240009_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

of Vlsit__4UComplian0e inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit O Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Not'rfication,46Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
G Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified [] Registered
Farm Name: ...........�... .s� 1........�4.r.�.s.... LL G ...........................
r_ .... ........
OwnerName: . ............................. �.. ` i..................................................................
Time: r 5'
Not
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _
County. l t'^'t U •r
PhoneNo: .......................... . .................... . ............... �..... .....
FacilityContact:............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:.................................................
MailingAddress: ........................ . ................................................................................
Onsite Representative: � g q'e-(0at .......... Integrator: Pe-v IoL e „„ _
......................�.............................................................. .............:........ .r� ...
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number: ..... ............ .._...... .__.
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ° 64 Longitude • 4 «
Design. .
gn : - Current ,_ - �'� Swine .: �rrent-- r`�
capacity Population Cc ., Po tianoCattle Ca tiot ii
'-E3 Wean to Feeder ❑Layer 1 1 ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Non -Dairy ❑
Farrow to Wean T
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑Boars "Total LW-'
Nuinbeik ofag asZ ❑Subsurface Drains Present10 Lagoon Area 10Spray Field Area
Holding Pon[)s /.Solid W
gding Traps [] No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes,[fNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ,01Na
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Pogo
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 77 ] of
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes'Pr90
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes O No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes oflo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes .E!fNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ C.....z......................0...............................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): S Z SB
5/00 Continued on Lack

Faoiaity Nufttber: Z — Date of Inspection 1 O
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes �'No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )ZrNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,E!fNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 12 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes O/No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ZNo
12. Crop type F:&we r"s f ✓i6,.�e� `"`v�°1TPetSf 0 fQ.1 6)--n 1� �s� s,, S'^'gt1 6""t
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes E]No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes,,E!fNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ YesZNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes _1244o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes XNO
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 'ONO
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
,,&No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes/eNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes • j rNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes )dN0
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑'No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ,3'No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes,,dNo
0; yiQl�ttliQgs;o# d�fic}ert�{es vv re note ding this'visit; • ;Y;ow will re.; ive oo futth • ;)
corresparideitce: ahwU this visit.
C ►mments (refer to ueshon #)i "Explain YE.S.ansivers and/or any, recotnmendafi a or. any oWOr ccommi! is ,
Use diawings.of facility to better explain,situatios (use additional pages as necessary} - e > r z
rs. Deed 49-1- geed �esGvc /ed{'�o�l IJsQ��l 5 J,
keel �D 5�4� s�r'�� berms Jd� er1 ~C re�Gt p{� U[�S "'�Gl . P of i -J
.sl�1. o�.t 1 d be �a ►� ►��q� w ► �.- o{es ► c.� t,�i- edl G r n p a,� rem 0V o1,�'�o,+•t �I
an
Be s► .-e 4P itse a �✓ojlc qno Ag4cA
app, vt-Von even br ors ql,c
c9. A)eed 4a -p,14 A-Ng4otf; vin AkV � ce are 1044ke
Reviewer/Inspector Name a�'LtuXi tKT i-5 T- �fi
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: X/c•p4iV1 Date: it r a ! 5100

Fact7ity plumber: 2 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes -ONO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes -2rNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ')�es ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (ix. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 14� No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes _VNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
bonal Commentsan or° rawings:�
or-cps,a�d reCC,rctS
qre ne4141y ke, 4- I
5100

Facility Number 24 9 Date of Visit: 11-19-2001 Time: 11:45
rO Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold_
Farm Name: .......................... ........ County: ColmmbM ............................... j? jRQ.--•---
Owner Name: •------------------------- _CpmtaLFarmsJnG---------------- Phone No: 6_48-021__------------- ------------._..
Mailing Address: lt6-A�.F�aSt. e f XSRI�.,fit...................... ......... WhiteviilliAC ........ 28.472 ..............
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title: ............................ Phone No:
.........................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: $A�y�e4#------------------------------------ Integrator: Px4iag�t+�1Cq-------------------------•
Certified Operator: lima by..R...........................J'QJ30& .................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1.7.8.6............................
Location of Farm:
)n south side of Hwy. 701 approx. I mile east of SR 1545. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 ' 26 ° 12 « Longitude 78 • 43 ° 00
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pouulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
6000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other 7771
Total Design Capacity 6,000
Total SSLW 2,598,000
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ®No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: CZ ........... ............ 3..-----•------------------------•-_---------------------•---------------------------------- -------------•-------------
Freeboard (inches): 52 58
n ' in in r .----'°---- -

u�iu�ivr
Facility Number: 24-9
Date of Inspection I 1-I9-200I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
t-ununuea
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments;(referr#o question ##). E�cplainTany YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to iei& egplarn. srtuations (use additional pages as irecessary) Fiel d Copy ❑Final Notes i
_
15. Need to seed Fescue at the end of pulls 49 and 51. Need to spot sprig Bermuda on field of pulls 16-19. Pull 53 should be maintained
with designated crop or removed from plan.
19. Be sure to use a waste analysis dated within 60 days of application events on the 1RR2's.
9. Need to put a flotation device on intake in lagoon.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'Stonewall Mathis r ";entered by Bette Rose
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Continued
Facility Number: 24-9
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ® Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
LAW rtEona omments and/or -:Dr
-aWings:-
Oversll the facility, crops and records are neatly kept.

_.,�„.fir :.v• .. -_ _; ... .. ..... .._.. _. ...,-
O
Division of Water Quality
Ilrvision of Soii and'Water`Conservatton
Dther Agency
IType of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 24 g late of Visit: 11-19-2441 Time: 11:45
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [] Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ _... __
Farm Name: CoasUl k'armb.9......................... ....................... County: cobnubm ............................... WjRQ.......
Owner Name: •------------------------ �9&�1#iIFACtt=SAC---------------- Phone No: 64$1---------------------- - - --- ---
Mailing Address: S.Q.4 A1.7S�.:1�liJCs.QAL .............................. W.�litti.Y.illy.![G.............................. .7.�...... ........
.................................. . ......................
Facility Contact:...........................................................Title:............................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative:py�@fgQl_ _ integrator:
Plestah� Foots.--------------------------•
Certified Operator:TimatlFy.2........................... .Jugs................. ............ Operator Certification Number: X.7.$.4{........................-
..................... ..
Location of Farm:
3n south side of Hwy. 701 approx. I mile east of SR 1545. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 • 26 12 °� Longitude 78 'F 43 00
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
6000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
0 Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacitv Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Lay I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 6,000
Total SSLW 2,598,000
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? _ ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
IdentifierCZ ........... ............ Q----------- ..................... ---------------------------------------------...........................
Freeboard (inches): 52 58

v Jiwiol,
Y
Facility Number: 24-9
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
c. onunueu
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes . N No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required Records _&_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to:,question #)" Explain any YES answers and/or`=any recominendatioms or anyotlier comments. _
Use drawings of facility to; better eiplaio-sit uations (use additional pages asnecessary) ' ;❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
ri
15. Need to seed Fescue at the end of pulls 49 and 51. Need to spot sprig Bermuda on field of pulls 16-19. Pull 53 should be maintained
ith designated crop or removed from plan.
19. Be sure to use a waste analysis dated within 60 days of application events on the IRR2's.
9. Need to put a flotation device on intake in lagoon.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Stonewall Mathis entered by Bette Rose-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

w
' IL
O5103101
Facility Number: 24-9
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
Continued
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ® Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
the facility, crops and records are neatly kept.

