310110_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental dual

l Division of Water Quality
jfa�tjmiber 3 J Q .Q Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
O Other Agency
r
e of Visit ,C,(ompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
son for Visit ICJ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied.Access
Date of Visit: /Z05 Arrival Time: t�.'�4 Departure Time: `F-` ` ' County:
Farm Name: Z 4 (� ul Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish I
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other - -
Title:
Region:
Phone No: l
�f 'integrator: 7 �iR �D Cc!'
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o =] ' = Longitude: = ° =
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et Ij
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pouets
❑ Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: -- Q Date of Inspection l
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes )ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes /Z] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IV
El NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes (� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes Oo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes '10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:
❑ Yes f ?rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes s. No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ,fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations_ or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Na 77;-z"9
'QCI' S5 �iG �GDSZ.✓e�—Qc�T �0'04/LJ.
Reviewer/]nspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: Z 'y
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — lQ Date of Inspection T� O
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA X51NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA XNE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design
g El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA gNE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA 'NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA �NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA )ZNE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1EYNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ;9'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ;2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

r
�."� r- �� � � � � �. _Division of 7T 8�r �lty - r,�. y �4s%��'. -�* ` �" � .� �"' `� -�iq• ..� 's
�-
_.d.y--
W
r.
E
f Visit �f Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Vissit/C"outine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number f Date of Visit: Time: 60
Not O erational Q Below Threshold
�Permiiteo Certified 0 Conditionally C-ertified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............... .....
Farm Name:// L � 2.1... !� - `�.t! �....7..� ...---..................... County:..._....L. �I! ' ._........... .._ ._ .�....
...... _s
OwnerName: ....... .... ................................ ..... ..................................................... . ....... . ........ Phone No: ....................................... ...... ...... ............... _................ ...
MailingAddress: .................................................... .................................................. ... ....... ....................... ..........................................
Facility Contact: .. _........ ... ........... - •- . Title: --..._.............................. --........ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: C ]a �r_— f........................__.. Integrator: ... ........ .. �..._ . _. _ . ..
Certified Operator: ....................................... ....... .. . .... . .... . .... . .... . ................... . ............ Operator Certification Number: ._.............. ............. .. .
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 64 Longitude • C 44
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Stru -tune 1 Structure 2 Structure , Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier: -...... --............ ... .............. ............. ...... ............ ............ --
Freeboard (inches): Z.5
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes L7 �
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes o
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?(,Yes 7No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? El Yes 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes Q I
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2 No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes UJIJ6
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ YesVNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below []Yes a/No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �o
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
=Camna�ents � efei to quesboa #) Explarn any Y� answers anul/or any��commendsiions oc any other commend. p x '
Use drawiags of fac�ty to better exp situshons. (use-adcLltonal pages as necessary)Fteld COPY ❑ Final Notes
i
1U � u 6(D6D o tj W ATULAOA' i i'j NELD Z .
ti-^.si-1��'j e-�u�v -t^°' `.'•.4' .,,�4�_ r 3"i.—�.';Y''��L- C�- �W'Y""'—r�u."Ya'�.G - _2 �'_Y
Reviewer/Inspector Name
_Q
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Ad Date: L �
I2112103 Continued

Facility Number: 3 —
Date of Inspection
Re uired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDI:S Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes VNo'
❑ Yes 240
❑ Yes 2 0
❑ Yes QN�
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes V
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes [(No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

Dnnsion of Water Quiilnty
Q DlvlSion of Soil and Water Conservation
.may &
_ OtherAgency
Typif�y�at
e of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit QJ Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow up Q Emergency No io� ,�wV Other ❑ Denied Access
I Date of Visit:
Facility Number
Permitted [3 Certified [3 Co itionaily Certified Q Registered
Farm Name: F Q Pt
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: M Title:
Onsite Representative: [ ' 1 G Cl _0 Q it Rz 5
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Time: E=
=Not Below Threshold
Date Last Opera or Above
Threshold:
County: 1J
Phone No:
Phone No: 1 f r
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
6 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' ' 0" Longitude 0' 0° 0"
Design Current
�wlne 4a achy ro ulatsOn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -La er ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Bolding Ponds / Solid Traps
Subsurface Drain
No Liquid Waste
Discharees & Stream i. mgacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Field
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes V
No
[3Yes No
Structure
Structure 6
Continued

1 F
Facility Number: — Q Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health, or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PA14 ❑ Hydraulic Overload
13. Do the receiving crops dider with those designatJd in the Certified
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Y110
❑ Yes_,( No
❑ Yes lLJ No
❑ Yes �Na
❑ Yes I/J No
❑ Yes YNO
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0. No
El Yes VNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes I
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
(7 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Y k- +r x F" ak_ a «x s
(refer toany YE5` answers�andlor any recomme dattons ur any other commenUse
drawttigs of facili0 better explain situahonsa (use aildthonalapages as necessary) Field Copv❑Final Note
a
,:.. , -
"
4,C
O C�13�5�
FkOL
Reviewer/Inspector, Name t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 if — Continued

Facility Number: bate of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or Iagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate covet?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes m No
❑ Yes o
ElYesON,
❑ Yes ❑ No

Type of Vlelt OGornpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ZrRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 0 D 1 Time: I MOO
..., O Not Operational O Below Threshold
U Permitted [3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....... .....
W.......
Farm Name: ..... ...i ve - !Od& .SO � r,--, Count3:. .I..r
................................ - .................................. ................ ...........................
Owner Name: W'�'� !^ ''� t �; S P S Z L e' Phone No:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title :................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ..............................................
Onsite Representative: „ ,+, G1�1 e+2 OIiD�'r 1 ..... Integrator:....Mk't o �'1
.............................................................................. .....I
....
Certified Operator: ........................ .. Operator Certification Number:...
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 6 64 Longitude • 4 14
Design:, Current
Canacity Penulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
_-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
-'
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current I>ecagn Cuirirent
Poultry C'iDaiitV Po uladou '-Cattle Cd ci_'Po -iAatian:­
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer J I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
ry Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 11OLagoonAren 10 Spray Field Area
Holding'Ponds I. Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
w:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes JNo
❑ Yes JYNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes )2�No
❑ Yes �INo
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 67
Identifier: :........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 3�
5100 Continued on hack

Facility Number: _3 — f Q Date of Inspection 14 D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
El Yes ANo
,f .
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
A
closure plan?
❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes ONO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancerimprovement?
❑ Yes J2(No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes JZ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes ONO
12. Crop type Ce.,n 1 W heAA , S'n4 beGihJL jLAv_0(t..Iaa -Trees
---
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes _No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes PNo
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑'No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes (PNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ONO
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes j2fNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JVNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ONO
23. Did Revicwer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ONo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes_'No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes j2(No
�Va•yiblati#i js;or• dgfejejmcies ft're itbtet3• dirriag phis-Apit; • ;Y;oU wiij•tec4iye flti futftg
correspondence agouti this .visiti................................... .

