20190432 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190404

DWR
IDIOM n of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
tial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20190432 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required What amout is owed?*
* Fee received r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification r $570.00
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776- Select Project Reviewer*
9800 Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Pleasant Garden Road Looping Project
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Dave Vena, PE, PMP
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/4/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Big & Little Alamance Creeks
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-IV;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.968448
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Guilford
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r^ Yes r No
Longitude:
-79.757388
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
,R 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
PNG Pleasant Garden Road Looping Project DMS Acceptance.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F_ Owner P Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) proposed utility easements
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
5.1 mile linear project
Address Line 2
Oty
Pleasant Garden
F stal / Zip Cade
27313
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Dave Vena, PE, PMP
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
84.19KB
State / Rovince / fbgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:

3b. Business Name:
Piedmont Natural Gas
3c. Address
Street Address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Address Line 2
cty
State / Ftwince / fbgion
Charlotte
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28210
USA
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
dave. vena@d u ke-energy. corn
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Pleasant Garden
F-
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
multiple parcels - linear project
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
CKY
Postal / Zip Cade
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Big & Little Alamance Creeks
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
Haw HUC-03030002/Deep HUC-03030003
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
603
State / Rwime / ftion
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The ebsting project corridor consists of agricultural, residential, and undeveloped/forested land as indicated on the recent aerial imagery and verified in the field. Land use in the vicinity
of the project consists of residential, light manufacturing, agricultural lands, and undeveloped forested lands.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r^ Yes r No r^ Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig2_Pleasant _Garden _Topo_FINAL.pdf 1.55MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fig4_Pleasant_Garden_Soils_FINAL.pdf 3.37MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
5.45
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
6,169
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*

PING proposes to install approximately 5.1 miles of natural gas pipeline in and around the town of Pleasant Garden in order to improve the overall system strength and allowfor future
demand growth in the area. Specifically, the Project will involve installation of a 12 -inch -diameter steel pipeline, extending generally northward from the existing Pleasant Garden
Regulator Station (N35.94102°; W79.76427°) through the easternmost portion of Pleasant Garden before terminating at a proposed regulator station at the northern extent of the
Project just south of the intersection of Pleasant Garden Road and Ritters Lake Road (N35.98903°; W79.77746°).
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project includes the installation of approximately 5.1 miles of 12" diameter steel natural gas transmission pipeline via open cut and jack and bore methods. Additionally, a
new regulator station (-0.324 acres) is proposed at the northern end of the project. The Project Will include 5 temporary access roads and 1 permanent access roads to provide
construction access and future maintenance access to the permanent ROW. See the Project Narrative and Notes on the Legends and Notes sheet of the attached plans for further
details.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
PleasantGardenPlanSheetsWithImpacts. pdf 99.19MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No f Unknown
Comments:
submitted Prelimary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination Request on February 12,
2019.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r NIA
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): HDR
Agency/Consultant Company: HDR
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Received Stream Buffer Determination Letter from NCDWR on 2/20/2019. USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination is pending.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
SectionB.4d.PNG Pleasant Garden Line Stream Determination Letter.pdf 202.31 KB
SectionB.4d.USACE Email.pdf 58.8KB
PNG_PleasantGarden_PJD_Submittal20l90206.pdf 11.23MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?)
2b. Impact type * M
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*M
area*
W1
Clearing and Open Cut
PBottomland
Hardwood Forest
Wetland 25
Yes
Corps
0.080
(acres)
W2
Clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 25
Yes
Corps
0.040
(acres)
W3
Clearing and Open Cut
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 29
Yes
Corps
0.009
(acres)
W4
Open Cut
T
Unknown
Wetland 27
No
Corps
0.002
(acres)