D�vtsibn.af Water uality_ Q =
Q Division of Soil and -Water COttservatiOp, -
O.Other Agency'
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 24 g date of Visit: I1-19-2001 Time: 11:45
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold- - -- -- -- -- -- --
Farm Name: GQ8s1Q.PAr]UPS.1UC ............................... ..-------- County: C-Ql=bm ................................ M180.....-.
Owner Name:.--------------_ �9a<St�LFA> msJAc-------- - ---- Phone No: G4:C8Z---- ------------ --- - ---------
Mailing Address: 5.W. A►.JF&S1.s a fgX5.QI0..St.....................................................................W.bj19..VAJ~.N.C....................................................... 7,8472..............
Facility Contact: ...........................................................Title: Phone No
Onsite Representative: 1�US�,Y�fxt4t-----------------------.------------ Integrator -
Certified Operator: li,aofby..R........................... J ups.................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1.7.8.46 ............................
Location of Farm:
Do south side of Hwy. 701 approx. 1 mile east of SR 1545. AL
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 ' Longitude 78 •
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
6000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 6,000
Total SSLW 2,598,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present © Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed, didit reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: C.2............ ............ C3----------- -•-----•--•--•--•--•---•--.-..-..-..-...-.-................................. -------•-----•-- ------
Freeboard (inches): 52 58

u�iu�iu� a.un�usuea
r L
Facility Number: 24-9 Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
q, W
Comments (refer ao ques#ion #) =Explain any YES answers a`ndlor any recommendations or any other e6minents:
Use diawingsof facility to better ex6iiii gsituations (d- additi6nal pages as necessary) i❑ Field Copy []FinalNotes
15. Need to seed Fescue at the end of pulls 49 and 51. Need to spot sprig Bermuda on field of pulls 16-19. Pull 53 should be maintained
ith designated crop or removed from plan.
19. Be sure to use a waste analysis dated within 60 days of application events on the HUJ's.
9. Need to put a flotation device on intake in lagoon.
wer/Inspector Name Stonewall=Mathis entered'by Bette Rose
E
wer/Inspector Signature: Date:

051031'01 Continued
Facility Number: 24-9 Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ® Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Cl Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
... _
Addit�ona ontuieuts an or raw 'gs: = r_
Oversll the facility, crops and records are neatly kept.

Facility Number .'� �f Date of Inspection 1 7$ W
Time of inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
? } r �, r"1 �7 t� S
Farm Name: GOOV ftq,r rg r•rKS Z -� 3 ............ County: ........................................................................
Owner Name:... ........................................... :............................ Phone No:
Facility Contact:--•-•...................................:....................................Title: . Phone No:
MailingAddress:................................................................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative :..... �. .....a'.°...... Inte rator �,Y e S�L�l 17 e
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.............
Location of Farm:
I.A�
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude �• �' ��=
Design Current
Swine Canneity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JE3 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
_ Total Design Capacity
- = Total SSLW
.= = 4Nuniber of Lagoons 1 '.: ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps =� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in cal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ID No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
X Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure'_ Structure ; Stricture 4 Struc"Urc 5 Strucaure h
Identi Fier: 2 3
Freeboard (inches): ......... ...3- ... 13
3. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? {ie/ trees, severe erosion. ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage. et;.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Z — G� Date of Inspection
"CAre there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste. Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soiI sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0: pia yiolaitgns'oi defirieacte were �tgfed iiirrtitg this'visit: Yoit will t eeesye do #wither -' .�
....
about this :visit.
Comments (refer to question #) -Explain any YFS answeis and/or any recommendations or any other comments - -
`. r` �a�-ddtia- Pages as necessary)Use drawin of faelitY to etterex lainhue =
Zh s�GG �1an, Gor,d t,G-�-ed in �e�pe�ase �d. �1-to„e �Ri j-�r•ar� on t�-�-e AL
rc�/`cscn•�q�-i 1/'e ���n.-� �rpc�•oci/� tNua.s .t� !� , •�c�cs .
L.aSooy. levelr sLtotti?d be jouvcrev( ii-1 n e-esfcrLs':L1e, 4,"^,e(y;".oimnee;
No-fe -.:� Dn s;{-e 1erre5eh�,-,4,'ve Sys 4kO n;jOjP/e c.,,a4erers L4;11 be
i'n-4,414 "q rteGr' �'�+ire �o �e� p covtServe F�es1, w��cr .r��vf fo
(n uJoohf,
Reviewer/Inspector Name 5.,o ncLi4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: d Date: q V 4D
323/99

. 0 Division of Soil and Water'Conservatzoa -Operation Review _
• �f 4
[3'Divtston of Soiil and_'Wat& ConservatiEon '.Compliance` Inspection
r .
JDivision of Water. Qualrty -,Compliance Inspection - -
,:. OrOther Agency ,Operation-Revilew _
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of
Follow-up of DSWC review 4P Other
Facility Number 2 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Permitted [3 Certified 1 1Conditionally Certified © Registered [3 Not O erationall �Date Last Operated:
Farm Name : ............... Ca.G1a�Tal..... C;O^ m.J 2—h C County: _.....0 �u r•-� Ul
/� p.................................................................. b....
Owner Name_ CAAsal F^o-r"t.S Yh C Phone No:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title: ..........................
MailingAddress: ...............................................................................)......................................
�/es�pdY
Onsi€e Representative:......fei,"4�4
......................t.............................................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
.............................................................................
Integrator. ....rC��`...
Operator Certification Number:.......
........... ... ................. ........................................... ..................................................................................................................................................... ............. I .......................
..... t
Latitude �• �' Longitude
Design Current
�� ._ .
FDesign Cur rent.. Design. Current
Swine =,
Capacity Population '_Poultry `-'Capacity' Pop ulation Cackle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total DeMgn`Capacity
- Total_SSM
Number of Lagoons �_ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
HoldiikFonds / Solid Traps �, . _ . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ,#k3
Freeboard(inches): ...............r...............................CJ..............................._....................................................................._......._...........--...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23199 Continued on back
4

Facility Number: 7,q — -f Date of Inspection
IL
6. Art;there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10_ Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: Io yiotattcjns:or deficiencies were noted• during �his:visit: • Yoir ivi3i•reeeiye lio #'uirthetr
: : • corresp6Tidence: abaut. this visit.. .: • : : • : • : • . • :.: • : • : • -
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments°(refei :to:question #) ;Explain any YESanswersrandior any recorimmendatrons oT any other'comments.
Use.drawings of facility to bettenexplain situations (use additional pages as necessary) F
Prey T onpttxer44ives Ca! ah lQ L, rc a L% r aqr jeYe , AL
APU�r l a9oohs � 12 j r,c�,et rh 6��
� 1
VAX, 3- Jed Pra4AJ C ref resevtW itrie 0)
Reviewer/Inspector Name ; f Orltt A e r J f� 5- I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature � 4P Date: /Q �9
3/23/99