Facility Number: 31— Date of Inspection Q �l
or1ssues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below XYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes JA No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes tVNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes�No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 1 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes /❑ No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:- _ s
,&I
5100

r c
e ..ion of Water Qual1ty
�. D�nsion of S_ii�l and Water Conservation-� -
}
z F 0 Other Agency _
jr,
- l .'. .. �.d.- i. . - �M . .•....... ....3�t c. d S .0 Yam,
€Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit. /� 2900 --rime- o Printed on: 7/21/2000
.� 1 / / �
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name. e,r 0 S �t.r.'''4 County: ur'q tom ................................. .......... ..... ........
Owner Name: Mv 4, Y"v .!}�e✓p�, LL G.......... Phone No:.....................................................................................
^seS
Facility Contact:
........................................ Title:.......
MailingAddress: .................................. .............. __._ ..........................................................
Onsite Representative:.. cq+?1..or/'tr.�an1.,B�1..... ..... ..............
Certified Operator: ................................................... ..
Location of Farm:
Phone No: 1�
...........:.......................................
Integrator: _ [1f _-•-A7.......
Operator Certification Number: .....................
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ]0 i Longitude & 4 0«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1E3 Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean Z.D
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1111 Lagann Area 111 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact~
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance ratan -made''
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'.' (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. I1' discharge is observed. what is the estimated flour in gal/rain"'
d- Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system'' (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
SnMcture I Structure 2 Structure , Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ................ I ............. ... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): _76
5100
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes ;5No
❑ Yes No
n a
❑ Yes fi6No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes JRNo
❑ Yes ,9 No
Structure ti
Continued on back

Facility Number:—?/ Date of Inspection %O 2 D Printed on: 7/21/2000
r5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes V No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ZrNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes .19'No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes qy No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes -;H No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes J9No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes OfNo
12. Crop type SP a ,, S"w 11@'lf a rA W &ao[S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMPV ❑ Yes 1No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E(No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes Dj(No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes gNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? `Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ONo
Reuuired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
'�No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20_
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21 _
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
El Yes
No
Oel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
�: �'�10 yigiations ;or aeficieucie5 were nUed- diWirig phis; visit' • Y:oir wil - . eeeive iio: ru . ther • ; ;
.. correspondence. about this visit .:............ ...............
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any.other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
IS. ah-/'u-•0rd; Ct�oWe� nee-d# 1,0 er7svre— Iq S-'thj W So�J t►1S
rIcv—ALJvod 1--Jee 4lr1Aj heed -%O hove weed cD►�-�1� dA n� � hR --d w eGd s- lsp, p1��5 �� o', 1'Iq.,d Waoots yioaA b e-if e✓
-5-4,ct moo. a-r ti vd woods -
1q. Acre e10
e s B rl -30- Z m rt 4c 1, M A P mot.-.�p�. q e je fool ✓� .
Be Spr,e fo vxe !7r'dole-of7¢'l� dole -of Lva� e �tn��st'J on 1�C/Z"`.?sls>
W
Reviewer/Inspector Name !1 G VA r,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

Faci rty Number: 3 f — Date of Inspection Q 2 Printed on: 7/21/2000
r
'Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge ;!Yor below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ YesNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes RrN0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes A No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes fNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Yes ❑ No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
a
5/00

r
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation _.Operation Review , - s
0-D�vEsion of Soil and.Water Conservation Compliance inspection
3 --
21 ion. of Water.Quality - Compliance Inspection -�
Dins _
D;Other Agency Operation Revtew6, x s
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
I Facility Number I
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified I©�Conditional�ly Certified Q Registered 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: County . .............
.............I—- .................... ...........
Owner Name:
............................................................................ Phone No:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...............--..................................
Mailing Address: ......................... ...
Onsite Representative:.. ����............................................................ Integrator: ....... K�411y....................................................
......
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
J
..........:....................... .................................. .....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude ' ' 11 Longitude • ° "
Design Current ------Design Current .--..y::._ Design _ Current,
swine. Capacity Po ulation ' Poultry _ °Capacity -Population Cattle Capacity Population'.,_;
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
CO
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Number -of Lagoons.. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid'Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes WNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes [I No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 9No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0
Waste Collection & Treatment \\
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes qNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ........ ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes RrNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

,Facility Number: '�1 — �c, I Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
I�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[5�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
U�No
Waste Application
10_ Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9fNo
IL Is there evidence of over a1pplic1ation? ❑ Excessive P1on%ding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
S�No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
D(No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
%No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N'No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
O No
18_ Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑
Yes XNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes X No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 5�No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ]` No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
..Rio yiolaiioris:or de#iciencies •were noted• dining is:visit; Yoet will reeeiye do uii`t ter "
Cori es ondeirce. aba�tif this visit..... ... .
Comments (refer fii questii6n #). -Explain=any YES answers andlor. any-rcco6 it eendations or any other comments.
Use.drawiogs of faciltty t€►_better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary}
Y : m s.- _.. -.. .
411 sue, s A,
"y 4 V, quo cm -roe_ "4
Of
3/23/99

FaAhEy Number: — Q [)ate r,f luspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes j No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes Wo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �(No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes XNo
Aadktionall Coinments Paid/or _ rawtngs
♦A
3123/99