W5
Clearing and Open Cut
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 26
Yes
Corps
0.060
(acres)
W6
Clearing
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland 26
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W7
Open Cut
T
Unknown
Wetland 18
IJo
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W8
Open Cut
T
Unknown
Wetland 17
IJo
Corps
0.020
(acres)
W9
Open Cut
T
Unknown
Wetland 16
Corps
0.002
(acres)
W10
Open Cut
T
Unknown
Wetland 15
IJo
Corps
0.002
(acres)
W11
Clearing and Open Cut
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 13
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W12
Clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 13
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W13
Clearing and Open Cut
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 12
Yes
Corps
0.130
(acres)
W14
Clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 12
Yes
Corps
0.030
(acres)
W15
Clearing and Open Cut
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 9
Yes
Corps
0.120
(acres)
W16
Clearing
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 9
Yes
Corps
0.040
(acres)
W17
Open Cut
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland 8
Yes
Corps
0.003
(acres)
W18
Clearing
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland 7
Yes
Corps
0.020
(acres)
W19
Clearing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 7
Yes
Corps
0.020
(acres)
W20
Clearing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 6
Yes
Corps
0.006
(acres)
W21
Clearing
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland 6
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W22
Clearing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 4
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W23
Clearing
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland 4
Yes
Corps
0.010
W24
Clearing and Open Cut
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 3
Yes
Corps
0.030
(acres)
W25
Clearing
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland 3
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W26
Clearing and Open Cut
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 3
Yes
Corps
0.030
(acres)
W27
Clearing
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland 3
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
W28
Fill (Timber Matting)
T
Unknown
Wetland 19
Yes
Corps
0.009
(acres)
W29
Fill (Permanent Rock
PUnknown
Wetland 17A
Yes
Corps
0.040
Fill)
(acres)
E—Ir"
(Timber Matting)
T
Unknown
fff
Yes
Corps
0.100
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.338
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.883
2h. Comments:
0.51 acres permanent conversion of forested wetlands &
0.04 acres of permanent fill
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0 545

