240077_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA J
Department of Environmental qua

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency`
�] Division of Water Quality � �`
M 45
O Routine Q
Coni laint
O Follow-up of DIVQ inspection
O Follow-up of DSWC revkc%, O Other
Date of Inspection
IZ__cl
Facility Number 7
Time of Inspection
1 st70 24 hr. (hh:mm)
W Registered
© Certified
© Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
0 Not O erational
Date Last Operated: .,,,,,
Farm Narne:
�7 nh
rj
wQr aW�
11�...........�.......... t�!4..
CountvbIG1►�iv,S
OwnerName:...
it
........................................................................................................................
Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .................................. ............................................ Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address:
I
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................ ... Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator................................................................................. Operator Certification Number.......................................... ...............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • =C =11 Longitude • K G{
v Design,
Current Design Current;' Design :Current
Swine Capacity
Population ; Poultry-.- M Capacity'Populatip Cattle `Y.. Capacity Population �
❑ Layer m ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ` ❑ Non -Dairy {
s,
y 'bk
❑ Otherz a
Dd
Total Design Capataty
,Total SSLW
n.
':n Area
Number of Lagoons f Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoo ❑ Spray Field Area
-
c
No id Waste Dian ent em
w ❑ Liquid Management System
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
� ❑Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
ZSO
❑Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance improvement?
El Yes
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes
❑ No
Discharge ari-ittated at: [I Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑Yes
❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in --al/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? ([f yes. notify DV4'Q)
El Yes
❑ No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
� Yes
❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
El Yes
❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than laQoonslholding ponds) require
0 Yes
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑Yes
❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑Yes.
❑ No
7125197
Continued an back

Facility Number: Z —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ;a No
Structure L tructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure. 5 Structure 6
Identifier: eS} �O j� a
......................... ..................:� 5...........................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): .................................... ................... z-
...... ............ ..............................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
.11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
JR No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0-No.vitilations-vr deficiencies.were-ittited-duritig this:visiC: You.vvill receive•n' 6Airiliei
correspondence ahoiit this`visit:• : • :. , .
Re_GeideC\ fetb(� OF CWefirtloW-f�'vrv+ knOU� -OusIA >GtYtk, CSuer V'11o+J CeUse� y
by (( v, c&a " ; c_ &A ve-C.y de v,,, A iv . 1M r_ c.L Gy, i s r- s,.6ld Ion
1f�G1Q Si�yt�d 1 O r fe je ► -k- V2e_f�ej OCcu r rain c� pf ji :c�S rer"-tdvtc� FYw�^
b14,C_i«Ses i 5; , �q. s•
See dla{I'am,
�1 7/25197
Reviewer/Inspect—or Name t `'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

-71
Fadlity Number: 2V— 77 ]:late of Insptction 1 - 'S
Additional Corn�mebts and/orDrawengsc
CL S�
�f O1
r•
t
lue s E 1 dog 701
LI C*A .
ti
r
r• 0.i�cr+� F�e-lo�
— H��L
- TQM�tx�ry
Darn !
��rrr+gf was �Ut'"`QinC �o►Y►vn�-� wa+e� �b %�•
�
.J
b M e- Pm S /47 z. � � I
�YY► idl ���, I -a,, ��scoled sg �; a �i�A
VDIUMe �S�,yr.atL G �e�O05a�io�5. Ct-t�ti ve��
7/25/97

Facility Number: Zz f — 77 Date, of Inspection
� j u f �► `Ca � ks � � s� i n� P
lea ev;�crcZ o� o� sc►c,-Se-:se c�car� �k�-
1�50.J vs �A�V1 � 1 1 Delt
Ass, - U-,•t ��' �- �-? ac, riw+ .
Vol wyke- �lsc Y�e� e s�+ ►ti.� e 2�i��� � �s is ss
i c, w ks d & Ve r 7 ` L-- a ► OV rs ftw 30 ; v►u -�cs
4-5- puy"p. .
7/25/97

envirochem
CONSULTING
CHEMISTS
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE:
SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037 [phone] (Office)
6602 Windmill Way
Wrightsville Beach, [phone] (Lab)
Wilmington,
North Carolina 28480 [phone] (Fax)
North Carolina 28405
NCDEHNR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94, DL.S CERTIFICATE #37729
Customer
Date Sampled:
12/05/97
Sampled By:
Steve West
Report To:
Steve West
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
NCDEHNR-DWQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Date of Report:
Purchase Order #:
Report Number:
December 10, 1997
7-3559
PARAMETER
Har wi Ditch Up
Hardwick Ditch town
# 9333
Fecal Coliform, colonies/100mi
Lab Accident
Lab Accident
Reviewed by and approved for release to the client.