10 xoutine p complaint p Vouow-up of UWQ inspection p vonow-up of t»wc review 0 utner
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered In of opera Iona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Coasta11..a:rnu Luc....................................................................................... County: Columbus WiRO
Owner Name:
Cnastal.Farms.Luc................................ Phone No: 648-.6825 ....................
Facility Contact: ....................................................................... ...Title: ...... Phone No:
..................................................................................................................
Mailing Address: 50&A.Faas1Ac isrma.Sk................................................................... WhiftAlleAC ....................................................... Z8.472 ..............
Onsite Representative:
Integrator: Frimtage.Farms......................................................
Certified Operator: Jamie ...................................... Smith ................................................. Operator Certification Number: 220.7.6.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ®& ©u Longitude ®• ®®�
es�gn urrent es�gn -urrent - esign W urrent
Swore Capacity Population ultrYx Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulatl n rr
rocan to ee erw p Byer ©airy �� ee er to mis W 13 on- ayer p on- any
arrow to can 6000- q
[3 Farrow to Feeder Other
[3 Farrow to FinisTata1 Design Capacity '' 6,000
p Gilts
p soars Total SSLW 2,598,000
m�
.._.�.
Number of°Lagoonssuracerainu p Spray Field Aa
x Holding Ponds /Solid Traps p No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes p No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................2................. �.................. .......................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............1.8..............................1.7................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, I7 Yes p No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

r
Facility Number: 24-9 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes p No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes p No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes p No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Yes p No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
a • XO violitioirs-or. -dehciencies.were tented during. this visit.: You. will ieceive no', further. ' .
...ckr6e afidek6 aNAA this :visit; - : -::::............................. .
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name StortewalLMathrs
.... . ::
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y� Date: 3

p complaint p ronow-up
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted N Certified o Conditionally Certified p Registered In Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Coasta1F.armsJAz....................................................................................... County: Columbus WiRO
OwnerName: ................................................... C.QaAaj.F0xms.1nC ................................ Phone No: fi4a:6825 ...................................................................
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 5Q6-. A►.East.Jeffcrsom.St................................................................... Whitexille.NC ....................................................... 28472..............
Onsite Representative: .......................................................................................................... Integrator: Pirmtage.Earmu .....................................................
Certified Operator:Jamk..................................... Smith ................................................. Operator Certification Numbcr:220.76 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®0®6 ©K Longitude ®• ®4 ®u
p Wean to Feeder
E3 Feeaer to rinish
® rarrow to Wean
13 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
13 Gilts
p Boars
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) E3 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes p No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 2.................. ..........................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... 1.8............... ............... i.7................ .................................... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes p No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

a S
Facility Number: 24_9 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes p No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes p No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN Yes p No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes p No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? p Yes p No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? p Yes p No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
p No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
p No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
p No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
p No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
p No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
p No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
1Q No.viol'ations-or-deficiemcies-were �n�oted-during.this visit. -Yatr will-receiveno further.
. • �c6rxespv6dence abhu( this:visit; ::::::::.::: :::::::::::.:.:.::.. .

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
E0 Division of Water Quality
Routine
Follow-U of
Facility Number
O Registered 0 Certified D Applied for Permit 1P Permitted
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of InspeCtiort
Time of Inspection I W 6 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name:......... taSt0....... it��f!'! ..,,......1 + .:......................................I.............. County:....... oL.mh.a............................ .0;ra........
Owner Name: ..........COA.I�d...... V1,
L An.
....h,C.......................................... ................ Phone No: ... (101...4.`i$.- h,.U5......................................
Facility Contact: ........ r.-Qff...... .......... I ...... I—,...... Title: __Vv,�IIJflp�, 'r.................................... Phone No:..............................
MailingAddress:......... ....'......... .....++.s��.�tf56h............ :..................... I.&.................................... ......
Onsite Representative:....... t.1i.0..ft...... ►....................... ..... Integrator: .... .4...................I........................
Certified Operator,... -Lt " r L .. ,.- Operator Certification Number,... . 7
Location of Farm:
arm...i�........... ss.....`•€..............r+f...7o.{.fN..7...1....rsi�t .+s.....a....5...i...........................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................... --
Latitude �'.�� 12 �� Longitude ®0
,.. ,Desi n , ,::Current -,Design, Current :`` Desi Current-"
g P,u
Swine ' . Capacity Population Poultry capacity Population Cattle , Capacity; ,Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
16co
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
k Numbet`of Lagoons / Holdmg'_Ponds';'�' Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
T
;`�o
❑ Liquid Waste Management System y
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' 10 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach'Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what'is the estimated flow in gal/min?
t
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
E3 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
❑ No
rriai ntenance/i mprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: Lq —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
® No
Structitres (Lagoon.01olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
U Yes
❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identi fier. ...7............... .............. .................... ............. ............. ............................... ..... ..................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft.).............1.,................................ is15............................... ................ ............................ ........................... ...........................I.... .....................
10. Is .seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of anv of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
'❑ No
12.. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers"
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
t4. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
9 Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW,MP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
w
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No-
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
21. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
[3 Yes
S] No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this:visit.•.You.vaill receive no further
correspondence about this.visit:.:
Comments (refec`tp question#):.Explain any YES answers and/or any retommendalions:or any other cotrunents��
Use drawings off icility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) ;
�.
��5 Ind d,�
tCL5 55�� wax , � e,
�a< a+"Wn S&+ -�a �� ad��cct ` �� .11 w •��e-r wCA s a�1v���� s � �
t
ON � IOG� ivy S4onr Wa; tJ-.vw%I or` ivwV
faGS Q ` ae�� O>- �o t�Y+er arec o� 4,L s v, ke(d.
Q-
WTI,. (,ASoan SS W SJ gin( Cl1[i re_ HOC vk �OL It 1 t�:� 0. �Jtn a + fVV l
] s7/25197
1Sv
ri S�G- Z2 oti• o f �w� {or tA�•
er/Inspector Name
Z:viewer/InspectorSignature: ^, Date:

Environmental Chemists, Inc.
® MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (Lab) Wilmington,
CONSULTING North Carolina 29480 [phone] (Fax) North Carolina 28405
CHEMISTS NCDEHNR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94, DLS CERTIFICATE #37729
Customer:
NCDEHNR-DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Rick Shiver
Brian Wrenn
Date Sampled:
Sampled By:
STREAM :24-9
03/17/98
Brain Wrenn
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date of Report March 30, 1998
Purchase Order #:
Report Number: 8-0851
ReportTo: Rick Shiver
Copy To: Brain Wrenn
PARAMETER
Sample ID
24-9
Lab ID
1 Fec / 1 Nut
# 1831
Fecal Coliform, colonies/100m1
340,000
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3 + NOz - N mg/L
0.24
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH3-N, mg/L
200
Total Kejeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
250
[Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
27.8
Reviewed b and approved for release to the client.

