240078_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Type of Visit Jj Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Soi-ne O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notffication 00ther ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 2 Date of Visit: O Tune:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
fig Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified CJ Registered Da ast Opera or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ...Crl(r.�' .......6�!C�Z.J�i. �t1!`15�Tounty: �„L
Owner Name: ........... . ......... Row �t�1Q Phone No:
Mailing Address :................._._....... ----•--...................I
Facility Contact: .. _. ._....... _.._ .._ ......._ . _...._ Title:...... .......................... Phone No: ........... .
Onsite Representative:.�J C` �D[c�lfil -r .. . Integrator: M
Certified Operator: ........... ......................... ......... .. --..... .......... ............. .......... ................ Operator Certification
Location of Farm:
2rSwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 « Longitude • ' 46
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
WOO
p p
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
_
❑ Boars
�❑ Non -Layer
N
Nezmber of Lagcwris
?.s fir_ s �•: s "
DischaEges Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If -discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 S cture 3 Structure 4 S tu ce 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......�! �............ 1"Q...� . .._.._._...................L:..-....--�.................... ......._�..... .--........ ............. ........ .....
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

e
1
- aci i Number: 2 — 7 9 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes gNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ONo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes'VNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancerimprovement? ❑ Yes m No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes 21 No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes gNo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type �,¢J, /ef/yf
13. Do the receiving crops differ wA those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes )'No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes 'ONo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ZNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes „f NN0
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes $ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes (�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
max.._, �. � �.,
=Comments (refer. to gttestton} F.xplaua a�uy YFs arlSwelrS a�ndlor<any r�camuen�datious ar any atheir atmrnentg.
;Udrawings of facilit
se y to better 6xn tuI Awstiik I dxb 'Qdipages as necessary ) ' py ❑ F tea
❑ o l Notes
T a Fte1d C
a
Ah�k P4,,j Z,_cfk k,? i4l')1�5 Ar 1 e W,
15 A)fl) DEN �� s &44AM-'_1)
1 4000 LIQG.00/J L V'61_5
Z, 9 r4—c GS,
'
T
^np.�...`s��
Reviewedlaspector Name - "a ;� } II�
Reviewerflnspector Signature. Date:
12112103 v r Continued

a
-Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Document~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
{iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes [ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
ONo
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
P No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
O No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
PrNo
NIPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
ONo
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Cl Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
/5 / 103,
Dd
jo
-
u�nJ AF 4G
D
5.r-r�d#
jai
�,D C roP M 012F
12112103

Type of Visit .116 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up E<Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Q 3 Time: I h9
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted ©Certified © Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �S h4 �gV i�•� f'S J L L C' County: b 01
Owner Name: t!5 ��`� r• S) L t Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
'Pee Vl�j9 i�S, per! W1nss`�w�un�
Onsite Representative: ✓ J—
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator• M v
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 4 " Longitude ' 6
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ILI Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
NumWr'of Lagoons ' 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds,"! Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway es ElNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: SO w
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Zef — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? -
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
,
El No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? f
❑ Yes
❑ No
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
.' ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
T� , S i +�.5 pe L-� i v h W4tS Gi O r1e t h C�rl� v o W i-}t. Dc. �v A 0(ct" 640
6~( S0;1 -�W r Cav,►sPrV'c;c-��'dn - o evgf�va ie -��ie ,s���� vial i�f 9�f�/
etr Ae ] eL opN . Al "^NC t ..Aa 4e � /'�' �� ��peCt rr S�Gt>�. %►�f r . H irS
gs s-1� �`Ieo( �'�t�;►.,� �i Zvi -Fo Fot �-v 771 c hear mAAjo" ,
V^pi� reS5 11
Q �'1Q[ ti �.� eS th ,S�-f I -� : Oki ,f'�' o q td be con-f,%tvcz /l y Gor,7n11lytfG�T�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: ! O
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: 2q — 9 B
81/1a3
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
2$. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments. and/or Drawings:.:
v�-FBI s�-i ��+.�ta�► i5 resolved. -roe pv•A19 .b havl 6-4ror--ls qre
apP�'�C�aked.
O5103101