State of North Carolina .
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govcrnor
Bill Holman, Secretar`-
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 15, 2000
Nor. John Bizic
Murphy Farms. Inc.
PO Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: Inspection Report
River Road Sow Farris
Facility Number: 31-110
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Bizic:
NCDENii
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATLRAL RESOURcLs
Please _find enclosed a copy of the inspection- report for the referenced facility for the
inspection that was performed on 9/24/99. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact me at 910-395-3900 ext. 203.
Sincerely_
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Engineer
enclosure
s -\w gslstone y131-1101 et
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 2840,5S Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%, post -consumer paper

Facilitv Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Permitted @ Certified p Conditionally Certified 13 Registered In N
of peratrona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: RLN=.Raad.Sow:.Farm............................................................................... County: Duplin WIRO
Owner Name:
lY.iurphy.F.aznilj:Farms...................... Phone No: 9.10-189-.2111 ..........................................................
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:.................---........................................... Phone No:..........................
MailingAddress: PQ.Roz..759............................................................................................ Rose.HiU..NC........................................................ 28.45..............
Onsite Representative: KextaM..esintt........................................................................... Integrator:l! urph,I'.Fami1X.F.; arm......................................
Certified Operator: Thomas.'Al........................... Reli...................................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.7798.............................
Location of Farm:
�� 44 =� Longitude Latitude
esign 'Current
Swine ,Capacity 'Population
In Wean to Yee er
Feeder to F mEs
® Farrow to Wean
p arrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
0 Boars
aD
esegn urrent - esign- -!Current
Poultry. Capacity :Population Cattle +Capacity Population
C3 Layer -p airy
E3 on -Layer rl Non -Dairy
f p06er
"_Total'De-sia i'.Capacity 1,200
Tota1'SSL'W : a 519,600
:Number of==Lagoons - _ p unsur ace rains resent ID moor, Area rl pray re a area
liolding.Ponds / Solid2.Traps p o rqur aste tanagement yssem
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes [3 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ) ©Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes C1 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes G No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure Structure j� Structure 6
Identifier:.................1.................
Freeboard (inches): ..............14. .......... .....
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, E3 Yes p No
seepage, etc. j
3/23/99 Continued on bac1;

C
Facility Number: 31-110 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes p No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes p No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? []Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
IL is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type Soybeans
11 Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WI.1P, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
p No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
p No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
p No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
❑ No
21 Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
p No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
M : No,V-1a,tations.or. deficiencies-were.u•oted:during: this visit. -Yau. vviii xe_ ce'ive tia. further•
. • . • i orresjp"dehc6 2 oirf this:visit:::..::..::..::...::..::::...:..::. :
Hurricane I'Ioyd Assessment.Inspection t. z �,} f v n =-� �`" . r �? ' �" �� • • s
u r r "`',�+ NS Y x R .'eY ' 1„ i..�.. rr ` �3 }: i11`. 1 x i.xq`'"`i • �- 2 '
r � r - i •• ,,,�. n�.7G'' r - t a•bF -� � y'}-. ...s ' r •-r-; - -_ �� {";`�'y�� of �^ .,-� x - .
t> -� � �. n. t_-• k�°'�"..+"i." r� �'� r�+...�^�'�"i ^�. �'� sag :r-.�,,..-.........�' 'x
,-.f a y : _ �^ `yi'.`t-� . !i`��•'. ,s,, }'{' w. vn�+, �' ...}yy . ••r Ma- .;J�1—'^i3�=°`v, sri�- ,,r= y-•+•
c €' z
.... .s... ...� __.._�. . Y .. .� •,3: � . r- .-.:.r tL _� -aifsn �.,-r^?��,�.d._ -:✓•- -_ -- -- ,..�r..-�:t•'�r+3;-'._.�.. �:��,-.+.e :��w. Q�s,'?��--
Reviewer/InspectorName Sto� 'newall. athts mot, -0 atrick�ussell �`� `
ark• .:,�s'aF.-s::i.�.t... s:c .. S'.e�..,,• n-,+:c.:. ...,..,. rs �.ra'c� •:-xra+.: ..�i'a....>�t..cr r•.r... r.� l .....a^2—MUM^r-:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - P� rfr� �jj/t��F�-� Date: 3111 ZY00

rintea on sl , i ©G
acr its Nurn er: 31_II( Date of Inspection
Odor issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
p Yes
m Ne,
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27_
Are there any dead animals not disposed o`properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
G No
28.
is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
E3 Yes
p No.
roads, building structure. and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
p No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)E3
Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate covet'?
p Yes
p No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
-
w_v-_ - ti- _.
i
- _ - -- - 'a
I nil;
.. -_ _ - _ - •' .-fir-'_c`'-a •- yr _
s"-��`'�F';::.
~ � *
"� '�.e,.yy.�... ...'tom` :.r��.3T �'�i���'i L � '�-..': GG'_
- _ _ .x �� r.-.. ""r'�•l�L,- ..
- - -.. ,.'i� a'"� !{+t-i.,. "•
_» .� .• r yY'�4� _+ice 'i..�'cw. {iw.'°"--a.
`.
- .,.., •�:.�
' .. _ _ _- _.:. i-+..gam-aa.. .1•:-,,�.4_w{ _µ..j.-�`«i:"7- I,L_
_
� f: Y '� �~ wF -_ �� �ilyii ..XT*..-. .in,...i+x� �5. �� ��r� sT'_/�•'M `y.
_