Lenviroch.e
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Collection and Chain „of Custody
Sample Tvne: Influent. Effluent. Well. (StrenM--Soil. Temn (a) Samnline : Other :
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
- OF5-1
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
Comp
or
Grab
BOTTLE
ID
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
NONE
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
THIO
OTHER
+� Z4-°�
3XI/If
I7,=i6
✓
iC
j=�e�Af 6>( �'
Nv- 2-4-i
—Y/7 9F
iL;f�
C
�ti1 -
(?3-13
V
Ice
,
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
Maximum Holding Time Between Collection and Analysis: BOD 48 Hours, Coliform in Wastewater 6 Hours,
Coliform in Drinking Water 30 Hours,
Transfer
Relenouished By:
Datcai=
Received By!
Date/Time
Received with Ice Water Chille to 42C: Yes No Accept Rejected:
Delivered By: ---- Received By: Date: 3 Time:
Comments:
Y

CONSULTING
CHEMISTS
Customer:
NCDEHNR DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Rick Shiver
Brian Wrenn
Date Sampled: 03/17/98
Sampled By: Brain Wrenn
STREAM :24-9
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037
[phone] (Office)
6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach,
[phone] (Lab)
Wilmington,
North Carolina 28480
(910) 392A424 (Fax)
North Carolina 28405
NCDEHNR: DWO
CERTIFICATE #94, DLS CERTIFICATE #37729
MAR 31 1998
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date of Report March 30, 1998
Purchase Order #:
Report Number: 8-0851
Report To: Rick Shiver
Copy To: Brain Wrenn
PARAMETER
Sample ID
24-9
Lab ID
1Fec / 1 Nut
# 1831
Fecal Coliform, colonies/100ml
340,000
Nitrate + Nitrite Nitrogen, NO3 + N% - N mg/L
0.24
Ammonia Nitrogen, NH3-N, mg/L
200
Total Kejeldahl Nitrogen, TKN mg/L
250
Total Phosphorus, P mg/L
27.8
Reviewed b C and approved for release to the client.

[envirochem
Z'
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Samule Collection and Chain of Custody
Sample TTDe: Influent. Effluent. Well. (Stream- —Soil. Temn Z. SamnlinLw : Other :
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
- ops'/
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
Camp
or
Grab
BOTTLE
ID
LAB
1D
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
NONE
H2SO4
HNOs
NsOH
TRIO
OTHER
. q1 , '?_4-
3XI/If
1Z:1G
4. re C,
/B 31 A
✓
zce
F-ecal
rp-rl
V
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
C
G
Maximum Holding Time Between Collection and Analysis: BUD 48 Hours, Coliform in Wastewater 6 Hours,
Coliform in Drinking Water 30 Hours,
Irans
Rglongulshed By-.
Date/Time
ReCtlyed fly*
Date/Time
Received with Ice Water Ch_ille to 44C: Yes � No Accept >_ Rejected:
Delivered By: ,c. --yr Received By: Date: y Time:
Comments: 3"

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint $ Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other I
Date of Inspection 3 /
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ; J 24 hr. (hh:nun)
13 Registered 0 Certified i [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted [3 Not O eratior<al /Date Last Operated:. ..................
FarmName: ..... ..`� AL' ..........%,t!1!j 7irt� ...... County:......1..!{±!�a.,%.......................
Owner Name: ........................ L..�C/..r�f� . �n L ........ Phone No: & .i�Y.A.7:.I........................................
..---........
`-. `L G/!v�PhoneNo• YZ ZFacility Contact: .. ........s:�..........:....... ,� Title ......�ARAZ.... ...�ilr . ... ��(t......----
MailingAddress:............. ...................................:..................:.................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:..r�C7 �f`- .... Iniegrator:..... .............................
Certified Operator:...54E.„4.q:y"................._.......f � l.� 7...? fl..� :.........-...... Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm: (,v �G G �x•c
J
....................................................................:.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude �, �� Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancetimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' [.Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen•ed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what'is the estimated flow in val/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
® Yes ❑ No
JZ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes gi No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 14 No
(j Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
M No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued an back

]Facility Number-. —
- _�,. -, — _
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'
Structures (Lagoons.Iiolding Ponds, Flush Pits, W.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes .[:]No
Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 1 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
// �J
Freeboard(tt): ......all .................�'!...: l.. �...... ................................... ...... ..................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structure,'?
❑ Yes
NO
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) l
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or inaximum liquid level markers"
❑ Yes
PO No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type7l1T'................................. ........... ...1�............................ ................... ........'.... ...............-....-.....--.....-.......................................
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
f No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
[] Yes
❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
FYes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
V No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only w
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No.violations or deficiencies were' noted- during this visit.- You.will receive no further
correspotiden& about this visit'..:
Coi invents (refer to,question #):; Explain; any .YES answers and/or any recommendations or any. other co�nents��
Ungsse drawiof facility -to better ezpiain situati(;ns. (use additional pages as.neeessarv). r Al, ..♦
Gp-�l �� � � � G�,v 7>>,� i✓ w� �� f.� s,..rl. � �,�-�EF��b � -+7 ,�sr`/f.
11-0.5 5 � S �2 (� (,y �t �.t.� ! 3 �E'ellt.er.�t s >w c % � �► i iz . G!//n�G
fJL�S�Qc [=A^fR'LS vh `rs�i,5
r go),i £ iD r q 3(v o C� `(� rf /t r���,�vr i p - Q 2 j �'a r D�i
4 ' ✓h fZ-,rl- I- k r4- r �,t p aI�, A- A
�dj0�2. �4 7'f '$eft G� �S Nf 2 D yA TD dJ� �R-r'� %� pia. S � • 1 . fl, 7/25/97
,r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date: /%

0
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
9LDivision of Water Quality
Witoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DtjWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other i
Date of lnspectio[t zG
Facility Number Z
Time of Inspection Enn 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered © Certified 0 Applied for Permit ,Permitted JE3 Not O eratinnal Date Last Operated :...................
Farm Name: Jfla.Az!��Tlaz....�=kq6.....__...� Z �... ..... .._ County:....tchr.%.v............................................
f...................
Owner Narne:...0.A�-T�A C ;* 2W —el Phone No: � �f 8 ... 5 9..............................................
...................................................................................
Facility Contact: ....t. ..i Title:...1t4!�z`�V&ft fcNU...�t��i���°Pitone No:..... �.......................................
�L 4 _ -
..............................`..�..............
Mailing Address:---.Q........:-A.....!� 5 S �:n-5 ....--.�L/.�.:f.v�ll. 28�f7Z
{Z �5 ft G
Onsite Representative: ..... ....`L....... _2`
....'.................................................. Integrator:... . ...................'{ .. ................................
Certified Operator ........ d•. kgv— .7049.................. IuP05...... Operator Certification Number,..............................
Location of Farm: 6L4 tf-
Latitude =• ' 96 Longitude r��0 1 «
kDes[gn; Current ,�,.._
Design Current Di'sign Current k
°Swine .,
":Capacity PapulateonFo Pi,ultry -;,a
Cipac[ty Population Cattle : k Capac[ty,' Population
n
❑ Wea42
airy.;
FD
`'on-Dairy
W k
AEJ
Total Desrgn4.
Capac>Ity'
R u
:Total SSLW�
Number of La Dons f Holthn Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Y
S
No
Liquid Waste Management System
to Feeder
❑Feeder to Finish
ow to Wean
Farrow to Finish
❑Gilts
❑Boars
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
� Yes
[3 No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
� Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at; ❑Lagoon pray Field [I Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
[I Yes
�•No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DV4'Q)
� Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? ([f yes, notify DV1�`Q)
❑Yes
A No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑Yes
0 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to file waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑Yes
�.No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑Yes
� No
mat ntenanceli mprovement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑Yes
� No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑Yes
®No
7125/97
Continued
on hack