3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
50 720
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
770
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The following measures were considered to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional surface waters during the design process.
• An on-site delineation was conducted to identify jurisdictional surface waters within the project vicinity. The proposed 12 -inch -diameter natural gas
pipeline was routed to avoid and minimize impacts to identified aquatic resources.
• The alignment between Nesbit Road and Appomattox Road and an approximately 2,600 foot stretch east of Hunt Road will run parallel with an
existing Duke Energy overhead line right-of-way (ROW) which will allow PING to utilize many of the ROW existing access roads. Additionally, this will
result in less clearing of existing forested areas.
• The temporary workspace adjacent to the permanent easement was reduced from a width of 30 feet to 15 feet at streams and wetlands to minimize
impacts to jurisdictional streams and wetlands.
• Stream crossings were designed at a near perpendicular angle (between 75 and 105 degrees) to the stream. The best route was selected to avoid
other potential wetlands on the property.
• A pump -around wAll be employed when installing the culvert at AR -005 to work in the dry. Water will be pumped through a sediment filter bag before it
is returned to the stream.
• As part of Nationwide Permit #12 — Utility Line Activities for the Wilmington District, justification is required for work corridors exceeding 40 feet in
width. The proposed project involves constructing a 12 -inch -diameter natural gas pipeline; the pipeline will be installed within a 50 -foot -wide
permanent easement. Throughout the project, the temporary workspace adjacent to the permanent easement will be a minimum of 30 -feet wide. This
typical 80 -foot wide workspace is needed for the staff and equipment to safely complete the work required to install a pipeline of this size. At all stream
and wetland crossings, the temporary workspace is limited to a 15 -foot -wide area and the permanent easement is 50 feet wide. Since stream
crossings include temporary bridges (typically 16' or 20' wide timber mats), pipeline trenching activities, and room for the establishment of dams to
effect a pump -around bypass or flume this additional width is required to safely conduct pipeline installation for a pipeline of this diameter.
• Where feasible, a 25' buffer was implemented in areas where the proposed project parallels a wetland by reducing the temporary workspace width.
Impacts to Wetland 5 ware completely avoided by reducing temporary workspace.
3a. Reason for impact
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact"
3d. S. name *
Tributary to Polecat Creek
3e. Stream Type *
(�)
Intermittent
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
Both
3g. S. width *
2
3h. Impact
length*
30
S1
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
watering and open cut)
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
g2
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Polecat Creek
Perennial
Both
3
51
watering and open cut)
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S3
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Big Alamance
Perennial
Both
5
58
watering and open cut)
Creek
Average (feet)
(linearfee)
Sq
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Big Alamance
Intermittent
Both
3
107
watering and open cut)
Creek
Ave age (feet)
(lin�rfee )
SS
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Big Alamance
Perennial
Both
4
64
watering and open cut)
Creek
Ave age (Feet)
(linear fee )
S6
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Little Alamance
Perennial
Both
5
57
watering and open cut)
Creek
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
g7
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Little Alamance Creek
Perennial
Both
4
55
watering and open cut)
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
gg
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Little Alamance
Intermittent
Both
3
53
watering and open cut)
Creek
Ave age (Feet)
(linear few)
S9
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Little Alamance
Perennial
Both
4
53
watering and open cut)
Creek
Average (feet)
(linea fee )
�01
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Little Alamance
Perennial
Both
15
53
watering and open cut)
Creek
Average (fee)
pin�rfeet)
S11
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Little Alamance
Intermittent
Both
3
55
watering and open cut)
Creek
Avera7e (feet)
(linear fed)
S12
Utility construction (de-
Temporary
Dewatering
Tributary to Little Alamance
Intermittent
Both
3
54
watering and open cut)
Creek
Ave age (feet)
(linearfee )
S13
Culvert Replacement
P
Permanent
Culvert
Tributary to Little Alamance
rY
Perennial
Both
4
19
Creek
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S14
Culvert Replacement
Temporary
Dewatering
Little Alamance Creek
Perennial
Both
4
30
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S15
Utility construction (de-
Permanent
Dewatering
ary to Little Alamance
FCreek
Intermittent
Both
3
31
watering and open cut)
Ave age (fee)
(li earfee )
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
50 720
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
770
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The following measures were considered to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional surface waters during the design process.
• An on-site delineation was conducted to identify jurisdictional surface waters within the project vicinity. The proposed 12 -inch -diameter natural gas
pipeline was routed to avoid and minimize impacts to identified aquatic resources.
• The alignment between Nesbit Road and Appomattox Road and an approximately 2,600 foot stretch east of Hunt Road will run parallel with an
existing Duke Energy overhead line right-of-way (ROW) which will allow PING to utilize many of the ROW existing access roads. Additionally, this will
result in less clearing of existing forested areas.
• The temporary workspace adjacent to the permanent easement was reduced from a width of 30 feet to 15 feet at streams and wetlands to minimize
impacts to jurisdictional streams and wetlands.
• Stream crossings were designed at a near perpendicular angle (between 75 and 105 degrees) to the stream. The best route was selected to avoid
other potential wetlands on the property.
• A pump -around wAll be employed when installing the culvert at AR -005 to work in the dry. Water will be pumped through a sediment filter bag before it
is returned to the stream.
• As part of Nationwide Permit #12 — Utility Line Activities for the Wilmington District, justification is required for work corridors exceeding 40 feet in
width. The proposed project involves constructing a 12 -inch -diameter natural gas pipeline; the pipeline will be installed within a 50 -foot -wide
permanent easement. Throughout the project, the temporary workspace adjacent to the permanent easement will be a minimum of 30 -feet wide. This
typical 80 -foot wide workspace is needed for the staff and equipment to safely complete the work required to install a pipeline of this size. At all stream
and wetland crossings, the temporary workspace is limited to a 15 -foot -wide area and the permanent easement is 50 feet wide. Since stream
crossings include temporary bridges (typically 16' or 20' wide timber mats), pipeline trenching activities, and room for the establishment of dams to
effect a pump -around bypass or flume this additional width is required to safely conduct pipeline installation for a pipeline of this diameter.
• Where feasible, a 25' buffer was implemented in areas where the proposed project parallels a wetland by reducing the temporary workspace width.
Impacts to Wetland 5 ware completely avoided by reducing temporary workspace.