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted M Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered in Not Operattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Rivetr.Raad.SowJ axm........................................ ............ .. .......................... County: Duplin WIRO
.
Owner Name: .................................................. Murphy -Family -Farms ...................... Phone No: Q10=289.-.2111 ......................... ... ...... ........................
FacilityContact: ................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: P..Q..fax..7.59........................``..................................................................... RustJ iH..SIC......................................................... ZM8 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: /`BV7h WeS'�or1.................................................. Integrator-Murphy...k'amily. ar]ms......................................
.... �............
Certified Operator-:Th0XUS...W........................... llRell..................................................... Operator Certification Number-:1.7,798.............................
Localion of Farm:
�atoa. -. .nest.xate srcy .. .,ex .... �utrn. a .trtx.ka. rxy .. .sia .... lz>>x. txn.ka. ivy.. spux ctx.kuxat. a .a�n.xsr ..........4.
1�41..Earxn.as.3.nailes.ian.nax7tfxside.. f :Rastof.I-4...................:::::::::::::::::
Latitude ®0®° ©4� Longitude ©• ®4 ©�R
esrgn -. Current Design: urrent Design Current =
Swine Poultry Cattle
Capacity P© ulation r3' Capacity Population Capacity Population:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
I& Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
p Boars
T: p Layer
❑ Non -Layer
:.: ❑ Other =
Total-:Design.Capacity 19200
Total SSLW 519,600
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface rams resent ❑ agoon rea p pray re rea
-Holding Ponds I Solid'Traps : - ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes 13 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State`' (If yes, notify D WQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes p No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
ldcntifier: .............................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):...............2.4..................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
3123/99 seepage, etc.)
p Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 31-110 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes p No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes p No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding 0 PAN p Yes p No
12. Crop type Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes []No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
U ; Div .vibrations _ or -deficien-cres.were -noted :during. this visit.: You_ will receive na further.: :
• : • coreespblidence, abouf this:visxt;.:.:::::::.:::.:::.:.:.:.:::::::.:::::.:::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::.: .
Comments (refer to i queston #) Explam<any answers and/or any. recommendatimons or�aay othercomiir
W YES w nro���ti.ri.o.;i.o.,,.....o...f_fo...1.*.�
urricane Floyd Assessment Inspection
p Yes p No
I] Yes p No
p Yes p No
0 Yes p No
p Yes p No
Yes p No
[]Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes © No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name newalPMath�s PatrEck,Fussell p A
Reviewer/inspector Signature: n�� �N ® Date: 7% f1 / 2bea

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency;.`
Division of Water Quality
110 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection (o
Facility Number l
Time of Inspection c3O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered M Certified Q Applied for Permit [3 Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ......................... t." b..)'K...................................... County:...(),IQ�iti
OwnerName: ........ _............... RZ.1 4+�............ v1E0+................................................. Phone No: ... 0.nx9kr..q x.G...............................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress: ......... x.l....... .!WYG�'ur..... ............................................................. ..... .t.n�{....ii.1.1.... q...N...ir................................... ..........
Onsite Representative: ........ I&AJ....... t�OV.S.lt.:............................................. ............. Integrator: ......... C.fi:..M..........................................................
Certified Operator* .......... l JT..:4......... Q..... ........I.iDItS.�Y....................................... Operator Certification Number, ... 17 ....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®' Longitude E '1'1 • F` 2l
Design Current ' 'Design
Current z Design ° •Current
Swore CapacttyPopulation ,,.Poultry.r , Capacity Population ;Cattle :Caput"ity.Populatton
Wean to Feeder 3S L u ❑ Layer ". ❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer'. ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
- ElFarrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 3 -s-z.
r ❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW a' j O(o SLo
A,°Number of Lagoons /,Hold[ Ponds ;� ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area '
zE❑ No -Liquid Waste Management System
,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Q No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
b No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
dNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
jv IA
-
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
q No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
lA No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
m No
7/25/97

` Facility Number: 3l —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures(Lagoons.Hokling Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 10 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 - Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ..............7::.!...................................... ......... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes yo No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes W No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type LQ?�r.. 1e�� , 4 �{ .tat r-.. .._... l �.Ctlxr............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes J9 No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 6d No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
21 No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JD No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?]
Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl c
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
fa No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
P Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
QO Yes
❑ No
0. No.viailations.or deficiencies.were-noted-diucing this:visit._ You:will i-eceive:no_ftiriher ::
eo&0*)tadeh& ,A out this visit
IZ. ta.Kt-, wco-S4 oa_ aOLL 1Wc,tti sk+�4_c- �{1t .O'VI'a�td, { ``'' ( `t ,f ` (
�Z-. WO S��if} SD2 t:L�r ei4 AD HJ14 .1 ��a cv6Q p4k6I� ir- 1'�`[l4 � 1 6i 4-7. AR1'-C' y—
da�c % � 6e �x�d�J egy-C'.
z -Ac. 0&%VL. a10%e� o:.�a dd o� oP�1ica�ati �a�cS. �.1( ��� �e. ��� � Nov 2.,ikgr,
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name s } w _>.-NOW€ I
Reviewer/InspectorSignature:,A I Date, in j��jgQ

Facility Number 31 110 s Date of Inspection 3117/98
Time of Inspection 15:10 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered M Certified E3 Applied for Permit M Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Rixtx..�iRatl. pll:.)Fara............................................................................... County: Rup iri............................................... WIRO.........
Owner Name:....... Murphy:.Family.Frarnas....................... Phone No:9.1.51-289-21.11...........................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................
Mailing Address: P..&,N..7.5`1......................................................
Onsite Representative: jobjI.Bizi�...................
Certified Operator: L.ee.Ii...................................... Hall.............
Location of Farm:
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Ii ou.011.. NC. ....................................................... 28458.............
... Integrator: 1!'),u rpby.I+.rt.tn.ily-Fanus .............................
Operator Certification Number:.18.4;j .............................
rU�tts.I-4.}:esl.t�tslt.H���:..1..��it,..Tsartx.Ir:ft..ort.lit.N�yy,..41..salxtlt....Ttzrnt.1.nzt.Xa.>�r��,.11.scttttkh,,.tltsein.t�tant.l>:1l.nln.ttr.l�.1at1....... i
?arnn.ls... l»ilrs..ari<.r>arf ft.sislt .GIs 1it.). ea5>t.uf.l-4�.---...................................................................................................................................................................... .
Latitude I 34 " 44 6 1i cG Longitude 77 °1 F-5-7—j Gf
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® FatTnw to Wean
1200
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ CTilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any butlers that need niaintt-Trance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any pant of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?- ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Nurface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhrtin'?
d. Does discharge byI)ass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ©No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge tram any pail of the operation'? ❑ Yes Q No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than front a discharge'? []Yes © No
5. Does any pint of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
niaintcriance/improvement'?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the (line of design'? ❑ Yes []No
7, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97

