310859_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H LAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit @) Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date OF Visit: 111171Z440 "Time: 13:tS Painted on: 11/17/2000
31 859
-. — O Not O erational Q Selow Threshold
®Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - --
harm Name: Martlan.d.f.mrM5.................................. County: ------------•-•--------WaRQ------
Owner Name: JrhilliR_A....................... UX9. ft1-.--•--------------•----------------------- Phone No: 41U 2$_$4ZQ-------------------------------------------
Facility Contact: --- - Title: - Phone No: - -
Mailing Address: G$4.0ld- 1►1 q4.spin.Ruai........--..,................................................ B.edul.-Av lkAC.....----------.........----------.............----...$S1$--------------
Onsite representative' ------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------- Integrator: 3.CI:9�l'_s_FQ4Q5_In-----------------------------------
Certified Operator:.- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
'south of Beulaville. On West side of SR 1802 approx. 0.5 mile North of SR 1804. A&
® Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle ❑ Horse l..:ttitude 34 ' S4 40 Longitude 77 • 46 29
Design Current
Swine Canacity PODnlation
® Wean to Feeder
3552
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Cl Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Nan -Layer I I JE1Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,552
Total SSLW 106,560
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Arca
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discltar es & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed fi-om any part of'the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge ori-inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If disclarge is observed, was the conveyance man-made" ❑ Yes ❑.No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of [lie State" (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. Ifdischarge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min"
d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than frorn a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 St.l'llelure 2 Structure 3 Suructure 4 Structure 5
]dcnof per : ....................
Freeboard (inches):
❑ Yes [:]No
Structure 6

5100
C on inued on hack
Facility Number: 31-859 Date of Inspection 11/17/2{t0o Printed on: 11/17/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Pond ing ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑No
e) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22,
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
this facility has not been constructed.
Reviewer/hispector Name Stonewall Mathis

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date: 5/00
Faeility Number: 31-859 hate of Inspection 11/17/2000 Printed on: 11/17/2000
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ElNo
liquid level of lagoon or, storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. 1s there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring ve�tietation, asphalt, El Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located hear the liquid surface of the lagoon? El Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
inents
ALi
J