td'sRt,)©o�
u
s�i C --- T
C
f`f\ S A ^� 6A)
1 'yAn
EE
quo -

"- =- s � : � (� Drvisioa of Soil and Water Conservation - --�- - - =
Type of Visit Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Otheerr ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Time- 4f�- =
�/ Not Operational Below Threshold
FJ Permitted [3 Certified [3Conditio ally Certified © Registered Date Last Operat r Above Threshold:
/Farm Name: — _ �l'f +� �>� County ✓`
Owner Name:
Mailing Address: _
Facility Contact: _
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Location of Farm:
VSwine ❑ Poultry
Swine .
Phone No:
No:
05 _��yC€r.S�GP/J'Tntegrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Cattle
❑ Horse Latitude 0'
0 0
Longitude
Design
Current _
Design- _ ,_'Current
_Des�gm _ Cbrrettt
"Ca aci&
. Po elation W ,;Poultry _'
�Capacrty Population
Cattle ..
__Capacity population .-
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
arrow to Feeder
000
2,000
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boats
Number of Lagoons JEJ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEJ 5 rav Field Area
~.Holding Ponds i So6d T 10 No Liquid Waste Management System l
Dischare` & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes /No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

1'qVW I !+,
Facility Number: —MI Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes El No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reouired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
9No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer tii:questian #) ' E:plain:any YES snswrers andfai".any recotameQdattans or any'other;comriEeitts.
Use irawings of facitlit_06 better explain situa#totis; (ase addrtiottal pages°as necessary) { Field Gonv - _ ;❑ ❑ Final Notes
n�S4—
PECK— of °^J6_ �G9�tSE- G%inPL,�zv�
���/��� rf�/✓1rn'7a<�O // D L.Drt1G- n%Cf/ .
` .�n%S�FCT�a� �di✓l��lCr�lJ ,��N: GyI�G' 'av���a,J
4c+V-1
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2 Q
05103101 Continued

Facility Number. Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drill during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le_ broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged f 11 pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional 'Comments;and/or-Drawin
❑ Yes ❑ No
[] Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2 L ,
'0 roo�14 n/o
5 L �n1 ! �'y,15�/z `o / /Sic✓ G,gGav n1„
NP72!55
��C�✓G GFi��
Z4� �n1WCC � i✓ /`f OOA T
�7o �oS 91vor���s
O5103101

Type of Visit JO Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Bate of
Visit: 0 Time:
10�
i�ot O erational Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified
13 Conditionally Certified E3Registered Date Last Operat
or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 1,�,�
County: _,o
L t c m 8 cr s
Owner Name:
Phone Na:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: FT
�)
InAP
tegrator:
'9GJn)-So I S
-Q��R
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
0Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' u Longitude 0• •
Design Current >- Design Current _ - Des Current
Swine Ca a¢itri :Po ulation . _ `Poultry Ca acrtm Po ulatioa . =Cattle` , _ : Ca acity:-. Pe ubthort ; ,H
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ; ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish [] Non -Layer ❑ Non-DairyrY,
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design; -Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars T6W SSL. . ,a _
:.Number of. Lagoons. - ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 S rav Field Area
Holding Ponds f Solitl:Traps �' L ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -
Discharges & Stream impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection S- Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
St�ct� I Smi� re 2 ,structure 3 Structure 4 Stru ture 5
Identifier. I0 t`+01;
Freeboard (inches): 5 2. i -
0510310I
❑ Yes ❑ ATo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the Iand application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or. Drawings:
C P V LkC-(6D ��GALk6 C- OF KU- k �F-CEi5 V E.DZ Ct4 Fs-rM O
no 112-jo3,
No e LCAR EJT.P[-:00E of Arj� � Sc �Rc- o�, F:j�Rrv, ,
b�-rE,D l RiNT
P-r(OQRr\NTV� 0$\O C��P7uR a LLE
I LOD GAL, fls-r� POO D E� O
(o RuK\?F-,DDL,-cDF
�RoviIJD 47�e -r,4p,r
�D R T �f �pQ�}r� z (2vcrt�l7 E �P
Cu ER-r r R r�?�5p
CD 0zTCr4 �bETctD Et�-- 1,D t� C , A W -7 1
E F0
CAr�a�.
00,k An-rdwec'5 Ar
�v� L NQ .WA-74< �EPk��,E n1 ? T� i/ '!av -
GC/i$�j iT�ZCIC �GlvS �G L
Im,5
05103101