Facilitv Number: 3t—llil Date of Inspection 1 3/17/98
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lazonns,11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
Stnicture 1 Stricture 2 StnrClure 3 Stricture 4
Identifier: „... jj.............. ....
Freeboard (11):................................... .................
10. Is seepage; observed from any of the stnictures?
11. Is erosion, or arty other threats to the integrity of any of the strictures observed'?
12. Do any of the stnictures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was ans-svered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Dig any of the strictures lack adequate minimum or maximrun liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or ninon entering waters of the State, notit} DWQ)
Stricture 5
15. Crop type
....................................... .......................................... .................................... ....... I.........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)'?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
S. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
21. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onlv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the ]` cennit'?
❑ Yes
II No
❑ Yes
M No
Stnictiire
G
....- ...............I.............
Ej Yes
© No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
E] No
CJ Yes
[] No
R Yes
® No
No. v-i'olati4gs'fir.dbrWiericleS.wbre:n'oted'dulripg tliisvisit.'Yost-Will'weive'rto`for her'.:.
-.�:car'res�atadencehlioilf�fhis.visit... -.�.-.-.... ..........:...............:....:........
❑ Yes 0 No
© Yes © No
0 Yes © No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes E] No
Yes © No
❑ Yes 1E] No
❑ Yes Cf No
A site visit was made because operator was observed pumping in the rain, As instructed by DWQ, tic pump was turned off.
14. Ponding of animal waste was observed on the Spray field due to over application. Although no surface runoff was observed, a large
amount of drainage from the field was flowing into a sink hole:. The on -site: representative was instructed to investigate tie sink hole, and
[he regional DWQ engineer (Holsinger) was notified of the situation.
A Notice of Deficiency will be sent for applying waste in excess of those limits established by the certified animal waste management
)1an.
7/25/97
Reviviverllnspector Name
r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �- J-A _ �� Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
#® Division of Water Quality
119 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Folio" -up of D,SWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection Z a 4
Facility Number Time of Inspection i 3:10 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered a Certified �13 Applied for Permit Permitted 0 Not O eratirrnal DO -ix
Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......►i�'. w......:f':.j......... �541�.......tf�iC�1�....................... ............. County: ....... DO- x...................................... .......................
......_..
Owner Name:....... 1h1. � �.1 ......... %5.................... Phone No:I��t!Q�..�,�ri'Zal(............................................
Facility Contact: y � - ......
.!e...............................I.........I.--.... Title:.... �I t1�Ef......nn.....................`......... Phone No: ,CiIO�.Z '... G33
MailingAddress: .... 1...�....�S3.K......7 ............................................................................. Hill l..... N'c.......................................... ..7-11 A!d......
Onsite Representative:...._.. C,.......... l-6yO .................................................. Integrator:..lvli.
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:............................. .
Location of Farm:
...a-5-°x!... {............`�t rff.......5 .1.1.......Q,......xhil��._ejs ...a........ . -"A ........................................ ...................................................
... ........... .. _ .... ... .......
Latitude • ° « Longitude • 4 "
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes N] No
❑ Yes iP No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
1I No
❑ Yes
W No
❑Yes No
❑ Yes
No
UbYes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
0 No
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
® No
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds. Flush fits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):........Z.......................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[0 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
j Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(if in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type ...........lsqt-1±8A&...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
W No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
EQ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
'® No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
® No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
W No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
(0 Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
t91 Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Yes
❑ No
0, No'violations-or deficiencies were noted during this:visit: Aou.will receive,rroAutter :
Ofrespnndence about this:visit:.:.:::
1� can at�.w+ s toe �ltatki 14 bt,+l� 4x,oJ W7Jnt ,s ioczW nor d: Uzi >o �4
c_.'.u&y- ion~ �,,,��, dt�� y{ ')b ) , ..
rz - Tit40�wgomn Cat-- Drsf n,+ Sol t¢-",
r a3Sii rro5iar t3Ur+a� aMeu nxr� Oj� lh�t� �� t s�t.�� �� f`r` d 4ii-W C11
wk� wm, o 1w-o jOi4 vN 5m WmS 1-4. A ki-a-k Vf
I Reviewer/Inspector Name
114.1 (10--A
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

m FORM IRR-1 Lagoon Liquid irrigation Fiefs Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
M
M)
0
OD
OD
N
P
C1
v
�c
LU
rr
Farm Owner Rwer P, - -,m F il— Facility Number t
Irrigation Operator `TTot-%, Ge. it
Tract #
Field #
Date
m/ dr r
Crop Type
Field Size
(acres)
Irri atiar- Time
Number of
Sri klers Operating
''
I
at$ 9
whew
7, 13
840
r
Z.j3
o7{U
/3
7 7
C
1
3
477.(33CUd
a
Y
7.,3
G
i
q
a 7
7-/3
a? div
I
47
7
ao
!
9
0v
9 7
25 $.2
r�
lit 7
9 7Sr00
O
t
a s 7
- I
S1 U
' 97
5S-
LZ
5.00
. S.;,
S o
I
7
7
'i,8f
1a0
3
+a T7
3
3?i3f97
7_ 13
Y$0
l
S
3 3 q7
S.co
0
a
_ r 3
3
ai 127
7-3
Sy❑
i
1
3 aw n 7
7.3
SSIv
a
3
3 a q-7
2,13
SY J
1
3 .?5
7- t 3
S YU
I

N
m
d
MI
m
0
M
IA
N
A
Q
W
FORM IRRA
Farm Owner
lrri alion Operator
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Facility Number I t -
�-
. •
r - ililil�
..
.- .
Sprinklers. -
.J. l l '
� • 1i -
• I! 1
�

