470 S 52'03'25' E 24.37 FT .
L516 S 72'22'52' W 30.58 FT
1-124 N 48'50
28' W 18.80 FT L398 S 70'50'47" E 21.08 FT L471 N 67'56'52" 63.98 FT L517 S 64'25'14' W 46
24 FT
1-125 N 27'35'18' E 12.92 FT L399 S 88'15'37' E 37.21 FT L472 N 66'51'23' E 11.26 FT .
L518 S 66'53'50' W 65.16 FT
1-126 N 4535'27' 13.53 FT L400 N 80'38'27' 97.15 FT L473 S 38'27'51" W 41.11 FT L519 S 6327'54' W 36.83 FT
L127 S 65'35'21' E 17.94 FT L401 S 64'58'51" E 52.35 FT L474 S 15'13'02" 46.39 FT L520 S 66'12'56' W 41.66 FT
L128 N 85'21'34' E 21.69 FT L402 S 35'51'16' 42.85 FT L475 S 75'28'12' E 38.13 FT 1-521 S 80'57'08' W 17.59 FT
1-129 S 06'43'01' E 18.82 FT L403 S 26 08'19" 55.14 FT L476 S 21'17'04" 24.68 FT L522 S 71'01'51' W 43.40 FT
1-130 S 67'06'44' E 17.45 FT L404 S 20'22'42' E 49.20 FT L477 N 82'12'21' W 27.38 FT L523 S 61'08'34' W 34.47 FT
L131 S 42'36'16" E 15.75 FT L405 S 7'50'29" E 47.37 FT L478 S 0114'21' W 38.48 FT L524 S 03'16'14' W 2209 FT
1-132 S 60 22'38' E 20.54 FT 1-406 S 27'55'19' E 72.35 FT L479 S 48'24'29" 44.65 FT L525 S 59'14'08' W 4281 FT
L133 S 72'05'08' E 14.54 FT 1-407 S 40'53'31' E 14.41 FT L480 S 4249'36" 52.22 FT L526 N 87'05'43' W 16.95 FT
L408 S 56'14'32" E 62.01 FT L481 S 36'10'15" 22.89 FT L527 N 72'37'58' W 19.29 FT
'

NF BEARING LENGTH 1-410
1-411 N 81'57
53' E
'
'
' 70.69 FT
SJB Strea L529 S 83'23'28' W 26.57 FT
N 88
43
01
E 39.72 FT m L530 N 74156'10" W 24.39 FT

1-414 S 89'18'00' E 46
33 FT L483 S 55'00'21' W 21.00 FT '

1-415
S 87'28'58' E .
48
87 FT
L484 S 13'27'15' W 19.15 FT L533 S 72'09
08' W 35.11 FT
'

1-416
S 80'50'48" E .
48
21 FT
L485 S 6018'09" W 8.50 FT 1-534 S 7030
50" W 21:75 FT
'
"

1-417
S 66'44'04' E .
61
51 FT L535 S 66'49
W 33.70 FT
59
1-418 S 76'3227' E .
71
93 FT L487 N 5526'45' W 5
62 FT
. . L537 S 62'50'48" W 45.81 FT

L427 N 62'53'17" E 28
18 FT L496 S 6534'35' W 19.41 FT '
'

L344 S 18'39'33' W 39.99 FT
L428
S 7945'05' .
58.35 FT
L497 S 83'11'35' W 15.91 FT L546 S 30'44
W 33.68 FT
23
L547
'
'

L345 S 38 0448' W 29.92 FT
L429
S 68'10'39" E
66.09 FT
L498 N 03'34'21" W 33.38 FT W 23.50 FT
S 5638
28
'
1-548
'
'
1-346 S 41'24'49' W 34.84 FT
1-430
S 7611'14' E
51.04 FT
1-499 S 8858'26" W 15.25 FT S 54
W 20.93 FT
07
02
L549
'
'

L34 S 20'57'39' W 27.69 FT
L431
N 89'36'55" E
49.59 FT
L500 S 82'03'34" W 20.55 FT S 7733
W 20.30 FT
19
L550
'
'
"

1-348 8 S 02'45'15" W 24.30 FT
L432
S 88'59'16" E
44.81 FT
L501 S 79'21'38" W 15.82 FT S 74
W 36.48 FT
15
55
L551
'
'

1-349 S 53'35'53' W 33.04 FT
L433
S 83'00'08" E
32
76 FT S 7637
W 33.26 FT
55
'
"

1-350 S 44'12'30" W 43.41 FT
L434
S 7643'06" E .
26
35 FT L552 S 71'08
W 28.85 FT
39

1-351 S 03'41'18' W 42.37 FT
L435
S 89'12'23' E .
42
47 FT
SJC Stream 1-553 S 78'40'41' W 22.92 FT
'

L352 S 06'30'48" W 28.20 FT
L436
N 7643'46' E .
73.77 FT
LINE BEARING LENGTH L554 N 87'02
49' W 19.66 FT
L555
'
'
"

1-353 S 12'04'32' W 46.15 FT
L437
N 7536'17" E
45.42 FT
L579 5 57'42'51' W 8.05 FT N 83
44
W 3259 FT
12
L556
'
'
'

1-354 S 44'23'12' W 33.32 FT
'
'
"
L438
S 55'45'22" E
47.82 FT
L580 N 88'30'47' W 14.86 FT S 12
W 2235 FT
52
18
L557 S 42'37'59' W 13
11 FT
L355 S 50
W 29.34 FT
00
55
L356
'
'
" L439 S 34'11'32' E 33.66 FT L581 S 65'12'23' W 6.98 FT .
L558 S 43'29'17" W 1215 FT
W 22.79 FT
S 24
40
29
'
'
" L440 S 29'13'55" E 5216 FT L582 S 15'17'20' W 14.63 FT L559 S 03'23'30' W 43
82 FT
W 20.87 FT
S 12
23
21
'
'
' L441 S 22'17'39' E 5266 FT L583 S 75'46'25' W 22.71 FT .
L560 S 27'18'21' E 51
16 FT
W 28.90 FT
S 14
49
48
'
'
' L442 S 2942'55" E 28.18 FT L584 S 31'2442' W 11.51 FT .
L561 S 38'30'44' W 24
42 FT
W 30.30 FT
S 29
38
17
'
' 1-443 S 22 02'11' E 64.48 FT 1-585 S 60 18'11' W 20.24 F7 .
1-562 S 66 16'59' E 23
20 FT
W 30.04 FT
S
'
06
'
'
1 L444 S 43'22'56" E 58.24 FT L586 N 8239'42" W 13.50 FT .
L563 S 32'40'03' E 19
24 FT
11
53
W 33.30 FT
S 11 53
39
'
'
" L445 S 62'14'06' E 59.18 FT L587 N 48'05'18' W 12.89 F7 .
1-564 S 2736'50' E 9
38 FT
W 53.06
S 20
46
57
'
'
' 1-446 N 78'07'21' E 101.96 FT L588 S 5835'59' W 15.20 FT .
L565 S 45'31'48' W 31
94 FT
W 2786
S 15
54
56
064
'
'
' L447 S 80'52'38' E 33.36 FT L589 N 77'0 '44" W 15.93 FT .
L566 S 29'56'23' W 21
80 FT
W 3268 FT
S 03
43
45
1-365
'
" L448 S 71'36'41' E 13.83 FT L590 S 57'49'03' W 14.25 FT .
1-567 S 29-2A'19' W 27
82 FT
E 9.65 FT
S 32 59
04
L366
'
'
" L449 S 71'23'01' 31.20 FT L591 N 7253'52' W 25.18 FT .
L568 S 66'42'56" W 27
06 FT
E 56.98 FT
S 28
53
53
95 FT
L367 S 74'10'31' E 34 L450 S 34'59'00'
' 51.34 FT L592 S 76 55'52" W 20.69 F7 .
L569 S 21 54'27' W 29.43 FT
.
1-368 S 63'41'38" E 39
77 FT L451 S 20'51
17' E
'
' 9.59 FT L593 N 82'26'01" W 23.69 F7 L570 S 59'59'09' W 28.66 FT
.
L369 S 18'24'57" E 45
75 FT L452 S 16'49
47
E
'
' 13.25 FT L594 S 00'28'48' 13.78 FT L571 S 00'05'16" W 17.49 FT
.
82 FT
S 25'50'58' E 23
L37 7453 S 23'53
57
E
'
' 29.58 FT L595 S 79'45'13" W 11.02 FT
'
' L572 S 68'52'11" E 18.27 FT
.
1
29 FT
1-371 S 4210'11' E 22 L454 S 08'43
13
E
'
' 45.30 FT L596 N 8937
W 10.39 FT
50
' 1-573 S 08'09'30' E 21.65 FT
.
L372 S 36'40'20' E 56
84 FT L455 5 00'53
45
W
'
' 31.02 FT L597 S 48'09
58' W 11.29 FT
' L574 S 25'22'32' E 7.94 FT
.
L373 S 52'19'54" E 35
29 FT 1-456 S 07'48
54
E 36.19 FT L598 S 7159
38' W 21.03 FT
'
' 1-575 S 34'00'24' W 13.20 FT
.
16 FT
L374 MS 66'44'24" W 34 L599 N 61'20
W 20.35 F7
25
' L576 S 50'18'47' W 29.14 FT
.
1-375 S 2425'08' E 5250 FT L600 S 85'46
59" W 29.66 F7 1-577 S 19'06'36' W 20.84 FT

L376 S 68'52'21' E 39.57 FT 1-578 S 07'57'43' W 11.75 FT
1-377 S 14'18'07' W 34.45 FT
L378 S 12'22'04" W 43.93 FT
L379 N 89'35'50' E 38.80 FT
L380 N 64'27'41" E 51.62 FT
L381 S 08'26'38" E 86.60 FT Sheet No. Four of Ten
1-382 S 20'02'11" W 53.47 FT
Figure 9

SEE SE
F G SE
SJE SE H Stream

1-328 S 16'5 '3 ' W 35.46 FT
1-329 5 5432'22" W 54.38 FT
1-330 N 76'36'2
W 38.19 FT

31
1-3
56'44'34' S
W
23.53
FT
1-332 S 25
'03'34" W 49.31
FT
1-333 S 47
'26
'17
'
W 92.02
FT
1-334 S
47'40
'
30'
W 58.41
FT
1-335 S 54'36'37' W 47.11 FT
1-336 S 50'06'16" W 13.94 F7
1-337 S 22'40'41' W 19.80 FT
1-338 S 32'28'03' W 31.46 FT
1-339 S 28'02'11' W 34.49 FT
1-340 S 34'12'11" W 64.43 FT
1-341
3'21'29' W
S 23-21-297'-W- -
34 .93FT
1-342 S 10'48'22' W 41.74 FT

343

0'05'41' W

'19' .. W 41.07 FT
1-409 N 72'25'15' 55.63 FT L528 S 72'24'04' W 51.31 FT
1-412 S 74'27'06' E 24.17 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH L531 S 21'30'08' W 17.81 FT
1-413 S 85'06'06" E 3274 FT L482 S 89'49'56' W 21.01 FT L532 S 6239'08" W 45.83
Fi
L486 S 7552'04' W 27.34 FT
1-536 S 75 01'53" W 30.17 FT
1-419 N 57'48'04" 30.28 FT L488 N 24'16'28' W 18.79 FT L538 S 73'47'47" W 36.45 FT
1-420 N 76'07'21' E 57.77 FT L469 N 2443'22' 13.05 FT L539 S 70'13'04' W 45.35 FT
1-421 N 82'31'13' E 57.68 FT L490 N 00'46'14' E 15.14 FT L540 S 7343'42" W 20.62 FT
L422 S 78'49'52" E 26.20 FT 1-491 N 60'06'45' W 15.31 FT L541 S 67'01'09' W 44.23 FT
1-423 S 11'10'08" W 24.70 FT L492 N 25'19'59' W 9.59 FT L542 S 65'09'08' W 24.92 FT
1-424 N 89'26'42' E 3296 FT L493 N 13'48'23' 19.87 FT L543 S 2222'08* W 31.84 FT
1-425 N 8623'19" E 57.81 FT L494 N 00'28'47' W 19.11. FT L544 S 43'25'44' W 15.53 FT
1-426 N 7518'30' E 60.33 FT 1-495 N 30'32'16' W 19.62 FT
37.27 FT L545 S 49'01'23' W 33.02 FT

34'4 '09" W 3247 FT

1-510
'24'33' W 17.34 F7

LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH
continued

1-717 S 7 '16'14" W 8.85 FT L797 N 87'04'38" W 19.28 FT L866
'
'
E 14.79 FT
S 2239
05

1720 S 0 '02'40' E 15.21 FT L800 S 02'35'01" W 37
79 FT '

1-721 S 44'3 ' 9' W 24.63 FT .
L801 S 69'52'55" W 7.86 FT L869 S 81'09
30' W 10.87 FT
1-870

22" W 1-723 S 52'49'20' W 38.05 FT L803 N 75'14'54" W 9.92 FT L872
'
'
'

1-724 S 5039'08" W 26.86 FT
L804 S 5 75' 4" W 27.56 FT W 39.73 FT
S 50
27
25
L873
'
'
"
E 26.63 FT
S 07
45
12

1-727 S 4942 ' W 27.37
FT
1-807 S 48 01'45' E 11.09 FT
L876
'
'
'
W 16.24 FT
S 74
13
8

1-810 5 0 '47'54" W 15.04 FT
SJG Stream L811 S 35'26'14' W 50.24 FT
LINE BEARING LENGTH L812 N 78'4 '19" W 14.87 FT SEI Stream
1-729 S 61'19'57" W 20.24 FT L813 S 43'48'32' W 14.24 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH
L654 N 32'51'59" W 18.92 FT L730 S 72'18'36' W 19.69 FT 1-814 S 09'39'" 15.16 FT L879 S 16'01'57' W 44.06 FT
L655 N 52'51'24" W 15.98 FT L731 S 41'10'11' IN 21.08 FT L815 S 14'47'52' W 19.09 FT L880 S 08'18'05' IN 14.55 FT
L656 N 38'01'43' W 19.79 FT L732 S 59'24'00" W 17.43 FT L816 S 68'31'12" W 2285 FT L881 S 18'03'48' IN 18.15 FT
L657 N 56'2426' W 9.65 FT L733 S 62'25'55" W 21.04 FT L817 S 34'13'59" W 13.47 FT L882 S 45'35'18' IN 18.63 FT
L658 N 15'05'14' W 12.67 FT L734 S 37'02'26' W 7.13 FT L818 S 28'48'10" W 31.77 FT L883 S 54'26'42' W 20.78 FT
1-659 N 19'38'13" W 17.61 FT L735 S 53'52'10' W 12.36 FT L819 61'5 '1 " W 19.09 FT L884 S 38'19'55" W 28.76 FT
1-660 N 11'49'03" W 26.27 FT L736 S 26'11'01" W 54.15 FT L820 S 65'50'25" W 17.67 FT 1-88S 36'44'06' W 24.93 FT
L661 N 06'37'37' E 12.02 FT L737 S 45'00'21" W 20.01 FT L821 S 27'15'22' W 18.04 FT L886 S 33'47'25' W 37.74 FT
L662 N 44'03'49' W 15.35 FT L738 S 23'04'01' W 40.10 FT L822 S 1400'08' E 23.71 FT 1-887
S 50'39'52" W 28.05 FT

L663 N 28'58'28' W 20.15 FT
L739 S 16'57'40' W 19.67 FT
L823 S 14'09'07' W 14.24 FT
11 1-888 '31'21' W 21.39 FT
1
L664 N 20'23'08' W 11.59 FT L740 S 46'07'45' W 39.13 FT L824 S 44'09'43" W 8.01 FT 1889 S 12'17'43' W 48.13 FT
L665 N 02'00'2 " E 9.21 FT L741 S 30'46'44' W 27.46 FT L825 S 57'17'35" W 14.24 FT 1-890 S 02'12'27' E 22.91 FT
L666 N 1030'37' E 21.34 FT L742 S 3232'38" W 35.39 FT L826 S 71'06'28' W 19.32 FT L891 S 56'53'31' W 36.77 FT
L667 N 21'58'32' W 10.26 FT L743 S 13'56'10" W L827 S 29'36'45" W 21.81 FT L892 S 00'16'16' E 31.66 FT
L668 N 67'02'48' W 18.48 FT L744 S 4521'43' W 21.15 FT L828 S 1'13'09" E 15.53 L893 S 3033'49" W 34.70 FT
89'47'56' W 12.66 FT L745 S 41'25'31" W 24.03 FT L829 N 88'1 '34' E 13.31 FT L894 S 00'08'52" W 23.90 FT
24'20'35' W 14.81 FT L746 S 61'24'05' W 22.52 FT L830 S 35'02'33' E 29.85 FT L895 S 05'29'04" W 48.38 FT
1-671 N 19'41'38" E 6.86 FT L747 S 41'53'59" W 13.73 FT L831 S 48'45'42" W 18.69 FT 1-896 S 14'13'10' W 11.31 FT
1-672 N 15'35'04' E 8.65 FT 1-748 S 60 03'44' W 20.05 FT L832 S 10'46'53" E 1203 FT 1-897 S 11'40'54' W 37.71 FT
L673 N 12'52'59' W 20.40 FT L749 S 13'59'37' W 11.89 FT L833 S 28'49'5 ' W 20.93 FT L898 S 63'11'55' E 29.73 FT
L674 N 06'06'13' W 16.86 FT L750 S 40'55'05' W 26.44 FT L834 S 30'07'59' W 13.48 FT
L675 N 48'21'16' W 26.90 FT L751 S 66'10'55" W 20.85 FT L835 S 44'58'08' W 15.53 FT
1-676 N 66'34'50' W 20.21 FT L752 S 4844'45' W 30.66 FT L836 N 7427'40" W 17.92 FT SEL Stream
1-677 S 75'24'10' W 10.85 FT L753 S 15'22'02' W 14.67 FT 1-837 N 55'01'18' W 1284 FT UNE BEARING LENGTH
L678 N 44'22'28' W 11.22 FT L754 S 18'56'10" W 14.93 FT 1-838 S 63'04'56" W 1697 L899 S 6129'04' E 60.28 FT
L679 N 24'58'29' W 17.63 FT L755 S 50'08'43' W 17.82 FT L839 S 87'02'50" W 17.82 F L900 S 2426'26' E 34.72 FT
N 00'23'42' E 14.13 FT L756 S 05'13'15' 23.64 FT L840 S 68'05'02' W 18.80 FT L901 S 19'10'06' W 27.78 FT
L681 N 16 0'41' W 14.64 FT L757 S 25'09'22' W 14.55 FT S 84'48'56" W 38.26 FT L902 S 36'0 '21' 25.50 FT
L682 N 13'31'27' W 15.18 FT L758 S 78'09'05' W 23.51 FT L842 S 14'19'57' W 14.21 FT L903 S 44'00'43' E 35.54 FT
83 N 2231'43' E 17.71 FT 1-759 S 25 4'18' W 10.06 FT 1-843 S 73 06'38" W 1267 FT 1-904 S 2415'51' E 23.34 FT
L684 N 30'43'08' E 19.19 FT L 660 S 8831'25" W 14.60 FT L844 S 4376'38' W 27.44 FT L905 S 06'52'2 ' W 37.39 FT
L685 N 3372'07' W 19.80 FT L761 S 37 54'53' W 38.42 FT 1-845 S 23 02'04' W 14.46 FT L906 S 24 53'34' W 32.08 FT
L686 N 14'55'19' W 11 29.43 FT L762 S 23'15'02' 20.41 FT L846 S 32'51'47" W 20.48 FT L907 5 0332'00' W 43.66 FT
L687 N 73'51'45' W 17.48 FT L763 S 18'18'26' W 18.66 FT L847 S 7377'23" W 13.72 FT -908 S 137635' W 40.02 FT
88 S 69'09'17' W T 1-764 S 1775'40' E 27.16 FT L848 S 4333'02" W 16.79 FT 1-909 S 34 04'10' E 18.76 FT
1-689 S 81'33'42' W 9.53 FT L765 S 00'02'04' W 9.00 FT L849 S 48'50'51' W 9.65 FT 1-910 S 36'57'23' E 49.77 FT
1690 S 65'54'47" W 7.30 FT L766 S 56'58'03" W 23.59 FT L850 S 28'01'1' W 23.89 FT 1-911 S 3756'02' E 41.78 FT
L691 N 6171'54' W 6.27 FT L767 S 36'17'45' W 20.76 FT L851 S 1413'40" E 21.16 FT L912 S 09'54'39' W 41.86 FT
L692 N 79'41'20" W 14.89 FT L768 S 1871'44" W 17.46 FT L852 S 13'55'38` W 9.94 FT 1-913 S 68'45'41" W 18.25 FT
L769 S 40'07'01' W 30.20 FT L853 S 22'06'37' E 20.91 FT L914 S 39'13'29" W 25.46 FT
1-770 S 70'07'54" W 23.68 FT L854 S 23'04'20' W 8.82 FT L915 S 28'08'36' E 37.89 FT
SJF Stream L771 S 5970'39' W 14.65 FT 1-855 S 58'10'05' W 20.66 FT S 80'52'14" E 49.50 FT
UNE BEARING LENGTH L772 S 83'38'03' W 7.83 FT L856 12'50'26' E 11.45 FT L917 S 3771'09" E 19.21 FT
693 N 7235'56' W 19.88 FT 1-773 N 3074'50' W 10.85 FT L857 S 74'47'37" E 7.38 FT 1-918 S 1272'31" 28.20 FT
1-694 N 87'19'20' W 24.75 FT L774 N 28'15'57" 8.59 FT L858 S 53'46'45" E 9.30 FT L919 S 29'33'33" W 24.70 FT
N 63'31'51' W 17.83 FT L775 N 05'07'31' W 10.88 FT 859 S 2529'28' E 9.72 FT L920 S 5679'09" W 30.47 FT
L696 N 83'13'34' W 23.91 FT L776 S 78'37'53' W 24.11 FT
1-697 S 59'36'22' W 25.15 F7 L777 S 88'02'23' W 12.11 FT
98
N 86'56'00' W 11.97 FT
L778 S 59'55'22' W 16.87 FT
SEK Stream
SEJ Stream
9 S 43'18'54' W 9.04 FT L778 S 04'44'44" W 14.30 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH UNE BEARING LENGTH
L700 N 7342'00" W 21.11 FT L780 S 24'07'02' W 23.41 FT 1-921 S 1874'42' W 46.43 FT L938 S 7272'17' E 27.96 FT
L701 S 5712'36" W 13.20 FT L781 S 0735'47' E 27.04 FT L922 S 22'14'08" W 39.83 FT 939 N 64'31'17" E 25.58 FT
L702 N 71'59'40' W 11.60 FT L782 S 07'04'01' W 14.92 FT L923 S 0819'59' W 6214 FT S 81'00'57' E 28.46 FT
L703 S 46'54'36' W 16.19 FT L783 S 18'06'24' 7.79 FT S 74'41'05" E 27.47 FT
L704 S 20'50'30' W 14.96 FT L784 S 54'40'35" W 18.91 FT L942 N 61'53'29" E 10.08 FT
L70 S 2712'35' W 44.36 FT L785 S 30 09'17' W 12.32 FT L943 N 81'55'15" E 29.62 FT
L706 S 34'03'22' W 35.91 FT L786 S 56'58'31' W 18.04 FT L944 S 88'56'03' 17.91 FT
L707 S 07'48'40" W 20.51 FT L787 S 3111'54" W 24.76 FT L945 N 74'37'48' E 66.39 FT
L708 S 71'56'41' W 21.89 FT
1-788 S 56'5637" W 9.89 FT
Sheet No. Five of Ten
L946 N 78'42'49' 17.67 FT
L709 S 0417'46' W 30.72 FT L789 S 76'05'40" W 13.61 FT Figure 9
S
JH Stream
UNE BEARING LENGTH
1-630 N 21'21'39' W 6.24 FT
1-631 N 54'14'05' W 14.58 FT
1-632 S 88'04'55' W 10.44 F7
1-633 S 87'38'44' W 16.91 FT
1-634 N 11'33'43' E 9.92 FT
1-635 N 45'03'13" W 18.69 FT
1-636 N 57'14'4 W 24.30 FT
1637 N 08'40'14" W 11.60 FT
1-638 N 3'19'20" W 8.17 FT
1-639 N 05'03'47' E 21.04 FT
1-640 N 52'00'11' W 12.69 FT
1-641 S 71'14'49' W 13.54 FT
1-642 N 26'22'39' W 19.73 F7
1-643 N 73'16' 6.16FT
1644 S W
68'20'58'
1-645 N 52'50'1 W
1646 N 85'56'18" W M
1-647 S 85'16'4' W
1-648 N 77'15'59' W
1-649 N 11'15'11" W
1-650 N 33'19'25" W 11.21 FT
1-651 N 585648' W 23.67 FT
1-652 N 53'31'57' W 14.88 FT

53

33'41" W SJF Stream SJG Stream SJG Stream
1710 S 30'0 '34' 11.11 F7 L790 S 10'38'25' W 1217 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH
1-711 S 29 '2 ' W 17.36 FT I L- L791 S 19'45'51' 20.85 FT L860 S 44'50'47' W 5.35 FT
1-712 S 77'56' 9" W 28.13 FT L792 S 29-48-21- 11.33 FT L861 S 29'40'05" W 7.26 FT
1-713 S 73'04'18' W 1239 FT L793 S 01'04'18" W 16.28 FT -862 S 31'14'13" 13.75 FT
1-714 S 60'39'27' W 17.97 FT L794 S 13'16'31' W 15.27 FT L863 S 55'07'05' E 13.38 FT
1-715 S 77'26'55' W 21.50 FT L795 5.02'41'16" 8.64 FT L864 FS84'36'01' E 14.72 FT
1-716 S 22'56' 1" W 19.85 F7 L796 S 47'27'38" W 10.83 FT L865 S 42'03'27' E 16.30 FT
1-718 N 32'15'36' W 8.38 FT L798 S 28'14'34' W 15.34 FT L867 42'19'0 " W 13.79 FT
1719 S 52'38'28' W 17.93 FT L799 S 18'31'47' W 22.79 FT L868 S 59'04'49' W 7.40 FT, I
S 15'09'08" E 36.90 FT
1-722 S 62'59'17" W 12.31 FT I I_ L802 S 5242'41' W 16.71 FT 1-871 S 17 00'16' W 21.49 FT
1-725 N 86'42'48' W 8.15 FT L805 S 83'18'59' W 14.97 FT 1-874 S 44'54'35' W 14.36 FT
1-726 S 55'35'54" W 30.96 FT L806 S 03'52'14" W 33.00 FT
1-875 S 02V6'12' W 2269 FT
1-728 S 57'51'5 ' W 14.28 FT L808 S 0 '54'20" W 35.88 FT L877 S 31'25'50' W 20.36 FT
1-809 S 15'45'52" 14.45 FT L878 15.30 FT
14.71 F7
SEM Stream
LINE BEARING LENGTH MC WETLAND MA/MB WETLAND SBA WETLAND STREAM
1-924 S 42'10'33" W 39.92 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH
L38 S 30'49'53' W 20
48 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1
-
'
* LINE BEARING I- LENGTH

L925 S 21'56'38' W 36.00 FT .
L39 S 61'17'15' W 26
69 FT 41
21
51
W 29.91 FT
1-2
'
'
' 1-137 N . 13'D0" E 14.81 FT

1-926 S 43'50'15" W 27.35 FT .
L40 S 6033'18' W 26.13 FT S 60
04
03
W 11.42 FT
L3 N 86'44'4 ' W 20
82 FT L138 N 36 05'53' 31.41 FT
'
'

1-927 S 23'42'49' W 48.08 FT
L41 S 5003'53" W 17.08 FT .
L4 S 8607'37'- W 23
80 FT 1-139 S 89'45
E 19.30 FT
48
1-140
'

1-928 S 33'32'21" W 33.56 FT
L42 S 66 56'37' W 24.73 FT .
L5 S 84'42'40' W 37
15 FT E 16.69 FT
S 881744
'
'

L929 S 11'48'00' W 49.36 FT
L43 S 34'44'55' W 35.44 FT .
L6 8723'26' W 20
12 N 606
E 4.18 FT
46
'
'

1-930 S 04'19'13' E 41.42 FT
L44 S 34'18'59" W 27.44 FT .
L7 S 733 'S5" W 20
42 FT N 6712
E 16.41 FT
46
'
'
NJ

,931 S 0000'44' W 26.23 FT
145 S 4803'40' W 33.92 FT .
L8 S 34'39'53' W 26.59 FT S 8404
E 8.40 FT
10
'
'
'

L932 S 58'55'01' W 31.23 FT
L46 S 79'31'41' W 4217 FT
L9 S 3703'51' W 21.48 FT N 89
07
E 17.15 FT
00
1-145
'
'

,933 S 28'22'53' W 61.49 FT
L47 S 3034'03" W 32.47 FT
L10 S 68'25'16' W 38
75 FT S 8433
E 17.14 FT
57
L146
'
'

L934 S 55'40'38' W 23.71 FT
L935
'
'
L48 N 58'48'44' W 41.77 FT .
Lll N 63'15'35' W 28.52 FT N 550
8.88 FT
08
L147 N 88 54'47' E 26
58 FT
W 29.84 FT
S 5532
10
L936 S 51'17'44' W 43
49 FT L49 N 68'38'25" W 23.74 FT
L50
'
'
' L12 S 79'54'36" W 28.16 FT .
1-148 N 60'16'19' 18.90 FT
.
L937
'
'
" N 71
W 28.62 FT
2
S9 L13 N 34'31'35' W 23.33 f I
W 19.41 FT
S 15
42
46 1-51 N 8834'31' W 48.23 FT
' L14 N 2001'31' E 38.05 FT XL Wetland
1-52 S 67'44
30' W 51.68 FT
1-53 S 31'28'32' W 40
89 FT L15 N 5457'17' W 17.23 FT
L16
'
'
' LINE

VJ 0 Wetland .
L54 S 32'56'12' W 38.44 FT S 81
45
E 22.68 FT
23
L17 N 25'35'35' E 53
80 FT

4'43'20' W 2299 FT
LINE BEARING LENGTH L55 N 79'43'42' W 25.63 FT .
118 N 8035'41' E 16
88 FT
W
1-947 S 85'23'25" W 19.50 FT L56 N 17'17'14' W 28.26 FT .
L19 S 41'53'0 ' E 33
66 FT
1-948 S 47'52'04' W 10.59 FT L57 N 0104'1 ' W 3259 FT .
L20 S 89"43'00' 45
52 FT N

L949 S 24'15'' E 18.50 FT
L58 N 16'06'59' W 37.65 FT .
L21 N 68'28'2 ' E 27
84 FT 1-982
:NI!?p- W 19.31 FT

1-950 S 56'54'05' W 15.94 FT
L59 N 10'21'01" W 46.41 FT .
1-22 N 29 01'5' E 41
08 FT L983 4' W 27.26 FT

L951 S 56'45'04' W 13.72 FT
L60 N 01'25' 7' E 33.59 FT .
L23 N 24 22'57' W 36
20 FT E
1-984
4' W 14.55 FT
L952 N 00'23'02" W 16.51 FT L61 N 76'29'11' E 21.87 FT .
L24 N 38'31'58' W 39
29 FT L98
FT
W 1
L953 N 12'26'54' W 18.40 FT L62
N 13'29'38' W 37.48 FT .
1-25 N 44'37'27' W 36
44 FT 6 0*
.5
L986 0' W 11.52 FT

L954 S 6901'59' W 18.80 FT
L63 N 89'52'53' E 37.28 FT .
L26 N 43'51'44' E 36.03 FT 1-987 S 17'19'38" W 14.70 F7

L955 N 04'27'41' E 11.77 FT
L64 S 0103'33' W 33.32 FT
L27 S 35'18'28" E 4289 FT L988 S 22'59'55' W 15.85 FT

L956 N 00'17'34' E 20.58 FT
L65 S 27'30'00' 26.83 FT
L28 S 48'31'10' E 25
49 FT L989 S 17.31'52' W 19.56 FT

L957 N 47'20'28' E 24.57 FT
L66 S 29'20'06' 31.89 FT .
L29 S 05'04'06" W 23
12 FT 1-990 S 31'26'30' W 14.68 FT

L958 S 52'17'46' E 12.58 FT
L67 S 66'56'37' E 31.22 FT .
L30 S 36 5556' E 25
93 FT L991 S 70'18'09' W 17.21 FT

1-959 S 51 55'00' E 13.84 FT
L68 S 60'28'14' E 31.36 FT .
L31 S 633' 36
92 FT L992 N 56'51'50' W 20.23 FT

1-960 S 74'45'51' E 15.47 FT
L69 N 89'56'03' E 55.12 FT .
1-32 N 88'28'25' E 13
75 FT L993 N 66'29'52' 14.19 FT

L961 S 37'37'49" E 18.50 FT
L70 S 7246'48" E 40.14 FT .
1-33 S 05'28'06* E 14
04 FT 1-994 N 6734'25' 13.61 FT

1-71 S 84'48'38" E 37.12 FT .
L34 S 7401'23" E 19
96 FT 1-995 N 0518'18' 11-30 FT
-

-
1-72 S 87'27'24" E 47.06 FT .
L35 N 43'51'23' 26
80 FT L996 IN
0213'37" W 14.84 FT

Bound
Along RocCreek
L73 N 60'41b5' E 30.94 FT .
L36 S 50'55'18" L997 N 05 21'53' W 8.63 FT

RING LENGTH
L74 N 36'59'36' E 15.54 FT
L37 S 02'15'25' E L998 N 24'42'9' E 28.73 FT

'55' W 21.68 FT
L75 N 17'11'26' W 1 .36 FT L999 N 31'23'03' E 20.32 FT
p
'31' W 50.21 FT
L76 S 54'22'48" W 30.86 FT 1-1000 N 34'32'18" E 21.97 FT

'50' W 27.91 FT
1-77 S 7601'07' W 45.96 FT
MD WETLAND 1-1001 N 44'57'30' E 21.20 FT

'35' W 40.41 FT
L78 N 59'49'15' W 3211 FT
UNE BEARING LENGTH L1002 N 60'13'08' E 21.13 FT

'51' W
1-79 N 67'27'29' W 36.86 FT
L95 N 1208'06' W 33
28 FT 1-1003 S 74 54'19" E 18.15 FT

'14' W 72.58 F7
L80 N 18'13'32" W 39.37 FT .
L96 N 15'14'29' E 26
14 FT L1004 N 28'31'18' E 33.64 FT
'

1-11 S 4625'32' W 125.18 FT
L81 N 3108'21' W 28.88 FT .
L97 N 1808'56' E 35
00 FT L1005 N 00'28
01' E 19.40 FT

1-12 S 5705'42' W 56.91 FT
L82 S 80'21'43' E 31.10 FT .
L98 S 77'40'34' E 27
41 FT L1006 N 40'22'04' 3218 FT

1-13 S 30'54'35' W 154.92 FT
L83 S 12'56'22' E 23.19 FT .
L99 N 81'58'07' E 38
35 FT L1007 N 47'27'03" 21.18 FT

1-14

S 18'39'02' W 98.62 FT

84 S 32'44'28" E 31.91 FT .

L100 N 76'50'09' E 39
60 FT L1008 S 15'13'15' E 13.94 FT

'

1-15 S 1601'51" W 82.82 FT
L85 S 72'10'08" E 44.66 FT .
L101 N 05'36'49' W 11 8
09 FT L1009 13" E 21.55 FT
S 27 50

Lib 262-43-59- W 3211 FT

L86 S 83'18'20' E 26.49 FT
.
L102 N 40'20'47' E 23
39 FT
L1010 04'33'03' E 14.48 FT
S
'

1-17 S 1901'20' W 70.22 FT
'
'
L87 N 44'21'16' E 37.00 FT .
L103 N 51'58'33' E 44.03 FT L1011 S 00'45
34' 20.56 F7
1-18 S 5236
15
W 64.98 FT
'
" L88 N 80'51'01' E 31.41 FT ,104 N 5071'58" E 35.28 FT
1-79 S 07'46
56
W 110.25 FT
'
" L89 N 63'38'31' E 41.64 FT L105 N 24'31'38' E 23.76 FT XD Wetland
1-20 S 3120
12
W 36.10 FT
' 1-90 N 4233'16' E 34.19 FT 1-106 N 0010'47' W 2262 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH
1-21 S 5775
44' IN 30.43 FT
'
' L91 N 41'47'23' E 33.11 FT L107 N 39'25'10" E 25.38 FT L1094 N 4601'17' 25.17 FT
1-22 S 1878
02
W I l l 4.15 FT
'
' L92 N 7108'57' E 23.86 FT L108 N 67'36'41' E 9.02 FT 1-1095 N 7356 2' E 31.36 FT
1-23 S 36'40
56
IN 29.47 FT
'
" 1-93 S 5818'32' E 23.60 FT 1-109 S 2430'49' E 36.49 FT 1-1096 N 67'11'34" E 27.54 FT
1-24 S 14'05
50
W 134.86 FT
' L94 S 0600'07' W 239 FT 1-110 S 46 50'37' W 35.90 FT L1097 N 5634'32' E 2277 FT
L25 S 3379
4
65.69 FT L711 S 1601'48' W 38.16 FT ,1098 N 87'21'30" E 21.35 FT

L26 S 7607'155.83 FT
ff
'

1-112 N 8072'22' W 20.29 FT
1-1099 N 84'50'46' E 20.20 FT
L27 S 26"19
545.05 FT XJ
Wetland
,113 S 42'31'09' W 30.23 FT
L1100 N 6209'26' 15.42 FT
1-28 S 170941E 31.56 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH ,114
S 69'13'58" W 28.63 FT 1-1101 S 49'08'56' E 8.37 FT
L1071 N 51'16'30' E 24.80 FT 1-1 15
S 0004'50" W 37.46 FT L1102 S 34 3'33" W 10.48 FT

BoundaryAlong ong NCSR 1137 1-1072 N 59'59'53' 28.68 FT
L116 S 1902'03' E 13.16 FT L1103 S 81 15'39' W 14.91 FT

RING LENGTH 1-1073 N 5402'03' E 26.92 FT
1-117 N 88'33'44' W 13.90 FT 1-1104 5 79'41'05' W 18.95 F7

5'15 W 81
06 FT 1-1074 S 84'16'09' E 21.17 FT
1-118 S 35'31'21' W 42.96 FT 1-115 S 76'49'43' W 18.15 FT
.
5'32' W 100
30 FT 1-1075 N 81 25'34' 23.30 FT L119 S 62'44'56" W 34.83 FT L1106 S 76 17'00' W 19.91 FT
r
.
'17' W 108
63 FT L1076 S 77'52'57' E 21.61 FT
1-120 N 86 59'47' W 24.8
FT 1-1107 S 60'56'12' W 10.97 FT
.
'10' W 108
69 FT 1-1077 S 15'53'20' W 20.81 FT 1
L121 S 6600'09" W 49.81 FT 1-1108 S 6'33'46' W 16.82 FT
.
4'26" E 74
20 FT L1078 N 87 57'15' W 23.99 FT L1109 S 65'28'32" W 20.08 FT
.
4'51' E 100.99 FT ,1079 N 8704'52" W 28.96 FT
1
'
'
'
XC Wetland 77'58'05' W 18.42 FT
'

1-1719 S 69'39'40' E 100.01 FT L
080 S 55
W 31.09 FT
58
55
'
'
'
LINE BEARING Li 111 S 6770
43' W 17.68 FT

1-1720 S 63'20'21' E 116.29 FT LI081 S 19
W 23.34 FT
43
41
L1082 S 32'55'51" W 31.56 FT LENGTH
L1112 N 81'44'23' 26.71 FT
1-1083 S 1404'31' W 28.74 FT ,1113 S 88'41'15' 15.33 FT
XH Wetland L1084 S 68'53'19' W 41.70 FT L1114 S 64'38'41' 26.40 FT
UNE BEARING LENGTH L1085 S 47'31'19" W 32.15 FT 11115 N 6907'56' E 15.97 FT
1-961 S 3510'14' W 24.51 FT 1-7086 S 75'43'06' W 21.59 FT L1116 S 7178'27' E 28.59 FT
1-963 S 61'43'1 ' W 2204 FT L1087 S 41'53'02' W 18.30 FT L111 S 4979'34' 22
1
FT
L964 S 72'48'00' W 24.72 FT L1088 N 0839'53' E 23.14 FT 1
L1118 8
24.11
S 3012'21' E F7
1-965 S 3978'19' W 20.40 FT L1089 N 36'59'07' 21.93 F7 1-7119 S 3103'37' W 19.40 FT
1-966 N 21'37'34" E 3274 FT L1090 N 55'24'14' 26.22 FT
1-974 N 39'46'50' 21.63 FT ,1091 N 6430'18" E 28.15 Fr
1-975 N 4411'53' E 27.72 FT 1-1092 N 16'50'38' E 26.52 FT
1-976 N 7808'42' E 14.34 FT ,1093 N 16'45'46' E 33.25 FT Sheet No. Six of Ten

.61 FT
L977 S 3335'55' E 15
Figure 9

' BEARING LENGTH

3'35'41' W 2233 FT
007'30' W 2224 FT
7'36'26" W 20.60 FT
JG Wetland VH Wetland VG Wetland GE Wetland
UNE BEARING LENGTH
1-1371
'
'
' LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING " LENGTH
N 19
W 26.87 FT
19
16
1-1372
'
'
" L1406 S 55'14'24" W 11.07 FT L1515 S 00'24'49" W 20.20 FT L1591 S 6697'15' E 7.10 FT
W 46.38 FT
N 34
02
35
L1373
'
'
' L1407 N 38'01'48' E 21.31 FT L1516 S 3813'06" W 33.66 FT 1-7592 N 62-20'12- E 43
15 FT
W 12.82 FT
N 28
51
27
1-1374
'
'
' L1408 N 30'4 '40' 25.80 FT L1517 S 39'5 '57- W 39.22 FT .
1-1593 S 73'23'46' E 15
89 FT
20.49 FT
S 47
24
07
1-1375
'
'
' L1409 N 30'46'17' 46.99 FT 1-1518 S 43'52'15" W 39.46 FT .
L1594 S 63'24'28' E 19.02 FT
S 49
E 16.86 FT
54
00
1376
1
'
'
' L1410 N 46'20'44' 33.59 FT L1519 S 589 '33' W 3283 FT L1595 N 65-02'51` E 19.33 FT
-
36.39 FT
N 82
28
51
1-1377
'
'
" L1411 S 4492'13' 41.58 FT L1520 S 4892'04' W 19.44 FT L1596 N 17'19'52
W 13.26 FT
35.36 FT
S 71
42
27
1-1378
'
'
' L7412 S 16'28'52" W 23.29 FT L7521 S 199649" W 4212 FT .
L1597 N 66-20'42' W 7.73 FT
28.37 FT
S 66
44
27
1-1379
'
'
' L7413 S 14'22'1 8' W 19.62 FT L1522 S 02'59'43" 30.29 FT L1598 N 22'44'36' W 18.03 FT
S 57
40.65 FT
35
07
L1380
'
' L1414 S 56'48'00" 22.75 FT L1523 S 01'49'58" W 23.89 FT L1599 N 3806'54' E 14.21 FT
39.24 FT
S 6995
49
1-1381
'
'
' L1415 S 7721'38" 26.75 FT L1524 S 1393'58' W 24.78 FT L1600 S 8821'46' E 26.18 FT
28.00 FT
N 18
47
25
1-1382
'
' L1416 S 30'06'37' W 2242 FT
' L1525 S 20'09'07' W 28.17 FT L1601 N 0227'12" E 20.07 FT
E 18.94 FT
S 8978
24
1-1383
'
'
' L1417 S 1I'07
59" E 36.22 FT L1526 N 49'03'30' W 23.63 FT L1602 2021'37' W 18.83 FT
E 13.25 FT
S 16
49
47
1-1384
'
" L1418 S 54'42'41" E 36.62 FT L1527 N 68'03'14' W 18.32 FT L1603 N 55'55'25 FT
' E 26
27
W 14.14 FT
S 8499
54
L1385
'
'
' L1419 N 76'20'45" E 41.10 FT L1528 S 20'58'41' W 19.69 FT .
L1604 N 26'31'05" E 29.80 FT
W 17.68 FT
S 20
53
42
'
' L1420 N 02'32'47-W 24.03 FT L1529 S 55'41'33' W 15.62 FT L1605 N 24'45'17' E 26
03 FT
L1386 S 29'46
W 28.86 FT
19
L1387
'
'
' L1421 S 79'55'50" W 25.25 FT L1530 S 50'37'16' W 25.01 FT .
L7606 N 1794'31" W 2296 FT
E 19.17 FT
4
S 50
59
L1388
'
'
" L1422 S 5255'53" W 25.71 FT
' L1531 S 50'20'42" W 17.94 FT 1-1607 N 28'52'11' W 26.82 FT
W 30.40 FT
S 01
01
21
'
' L1423 N 52'37
35' W 25.86 FT L1532 S 1828'53' W 30.18 FT 1-1608 S 0396'55' E 19
66 FT
1-1389 S 0194
W 40.57 FT
36
'
' 1-1424 N 0099'37' E 29.45 FT L1533 S 2091'49' W 24.57 FT .
1-1609 S 079149" 18
87 FT
1-1390 N 46'09
E 28.16 FT
50
'
" L1425 N 17'38'39" W 19.29 FT. I L1534 S 2895'21" W 26.39 FT .
L1610 S 0491'21' W 19
76 FT
Ll391 S 71'08
E 8.42 FT
31
'
' L1426 N 4158'24' E 28.35 FT L1535 S 54'03'00" W 2244 FT .
1-1671 S 264527" W 14
21 FT
1-1392 S 28'58
33.63 FT
47
'
' 1-1427 N 3151'17" E 11:78 FT 1-1536 S 6698'46' W 17.97 FT .
1-7612
1
S 55'03'33' W 34
14 FT
1-1393 699
W 37.86 FT
16
'
" L7428 N 26'00' E 23.86 FT L1537 S 4000'03' W 22.32 FT .
1-1613 N 7025'32' W 19
37 FT
1-1394 N 87'25
W 31.44 FT
20 L1429 N 0228'44' E 27.94 FT L1538 S 05'46'01' E 19.94 FT .

1-1395 N 7091'00" W 34.09 f7-
L1430 S 4826'45' E 20.28 FT
L1539 S 35'25'20' W
32.59 FT
1-1396 N 4991'28" W 25.68 FT L1431 N 74'23'06` E 24.66 FT VE Wetland
1-1397 N 81'29'19" W 30.26 FT
'
' L1432 S 87'45'48" E 25.71 FT GF Wetland UNE BEARING LENGTH
1-1398 N 6294
W 37.19 FT
13
'
' L7433 N 6 '40'49' E 17.86 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH
LENGTH 1-1614 S 2693'23' E 7.05 FT
L1399 N 8594
W 24.18 FT
5
L740
'
' L1434 N 5755'15" E 3238 FT 1-1540 N 3758'10" E 3
39 L1615 S 2850'57- E 31.01 FT
1 S 0097
W 27.53 FT
32
1-1401
'
'
" L1435 S 68'59' 0" W 17.83 FT
' .
L1541 N 16'30'10' W 33
13 FT L1616 S 32'55'08" W 18.65 FT
E 36.35 FT
S 14
01
40
L1402
'
'
' L1436 S 56'32
56" W 24.37 FT
'
' .
L1542 N 52'01'35" W 24
84 FT L1617 S 5791'58' W 16.64 FT
E 34.13 FT
S 01
00
22
L1403
'
'
' L1437 S 07-07
30.06 FT
05
' .
L1543 N 5797'56' W 25
63 FT L1618 S 33'22'25' W 11.59 FT
47.25 FT
S 09
03
24
L1404
'
" L1438 S 17'40
39" W 42.38 FT .
1-1544 N 7792'02' W 14
73 FT L1619 S 68'00'10" W 19.74 FT
E 54.78 FT
S 2092
07
1-1405
'
' L1439 S 04'05'18' E 46.34 FT
' .
1-1545 N 85'05'18" W 15
06 FT L1620 S 50'09'54" E 19.81 FT
W 4290 FT
S 18 09
35 L1440 N 81'03
19" W 30.01 FT
' .
1-1546 S 6157'22 W 15
84 FT 1-7621 S 31'37'56" E 29.14 FT
1-1441 N 66'02
50' E 25.21 FT
'
` .
L1547 S 69'47'43' W 18
34 FT 1-1622 S 1724'12' W 17.06 FT
1-1442 N 1693
W 28.94 FT
49
' .
L1548 S 4842'09" W 22
43 FT 1-1623 S 4922'33' W 18.00 FT
K Wetland L1443 N 6 '31
14' W 40.14 FT
' .
L1549 N 87'52'54" W 10
92 FT 1-1624 N 05'39'48' W 4.28 FT
LINE BEARING LENGTH L1444 N 2529
36" W 35.72 F7 .

