20190432 Ver 1_PJD_Submittal20190206_20190404

F)2
hdrinc.com
February 6, 2019
Mr. David Bailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory District
Raleigh Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Ms. Sue Homewood
N.C. Division of Water Resources
Winston Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston Salem, NC 27105
Subject: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination Request
Guilford County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Bailey and Ms. Homewood:
HDR, on behalf of our client, Duke Energy Piedmont Natural Gas (Duke Energy PNG), is requesting
a written Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) and Buffer Determination for jurisdictional
features located within the proposed Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) Project
(Project) in Guilford County, North Carolina (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3).
Duke Energy PNG proposes to install approximately 5.1 miles of natural gas pipeline in and around
the town of Pleasant Garden. Specifically, the Project will involve installation of a 12 -inch -diameter
steel pipeline, extending generally northward from the existing Pleasant Garden Regulator Station
(N35.94102°; W79.76427°) through the easternmost portion of Pleasant Garden before terminating
at a proposed regulator station at the northern extent of the Project just south of the intersection of
Pleasant Garden Road and Ritters Lake Road (N35.98903°; W79.77746°).
Project activities are anticipated to result in minimal impacts to jurisdictional surface waters and will
require submittal of a Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404/401 Nationwide Permit Pre -Construction
Notification.
Applicant Name: Duke Energy; POC: Mr. David Vena
Mailing Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: [phone]
Project Location: Town of Pleasant Garden and the vicinity immediately north and south
River Basins: Haw (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 03030002) and Deep River (HUC 03030003)
City: Town of Pleasant Garden
440 South Church Street, Suite 1000, Charlotte, INC 28202-2075
T 704.338.6700 F 704.338.6761

Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination
February 6, 2019
County: Guilford County
Center Decimal Degree Coordinates of Study Area: -79.762166°, 35.964749°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Pleasant Garden, NC (1982)
Study Area Description
The approximate 143.49 acre Study Area consists of single family residences, agricultural fields,
and forested areas. Dominant woody species consist of American beech (Fagus grandifolia),
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua),
and multiple oak (Quercus sp.) and hickory species (Carya sp.) in the canopy layer. The understory
is composed primarily of American elm (U/mus americana), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica),
red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum, Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), autumn olive (Elaeaganus
umbellate), American holly (Ilex opaca), and black cherry (Prunus serotina). Herbaceous and vine
species include Nepalese browntop (Microstegium vimineum), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia),
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Virginia creeper
(Parthenocissus quinquefolia), and blackberry (Rubus sp.).
According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soils Survey of Guilford County
(Figure 4), on-site soils consists of Appling sandy loam (ApC), Cecil soils (CcC, CcD, and Ce132),
Chewacla loam (ChA), Enon fine sandy loams (EnB, EnC, and EnD), Iredell fine sandy loam (IrB),
Mecklenburg sandy clay loams (MhB2 and MhC2), and Wedakee loam (WhA). The NRCS's
National Hydric Soils List classifies Chewacla loam, Iredell fine sandy loam, and Wehadkee loam as
hydric (NRCS 2017).
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) makes wetlands
data and analysis available to the public. A review of the USFWS NWI (USFWS 2017) indicated
multiple wetlands and streams within the Study Area (Figure 5). The U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) provides publicly available digital geospatial datasets
that map a network of surface waters and catchments of the United States. The USGS NHD (USGS
2017) depicts multiple stream channels within the Study Area (Figure 5). No Federal Emergency
Management Act (FEMA) 100 -year floodplains are located within the Study Area (FEMA FIRM
Panels 3710787100, 3710787000 and 3710777900; FEMA 2017) (Figure 5).
Jurisdictional Delineation
HDR environmental scientists surveyed the Study Area for waters of the U.S. under Section
404/401 of the CWA. Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were delineated according to the
methodology and guidance described in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 1987 Wetland
Delineation Manual, USACE Post-Rapanos guidance, and the 2012 USACE Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Regional Supplement (Version 2.0) (USACE 1987; 2012). Streams were classified
utilizing the methodology and guidance provided in the Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 05-05
(USACE 2005) and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Methodology for
Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (Version 4.11). Jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. were flagged in the field and mapped using a Trimble°Geo7X GPS unit capable
Page 12

Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination
February 6, 2019
of sub -meter accuracy. GPS points were post -processed utilizing Trimble°GPS Pathfinder Office
software.
Surface waters were verified in the field by USACE's Regulatory Project Manager David Bailey on
November 1, 2018 and NCDWR's Regulatory Project Manager Sue Homewood on December 6,
2018.
Results
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by HDR, which were field -verified by federal
and state regulators, indicate that there are 20 jurisdictional stream channels, 30 jurisdictional
wetlands, and 3 jurisdictional open water ponds (Figures 6A -6H).
The on-site waters drain to the Haw (HUC 03030002) and Deep River (HUC 03030003)
watersheds. Surface waters located in the Haw HUC 03030002 are subject to the Jordan Lake
Water Supply Buffer Rule (Rule). The Rule applies to surface waters including intermittent streams,
perennial streams, lakes, reservoirs, and ponds, excluding wetlands. Features must be shown on
the most recent USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle or NRCS Soils Survey Map and score at least a
classification of `intermittent' as defined by the NCDWR Stream Identification Methodology. Ten
features located within the Study Area are subject to the Rule. These features are identified in
Table 1.
Potential Jurisdictional Features
On-site potential jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total 6,169 linear feet (If) (or 0.568 acres [ac.]) of
jurisdictional relatively permanent waters, 5.45 acres of jurisdictional wetlands, and 0.27 acres of
jurisdictional open water ponds (Figures 6A -6H). A summary of on-site potential jurisdictio0.5nal
waters is provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of On-site Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S and
Waters Subject to the Jordan Lake Water Supply Buffer Rule
Relatively Permanent Water Tributaries — Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the U.S.
Page 13
Length: 659 feet
Stream 1
35.988810
non section 10 - non-
R5UB1
Width: 4 feet
Yes
-79.776827
wetland
Area: 0.06 ac.
Length: 285 feet
Stream 2
35.988981
non section 10 - non-
R4SB3
Width: 3 feet
No
-79.777067
wetland
Area: 0.02 ac.
Length: 239 feet
Stream 3
35.988620
non section 10 - non-
R4SB3
Width: 3 feet
No
-79.774915
wetland
Area: 0.02 ac.
Length: 217 feet
Stream 4
35.987951
non section 10 - non-
R4SB3
Width: 4 feet
No
-79.770215
wetland
Area: 0.02 ac.
Page 13

Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination
February 6, 2019
Page 14
35.988249
non section 10 - non-
Length: 6 feet
Stream 5
R5UB1
Width: 5 feet
Yes
-79.768757
wetland
Area: 0.001 ac.
Length: 264 feet
Stream 6
35.988105
non section 10 - non-
R5UB1
Width: 4 feet
Yes
-79.766118
wetland
Area: 0.02 ac.
Length: 299 feet
Stream 7
35.987700
non section 10 - non-
R5UB1
Width: 15 feet
Yes
-79.765981
wetland
Area: 0.10 ac.
Length: 370 feet
Stream 8
35.983891
non section 10 - non-
R5UB1
Width: 4 feet
Yes
-79.765123
wetland
Area: 0.03 ac.
Stream 9
(Little
35.977800
non section 10 - non-
Length: 121 feet
R3SB3
Width: 4 feet
Yes
Alamance
-79.761116
wetland
Area: 0.01 ac.
Creek)
Length: 219 feet
Stream 10
35.972939
non section 10 - non-
R5UB1
Width: 5 feet
No
-79.758138
wetland
Area: 0.03 ac.
Length: 511 feet
Stream 11
35.967885
non section 10 - non-
R4SB5
Width: 2 feet
No
-79.756964
wetland
Area: 0.02 ac.
Length: 191 feet
Stream 12
35.968213
non section 10 - non-
R4SB5
Width: 1 feet
No
-79.757163
wetland
Area: 0.004 ac.
Length: 444 feet
Stream 13
35.967339
non section 10 - non-
R5UB1
Width: 4 feet
Yes
-79.756823
wetland
Area: 0.04 ac.
Length: 167 feet
Stream 14
35.967109
non section 10 - non-
R4SB3
Width: 4 feet
No
-79.756906
wetland
Area: 0.02 ac.
Length: 217 feet
Stream 15
35.963843
non section 10 -non-
R4SB3
Width: 3 feet
Yes
-79.757555
wetland
Area: 0.01 ac.
Length: 495 feet
Stream 16
35.958253
non section 10 - non-
R5UB1
Width: 5 feet
Yes
-79.754960
wetland
Area: 0.06 ac.
Length: 502 feet
Stream 17
35.947273
non section 10 - non-
R4SB3/R5UB1
Width: 3 feet
No
-79.755126
wetland
Area: 0.03 ac.
Length: 135 feet
Stream 18
35.947333
non section 10 - non-
R4SB4
Width: 2 feet
No
-79.754961
wetland
Area: 0.01 ac.
35.943687
non section 10 - non-
Length: 208 feet
Stream 19
R4SB4
Width: 2 feet
No
-79.759513
wetland
Area: 0.01 ac.
Page 14

Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination
February 6, 2019
Page 15
35.942688
non section 10 - non-
Length: 590 feet
R5UB1
Width: 4 feet
No
-79.759250
wetland
Area: 0.05 ac.
Length: 30 feet
Stream 20
35.989553
non section 10 - non-
R5UB1
Width: 5 feet
Yes
-79.772586
wetland
Area: 0.003 ac.
Total Potential Jurisdictional Relatively Permanent Water
Tributaries of
Length: 6,169 If
the U.S.
Area: 0.568 ac.
Wetlands - Potential Wetland Waters of the U.S.
Wetland 1
35.990365
non section 10-
PSS1
Area: 0.67 ac.
No
-79.776434
wetland
Wetland 2
35.988821
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.01 ac.
No
-79.776905
wetland
35.99102
non section 10-
Wetland 2a
PEM
Area: 0.10 ac.
No
35.99102
wetland
Wetland 3
35.398804
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.27 ac.
No
-79.771996
wetland
Wetland 4
35.983850
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.06 ac.
No
-79.762905
wetland
Wetland 5
35.982947
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.09 ac.
No
-79.762610
wetland
Wetland 6
35.981816
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.05 ac.
No
-79.762790
wetland
Wetland 7
35.979089
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.04 ac.
No
-79.762883
wetland
Wetland 8
35.384223
non section 10-
PSS1 (Clear -Cut)
Area: 0.07 ac.
No
-81.288806
wetland
Wetland 9
35.975476
non section 10 -
PFO1/PSS1
Area: 0.38 ac.
No
-79.758129
wetland
Wetland 10
35.968466
non section 10 -
PFO1/PSS1
Area: 0.10 ac.
No
-79.757253
wetland
Wetland 11
35.967984
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.07 ac.
No
-79.757095
wetland
Wetland 12
35.964092
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.23 ac.
No
-79.757634
wetland
Wetland 13
35.963782
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.06 ac.
No
-79.757633
wetland
Wetland 14
35.956200
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.04 ac.
No
-79.754664
wetland
Wetland 15
35.955435
non section 10-
PEM
Area: 0.09 ac.
No
-79.755421
wetland
35.954340
non section 10-
Wetland 16
-79.755282
wetland
PEM
Area: 0.11 ac.
No
Page 15

Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination
February 6, 2019
Page 16
35.951523
non section 10 -
Wetland 17
PSS1 (Logged)
Area: 0.49 ac.
M
-79.755272
wetland
Wetland 17a
35.951077
non section 10 -
PSS1 (Logged)
Area: 0.03 ac.
No
-79.753225
wetland
35.950335
non section 10 -
Wetland 18
PSS1 (Logged)
Area: 0.76 ac.
-79.755273
wetland
Wetland 19
35.948688
non section 10-
PSS1
Area: 0.03 ac.
N
-79.756330
wetland
Wetland 20
35.948667
non section 10 -
PFO1
Area: 0.19
-79.755528
wetland
ac.
Wetland 21
35.948251
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.17 ac.
No
-79.753420
wetland
Wetland 22
35.947760
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.27 ac.
No
-79.755664
wetland
Wetland 23
35.943716
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.45 ac.
No
-79.759421
wetland
Wetland 24
35.942580
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.51 ac.
No
-79.759404
wetland
Wetland 25
OUTSIDE
OF FINAL STUDY
AREA
Wetland 26
35.943816
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.07 ac.
No
-79.757153
wetland
35.942102
non section 10-
Wetland 27
PSS1
Area: 0.02 ac.
No
-79.757094
wetland
Wetland 28
35.941114
non section 10 -
PFO1
Area: 0.01 ac.
No
-79.757611
wetland
Wetland 29
35.940899
non section 10-
PFO1
Area: 0.01 ac.
No
-79.757515
wetland
Total Potential Jurisdictional Wetlands of the U.S.
Area: 5.45 ac.
Open Water - Potential Non
-Wetland Waters of the U.S.
Pond 1
35.989448
non section 10 - non-
PUBHh
Area: 0.13 ac.
No
-79.776998
wetland
Pond 2
35.963480
non section 10 - non-
PUBHh
Area: 0.03 ac.
Yes
-79.757109
wetland
Pond 3
35.943337
non section 10 - non-
PUBHh
Area: 0.11 ac.
No
-79.759344
wetland
Total Potential Jurisdictional Open Water Ponds of the U.S.
Area: 0.27 ac.
Length: 6,139 If
Total Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Area: 6.28 ac.
Page 16

Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination
February 6, 2019
R3SB3 = Riverine, upper perennial with a cobble -gravel streambed.
R4SB3 = Riverine, intermittent with cobble -gravel streambed.
R4SB4 = Riverine, intermittent with a sand streambed.
R4SB5 = Riverine, intermittent with a mud streambed
R5UB1 = Riverine, unknown perennial with a cobble -gravel unconsolidated bottom.
PEM = Palustrine, emergent
PF01 = Palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous, temporarily flooded wetland.
PUBHh = Palustrine, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded, diked/impounded open water.
On behalf of Duke Energy PNG, HDR is hereby requesting a PJD and Buffer Determination for the
jurisdictional surface waters identified within the Study Area. Should you have any questions or
require additional information following your review of the enclosed materials, please contact me at
[phone] or eric.mularski(a)hdrinc.com.
Sincerely,
HDR, Inc.
Eric Mularski, PWS
Project Manager/Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Preliminary Jurisdiction Determination Form
Figure 1. Project Location
Figure 2. USGS Pleasant Garden 7.5 Minute Quadrangle
Figure 3. Aerial Imagery
Figure 4. NRCS Soils Survey of Guilford County (1977), North Carolina
Figure 5. USGS National Hydrography Dataset, USFWS National Wetlands
Inventory, and FEMA Floodplains
Figures 6A -6H. Delineated Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP1-DP35)
Stream Classification Forms
Representative Site Photographs
Property Owner List
cc: Carl Rogers - HDR
Alicia DePalma — Duke Energy
David Vena — Duke Energy
Page 17

Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination
February 6, 2019
References
Cowardin, L.M., Carter, V., Golet, F.C., and LaRoe, E.T. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington,
D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Technical Report Y-
87-1. 207 p.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2017. Special Flood Hazard Area
Definition/Description. Online [URL]: (http://www.fema.gov/special-flood-hazard-area)
(Accessed: June 2018).
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2017. United States Department of Agriculture.
Web Soil Survey. Online [URL]: (http://websoilsurveV.nres.usda.gov/) (Accessed:
December 2018).
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2012. Regional Supplement of the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0). U.S.
Vicksburg, Mississippi. April 2012. Online [URL]:
(http://www.usace.army.mil/Portals/2/docs/civilworks/regulatory/req supp/EMP Piedmont
v2b.pdf)
2005. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) No. 05-05: Ordinary High Water Mark
Identification. December 2005. Online [URL]:
(http://www.usace.army.mil/Portals/2/docs/civilworks/RGLS/rg105-05.pdf)
. 1987. Wetland Delineation Manual. Vicksburg, MS.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2017. National Wetlands Inventory. October 2017. Online
[URL]: (https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/) (Accessed: June 2018).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2017. National Hydrography Dataset. Online [URL]:
(http://nhd.usgs.gov/) (Accessed: June 2018).
USGS1983. Topographic Quadrangle Maps (1:24,000 -scale); Pleasant Garden, NC (1982)
Page 18

urisdictional Determination Request
us Army corps
of Enylneers
Wftingwn DwUkg
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
htta:: www.saw.usace.army.mil Missions.`Re uQ latoaPermitProgram: Contact,"CouniyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number (828) 2 71-79 80
Fax Number. [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
1:S Army Corps of Engineers
240- West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 2514610
Fax Number- [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wilmington. North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: 910-2514633
General Number. (919) 5544884
Fax Number. (910) 2514025
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page I

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See attached maps & property oA
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: HDR (POC: Eric Mularski, PWS
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
440 S. Church Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
[phone] (Office)
[e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
ZI am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION" -
Name: Proposed utility easements
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION','
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
40.4 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
David Vena
Print Name
Capacity- Z Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
PNG - Utility
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from. the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
8 A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version; May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
ZI am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
42).
F] I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
✓❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
F0Size of Property or Review Area 101.4 acres.
aThe property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.968448
Longitude: -79.757388
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 l x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidallnavigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
e Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. littn:liwwnv.saw.usace.army.mil+'Missions?RegL]latory-Permit-
Proerarn/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a PrciiminM Jurisdictional Determination Form and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs• t)lease complete an A,pyLQved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
W] Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
21 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
zNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
www,saw.usace.army.mil.,Portals.59`docs,regulatorv+readocs:JD-RGL 08-02 Ann A Prelim JD Form fillable.ndf
8 Please see httn:,ww,%v.saw.usace.army.milWissionsi eaulatory-Permit-Progrant/Jurisdiction.r
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of]ustice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made avai table as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will bemadeavailable to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

LEGEND
Q Study Area
DATA SOURCE: Esri, OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User Community
r
0 Miles 0.5
!--Fll • "aft.
AMR L,
S
1
_ r
.r
Study Area Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project _
Applicant: Duke Energy
Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
NC Date: 2/4/2019
Study Area: 143.49 acres —
Guilford County Center Coordinates: -79.763083°, 35.964806° II
DUE PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
01 NBt rural G �a� PROJECT VICINITY
�t�
.t•, 1� •.,; ENWT- FIGURE
PATH: H:IGISIPROJECTS\3672 DUKEENERGY10110236 PLEASANTGARDEN\7.2 WORK IN PROGRESS\MAP DOCSIMKDIWORKINGIJD PERMIT\FINAL PJDIFIGI PLEASANT GARDEN VICINITY FINAL.MXD - JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

i
LEGEND # L,
Q Study Area;
Topographic F w
Quadrangle
DATA SOURCE: Pleasant Garden 24K _
Topographic Map (1982); USA Topo Map -
GIS Service
F
0 Feet 2,000 -w-
• k z - . _ 1
eII�'L r'
F r
+
rPLEASANT GARDEN -
- ' E CLIMAX
V.
�%
y
_ •�., ` Vis+ � •
_ . _ • Fir � -
r J I
� ice,'• rr
IF
Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project I '
Applicant: Duke Energy
Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity t ''
Date: 2/4/2019
Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinates: -79.763083°, 35.964806° bt=- t��J
PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT Piedrnant r4latural Gas tUSGS PLEASANT GARDEN 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE
Gsly�n..
FIGURE 2
PATH: IICLTSMAINIGIS DATAIGISIPROJECTS13872 DIIKEENERGY18118238 PLEASANTGARDENIT.2 WORK IN PROGRESSIMAP DOCSWXD\MRKINGWD PERMITIFINAL PMFIG2 PLEASANT GARDEN TOP JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

�CC IIM`L4L+.0 �:I— L�L� ihlr{ISAJYs •t.f
LEGEND
_Study .rea ..r
Guilf
• • County- IIJJJ'{{{Y���#{tT���TTT jj74I}y,
DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery Bing Maps
Ijl.l J ,. t.� '
• •YY
MW i
`-fit ►Lr I_ _ .4
_,
ON
FID 'I 41r
imp. AW I I W -z i
JV-, I F7 �H-
_vW.- A.,
M-41
4r rO
r � 71 J I y { + { r 1 #
FYf.�ad r T . S � � I } � t" e ? � _ f '"yr'I.�t IN+i�r _ . - • L Y
L 1W
1J, ,,, 7
X 4L
� � � _ � r ''•J�r or ' > s
I �
1
L _ _L
r Ar JL.
1� r
J. NNF-q
+ • ' ;' - - '
T.
LA
14
+ r _
CL
k _tib � M1�• 4 •r I � •.
J
ir
ir
Z.
# I }
r
r r{ �• - r
-` � �• spy; x^•`�'an!
7 1III .-
J
`11
Jaw
k -
A? .
jft
Applicant:PleasantD• It f
Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity "P.
{. } I
..te: 2/5/2019 1 Center Coordinates: -79.763083', 35.964806*-
Study Area: 143.49 acres
y �

VkA
• •
1
• •
Study Area:
Center • •
vI
Adw� I
MF
NELOW vw WW - opp�
+
K. _. -may :r • �_ '`� _ I 3
AW02MM
--- JORDAN'LbAKE
ERSHED
Mum
_
adIko . 4TVA
JIM M
YL ft
SIMI V"
6 'W-OW11
`x
-T
W,4E
JIM
-��
-3M
Ilk
y -
i 14311,1.17 e�
�I
6
ti 1.
.z
�x::.....:. 1.
i..........:
[ %,, .. ... ..... .. ... tM � � .... ........ �:.e, r...e �l� ?•i � .: Vic. �.�l lr r.. r• Y,��!'::::,.�.i-.`-.5.. �•l�� �! xl'-:.'ii.����•�:..
S
3
,
.y
1
7
F
i
S
€ .. ... ................. - .IS . E.�. 1:
.. ,.
x .. ... .. .... ... - .�.. ;,::,::::�::•;:: •.: ,. � s . ., S.S.
Piedmont ��� DUDE PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
FNNatural Cans ENERGY NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF GUILFORD COUNTY (1977), NORTH CAROLINA
EI'Klgg0el=-.aws+ FIGURE 4
PATH:%ICLTSMAINIGIS_DATAIGISIPROJECTSG 812DUKEENERGV 10110236_PLEASANTGARDENI7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESSIMAP_DOCSIMXDIWORKINGUD_PERMITIFINAL PJDIFIG4_PLEASANT_GARDEN_SOILS_FINAL.MXD - USER. EMULARSK - DATE: 21512019 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

golw iv) -
P
LEGEND C
4— L--.6
Study Area J
Ad
USGS National Hydrograhpy - 1 0
L I Dataset
11L
USFWS National Wetlands
Inventory
FEMA Firm Panel
FEMA Flood Zones
100 -Year Flood Zone
dog 'Ir,,61 -
500 -Year Flood Zone
DATA SOURCE: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer
,NFHL,; JISGS National Hydro,ra,1yDalase1,NHD,;
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NW I)
L VV JT PV4n
rr
Feet 1,000
0 _x
Jr. Ej6
JiM Ill. -W T" 7AV
RVO
MIL N.*
W TO
h
%I V
IML 26
r13'
4P6.
IL
7
YL
RkmnW
L
7 of
wl, I` VM7 YL 2 4=K LF
3,
4 Y, or1'y
IF TN
T % .,o —P
'31
4L
Nd.
All ML
Ar Ae M Nk
J
ir I
Aga\
T
49P _rL "V
9N
..
,�_d Looping (Line 450) Project
Rr. 7
n of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity 9.k Hi
,3083', 35.964806'
T r
4 IN OL
ikA
74
Q6
'c
'a6 A- P
1 1 l FF
4

Wetland 1 - Potential Wetland
} Waters of the U.S.
JI`'. 0.67 ac.
{ Stream 2 - Potential Non -
1 ' Wetland Waters of the U.S.
y * 285 linear feet
IF
_-dhOL� ► Pond 1 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
_0.13 ac.
Stream 2 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
285 linear feet
14''L
Wetland 2 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.01 ac.
Approximate Total Jurisdictional RPW Tributary: 6,169 linear feet (0.568 acres)
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Wetlands: 5.45 acres
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Pond: 0.27 acres
Approximate Total Uplands: 137.20 acres
* ■ Approximate Total Site Acreage: 143.49 acres
■ . - Wetland 2a - Potential Wetland
Waters o the f h U.S
eke Wb&
Jr
Wetland 3 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.27 ac. ,
. � 0.10 ac. •
� Stream 20 -Potential Non- #■
Wetland Waters of the U.S. .. A
T
Stream 4 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
217 linear feet
T
Stream 3 -Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
239 linear feet
Stream 1 - Potential Non -
`tib•..
•�
�. `
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
P.
i•i*4`�t
659 linear feetWetland
3 - Potential Wetland
F
r..
_
Waters of the U.S.
,
,f;
0.27 ac.
MAP LOCATION
� •�
30 linear feet
- � = ■■
L4
Stream 4 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
217 linear feet
T
Stream 3 -Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
239 linear feet
Stream 1 - Potential Non -
`tib•..
•�
�. `
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
P.
i•i*4`�t
659 linear feetWetland
3 - Potential Wetland
F
r..
_
Waters of the U.S.
,
,f;
0.27 ac.
MAP LOCATION
w ~'
Stream 4 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
217 linear feet
T
`tib•..
•�
�. `
!-�J.
i•i*4`�t
L+-
fir'
F
r..
F 4, M1 -U Jr /
,
,f;
Stream 4 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
217 linear feet
Stream 5 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
6 linear feet
Stream 6 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
264 linear feet
LEGEND
Photograph Location
Upland Data Point
Wetland Data Point
T� Culvert
Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the
U.S.
Delineated Stream - Intermittent
Delineated Stream - Perennial
Delineated Wetlands
Delineated Ponds
DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery Bing Maps Hybrid
GIS Service
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING TRIMBLE
GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED
A
0 Feet 300
Stream 7 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
299 linear feet
Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Applicant: Duke Energy
Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
Date: 2/5/2019
Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinates: -79.763083°, 35.964806°
PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
��1MC DUKE DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
rdivatura1 Gas t. EWRGY.
E gyros aha vwavYs' FIGURE 6A
PATH: %%CLTSMAIN%GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3872_DUKEENERGYkIO110236 PLEASANTGARDEN\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS%MAP_DOCS\MXD\WORKINGUD_PERMIT\FINAL_PJDTIGGA_PLEASANT_GARDEN_JD_FINAL.MXD - USER: EMULARSK - DATE: 21512019 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