Facility Number: Z —
8. Are there lagoons or.storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes gj No
Structures (LagoonsMolding Ponds, Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? jQ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure. 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ......:...................
�.. ............................... ....... I ......... I..................
....
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
1-1
15. Crop type S' .... ..... . ... r F-S CG r.
..................... . .............................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes ll No
❑ Yes 0 No
RrYes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes KNo
/4 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes MNo
,Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JZ No
❑ Yes JO No
[]° No.vidia' donsvar deficiencies. were- noted -during this:visit.- Yodwill iece'i�e•_rto•ftir_ther- . -
: ctirrespondehtc ai oiit this_visif. "
❑ Yes Ea No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
� ��5 ; �� P �� ;vim �- �� �� �,e-� ;�, �•os � .� �
$ Lx-V Qc�.,„� P,�r s m �i°�stzI NR4 5
01 WW /trN IO c2,71 17
�, � , l7,�„ � �lf� e �� !v� f�PA4 �� ..✓ 3� ��irP, 5 �P� 7d v-f. /� .v /-� S�r� , �
5,✓N-Cr,,M..•�c�
A Ofi e � LM 4Jrt s F� 2t.+4 17 25197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: X/Z4

• Environmental Chemists, Inc.
® MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (Lab) Wilmington,
CONSULTING North Carolina 28480 (910) 3924424 (Fax) North Carolina 28405
CHEMISTS NCDEHNR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94, DLS CERTIFICATE #37729
Customer:
NCDEHNR-DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Rick Shiver
Dave Holsinger
Date Sampled:
Sampled By:
9
RECEIVEID MAR 6 3
Date of Report:
Purchase Order #:
Report Number:
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
02/26/98 Report To:
Dave Holsinger Copy To:
March 2, 1998
8-0634
Rick Shiver
Dave Holsinger
Coastal Fares
Coastal Farms
PARAMETER
IF
2F
# 1365
# 1366
Fecal Coliform, colonies/100ml
11,000
127,273
Reviewed by
and approved for release to the client.

:envir7ocem
Samnle Tyne: Influent. Effluent. Well
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Sample Collection of Vustody
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
BOTTLE
ID
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
NONE
E6SO,
HNO
NsOH
TRIO
OTHER
e
Maximum Holding Time Between Collection and Analysis: BOD 48 Hours, Coliform in Wastewater 6 Hours,
Coliform in Drinking Water 30 Hours,
Transfer
Relinquished By:
Date/Time
Received By:
Date/Time
1
2
Received with
Delivered By:.
Comments•
ected :
&Time• :3

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: JWILZ!�415
II

r,0;�
i ` , :µ.-=pI)i�esionof Soil and=WaterConseration Operation Review `. r
a p Division of goil,autitWater Conservation -Compliance laspection
D� Aston of " uality Compliance Ins pection'.
s Water Q _ p �.
;� 'y,may �
p.Other Agency -.Operation Review` a
p Routine p Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWr review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered Eli Certified p Applied for Permimitted in Not peratjona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Coasta1.Farm&Luc.......................................................................... CountyColumbus WiRO
OwnerName: ................................................... 0aagal.Farms.1ne................................ Phone No: 648-.682S ...................................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 506-A.East.JRffrrsoon.St................................................................... WhilevZe.NC ....................................................... 28.472 ..............
Onsite Representative: Scott.Register............................................................................ Integrator: Pratage,.Farmis.....................................................
Certified Operator: S............................ Register ister.................. p that. .......................... Operator Certification Number:2Q2.73 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®a ®' ©" Longitude ®+ 4 ®�
Swine
esi n urren �y _ e i tY purren es�gn urren
-- g a g
a
Capacity. Population -oil Ca ace Po ulat16i Cattle Capacity =Population
p Wean Feeder
p Feeder to mis
® Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
13 Boars
:- Numbeingr of -Lagoons l HoldPonds: pSubsurface rams resen p agoon rea p pray �e rea E
_ 13 No LiquidWaste n System m
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [3 Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon E3 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) © Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) Yes E3 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No
7/25/97

Facility um er: 24_9 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
13 No
Structures (Lagoons,Holdng Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
N Yes
13 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............... #2.............................. &I ............... .................................... ..................................
......................................................................
Freeboard (ft): .8 .5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
13 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?.
p Yes
13 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
13 No .
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
13 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes 13 No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
• ootots•o{a iemes-were•.n.o.e..u....s Ws bi•teciVe dv. ,tD , ,il
torrespandence ab-61it ttii-vst::::o e
.
p Yes 13 No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
13 Yes p No
13 Yes p No
13 Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
:Comments refer to question.-M. # �Ex lam any. YES answers•and/or any_:recommendations or any. other Comments._
q L.-
Use drawings of facilityto better explain situations. (use additional pages"as4neeessary):
Low areas in spray field at c-2 have been,filled , graded and reseeded. Erosiom areas on #3 lagoon have been repaired and reseeded. •
Baking hydrants have been repaired:
).Both lagoons have insutl'icient'freeboard. The ligoonlevels-should'be loweredtii required 19"'ii a responsible an&timely -
anner:
:a.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Brian.)7. Wrenn -

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency P
Division of Water Quality In
O Routine 0 Complaint 6 Follow-up of DWQ ins etion O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection Lly
Facility Number �
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:msn)
Registered © Certified U Applied for Permit E3 Permitted [a Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:....... 5` iL......Qkrn-%......... ..... .......... County:....alssbtii..$........................................................
Owner Name: ..... cacs�i f....... n►.5.....� ..6t.�............................................................ Phone No: ..(�ill:.�..G.� M.�u�L�.........................
Facility Contact:.....SCA
...F k-.V......
......�.t.....�..................... Title:..-p lt�a�ff......................
�{ Phone No: ...........................
Mailing Address:.... � -A......��r..as .....laj-t !" ....s........................................ .... .1�.�{..V.LII,t.....t..VC......................................... -;. . ......
Onsite Representative:......S�.Qt.._..1g,6!4............................................................. Integrator:......Pi1.1t f...........................................................
Certified Operator;............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number........................
Location of Farm:
t..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................,
Latitude 4 0" Longitude ' 46
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: --
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.tIolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ..........Zl 3
Freeboard(ft):............0:............................ ae�............ ................................... ..............................
14. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
❑ Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
Structure 5 Structure
6
........................................................................
❑ Yes
L
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
2Q. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0. No:violitions:or. 65ciencies.were:noted_during this;visit: You.will recei've:na_ftidher;
.•:�ctirrespQtidencealioutthis:visit.-"-::::-:-:-�-;-:.-; ::-:- �:-:�- .-... : .�.-�,
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
LoWq,r�i in s�'"W ���� �j— C.—b kavi (acc{�- �t4� g�e� � r[sttCW- �✓DSiCh a,riA-S o,h
W o, KfF;, e d " tres e d e� . Lf ecki � �rt�.�S i�av+c 6 err.- rtih a; n-d .
1. 8oit- (0l1"►S kNko' i � u z1o0EirJ J. `C k 1,lov, �t wl i 1L ko 010 �� 1 a c0r 0
K.�v1� {°i" i� a t-,tsl�onSibk •l` �-tn�.(� 4tnatnvLLr.
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: &A.: - / A Date: i )Z7