6392'07' W 3260 FT
N
L1445 N 6251'19" E 28.63 FT L1550 S 5525'40' W 28.38 FT
O
N 6598'13' W 13.65 FT
L7446 N 28'07'07" E 26.43 F7 L7551 S 59'39'26' W 19.62 FT
'
GD Wetland
S 7692'59` W 17.06 FT L1447 N 29'00'23' W 20.25 FT L1552 S 57'09
17' W 27.92 FT
L1553
'
' LINE BEARING LENGTH
S 40'24'53" W 29.09 FT L1448 N 47'08'37' W 36.38 FT
'
" W 15.43 FT
S 8798
47
L1554 N 44'56'56" W 11
92 FT 1-1625 N 00938' W 4.47 FT
S 64'47'18' W 30.39 FT L1449 S 43'44
E 47.38 FT
32
' .
L1555 N 0
75 FT
4 21'02' W 9 1-1626 N 17'07'06' W 16.26 FT
1-7473 N 68'51'28' W 3251 FT 1-1450 S 69'34
46" E 26.15 FT
'
' .
L1556 N 52'35'52' 14
05 FT 1-1627 17.45 FT
1-1474
N
26
.80
FT
23
42
'
03
"
W L1451 N 6991
42.93 F7
59 .
L1557 N 60'39'39' 11
44 FT
L1475 N 59'00'51' W 15.18 FT L1452 N 45-02'22" E 2232 FT
'
" .
L1 55g N 45'29'24" E 10
07 FT
1-1476 S 5799'24" W 6.61 F7 L1453 S 24'03
W 30.86 FT
13 .
L1559
'
'
'

1-1477 S 66 23'25' E 15.80 FT
1-1454 S 7196'15" W 36.25 FT N 52
46
E 26.46 FT
00
GC Wetland
1-1 478
21
.72
N
74
'47
FT
'
34
'
E 1-1455 S 1133'16' E 31.69 FT 1-1560 N 74'38'05" W 10.86 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH

L1479 N 1859'16" E 17.14 FT
L1456 S 1293'15' 29.57 FT L1561 N 5924'36' E 27.17 FT
L1629 N 40'21'43' E 30
56 FT
1-1480 N 54'01'18' E 29.53 FT L1457 N 1594'48" W 23.76 FT 1-1562 N 12 06'34' E 19.71 FT
1-7563
'
' .
L1630 N 4317'06' E 22.45 FT

1-1481 N 56'04'53' E 26.96 FT 1-1458 N 2853'1 0" W 35.83 FT N 5900
E 79.16 FT
41
1-1564
'
'
' L1631 N 30'39'20' E
8.09 FT
L1482 N 44'29'14' E 35.55 F7 L7 45g N 6026'00" W 41.72 FT S 79
E 18.51 FT
50
34

L1483 S 39'06'29' W 18.06 FT
L1460 S 81-03'07" W 28.52 FT L1565 S 57'02'10' E 21.38 FT

L1484 S 00'09'54" E 8.74 FT
L1461 S 06'45'43' W 17.09 FT 1-1566 N 61 24'52` E 24.71 FT
VD Wetland

L1485 S 01'40'28" W 30.36 FT 1-1462 S 10'42'57' 29.34 FT L1567 S 76'59'15' E 25.63 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH

1-1486 S 2124'45" E 82.87 FT
L1463 S 08'00'10" E 36.03 FT L1568 N 4997'15" E 20.39 FT
'
L1632 S 20'03'49' W 27
75 FT
1-7464 N 79'51'02' 23.88 f7- 1-1569 N 23'31
37' E 16.70 FT
' .
L1633 S 7196'18' E 2202 FT
1-1465 S 67'05'31' 29954 FT L1570 N 5856
16' E 2283 FT
' L7634 S 29'48'30' E 24.31 FT
1-7466 S 40'4959 E 30.24 FT L1571 N 38'05
11" E 26.57 FT L1635 N 6136'17" W 14.29 FT
LINE BEARING LENGTH 1-1573 N 3692'24" E 39.90 FT

L1574 N 53'04'30" E 39.39 FT L1637 S 39'46'29' E 25.88 FT

1-7575 N 03'41'48' W 22.00 FT L1638 S 0357'09" W 24.12 FT

VA Wetland
1-1576 N 2248'21" E 3239 FT 11639 S 86 07'00' W9.89 FT

LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1577 N 39'52'29' E 20.85 FT L1640 N 16'42'23" W 37.25 F7

1-1496 S 3534'17' W 4.72 FT
L1578 N 40'48'01" E 35.47 FT L1641 N 06 01'27' W 28.45 FT

1-1497 S 0596'30" E 18.40 F7
L1579 N 2527'12" E 26.97 FT 1-1642 N 2742'19' W 15.27 FT

1-1498 S 23'53'13' E 22-39 FT
1-1580 N 3091'18' E 24.26 FT 1-7643 N 52'06'35' W 19.70 FT

1-1499 S 1391'50" W 28.09 FT
1-1581 N 7898'00' E 34.50 FT 1-1644 N 51'31'27' W 20.41 FT
1-1500 S 47'08'07' W 25.74 FT L1582 N 57'08'06" E 56.05 FT
1-1507 S 43'00'31" W 29.89 FT L1583 N 3093'44' E 4.60 FT
S 68'02'53' W 26.11 FT VC Wetland
GG Wetland S 42'29'31' W 24.58 FT NE BEARING LENGTH
LINE BEARING LENGTH S 36'08'46" W 24.46 FT
E VF Wetland 645 S 0'57'40' W 31.11 FT
k

1-1507 N 5999'08" E 2.71 FT L1505
S 2552'57' W .45 UNE BEARING LENGTH 646 S 6293'10' W 19.80 FT

L1508 N 48'49'16" E 24.
FT N 50'52'05" W 9.23 F7 L1584 S 09'37'41' E 7.29 FT L
647 S 8 89005' W 20.31 FT
1
L1509
N 47'32'59" E 37.771 FT L1585 S 01'59'34' W 37.44 FT

1-1510 N 54'07'15' 20.59 FT L1586 S 33'27'36" W 34.07 FT
1-1511 N 3254'01' 62 FT
E 19. 1-1587 S 19'44'43" W 24.54 FT

1-7512 N 02'52'44" E 42.58 FT L1588
S 25
W 33.4
9 FT
'19
'
52

L1513 N 3793'23' E 50.22 FT L1589 S
30.97 FT
5422
'
`
W
13

1-1514 N 5196'41' E 8.87 FT 1-7590 N
8998'15
' W 35.68 FT
Sleet No. Eight of Ten
Figure 9
GA Wetland

1-1487 S 86'05'16" W 2.77 FT
1-7488 S 74'59'02' E 21.40 F7
1-1489 S 1235'50" W 27.17 f7
1-1490 S 14'50'26" W 2237 FT
1-1491 S 01'57'48' E 28.71 FT
1-1492 S 56'22'38' W 17.48 F7
1-1493 S 39'21'09' W 37.23 FT
1-1494 N 30'06'00' W 36.04 F7

1-1495
S 01'56'09' W 1-1467 S 19'30'53' W 8.21 FT L1572 N 39'46'19" E 36.07 FT L1636 S 0 '46'05" W 25.76 FT
5.43 FT

5'

N 45'34'33' W
1-1628 N 12'05'49' E 4.22 FT
L/591
Begin
i
5g8C?Sg
`,
t
C75gJ
GE Wetland aL1600,`ig0 1a
0.17 Acre k < v W L1614
Begin
c Ri
o
S
b
Q
C
?
b,?
1
1J
b1b
v
?
W Wetland
GD Wet/and 0.04 Acre f
0.01 Acre f 7 03
(L1625 L1626)
(L1627 1.1628??$ w o
NORTH GC Wetland
CAROLINA 0.02 Acre f - End
GRID NORTH (1.7629 L1630 1.1631) L1624
NAD 83
4 LL1Begin
632
I 11 -
W Wetland
Vt; W'dond 0. 0.5 Acre t
End 0.02 Acre f L1639
n
b
ENLARGEMENT
'g 1 inch a 100 feet
G8 Wetland
0.28 Acre f
L166?
VB Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1648 S 49'55'36' E 45.19 FT
L1649 S 52'35'08" E 28.63 FT
L1650 S 58'42'04" E 31.93 FT
L1651 S 65'49'30' E 44.68 FT
Ll652 S 72'16'31" E 44.94 FT
L1653 S 08-24'58' W 31.56 FT
L1654 S 7635'08' W 25.31 FT
L1655 N 80'37'30' W 44.20 FT
L1656 S 61'27'01' W 29.92 FT
L1657 S 16'41'19" W 24.36 FT
L1658 N 77'51'20" W 23.08 FT
L1659 N 30'59'55' W 32.19 FT
L1660 S 66'56'36" W 33.63 FT
L1661 S 52'48'32' W 35.69 FT
1.1662 S 47 58'19' W 18.21 FT
L1663 S 64'11'35' W 35.42 FT
V8 Wetland
0.46 Acre f
GB Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
Ll664 S 64'11'35' W 34.59 FT
L1665 N 15'12'19' W 2.86 FT
L1666 N 14'06'35' E 36.94 FT
L1667 N 23'48'00' E 50.34 FT
L1668 N 03'34'38' 34.86 FT
L1669 N 24'13'58" E 39.46 FT
L1670 N 05'51'48" W 36.22 FT
L1671 N 18'53'41' 26.70 FT
L1672 N 14'2437' W 30.36 Fr
L1673 N 21'57'55' W 30.63 FT
L1674 N 07'31'17" E 31.66 FT
L1675 N 18'41'39" E 37.26 FT
Ll676 N 30'13'12' E 21.88 FT
Sheet No. Nine of Ten
Figure 9
EA Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1677 S 60'37'29' E 3293 FT
L1678 S 5 58'15' E 26.31 FT
L1679 S 58'07'15' E 40.70 FT
L1680 N 2041'07' E 3266 FT
1.7681 N 26 03'02" E 36.55 FT
L1682 S 7632'27' E 28.78 FT
L1683 S 3'00'57' W 24.39 FT
L1684 S 3 ',32'11* W 47.57 FT
L1685 S 33'37'24' W 28.92 FT
L1686 S 18'10'19' E 40.15 FT
L1687 S 34'34'59" E 31.84 FT
L1688 S 2356'08* E 33.86 FT
L1689 S 5238'25' E 28.73 FT
L1690 S 3648'29' E 36.32 FT
1.1691 S 21'48'16' E 23.18 FT
SJA2 Stream
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1692 N 54'04'42' W 12.33 FT
L1693 N 20'41'18" W 16.85 FT
L1694 N 55'01'29' W 10.56 FT
L1695 N 22'25'40' W 22.16 FT
L1696 N 00'38'44' E 10.17 FT
L1697 N 41'19'39' W 14.86 FT
L1698 N 11'18'06' W 14.02 FT
L1699 N 54'55'26" W 30.13 FT
L1700 N 24'00'50' W 12.72 FT
L1701 N 6549'50" W 9.83 FT
L1702 N 17'36'57" W 17.47 FT
L1703 N 48'16'39' W 27.82 FT
1.1704 N 02'31'00' E 10.03 FT
LI705 N 26'2622' W 11.28 FT
L1706 N 02'23'27' E 6.14 FT
J
L1707 N 40'49'38' W 14.05 FT
L1708 N 25'58'08' W 10.95 FT
JA2 Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1709 S 61'31'07" E 32.79 FT
L1710 S 34'00'57" E 41.79 FT
L1711 S 37'09'18" E 47.97 FT
L1712 S 10'07 35' E 32.63 FT
L1713 S 46 29'05' E 30.00 FT
L1714 S 2225'18" E 36.14 FT
L1715 S 46 05'36' E 40.12 FT
1.1716 S 57 50'59" E 29.12 FT
PE Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1717 N 03'58'39' W 39.95 FT
L1718 N 27'15'17' W 43.20 FT
L1719 S 6646'27' W 32.21 FT
L1720 S 84'55'54' W 50.96 FT
1.1721 S 29'43'11' W 70.80 FT
Ll722 S 51'14'18' W 38.28 FT
L1723 S 08'08'47' W 48.42 FT
L1724 S 05'45'32' W 26.90 FT
L1725 S 32'21'50' W 73.86 FT
L1726 S 24'24'18' W 43.25 FT
Ll727 S 38'41'16' W 53.45 FT
L1728 S 61'19'00' W 61.74 FT
L1729 S 1836'31" W 51.87 FT
L1730 S 06'04'38" W 69.16 FT
PA Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1731 S 33'51'33'. E 35.51 FT
Ll732 N 4935'40' E
- 32.59 FT
71733 49-56"56' E
V 22.43 FT
L1734 707-58-27- E 31.95 FT
1.7735 S 04'05'04" W 20.09 FT
L1736 N 88'19'07' E 16.06 FT
L1737 N 11'21'55' E 52.98 FT
Lt 738 N 07'58'18" E 33.14 FT
L1739 N 6250'16' E 45.95 FT
L1740 N 66'17'54' E 32.37 FT
1.1741 N 59'10'04' E 39.92 FT
L1742 N 63'07'00' E 41.15 FT
L1743 N 01'42'57' E 12.71 FT
L1744 N 05'09'08' W 53.79 FT
L1745 N 0616'02' E 59.62 FT
L1746 N 34*04*17" E 74.40 FT
1.1747 N 13'00'14" E 37.75 FT
L1748 N 3748'36' W 10.56 F7
PC /PD Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1749 N 56'05'42' W 28.15 FT
L1750 N 34'39'56' W 46.61 FT
L1751 S 83 54'31' W 21.69 FT
L1752 N 45'42'19" W 23. 6 FT
71753 N 28'48'51' W 47.44 FT
71754 N 2944'31' W 38.21 FT
1.1755 N 64'02'44' W 21.51 FT
PB Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1756 N 15'42'49' E 41.64 FT
L1757 N 88'35'44' W 13.52 FT
L1758 S 08'18'55' W 31.25 FT
L1759 S 35'25'35' E 11.66 FT
Wetlands Survey for.-
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, L.L.C.
Uwharrie Environmental Project
Properties located along the north side of N.C. Secondary Road 1137
Troy and Uwharrie Townships, Montgomery County, North Carolina
Deed Reference Book 378 Page 28, Book 394 Page 311,
Book 263 Page 577, and Book 283 Page 812
Surveyed by Thomas J. Fields, PLS-2906, in January thru February 2001.
REVISED & UPDATED on May 10, 2004.
400 0 400
Scale is in Feet
1"= 400'
From the office of
WRIGHT & FIELDS LAND SURVEI1NG
1340 Albemarle Road, Suite C
TROY, N.C. 27371
Job No. 2001-1, 2002-56, & 2002-248

Bearings & Distances along Wetland Boundaries ( 12-1996 Wetland) 12-1996A Wetland
LINE BEARING - DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE
A32 S 17'19'31' W 21.46 FT A118 S 21'49'27' W 24.79 FT ' A204 N 37'26'26' E 37.08 FT B1 S 86.02'44' E 47
76 FT
A33 S 26.04'13' W 34.85 FT A119 S 18.07'00' E 32.93 FT A205 N 41.36'50' E 26.88 FT .
B2 N 81'07'05' E 51.34 FT
A34 S 33.51'47' W 40.41 FT A120 S 51.03'08' E 36.52 FT A206 N 56'18'53' E 18.86 FT B3 N 78'53'00' E 42.73 FT
A35 S 36.46'49' W 44.64 FT A121 S 27.45'09' E 38.70 FT A207 N 54.33'04' E 36.75 FT B4 N 76'55'31' E 49
60 FT
A36 S 40'08'53' V 61.97 FT A122 S 12'01'46' W 31.77 FT A208 N 43'09'42' E 28.45 FT .
B5 N 28'34'17' E 36.74 FT
A37 S 33.04'50' W 57.57 FT A123 S 15.39'18' W 38.52 FT A209 N 27.05'30' E 52.65 FT B6 N 39'07'53' E 55.60 FT
A38 S 00.48'41' W 55.70 FT A124 S 10'33'21' W 42.51 FT A210 N 23.34'37' E 38.26 FT B7 N 35.22'51' E 61
40 FT
A39 S 22.34'42' W 25.81 FT A125 S 07.07'36' E 42.39 FT A211 N 15'18'53' E 48,28 FT .
B8 N 03.32'45' E 59
25 FT
A40 S 36.36'38' W 62.12 FT A126 S 34'29'10' W 48.87 FT A212 N 14'30'01' W 58.25 FT .
B9 N 45'10'44' E 49.52 F7
A41 S 17.56'32' W 43.52 FT A127 S 29.31'30' W 40.97 FT A213 N 26.55'47' W 39.06 FT B10 N 77.34'25' E 56.92 FT
A42 S 06.36'39' W 47.88 FT A128 S 43.37'44' E 36.44 FT A214 N 13.36'39' E 30.83 FT B11 N 64.18'09' E 52.51 FT
A43 S 31.25'07' V 45.13 FT A129 S 34.47'38' E 34.62 FT A215 N 25.43'31' E 42.48 FT B12 S 61.29'58' E 52.68 FT
A44 S 54.37'24' E 43.62 FT A130 S 24.18'02' V 44,33 FT A216 N 01.35'26' E 67.23 FT B13 S 10.35'42' W 69.87 FT
A45 S 49'42'33' E 29.33 FT A131 S 27'01'36' V 28.83 FT A217 N 18'52'33' W 48.58 FT B14 S 21.44'03' W 58.87 FT
A46 S 50.43'50' E 39.87 FT A132 S 17.56'52' W 33.58 FT A218 N 09.22'59' W 52.75 FT B15 N 28.51'20' E 59.69 FT
A47 S 21'08'08' E 45.51 FT A133 S 55'05'53' W 37.47 FT A219 N 30.31'31' W 66.38 FT B16 N 24.56'59' E 46.26 FT
A48 S 15.34'36' E 39.84 FT A134 S 76'21'06' W 15.32 FT A220 N 39.35'24' V 51.73 FT
A49 S 31'39'08' V 45.69 FT A135 S 40.02'27' W 29.27 FT A221 N 26'06'40' W 45.60 FT 12-199813 Wetland
ASO S 12.10'52' W 30.84 FT A136 S 44.28'28' W 55.37 FT A222 N 14.39'46' E 32.91 FT LINE BEARING DISTANCE
A51 S 31'26'28' W 42.00 FT A137 S 14.22'44' E 49.64 FT A223 N 66.51'42' E 21.60 FT B17 S 12.50'08' V 39.22 FT
A52 S 18.42'42' W 58.97 FT A138 S 55.34'35' E 37.21 FT A224 N 65.32'58' E 35.32 FT B18 N 24.14'08' E 38.97 FT
A53 S 39.08'22' W 55.16 FT A139 S 80'14'38' E 53.82 FT A225 N 27.22'18' E 32.68 FT B19 S 63.50'05' E 31.85 FT
A54 S 25.37'20' W 53.26 FT A140 S 29'45'06' E 67.94 FT A226 N 17'20'54' E 41.02 FT B20 S 11.44'19' W 33.43 FT
A55 S 31.51'18' W 65.97 FT A141 S 07.10'20' E 37.65 FT A227 N 24.06'50' E 48.26 FT B21 S 64'59'50' E 39.28 FT
A56 S 47.33'03' W 45.17 FT A142 S 08'31'20' E 56.53 FT A228 N 18'20'53' E 34.77 FT B22 S 41.41'21' E 34.00 FT
A57 S 65.23'06' W 43.70 FT A143 S 05.49'07' E 57.39 FT A229 N 39.41'44' W 48.83 FT B23 S 52'16'18' E 32 76 FT
A58 S 71'44'15' W 41.23 FT A144 S 29.59'45' W 44.89 FT A230 N 61.05'53' E 48.90 FT B24 N 89.47'32' E 3015 FT
A59 S 75.21'53' W 45.99 FT A145 S 07.21'04' V 32.98 FT A231 N 02.10'38' E 70,89 FT B25 S 70.46'46' E 26.70 FT
A60 S 78.15'02' W 38.65 FT A146 S 44.11'05' W 29.49 FT A232 N 15.01'45' E 40.12 FT B26 S 59'49'13' E 3456 FT
A61 N 85.09'56' W 52.32 FT A147 S 27.02'55' W 16.45 FT A233 N 03.48'30' V 38.80 FT B27 S 54.32'16' E 23.32 FT
A62 N 87.40'14' W 51.68 FT A148 S 00.40'50' E 21.34 FT A234 S 26'10'45' E 56.67 FT B28 S 50.51'37' E 23.24 FT
A63 N 68.12'48' W 69.17 FT A149 S 82'29'32' E 16.38 FT A235 S 09'02'02' E 69.74 FT B29 N 67.33'09' W 24
72 FT
A64 S 74.59'37' W 3125 FT A150 S 31'03'38' E 28.34 FT A236 S 27.29'41' E 45.48 FT .
B30 N 86.12'56' W 24.47 FT
A65 S 17'14'15' V 32.58 FT A151 S 11.23'54' E 38.61 FT A237 S 00.25'42' E 37.87 FT B31 S 85.47'06' W 32.02 FT
A66 S 76.10'30' E 31.98 FT A152 S 12'21'15' W 36.41 FT A238 S 06'08'18' V 42.19 FT 232 N 08.30'10' E 37.48 FT
A67 S 58'53'58' E 44.15 FT A153 S 40.59'41' W 45.25 FT A239 S 31'09'45' E 62.45 FT B33 N 30.26'10' V 25.63 FT
A68 N 86.47'23' E 53.68 FT A154 S 55'00'14' V 48.74 FT A240 S 38'54'36' E 61.26 FT 234 N 39.55'30' W 40.29 FT
A69 S 18.10'16' E 44.97 FT A155 S 53.47'27' W 43.24 FT A241 S 39.57'21' E 43.70 FT
A70 S 36.45'20' . E 58.87 FT A156 S 51.56'33' W 47.76 FT A242 S 48'29'38' E 55.71 FT
A71 S 64.0321' E 44.29 FT A157 S 48'55'09' W 41.10 FT A243 S 34.58'53' E 36.00 FT
A72 N 52.36'33' E 43.36 FT A158 S 71'42'54' W 34.20 FT A244 S 12'27'55' E 53.60 FT
A73 N 03.01'50' E 43.65 FT A159 N 51'07'46' V 64.57 FT A245 S 04'14'22' E 45.59 FT
A74 N 32'28'52' E 45.11 FT A160 N 55'10'58' V 50,27 FT A246 S 02'34'17' V 3153 FT
A75 N 62'18'32' E 23,86 FT A161 N 44'45'17' W 51.00 FT A247 S 71.10'57' E 22.20 FT
A76 S 74.31'12' E 32.09 FT A162 N 40.03'56' V 58.15 FT A249 N 67.41'52' E 37,09 FT
A77 S 41.15'10' E 34.01 FT A163 N 60'01'11' W 49,63 FT A249 N 13.35'29' W 76.14 FT
A78 S 22.40'53' W 24.39 FT A164 S 74.13'25' W 43.10 FT A250 N 25.43'28' W 54.88 FT
A79 S 64.52'53' W 33.72 FT A165 S 78'59'22' W 49.96 FT A251 N 25'29'49' W 30.69 FT
ASO N 72'26'15' W 20.36 FT A166 S 68.08'06' E 29.38 FT A252 N 26.14'38' W 27.90 FT
A81 S 16.24'02' W 32.28 FT A167 N 83.40'15' E 50.95 FT A253 N 22.56'56' V 55.44 FT
A82 S 30'38'05' V 27.10 FT A168 S 75.37'39' E 46.40 FT A254 N 34'05'13' W 42.95 FT
A83 S 44.54'20' V 45.19 FT A169 S 42'49'34' E 71.21 FT A255 N 26.53'57' W 50.95 FT
A84 S 55.53'41' W 43.99 FT A170 S 48.48'01' E 68.27 FT A256 N 09.27'53' W 62.15 FT
A85 S 31.59'51' V 61.85 FT A171 S 51.46'59' E 28.24 FT A257 N 41.14'27' W 46.83 FT
A86 S 50'51'34' W 43.74 FT A172 S 17'03'46' E 34.52 FT A258 N 18.39'16' W 60.95 FT
A87 S 13.32'42' V 38.18 FT A173 S 38.56'33' E 2946 FT A259 N 23'08'14' W 40.57 FT
A88 S 17.08'38' E 38.12 FT A174 S 89'06'14' E 22.11 FT A260 N 15'58'59' W 33.54 FT
A89 S 88.30'42' E 26.51 FT A175 N 76'33'40' E 29.36 FT A261 N 30'48'43' W 56.60 FT
A90 N 75'23'38' E 43.75 FT A176 S 66'40'32' E 16.00 FT A262 N 13.42'01' E 37.80 FT
A91 N 17.30'54' E 48.12 FT A177 S 28'11'53' W 45.50 FT A263 N 14.35'35' W 38.20 FT
A92 N 37.26'39' E 43.91 FT A178 S 31.47'53' W 30.80 FT A264 N 46.58'16' W 34.04 FT
A93 N 58.26'53' E 44.26 FT A179 S 13.54'46' W 40.97 FT A265 N, 52'25'23' W 46.77 FT
A94 N 49'43'26' E 23.17 FT A180 S 25'30'03' V 45.03 FT A266 N 13'53'09' E 31.93 FT
A95 N 41'55'17' E 39.24 FT A181 S 65'47'08' W 44.75 FT A267 N 03'37'14' V 66.02 FT
A96 N 32.28'38' E 44.82 FT A182 S 89.41'48' W 46.22 FT A268 N 16.23'43' E 24.56 FT
A97 N 38.54'44' E 89.68 FT A183 S 77.01'19' W 33.76 FT A269 N 04.24'39' W 37.50 FT
A98 N 35.58'42' E 38.59 FT A184 N 86.58'32' V 41.97 FT A270 N 23'27'49' V 45.08 FT
A99 N 26.39'18' E 49.63 FT A185 N 67.16'55' W 40.86 FT A271 N 49.25'00' W 48.98 FT
A100 N 00'55'05' W 59.72 FT A186 N 71.13'52' W 4L55 FT A272 N 48'56'43' E 41.22 FT
A101 N 08.04'28' E 32.54 FT A187 S 82'02'57' V 26.37 FT A273 N 08'26'49' E 49.88 FT
A102 N 26'59'14' E 33.75 FT A188 S 40'28'36' E 29.21 FT A274 N 40'03'52' W 50.66 FT
A103 N 37.47'54' E 45,00 FT A189 S 25'52'39' E 26.76 FT A275 N 25.41'55' V 39.54 FT
A104 N 19'17'23' E 49.60 FT A190 S 49'57'29' E 45.54 FT A276 N 06'02'05' W 48.48 FT
A105 N 37'52'48' E 39.76 FT A191 S 64.28'27' E 50.01 FT A277 N 45.30'35' W 46.55 FT
A106 N 36.41'19' E 26,51 FT A192 N 71.20'01' E 35.29 FT A278 N 63'19'51' W 46.98 FT
A107 N 28.08'35' E 30,00 FT A193 N 75.20'21' E 32.37 FT A279 N 19'46'08' W 29.76 FT
A108 N 08.54'43' E 53.87 FT A194 S 66'06'52' E 24.48 FT A280 N 10'22'07' E 39.31 FT
A109 N 36.47'29' E 32.17 FT A195 S 68.54'35' E 24.21 FT A281 N 20'20'57' E 67.91 FT
A110 S 28.47'54' E 17.33 FT A196 N 29'17'33' E 41.00 FT A282 N 41'44'20' E 45.59 FT
AM S 28.35'51' W 19.78 FT A197 N 39.49'00' E 30.57 FT A283 N 02'23'03' V 48,47 FT
A112 S 13'36'28' W 52.38 FT A198 N 61.28'09' E 38.93 FT A284 N 05.07'44' E 67.68 FT
A113 S 01.58'38' W 42.94 FT A199 N 47.17'57' E 47,55 FT A285 N 36.56'37' E 70.77 FT
A114 S 09.22'39' E 30.69 FT A200 N 01.01'34' V 43.22 FT A286 N 50.48'39' E 32.81 FT
A115 S 18'38'20' E 60.86 FT A201 N 19'59'36' E 48.44 FT A287 N 43.38'18' E 52.41 FT Sheet No. Ten of Ten
A116 S 29'18'34' E 43,23 FT A202 N 28.40'13' E 37.17 FT A288 N 04.48'57' E 42.76 FT
A117 S 25'50'08' W 39.63 FT A203 N 38'48'18' E 38.61 FT A289 N 17.23'20' E 40.53 FT Figure 9
APPENDIX A
Table 1. On-Site Stream Information
Table 2. On-Site Wetland Information
Table 1. On-Site Stream Information
Wetland and
Stream System No. Stream
Flagging
Se uence Length
(Linear Feet) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of Impact
(Linear Feet)
5 SEA 466.13 U -
5 SGA 160.79 U -
5 SEC 1,232.39 U -
5 SED 63.82 U -
4 SJH 953.05 U -
Rocky Creek SEE/SEF/SJE
SEG/SHE 2,416.30 I (portion)
new road crossing 83.16
4 SJB 353.42 I (portion) improved
road crossing 38.17
4 SJA 2,301.52 I (portion) improved
road crossing 29.97
4 SJC 357.83 U -
3 SJG 2,806.74 I (portion) improved
road crossing 40.44
3 SJF 724.27 I (portion)
improved road
crossing 34.01
2 SEI 582.24 I all 582.24
2 SEL 746.16 I (all) 746.16
2 SEJ 251.14 I (all) 251.14
2 SEK 148.4 I (all) 148.4.
2 SEM 511.09 I (all) 511.09
Across SR 1137 SJA2 333.54 U -
6 SP/SPA/SNA 1514.72 I (portion) improved
road crossing 60.2
6 SNB 358.25 U -
6 SPA 251.58 U -
1 SBA 209.85 I (all) 209.85

TOTAL 16,743.23 - 2,734.83
Table 2. On-Site Wetland Information
Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)
5 JE/JF 0.26 U -
5 JD 0.12 U -
5 JC 0.23 U -
5 JB 1.21 U -
5 JA 0.26 U -
5 GK/GL/GM 1.02 U -
4 XA/XB/XE/XF/XG 2.11 U -
4 XC 0.06 U -
4 XD 0.04 U -
4 XK 0.26 U -
4 XL 0.20 U -
4 VJ/XO 0.05 U -
4 XH 0.04 U -
4 XI 0.33 U -
4 XJ 0.16 U -
4 XN 0.05 U -
4 XM/GH/GI/GJ 0.20 U
4 SJD Pond 0.40 U -
4 SJI Pond 1.78 U -
3 GB 0.28 U -
3 GC/GD 0.03 U -
3 GE 0.17 U -
3 GF 0.73 U -
3 GG 0.11 U -
3 GA 0.08 U -
3 PE 0.79 I orlon 0.05
3 VK/XP 0.19 U -
3 VH/VI 1.31 U -
3 JG - 1.17 U -
3 12-1995A 0.74 U -
3 PC/PD 0.04 I (portion) 0.01
3 PB 0.01 I all 0.01
3 PA 0.53 U -
3 VA 0.12 I ordon 0.05
3 VG 0.47 U
3 VF 0.10 U -
3 VE 0.04 U -
3 VD 0.05 U -
3 VC 0.02 U -
Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)
3 VB 0.46 U
2 12-1996 5.42 I (all) 5.42
2 12-1996B 0.31 U -
Across SR 1137 JA2 0.15 U -
Across SR 1137 EA 0.22 U -
6 QC 0.01 U -
6 MY/MZ 0.01 I all 0.01
6 PB 0.01 U -
6 PC 0.01 U -
6 PD 0.04 U -
6 PJ/PK/NG 0.15 U -
6 PE/NB 0.11 U -
6 NC 0.56 U -
6 PF/ND 0.13 U -
6 PG/NE 0.26 U -
6 PH/ZD 0.10 U -
1 MD 0.29 I (all) 0.29
1 MB 0.52 I (all) 0.52
1 MC 0.68 I (all) 0.68

PREVIOUS
EWPACTS 0.95 I (all) 0.95

TOTAL TOTAL 22.32 - 7.99
Note: The impact numbers include 0.95 acres of jurisdictional wetlands that were
impacted previously under the Nationwide Permit Program.
APPENDIX B
Correspondence with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27610
[phone]
17 April 2003
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Bibliography Errata
Mr. Brook:
In a letter dated June 29, 2001, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) informed
Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) that the bibliography to the ESI report An Intensive
Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Uwharrie MSWL Expansion, Mont og_ mery
County, North Carolina by Scott Seibel, Giampaolo Di Gregorio, and Greg Smith was
missing citations from the References Cited. It was stated that an errata to the References
Cited would be acceptable to correct the oversight. Enclosed are two copies of the
References Cited errata for the aforementioned report.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
tt A
Archaeologist/Senior Scientist
Encl.

HODGES,, HARBIN.- NEWBERRY & TRIBBLE? INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
484 MULBERRY STREET, SvrrE 265 • Posy OFFICE Box 974
MAcoN, GEORGIA 31201
H. LOWRY TRMBLE, JR., PE
WMUAM R H0DM, PE
HARoED L. Nrwsm=, PE
J. STEVEN HARKW, PE
JEFFREY M BROWNE, PE
November 26, 2001
Mr. David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Tkmwa a [phone]
Pax [phone]
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Preservation Plan for Sites 31MG1004,1679/1679**,1689, and 1690
HHNT Project No. 1001-303-01
Dear Mr. Brook:
In response to your letters to Richard G. Harmon of January 16, 2001, and June 29, 2001, we are
pleased to supply the enclosed plans for avoiding sites 31MG1004, 1679/1679**, 1689, and 1690
at the Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, North Carolina: -We•are
providing plans, details and a written strategy for avoiding the four sites and ensuring their
protection in the future.
Please let me know if the plans are acceptable, and I will put the preservation plans into effect.
Should you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY & TRIBBLE, INC.
William F. Hodge E.
Principal
WFH/jlm
cc: Ken Lowder
John Murray, P.E.
Brant Lane, P.E.
Jan Gay
Scott Seibel
Encl..
Preservation Plan for Sites 31MG1004,1679/1679**,1689, and 1690
The following are plans for avoiding sites 31MG1004,1679/1679**,1689, and 1690 at the Uwharrie
Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, North Carolina (Figure 1). We are also
providing engineering plan maps to show the locations of the four sites and the placement of fencing
and/or other protective measures. Details of the fencing to be installed are also enclosed (Figures
2-4).
31MG1004
Site 31MG1004 is located along the south bank of Rocky Creek. Periodic flooding of the creek will
continue to deposit alluvium over the site, thus further protecting the cultural deposits under a thick
layer of sediment. The site is currently covered in pine and a herbaceous vegetative ground cover.
This vegetative cover will be enhanced and maintained to hold existing soil in place as much as
possible and reduce erosion. A barrier fence 4 feet high will form a buffer 25 feet wide around three
sides of the site to prevent intentional or accidental entry to the site (Figure 5). The north side of the
site is protected by Rocky Creek. This site is not accessible by vehicles.
31MG1679/1679**
3 iMG1679/1679** is located on an exposed ridge top. While portions of the site are covered with
dense vegetation (secondary growth), some portions are only covered with short grasses and are
subject to erosion. Additional vegetative cover will be introduced to these locations to prevent
additional erosion. A dirt access road currently bisects the site; this road will be maintained.
However, to prevent intentional or accidental entry of vehicles to the site, a hog wire fence-mill• b a
built to encircle both the northern and southern portions of the site (Figure 6). This fence will
measure 5 feet high and form a buffer 25 feet wide around the site, except where the site abuts the
road.
31MG1689
The site is located on two ridge toes overlooking the floodplain of tributary of Rocky Creek. The
site is currently covered in fairly dense vegetation consisting of adolescent pine and hardwoods,
herbaceous growth, and blackberry bushes. An abandoned dirt road crosses the western portion of
the site within which small gullies have formed. Vegetative cover will be introduced to the
abandoned road to reduce further erosion. Additionally, to prevent intentional or accidental entry
of vehicles to the site, a hog wire fence will be built to encircle the site (Figure 7). This fence will
measure 5 feet high and form a buffer 25 feet wide around the site.
31MG1690
This site is located on a ridge toe adjacent to a tributary of Rocky Creek that forms a natural
protective barrier for this site on the south and west. Vegetation at the site currently consists of pine
forest with a relatively open understory. Additional vegetative cover will be introduced as needed
to reduce the impact of erosion to the site. Access to the site is limited to pedestrians or 4-wheeled
vehicles. To prevent intentional or accidental entry of small motorized vehicles to the site, a barrier
fence will be built to encircle the site (Figure 8). This fence will measure 4 feet high and form a
buffer 25 feet wide around the site. This site is blocked from vehicular access by jurisdictional
waters, therefore a barrier fence must be used to protect this site in place of hog-wire fencing.
Ii,11? nl I ? • j, ' ?"./_'? ?L ? i ?%-?-?•.?q,t?;??, ?• _ _ ti. - -. t , d -?
-0 Afx
t
,^_I?' } ??/`r '??p° ..? :?? 1 Ili _ _ ?j_ `? K _. ?. ??g0 ',' _ ,'!•y.
113
v fl _? _ i= fort
/ 1? c'?> 7763 165
.16
0 ;: - l ?•`t _ j ?'i °r(? .,
? '-'.OF 16? ; i - - ^^ ? i • '?r '? - ., i ? l _ ter` J r .??i'j• X'62si '?`'? _.: / ?? {
-517
- /.?? / 1 -? )? •? i ?1 _,' `'-.?. 1• i it fii ?( / ;\_'1• ?? ?1. -i ?4: '.
1 )r •? _ ? r?y?l ?)( . gyp!" 11 ?,
? f lt,%'"7?l ?f,?i? ? - ? i "-?`_ ^ (J_`? ' -/ ? `ro .i- ? _ ? /^ I!'fYtl \ ;? ? /'1/ 6 / ? ! J,, { r ?•y?,_. -
•NO ?'1'?, r , . ' `.QSPNI / 4. a ? ?ooh (fj•,? -'.J1?-• ?j rJ' /,? /I ?: > > _..(,? ? -
`;lil ' /• ? ? '? Iii/ ?? _, ,'?? i? li s•1? t ?.-? - - ? _;/ 1 / ?,?` il' %?- i _
??'??)> ?(• % If' --aj8ll ?. Ili -?1\ ? r _r ?.. r r?i ',? ?';.' )- -
II
? ?? (,1.1 `- .?' of .'7i/? ,.,??? -„?` \ s.??" ' `^ i;l .? : I ?•? ? r -\J ?f ?(j' 4/ ? '? ^^.\ ; ,
-'~4•;,- /7/? i??/ ..? ;:\'„ ?j` ;, , , _ .•, ; ? ? j '??.---- :J Sad
.'`i??nJ7,rJ\1>Il? 1 / I?` r. tcA r=j- x'r1` i 1 :?? ) 1st ?? -
k`(
31 li?lI!
bop_'
/ ( k
'6??.? ?_? ; , I ;: ? ;?= ,.,, -rte ,?, ?^? r •? il•; ?•? ? ..=. 4,
1
NO. 14 GA -
WOVEN WIRE
FENCING
FIGURE NO. 2
2 STRANDS OF BARBED
WIRE EQUALLY SPACED
PAINTED METAL
OR 4" PRESSUR
TREATED POST
(10' O.C.)
48"
NOTE:
PULL POST SHALL BE LOCATED
EVERY 300' FEET AND AT CORNERS.
HOG-WIR
FENC
N.T.S.
10" ROUND PRESSURE TREATED
PULL POST 8' LONG
GALVANIZED TENSION WIRE
ETAI
8'
12-13-01
NOS:
1. FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS.
2. INSTALL POSTS AT SPACING RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER.
BARRIER FENCE DETAIL
N.T.S.
FIGURE N0.
3
12-13-01
4" X 4" PRESSURE
TREATED POST OR
POST RECOMMENDED
Snow Fence Barrier Fence SF5( snow Control Fence
- ' rc u
Ty??
SF50 Snow Control Barrier Fence
f.
4?
-;
Page 1 of 1
Resinet SF50 is designed to meet the
requirements of state and local governments.
Resinet SF50 still maintains the standard 40
pounds of weight for a 4' x 100' roll and maintains
a nominal mesh opening of 55% to insure
optimum snow control with an extended service
life.
The laminar design of the SF50 gives this fence
more surface area for greater wind loading.
Some applications are:
4JAirports
1§ Highway
19 Ski Areas
e Access Roads
Specifications
Material: High density polyethylene
Ultraviolet resistance: Fully stabilized
Temperature range.- -60 degrees F. to 180 degrees F
Tensile yield: 3200 psi
Tensile Strength: 370 Ibs per foot
Elongation at Break: 150%
Nominal Mesh Opening: 1-1/4"x 1-1/4"
Size: 48" x 100'
Ordering
LSF50-48100 $78.80 + $18.21 Shipping
ange
For omers or 7u or more call today for special shipping rates: 8001878-7829
Discount Fence Home Pagel Snow Fence Index
8987 State Route 14' Streetsboro OH 44241 ° Phone [phone] ° FAX [phone]
e-mail us at discount(d-lek.net
Hefgenand A .a+z
eslon an u ma
FIGURE NO. 4
hftp://www.discountfence.com/snowfence/Snowfence-SFSO.htn 11/16/01
610--

:::: ROck?
....g ,Creek ?.
6' FENCED
BUFFER \
N`
Ya x
o y3o ?? 63
X 628.87
100 50 0 100 200 62997
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 x
625.42
SITE 31MG1004
PRESERVATION PLAN
FOR
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
FIGURE `NO. 5 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
SITE 31 MG1
1-1
1 Y SEDIMENT
POND

k°° i
i
bhp ? ? ?
20 /
,629 28
i
x 633.

12-13-01

NORTHERN PORTION
OF SITE 31 MG1679
Z?
N`
r

MAINTAIN ROAD
ACCESS
S,
o
25' FENCED BUFFER
INSTALL FENCE ON SITE BORDER
ADJACENT TO ROAD / / l
_ ..'........

100 50 0 100 200
WNEW
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SITE 31MG1679
PRESERVATION PLAN
FOR
FIGURE NO. 6 REPUBLIC SERVICEREGIONAL N9TH CAROLINA, LLC
3SIOUTHERN PORTION
E 31MG1679
--25' FENCED BUFF
12-13-01
629.51
63p
52.36 x
x 651.52 /
JURISDICTIONAL.
WETLANDS
// r 1 \i /
: A?
SITE 31
1
w ?
w .5t
630
W
W DS
w
Qom,
FENCED BUFFER
? W
3 x 6c2
w w W W xw
w w w w
w W w W w
w W
100 50 0 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SITE 31MG1689
PRESERVATION PLAN
FOR
UWHARRIE NO. 7 REPUBLIC SERVICES REGIONAL OF NORTH A SR UNA, LLC 12-13-01
w W
W W W
W w
630
ii/iJfl??w W
w
430

W w,Y W w62.51 X
X+
W W W w
W W W W
W W W
w W
W W W W
W W W W ?•.
W W W W W?
w w W W?
w
W W I
'--25' FENCED
r---?" BUFFER
SITE 31 MG1690
W W
W
w w
w W
W W
W W W
V' ?Y W W
W w w W W
W W/
w w
//j
JURISDICTIONAL
100 50 0 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

w
W W W
W
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
640
SITE 31MG1690
PRESERVATION PLAN
FOR
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
FIGURE N 0. 8 REPUBLIC
SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
12-13-01
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
North Carolina Department'of Cultural Resource - -
State Historic Preservation Office ---
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
June 29, 2001
Richard G. Harmon, Vice President
Environmental Services, Inc.
1100 Wake Forest Road, Suite 2060
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Dear Mr. Harmon:
Thank you for your letter of May 11, 2001, transmitting the survey report by Mr. Scott
Seibel, Giampaolo Di. Gregorio, and Greg C. Smith concerning the above project.
The following properties were determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places: 31MG1680-31MG1688**, 31MG1691-31MG1693, 31MG1678 due to lack
of integrity
Until additional information for the properties listed below is provided, we are unable to
snake a determination of their eligibility for the National Register.
31MG1679/1679**, 31MG1689, 31MG1690
One previously recorded archaeological site, 31MG1004, in the project was assessed as
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. It was to be avoided. The
report, on page 19, states that a preservation plan will be submitted a later date. We
suggest that all sites that are unassessed and will be avoided be included in a single
preservation plan. The preservation plan should include construction plans, illustrating
how the sites will be avoided during construction and protected in the future, as well as a
written statement explaining the avoidance strategy and future protection of the sites.
The bibliography does not include many citations referred to in the text. One of the US
Forest Service reports in the bibliography is the Croatan Overview. More appropriate to
the region would be the Uwharde Overview. Although Dr. Smith is an author, none of his
work is included in the bibliography, including the previously prepared reports for the
landfill. Rather than reproducing the entire report errata bibliography pages that we can
add to the report are acceptable.
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone].733-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh , NC . 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4618 Mail -Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4618 [phone].715-4801 .
Page 2
Richard G. Harmon
June 29, 2001
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator, at
919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
r&--tx? ?U"- &jtt-
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:kgc
ENViRONmENTAL SERvicEs, INc.
524 NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27610
(919) 2121760 FAX [phone]
11 May 2001
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: Uwharrie MSW Landfill, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Dear Mr. Brook:
Enclosed are two copies of the report for the survey of the Uwharrie MSW Landfill,
Montgomery County, North Carolina as performed by Environmental Services, Inc.,
(ESI) for Hodges, Harbin, Newberry, and Tribble (HHNT) as recommended by the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in a letter dated January 16, 2001.
Site forms for the archaeological sites recorded during the investigation are also included.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
cott Seibel, RPA
Project Archaeologist/Senior Scientist
Encl.
North Carolina Depa i ent of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History
January 16, 2001 Jef fey L Crow, Director
Mr. Richard G. Harmon, Vice President
Environmental Services, Inc.
1100 Wake Forest Road, Suite 2000
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Dear Mr. Harmon:
Thank you for your letter of November 21, 2000, concerning the above project. We appreciate the
project being plotted on the photocopied USGS quadrangle, which facilitated our review.
As indicated by your letter, ESI recorded a number of archaeological sites in earlier landfill surveys
adjacent to the proposed project area. One archaeological site, 31MG1004, in the project is assessed
as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and will be avoided. Please forward
the plans illustrating how the site will be avoided as. well as, protected during construction and in the
future. In addition to the plan sheets, please forward a written strategy for avoidance and future
protection of the site.
Based upon previous work for the landfill as well as other work in the region, we recommend that
an archeological survey of the proposed project expansion area be conducted.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook 9Y
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:ktrc

Location Mailing Address Tcl*mc/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St. Raleigh 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone].715-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh 461 8 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4618 [phone].715-4801
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INc.
1100 WAIF FOREST ROAD, SUITE 200
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
November 21, 2000
[phone] FAX [phone]
Mr. David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brook:
Hodges, Harbin, Newberry & Tribble (HHNT) is proposing to expand the Uwharrie
Regional MSW Landfill facility in Montgomery County and has asked Environmental
Services, Inc., (ESI) to coordinate with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) concerning the proposed project. Enclosed is a map showing the limits
for the proposed project. The property includes seven contiguous tracts that total 308.81
acres west of the current facility location. Two of the seven tracts (103 acres) were the
focus of intensive archaeological surveys conducted by ESI (Smith 1992, 1994). One
previously unrecorded site documented during the surveys was found to be eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places (31MG1004). This site will be preserved in
place by HHNT.
ESI respectfully requests comment by the SHPO on the proposed project. If you have
any questions or comments, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Richard G. Harmon
Vice President
Encl.
cc: William Hodges, P.E.
4r aA"urr" f' i? g(? Wetllfaa?nds S.verfar
4' ff pp? tt
VICES V.s1YOirIb1C4'..1?t.7:.A.tTT.l'TT plir 1.A.L.C.
IItrhnrrls LhYlronmentel Project
PraP.rtbe located dan9 tin narth ddr of N.0. S•wndary Road 1137
VICINITDeal R.ror.na. Baa! Sze Pop• 74 Bad Sae Peer an.
ease 263 Raq. 377, and Book 283 Pape ni
Sar..yw by mama. L fldM. PLS-260e, M January tl M FebumY 2OM-
RENSED z UPDATED M AWe B. 200.7.
$AM Se. One of raw
300 o soo
aoee k M r•d
From the *f""' of
MPoONT ! nWS LAND SURVEY M
303 Mt3'T SPRING STREET
TROY, N.C. 27371
. I Beesrr, e.a .. -
O.ed sod Jw PoW MO
I Fadd 9MA * le-iN
Hbf C.&h aOhtt Ah / A Aa Sal I are! Bud it
J1D MM S." L•maedt
Pupa 700 OWd Boot Jll
SFA 56- Sew 1 eG1 rT e 7"
I pesit= IT Mill IT ars Aea !! rain I SA
Myra
.1
p,rF a ME •l \ l••r ?11.Ia R NAa R yam.
5e? I"~ Iele6 R 1N IT
10.06 IT
-,-.......:. rM nJ7 Ao1 ! I
ma°gw.lM° 1a.M IT ?u TlU r ...ZM7P3e• F?.I , aeT1TM•c `?-------?
x.dn iiui 14?" Ti1tT? to eq
u ?Y 1.a f -r-* %.3/4*
U4 k4 \ x•atr fns r W .(7C?? ' !a! d s.t
` Ly JO Maud v a,H 1 Ind rAaw
lA A12 A.t ! ei1W un tQx Apt a \?? 7h- W
wand ?r wedbd /v `> Ur JnAar wbar•. ?ft
aJD Aare! all Apt ! / •. \\J? LWd Bed im
um / l?V AglApe !3 NV. J60
ur.
wttaed wan -- ---.-----
U? uu
.M ?.? ? 3 •eWvM'
ww d a"
D a10 Ape !
s 4e
•OWUeft• sJf Steen ' AN+ Lw.rw
awd A.n ! q .G1A
Abro N A a sn/m XA1AV1 T IT dr 4' p q. L?
A s•l1aM1-d jr 11.fM4 wqX LLeaon, LWd Boat 10 ft" .191
xmA L SnMM !r Apt ! 1.d .-? SO?/5fT/XL
D.+d aoao !J6 rrpv my `'ri rl"p a2O A.* / ?! SEC sn.pn
UFO s 1.J0 Apt t r
t
ua.- ` . l Part
.a' D`NM fw ?? I Al??/ 1280 IT ""I lr u M
1 ateAa. :
1 { ,,jA* T4 EM l, rand TL. tl?.
/ uAf S.N S. "\ sa
c ranlt
9? sr a?i44it.a: \1 awu s It ioxun ?aoa_.._._e M75-38-
! ,? 1Lenumnt
,: um a0 wwAaars ! amAa n1crr IT
War _ u v
20,11 µ aw Apr !
li IT U NO MwM " U' aq \?w' \p weolind S ? TMnpr A ain.- a wYe
a W Apt ! / ? `F QJJ Apt ! u.oa
Jnx fbpt 740 Ian! r
\ 1 i1J '0 X? BaN ?w t [M? Mrd Boat 2 LrelaW
S0 Pa'N 1."4
it ID Apr .4 to Apr !\u •% 4• Js An R ew Pp
^G C
0-71 . r ?MK A-
1r, X 106x•06• / ?1,1a v \\ LN a S z / ?? uI da S&_ WV ! Y u
J05 1
A"
3r rw? q t \ r_ `r,a, r.nc Wr aeraw u? °q ,•s ` x roaw~?DAl?
1 la.r d J]/? d% W by /D Aar ! - IAO° LI7Apt! fou,a 3/A•
aoAT
W rwPe•
\+ M wax
T,t: 2>?RTT un a.'C Apt!
1>},D eau rt --p-a6r+35i fT ?StD ? ? _? t?• ?sr sawn 8
?'? • a0B Apt: A w uo
/ r tiS73 rY r ""`Pe'. so n.an ? I \?? \ ! 6 IT II
- - -q AT .76 It ` xr
run pep?/s' 1 / a snr • x07 A- ! nn Aat ! a? u,y R
•7.1o
.M.a /aM? I rT 141.80 IT a 3 rt der i \ `.`1-IOWA P? _ i rw.e twit
sc sewn n/ E \?.+n r.W.
Ml-w I r?RIl' far Ap.: t7D ApP-d t! •?+?*L 1 ,. N anru•• raw
! ? IT din `. •cutwrt . M F w 116M IT
reand\??waew s7 Sawn
Gb1M smen et drM I Qc0 Apt : \ w Apr ! •? 1•r. ,? aw Aar !
7b/o 01y L Saver AsnM aa.wr IA•vud!• UMr . ! 3 R
b•nr ra rdd• 11-rD?NB DeebW
\ PB Mb-4 1 QJ/ Apt !
LY•dBean Tee AV. 104 I e'er KM 9-0.
Br Mb nW h• .T . ,p oar Aar ! Inle Go Nbd..d s
NM Boat I1D P.P. 610 -, fLrd 0"-4 9 I \ J'PA IMfNW PA MUmd la. er
ens a 12 Harr ! I aSr AT ! Mr Sbran I awn 'o'
==20 L
Pap D/1 e ' 1]Y j ! 3 R wiM 1ev. .., SQ Sbwwr
w_ j I Aar! g
la aI aoneeWd 1. aar
din ..
a, wev-d I 5[1. Sbwn lh"? "' e ! a IT
all Aar ! .= Ir aa7 Aar r r.`
f q f?? : a IT
din lea
Ia::ti x47 Ae+! 8i EM
!wi aF wOaM ?es z?' j •? ua,rPanar Lba+ry
Qrl Aar ! Ned JIJ
Abyw• _I..• 1 r r. Pope e 452
' '-aJV• .ay jwan j YJSarae r.
rY' ``A1r``Ine k K weeNre 1 act A- ! r f1-IOW weGbW
•A.• S41 Aar !
Sandr R Fbran ?at0 Aar ! I ! a IT
' RwraV A M I.a.! Y 1 J
' PhDr A'G 7 WM ? FM 0e.1 Gr/.rr? SY. i 1 1
Waspy 1 I rand
1 Grim ? ? ?1 oar AA- i °riawe eaeA xx f 1 ` w M r.r
' as Apr ! foss i r°'t
J77 i
See rtllae7ernelot w w?Bp I r M eon ryd ro I , ..
?raands Ol?cc(CfD lop I axis Aar ! Lb q LLc i k r
Ge/YB/VC/iD/Yi L 1 1 ••
\ Gb wean/ GW A-! r.a,! 1/Y i rwnk M r. wM? t`-s r .
b la.n• d
ale Axe !,?, M M!r ?Y 1 r -ft 3/p alas Pd• j r w fan! 1' / tkaerr,l
L------ _ em x7'
raNr \? wasy I C' 17158 ???N7p6D-63'?r ba FanlY
.... M M ? 11a#sbAa. : ? -- , 43 AAtalnrn
a NQT' • 4N I r? 31r
x7aa R II
- Xw IenO B .+n1 IJaeae Lbier I a..Podq???t Jls I fig
I bed bed W 1 - 1J JW `?r f h ?E
eXbars# I Pepe 673 yLytyjy ?c i ?S Sa Aare f ,?y?`'? ¦ 6 `0
tope am
I s N u? R a 42' "1
I V," . I07 1 n = ?? rye t se I i ? ra.a aw.. `1\Ati--}'9'\ w^.._aa y
.a n sWM ?i--?
I ar ti I ra•,e ^, rnn y,,,. -v 1r 1.r± ----- - •'r• ' Y
.., n. 1 ».ae rt ..n1 n --- w msa c nw.6o rt
NORTH ?,gerr 10i1"•'?1 1 PN M! Boma ?C ,? a ?yr?tP' „d Na..a'i,u
CAROLINA a%.'r'l..• •r??tZ" 1-4 r...a >?'ar per,. 1 u- T '? ,B ,dd if
GRID NORTH
lJ! 4 / ^'- •? t\X we a Mad wrr r•Si
_ 2 lane
DO= 70;rV12
pb.
w .?, e, I
[A Mtbld s,f
e 2
au A
1
evi IT- LF- x
i,`
Ak.a G1ra
1
C
L
°u^
r
=J? Lwd Bod 407 Ilmfp
D•C
X N R c ,
1la?ct ft 2 DA 166 Pp 2X
121.#4 A~ 3
`
P.A OwMt.tdr!
Ley Ceara a.e•. W LAw rpan

D-0
D•N Boat 17J Pose S)1
*
A-!
a/J Aar
7'
.
??
Ord bbd 100
fMD 1.TI
t U,. wrbu. rb.ara
h
l
w Sf11 Sewe
MOM Avepw r
o.n
o
at .trten .nNn
M nd Ma4M .rte, M1ji ! 3 FT eW
wUSd div.
f-ft 3 4* I Thb -Ur- that Mb eaOY d Ihir Vd pWaddy dgbl• the
S
M t1p,r rye eaneay d eN === Ulr awn e' Aol
; re e•1•rrra,•d b on this Mt.. W.w b-I b o
/
tw
o
OWnp• M Ua be ar - WAAlad f•¢AaU k Ulb d•t iir
m. T.p. 404 ban6om gJ.tdal•. Tine Mt•rm 1 'ten pa Pods UUUMI the
tae? Capr of Fngbarr WUanO. DlM.atlan YaWeL
>,. f ::HJ--iTY
t Thane. J. FN1dk Willy VWt Ud. Vat ea. ?ie
r••rpee !ar w wbd .p.rr dew ey n• M
aa,-ra xam end b h d rrl bW b.1k6 oe The The
ea tn. e..t d my b,ad.ea. aW 11M
ratb d Vwtdon oe aaladoW by binaaM and
Mpa4NM b,=te00a'f

Th Vats1w.
B
d

.. lay I
ol
VtpsN M awdaWa with
Mtnea mY a gFd .Iawert old oflidd Nano
2003
f J
uc u-H'+w tLNGM
Llnl ` °'

FIGURE 9
o.r.
Jurisdictional Wetlands
m.
Ml. the a d.y o l'T]3 a la ; Iroi
MT .

and Streams Southwest of Rocky
?
a-?
1.'
°°°s
"-e
' k
t.a. n..r. p.1.
n
;
35
a rwi w now M Cree
.
Joe No. 2001-1.. 100A-bx. t 2001-Eee
No harlmntd caned within 2000 fwL
R
u 1 ui1 i IL ZE"t L:1
u» 1uR
1127 7 K R -/ \.llea!
l1M OeaR LS( 1ENaq bnuiQ
as 111 R
Uil aia6
PR .eL.1 Lti AIL
u,[ Icw.W bSLN{E LI.3 xw R
u7. 9nn uw aa)n
4.13E ISRR Lta1 T.J1R
113, ISIaR 6K IDAR
1132 211] R
W 7abR
r.uw
u[ Ni NSC bslwa
1D 1NL+6 LIi>
L.11 34 R
eLw?c nslwlx 4
u0. --r 1 3L R
Ll3 3.378 Llil zeroR PI man.
LIDS 31.1 1100 sDl rr
Ltlt w>1 R LDI ?,.1 R
u11 Icaert xuR
LIM StnR L7W al. R 71
LtSe 1.11 R 12.1E 26N R
LDS 72 w r
VE BFw'a: bnwS Pr T-" read.
llw II.U R LK I z 0'Z;
1111 t113 R L2% 17,2 R
LN2 1111 R lAi y.Y n1 R
uaJ T.NR L2.a 11.21"
LIN 1111 R W 30..11
L" s Se.6a R 4,
1N Z:-MT L711 2631 R H ?4 5--w It LSE) 30:.1 R
1LW 1.,1 5 IF
lW 3 aWnI) I R
Ll-
M'.43- v R
W14R
,211 T R R
2! N R
W idi.d
BE0.aC. C, T-E
L117 ALlR PD V.Waa
L131 21. R LeE 6[wa0 LY)Iw11;
. 41C.
Ll? -Wl'I tafOR
uv Rt1R L21! 26118
111E 760. R LT9 73.ie R
Ll" 11.11 R L320 31.n R
ll)6 tatiR L221 SO.WR
S 7169I I b n.:2 R
Nue 1.
la PN ins e.Ur. neat ndL car d Nb dd erardds dpkt. °"
e b- S6xI
ss
??ei V'? ? laMV7 d tln Y?tbn d Srttia 101 d tln Won 11vtc k4.
Jy d the u9 th. InePLIb` a an Me fah Ile.w Ihn IL a
6 'A MEGmd: $Lv ry fa S- III b 9 io1 9a lnauo? e M e ?a
_, s _ G ?T h kwtan fen qs deael blmYMb. w meee WHO M
A6 Gel. j1l71 ? ?? L<r? 5. ±°7?3 Tlt agrl 1e81 OePe dFnpew. ewole. OAatlla Wal
UTrharrie Environmental Site ?x 3/0
Naa °"
YOU "S SW Ullhmre s Tloi Ta.n"4 Yantgan-y County, 2 CadFla
D.ee Refs.WM Boo! 313 Pope 132 me Book 434 Pope 093.
C
.dad RM .o.dw. NCINITY MAP Surlei.e by TnamaRUSED sz u oe? %I:?oai.. DC2 -d uay 23oi
Pc s.ume Paaae Sheet Na Four of four Woe OC xbGms am.
V u[ swat cmwcx
u21 Ir.1a RD p'j1
Lzn 2eln R loo o too
172E 2a.3a R M1 4 U10
e.er 1rw Sole s M FM a 4130 R ? "In t =.h- dF,,, th. -I- . '.
PH Ior `
a.w N3 r 1dLe1 r C.
BV.'x+. [61/ME In0an1 NW
4.v) l.ll R Fee B. d3L. d
L271 sal R VOG11T At FIMM LAND "WMA"u
N •44. SVi. e L21 a01 R 303 [EST 'PRONG STREET LI!
y,y Me ! ry TROY. N.c mn I•tAd
?. .filed eat. R3a / O _ II.o1.. 3/P .m Roan
?-- IeN: ff1a+. tanara Ile 6..1. r P1eiu. YaneuN
L: d ii.n R Fray WWAP rAMmy AFZ INLGm!a 1.32 •_ ewdw r O ad1 Yweant
Wetlands 9 °A0 R AAYlIW K Ks' "°' ?! Yr wenmd
W E 9 ._ LIW it]! R D-d BCOt J24 Pag* M I? w 131 0.=- A
S Reference Map Owd Bonk J25 Ay. zap ° Lx
w 7
.d 7.L
to
YT e.U"d tb®eRr [`E 1dLd Bhe.m 0.D 1.Wd PS tfmd
L17 N 37' S2 F 19.32 FT [(wa0 05tw. L"'E KI:14 bs*uKE f
LF 160. R 1111 611 in
L16 N 23 i E Ilw R L95 0.M n L1M 2.92 R <
LID N JOG}If V 21.36 R LM 17e) R lnl I a 6T N' E Lai
T3. U.. lil 10..1 R LIU MCI w
110 N M'W b 1110.31 FT l1O 20.)0. R 061 W R Rpolk' 5.14 !
L92
ba e.u.ne 0-d-T Lm 21 0.1 R L1ea I. i) R f N-ty C-41"A (C /{) IS El--1"7' E LIt S 2dN 53 V 10.73 R liM 2ie 57 IT 1.'.7 R LIe1 1111 R 2•Wd Bao! 434"69J / LM
111 SIL' 2 E 11WR 11d 1u1TTL IIMR `/
r..e
r ab.L.