Stream 8 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
."Ip "k - r 370 linear feet
res
49
J
*3 r�
�t
Y 111
r
MAP LOCATION
`ter F Fyr 'A '1 '�1'
� �
ip
I
hmwl
�. L
'#
■ 1 10 r•
0 IF
y
' w 1'*
- r
Approximate Total Jurisdictional RPW Tributary: 6,169 linear feet (0.568 acres)
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Wetlands: 5.45 acres
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Pond: 0.27 acres
Approximate Total Uplands: 137.20 acres
Approximate Total Site Acreage: 143.49 acres
Wetland 4 -Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.06 ac.
1 J
1 Wetland 5 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
r 0.09 ac.
. i -
RAT - x
Rye rl `•' Y� .w
11 IL. •- -� a�'' I •1.-1 • I Ilti • �f'trr . f
Wetland 6 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
:r 0.05 ac.
4L Ifrr• L'1 _ y r
w J t + _
rte'
I
#a
pwkliu
Ir
LEGEND
Study
Photograph Location
�
Upland Data Point
�
Wetland Data Point
�-
Culvert
Potential
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.
Delineated Stream -Intermittent
Delineated Stream - Perennial)
® Delineated Wetland
Delineated Ponds
DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery Bing Maps Hybrid
GIS Serv
ice
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING TRIM BLE
GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED
0 Feet 300
40
y r
Y 1� Yid.+ �y ■
'1
r
1�1 & Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Wetland 7 -Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.04 ac.
Applicant: Duke Energy
Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
Date: 2/5/2019
Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinates: -79.763083°, 35.964806°01
PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
Piedmont t ��C��j� DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.SrMINatura 1 G ins.
E-wps'ihla! vwx,rs' FIGURE 613
PATH: H:\GIS\PROJELTS13672_DUKEENERGY\10110236 PLEASANTGARDEN\].2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCSIM%DIWORKINGWD_PERMIT\FINAL_PJD\FIG6B_PLEASANT_GARDEN_JD_FINALMXD - USER: EMULARSK -
DAT E: 215/2019 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

la
' Approximate Total Jurisdictional RPW Tributary: 6,169 linear feet (0.568 acres)
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Wetlands: 5.45 acres
Wetland 8 - Potential Approximate Total Jurisdictional Pond: 0.27 acres
Wetland Waters of the U.S. Approximate Total Uplands: 137.20 acres
M1 4 0.07 ac. Approximate Total Site Acreage: 143.49 acres
5a i
30
ANT
Stream 9 - Potential Non - Pr
lQ'`�
Wetland Waters of the U.S.' ` � ►
_ 121 linear feet
+ �• •` '-
F f _ ,F�: —�-, -++nom as ria.— :wit •!� {� K+ F T
9. 111
�'� r'• �'F ' �_ + - r •ti r - f+r - ' M � ,y i� t-��ai
'r ' '� _
��_ ��*. �_ •�f' ` � • , •�•� .� �
F j .+ I r !dL
Ippqr F{'
Ff#_ -••4 �'� £.. ��#.�i]�. -rte •��' I - - _�'•■#_.
r ? €' � f - -yam
or
to ll
-re. f. r II y'} ti `• ~" r �':Ih` ry l- •• L
yrs � � T �, • - � _ � �ti F , � y 40 1.1 r � F • 14'� ItIt
_ .`; �� fir: � � � - t.. � � T.•�F .�Y r - .�. n� } _
+ �'� �� �,��''`� z !�• ,_d '�I � � �_ ,f ��+ � _'' ��``�+ �J�:-��#ter{- � . t+
i.•i" -+ �' ti}T -•r 4• h= �,+_ + L �1<��,.L•y• _._�i r'•�.u.
r i ! J h
' �,�' � � � 7!�! J` , � �� *� '� ���•_ _�� � . � .:' rf sir �� i �
I'� 313. WF6- -Ir
! + loopF.
` {
Alled AW.014i iMiff5ims
Ln. V111l V, 411F iLdEF996
W# I - _4 l
MAP LOCATION 4._% r" ��,Jr
Jr UP.4
■Iwa•
:} W. _# J
- + Ilk ,
-AL
��• ,�F• +�}:Till �� - � k } * -7J
F; 0 Fr
%dL
.� .
,114 A do
F ITS'.
Wetland 9 - Potential WetlafdF
Ilk Waters of the U.S. 4L
0.38ac.
ifi
�7. }4
:- "�.+ � � : �4• �4 � � -'ter .�'�' �`
TM
• qr-. -d' IF A r.- t�
IrLe-
�� �� •kr+� r � I� `: •r
}
!IF
_r 1
Stream 10 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
219 linear feet
LEGEND
Photograph Location
® Upland Data Point
® Wetland Data Point
T� Culvert
Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the
U.S.
Delineated Stream - Intermittent
Delineated Stream - Perennial
® Delineated Wetland
Delineated Ponds
DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery Bing Maps Hybrid
GIS Service
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING TRIMBLE
GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED
0 Feet 300
x ~ -
Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Applicant: Duke Energy
Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
Date: 2/5/2019
Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinates: -79.763083°, 35.964806°
PWmo tPLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
rMINatural DUKE DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
13 as r ENERGY.
E-wggil lh! arvwsl FIGURE 6C
PATH: H:IGISTROJECTS13672_DUKEENERGI 10110236_PLEASANTGARDEN17.2_WORK _IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXDIWORKINGWD_PERMITIFINAL_PJDIFIG6C_PLEASANT_GARDEN_JD_FINAL.MXD - USER: EMULARSK - DATE: 2MM19 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

I lip
�F —
• S
1 _if_
r
.F J10- -
MAP LOCATION i
I' Ak� - A
. �-0-2r
t M
W
Joe
y _
1
Delineated Stl
t Fes" - F� �1
d4w Ir ® Delineated WI
+TSF � � , O+ � R
��,�*_�•r�'t,l I Delineated Po
�q ■�i _ DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery I
- Is rA Il� g �t r GIS Service
_ _ T �• �ti _ _■ 1 GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTS
16 AA! "Fa
opR 4 �i GE07X AND POST-PROCESSEI
o Fee,
FP
l d-
I�,
u 1 f � - F. { r ii.Efia � t iu 1
' 1f ■ if ti. R __ l
# i AUMS
z:
f+ + + 7
F • �� 7
4s
IL F
L
16/ linear Leet
�
11F 4&L
t��ti• # fir, �.
* �F �� .► Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
■ F,'1 * *_' f„�4 r”: �,.. - • '-' f = s' Applicant: Duke Energy
�3 $ __ �• �� I .. , _' ESI ` Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
.� Date: 2/5/2019
Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinates: -79.763083°, 35.964806°
P1PC_ _ .r.•
PiedmontPLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
01 DUKE DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
rMINatUra I Gas r �I�L11V 1 •
E-wogil,e! vwavrs' FIGURE 6D
PATH: H:\GIS\PROJECTS13872_DUKEENERGY\10110236 PLEASANTGARDEN%7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCSIMXDIWORKINGUD_PERMIT%FINAL_PJD\FIG6D_PLEASANT_GARDEN_JD_FINAL.MXD - USER: EMULARSK - DATE MOM JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

Approximate Total Jurisdictional RPW Tributary: 6,169 linear feet (0.568 acres) y �_ Y.*.
��
F rW4�_
�• � - �
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Wetlands: 5.45 acres t ,
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Pond: 0.27 acres • t r .
Approximate Total Uplands: 137.20 acre. _�
Approximate Total Site Acreage: 143.49 acres � r'� a v .� �+ "
MAP LOCATION
.O b
Ar7X.
.l Jk lip. � �.4 � �� � �_� a� , � 'r r ti ` Wetland 12 - Potential Wetland
; '� x j Waters of the U.S.
L 0.23 ac.
qP
�- k4 .rte# _ Stream 15 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
+f T_l• i
217 linear feet
T #3 Pond 2 - Potential Wetland
r Wetland 13 - Potential Wetland �� Waters of the U.S.
Waters of the U.S. 0.03 ac.
- - 0.06 ac.rh
3 T
'L d6t
VWR
j.6 J6-
rr' LO
d. _� �_ � �
~ { 1 ,. k ` _
l'Afto *&WOA-7
Ah �
L
# 4 F
r
LEGEND
Study Area
Photograph Location
®
Upland Data Point
®
Wetland Data Point
T�
Culvert
Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the
U.S.
Delineated Stream - Intermittent
Delineated Stream - Perennial
® Delineated Wetland
Delineated Ponds
DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery Bing Maps Hybrid
GIS Service
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING TRIMBLE
GE07XAND POST-PROCESSEDfrof ..W iIIIIIIII01 WAr
0 Feet 300
A6�ek 47
�.. L_lTirk • _ .�
Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
5
Applicant: Duke Energy
Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
Date: 2/5/2019
Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinates: -79.763083°, 35.964806°
Piedmont PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
r �nMINatural �as DUC��yy��++5� DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
E -Os' ihs
a! irvw' EE[i�l 1 ��
FIGURE 6E
PATH: H:\GIS\PROJE°TS138]2_DUKEENERG�10110236_PLEASANTGARDEN\].2_WORK _IN_PROGRE55\MAP_DOCS\M%OIWORKINGWD_PERMITIFINAL_PJDIFIG6E_PLEASANT_GARDEN_JD_FINAL.M%D - USER: EMULARSK - UATE:2I5/2019 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

Approximate Total Jurisdictional RPW Tributary: 6,169 linear feet (0.568 acres) A . ' �
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Wetlands: 5.45 acres.'
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Pond: 0.27 acres
�.�. Approximate Total Uplands: 137.20 acres
6—
P•.Y,
Approximate Total Site Acreage: 143.49 acresF1w_' - , - r!' . *_#'+. �P }�
IL
I AL
J�
'�- ' ' # Y �'++ . ' Stream 16 - Potential Non-
- a * doNk
r � � a _ ilp TP# l Wetland Waters of the U.S.
?�NL
a rt y } 4F :rt 496 linear feet
sr {JFy tiF {moi i
am,
Fti
r i' Tr may..
r.r � h a �tPL� f '�dL
X11 � L� &•y Atd
•.
} rr }' F• _ -tib ■ Ty. �op
L�
jdrAr
- i -�$$
T- (j -: 4571
.,
r p t V,, � � {f,W;r-�' �r
�.-�
� � � . r' � _ +F4 Wetland 14 -Potential Wetla.jbnd } I
�,_ * , �• 1 rrl,# *r3i�,h. aters of the U.S.
JL
sem_. ' 4 �+_: •' "1 �� '_:`" f 0.04 ac.
I Ir
4- 1161
A.
r_* _ T rt • Jr '�
Wetland 15 - Potential Wetla
�yyi' nd]
�. r v Waters of the U.S.
F. .� ..�4 �� ri ��, ' �w' '� + } 0.09 ac.
Vol
PAW
MAP LOCATION 'o'
' � r _ r rte � 3.. � _ • '�t ,_i �� �f � F i� �. �
'-r _ - ' v� �''��'{� •�' Wetland 16 - Potential Wetland
'' `�■, _� c'.�' '• {.J. y+ 1 '��' Waters of the U.S.
T F T
i0.11 ac.
' {'' - • �r � 40; 0-'r F Name:
I* � i, • I' ! Applic�
��'-_
tris= -
e'r . r y , • ,,� r .'+ Date: 2
.�
.'� •_r,.'rdir
- �''`+� }.- �. Study,
•r'r��'�4 ��.rr l VIP* Center
LEGEND
41& Study Area
� Photograph Location
Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the
U.S.
PWmo tPLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
Fn#� as t DUK�Ey DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
E-wg!? ihB! v%weLl � E[i 1
FIGURE 6F
PATH: H:\GIS\PROJELTS138]2_DUKEENERGI'110110236_PLEASANTGARDEN\].2_WORK _IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\M%DIWORKINGWD_PERMITIFINAL_PJDIFIG6F_PLEASANT_GARDEN_JD_FINAL.MXD -USER: EM ULARSK -DATE: 2162019 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

Approximate Total Jurisdictional RPW Tributary: 6,169 linear feet (0.568 acres)
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Wetlands: 5.45 acres
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Pond: 0.27 acres
Approximate Total Uplands: 137.20 acres
Approximate Total Site Acreage: 143.49 acres
OF
i
MAP LOCATION
i
� x
} 4r
�f a ' 261~
A9 dip
�.
' P. — # # i
ow o 5k'y
Wetland 20 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.19 ac.
Wetland 19 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.03 ac.
*W
MSF
.. !T Ir 1. F r
Rti� f
. rJ • m ��
�. 40r.Vq
Wetland 17 - Potential Wetland n
Waters of the U.S..
0.49 ac.L-T11A+. i
1p
y
1�f�Ellly 6.
y
IP JV'I
QL # � JYa ,i Lrww fir . Ilk
Fork.. k
f � -
f Wetland 18 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
—0.76 ac.
Wetland 17a - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.03 ac.
F _Wetland 21 -Potential Wetland
'."
&VWaters of the U.S.
0.17 ac.
NOW L_W+ Jr
.�
Fes_ 3
,% 'P— vo.+ # :
•. ! f pw-- .-
+
f
'rr 41
i _ _� .. ■r - Jam- �•• � }�J� s Y: -
Wetland 22 -Potential Wetland Stream 18 - Potential Non-
,,�y Waters of the U.S. =1111111IIIIIIIIWetland Waters of the U.S.
�•'I�`: 0.27 ac. 135 linear feet
z sJ.
_L
�y s
Ilk
LEGEND
PWmo tPLEASANT
.�
E -os' ihB! arvvs
�an
Study Area
GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
FIGURE 6G
Photograph Location
®
Upland Data Point
®
Wetland Data Point
Culvert
Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the
U.S.
Delineated Stream - Intermittent
' Delineated Stream - Perennial
Delineated Ponds
® Delineated Wetlands
DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery Bing Maps Hybrid
GIS Service
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING TRIMBLE
GE07XAND POST -PROCESSED
0 Feet 300
' Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Applicant: Duke Energy
:1inear
- Potential Non- Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
aters of the U.S. Date: 2/5/2019
eet Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinates: -79.763083°, 35.964806'
Fn#�
PWmo tPLEASANT
.�
E -os' ihB! arvvs
�an
DUK�Ey
� E[i 1
GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
FIGURE 6G
PATH: H:IGISTROJECTS13672_DUKEENERGY10110236_PLEASANTGARDEN17.2_
WORK _IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXDIWORKINGWD_PERMITIFINAL_PJDIFIG6G_PLEASANT_GARDEN_JD_FINAL.MXD - USER: EMULARSK - DATE 21W2019
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

