240106_INSPECTIONS_20171231

�.d•
NORTH CAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh.mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered (:1 Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ........ ..... _......... _....._......
......_......._.
Farm Name-.j �✓ ,r. .._ County.
Land Owner Name:...gas.�c.z Q gym.. _ ... �.... .... _ ....._ .._
Facility Conctact:
Title:
Phone No:.LO. 91....E .!... �_.7 .
Phone No:
Mailing Address:7..�_�. ..� ..
Onsite Representative:...., �c..�..t:►rsaXYk i.... Integrator: .1~'1. r..�
Certified Operator: _.... w........... O erator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude C ' , �K Longitude EM ®�«
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
b MNE5igli'Carrent
SwinePauE
Wean to Feeder
' M. •` F># - �i y D4J�gn yam. a CYrrent r "� k �'} ,�L.ligY £ "- C 41 { 1Lllt
_Cattle- -:,
Ca aci 1'ii illation . �v ,M., Ca aci Po ulatiaiiI Ca aci t Po elation
5200 ❑ Laver ❑ D
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer M ❑ Non -Dairy
r Farrow to Wean;
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
w�
❑ Other
y . H_
K291
Total Design Capactty S`,Zo�
r � '
>, , r
.
HTota1,S�SLW 1 _
H `
Number f L g ons! H deng Pands ❑Subsurface Drains Present
3 A
` ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
-
Genera
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes JR No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
J9 No
❑ Yes
12 No
N JA
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
(8 No
® Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

F&4,lty Number: ..Zti. —..1.Q !a._
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes gNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? Yes gNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ®No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes RNo
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.... ......_».... ..... _................ .................. ».. .................... ...... _.......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes &No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 10 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Wastf, Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For C-erdfled Facilities Only
22, Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes RL No
❑ Yes [9[ No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes fia No
JEJ Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes fid No
❑ Yes ['No
❑ Yes JK No
❑ Yes JR No
Comments,{refer to `questton°#� Ezplam°any YE$ answers andlor�any recommendations br any other comments :,
Luse drawings of facihty toklietterexplain�situatians (use additional pagess necessary) .; - .-
, .,.
5 .' 14. 1 v- ,r ,1 1, l- i t) S �{ S E -- --% w i I 1 b C i r, s f a I t t,q( ' � t L.- e, w le-y� { e�
4
Yv,Ow t'kr . 1
t 2• t: v e q tL a %� v� ,...�,1 bra .r a o a Le ti-g Lam-¢ l 0 01,,_ w u! i p
I W o y o h w >� b l e vv% i i ,ti �Q e-,r w, V CLCL .
ffr
q �`4llpW Up Vide W, 11 p c.G-uv- a�
S� S f �-,•� I X &4
k« 1 l& o -% of e" lo o xb
Reviewer/Inspector Name BMW � .:: �*; � W:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 Date:
cc: Division of Water Ouality. Water Oualitv Section. Facilitv Assessment Un 4/10/97