Fj"
Date of Inspection S 4$
Facility Number ?
Time of Inspection D=DO 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13Registered M Certified 0 Applied for Permit [APernutted IDNot2zrational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: (j�� y. ... ?. ..vlb,Ym ... County:....... ......................................................
Owner Name: ............Laia..&xtl..........................s'x1 .QAI,yt: t.......... Phone No: °ILA.. 7i'[�? ......................
Facility Contact • Title: ......... Phone No:.. ....................................................
MailingAddress:jw... J.0.ft&........... s!..................................................... ............. ...... �L.I........t ..........._ ...............:.. ...Z: .......
Onsite Representative:...... + ` u .............. ........... Integrator: ....,.&_pt:?.t1A...........................................................
Certified Operator;....I✓D:�Jr,2........... Q.,,....... Operator Certification Number:....iA�15..A..............
Location of Farm:.
l�.sr.r ....tu+l7c�rtte ....�en.....ea�s�....�i .tr i
1....ta.....................1'......+�.�.1t��C.,........ ..................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude' �
'-.Design :.Current
iwtne �:, Capacity.'Potiulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
of I ag©ons /Holding Ponds ] 5 [ IKSubsurface Drains Present
❑ No Liquid Waste Managen
Design 1: ,Current
Non-Dairy
apacityM
a-0
ss W
o-t
�00
pray Field Area
Lagoon Area
System
�.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what�is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No.
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑'Yes ❑ No .
7/25/97 Continued on b\

1
Facility Number: -L4 — -7
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
El Yes
[I No
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
XYes
❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Strucrture 5
Structure
6
Identifier: Ok.J................. ...........I...N.IK5.................... N.Q'%......---..........3....�fui:�
`T �.v.,
.............................
Freeboard (ft): ........... .:3................. ............. 12.......... ...... ............... :............. :{P.GP........
.................
�'9
........................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
C9 Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ...............6 .011A.VA ........................... Il. li�A�x�..-......................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
f Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted_ Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0. No'violitions-or. deficiencies. were noted during this;visit: Yoa:will receive. Qo:further : ;
correspondence aihotit,this;visit:
ktLgc ��vPelc,C14 Arc.x". t-k"Yot. LLW ISS6 d b c IOWe► V t h CA_
IS. Srv+o,.(« o�i'oy;+� S�na.a U ibe It�ef1 'rr}+r'0•� S�+�j �c`p�. �4.Yw�Uc1G Srtov�� �e f m�YD�+YO 'la �e.�
Z-z. Wee Gy-k6 (�,veiS SkoJ�r1 �e reto�et� (LL wlk& 11 �s
Mr�r�ao.,5�� l.cu1Q cY51°V a� ea-r�ISOVd Sl�pil)il vie-rhoaaed- `u vim WtitiS or-�.�ll k-w
V 7/25/97