I y■[
Approximate Total Jurisdictional RPW Tributary: 6,169 linear feet (0.568 acres) IF
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Wetlands: 5.45 acres
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Pond: 0.27 acres '
Approximate Total Uplands: 137.20 acres
Approximate Total Site Acreage: 143.49 acres' ! Pond 3 - Potential Non-
;- r r
�c �' Wetland Waters of the U.S.
Wt inJar �r CI ^ ■rte, 'y� .0.11 ac.
W, M
r
r {_--•,�-: # - ter; *�':����� _
rI -
Wetland 23 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.45 ac.
Stream 19 - Potential Non- —
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
208 linear feet
Wetland 24 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.51 ac.
• I
_•i
F IF'
�r Mwl
4
P 5r F P. P.
Wall
toAr
1. x
MAP LOCATION _ } ' _
41
Stream 19 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
590 linear feet
rr�
Wetland 26 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.07 ac.
Wetland 27 - Potential Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
0.02 ac.
Wetland 28 - Potential Wetland
y 4 j Waters of the U.S.
I 1� 0.01 ac.
aL
IL
�i
I
Wetland 29 - Potential Wetland
,. Waters of the U.S.
0.01 ac.
% Y b
LEGEND
Study Area
'+ r
Photograph Location
Upland Data Point
Wetland Data Point
=
Culvert
Potential
Jurisdictional Waters of the
U.S.
Delineated Stream - Intermittent =
Delineated Stream - Perennial
Delineated Ponds
® Delineated Wetlands
DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery Bing Maps Hybrid
GIS Service
GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING TRIMBLE
GE07X AND POST -PROCESSED
A —
0 Feet 300 4
4
t
+
'+ r
F
IL
P.
I ]
�+ IIS 1�
Wetland 25 - Potential Wetland �* �•.++r :#
'�i�..
_ _
±�
Waters of the U.S.
t r q L L
w0.23
_ ITFI+
ac. #
+ Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
, .F `- , TJ�f,' - Fr '" a 1} M
�,
Applicant: Duke Energy
• e ► ;•� *_r-- ,t����'� _•`
Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
f
{ l # tiF ' A ?w
= Date: 2/5/2019
•
F•, I. r , r rr Ff a I;F
r' _
Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinates: -79.763083', 35.9648060
+` -_ ,
r L, r x4
F
f All—
do —
PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
�#
ff�E
rMINatura
I G as
DUKE
1•
r EMMY.
DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
E-wroyihe! vwavrs'
FIGURE 6H
PATH: H:\GIS\PROJECTS13872_DUKEENERGY\10110236 PLEASANTGARDEN%7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCSIMXDIWORKINGUD_PERMIT\FINAL_PJD\FIG6H_PLEASANT_GARDEN_JD_FINAL.MXD - USER: EMULARSK - DATE: MIMS
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 06/28/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP1-Wet1
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, T. Blackwell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley floor Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.990257 Long: -79.776483 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PSS1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional srub/ shrub wetland (Wetland 1)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1-Wet1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Ulmus americana
10
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
10
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
OBL species 40 x 1 = 40
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1.
Cephalanthus occidentalis
30
Yes
OBL
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
2.
Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
Rubus
20
Yes
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 180 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.80
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
70
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Vernonia noveboracensis
20
Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Boehmeria cylindrica 10 No FACW
4.
Juncus
20
Yes
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Mimulus alatus
10
No
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
60
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1-Wet1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 3/2
90
10YR 4/6 10
—Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy/Clayey
2-8
2.5YR 6/2
60
2.5YR 5/6 30
M
Loamy/Clayey
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
7.5YR 4/6 10
PL
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
8-20
2.5Y 6/1
50
7.5YR 4/6 50
M
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
`Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 06/28/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP2-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, T. Blackwell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hill side Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.990145 Long: -79.776434 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to wetland 1
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
10 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
2. Rubus
10 Yes
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 25 (A) 80 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.20
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
20 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Festuca
80 Yes
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Tsuga
10 No
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Solidago 5 No
4. Solanum carolinense
5 No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2-Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/3
100
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy/Clayey
2-10
2.5Y 5/3
80
2.5Y 5/6 20 M
Loamy/Clayey
10-20
2.5Y 6/3
90
2.5Y 5/6 10 M
Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
`Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/12/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP3-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.988849 Long: -79.775714 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to an ephemeral stream
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Platanus occidentalis
10
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50
Yes
FACW
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
2.
Ligustrum
30
Yes
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
Quercus phellos
10
No
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 300 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.50
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
90
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium
20
Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Campsis radicans
20
Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Vitis rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP3-Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3
10YR 2/2
100
Sulfide (A4)
Loamy/Clayey
3-9
10YR 5/3
70
7.5YR 5/8 30 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-20
10YR 5/2
80
10YR 6/6 15 C PL
Prominent redox concentrations
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
7.5YR 5/8 5
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Sulfide (A4)
Gleyed Matrix (F2)
? Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Hydrogen
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 11/1/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP4-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley floor Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.987969 Long: -79.771881 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PF01
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetland (Wetland 3)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (69)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
X Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acer rubrum
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3.
Nyssa sylvatica
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 115 (A) 355 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.09
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium
80
Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
10
No
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Impatiens 10 No
4.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Juncus
2
No
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
107
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
54 20% of total cover:
22
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP4-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 3/2
100
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy/Clayey
2-10
10YR 4/2
90
7.5YR 4/6 10 PL
Loamy/Clayey
10-20
10YR 4/2
60
7.5YR 4/6 40 M
Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 11/1/2018
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP5-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 8%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.98800 Long: -79.771813 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of upland forested area adjacent to Wetland 3
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP5-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Quercus alba
10
No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
95
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
48 20% of total cover:
19
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
2.
Ulmus americana
10
Yes
FACW
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 135 (A) 450 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.33
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium
40
Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Solidago
10
No
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Chasmanthium latifolium 10 No FACU
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
60
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP5-Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 11/1/2018
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP6-wetiand
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.982928 Long: -79.762554 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB- Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of jurisdictional headwater forested wetlands (Wetland 4, Wetland 5, Wetland 6, and Wetland 7)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
x High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP6-Wetland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
40
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species 165 x 3 = 495
2.
Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3.
Nyssa blflora
10
Yes
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 180 (A) 535 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.97
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
50
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
40
Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
No
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Chasmanthium latifolium 5 No FACU
4.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
55
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP6-Wetland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/2 100 Sandy
2-20 10YR 5/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 11/1/2018
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP7-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.982826 Long: -79.762552 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB- Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland areas located nearby similar headwater forested wetlands (Wetland 4, Wetland 5, Wetland 6,
and Wetland 7)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP7-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
20
No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
40
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Quercus alba
10
No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
105
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
53 20% of total cover:
21
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
2.
Ulmus americana
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species 80 x 4 = 320
3.
Ilex opaca
10
Yes
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 190 (A) 650 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.42
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
50
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
20
Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
No
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Chasmanthium latifolium 5 No FACU
4.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
35
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
18 20% of total cover:
7
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP7-Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/2 100 Sandy
2-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 12/5/2018
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP8-wetland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.977641 Long: -79.760969 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland data point representative of Wetland 8 located in the floodplain of Little Alamance Creek
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
x Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
x High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) x
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP8-Wetland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant. Recently clear-cut.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum
10 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Platanus occidentalis
5 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
15 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1. Ligustrum japonicum
40 Yes
UPL
FAC species 22 x 3 = 66
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 40 x 5 = 200
4.
Column Totals: 67 (A) 276 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.12
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
50 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2 No
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
2 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
1 20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant. Recently clear-cut.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP8-Wetland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 3/2
100
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy/Clayey
2-6
2.5Y 4/2
90
10YR 4/6 10 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-14
2.5Y 4/2
80
10YR 5/8 20 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
14-20
2.5Y 5/2
70
10YR 3/6 30 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 12/5/2018
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP9-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.977653 Long: -79.760893 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation x Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Representative upland area adjacent to Wetland 8. Uplands have recently been clear-cut
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP9-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Recently clear-cut.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Recently clear-cut.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP9-Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 06/28/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP10-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, T. Blackwell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley floor Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.975414 Long: -79.758198 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC- Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: PF01
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetland (Wetland 9)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (69)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP10-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acer rubrum
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3.
Nyssa sylvatica
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 115 (A) 355 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.09
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium
80
Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
10
No
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Impatiens 10 No
4.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Juncus
2
No
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
107
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
54 20% of total cover:
22
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP10-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
2-10
10YR 4/1
90
7.5YR 4/6 10 PL Loamy/Clayey
10-20
10YR 4/1
60
7.5YR 4/6 40
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 06/28/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP11-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, T. Blackwell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.975367 Long: -79.75828 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to wetland 9
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP11-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
85
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
43 20% of total cover:
17
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
2.
Nyssa sylvatica
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species 45 x 4 = 180
3.
Ulmus americana
5
No
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Quercus alba
5
No
FACU
Column Totals: 130 (A) 430 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.31
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
40
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium
80
Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Solidago
10
No
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Chasmanthium latifolium 5 No FACU
4.
Rubus
5
No
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP11-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/3
100
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy/Clayey
2-10
2.5Y 5/3
80
2.5Y 5/6 20 M
Loamy/Clayey
10-20
2.5Y 6/3
90
2.5Y 5/6 10 M
Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 07/17/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP12-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, M. Yayac Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley floor Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968475 Long: -79.757348 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC- Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: PSS1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional scrub/ shrub wetland (Wetland 10)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1.
2. Alnus serrulata
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 30
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1. Commelina communis
2. Solidago
3. Boehmeria
4. Microstegium
5. Polygonum
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 48
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicatc
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
60 Yes OBL
20% of total cover: 12
10 No
10 No
10 No
5 No
20% of total cover: 19
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Sampling Point: DP12-Wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 60 x 1 = 60
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 120 (A) 240 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP12-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/3
100
Loamy/Clayey
2-8
10YR 6/2
50
7.5YR 4/6 5 C PL Prominent redox concentrations
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
10YR 5/2 45
8-16
10YR 4/2
60
7.5YR 5/6 40 RM
16-20
10YR 5/1
95
7.5YR 4/6 5 RM
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 7/17/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP13-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, M. Yayac Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968445 Long: -79.757388 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC- Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to wetland 10
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP13-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
35
Yes
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
35
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
18 20% of total cover:
7
OBL species 40 x 1 = 40
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Alnus serrulata
40
Yes
OBL
FAC species 5 x 3 = 15
2.
Rubus
30
Yes
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
No
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Ulmus rubra
FAC
Column Totals: 65 (A) 135 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.08
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
80
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Solidago
60
Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
No
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Lonicera japonica 5 No FACU
4.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
75
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP13-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/12/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP14-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968044 Long: -79.757177 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC- Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetland (Wetland 11)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP14-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Alnus serrulata
20 Yes
OBL
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
2. Acer rubrum
20 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 240 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.40
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
40 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Ligustrum
30 Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 No FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
60 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP14-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4
10YR 3/1
100
Loamy/Clayey
4-9
10YR 6/2
85
7.5YR 6/8 15 C PL Mucky Loam/Clay Prominent redox concentrations
9-20
7.5YR 5/1
90
7.5YR 5/8 10 C PL Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/12/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP15-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.968036 Long: -79.757234 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC- Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to wetland 11
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP15-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Pinus virginiana
20 Yes
UPL
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
2.
Acer rubrum
10 Yes
FAC
FACU species 25 x 4 = 100
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
10 Yes
FACU
UPL species 20 x 5 = 100
4.
Ulmus alata
10 Yes
FACU
Column Totals: 60 (A) 245 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.08
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
50 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium
60 Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Dichanthelium
20 Yes
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Vitis rotundifolia 5 No FAC
4.
Solanum carolinense
5 No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP15-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-20 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 10/03/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP16-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, K. Thames Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.964888 Long: -79.758307 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2% slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to wetland 12
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP16-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
5
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1.
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
2.
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3.
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
4.
Column Totals: 90 (A) 280 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.11
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
70
Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Ligustrum japonicum
5
No
UPL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 No FAC
4.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
No
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Aster
5
No
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Setaria
5
No
height.
7
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
95
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
48
20% of total cover:
19
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP16-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-20 7.5YR 4/6 50 2.5Y 5/4 50 M Loamy/Clayey Dual matix
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 07/17/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP17-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, M. Yayac Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.963724 Long: -79.757504 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: PF01
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetlands (Wetland 12 and Wetland 13)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP17-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 80 x 2 = 160
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50 Yes
FACW
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
2. Ligustrum
10 No
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 115 (A) 265 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.30
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
60 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 .
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
5 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP17-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-20 10YR 4/1 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 PL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 10/03/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP18-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, K. Thames Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.94864154 Long: -79.75631086 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB- Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a upland adjacent to jurisdictional linear wetland (Wetland 12)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP18-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Upland vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
25
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Pinus virginiana
25
Yes
UPL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28.6% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FACW
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
2.
Pinus virginiana
10
Yes
UPL
FACU species 75 x 4 = 300
3.
UPL species 35 x 5 = 175
4.
Column Totals: 155 (A) 600 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.87
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Sorghum ha/epense
60
Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
lespedeza
70
Yes
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Solidago altissima 10 No FACU
4.
Lonicera japonica
5
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
145
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
73
20% of total cover:
29
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
5
Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Upland vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP18-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-20 2.5Y 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 07/17/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP19-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, M. Yayac Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.955214 Long: -79.755456 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC- Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: PF01
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetland (Wetland 15)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP19-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Carya tomentosa
60
Yes
UPL
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Quercus falcata
20
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
1.
Nyssa sylvatica
30
Yes
FACW
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
3.
Vaccinium
10
No
UPL species 60 x 5 = 300
4.
Column Totals: 155 (A) 575 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.71
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
60
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Microstegium
10
Yes
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP19-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-20 2.5Y 3/1 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 7/17/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP20-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, M. Yayac Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.955165 Long: -79.755443 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC- Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to Wetland 15
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP20-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Carya tomentosa
50 Yes
UPL
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
20 Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Carya glabra
10 No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Carya tomentosa
20 Yes
UPL
FAC species 5 x 3 = 15
2.
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
3.
UPL species 70 x 5 = 350
4.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 485 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.62
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Vitis rotundifolia
5 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP20-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-20 2.5Y 6/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 12/5/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP21-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.951745 Long: -79.755063 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MhC2 -Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 6 to10% slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: PSS1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional scrub -shrub (logged) wetland (Wetland 17)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
x Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
x High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP21-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Platanus occidentalis
10
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Carya pallida
10
Yes
UPL
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FACW
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
2.
Quercus alba
5
Yes
FACU
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
3.
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
4.
Column Totals: 155 (A) 480 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.10
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
15
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
90
Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Eupatorium capillifolium
5
No
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Rubus argutus 5 No FACU
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP21-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4
2.5Y 4/2
100
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
M
Loamy/Clayey
4-10
2.5Y 4/2
80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10-20
2.5Y 5/2
70
7.5YR 4/6 30 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/13/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP22-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.950630 Long: -79.755416 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: IrB-Iredell fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to wetland 18
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP22-Upland
Dominance Test worksheet:
Absolute Dominant
Indicatc
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
1.
1
(A)
2.
3.
4
(B)
4.
5.
25.0%
(A/B)
6.
7.
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
=Total Cover
FACW species 0 x 2 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FAC species 10 x 3 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACU species 10 x 4 =
1. Pinus virginiana
20 Yes
UPL
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
10 Yes
FACU
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
4.
10 Yes
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP22-Upland
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
1
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
4
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
25.0%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
FAC species 10 x 3 =
30
FACU species 10 x 4 =
40
UPL species 20 x 5 =
100
Column Totals: 40 (A)
170
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.25
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant. Herb stratum was difficult to identify due to recent herbicide treatment
No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP22-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 2.5Y 6/3 95 10YR 5/8 5 PL Loamy/Clayey
12-20 2.5Y 4/3 95 10YR 5/8 5 PL Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/13/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP23-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.950401 Long: -79.755327 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: IrB - Iredell fine sandy to am, 0 to 4 percent slopes NWI classification: PSS1 B
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional scrub/shrub wetland (Wetland 18)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Quercus phellos
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1. Microstegium
2. Scirpus cyperinus
3. Bidens aristosa
4. Eupatorium capillifolium
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 53
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicatc
% Cover Species? Status
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FAC
I U - i ULdi wver
20% of total cover:
2
80 Yes
10 No
FACW
10 No
FACW
5 No
FACU
20% of total cover: 21
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Sampling Point: DP23-Wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
FAC species 10 x 3 = 30
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 35 (A) 90 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.57
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP23-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-20 2.5Y 5/2 80 10YR 4/6 20 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 10/03/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP24-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, K. Thames Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Linear swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.94868278 Long: -79.75634837 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB- Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: PSS1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional linear wetland (Wetland 19). Bricks and debris in wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
x Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
x High Water Table (A2) x
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
x Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP24-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum
60 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FACW
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2. Ulmus rubra
10 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 340 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.83
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
10 Yes
FACW
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
5 Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP24-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 3/2 90 10YR 3/4 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 10/03/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP25-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, K. Thames Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.94864154 Long: -79.75631086 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB- Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a upland adjacent to jurisdictional linear wetland (Wetland 19)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP25-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Upland vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
25
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Pinus virginiana
25
Yes
UPL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28.6% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FACW
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
2.
Pinus virginiana
10
Yes
UPL
FACU species 75 x 4 = 300
3.
UPL species 35 x 5 = 175
4.
Column Totals: 155 (A) 600 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.87
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Sorghum ha/epense
60
Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
lespedeza
70
Yes
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Solidago altissima 10 No FACU
4.
Lonicera japonica
5
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
145
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
73
20% of total cover:
29
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
5
Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Upland vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP25-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-20 2.5Y 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/13/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP26-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.948739 Long: -79.755581 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB- Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetland (Wetland 20)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Platanus occidentalis
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Uominant
% Cover
Species?
30
Yes
30
Yes
20
Yes
10
No
90 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: DP26-Wet
idicator
Multiply by:
OBL species
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
0
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
x 2 =
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4 (A)
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
FACU species
FACW
Species Across All Strata:
6 (B)
UPL species
Percent of Dominant Species
x 5 =
0
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
66.7% (A/B)
18
10 Yes FACW
10 Yes FAC
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft
1. Microstegium
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50 Yes
50 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers
4
10
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
50
x 2 =
100
FAC species
40
x 3 =
120
FACU species
20
x 4 =
80
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
110
(A)
300 (B)
Prevalence Index =
B/A =
2.73
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP26-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 5Y 5/2 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
8-20 5Y 5/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/13/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP27
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hill side Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.948839 Long: -79.755701 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to wetland 20
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP27
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acer rubrum
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2.
Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3.
Ligustrum
10
No
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Ilex opaca
10
No
FACU
Column Totals: 115 (A) 350 (B)
5.
Quercus phellos
10
No
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.04
6.
Ulmus americana
5
No
FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
85
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
43 20% of total cover:
17
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Smilax
10
Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP27
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/26/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP28
Investigator(s): E. Mularski Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.94803037 Long: -79.75540103 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB- Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area between forested wetland 20 and wetland 22
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
One secondary wetland hydrology indicator is present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP28
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Quercus alba
30
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Carya tomentosa
20
Yes
UPL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Quercus phellos
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
60
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
2.
Ulmus americana
10
Yes
FACW
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
3.
UPL species 20 x 5 = 100
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 425 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.54
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
40
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Quercus alba
5
Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Microstegium vimineum 10 Yes FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP28
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 2.5Y 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-20 2.5Y 4/4 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/26/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP29-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.94820919 Long: -79.75344785 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB - Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional scrub -shrub wetland (Wetland 21)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
x High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
X Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes x No
X Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP29-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
1. Platanus occidentalis
30 Yes
FACW
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
20 Yes
FAC
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 60 (A) 160 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.67
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
50 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium
50 Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Eupatorium capillifolium
10 No
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
60 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP29-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-20 2.5Y 5/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/13/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP30-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.94785188 Long: -79.755581 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB- Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetland (Wetland 22)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP30-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acer rubrum
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Platanus occidentalis
30 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20 Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10 No
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 50 x 2 = 100
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10 Yes
FACW
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
2.
Acer rubrum
10 Yes
FAC
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 110 (A) 300 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.73
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium
90 Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP30-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 5Y 5/2 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
8-20 5Y 5/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 12/5/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP31-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.942703 Long: -79.759059 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15% slopes NWI classification: PF01
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetland (Wetland 24)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Quercus alba
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Quercus phellos
5. Pinus taeda
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicatc
% Cover
Species?
Status
40
Yes
FAC
10
No
FACU
20
Yes
FAC
10
No
FAC
10
No
FAC
90 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
10 Yes FACU
10 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Sampling Point: DP31-Wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
3
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
66.7%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
FAC species 80 x 3 =
240
FACU species 20 x 4 =
80
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 100 (A)
320
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.20
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP31-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist)
%
Type'
Loc2
Texture
Remarks
0-6
2.5Y 4/2
80
2.5Y 6/4
20
C
M
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
6-12
2.5Y 5/2
50
2.5Y 6/6
30
C
PL
Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
10YR 5/8
10
C
M
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Prominent redox concentrations
12-20
10YR 6/4
50
2.5Y 6/6
20
C
M
Loamy/Clayey
Distinct redox concentrations
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
10YR 6/8
30
C
M
Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 12/5/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP32-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.942707 Long: -79.758919 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CcD-Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a upland area adjacent to Wetland 24
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP32-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Upland vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acer rubrum
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Quercus rubra
20 Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Quercus falcata
5 No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Pinus taeda
10 No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Ulmus americana
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
65 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
33 20% of total cover:
13
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
2.
FACU species 32 x 4 = 128
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 72 (A) 248 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.44
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Ligustrum sinense
5 Yes
FACU
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Lonicera japonica
2 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Allium 2 Yes
4.
Smilax
2 Yes
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
6 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Upland vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP32-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/4 80 10YR 4/3 20 M Loamy/Clayey Dual matrix
6-20 10YR 5/3 100 M Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/13/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP33-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.941008 Long: -79.758653 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC- Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a jurisdictional forested wetland (Wetland 25)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
X Iron Deposits (65)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP33-Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
60 Yes
FAC
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2. Acer rubrum
10 No
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 300 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
70 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Smilax
5 Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP33-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/2 90 10YR 6/8 10 M Loamy/Clayey
5-20 2.5Y 5/2 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 PL Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 09/13/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP34-Upland
Investigator(s): E. Mularski, J. Velasquez Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.941045 Long: -79.758624 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD- Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point representative of a non -jurisdictional upland area adjacent to Wetland 25
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP34-Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum
30 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
30 Yes
FAC
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2. Acer rubrum
20 Yes
FAC
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3. Quercus phellos
10 No
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4. Ilex opaca
10 No
FACU
Column Totals: 115 (A) 350 (B)
5. Ulmus americana
5 No
FACW
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.04
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
75 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Smilax rotundifolia
10 Yes
FAC
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP34-Uplanc
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-20 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping (Line 450) City/County: Guilford County Sampling Date: 1/9/2019
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: DP35-Wet
Investigator(s): E. Mularski Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2-4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.991190 Long: -79.772328 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB - Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point representative of a emergent wetland (Wetland 2a) located in agricultural field and access road
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (69)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1. Carex
2. Eupatorium capillifolium
3. Microstegium vimineum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 50
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicatc
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
10 Yes FAC
20% of total cover: 2
70 Yes
10 No FACU
20 Yes FAC
-.
20% of total cover: 20
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Sampling Point: DP35-Wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
3
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
66.7%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
FAC species 30 x 3 =
90
FACU species 10 x 4 =
40
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 40 (A)
130
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.25
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP35-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-20 2.5Y 5/2 80 2.5Y 5/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators..
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric soils indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