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone 9
Vote:
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field tf /
•7 ( 3
(�,Jer RuG —ti1l~r
510 .-Qt9 a(tf
X a.4 `� ul bo
I a O L4,..v%tici e
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator m e (
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
1 eet' 0bIaere) _ (a) �oZ
(1) (_) (3) (4) (5} (0) (7) M (9) (10) (5r1
Date
nm'ddyr
rriga4an
Waste Analysis PAN'
¢hr1000 gaf}
PAN Appl,ed
rat " rsr
1444
H.rrogen aaiaxe
(Vac•e]
B} • r r ^1
Sta(Ituacret
�
End Tlnx
Total
N(es
(3).(2)
q of Sprinklers
Operat ng
Flaw Rate
IgaVrrin)
Tota: Vdume
Igalo-M]
(0)" (51 _ (4)
Volume
per Acre
(galracrel
Q
(Al
7I
3coO
ago
75 cx; o
10 57 9
i
, S
3 `!. 7
7 0 c 0
7a
!
'a
?
5 a
I
5C:
l3Sooc
r �3
r�.3
Ia.S
3(s7 1 57.
*93 q
15,3
a
�fao
/
so
io.5 cC d
lab
11,9
- q.
I
Crop Cycle Totals f j
Owner's Signature
Certified Operalar (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operalcr's Cer',irtcalicn No.
t NCCA VVaste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section CG3.
Enter the value received by subtracting mltrmn (10) from (e). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation evert
W
m

FORM iRR-2
rn�s�
�et;C Yrcfc = 5CIT
b�jgcr< TI
Lagoon Irrigation fields Record t ,AA ck
One Form for Each Fleld per Crop Cycle
+p
Field #
1 �J
o - P-1
r1'rU o-t S Cl Q (f f
Volume Waste Analysis PAN PAN Applied rblro7Pn BaIa1_e
From Waste Utilization Plan A
Crop Type AeGOrtirnended PAN Loading <
(3) (4) (5) (71 (e) {9) {to; {r+) A
�
Irrigation
Crop Cycle Totals I I
Owner's Signature rperator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) 4' Operator's Certification No
NCDA Waste AnaylysiS or Equivalent cr NRCS Esbmale, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (i3)_ Conlinue subtracting column (10) from column 01) felrowing each i-ricalion event
Tract # Facilrty Number
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner Irrigation Operator
Owner's Address Irrigation Operators
Address 3
3
Owner's Phone # Operator's Phone 0

m FoRM IRR-2
Tract it
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm owner
Owner's Address
to
�a
m
h
W
N
T
Owners Phone it
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field r 3
� w4 (• L: a
Facility NLrnber
Irrigation Operator Tc:% Qir;(
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone is
From Waste UtilizOion Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
L"-' hQc (lustre)
1f1 1h nk JA% PAN ra, 17% r9t7 r97 II '111
Date
mrrdddyr
IRi9dlID� ,
a Spr111tirers VOlwne VL'aSIC A'S,ZI� s $ ?AN '
S:arf Trnfe Tots Total Voljmc perA:re fib,1000gat)
operating FlowRata
CndTime Minutes (gallons) (gallacre',
M - (2) (gavrrnn) (a) . 15) y (e} -(71
(A)
3co i arc �S�ac� i c s� 9
PAV App ied
VaUf!)
{9�t[91
1000
rr ln5a tda«,ce :
f?:-''=!
4y
` i 1
`i U
C
r,75d
�av�,,•.�
r'683�
► 3.
G
3 ra 7
SYU
/5'c7
i 3.5,cz;C
t r Ef53K
�S. 3
3,
r3
�O
750
taCcf-a
/6rs3C
/3. �,
�I, i✓
q?
SYU
35-G
3�ocU
! s153
i5. 3
- 9 (a
3 �c g�
�7 97
i
o
� 5 ci
Q 5C oc:r
r 93 y
i S• 3
- NO , a
also
�o$poo
,L{7-2
�fl
ao
I
o
, soon
/V r-r 6q.
O
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) 1' Operator's CerliFicaiion No.
i NCDA Wasle Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Coniinue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each i►l igatinrt even)

m FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
ro
m
m
m
N
1p
N
m
..r
'T
Tract 4
Field Size {acres) = (A)
Form Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Field # 47
Q1�Qf .�c
p 339,�11(
Fadilily Number -
Irrigation Operator le
irrigation operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type ke at Recommended PAN loading ^_
(11 r71 r17 rn r51 rrir r71 ref f47 (lot
Date
rrnurtdlyr
irrigalion
waste Amry;<s PAN PAN Apple"
ob:acre;
(Iti1lL1gOgal; fe)-f2)
9. `�.
rb rn�-7 n, is -gin
SiartTne
End Tirne
Tclal
Minutes
(3) - (7)
? of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
lga!lmin}
Total Volume
(gaRans)
(� ' (5T ` faJ
Volume+
perA[a
(galave)
(7)t100
JA),
(e.
a 7
SG
vote=,
i a a 5,
Lf . 7
,;?rr 7
4Sc . :u
ra.a9S
3 -1,
7
6c0
r
07so
3Uoi:o
30737
a .9
- 3-7
5 A 7
S YO
i
a 5 a
/ 3.S o "G
..? '74 6
a.'
N 97
ya
!
ESL
ioSetC
. -7bS"63
Crap Cycle Totals I i I I
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) 1" Operator's Certirication No.
l NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Section 633.
t Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

I~
m FORM (RR-2
Traci #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
M
�D
CID
D
OD
N
0
w
Ot
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field # J
I>
R. , e r Porn j (A F
Facility Number—�
Irrigation Operator T•r,, 10"If
Irrigation Operator's
Addre s s
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type — _ Fecommended PAN Loading�-
W (lolazrel = (8) / I
r7l M fin` !m I'M i9l M rat 19) OM [t'1
Date
mrru'dd,yr
I0gal
Waste Analysis PAN'
(IhflWO gal)
(Ib;av;re) PAN A
e)
1P06
Start Time
End Time I
'
Total
Minutes
M-{2)
xorSprinklers
Operalfng
Flow Rate
(gaYmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(5} ;5}' (4)
Volume
Pei Acre
(gal4cre)
(71-
(A)
a ro 97
3CC,,
r
BSc
-7500C i
isc-cic
v. a r
ci7
375CO
7500
,'
3If.
3 niq
ISO
a SG
15C rr,tD
a jocG
i
i
Crop Cycle Totals I 1
Owner's Signature _ _ _ Operator's Signature
Cell Operator (Print) lr �. Operator's Certification No.
r NCDA Waste Anal or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (IQ) from (6). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