-a. �;:A4...�„.„,. .. r m.. .. m-'- „7a gym:-.a:.,,.V ,.,- ..,.a:r...; ••a�" • :_zrAw.. ,' ,,,,.....2�. ^x a'v �''S _ «s.
r __k ❑Division of Soil and 14 ater Conservation ❑Other Agenc` yF�
,,� � � �:�❑ Division of Water Quality
���'�' nab:: �.�':�,,:.,—.:.yas..,,,•,x <::.,.,,�-.::F,-:�-;:--,..q,,...� �.-.�,�^m. :�'x�•- .;� � �
x
Routine O Complaint @ Folio«-uo of I)WO inspection O Follow-uo of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection i r 310
Facility Number :.L -1
Time of Inspection 13: u 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ® Certifie Applied for Permit Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ....... ...... ............IkE� .-..-..-...... . ran tr-.................. County:......c'i.o aka...................................� �'&........
Owner Tame:..... 1G.�.�l.G�t �....:�531. r F i"a................................................... Phone No:.�%(Z..L�'sR.�...7`��r............. •.............
Facility Contact:..... Rc#.ti._....(1qwi.................................... Title: ..... 9+A. y........................................... Phone No: f °!.1��.�t` Z.' !S�C�_....----
Mailing Address:.....`. LI....... kgu<........ S4................................................................... ... IkAftl !� I11c t.�V r........................ Ztr47Z ....
��. 1- k '
Onsite Representative:.._. ...... �!�•.1�...._......._......._........................................ Integrator: z.x_...................... ................ ................ ....
Certified Operator..........., .c............P......... uu..-----....------------------------- Operator Certification Number,...�j f�.�.(... ......
Location of Farm:
. ;rrr .WF ::.....r......_..t. .......14s: �dec S.U451 ...... ,,.s .... ...1 � .....fir..—_Sck. siaC....... ILOZ..- -r..... . +
9 ._......�iCr'_ .... rri� .... �' : .,t!�s.t S._...e�!^s .... t:x^...0 !.' ...a... F?xY�.x.S.....%?.:......7�'l� k Y
Latitude t l l• I 9 6 0 " Longitude ®• ®4 ®t'
DesLgnCUrreretI)eS1gI1 Current
Swmeg @apacrtyPopuiatian Poultry �T Capac>ty�Poulat�on Catile� h xCapacityf Population
❑ Wean to Feeder U ❑ Layer ry ❑ Dairy
[IFeeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I RIE] Non Dairy
ipFarrow to Wean +-��.Q�^v�• �+.x'?R.. '�P.e. s_"' .,--�'rx AM
OtherFarrow to Feeder os �m.: v
❑Farrow to Finish Ni21
, > ��TOtaI<Desxgn�Capacty t?c
ff Gilts
❑Boar$^ M Otal z"4 t Q1�l� QGC r?
NEimber of Lagoons 1Holduig Ponds ® ® Subsurface Drains Present 1150 Lagoon Area Spray Feld Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Ianagement System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon W Spray Field []Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the convevance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify, DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated low in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than laaoonstholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197 _
❑ Yes
❑ No
i2 Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
R3 Yes
❑ No
pAI• !'111�. !/ttiin.
❑ Yes
53 No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued
an back

Facility Number- yq — -)I
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (L.woons.Ilolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: �t..... k,hr......... .............
Freeboard (ft)= .. . .................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ❑ No
IXI Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
12, Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .....--.......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
I7. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack -of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
13- No.violitions-or deficiencies. ' we're- noted- during th_ is:visit-_ You 4in receive IIfo-iziher :
:. corre*)fideitce about �this:visit" : .. : .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes (it No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�Com�tts�(refer,,t0 gttestio#)�E�xpldlYi `a�yYES answ aROr'a�y�flYt1m p tltBIly�O�.IieriCtJJIDiYteiifS.x ;,
�
U��i�gsofa�cr6ty to be#te��pla �se��(> a�ddihnI�age��r,�'�
2-k)askpp uk:s T SGtt�rriKr� Sccis s�. �� Z6. rt~ff ofcr,.�rrc� err+. j;iCG�+rovrgd A+- Z
. ``;,,
fo -L i,eO [� �k1%• fv. S`0,4T_� s}CU AS a 61ve hr" i�(�tfan,t� �`1tlrSj a� 4�.� �ptFG%. AVisd OcJ�u1�
r5
�� S 1'b�•
1--agao,\ kRs i"Sufficze4 frctrtr�. �, aon Le"'( SLA Le -too") {� !9" �e� ,N C_ rGS0:15a
t''112. C%�lositti AXfo.i on �a�Ocr 6vt bten. rr-P,,:.rad. .
7/25/97
. E
Reviewer/Inspector Name € ` M"',,
=1��" : ,; ; .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:- - --' - - - -- hate: 1/13�gg
"�T