NC DWO Stream Identifienflan lF'nrrn Vercinn Q_ 1 I
Date-, i,�f Q� yQ�
I1l�[r.�
Project/Site: €' }.} f�,t?f 1'•;s .l
r't �. rl:. [r..Ff�14J11
Latitude:
7SiV
Eyaivatvr:'�� � `x �k�arup¢, ► I
!County: -SLA, 1,. ,O
Longitude,
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
father RelAsm'K
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2, 19 or perennial it L> 30" 3n�.-;
Ephemeral Intermittent t�erersnia Z
e.g. Quart Name: G�tfs�[�r1�
A. Geomar ho( (Subtotal= 3
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent Weak
0 1
Moderate
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
riuule-woof seauence
02
t}.5
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 --�
2
3
5. Activefrelict floodplajn
_
[}
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
p
0 1
w.........--
2v
_ _...
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
S. Headcuts
0 1
1
2
3
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley_
0 0.5
-"
1.5
11, Second nr greater order channel
No - ,�
Yes = 3
arum;iai ownez are not raleu; see Oirictj tons In manual
12. Presence of Baseflow -
p- _ 1
2
40
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
l 1
2
3
14, Leaf litter
1.5
t}.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or [febris
0
3
9.5
16. Organic debris tines or piles
0 O:b
( s
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
Yes
L.. t-stataav [SunTOLgJ = 1_( .0 }
16. Fibrous roots in stream bed
..�........... .
2
1
0
19, Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
�.......
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 _
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
t7.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
0.5<i>
1.5
25. Algae ITT0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FAtVV = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other]
'perennial streams may Wso be identified using other methods. See p. 35 ai manual.
m
Nates:
Sketch;
FY
r.. . .
V.