Fw!
A7LOID Ilennnell
_`
FD WeGm
0.p 4.w!

3110
.00 R --_

I
?,
I?
In Lb

L.
Ymlpwn,r Cbinty
D..d Boa[ JIJ Pap. 432 i
I U
reek I
1/C M
.q \
I \\
\
I
I
I \
\
\\ 1
\
I
I \\
\
I
I >3 a Lm \
* u
I
?
-P.w °1R

F-1.714.Mn FT n
e"
S
-bov sad s I..e pw.113e1 FT
I
o I
AV Wk
q

el

F1.n Na S
C..d B-k AM Pay. Sir

Mantymri7' County WI
C.+d dent JIJ Pay. 432 FI
?I
I
- - - - - - - - - - ?
rae+N.3
I
N.160A13]i R
E.l.n4%211R
I p.a,.61/b7 R
raWd r

b 67er. Plw
cen Na 4 '

€ A r [4.e+...
I wu+.d 1aM

.. metkod
pn I,
tis?ow
PC WIGmd
Q01 be!
PJ W.fAwd
as N..!
LIM
LIM LIM 3 e 19.00 R
i a 441
uk
fel lt.s Uie
e
PK/NC M6fWd LIM
°
um L1
uw sties.! y
'
s g S77rA1r H
I

P*" W'.Gmd I:
atl Iw ! ,,,r
' aq
j {
6YlR.On C-.%,% C 11
Drd BWe 4J4 Pop. d9J j
e
SNA SIRE M 9
Ear 1.. ! t
?S
1?4 4

PP wsNad \
u
at]M!
\\
W U31 94.1ER
\
\
ID W.Gmd u .
nw
PC/NE WaGmd \\ aMNn u ?
\ \ u ,
• a
aA.s.!
alA \
\\\UI 72
B T. r rk.&-
u `
y ?I II a PH W.Gmd nfia+ni
4.
LI
S u11 \ In elm b.! a
11
° SRA S1Rr"' U` -. \\
° 0.0E Ave !

Tdd DNLe? 3/a' !a
Rtle

tt-
1. IV- 4 FW46 a.iny tlgt qs dd .a
P'pe.e ben a 4d nnp e>. h n. N
1A3 ek 4 F d ,.pale -d
h b. E.d d m7 `l-III' 0.e bMd 11.
USA ratio d P.ddo. a L .toe by blft I . W4
fmd Lmd! ellr.ae. sylS?i• IN. Plat .m
M
rroct lla I37A vpe.a a aaova.... 6-4 PLM low
WK NW Estob Trod INWp n7 wipbd Owmil" we dmd eb'0
tale 4.M M dq d ee. 20W
FIGURE 9a. Jurisdictional Wetlands and Streams .?. ti..
Northeast of Rocky Creek. N. Me-bi embd .e82300 G.L
Jab It. ZD00-70
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 21, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
C/o Mr. Paul Petitgout
P.O. Box 2943
Hickory, NC 28603
Subject Property: Foothills Environmental Landfill
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Petitgout:
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 04-1138
Montgomery County
Page 1 of 2
On August 5, 2004, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your most recent correspondence regarding your
application for an Individual Water Quality Certification to construct the above-referenced project. DWQ will
accept the proposed 50% impervious cover for this site. However, your application is still incomplete and/or
provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the
additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information.
Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Stormwater management designed to remove 85% Total Suspended Solids (TSS). The plan must be designed
in accordance with the NCDWQ 1999 Stonnwater BMP Manual.
(hgp:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/download.html). Please include the following:
¦ Signed and notarized operation and maintenance agreement
¦ A worksheet for each BMP
¦ Copies of plans and specifications, including:
Development/Project name
Engineer and firm
Legend
North arrow
Scale
Revision number & date
Mean high water line
Dimensioned property/project boundary
Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
Wetlands and streams delineated, or a note on plans that none exist ' .
Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
Drainage areas delineated
Vegetated buffers (where required)
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlandsl
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Paul Petitgout
Page 2 of 2
Date: September 21, 2004
Since perennial stream impacts associated with this project exceed 150 linear feet, and wetland impacts exceed
one acre, compensatory stream and wetland mitigation will be required in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0506(h). You have the following options (or combination of options) for satisfying the mitigation requirement
associated with this project:
a. Payment into the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Fund administered by the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP), if the EEP will accept the responsibility for conducting this mitigation work, and/or
b. Preparing and implementing a detailed mitigation plan with a minimum of a 1:1 restoration component for
both stream and wetland impacts.
If you decide to propose use of the EEP in lieu of developing your own stream mitigation plan, you will
need to contact the EEP at [phone] to see if they will accept the project. You should note that
mitigation requirements proposed to be mitigated through the EEP must be rounded to the nearest linear
foot and quarter acre increment according to 15 2r.0503(b).
Your application included a proposal to use a combination of the EEP and/or development of your own
mitigation site(s); however, an EEP approval letter was not included with your application as required.
Furthermore, you have not provided specific details related to the potential on-site or nearby mitigation
opportunities. Until the EEP approval letter and/or detailed, specific onsite mitigation plans are provided, I
will request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this project on hold. Also, this project
will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete-information (15A NCAC 2H.0507(h)).
Please respond within three (3) weeks of the date of this letter by sendii g this information to me in writing and Ken
Averitte of the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume
that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected
buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the
DWQ. Questions related to the stormwater management plan requirements may be directed to Ms. Cynthia Van Der
Wiele at 919.715.3473. Other questions may be directed to or Mr. John Dorney or Ms. Cyndi Karoly at
919.733.1786.
JRD/cbk
Sincerely,
J orney,
W , Wetlands / 401 Uni
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District, USACE
File Copy
Central Files
Suzanne Klimek, EEP
Mr. Paul Petitgout, ESI, 9600-G Southern Pine Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28273

Filename: S:/2004 correspondence/041138UwharrieLandfU,-(Montgomery)onhold.doc
Re: Uwharrie Regional Landfill Facility, Montgomery Co....
Subject: Re: Uwharrie Regional Landfill Facility, Montgomery Co., 04-1138
From: Ken Averitte <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:02:15 -0400
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
I've got the spiral bound edition and have finally got a chance to
read it.
I've been there a couple of times w/Paul Pettigout and looked at the
site.
Will enter on FMP
Also, I've heard nothing in the way of public comments. There has
been a
landfill of some kind in this immediate vicinity for years.........
I'm very unclear on the mitigation they propose. The stormwater plan
looked
like something for temporary sediment and erosion control, not
permanent.???
Will fill out, with standard condition that minimum 1:1
restoration/creation or some combination of acceptable mitigation be
provided. There are some locations on the site that can provide
on-site
mitigation. Also, some of the streams and wetlands that are to be
impacted
are pretty marginal (at least in my opinion). Nonetheless, Angie
claimed
them.
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
Ken, I've got so many files in my head, I can't remember if we've
discussed this one. Anyway, please let me know if you plan to
enter a
staff report. It's a big project but the file's not all that
thick,
surprisingly. The Public Notice was out 7/9/04. We also received
on
8/5/04 a spiral-bound document with a sketchy stormwater plan and
brief
mitigation outline. Please advise if you'd like me to copy file
materials for you. So far there's one very long handwritten
opposition
letter addressed to the Corps, so we're not planning a hearing at
this
time. You may be better aware of local sentiments.
1 of 1 9/13/2004 4:10 PM
Re: Uhwarrie Landfill (DWQ 04-1138)
V) Ped FiCd
Subject: Re: Uhwarrie Landfill (DWQ 04-1138)
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:43:13 -0400
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiele <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
they need to meet 85% TSS removal based on 50% impervious. i'll let
cyndi decide whether to put them on hold. i assume that there is at
least a conceptual stormwater plan provided. thankx
Cynthia Van Der Wiele wrote:
Cyndi and John,
I've reviewed the stormwater management plans for the Uwharrie
Landfill (DWQ 04-1138). The same consulting firm in Macon,
Georgia did the stormwater management plans for the Foothills
Landfill. /It is word-for-word the same/...except this one has
more typos.
My question is this. What is the status of the project? Is it on
hold? The public comment period has ended. I think the plan is
inadequate. They are also claiming 50% impervious. Don't they
need to meet 85% TSS? I suppose if the stormwater is the only
holdup, you can issue and make a final stormwater plan a condition
of the IP. If they're in a hurry, they can always do Express
Review stormwater, right?
OR, I guess I can write up a more info' letter.
C.
1 of 1 9/9/2004 3:23 PM
Re: Uhwarrie Landfill (DWQ 04-1138)
Subject: Re: Uhwarrie Landfill (DWQ 04-1138)
From: Cynthia Van Der Wiele <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 16:00:05 -0400
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
CC: John Dorney <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
Instead of a copy, how about this:
S:/2004 correspondence/021816 FoothillsLandfill (Caldwell)onhold2.doc
Easier to cut and paste the appropriate info for the consultants that love to do
likewise.
John Dorney wrote:
cynthia - please give cyndi a copy of the soon-to-be-on-your-desk-for-revision on
hold letter for the Foothills Environmental Landfill. it may help cyndi craft an
on-hold letter for her and ken's landfill too. thankx
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
It's not on hold, right now the clock ticks through Oct 11, '04. I've asked FRO
if they want to provide comments on this project and also plan to discuss with
Corps. The mitigation plan is "preliminary", so I anticipate putting the thing
on hold for mitigation as well as other issues FRO may have.
John Dorney wrote:
they need to meet 85% TSS removal based on 50% impervious. i'll let cyndi
decide whether to put them on hold. i assume that there is at least a
conceptual stormwater plan provided. thankx
Cynthia Van Der Wiele wrote:
Cyndi and John,
I've reviewed the stormwater management plans for the Uwharrie Landfill
(DWQ 04-1138). The same consulting firm in Macon, Georgia did the
1 of 2 9/13/2004 11:47 AM
Re: Uhwarrie Landfill (DWQ 04-1138)
stormwater management plans for the Foothills Landfill. At is
word-for-word the same/...except this one has more typos.
My question is this. What is the status of the project? Is it on hold? The
public comment period has ended. I think the plan is inadequate. They
are also claiming 50% impervious. Don't they need to meet 85% TSS? I
suppose if the stormwater is the only holdup, you can issue and make a
final stormwater plan a condition of the IP. If they're in a hurry, they can
always do Express Review stormwater, right?
OR, I guess I can write up a 'more info' letter.
C.
2 of 2 9/13/2004 11:47 AM
0I( - // 5Y
?pPtMENT OF ty?Za
N O
? a
? ' a9
?4ACH 9 ?6
Mr. Keith Harris
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh. North Carolina 27636.3726
August 6, 2004
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
AUG 1 6 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Subject: Action ID No. 200200607, Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC, Uwharrie
Regional Landfill, Montgomery County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Harris:
This letter provides the comments of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the subject
Public Notice (PN), dated July 9, 2004. The applicant, Republic Services of North Carolina, has
applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit to expand a solid waste facility to provide an
additional nine million cubic yards of capacity. These comments are submitted in accordance
witli the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-
667d). Comments related to the FWCA are to be used in your determination of compliance with
404(b)(1) guidelines (40 CFR 230) and in your public interest review (33 CFR 320.4) in relation
to the protection of fish and wildlife resources. Additional comments are provided regarding the
District Engineer's determination of project impacts pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The project area appears to be a private inholding within the Uwharrie National Forest. A
Service biologist attended an on-site, interagency scoping meeting with Mr. Paul Petitgout of
Environmental Service, Inc., on August 8, 2002. There is currently an existing landfill operation
on the site. The subject PN considers impacts from the proposed expansion of this operation.
Mr. Petitgout stated that three alternatives for the expansion had been considered. Much of the
area that would be impacted is wooded and represents various stages of forest regeneration.
Some areas showed evidence of recent timber harvesting. Mr. Petitgout stated some stream in
the area had been channelized in the past and were now incising (downcutting). Such streams
could offer opportunities for stream restoration.
The proposed expansion would impact 7.04 acres of wetlands and 2,450 linear feet of streams.
An additional 285 linear feet of streams would be impacted by four road crossings providing
access to the landfill area.
The PN states that the applicant proposes to compensate for the unavoidable impacts to
jurisdictional areas with a combination of on-site preservation, enhancement, restoration and
utilization of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). However, no
mitigation plan has been provided to the Corps at this time.

Special Status Species
The Service has reviewed available information on federally-threatened or endangered species
known to occur in Montgomery County. We have also reviewed information from the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database which contains excellent data on the
special status species, both federal and state. This database can be accessed by topographic
quadrangle (quad) of the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS). Data from USGS quads provide the
most project-specific information on species which should be considered in permitting this
project. The project area is located in the Troy quad. The occurrence data of special status
species within this quad can be obtained on the internet at <
http://www.ncsparks.net/nhp/quad.html >.
The only federally listed species reported from the Troy quad is Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii) which is listed as endangered. The species grows in clearings and
along the edges of uplands woods, thickets, and pastures. It is also found along roadsides,
powerline clearings, old pastures, and woodland openings. Such areas may exist in the site of
the proposed landfill expansion. The NCNHP database shows several occurrence reports of this
species both north and south of the project area, but none in the immediate vicinity of the landfill
expansion. Many of the reports are near the community of Roberdo, southeast of the project site.
At the August 2002 meeting Mr. Petitgout stated that some work on federally listed species had
already been done, but the current PN contains no survey data.
Prior to the issuance of any permit, the area should be evaluated for the presence of suitable
Schweinitz's sunflower habitat. Since this species can occupy disturbed sites, field data that is
more than two years old may need to be updated. Information on the species is available on our
website at < http://nc-es.fws.gov/plants/schwsun.html >. If these surveys reveal that suitable
habitat exists within the project area, then actual surveys should be done. If Schweinitz's
sunflower discovered within the project site, the Service should be contacted to develop
conservation measures. There may be opportunities to transplant any plants that would be
impacted to a protected area.
Service Recommendation
The Service recommends that a DA permit not be issued until a detailed plan for compensatory
mitigation has been circulated for review by resource agencies. The plan should focus on
opportunities for on-site restoration and enhancement of wetlands and streams. If, as Mr.
Petitgout stated, there are streams which have altered by channelization, some compensatory
mitigation can be accomplished on-site. The applicant should make every effort to provide
compensatory mitigation within the immediate vicinity of the work.
Small bridges over wetlands could be used to reduce fill associated with access roads. If culverts
are needed, they should maintain natural water flows and hydraulic regimes without scouring, or
impeding fish and wildlife passage. Culverts or pipes should be of sufficient size to allow
normal surface water exchange between the wetlands above and below the culvert. The culvert
or pipe invert should be buried at least one foot below the natural streambed to promote the
passage of aquatic organisms. If multiple cells are required, the second and/or third cells should
be placed so that their bottoms are at stream bankfull stage. This will allow sufficient water
depth in the culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate the movement of aquatic

_s
organisms. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow wildlife passage. If culverts are long and sufficient
slope exists, baffle systems are recommended to trap gravel and provide resting areas for fish
and other aquatic organisms. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment
or widening is required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures
usually causes a decrease in water velocity. This produces sediment deposition that will require
future maintenance. Riprap should not be placed on the streambed.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this PN. Please advise us of any action
taken by the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers. If you have questions regarding these
comments, please contact Howard Hall at 919-856-4520, ext. 27 or by e-mail at <
[e-mail] >.
Sincerely,
John Hammond
Acting Ecological Services Supervisor
cc:
Ronald Mikulak, USEPA, Atlanta, GA
John Dorney, NC Division of Water Quality, Raleigh, NC
Shari Bryant, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, Sedalia, NC
.Y-?
August 2°d, 2004
Dear Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetland / 401 Unit - North Carolina Division of Water Quality
County Manager - Montgomery County
Republic Services of North Carolina
Environmental Services Incorporated
01/- ll-Z?o 9

AUG 0 6 2004
My name is Winfred Lemonds and I live on Vestal Road in Troy, North Carolina.
I have lived in Troy all of my life, and I have lived in my current home for some 33 years.
I like it here, but there are a lot of aspects about the ever encroaching and ever visible Uwharrie
Environmental that are not welcome.
Instead of restating some if not all of the same concerns, I will enclose a copy of a my
son's letter.
Sincerely,
A nfred E. Lemonds
y
August 2`d, 2004
Dear Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands / 401 Unit - North Carolina Division of Water Quality
County Manager - Montgomery County
Republic Services of North Carolina
Environmental Services Incorporated
My name is Todd Lemonds and I live on Nance Farm Road in Troy, North Carolina.
As a matter of fact, my property borders the property of Uwharrie Environmental / Republic
Services/ lands owned by the County of Montgomery (all of which encompass what is commonly
called Uwharrie Environmental Landfill).
I am quite frankly appalled at not receiving a copy of the Public Notice from the
Department of the Army dated July 9, 2004 in the mail. All of my neighbors did. I did , however,
receive a copy from one of my fellow neighbors. Again, this is a disgrace that not all affected
parties are being informed consistently. It seems as though some parties are intentionally being
uninformed or misinformed by various landfill executives and county officials.
I am writing to you because I have concerns about not only the possible expansion of
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill but also about its existing practices. The following is a list of
some of the concerns that not only I have but also.the hundreds of supporters that showed up at
the last talks of the landfill expanding:
* The landfill has acquired well over 1000 acres in the last 8 years or so. My land now
borders land owned by Republic Services.
* All reports from landfill executives and county officials were that the landfill had no
intentions of crossing the creek in question
* The smell that originates from the dumping site is just awful, not just sometimes but
most often. This smell of trash / garbage is just completely putrid when it encompasses the
day and the night. Again, this odor can be smelt for several miles.
* The sound of buzzards, seagulls, and especially bulldozers and other heavy equipment,
can be heard for several miles. The inevitable banging sound is especially horrid at all
times of the day and night.
* The existing landfill site currently has 30 acres or more of continuously disturbed lands,
not including the trash mountain peak and the mound walls. According to the North
Carolina Division of Natural Resources only less than 1 acre can be disturbed without an
erosion control plan.
* The landfill is unable to keep grass or some kind of ground cover over what is currently
disturbed and exposed.
* Dumping occurs at all times of the day and night.
* People that live on Landfill Road are consistently being run off the road by garbage
trucks at all times of the day and night.
* Garbage trucks, both commercial and county, are driving on narrow backroads instead
of sticking with the major thorghfares.
* Trash found on the sides of the highway is most common directly around the roads that
lead to the landfill. Trash and debris are falling off trucks.
* High powered lights can occasionally be seen lighting up the night sky around the
landfill at all hours of the night. What is this? Why is this necessary?
* Several years ago, one of my neighbors saw a truck that was escorted by several
armored vehicles go to and leave the landfill. This convoy was sighted on Liberty Hill
Church Road and Landfill Road. Can this be explained?
* Just recently, it was rumored by one of the local trash haulers that a dead baby was
hauled and dumped by one White Oak truck out of Winston Salem, North Carolina to
Uwharrie Environmental.
* No one knows just exactly what is being dumped. No one checks the trucks as they
come in and no one checks them as they are being dumped.
* All public roads that surround Uwharrie Environmental Landfill are supplied in their
entirety with county water except one - the closest one to the dumping site - Nance Farm
Road. The roads that do have county water are: Highway 24-27, Landfill Road, Liberty
Hill Church Road, Vestal Road, and Old Dairy Road. The county water does extend part
of the way down Nance Farm Road. I and one of my neighbors did ask for it to be
extended down the entire road several years ago. The response from the County Manager
was that we had to cover the cost in excess of $13,000 not only for the extension but also
for the relaying of what had already been laid because the current size pipe would not
supply the entire road. This sounds lice a county blunder, not one that we few residents at
the end of Nance Farm Road have to muster. We also want access to safe, healthy county
water. Instead, we all have wells and suffer the consequence of landfill soil and water
contamination.
* While talking with the previous County Manager, several years ago, I pleaded with him
for Nance Farm Road to be an pressing issue for county water because of the landfill
situation. His response was that landfill and county water were two separate issues.
Anyway, he stated that if the expansion were granted the new dumping wound occur
closer in direction to 24-27 not in the direction of my home. This is complete fabrication.
* My personal feeling is that all residents within 1 mile of the dumping site should be

supplied county water at no cost, and all wells should be tested for contaminates within a
3 mile radius.
* I and all my neighbors have found numerous ancient Indian artifacts including various
arrowheads.
* If, in fact, there are archeological sites in and around the lands that are included in part
of the landfill expansion, they need to be uncovered and preserved. Most any other
county and state wound make and effort of conservation. Instead, , this petition wants to
disturb it and cover it with garbage of all things.
* The disturbance of 8 acres wetlands and especially the destruction of the endangered
plant species in question is not the best scenario. Again, these areas need to be conserved
and fully realized.
* This Public Notice is the first of any kind of notice since 1996 (when I purchased the
land where I live) that I have received about the direction and impacts of the Landfill.
And, as I stated before, they have acquired over 1000 acres in 8 years. With what
intention? And, with what damage to the environment?
* A couple years back when the previous expansion efforts failed, my property and many
others surrounding the landfill were on ariel photographs taken and analyzed with possible
soil and water contaminate impacts. Again, this is not a pleasing scenario.
* Landfill is not adhering to contract dumping limits. No one is verifying either what is
being dumped or how much of it is being dumped.
I would like to end by saying that living close to a landfill is not a pleasant experience. A
garbage dump site is just exactly that: a place where people's garbage is dumped. And, in this
case it is a lot of other people's garbage. No one wants to live close to that, and believe you me,
if I had known 4 years ago what I know now, I would have built a home as far away from `it' as
possible. We all know that there are health risks. And contamination can and does occur in the
air, the soil, and the water.
Do the right thing! Make a difference. Investigate before you act.
Sincerely,
Todd S. Lemonds
August 2°d, 2004
Dear Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetland / 401 Unit - North Carolina Division of Water Quality
County Manager - Montgomery County
Republic Services of North Carolina
Environmental Services Incorporated

AUG U 6 2004
My name is Winfred Lemonds and I live on Vestal Road in Troy, North Carolina.
I have lived in Troy all of my life, and I have lived in my current home for some 33 years.
I like it here, but there are a lot of aspects about the ever encroaching and ever visible Uwharrie
Environmental that are not welcome.
Instead of restating some if not all of the same concerns, I will enclose a copy of a my
son's letter.
Sincerely,
?W'!d E. Lemonds

August 2'd,2004
Dear Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands / 401 Unit - North Carolina Division of Water Quality
County Manager - Montgomery County
Republic Services of North Carolina
Environmental Services Incorporated
My name is Todd Lemonds and I live on Nance Farm Road in Troy, North Carolina.
As a matter of fact, my property borders the property of Uwharrie Environmental / Republic
Services/ lands owned by the County of Montgomery (all of which encompass what is commonly
called Uwharrie Environmental Landfill).
I am quite frankly appalled at not receiving a copy of the Public Notice from the
Department of the Army dated July 9, 2004 in the mail. All of my neighbors did. I did , however,
receive a copy from one of my fellow neighbors. Again, this is a disgrace that not all affected
parties are being informed consistently. It seems as though some parties are intentionally being
uninformed or misinformed by various landfill executives and county officials.
. I am writing to you because I have concerns about not only the possible expansion of
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill but also about its existing practices. The following is a list of
some of the concerns that not only I have but also the hundreds of supporters that showed up at
the last talks of the landfill expanding:
* The landfill has acquired well over 1000 acres in the last 8 years or so. My land now
borders land owned by Republic Services.
* All reports from landfill executives and county officials were that the landfill had no
intentions of crossing the creek in question
* The smell that originates from the dumping site is just awful, not just sometimes but
most often. This smell of trash / garbage is just completely putrid when it encompasses the
day and the night. Again, this odor can be smelt for several miles.
* The sound of buzzards, seagulls, and especially bulldozers and other heavy equipment,
can be heard for several miles. The inevitable banging sound is especially horrid at all
times of the day and night.
* The existing landfill site currently has 30 acres or more of continuously disturbed lands,
not including the trash mountain peak and the mound walls. According to the North
Carolina Division of Natural Resources only less than 1 acre can be disturbed without an
erosion control plan.
* The landfill is unable to keep grass or some kind of ground cover over what is currently
disturbed and exposed.
* Dumping occurs at all times of the day and night.
* People that live on Landfill Road are consistently being run off the road by garbage
trucks at all times of the day and night.
* Garbage trucks, both commercial and county, are driving on narrow backroads instead
of sticking with the major thorghfares.
* Trash found on the sides of the highway is most common directly around the roads that
lead to the landfill. Trash and debris are falling off trucks.
* High powered lights can occasionally be seen lighting up the night sky around the
landfill at all hours of the night. What is this? Why is this necessary?
* Several years ago, one of my neighbors saw a truck that was escorted by several
armored vehicles go to and leave the landfill. This convoy was sighted on Liberty Hill
Church Road and Landfill Road. Can this be explained?
* Just recently, it was rumored by one of the local trash haulers that a dead baby was
hauled and dumped by one White Oak truck out of Winston Salem, North Carolina to
Uwharrie Environmental.
* No one knows just exactly what is being dumped. No one checks the trucks as they
come in and no one checks them as they are being dumped.
* All public roads that surround Uwharrie Environmental Landfill are supplied in their
entirety with county water except one - the closest one to the dumping site - Nance Farm
Road. The roads that do have county water are: Highway 24-27, Landfill Road, Liberty
Hill Church Road, Vestal Road, and Old Dairy Road. The county water does extend part
of the way down Nance Farm Road. I and one of my neighbors did ask for it to be
extended down the entire road several years ago. The response from the County Manager
was that we had to cover the cost in excess of $13,000 not only for the extension but also
for the relaying of what had already been laid because the current size pipe would not
supply the entire road. This sounds hike a county blunder, not one that we few residents at
the end of Nance Farm Road have to muster. We also want access to safe, healthy county
water. Instead, we all have wells and suffer the consequence of landfill soil and water
contamination.
* While talking with the previous County Manager, several years ago, I pleaded with him
for Nance Farm Road to be an pressing issue for county water because of the landfill
situation. His response was that landfill and county water were two separate issues.
Anyway, he stated that if the expansion were granted the new dumping wound occur
closer in direction to 24-27 not in the direction of my home. This is complete fabrication.
* My personal feeling is that all residents within 1 mile of the dumping site should be

supplied county water at no cost, and all wells should be tested for contaminates within a
3 mile radius.
* I and all my neighbors have found numerous ancient Indian artifacts including various
arrowheads.
* If, in fact, there are archeological sites in and around the lands that are included in part
of the landfill expansion, they need to be uncovered and preserved. Most any other
county and state wound make and effort of conservation. Instead, , this petition wants to
disturb it and cover it with garbage of all things.
* The disturbance of 8 acres wetlands and especially the destruction of the endangered
plant species in question is not the best scenario. Again, these areas need to be conserved
and fully realized.
* This Public Notice is the first of any kind of notice since 1996 (when I purchased the
land where I live) that I have received about the direction and impacts of the Landfill.
And, as I stated before, they have acquired over 1000 acres in 8 years. With what
intention? And, with what damage to the environment?
* A couple years back when the previous expansion efforts failed, my property and many
others surrounding the landfill were on ariel photographs taken and analyzed with possible
soil and water contaminate impacts. Again, this is not a pleasing scenario.
* Landfill is not adhering to contract dumping limits. No one is verifying either what is
being dumped or how much of it is being dumped.
I would like to end by saying that living close to a landfill is not a pleasant experience. A
garbage dump site is just exactly that: a place where people's garbage is dumped. And, in this
case it is a lot of other people's garbage. No one wants to live close to that, and believe you me,
if I had known 4 years ago what I know now, I would have built a home as far away from `it' as
possible. We all know that there are health risks. And contamination can and does occur in the
air, the soil, and the water.
Do the right thing! Make a difference. Investigate before you act.
Sincerely,
Todd S. Lemonds

?t
August 2°', 2004
Dear Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office AUG 0
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 6 2004
Wetlands / 401 Unit - North Carolina. Division of Water Quality
County Manager - Montgomery County
Republic Services of North Carolina
Environmental Services Incorporated
My name is Todd Lemonds and I live on Nance Farm Road in Troy, North Carolina.
As a matter of fact, my property borders the property of Uwharrie Environmental / Republic
Services/ lands owned by the County of Montgomery (all of which encompass what is commonly
called Uwharrie Environmental Landfill).
I am quite frankly appalled at not receiving a copy of the Public Notice from the
Department of the Army dated July 9, 2004 in the mail. All of my neighbors did. I did , however,
receive a copy from one of my fellow neighbors. Again, this is a disgrace that not all affected
parties are being informed consistently. It seems as though some parties are intentionally being
uninformed or misinformed by various landfill executives and county officials.
I am writing to you because I have concerns about not only the possible expansion of
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill but also about its existing practices. The following is a list of
some of the concerns that not only I have but also the hundreds of supporters that showed up at
the last talks of the landfill expanding:
* The landfill has acquired well over 1000 acres in the last 8 years or so. My land now
borders land owned by Republic Services.
* All reports from landfill executives and county officials were that the landfill had no
intentions of crossing the creek in question
* The smell that originates from the dumping site is just awful, not just sometimes but
most often. This smell of trash / garbage is just completely putrid when it encompasses the
day and the night. Again, this odor can be smelt for several miles.
* The sound of buzzards, seagulls, and especially bulldozers and other heavy equipment,
can be heard for several miles. The inevitable banging sound is especially horrid at all
times of the day and night.
* The existing landfill site currently has 30 acres or more of continuously disturbed lands,
not including the trash mountain peak and the mound walls. According to the North
Carolina Division of Natural Resources only less than 1 acre can be disturbed without an
erosion control plan.
* The landfill is unable to keep grass or some kind of ground cover over what is currently
disturbed and exposed.

t
* Dumping occurs at all times of the day and night.
* People that live on Landfill Road are consistently being run off the road by garbage
trucks at all times of the day and night.
* Garbage trucks, both commercial and county, are driving on narrow backroads instead
of sticking with the major thorghfares.
* Trash found on the sides of the highway is most common directly around the roads that
lead to the landfill. Trash and debris are falling off trucks.
* High powered lights can occasionally be seen lighting up the night sky around the
landfill at all hours of the night. What is this? Why is this necessary?
* Several years ago, one of my neighbors saw a truck that was escorted by several
armored vehicles go to and leave the landfill. This convoy was sighted on Liberty Hill
Church Road and Landfill Road. Can this be explained?
* Just recently, it was rumored by one of the local trash haulers that a dead baby was
hauled and dumped by one White Oak truck out of Winston Salem, North Carolina to
Uwharrie Environmental.
* No one knows just exactly what is being dumped. No one checks the trucks as they
come in and no one checks them as they are being dumped.
* All public roads that surround Uwharrie Environmental Landfill are supplied in their
entirety with county water except one - the closest one to the dumping site - Nance Farm
Road. The roads that do have county water are: Highway 24-27, Landfill Road, Liberty
Hill Church Road, Vestal Road, and Old Dairy Road. The county water does extend part
of the way down Nance Farm Road. I and one of my neighbors did ask for it to be
extended down the entire road several years ago. The response from the County Manager
was that we had to cover the cost in excess of $13,000 not only for the extension but also
for the relaying of what had already been laid because the current size pipe would not
supply the entire road. This sounds hike a county blunder, not one that we few residents at
the end of Nance Farm Road have to muster. We also want access to safe, healthy county
water. Instead, we all have wells and suffer the consequence of landfill soil and water
contamination.
* While talking with the previous County Manager, several years ago, I pleaded with him
for Nance Farm Road to be an pressing issue for county water because of the landfill
situation. His response was that landfill and county water were two separate issues.
Anyway, he stated that if the expansion were granted the new dumping wound occur
closer in direction to 24-27 not in the direction of my home. This is complete fabrication.
* My personal feeling is that all residents within 1 mile of the dumping site should be
i ?
supplied county water at no cost, and all wells should be tested for contaminates within a
3 mile radius.
* I and all my neighbors have found numerous ancient Indian artifacts including various
arrowheads.
* If, in fact, there are archeological sites in and around the lands that are included in part
of the landfill expansion, they need to be uncovered and preserved. Most any other
county and state wound make and effort of conservation. Instead, , this petition wants to
disturb it and cover it with garbage of all things.
* The disturbance of 8 acres wetlands and especially the destruction of the endangered
plant species in question is not the best scenario. Again, these areas need to be conserved
and fully realized.
* This Public Notice is the first of any kind of notice since 1996 (when I purchased the
land where I live) that I have received about the direction and impacts of the Landfill.
And, as I stated before, they have acquired over 1000 acres in 8 years. With what
intention? And, with what damage to the environment?
* A couple years back when the previous expansion efforts failed, my property and many
others surrounding the landfill were on ariel photographs taken and analyzed with possible
soil and water contaminate impacts. Again, this is not a pleasing scenario.
* Landfill is not adhering to contract dumping limits. No one is verifying either what is
being dumped or how much of it is being dumped.
I would like to end by saying that living close to a landfill is not a pleasant experience. A
garbage dump site is just exactly that: a place where people's garbage is dumped. And, in this
case it is a lot of other people's garbage. No one wants to live close to that, and believe you me,
if I had known 4 years ago what I know now, I would have built a home as far away from `it' as
possible. We all know that there are health risks. And contamination can and does occur in the
air, the soil, and the water.
Do the right thing! Make a difference. Investigate before you act.
Sincerely,
r?
Todd S. Lemonds

w 11 N61
August 2-d,2004
Dear Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality AUG 0 6 2004
Wetlands / 401 Unit - North Carolina Division of Water Quality
County Manager - Montgomery County
Republic Services of North Carolina
Environmental Services Incorporated
My name is Todd Lemonds and I live on Nance Farm Road in Troy, North Carolina.
As a matter of fact, my property borders the property of Uwharrie Environmental / Republic
Services/ lands owned by the County of Montgomery (all of which encompass what is commonly
called Uwharrie Environmental Landfill).
I am quite frankly appalled at not receiving a copy of the Public Notice from the
Department of the Army dated July 9, 2004 in the mail. All of my neighbors did. I did , however,
receive a copy from one of my fellow neighbors. Again, this is a disgrace that not all affected
parties are being informed consistently. It seems as though some parties are intentionally being
uninformed or misinformed by various landfill executives and county officials.
. I am writing to you because I have concerns about not only the possible expansion of
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill but also about its existing practices. The following is a list of
some of the concerns that not only I have but also the hundreds of supporters that showed up at
the last talks of the landfill expanding:
* The landfill has acquired well over 1000 acres in the last 8 years or so. My land now
borders land owned by Republic Services.
* All reports from landfill executives and county officials were that the landfill had no
intentions of crossing the creek in question
* The smell that originates from the dumping site is just awful, not just sometimes but
most often. This smell of trash / garbage is just completely putrid when it encompasses the
day and the night. Again, this odor can be smelt for several miles.
* The sound of buzzards, seagulls, and especially bulldozers and other heavy equipment,
can be heard for several miles. The inevitable banging sound is especially horrid at all
times of the day and night.
* The existing landfill site currently has 30 acres or more of continuously disturbed lands,
not including the trash mountain peak and the mound walls. According to the North
Carolina Division of Natural Resources only less than 1 acre can be disturbed without an
erosion control plan.
* The landfill is unable to keep grass or some kind of ground cover over what is currently
disturbed and exposed.

* Dumping occurs at all tunes of the day and night.
* People that live on Landfill Road are consistently being run off the road by garbage
trucks at all times of the day and night.
* Garbage trucks, both commercial and county, are driving on narrow backroads instead
of sticking with the major thorghfares.
* Trash found on the sides of the highway is most common directly around the roads that
lead to the landfill. Trash and debris are falling off trucks.
* High powered lights can occasionally be seen lighting up the night sky around the
landfill at all hours of the night. What is this? Why is this necessary?
* Several years ago, one of my neighbors saw a truck that was escorted by several
armored vehicles go to and leave the landfill. This convoy was sighted on Liberty Hill
Church Road and Landfill Road. Can this be explained?
* Just recently, it was rumored by one of the local trash haulers that a dead baby was
hauled and dumped by one White Oak truck out of Winston Salem, North Carolina to
Uwharrie Environmental.
* No one knows just exactly what is being dumped. No one checks the trucks as they
come in and no one checks them as they are being dumped.
* All public roads that surround Uwharrie Environmental Landfill are supplied in their
entirety with county water except one - the closest one to the dumping site - Nance Farm
Road. The roads that do have county water are: Highway 24-27, Landfill Road, Liberty
Hill Church Road, Vestal Road, and Old Dairy Road. The county water does extend part
of the way down Nance Farm Road. I and one of my neighbors did ask for it to be
extended down the entire road several years ago. The response from the County Manager
was that we had to cover the cost in excess of $13,000 not only for the extension but also
for the relaying of what had already been laid because the current size pipe would not
supply the entire road. This sounds lice a county blunder, not one that we few residents at
the end of Nance Farm Road have to muster. We also want access to safe, healthy county
water. Instead, we all have wells and suffer the consequence of landfill soil and water
contamination.
* While talking with the previous County Manager, several years ago, I pleaded with him
for Nance Farm Road to be an pressing issue for county water because of the landfill
situation. His response was that landfill and county water were two separate issues.
Anyway, he stated that if the expansion were granted the new dumping wound occur
closer in direction to 24-27 not in the direction of my home. This is complete fabrication.
* My personal feeling is that all residents within 1 mile of the dumping site should be

supplied county water at no cost, and all wells should be tested for contaminates within a
3 mile radius.
* I and all my neighbors have found numerous ancient Indian artifacts including various
arrowheads.
* If, in fact, there are archeological sites in and around the lands that are included in part
of the landfill expansion, they need to be uncovered and preserved. Most any other
county and state wound make and effort of conservation. Instead, , this petition wants to
disturb it and cover it with garbage of all things.
* The disturbance of 8 acres wetlands and especially the destruction of the endangered
plant species in question is not the best scenario. Again, these areas need to be conserved
and fully realized.
* This Public Notice is the first of any kind of notice since 1996 (when I purchased the
land where I live) that I have received about the direction and impacts of the Landfill.
And, as I stated before, they have acquired over 1000 acres in 8 years. With what
intention? And, with what damage to the environment?
* A couple years back when the previous expansion efforts failed, my property and many
others surrounding the landfill were on ariel photographs taken and analyzed with possible
soil and water contaminate impacts. Again, this is not a pleasing scenario.
* Landfill is not adhering to contract dumping limits. No one is verifying either what is
being dumped or how much of it is being dumped.
I would lice to end by saying that living close to a landfill is not a pleasant experience. A
garbage dump site is just exactly that: a place where people's garbage is dumped. And, in this
case it is a lot of other people's garbage. No one wants to live close to that, and believe you me,
if I had known 4 years ago what I know now, I would have built a home as far away from `it' as
possible. We all know that there are health risks. And contamination can and does occur in the
air, the soil, and the water.
Do the right thing! Make a difference. Investigate before you act.
Sincerely,
Todd S. Lemonds
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 28273
704523-7225 • FAX [phone]
www.esinc.cc
4 August 2004
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2660
RE: Individual Permit Application
& Modified Environmental Assessment
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill
Montgomery County, North Carolina
NC DWQ Project Number: 04-1138
Dear Ms. Karoly:
WETL ANDS / 401 GROUP
AUG 0 5 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Enclosed, please find two bound copies of the individual permit application and
supporting modified environmental assessment document for the aforementioned project
as requested in your 21 July 2004 letter. Additionally, the permittee will be forwarding a
check in the amount of $475.00 for the permitting application fees. Please note that as an
addition, the permittee has asked that ESI submit the stormwater plan for the site as an
addendum for your review. This document is bound into the documentation provided and
can be found behind the final separation page (red page) at the back of the document.
Should you have any questions, please give me a call [phone] or email
(ppetity,[e-mail]).
Sincerely,
SERVICES, INC.
S. Paul Petitgout
Vice President
Enclosures

JACKSONVILLE • ST. AUGUSTINE • COCOA • JUPITER • DESTIN • SAVANNAH • ATLANTA • RALEIGH 0 CHARLOTTE
r
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 325)
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
Expires December 31. 20na
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimatsd to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
' completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20603. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shall be subject to any penalty for fairing to comply with a collection of information if R does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
ITEMS f TH 4 TO B FILLED BY HE CORPS)
' 1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
ffE ELOW TO BE FILLEDBYAPPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE ranawmjsrw mauved)
Drew Isenhower S. Paul Petitgout
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Republic Services on NC, LLC Environmental Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 2943 Hickory, NC 28603 9600-G Southern Pine Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28273
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b: Business [phone]
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
1 hereby authorize, Environmental Services, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
' furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this pe"O"MM7.401 GROUP
/9W 1PAA,' AUG 0 5 2004
'. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE rsaeb=nuc&vw1
Uwharrie Regional Landfill - Expansion #2
`3. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN afan.&-htPI 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS afappumb/e)
UT of Rocky Creek Uwharrie Regional Landfill
500 Landfill Road
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Mt. Gilead, NC 27306
Montgomery North Carolina [phone]
COUNTY STATE Attn: Mr. Ken Lowder - Site Manager
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, rse ins&wvom)
E17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From the City of Troy, NC: Take NC Highway 24/27 West towards the City of Albemarle, NC for
approximately 4 miles. Turn right onto Landfill Road (there is a large Uwharrie
'-Environmental, Inc. sign at the intersection of Landfill Road and NC 24/27). Proceed
approimately 1.5 miles and the landfill entrance and scalehouse will be on the right.
' 18. Nature of Activity (Descdpdon of pwiest, axkA a ea feenres)
The activity consists of the placement of clean fill into approximately 7.99 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands (this includes all previous permitted acreages) and 2239 linear feet
' of jurisdictional streams.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see jrsvuch'aisl
See Attached Page Marked Block 19.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
' In order to be able to construct a landfill expansion with the purpose of extending the life
of the current landfill without having to construct an entirely new facility.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharaed and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards
The activity involves the placement of approximately 150,000 cubic yards of clean structural
' fill material for the purposes of constructing an expansion of the current landfill
facilities.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled iseeftmwdom)
±7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
±2239 linear feet of jurisdictional streams

23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No
IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See Attached Page Marked Block 24
0
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.

Af-C&I W
--•--- - ••• • ••-- ...?....,..,,.,,.,?. nv...vQn urIC rlrt-ucv vAit Arrmuvtu DATE DENIED
NC SHPO Concurrence N/A 5/11/01 6/29/01 N/A
is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain
,26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
applic 'on is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
dul
IAP"Wd"' orized ent o the applicant.
' n-11-0; S -11-11-03
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNAT E OF GENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing some to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than 510,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.