[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
MDivision of Water Quality
[ORoutine OComplaint 10,Follow-up 'of MVQ ins p ection 0 Follow-up of BMW review 00ther
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Z
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Registered Certified 10 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
-.&S4i
Farm Name:4
4. ........................ County:- . C................................ ..# .. ...... .
OwnerName: ...... W. �. �A kA ............................ .............................................. Phone ...................................
Facility Contact: ... yf-j.-t jr.................................. Title: .......... 2S,41 .......... ........................... Phone No: -Isyk .........
gJkU�...Mailn'.......... At�................................................................ ....................
Onsite Representative::..... . . . ........ ... 16: sx-j ................... Integrator: Inw.-o"s .............................. . ..... . ................ . ..
Certified ....... ........ . ........ .............. . ............ Operator Certification Number:._ A15.,L ...... . ..............
Location of Farm:
. ..... ...... SF ic ....... Scutt. sajr—� ... Fpaiw ...... 1-,-& ...........
&.4 . . ..... ... ........ . . ..... . ...... . ....... . ..... . ......
Latitude 0 =1 00 46 Longitude 0 4 44
=5wme wo PUL
�Oz M, 3
D jgn'x CurrentsDe V-p--gh C �gkvm
NONE
.�_CaPa y
❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Z10 M Non -Dairy
0 Wean to Feeder
[I Feeder to Finish
-1-11
91'.1. �w
[] Other
I
0 Farrow to Wean
[A Farrow to Feeder
N
Q U�":"'T tA poo
El Farrow to Finish
0-K]
Gilts
❑ Boars,
M
Number ,.of,Ei'901CM.: 411614mg --P Ponds
--,- " zp
Subsurface Drains Presej[jrLagoon Area JIR Spray Field Area
Present
V,:
El No Liquid Waste Management System
A.,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of.the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon . [I Spray Field [I Other
M M
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in -at/min?
-d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon system! (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovenient?
6. Is facility not incompliancewith any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility -fail to have a certified-operatorin-responsible-charge-?------�- -
.7/25/97--.
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
D Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
El Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
P Yes El No
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes [I No
Continued on back

Facility Number: bA—
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site vvhich need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes - ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons,Ilolding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? CE Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: iL. 5QL,2....... 1... [!%t.!('s... Z `!�li.. .4 ...x'�L'aC.`•:........... `5.......Al,drt3s ..
tt.... __............. :.............
Freeboard(ft):......................`a...........`A.......... ................... I .............. ........... 0:.�............... ................... -... ..........
..
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? [I Yes [I No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .................... ......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
I8. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Perpr tted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0- No.violitioits•or deficiencie's.were-itated-during this;visit. You.4ill iecei*ve•na-ft rther-:-
:: correspondence EiVoiit .this. visit:• ; - : - ; ;
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
tsomatet�a refer to aestton #) ,>Irxplatn agy�YES,answers-and/or amy�rerommendaf�orts orany #her +co
p$�U� s�ep�dra�viiugs of f ctlrtyt�i be#ter-expiate sit. ahons �� s�addtaonal p g s he�s�sa�}�y,�` - §, "" � --
t1'.�.�����'?�.�,-�"s'_
S 6ex S�Culj toe mcve3 CVrk,4— Prnti— ac+:[� �~l�V�... At t�1. il^��ac 4,
4`G f &4 + ` `� ne O� )cayl G 1ati .
9. I�1 t l a ecvs s �►a�ve : v, s � e(��.r� cyJ
-+`n.tyy%A:�nr--r-
LI) 0, or -�b C, ,r,rl
-- . 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name . =fZA
Revi wer/Inspector Signature: - --" — - Date. �{ —