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
[late: Q [Z i$
Prajectl5ite;��J�
Weak
Evaluator;UICi .'[ •��}
County:
�
�D
Total Points:
streamis a leasi intermittent
Stream Det�ination circle one)
-1 phemera _te r> ntt#en Perennial
�__.�--•
Other � �¢ .,i' 1 j
e.g. Quad Name: ; 1 6
if .. 99 �raerenniel rf a $4'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
r.
Lati#uae:
Longitude:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal =_�.
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1'- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
oz
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
rimfe-pool sequence m m ...... _...�.....__--------•
4. Particle size of stream substrate
-.... -� 0
0}�
1
2
2
3 ^^^
__. 3 m
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
...................... m .� ._m. _ ..-.........r...........
6. Depositional bars or benches
-
0
3
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
Q
2
3
_...._........�...................
8. Headcuts
�
. Q
1
2
3
9. Grade control
1.5
Q•5
1
1.5
_ ....._.........._...._..._......................._...
1Q. Natural valley
Q
4.5
1.5
25. Algae
_
11. Second or greater order cannel
tVa =`, Q
Yes = 3
- artitteiai ouches are not rated; we discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal= 6 1
------------- M.. .r _...........
12. Presence of t3aseflow
Q
2
3
Iran oxidizing bacteria
(Q
0
3
_13. .......w
14. Lea# litter
[ 3�
-..
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
oz
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
[ 0 0.5
1
E �.. 1.5
17. Solt -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
�............
Yes
G. bliola0V (Subtotal= C•I ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
�.�................. ...... ......�
3
2
1
0
-----...---
j 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
[ 3�
-..
2
............
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
{ l7
1
2
3
22. Fish
f l7
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
�._m
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
C
0.5-
1
1.5
25. Algae
�0 __.
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other � 0-
'perennial streams may also be identified using othet methods- See p. 35 of manual.
Nates:
f 1
€
5re�.n 'i
17
. .

NC DW0 Stream identification Fnrm Versinn 4.11
Bate:i
_.......____. t•1 �, �`�
ProjectlSite:�r �;lf.s
t -..� lsG��1�i�7
Latitude:
� *' r I CSJ'+'�
Evaluator: FU4-
County: •�vFvfW]
Longitude:
Total Point5;
leas[
Stream iJeta ination (circle one)
[ether
Stream is at intermittent ! �
if a 19 or perennial if it 30" w
E h� 8r31errn! Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: ��� 41W
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = w I � l
i Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
1 ",Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
-3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4, Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 2
2
3
3
-------------
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
(°i7 2
3
6, Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8, Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley _
�... 0
0.5 �]....................
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel _
leo NP-) Yes = 3
arnticial ottcnes are not rates; see discussicau in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal= 14' f ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
E 0
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on _plants or debris
0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0-40
1 1
1.5
17. Soil based evidence of high water table?
m_.. No = 0 Yes
. U. t31010 tv (Subtotal = (!� }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
`._.........
2
1
E 0
19. Footed upland plants in streambed
2
1
_ W.._..m..........
.... • -
[ 0
_20. Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundance}
j 1
2
[ 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
3
2�--...._.3
22. Fisht17
0.5
1
1.5
_....
23. Crayfish
._. _.._.-m _........
C>
0.5
.... -
1
--
1.5
24. Amphibians
�
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
[6j
0.5
_......-----
1
--
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
_.
FACW�. 0.75; 06L = 1.$ Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
......................
Notes. ry4�r
t�i�]�W
li�i'�..LY S.%✓4I G/i�:S 3'�LC{ii••ii4�'�
-•��e�. �i i�]�-lY..
..............
Sketch:
:. L }=...., i....
.. : • 5's7tFii�rt �
jj__,--•.c�. Arr' W.40aeu.T

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and 'Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11S l�e� _ - r� � v � I'll
Date; 111L 116
ProtectlSite: � �[3i rr►.
Latitude: 35.
_
Evaluator: quicl(S i LJo Ve. ,'S L
county: �1l �i3YC CO•
Longittuude: - � .,��p Z4
Total Points:
Strearn is at least intermittent 2
Stream Tie rminaijj ircfe one}
i
Ephemer lrntermitten9Perenntal
Athe �J [i[tjil�al rtj{
e. Quad Marne,
9.
if? i9 or perennial if? 30'
_
3. In -channel structure' ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
r le- ool sequence
01
_A. Geomorphology -{Subtotal _ _ }
...... ...........
Absent
Weak
Moderate
stng
ro
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank-
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
( 3
_
3. In -channel structure' ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
r le- ool sequence
01
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2)3
1.5
6. Depvsitonal bars or benches
0
3
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
6
1
2
3
8, Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
-5
1
1.5
16. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
0
Yes = 3
0-5
- artniciar oitcnes are not rates: see aiscussions to manual
R _ Hvdroinnv !Subtotal = Jr 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
01
2
3
13- Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
- 22
3 mm
14. Leaf 11tter
1.5
1
QC.5
0
15- Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16- Organic debris Imes or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence.of high water table?
- �M No = 0
_ YesW4
C. Bioloov (Suhtntal M 0 ) 1
18- Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
3.
2
1
0 mm
20, Macrobenthos (nate diversity and ahundance)
1
-
2
3
21- Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0-5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
if
0-5
..
1
1-5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
[
0.5
1
1.5
_
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 07 5-1 OBL = 1.5
Other00
_
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35ofmanual.
Ndtes: YI( Sr -7.I<
•
.
I
> tr#w:
e''rr>r ?n1A
riw rr f 51-1
.. .
Sly t rt:
. .
- { ...-�1R f� .
_9
. z 4
r�.�.. _� �.� .�• - �-•- ---_-
�...-. ---• 1
Adv
. reo
41
................................................................................. ............................. ...............................

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form. Version 4.11 5 1
Date: �Z
Projectl5ite:
i.atitt,de: `j, lB
t.
Evaluator.,�J
Count: i
Longitude, � J.
Total Points:
Stream n at least im ermirtent 29
if a 19,:" ,perennial if 2 30'
Stream Determination (Ci c1e ars
Ephemeral Intermittent rerErsiaE
Other -06%04 6cfJen
e.g" Quad Name: LL
�h
Geomor holo (Subtotal=
__�.... .__
AA. sent
Weak
Moderato
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and hank
0
1
2'
14. Leaf filter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
3
2_ Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
0
3
3- In -channel structure: ex. ride -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
No = 0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
22. Fish
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
i
2
1.5
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
}
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
- 1
2
1
3
8. Headcuts
-
0
1
2
0.
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
- FACVV = 0.75; DBL = 1.5 Other = 0
1.5
10 Natural valley
0
�. 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
0
Yes = 3
arEinctai micnes are nor ratan; see aiscussions in manual
S. Hvdmloo�► [Suhtntat W ct] r_'� 1
12. Presence of Basefiow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf filter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1 5
0'
1
6.
0-5
1
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
t3.5
1
1.5
17. Sail -based evidence of high watertable? -
21. Aquatic Mollusks
No = 0
Yes 3
m
U. tblolow 43ut}total = (0 k.- )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
{ 3 _..
2
1 _-W
0
20. Macrobenthos (nate diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
Q.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
5'
1
1.5
25. Algae
Q
0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
- FACVV = 0.75; DBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using a4hor
methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: YC.[ rY1 C` et (JP r t
- f- 5
r3'rpY)ni
r
w UV
Sketchl.
.3
..1.
..-.�
;
�i'7It{ 41i 1
:�k
{
..... .... .... ................
..................................................................................................................................................

NC 1)WO ;gtrpam identifientinn Fnrm VPrcinin d_ti �t V'. "A AA ("
Date -oil t% �\
Projectf5ite;
Latitude: .
Evaluator:% dyG`kf4
County: w� �
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination, (cires"e)
Ephemeral Intermittent nEa
Other : ~
e.g- Quad Name:
if? 19orperenrualit=30"
1
�.w3�7-YAI
A. Geotnor hologr (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
1v` Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
[ 3
3. In -channel structure: exriffle-pool, step -pool,
ripp)e-Fool sequence
0
1
2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
m. �.......�
0
.................
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
w..
No = 0
1
2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
.._. ....
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
23. Crayrish
2 3
8. Headcuts
1
1
2 3
9. Grade control0
0
0.5j
1 1.5
I0. Natural valley
0
_ .........-
25. Atgae
f 0,
11. Second or greater order channet
Noe
T 3
- antval ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdro€oav !Subtotal = i-6 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iran oxidizing bacteria
0 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
14. Loaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
Q7
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3
U. bloloov !subtotal = r 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
m
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
...........
_
0
20. Maerobenthos {nate diversity and abundance}
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
w
........... ...
1
2
3
22. Fish
[�$
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayrish
- -
[ice
a.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
_.__..._...�................
0
0.5j
1.5
_ .........-
25. Atgae
f 0,
0.5
_....
r 1
- -
1.5
26.1Netland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be zder lftd using ather methods. See p- 35 of manual.
Notes:sto.:�4
Sketch.
............ . ..... .
0-',r euur

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
gate:
Project/Site:
Evaluator: >raw�nxtc, 1Tv
County:',��
Total RrStn#s:
Stream Determination (circ
Scream rs at yeast intermittent
Ephemeral fntermiiierl#
if? i9 or perennial if �t 30`
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
r
5. Activetrelict floodplain
0
1 (13
Ti • nig ,f,,,,4 Amz..; To L.t s i' _r . {.rt,',f
Latitude:
Longitude:
le nA) Other
e enni ] e.g. Quad Name: �#ACN%.
r
A. Gt;orllar holo Stabtotal = }
18' Continuity of channel bed and hank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
1
2
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
r
5. Activetrelict floodplain
0
1 (13
2 1
3
6. depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
}
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
25. Algae
3
8. Headcuts
1.5
1
2
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural vaiiey
0
0
0.5t:
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No - 0
Yes3
Sketc
- artifiml ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov [Su6tntal = `7o1!3� 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
Ky 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
��
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1 5
0.5 0
15. Sedimerrt on plants or debris
0
.5
t 1.5
16. Organic debris Ilnes or piles-
0
0.5
<0 1 1.5
17. Soil -teased evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes � ..
C..Biolociv (Subtotal = n en 1
16. Fibrous roots in streambed
v 2
4
p
m _ .._ w.... ......
19. booted upland plants in strearnbed
M .... _.... �- . -- -- ----
2
--------
1
- -
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
-------
051D 1
2
3
22. Fish
0 0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 0.5
F0.5
1.5
25. Algae
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW - 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: u�r�
iC` 4�, . 1C] E ` ......
Sketc
s
r.

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:(01
L$
Projectfsite: ,��
Latitude:
r. .
Evaluator: y� Ntu, IsrRS r� !��vG,
County:
Longitude:
Tota{Points:
Stream Determination (01rcip-pne)
Other
Stream is at feast intermittent
iia 49 pr erennialff?3R'
Ephemeral Intermittents eennlat-
�
e.g. Quad Name.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I3•, j }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
-
I "� Continuity of channel (sed and bank
0
1
2
UT
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool.
0
�
2
3
ripple oof se uence
No = 0
Yes
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland pfants in streambed
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
._ _.........
3
T. Recent aliuvial deposits
0
010)
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No •
Yes = 3
annsciai uacnes are not rates; see arscussions in martuai
F•,
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = R, 7 )
12. Presence of Basedow
0 1
:)
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 _
2
3 w
14. Lea# litter __.G
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
1.5
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal ='
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
...............-....._..._ PI -an ..... -------------- ------
19. Rooted upland plants in streambad
20. Macrobenthas (note diversity and abundance)
..._...
2
0 elt)
.....-----1........m........ _ .� .._._......
1
2
_._..
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
.23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
25, Algae
0 0.5
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland pfants in streambed
FACW W 0.75; O8L = 1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also he identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:-�,;.,; `'f t:= ,, ti' .;.;
i I=z•; �'. sr± - �I
._ _.........
.:............ _ _. w. _......: ...................... :
......

Ct '
NC DW[) stream Tdentif catir�n Form Versirmn 4.11 1�.��a•s-;f I �i�i� L13 .r..:...AA L.�": '.1_.:Y;3;
Date; � �
Projectf5ite:
Latitude:
Moderate
:.{r
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
Evaluator: ��°fCih�A'�C•V_ n+ lF:._
C Stli
,
County:
Longitude:G
' LF
Total Points: t
stream Determination (circle an¢)Other
0
Stream is at least intermittent 2
if 2 19 ar erenmai it k 30" i
Ephemeral Intermittent ,piren4li l
e. g. Quad Name: {
A. Geomorphology Subtotal
Abserd
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
�.
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. rifle -pool, step -pool,
0
01�)
2
3
ri le- oat sequence
0
1
E 1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
3
2
3
5, Activelrelict floodplain
0
2
3
6- De msitional bars or benches
0
12
0.5
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. HeadcutsW
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Pia Tzb ;,
Yes ifn
-arti%clal ditches are not rated-, see discussions In manual
B. Hvdroloev (Subtotal = 8 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iran oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf titter
1.S
1
0.5
0
IS. Sediment on plants or debris
0
01�)
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
E 1.5
17. Soll-based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
3
Yes3
C. Riolnov lSulatntal VL'. 1
18- Fibrous roots In streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
[]
2
1
20. Macrobenthos {nate diversity and abundance)
0
01�)
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0)
1
2
3
22. Fish _
0'........_
1.S
23. Crayfish
0.5
._ ...........
...... ......
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; DBL = 1.5
Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: i�f- u1, .4 : tori; , la' ]
�°:; •.:v.. ..Ssl:; �
Sketch:
.......... _.
[

PSC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Cs C�' ►}.��1 PIS �tC',a [�1���5 ( T6
�y�1Vr�aJq LatltU[le: ..
Date: ('!$
0
tyraseetlsite: R'
35,91
Evaluator: � � µy n.�Sl�
Vii-��O
ti kS
-county:
un i� ]`c�
Lon Longitude,
g - 7)9,256A
Total PcilnW
S[■eam hs at [east intermittent
r
Stream Deterrninatiorr (c'
........_.._.._.._.�..�,...,�..�
Other ` ui
if a 19 or erenma[ it z 34'
[ t
Ephemeral Interrnitten Perert�
e -g- QuadAla-0: C
k 1{ �,
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal �,._ ."(C�.......j
0
2 3
Absent
Weak
Moderate
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Strong
1" -Continuity of channel bed and bank
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Sail -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
1 1.5
Yes m
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
[
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
�f
''
2
23. Crayfish
3
ri le -cool sequenced
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1.5
25. Algae
0
2
i
3
5. Activefrelict floodplain
0
1
streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
Notes:
0
T 1
3
7. Recent alluviat deposits
0
1
Sketch:
3
_ .._
$. Headcuts
...........
0 .w.........
�
.._ _._ � ...
2
3
9. Grade control
0
I 1
1.5
13. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0.
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see diseussions in manual
R. Hvdrn€nnv (Suhtntal = (�'' 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2 3
13. Iran axidWng bacteria
14. Leaf litter
1
1.5 1
2 3
o.5 j 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Sail -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
1 1.5
Yes m
C_ Bioloov (Subtotal = H •C-� t
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2 :
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
2
1
8
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0,5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
i
1.5
26. Wetland plants in strearnbed
FACW = 0.75; CBL = 1.5
Other = 0
streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
�€tf 5�3F
Sketch:
..............