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
• Stream and wetland crossings will be installed in the dry within a 24-hour period during low flow conditions.
Local weather conditions will be monitored, to the extent possible, to avoid high flow events during and immediately following construction.
• Water crossings will be monitored during pipeline installation by an experienced environmental inspector(s) familiar with stream and wetlands
crossing procedures and existing site conditions and knowledge of North Carolina Environmental Regulations. The environmental inspector(s) will
have the authority to stop work should conditions change or if different measures are required. The environmental inspector(s) Will be on-site from the
initiation (preparatory stages) through project completion (e.g. implementation of the restoration plan).
• Qualified staff will be maintained throughout the duration of the project such that compliance monitoring activities associated with the pipeline
installation in other locations do not take precedence over water crossings.
• The upstream and downstream crossing points Will be sealed to isolate the crossing for the pipeline installation "in the dry." Clean steel plates, sand
bags, or similar measures will be inserted to temporarily dam the flow. Steel plates will be cleaned prior to use with biodegradable products or heat. On
both sides of the installed plates (both upstream and downstream), sandbags will be placed to secure the plates, reinforce the damming of water, and
provide a secondary barrier to seepage. The excavation trench will be monitored for groundwater intrusion and, if necessary, excess water will be
pumped to a discharge site located 50 to 100 feet from the top of the bank of the receiving stream. Discharged water from the trench will be filtered
through an appropriate Erosion and Sediment Control measure.
• Where possible, the top 6 to 12 inches of streambed substrate will be stockpiled separately from the subgrade material and kept saturated during
the pipeline installation. After pipe installation is complete, the stockpiled substrate will be replaced on the bottom of the stream channel and set at its
pre -construction streambed elevation.
• Pumps shall be obtained and staged prior to executing the stream crossing. Back-up pumps shall be kept on-site in case of primary pump(s)
malfunction or to control high flows. All pumps will have screened intakes and Will be placed in secondary -containment for the duration of the
installation. In the event of unforeseen weather (i.e., rain) during installation, pumps near the crossing Will be monitored 24 -hours a day until normal
flow conditions return.
• Pump flow rates will be monitored to ensure adequate flow is achieved such that water neither accumulates behind the upstream side nor is
discharged too rapidly on the downstream side. At the downstream discharge location, flow discharge rates shall be controlled such that scouring of
the stream bed and/or banks does not occur. Efforts will be made to aerate the water prior to downstream discharge into the receiving stream.
• Removal of in -stream control devices will be conducted in such a manner as to allowa gradual re -introduction of flowing water into the channel.
The contractor may employ a flume pipe diversion in lieu of pump diversion if practical based on stream flow rates at the time of construction.
Any disturbed stream banks will be sloped back and seeded with a native riparian seed mix Coir matting will be installed to anchor the seeding and
stabilize the banks.
• Stream crossing will be monitored for stability following construction and for the duration of the pipeline construction. Restoration will be considered
complete when herbaceous vegetation reaches 80 -percent coverage of the affected area.
Wetlands Will be re -graded to their pre -construction contours and seeded with a native wetland seed mix; no heavy mulching will occur in wetlands.
• Construction equipment operating near streams and wetland areas will be limited to that necessary for excavation, pipe installation and restoration
activities. Vegetation near the streams will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to promote re -growth.
• A pump -around will be employed when installing the culvert at AR -005 to work in the dry. Water will be pumped through a sediment filter bag before it
is returned to the stream.
• Erosion & Sediment Control devices will be installed according to the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning Design Manual' and approved by the local governing authority. All implemented measures for best management practices (BMPs) Will be
inspected on a routine basis and operation and maintenance of devices will be in compliance with water quality standards.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes
r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
F DWR
W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
F Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r: Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.55
49. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
According to the USACE RIBITS database https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Mitigation/ no wetland credits are
available in the Haw HUC-03030002/Deep HUC-03030003.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r: Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
v

