240107_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CARQLiNA
Department of Environmental Qual

r-3
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine Ocomplaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 2
Date of Visit:
Permitted 13 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered
r
Farm Name: • x t' a �'
Owner Name: C e-G ► 1 9g ,,- n h-11
Mailing Address:
4� Time: 2 ' b
=Not Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County: C d1,-,+1bV .s _.._
Phone No:
Facility Contact: 1 Title: op_� ll____ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: CeG i �' �a /►? rt �� %� bRrG�'r Integrator: Ca
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current
swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Caaacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I JEI Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Subsurface Drair
No Liquid Waste
Total SSLW
Area
Discharges 8& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 317
03103101 Continued

" Facility Number: Z'1 — f 4'] Date of Inspection 1 t?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
❑ No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
e) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ONo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
a
Comtiients (refer to.questron # Egplarn any YES answers andloi any recommend h ps t r an}other'Coiaiiments.
^'
UsedraRings of factlrt} to better situations: (use as
explain addtbpnal:pages necessary} El Field Copy ❑Final Notes
ko-'pon ado ornp1ca;riJ of q s4e>'1[.Ll And re11 v4ed ff4re-iA.--
cam:-j9 born s-tenc6 � ���;�1- -�'1, q',r
Lvko 1v;11 Aol(ew 1 )o in 4W toy;n-j weeks- iaco.r jvghJ _5;iwlj;kS qytd
c4voe5 wefe 4,qke i .-ors -the vVh;c1t ;5 adtiacenagc ray'''''),
srtw no ev i dr'nce C'y' q d: se vie uv-t-f �c {.o 4tle
w;it �ollawv a4gc- sa/14fJe rcro a-,e rre cei ved ',n
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Itz 2- D L
O5103101 Continued

Facility Number: 2 Date of Inspection 2. D
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Se42 .-V� A»iV'V'ga✓S i v199efL��e� 7>�p�vt .

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
®.Division of Water Quality
0 Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of MVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 6 $
Facility Number Z 1 Time of Inspection I- 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E] Registered la Certified © Applied for Permit [i Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:......,.
Faris; Name::. ...IS ..... 1, V- . r� . ,........................................... County:....f?...sl..Pact.U5.........................
.tA.l.ci..
Owner Name: ' ' ....,.......R..►..�.:.�...................�a�.r...v.L.�S......................................... Phone No:..�.q..l..a.}..�..�.i....^...Q..l..�........................
Facility Contact:.......................................................... .. Title:..................... ..... Phone No:
...........................................................................................................
Mailing Address:.....35i.51....... �.✓ 5.......C..",10.4.5.....�.:................ ....L .�^^. 4 x.. .. .r.. ..�.1........... .. .... .. .
Onsite Representative:....[ �.1...C.........p, Y.S.. g ......... - ✓L c
................. ......... Integrator: �. �.a. .5..................�.
Certified Operator:................................................................................. ......... Operator Certification Number;,,.. c V 1 �.r..._.........
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 4 44 Longitude ` ' 0"
&� -�
Destgu Currency 4 i}estgn Current :� Design Current
•
a„
,Swutte , - Capacity Papuilation „Poultry _ "", i apacrty ^Population Cattle , Capaci#y ,Population=
to Feeder
❑ Layer ❑ DairyFeeder
fE03Wean
to Finish
�c ' ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Weanmn
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
[IFarrow to Finish
Total DestgnCapacity S
❑ Gitts
❑ Boars
{
Total- SSLW
�NuFmlter ©f Lagoons /.Holdutg Ponds.
❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area ID Spray Feld Area
. .
W'
O No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c_ If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsfholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
f. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: — O
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes []No
Structures (Lagoons,floldini Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft.):.................................... .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..................... .......................... ...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No'violationsor deftde'6es.were noted -during this:visit.- Yo"114ill i__eceive-no-furtlier•
Ofrespondei t aliout -this'.visit'.-.'-'
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
' z fse -•.. -r - - - ri t a „-�.. .. ,�. ..,z,is ,..c c° -- 's 3 N 4v+E mkt 9'w ,. -. f
Comtttts (refer>to question #) �E:cplain any YES a�wers andlor any recomme�nd�ttons or�any other camenents. ��'
�
Use�drawings�of facthtyi`to better explaur situations fuse additional.pages�as'rieces5ary�• � ���_T � �:• 'r�� ��„ ins
kA4k. re-V 10vS PV J Q ulSft 1A-QaC✓L wat I Leo
- C15r-4-'e-c�y��'0.I`•
.S
Cep r J`�vLt Qir� S i 4 w r,:_v CL, 0 D c` Vtj
L G ti0 V v-2 tr 1 e 1' 0 i Y� 0. rd V v. d_ -s 6 r , d✓t � � tl �'in S E J
e IL 2, vies) b v k 0 J t V-k [ I +LA " � l o a kja
r..q Q 60
U `J
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name € _ y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q
V