A
l
pp
ication for Department of the Army Permit (33 CFR 325)
BLOCK 19
Project Purpose
' The overall purpose of the project is to expand a municipal solid waste landfill to enable the
existing facility to continue operating the Uwharrie Environmental Landfill site and PLecycling
Center. Without the landfill expansion, municipal solid waste generated in the local/regional
' service area will need to be trucked to alternative sites, which will significantly increase the cost
of landfilling regionally generated waste, or new landfill sites would need to be identified and
permitted. Additionally, the recycling complex located on the Uwharrie Landfill site was sited
' here due to its proximity to the existing landfill. If the landfill is prohibited from expanding and
waste is transported to other facilities, the recycling complex will likely default due to lack of
incoming waste at the site. Economically, it would not be feasible to transport recyclable
' materials from another facility to the current recycling facility or to try and relocate the recycling
facility to another location
The rec
lin
f
ilit
i
l
o
.
yc
g
ac
y
s
n
y cost effective if it is located adjacent to
a permitted municipal solid waste landfill. Additionally, there would be the possibility that
electric power could be generated using the methane produced by the existing landfill and the
' proposed landfill as a new renewable energy resource.
BLOCK 24
' Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the
Waterbody.
It should be noted that the applicant is the only property owner whose property adjoins the -
waterbody (i.e. the waterbodies proposed for impact are wholly contained on the applicants
property.
' However, names and addresses of all landowners adjacent to the property held by the applicant
are provided as information to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
' LANDOWNERS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY HELD BY THE APPLICANT
1. Applicant
Uwharrie Regional Landfill
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC.
P.O. Box 2943
Hickory, NC 28603
Lot Numbers: 0110, 1354, 2786, 4952, 7551, 6058
2. County
Montgomery County Board of Commissioners
102. East Spring Street
Troy, NC 27371
' Lot Numbers: 0440, 0770, 3280, 5456, 8012, 8736, 9814
3. Michael W. Kelly
1258 NC 109
Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 0045

4. Sur-Shaw and Ko Vang 5. Thurman A. Chriscoe
Route 3, Box 2009 227 Gap Road
' Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Seagrove, NC 27341
Lot Numbers: 0375, 6207, 6430, 8999 Lot Numbers: 0482, 1196
6. Gary Wayne Cook 7. Warren R. and Francis J. Greene
126 Honey Drive 679 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Mount Gilead, NC 27306
' Lot Number: 0478 Lot Numbers: 0549, 0839, 0852
8. John and Sue Lewellen 9. Bee C. and Ger Y. Vang

' 459 Nance Farm Road
Troy, NC 27371 226 Vang Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Numbers: 0651, 1637 Lot Number: 1169
' 10. Douapao and Sheng Pha Vang 11. Teng and Sheral S. Vang
288 Vang Drive 265 Vang Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Mount Gilead, NC 27306
' Lot Number: 3900 Lot Number: 6013
12. Xao and Jer X. Vang 13. Kaha and Kia Vang
253 Vang Drive 196 Kaha Lane
' Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Mourn Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 6234 Lot Numbers: 7125, 8314
' 14. Sia Shoua Vang 15. Tou and Anonh Vang
265 Vang Drive 301 Vang Drive
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Mount Gilead, NC 27306
' Lot Number: 7718 Lot Number: 8895
16. Phothisane T. and Nancy S. Vanh 17. W.D. and Velvin Kelly
' 842 Landfill Road 1258 NC Hwy 109
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 6611 Lot Number: 1273
' 18. Gary A. Hunsucker 19. Bowater Timber 2, LLC.
24601 Canton Road c% Jordan Properties, LLC.
Albemarle, NC 28001 P.O. Box 98
Lot Number: 1717 Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 2155
' 20. John Robert Loftin 21. Doyle M. and Faye M. Atkins
1271 Albemarle Road 2497 Lovejoy Road
Troy, NC 27371 Troy, NC 27371
' Lot Number: 2201 Lot Number: 3745
22. Kelly L. and Emir Coltrane 23.Odus D. Smith, et. al.
911 Uwharrie Street c/o O.D. Smith, Jr.
Asheboro, NC 27203 316 Maner Road
Lot Number: 9631 Kings Mountain, NC 28086
Lot Number: 2376

'
24. William D. and Brenda W. Kirk 25. Darrell L. and Pamela P. Hurley
797 Landfill Road 694 Strider Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Troy, NC 27371
' Lot Number: 2833, 9884 Lot Number: 2850
26. Timothy D. and Gina P. Lefler 27. Danny and Frances Loftin
' 811 Landfill Road 829 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Mount Gilead, NC 27306
' Lot Numbers: 2963, 3972 Lot Number: 3149 _
28. Thomas A. and Mandy L. Wooten 29. Vera W. Morris
408 Nance Farm Road 8426 Doughton Drive
' Troy, NC 27371 Bahama, NC 27503
Lot Number: 3229 Lot Number: 3478
30. Roger L. and Barbara Hunsucker 31. V.A. Green, Jr.
149 Honey Drive 675 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Mount Gilead, NC 27306
' Lot Numbers: 3847, 8780 Lot Number: 4017
32. Dennis N. and Gail G. Luther 33. Lonnie Gibson
665 Landfill Road 731 Landfill Road
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 4112, Lot Numbers: 4939, 7073
' 34. Albert S. and lane Hunsucker 35.11artha McIntyre
3004 Love Joy Road 728 Landfill Road
Troy, NC 27371 Mount Gilead, NC 27306
' Lot Number: 5642 Lot Number: 6610
36. Darrell Lynn Hurley, et. al. 37. Barry L. and Rebecca B. Stegall
305 Nance Farm Road 306 Nance Farm Road
' Troy, NC 27371 Troy, NC 27371
Lot Number: 6893 Lot Number: 7225
' 38. Edmond Phillip Greene 39. Todd S. Lemonds
694 Landfill Road 113 Johnia Court
Mount Gilead, NC 27306 Thomasville, NC 27360
Lot Numbers: 8155, 9383 Lot Number: 8262
40. Sandra R. Parsons
125 A V&ttie Lane
Mount Gilead, NC 27306
Lot Number: 8731

MODIFIED ENVIRONEMTNAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE
UWHARRIE ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFILL EXPANSION
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
In Support of an Individual Permit Application
Section 4041401 of the Clean Water Act
Prepared for:
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
Conover, North Carolina
Prepared by:
ENVIRONEMTNAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Tel [phone] Fax [phone]
MARCH 2004
4

MODIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE
UWHARRIE ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFILL EXPANSION
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC, (aka Uwharrie Environmental, Inc.) and the
Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, proposes to construct an expansion to
the existing landfill facility located adjacent to the existing landfill on a 250-acre site
located in western Montgomery County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). More
specifically, the public/private partnership facility is located near the intersection of
Landfill Road and NC 24/27 approximately five miles west of the Town of Troy, North
Carolina. Mr. Drew Isenhour is the applicant and Mr. Ken Lowder is the on-site project
manager. Hodges, Harbin, Newberry and Tribble, Inc., Consulting Engineers (HHNT) of
Macon, GA is the Engineer of Record for the project. Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI)
of Charlotte, North Carolina is the environmental consultant assisting HHNT with natural
resource issues and permit acquisition.
The Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion is proposed to expand the existing
landfill to ensure a viable repository for municipal solid waste in the region. The
permitted landfill provides ±9,000,000 yds3 of airspace and the proposed expansion will
provide an additional ±9,000,000 yds3 of capacity. Expansion of the site will provide an
' additional nine years of disposal life for a total of approximately 20 additional years of
continuous operation.
Uwharrie Environmental, Inc., will be submitting a permit application to the US Army
Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requesting authorization to impact approximately 2,735
linear feet of first and second order stream channel and 7.04 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972 (33 USC 1344).
Additionally, the permittee will be responsible for mitigating for approximately 0.95-acre
of jurisdictional wetland area that was permitted previously under the Nationwide Permit
Program of the US Army Corps of Engineers (total cumulative wetland impact of 7.99
acres). This permit action will also require a Water Quality Certification from the State of
North Carolina through the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) (NCGS 143-215) pursuant
to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
The purpose of this document is to provide an evaluation of three general criteria which
will be considered as part of the permit process: 1) the relative extent of the public and
private need for the proposed activity; 2) the practicability of using reasonable alternative
locations and methods to accomplish the objective of the proposed activity; and 3) the
extent of the effects which the proposed activity is likely to have on the environment in
and around the area of the proposed. This document is intended for use by ACOE and
DWQ as the basis for determining the applicant's compliance with the Section 404 (b)
(1) guidelines and other Section 404 permitting requirements, and Section 401 water
quality certification.

i

2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
2.1 Overall Purpose and Function of the Project
The overall purpose of the project is to expand a municipal solid waste landfill to enable
the existing facility to continue operating the Uwharrie Environmental Landfill site and
Recycling Center. Without the landfill expansion, municipal solid waste generated in the
local/regional service area will need to be trucked to alternative sites, which will
significantly increase the cost of landfilling regionally generated waste, or new landfill
sites would need to be identified and permitted. Additionally, the recycling complex
located on the Uwharrie Landfill site was sited here due to its proximity to the existing
landfill. If the landfill is prohibited from expanding and waste is transported to other
facilities, the recycling complex will likely default due to lack of incoming waste at the
site. Economically, it would not be feasible to transport recyclable materials from
another facility to the current recycling facility or to try and relocate the recycling facility
to another location. The recycling facility is only cost effective if it is located adjacent to
a permitted municipal solid waste landfill. Additionally, there would be the possibility that
electric power could be generated using the methane produced by the existing landfill
and the proposed landfill as a new renewable energy resource.
2.2 Need for the Project
Based on current use levels for the Uwharrie Landfill and Recycling Complex, the need
for a landfill expansion has been demonstrated. Use of the landfill facility has increased
steadily over the last few years, shortening the expected life of the current landfill
footprint. In order-to proactively plan for future growth of Montgomery County 'and
surrounding areas within the service area of the existing facilities, expansion of the
existing landfill site must be considered early in the solid waste and growth processes in
order to allow adequate time for review of all of the environmental, physical, and socio-
economic issues that need to be addressed. With a shortening of the proposed life of
the existing footprint, planning for expansion must begin now to ensure a viable/reliable
site for landfilling that meets all of the expected goals of both the regulatory agencies
and the applicant.
3.0 ALTERNATIVES
Headquarters of the US Army Corps of Engineers (HQ-USACE) guidance from 22 April
1986 requires that alternatives be practicable to the applicant and that the purpose and
need for the project must be the applicant's purpose and need. This guidance also
states that project purpose is to be viewed from the applicant's perspective rather than
' only from the broad, public perspective. The essential point of the HQ-USACE policy
guidance of 22 April 1986 is that under the Section 404 (b)(1) Guidelines, an alternative
must be available to the applicant to be a practicable alternative.
3.1 Alternative Analysis Criteria
The following criteria were examined during the analysis of alternatives for the project: 1)
' Availability of Property; (2) Demographic (Population) Information; 3) Proximity to
Highways/Infrastructure; 4) Geologic Information; 5) Hydrogeologic Characteristics; 6)
Presence/Absence of Wetlands/Waters of the US; (7) Presence/Absence of Endangered
and Threatened Species; and 8) Presence/Absence of Cultural Resource Issues. Other
1

criteria examined also included, the proximity of the sites to airports, the proximity of
nearby drinking water sources, and other criteria related to the permitting of subtitle D
landfills.
3.1.1 Availability of Property - Three sites were included in the analysis of
alternatives for the proposed expansion of the Uwharrie Environmental Landfill. Each of
the four sites evaluated was determined to be available for purchase at the time of the
proposed expansion planning.
3.1.2 Demographic (Population) Information - One major goal of siting a new
landfill or expanding an existing landfill facility is to reduce or eliminate the burden on
any/all neighborhoods and communities. The simplest method of achieving this goal is
' to site facilities away from population centers to the greatest extent possible. All of the
alternatives reviewed are a minimum of one mile from any population centers within
Montgomery County.
3.1.3 Proximity to Highways/infrastructure Vehicles must be able to quickly access
the project site to prevent detrimental impacts to the local traffic patterns. Adjacency to
' primary county roads and state highways are undeniable positive attributes of any
proposed project site. Additionally, weight restrictions on secondary roads may prevent
access to the site by potential users. It is important for patrons who may travel long
distances to be able to find the facility with ease and without utilizing secondary roads
which may have weight restrictions. Only one of the four potential alternative sites
meets this criteria (the alternative adjacent to the existing landfill facility).
3.1.4 Geologic Information When new or expansion landfills are proposed, the
geology of the proposed site is very important. Site stability from the standpoint of the
presence/absence of fault zones, seismic impact zones or unstable areas is extremely
' important in determining the potential for safety issues resulting from potential land shifts
that may compromise the integrity of the landfill facility. Based on the review of the
Geologic Map of Montgomery County and the Seismic Impact Zone Map for the
Southeastern United States by HHNT, it appears that the four alternative locations are
free from any potential geologic fatal flaws that would exclude them from potential use.
3.1.5 Hydrogeologic Information - Additionally, the hydrogeology of a particular site
is also a very important siting characteristic. Generally, the piedmont consists of fairly
localized aquifers which tend to be recharged in the higher elevations of the local
topography and discharge into the lower ends of the local topography. The four
alternative sites, as well as most areas within Montgomery County, exhibit acceptable
hydrogeologic characteristics for the siting of a landfill or landfill expansion.
3.1.6 Presence/Absence of WetlandMaters of the US - Wetlands and other waters
of the US are extremely important ecological components of our surrounding landscape.
Whenever possible, the applicant has attempted to locate sites where impacts to these
important systems could be avoided to the greatest extent possible. Based on initial
observations, it should be noted that all of the alternative sites contain jurisdictional
waters of the US as defined by the US Army Corps of Engineers and the North Carolina
' Division of Water Quality. Due to the general size requirements for landfills to be
considered viable ventures, impacts to jurisdictional waters of the US can be expected in
most instances and are expected to occur on all of the proposed alternative sites.
0

L'
t

0

1

3.1.7 Presence/Absence of Threatened and Endangered Species - In addition to
wetlands and other jurisdictional waters of the US, endangered and threatened species
are also an important component of the ecological systems present in Montgomery
County. Based on the review of both Federal and State listed species, there is potential
habitat for endangered and/or threatened species on all of the alternative sites.
3.1.8 Presence/Absence of Cultural Resource Issues - There exists the possibility
that there are relevant cultural resources located on all of the proposed alternatives.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act states that projects requiring a
federal permit must undergo review to define the presence of any significant historic or
pre-historic resources that may be located on the proposed site. Potential exists on all
of the proposed alternatives for the presence of cultural resources.
3.2 Alternative Property Search
A search for alternate properties was conducted by HHNT as a part of the Solid Waste
permitting requirements. Properties needed to be of sufficient size (>200 acres) and
needed to be available for purchase to be considered viable. Four properties were
located in Montgomery County which satisfied both of our pre-qualified search
parameters. It should be noted that three of the tracts are located south and southeast
of the city of Troy, and the fourth location consists of several tracts adjacent to the
existing Uwharrie Environmental Landfill.
3.2.1 Alternative Location One - Alternative one consists of a site that is located
approximately two miles south of NC 24/27 and approximately two miles south of the city
of Troy, NC (Figure 3). The property is available for purchase and is situated in a rural
setting just south of the city limits of Troy. This area is somewhat populated due to two
small communities located nearby (Caplise and Onvil). Access to the site is considered
poor due to the absence of adequate access to primary highways. In fact, the primary
access corridor would probably come through the city of Troy. Other secondary roads
that access the site would likely have weight restrictions that preclude the use of those
corridors. Additionally, new infrastructure would need to be constructed on this site
(recycling facility, scalehouse, lechate tanks, roads, etc. (cost: ±$7,000,000)) to utilize
the site as a landfill. From a geologic/hydrogeologic perspective, this site meets all
requirements and has acceptable characteristics. This alternative site contains several
acres of wetlands and approximately 15,000 linear feet of jurisdictional streams on site.
Based on the size of landfill footprint that would be required to meet the project goals
(because there is no existing landfill adjacent that would allow vertical expansion volume
while reducing land requirements to create the total volume needed), a majority of the
jurisdictional areas on site would likely be impacted in some fashion. Mitigation for both
stream and wetland impacts would be limited due to the size of the project because the
project would consume the majority of the property. No threatened or endangered
species are located on site and only one species (Schweinitz's sunflower), is located
within one mile of the project site. No adverse effects are expected to any threatened or
endangered species if this site is utilized. Cultural resources have the potential for being
located on the site based on its proximity to water and the topography of the area, and
the patterns of use in the area.
Based on the information contained above, this site would not be considered a viable
alternative. The factors which limit the sites ability serve as a viable landfill site
candidate are: (1) jurisdictional impacts would be significant; (2) onsite mitigation

0

opportunities would be severely limited due to the area required for the project; (3)
access issues make utilizing this site unfavorable; and (4) infrastructure improvements
would be costly.
3.2.2 Alternative Location Two - Alternative two consists of a site that is located
approximately three miles south of NC 24/27 and approximately three miles southeast of
the city of Troy, NC (Figure 4). The property is potentially available for purchase and is
situated in a rural setting just south of the city limits of Troy. This area is somewhat
populated due to four small communities located nearby (Caplise, Onvil, Troy, and
Biscoe). Access to the site is considered poor due to the absence of adequate access
to primary highways. The primary access corridors would most likely come through the
cities of Troy and Biscoe. Other secondary roads that access the site would likely have
weight restrictions that preclude the use of those corridors. Additionally, proximity to the
local airport may preclude the use of this site. FAA regulations potentially limit the
placement of landfills within five miles of an airport. New infrastructure would need to be
constructed on this site (recycling facility, scalehouse, lechate tanks, roads, etc. (cost:
±$7,000,000)) to utilize the site as a landfill. From a geologic/hydrogeologic perspective,
this site meets all requirements and has acceptable characteristics. This alternative site
contains several acres of wetlands and approximately 16,000 linear feet of jurisdictional
streams on site. Based on the size of landfill footprint that would be required to meet the
project goals (because there is no existing landfill adjacent that would allow vertical
expansion volume while reducing land requirements to create the total volume needed),
a majority of the jurisdictional areas on site would likely be impacted in some fashion.
Mitigation for both stream and wetland impacts would be limited due to the size of the
project because the project would consume the majority of the property. No threatened
or endangered species are located on site and only one species (Schweinitz's
sunflower), is located within one mile of the project site. No adverse effects are
expected to any threatened or endangered species if this site is utilized. Cultural
resources have the potential for being located on the site based on its proximity to water
and the topography of the area, and patterns of use in the area.
' Based on the information contained above, this site would not be considered a viable
alternative. The limiting factors which limit the sites ability serve as a viable landfill site
candidate are: (1) jurisdictional impacts would be significant; (2) onsite mitigation
opportunities would be severely limited due to the area required for the project; (3)
access issues make utilizing this site unfavorable; (4) proximity to the local airport; and
(5) infrastructure improvements would be costly.
3.2.3 Alternative Location Three - Alternative three consists of a site that is located
approximately three miles south of NC 24/27 and approximately three miles southeast of
the city of Troy, NC (This site is adjacent to alternative two) (Figure 5). The property is
potentially available for purchase and is situated in a rural setting just south of the city
limits of Troy. This area is somewhat populated due to four small communities located
nearby (Caplise, Troy, Onvil, and Biscoe). Access to the site is considered poor due to
the absence of adequate access to primary highways. The primary access corridors
would most likely come through the cities of Troy and Biscoe. Other secondary roads
that access the site would likely have weight restrictions that preclude the use of those
corridors. Additionally, proximity to the local airport may preclude the use of this site.
FAA regulations potentially limit the placement of landfills within five miles of an airport.
New infrastructure would need to be constructed on this site (recycling facility,
scalehouse, lechate tanks, roads, etc. (cost: ±$7,000,000)) to utilize the site as a landfill.
From a geologic/hydrogeologic perspective, this site meets all requirements and has
' acceptable characteristics. This alternative site contains several acres, of wetlands and
approximately 16,000 linear feet of jurisdictional streams on site. Based on the size of
landfill footprint that would be required to meet the project goals (because there is no
' existing landfill adjacent that would allow vertical expansion volume while reducing land
requirements to create the total volume needed), a majority of the jurisdictional areas on
site would likely be impacted in some fashion. On-site mitigation for both stream and
' wetland impacts would be limited due to the size of the project because the project
would consume the majority of the property. No threatened or endangered species are
located on site and only one species (Schweinitz's sunflower), is located within one mile
of the project site. No adverse effects are expected to any threatened or endangered
' species if this site is utilized. Cultural resources have the potential for being located on
the site based on its proximity to water and the topography of the area, and patterns of
use in the area.
¦ Based on the information contained above, this site would not be considered a viable
alternative. The limiting factors which limit the sites ability serve as a viable landfill site
' candidate are: (1) jurisdictional impacts would be significant; (2) onsite mitigation
opportunities would be severely limited due to the area required for the project; (3)
access issues make utilizing this site unfavorable; (4) proximity to the local airport; and
' (5) infrastructure improvements would be costly.
3.2.4 Alternative Location Four - Alternative four consist of four separate tracts that
adjoin the existing Uwharrie Environmental Landfill and Recycling Center property,
located on Landfill road, approximately one mile north of NC 24/27 and approximately 5
miles west of the city of Troy, NC (Figure 6). These properties are currently available
' for use as a landfill, and are situated away from residential areas in the county. This
area is sparsely populated. Access to the site is considered excellent because the site
is within one mile of a primary highway system (NC 24/27), and the secondary road used
' to access the site (Landfill Road) does not have any weight restrictions. Additionally,
the infrastructure for the existing landfill can be utilized for an expansion if the expansion
is located here. From a geologic/hydrogeologic perspective, this site meets all
requirements and has acceptable characteristics. This alternative site contains
approximately 16 acres of wetlands and 12,000 linear feet of jurisdictional streams on
site. However, the proposed expansion would only impact approximately 8 acres of
wetlands (including previously permitted wetland impacts) and 2,300 linear feet of
' streams. On-site mitigation for both stream and wetland impacts is feasible if this
location is selected. No threatened or endangered species are located on site and only
' one species (Schweinitz's sunflower), is located within one mile of the project site. No
adverse effects are expected to any threatened or endangered species if this site is
utilized. Cultural resources have been located on this site, but all areas of interest are
capable of being preserved in situ without affecting the expansion of the landfill site.

Based on the information contained above, this site would be the preferred alternative
because this site meets all of the conditions set forth by the applicant and avoids
' impacts to all environmental resources to the greatest extent possible while maintaining
the project's goals. Where impacts are unavoidable, the permittee has devised a
methodology to mitigate for those impacts in a way that is beneficial to the site and to the
surrounding environment.
u
3.2.5 No Action Alternative

u
H
A "No Action" alternative is considered to be one that avoids all wetland and surface
water impacts. Due to the constraints dictated by site topography and land-grading
requirements, this project cannot be down-sized or shifted to avoid all jurisdictional areas
and still satisfy project purpose and need. Additionally, due to the necessary area
needed for the landfill expansion and its attendant features, it would be extremely
difficult to locate a different site where no jurisdictional areas occur.
A "No Action" decision at this location would likely result in the closure of the Uwharrie
Environmental Landfill and the Recycling Center. The dissolution of the public/private
partnership between Montgomery County and Republic Services of North Carolina, Inc.,
and subsequent closure of the Uwharrie Environmental facility would place a severe
strain on the ability of other landfills in the area to absorb the inflow of expected waste
generated by the closure of the Uwharrie site. The "No Action" alternative is not capable
of achieving the basic purpose and need of the proposed project and, therefore, cannot
be considered a reasonable alternative.
3.3 Minimization Alternatives
' The project engineer has been working closely with the applicant and with ESI to
minimize stream and wetland impacts on the preferred alternative site. Due to regional
and local topography and earthwork necessary for site preparation, the proposed project
' will impact jurisdictional wetlands and streams anywhere that it is placed on the subject
property. The currently proposed site for the landfill expansion and all of the attendant
features utilize an area on the central portion of the site. The streams in this portion of
the site appear to have been previously disturbed by agricultural activities. The northern
1 portion of the site generally contains streams and wetlands that are of a higher quality
than those proposed for impact.
' Total stream channel impact as currently proposed is 2,735 linear feet. Approximately
14,008 linear feet of stream channel will remain undisturbed or will be used for
mitigation. The site plan has been moved and shifted as much as possible by the landfill
designer to minimize the amount of stream and wetland impacts. Further attempts to re-
configure the project layout would result in not meeting the projects purpose and needs.
' An alternative resulting in reduction of the size of this project would not meet project
purpose and need. Optimal project size is based on development costs versus
projected revenues. Market research has determined the optimal project size, and a
reduction in size would jeopardize the economic viability of this project.
There are no reasonable on-site alternatives to the current site plan. Moving the
proposed construction to a different part of the site would also result in stream and
wetland impacts. Siting of the landfill expansion away from the current landfill would
require a much larger footprint to provide the same volumes as an expansion plan
adjacent to the existing landfill (vertical expansion capabilities). In addition, the streams
on the northern portion of the property are generally of a higher quality than those on the
southern portion of the site, where some previous disturbance is evident. Steps to
minimize stream and wetland impacts have been taken where possible.

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
' This section presents existing environmental conditions of the proposed project site and
discusses environmental impacts anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The
Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion site has been visited several times by ESI
' personnel from January 1999 to the present in order to evaluate existing conditions and
to document physical and biological resources. Additionally, ESI personnel were
involved in the initial Section 404 Permitting on the original landfill site during 1992-93,
' and are extremely familiar with the entire landfill project area.
The site is located near NC Highway 24/27 approximately 5 miles west of Troy, NC.
Total size of the site is approximately 250 acres. The proposed expansion site has been
proposed in an area that is adjacent to the existing Uwharrie Environmental Landfill site,
which is in a highly disturbed state (Figure 7).
' 4.1 Physical Resources
4.1.1 Physiography, Topography, Geology, and Land Use
'
The study area is located within the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina.
The landscape is characterized by rolling hills with moderately steep slopes. Elevations
' within the study area range from approximately 750 feet MSL in the southern portion of
the site to approximately 600 feet MSL near Rocky Creek (USGS Troy 7.5 Minute
Quadrangle, 1982) (Figure 7).
' 4.1.2 Regional Geology
The crystalline rocks of the Piedmont Province occur in belt like distributions (Horton &
' Zullo 1991). According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina, 1985, the Piedmont
province is divided into five distinct belts: (1) the °Inner Piedmont Chauga Belt", (2) the
"Charlotte and Milton Belts", (3) the "Carolina Slate Belt", (4) the "Raleigh Belt", and (5)
' "Eastern Slate Belt". Montgomery County lies almost solely within the Carolina Slate
Belt. In the southern portion of the county, Triassic rocks, predominately shale and
Cretaceous sediments of the Tuscaloosa formation occur (Schipf 1961)
Rocks of the Carolina Slate Belt in the Albermarle-Troy-Asheboro Region are slightly
deformed and metamorphosed. The dominant structures are open folds plunging
southwest and regional metamorphism is chlorite or biotite grade (Horton & Zullo 1991).
4.1.3 Soils
' There is currently no published soil survey for Montgomery County, although production
of one is under way. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has
identified two non-hydric soil series which occur in the project study area: Herdon and
Georgeville. Both soils consist of well drained, moderately permeable soils that
originated in residuum weathered primarily from Carolina slate or other fine grained
rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Both soils generally occur on gently sloping to
moderately steep areas. No hydric soil series have been identified in the vicinity of the
project area by the NRCS.
4.1.2 Water Resources
Two major cataloging systems are used in North Carolina to identify surface water
drainage areas: one developed by USGS and the other by DWQ. The project site is
located within USGS's hydrologic unit 03040104 (Seaber et al. 1987). The DWQ system
places the site in sub-basin 03-07-15 of the Yadkin River Basin and the Site Index
Number (SIN) is 13-25-30-(0.3)(DEM 1994) (DENR 2002).
' The property contains several unnamed tributaries of Rocky Creek. These tributaries
consist of first order streams that are intermittent to perennial in nature. The current
condition of the first order streams suggests that they are intermittent in nature. A total
of 16,743 linear feet of streams occur on the site including Rocky Creek (This does not
include approximately 1,580 linear feet of Rocky Creek where the applicant has control
of only one bank of the creek)(Table 1 - Appendix A). A total of 25.20 acres occur on
the site (Table 2 - Appendix A). The current site plan calls for filling of approximately
' 2,735 feet of stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands (including
previously permitted wetland impacts) to facilitate construction of the landfill expansion
(Figure 8).

Rocky Creek and its tributaries located on the project site are assigned best usage
classification of C. Class C waters are freshwaters protected for fishing, aquatic life
propagation and survival, wildlife, and secondary recreation, which includes wading,
boating, other uses not involving human body contact with water where such activities
take place on an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental basis.
Water quality is assessed by DWQ through several programs, including benthic macro-
invertebrate monitoring, fish community structure, and aquatic toxicity monitoring. Three
benthic macroinvertebrate stations were monitored in 1989 along Rocky Creek
downstream from the project site. Water quality was rated as "Good" to "Fair" and was
substantiated by the macroinvertebrate results (DENR 2002). Fish community structure
was sampled in Rocky Creek in 1996 resulting in a "Fair" rating (DENR 2002). Overall,
benthic macroinvertebrate and fish community structure indicated "Good" water quality in
Rocky Creek. However, both point and nonpoint source pollution contributed to a "Poor"
bioclassification of the lower reaches of this stream (DENR 2002).
Water quality and pollution abatement are very important issues in the development of
this project. Measures are being undertaken to attenuate stormwater runoff. The
proposed project will include stormwater detention basins designed to handle
stormwater runoff from the project site. The stormwater management plan is being
developed by HHNT to comply with state stormwater rules and regulations. Best
management practices, including stringent erosion and sediment control measures, will
be implemented during construction to minimize impacts to downstream water quality.
4.2 Biological Resources
4.2.1 Plant Communities
Only two general plant communities have been identified within the project site: Mesic
Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) and Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest
(Schafale & Weakley 1990) and disturbed variants of the two communities. These plant
communities represent assemblages of plant species which vary according to soil type,
topographic position, past land use, and level of human disturbance. Descriptions of
these communities are provided below. Scientific nomenclature is typically in
accordance with Radford et al. (1968).
4.2.1.1 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest - Mixed mesic hardwood forests are generally
found on slopes and well drained, small stream bottoms on acidic soils. This community
type is abundant on the project site, although logging and conversion to pine dominated
plantations have resulted in the loss of the pure form of this forest type. Dominant tree
' species include: Yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Northern red oak (Quercus
rubra), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The shrub layer includes such species as red
maple (A. rubrum), dogwood (Comus florida), and American holly (Ilex opaca).
Herbaceous species consist primarily of Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides)
and heart-leaf (Hexasty/us arifolia).
4.2.1.2 Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest - Piedmont/low mountain alluvial
' forests are found along small stream systems within the piedmont and low mountains.
Piedmont/low mountain alluvial forest is common on the project site. Dominant tree
species include: tulip poplar, red maple, and Northern red oak. Dominant shrubs include
' American holly and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana). Herbaceous species include
Christmas fern and river oats (Chasmanthium latifolium).
' The disturbed areas of both forest types have generally been converted to pine
dominated plantations during silvicultural operations over the past 30 years.
4.2.2 Wildlife
The location of the project site is in a generally rural setting in the central piedmont
between Troy and Albermarle. One benefit the site has is that its eastern boundary is in
e close proximity to the Uwharrie National Forest, thus allowing for a very large natural
area for any on-site wildlife to utilize.
4.2.2.1 Terrestrial Wildlife
The project site is known to contain both game and non-game species. Resources used
to research species distributions and habitat requirements include text by Webster et al.
(1985); Simpson (1992); and Martof et al. (1980).
Game species known or expected to occur on-site include: white-tail deer (Odocoileus
virginianus), wild turkey (Meleagris ga/lopavo), raccoon (Procyon /otor), eastern
cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), and grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). Non-game
species expected to occur on the site include: oppossum (Didelphis virginiana), smokey
' shrew (Sorex fumeus), eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), and striped skunk (Mephitis
mephitis).
' Additional avian species observed or expected to occur on-site include species
commonly occurring in forested and disturbed areas of the region. These species
include: common crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), red-
tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), eastern screech owl (Otus asio), great horned owl
(Bubo virginianus), downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), pileated woodpecker
(Dryocopus pileatus), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), carolina chickadee (Parus

10
' carolinensis), tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor), American robin (Turdus migratorius), and
northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis).
4.2.2.2 Aquatic Wildlife
' Wildlife species associated with the areas in and around the aquatic ecosystem consist
primarily of salamanders and benthic macro-invertebrates inhabiting the areas in and
' around the on-site streams. No specific studies were conducted for the purpose of
identifying or classifying the benthic macro-invertebrates.
' 4.3 Cultural Resources
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites,
structures, or artifact deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are
' those sites that are eligible or potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places. Evaluations for cultural resources are required whenever a Section 404
permit application is submitted to ACOE. Evaluations of site significance are made with
' reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (33 CFR 60) and in
consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO).
' Mr. Scott Seibel, a Registered Professional Archaeologist with ESI, conducted a
preliminary cultural resources assessment to determine if any known cultural resources
are located on or in the vicinity of the project site, and to assess the potential of the
project site to contain significant cultural resources. Research was conducted at the
North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) and the World Wide- Web site of the
National Park Service (NPS).
' 4.3.1 Executive Summary of Cultural Resource Evaluations
Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) conducted an intensive archaeological survey of the
proposed expansion of the Uwharrie Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSWL) facility in
Montgomery County, North Carolina to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (Seibel et al. 2001; NHPA 1966, as amended). This survey, which took
' place during February and March 2001, resulted in the recording of 16 archaeological
sites, three of which (31MG167911679**, 1689, and 1690) are considered eligible for
listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). Previous
' expansion areas were surveyed by ESI in 1992, 1993, and 1994 (Smith 1992, 1993,
1994). One of the archaeological sites (31MG1004) recorded during these earlier
surveys is also considered eligible for the National Register. All of the other
archaeological sites recorded during the aforementioned surveys were considered not
eligible for listing in the National Register and therefore do not require any additional
consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO).
' Clearance for the proposed expansion was granted by the NC SHPO predicated on the
avoidance and preservation of sites 31MF1004, 1679/1679**, 1689, and 1690. A plan to
preserve these four sites in place was submitted to the North Carolina State Historic
' Preservation Office on November 26, 2001. Copies of the NC SHPO's correspondence
and a copy of the preservation plan for site 31 MF1004, 1679/1679**, 1689, and 1690 are
included in Appendix B.

11
4.4 Jurisdictional Issues
4.4.1 Wetlands and Surface Waters
Within the project site, wetlands and surface waters are subject to jurisdictional
consideration under the Section 404 program as "Waters of the United States" (33 CFR
328.3). Jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters were delineated in November and
December 2000. The streams and wetlands were surveyed and platted by Wright and
Fields. Land Surveying following delineation. The streams proposed for impacts were
reviewed by Ms. Angie Pennock.of ACOE. On-site streams comprise first and second
order channels. Figure 9 and 9a depicts the on-site jurisdictional surface waters and
wetlands. Approximately 2,450 feet of Rocky Creek also occur on the project site;
however only one road crossing is proposed for Rocky Creek. Additionally, Uwharrie
Environmental, Inc. controls both banks of Rocky Creek on only 2,450 feet of the total
4,030 feet of Rocky Creek adjacent to the property.
Stream characteristics were evaluated for use in classifying the streams according to
Rosgen (1996). The classification stratifies streams into comparable groups based on
pattern, dimension, profile, and substrate characteristics. Based on the site plan, a total
of 16,743 linear feet of stream channel occurs on the project site (Appendix C/also
Figure 8). Of this total, approximately 2,735 linear feet are proposed for impact by the
project. Of the 2,735 linear feet of impact, approximately 285 linear feet is impacted
through either the improvement of three existing stream crossings or the construction of
a new stream crossing across Rocky Creek (Appendix D). The remainder of the impacts
is attributed directly to the construction of the landfill expansion. Streams proposed for
impact on the subject property were characterized at Level I of the Rosgen hierarchy of
stream classification. Level one consists of the characterization of the stream into
particular types based on the dimension, pattern and profile of the stream reach. Stream
classifications were performed on the streams proposed for impact by a team of
scientists led by Mr. Paul Petitgout of ESI. Mr. Petitgout has completed all four levels of
the Rosgen courses as taught by Mr. Dave Rosgen of Wildland Hydrology, Inc.
The streams are labeled according to the flag sequence used during the delineation (i.e.
SEJ, SEK, SEL). Individual flag numbers are included with each stream label; however,
each location is not necessarily within an impact zone. The different locations merely
serve to give a more accurate description of the stream channel as a whole.
Measurements of the streams proposed for impact were not collected for the Level I
classification. Additionally, pebble counts and other substrate evaluations were not
conducted in the streams proposed for impact due to the consistent nature of the
substrate. The substrate in these streams consists primarily of gravel and sand
producing a riffle-pool morphology in some sections and a step-pool morphology in other
sections. Some areas also contain head-cuts with boulders where small waterfalls have
formed. The steepness of the gradient in certain locations and the degraded nature of
the channels across most of the stream reaches proposed for impact made ascertaining
bankfull in the field extremely difficult. To verify the field estimation of bankfull, estimates
of cross-sectional area were compared to regional curves of drainage area versus cross-
sectional area. Table 3 contains the characteristics of the streams proposed for impact.
12

t

Table 3. Classification of streams proposed for impacts.
Stream Locations
Parameter SO SEJ SEK SEL SEM SBA SJA/
SJB` SJG` SJF` SPA` RC`
Channel G G G G\C G C G G G/C C B
Type'
Approx. 582 251 148 746 511 210 68 40 34 60 83
Im actb
' a Rosgen Classification of Stream Type
b Impact amount in linear feet of channel
` Road Crossing Impacts
t 4.4.2 Stream Descriptions
Stream to be impacted by the proposed landfill expansion activities were generally very
' low-quality first and second order streams that have been degraded ' over time by
agricultural and forestry activities over the last 20-50 years. A Rosgen classification of
the stream reaches proposed for impact would generally place these streams into a "G
' Stream Type," which is characterized by a reach that is highly entrenched, a low
width/depth ratio and can be somewhat sinuous. These streams are generally referred
to as small "gullies." However, there are some short reaches of B and C Stream Types
intermingled with the G Stream Type.
4.4.3 Federal Protected Species
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially
Proposed (P) for such listing, receive protection under the Endangered Species Act of
1973 (16 US 1531 et seq.). The most recent list prepared by the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) is dated May 31, 2002. This list indicates that four endangered
species and three threatened species potentially occur in Montgomery County. These
species are:
¦ Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Ta
Eastern cougar Felis concolor cougar E
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E
Schweinitz's sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii E
' Smooth coneflower Echinacea laevigata E
a - Proposed for delisting, but the bald eagle will remain protected under the Migratory
Bird Act (16 U.S.C 703-711) and Bald Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d).
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) records in Raleigh. NC
reveals that none of these federally listed species is known to occur on the project site or
within a one-mile radius (except for Schweinitz's sunflower). A literature search was
conducted by ESI to determine suitable habitat requirements for each of these species
and a survey for these habitat types was then conducted on the project site. A
1 13
' description of these species, habitat preferences, and biological conclusions are
provided below.
Bald Eagle - The bald eagle is a large raptor with a wingspan greater than 6 feet. Adult
bald eagles are dark brown with white head and tail. Immature eagles are brown with
whitish mottling on their tail, belly, and wing linings. Bald eagles typically feed on fish
but may also take birds and small mammals. In the Carolinas, nesting season extends
from December through May (Potter et al. 1980).
Bald eagles typically nest in tail, living trees in a conspicuous location near water and
forage over large bodies of water with adjacent trees available for perching (Hamel
1992). Preventing disturbance activities within a primary zone extending 750 to 1500 ft
outward from a nest tree is considered critical for maintaining acceptable conditions for
eagles (USFWS 1987). USFWS recommends avoiding any disturbance activities,
including construction and tree-cutting, within this primary zone. Within a secondary
' zone extending from the primary zone boundary out to a distance of 1 mile from a nest
tree, construction and land-clearing activities should be restricted to the non-nesting
period. USFWS also recommends avoiding alteration of natural shorelines where bald
' eagles forage, and avoiding significant land-clearing activities within 1500 ft of roosting
sites.
' BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect. No impacts to bald eagle populations are
expected as a result of this project since no large bodies of water are in close
proximity to the project.
' Eastern Cougar - The eastern cougar is a possibly extinct eastern subspecies of the
widespread mountain lion species. This species was possibly extirpated from North
Carolina by the late 1800s, although recent sporadic sightings have been reported from
remote areas of the mountains and coastal plain (Lee 1987). Mountain lions are large,
long-tailed cats; adult males may measure 7 to 9 feet total length with females averaging
30 to 40 percent smaller (Handley 1991). Adult mountain lion tracks measure
approximately 3.5 inches (Lee 1987).
Recent specimens of mountain lion taken in North Carolina and elsewhere in other mid-
Atlantic states have proven to be individuals of other subspecies that have escaped or
been released from captivity. The eastern cougar requires large tracts of relatively
undisturbed habitat that support large populations of white-tailed deer (Webster et al.
1985).
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect. No impacts are expected to eastern
' cougar populations since it is believed to be extirpated from North Carolina.
Red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) - This small woodpecker (7 to 8.5 inches long) has
a black head, prominent white cheek patch, and black-and-white barred back. Males
often have red markings (cockades) behind the eye, but the cockades may be absent or
difficult to see (Potter et al. 1980). Primary habitat consists of mature to over-mature
southern pine forests dominated by loblolly (Pinus taeda), long-leaf (Pinus palustris),
slash (Pinus ellioth), and pond (Pinus serotina) pines (Henry 1989). Primary nest sites
for RCWs include open pine stands greater than 60 years of age with little or no mid-
story development. Nest cavity trees tend to occur in clusters, which are referred to as
colonies (USFWS 1985). Foraging habitat is comprised of open pine or pine/mixed
1 14
hardwood stands 30 years of age or older.. Pine flatwoods or pine-dominated savannas,
which have been maintained by frequent natural fires, serve as ideal nesting and
foraging sites for this woodpecker. Development of a thick understory may result in
abandonment of cavity trees. The woodpecker drills holes into the bark around the
cavity entrance, resulting in a shiny, resinous buildup around the entrance that allows for
easy detection of active nest trees (Henry 1989). No real potential nesting and foraging
habitat for this species is present within the project area. NHP records do not indicate
any occurrences of this species within 3.0 miles of the project area.
n
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No impacts are expected to RCW nesting or
foraging habitat.
Schweinitz's Sunflower - Schweinitz's sunflower is an erect, un-branched,
rhizomatous, perennial herb that grows to approximately 6 feet in height. The stem may
be purple, usually pubescent, but sometimes nearly smooth. Leaves are sessile,
opposite on the lower stem but alternate above; in shape they are lanceolate and
average 5 to 10 times as long as wide. The leaves are rather thick and stiff, with a few
small serrations. The upper leaf surface is rough and the lower surface is usually
pubescent with soft white hairs. Schweinitz's sunflower blooms from late August to frost;
the yellow flower heads are about 0.6 inches in diameter. The current range of this
species is within 60 miles of Charlotte, North Carolina, occurring on upland inter-stream
flats or gentle slopes, in soils that are thin or clayey in texture. The species needs open
areas protected from shade or excessive competition, reminiscent of Piedmont prairies.
Disturbances such as fire maintenance or regular mowing help sustain preferred habitat
(USFWS 1994).
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No impacts are expected to Schweinitz's
sunflower, due to the lack of potential habitat on site.
Smooth coneflower - This species is a stiffly erect, rarely branched perennial that
grows up to 1.5 m (5 ft) tall. Basal and stem leaves are large, glabrous, lanceolate to
narrowly ovate blades reaching 15 cm (3 inches) in length. This coneflower blooms from
late May to July, producing solitary, purple, tubular or cone-shaped flowers (Kral 1983).
This species grows in calcareous, basic, or circumneutral soils on road sides, clear cuts,
and power line right-of-ways where there is abundant light and little herbaceous
competition. Fire-maintained woodlands also appear to provide potential habitat for the
coneflower. Shading of road sides by adjacent forest trees and routine mowing reduce
the suitability of road sides within the study corridor for this species. NHP records
indicate that this species has not been documented within 1.0 mile of the study site.
Disturbed areas in the site are regularly maintained, by mowing, providing little or no
opportunity for growing of this species. No specimens were noted during field surveys.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. No impacts are expected to smooth
coneflower, due to the lack of potential habitat on site.
4.4.4 Federal Species of Concern
USFWS also tracks a category of species designated as "Federal species of concern"
(FSC). The FSC designation provides no federal protection under the ESA for the
species listed. Ten species with the FSC designation are listed for Montgomery County
15
pursuant to the June 16, 2000 list. NHP records do not document any of these species
on the project site or within a one-mile radius of the project site.
4.4.5 State-listed Species
Plant and animal species which are on the North Carolina state list as Endangered (E),
Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) receive limited protection under the North
Carolina Endangered Species Act (GS 113-331 et seq.) and the North Carolina Plant
Protection Act of 1979 (GS 106-202 et seq.). NHP records show that no state-listed E,T,
or SC species have been documented within a one-mile radius of the project site (with
the exception of Schweinitz's sunflower, which has been discussed above). This project
is not expected to adversely affect any known populations of state-listed species.
5.0 MITIGATIVE MEASURES
5.1 Mitigation Requirements
ACOE has a wetlands policy based on "no net loss" of function, and generally requires
mitigation to offset wetland impacts greater than 1/3 acre and stream channel impacts
greater than 500 linear feet. DWQ mitigation requirements are coordinated with ACOE.
The proposed Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion will result in unavoidable
impacts to 2,735 linear feet of stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
The majority of the impacted reaches are small, first and second order channels.
' Mitigation will be required for the 2,735 linear feet of stream channel impact. Mitigation
will also be required for 7.99 acre wetland impact. The permittee therefore proposes to
mitigate for all unavoidable losses of streams and wetlands in accordance with guidance
received from the regulatory agencies.
5.2 Mitigation Site Search
The applicant has three options with regard to providing compensatory mitigation for the
proposed impacts. The first option is for the permittee to find suitable areas for stream
and wetland mitigation either on-site or nearby. The permittee would be responsible for
' implementing and monitoring mitigation activities under this option. Onsite potential for
both stream and wetland mitigation have been located and reviewed by the regulatory
agencies. However, wetland mitigation is not abundant on site and may not provide
enough wetland restoration to satisfy the minimum 1:1 ratio (wetland restoration to
wetland impact) required by the State.
The second option is to utilize the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) [formerly the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP)]. This program
allows the permittee to pay into a fund that goes toward wetland and stream restoration.
This payment to EEP serves as the permittee's required mitigation upon acceptance by
EEP. Informal communications with EEP have been completed regarding use of the
fund for this project. The EEP is active in the Yadkin/Pee Dee River basin and EEP
mitigation projects currently exist in the basin. The EEP has stated that it would be able
' to provide wetland and/or stream mitigation for this project (based on acceptance by the
regulatory agencies).
16

t The third option is for the permittee is to utilize portions of the first two options in order to
meet the compensatory mitigation requirements. Stream mitigation potential is located
' on site and the permittee should be able to meet or exceed the stream mitigation
requirements. Wetland mitigation can also be accomplished on site. However, the
permittee may not be able to provide the 1:1 ratio (wetland restoration to wetland impact)
required to satisfy the State's mitigation requirements. The permittee would propose
purchasing wetland mitigation from the EEP to satisfy the State's mitigation
requirements while utilizing the remaining on-site wetlands and streams to satisfy the US
Army Corps of Engineers requirements. Onsite potential for both stream and wetland
' mitigation have been located and reviewed by the regulatory agencies.
' 5.3 STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
The proposed Uwharrie Envioronmental Landfill expansion will result in unavoidable
impacts to 2,735 linear feet of stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
' The majority of the impacted reaches are small, first and second order channels.
Mitigation will required for the 2,735 linear feet of stream channel impact. Mitigation will
also required for the 7.99 acres of wetland impact.

Potential mitigation for both jurisdictional wetland and stream impacts has been located
on-site for all of the unavoidable impacts associated with the expansion of the landfill, as
well as, the previous impacts permitted under the US Army Corps of Engineers
' Nationwide Permit Program. Mitigation for the impacted wetlands will consist of wetland
restoration, wetland creation, wetland enhancement and wetland preservation. Stream
mitigation will consist of stream restoration and stream preservation.
Above, three options are listed. The following will detail the specifics of each of the
' options in order to better understand the mitigation strategies proposed by the permittee.
5.3.1 Option 1
' The first option is for the permittee to find suitable areas for stream and wetland
mitigation either on-site or nearby. The permittee would be responsible for implementing
and monitoring mitigation activities under this option. Onsite potential for both stream
' and wetland mitigation have been located and reviewed by the regulatory agencies.
Specifically, on-site mitigation opportunities may provide as mush as 2,300 linear feet of
stream restoration. Associated with the stream restoration, approximately 6.0 acres of
' wetland restoration will be provided through the implementation of a Priority One stream
restoration. The Priority One stream restoration will aid in re-hydrating adjacent areas
by raising the base elevation of the stream to the elevation of the adjacent floodplain
' instead of leaving the stream in the current incised channel (approximately 3 feet deep).
The existing channel will be blocked or filled to prevent the stream from re-diverting into
the incised channel. The stream will be moved from the incised channel into remnants
' of the channel that were abandoned due to channelization activities that occurred years
ago. This plan is thought to have a high probability of success due to the presence of
adjacent wetlands in all of the other sub-basins located on the property. Stream
restoration will follow the Natural Channel Design methodology (Rosgen 1996).
' In addition to the stream and wetland restoration, stream preservation will also be
provided. Approximately 11,708 linear feet of stream will be protected in perpetuity
17

'
through either restrictive covenants or easements. This constitutes the remainder of the
linear footage of stream located on the site.

Additionally, along Stream and Wetland System 3 (Appendix C), approximately 6.15
acres of wetland enhancement will be conducted through the planting of overstory
species. Recent harvesting in the area has reduced the number and quality of overstory
species within this stream and wetland system. Species such as yellow poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), American elm (U/mus americana), green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana) will be planted to restore the
' natural Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest (Shafale and Weakley 1990).
' Finally, 8.44 acres of wetland preservation will be offered and protected in perpetuity
through either restrictive covenants or easements. This constitutes the remainder of the
wetland acreage located on the site.
' Proposed Mitigation Ratios for the proposed mitigation is as follows.
Wetland Restoration: 2:1 ratio for 6.0 acres = 3 acres of mitigation
- *fulfills 6.0 acres of restoration to satisfy the State 1:1 ratio requirement.
Wetland Enhancement: 4:1 ratio for 6.15 acres =1.53 acres of mitigation
'
Wetland Preservation: 6:1 ratio for 10.62 acres =1.77 acres of mitigation
6.3 acres of mitigation can be satisfied on site, requiring the permittee to
purchase 2.0 acres of mitigation from the EEP. This will also satisfy the State's
minimum 1:1 ratio requirement.
Since there is not enough wetland restoration to satisfy the minimum 1:1 ratio (wetland
restoration to wetland impact) required by the State. The permittee would propose to
use the EEP to satisfy the remainder of the wetland restoration required to meet the
State requirements.
The entire on-site wetland and stream mitigation plan will be discussed fully in an
addendum to this Environmental Assessment document.
5.3.2 Option 2
The second option is to utilize the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) [formerly the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP)]. This program
' allows the permittee to pay into a fund that goes toward wetland and stream restoration.
This payment to EEP serves as the permittee's required mitigation upon acceptance by
EEP. Informal communications with EEP have been completed regarding use of the
' fund for this project. The EEP is active in the Yadkin/Pee Dee River basin and EEP
mitigation projects currently exist in the basin. The EEP has stated that it would be able
to provide wetland and/or stream mitigation for this project (based on acceptance by the
_ US Army Corps of Engineers and the NC Division of Water Quality).
Proposed Mitigation utilizing the EEP as the sole source of mitigation is as follows.
7.99 acres X $24,000 = $191,760
t 18

' 2,735 Linear Feet X $200/if = $547,000
' Total Mitigation purchase: $738,760
The permittee would propose to reduce the dependence on the EEP, by allowing the
EEP to provide only the wetland mitigation portion at a cost of $191,760 and protecting
' all of the linear footage of stream remaining on site in perpetuity (14,008 linear feet of
stream preservation) in order to offset the impacts to stream systems on site. This
would reduce the cost of mitigation paid to the EEP (Total $191,760). Additionally, all of
the wetlands on site would be protected in order to enhance the adjacent protected
streams.
' 5.3.3 Option 3
Option 3 could take many forms, but would basically rework components of the first two
' options in order to meet the expectations of the regulatory community.
6.0 CONCLUSION
'
6.1 Proposed Project Benefits
Landfill expansion planning has begun on the proposed Uwharrie Environmental Landfill
located in Montgomery County, North Carolina on approximately 250 acres located near
NC 24/27. The development of this landfill expansion will extend the capability of this
' facility to receive and dispose of municipal solid waste for approximately the next 20
years. At current usage levels, the existing landfill will reach its capacity soon. Planning
has begun to expand the landfill to extend its useful life and to ensure a viable, safe
disposal service for the facility service area. Without this expansion, the Uwharrie
' Environmental Landfill and Recycling Center will be forced to close, placing a burden on
those that reside in Montgomery and surrounding counties.
' 6.2 Summary of Environmental Impacts
Proposed environmental impacts will consist of approximately 2,735 linear feet of first
and second order stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
Approximately 14,008 linear feet of stream channel will not be disturbed as a result of
this proposed project. A stormwater management plan will be developed for this site as
' a part of the solid waste permitting requirements and will include detention basins
designed to protect water quality for receiving waters. No hazardous material issues
have been identified that preclude the intended development and use of the property.
The proposed Uwharrie Environmental Landfill expansion is not expected to adversely
affect any known significant archaeological or cultural resources. Additionally, this
project is not expected to adversely affect known populations of federally protected
' species, federal species of concern, or state-listed species. Wildlife displaced from the
project area do not represent populations of rare or unique species.
An evaluation of alternatives meeting project purpose and need shows that Section 404
jurisdictional areas can not be avoided. Alternate sites that would provide , all the
necessary components for this project are not currently available based upon alternate
site search results. The proposed project will result in unavoidable impacts to 2,239
linear feet of stream channel and 7.99 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Compensatory
19
r
mitigation is proposed for unavoidable stream channel and wetland impacts. Mitigation
alternatives have been identified and conceptual mitigation plans have been developed
' that provide for the replacement of impacted resources.
7.0 REFERENCES
' Amoroso, J.L. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North
Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NC Department of Environment, and Natural Resources, Raleigh.
85 pp.
' Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 1994. Basinwide Assessment Report: French Broad
River Basin. NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Raleigh, NC. 198 pp.
' Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 1998. Basinwide Assessment Report: French Broad
River Basin. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
NC. 203 pp.
' Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 2000. Basinwide Water Quality Plan: Yadkin River.
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC. XXX pp.
' Hamel, P.B. 1992. Land Manager's Guide to the Birds of the South. The Nature
Conservancy, Southeastern Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 437 pp.
' Handley, C.O., Jr. 1991. Mammals. Pp. 539-616 in: K: Terwilliger (ed.). Virginia's
Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium. The McDonald and
Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, VA. 672 pp.
Horton, J.W. and V.A. Zullo. 1991. The Geology of the Carolinas. The University of
Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN. 406 pp.
Lee, D.S. 1987. Felis concolor True, Panther. Endangered, Threatened, and Rare
Fauna of North Carolina: Part I. A Re-evaluation of the Mammals. Occasional
' Papers of the North Carolina Biological Survey 1987-3. 52 pp.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians and
' Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. The University of North Carolina Press,
Chapel Hill, NC. 264 pp.
Massey, J.R., D.K.S. Otte, T.A. Atkinson, and R.D. Whetstone. 1983. An Atlas and
Illustrated Guide to the Threatened and Endangered Vascular Plants of the
Mountains of North Carolina and Virginia. Southeastern Forest Experiment
Station, Asheville, North Carolina. 218 pp.
' Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb's Wildflower Guide. Little, Brown, and Company,
Boston, MA. 490 pp.
1 Palmer, W.M. and A.L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. The University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 412 pp.
1
20
L

Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell, and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 408 pp.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Inc., Pogosa
Springs, CO. 365 pp.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation; NC Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC. 325 pp.
Seaber, P.R., F.P. Kapinos and G.L. Knapp. 1987. Hydrologic Unit Maps. US
Geological Survey - Supply Paper 2294.
Seibel, S., G. Di Gregorio, and G.S. Smith. 2001. An Intensive Cultural Resource
_ Assessment Survey of the Uwharrie MSWL Expansion, Montgomery County,
North Carolina. Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.
Simpson, M.B. 1992. Birds of the Blue Ridge Mountains. The University of North
' Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 354 pp.
Smith, G.S. 1994. Addendum to A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey for the
' Proposed Expansion of the Montgomery County Landfill, Montgomery County,
North Carolina. Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.
' Smith, G.S. 1993. Addendum to A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey for the
Proposed Expansion of the Montgomery County Landfill, Montgomery County,
North Carolina. Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.