F Level Spreader
F Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
F Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
* Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r^ Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
The overall percent impervious of this project is 1.9%. The project is in a Phase II area and has less than 24% built -upon area.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r^ Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is privately funded and will not require a cumulative impact analysis. Best management practices will be deployed through the duration of
the project. The completed project is not anticipated to result in incremental adverse affects to downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r' No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
C Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS IPaC and NC Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer Reports. See attached USFWS concurrence letter dated February 1, 2019.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Section F.5d_USFWS_PNGPleasantGardenRoad 12inchLoopingProject_20190201.pdf 180.08KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper hftps://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Phase I Archaeological Survey conducted by S&ME determined that no properties or sites are eligible for the National Register. See attached NCHPO
concurrence letter (ER 18-1259) dated December 21, 2018.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SectionF.7b_SHPO_ER 18-1259.pdf 120.04KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map Panel No: 6819
Miscellaneous
Comments
U
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Fig1_Pleasant_ Garden_ Vicinity_FINAL.pdf
1.23MB
Fig2_Pleasant_Garden_Topo_FINAL.pdf
1.55MB
Fig3_ Pleasant _ Garden_ Aerial_FINAL.pdf
3.78MB
Fig4_Pleasant_Garden_Soils_FINAL.pdf
3.37MB
Figs_Pleasant _Garden_NHD_FINAL.pdf
3.81 MB
Signature U
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a 'transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Eric Mularski
Signature
Date
4/4/2019

FYZ
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
I, David Vena, hereby certify that I have authorized Eric Mularski, representing HDR
Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to
the processing and issuance of the Section 404 Nationwide Permit and Section 401 Water
Quality Certification associated with the Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
located in Guilford County, North Carolina.
We hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
David Vena
Applicant's Name
Applicant's Signature
Date
hdrinc.com
440 South Church Street Suites 900 & 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202-2075
T 704.338.6700 F 704.338.6760
Eric Mularski
Agent's Name
E��- - - - -
Agent's Signature
3/14/2019
Date

9
&E 1 1 &n g!�ft ■ 1 Lu Ill&
■ - -9 -_JIM 1 j iC��I I �'7 - U -T -111 -0511- _A I IML
mv
iii I V -11 kvim .� II inIII A mrd*r+P ►4 1 #-w- im R 1O ■ ItTmm 3IIm 1r1iiar■ mkm mi III
fail 1 IJ 1111 -+1 1111 �►r�11��
1 g11 1■ i ii11k oIII 1 m■ -1 m blirmwol
111 ■II IIII■040H 11 11 III vc411 Elm 11c11 TIi•i 11 Ia1: 11 IMiii ■11 iii 1u -l#n2Q 1 16"IuJ M&
O.Mlk••_ 1 mhlt
�i1F
411 —1
wi
1� i M
�)
_r
OP�1■177�_ ■ II -�:-:�
111 L A Al G{-," - "ML -Cl I I ►
1 II 1 DO 1 11
I
L.■1=0�
w

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Dtrt Tor
Dave V. PE
Piedmont Natural Gas
PO Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 2, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 10/2/2019
Project: PNG Pleasant Garden Road Looping Project County: Guilford
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
Cape Fear 03030003 Riparian Wetland 0.19
Cape Fear 03030002 Riparian Wetland 0.36
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B.0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Eric Mularski, agent
Sincerely,
Jame§. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
- DEC D
� r
North Carolina Departrnrnt of bMronmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
717 w. jones Street 11657 Mad Service Cetiter I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.7D7.8976

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
February 1, 2019
Eric Mularski
HDR Inc.
440 S. Church Street, Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202
Re: PNG Pleasant Garden Road 12 -inch Looping Project — Guilford County, NC
Dear Mr. Mularski:
This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on-line project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by a proposed project. For
future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office's project planning website at
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be
present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaC) website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
at https://ecos.fws.gov/i/ipac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered and threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concern' that
are known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
' The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
2

We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
L& 6 �
Penj amin
Field Supervisor
3

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
December 21, 2018
Alicia DePalma
Duke Energy
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Alicia.depalmanduke-energy.com
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Pleasant Garden Road 12" Looping Gas Line, Line 450, Guilford County, ER 18-1259
Dear Ms. DePalma:
Thank you for your November 14, 2018, letter transmitting the draft report for the above -referenced undertaking.
We have reviewed the report and offer the following comments.
We concur that the following properties are not eligible for the National Register for the reasons outlined in the
report:
Sites 31 GF576-31 GF578 do not have the potential to contain information pertinent to prehistoric or historic
research questions.
Site 31 GF215 was not relocated within the project corridor. It is not eligible for the National Register within the
area of disturbance and is not assessed beyond those boundaries.
Attached for your use are items that need to be corrected in the final report.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part
800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact
Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or environmental.reviewnncdcr.gov. In
all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(a� ��uLt
60*1 Ramona M. Bartos
Attachment — corrections
cc: Kimberly Nagle, S&ME, Inc., knaglensmeinc.com
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