tNtl1 !! CA R0,I111.A. I�Z NO ���_��� *1u�t
. ,r..—t3. 199�! 1: ,'6AM TASK FORCE FPB P.GL ._ - — N0. 393 P . 41
'- `r_�� r.:: ti 1:'}?grti:'ti•� :.,1r fSkiL4i- r:-: s. i
•QDSWG;An oral Fiiid_lat_O uyelation Rev_ i_e*'
;�rt:"` �+ "''�'' r 'F`s. f.rMyY�17T sIISi•'`,y v �'4s •7+,._• K.-,'; � - 41 avi, r'r "" r' rl+k rn e'� �.,:�i�� �.
• }r._i ,r.l I��',� wY.��'i .r� r��;.,,r;,+F'�Ca' '1 .-;�. I � ••;M•= � a`*n n». J'.': .�",�
'�'��'r4���,�lF;.��"•'s '? � ��'Q'Anuual Feedlot' Op�ratf�ti Sffe.Tnspec#ian_.,r�Kf"�..�L �•r'»:, �tr,t `• '
.t r• h.i. tier. �C; r r♦ r«. .� ,ib, srl:Ur v.r•Ip L9 �. y.. ii ��,;j,',:'
M`r��iiry. �' .^� .'�'3 S' ^1 :r"'t•:l ris4:.�:` '� .'(: ,Y l�1; �"'a.'A",:•,Y;;�i �{;r.nr`�.,. t..� .•�,;-r �r. ,��. r�-_.'�•+'.a 4:'
0 Routine jgCompkint 0 Follow-un aP Dw i cctian O Fallow -up of l)SWC rovietr 0 Other
Facility Number Bate of inspection
Time of Inspeetica o Use 24 h,:. time
Farm Status: --. Cs-Y-�4s3», Told Time (in hours) Spznt anRaviovt' Z�S
or Inspection (includes travel. and proceisin;)
F'armNaine: •�.L� �.�. .lr �� _- ».�.».�.»r»..... Conntv:� � •• ..»..»^... ._
Urvaer Nai :e: i #car : i-iygCt ; iL� _. �. _ Puna a a:.iJ.t� ',...�� .fie !.....�... _..wr.. �.
Mailing Address: -Lqri~►R�.._ .__ � .._ ,. ��'�v 1�.�`��srM ._ .,� R ��.. �. «» _.,.
OnsiteReprefentafive: ,��5 �:..�.»_:-- intcrratcr: l eta , . .. ts4_..�._�_
CerdtiedOperator;—R04U.— --_...-_.,.- „_ Operator UrtiEwiohNumber:��
L"atian of Farm:
Lat;inde 11M& ®a Longitude 15U • BE' LE"
dot Oscrst721
bate W.1 Overated:
r)pe of Operation sad Design Cgpatity
i1 i i� �.a '..:.r asz.� t:,V j�rn' ^+ir' +u,< - � .. , . ,
r C ".Sis4�.'•r. rC�� .�, a *i_ r:;� '*L''<xQati'r� 'F r:' :a �Ylr •:',,. .x .ti ql." �R:
a7 lnC r t 't r•,'w rl yT»� -+rt ..a a p:,ur.. ".-^'": .a. t.,, .a'•, , .7
{� t S Vy� �r�w► Fxr'KS S' `t,{....,,�r- i fir. i. !,Y���./.�'.•.}_I-,, 1�f .s.
`1 F h.4 .�!t'. \i: .�. ": F'tp'I�N�i1 L1II1b 'i'W7iN'. !a'irF•�.r�7f •:t` :il:.'{M"7:' ll�.r•r ,.�`(�r�{.3ti+2-:•t:• :.XU6i ]oi
Dairy10
:lau-Laver I. , j� Berf
..r._.,,
y "•:.i�P Y ��1�•,f�7Y•'1:�y. Z4 1L%,,, i• •,:. ,, .A'� i,. :• it'y,,+:!:' YJ ,j;i r � , .. j F.y,�l+y!ytr •
t - ,�a'�';:0 t?tber T pe of livestock
t MS:S • ».t w! 'p%?w y,.i., ..+.;--��-f°:t•4'rIN F`. �.: r: "`,D,V� •rs�: �4
r'{� •" ':'..-.�`• •• °�,rin . 1� • tb:. i r
❑ WC3rt to Fe'e3er
M
Feeder to Finish
F w to w�
Farrow to F -
parrow ra 'nisi:
re�_nrral -
1. ,are tacre eLy bt:ffes tF.st need tt:aiateaaatcri.-nprove:s:eat7 [] •Yes (R :Ya
2. Is any discbags obsuved ftm Hay part of the op_ -.dog?
a. If discharge is observed, was the mawoyance than -made?
b. If discha A- is obSrrvcd, did it rea-,� Surface Water? (If y:s, aod.R• MVQ)
c. If a scbarge is oba ed, whet is the caimated flow In Gallmiu?
•d-Doei dscharge bypass a lagoon sysC_m? (if yes, ncti y DWQ)
_�. is rbcr. cvideace of p :st discharge aorn any pare opts' a operation?
4. ' 'a3 there aey : o� a�a ir:,paecs to the wgt�S of the State OfQer tbt:n ftrn s discharge?
5. Does any p;,rt of toe u7stc m�na,etreac system (other than lagoonslhotding pond;) require
Yes ❑ Na
(fit} Yes G No
� Yes [� Na
.k htl
[f Yes (Z Na
0
Yes 0 \e
(]Yes %Na
S! 4'cs 0 No