NC DWO Stream Identification Farm Version 4.11
Rate:
Projec#1Site: PQ C
Latitude: 3 5,
Evaluator: Q fCounty:
Moderate
Longitude, -4 35Gg6A
1" -Continuity of channe€ bed and bank
tX
1
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Deter 'ruff circle one)
Other j� Q{�Q V1 {�
ifs 19 orperennial if;- 30" +
Ephemeralnterrrtittent Perennial
e.g- Quad Name:
A. Geomn holo 5ubtatat = ]
Absent
m Weak
1
Moderate
strong
1" -Continuity of channe€ bed and bank
0
1
1
2
3
2. 5inuo5ity of channel along thalweg
0
7,
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step pool,(n1
ripple -pool sequence
_4.'­Psize of stream substrate
V
0
1
_
1
0.5
2
2
3
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
0.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or beaches
0
1_
No = 0
2
3
7, Recent alluvial deposits
_.........w......_
0
1
1
2
3
_.
8, Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9, Grade control
0
0.5
0.5
1
1.5
M Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
0I
Yes - 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdrolaav (Subtotal = 4 ]
... ....
12. Presence of Baseflow
(0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
0
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
3
_
0.5
1
1,5
16. Organic debris lines or piles _.
2
�0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soit-based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes 3
G. I3ialoov (Subtatal = 1 i
1 B. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks u�WW W
T.
0
1
2
3
21 Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23, Grayrssh
0
0.5
1
t.5 . ..
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
(0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAGW - 0.75; 0BL = 1.5 Othe = 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods- See p- 35 of manual.
Motes:
Sketch:" .
......
..........
,.a.
f. r
A

NC ©'LVO Stream Identification Farm Version 4.11
Date: _01: l�
ProjectlSKO-. 9t()�04 aO dej).
Latitude:35. j(082 3
Evaluator: I. M VkO 4 (,M . T61dc
County- (3
U
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
+
Stream D to irration.(cirele one)
Ephemeral intermittentittent erenniat
other C�( 341( �L➢t
e.g. Quad Name:'M �^
if A! 19 ar erernMal if 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphola {Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 .. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
rip ole Wools ueneJe
r
LTJ
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
7
2
3
5. Acbvelrelict floodplain
0
1
3
G. Depositional bars or benches
T. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
T
1
2
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
�....__ ................._......._.....
10. Natural valley
D
o.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
0
Yes » 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = '7.5 1
12. Presence of Basedow 0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0
2
3
14. Leaf fitter 1.5 #
0.5-m
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris D 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or p#les 0 D.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
m Yes 3
U Eiioldav (Subtotal = 4-- 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In strearnbed
3 _F
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
-0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish........._............�.._.�...�._...._._____..
._
...�.
.... 0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
015
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.51
1.5
26. Wetland plants in strearnbed
FACW = 0.75; QBL = 1.5
Other
0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods, See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: 5'rtrri lam ,
.....
Z t
(~ 1

NC DWO Stream Identification Farm Verciion 4.11
�1CY► ti y���-i EJf� Al
Date; ! d 3
Rrajectl5lte' �P,n
i�atitude. , Cp
(*
Evaluator: 1 t. CA
County: �fU1 dL3Y
Longitude:
Total Foints:
Stream Daterminatlon,circ a
Ephemeral tntennitten eremnial
Other P,'P60 �- evy
A e.g, Q11ad Name: Z
if � 73 Qr erenrarai if Z 3d` l
2
3
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 ",Continuity of channel bed and bank 0
Stream is of least intermittent
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
1
2
3
A. GeomorDhoiocty (Subtotal = 1
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 ",Continuity of channel bed and bank 0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
1
2
3
3. Jn-channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, 0
ria le -goal se uerlce
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0
1
�
W..
3
5. ActivflrelJct floodplain 0
(1)
2
3
6, Depositional bars or benches 0
1
[ 2 }
3
7. Recent alluvia[ deposits I 0
..._-_--...._._................
1�
2
3
0. Headcuts 0
1
m..
2
3
9. Grade control 0
......_.............
.. ..
C p,$
1
1.5
10. Natural valley 0
U; 1
..... ............
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 `'
Yes
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolonv (Suhtntal �, -)'K 1
12. Presence of Basedow
0 1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
8), w
2 3
14. Leaf litter
2
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1 6 0.5-.
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
i) .5 _
1 1 gEo 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? _
No = 0
Yes 3
C_ BiolOau fSubtotal = i 7 ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1 J. Floated upland piants in strearribed
[3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity rid abundance)
0 .
&5)
2
3
21, Aquatic Moliusks
d
1
2
3
22. f=ish0
0.5
1
1.5
_.........__ -
23. Crayfish[
0
0.5
1
M ..
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
..25. Algae_r__.m.._._..__�........_.. .-•-----
0,
0.5
1 '-_--_
-- 1.5 -..
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be idtribfied using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Bates:
.........:.:......:......
Y"

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their 0doinsy. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5-1- . V'A
Date: 1)2-
ProjectIsite: �fN� Cmj 6fji evl
Latitude:
[[,_ p f
Evaluator: E. 1" [ U 1 � � �ILi � . V � L��J�
County: �{�-
Longitude: - � t�, 75 Gj 3?)
Total Points:
Stream Oe rte#natiegt s role one
It
Other i �5vf
Stream is of least infermiftenf �l rj
if � 19 or pemmniai if � 30° r
Ephernera termitte t erennial
a.g. f�uad
I `L
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal=�
� Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
9
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2, Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex- riffle -pool, step -pool,
dovie-pool sequence
0
_••_
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
i
2
3
G. Depositional bars or benches
_
I
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
WJ
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
--M 1
2
3
9. Grade control0.5
1
1
1-5
10. Natural valley _•_
0
,� 0.5
1 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No -
Yes = 3
Notes:
"artificial ditches are not rated; sae discussions in manual
A }- wirninrty tRr rhtntal = -4- 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteriam _
a
1 W_
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0-5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16- Organic debris lines or piles
Q
[ 0.5
1
1.5
17_ Soil -based evidence of high water table?
2
No = 0
Yesk 3
C Hininnv IRIS htntal = LTJ 1
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
i
1
2
3
22, FishQ
0.5
1
1.5
23- Crayfish�7_pj
24. Amphibians
0,
0,5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
25. Algae
(
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wet#and plants in streambed
FACVV = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other= 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
1
------------
�
l
Its.
.__.M...... --------
a
............... ......... 41
'......................................................................................................................................................................

NC DWQ Strewn Identification Form Version 4.11j
16( r
�jl(.(
13I n'i�ldttC
D;;
Q ArviectlSlte: +'1
f61vvora
Latitude: 35*
2
2
3
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
Evaluator: �jaf1C County:�i DY Longitude:
total Points: Stream Determination (cir ej Other PleO ,11 Cjo deo
Stream is at feast intermittent Ephemeral Intermitten ' eren �! e.g. Quad Narne:
if 2 19 or perennial if ? 30" �• -
A. Geomoroholoav lSubtotal = 1� ) Absent [ Weak Moderate Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
1
1
2
3
3
3. €n -channel structure: ex. rRe-poo[, step -pool.
ripple -pool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0
1
2
2
3
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
m Yes S
3
7. Recent akluvial deposits
0
1
3
3
8, Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5 :
1
1.5
3
11. Second ar greater order channel
1.5
Na0 -
Yes W 3
0.5
-artificial ditches are not rated; sae discussions in manual
8_ Hvdrnlnnv (Suhtntal = 8 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
'I
2
3
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1.5
4
(1
0.5
0.5
1
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of.high water table?
0
0.5
No = 0
m Yes S
1.5
C_ Biolaav (Subtotal = K) ]
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
2
1
0
19, Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
(3.
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
.0 .
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.S
24. Amphibians
D
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in stfeambed
FACW = 0.75; 08L W 1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: w �ilzs, � � t ? : t !_1`.�r '� ;� =
yr t
Sketch:
t`
,c�' �, ( XI
ry
i
..................:r....... ......-..-.-_�.-_-..�--r-,�.�._l.
_�y~"'......�.,....
.,...,--....._..,}

NC DW Stream Identificatioa Form Version 4.11
D ate: - Proiecttsite: Ae"
Evaluator: . County: 6- i 1(. �C] A
Total Points: Stream Determination ([
Stream is at least intermilrent 32- Ephemeral Intermittent
if 2 19 or perennial if 2 30"
Latitude. 3�. � ? 4-I
Longitude:"-��� i5Ag4
Other Aeq av
e Y. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology =........ Q............iAbsent
......
0
Weak
lVloarata
Strrkng
--{-Subtotal
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channBi along thalweg
Q
13
..�.�.
2
.....�..... _..
3. !n -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -poo[,
0
1
1
3
ripple -fool 5@fluence
0
0.5
1
1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
01
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain �..... _..�..........
i7
1
_..._._....... �.
2
------
3
S. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent deposits
Q
0
1
2
2
o.5
alluvial -....-_....._....�.._................__
B. Headcuts
.............
0
_...........__.._..........._....
1
_..... ..
2
_.. ......._,3 ......_.........
3
9. Grade contra$
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
1
- _1111 "I ..........1111._----1111 ------------___1111... ................
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
-- .............-
0
IYq
.............................
i 0.5
Q
...... ... .
1
Yes
1.5
= 3
"artificial dktches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R_ Flvclrntnnv fSuhtntnl = V 7
�.. .............. _ _ _ _
12. Presence of Basef#ow
......
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
fl
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1,3
1
0.5
q
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
A5
1
1.S
16. Organic debris tines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes miJ3
1.5
C. 8inlonv (Subtntai = R ) 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
p
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
! i
a
20. Macrobenthos_(note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
�mm
1
2
3
22. Fish0
015
1
1.5
�..__.�._m_.. .....w..�.........._......_ ..r.
23. Crayfish
..__..........._w.
ro
0.5
1111-
1
_._..
1,5
24. Amphibians
a-.
o.5
1.5
25. Algae
._ ....
_._.._ 0.5
_. _. 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5Other 0t...w....._.__
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
......_.. 1111
_...........
Dotes:
3.._............... .........._.._..............___.
�.....__.......
... ...........
......... __�
1
_111_1.__.._.___..........
_ 1111.._.
t
Sketch:
`
cYll'`Qp►,n ��
l

NC Division of Water Duality -Methodology for Identification of Interl
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
ittent and
'R9 ........ ...'.' 3 .
Pole C -q l (100
pate: ❑
3
ProjsctlSite: � LFtp L'f(_Ij
,Latitude. �Z;4
Evaluator_
County,
Longitude: w
Total Points:�k
Stream is at least intermittent �1
L
8trearn l]e ermltZa#ior�:(ts Cie one)
i=phernerk lnterrnittent erennial
4
' Other � 1 cfN�CI�! � �"� ol [h�';
e.g. Quad Name: r
if ? 19 or perennial of ? aid'
0
v
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = � � �)
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
- Absent _�._._.
0
Weak
1
Moderate J
2}
w. Straw _....._
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
1
r_
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
rigpfe»pool sequence __�
0
v
2
3
4. Particle size of strearn substrate
0
1
2
3
€ 5. Activetrelict ftoodp€aln
CO)1
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
3
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
l
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0-51
0
0.5
10- Natural valley w
0
1.5
25. Algae
11. Second or greater order channel
j No
0
yes = 3
" arAcial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B_ Hvclmloav f5uhtntA = T 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidiz#ng bacteria 0
2
3
14. Leaf litter 1.5
1
0.5
0
15. 5edirrient on plants or debris
-µ
20. Macrobenthos (note dWersity and abundance)
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 U.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? ; I o - 0
Yes :o
C_ Bioloov fSubfotal = ill 1
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
2
0
19- Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
3
2
-m ..m.
_..._.. m ......1
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note dWersity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23_ Crayfish
24, Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in strearnbed
FACW =
0.75: OBL = 1.5 Other
"perennlal streams may also be identified using other rnettiods. See p. 35 of manual.
ldoteg-
Sketch: rrf3ti.
l
....
ri ...... ............
...... u
C16 -ed
�...
. E-:
41
.................................................................................................................................................................