North Carolina Office of State Archaeology
Archaeological Investigation Standards and Guidelines, 2017
Corrections for Final Report for ER 18-1259
Please add the information listed below to the final report, described in the guidelines for Phase I Identification
Survey Reports, pages 21-27
a. Management Summary
2. Relevant legislation and SHPO environmental review number
4. A summary of the survey methodology (including information on transects and shovel tests)
Figures 1.1 through 1.4 show a current survey area labeled in red and a previously surveyed area in blue.
Most of the area in blue had not been surveyed before the current work. Please clarify maps.
b. Introduction
3. SHPO environmental review number
c. Environmental Setting
1. Total acreage of the project area
2. Map of project boundaries showing recent aerial imagery at a scale of 1:24,000 or less
5. Estimates of acreage within each soil category
On page 12, the Pamlico River is misspelled as "Pamplico" twice.
d. Archaeological and Cultural Background
On page 13, Powell 1968 is cited as a source. This work is not included in the References Cited section.
f. Results
6.f. At least one representative photograph of a shovel test profile should be included for each site
On page 32, the final paragraph should read "and is no longer extant", not "extent"

Mularski, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Eric,
Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Monday, March 11, 2019 9:06 AM
Mularski, Eric
DePalma, Alicia ([e-mail]); Rogers, Carl; Vena, Dave;
Grabowsky, Jeremy ([e-mail]); Homewood, Sue
([e-mail])
RE: PNG- Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project - Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination & Buffer Determination Request
The updated maps for the PNG - Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project site appear to reflect the changes
made and discussed during our site visit on 10/1/2018. 1 will use these maps when processing the PJD and/or permit
application/request for this site. Please let me know if you have any questions.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE -SAW -RG -R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at:
https://nam0S-safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcorpsmapu.usace.army.mil%2Fcm_apex%2Ff%3F
p%3D136%3A4%3A0&amp;data=02%7C01%7CEric.Mularski%40hdrinc.com%7Cf0a378291ace4a73f2e208d6a6226471
7C3667e201cbdc48b39b425d2d3f16e2a9%7C0%7C0%7C636879063979615047&amp;sdata=8h2nxGZjg3uHo7wrkjBBwT
zFLedjHrRtcloP8HReddQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
-----Original Message -----
From: Mularski, Eric [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:49 PM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Cc: DePalma, Alicia ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Rogers, Carl
<[e-mail]>; Vena, Dave <[e-mail]>; Grabowsky, Jeremy
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] PNG- Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project - Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination & Buffer Determination Request

Dave & Sue,
Please find the attached pdf of the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Buffer Determination Request for the
Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) project. We appreciate the field visits and regulatory guidance you provided
during this process. We will be submitting a Pre -Construction Notification for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional
waters and a stream buffer authorization request to Guilford County in the upcoming weeks. Please let me know if
require any additional information to process our request.
Thank you,
Eric Mularski, PWS
Environmental and Regulatory Team Lead
HDR
440 S. Church Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
D 704-973-6878 M 704-806-1521
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
hdrinc.com/follow-us <Blockedhttp:Hhdrinc.com/follow-us>

NORTH CAROLINA
ROY COOPED Erxlr�ronmantaf�e�aNty
coves
MICHAEL S. RECAN
Ser 1-Y
LINDA CULPE<PPLP,
hrrerfrA &[rector
February 20, 2019
Mr. Eric Mularski
HDR Inc.
440 South Church St, Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202-2075
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500)
Subject Property: PNG Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project, Guilford County
Dear Mr. Mularski:
On December 6, 2018, at your request and in your attendance, I conducted an on-site determination to
review features located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted
state regulations.
The Division acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the LISACE.
The attached maps accurately depict all stream determinations conducted during the site visit.
Please note that at the time of this letter, all perennial stream channels and jurisdictional wetlands found
on the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. In addition, the Jordan Lake buffer Rules
may apply to some streams along this project, please be sure to contact the local government for further
information regarding the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in
any future correspondences concerning this property. This on-site determination shall expire five (5)
years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination
by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing
EQ.:>
� r
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
336.776-9800