:'r1 BRoci, S iiF ,L.A_.i_I� i :'.k �iG. ?i�17y=,�� 1�
MAY Q. 1997'- •_11 a 47AM TASK FORCE FPS RGLWD
6. Iy rscuny rsoc la evmpitaace with say applicable setback Criteria?
J. Did the facility fail to have a eerrifed opmtor in respomble eharge (if iaspecdoa a`ter 111197)?
8. Are thca lagoons ar storage ponds oa site aticb need to be properly closed?
Structures sL s and/or Holds Peals
9. is strutttssl freeboard teas than ed�?
W y .
❑ Yes lti'o
Q Yes 50 No - .
❑ Yes A'a
{� Yts l No
Freeboard (h): Lagoon 1 Lagaoal 2 Lzaooa 3 Lgooa 4
10. -Is seepage observed from any aftbe stnieam? ❑ Yes OR No
11. Is erosfon, 'or any other threats to the integrity of aby of the structures observed? Yes L7 No
12. Do auy of the strucraw aeedrnainttaaaee/iatgrovcratat? my ❑ No
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Emmediate publie health or a vironraental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the =:�mes lzek adquate =leers to idea* start aid stop putnpin; levels? ❑ yes W No
jVgste,kp llcatien
14, Is &art physical tvtd=ce of over applkaciaa? ❑ Yes 19 No
(If in excess of *12, or nmofff entering v atn of the State. notify DWQ)
is. Crop type lgmtea
16. Do the active claps differ with those designmd isr too Apt l Wasm Maaagem= Plzz? � Yes ❑ \'a
17. Does the facility have a lack of x1eq>ite gauge for laud ap'PIfcadoa?, [' Yes 13No
I S_ Dues the cover a:np need improvesdMe Yes ❑ No
19. Is there a lack of mCable it igadan egraipmeW? - ❑ Yes ® ro
For ertii d FaelZltics On
20. Does the fatiU7 fail to h%ve a copy of tbA Aninmi Waste Maaagem=*t Plan ttzd7y a-mrabM 52 Yes M No
21. Does tha fa:3 to comply with the Aaizr l W=e Mau'n=Cat PIM in auy way. _ - ® Yes ❑ No
2? Dote retard kupiag need kq=vtm>=0 Yes ❑ No
23. Does facIty require a fatow-up visit by same agency? Yam"+❑ No
24. Did Raview5lIuspector iai tv discuss reviiwil tspt4m with owner or opemiur is charge'! © Yes No
����**a}}�.. .'!!. �ww1.4'J 1f ..�.. �1 h. �LLj�.�}�� ... �,��1�—�I�{r�• �y� ji��
Xili/.LL:uS++crLfl Vi riT'Y �1•, e IN iL�iY^'T"
;� sv"gs.o ziv'to etses 1 st vseaccW_ jrj::?
2. A W{s_v,,r ,, c nm-wA e, ty `ibu 1&-ya. -ra WE3110 Ind ,A% r- ,Wc It" r its "T ' 9 4
'JeVe k
6, t�rcc�ar�fi^S Oil a trriyp on Pipe; crest Jl 4tivs �a,� 6e �l 44- p�- AP% armtor. t�mrtrl(
was ob-.erv@ al�,y '�a will ;an ���in' �l o.'E s �� be is !"e5ea d- 6�k�•� Lq�
tt./M Ewo's g ft s o eh tnlur•�4��, Cv( 1e eon >ut!!a sHcuf�ke � ruse • l.oW Jreas a4' {' 1
` ►ter �slwelt/ toe 1 a,.� +� &OW. V ¢ja k an 4301, waft sha;id ba rnbu�•
4&CcL-.1�j 6er►nuza1 Go^0 U4% I1N ;r►3 c�1En.
� AO• �" tri dl I+� S► k 1�lanyctw►� l iO�V� aVa.A+ tt�L
J;sc6&cj;, 1) 1t45 =6% a4'
�n•-o �f'It } i {tad• - .
8
ReviewerAnspettor Nagle
Reviwer/iuspectar Slgaaturt: �3sra. Q7
�f