_'/ _ -. ii
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered a Certified p Applied for Permit ■ Permitted 10 Not op=Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: GoasWEarms,.bm....................................................................................... County: Columbus WiRO
Owner Name: ................................................... Caastal.F.arms.Inc................................ Phone No:fi4&.-A825 ...................................................................
Facility Contact: Scntt.Register.................................................Title: managa ............................................ Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 5:0A7A.East.aeffcrscan.St...................................................-----........... Whilex.Wc.NC ....................................................... 28.472 ..............
Onsite Representative: Seott.Reglctu............................................................................ Integrator: PrimtagAlarim .....................................................
Certified Operator:Tiznoft.S............................ Regisier ............................................ Operator Certification Number:202.73 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ®° ©" Longitude ®• ®' ®"
esigu .'Curren es�gn . urren - esrgn Current
Capacity: Population_ -_..Poultry Capacity Pooulatron�` Cattle Capacrfy`Population�u,
r7 Layer I I a Arl Dairy
[3 Wean to Feeder
[3 Feeder to Finis
® Farrow to Wean
13 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
Boars
Nuiirber.of Lagoons/ Holding Ponds 13 u sur ace ramsPresent-1p Lagoon Area p pray �e Area
p110 Liquid Waste Management Sys9R = -;
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancetimprovement? p Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon E Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ® Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ® Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 2
C%
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes 13 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes 13 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No
7/25/97

t
acility Number: 24_9 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holdinp, Ponds, Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
® Yes
p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ...............##2......#................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 1 0.5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
13 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? -
p Yes
p No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
® Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type...........................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
p No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
p No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
C1NoVql4tiobs.eW a 4iD etkies wer.e.no e!fig sW s bg •teb9iV611 further .
iorrespanderiee M�rotzt Ais visit:.. :.:.:: :...:.:.:. .:.: :.:.

�.Division,of Soil;and Water Conservation Operation Review.
IJ
'x` p Division>of Sorleand Water Ciinservat�on Compliance In"spcction'
pnD�v�s�on;of�Water Quality Cornpliance Inspection:
p;QthegAgency='OperatEon'ItevEew
x
Routine19 p Complaint p Follow -up -of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of 13SWC review O ter
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection l� 24 hr. (hh:mm}
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted in Not 0pera Bona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CoastalEarms.Inc....................................................................................... County: Columbus WiRO
Owner Name:.... ................................................... Gaastal.Farms.Inc................................ Phone No: fi4a-fi825 ...................................................................
FacilityContact: .....................Title: .......................................................... ............................................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: SQh A.East.Jctlfc=n.St................................................................... W..hiteville.NG....................................................... 28.472 ..............
Onsite Representative: Glenn.Clifton............................................................................. Integrator: Print;*.Farju .....................................................
Certified Operator:Timothy.&.......................... Register ........................................... Operator Certification Number:2Q2.73 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®0®6 ©u Longitude ®r ®6 ®K
Swine
Design.- urren :• = esi n urren Vesign -- urren
...
Capacity _Population Poultry Capacity- Population Cattle, Capacity Population
p ean to ee er
p Feeder to finis
® arrow to Wean
p Farrow to Fee er
13 Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Number of. Lagoons / Hold in— jTonds 1 2 Irl Subsurface Drams Fresffnj 13 goon rea 113 pra� rea
p No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon p Spray Field 13 Other y
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes N No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes H No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes N No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes N No
7/25/97

ace i y Numbim 24_9 Date of Inspection
8. Are there Iagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holdinst Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ............... #2............... ............... #3............... .............................
Freeboard (ft): 0.92 1.58
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes
® No
M Yes
p No
Structure 5 Structure 6
.............................................................
p Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
15. Crop type ...................... Fescue ............................. Coastal.Ra=da.Crass-..... ......................... Rye ..........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes m No
_ p Yes
N No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
m No
p Yes
® No
® Yes
p No
® Yes
p No
m • • o v, ti t ohs•or e• cieit4cies'were-lid U dg: s V s bit rebei*e do; ke •'
roi�respandeAce about itfiis visit: .........
comments (refer•to question_ #); Explain any XES'answers-and/or any reeommendations.or;any4ther.comments::
Use:drawings.-of facility -to -better explaiii'situations (use adilftional.pages as necessary): _
Need to,lower lagoon #2.to the,19" freeboard' level. in accordance with irrigation, and soils parameters:: AL
4. Need.to take soil samples annually
5. Need to•kee ��weekl- 'freeboard levels' r `
P Y-
r '
Reviewer/Inspector Name : udrey�Oxendine
IA - -

R.J I
'�V 0.
EVlvislon OPSoil'and water uonservatyon Vperation Kevlew
p_UivUs on'of So&and Water -onserVat�on" Compliance iiispectioii.
Drvision of Water:. usu Coin lianee Ins ii6ons . '
0: Q ty p p
m e p`Otheir Agency Operatw�-Review
a
_ -.. ..
p Routine p Complant p Follow7p of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review -0-.Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 NotOpera Iona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CoastalEarmix Inc....• ........................ ...........•....-....-....... County: Columbus WiRO
OwnerName: ................................................... Ciaasial.Fatms.Inc............................... Phone No: fi4&682.5 ...................................................................
Facility Contact:...............................................................................Title: .. Phone No:
. 1N.hixevalle.I!iC................................................ ... 28.472 ..............
Mailing Address: .-.A►.st. cmxar�. k................................................................. ....
Onsite Representative: Randy-Barefoot........................................................................ Integrator: Priatage.Farjus .....................................................
Certified Operator: Tuaoft.S............................ Register............................................ Operator Certification Number:202:73.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®s®� ©K Longitude ®• ®®�
�1 esign - Lurrent. Design urren =Y _ .. esign -. urren
Swine _ Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity _Population---,
13 Wean to Feeder
rl Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to ean
13 Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finis
Gilts
13 Boars
`Numbef of Lagoons [Holding Ponds : 2
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
13 Yes p No
13 Yes 13 No
13 Yes 13 No
13 Yes p No
p Yes 13 No
13 Yes p No
p Yes 13 No
p Yes p No
13 Yes p No
p Yes p No

Facility Number: 24_9 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
p No
Structures (Lagoons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
N Yes
p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ............... #2.............................. #3............... .................................... ................................... ...................................
...................................
Freeboard (ft): 0.83 0.92
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
p No
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
p No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
0 Yes
p No
1.8. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
p No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
p No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
o'v o ebs-w' _ e �cisft4cEes-were•n� e n s W s wt W rewivc a further
coiiesllio deace about Hiis-visit::
c:.ommenm treier to ,. uestjon xpjaiwany r,Ea•answers anaor any recommenaations•or any otner comments.
Use driiwtngs of, factl�ty to better explain situations. (use:additional,pages as necessary)•_
This,was a,follow-up to: check. freeboard. Tacility had lagoon level records and rainfall records available. Recent y had.a 4" rainfall
,June 4):`�New'irrigation7is currently beiQg installed: Owner is working to lower lagoons: Contact me when lagoons ake in
;ompliance. ' Irrigating a;.t ie'time of inspection: 0
A:
Reviewerfinspector Name FAudreyOxendine

r - Division of.Soil an&Water conservation - uperati",op-.g ew
p Division:of Soil and Water Conservation Compliance Inspection
F Divaian of•VVater ualE Com fiance --Ins ectioo
0 Q ty . P P = -
p ether Agency- 0 irAti onRe�iew,
w
p 1routine 0 Complaint 0—Follow-up of VWQ mspection o Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered a Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted in Not Opera7l"o—na-M Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CoastalF.arms,.Ins............................................................................... County: Columbus WiRO
Owner Name: ................................................... Coastal.FarmS.Inc................................ Phone No: fi4&A&25.:...................... ............................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............--------------------------------------------------- Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 54fi:A.East.J.eUex um.St................................................................... W.UtexWeAC ....................................................... 28.472 ..............
Onsite Representative: Randy-Rarefaot........................................................................ Integrator: Prjmtage.Farms,.....................................................
Certified Operator: Tim_o ft.S............................ Register ............................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®+®6 ©u Longitude
Design
Swine Capacity Pa
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to FinN ,
® arrow to Wean
p Farrow to Fee er
p Farrow to Fmis
p Gilts
p Boars
NimbeF_of:Lagoons I Holding Ponds . p u sur ace rains Present IFUgOlDn Area 17 Spray �e rea
F _ = E3 No LiquidManagement System nag , -
Waste a en m �`
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No-
7/25/97