Page 2 of 2
c/o 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals that
dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface water from
the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start
until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not
approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact me at 336-776-9693
or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
11_
Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
HDR Stream/Wetland Location Map
Cc: PNG ([e-mail])
David Bailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office

r^ �
LEGENDWney-LeosP Wiley Lewis' a
Project Area
P
Q
DATA SOURCE: Esri, OpenStreetMap i o 79
contributors, and the GIS User Community - - - 0; dock Rd
• ^ as - - Blumenthal Rdt
0 Mlles 0.5 a �a e
a
_
E ___-_____ O� g
Rd 9Fy �o
4211
3
v ce Cre ny
a �,w°
CynlMa Rd a P\9 =
� e\0 a
SPur Rd N L
ID Talbot Rd
997 tt Q
I 9y�
d
I ae�
a 21
i
r
E She rain park -Rd �M1>den Rd
Neeley Rd
Pleasan
Garden
`a,,1�Cle, Church Rd
'V
D
Burning Bush Dr 9 _ _ _ _ _ - _
o i
emo6 Rd
si 'P
xSboniicmp
_ T CFOar Joy
845 tt i
(22 Naga^ 5\D a Park Rd - - - — -
�a
oe r
1aa /
J F,eklvlew Rd
I
0
e?2 rr
' Kearns -Hackett Rd
° - S
__._-_-._.__6 G�
i
i w
an Rd o Palley Rd _ 2T
t{nAgr. - P
z oI
�o
'ytpo'
62
R' Guilford County WIC01R, CHI
rolvatural
PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING PROJECT
Fp iedmont
Gas PROJECT VICINITY
Energy that shows° FIGURE 1
PATH: H:1GISIPROJECTS13812 DUKEENERGY110110236 PLEASANTGARDENI7.2 WORK IN PROGRESS\MAP DOCS\M%D\WORKING140d PERMITIFIGI PLEASANT GARDEN VICINITY FINAL.M%D - USER: EMULARSK - DATE:3/18/2019 SECTION 404/401 PCN

.w�. � a ""N 41L:.+M. • ? —b l •
LEGEND
Project Area
Topographic m
Quadrangle 1
W
DATA SOURCE: Pleasant Garden 24K _
Topographic Map (1982); USA Topo Map
GIS Service �f
0 Feet 2,000 ;
'CA
I
(CLIMAX
I
PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING PROJECT
raratural
iedmont
Gas USGS PLEASANT GARDEN 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE
Energy that shows.' FIGURE 2
PATH: \\CLTSMAIWGIS DAWGI&PROJECTSI3872 DUKEENERGYU0110236 PLEASANTGARDEW7.2 WORK IN PROGRESS\MAP DOC&NIXDMORKING\WO4 PERMITIFIG2 PLEASANT GARDEN TOPO FINAL.M%D - USER: EMULARSK - DATE: SECTION 4041401 PCN

.--.l_Ritters1ake.Rd \�y
Gardengate Rd--. _
t � M
i • ,
y j o
0. Cocoa D,
3' Y
1
1 Feet 2,000 Y4 Lam' .,
r
t — v
9 ^
a `fin
JAb
{ .. Cyntha, RU �� 1�'t /- �, <•'' _ �+ Ct� ,X,�
f Cynthia Rd
17 1
'SSS
!!
.� _ ..
.r - a• t _rt. TalbotRd�'`,.s._.
toneyHAI t•
! f _ tk.
s { �y. �� .tea•. �t ,. � }j ,. �` � r' 4
ry S
Wood��. . «tea ...� P, Carnage R4.
unDr7
Lake `+ �r . >+ , ..� f �. - •� -' 1 Srye9,atte Dr4.. •,+�, 7- , ,
' �GrandwnfR y[ryy, - ' r' -- �
Rd i �= / n
�r, V it fit. ' V� a' t �_"v ,. - ,� •, � i ,
a
- .' 1. �• a I �` . -; i LSurel KnollfDf s . 1 y � 'S, v
1-7
'Or r -O=' milto a.
s• ,.. - ^t' o- ;,_Ha n Rd
14 ' II ckDr; Tm
Thr r"Rd •1 t
47 t
0 idol
urning Bush or" • .
` �
9 +`L+98CY; are Dr a•. '� I , 4ii yan Sri. r _
_ >t
SSL �, � d I t. f . � _ •`�(�'•
t
H k
ke
or
9q
Rdj„{::; _ t •t•`� � ,� dpi
�• r q Rd. r '' !
µ•,. �- "KearnsHadev Rd _-
Ade
tip bin 9