Smith, G.S. 1992. A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey for the Proposed
Expansion of the Montgomery County Landfill, Montgomery County, North
Carolina. Environmental Services, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1997. Natural Resources
' Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Haywood County, North Carolina. 276 pp.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Habitat Management
Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region. U.S. Department of the
Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 8 pp.
USFWS. 16 June 2000. Update of Protected Species Lists for Counties of NC. Web
Address: http://nc-es.fws.gov.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). Troy, NC 7.5-Minute Quadrangle.
'
Webster, W.D., J.F. Parnell, and W.C. Biggs, Jr. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas,
Virginia, and Maryland. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
' 255 pp.
21

8.0 FIGURES

I

22
?/? ? \?j? ,\\?? `I ?)?? 1,????? ?-?? ? ? ?? • ?g z.,?.r i,? vii ?..Scr?"'. ????c- qtr 7? ? ''??-ti?
y?-1 ??-
C\i y'
` i > A roximate
Project Location
U „o n nz
• ?ti??? r ? ?j(h?Q ??JI/ iJ ??a? -. ? S, , r-?''1?"?ja??l-t.??? J.k^ 1 " n `>!'? r. ?f ?i ?r?'?J 1
?` ? ??., ,-,sss ?;? fir; r1 ? (,. ?G, y ,?, ?1 h ?• ?i', 3- fY ??, , •??, it?„
7 , ? J v
?? . ,L?? 1 /? ?? 3 ? ? re 1, , ?3 ? 2 f ? ry .-as ?`tii`?; ` v? \?r ? ? ,??? J r?, .^` .? fV? ?? ? S cT? i -r
-•?? \ ?\? 1y,., ..-c; ?. ti, ?J tM? 777 Cam, i- ,
?.-
??
c (r i l t ?c 0-5 i? : ll ?1 ., f1 ` s(; t (?} ?` 1?L CS 3 ?? vt ' "as
av fir'
ti
0 1 2 3 Miles
1 2 4 Kilometers
Source: USGS 1:100,000, Soulhem Pine;, NC
30' X 60' Topographic Series

General Location Map Figure: 1
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Project: ETO1006.01
Date: March 2004
((C
i ;

lfi
A
r

U7 U .25 0.50 KM
II
I
General Location Map Figure: 2
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Project: ETO1006.01
I , w I I I ; , Date: March 2004
-7)
,_1
0 0.25 0.50 MI
Source: LEGS 1:24,000, Ttcy. NC
9uadrongie, 1982.
b, ?.
„r

w ice.
0
e
e
e
8
D
1
e
8
1
1
1
1
1
i
1.0 1.0 mbt
I.U 2.0 a.o bn
Source: Montgomery my Road Mz:p,
NCDOT, 3
v
E;
N o CN
O L
U
? U
U U
w a A
C
0
.U
C: (z
To
[W Q
C) CZ 0
0Oz
(1)
in Cz D
>EU
5 oc?
awo
?m
00
pu
?S
y
5'S
ri y
?\ ? SS I 1 135 f 1
? 1\V t? ? ? r i sas ? 7m t tae2 1
I
0 o v
°o
] w y '? AIbh I ?ne! A 10 6 CD N
MOP,F0.4 I fulp
I : O L
MOUNTAIN • I 1 iW m _ 2
' u 4 + b m4 , r s ,> ro " J i j _o >, tlTe 1 ?i
no!
? 8 G2cxe lalo me I ? 1347 1 • ? `
Y IpU1TAI 4- I ] I 1
s7r UVMARRIE > nu 1.I 175s 5 ?:. , i+
® y . L i t7e F3. ar7s
I
/ I ? ^ t-.
WLDLIF ?1 ti ' I 0 l0 2.o mlee
r aw 1 .• STAR ... 0 16 4 w R~•1 A
?•q? Le3 J i sue! ` .U 3.0 sm
1
?j AREA Source: Montgomery County Road Mop,
y ? L'Y "is r L3 , tC=,, 2003 1123 t7U
hUC1C ? i '-• i • ,
Irvh+ MOUdAIN a a Altemative Site 4 I '
JJ ANN
t_j / r+ tllf
Nesrsa 1 11
' Aitemative Site 2 1
um is
MOUNTAIN
! MScO; l ?1
12 LS4 , ,?, . > 7i,? T"yi1' ,- . Qrowmux+ C C
e o 1n r - ! ; `
1 X
Q MOUNTAIN IIII _ _ ' •, • >?71 ?' • 1f • r 1- + 1 C W O
72 ]III == IIII = / '• ?? O w, U
N T I O N A L =IIII- `?' • 564° y? ,f00 } O
IVW
Altemative Site 3
1it0110N - d0
pp r
... Q? Q MOUNTAIN f? I .h9 j _
? ? / I r ten to [C
r- u
I Ism1 C
1`
? f° 1519 / , ???1 ,I ? ?••
L /• 1541.> i 4 L s?9 pp9? 0 C
t? 5• ? a
t
! StflTEN WadNEi? / Se 4 De ', _ C)
ns4 ?r / ae ! it' C/.HJOR • L
MOUNTAIN 11,3 its / 't 1"9 L
ILl i ! L'1 D In 2 1
1549
LII ? ? / `' tae ? ! a 1L'4 ? 14!4
/ s4e
tV , n?q 12A Al a ! 33 ' 4
Qty ? ,r5. / • !
Left -
• Pw D" Altemative Site 1 '°
111! Y` ? 55 %/ 1 I!!! Se '? rt 7
.0 N 11 1179 // 1541 ! -
Ifr "mil ml 1 • J / l/ ! 169e
QM1 h
O 1?1 • ?Y 1 X571 a5•H
111
1 ,5s o FORE S T
r r5?4 ?p F,uery
> I 1 y
m° i 100 >
mt ? tU
b. L
Ilia 1524
L3 k 17
t• O
1621
1574 u
9
! r 1
9 Inge y1114 m 1 ' ie t >15_ 1579 N •Lw
1643 1679
?- > ,• :I P" Harttnt> 1524
16 <
\ > 1
,, I \ > J I 4 1573
UAt q 1
2 teas
\ um 1542 NN4 Cftt}]C . r u
. fare o ,
ti
W't ILATW/31 KLAM
t rr?a t?aa YS1E5
R. cetwo ,?a a.u» telu >utow
\rijJ
sit
5? fl,
1..'?`,?,T`/ +i J 1 _o I nlZ?%\\h%v+\\, ?S
i fit, .?{? 3^• j
t'p,\ l(tt // \ T")" \fl `??, t :•//rr',?.. `N \ / r { !IyfJr.f i
Yi srt OF ?ftf --
.xaa ! - ?S?t 3 [ ! f r????r \ty) \.r•,R'\51`\_5. /r'r'c,,`,..?t `E? euernt, wro>t
w Lam M
l i ` 4. N?,. i I fl l (Jf 'r/ \ w ` * , ?ta '! riz ,f ±, \t? a •*3! J J/!JJ} 1J/ji + \ \ ?l r + + + + + + + + tanom wff? nv m rtrT
f, ' S I4va? ° ti \\' \ t' tr • f"` `'`, /,> r?. ti f e i rr` 11 • i, ?/7 fl (/?'~\••" \`'t`,':y?,?' ,sxrr rnw tuna t?s«a mmt
tvci e'`1\` ?`"'?.s e 1%x ,t ah J t' {lj/ `y?\?15 a• SarwMnwwns
? ab? \ Q . ?,,. J l %? !j? , // fJ W.-W, \\ . .04 tuvNM a Mr. b
J. Y.; `r••••,'\~v ?J? 1 i ?a \ \`? 1 (1 J??%?% ,-•? / ' )/r; w w Ur-,b w Mxxt . I?4. 1 rw o..r.
/-??; yYr" w l mean n a MCI= i
Croeel rc
?I
?"?.? / '`CTlln a '1? t pP(I ,/, , IJ/r'//?'Jr'rl.l/rl'•j , r- _
..... FIADU w..+.4
" ( \ •\ ?+' .r / as ` I,ot I®ttu 6 m IVIIA
<,tex. ???{ ? t , `\!>;?.. ?l? ? 'r,? t>t> /i'?'/ ,?< ?' ?l Jdrr;! 5 l? ?`??,?• ? + + + + + + + +
? l J
(ih %??r 3i ?j J 1it3?fftJ(r?J/j,¢a ??lj t\;\i `\\;\{?L 5?'ii tv+J'j
%L1 ojn+ r:?w <,yaa ta,•me t:jne that %7 ;:tlt ttKCe ..... o tW \ .,
/'fat \\ 4t j \ \ \ ?E Stream Crossing 11 } ?.
? f, ?? t 1 t, 1 ?\ e?/, p rtt IL\
+ + ^1^'! ° + %i Jf ! 1 tJ Y., y,t(\w:. "°R+
«•'ll? ICJ *?! l+(J t ``" f ??"' ;?4"`?\t,\?\\` `7 '\ \\`??`/ J'tXt}.;1'J't i/ ?1J
;"' i ? • Y/lo + %, It C \\\?.;??\??\\ tI \\. l ! t 1°1F 1 YP j .?J KILAND/STREA41 SYSTEM 6
M:+ lgi ? ? ? •? ?/ J .d r ?\ '"?v13' ?'? ,1? e... ?s'i J?.c )5 "4? l +? , ,. f.\:\
iao r `r+"/J 4,, r' v / y` ?\ ?\`;? Y!. ? \? 6 !'J1 .?+`•a 'iya),f1/!4•w.rx ?•? \?.\\5 YI ? ??\? l ?\\5e.`j,e?? l i \\ 1
' it??1',JJ« \ -nJM?J is Ala \ \43 \F ?<)P??. ?¢\ l,i c g \
jf(1r'?t N / r "'Al
\,.
A J?{i?,??/+? t.`+7,lJr,+rf+t z/l rCl>!`liA\?,4 :?"?
,'i/?J.wt.t/
-< \l3 ?... \?} .`'V
„s r 5_1 ? ?•.A \\r? ?.. 'i jl?l?l//'!.!/?".a,j?/ )j..l ,l ?..c I a.+,? ,,,`tll\\?`??\`,:, ?1''?' /\• a'.,°?S'Rv`Yv1'?... z 1 .,;j?f `r?: :I
t J J r i T 'r'Q t y f. \ 1 t
.w ,,,,f 1' J /r •advj, f JI•tr •i ? ti•y r:.'? \ _ - ??};
'tt •1 , t„ ;,. :.,. . \ ., ? w•? J ? ?!. \. Stream Croeetl k .. ,. m., t
/ : )( it' ? t ( /!,r r i//, l,t 1 i :C r• / ;K ....r'\\. .\.`c .\?i? a- .c. , "'?"^at?L ? ti.,r Q ?, ??.<\4i'.
ri ?}.'?.,- ..% \?..t' '?(, ?'? d. /4 ?'t, tlljJ iiJ, (., :v... ,?5...;,,,; \\ ?.\`?.;,5z .: }„ f ??>,l :??,,,,r"?°+.:` ?``w.\r' ? ? ?•.., ?, vY\? 1:, lJ(( 1` fl,.,A
c ,: :?1: \??`t t•, ` \ 5 . ? ; , R t Yn JJ Fr' ,\\ ? \?.,,?. ?2k4 ?? ?/(i1,r V ? F •¢. v ? `\,'w... ?„M """"\. 4 £?e y h •`rh ? g a. ? l! , y F. !
/rC• 5 ?"UI ?t,t?il?Tr J.f..kjJi,,;,l...tg• J a +e.\vu w op 1:' F9` ?W"' , G\` 3 iF:. l,' {v ?3':' n
i ,
\\ 4 n, !J. ,`, + "Y l i:r. a" t, t» y be \ m p; ?J` _ l
H\;? f
r W yC??! YJ ? ? `,Yti ¢+-J ,,t tr "' IN? V S'..\ I,, !,
f \ 3 M \\ t>` f!?i' , = c;' 1'I I + ?,? „\?.\. ,4, '.t... ?.... i 7 ?; ?\v;.. j .r•^^"'?'-?, -^R'r.? :. i ,f ' ``•`? '0? e- to
««
,t7S{; ! ".?.•?t"``+ \r?'e°°" ?\ _'r'% 'a: 'e, tt \`? \ \ j ?:. /.. r>..
>am. ? + t (d'.tr "II:ILy. ,r,;? ......
l1`\1 Stream ttrrosiTriQ f ? / . e { > .
'1 ,-F a / 1? ''•,?L ,,,. '?1.1.F*' ti.^. \ ;? ?•3 /rte r Irv?`e•?'`, q, /
WElUd7D/STREAU J,' I /j^ \ \.\ i /! r? i:?/ D, ? ,,.:it..k:? w?`?ft J r :«?, .,?`;•w .: - \
r« ?v Y: , •,r\? ?+s?a ?r/ w i ?? tiC t...
SYSTEM 4 \?
k
rat 1 .? H\ O NS \\\ 1 l` ..5...,t. + .x.S?R,......? r, ?? r f' } s „i k.f.,.
j
\ ?.`
! ... // ?\ea , 1??1) +• a :ate ?r s•:i •°•:x?ia ? ! ••;r,:,.:. ?,tl \'4 \ 6 ?"?? ,.r'' +? '?,?'`
!;?'.'f`I .:./,Jl?" ?trJl,f!P?? `r',..:?,'r.?5....:::.•l.•..'•" ,.S?'?4 ?,°1!•'•../;+,a.,..._`,?w?, ? .a•?,,,r,. ,7 +t ? ' \ "1`,;:
{tit- \\ v • fj / ?y ».r,' rt??:11k.t... k i, i a ?1?? oa? r aJ )' V, .,?. + + •.xti „5 ? . 1 ? ,?:+?`?.. ?•:?:'• " \1'k13 ?!t{ °?t , ;"+,? ,'?' r + « , ?` +? E ''?+ c +'?` t/ 1,rF.J: r
?@`g?,?,1,j ,11 ?,. c ,r t 's\g.•: ^. kFS, ,y .'.i j .}ti~ t 1. 'i {t om r g<1, , 1 t 1 } ?(:n ?: { ;? // 1f1.FJ
?S wPi ,iaS, t y 1 S l:' ?'T? JY
\'1 ';1(:?l ?t? wai ?>• 'J?, , ^?? iitT "•.ME?i1.. }t,l . N'°?' }1t,' ProJsC! Area
ED
r? E 1t`t , ?/+ r ?5 SS, f}sT1.t'?y? rJ.•.;{St J; ?:i i R ?? 1STJA ?? A {{
ff/,;'1.
?? ? ?? J 1/F Y µ >xw?1l?'??Ty t/rr ?r .j• , , '•C?.ilq'?tM??, .t+ `J??tr??,, 'c ,;Y°e `? ?tT ` i z?e ?? GJ,•,f;1
\ ;\ /'1.' 1 iF t 1 {1 »y1 '! {'r l N. 2 1'h' / \ 1 3 ..
%
??(f?, ? l? ?`4.'1r a /,_? a,r Y it ..•}PP•, ..<'t. I ' a r M- t rJJ,?` ','S.t !•' ,f ?' t1r ?j?;?H.[?_?.''?'"'?S', '?\•\' g "'a ! ? Pond Area
,?"? 71ti ItJ /I? / k". #`? ?' 1 ? ? 1a,'? .n5 \ ' US :?r +, ? V 5" ,??••(rw'•" Fi.11 ? , , 3?a•'4 `r.,.F;
vtx.o- + + V?,.? f?i,GC'S A' 1 / J }f;.' t"0va^,'ii 5• i.^`^' \ xl\t?.t 5ii•?r?h M3 r / ,,. '? +'.., ?.,?1 337, ! : Nl 1 r j' Wetland Enhancement
" ; ?f?i\ \.\ f .< iYt' ?J tl?t t : " I {t ' w \% Y( .rc'i' a vkl iS.. Mea
,r1.Jl } <t .5.. 'F t?4 s? 1.( .t,. .•>. i ??;
y ,fi t ?? \ is t 1 \ SS` r r 3 C tiS ST \ : w : ?"? 3p t r 11 f t /yf tland/Streom Impact
Z,
¢??'' !Z.??R r..l ?"t`'k ^'-*, Y ? r ?1 X/3. 3? . J •f .? ?_mwL .xe ,.j ` ) tt'y :..??`tJftr/•E': Area
Ar e@. ?/"?' < ? , V? ? ;'t ?? ?I`itljt>,/J,?r i -
?" $ 1 '.?s.2 J5?''?' t 'S'>-J''! S t /r'+.' ?w73a a . S raJ
Wetland Preeervatfon
1 7ta' A! ?S tv Y) C t1 U !YY ?TIx V y /.j lI r 2> - Y+t,IJ 1 f
>9, Area
tv,an- + + + } °?? t v..u... o, d ?,S'tAr- ?" +s' 4 `O^ a v 1 toys .?.?
V I a J ? ' ?''r'r. si 5 r > i'r ? ri r;' ,SLR\Et S?\J? ? S \ " } C' v" r?i ? %i •? ..r ? f? M i Wetland/Stream
S • 1 $ ri .?6 s.a. A.. r hr°: Restoration Area
, 9n r'''/ ? t,l tl 3 T k \ t 1!,? r•+l,+,p + ti ?}) M, r, i '$Cs"^/ ??.?!
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 3 ?A\\w: t ; v!'? W17 a/ ?} , k rya ?'4 F { "E y\/i,r prs
ii ? r d 3 > \
Stream Crouln s
9
I ?. 1', tGt? /J rr t 5 Z\ S 1 ,i,? ? 5 ...? 4 e I ? r 4 r eh ? l
5 t .!J / ? ^',+IJt, +..f ! r !r / tr )1 r ,,,,,rdr /? ?"l5\ \! %il,('. a,?s ry? ?aRy r,??j bt(j!
.rt v :e:%? / Ir,lr; •{f"' (s `. rJ 1 ,a. ^G! 'b.a` ti//l, l?. 'a1 C' - /N JrJ } 44 •?\•?, \ ?'t
fir: l?:t ! u r tai CY r+ x.;C ?J1 '! r«' r q
1 + w??-^' / aE\?.
. aro. + + + + I ti5' - kr t:' \\ j a a 4s4 t -r
1 ,? , 't?...'?? tUU +c1 4"' I?? t?n ' / ?M:`*yr y( ?i??r?1,?? llirpc rarj// 't +zv`?"?•??.?Jt?'`k°?.\ ???tt{!
•'4h.'•?l /y ;'??,.`. ?..'T ,r? M ... 1 x ,.?i S r1?( 3' 33.. a?? ?<.ft,?\ ,1,,, J 5. a r+ ,.s,w\ `*+•
?4A •`':::1.•l,t l5 P5 Slia0lf? ^' <'wr ..;J,r-1 tt ') `?T 4J.m?t ?.,\\?;\ri,?'y /9
y t v,1 !r J/Y ¢ aya r -gyp T rte' I' fJ r't? `\ .t?`` ?i //, r "? ? +
t`tt ` tti , 1. / ! +t r t5^ t (•, }}--•-?,?' •, t J •.., k n t 2 F' V. t / :j ?J4?1, 'S$, /rJ 1 t'S.C>-3 ! 5 \ J 4 ``? \\'\ v.'t `Y \\ /.?' F a A:n\
/ '?•.'S .+ t , ), IrJ /'?6.\S ,P?\ y... yJO V k.?•i
/ ..t?•....? ` ? r.-??'???'tt+??>~ u:...{t` .:J..4+ro r .' ?L •.? ,?, i/ y?1,-::• ?;r?` x ???,r,???y° ? ^' ? ? -..
1 r /,,. •. , '"5!l3?\ w 1. ? r? 5\ ?t\\?? ?>?I I? J a .. 7` ? . >~ - t /?/ c r / ( y r ? ? \ , M` t} r f ,Cyo..M k.G ,?,, \ \
1 / / y\ ,?,, ?3., \ ?i. ' ? 5 551t}' ° ? r~ " r:et > i c J J?, X'? r wl f ?' \?? f ,l (I If ? ?'Yx^ Y\? \'T?• .
j r• l 'Cw. •: ..5.4 ` 1 ''?" T 5 1.,,ru„ `V ?W r 1 )C '?K \ `"'arc `qe?''_?\
S > t .r •,X ?\ ?" \?•? ` \ \I.
eavao- + + + + +wJ 3•. \ . w l„ y\ J > ?(Y' 1Y
•! ?? '!( -rr J= '{l;\,..?• y?Y;?4\ 5yt yx,A° x„i:_ .^. 4;??. lk
1t jt f \ Jr ! T.Y r `\/'?\, • tia ll? t; J Jv ?a `\ J !/ \ ,p?4 W a yy?!?n\ 1 ,
1 M m.g r'/ yS / v,,_• ?, /J \ \„\ ?lr 1n 0rc. \?!\?'?\
t. a 4
} .,:.?+\'\n' ti l"`,. .? 'Jl:::.'?r .' ,/ r' ' l •.?\fyJ ?sv>?ny>? ?"?,{'`?C, tvnt /T i\?+
\ ?2 1
?, w ?c,.'-?..-•,_ /.r?,?,. \y r1d / t!? .. ?,•?i!ri:(S-ti,j? q ?,t:r ^? <g???t? i sym';;,{J u,i x1?a<'``
/HIS a
u, •,?yn }•;, y,,\? rl,?ayt t K arJ,ixt t "?'e,C?r`=''r.,v rt?E?!\?X\,?y??•?, t '?" 1?'???\`j??
\ J" wi r\ t ! t { 3? \\ J l? x? a
r \?$-• rty) a C ?a WAL CRAD04 Pwl
naves %wtw ?c'w. wxrwt tw tiw .. + / 4`?'
};??fi?-'? .\ K.4 t.".
, .,,.,c???t??^ •? ??,;? , FACILITY PLANS -COMPLETED SITE
WETLAND/STREAM
SYSTEM 2
UWHAR
KWO/STREAM SYSTEM
L?>w ?'?? `?/?J(•; .?-? I r,x'y s b???tlr REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
rswortstw.??ti,aotuaat A +'£:at':,y-.^?,,;.,?.: ??y?; MONTGOMERY COUNTY. NORiH URCt1NA
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
"?3 ?.'?-?°;":`= e??; ~ \•,?r„t dt TRIBBLE INC.
e axe , `S:+l0.,e e,atvt rave e:ku <A_ :ejox e'y'ao c,•4ut ee!n,u\?y,,,.-•? ul sue` r:+bw, taltlt t- t:.'\,3. z
` • S 484M
FIGURE wharrfe Ewronment
d - '-
LondfLl L
'I SHEET 11 OF 11
-- ' 2004.
FEeR.N
min
U! LO 2.U 3.0Im
Source: Montgomery County Road Mp,
NCDOT, 3
v
E) O
O
N
O
O t
U
to
? U
U U
•p r"'
C
0
CC
a?
w o
c o?
0Uz°
?c
B- CD
>EU
c
?0
awo
mm
EC
L?
c?
o?
?+ J
W t!]
6
0 1.0 1.0 mlm
NCDOT, v
?3l 0 Wk
unty Road 6kp,
2003
0 0
0
M C)
O L
U
a
? U
U U
O
•w" a" A
r-
0
.N a
cc
(0
cw a
04-L
C3 0 -E=
0Oz
J
a)
C 3
>EU
c
ao?
QWo
mm
'E c
a0
e
e
n
? GJ
?s
au
Hrin
r

Wetlands Survey for :
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
7l PC Ilbt/ond
I
0.a Am :
PJ Weiland
0.00 Awe s
L107
107
Li? LIONS z
L31o L7be?oA
Li+
k 19.50 FT
.
U
Lta LH7 LIM LIM
I F
1203
PK/7VC IHrtland
% L, Lio3
0.07 Awo : a
\190 .9V3 S7REAM ,
0.007 Awes IL

?4 PE/NB 146t/ard ?
e- 0.11 Am s

IN
1ta1 Repub6e .SerlVcea
ts0 0/ North Carolhq LLC
so Deed Boot 434 Page 695
i
.WA S7REAM
0.07 Awe :
Uwharrie Environmental Site h?
Uwharrie alt Troy Townships, Montgomery County, North Carolina So
314V r This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the
Deed Reference Book 313 Page 452 and Book 434 Page 693. 1
boundary of the Jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act

Surveyed by Thomas J. Fields, PLS-2906, In November 2002 and May 2003. as
Sectge ion mi the by the undersigned an this date Unless there a

the
law or our published regulations
this determinati tion of
REVISED $ UPDATED on May It
y 10, 2004. I ,
? Section 4
404 Jurisdiction may be relied upon for a paryod not to exceed
$ five years from this date. This determination was made utlizing the

.y 8
Sheet No. One of Two

1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

200 0 200 o Lit
Litt ^ Name
= 41 Orr as U10 't J
M 1-I
' ?Iw
_I
J
//
C
L
?
I/
OC Wetland I
l
?
J
/
YK• i
C
rl
l
Scale is in Feet Tilde
1 "= 200' &?
ate
Lie
From the office of Se
WRIGHT Lk FIELDS LAND SURVEYING
1340 Albemarle Road, Suite C MZ IHet/and Lw 1
TROY, N.C. 27371
0.004 Lu L'• MY Wetland No harizontd control within 2000 feel
0.007 Ann s

" L93 Lie
U? L34 NOTE: Acreages shown for the various streams
do not incl
d
h
th

,_. 4 u
e areas w
ere
e stream enters
wetland sites.
Troy Lonbr Company
and
Ul"Vei W. KeFy
Deed Boot J24 Pow 843
Deed Bast 311 Pape 100

control No. 3
N-'550.573.32 FT
E-1.714,362.74 IFT
D-6145L7 FT

Job No. 2004-65
I s-
I
I '?y? eL
I
I
?I
GC
X18 MaMpanwry Comfy
Deal Boot J9f
gl Pei" 311
WI
HI
zl
F-.& r
AWNwn Manwrwlt
I h stone Pie
\
J
3 \ R???f
6 X0.13Awo and
\\
?.Lix \
LISS \ \ m Ws Hand
U30 N \ \ 0,04 Am :
r'y PC/NE Nbt/mrd \ \
ai64- \
??• fi 40 '? \ \
TN Line to
3/4' son Rob.
found In Stan. Ph
Legend
O ......? denotes 314' Iron Rebars
®•..... denotes 2' Aluminum Monument
®._... denotes 3' Concrete Monument
NORTH
04L44e11e41 1
b?
r
94.ts Fr
To Y AWN-
Mwwrowlt rand
in Stns Pie
Liao N6Uand
Life Lits 0.00 Am !
SPA SIREAN u1a \\?
0. -Ams
Found:
J ]/4' Nn
._.w DUtanG Reber
N 7"" ?\ NORTH CAROLINA
yoDFr \ MONTGOMERY COUNTY
\\ I. Thomas J. Fields, certify that this plat was prepared from
USA an actual survey done by me In May 2003 and Is in all respects
Fowl Lands correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. The ratio of
Tact Na 1512b precision as calculated by latitudes and departuree to 1:15,000'+.
W14 De1VS Estate Trost This plat was prepared N accordance with Road Rule .1500.
Witness my original signature and official stamp this the 10th
day of =

Figure 9a r" t \ - I
Surv.yw 1`13-2906
Republic 9rwees
of North CadA4 LLC auna:
Odd Boob 4J4 Pops 69J 3. Fon d:
M-nt
N 8730'05' w PO Wetlan
?- 0.04 Awe :
371.00 FT
1% Une TMt°........_._...- ..
UP,
Deed B? J11J ?f 452
I LA
I Le
Found: I
]/4' Iron I
a.bw rd`
I \\
I \
I \\\ 4
I \
I , 175 L17 t \
j 4>) G79N sownAmaid is

f:
L

I

n
0

H
weaar,d Sires
f7Puro 9
Wetlands S1Lnroy for
:
New
Wetlands Site REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
Flyrre so Uwharrie Environmental Site
Weaofd SJtes
?f7gan 9
Rocky Creek Uwhand k Troy Townships, Montgomery County, North Carolina
Surveyed by ThomasaI FBook ields, IA.!M08
in November 2002 and Ma
2003
,
y
.
REVISED & UPDATED on May 10, 2004.
Sheet No. Two of Two
MWavd SJtes
flyws 9 200 0 200
N ""land S/tu
F79U 9
Scale is in Feet
Wetlands 1 "= 200'
w E ' Reference Map
S
Not To Seale From the office of
WRIGHT a FIELDS LAND SURVEYING
1340 Albemarle RV Suite C
TROY, N.C. 27371
MY Wetland Boundary
L17 N 32-52-52- E 19.52 FT
L12 N 25'2319 E 13.48 FT
Li9 N 30-0314 W 22.58 FT
Tie Line
L20 N 66'4936 W 10.31 FT
31Z Wetland Boundary
L21 S 28.4455 W 10.73 FT
L22 S 145 Y E 13.03 FT
L23 S 01'53'21
W
12.88 FT
710 Line
L24 S 20'59'41' E 18.53 FT
SP Wetland Stream
L25 S 58-59-31-
.15 FT
Line
710
L28 S 46'4212 E 21.03 FT
SPA Wetland Stream
L27 S 63-1836 E 6.98 FT
L28 S 13-29'56* E 1122 FT
L29 S 89'2309 W 6.19 FT
L30 S 21'48 23 W 14.70 FT
L31 S 2652'35' E 9.82 FT
1-32 S 19'05 08 E 11.28 FT
L33 S 095800 W 7.56 FT
L34 S 26'1016 W 16.16 FT
L33 S 061445' W 11.40 FT
PH Wetland Bouad u
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L129
N 36'49'18' E 19.71 F
L130 18,3100 E 23.77 FT
1-131 28.90 FT
L132 25.23 FT
L133 24.58 FT
ZD Wetland Houndu
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
1-134 53'44'03" E 3.37 FT
1-135 4' 9'4 37.16 FT
L138 40.71 FT
U37
07-55-48- W
19.99 FT
U38 14-0245- W 53.12 FT
L139 7.5 FT
PC Wetland Bolin
LINE BEARWG DISTANCE
L222 19.35 f3-
1-223 0 29.86 FT
L224 30.49 FT

PB Wetland Bound ary
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
1-223 20.45 FT
1-226 29.47 FT
L227 16.21 FT

Wetland Bounda ry
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L228 19.28 FT
L229 11.65 FT
L230 1228 FT

ND Wetland Bo>mda
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
Li So 19.44 FT PD Wetland Bound
L160 29,92 FT LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L161 16.53 FT L217 18.77 FT
L162 18.07 FT L219 26.31 FT
L163 22.04 FT 1-219 23.98 FT
L164 14.95 FT L220 N 03-57 93. 39.31 FT
1-165 20.79 FT L221 53.94 FT
PZ/NB Wetland Boon dary
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L190 14.20 FT
L191 42.08
L192 31.69 FT
1-193 36. FT
L194 2293 FT
L195 21.35 FT
Li 98 36.78 FT

81Ti
rr?
To To
Albrnale 4 a 27 Troy
110 He 1
I
TS
CINITY
VI MAP
Figure 9a
au?7 V3;ID ' °'F' 4?e F ?r rsn .p z1v Al rLS 060d L!r 4008 P»a
• ttLN ea9t
? P?g9N rn v113 on bv,wco W7AM au?? 't/DiaRr
LLY •Cod o Pull F &,0Y loa Loses tnn . '^ Mil !O w"AS Np9ndkdl?p
fir 4008 Pao a ?; F ?+OY !rV ".u C t P-11" Od "bee 4 'rh 0*9 -&d 6L! 4>08 P+•O ( f8L •60d
XILLi .GaurP ? ; PLL084N 89661-L! F C tRV c? ` ? N,., ton o p t J+prxu W aW ulgN08 I 88L 4008 Pao
"00045 [34 _ Pao+M OdlOd \ F "Y 80V • y `( 11 -{o--w XNwJ --r I -im -
M 9*9t& .u sov crt \?` ?n ??1! Pwe.lt rs _ •.+P-S
9
el"d "MA U04 all L9? aan F •t0Y ?L 17 ? Bi 'wnpw' FPwd fS 9 9 F MOY roil JOq•a u" I
an 4ww! / aazv to Btl t .t/C ?uro! I a+N-i?V
a P OMI Y9661-Z! t U10414S W
t2 y9•g ?Pu3 \ 1 "le 1.1 £ i [.! 96'91 I P-)
spry
q abl OtYt F
rt n • oty) etn ?\ F -r 6LV • ?O Y LO'O oLY? I io •qd t»tl
$° CM Me I! S 4 \ P-089N 3d UVA4S &T •dld -4 ? ?g M .[LLS[9 S t/C q'LLOO!
Frt y 9017 a .) :PLm!? 09'CZL 1! tCY[L Y•-'--??y?uy S -¢--.------
AS .!5
g .p?•,, ~-t£Lt.Z9 id 09'09 ?C. Ni 0q• h
'-cDN MIA u 5- :SIus1
a ?I S P"3
JA ?un9! I \otn d I f3 1
WWI 4?8 •4d tatl 4
F •pY OZV0u, IKl 6.£( $j
149 ,? a9 Z, Pu08Ml w s4,r F AMV 61V pd
OLOIS PO08gM ryp •tGl C I0
u3 09% l4
NI?? t£OL S 46.8 otsp ul6•g ?! san P-44W Wm q>! ?? ulMg ?taal ? aoo'1 f! ? £C? g \ u0aa
?j13• n?\ C cant B F "V rov 1 9Ar /u04 .1/C
C9tn / M .6 yuro!
I^t mgaa dell LWn a0fn *PI- 1! 9 :F 45" P"R" ALY _
1 A/C Yu-.j F "Y !r'! F "V Irv Icon ? n ?
s
d G' `•A ry Pu0N19 %/1N \ c Ku, M N N b J
°°'S rs cP"3 n ,999m
•4e YOM [! aa? t to ? F "V 0*v
s + _4
-F Jklov 91 v .L yOnO! OIL os°d Z8r 4>d8 Pao \P03 aon 46.9 P PX P"3 Pwd OS y
•00+%4417 71 N)9651 mm Il +ton am _ n
ylf« Y aONaptp V tattrts)W[ v) G, PURRAW of I 9otn F wY 90V oL\
iwwnuNa S L Ll'OL
LLn4wMV Y 0017 \ =J •4tt) P4on" JX
F Atm ?yy^ uui Soot own =n
T °J? P?//9N fLC Lt n z ;PUMA i F dpY SOV F AAr f0V cull
/
O------ -._._-11. LOTZ[- Pl PLL084 * OX/M \ Pa0AM1 6Y
3 .
?C.CL .9C S
9oLLS - 1 / 0a? C L
3
4'1 L :PUMJ "LL '" [! 00'L6Z ' Pu3 ul6.a ty0n \ 489 CPIO"3n F ?Y AO{V P
• LL3 uttT
•4l LL .9CSL99 4zati tssT ° zmn UAMlS MT ?n
togas tnrl ( '
08Zl
uro
.1/C !
9L) az) --U00
/ yya -"
F "Y 9LV
000.9"
XY
Los"
SOMA WA J

Stn
90i .PLLtw! F •?OY 097
f o
F "Y OL'O
CB OVN UAM4S WWI
t
3$ 35 Pu3 \ PLL084N1 7X
H1210N ORI9 mr 96N
e Ho0
100 4
6ie
m
rt
VN1108vO •P
e
M
who HINON
°
110
,,.a„«,7 tWq
F
Y ron
taoags 8)'S
,, .rt+M1r.N.
b
f •4Or 9z'O
s P44o8911 M
?
,i+sM11+t0. ?
om
-
----------- -?
Pl,
4
- 46.8 I
Aw 46
094 •6Od r "Y !oV \ Z on m,
- 96r 4,006 Pao u"4S MIS CaJ1 l
N s
m - on F dpr rzV
R4 9401 Or
Ian °4
0
Al
•g
t) y
soulm
ulo"
A` F •rNY Loy eon
a` t, ??
q
440 Un
F • 0r z! n
4
?
9
P
09N
z m
d LLIO•e nYxYYao
4e
?w
Sell ?
a
sl
nn \ P"'.9" cr
Pu3
.t/£ Yonol-?- 1 [! 0
a'WC -46• tLn.
09't9t
£CL9 S
---.----
n / c[n °116 e

[! tCSI?
PL9

,
l :. F SL V til
!! 00'6L \9l L
Me *60
l
•
- 6/r 4008 Pao /
` L ?tZ ?n
r3
D03 D03 3.9[,1£99 S?
an I! 9929
4R
1! 69'M 1! 9YYt P''
Ww "7 WILLS PPO
1

L
one!
// J! L1'09 uu?lS Y.AS WI
I
I
99L
•6Nd
!
?r [! 9t11L
1
61f 4108 Pao I .. u
LL.Oaru rig
SPu0w07 WILLS PPO! i
IISL to •+IO '0N tsOVS Orb AM Y 1flfM lold

't00L 'Ol I0w "0 a31V17d11 v o35N3a 8
O/8 i6odnttOf' 4N rOaOd
008 Pao
't00Z A--q•! W Ai--r 4 '9062-sid '•PI•Ii T 90ua4L Aq Pafaotng ?y :OINIINB
Zt9 960d EVE )1008 P"O 'L19 960d C9Z *08
'L!C 86od ?6C WO8 '9Z 96od VIC 4008 9atatJ9l9a Pa9a
0410ta3 LA-N 'Alums 4--64w„ '8048-0[ • tvAn Duo Fa[
ICtL POOa ti0Pu000S 'a'N 10 *PIS 44tou 944 6wp -1000 a m
r "Ov 9Lt)
•i u u
is i"d aod -3 3 uwl
1! 0591 DLL3 i LOL q"0o1
to I
I
1 R49 4d 6 a.[-6hf
Zoa[o.td Iryvamaotlsmg aFa.)9grn
'31-1 `?i?TI'I02I?'D HLL2IOi?t 30 SHOIA2IaS 0I'IHtldH2i vans 'P0L[.pD '?•N umgl DKI
0a o
?NUanans oNn saUU oil! V JHDI
t1a1aM
: io/ .f-S spu0now to •olyo 9tp tw,-4
own o
F •+oY tlZ ?9 ??Cy
plop"
dVh ulN130,
nr SIN
Ott
,? 1L F•li
do,l
o[ I% •POOwlagry
MIS
!r4
M_Zooz $ '99-ZODZ '0r-100t 109 qat 6 a.cn4j
uad la off u 'ON ;ans l! SS'OC M Sl OZZ N
buys SZlll
eoa-cla •`?j ? 11 tt?i
J i t 1! B['afl M l[ 1,.6a S 1ZLll
-so
1! 06'66 M ZZ moz S Mill
> V a 1! lo'coL M 9,S£OL S run LL
+oo-?oW ;o -(-p viol a43 6IIA (z J y'?.ti J M : NaaNrr oN6>r3e aNn
dwDls Iola!;;O PUD aJnlDu6ls loul6lJo Aw ssoullM ?+ - t tstt WON lY mmog
0091' slna P?8 411m DOMPJDaaa ul paJodO.d 17:33 i ewDN
eDM lDld 6141 -T TT- s! sa.nliodop 1 b s
puO sapnillol Aq pololnaloo co uolclowd ;o opoJ m W •;9110q PUD a6PSIMOU)I Aw ;o lsaq ayl al r(? ti QO w i a4d u"s ?n??s 'or laa.wa sloadcaj ilo ul sl puD-j00Z goj-uDr 91 I ?d u ?! •IDnuDrl uollooullo0 spuDaeM eJOoul6u3 ;0 6dio0 1.961
4 ew Aq ouop AOn.ns pnlao uo uaJ; poJOdud 041 6ulzlRin spow soM uolloulu.mlaP 6141 •9lop s141 U 4 -W -B
soM fold alto loll} A;Il.aa 'splalj p sDwoyl .1 * 1 eP1+ z N z psaoxa of lou pol.od o .o; uodn pollOJ aq Aow uo13o1Psl.np *Of uolloOS
!!?/llcUletll 0u4Se"T ` Q ;o uopDUlwmlOp ciyl '8u0lloln6eJ peyslignd Jno JO MDI 043 4 06uoyD
A:z egad It D 61 9.041 ssalun •elop 6143 uo pou6lsJepun s11; Aq peuluwelep so
AlNf10O ANWICIO1NM 991 *W PoeO eem .,v,
VNnoaV? HiaoN Iflu-0 Lruwg)-m \ F eoY 91v 30V aJOIDM pal o10 oo s to ;o a43 aI AJopunoq
'qy +e zrr 4n i ria!daP A13DJ ;old 14i ;o Adoo doa r 61La43 j a43 60UI3.0a 6141
o.'F` rD / ern
lf et*= HT O&d r1.! 4-6 Pero
.F 9210Y ti•'/ZZ M e6ed 3^9= N eueMq WOM 907 DW3 ?O
lfl d 991 '9'O o1 4r / as Ul SI aIpOS
a LOY w°s P9; ?. p elta s a b/Jeap ra 077 bvPa. 4wN
XPWd-d
.r;uno0 .f?ua6;w? JO aa'was 21ro0*2f ?. t= tLV u•, ?u ?"go Y3 . d,
/ -Al .*/£ 50 00t,
Q 00t,
I L? R ye trrwd ? ! t! 9L6C ? Fes! „i''?' / I r1. &Cod Lrl 4-0 P"a
` F evY 6Zt/ Moll 'Pow yo Jeiueo y 3 .eZ.YZRO azz &&d 9rz woo Peal!
V P?aMI MY •LSl 1y a 7993 OOOL 4441- PA- p3uozV04 eN Z •eN 3lON
D-loool OPN xd FlMUUe! wa47 ?!K'l PueWo3
A.avpuoDes oHi ?(1/ oPM SA ? 'q
PwpeM aM7W
i?O'e?' orl?' ^ ' i. ll_ZI-O--6j?Y1 qM Puna Y°I .f/C rid ?q6L 5 sqPe ux" e4l Mr4M I W^P4 iou oP
unywryy u" L 9l•OC i100! ?,eL 10+1 A/C s^qa aN JDI wo4r n6oes^/ ?l *ON 310M
ei.Zueuo:D1no!uoN 1! 06'9911 3 .96,£91 N ___- _______d? r b O.Y v Jeuba NN Nd 6?*_j
uw4 1! 66'l 62
ra
u015 4 u04 1 3oun0! . y v_j Wc
e
c u.)s
C amnbS F1 . Jo
1 IoM m pelou 'o lee
0 ti r a n I P1 p1 ryuewnww vgourp -0
v a' q F eer NOV
serv rv I PaalaZ
2 ? z n lT PW19" _vv H$l?? r92lCar ` ea° Yr ! VW ; j
?, y 1
1j P^ s 8 4 + Cos r lyn aw 060d S i !Y•9 Mood
a Nn F eery ZCD F eeoY 6Z,99,
a+\ le2v ecrv etn 077 'e'e4%m7 4JAiV fgZ 3De9 Pero
g PLOaMI B/ ym 60r e6e
N Q s fjgu? j a " ` r tt tf fo aaarps ll
lqrl& dl a to 3°eS Pero I 'airs °ex
rv arv wrv p !f I tQ OrN
iuswrarory _ roar rv 19ty Pon w/v} Wd Owl I 1! 10.OLZ
EuaoN oiao
. '"°! I n .s/c rMw! 1 ? M.leea"s VNn0HV3
'Y7-csar? N 1! 94211 ` .? ? F eaY grn' I P" -11 Moro. H1210N
3 =jaw S ,wr ddd------ P?aMI si I .l :P-j
edla u*4 912V y_
?,?--_-_? t! £o l1.£ 1! 091M z ?.
3uew^uoN N .l :P MJ lr qd eL."S idle uoM 3 1Y.LZW S M
yenuoD var n io *wlS an .t/£ ;PuoO! z9?u u0+1 '6Y N " v ;r -Y Rev
.1K./ *-"A $ !!i• curv nn l yun0lr .Z/t F100! F "Y Pon P`'srfi" W
Y wxv • 1 PW9Mry3
01 e.:r say arv
`yen 'vv??''yy?? 3N WOO
rav aav `r 1 L!Y 4w9 Pero PaeRMI 61? ,?' Q9Jj9 S9 6Pu'DtiaA /
7?Od ever r ! 077 UfAIM9 47 N N .9011 tuav/aQMMI DOS /
M-3 Mq IPi m v `Y ! !° ae +-s a?rv ar F ear mn I
r1^e! ear . M!Y vwaOM?l ? -R-RMI Q2/x7 I - -74
/
F eJaY LYT asrv ¢? = oven C ,t Fene! bd Y PPUadI
PGOaMI ,966[-1.l Meer ,2vcn w F &"v Z :F i F eoY 01 *0
MY CRY PWJMI !1 elol yl, LtleOd b ageog lov r? B P"a o63 0? cm [ir ov 6 u''°MS P35 ,Nwi?- ptgte
Ljum? Lpup6ltury u:nr
Pu3
e
IV Pon R $ F Y L! U l
&t? 29iv 'J w3 y
poy
rorv !E F eoY LtY+ PIMP" 3.7
y em Lan ws3 m PiIY PMOaMI '31 '.1
y R son n mil! Z F of I.'?' p fzr -god z
Zr° x7 F apY t :F AM !r 4698 UAm4S A3£ 1'1 F -Y rl'D L!i 'Poo PeM pyg egad 6l! 30a8 o eO
M. Li ea P?RMI !J' 977 bN10le- J 4!?
emu. 73S utr car rv ,u3 4a T ?' c .rlvMelmN *u" eOIN°e8
at wrv w cm "J!Zs cstt,sr'el o \ Pu3 to aoMI+S M b/M Pea
fool rtY, ZZe1 P \ ?n trgF &0v lov 9 'o'l°irunN'O/u°J aea9"
aUg7 'yogvytr u?ee s xas F eor 1.7a F ear it .0
,wv
W P-aMI Yn t0C" P-11" 00 auz7 11071W

t

11

I

t

LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING

LINE BEARING LENGTH

*52'02" E 78.92 FT L603

L42 S 62'31'3 W 13.81 FT

LINE BEARING LENGTH

S 4p• '3g• 9.81 FT

LINE BEARING LENGTH

LINE 11 BEARING LENGTH

SEA Stream JD Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH

178 S 47-59'23" E 20.75 FT
L79 N 79'08'5 " 27.99 FT

LINE BEARING LENGTH

-
L165 N 77'00'00" W 27.02 F7

Sh eet No. Th»? o f Tan

JE JF Wetlan d

L29 S 20'41'51" W 14.71 FT
l30 S 16'04'38" E 15.05 FT
L31 S 43'35'20" W 19.38 F7"
L32 S 02'33'51' E 15.60 FT
L33 05'17'2 W 15.58 FT
L34 S 54.51'23" W 21.87 FT
L35 S 66'0 '40' W 18.20 FT
L36 S 84'05'43" W 9.78 FT
L37 N 83'58'0 W 8.13 FT
L38 S 75'08'01" W 14.46 F7
L39 37'5 '39` W 11.39 FT
L40 S 45'2 '38" W 13.03 FT
L41 2549'30" W 17.39 FT

L43 S 66'23'08' W 15.47 FT
l44 S 56'34'13" W 16.63 FT
L45 N 61' 4'18' W 15.52 FT
L46 S 47'11'35" W 17.05 FT
L47 S 21'35'41' W 18.83 FT
L48 N 89'45'55' W 22.46 FT
L49 N 39.41'3 W 23.11 FT
L50 N 66'19'53' W 20.53 FT
l51 N 51'21'09' W 21.44 FT
L52 N 61'05'52" 78403 FT
L53 N 82'04'07* E 18.38 FT
L54 83'30'07' 27.17 FT
L55 N 65'35'59' 20.37 FT
L56 N 72'55'36' E 23.29 FT
L57 78'16'33' 20.17 FT
L58 N 5'21.41" E 17.03 FT
L59 N 44'12'38" 27.26 FT
l60 N 35'29'39' 13.80 FT
L61 N 51'55'10' E 17.08 FT
L62 61'06'36" 14.40 FT
L63 N 44'57'13" 7.02 FT
164 N 53'04'00" 14.99 FT
L65 N 43'10'08' E 12.39 FT
L66 N 3930'2 " E 9.76 FT

7

'11'50" E dH Wetland SEC Stream SED Stream
L134 S 72'20'37' W 25.24FT
L135 69'16'33' W 20 .90FT
11 36 S 79'42'57' W 19.31 F7
1137 '34" W 35.64 FT-
L138 N 89'59'24" W 19.89 FT
L1
L142
L144
L1 48 2'59'54" W
L7
L1 49
L150
L151
L 54 N 00'5
L1
L1
L164 N 65'50'55
L281
L282
14.72 FT

L68 S 27'2 '38" 21.24 FT
169 S 08'24' 0" 16.43 FT
L70 S 7942'02" 24.32 FT
L71 S 87'20'17` 48.13 FT
L72 4823'40' 20.65 FT
L73 S 79'48'01` E 42.28 FT
L74 S 80'22'3 " 32.79
L75 N 85'05'23* 22.97 FT
L76 S 17'17' 35.72 FT
L77 3'40'00" 15.32 FT

L80 N 55'36" 33.41 FT
181 N 5'26' ` 27.76 FT
L82 14'34' 3" W 27.80 FT
183 N 23'30'24" W 30.53 FT
L84 S 8'13'03' 25.03 FT
L85 S 16'55'30" 33.81 FT
6
L8 S 26'12'17` W 31.91 FT
187 36'24'56" 40.28 FT
L88 S 4'4 '01' W 41.55 FT
L89 N 6'39'46" W 22
.40 FT
L90 N 23'11'28' W 25.52 FT
L91 39'23'49" W 29.99 F7
L92 N 86.22'58' W 37.88 FT
L93 N 82'30'57" W 40.85 FT
L94 N 47'18'59' W 25.60 FT
195 S 86'07'09` W 40.06 FT
L96 N 7'48'14" W 41.28 FT
L97 N 17' 0' W 22.57 FT
L98 N 5'20'01" W 25.44 FT
L99 43'51'07" W 9.04 F7
L100 S 74'56'24' W 12.74 FT
L101 N 85'07'47` W 19.74 FT
L10 N 63-37'08- W 1.05 FT
L103 N 58'11'58' W 18.28 F7
L104 N 58'12'5 ' W 33.98 FT

L106 N 69'21'49" W 42.50 FT
L107 N 56'05'13` W 37.15 FT

108

50'32'09' E

70'50'51' W 20.53 FT
L239 N 6
L195 N 5'03'04' W 17.83 FT L314 81'55'36' W 18.35 FT L240 N 61 4'S ' W 21.90 FT
L196 S 8910'44" W 25.77 FT L241 N 3458'1 19.36 FT
4.73 FT

S 59'3

L139 S 36'17'45" W 17.56 FT
L140 S 13'03'53" 23.60 FT
41 S 7'34'3" W 24.15 FT
S 7'28'2 ' W 32.30 FT
L143 N 77'5'0' W 16.81 FT
N 6 0'40" 16.28 FT
1145 N '29' W 20.81 FT
20.28 FT
L147 N 29'12'04' W 13.93 FT
48 N 10'56'21 ' W 20.26 FT
N 50'58'31" W 24.95 FT
S 71'36'46" W 30.45 FT
N 41'12'33" W 20.38 FT
N 71'53'23' W 19.66 FT
Li53 N 27'53'56' W 34.73 FT
4'07" E 21.64 FT
L155 N 20'47'15" W 28.53 FT
U56 N 10'56'31" W 29.13 FT
L157 N 10'51'13" E 21.58 FT
1158 N 12'30'17' E 23.63 FT
59 N 47'12'15" W 16.34 FT
L160 S 53'13'24' W 16.05 FT
L161 S 83'40'57' W 22.98 FT
62 S 85'36'52' W 19.90 FT
L163 N 24'00'1 4' W 26.19 FT
" W 22.11 F7

65

8'1 1'7' W L257
L259
L265 jim
L269 1268
L270
L271
L272
L2 L273
L275
1277 L276
L279 L278
42.03 FT
GK GL Glt 1letlnnd

L166 S 09 5'50' 38.08 FT
L167 S 5'00'17' 45.38 FT
L168 S 4842'41 " 35.37 FT
1169 S 59'09'37" 34.42 FT
Lila 1'12` 40.73 FT
L171 N 70'29'00" 39.42 FT
L172 N 7'15'30" 43.12 FT
L173 N 7 'Sg" 47.89 FT
1174 N 80'07'08" E 35.03 FT
L175 N 3 '0` 44.07 F7
L176 N 39'45'54` 31.18 FT
Li77 N 27'43'08' 28.92 FT
L178 S 4 58'40` W 43.38 FT
1179 N 2'49' W 47.34 FT
L180 6'51'21' W 22.81 FT
L181 S 30' 39 '27" W 47.59 FT
U 82 S 4536'19' W 22.33 FT
L183 S 254'6` W 40.71 FT
L184 S 37'15'49" W 37.11 FT
L185 S 35'59'31 ' W 34.40 FT
L186 S 6 '57'56' 34.03 FT
L187 S 7 '30' W 39.82 FT
L188 S 9'50'18` W 19.62 FT
Li 89 S 60' 5'58' W 21.93 FT
L190 N '37'51 " W 1 .90 FT
1191 N 10' 7'27' W 30.33 FT
L192 S 67' 1'3" W 17.95 FT
1193 S 4'S W 23.55 FT
L194 S 87'45'08` W 23.53 FT

L197 S 60'4 '42` W 32.11 FT
L198 N 89' 7'25' W 26.10 FT
L199 S 80'16'54' 26.79 F7
L200 S 78'13'0 ' 43.48 FT
L201 N 64'34'20" 22.40 FT
L202 N 47'39'50" 51.18 FT
L203 N 72'24'58" 24.95 FT
L204 S 48' 8'14" 26.81 FT
L205 N 79'17'16' E 35.14 FT
L206 N 56'0 S9" 27.32 FT
1.207 N 3'00'04" 28.75 FT
L208 N 28'47'20' 30.08 FT
L209 N 21'47'3 " W 43.12 FT
L210 N 59'4 '31' W 27.99 FT
L211 N 43' 4'54' W 34.63 FT
1212 N 0 ' 'S7" W 24.46 FT
L213 S 32'21'19" 8.62 FT

214

34'45'" L283
L220
L224
L229
2.14 FT

LENGTH
L249 S 7654'0 6.83 FT
L250 S 34'08'02` 47.25 FT
1251 S 9'58'43` 18.54 FT
L252 S 20'58'07' W 17.94 FT
1253 S 53'49'3 ' E 10.17 FT
L254 N 78'56'37' E 21.13 FT
L255 76.06'41 " 34.02 FT
L256 N 86 '13" 26.58 FT
N 4'3 '30" 16.71 FT
L258 N 68'51' 88.55 FT
N 26'49'56' 17.86 FT
L260 S 76
L261 84'13'23` 33.61 FT
L262 S 5 '14'33' 49.93 FT
L263 70.37 FT
1264 56.03 FT
19.40 FT
L266 S 24'41'57' 16.55 FT
L267 S 68'03'29" 8.49 FT
S 60'08'2` 18.59 FT
S 53 '4 '33' 64.21 FT
N 70' '37' 50.10 FT

7137'37' 40.32 F1
S 6 '07'1' 40.78 FT
74 S 80'16'15' 38.29 FT
N 84 1' E 36.66 FT
S 76'16'05" E 48.61 FT
N 46'0 '14' 25.11 FT
N 66' 20.39 FT
S 83'46'45" 46.50 FT
L280
N 7 6'1 " E
25.06 FT
S 88'47'18" 49.32 FT
63' 0'15' 9.86 FT
S 5 9'15" 46.29 FT
L284 S 65'03'0 ' 23.61 FT
L285 S 05'14'36' 8.13 FT
L286 N 80'3 'S4' 33.75 FT
L287 N 49'28'5 ' W 40.65 FT
L288 N 78'1 '11" W 43.38 FT
1289 S 37 3'9' 40.22 FT
L290 N 89'44' i' W 33.99 FT
L291 N 80 6'0 ' W 22.84 FT
L292 S 46'5 'S" W 27.22 FT
L293 75 1 '44" W 58.39 FT
L294 S 8 '4710' W 29.17 FT
L295 83'59'46' W 47.00 FT
L296 N 58'49'04` W 51.47 FT
L297 7 ' 3'26" W 24.69 FT
L298 83 4' W 16.94 FT
L299 76 '0 " W 43.86 FT
L300 53 3'4 W 73.28 FT
L301 N g 1' W 13.26 FT
L302 N 46 0'0" 16.02 FT
L303 N 09'5 '32' W 16.72 FT
L304 00'41' W 15.05 FT
L305 N 24 '2 W 55.26 FT
L306 N 2 'S ' W 73.82 FT
L307 60'1 S" W 47.68 FT
L308 77'28'09" W 20.49 FT
L309 75'56'26" W 73.06 FT
L310 S 39'1 '49" W 23.72 FT
L311 S 69' 'S9' W 79.08 FT
L312 S 51'45'43" W 20.23 FT
L313 S 71 '57'4 ' W 18.47 F7

L315 N 80'20',32* W 32.41 FT
L316 N 8 .59'18" 22.75 FT
1317 435 '21" W 18.43 FT
L318 N 0.56'56' 15.53 FT
L319 N 16'1 '4 ' 17.08 FT
L320 N 41'08' 6" W 41.13 FT
L321 83'55'16" W 17.40 FT

2

'28 '3' W
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L323 S 71'03'41' 42.20 FT
L327
L6L606
L152
JA Wetland
1217 N 87'18'37" E
L218
L219
L221
L222
L227
L228
1230
L231
1232
L233
L234
L235
L236
1237
L238
FT
L242
1243
L244
1245
L246
L247
32.51 FT
SGA Stream

L624 3445'46' 26.14 FT
L625 S 32 '1 E 8.62 FT
L626 5135'05' 37.47 FT
1627 S 4435'04" 24.50 FT
L628 S 50'46'08
' 34.08 FT
L629 S 33'51'47
E 29.98 FT Figure 9

L324 N 9'38' 08" E 28.19 FT
L325 N 10'18'12' E 4.87 FT
1326 70'49'04` W 21.58 FT
N 72'34'5 W 35.68 FT
SJD Pond

L601
N 52'32'10' W
135.30 FT
L602 N 51'22'35" W 89.15 FT
N 5324'03" E 51.66 FT
L604 N 71'49'06' E 111.63 FT
L605 N 88'13'15" E 7.44 FT
S 18'47'38' W 25.05 FT
L607 S 06'31'37" E 53.55 FT
08 S 0831'51" E 106.57 FT
SJI Pond