Facility um er: 24_9 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ............... #2.............................. #a ............... .............................
Freeboard (ft): 0.5 0.5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4 Structure 5
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste_ Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes p No
N Yes p No
Structure 6
p Yes t3 No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
0 Yes p No
15. Crop type ...... oasmi.13=uda. Grass.......Small.Graiiu�.:(.W=t,Barl,ay,.......................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the' Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23, Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
. o'v o ohs-bt' e• f e1Wi9s'Were •kd a t1 rtg this W •s •. b •receive Ito rt• er
zoiieipo diriee about itiiii-6iiL
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes r3 No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Comments (refer to question:#): Explain a.ny,Y-hs-answem and/or, any recommendations oranother comments.
;Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (dse additional pages as necessary) m
Lagoons have less than 19" of freeboard. Prestage has brought in extra equipment to heIp4ower levels in an appropriate manner.
Owners are conserving as much water as possible and have nofified DWQ:. ' L
o not let lagoon overtop Do whatever necessary to maintain integrity,of lagoons:'
tj
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1Wudrey4xendine � -

�s p Division of Soil'and Water uonservation operation Keview
` p Dtvision of So►1 and Water Conservation Compliance Inspection=
ri i
peDivnsion of W&WQbality Compliance Inspection
p Othe"r Agency :Operation Review:
Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of VWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit E Permitted 10 Not OperationalDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: Coastal..arms Iiut........................................................................................ County: Columbus WiRO
OwnerName: ................................................... Cnas1a1.FaLrnns.Inc................................ Phone No: 648-6 25...................................................................
Facility Contact: Colr,Grey .......................................................Title: Managing ftxUer........................ Phone No: 642:20fi................................
Mailing Address: 511f6A.East.J. ffej=xL.St................................................................... 1i4hile. i11e.Nr........................................................ 28.472 ..............
Onsite Representative: .......................................................................................................... Integrator: Pri stagr—Farnm.....................................................
Certified Operator: Timoft.S............................ Register ........................................... Operator Certification Number,.202.73 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®0 ®1 ©u Longitude ®0 ®` ®�
esign- urren . Vesign2 - lCurrent:esign urren =
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity, Population a,
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to lnis
® rarrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Number of Lagoons I Holding P©ntls:.` p u sur ace rains resen p ,goon rea p pray ie rea
p o LiquidWaste anagemen ys em -
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
-7/25/97
® Yes p No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
Unkn.
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No

racility Number: 24_9 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
N No
Structures (Laeoons.Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
® Yes
p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .........................
Freeboard (ft): 0.5 0.6
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(1f any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
H No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
® Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Small..Grua.((he�a�z,.Barley........ C.aastal.Bermuda.Gs .ras...........................Fescue..................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differOwim those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
awe�Eeere•f� a trill sVisit'. b� teeile fofurther -
o'v ri olnS or i: ......,... .ece6t Nlsist:.correspondn...
p Yes N No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No:--
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
omments treler to.question i;) Explain.any rra-answers anator any.recommenaanons or -any oinerycommeats:,
;Use drawings ofafaeiltty to"better expiain,situations (use 9dditi nal pagesas;neeessaii z.
Excessive ponding andrunofffrom fields T96362'(3) T92419(5)(7). Operator stopped pumping at request of inspector. Need to
lock runoff paths from spray�fields. Estimate 20+- acres of woodland flooded:wl animal waste. Samples taken at canali. exits.
Some other fields appear. in.better.shape to utilize iii;spreaying waste. Pressure, guage and RPM meter on reel non-fumctional. �<
annot;accurately track waste applications: Canals appear FULL of waste runoff (photos}'"Additioiia150'acres maylbe available':
Reviewer/Inspector Name David-RO—Binger I

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit M Permitted In Not Operatrona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: !Coastal.Farms.1ne....................................................................................... County: Columbus WiRO
Owner Name:.. ................................................... Goastal.Farms.Inc ............................... Phone No: fi4RrfiH25 ...................................................................
Facility Contact: CokcGrey ........................................................Title: MaaagingP.airfteir........................ Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 54tt-A.East.Jcffcmn.3t................................................................... W.h!tC.V.We.NC ....................................................... 28.472 ..............
Onsite Representative: Scutt.RegisW............................................................................ Integrator: P.restagc.F:areas.....................................................
Certified Operator: Timptbat.S............................ Register ............................................ Operator Certification Number:202.73 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ®' © Longitude ®• ®f ®K
Swine _
..=.Lesrgn e.°�.urrent�
Capacity -Population
[3 Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
® arrow to Wean
13 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
uesign e.urrent uesrgn
Poultry'.:. Capacity Population ` Cattle.. =.-Capacityy
E3 Layer 13 auy
u E3 Non -Layer p on- airy
F.
p Other
TotalrDes>Igia CapaLC4
Total SSLW
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? R Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? N Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon N Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ® Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 3
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No
7/25/97

IPacility Number: 24_9
Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
p No
Structures (LagoonsiHolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
N Yes
p No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 0.17 0.42
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
H . Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
® Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.........................•-----------------......................CDastal.Ha=da.Grass.-----...................... Fes te..................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
o-vo obs•we 4ciettits.were-is a gs Wso .receivcf 0 further - . - .... . . .
roResponderice about this visit:. • ... ........
p Yes p No
N Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
N Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Comments (refcr1o,4uestion-#) Explain any YES answers: and/or any:recommendations-or,any othei• comments._: .
fy ..
Use dawmgs:of faeihty to -better explain situations (use additipnal,pages as necessary); =�
Cattle on,lagoon dik e walls. Insufficient freeboard in both lagoons. Risen@ coastal'43 spraying waste.into air., .Waste, -observe ,in. i
itches andcanaNs n;farms 2 and'3. Runoff abserved'from field T93630(3) into Butler 13rarich..,R@ar sprayfields coastal Dare
ubmerged. It would'appear that additional APPROPRIATE acreage is neededto'opeiate this.facility.
X
Reviewerllnspector Name DavHolsanger - _