_ LEGEND-
nl
DATA SOURCE:
r
f
h Fr i
CD
(, c A., i
hrtFf:f M, 118
EnC
Fr •. E • fi it Crlti� `� :i:
c �, 1 r► Cod
wr, nilll:•
J
;I !
f n i i
Fra l' •' E o B n Ft
> � 1 F rI I t
Mt G2 y �
Jp
h A, p
h13 Fn'[3 Grf' l
M1
:I• i , hf
FF)E{
��-
x
t: r,
�.. E„G P#asant MhLf+, EnFsf
6 �F"
Garden � � E` Li I
B t Mrrb" 1
ry r„ 1
to r
=+ h'nr
_y P,tllE#' ry
li
4rlg
LrlFt
r
CLJIL Pb COUNTY, I RTH CAROLINA — SHELT
- - — En B
t EnD Mh rr XFrr6
�. 4f �r r.;fil • ,
On -Site SoilsEr
r-
r.eG2 =
1
° Mr.Hd
F W. o lH
}
f'1 l 113 L 1 l
1
I�Il7B
R�
Fn" rEG I ..
Fn rMPiedmont PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING PROJECT
iNatural Gas NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF GUILFORD COUNTY (1977), NORTH CAROLINA
Energv that shows' FIGURE 4
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTW8T2_DUKEENERGY\10110236_PLEASANTGARDENIT.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOMMMINORKINGM4_PERMIT%FIG4_PLEASANT _ GARDEN_ SOILS_FINAL.MXD - USER: EMULARSK - DATE: -6/2019 SECTION 404/401 PCN

,.. ... Crena 6r' / ... :. - �✓ ,_ - ,
F
\ / a
LEGEND
Project Area
Dataset
�-
FloodUSFWS National Wetlands
Inventory
FEMA Firm Panel
FEMA Zones
/ J V
100 -Year Flood Zone
1 1 -Year Flood Zone
/ M nlerslRig�, o
t I rY .s ♦x
rp
DATA SOURCE: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer
LISFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
OF
I110-
\ A
Sf
0 Feet 1,000 eeeel*do. �' w h•'�
=i ,►' • - �' _ r.=,�, / t�.. _ - ••�, ... ialtrulRd,' -
•-�/ 8 Q
_ q��Stoney ill cu� 6
O. .� .. �J,� ,{ _ Came!:
i� 7F ' • '7 �` �' "' {.. �r Y - 9e Run'Dr
Al
�JGrandwerd
alft
es z o
1 s
' apt { �• ' h � f J � � . - ,. � I � � •' y' ,!i.-.^\'..� � � ��
4at\1la '} I m I `rig a •i. ,
1 .
i Laurel Knollipt� e P y.
6
' Dr
.fir o P •y / _ 10 afriilton
o• � drcresLDr fi 1. �, H Rd
4 ,-
.f4 , ( Dr
\w. l j. , • r - A_ I� 'fie
Rd
/ rv.. "s'• tJ 1
..a
:-
Beatie Dr ►J' -
w r
.gyis ,Rd .
v e 4 .
�, y CST �.: \fin\ j[�"f'•.r � ,;. _ j ,� Y61 Pcint,oAwNt
bin
dr
Y,�. , t
1 1
` wz4q
r
.1 i
1 nY..Ridge RO'r. �� 14p,
oo�0OM9fl o 9MAL ��GBDD�OO�io flaCG3G