IO Routine ® Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspectio
-'F iciti I i h� Number 24 78�µH��
Farm Status: Registered Applied for Permit
Certified ] Permitted
© Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Follow-ue of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection 418197
Time of Inspection 12:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 2.S
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name:N:W.ktaggir�5.-.#Z7..7...................... ..: count}: al.u>7ttlau......................................... W..�.�.........
OwnerName: WiHard................................... H aggins...................................................... Phone No: 9.10 fi.55.Gfi8.1...........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: .................................................................. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: I40.11iumcs.st....................................................................................... ..W1cyAkN.C....................................................... Z84.7.2,.............
Onsite Representative: Rod:cclu.nc................................................................................... Integrator: ...........................................
Certified Operator: Ra,,krc.)P:................................ junr ................................................... Operator Certification Number: 169,5.1_........
Location of Farm: _
T.aloe.Slt..I3S�.sQ.ukl>1.aut.af.Cc:r.Kc�..�c�rslo...Aix.izikcrs�:�:tiatl..exitt3a.�.4.1.5. txtx>U.Lft,.�a.�.4Q.�.ds...an�.xurst.rai.:hk.u�n. cli.t:t.xaa�d...�a.a
Latitude 34 ° 1 IC J, F 00 =1 Longitude 78 • 556 F-5-0716
Number i f La�c►crns 1 H ldme Pontls`E 5 1 I® Subsurface Drains Present JI® Lagoon Area IN Spray Field Area ..a
General
1. Are there anv buffers that Aced Itla3[llenal]CehmprClVCnlCnt? ❑ Yes CR No
2. Is any discharge observed from an} Dart of the operation? Yes E No
Discharge originated at: [j Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ t.)ther
a. If discharge is observod, was the conveyance man-made'? j I Yes © No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes; notify DWQ) ® Yes © No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated floxv in gal/min? 0.1 gal./min. -
d. Does discharge bypass -a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? E] Yes 0 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the \vaste management s1_�'40111 (othor than lagoons/holding lxmds) require Yes Q No
nnainte3iance/improvemont'?
4/30197

Facilitv Number: 24-78
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect itthe time of design'?
7. Did the facility tail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structure (ULoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus stone storage) less than adequaic'?
Freeboard (if): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure Structure 4
................L7..............................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is crosioh, or any other threats to the integrity of any or the stnuctures observed?
12. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/itnproveutent'?
(If any of questions 9-12 leas answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the strictures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid levci starkers?
Waste Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMI', or runoff entering. waters of the State, notify DWL)
15. Crop tyke 'QkMIL1.T�� zlti Itt.(Ww-........�nzall,.Qraia.(.1�'lzeat� 3.arls:r......................................................
Milo, Oats)
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Anunal Waste Masagentent flan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'? - '
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
21. Did Reviewer/Iaspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan -readily available'?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No ,
Stntcture 5
Structure 6
❑ Yes
CK No
N Yes
E] No
N Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
0 No
0 Yes
N No
............................................................
N Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
N No
® Yes []No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes 0 No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes 0 No
® Yes 0 No
N Yes Q No
2. A subsurface drainage pipe from the lagoon area was observed discharging into a blue line ditch. Water quality Samples were taken. �
5.Discharging pipe should be removed. ln•igation pipes crossing ditches Should be double -piped. An erosion channel was observed
along the irrigation piping that should be tilled in and reseeded.
1 L/12. Erosion and bare spots on inner and outer lagoon walls should be tilled and reseeded. Low areas around the entry pipes to the
lagoon should be filled and reseeded. Vegetation on lagoon wall should be snowed.
18. Coastal bernnuda crop needs Improvement.
16./20. Animal Waste Management Plan was not available at time of inspection:
21. Facility was discharging into waters of the State. Improper disposal of medical waste and animal mortalities.
22.Spray records were not available at time Cif the inspection.
Reviewer/inspector Name. ,AntlM C l [e tnm cr 13r�;tn i "4V�renn
Re-0mverlinspector Signature: Date:

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT + 1
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: C�� 9
Farm Name/Owner: H U ja j tj'S Y
Mailing Address:
t� 1t County: Co
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
Phone:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' " Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
• Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or. No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: WbT j-020 g D Vn A q 1 Nb 1 (i �A�L
Inspector Marrie Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
41
Use Attachments if Needed.