L609 N
00
'21'49' W 69.73 FT
L610 1
3
'
g
" w
47.93 FT
47.93 FT
L611 33
' 8
'
33
' W 97.96 FT
L612 N '17'4' W 128.04 FT
L613 N 4'23'51" 64.50 FT
1614 60'1
7
'
25`
63.49 FT
L615 S 37' 7' 74.06 FT
16/6 55 ' 58'03' 127.53 FT
L61
7 7
2
' 67.93 FT
L618 49'36'40` 90.58 FT
L
619 47
'
30
' W 175.31 FT
1620 S 36 '42'4 ' W 55.18 FT
L621 60'34'11" W 59.29 FT
L622 N 53.22'2 '
W 73.53 FT
L623 N 30'16'58'
W 63.
00 FT

L215 S' 59'30'TT E 24.68 FT
L216 N 80'19'59" 27.78 FT
15.52 FT
S 47'19'04" E 19.05 FT
S 79'28'31" E 25.74 FT
S 7653'19' E 30.09 FT
S 65'48'35' E 33.53 FT
S 51'39'32' 24.68 F7
L223 S 31 '13'14' W 26.40 FT
N 6003'19" W 19.37 F7
1225 S 74'09'18" W 16.11 FT
L226 S 5'49'43' 31.69 FT
S '16'26' 25.69 FT
2932' 23.72 FT
S 15?07'S ` 23.93 FT
S 18 '16'5 " 37.46 FT
N 00'29'37' W 54.65 FT
N 41 '12'49" W 26.05 FT
N 443'28" W 14.55 FT
N 02'00'30" W 28.15 FT
S 89 1'50" W 21.65 FT

N 3'51'T W 17.49 FT
S 8 •53'07` W 15.55 FT
'28'44 ' W 19.71

N 4726'4 " W 17.11 FT
N 72 '3 '12" W 15.56 FT
S 82'49'50* W 22.52 FT
N 65'01'39' W 22.79 FT
N 9'59'09` 9.38 FT
N 47'21' 15.84 FT
L248
N 88'24'1
33.16 FT
t

JC Wetland SEF SJE SEG SEH Stream
UNE SJA Stream
BEARING LENGTH
UNE EARING LENGTH E BEARING
'
'
'
1 72 FT
50 continued
UNE BEARING LENGTH L502 S 65' 'S5' W 18.19 FT
5109 5231'49" W 18.48 FT 3 S
3Z E
4
37
0
'
' .
34
93 FT
457 R 21 V52V' E 33.43
FT
L503
S
W 3362 Fl
-110 S 65'17'03' W 19.18 FT 29
L384 4514
L385 S 12'13' 4' .
0.54 FT
4 L458 S 12'09'10' W 30.71 L504 48'48.04" W 40.23 FT
44 FT
42
'
'
'
L111 68'07'35" W 29.57 FT
23 FT
24 L386 0"20'39" 30.61 FT L459 S 22 54'06" W 32.21 FT
' .
15
L506 S 43
06
41 07 FT
L506 S 53'30'19' W
.
L112 N 651 W
L113 S 3200'41" W 13.87 FT L387 S 5617'39" E 70.15 FT E 36.53 FT
L460 S 43'57'10
L461 S 80'41'57" E 49.57 FT L507 S 34'42'09" W 32.47 FT
Li14 45'53'41 W 24.07 FT L388 N 55'59 53.77 FT
FT 37*60 FT L508 1_2§28 ?_2-W 4-72 FT
1
1115 N 84'38' 7" W 16.16 FT L389 S 001
'
'' 47 01 L483 S 43 36'23" E 39.45 FT " W 16.63 FT
L509 S 0016'5
47 FT
"
'
5116 73 0950' W 18.94 FT L390
L391 1
S 01
12'37' S" 64.35 FT L464 S 38'28'21" E 22431 FT W 39.
5
L510 S 35'3
34 FT
17
"
'
5117 N 25'3 '49" W 15.23 FT
03 54'17" 19.07 FT
18
7 L392 S 0 011 39.83 FT L465 S 1616'42' E 48.72 FT
50 FT
42
'
' L511
L512 .
_12:L
W
33
S 4411'26" W 38.73 FT
N
L
9 N 17'40'43" W 14.10 FT
L11 L393 S 15 53'38"
' 39.49 FT .
E
43
L466 S 37 53
7 S 59-00-42- E 36.37 FT
L46
5 FT
3' S'1 W
L513 S 4
1
L120 N 3418'15" W 14.35 FT 5394 E
S 06'51'19
" 54.40 FT

9

w
9,59 FT FT
4
.58
!58'31'40* W
L514
S
L121 N 5'45'07" W 12.99 FT L395 E
251434
'
'
' FT
43
93 L469 S 08 05'37" E 5515 64'48 03" W 56.51 FT
L122 N 54'0 ' 6" W 16.28 FT L396 13
48
S 51
'
' .
32 07 FT 5470 S 52'03' 5516 S 72 22'52" W 30.58 FT
'
L/23 N 03'54'37 W 23.01 FT 5397 19
S 79
'
'
'
08 FT
21
L471 N 'S
t63.98 4 L517 46.24 FT
64'2514
"
L124 N 48''W L398 47
50
S 70
'
'
' .
21 FT
37 L472 N 66 1'23" W 65.16 FT
L518 S 66 53'50
L125 N 7'3518E 12.FT L399 37
15
S 88
"
'
' .
15 FT
97
- FT
41.11
L473 3 27'5 ' W 1
'
7
L726 N 45'35'27" 13.53 FT L400 E
7
38
N BO
"
'
' .
52 35 FT 48.3
L474 S 1513'0 g" F L520 .66 FT
W 4
'56
S 661
"
L127 S 65' 5'21' 17.94 FT 1401 51
58
S 8
'
'
'
85 FT
42 38.13 FT
L475 S 75 8'12' L521 W 17.59 FT
80 57'08
5128 N 85 21'34" 21.69 FT L402 16
51
S 35
'
' . LCD 2
0 '01'51 Q FT
4
0
1
Li 29 06'4 '01' E 18.82 FT L403 E
19
S 26 08
"
'
' 20 FT
49 1' W 27.38 FT
L477 N 8212' L523 7 FT
4
08 34' W 34.
S 6
L130 67'06'44' 17.45 FT L404
05 4
22
S 20
7'50'29' .
47.37 FT 8 FT
L478 01 14'21" W L524 S 0316'14" W 22.09
81 FT
42
'
'
'
L131 4 '36' 6" 15.75 FT
54 FT
• 20
' L4
L406 S 7'55'19" 72.35 FT 4.
L479 S 48 24' 9" E 44.65 FT L525
L526 .
W
08
14
S 59
N 8705'43" W 16.95 FT
.
8
L132 S 60 2
L733 S 7 0514.54 FT L407 S 40' 3'31' 14.41 FT L480 S 4'49'36" E 52.22 fT
36 0'15 22.89 FT
481 -527 N 7 '37'58" W 19.29 FT
5408 56'14'3 E 62.01 FT 5
S -528 S 7 ' 4.04" W 51.31 FT
L409 N 7 '25'15' 55.63 FT L529 S 83 23'28" W 26.57 FT
SEE SEF SJE SEG SEH Stream 5410 N 81 57'53" 70.69 FT SJB Stream L530 N 7 '56'10" W 24.39 FT
UNE BEARING LENGTH L411 88'43'01" E 39.72 FT LINBEARING LENGTH
E
F L531 S 2 '30'08' W 17.81 fT
L328 S 16 5 " W 35.4& FT L412 74 710 ' 24.17 FT -
- 6" W 21.01 FT
8 L532 S 6239'08' W 45.83 FT
L329 543 54.38 FT -413 85'06'06 32.74 FT
4 5 b ' 1' W 21.00 FT
1533
S 7 09'0 ' W 35.11 FT
L330 636' 2" W 38.19 FT L414 S 8918'00" x'33 S 1 27'15' W 19.15 FT L534 7030'50" W 21.75 FT
L331 S 44' 4" W 23.53 FT L415 87 8'S 87 8.50 FT L535 S 66'49' 9' W 33.70 FT
L332 S 503'34" W 49.31 FT L416 8050' E 48.21 FT E
S 7 'S '04" W 27.34 FT L538 7501' 3' W 30.17 fT
L333 S 7 6'17 W 92 02 FT L417 S 66'44'04" E 81.51 FT 5 '26'4 " W 5.62 FT L537 AM '50'48" W 45.81 FT
L334 S 47'40'30" W 58.41 FT L418 6' 2'27" 71.93 FT N 2416' 8' W 18.79 FT L538 73'47'47" W 36.45 FT
L335 436' 7" W 47.11 FT L419 7'48'04" E 30.28 FT N 24'43'2 ' E 13.05 FT L539 S 70'13'04" W 45.35 FT
-
'
L336 5 '06' 6" W 13.94 FT L420 N 76'07' 1" E 57.77 FT

L490 0 14' 15.14 FT

5540
6 2 FT
20.62 FT
2 0.
7 '43'4 ' W
1337 2'40'41" 19.80 FT L421 .13"
N 8 * 7.68 FT

15.31 FT
L491 N 6 64 ' W 44.23FT
28'03" W 31•? FT
L338 3 L422 "
S 7849'52 28 20 FT L492 N 25 9.59" W 9.59 FT
L339 S 2 '0 ' 1" W 34.49 FT L423 S 0108" W 24.70 FT L493 1 '48'23' E 19.87 FT
L340 3 '1 1' 64.43 FT L424 N 8 6'4 ' 32.96 FT
L494 N 8'4T W 19.11 FT
93 FT
L341 3 9' W 5425 86 3'19" 57.81 FT L495 N 30-3Z115' 19.62 FT L545 S 49
L342 S 10' W 41.74 FT L426 N 7 '18'3 60.33 FT L496 65' 4' 5' W 19.41 FT L5 46
L343 S 20'05'41' W 37.27 FT L427 6 '53'17" 28.18 FT L497 S 8311' " W 15.91 FT LS 7 S 56' 8
L344 S 1 39' 3" W 39.99 FT L428 S 7 '45'05" 58.35 FT
T
L498 0 '34' 1' W 33.38 F
L345 S '04'48" W 29.92 FT L429 68 0'39" E 66.09 FT -499 S 8 'S8' 8' W 15.25 FT
L346 S 41 4' 9" W 34.84 FT L430 S 76 1'14" 51.04 FT L500 S 8 '03'34" W 20.55 FT
L347 S 20'57' 9' W 27.69 FT L431 8 '36'5 49.59 FT 5501 S 79 1'38' W 15.82 FT
5348 S '15' W 24.30 FT L432 88'59'16" 44.81 FT
L349 S 53'35'53' W 3 .04 FT L433 S 8300'08' 32.76 FT
L350 S 4412'30" W 43.41 FT L434 S 76'43'06" E 26.35 FT SJC Stream
L351 S 03'41'18' W 42.37 FT L435 S 8 12'23' 42.47 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH 1555 N 83 W
L352 S 06'30'48" W 28.20 FT L438 76'43'46" E 73.77 FT L579 S 5742'51" W 8.05 FT
53 S 1204'32" W 46.15 FT

53 L437 N 75'36'17" 45.42 FT
L580 N 88' 0' " W 14.86FT

5557

11
1354 S 4423'12' W 33.32 FT L438 S 55'45'22 " 47.82 FT
1 8.98 fT
L581 S 65'12'23' W
L355 S 5000'55' W 2 .34 FT L439 S 3411'32* 33.66 FT
1 14.63
L582 S 15 7 0" W FT
L356 S 24'4029" W 22.79 FT L440 S 29 3'55" 52.16 FT L583 S 7 '46'2 ' W 22.71 FT L560
51.16 FT
S 27'1821" E
'21 ' W 20.87 FT
L357 S 12'23 L441 S 2217'3 ' 52.66 FT L584 31 4' W 11.51 FT L561 S 38'30'44" W 24.42 FT
L358 S 14'49'48" W 28.90 FT L442
28.18 FT
S 2 '4 '5 '
S 6018' 20.24 FT
L585
L359 S 29'3817" W 30.30 FT L443 22*02'11" E 64.48 FT 5588 N 8 39'4 " 13.50 FT
L360 S 3421'06" W 30.04 FT L444 S 43 'S6" 58.24 FT -587 N 4 '05'1 " W 12.89 FT 5564 S 27
5361 S 11'53'3j7 W 33.30 FT L445 S 6 '14'06" 58.18 FT L588 S -f7-- - '5915.20 FT L565 S 45
L362 S 20'46'57" W 53.06 FT L446 N 7807'21" 101.96 F T L589 N 77'02'44" 15.93 FT
L363 S 15'54'56" W 27.86 FT L447 80'5 ' 33.36 F T L590 5 '49' W 14.25 FT L567 S 29 28
L384 S 03'43'45' W 32.68 FT L448 136'4 ' E 13.83 F T L591 N 72-53'52* W 25.18 FT 5568 S 66
L365 S 32'59'04" E 9.65 FT L449 S 71'23'01* E 31.20 F T L592 76 5' 20.69 FT L569 S 21 W
L366 S 28'53'53' 56.98 FT L450 S 34'59'00" 51.34 F T L593 N 8 '26' 1' W 23.69 FT L570 S 5
L367 S 74'10'31" E 34.95 FT L451 S 20'5 ' " E 9.59 FT
.78 FT
5594 00 13
1571 S 00
L368 S 63'41'38" E 39.7 FT L452 S 16'49'4 E 13.25 F T L595 7 '4 '1 W 11.02 FT
L369 S 18'24'57" E 45.75 FT L453 S 53'57" 29.58 F T L596 8 '37 5 10.39 FT L573 S 08'09'30' E 21.65 FT
L370 S 25 50'58' E 23.82 FT L454 S 08'43'1 " E 45.30 F T
L597 09'5 ' W 11.29 FT 7574
L371 S 42 10'11' E 22.29 FT L455 S 00-53'45" W 31.02 F T
L598 S 71' 9'38" W 21.03 FT
L3 2 S 36'40'20' E 56.84 FT L456 S 07' 4" 36.19 F T L599 N 61' 0'2 ' W 20.35 FT
L373 S 5219'54" E 35.29 FT L600 S 85'46'59" W 29.66 FT
L374 S 6644'24' W 34.16 FT
L375 S 24'25'08' E 52.50 FT
L376 S 68 52'21 E 39.57 FT
L377 S 14'18'07" W 34.45 FT
L378 S 12'22'04" W 43.93 FT
L379 N 89'35'50' E 38.80 FT
Shat No. Fow of Ton
L38 N 64'2741' E 51.62 FT
L381 S 08'26'38" E 86.60 FT Figure 9
L382 S 20'02'11" W 53.47 FT

L541-
L542 65'09'0 ' W 24.92 FT
L543 S 2'2 '0 ' W 31.84 FT
L544 43 5'44" 15.53 fT
'01'2 " W 33.02 FT
30'44' 33.68 FT
'28' W 23.50 FT
L548
S 54 7'0 " W
20.93 FT
L549 S 77'33'19" W 20.30 FT
L550 S 74'15'55" W 36.48 FT
L551 S 7637'55" W 33.26 FT
L552 S 71'08'39" W 28 .85 FT
L553 S 78'40'4 " W 22.92 FT
1.554 87'0 '49" 19.66 FT
'44'12' 32.59 FT
L556 S 12'52'18' W 22.35 FT
S 4237'59" W
FT
13.
L558
L559 S 43'29'17' W
5 03'23'30" W 12.15 FT
'43.82 FT
'

L562 S 66'16'59" E 23.20 FT
L563 S 32'40'03" E 19.24 FT
'36'50" E 9.38 FT
'31'48" W 31.94 FT
5566 S 29'56'23' W 21.80 FT
''39
" W 27.82 FT
'42'56" W 27.06 FT
'54'27" 29.43 FT
9'59'09" W 28.66 FT
'0516' W 17.49 FT
L572 S 68'5 '1 18.27 FT

25'22'32' E
S 7.94 FT
L575 '0024' W
=S3 13.20 FT
L576 S 50'1847' W 29.14 FT
L577 S 19'06'36' W 20.84 FT
L578 S 07'57'43" W 11.75 FT

11

1644 S 68'20'58' W 24.58 FT L724 50'39'08' W 26.86 FT L804 S 5 5'4 W 27.56 FT L873 07'45'12` 26.63 FT

LINE BEARING LENGTH L7 72 83'38'0 ' W 7.83 FT L856 S 12'50'26` 11.45 FT L917 S 37-21'09' 19.21 FT

L705 I S 27'12'35" W 44.36 FT L785 S 30*09'170 W 12.32 F7 L943 N 1 5'15" 29.62 FT

1707 S 07'48'' W 20.51 FT
S 31 '11'54" W

'

.39 FT

I Shoot No. Five of Tan
L946
I
N '4 '49"
j
17.

-sax stream
UNE BEARING LENGTH
L630 N 21'21'39' W 6.24 FT
L631 N 54'14'05" W 14.58 FT
1632 S 88'0 'S ' W 10.44 FT
L633 S 87'38'44` W 16.91 FT
1634 N 11'33'43' E 9.92 FT
L635 N 45'03'13' W 18.69 FT
L636 N 57'14'42" W 24.30 FT
L637 N 08'40'14' W 11.60 FT
L638 N 23'19' W 8.17 FT
L639 N 05'0 '47' 21.04 FT
L640 N 5'00'11" W 12.69 FT
S 71'14'49" W 13.54 FT
L642 N 26'2 '3 " W 19.73 FT
L643 N 73'16'2 ' W 6.16 FT

L645 N 52'50'12` W 13.96 FT
1646 N 8'56'18" W 21.28 FT
L647 S 85'16'24' W 19.48 FT
L648 N 77'15'59" W 8.75 FT
N 11-15'11' W 8.81 FT
L650 N 33'19'25' W 11.21 FT
1651 N 58'56'48' W 23.67 FT
L652 N 5 ' 'S7" W 14.88 FT
L653 N 5233'41" W 14.71 FT
L654 32*51'59* W 18.92 FT
L655 N 52'51'24" W 15.98 FT
1656 N 3'01'43" W 19.79 FT
1657 5624' 8" W 9.65 FT
L658 15'05'14" W 12.67 FT
L659 N 19'38'1 W 17.61 FT
1660 11'49'03' W 26.27 FT
L661 N 06'37'37
' 12.02 FT
1662 N 44'0 '49' W 15.35 FT
L663 N 28'58'28' W 20.15 FT
L664 N 20'23'08' W 11.59 FT
L665 N 02'00'2 ' E 9.21
L666 10'30' 7" E 21.34 FT
L667 N 21' '32' W 10.26 FT
L668 N 67 '48' W 18.48 FT
L669 8 '47'5 ' W 12.66 FT
L670 N 242 '35' W 14.81 FT
L671 N 19'41'38" 6.86 FT
L672 N 15'35'04" 8.65 FT
L673 N 12'52'59* W 20.40 FT
L674 N 06.06'13' W 16.86 FT
L675 48 6• W 26.90 FT
L676 N 66'3 'S0" W 20.21 FT
1677 75'24'10' W 10.85 FT
L678 N 44 2'28" W 11.22 FT
L679 N 24'58' 9" W 17.63 FT
L680 N 00*23'42" 14.13 FT
L681 N 18'20' 1' W 14.64 FT
1682 N 13'31'27* W 15.18 FT
L683 22'31'4 ' 17.71 FT
L684 30'4 '08' 19.19 FT
L685 3322'07' W 19.80 FT
1686 N 14'55'19" W 29.43 FT
1687 N 7 '51'45' W 17.48 FT
L688 S 69'09'17' W 6.12 FT
1689 S 81.*33'42' W 9.53 FT
L690 S 65'54' 7' W 7.30 FT
L691 N 61'2 'S4' W 6.2 7 FT

N

1'0" W SJF Stream S7G Stream SJG Stream
LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH continued
L710 S 30'02'34* 11.11 FT L790 10'38'2 ' W 12.17 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH
L711 g W 17.36 FT L791 19'45'51` 20.85 FT L860 S 44'50'47" W 5.35 FT
1712 S 77'56'59" W 28.13 FT L792 26.46'1 • 11.33 FT L861 S 29-40-05- W 7.26 FT
L713 S 73'04'18' W 12.39 FT L793 S 01 '04'1 W 16.28 FT L862 S 1 "14'13" 13.75 FT
L714 60 17 .97FT 7794 S 13'16'31' W 15.27 FT 1863 55'07'05' 13.38 FT
L715 S 77'28'55` W 21.50 FT 1795 02'41 '16` 8.64 FT L864 S 8436'01" 14.72 FT
L716 S 2 '56'41" W 19.85 FT L796 S 47 7'38" W 10.83 FT L865 42'03'27` 16430 FT
L717 S 76 '14' W 8.85 FT 1797 N 87'04'38` W 19.28 FT 1866 S 22-39-05- 14.79 FT
L718 N 2'1 6' W 8.38 FT 1798 S 28'14'34" W 15.34 FT 1867 42'19'08' W 13.79 FT
U79 S 5 '38'28' W 17.93 FT L799 S 8'31 '47' W 22.79 FT 1868 S 9'04'4 ' W 7.40 FT
L720 o4-02-40- E
L721 S 443 '29' W 24.63 FT L801 S 69'52'55" W
L722
L723 52'49'20' 38.05 FT L803 N 75'14'4" 9.92 7872 50-27-25- 39.73 FT
L725 N 86'4 ' W 8.15 FT 1805 S 83'18'59` W 14.97 FT L874 S 44'35' W 14.36 FT
L726 55'35'54' W 30.96 FT L806 S 03'52'14' W 33.00 FT L875 02'06'12' W 22.69 FT
L727 49'54'2 W 27.37 FT L807 S 48'01'45" E 11.09 FT L876 7 '13'08` W 16.24 FT
1728 S 57 14.28 FT L808 S 0'54'20"
L809 S 1 '45'5 14.45 FT L878 S 20'41'18'
L810 0 '47'5 ' W 15.04 FT
SJG Stream L811 35 *26'14* W 50.24 FT
LINE BEARING LENGTH L812 N 78-42'19" W 14.87 FT SFd Stream
L729 S 81'19'57` W 20.24 FT L813 S 4 '48'32' 14.24 FT UNE BEARING LENGTH
L730 72'18'3 W 19.69 FT
L731 S 41'10'11" W 21.08 FT
L732 S 5 '24'00` W 17.43 FT L815 S 1447'5 W 19.09 FT L880 S 08'18'05' W 14.55 FT
L733 62'25'55" W 21.04 FT L81 6 6 '31'1 22.85 FT L881 S 18'03'48' W 18.15 FT
L734 S 37'02'26' 7.13 FT L817 S 34'13'59" 13.47 FT 1882 S 45'35'18' W 18.63 FT
1735 S 53'5 '10" W 12.36 FT L819 61,51,12* 19.09 FT L884 S 38'1 9'55' W 28.76 FT
1736 S 267 1 '01' W 54.15 f7 L820 S 6 'S0' W 17.67 FT L885 S 36'44'06" W 24.93 FT
L737 S 45-00-21' W 20.01 FT
L821 S 75' W 18.04 FT L886 S 33'47'25" W 37.74 FT
L738 S 23'04'0 " W 40.10 FT L822 14 '08` 23.71 FT L887 S 50'39'52" W 28.05 FT
L739 16'57'40' W 19.67 FT L823 14'09'07' 14.24 FT L888 S 05'31'21 ' W 21.39 FT
L740 S 46'07'45' W 39.13 FT 1824 S 4'09'43` W 8.01 FT L889 S 12'17'43' W 48.13 FT
1741 S 30'46'44` W 27.46 FT
L742 35.39 FT L825 7'17'35` 14.24 FT L890 S 02'12'27' E 22.91 FT
L743 W 25.35 FT L827 936'45" W 21.81 FT L892 S 00'16'16' E 31.66 FT
L744 45'21'4 W 21.75 FT L828 31 '13'09" 15.53 F7 L893 S 30'33'49" W 34.70 FT
L745 S 41'25'31" 24.03 FT L
L746 6 *24'05" W 22.52 F7 '02-33- 29 .85FT L895 S 05'29'04" W 48.38 FT
L747 S 41-53-59- 13.73 FT L831 5 48.45'4 ` W 18.69 FT L896 S 14'13'10' W 11.31-F
L748 60'0 ' W 20.05 FT L832 10'46'3' 12.03 FT L897 S 11 '40'54' W 37.77 FT
L749 13'59'37' W 11.89 FT L833 S 28'49'5 W 20.93 FT L898 3'1 '5"
L750 40.55'0 ' W 26.44 FT L834 0'07'59' W 13 .48FT
L751 S 66-10'52" W 20.85 FT L835 4458'08' W 15.53 FT
L752 S 4844'45" W 30.66 FT L836 7 27.40. 7V 17.92 FT
L753 S 15'2 '02" W 14.67 FT L837 5 1'18' W 1284 FT LINE BEARING LENGTH
L754 18'56' W 14.93 F1 L838 63'04'56' W 16.97 FT L899 61'29'04' 60.28 FT
1755 S 50'0 '43" W 17.82 FT L839 S '50` 17.82 FT L900 S
L756 05'1 3'15" 23.64 FT L840 6 '05'0 ' W 18.80 FT 1901 9'10'06' W 27.78 FT
L757 S 25'09'2 W 14.55 FT L841 84' 'S6' 38.26 FT L902 S 36M2'21- 25.50 FT
7758 S 78'09'05` 23.51 FT L903 S 44'00'43' 35.54 FT
L7 59 L842 S 14'19'57' 14.21 FT
L760 S 88-31-25- W 14.60 FT L844 S 436'38" W 27.44 FT L905 S 06'52
L761 S 37'5
L762 23'15'0 ' 20.41 F7 L846 g 32'51'47* 20.48 FT L907 W 43.66 FT
L76 S 18'18'26" W 18.66 FT L847 7'23" W 13.72 FT L908 S 136'35' .02 FT
1764 17'25'4-0" E 27.16 FT 7848 S 4 '33'0 W 16.79 L909 S 4'04'0" 18.76 FT
L766 S 56'58'3` W 23.59 FT L850 8b '11' W 23.89 FT L911 37'56'02' 41.78 FT
L767 S 6'17'45' W 20.76 FT L851 S 1 3'40' 21.16 FT L912 S 09'54'39' W 1 .86FT
14.89 fT L768 18'21'44' W 17.46 FT L852 S '55'38' W 9.94fT L913 845'1" W 18.25 FT
SJF Stream

1693 N 72635'56` W 19.88 FT
L694 N 87'19'20` W 24.75 FT
L695 N 63'31'51' W 17.8 FT
L698 N 83'13'34' W 23.91 F7
L697 S..59'36'22" W 25.15 F7
L698 N 86'56'00' W 11.97 FT
L699 S 43'18'54' W 9.04 FT
L700 N 73'42'00' W 21.11 FT
L701 S 5712'36' W 7320 FT
L702 N 71'59'40" W 11.60 FT
L703 S 46'54'36` W 16.19 FT
L704 S 20'50'30' W 14.96 FT

L706 S 34'03'2
W 35.91 FT
40
1708 S 71'56'41' W 21.89 FT

09

4'17'46
' W 6771 _L59-20-39- W 14.65 FT L855 S 58'10'05" W 20.66 FT 1916 S 80'5 '14" 49.50 FT
L773 3 4'50' 10.85 FT 1857 S 74.47'37" E 7.38 FT L918 28.20 FT
1774 28'15' 8.59 FT L858 S 5346'45' E 9.30 FT L919 S 2933'33" W 24.70 F
L775 N 05V7'31 ' W 10 .88FT 1859 25'29'28' 9.72 FT L920 56 9'09" W 30.47 FT
L776 837'5 ' 24.11 FT
L777 88'02'23* W 12.11 FT
L778 S 5955' W 16.87 FT S1sIC Stream SW Stream
L77
178
L7782 07'0
L783 S 18'06'4" E 7.79 FT 6941 S 74-41-05- 27.47 FT
L784 S 54'40'35* W 18.91 F7 L942 N 61 '53'29" 10.08 FT
1786 S 56-58'31 " W L944 S
L788 S 56'56'3 ' W
V
30.72 f T

'39' 7' W

75 .21FT

62'5 '1 " W 12.31 FT
W

'51'52' W S 3 38' 13'56'1 ' 25'54'1 W 10.06 FT

4'53` W 38.42 FT

1765 S 00'02'04' W 9.00 FT

L769 40'07'01' 30.20 FT
L770 S 0'07'54' W 23.68 FT

'

9 S 04'4444' W 14.30 FT
0 S 4'07'0 ' W 23.41 FT
L81 S 07'35'47" E 27.04 FT
4'0 ' W 14.92 FT

18.04 FT
L787 24.76 FT
9.89 FT

9

76'05'4 " W L845 L802 S 52' 23'0 '42'0441' ` W 16.71 1446FT FT L906 L871 S S 3'' 17'00'16' W 21.49 FT

853 '06'37' 20 .91FT L914 S 39'13'29' W 25.46 FT
L854 S 3'04'20" W 8.82 FT L9/5 S 8'08'36' E 37.89 FT
LINE L921 L849 B'50'5EARING " W W 46.43 9.65 LENGTH FT FT LINE L938 L910 S S 7236''522''17BEARING' E 27.96 FT
L922 S fS 2 08'719''5908' " W 39 62.14 .83 FT FT L939 L940 S N 81 64-31'17" '0'7' 28.46
13.61 FT
Figure 9

L800 S 0 '35'01 ` W 37.79 FT
7.8 6FT

FT
"

4'20" W 35.88 FT

L814 09'39'44' 15.16 FT

L818 S 28'48' 0' W 31.77 FT

'00

L826 S 71'06'2 W 19.32 FT

82 9 N 8'12'34' 13.31 FT
L830

.

L843 7 '3g• 12.67 FT

L877 L870 S 3' 509''5008' ` W 36 20.36 FT
L879 S 16'01'57' W 44.06 FT
L894 S Ob8' 23,90.FT _

S 18'244 '

L923 '

L869 S 81'09'30" 10.87 FT
.90 FT

15.30 FT

L883 S 54'26'42' W 20.78 FT

L891 S 56'53'31' W 36.77 FT

T

29.73 FT
SEL Stream

4'26'26' 34.72 FT

L904 47 'S1" 23.34 FT
'2
' W 37.39 FT
34 3208 FT
03'3 ' 0"

23' 49.77 FT

' T

LENGTH

25.58 FT
FT

88 6'03' 17.91 FT
L945 N 74'37'48' 66
67 FT

t

1
l

LINE BEARING LENGTH
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH

LINE

BEARING

LENGTH

LINE

BEARING

LENGTH

L5 84'4'40" W 37.15 FT

L45 S 48'03'4 ' W 33.92 FT

L10 S 68 5'16" W 38.75 FT
L48 N 5 ' '44" W 41.77 FT

Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH

LINE BEARING LENGT
H
L947 S 85'23'25' W
L948 S 47'52'04' W
L949 S 24'15'41" E N
L950 S 56.54-05 W L59 N 10'21'01" W 46.41 FT L22 N 2 '01'53" 41.08 FT
L951 S 56'45'04" W
L952 N 00'23'02" W 986 S 19'49'20' W 11.52 FT
L953 N 12 6'5 ,

K
S 48'31'10' 25.49 FT

L330

L69 N 'S6' 3" 55.12 FT
E

LINE BEARING LENGTH

33
L10 S 37'5514'-W- 72.58 FT
L11 S 48'25 32 W 125.18 FT
L97
N 18'08'56' E
35.00 FT
L12 S 57-05-42- W 56.91 FT
L98
S 77'40'34" E
27.41 FT
N 47

C16-

5-7- L87 N 44'21'16' E 37.00 FT

L116 S 19
Boundary Along NCSR 1137
LINE BEARING LENGTH

- LINE BEARING LENGTH
5
7 11112 N 8 '44' 3' 28.71 FT

LINE BEARING LENGTH

Shoot No. Sit of ran

snt strew

1924 S 42'10'33" W 39.92 FT
1925 S 21'56'38` W 36.00 FT
L928 S 43'50'15` W 27.35 FT
L927 S 23'42'49" W 48.08 FT
L928 S 33'32'21" W 33.56 FT
L929 S 11'48'00' W 49.38 FT
L930 S 04'19'13' E 41.42 FT
L931 S 00'0044" W 26.23 FT
L932 S 58'55'01` W 31.23 FT
L933 S 2822'53" W 61.49 FT
L934 S 55'40'38` W 23.71 FT
1935 S 55'32'10' W 29.84 FT
1936 S 51'17'44' W 43.49 FT

L937

154246` W
S Mc WETLAND x1,•rlaxn SBA w>;1'l.axn STREAM
N 88'34'31 " W N 20 XL
19.41 FT
VJ O 1?etlnnd

4' W .
L954 69'01'59* W 18.80 FT
L955 N 04'27'41" 11.77 FT
L956 N 00'17'34` E 20.58 FT
L957 N 47 0'2 ' 24.57 FT
L958 S 5'17'46` 12.58 FT
L959 S 51'55'00" E 13.84 FT
L960 74'4 'S1' 15.47 FT

1961
S 7'37'49' 33.32 FT
18.50 FT
Bounder Along Rock Creek

LS S 52'25 55 W 21.68 FT
L6 S 22'13 31' W 50.21 FT
L7 S 69'42 50 W 27.91 FT
L8 S 53'51 35' W 40.41 FT
L9 N 54-28"517 W 28.42 FT

U3 S 30'5435 W 154.92 FT
L14 S 18'39'02' W
98.62 FT
L15 S 16'01'51" W 82.82 FT
6
1 S 62'4359" W 32.11 FT
7
1 S 19'01'20" W 70.22 FT
L18 S 52'36'15' W 64.98 FT
l19 S 07'4656" W 110.25 FT
0
L2 S 31'20'12" W 36.10 FT
L21 j"57-25 44' W 30.43 FT
L22 S 18'28'02' W 114.15 FT
L23 S 36'40 56' W 29.47 FT
L24 S 14'05'50" W 134.86 FT
L25 S 33'29'40" E 65.69 FT
L26 S 76'07'17" E 55.83 FT
L27 S 26'19'51' E 45.05 FT

l28

S 17'09'41" E

'5015 3' E 13.94 FT
'
LINE BEARING LENGTH
N 63'38'31' E 41.64 FT
L
31.58 FT

L1 N 85'4515 W 81.06 FT
L2 S 87'55'32" W 100.30 FT
L3 S 81'58'17 W 108.63 FT
L4 S 75'5810 W 108.69 FT
Li7i7 S 82'4426 E 74.20 FT
L1718 S 78'04 51' E 100.99 FT
19 S 69'39 40 E
- 100.01 FT

L1720
7-63-'20-21-
E L1081
116.29 FT L1082 3 '55'5 " W
XH Nettand

L962 S 35'10' 4' W 24.51 F1
L963 61*43*12* W 22.04 FT
L964 S 7'48'00" W 24.72 FT
L965 S 39'28' 9' W 20.40 FT
L966 N '37' 4' 32.74 FT
L974 N 39'46'50' 21.63 FT
L975 N 47 'S3' 27.72 FT
L976 N 78'08' 14.34 FT

L977

S 33'35' S" 11118 11 s 3012'21" 24.11
Figure 9
19.61 FT

L38 0'49'5 ' W 20.48 FT
L39 S 61'17'15" W 26.69 FT
L40 60'33'18" W 26.13 FT
L41 S 5 3' 3' W 17.08 FT
L42 66'5 '7 ' W 24.73 FT
l43 34'4455" W 35.44 FT
L44 S 3418'59* W 27.44 FT

L46 S 79'31'41" W 42.17 FT
L47 3 ' 3" 32.47 FT

L49 N 68'3 'S' W 23.74 FT
L50 N 71'22'59" W 28.62 FT
L51 48.23 FT
L52 S 67'44'30" W 51.68 FT
L53 31 832' W 40.89 FT
L54 S 3256'12" W 38.44 FT
L55 N 79'43'42' W 25.63 FT
L56 N 17'17'14" W 28.26 FT
l57 N 0 4'1 W 32.59 FT
L58 N 16'06'59"W 37.65 FT

L60 0 5'7" 33.59 FT
L61 7 9'11' 21.87 FT
L62 N 13 '38' W 37.48 FT
L63 N 8'S '53' 37.28 FT
L64 01'03'33' W 33.32 FT
L65 S 7'30'00" 26.83 FT
L66 90'06" 31.89 FT
L67 S 66' 6'3 7' E 31.22 FT
L68 60'84" 31.36 FT

L70 S 46'48" 40.14 FT
L71 S 84'48'38" E 37.12 FT
L72 S 87'27'24" E 47.06 FT
L73 N 60'41'05' 30.94 FT
L74 N 36'59'36" E 15.54 FT
L75 N 17'11'26" W 1 .36 FT
L76 S 5422'48' W 30.86 FT
L77 S 76'01'07' W 45.96 FT
L78 N 59'49'15' W .32.11 FT
L79 N 67'27'29" W 36.86 FT
L80 N 18"13'32' W 39.37 FT
L81 N 31'08'21' W 28.88 FT
L82 S 80'21'43' E 31.10 F1
L83 S 12'56'22" E 23.19 F1
L84 S 32'44'28" E 31.91 FT
L85 S 72'10'08" 44.66 FT
L86 S 83'18'20" E 26.49 FT

L88 N 80'51'01' E 31.41 FT
L89
L90 N 42'33'16" E 34.19 FT
L91 N 41'47'23" E 33.11 FT
L92 N 71'08'57' E 23.88 FT
L93 S 58'18'3 ` E 23.60 FT

4

6'00' 07' W S 86'07
L6 S 87'23
L9 7' 3'51' W 21.48
L14 1
L17 N 5'35
L18 N 80'35
L19 S 41'53
L20 S 89'43
L24 N 38'31' 39.29 FT
L25 N 44'3 ' 7' W 36
N
L1
2.39 FT
XJ Wetland
UNE BEARING LENGTH
L1071 N 5 'I6' 30" E 24.80 FT
L1072 N 5 'S9' 83" E 28.68 FT
11073 N 54'0 '03" 26.92 FT
L1074 S 84'16'09" 21.17 FT
L1075 N 81'2 '34' 23.30 FT
L1076 7752' T 21.61 Fr
L1077 1 3'0" W 20.81 FT
L1078 N 87'57 '15' W 23.99 FT
11079 N 87'0 'S ' 28.96 FT
11080 55'58' W 31.09 F
19'4 ' 23.34 FT
31.56 FT
L1083 14'04'31" W 28.74 FT
L1084 S 68'5 '19" W 41.70 FT
L1085 S 47'31'19' W 32.15 FT
L1086 S 7'43'06" W 21.59 FT
L1087 41'53'0 W 18.30 FT
11088 0 '39'53' 23.14 FT
L1089 N 36'59'07' 21.93 FT
L1090 N 55'24'4" 26.22 FT
11091 N 643 '18' 28.15 FT
L1 92 16'50'38" 26.52 FT

1093

16'4 '46' Li 13 S 4
L118 S 35
L119 S 62
Li
L1119 S 1b 7' 19.40 FT
33.25 FT
M n

L1 S 4 '1'51" W 29.91 FT
L? 6 '04'3' W 11.42 FT
L3 N 86' 4'48' W 20.82 FT
L4 '7" W 23.80 FT

'26" W 20.12 FT
L7 3'39'55" W 20.42 FT
l8 34'39'53" W 26.59 FT
FT

L11 N 63'15'3 ' W 28.52 FT
L12 S 79'5436' W 28.16 FT
L13 N 4' 1' 5" W 23.33 FT
'1' 38.05 FT
Lis N 4' 7'17' W 17.23 FT
L16 S 1'45'2 22.68 FT
'35" 53.80 FT
'41" 16.88 FT
'02" 33.66 FT
' 0" 45.52 FT
L21 N 68'28'2" 27.84 FT

L23 N 42 '57' 36.20 FT

.44 FT
L26 N 43'5 '44' 36.03 FT
L27 S 3'18' 42.89 FT

S 05'04'06" W 23. 2 FT
36'55'5 25.93 FT
6'33'3' 36.92 FT
N 88'28'5" 13.75 FT
S 0 8'6" 14.04 FT
S 74'01' 19.96 FT
3'51' 3" 26.80 FT
50'55' 24.30 FT

'1 S' L137 N 12'1 '00" 14.81 FT
L138 N 36'05'53" 31.41 FT
L139 89'45'48" E 19.30 FT
L7 40 S 88'17'44!* E 16.69 FT
L1 1141 42 N N 67 67'06'46' 14.18 FT
11 43 S 84'04
L983 S 48'0
L985 S 44'05
20.98 FT
1[D WETLAND
..LINE- _.. BEARING LENGTH
L95 12'08'06' W 33.28 FT
L96 N 15'14'29" E 28.74 FT

L99 N 81 '58'07' E 38.35 FT
L100 N 76'50'09" E T
L10/ N 05'36'49' W
L102 N 40'20'47" E T
L103 N 51'58'33" E T
L104 N 50'2'58' E T

L105
N 24'31'38" E
T
P
L106 N 00'10'47" W T
07 N 39'25'10" E T
1108 N 67'36'41' E T
L109 S 24'30'49" T
L110 S 46'50'37" W
111 S 16'01'48" W 38.16 FT
1112 N 80'22'22" W 20.29 FT
'31'09" W 3 .23 FT
1114 S 69'13'58" W 28.63 FT
LiiS S 00'04'50" W 37.46 FT
'02 '03" E 13.16 FT
1117 N 88'33'44' W 13.90 FT
'31'21' W 42.96 FT
'44'56" W 34.83 FT
L120 N 86'59'47" W 24.86 FT

21

'00'09* W L1002 60
11 003
L1
11008 15'13 ' '1
L1009 2 21.55 FT
L1 011 00'45 34" 20.56 FT
XD Betland
49.81 FT
XC Wetland

L1113 S '41'15" 15.33 FT
L1114 S 643 '41" 28•'a ?
L1115 N 69 7'56' 15.97 FT
L1116 S 1'28'2 " 28.59 FT
117 49'29'34' 22.17 FT
FT

'
'1 '46" 16.41 FT
L1111 67'2 '4 ' W 17.68 FT

'10" 8.40 FT
L144 N 89'07'00" 17.15 FT
1145 S 4'33'57" 17.14 FT
L146 N 25'50'08" 8.88 FT
L147 N 88'5447` 26.58 FT
L148 N 60'16' 18.90 FT

1978 S 34'43'20" W 22.99 FT
L979 S 33'3 '41" W 22.33 FT
L980 S 60'07'30' W 22.24 FT
L981 N 67'36'26' W 20.60 FT
L982 N 1'50'44' W 19,31 FT
' 4' W 27.26 FT
1984 S 10'41'04' W 14.55 FT
'53" W 17.11 FT

S 17 9'38" W 14.70 FT
'S9'S' W 15.85 FT
17'31'52" W 19.56 FT
S 31 6'30' W 14.68 FT
70'18' 9' W 17.21 FT
W 20.23 FT
L993 N 66'29'5 ' E 14.19 FT
L994 67-34 25' 13.61 FT
L995 N 05'18'18" E 11. 0 FT
1996 N 0 3'37" W 14.84 FT
L997 N 0 '21'53' W 8.63 FT
L998 N 24'4'59' E 28.73 FT
L999 3 3'03' E 20.32 FT
L1000 N 34'3 '18' 21.97 FT
L1001 N 44'57'30' E 21.20 FT
'08' 21.13 FT
74'54'19" 18:15 FT
L1004 28'31'18" 33.64 FT
005 N '28'1" 19.40 FT
L1006 N 40'22'04' 32.18 FT
L1007 '27' 03 ' 21.18 FT

L1010 S 04'33'03" 14.48 FT

L1094 461' 25.17 FT
L1095 7 'S6' 2' 31.36 FT
11096 N 6 1'34" 27.54 FT
L1097 56'4'3 " 22.77 FT
L1098 N 1' 0' 21.35 FT
L1099 N 84'50'46' 20.20 FT
L1100 6 '09' 6' 15.42 FT
L1101 S 49'08' 6' 8.37 FT
L1102 S 3'33' 10.48 FT
L1103 7 '39' W 14.91 FT
L1104 S '41'0 ' 18.95 FT
U105 76' 9'43" W 1 .15 FT
L7106 S 67 '00' W 19.91 FT
L1107 60'56'12" W 10.97 FT
L1108 S 6733' W 16.82 FT
L1109 65 8'3 ' W 20.08 FT
11110 S 77'58'05" W 18.42 FT

t

XK Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1012 N 88'51'50' W 33.66 FT
71013 N 71-3440- W 18.69 FT
71014 N 79-26-02- W 12.16 FT
L1015 .34'26'56• W 39.31 FT
L1016 S 20-28-04- W 22.02 FT
L1017 70'38'19* W 20.58 FT
L1018 N 89'56'16" W 17.32 FT
L1019 84.43'0 ' W 20.87 FT
L1020 S 40'30'40' W 25.39 FT
L1021 S 73'46'53' W 25.97 FT
L1022 N 80.34'26` W 26.50 FT
L1023 N 65'11'02• W 21.86 FT
L1024 N 77'21'09" W 18.00 FT
=1025 S 84-56'27' W 24.86 FT
L1026 N 67 23'44' W 27.36 FT
L1027 N 5495'06" 15.19 FT
L1028 S 84'55'38' 13.16 FT
L1029 N 72'53'01" E 19.49 FT
L1030 N 7819'17* 21.33 FT
L1031 N 80'51'53' 22.57 FT
L1032 N 52'35'50' 32.07 FT
L1033 S 89'55' 3' 29.62 FT
L1034 N 74'09'5 ' 26.40 FT
L1035 N 5 '59'48' 23.25 FT
L1036 N 4924'46' 18.73 FT
L1037 N 58'54'15' 18.14 FT
L1038 S 69'0 ' 29.04 FT
L1039 S 71'5 '56' 24.25 FT
L1040 N 7545'57' 28.68 F7
L1041 N 64'5 '45' 24.98 FT
L1042 0814'43" 15.76 FT
L1043 4 1 g• 19.13 FT
XI Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1044 N 65'29'30` W 24.68 FT
L1045 S 6015'38" W 24.10 FT
L1046 S 8712'03" W 27.51 FT
L1047 N 47'24'57" W 22.21 FT
L1048 -N-75'30'22-. W 24.13 FT
L1049 N 04.53'34" W 18.79 FT
L1050 N 33'40'29" E 18.92 FT
=1051 S 83'29'07" E 25.50 FT
L1052 N 87'59'04" E 27.31 FT
L1053 N 43'02'52" E 21.66 FT
L1054 N 56.08'57" E 21.20 FT
L1055 N 69'55'30' 23.22 FT
L1056 N 41'51'36" E 22.86 FT
L1057 N 62'01'28" E 19.53 FT
L1058 N 61.23'00' 25.14 FT
L1059 N 61'21'44" 22.37 FT
L1060 N 63'53'27' E 32.0 FT
L1061 S 76'39'29' E 14.77 FT
L1062 S 05'52'45" W 16.74 FT
L1063 S 00'59'35' 25.30 FT
L1064 S 68'26'02' W 25.36 FT
L1065 S 18'22'42" W 17.98 FT
L1066 51'45'28' 29.17 FT
L1067 S 4756'27" W 13.73 FT
1-1068 W 27.35 FT
L1069 W
45 4'57' 30.99 FT
L1070 ,
55'50'45" W 19.18 FT
XN Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1120 N 6416'36" W 18.35 FT
L1121 N g '3 ' 23.70 FT
L1122 N 81'59'30` 26.47 FT
L1123 S 641 8` 26.11 FT
L1124 6'01'4 ` 22.25 FT
L1125 6743'48' 22.76 FT
L1126 S 68'07'36` 15.61 FT
L1127 N 9'57'50" 20.02 FT
L1128 S 1'46'25" E 15.21 FT
L1129 S 73'58'18" 18.84 FT
L1130 S 4.49'17" W 52.28 FT
L1131 N 8812 6' W 14.73 FT
Li 132 N 70'01 W 14.90 FT
71133 S 68'20'49' W 14.10 FT
71134 S 87'04!07" W 15.05 FT
X17 GH GI GJ Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1135 S 02'11'46' 21.45 FT
=1136 S 01'35'45" 17.57 FT
71137 S 26-17-50- 25.20 FT
L1138 S 15'29'48" E 26.65 FT
7/139 S 0'55'0 21.58 FT
L1140 S 60'49'10" 15.58 FT
L1141 60-23-44- 16.22 FT
L1142 S 36'21' ' E 23.85 FT
71143 S '35'43" E 52.07 FT
L1144 S 47'05'35' 15.94 FT
L1145 S 45'14'13` 23.94 FT
L1146 S 88'3 '52" 37.41 FT
L1147 ` E 16.57 FT
L1148 ` E 26.59 FT
L1149 " W 16.65 FT
L1150 ` W
9 14.75 FT
L1151 W 20.51 FT
L1152 " E 19.75 FT
L1153 " W 26.39 FT
L1154 08'15'16*
W 41.76 FT
L1155 N 25'00'5 ` W 29.14 FT
L1156 4712' " W 40.54 FT
L1157 34-23'13* W 41.17 FT
1-1158 N 5328'31' W 26.97 FT
L1159 N 50'06'45' W 25.17 FT
L1160 3237'07" W 2100 FT
L1161 N 44'57'58" W 22.68 FT
L1162 N 51'26.44" W 16.45 FT
Li 163 N 15'54'35" W 28.23 FT
L1164 N 2624'51" W 26.49 FT
L1165 5'38'05" W 31.34 FT
L1166 S 4 5' W 39.45 FT
L1167 1'59' 4" W 20.78 FT
L1168 S 0 9 1" 12.76 FT
L1169 S 0413'11" 18.24 FT
L1170 18.49'29' W 12.09 FT
L1171 11'23'5 16.00 FT
71172 S 30-19-17' E 13.18 FT
L1173 7118'35" 22.83 FT
L1174 13'40'54` W 33.91 FT
L1175 0.54'1 19.25 FT
L1176 2116'51' 22.34 FT
L1177 N 0 '53" E 32.59 FT
L1178 N 41'0 '34' 41.95 FT
L1179 N 52'10'47" 13.30 FT
L1180 S 68 4'2 " 9.80 FT
G Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1181 N 37'07'55" W 23.59 FT
L1182 N 27.0449' W 24.28 FT
L1183 N 23.03'02" W 23.06 FT
Li184 N 41.28'03" W 23.29 FT
L1185 S 84'37'44" W 27.47 FT
L1186 S 53'54'42" W 19.46 FT
Li 187 S 5447'20' W 22.62 FT
L1188 S 46'53'41" W 21.05 FT
L1189 S 28'53'58" W 19.61 FT
L1190 S 38'59'56' W 15.62 FT
1-1191 S 07'36'57' E 22.94 FT
L1192 S 0018'24` E 21.51 FT
L1193 S 21'32'58' W 25.61 FT
L1194 S 39'43'16" W 26.03 FT
L1195 N 7353.07" W 20.97 FT
L1196 S 57'05'01' W 28.45 FT
L1197 S 77'30'25' W 27.70 FT
L1198 S 12.48'08' W 18.02 FT
71199 S 13.27'27` E 17.75 FT

L! 200
S 22'58'22' W -
37.36 FT
=1201 S 69'24'51" W 23.78 FT
L1202 S 32'40'51" W 15.67 FT
L1203 S 6237'40' W 17.46 FT
L1204 S 6411'58' W 24.30 FT
L1205 S 2818'19" W 23.54 FT
L1206 N 82'06'53" W 14.91 FT
L1207 N 29'55'31' W 21.84 FT
L1208 N 1658'56' E 22.83 FT
L1209 N 52.03'41' E 19.29 FT
L1210 N 52'02'28 22.47 FT
Li 211 N 29'32'32' E 15.30 FT
L1212 N 86.34'23" E 17.61 FT
Li 213 N 15'25'29' E 22.56 FT
71214 N 8'57" W 28.57 FT
1-1 15 N 65'07'30' W 20.65 FT
XM GH GI GJ Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1301 S 35'48'17' E 18.90 FT
L1302 S 02.54'55' E 24.29 F7
L1303 S 38'24'05" E 16.02 FT
L1304 S 50'41'28' E 23.18 FT
L1305 S 25'10'34• E 31.58 FT
L1306 S 78'28'31' E 16.64 FT
L1307 S 18'51'09" W 16.39 FT
L1308 S 4239'56' W 19.08 FT
L1309 S 17'24'04' 18.49 FT
L1310 S 0'02'45' 20.78 FT
L 3311 S 04'22'44" 21.51 FT
XA ®XE sT tG Wetland
Continued
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1312 S 02.36'16" W 25.36 FT
L1313 S 01'32'15' E 21.92 FT
L1314 S 4119'02' E 15.68 FT
L1315 S 42'48'40' E 11.21 FT
L1316 S 69'56'19` E 14.39 FT
L1317 S 3333'27" E 15.87 FT
L1318 S 66'44'27' E 21.97 FT
L1319 N 4456'04" E 7.86 FT
L1320 S 79'22'43' E 7.35 FT
L1321 N 35'37'06' W 13.77 FT
L1322 N 07'01'43' W 8.27 FT
L1323 N 57'34'03` E 12.84 FT
L1324 N 65'23'3 ' E 18.28 FT
Li 325 N 5'05' 6' 21.90 FT
LI326 78.43'39' 26.61 FT
L1327 N 31'30'10' E 28.39 FT
L1328 N 2653'28* 27.40 FT
L1329 N 41 7'54' 19.58 FT
L1330 N 31 12'16' 23.45 FT
L1331 N 12'36'44' 16.72 FT
L1332 N 528'40" E 19.40 FT
L1333 N 80'08'48' 22.46 FT
L1334 N 60'40' 4' 17.77 FT
=1335 64'46'07' 17-f6 FT
L1336 N 66'45'2 ' E 17.15 FT
LI3 7 S 86-48'32* 18.82 FT
L1338 79'44'40' E 22.69 FT
Li 339 S 65'0 14' 18.52 FT
L1340 4647'30* 18.70 FT
L1341 3 '49' 26.70 FT
L1342 11.4 ' 16.39 FT
1-1343 47 '07' E 18.45 FT
L1344 S 57'53'3 ' 21.06 FT
Li 345 S 10'5 ' W 25.91 FT
L1346 S 42-24'35' W 24.88 FT
L1347 00'5 '14" W 20.38 FT
71348 S 21-56-42- 21.71 FT
L1349 S 3 20.45 FT
71350 S 04-58-59- W 17.52 FT
1-1351 N 4759'12' W 19.91 FT
L1352 S 63'04'11* W 16.35 FT
JG Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1353 N 20*50'17' 68.33 FT
L1354 10'42'55' W 32.35 FT
Lt 55 S 88-35-31- W 48.05 FT
L1356 S 3 •32'0 ' W 33.25 FT
71357 N 51-37-50- W 37.75 FT
L1358 N 25 4' 3' 33.06 FT
L1359 N 82"19'54' 37.40 FT
L1360 N 8 7'11• 34.23 FT
L1361 N 1975"18* W 11128 FT
L1362 S 8 ' 9' 6' 26.09 FT
L1363 74 '38" 1126 FT
L1364 08'09'32'
E 27.66 FT
L1365 -
-
80-34-03- 9.69 FT
L1366 S 0811'23' 28.37 FT
L1367 S 381 '22` 22.05 FT
L1368 S 17'31'49" W 32.58 FT
L1369 S 88'02'53" E 37.06 FT
L1370 N 62'48'14' 33.67 FT
Sheet Na Seven of Tan
Figure 9