NC Division of Water Quality --Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC.... Stream ...... Identification Form Version 4.11 �(�C
Late; w l 3 1 18 Project/Site:Q �Latitude: {�f� u44
Evaluator: County. � i� lr Y Longitude: -q q}
Total Points; Stream Letermfnatian.=.crere�nnjla'l
Other
Stream is at least intermittent f
if z 19 w renniai if? 30• Ephemeral Intermittente.g- QuadName.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=-- �1
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
............ Aiasen# m m
iN eak
1._...
Mod erate
2
C13. Iron oxidizing_ bacteria d
Strong
3"
2- Sinuosity of channel atong thalweg
_._.
1
2
0.-5
3
3. In -channel structure! ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0.5
1
2
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0
3
,4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5- Activelrelict floodplain
(#
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or beaches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
2
3
8, Headcuts
(i
1
2
3
9_ Grade control
0
0.5
1
1_.5
10, Natural valley
06.5
1
0.5
11. Second or greater order charnel
No - 0
Yes � 3
" artificial ditches are not rated; see disc�sians In manual
B. Hvdroloav !Subtotal M 15 1
52. Presence of Baseflow 0
1
2
3
C13. Iron oxidizing_ bacteria d
1
---.................................
2
3
14. Leaf litter 1,5'
1
0.-5
l3
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0
0.5
-----------------------------
1
---.---.. -
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0
0.5
1
5 }
17. Soil -based evidence cf high water table? No = 0
Yes 3
C. Bioloov {Subtotal = V1 a

NC Division c f Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DW Strearn Identification Farm Version 4.11 s )Ien rte_
I�
Date:
Absent
Pro'eCf1S1te:
Latitude: f-
Evaluator:
�� �
Coup
�!� �;Irk .�ori`
Iron itude: _
� 4q, �5 4q ('2
Total Powe j
Stream is at feast intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennldl
Odwr plmavll.
e.g. Quad JV�rr1L': �t.j-( A
if _ 19 or perennial if z 30*
0
7
A. GeotnorpttolDgy (Subtgtat =�:_ }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
5#rang
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
_ _
6
-_
1
1.5
�._
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. Irl -channel structure: 6x. riffle -pool, step -pool,
1loole-cool seouence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of strum substrate
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
-
1
2
3
6. Depositional tars or benches
k'
7
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
, 0
1
2
3
S. Headcuts
0)
FACW = 0.75; ❑BL = 1.5 Other
........
3
9. Grade control
04_5;
Motes:
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
D
0-5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel M
No = 0
Yf;s W 3
artificiai ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 4A 1
12_ Presence of Sasefiow 0 1
_...... ....................
2
3
_ .....-
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1
14. Leaf litter 1. 1
0.5�
f 3
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris l p 0.5
1
1.5
1S_ Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5
-
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
Yes
U B10100y (Subtotal = ]
18. Fibrous roots its strearnbed
3
2
1
0
19, Rooted upland 0ants in streambed
2
1........_._.
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish _
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
-
0.5
1
1.5
€ 24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in strearnbed
FACW = 0.75; ❑BL = 1.5 Other
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Motes:
.__,....w
....
Sketch; ++ ,, _ _�••_-• _.
..,....
�..
(:.. ^4 .
..........

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S �0
Date: its �c�
ProjectlSite: 1-i V1 r te' u }
Latitude:
Evaluator: G'a d
County.,C �1Vls i. FG�
f:
Longitude:t ' �} 1
Strew Fs
Stream Determination 4eirct
y.. fJ-_$.w.. ....
other
at least
Stream r at,-nnj intermit'
if i' 9 9 or p8rennial if � 3P�
Ephemeral Intet'mitten erenn
P
e. Quad Name:
9-
A. Geomor hof {Subtotal = k E }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 ° Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1.5 7j" 5
0 £g:5 :;,
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2`
:1:=$
3, In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
17. Sall -based evidence of high water, table?
No = 0
2
3
4. Partide we of stream substrate
0
1
3
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or -benches
0
1
CPA
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
y
2
3
8. Headcuts
,r$'j
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
FACW 0.75; 08L W 1.5 Other= 0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
t 11, Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artE wmi mtcnes are not rates; see aiscussws in manuai
nVi rn.J
B. Hvdroloav [Subtotal = ]
12. Presence of aaseflow
2
13. Iran oxidizing bacteria -
0
2 -�
3 --
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris -
1.5 7j" 5
0 £g:5 :;,
0.5
1
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or psles0
0.5
:1:=$
1.5
17. Sall -based evidence of high water, table?
No = 0
Yes
0
(: Riolonv !fia[htntni = 5
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos tnote diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fists
(3
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
�.
'b'}
m
.......... ..................
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
;`
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
w 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in strearnbed
FACW 0.75; 08L W 1.5 Other= 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods- See p. 35 of manual.
etc :. ..
Sic hs.. � �y/;.�::
� �;�.',•1��+
.........

I 5r]
• VNU - rieasant garden (Line 45U) - bite rnoto
Photoqraph 1 - Wetland 1 (Scrub -Shrub) facinq southwest
Photograph 2 - Stream 2 (RPW with Seasonal Flow)

I 5rl
• VNU - rieasant garden (Line 45U) - bite rnoto
Photograph 3 — Pond 1 facing northwest ��•T
7.
AMR&"- �,-ff
alY ■'ATL �kF`-�. L. J�? i 71S T'a i�
Fli
� - - gam,. `_ .,> " +�
::moi �, �`-. � • -. ,�,'.x"'�*•-���,��
IN -
Photograph 4 — Wetland 2 facing south

I
Ic
-P
Jl , 4rw
�
te
3
. ...... Ar
Ar
94M
r
p 7,
eL
wel.
A
p-
Ap
e6

,1
r r •; � J•� yy 1 - ..
-' k }F' 1d, !
lip
licit
r 4+ `yam' • � i -
ti iPP y�� ■
r
- 1
47
•F� M1
-
�.!_
-moi_
L� :
z�•t_
I�
}ILL.
•
•'yl5t5 L r.y
� i1
r
1.15 •
:may
_
,1
r r •; � J•� yy 1 - ..
-' k }F' 1d, !
lip
licit
r 4+ `yam' • � i -
ti iPP y�� ■

I 5rl
Y 7 ti
r
� �
_ vim- '1•'
�r
1
r
x
Y if
{ • 1 —
-rM -
+ -
-•{n •— rtyjY
1
Y
•� rte- •#z;. .T�"� - �:
}• ..yam `� —' +�
�;
2 y'
;9�
_ {
T
—:� 99 4
k d
{'
rt
• 7:''�
SR
pt

I 5r]
d
-N
t
Photograph 11 - Stream 5 (RPW with Perennial Flow) facing downstream
- r
IM_ ..
y • '• ice. •�r� .
Orr
alt-
-, 4 -yo
y,
VNU — rieasant garden (Line 45u) - bite rnotograpns
ot
Photograph 12— Stream 6 (RPW with Perennial Flow) facing downstream

y �
3
Jr
� r
LZ- ,
*: '.
• y+ �''- 3 ;tea` ��ti _ ���.
_ moi. },�� _ — � _ •• '
• r� •ice: � t� 1 �• + � ,� •� � I �r ���' _:'.
.� .

' • I • • • , •
-�-�� � �'� •�; ,' Fry_ .•7 `+• �•:
.� ti. r. •
y r • �! f. -
rr
a
Th
i1plIplillill 11111 1 111
• •r- •�� ���+•�' + _ - may.
may.
. .
1��Il III 'III lipp 11111111
71
p_� T rTi
�r•}.p,�`
'ter`_
-- 1.�:

I 5rl
• �r VNU — rieasant garden (Line 45u) - bite rnotograpns
.- {• _ `rte �-•� xr� ' T�
... -may; rt t� 1�C•-s
��SR•2�G,. fir` \ 1
SW
rl -
x• r
ti
:,r�'3 ' ` �S'il��}.114. • � ����
Photograph 17 — Wetland 6 facing west
Photograph 18 — Wetland 7 facing west

I 5r]
• VNU - rieasant garden (Line 45U) - bite rnoto
Photograph 19 — Stream 9 (Little Alamance Creek) facing downstream
. I :' ' MP;;
- -
MMEMN&
!F AUX
Ems: a A01}._
Photograph 20 — Wetland 8 facing north

_ •rte . �k".
rJ J = R
-F • � -ice r
s �
Apr -IF
� _ � '+ r •r

I 5r]
• VNU - rieasant garden (Line 45U) - bite rnoto
Photograph 23 — Wetland 10 (Forested) facing southeast
Photograph 24 — Stream 11 (RPW with Seasonal Flow) facing downstream

•fes..•• - '• - _•• •••;
r. ti
-4p
q_b
- � . � f• r�yr x ti •'-'�
er
ri
.fes
5L !t I r2� _ � •�� '
ti
x ;
T
_ k
r : -is
.t}M1 r�T ..ter•-' � ��.. ��• _ � •• - ,F .
AF
l
ir
YJ
jw
f
'� ti� � � of , � -� •
� ' • � H •rL +�r � - % �
J�6 ' �Jr •• x 7L' i
r ir
5
. - . J �•}l • jLy
le
? �'

4k _ -
�y
IDL M.
41 j 4t -
IQ
r
1 1.
-+ � -� � 1 � : ~ gyp: '„ -• -
•� if�r '• •'r �~� j ' 4••� �•.- v -a• ti.lL ' L •• - L- v--
a � � � :• � M1 • vim'- - �-
�� '� � •ter .�, :-�
_- t � J L}v�•y 4�
• r v - - �:i L y•i•• !L r f
�.:
_ �
I"
17

I 5rl
VNU — rieasant garden (Line
�iu) - site rnotograpns
Photograph 35 — Wetland 16 (Forested) facing southwest
Photograph 36 — Wetland 17 (Scrub -shrub) facing southwest

rf
I
{
Ad
)65 I r ? .�, • .3r
4 '-. r i- r•
•ri .
L
5 1
j'TT ti
Yle
k + L
' � 1
}
I• fAm
a,� .. y� r •yo-
1
' {��} ,i •} ��, r+i ly 4.�i. , rT�r r
..•S
x
L �!'h
�.J all I '_r�+ .' ,"1 j��j�-'��J•.y����J• _
`r
•,
•,Y
.. .r'\\1I•�
i+'j'L
}'F ,± .:� k
_+i.
�,�r�•
ri
:•r
��+
rt� ``�•i� •• •��•
1, -- f • { -
+ r ; Mei ~"' �: �'• ,. "1 f kF
�"'••r -{- sT'f} ' •; .'
r • I • 'x'v�y,,�_; I,
_-'�"�1b: as
•a•• y'r�. � .�:.r��� _
Y' .,ter ti• �'-

I 5rl
• VNU - rieasant garden (Line 45U) - bite rnoto
Photograph 39 - Wetland 19 (Scrub -shrub) facing southwest
Photograph 40 - Wetland 20 (Forested) facing north
I '- IF
V
114
E
1 a
I
-IRL
m 1 :19
-A
.A
m—W .
I 1
: � ■ '' d ■
t
mmk.
)m
T iMV
vas 4a3�L +i�
'y�LS I:����a�••.�
Photograph 40 - Wetland 20 (Forested) facing north

I 5r]
■ �r PNG - Pleasant Garden (Line 450) - Site Photographs
tib' �'- , �• t.
J }G
i
ry
A {'
r`;•x :fi
x''14. � � •,:ars �. r' �. ''.�`F.
41 , j1it
4
Photograph 41 - Wetland 21 (Shrub -shrub) facing north
AJ
�.* .
.l}
L
Photograph 42 - Wetland 22 (Forested) facing west

�• ~ A
'•
��
1, � Flt
,` �a�--�� ���`5� •-�� •' � �i�a,
.`�,
�� .� 1,•�� � •
'�. f} {i�EJ•F�i 1�.�r'S is a: CTS'~li� 1 -
• � _
- Fri -aLr� • � r
ray
' ' •�tiy4
• - 1 • i � _ _ L•
W..k LZ. -a —

I 5r]
• VNU - rieasant garden (Line 45U) - bite rnoto
Photograph 45 — Stream 19 (RPW with Intermittent Flow) and Wetland 23 (Forested) facing
south
Photograph 46 — Open Water Pond 3 facing west

I 5r]
• VNU - rieasant garden (Line 45U) - bite rnoto
�I , l 1� l t ,�.I�■ X13, i �: � ���t�� �3r'I`r�#-r•,
.. � Y • M Kik` � s�,,-, •�+r
Wt
Photograph 47 — Stream 19 (RPW with Perennial Flow) facing downstream
ti�ilrb3T3M�{��.}���g'"!C -y J.I .} � �: SMr.' - -I . '• � :•rG. �' J����
FT L
..''�
Uw
" �.y[•�1: ,�• _ri-: r+•f?�. if � ICnh �#"y#r�•�r
' iO.i��F Tom," �•:ri•�#�=�fi't', �°'::�6l��..'ii i��.'.z �..
Photograph 48 — Wetland 24 (Forested) facing south