OD
m
li
to
M
�0
u�
OD
N
.a
a
a
a
w
FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fieids Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # Field It Faci!ity Number
Field Size (acrei) = (A) 5
Farm Owner �v i t no c1 M F F Irrigation Operator o e-% G e t s
Owner's Address Irrigation Operator's
Address
Owner's Phone # 9/CG a$9 911F Operator's Fhone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Cr Type Reem rnended PAN Load' ``] r�
Crop rp uj � cat ow2cre, = {9 �/ oC
In rn m rAt M rRl r7l !Fi rat rl�t Itt�
. lrriQatinn
VoumO
Cat! I O' Sprink!ers
mrNa yr StartTlmg Total operating FbwRule Total Volume pat Acre
FndTme hAinuies (gallons) (gayauel
(gel'mi�)
;�f ter (s) - ts: , (4) -L?L
rA)
%IJQMe final) sisPAN
t411000ga1,
PAld A. Dlt!1
r,ll nacre)
—lei yi91
: a_ -a.
S51.rlCl
a47
ISO
!
CSC.
�/SCco
%cJUC)�
3' 7
'ateU
a7SL:
iCS(?�c
23 333
5, 0
' 7
O
1
a S 0
3 75-0Q
-` 33 3
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) 9"
Operator's Signature
Operator's Cerlifrcalion No.
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimale, Technical Guide Section 633,
= Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (0). Continue subtracting column (1 U) from column (1 t) ietlawing each irrigatlnn event

P_ 09
AUTOMATIC COVED SHEET
DATE
TO
FAX U
FROM :
FAX U :
FEB-11-98 12:19 FM
19103502004
RIVER FORD
9 PAGES WERE SENT
(INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET �

m
Q
A
0
W
a
m
E,
FORM IRR-1
ATTY: 13r Iair-, Wrey) n
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Ve: CO -M r=r
irrigation Operator C-1k_ _
Facirity Number I i i -
Tract
Field 4mmldd
Date
r
FOR Type
Field Size
acres
Irrigation Time
Number of
Sprinklers O eratin
a 8 4
c,,hea-r
7. 1
1540
L,
7
3
1CSO
%
7
7.r3
3c[:
1
-3
aV 9Z
7.0
3tUra
—?0 cs
A9
3 C L
r
7.13
aYo
!
19
97
'Y"RY ic1
i
(o
a 7
.50
0
a 7
50
as
r
30U
g
v
i
97
4/SO
/
Savo
b
t
a .73
7,/3
$�
�f7
Y•BS
bC)b
S
7
5,00
/ SU
.so
1 so
7
7- r 3
0
3 7
7/ 3
a c
3
.71 is 197
7_ I
$yU
/
3
3 J3 7
7-r3
S+�icU
I
5
3 ,3 47
5.00
�{ O
a
_13
s v
f
3
2L.9 i 97
7-13
SYo
1
1
Lav 7
7-f3
SY0
1
-3
•3'z y7
7.,3
-T4e0
1
.7s 97.
7- e 3
1
.S 1-/0

N
m
Q FORM 1RR-9 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner
Irrigation Operator
IR �.►rc� Ua — FF
c: it Q Q
t=aciky Number � ti�i -
Date
MBM
Irrigation Time
Number
�1

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Form Owner
Owners Address
Owner's Phone #
ri1 AN
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record 1
One Form for Each Field per Crap Cycle i a U Lb
l
Field #-7 4
/
t�,.,er- RQc -MF=
`7/0 .;zgGi a 11 i
Facility Number i OD
r
N
Irrigation Operator ! �"+ e
It
Irrlgatlon Operators (A
Address
Operator's Phone # 3
3
ion
Irrigat
Crop Cycle Totals I l
Owner's Signature Operators Signature
Certified Operator (Print) 1. Cperator's Certification No.
r
Q
N
OD
(t
M
ON
w
w
v
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from 119). Continue subtracting column (10) from column 01) following each irrigal6n event W

FORM ERR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owness Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field #
7r
S�cy Fit/ 5771
r97! Aefc-IC Yield .5c )oy/ckc• c ,".lr
,r rjwIbu ',M
IPR"�ICem
r
' r
m
Facility Number C_ W
Irrigation Operator vr„ Qe ft
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operators Phone # i 3
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Lowing
W heat Itbracre)=tat
Ili fir n1 W !Al 141 n1 191 rM rrnl fill
Dale
mm'dWyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAIV
(IN1 D00 gat)
PAN Applied
(lb+acre)
!al • f9l
1300
r+11101jea Sa!an.e :
(VaVe)
!1
(g! -"1
Start Time
End Time
Total
Mirurw
M 0)
X of Spra*lera
Operating
flow Rate
(gat'min)
Total Volume
(gaeeru)
(a) ; (5) , (d)
Volume
per Acre
(gaVeae)
_t?Z
(A)
r 9
iv brO
1
as0
A 7v 000
37263
U< 5' 1
3C.7
1 (. 3
.'! 7
C)U
1
5'O
7a ace.
/O SI 2
. $
a
C3
1
SU
t; GaC
yr s
O
3 iar
a5
J Na
/
RSU
13SccD
rlyrr3
137,0VO
9.3q
/5,3
- 33.5
5 /•3
T OZU
l {
U
/OS GGCI
C�'7�►�+Sr.�i
/( �7-A
8,
Crop Cycle Totals I j
Owner's Signature Cperator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) t' Operalcr's Certification No.
I NCCA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Ente- the value received by subtracting col-umn (10) frgm (13). Continue subtracting cotumn (10) from column (11) following each irriglet;on event
w
U
0
w
04