[l

t
11

1

JG Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
Ll371 N 1919'16" W 26487 FT
L1372 34'0 '35' W 46.38 FT
71373 N 28'51'27- W 12.82 FT
L1374 S 47024'07" 20949 FT
L1375 S 49'54'00' 16.86 FT
L1376 N 8 '28'51" 36.39 FT
L1377 71'4 '27' 35.36 FT
L1378 S 6 •44' 7" E 28.37 FT
LI379 7'35'07" E 40.65 FT
L1380 S 69'15'4 " 39.24 FT
L1381 N 18047'25' 28.00 FT
L1382 89 '24' 18.94 FT
L1383 S 16'49'47" E 13.25 FT
L1384 S 84'19'54' W 14.14 FT
L1385 S 20'53'42" W 17.68 FT
L1386 S 9'46'19" W 28.86 FT
L1387 S 50' '59" E 19.17 FT
L1388 S 1'01' 1" W 30.40 FT
L1389 01 4' 6' W 40.57 FT
L1390 N 46.09'50' 28.16 FT
L1391 S 71'08'31 * 8.42 FT
L1392 S 28'58'47' 33.63 FT
L1393 86'19'16` W 37.86 FT
L1394 N 87-25-20- W 31.44 FT
L1395 N 70'11'00` W 34.09 FT
L1396 N 4 '11' 8' W 25.68 FT
L1397 N 81'29'19" W 30.26 FT
71398 6 '14'1 " W 37.19 FT
L1399 8 '14' 5" W 24.18 FT
L1400 S 00'17' 2" W 27.53 FT
1_1401 14'01'40' 36.35 FT
L1402 S 01-00-22- 34.13 FT
L1403 S 9'03' 4' 47.25 FT
71404 S 20'1 b7' 54.78 FT
71405 18'09'35' W 42.90 FT
VK/XP Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1468 N 63'12'07' W 32.60 FT
L1469 N 65'18'13' W 13.65-FT
Ll470 S 76'1 'S9" W 17.06 FT
L1471 S 40 24'53` W 29.09 FT
L1472 S 64'47'18' W 30.39 FT
L1473 N 68'51'28' W 32.51 FT
L1474 N 23'42'03' W 26.80 FT
L1475 N 59'00'51' W 15.18 FT
L1476 S 57'19'24" W 6.61 FT
L1477 S 66'23'25' E 15.80 FT
L1478 N 74'47'34` E 21.72 FT
L1479 N 18'59'16" E 17.14 FT
L1480 N 54'01'18" E 29.53 FT
L1481 N 56'04'53' E 26.96 FT
L1482 N 44'29'14' 35.55 FT
L1483 S 39'06'29" W 18.06 FT
L1484 S 00'09'54' 8.74 FT
L1485 S 01'40'28" W 30.36 FT
U486 S 21'24'45" E 82.87 FT
GA Wetland
LINE BARING LENGTH
71487 S 86'05'16" W 2.77 FT
71488 S 74'59'02' 21.40
L1489 S 12'35'50" W 27.17 FT
L1490 S 14'50'26" W 22.37 FT
L1491 S 01'5748" E 28.11 FT
L1492 S 56'22'38" W 17.48 FT
Li 493 S 39'21'09' W 37.2 FT
L1494 N 30'06'00" W 36.04 FT
L1495 S 01'56'09' W 5.43 FT
GG Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1507 N 5919'0 ' 2.71 FT
L1508 N 48'49'16` 24.50 FT
LI509 N 47' 'S9' E 37.71 FT
L151 NN 54'07'15' 20.59 FT
L1511 N 3254'01" 19.62 FT
L1512 N 02'52'44' E 42.58 FT
L1513 N 37'13'23" E 50.22 FT
L1514 N 5116'41' E -T -878-7 FT
VH/Vl Wetlan d
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1406 S 55'14'24` W 11.07 FT
L1407 N 38 01'48` E 21.31 FT
L/408 N 30'4 '40' 25.80 FT
Li 409 N 0'46'17` 46.99 FT
L1410 N 46'20'44" E 33.59 FT
Li 411 44'1 '13" 41.58 FT
L1412 S 16'28'52' W 23.29 FT
L1413 S 14-22-18- W 19.62 FT
L1414 S 56'48' 0' 22.75 FT
L1415 S 7 '38" E 26.75 FT
71416 S 30V6'37' W 22.42 FT
L1417 11'07'59' 36.22 FT
L1418 S 4'42'41' 36.62 FT
L1419 N 76'20'45* 41.10 FT
L1420 N 0 '3 '47" W 24.03 FT
L1421 S 79-55-50- W 25.25 FT
71422 52'55'53' W 25.71 FT
L1423 N 5 '37'35' 25.86 FT
L1424 N 0019'37' 29.45 FT
L1425 N 17'38'39" W 19.29 FT
L1426 41'58' 4' 28.35 FT
L1427 N 31'51'17' 11.78 FT
71428 N 3 26' 2186 FT
71429 N 4' 27.94 FT
L1430 S 48'26'4 " E 20.28 FT
L1431 N 74' 3'06' 24.66 FT
L1432 S 87' 5' 25.71 FT
L1433 7'404 17.86 FT
Li 434 5755'15' 32.38 FT
L1435 68 9'20" W 17.83 FT
L1436 ' W 24.37 FT
L1437 07 7.05' 30.06 FT
L1438 S 17' '3 " W 42.38 FT
L1439 S 4'05.18' 46.34 FT
L1440 N 1'03'19" W 30.01 FT
L1441 N 66'0 '50" 25.21 FT
LI 442 N 16'13'4 ' W 28.94 FT
L1443 N 62' 1'14' W 40.14 FT
L1444 N 25'29'36* W 35.72 FT
L1445 N 62'51'19;" 28.63 FT
L1446 N 8'0'07' 26.43 FT
L1447 9'00'2 ' W 20.25 FT
L1448 N 47.08'3 ' W 36.38 FT
L1449 S 434432' 47.38 FT
L1450 S 6934'46' E 26.15 FT
L1451 69'11'59' 42093 FT
L1452 N 45`02'22* 22.32 FT
L1453 S 4*0'13' W 30.86 FT
L1454 S 71'16'15" 36425 FT
L1455 S 1 '33"16" 31.69 FT
L1456 1 '15' 29.57 FT
L1457 15'1 '4 ' W 23.76 FT
L1458 N 28*53'10" W 35.83 FT
L1459 N 60' 6' " W 41.72 FT
L1460 8 '03'07' W 28.52 FT
L1461 S 6'45' 3' W 17.09 FT
L1462 0'4 '57" 29.34 FT
L1463 S 08-00-10- 36.03 FT
L1464 9'51'0 ' 23.88 FT
Li 465 7b '31' 29.54 FT
71466 40'4 'S " 30.24 FT
71467 1 0'g • W 8.21 FT
VA Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1496 S 3 '34'17" W 4.72 FT
71497 S 05-16'30* E 18.40 FT
L1498 S 23'53'13' 22.39 FT
L1499 S 13 '50` W 28.09 FT
L1500 S 47'08'07" W 25.74 FT
L1501 S 43'00'31" W 29.89 FT
Ll502 S 68 '53" W 26.11 FT
71503 '29'3 ' W
FT
i;.58

L1504
36'08'46" 4.46
2 FT
?
71505 S 2552'57* W 29.45 FT
L1506 N 50 5 'OS" W 9.23 FT
VG Wetland
UNE BEARING LENGTH
71515 S 00 4'49" W 20.20 FT
L1516 38'13'06" W 33.66 FT
L1517 S 3952'57" W 39.22 FT
L1518 S 4352'15" W 39.46 FT
L1519 S 58'12'33" W 32.83 FT
L1520 S 48'12'04" W 19.44 FT
L1521 S 19'16'19" W 42.12 FT
L1522 S 02-59-43- 30.29 FT
L1523 S 01'4 '58` W 23.89 FT
Li 524 S 13'13'58" W 24.78 FT
Li 525 09'07" W 28.17 FT
L1526 N 49'03'30' W 23.63 FT
L1527 N 68'03'14' W 18.32 FT
L1528 S 20'58'41" W 19.69 FT
L1529 55'41'33" W 15.62 FT
L1530 S 50'37'16' W 25.01 FT
L1531 S 50020'42' W 17.94 FT
L1532 S 18'28'53' W 30.18 FT
Li 533 2071' 9' IW 24.57 FT
L1534 S 28'15' 1" W 26.39 FT
L1535 S 54'03'00' W 22.44 FT
L1536 S 6618'46* W 17.97 FT
L1537 S 40 0'03" W 22.32 FT
L1538 S 05'46'01" 19.94 FT
71539 S 35 5'20" W 32.59 FT
GF Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1540 N 7'58'10" 3.39 FT
L1541 16 0'10" W 33.13 FT
L1542 N 52'01'35" W 24.84 FT
L1543 N 57'17'56" W 25.63 FT
L1544 N 77'12'0 " W 14.73 FT
L1545 N 85105'18' W 15.06 FT
L1546 S 6 '57' 7' 15.84 FT
L1547 S 6 •47'43' 18.34 FT
L1548 S 48'42'09' 22.43 FT
L1549 N 8 '52'54' W 10.92 FT
L1550 S 55'25'40' W 28.38 FT
L1551 59'39'26" W 19.62 FT
L1552 .57-09-17- W 27.92 FT
L1553 S 77847• 15.43 FT
L1554 N 44'56'56` 11.92 FT
L1555 N 04-21'02" 935 FT
L1556 N 5 '3 'S ' 14.05 FT
L1557 60'39' 9' 11.44 FT
L1558 N 45'29' 4' 10.07 FT
L1559 N 5 '46'00• 26.46 FT
L1560 N 7438'05" W 10.86 FT
L1561 N 5924'36" 27.17 FT
L1562 1 '06'34' 19.71 FT
L1563 N 59'00'41' 19.16 FT
L1564 S 79-50-34- 18.51 FT
L1565 S 7*0'10' 21.38 FT
L1566 N 61-24'.92' 24.71 FT
Li 567 S 76'59'15' E 25.63 FT
L1568 N 49'17'15" E 20.39 FT
L1569 N 23'31'37' E 16.70 FT
L1570 N 5856'16" E 22.83 FT
L1571 N 38'05'11' E 26.57 FT
L7572 N 39'46'19" E 36.07 FT
L1573 N 36'12'24" E 39.90 FT
Li 574 N 53'04'30' E 39.39 FT
L1575 N 03'41'48" W 22.00 FT
L 5576 N 22'48'21" E 32.39 FT
L1577 N 39'52'29' E 20.85 FT
L1578 N..40'48'01* E 35.47 FT
L1579 N 25'27'1 ' E 26.97 FT
L1580 N 30'11'18" E 24.26 FT
L1581 N 18'18'00' E 34.50 FT
L1582 N 57 08.06' E 56.05 FT
L1583 N 30'13'44" E 4.60 FT
VF Wetland
UNE BEARING LENGTH
L1584 09' 1' 7.29 FT
Li 585 S 01'59'34' W 37.44 FT
L1586 3 7'36' W 34.07 FT
L1587 S '44'43' W 24.54 FT
L1588 5.52' 33.49 FT
L1589 S 54 '1W 30.97 FT
11590 N 8 '181 W 35.68 FT
GE Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1591 6617'15' E 7.10 FT
71592 N 6 '20'1 43.15 FT
L1593 S 3' 4646' E 15489 FT
71594 S 63'24'28` E 19.02 FT
L1595 N 65'0 ' 1' 19.33 FT
L1596 N 719'52' W 13.26 FT
L1597 N 66 0'4 ' W 7.73 FT
L1598 N 22'44'36' W 18.03 FT
L1599 N 38'06' 4' 14.21 FT
L1600 S 88'21'46' 26.18 FT
L1601 N 02'27'12' E 20.07 FT
L1602 N 20'21'37' W 18.83 FT
L1603 N 55.55'25' 26.27 FT
L1604 N 2631'05" E 29.80 FT
L1605 N 4'45'17' 26.03 FT
L1606 N 17'14'31" W 22.96 FT
L1607 N 28'52'11' W 26.82 FT
L1608 S 03'16'55' 19.66 FT
L1609 S 07'1149" 18.87 FT
L1610 4'11'21' W 19.76 FT
L1611 S 26'4 '27' W 14.21 FT
71612 55'03'33' W 34.14 FT
L1613 N 70'25'32" W 19.37 FT
VE Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1614 S 26'13'23' E 7.05 FT
L1615 S 28'50'57" E 31.01 FT
L1616 S 32'55'08" W 18.65 FT
L1617 S 57'11'58' W 16.64 FT
L1618 S 33'22'25" W 11.59 FT
L1619 S 68'00'10" W 19.74 FT
L1620 S 50'09'54' E 19.81 FT
L1621 S 31'37'56" E 29.14 F7
L1622 S 11'24'12" W 17.06 FT
L1623 S 49'22'33' W 18.00 FT
L1624 N 05'39'48' W 4.28 FT
• , - GD Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
71625 N 0015'38" W 4.47 FT
L1626 N 17'07'06' W 16.26 FT
L1627 N 4 '34' 3' W 17.45 FT
Ll628 N 12*05'49' 4.22 FT
GC Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1629 -N..40-21'43" E 30.56 FT
L1630 N 43'17'06" E 22.45 FT
71631 N 30'3920' F. 8.09 FT
VD Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1632 S 0'03'49" W 27.75 FT
L1633 11 '18' 22.02 FT
L1634 29 '3 24.31 FT
L1635 61'361 " W 14.29 FT
L1636 S 02'46'0 ' W 25.76 FT
L1637 S 39'46'29' E 25.88 FT
L1638 S 0 '57'09' W 24.12 FT
L1639 S 86'07'00' W 9.89 FT
L1640 N 16'4 '2 " W 37.25 FT
71641 N 06.01' 7' W 28.45 FT
L1642 27'42'19' W 15.27 FT
Li 643 N 52'06'35" W 19.70 FT
L1644 N 51'31'27" W 20.41 FT
VC Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1645 S 0 5740" W 31.11 FT
L1646 S 6 13'10" W 19.80 FT
L1647 S 88'1 'O5' 20.31 FT
Shaot No. Eight of Tan
Figure 9

NORTH
CAROLINA
GRID NORTH
NAD 63
End
GE Wetland
a 17 Acre f
GS Wet/and
v
0.01 Acre *
(0625 L1626
(L1627 L1628
GC Wetland

O.0? Acre f /
(1.1829 L1630 L1631)
L7614
Begin
W Wetland
0.04 Acre f
?- L1624
-Begin
L1632
I + r'e
W Weiland
l4; Wet/and O.OS Acre t
a01 Acre t U639
ENLARGEMMT
1 Inch - 100 feet
GB Wetland
0.18 Acre.*
0
End
VB Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1648 49'55'36' 45419 FT
L1649 S 52*35'08' 28.63 FT
L1650 L56-42'04* 31.93 FT
L1651 6p,49'30' 44.68 FT
L1652 S 7216',31' 44.94 FT
LI 653 0 4'S ' W 31.56 FT
L1654 S 7635'08' W 25.31 FT
L1655 N 8017'30' W 44.20 FT
L1656 S 61-27'01 * W 29.92 FT
L1657 S 16'41'19' W 24.36 FT
L1658 N 77' 0" W 23.08 FT
U 659 N-.,39'59'55' W 32.19 FT
L1660 S 66-56-36- 33.63 FT
L1661 S
' W 5.69 FT
L1
662 WI
' W
18.21 FT
1.1663 3 S 64'11'35* W 35.42 FT
k8 Wetland
0.46 Acre t
GB Wetland
UNE BEARING LENGTH
L1664 S 6 1' ' W 34.59 FT
L1665 15'12'19' 2.86 FT
L1666 14 6' 36.94 FT
L1667 23'48'00* E 50.34 FT
L1668 N 03'34'38' 34.86 FT
L1669 '1 '58• 39.46 FT
L1670 05'51' 36.22 FT
L1671 N 18-5,3'41" 2630 FT
L1672 14 4' 7' W 30.36 FT
L1673 21-57'55' W 30.63 FT
L1674 07'31'1 31.66 FT
L1675 N 18'41'39' 37.26 FT
L1676 30'1 '1 21.88 FT
Sheet No. Nine of Ten
Figure 9
EA Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1677 60'37'29' E 32.93 FT
L1678 S 52'58'15" 26.31 FT
L1679 58'07'15" E 40.70 FT
Li 680 N 20'41'07" 32.66 FT
L1681 26'03'0 36.55 FT
L1682 S 76-32'27" 28.78 FT
Li 683 S 03'00'57' W 24.39 FT
L1684 S 3 '3 '11' W 47.57 FT
L1685 S 3337' 4" W 28.92 FT
L1686 S 18'10'19* 40.15 FT
L1687 S 4'34'5 " E 31.84 FT
L1688 S 2 '56'08" E 33.86 FT
1.1689 S 5 '38' 28.73 FT
L1690 S 36'48'29' E 36.32 FT
1.1691 S 21'48'16' 23.18 FT
SJA2 Stream
UNE BEARING LENGTH
L1692 N 54'04'4 ' W 12.33 FT
L1693 20'41' 8" W 16.85 FT
L1694 5 1' " 10.56 FT
L1695 N 22'25'40' W 22.16 FT
L1696 N 00-38-44- 10417 FT
L1697 N 41'19'39" W 14.86 FT
Li 698 N 1118'06' W 14.02 FT
Li 699 N 54'55'26" W 30.13 FT
L1700 N 24'00'50' W 12.72 FT
L1701 N 65'49'50' W 9.83 FT
Li 702 17'36'57" W 17.47 FT
L1703 N 48'16'39" W 27.82 FT
Ll704 N 0211' 10.03 FT
L1705 2626'22" W 11.28 FT
L1706 N 02 3'27• 6.14 FT
Li 707 N 40'49'38' W 14.05 FT
L1708 N 25'5 '0 ' W 10.95 FT
JA2 Wetland
UNE BEARING LENGTH
L1709 S 61 *31'07" 32979 FT
L1710 4'00'57" 41.79 FT
Li 711 37'0 '18' 47.97 FT
Li 712 10'07'3 ' 32.63 FT
L1713 46 9'0 30.00 FT
Li 714 2 '18' 36.14 FT
1.1715 S 46*05'3 40.12 FT 1

1.1716
S '505 '
29.12 FT
1
PE Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1717 N 03'58'37 W 39.95 FT
Li 718 N 2715'17" W 43.20 FT
L1719 S 66'46 27" W 32.21 FT
Ll 720 S 84'55'54 W 50.96 FT
L1721 S 29'43'11" W 70.80 FT
L1722 S 5114'18" W 38.28 FT
L1723 S 08'08 47' W 48.42 FT
L1724 S 05'45 32 W 26.90 FT
L1725 S 32'21 50' W 73.86 FT
Li 726 S 2424'18" W 43.25 FT
L1727 S 38'41'16" W 53.45 FT
L1728 S 61'1900 W 61.74 FT
L1729 S 18'36'31 W 51.87 FT
L1730 S 06'0,08' W 69.16 FT
PA Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1731 S 33'51'33' E 35.51 FT
L1732 N 49'3540' E 32.59 FT
L7733 N 49'56'56 E 2243 FT
Ll734 S 07'58'27 E 31.95 FT
71735 S 04'05 04' W 20.09 FT
L1736 N 8819'07* E 16.06 FT
L1737 N 11'21'55' E 52.98 FT
L1738 N 07058'18 E 33.14 FT
L1739 N_62'50'16 E 45.95 FT
L1740 N 6F'17'54 E 3237 FT
L7741 N 59'10'04' E 39.92 FT
L1742 N 6507'00' E 41.15 FT
Li 743 N 01'42'57 E 12.71 FT
L1744 N 05'09 08" W 53.79 FT
L1745 N 06'16'02' E 59.62 FT
L1746 N 34'04'17' E 74.40 FT
Ll747 N 13'00'14' E 37.75 FT
Li 748 N 37'48 36 W 10.56 FT
PC /PD Welland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1749 N 56'05 42 W 28.15 FT
U 750 N 34'39 56 W 46.61 FT
L1751 S 8554',3 1 W 21.69 FT
L1752 N 4542'19 W 23.96 FT
L1753 N 28'48 51' W 47.44 FT
L1754 N 29'44 31' W 38.21 FT
L1755 N 64'02 44 W 21.51 FT
PB Wetland
LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1756 N 15'42'49' E 41.64 FT
U 757 N 88'35'44' W 13.52 FT
L1758 S 08'18'55' W 3115 FT
L1759 S 35'25'35" E 11.66 FT
Wetlands Survey for :
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, L.L.C.
Uwharrie Environmental Project
Properties located along the north side of N.C. Secondary Road 1137
Troy and Uwhorrie Townships, Montgomery County, North Carolina
Deed Reference Book 378 Page 28, Book 394 Page 311,
Book 263 Page 577, and Book 283 Page 812.
Surveyed by Thomas J. Fields, PLS-2906, in January thru February 2001.
REVISED & UPDATED on May 10, 2004.
400 0 400
Scale is in Feet
1"= 400'
From the office of
WRIGHT & FIELDS LAND SURVEYING
1340 Albemarle Road, Suite C
TROY, N.C. 27371
Job No. 2001-1, 2002-56, & 2002-248
L1591
Begin
I -
Bearings & Distances along Wetland Boundaries ( 12-1996 Wetland J 12-1996A Wetland
LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE
A32 S 17.19'31' W 21.46 FT A118 S 21.49'27' W 24.79 FT A204 N 37.26'26' E 37.08 FT BI S 86'02'44' E 47.76 FT
A33 S 26'04'13' W 34.85 FT A119 S 18.07'00' E 32.93 FT A205 N 41.36'50' E 26.88 FT B2 N 81'07'05' E 51.34 FT
A34 S 33.51'47' W 40.41 FT A120 S 51'03'08' E 36.52 FT A206 N 56.18'53' E 18.86 FT B3 N 78.53'00' E 42.73 FT
A35 S 36.46'49' W 44.64 FT A121 S 27.45'09' E 38.70 FT A207 N 54.33'04' E 36.75 FT B4 N 76.55'31' E 49,60 FT
A36 S 40.08'53' W 61.97 FT A122 S 12.01'46' W 31.77 FT A208 N 43.09'42' E 28.45 FT B5 N 28.34'17' E 36.74 FT
A37 S 33'04'50' W 57.57 FT A123 S 15.39'18' W 38.52 FT A209 N 27.05'30' E 52.65 FT B6 N 39'07'53' E 55.60 FT
A38 S 00.48'41' W 55.70 FT A124 S 10.33'21' W 42.51 FT AM N 23.34'37' E 38.26 FT B7 N 35.22'51' E 61.40 FT
A39 S 22.34'42' W 25.81 FT A125 S 07.07'36' E 42.39 FT A211 N 15.18'53' E 48.28 FT B8 N 03.32'45' E 59.25 FT
A40 S 36.36'38' W 62.12 FT A126 S 34.29'10' W 48.87 FT A212 N 14'30'01' W 58.25 FT B9 N 45.10'44' E 49.52 FT
A41 S 17.56'32' W 43.52 FT A127 S 29'31'30' W 40.97 FT A213 N 26.55'47' W 39.06 FT 610 N 77.34'25' E 56.92 FT
A42 S 06.36'39' W 47.88 FT A128 S 43'37'44' E 36.44 FT A214 N 13'36'39' E 30.83 FT B11 N 64'18'09' E 52.51 FT
A43 S 31.25'07' W 45.13 FT A129 S 34.47'38' E 34.62 FT A215 N 25.43'31' E 42.48 FT B12 S 61'29'58' E 52,68 FT
A44 S 54'37'24' E 43.62 FT A130 S 24.18'02' W 44,33 FT A216 N 01'35'26' E 67.23 FT B13 S 10'35'42' W 69.87 FT
A45 S 49.42'33' E 29.33 FT A131 S 27'01'36' W 28.83 FT A217 N 18.52'33' W 48.58 FT B14 S 21.44'03' W 58.87 FT
A46 S 50'43'50' E 39.87 FT A132 S 17.56'52' W 33.58 FT A218 N 09.22'59' W 52.75 FT B15 N 28.51'20' E 59.69 FT
A47 S 21.08'08' E
.
'
' 45.51 FT A133 S 55.05'53' W
'
'
' 37.47 FT A219 N 30'31'31' W 66.38 FT B16 N 24.56'59' E 46.26 FT
A48 S 15
34
36
E 39.84 FT A134 S 76
21
06
W 15.32 FT A220 N 39'35'24' W 51,73 FT

A49
S 31.39'08' W
45.69 FT
A135
S 40.02'27' W
29.27 FT
A221
N 26'06'40' W
45.60 FT 12-1998H Wetland
A50 S 12.10'52' W 30.84 FT A136 S 44.28'28' W 55.37 FT A222 N 14.39'46' E 32.91 FT LINE BEARING DISTANCE
A51 S 31'26'28' W 42.00 FT A137 S 14.22'44' E 49.64 FT A223 N 66.51'42' E 21.60 FT B17 S 12'50'08' W 39.22 FT
A52 S 18.42'42' W 58.97 FT A138 S 55.34'35' E 37.21 FT A224 N 65.32'58' E 35.32 FT B18 N 24.14'08' E 38.97 FT
A53 S 39'08'22' W 55.16 FT A139 S 80'14'38' E 53.82 FT A225 N 27'22'18' E 32.68 FT B19 S 63'50'05' E 31.85 FT
A54 S 25.37'20' W 53.26 FT A140 S 29.45'06' E 67.94 FT A226 N 17.20'54' E 41.02 FT B20 S 11'44'19' W 33.43 FT
A55 S 31.51'18' W 65.97 FT A141 S 07.10'20' E 37.65 FT A227 N 24.06'50' E 48.26 FT B21 S 64'59'50' E 39.28 FT
A56 S 47.33'03' W 45.17 FT A142 S 08.31'20' E 56.53 FT A228 N 18'20'53' E 34.77 FT B22 S 41'41'21' E 34.00 FT
A57 S 65'23'06' W 43.70 FT A143 S 05.49'07' E 57.39 FT A229 N 39'41'44' W 48.83 FT B23 S 52'16'18' E 32.76 FT
A58 S 71'44'15' W 41.23 FT A144 S 29.59'45' W 44.89 FT A230 N 61'05'53' E 48.90 FT B24 N 89'47'32' E 30.15 FT
A59 S 75'21'53' W 45,99 FT A145 S 07'21'04' W 32.98 FT A231 N 02'10'38' E 70.89 FT B25 S 70.46'46' E 26.70 FT
A60 S 78.15'02' W 38.65 FT A146 S 44.11'05' W 29.49 FT A232 N 15.01'45' E 40.12 FT B26 S 59.49'13' E 34.56 FT
A61 N 85'09'56! W 52.32 FT A147 S 27'02'55' W 16.45 FT A233 N 03'48'30' W 38.80 FT B27 S 54.32'16' E 23.32 FT
A62 N 87.40'14' W 51.68 FT A148 S 00.40'50' E 21.34 FT A234 S 26'10'45' E 56.67 FT B28 S 50.51'37' E 23.24 FT
A63 N 68'12'48' W 69.17 FT A149 S 82.29'32' E 16.38 FT A235 S 09.02'02' E 69.74 FT B29 N 67.33'09' W 24.72 FT
A64 S 74.59'37' W 31.25 FT A150 S 31'03'38' E 28.34 FT A236 S 27'29'41' E 45.48 FT B30 N 86'12'56' W 24.47 FT
A65 S 17'14'15' W 32.58 FT A151 S 11.23'54' E 38,61 FT A237 S 00.25'42' E 37.87 FT B31 S 85.47'06' W 32.02 FT
A66 S 76'10'30' E 31.98 FT A152 S 12'21'15' W 36.41 FT A238 S 06.08'18' W 42.19 FT B32 N 08.30'10' E 37.48 FT
A67 S 58'53'58' E 44.15 FT A153 S 40.59'41' W 45.25 FT A239 S 31.09'45' E 62.45 FT B33 N 30.26'10' W 25.63 FT
A68 N 86'47'23' E 53.68 FT A154 S 55'00'14' W 48.74 FT A240 S 38.54'36' E 61.26 FT B34 N 39.55'30' W 40.29 FT
A69 S 18.10'16' E 44.97 FT A155 S 53.47'27' W 43.24 FT A241 S 39.57'21' E 43.70 FT
A70 S 36.45'20' E 58.87 FT A156 S 51.56'33' W 47.76 FT A242 S 48.29'38' E 55.71 FT
A71 S 64.03'21' E 44.29 FT A157 S 48.55'09' W 41.10 FT A243 S 34.58'53' E 36.00 FT
A72 N 52'36'33' E 43.36 FT A158 S 71'42'54' W 34.20 FT A244 S 12'27'55' E 53,60 FT
A73 N 03'01'50' E 43.65 FT A159 N 51'07'46' W 64.57 FT A245 S 04'14'22' E 45.59 FT
A74 N 32.28'52' E 45.11 FT A160 N 55'10'58' W 50.27 FT A246 S 02'34'17' W 32.53 FT
A75 N 62'18'32' E 23.86 FT A161 N 44'45'17' W 51.00 FT A247 S 71'10'57' E 22.20 FT
A76 S 74.31'12' E 32.09 FT A162 N 40'03'56' W 58.15 FT A248 N 67.41'52' E 37.09 FT
A77 S 41'15'10' E 34.01 FT A163 N 60'01'11' W 49.63 FT A249 N 13.35'29' W 76.14 FT
A78 S 22'40'53' W 24.39 FT A164 S 74.13'25' W 43.10 FT A250 N 25.43'28' W 54.88 FT
A79 S 64.52'53' W 33.72 FT A165 S 78.59'22' W 49.96 FT A251 N 25.29'49' W 30.69 FT
A80 N 72'26'15' W 20.36 FT A166 S 68.08'06' E 29.38 FT A252 N 26'14'38' W 27.90 FT
A81 S 16'24'02' W 32.28 FT A167 N 83.40'15' E 50.95 FT A253 N 22.56'56' W 55.44 FT
A82 S 30.38'05' W 27.10 FT A168 S 75.37'39' E 46.40 FT A254 N 34.05'13' W 42.95 FT
A83 S 44.54'20' W 45.19 FT A169 S 42.49'34' E 71.21 FT A255 N 26.53'57' W 50.95 FT
A84 S 55'53'41' W 43.99 FT A170 S 48.48'01' E 68.27 FT A256 N 09'27'53' W 62.15 FT
A85 S 31'59'51' W 61.85 FT A171 S 51.46'59' E 28.24 FT A257 N 41.14'27' W 46.83 FT
A86 S 50.51'34' W 43,74 FT A172 S 17'03'46' E 34.52 FT A258 N 18.39'16' W 60.95 FT
A87 S 13.32'42' W 38.18 FT A173 S 38.56'33' E 29.16 FT A259 N 23'08'14' W 40.57 FT
A88 S 17.08'38' E 38.12 FT A174 S 89'06'14' E 22.11 FT A260 N 15'58'59' W 33.54 FT
A89 S 88.30'42' E 26.51 FT A175 N 76'33'40' E 29.36 FT A261 N 30'48'43' W 56.60 FT
A90 N 75.23'38' E 43.75 FT A176 S 66'40'32' E 16.00 FT A262 N 13.42'01' E 37.80 FT
A91 N 17'30'54' E 48.12 FT A177 S 28.11'53' W 45.50 FT A263 N 14'35'35' W 38.20 FT
A92 N 37.26'39' E 43.91 FT A178 S 31.47'53' W 30,80 FT A264 N 46'58'16' W 34.04 FT
A93 N 58'26'53' E 44.26 FT A179 S 13.54'46' W 40.97 FT A265 N, 52.25'23' W 46.77 FT
A94 N 49'43'26' E 23.17 FT A380 S 25'30'03' W 45.03 FT A266 N 13'53'09' E 31.93 FT
A95 N 41.55'17' E 39.24 FT A181 S 65.47'08' W 44.75 FT A267 N 03.37'14' W 66.02 FT
A96 N 32'28'38' E 44.82 FT A182 S 89'41'48' W 46.22 FT A268 N 16'23'43' E 24.56 FT
A97 N 38.54'44' E 89.68 FT A183 S 77.01'19' W 33.76 FT A269 N 04'24'39' W 37.50 FT
A98 N 35.58'42' E 38,59 FT A184 N 86'58'32' W 41.97 FT A270 N 23'27'49' W 45.08 FT
A99 N 26.39'18' E 49.63 FT A185 N 67.16'55' W 40.86 FT A271 N 49'25'00' W 48.98 FT
A100 N 00.55'05' W 59.72 FT A186 N 71'13'52' W 41.55 FT A272 N 48'56'43' E 41.22 FT
A101 N 08'04'28' E 32.54 FT A187 S 82'02'57' W 26.37 FT A273 N 08'26'49' E 49.88 FT
A102 N 26'59'14' E 33.75 FT A188 S 40'28'36' E 29.21 FT A274 N 40'03'52' W 50.66 FT
A103 N 37.47'54' E 45.00 FT A189 S 25.52'39' E 26.76 FT A275 N 25.41'55' W 39.54 FT
A104 N 19'17'23' E 49.60 FT A190 S 49'57'29' E 45.54 FT A276 N 06'02'05' W 48.48 FT
A105 N 37'52'48' E 39.76 FT A191 S 64'28'27' E 50.01 FT A277 N 45'30'35' W 46.55 FT
A106 N 36'41'19' E 26.51 FT A192 N 71.20'01' E 35.29 FT A278 N 63.19'51' W 46.98 FT
A107 N 28.08'35' E 30,00 FT A193 N 75.20'21' E 32.37 FT A279 N 19'46'08' W 29.76 FT
A108 N 08'54'43' E 53.87 FT A194 S 66'06'52' E 24.48 FT A280 N 10'22'07' E 39.31 FT
A109 N 36.47'29' E 32.17 FT A195 S 68.54'35' E 24.21 FT A281 N 20'20'57' E 67.91 FT
A110 S 28.47'54' E 17.33 FT A196 N 29.17'33' E 41.00 FT A282 N 41'44'20' E 45.59 FT
A111 S 28'35'51' W 19.78 FT A197 N 39.49'00' E 30.57 FT A283 N 02.23'03' W 48.47 FT
A112 S 13'36'28' W 52.38 FT A198 N 61'28'09' E 38,93 FT A284 N 05'07'44' E 67.68 FT
A113 S 01'58'38' W 42.94 FT A199 N 47.17'57' E 47.55 FT A285 N 36'56'37' E 70.77 FT
A114 S 09'22'39' E 30.69 FT A200 N 01'01'34' W 43.22 FT A286 N 50.48'39' E 32.81 FT
A115 S 18'38120' E 60.86 FT A201 N 19'59136' E 48.44 FT A287 N 43'38118' E 52.41 FT Shoat No. ran of Ten
A116 S 29'18'34' E 43.23 FT A202 N 28'40'13' E 37.17 FT A288 N 04.48'57' E 42.76 FT
A117 S 25'50'08' W 39.63 FT A203 N 38'48'18' E 38.61 FT A289 N 17'23'20' E 40.53 FT Figure 9
APPENDIX A
Table 1. On-Site Stream Information
Table 2. On-Site Wetland Information

u

Table 1. On-Site Stream Information
Wetland and
Stream System No. Stream
Flagging
Se uence Length
(Linear Feet) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of Impact
(Linear Feet)
5 SEA 466.13 U -
5 SGA 160.79 U -
5 SEC 1,232.39 U -
5 SED 63.82 U -
4 SJH 953.05 U -
Rocky Creek SEE/SEF/SJE
SEG/SHE 2,416.30 I (portion)
new road crossing 83.16
4 SJB 353.42 I (portion) improved
road crossing 38.17
4 SJA 2,301.52 I (portion) improved
road crossing 29.97
4 SJC 357.83 U -
3 SJG 2,806.74 I (portion) improved
road crossing 40.44
3 SJF 724.27 I (portion)
improved road
crossing 34.01
2 SEI 582.24 I all 582.24
2 SEL 746.16 I all 746.16
2 SEJ 251.14 I all 251.14
2 SEK 148.4 I all 148.4
2 SEM 511.09 I (all) 511.09
Across SR 1137 SJA2 333.54 U -
6 SP/SPA/SNA 1514.72 I (portion) improved
road crossing 60.2
6 SNB 358.25 U -
6 SPA 251.58 U -
1 SBA 209.85 I (all) 209.85

TOTAL 16,743.23 - 2,734.83

Table 2. On-Site Wetland Tnfnrmstinn
Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)
5 JE/JF 0.26 U -
5 JD 0.12 U -
5 JC 0.23 U -
5 JB 1.21 U -
5 JA 0.26 U -
5 GK/GL/GM 1.02 U -
4 XA/XB/XE/XF/XG 2.11 U -
4 XC 0.06 U -
4 XD 0.04 U -
4 XK 0.26 U -
4 - XL 0.20 U -
4 VJ/XO 0.05 U -
4 XH 0.04 U -
4 XI 0.33 U -
4 XJ 0.16 U -
4 XN 0.05 U -
4 XM/GH/GI/GJ 0.20 U - -
4 SJD Pond 0.40 U -
4 SJI Pond 1.78 U -
3 GB 0.28 U -
3 GC/GD 0.03 U -
3 GE 0.17 U -
3 GF 0.73 U -
3 GG 0.11 U -
3 GA 0.08 U -
3 PE 0.79 I (portion) 0.05
3 VK/XP 0.19 U -
3 VH/VI 1.31 U -
3 JG 1.17 U -
3 12-1995A 0.74 U -
3 PC/PD 0.04 I (portion) 0.01
3 PB 0.01 I all 0.01
3 PA 0.53 U -
3 VA 0.12 I ortion 0.05
3 VG 0.47 U -
3 VF 0.10 U -
3 VE 0.04 U -
3 VD 0.05 U -
3 VC 0.02 U -
L?

11
n

I
Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage
3 VB 0.46 U
2 12-1996 5.42 I (all) 5.42
2 12-1996B 0.31 U -
Across SR 1137 JA2 0.15 U -
Across SR 1137 EA 0.22 U -
6 QC 0.01 U -
6 MY/MZ 0.01 I all 0.01
6 PB 0.01 U -
6 PC 0.01 U -
6 PD 0.04 U -
6 PJ/PK/NG 0.15 U -
6 PE/NB 0.11 U -
6 NC 0.56 U -
6 - PF/ND 0.13 U -
6 PG/NE 0.26 U -
6 PH/ZD 0.10 U -
1 MD 0.29 I (all) 0.29
1 MB 0.52 I all 0.52
1 MC 0.68 I all 0.68

PREVIOUS
IMPACTS 0.95 I (all) 0.95

TOTAL TOTAL 22.32 - 7.99
' Note: The impact numbers include 0.95 acres of jurisdictional wetlands that were
impacted previously under the Nationwide Permit Program.

n
L

n
n

u

L

1

D
Correspondence with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
APPENDIX B

11

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27610
17 April 2003
[phone]
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Bibliography Errata
Mr. Brook:
In a letter dated June 29, 2001, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) informed
Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) that the bibliography to the ESI report An Intensive
Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Uwharrie MSWL Expansion Montgomery
County, North Carolina by Scott Seibel, Giampaolo Di Gregorio, and Greg Smith was
missing citations from the References Cited. It was stated that an errata to the References
Cited would be acceptable to correct the oversight. Enclosed are two copies of the
References Cited errata for the aforementioned report.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
tt A
Archaeologist/Senior Scientist
Encl.

e
HODGES,, HARBIN,, NEWBERRY & TRIBBLE, INC.
' CONSULTING ENGINEERS
484 MULBERRY STREET, SurrE 265 • Posr OFFicE Box 974
' MAcoN, GEORGIA 31201
H. LowRY T=Bu, JL, PE
Wn iAm F. HODCEs, PE TE[mmbm [phone]
HAROLD L. NEmmw, PE
' J. STEvEN HAnw, PE FAx [phone]
JEFFREY M BRowNE, PE
November 26, 2001
Mr. David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
' Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
' Preservation Plan for Sites 31MG1004,1679/1679**, 1689, and 1690
HHNT Project No. 1001-303-01
Dear Mr. Brook:
In response to your letters to Richard G. Harmon of January 16, 2001, and June 29, 2001, we are
pleased to supply the enclosed plans for avoiding sites 31MG1004, 1679/1679**, 1689, and 1690
at the Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County; North Carolina. We are
providing plans, details and a written strategy for avoiding the four sites and ensuring their
protection in the future.
Please let me know if the plans are acceptable, and I will put the preservation plans into effect.
Should you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY & TRIBBLE, INC.
William F. Hodge E.
Principal

' WFH/j lm
cc: Ken Lowder
John Murray, P.E.
Brant Lane, P.E.
Jan Gay
Scott Seibel

Encl..

Preservation Plan for Sites 31MG1004,1679/1679 ,1689, and 1690
' The following are plans for avoiding sites 31MG1004,1679/1679**,1689, and 1690 at the Uwharrie
Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, North Carolina (Figure 1). We are also
providing engineering plan maps to show the locations of the four sites and the placement of fencing
' and/or other protective measures. Details of the fencing to be installed are also enclosed (Figures
2-4).
31MG1004
Site 31MG1004 is located along the south bank of Rocky Creek. Periodic flooding of the creek will
' continue to deposit alluvium over the site, thus further protecting the cultural deposits under a thick
layer of sediment. The site is currently covered in pine and a herbaceous vegetative ground cover.
This vegetative cover will be enhanced and maintained to hold existing soil in place as much as
' possible and reduce erosion. A barrier fence 4 feet high will form a buffer 25 feet wide around three
sides of the site to prevent intentional or accidental entry to the site (Figure 5). The north side of the
site is protected by Rocky Creek. This site is not accessible by vehicles.
31MG1679/1679**
31MG1679/1679** is located on an exposed ridge top. While portions of the site are covered with
dense vegetation (secondary growth), some portions are only covered with short grasses and are
subject to erosion. Additional vegetative cover will be introduced to these locations to prevent
additional erosion. A dirt access road currently bisects the site; this road will be maintained.
However, to prevent intentional or accidental entry of vehicles to the site,- a hog-wire-fence will, be
built to encircle both the northern and southern portions of the site (Figure 6). This fence will
measure 5 feet high and form a buffer 25?feet wide around the site, except where the site abuts the
road.
31MG1689
¦ The site is located on two ridge toes overlooking the floodplain of tributary of Rocky Creek. The
site is currently covered in fairly dense vegetation consisting of adolescent pine and hardwoods,
herbaceous growth, and blackberry bushes. An abandoned dirt road crosses the western portion of
' the site within which small gullies have formed. Vegetative cover will be introduced to the
abandoned road to reduce further erosion. Additionally, to prevent intentional or accidental entry
' of vehicles to the site, a hog wire fence will be built to encircle the site (Figure 7). This fence will
measure 5 feet high and form a buffer 25 feet wide around the site.
31MG1690
This site is located on a ridge toe adjacent to a tributary of Rocky Creek that forms a natural
' protective barrier for this site on the south and west. Vegetation at the site currently consists of pine
forest with a relatively open understory. Additional vegetative cover will be introduced as needed
to reduce the impact of erosion to the site. Access to the site is limited to pedestrians or 4-wheeled
vehicles. To prevent intentional or accidental entry of small motorized vehicles to the site, a barrier
' fence will be built to encircle the site (Figure 8). This fence will measure 4 feet high and form a
buffer 25 feet wide around the site. This site is blocked from vehicular access by jurisdictional
waters, therefore a barrier fence must be used to protect this site in place of hog-wire fencing.
,u
?1i' - 11 ?h Z.11 1E
i
J r '
•,1p? S rte` ? ' \ ss ? , _ , ?' ,1 -
Flu
13
({ ?/? J O 1 + ?.? I x :113
J 65U
.:
01.
/?'I! t ,i;'\ /f /?t i L'' ' •l JFFi.'w? Hly ?•?650 'fir _ r A - p ' - r /
/ '
., OF 31 ? ` ttip? ? -- •+, _ ? " _? ! , I' X'rz9 , t? - 1 ? ,
OM-
' r ? ! ii _... ?1 •) . ? ? I v~.' ??' ?- ? it ?',, - - =i
r
-?, i ?p 9 1
TW-
27,
NN ? `fir, .1 II!- _!. '1 ?'` ? ' .% _ i??•j ?( ;O,?t„';- ' .i?` ..
ix;
j'• ? ;-. ?i \ \ f\?. ?? \?,• _ .?i 1 mil, ?? • / r- -+? _ ?1?i1 ' -? ? ! \ ?lI' 55 .! ?•'
NO
f'\< 1 '?\. ? _ ,?\?\ ?• 55f r \`?\?'i l•?r y5 ?',
ARM EN N
V
1A WJI
11
0
w
w
w o
w --?
Ix
n. o0
z N
Oa
w J
s -1
O D
a

ao
z_

M
in
ir__3
w
?,u ; O
oaoc,?
a0F-
W W
in U
in
in a
C/)
LL- 0 >-
J
Z? D
4 =
W
w
m
N 3

O
z
N
w
z
O
W
H
D
w
N
c?
I w
a?
?Zz
v
z
z 3 ?,`?
vi
w
oz
w
Q U
U
O Q?
wo
m?E
N
t; O
a M
ow a
U
Z
W C#i
lL z
w
O
I
N
O
Z
W
C?
Li
NQIF--
1. FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS.
2. INSTALL POSTS AT SPACING RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER.
4" X 4" PRESSURE
TREATED POST OR
POST RECOMMENDED
BY MANUFACTURER

FIGURE NO. 3
BARRI
N.T.S.
ETAIL
12-13-01
' Snow Fence Barrier Fence SFS' '-now Control Fence Page 1 of 1
+1.f11ir.
ErRy,
SF50 Snow Control Barrier Fence
Resinet SF50 is designed to meet the
requirements of state and local governments.
Resinet SF50 still maintains the standard 40
pounds of weight for a 4' x 100' roll and maintains
a nominal mesh opening of 55% to insure
optimum snow control with an extended service
life.
The laminar design of the SF50 gives this fence
more surface area for greater wind loading.
Some applications are:
S Airports
a Highway
is Ski Areas
6 Access Roads
Specifications
Material: High density polyethylene
Ultraviolet resistance: Fully stabilized
Temperature range: -60 degrees F. to 180 degrees F
Tensile yield: 3200 psi
Tensile Strength: 370 Ibs per foot
Elongation at Break: 150%
Nominal Mesh Opening: 1-1/4" x 1-1/4"
Size: 48" x 100'
Ordering
L SF50-48100 $78.80 + $18.21 Shipping IV Orange
t-or orders of 10 or more call today for special shipping rates: 8001878-7829
Discount Fence Home Pagel Snow Fence Index I
8987 State Route 14 • Streetsboro OH 44241 ° Phone [phone] ° FAX [phone]
e-mail us at discount(cDlek.net
?rHef&=and AV&ZVg s
iAr esi4n an any
FIGURE NO. 4
hftp://www.discountfence.com/snowfence/Snowfence-SF50.hbn
11/16/01

i ?\ \
w N/ \ v
z
W ° •. 0: /moo---- \ n?
m
\c
ice/3 \aN, \ x
J '9
? X
bQ? 1 1 1 tA? ? \
OX U
x Z
cu Q
(xi mj
°' N X 20• ?' 0
0Z
o ?o
co ?oz
o-,L
?'-so
j-7 >
k ?- W
mX -Co N
W
w
p cy-
M} O
N o ro CV
O
w
_ o LO
?
_ p
U '
o = 0
Z 65Z z
_? C9
CD W
O
O 0
I O LL
1 1-?
0
_ NORTHERN PORTION
^ \ OF SITE 31 MG1 679

MAINTAIN ROAD
ACCESS
0

25' FENCED BUFFER
INSTALL FENCE ON SITE BORDER
ADJACENT TO ROAD
------- ------ --------- -

SOUTHERN PORTION --f
\ OF SITE 31 MG1679
\ 25' FENCED BUFFER
' 100 50 0 100 200
/r GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
?. SITE 31MG1679
PRESERVATION PLAN
FOR
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
FIGURE NO. 6 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA. LLC 12-13-01
?Ir rr r¦f rat rs r rl rl r r rt r i r?l 1r r? a? rl r?
629.51
63o
52.36 x
x 651.52 /
WETLANDS
' I \i
W
W
W
SITE 31 \ 1689
W
i x y * 6121St
W W W W xW
W W W W W
630 W W W
W
W W
W W
W
W W W W W
WEfl?ANDS W W
0
25' FENCED BUFFER
100 50 0 100 200
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
FIGURE NO. 7
A / ( / \ \ i \ ?. s60_ _
SITE 31MG1689
PRESERVATION PLAN
FOR
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
12-13-01
! M! mm mm m IM !! M !! IM M! ! ! ! m

630
w
x X
5.9.. w W w w 6c 2,51
w w w w Yw
w w w w w w
i W W W W W
w 63 W W W
W W W W

W W W W
W W W W w
w W
W W W W
W
W W w
w W ?
W W
is l 25' FENCI
----?' BUFFER
SITE 31 MG1690
y
W
w
W
w w M-
W w W
W w W W
w W W W
W W
w ( Y
W
W w w i
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
100 50 0 100 200 \
640
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET -
SITE 31MG1690
PRESERVATION PLAN
FOR
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
FIGURE NO. 8 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA. LLC

Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Cultural
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
June 29, 2001
Richard G. Harmon, Vice President
Environmental Services, Inc.
1100 Wake Forest Road, Suite 2000
Raleigh, NC 27604

Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Dear Mr. Harmon:
Thank you for your letter of May 11, 2001, transmitting the survey report by Mr. Scott
Seibel, Giampaolo Di. Gregorio, and Greg C. Smith concerning the above project.
The following properties were determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places: 31MG1680-31MG1688**, 31MG1691-31MG1693, 31MG1678 due to lack
of integrity
Until additional information for the properties listed below is provided, we are unable to
make a determination of their eligibility for the National Register.
31MG1679/1679**, 31MG1689, 31MG1690
One previously recorded archaeological site, 31MG1004, in the project was assessed as
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. It was to be avoided. The
report, on page 19, states that a preservation plan will be submitted a later date. We
suggest that all sites that are unassessed and will be avoided be included in a single
preservation plan. The preservation plan should include construction plans, illustrating
how the sites will be avoided during construction and protected in the future, as well as a
written statement explaining the avoidance strategy and future protection of the sites.
The bibliography does not include many citations referred to in the text. One of the US
Forest Service reports in the bibliography is the Croatan Overview. More appropriate to
the region would be the Uwharde Overview. Although Dr. Smith is an author, none of his
work is included in the bibliography, including the previously prepared reports for the
landfill. Rather than reproducing the entire report errata bibliography pages that we can
add to the report are acceptable.
Location Mailing Address Telephone./Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone].733-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 276994613 [phone].715-4801
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4618 Mail -Service Center, Raleigh 276994618 [phone].715-4801
Page 2
Richard G. Harmon
June 29, 2001
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
' Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator, at
919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
r - v4da-
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
f
DB:kgc
ENvIRoNmENTAL SERvim, INc.
524 NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27610
11 May 2001
[phone] FAX [phone]
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: Uwharrie MSW Landfill, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Dear Mr. Brook:
Enclosed are two copies of the report for the survey of the Uwharrie MSW Landfill,
Montgomery County, North Carolina as performed by Environmental Services, Inc.,
(ESI) for Hodges, Harbin, Newberry, and Tribble (HHNT) as recommended by the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in a letter dated January 16, 2001.
Site forms for the archaeological sites recorded during the investigation are also included.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
cott Seibel, RPA
Project Archaeologist/Senior Scientist
Encl.
OMII W'
North Carolina Depaiiitinent of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History
January 16, 2001 Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
Mr. Richard G. Harmon, Vice President
Environmental Services, Inc.
1100 Wake Forest Road, Suite 2000
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion, Montgomery County, ER 01-8198
Dear Mr. Harmon:
Thank you for your letter of November 21, 2000, concerning the above project. We appreciate the
project being plotted on the photocopied USGS quadrangle, which facilitated our review.
As indicated by your letter, ESI recorded a number of archaeological-sites in earlier landfill surveys
adjacent to the proposed project area. One archaeological site, 31MG1004, in the project is assessed
as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and will be avoided. Please forward
the plans illustrating how the site will be avoided as well as, protected during construction and in the
future. In addition to the plan sheets, please forward a written strategy for avoidance and future
protection of the site.
Based upon previous work for the landfill as well as other work in the region, we recommend that
an archeological survey of the proposed project expansion area be conducted.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservations Regulations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
V
?"%Aw I
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:kac
Location Mailing Address Telcome/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 276994617 [phone].715-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].7154801
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St. Raleigh 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4618 [phone].715-4801
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1100 WAIF FOREST ROAD, SUITE 200
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
November 21, 2000
Mr. David Brook
[phone] FAX [phone]
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill Expansion
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brook:
Hodges, Harbin, Newberry & Tribble (HHNT) is proposing to expand the Uwharrie
Regional MSW Landfill facility in Montgomery County and has asked Environmental
Services, Inc., (ESI) to coordinate with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) concerning the proposed project. Enclosed is a map showing the limits
for the proposed project. The property includes seven contiguous tracts that total 308.81
acres west of the current facility location. Two of the seven tracts (103 acres) were the
focus of intensive archaeological surveys conducted by ESI (Smith 1992, 1994). One
previously unrecorded site documented during the surveys was found to b_e eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places (31MG1004). This site will be preserved in
place by HHNT.
ESI respectfully requests comment by the SHPO on the proposed project. If you have
any questions or comments, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
X?2 A - <54?
Richard G. Harmon
Vice President
Encl.
cc: William Hodges, P.E.
/? tt .?{{?`J ?{ ?,.Jf .rr ? s f.-. f L?.? h••?a ,.,;'i .c t T?a-;?
.J?? <\' L \c./i%/I"?i' i ..f f ` 1 i 1I , `? ? ? ?'•- ? 'fir
YN,
_ ( ??1 ^y
/r f? /'t?j N f?1 - W }. ' I. ! 1 i •?`O\ t. t :'?' ? ,':" ?`/ ??[ ? ??"? 4l ? ??f 5 ' 1 _ -1 n tar= ?_? ?4
li J (? ?_/^ ,'J? k j .„?---•? ! i is j!, :r ?.. i •i' t }?'::t• _r'_'"b s - x-it w a
:? i t!a? ? -•. ??, \ ? x ,? ,? i? ? . s ...CAI Al fi ? ;?`? '?".
?y?"'?,? '? '° R , s ? s A k i:?,?, ?, y. v, } : u ' Z, ;? . ?, • s '?y.
63\,l / r k,?,. ,7 N a..r •t J '? ?4 r•,.n 3? 'f }:i,' i y - °f °,, - .?
? Ay. ?i - ` q .c' ?[. v ' ar a 'J,,,? •. -A° ?_ ? t - .i. 'tF,?al+? - ?,? *• '+k
s •?q\??tY ea !* .rtMl ?,,,'_,! +v .a 'x ?.}° s. ,d. 1#a ?_ Y ? ',?i 'hS 'YyF ?, a
-/•'c ` m ,+ xy F ? r.; ??? ? psp..p si. st 1 !,? 'a I? gi a?3 r - ,- ? !?? ,t f
r,.
s ? t L' r r
rWb j ^:,, r .c- _ rtr jj '? S i!fl?4sr fe
r 7 ?7e ?'• m?S? ?a '' ,1.?1 ao- •. }, ??^, ??•fftl ` \., 1 r-? s
0. L
yi wgrr . s' tea.: _,/'?' } ' .Y { ;!. r'-.? ???-.'??l ?'? /1 i /_y' (t?,•t i\
( `x y ? i Fi rm U. " j;' f<</(f
f f t,
`d 't? c3't ! {,,, Jll/„? ?cr 't ? Y % /`"i ;;s..: - H;,. f'/"ti?{ ?'•;!;??•i\?????y.??"?L j ? ?ir r; i?• ,,
J .yam •.7t } ?: Y,tt •;q?q\ Y ! ?1 ii .1
tt..`'' +? ?% - ??, f$: !••( rt ? ? • , ? yn;?, I+ Vim'
? •? ASS v .4,,.?t? n? ? +r?X?x. < ?4ru,+ ? ' ?~ \ \ r ? '/' .. ,.--
'c):..7 atT ?` `4:'? ?.?+gf?'S? ??r? s 6.. ? 4 ? '" ) ? C } `?,f /???? +//p i ??i ?`?a f )? • P
Y{ ? a?'cty'? -?. v? ", ?' '? r(T/? )??)is\l L_S I?( / ~.rrr R j1
;?t'ii?• ttY-r^E'.1`'' t, ifr,.Q? Y rC?'..=J?/i !C 11iji? t?: ?t,.' 1,'Il/I?l?
y?(.fff iii ??`? \\?Lf t1\
- y.! rt ??. ? `' , ?. ,' +?', t, ? ?,11! % i • i; ?+i!(";e')g
.fx- .Jr tc±-?r:? %?; t, . vx as ?? -? ?„{? ?``?J ` v.\y s F?? !? j? t ? ? ?'?•?•?,
U09W. IN
r GO
}I'G?L ///\/ r
Previously Surveyed `a x•}, ,?; +?
q rl' : ?G??-\./ T I ii` ? I } 1 l ? ?i 1 1 t/ '' ? {
iat ?' , , { i,, J ' l s 'J?lJfJ
Smith, 1992,1994,
Proposed Project Limits
.?i/%?}x. ? ,; r` 'rte-? ,?j ???? ??.t ?`-?/?`" ?{-'t? \??, ! ?•; :J.
Scale
O 0.25 0.50 Mi
0 ^ 0.25 0.50 Km /•5j jV \t .
Source' USGS 1:24.000, Troy -tr ;{ . t G 1 l? L! ?i 7
r Quadrang1% 1994
L Y Y i '? IJ' , ' t r'?? l.•?? / /?„J'/mil t ?f' 7J f7^r'
Cl• .a .. .
1
Figure:
Environmental Site Map
Services, Inc. Uwharrie MSW Landfill Project: ER00-066
Troy, Montgomery County, North Carolina
m
$ Date: November 2000
W
1
1
1
1
1
APPENDIX C
8.5" x 11" Site Plan Sheets Depicting the Grading Plan
and Impacts Within the Proposed Expansion Area
ET01006/iocation.dwg
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-1
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: E701006
?_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

ET01006AocationAwg

Match Line Sheet 2A
-i- -}- -i- ?-

m
a
s
V)
a)
C
J
L
U
O

_ Ninety (90) percent of the elevations determined from the solid line contours of this topographic nap has an +
accuracy with respect to true elevation of one-half (1/2) contour Interval or better and the remaining ten (10)
percent of such elevations are not In error by more than one contour interval. In densely wooded areas
where heavy brush or tree cover fully obscures the ground, the contours are shown as dashed (Ines. They
have been plotted as accurately as possible From the sterescopic mode(, while making full use of spot
elevations obtained during ground control surveys and spot elevations measured photogrammetrically In
places where the ground Is visible.
This map was compiled by BEI Aerial Mapping, using photogranmetric methods. Contours portrayed as
dashed or broken (Ines represent areas of dense vegetation and should be considered approximate. This map
has not been field verified. Prior to use as a basis for design and/or construction, It should be field verified.
MAP COMPILED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF TERRY L. BECKOM, PLS #L-4209
THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
AND THOSE STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PHOTOGRAMNETRY & REMOTE SENSING
E 1708000 E 1708500 E L709000 E 17095W
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-1A
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: E701006
M_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

fl

0
CJ
ET01006Aocation.dwg
Match Line Sheet 3A

?h µ

42.
\ 652.

