310875_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

r.
r
Type of Visit 66 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit A Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ' Q Departure Time: Nf � County: ��G��✓ Region: O�06Q
Farm Name:, L�/Qe,&F Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Altle:
Onsite Representative: �L � +'p��c 7
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone:
Phone No: Q
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ Q = d Longitude: = ° = j
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
_ �,' ❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures: F�
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ElNA
ElNE
❑ Yes
D No
❑ Yes
la No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
13 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

..
Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes No
ElYes 9No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: f A 16
Spillway?: A10 �p
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 14 .3Tr
El NA El NE
❑NA El NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 40
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) `[[
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Cl Yes No ❑ NA ElNE
maintenance/improvement? 0
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA El NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
&) /i eeo A5 •&zc- % fa-,e- '5 7 'lC'mwww-C
?L-5-q4 -71�- AlaW2 ✓Ad7- /JEF C•tA500<K0',
Reviewer/Inspector NamewPhone.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: D
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design
g El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes
ElNA
ElNE
ElYes
/YNo
Pf No
❑ NA
❑ NE
21. Does record'keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;,ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I ° Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
P(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
'0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
pr,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
["No
❑ NA
El NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
/0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
�No
El NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
10No
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Cnmmeuts andloi^ Drawings:
�vorEs.
o-fFfs- C o�lt /1'ifn/ � S �P IZ �,�Cy L ? 7y I-l� �P.Q,v ©o r60 6,90.0
.
I2/28/04

[Type of Visit .Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit f2eRoutine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: S S d Time:
0 Not O erational � Below Threshold
ermittedd Certtifi, ed [] Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
hreshold: .........................
Farm Name: .—...---•-•Ulf 2... _.... ..... ......................... .................... County:.........Q UPL,J.�`� ...... ......... .....�_._........
OwnerName: ..... -.... -................ .--....... -------- --- — ...... --� _..� . W ..W ........................... - Phone No:
Nfailing Address:.._............-
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:.. .q L. _b ............................... Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
.................................. ..... ............ ... Operator Certification Number:.................. _......_. .
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 " Longitude • 4 "
x i Desrgi `Curren# "� r I gii ` l:ukieritzs T } Design
Current
Ca
Swine Ca act Po -iilatton.. PaWtry � ' ttte Ca`ara
=Po nlaboa
_ -
_
�Cii act --Po uia6oa _._
❑ Dairy
-
❑ Non -Dairy
f
J
1
5:.
4Capactty
a SSLW _
} Nwiriber of:Lago©ios ° =
`
Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
Feeder to Finish
D
❑ Non -Layer
Farrow to We
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: _� .. ....�........ �- _ _ _ W_ . __.........__ ..... _. _�..
Freeboard (inches):
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No 7NV
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
Structure 6
I2/12/03 Continued

Facilit3 Number: 31— S Date of Inspection S 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes /No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or 0 yes
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 7No,,- /Ncy
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelmprovement? El YesWNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N
I 1. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type E 1A %0 Nfkepkmoml
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes �4_
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes rNg
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes L7 N
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Vo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes To
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
'Comutients {�cefe to question #) Explaun any YES.a_ answers and/or airy recommendafroiLs orally other cornriients.
Use drawings of fadity to better explain sltoabo (nse �ddrteonai pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
i
Reviewer/Inspector NameJ6
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Y Continued

Facility* Number: 3 _ S Date of Inspection U
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes iio
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Nc�/
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes o
El Yes L. o
❑ Yes
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes io
❑ Yes GWO
El Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
12112103

• Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 31 g7g Date of Visit: 7/25/2002 Time:
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified U Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: ..................................................... .............. County: MAW .... ................................ S'.4'IRO......
Owner Name:.--------------------_-_-- Murphy-Fauuly_F,uutS-----_-__-- Phone No: 41.Q:289_?tiL1LL�YiFF olfi�ce�- _-_-_--
Mailing Address: FQ.Ifll .7 Q................................... .. RStSUlAll.M.................. ......................................
Facility Contact: ............................................................ Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:._.--------------------------------------------____-- Integrator:) JJuxp yJFai 11yJF31!<JIm_.-_-.-.----------•
Certified Operator: 5fig ad.I eoxi..................... Norrjs.................................. ........... Operator Certification Number: 19.8.1......................
Location of Farm:
AA Registers Crossroads. Entrance is just South of Crossroads on West side of Hwy 11 at MFF Truck Wash facility.
Take NC HWY 11 north from 140. Farm is on west side (left) just before Murphy Milling plant and Register's crossroads.
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude 34 ' S1 08 Longitude: 77 • 58 ' 11 u
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1840
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JEINan-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,840
Total SSLW 248,400
Number of Lagoons 7 IN Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: --------------------------- --------------------------- --------------------•----- ---------------
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facffi y Number: 31-875 Date of Inspection 7/25/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes El No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste, structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[]No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
-hP, '. _. - ,;. {7 .- - -_, a`. - ehC:(i �` tiSYV, - Ai(' I}ti. '. - B '_n .-., ,-_. P € �� '4
;Comments (ieffer to q'uestton:#) Eiplain.any YES answers and/or any or any other comments �g4
.recommendations
Use drawing's of facility to better explain;situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
NOTE: See compliance inspection done on 7/25/02 for Facility # 31-11. At time of inspection, facility was
hought to be combined with facilities 31-876 and 31-11. Gale Stenberg did the compliance inspection for
Facility # 31-11 on 7/25/02. Comments entered by Chester Cobb on 12/9/02.
--------------
Reviewer/Inspector Name Gale Stenberg
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Faciity Number: 31-875 Date of inspection 7/25/20D2
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
J'Additidiial omments au or rawin s "`
to ,
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
05103101