IARoutine OCam pfaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 00ther
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
0 Registered [I Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 3.
Farm Status: 0 Certified led E] Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: . ..... . . .... . ..... . .....
Farm Name: .. . .... County:. 41
ounty*_41
Land Owner Name- ............... Phone No: ... . .... . . ..... . .....
Facility Conctact:..._j).?.VW_' ..... X-A I I Title: Phone No. .... . .....
J�. (_ -7F
Mailing Address: ---- ...... _K2Se_...qALt ..
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ... . ...... -.21491 ... ......... . ..... . ..... . . .......... Operator Certification Number . . .................. . .....
Location of Farm:
CL4 3-- t.-P.im ..... lia .... �Qn .... :6._� K_J .11--F4 aaa1.C_d5Lq_.L K:*_
Latitude 0 4 lS " Longitude 0 & 94
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Current
�'V�' Design z Swine Current V
_y-
Yltr
IIJDIICIM'elation:
ODU 0 ❑Xap PoDz-
D _ai
Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer
El Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer JE] Non-Da'ryl
:14 Farrow to Wean jZ00
Farrow to Feeder Total
El Farrow to Finish
SE
10 Subsurface Drains Present
10 Lagoon Arear, I0 Spray Field
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [I Spray field % Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass, a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
[I Yes Q No
�; Yes El No
[:]Yes 0 No
❑ Yes q No
ktgL LVA-
f
Yes [I No
0 Yes [3 No
0 Yes krNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
R Yes [I No
Continued on back

Facility Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Pan -)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes 19No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes b No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Appligation
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DjWQ,) l
15. Crop type g{1�5............... ........................................ ........ 4wlrlBG.T___..........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For-Certifie4 Facilities Qnly
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes J�jNo
❑ Yes Iallo
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IR No
❑ Yes ($ No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ER No
❑ Yes
CaNo
❑ Yes
"No
Mes
❑ No
❑ Yes
'R No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes M No
ER Yes ❑ No
Comments;(refer to question #) Explain any YES answers' and/ovany recommendations or any other comments r
facility to better explam situations' (use addihonal pages`as necessary} Use'drawrrigs of
'
..(�
tzv e�
b [a ka5 e, Cz O e o,,r, o �ow 0 was T w rn.l+" e
004qr'1 sOyl ce. rcx� - n-oruc r) p wr"Sle-
4
VVJed
�YaSSe� c�}ot►rv?� S Slnou r� 11�9Eial�'-r�I
z [� e; �a. sl,p�(r� Ise, ex�e-�� a�sas 5ci be bad
rt4 d. TYe.-c-, �.e,_ 8h [R cM. (( �Cojjj'k's
z . S rep I fo nuo%6�' 'C N co_u��—
Gc*%StS k44.
a
cc: mviston of water Lluatrty, water Llualtty .Section, Factltty Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Site Requires Imrne:ia:e A=tion: iC
Fac:iiry Na. �� 1 L_2
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN 1
AN-M4AL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE. �� +`� , 1996
Time: 1 3 0 -72,
Farm Name; Owner: e a a_ j:-A a"..5 Je 4t jV v r2
Mailing Address: (r z S e. ••.e e- 2.j . t) ca 1 t A c.E 'z- Y e I
County: P, 2 P ( A) _
Integrator. t'►� �12PF-�c�- _ _ Phone:
On Site Representative: AJyN,-� Phone:
Physical Address/Location: S te. IR'41 _ J v 5 } r_A �. r '� -r _'- F D _
Type of Operation: Swine `� Poultry Cartle
Design Capacity: _ 3 g ZS Number of Animals on Site: 44't' .
DEM Certification Number. ACE DEM Cerancation Number: ACNW
Latitude: Longi. ude: Eievaron: Fee:
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot _ 25 ye--:- 2^ hour stout event
(approximately 1 Foot T 7 inches) Yes orE;) Actual Freeboard: 1 Ft. 4� Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or & Was any erosion oose: ,ie4? Yes orb
Is' adequate land available for sprav? Oor No Is the cover crow adeou_.0 CES) or No
Crop(s) being utilized: M r AA,, •-a.
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?. 200 Feet fi-om Dwellings? 'fo or No
100 Feet from Webs? Yes br No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or KD�
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within. 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes order
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by than -trade ditch, flushing systern, or other
similar than -made devices? Yes or bd� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volurnes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crap)? Yes or No ?
Additional Comments: -0h ser..Lf-c9
V%S0 C,e-I.ur F9&C S aogN 4to a Lx & to
ril5 rn
Inspector Nam
tgnature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Us,- Aaachmems if Ne,:dzd-

w61�j416
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 3 f�i 10
. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: C g , 1995
Time. 1? ' 0 0P"'t
•
Farm Name/Owner:_/q,- rM
Mailing Address: h,2 5 kiy E o2 ►ed l(J�+ t.c.A cF�1 Iy G Z8 ¢(o fo - - -
County:v-
Integrator: M Phone:
On Site Representative: �� PO V ~ Phone:
pJr' aF r JACi./1'c6 0a eF! 6 4-sr -ruin., P-r 1-tUJI, /E fo ,Z 'rkV 6L + an s 1
Physical Address/Location: �t cs_ s �- �� �o a /�o vkr
Type of Operation:
Design .Capacity:
Swine v Poultry Cattle
1 k5o
3y60 e-S
5oc�s Number of Animals on Site:
38361.. � �5-0-0-0
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 1�, -y- ' 7 Longitude: 7 7 ° 6- 6 - Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) /Yes r No Actual Freeboard: _Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed?. Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray?/ es r No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: G_aA ,,.
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?. 200'Feet from Dwellings?rYes,or No'
100 Feet from Wells?or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes, Or fo
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes oryNo�1
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state -by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man --made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? es or No
Additional Comments: k -dw�(
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

L
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 4�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: t
Time:
Farm Na
Mailing
County:
Integratc
On Site l
Physical Address/Location: �N CS K _.� ``1 "I_-62 s, / J Y,� i 'aan —
Type of Operation: Swine . V Poultry Cattle '�
Design Capacity: �9-16�0 U . _ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:_" Longitude:_' _' -�7 " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does theAnimal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 6
Was any erosion observed? 0or No
Is adequate land available for spray � r No Is the cover crop adequate? or No
. .r r
Crop(s) being utilized: _� �� 4(,2,2M .J-�QqI 4" Ae
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from DweilingsZIA or No
100 Feet from Wells? �6 or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ogi�
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or&
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 0�9 If Yes, Please Explain_
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volume of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No r
Additional Comments: _�it'r7 S � at � vt V_(f
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.