?5 ? 3
f 1117!!
~

+ +
\??
1 r?
-= Stream Crossin
9
1
1

WETLAND/STREAM 6 .7
SYSTEM 4 f s

(
T
65
•3 8
JURISDICTIONAL
, 6132.4 WETLANDS TYP.
678.5 h

+ + 9

680.8

+ j -t- JURISOICTIONA
TREAM P.
.
4fl. !.•
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 3

Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-2A
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina
?_ Date: Dec 2003

D

ET01006Aocat1on.dwg
r

7
' 6 b. Y 63
613.39
~ 635.08
630.97 629.51
+ -

ENSE

dL2
76
675,, WETLAND/STREAM
SYSTEM 5
678

7 .
` I m •6
688 1

/ x -68
683.58 _
68
9.02

679.
675,12 677,0 674.53
A
URISDICTIONAL 676.93 Stream Cros
WETLANDS (TYP.) 677,4 in

CO

81.01

677.06 m
a?
N

677, 2
1
1 m

6 667.
X59.1 //? `
? ?E
• •
671

DENSE TR
679. 2
" "

7213
665 7
•
r "?
/
.'6211
'

e
691.
"
?> I 693
J'VAMatch Line Sheet 2A
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-3A
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?. Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

e
11 J ? J
ET01006AocationAwg
""" Match Line Sheet 2B '" O

........... .

25..... '.. '.
737.2 +
p 14.5pd??
Q 39.41 ?1" - ?.?
-? U .

.-

L 40.4 7.24,
a
N L
L ? L
Ai
+ ?--? +
WETLAND/STREAM
SYSTEM 2
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 1
E 1710000 E 1710500 E 1711000 E 1711500
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-1B
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: Dec 2003

t

ET01006ftcation.dwg
Match Line Sheet 3B -.•`- /
SE-IRELT

S
JURISDICTIONAL I •. .::..:.:-.::._ .:._.' :.............. \ NS T
STREAM TYP.) ?:•'? .:.:.-....:.'..

1 I /+` .? /// /,,,•.'642: k:'..?".?.'....
'` ( \\..... ....: •V ..jj'' /?
?l/ '
.`..
N 581000
.
...
.
".'.'.'."..:..... ............ :. ":..
8:
":
"
"
'
"

N .. ;.
.
..
.
.
A
.. .".:?."... ?. :.
.:; ''.:': ...........:............
'.'.
?.;
\
?
..-
..\
...
..
....

1'.. i

4 A.

... ... T34'.6 . ':.738 ... '.. '.'
4&-
'

7
.73
•.741:71..... ..?•.,•.?-.=.. .• -?.'. .;('?? ....:" .'.'.'..'.'::.... .

fi
Match Line Sheet 1B '•'- "'•"'••_-'
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-213
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: Dec 2003

ET01006ftcation.dwg

69.2

4

16.88
` J
+61`!.5
1 617.96 61.8
\
/617 6 0.
.4
4
4
614.35 VP
Y
OENS
REES
E
/ 6
5
T
17.12
R

?
au

S
4.3/ 5
/
_--
J 648.

6
N

aU ,I

4
651.
c_
26.7 6421
64

M
r 7665.4 a?

6:'

/
642.46
69183
6§1,80 r-
N
2
n #

655.7 '
655 , }-
:a. l
?
S R
•6

-64

5.15 pg

9?
61Q
?. ¦
• • •?•• 610. 2
?? •??
••?.?.?. 610.90
N ' .'. 6

:. .
.
Match .
Line Sheet 28
7-1 ?-
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-313
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: Dec 2003

t

k-
I

ET01006Aocation.dwg
: Match Line Sheet 2C r .? -_^63

.\?..
zz.
6 9
a
\\
ft

: .. ; ' \\
6.80
63 J I f ??
fill

g Af yo gg lb"
rl C t W ?yF? 4
• ?w?
t W ?
Mu
W
Y
// / ?\
// /r 1
E 1712000 E 1712500` E E 17135
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-1c
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
1

ET01006Aocation.dwg
Match Line Sheet 3C
40 ? , --TREES 80-.Fe
RISDICTIO AL zo' : °,er`°'
STRUCTUM
_ WETLANDS
A
SIN NO. 2?••. =s ._

? „/? ? / _?'?-tea
T ES•?
59

A /
ENSE ES
. ... ........

M ' Q'.

N
L L
T
746.
N
r

C
'
- .
.:.. .e.. Y? is

. ....
32. -+ 745
\ n\
73 .
T
:.'.'.4'.'.'. '. ".....':.'.'.::'."...:' .... / .743.89
... .... ..... .. ..... '...' .' '.' • 731.
4 \

..... .. • 694. t ?40
!+
r

•690.97

G ..
.
.Q

'. .686: ..... .. .. .. ... ...

" •' "' "" •' Match Line heel

Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-2C
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

r

ET01006Aocation.dwg
E 172000

Sol. 651.%
6 7.

M

M U
v
L

N
?
L U7
C
J
V)
N t
_U
C
J O
L
U
'+' L ?I?
T -i-
E 1712000 E 172500 E 1713000 E 171350
'i-

x643. 29 :6? b
?J l
644. 6§9.41 ro ?
621-
3,7\ 60
Is
47. ?
4- %0
+ DENS E
?
7135
?
Match Line heet
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: c-3c
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

1

ET01006/location.dwg
et
D
Match Line Shee
r

J
?
UAW p1l, ml-M ml\'111,
js \?w /Z
??\ \\?
SET
gk"
A /?/iii l\\ ??1? 11? ((11111 I//
If
Il /Il llll /////
1'11'
l? III??? % ?T ?l 1111 l / /

J
a 7
/
R E '

r/ T V / J

E 1714000 E 1714500 E 1715000
CO
(47,
S
3)1
PR J.
SC L
DA E
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-1D
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: Dec 2003
t

ET01006Pocation.dwg
I ?1>>I ?I?IJ
z I J?-?l/f(
Z? ?/.
Q 102 02
WI ?L
s11
?WSE ^?)
/75
00
LLJ
(ohs
Lt-

Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-2D
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
t

ET01006/location.dwg

M
N
t M
?
N
c
J
C U1

N
J
O
? r
U
O

E 1714000 E 174500 E U
Stream Crossing #4
A A
+

5
a
?
llllt ?
•
60 I
60 k;4?
J// \??\\\ \ ?? 601.
_. -\??\\ \\? E A A

s
-?66.94
`?- E 400 \ ` \\\\??? NS ?. - d

^ Match Line Sheet 2D
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-3D
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
F
1

ET01006Aocation.dwg
Match Line Sheet 2E
0
v
a

aC
J
L
U
O
INITIAL GRADING PLAN
FACILITY PLANS - COMPLETED SITE
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
UBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
S LTING ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 265
743-7175 MACON, GEORGIA 31201
J. N0. 1001-303-01 DWG. UWHX2-WET EDIT 2-23-04
L 1" = 300,

E SHEET 1 OF 1
FEBRUARY, 2004

Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-1 E
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?_ Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

ET0100611ocation.dwg
Match Line Sheet 3E

0

C
N 58100+
N
N
N
L
Ln
N
Project Area
t
U
D
Pond Area
•` "•'•`•'• Wetland Enhancement Area
•'•`•••`•`'`? (Stream Preservation)
Wetland/Stream Impact
Area
Wetland/Stream
Preservation Area
Wetland/Stream
Restoration Area
Stream Crossings
Match in Sheet 1E I
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-2E
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003

t
ET01006Pocation.dwg
DATE ?F PHOTOGRAPHY, 12/20/2000
DATE ?F.SUBMITTAL, 1/18/2001
CONTOUR INTERVAL, TWO (2) FEET
HORIZONTAL DATUMt LOCAL COORDINATE SYSTEM
n, VERTICAL DATUM, NAVD88
? This topographic base map was produced by BEI Aerial Mapping, Peachtree City, Georgia
for Hodges, Harbin, Newberry & Tribble, Inc.
of the Uwharrie Regional MSWLF, Montgomery County, North Caro(Ina
s
U HHNT PROJECT # 1001-102-01
o BEI PROJECT # 1001206
UPDATED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
FROM DECEMBER 23, 2002 RECEIVED
FROM BEI AERIAL MAPPING
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
55 E 1716000
i
N 58200g-
WETLAND/STREAM SYSTEM 6
N 58150$-
Match in Sheet 2JEJ
Proposed Expansion Area Figure: C-3E
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006
?. Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina Date: Dec 2003
1

l
APPENDIX D
Plan, Profile, and Cross Section Views of the 4 Stream Crossings
f rr ?r ?r rr ?r ?Ir r r r? r? ri rr r? rr r ar r? r r?
DELINEATED
WETLANDS (TYP.)
72" HEADWALL
85 L.F. 72" / INV.=626.00
/ CMP AND 36" 36" HEADWALL
CMP INV.=628.00
\ I
72" HEADWALL p
INV.=629.00 rn ?-
36" HEADWALL o /
INV.=631.00
62 ,58
1 \X ?
I /
LEGEND
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR 640
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
CENTERLINE OF ROAD
EDGE OF WETLANDS
CENTERLINE OF STREAM 626,3
PROPOSED PIPE
PROPOSED HEADWALL
GRADING PLAN - STREAM CROSSING NO. 1
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
role
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
e1@1100110V C MM MOM CAMW
` HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
0 50 100 & TRIBBLE, INC.
I CONSULTING ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 265
III 478 743-7175 MACON GEORGIA 31201
PRO& NO. 1001-340-01 DWG. S7R1-G EDIT 11-12-02
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET / SCALE '.' 30 SHEET 1 of 1
DATE NOVEMBER, 2002
STRUCTU AL
640 640
630 630
620 620
A146' 30 CMP 2 OF 72
'MP BURIED ® F STREAM
SECTION A
1"=100' HOR., 1"=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #1
1 / -, 2-t72
t
t

660 Q 660

E
S
640 ROAD
BAS 640

STREAM E EVATION
629.00 AT MVERT
620 72" CMP-1 2" 620
36" CMP-TOP BURIED
OF IPE LEVEL
WIlT I /2'

600 600

STREAM CROSSING #1 LOOKING EAST AT INLET
1"=100' HOR.> 1"=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL

x-SECT1
1t-18-G2
L.?
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

660 Q 660
0-1
i
(n

6" STONE
640 64 0

620 620
2" (-MP-1?"-
BURIED ni - Dior 117N/171

600 600

STREAM CROSSING #1 LOOKING WEST AT OUTLET
1"=100' HOR., 1"=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
-7
x-SMT1
18-02
I
J

x°
H EADWALL
INV.=616.00
-.96 L.F. 108"
CMp
x
620
DELINEATED ro
WETLANDS (TYP.)620
EADWALL
INV.=615.04
LEGEND
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR GRADING Puw - srnEAM CROSSING N0.2
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR 640 UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
CENTERLINE OF ROAD REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
EDGE OF WETLANDS °0N1D0Y°""TM N0R1H CMtQUM
CENTERLINE OF STREAM ------~ I HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
PROPOSED PIPE 0 50 100 & TRIBBLE, INC.
CON5IR.TNG ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - S1E 265
478 743-7173 MACDN GEORdA 31201
PROPOSED HEADWALL PROB. NO. 1001-340-01 DwG. STR2-0 6T 11-13-02
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE 1.
DATE NOVEMBER 2002 SHEET 1 OF 1

STRUCTURAL
630 6,30
620 620
HEADWALL (IYII.)-
610 610
C p OF STREAM
SECTION A
1"=100' HOR., 1"=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #2
STRt-P
11-13-02

650 Q 650
0
6" STONE
630 ROAD BASE
630
616.00 AT 1WN.4F:,RT
610
610
108" CMP 12"
B=u
590 590
STREAM CROSSING #2 LOOKING EAST AT INLET
1 "=100' HOR., 1 "=20' VERT,
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
X-SECT2
17-78-62
J

650 650

0

630 6" STONE 630
ROAD BASE

STRE M ELEVATION
610 61 0
„ „
BURIED

590 590

STREAM CROSSING #2 LOOKING WEST AT INLET
1"=100' HOR., 1"=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
X-SECT2
17-18-62
J
\ \``• \. ?DENSE TREES -- \ \ i'
\ \\ \ \ \ HEADWALL `? - - -- \
\ \ \ \ \ \ NV.=558.50
\ \ \ ? BOX CULVERTSCRE E
\ \ \ \ \ .,? 60 L F. -?
LEGEND ??? \ ~ \
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR 560
EXISTING 2 CONTOUR \\ HEADWALL---_
\
PROPOSED 10 CONTOUR 60 INV.=557.50 ?.
1
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR ,? \ \ \\ \
'CENTERLINE S
ED ?? \ \ \\ \\ \? NOTE: TOPO INFORMATION TAKEN
OF WETLAND
FROM AERIAL ING COMPLETED
STREAM BOUNDARIES --- \ \\?\ \ \ B
Y BEI DATED M2P20 2000 ---
PROPOSED CULVERT
PROPOSED HEADWALL GRADWO PLAN - = = No. 3 - Roam CRM
EXISTING TREELINE \ UMARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
FOR
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF
NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
' ? \ \\\ \ Ma(roaorr oouRnc 11oRm Wa.NA
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
1 0 50 10 ?\ \ TRIBBLE, INC.
00118 1110 t $ "44 UN B MY &T. - STC 2"
\ [phone] MACON OEOROIA SUM
Fit" NO. 1001-340-01 OWO. 5783-0 MT 12-19-02
r GRAPHIC SCALE IN `FEET t BGAL6 r _ eso,
?11\ eA-m fwfvLs o erns SPIFFY 1 OF 4

580 580
5 -.97
560 560
^ROUND
550 - 550
PAN" 90
BURIED
540 540
530 530
PROFILE VIEW
l m=50' HOR.. l w=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #3
OF
r '
I
580
570

CONCRETE
550
5
STREAM CROSSING #3 LOOKING EAST AT INLET
l"=50' HOR.. l m=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
SHEET 3 OF 4
580 80
6" STONE
ROAD-BASE
570
560 STRUCTUF AL FILL
560,
550 3-9'x9 CONCRETE
BOX CC EVERT.S-- 550
W. = 557.5
2" 81 jRjM)
540
530
STREAM CROSSING #3 LOOKING WEST AT OUTLET
1"=50' HOR., 1"=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
R-SECTS SHEET 4 OF 4
12-18-02
1 _1
II

171

1
c°
LEGEND
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR 560
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR---560
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
EDGE OF WETLANDS
STREAM BOUNDARIES ?•
PROPOSED CULVERT
PROPOSED HEADWALL
)
40
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
CD
Lo

?o

L -i. ?vl 771 I
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS (lYP.)
NOTE: TO PO l INFORMATION
FROM AERIAL MAPPING CO
BY PEI DATED 12-20-20(
ORADW PLAN - STREAM CROSSING NO. 4
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
3UC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, JC
MONiC01 M C=M N" CAWJM
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
TNO Examen N 454 IIU.a MY ST. - STS a"
L toot-340-01 DWO. SYRX-4 EDIT 4-06-04
-' =50- SHEET 1 OF 4

1
1
r
r
1
1
' 590 r-STRUCTUFLAL 590
ROADWAY' FILL
PROPOSED GRADE
580 580
570 HEAD ALL
1
ROPOSED 3 x10' EXISTIN GROUND
r
r
r
' SECTION A
1 "-100' HOR.. 1"=10' VERT.
1
1
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING 4
STR4-P
4-05-04
1
r
r
590 ---- 590
r
8- STONE--
BASE
r
580 580
-- ---------------- -- ----------- ---------------------- --
1
570 " 570
1
1
560
r
1
1
STREAM CROSSING #4 LOOKING
SOUTHEAST AT INLET
1 "s 100' HOR., 1"=20' VERT.
1
1
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
X-SWI4
4-05-04

0

STREAM EL V
EATION
= 574. 0 AT INVE
3'x10' CON RETE
BOX CUBE

590 0
LL-
-8" STONE
ROAD BASE
580
57o 573. L 570
3'x10' CONCRETE
_ BOX ULVERT
560 560
STREAM CROSSING #4 LOOKING
NORTHWEST AT OUTLET
1 "a 100' HOR., 1 "=20' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
x-Swr4
4-05-04
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
AND
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
AT THE
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAY 2004

SEAL
1614(
VN-
?b F..

SF?
2?? 8
RA NT V
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY & TRIBBLE, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
484 MULBERRY STREET
SUITE 265
MACON, GEORGIA 31201
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
The Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill (MSWLF) is an existing municipal solid waste landfill
located adjacent to. Rocky Creek in Montgomery County, North Carolina. Approximately 73 acres
' of the landfill footprint is currently constructed. Future development of the landfill will disturb
approximately 150 acres. Of this disturbed area, approximately 110 acres will represent the actual
' footprint of the waste disposal area and approximately 40 acres will represent areas for access road,
buildings, support facilities, sediment basins, and outside slopes along cut and fill areas around the
' landfill. Every effort has been made in the design of this facility to minimize the total disturbed area.
Disturbed areas will be stabilized immediately using aggressive erosion control measures.
Stormwater which comes from off-site will be diverted around the MSWLF. Stormwater which falls
onto the MSWLF will be collected and transported to one of five sediment basins. Stormwater
inflow to each of the sediment basins is calculated based on 50% or greater runoff from the landfill
' area. These basins are designed to reduce the stormwater runoff rate and retain sediment contained
in the stormwater runoff. These basins, as well as a timely application of various erosion and
' sedimentation practices, will minimize the time that soils are exposed, control stormwater runoff,
protect soils from erosive forces, protect surrounding property and preserve water quality. Below
' is a detailed description of the stormwater, erosion and sedimentation control techniques to be used
at the MSWLF to protect the site and surrounding property.
t The best way to control sediment is to minimize erosion at its source. One way to
minimize erosion
is to control stormwater through the use of stormwater management structures in areas of
concentrated water flows. In the design of a MSWLF, stormwater must be controlled, collected and
' transported from the top of the landfill to the point where it exits the property. Stormwater which
falls onto the top of a landfill or along its side slopes, will be collected by a series of side slope
' diversion berms and side slope downdrain pipes. Side slope diversion berms are vegetated earthen
structures constructed across the landfill side slope. These are spaced every 20 vertical feet on the
landfill side slope (approximately 65 feet apart horizontally). The side slope diversion berm is
constructed 2' high and provides a 1 % slope along the stormwater pathway. The purpose of the side
' slope diversion berm is to reduce the slope length that stormwater runoff will travel as sheet flow,
break up concentrations of stormwater runoff, and move the stormwater to a stable outlet at non-
erosive velocities.
' May 2004 1 Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill
Project No. 1001-303-01 Stormwater Management & Erosion & Sedimentation Control

Therefore on the proposed 3.51 side slope on the landfill, stormwater will travel approximately 65
horizontal feet as sheet flow on a 3.5H:1 V slope (28.6% grade) before being collected in a side slope
' diversion berm which is constructed at a I% slope. All landfill side slopes and berms will be fully
grassed imm. Berms will also be lined with a temporary ditch liner, such as excelsior
matting for temporary protection prior to permanent vegetation being established. The side slope
downdrain pipes are the stable outlets that are mentioned above. These pipes will be used to
' transport runoff from the top of the landfill to the bottom. These pipes are corrugated HDPE pipe
and will be sized to carry the runoff from each berm while not exceeding 65% of the capacity of the
' pipe. The downdrain pipes will discharge into a stabilized open ditch system. A rip-rap apron will
be placed at the outlet of each downdrain system to reduce the velocity of the stormwater runoff flow
' and prevent erosion at the outlet as it enters the stabilized drainage ditch system which encircles the
waste footprint.
The perimeter drainage ditch system around the waste footprint collects all of the stormwater runoff
' from the centerline of the access road around the landfill to the top of the landfill. These ditches are
' 2' wide at the bottom, 4' deep, and they have 2:1 side slopes. All ditches will be grassed. However
if velocities exceed 2 feet per second (i.e. scour velocity) in any ditch section, other protective
measures will be used to prevent scouring. These include temporary ditch liners which are used to
protect the ditch until the grass has time to grow and mature, and permanent ditch liners, such as
' stone rip-rap, concrete or special geotextile materials.
' The stormwater runoff has now been taken from the top of the landfill, along grassed diversion
berms, through the downdrain pipe systems to the drainage ditch system. The drainage ditch system
' transports the stormwater by the gravity flow from around the waste footprint to five sediment basins
located at low points around the landfill. The stormwater enters the basins through drop inlets and
' drainage pipes. The inlets and pipes are sized to handle the 25 year - 24 hour storm event.
Temporary drop inlet protections in the forms of sediment traps and silt fence are used around the
' drop inlet to collect sediment from upstream ditches. These protections help keep sediment out of
the drainage pipe system. Once the drainage ditches are adequately protected by vegetation cover,
May 2004 2 Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill
I Project No. 1001-303-01 Stormwater Management & Erosion & Sedimentation Control
these temporary protections will be removed. The outlet of each drainage pipe entering the sediment
basins is also protected from soil scouring with a stone rip-rap apron.
The next structure used to control stormwater runoff and any sediment that has reached this point
' in the system is the sediment basin. Five sediment basins are to be used at the MS WLF. The basins
are sized to collect all the sediment from the disturbed area of the landfill (1800 cubic feet per
' disturbed acre), retain at least the 25 year -.24 hour storm event, and then dewater slowly through
a principal spillway system. The basins will also have the capacity to pass two back-to-back 100
' year - 24 hour storm events through an emergency spillway system. These basins not only collect
sediment, but they reduce the flow rate from the 25 year storm by at least 96%. The anticipated
' inflow and outflow rates for each basin is listed below to demonstrate the effectiveness of each
basins.

SEDIMENT STORAGE DEMONSTRATION

Basin
No. Required Sediment Storage Per
Disturbed Acre
cubic feet er acre Available Sediment Storage Per Disturbed
Acre in Lower 3' of Basin
cubic feet per acre
Safety Factor
(F.S.
1 1800 2218 1.23
2 1800 4425 2.46
3 1800 5757 3.20
4 1800 5962 3.31
5 1800 12994 7,22
May 2004 3 Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill
Project No. 1001-303-01 Stormwater Management & Erosion & Sedimentation Control

r
u
STORM FLOW RATE REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION
25 Year Storm Event 100 Year Storm Event Back-To-Back
100 Year Storm Event
Basin % % "
/o
No. Reduction Reduction Reduction
Inflow Outflow in Flow Inflow Outflow in Flow Inflow Outflow in Flow
(cfs) (cfs) Rate (cfs) (cfs) Rate (cfs) (cfs) Rate
1 198 8 96% 257 32 88% 257 67 74%
2 158 7 96% 206 31 85% 206 89 57%
3 297 10 97% 384 12 97% 384 182 53%
4 176 6 97% 227 7 97% 227 5 41%
5 226 6 98% 292 8 98% 292 ±81 72%
' The principal spillway in each basin consists of either a 48" or a 60" diameter concrete or aluminum
' riser pipe, 7 feet high. Each riser has a specified number of 1" or 1.5" holes set at the bottom of the
riser. The holes are used to slowly dewater the basin after it has retained the 25 year - 24 hour storm.
The diameter of the riser and basin outlet are sized to c the outflow from pipe the basin based
' on back-to-back 100 year storm events, and to maintain at least a 12" freeboard from the maximum
water surface elevation to the top of the basin levee. (see demonstration below). This system will
' be used in lieu of an emergency spillway over the top of the basin levee. The outlet from each pipe
will be protected from soil scouring by a stone rip-rap apron.
-rv? de+v? J t? QQ?w ,
0

n

I May 2004 4 Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill
Project No. 1001-303-01 Stormwater Management & Erosion & Sedimentation Control

n

r

D

RISER AND OUTLET PIPE CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION

asin No.
Max. Flow To
Be Handled
CFS
Riser
Dia.
in. Max. Flow Over
Riser With 12"
Freeboard
CFS Outlet Pipe
Diameter
(in.) Max. Flow
Through Outlet
Pipe With 12"
Freeboard CFS
1 67 60 137 42 176
2 89 48 110 30' 91'
3 182 48 110 48 225
4 135 60 137 48 188
5 81 48 110 36 100
'A 36" x 22" arch pipe has been installed as an emergency spillway and handles an additional 22 cfs.
Based on the topography of the site and the design of the landfill, there are areas that will be
disturbed and the stormwater runoff from these areas can not be diverted to one of the five sediment
basins. These areas include the outside cut and fill slopes on access roads, and the sediment basins.
In order to control stormwater runoff and control erosion and sedimentation, all of these areas will
be immediately mulched and vegetated. Mulch helps to reduce runoff and erosion, conserve soil
moisture, and prevent soil compaction and crusting. Each of these areas will be stabilized by using
temporary and permanent grassing along with slope protective materials, such as excelsior matting,
permanent erosion control pre-seeded blankets, channel liners, other types of erosion control blankets
and mats, and a sprayed-on synthetic polyacrylamide. This product has been effective at reducing
turbidity related to construction by as much as 95%. The polycrylamide chemically binds to the fine
clay particles and prevents the particles from going into solution. In addition to the use of mulch,
grassing and slope protective materials, all areas immediately downhill of a disturbed area will be
protected with silt fencing. Silt fencing will capture sediment and prevent it from leaving the site
and entering any natural drainageways.
Exits from disturbed areas of the site will be protected by installing stone-stabilized pads where
vehicular traffic will be leaving the site onto public right-of-way. These pads or "construction exit"
May 2004 5 Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill
Project No. 1001-303-01 Stormwater Management & Erosion & Sedimentation Control
C
erosion control structures help to reduce or eliminate transportation of soil by motor vehicles from
the site onto public rights-of-way.

n
In addition to the use of the measures discussed above, stormwater, erosion and sedimentation
control measures will be inspected daily. Any damage observed will be repaired immediately.
Cleanout of sediment control structures will occur re_ ?ularly to maintain the effectiveness of the
structures. Sediment removed from these structures will be used as cover soils in the active landfill
v area or spread on the site in a manner which does not cause further erosion and sedimentation. Silt
fencing and drop inlet protection will remain in place until sediment contributing areas are stabilized.
Sediment basins will remain in service for the life of the landfill and continue to be used for
stormwater retention and, if necessary, for further sediment control.
The site manager of the MSWLF will be responsible for the facility stormwater, erosion and
sedimentation control program. The address and telephone number of the manager is listed below:

i

0

I
Mr. Ken Lowder
Uwharrie Regional Landfill
500 Landfill Road
Mt. Gilead, NC 27306
Phone: [phone]
May "2004
Project No. 1001-303-01
6 Uwharrie Regional MSW Landfill
Stormwater Management & Erosion & Sedimentation Control
P- w
G ?(
1}!C• x737/
(9io) s7a-s3ia

WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
AUG 0 5 2004
HATER QUALITY SECTIQ;4

[? ?'B?x20/?0 Gff2?Lf??GC? . ?. 6vcccrv ?
'?'? CC/l2cL 2L2 Q7t?- O 71o ?0 • /?e°?Q??
?C. GLQ'??Gt? . La7 Q
A . I
Ala, &&A-
Z? 00,
14
alteeto,
r
Y.V#. J?9 - -

vV?

I vf:
fz; -4?
t?
00,
93.1
,7 /L(liltQi 1 ?o
G2nGC /.?f?ee c2E? Gr/-B-?+Li Gvti?uv? Sm? d?L.

Z- 5. do -
Atoa?;4-
G
ael?w

2t
,
1%,
l9t

l
cam, a? ale /Zi%
?a,
Val-2Ct.? .?
Rol ll&?
A,v

'd??-OAe, if

A?a
Poll

5

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 200200607
PUBLIC NOTICE
W"LW'S / 40 ? f-RCUt"
AUG 0 5 2004
?Vkl Erg QUALITYSECifUr?,July 9, 2004

Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC, P.O. Box 2943, Hickory, North Carolina, 28603 has
applied for a Department of the Army (DA) individual permit pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act TO DISCHARGE 150,000 CUBIC YARDS OF CLEAN STRUCTURAL FILL
MATERIAL INTO 7.04 ACRES OF JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS AND 2735 LINEAR
FEET OF JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE
CURRENT UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL FACILITY AT 500 LANDFILL ROAD,
MT. GILEAD, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, YADKIN RIVER BASIN, NORTH CAROLINA.
Mr. S. Paul Petitgout, Environmental Services Inc., 9600-G Southern Pine Blvd., Charlotte,
North Carolina 28273, is acting as agent for Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC in the
processing of this application.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant; archive
records and from observations made during site visits by representatives of the Corps of
Engineers. The applicant proposes to expand the solid waste landfill to provide an additional
9,000,000 cubic yards of capacity to the current capacity of 9,000,000 cubic yards. The project
expansion will impact two wetland/stream system complexes totaling 7.04 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands and 2450 linear feet of jurisdictional streams. In addition to the 2450 linear feet of
stream channel impacts associated with the landfill site, 285 linear feet of stream channel will be
impacted by four road crossings providing access to the landfill area.
Previously permitted impacts on this project include 0.85 acres of headwater wetlands associated
with the previous expansion of the landfill in 1995; the culverted crossing of an intermittent
stream for borrow site access impacting 0.01 acre of surface waters in 1995 and 0.1 acres of
headwater wetlands for an culverted access road crossing in 1993. Including 0.96 acres of
jurisdictional waters impacted under previous DA authorizations; the total cumulative
jurisdictional waters impacts of the landfill project will be 8 acres.
The applicant has proposed to compensate for the unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional areas
associated with this proposed project by a combination of on-site preservation, enhancement,
restoration mitigation and utilization of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement program.
No mitigation plan has been submitted to the District for review at the time of this notice.
9
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant
to obtain any required State authorizations. No Department of the Army (DA) permit will be
issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by
this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certification as required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice,
that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state,
with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places (NHRP) for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed
as being eligible for inclusion therein. There are no known archaeological or historic sites or
properties that are located within the vicinity of the project that are listed or are eligible for
listing in the NRHP. Environmental Services, Inc., working on behalf of the applicant conducted
archaeological surveys of the proposed expansion project. The surveys identified sixteen
potential archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Three of these sites were
determined to be potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. A fourth potential NHRP eligible
site was identified by Environmental Services, Inc. in previous surveys conducted in 1992, 1993,
and 1994. A preservation plan for the above referenced sites has been developed and provided to
the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) for review. Acceptance by the SHPO is still
pending. A copy of the preservation plan is available for review in the Wilmington Regulatory
Field Office at 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28402. This constitutes the extent of
cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the
presence of any other resources within the project area.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed activity will
affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts,
including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest.
Evaluation of the probable impacts that the proposed activity may have on the public interest
requires a careful weighing of all those factors that become relevant in each particular case. The
benefits that reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against
its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the
conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of
the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both
protection and utilization of important resources. All factors that may be relevant to the proposal
must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation,
economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and
wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order
11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and
2
3
conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs,
considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For
activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a
permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply
with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding
sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the
District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies
and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the
impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal.
To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed
above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA) permit will not be
made until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives
State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDWQ considers
whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of the Army (DA)
permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the
offices of the Wetlands/401 Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 2321
Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. Copies of such materials will be
furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
(NCDWQ), 1650 Mail Service Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650, Attention: Mr. John
Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in this
office, Attention: Mr. Keith Harris, until 4:30 p.m., August 9, 2004.
3
:T. O L
L ,
?4; Approximate
?''°f r ! Project Location
s Sy?l1j J.

)1+???y ;?1' ',,y_?.,r -.= ;,. ,. l-?1)-J J -? .J •• ??...? ? `y?.y tai t
ill ' t
IRT?
??. s f/r?ui IS, I- I
;c+YL,
?V
nU
`-.?/s?J
^?? _ f ? ? ? Grp '1?, ; ?; J , ; ?? ,? ??-? ? ' ?C??Ur,??l/ n 1.? , ! al f,? •-r??' e J 1'y ?? ?! ? `? S ?•?
0 1 2 3Mles
0 1 2 3 4 lalometers
Source: tISGS 1;100.000. Southern PV-- NC
30' X 60` Topographic SerieS
General Location Map Figure' 1
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion Project: ET01006.01
Services, Inc. Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: March 2004
L
A
- •_/ ? ? --- `? t ; r ? so \ ? " ? 1 ;.J ? l i r? lyv ? 7/?//f/ / ?\?_ / ;? }1{ ?(?r?` 11(
!/ ? ? / r(??\ ?\ l `r ?• ?`? } 1 ? - ,' (? ??? ? 1 i i 1 - y .. ; C.(?' f , ?.`J,????};,?t ?/ ;' / ?J ?' ?? i ''
i j ! ? ? \ \?/ : / 1 .i ' 1? - ? • arc ? )?? _ \-? \?`?--`' ??'T /' ??._J ?_ :\ t _
r .9" .
li')
\, r`• ` ..•l lI ` f 687x •/ 'l i ?? :'}1 '?/? ?, 1.(l ?'\ t\-JOIk 1?? `C ^?`\
l? ? ? ti ti j I I r l r t?? I
• 1 r/ C? ,''-^?___? ??J r / (?i, 11?.1?1/J1' ??('v /n\-J \?\ 'jam !!( s ? .. ? ?t ?j/?f/ ???J?s?r?? r???
V% ??-\? f? T`? ?/. l .. ? =\ti?__ ??f'_?`' *? ( 1 ??? /' ° i,",? l't Ji -}? ?- i 1 ' ? ?=? 1 ? '', ??>•'(. l? f /'? j?/',\ l?? 1 _ _
3 ; s? ? -? r: •$ ['--='fir` ?+• ??, `'?.?`t ?' rl t c• /!? ? 1 ? -? s - ?c FC-'? /
1-,t
j
\ 1J1'
?665 %
f '1 `?? ?(}\11i? t•1 1 F? ??? 1 \ \ 1?/ ??( 11! «%=/? I7( ?? ! !. ?J 2 i
/ 13
1 L i
'l.F
"""/ f.. i y V\?\?'',' ??-??~!? J,i ? .? Tom` ?v ?. ?? _ \??`? •t ?,l'•" r? 1\',?i'f]?I }i`;;mil--?l'5i5? ' -?t1-.
J.~?/ f t? / + \? 1 y ??\ x tl 7t
' f? J i? ? ? ?. \? ? -? ? ?• ???'r\\. ?J '?1. ?" ? ?` `'` ?? ??? )/? ? ? ? r- -?"`/, a mot.
/ C}1 yr f I I} 5?'? Il
It? -•.-= ?\?l JiIJ. ' ? 1, ?' `??? `` l \ •? f`ro n - >? ?? j r1 Sr? j t1/`/ !?? ?1??J? fl?%(' _?\.. `ice--- :)\ ;+ t_'
r???.-?
' tt 'mil 1 !J ?-,i
(1 ! y
T
`?,.? , ? f { (? ? t ? 1, ?-?/ J, g ? `?,r;'?' ? ?.???1? '?-? .??? r {: `1' `? yf ` l ~ - - ? \? . d? • ) `'1 z f ? C 1 ?? ??? J t
Jt t ` ,off ? ? ?J,,
`?? ?? ?? '1. ,\ ??. ?1 ,/' ? `?1?? ?'Z ??-p'?%/? fly .?? ? ?/t 3??? Lit _•?c??Cl_ ,r <'J? Ir?•,-\.
n? .
0 0.25 0.501A
07- 0.25 0.50 Km
Source: USGS 1:24,000, Troy
Quadrangle, 1982
General Location Map Figure: 7
Environmental Uwharrie Environmental Landfill Expansion
.Q Services, Inc. Project: ET01006.01
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Date: March 2004
8
a
w

Table 1. On-Site Stream Information
Wetland and
Stream System No. Stream
Flagging
Sequence Length
(Linear Feet) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of Impact
(Linear Feet)
5 SEA 466.13 U -
5 SGA 160.79 U -
5 SEC 1,232.39 U -
5 SED 63.82 U -
4 SJH 953.05 U -
Rocky Creek SEE/SEF/SJE
SEG/SHE 2,416.30 I (portion)
new road crossing 83.16
4 SJB 353.42 I (portion) improved
road crossing 38.17
4 SJA 2,301.52 I (portion) improved
road crossing 29.97
4 SJC 357.83 U -
3 SJG 2,806.74 I (portion) improved
road crossing 40.44
3 SJF 724.27 I (portion)
improved road
crossing 34.01
2 SEI 582.24 I (all) 582.24
2 SEL 746.16 I (all) 746.16
2 SEJ 251.14 I (all) 251.14
2 SEK 148.4 I all 148.4.
2 SEM 511.09 I (all) 511.09
Across SR 1137 SJA2 333.54 U -
6 SP/SPA/SNA 1514.72 I (portion) improved
road crossing 60.2
6 SNB 358.25 U -
6 SPA 251.58 U -
1 SBA 209.85 I (all) 209.85

TOTAL 16,743.23 - 2,734.83
r
Table 2. On-Site Wetland Information
Wetland and
Stream System
No. Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)
5 JE/JF 0.26 U -
5 JD 0.12 U -
5 JC 0.23 U -
5 JB 1.21 U -
5 JA 0.26 U -
5 GK/GL/GM 1.02 U -
4 XA/XB/XE/XF/XG 2.11 U -
4 XC 0.06 U -
4 XD 0.04 U -
4 XK 0.26 U -
4 XL 0.20 U -
4 VJ/XO 0.05 U -
4 XH 0.04 U -
4 XI 0.33 U -
4 XJ 0.16 U -
4 XN 0.05 U -
4 XM/GH/GI/GJ 0.20 U
4 SJD Pond 0.40 U -
4 SJI Pond 1.78 U -
3 GB 0.28 U -
3 GC/GD 0.03 U -
3 GE 0.17 U -
3 GF 0.73 U -
3 GG 0.11 U -
3 GA 0.08 U -
3 PE 0.79 I (portion) 0.05
3 VK/XP 0.19 U -
3 VH/VI 1.31 U -
3 JG - 1.17 U -
3 12-1995A 0.74 U -
3 PC/PD 0.04 I (portion) 0.01
3 PB 0.01 I (all) 0.01
3 PA 0.53 U -
3 VA 0.12 I ortion 0.05
3 VG 0.47 U
3 VF 0.10 U -
3 VE 0.04 U -
3 VD 0.05 U -
3 VC 0.02 U -

Wetland and
Stream System
No, Wetland Flagging
Sequence Area
(acres) Impacted or
Undisturbed Amount of
Impact
(acreage)
3 VB 0.46 U
2 12-1996 5.42 I (all) 5.42
2 12-1996B 0.31 U -
Across SR 1137 JA2 0.15 U -
Across SR 1137 EA 0.22 U -
6 QC 0.01 U -
6 MY/MZ 0.01 I all 0.01
6 PB 0.01 U -
6 PC 0.01 U -
6 PD 0.04 U -
6 PJ/PK/NG 0.15 U -
6 PE/NB 0.11 U -
6 NC 0.56 U -
6 PF/ND 0.13 U -
6 PG/NE 0.26 U -
6 P1VZD 0.10 U -
1 MD 0.29 I (all) 0.29
1 MB 0.52 I (all) 0.52
1 MC 0.68 I (all) 0.68

PREVIOUS
EWPACTS 0.96 I (all) 0.9ro

TOTAL TOTAL 22.33 - ADD
Note: The impact numbers include 0.96 acres of jurisdictional wetlands that were
impacted previously under the Nationwide Permit Program.
wEnAdSnT?
anTLw
FIGURE"A Uwhartld ErnYalrndnW
?r
xEiw+onTMUU smEr s
.W
P.J.d A,"
Pend Mw
w.uow [M_..m.nt
A-
w.S..d/St- W"d
A-
A...
St- G...Pp
MAUIT MANN - t.VMrLLjLu JIIC
UWHARRIE REGIONAL LANDFILL
BUG SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
lwunrouxr cu wtw ?
HODGES. HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE. INC.
.p OKYdLU .M 1.4lOtltY St - M t.!
o-nn w aoeaA rm
t trot-ws-al ow. tuna.-wn mrt s-v-a
r?wo

DELINEATED
WETLANDS (TYP.)

85 L.F. 72"
CMP AND 36/
CMP
:72 HEADWALL' I
INV.=629.00
'36" HEADWALL.,
INV.=631.00
62 ,58
I \X
LEGEND •''
P
.EXISTING 10' CONTOUR ,
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR 640
PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
CENTERLINE OF ROAD -
x
EDGE OF WETLANDS'
CENTERLINE OF STREAM -?-- 626,3
PROPOSED PIPE
PROPOSED HEADWALL
r'
0 50 100°' F'
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
1

72" HEADWALL
INV.=626,00
36" HEADWALL
INV.=628.00
P

?j
GRADING PLAN - STREAM CROSSING Na I
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
KIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
RNG ENGINEERS 484 MULBERRY ST. - STE. 293
43-7175 MACON GEORGIA 31201
0. 1001-340-01 M. STR1-G EDIT 11-12-02
T• 50' SHEET 1 OF 1
NOVEMBER, 2002
d

STRUCTURAL
HOAUWA! F ILL -PROPOSd GRADE
ttivotHE
SECTION A
1"=100' HOR., 1"=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #1
sml-P
11-12-02

64 0 640

630 630

620 620

A D 36" CMP .2" OF 72'
? F STREAM

, I
i3
STRU
16
161
OF
SECTION A
1 "=100' HOR., 1 "=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #2
S Rt-P
11-13-02
\ \°``? \. \ 'DENSE TREES
\ `\ \ \ \ \ - -_ ssii?,?1
1
\ \ HEADWALL
\ \ \ \ \ \\ NV.=558.50
\ \ \ \ \ \: ` (3)-9'x9' CONCRE E
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ BOXL C ULVERTS- _
Iz I.,
LEGEND \ • . ?.
D(ISTING 10' CONTOUR 560 --
EXISTING 2 CONTOUR HEADWALL--, \
'ROPOSED 10' CONTOUR 560 INV.=557.50 \
^ROPOSED 2' CONTOUR
_ENTERUNE OF ROAD - ??? \ \?\\\ \
STREAM EBOUNDARDIES FROM AERIAL INFORMATION ETED
_..... ,
PROPOSED CULVERT ?\ \\ \\ \ BY BEI DATED 12-20-2000
'ROPOSED HEADWALL \ \ ?\ \ CRADNG KM - SIRFJW cROSSNG Na 3-
ROCKY CREEK
D(ISTING TREEUNE \ UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
Foot
N\N?\
4` \\ \1? REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
0 50 100 \ & TRIBBLE, INC.
i \ \ comm"nua
743nEN081E m 484 WABER MACON OT. - ST 2"
' GRAPHIC S--C?ALE I FEET \ F(478) g_1A3120l
ROA NO. 1001-340-01 owa sm-o Wrr 1z_?9-os
' l v . Oifslmmm. 9ee2 SHEET 1 OF 4 I Y
PROFILE VIEW
1 "=50' HOR.. l w=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #3
P
-D2 _ _

O
O
r
LEGEND
EXISTING 10' CONTOUR 560
EXISTING 2' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR -------- 5f.`r---
PROPOSED 2'. CONTOUR
EDGE OF WETLANDS
STREAM BOUNDARIES
PROPOSED CULVERT
PROPOSED HEADWALL ,
0 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

i
i
i
i
ADsiiW

Ar

10'
?NV,-i573.00 I
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS (TYP.)
'IIII?I
NOTE: TOPO INFORMATION Tj
FROM AERIAL MAPPING COMI
BY BE! DATED 12-20-2000
CRMNO PLAN - STREAM CROSSNO Na 4
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LL(
MoNmowuY CMKN. NORM C."OUNA
HODGES, HARBIN, NEWBERRY
& TRIBBLE, INC.
COw{ULTNO iw0lam" 484 wRLURRY 4T. - $TL ICS
4 f 7th GE
PR M0. 1001-340-01 IML STRX-4 EW 4-0!S..04
scue t - so'
-- 1 OF 4
/
59 0 STRUCTU 5 90
PROPOSED GRADE
7f
580 5
570 HEAD FA -- 570
ROPOSED 3 x10' EXISTI GROUND
-SECTION A
1 *=100* HOR.. 1 *=10' VERT.
UWHARRIE REGIONAL MSW LANDFILL
STREAM CROSSING #4

-- Flit I '
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
July 21, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC
C/o Mr. S. Paul Petitgout
P.O. Box 2943
Hickory, NC, 28603
Subject Property: Uwharrie Regional Landfill Facility, Mt. Gilead
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
To Whom It May Concern:
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
DWQ Project # 04-1138
Montgomery County
On July 9, 2004, the Public Notice for your application to impact 7.04 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands and 2,735 linear feet of streams for the expansion of the Uwharrie Regional Landfill
was received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality. The Division will begin to review the
project for eventual decision. However, please be aware that beginning January 1, 1999 that the
N.C. General Assembly passed legislation requiring payment of a fee of $475.00 for this project.
Also, applicants are required to provide to DWQ two copies of all application materials provided
to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be issued
until this fee is paid and the copies are provided. This project has been assigned DWQ Project
No. 04-1138. Please refer to this project number in all future correspondence. Please note that
as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 we will place this project on hold as incomplete until we
receive this additional information.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. John Dorney
at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss
this matter.
Si lcerely,
Joh Dorney,
DWQ, Wetlands / 401 Unit
401 Wetlands Certfflcation Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recyded/100% Post Consumer Paper
Republic Services of North Carolina, LLC:
Page 2 of 2
July 21, 2004:
JRDlcbk
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 04113 8Uwharrie(Montgomery)Hold

ITEM# 6626007-B
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NC, LLC (3041) Vendor Number: 39845
NO. 3158012152
INVOICE DESCRIPTION =Igilv GROSS AMOUNT I DISCOUNT
DWQ PROJECT #04-1138 07/21/04 475.00 0.00 475.00
WET1A ,lAn?~
nP
AUG 1 3 2004
WATER QU
U SECTION
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI OOZY /Vll .- irstlGassMu
• Sender: Please print dPhOrriK, address, and7lP-+4-4ts4H9I5oxw'
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
1,11111,It111i11i11111111111111111111111:1111:I IlIlu111111111
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Republic Services of NC, LLC
Post Office Box 2943
Hickory, NC 28603
DWQ# 04-1138 - Montgomery
A. Signature '
X ?'j??? .? ? Agent
(??/, ? ? Addressee
B. ceived by [PrinWe Name) C. Date of Delivery
Cf7p
D. Is delivery add ess different from item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
3. Service Type
12 Certified Mail ? Express Mail
? Registered f $. Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number 7004 1160 0002 2706 6011
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV19P `.
_ First-Class Mail --
Postage & 56% id
_psFS.ni.,
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
S E ii 4 iS ii S i S i i1 ii S i 1
1 1i s
Wild 1ii11i1!III 1i1iiliil111i1i11F11I11i11141E1iiilliiiiill?
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. S' nature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, eceivecl by

h
f
f
i ???
or on t
space perm
ts.
e
ront i
1. Article Addressed to:
Republic Services of NC, LLC
Post Office Pox 2943
Hickory, NC 28603
DWQ# 04-1138 - Montgomery
D. Is delivery address
If YES, enter delivj
99--Ag nt
r ? Addressee
C. Date of Delivery
rJUL 2 6 2DN
item 1? ? Yes
4Qw: ? No
v `?C
3. Service Type c
P2 Certified Mai ? Express Mail
? Registered R-Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number 7004 0750 0003 3326 7241
(Transfer from service label) I
PS Form 3811, Februa 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540