_ Division•of_Soil3and-Water Consekvatlon-= Operation -Review _ -
�.. _
� DlvlsiowofSoi[:and`Water C_i►nservation�Complhatice Inspection,
- p.. _ ,
a. .
p:-Drvlsion-ofVater_Quallty Complianee Inspection
Other A- euc -'O eratlon Rer+Iew
p Routine p Complaint p o ow -up of DWQ Inspection p Follow-up of VSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit N Permitted In Notpera cone Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Coasta1Earms.Inc....................................................................................... County: Columbus WiRO
OwnerName: ................................................... Coagad.Farins.1ac ................................ Phone No: MUM ...................................................................
Facility Contact: ..................................................................... ..Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 50.&A.E.ast.ieffarma.St...................................................................WlhliteAlle.NC....................................................... 28472..............
Onsite Representative: Szoxt.ltegktea:............................................................................ Integrator: PrratagcYarju .....................................................
Certified Operator: Timulhy.S............................ Register ............................................ p ................. Operator Certification Number:2M.73 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ® • ®°" Longitude ®. ®6 ®"
eslgn .: urrent
Uesign'_. • urren es!gn w . urren m
ine:Capacity Population Poultry Capacity .Population Cattle Capgcity Population
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to mis
® Farrow to Wean
6000
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
Boars
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
rea
17 bpray r leia Area
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ❑ No
p Yes p No
p Yes 0 No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No

aci i y Numbm Z4_9 Date of Inspection
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LaQoons,Holdint-Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: #3............... . #2...............
Freeboard (ft): 0.5 0.92
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
® Yes
p No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No -
15. Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
:1 • o'v ti ehS Ox' a acisttt> s'v�ere •t►d e n s v •s of w •rtebth g �10_ er
.......abaut Niis visit::
to Better ekplA1wsituat1ons Nie i
as n"sary)
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
0 Yes p No
® Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Spot check for lagoon-teeboard, since heavy. ramtau is .expected' later this week: 5 reels,on srte w/; 3 pumps. I -reel,runnutg and! L'
oney wagon. Talked'w/ Rdndy Barefoot (. Prestage Rep.) about situation. He indicated some problems w/ a pump shaft on h pump
d would get' all others running ASAP. 'Prestage will betaking over irrigation on this farm this week.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Wudrey Oxen..dme -:

--DIVISIo©�ofSotlrand=Water-t:aonserv-ation O eration-Review
- _ - j Drvtsiodkof,Soit.andWater Conservation Compliance Inspection,
Division of Water Quality Compliance Inspec#tong. v
16
. Uther A enc 0 eretion Review ` � - - 7
µ
W
Routine O Complaint p o ow -up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit E Permitted In Notperattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Coastal.Earm.&J=...................... ..................... County: Columbus WiRO
Owner Name- --------------------------------------------------- C,aasial.Farms.Inc----------------------------.... Phone No:&R-_6825 ...................................................................
Facility Contact:---.-------•-------••..........................................................Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 50.6 A.EastAc fcr.&nn.St................................................................... Whitexille-NC ....................................................... 28.472 ..............
Onsite Representative: Randy..B,arefaot........................................................................ Integrator: Printage.Farnix .....................................................
p . JDaMey ............................... . Operator Certification Number-.20.73 ............................
Certified Operator: .................................... .................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• ®6 ©" Longitude ®• ®®u
eslgn , Curren estgm ur - = esign urren .-
Swine' `°Capacity PPapulation 'Poultry Capacity Population- Cattle o Capacity;Population
13 Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finisfi
® Farrow to Wean
13 arrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes N No

aci i' Number: 24_9 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures a oons Holdin Ponds Flu" h Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ............... ##.3............... ............... #2............... .......................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 3.83 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .....Coasta:IBcrmuda Grass-----------------------•----....zye...................................................................
p Yes
B No
p Yes
M No
Structure 5 Structure 6
...................... ...............................
p Yes
M No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
o'v o obs." d. a 4cieiCies,were•n� c dttg s visit. iDa W-teceiVe 110 •r• •••• (•
: corTespondince ah6iit Niis v-
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No
® Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes M No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes B No
p Yes N No
Comments refer to uestion;# Ex lain any Y answers and/or any recommendations or. any other comments.
UseJrar­ngs-.of facility to Better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary3::
18..Need,to-resprig:someIfields,and mow down dog fennel:
Reviewer/Inspector Name IAudrey Oxendine

7-7
19 Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p o ow -up of DSWC review p Otter
Date of Inspection i�f'i�3T
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered n Certified p Applied for Permit E Permitted 113 Not opera Bona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CoastallarxuJi c....................................................................................... County: Columbus WiRO
Owner Name: ................................................... Coastal.Farms.1iii ................................ Phone No: 648 6825...................................................................
Facility Contact: .......................------..............---.......------------..............Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 54.fi:A.East.J�effc=n.St................................................................... WhilexWeAc ....................................................... 28.422 ..............
Onsite Representative: ScottErgistier............................................................................. Integrator:Pr',e&tage.F.ar m.....................................................
Certified Operator:Tunaihy.S............................ Register ........................................... Operator Certification Number: MUD ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ® Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes N No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

aci y um er: 24_9
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .........Farm.#3......... ......... Eactn 12......... ....................................
Freeboard (ft): 20" 30"
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... Coastal..Bsxnauda Grass---------------•-•--------..Fiescur.......................,Small.Grain.(Wbeat,.Barley.,.--•---....--------......................... ................
Milo a
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management P anl)AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
:X No -violations.or deficiencies io this visit; - You will.receive no u er . .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes IS No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes Ig No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
`Reviewer/Inspector Name
IReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Coun
Eo um us
Owner
roastal Farms Inc
manager
imot y S. Register
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
Permitted
ICoastal Farms Inc - -
Phone um
er -
essee
restage Farms Inc.
Region
0 AKU 0 MRO 0 WAKO 0 WSRU
p FRO p RRO p WIRO
cln. . . . . ..e tif.ri. : ?UI apProx.:.l. mtie yeast of SK.1545., -East srde Vurries,tiranch�.Ked.H• .!lilt Swamp..
.............. ....... ......... ........ ..... .
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
originally certified as 2 separate facilities (24-21 deleted)per permit process. +
w
Date inactivated or closed
Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity tIrma
Total , wine
SSLW 2,598,arrow to Wean
Latitude Longitude

Higher Yic
Vegetation
Acreage
Other
p Request to be removed 13 Removal Confirmation Recieved
Comments Basin Name:
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits 1

JUL-14-1955 1 :22 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTIOH TO
WIRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Q , 1995
Time: I is m
Farm Name/(]weer:—_
Mailing Address: 5 171r - g ,�5 Z (? bLit PL, io 1A I G1ca%. - C F 3
County:. f_x2-4Q m b0 S _ _ -
Integrator: Prz 5 � - - _ _ - _ Phone:
4n Site Representative: ",P-- j 1�.i1��1 •+ {. Phone: %� 6 5—
Physical Address/Location: 2G 'Z7 w -701 hor4h S, e.
J
Type of Operation: Swine v Poultry _ Cattle cry
Design Capacity: Oo cD ! vO S Number of Animals on Site: 1 (5-2
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude. Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 6 or No Actual Freeboardk__( Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o� Was any erosion observed? Yes o&
Is adequate land available for spray??j e r No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Cmp(s) being utilized: � ?T - � '� "yJ(. {.t.P,
Does the facility meet SCS minimum. setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?(!R or Na
100 Feet from Wells? l5or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes of
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar roan -made devices? Yes o No if Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes r No
1% .,�� r
Addition Comments: S � rye. �,Q WL _
p1'\ [
G-4 64Ck_ I_L it-deL f
Inspector Names r -
Sianatvre
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.