F
ochem
Samnle I'vne! Tnflupnt_ Flflnpnt_ WAIL
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC
Cn11_ nthare
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
SAMPLE
IDENTIFICATION
COLLECTION
BOTTLE
ID
LAB
ID
PRESERVATION
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
DATE
TIME
NONE
E6S O
HNO
NaOH
TRIO
OTHER
,< <, Nw
�—
Maximum Holding Time Between Collection and Analysis: ROD 48 Hours, Coliform In Wastewater 6 Hours,
Collform In Drinking Water 3U Hours,
Transfer
Relinquished By:
Date/Time
Received By:
Date/Time
1._
2
l
` Received with Ice Water Chilled to MUM Yes No
Delivered BY: Q,�_ U Received By;
Comments:
Reje-clwd
��5 it me:

IQ Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
q�
Facility Number Date of inspection
Time of Inspection pip 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: 09 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:I..25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review Z.5
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: U lll .. i!�'" .. ..... ..... _..__..... .._ _ County: ,tr �15 _.. ....._ ... w..... .... _ .
Land Owner Name:.. s].:.:........... u3 .... ... ... Phone No: ...
Facility Conctact:..._._. i.:..W...Jr bli.....-.:........ _.. Title: ... ....... _...... ... Phone No:29
Mailing Address: ..... ..... ..........
._..i�4���,. �. ......_...�Z.. ...........
nn 11 J
-Onsite Representative:Integrator:... .....� .............. _ .
Certified Operator: �L. ,.hZi .... _.......... ..... . _........ Operator Certification Number:...__.............................._...
Location of Farm:
__ f ...... ka�.
-. .............. _...... -....... _._.... ._.... _._.............. -_..I ................... _....... ----- ------.._.....------- ---- ..._................ ........ -...... -._..... .... .... _....... I.. ................
a
Latitude � _.J0 4 " Longitude 0 4
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Design CWrrent Design Current Design ` �C�urrent
Swx Poul
ine Cattle „Ca aci ->Po ulahon P,o ulad�on �� Ca achy» Po -alat�on-=
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ layer s° ❑ D
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Da
Farrow to Wean Y
Farrow to Feeder Total Design,Capad
Farrow to Finish zs0 4 '
� r ,
F,...w . _ : Total SSLWLl
M ❑ Other
EAr4umbons! Holding Winds 3 ❑Subsurface Drains Present �� � ��� '; � y ' �- ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes &9 No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
No
[a Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
19 No
W Yes
❑ No
Continued
on back

Facility Number:.... _ .... ........_
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? [:]Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? . ❑ Yes No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Yes ❑ No
Structures Lagoons and/or Holding nd
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No
Freeboard (#i): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
�... .�._ .. ..... .-..... �....._ ....._ .... ......... .......... _ . .-..... ....-.......
_
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No
It. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
❑ No
Waste_ Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type _ .... 5 ....)QLq 7!. ............. _....... e. � g... .. .. _...._
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
fig No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
P No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
In No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
2I.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
GINo
For
Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
tO No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
Comments `(refer to`gtiestiori'#) Explairi atiy YES answers and/or'any recommendations'or any, other comments -
iii.drawings of facility to be expiam situations (use adclihonal pages as necessary}
feh 041 yY'15 W'11100 i As WAS "r- teAACnqJ pcq. Mrac 3b 4.
1
Q
0Jts:Je e� eh- No �C t6rge. Q3bseNrd-
44
9 _ Leu ki i n Jai., Z h t r- ALr eh �. � a&o m d ` -o are vcJ
v. oQ (cyor. -, 60J be- (,64 o Uk
oU4;r � � ,ra +t 06d a&J "seeJcJ-1-MOO" '30.t(5
IZ. LAPPh 4 L LDS tv510n CAAS oy�- 0,0L11
c� \% . 6-,00aS rkoJJ be wov)eA
��e��.
t3• Po ,n�rl4�,-s �o Wica e 541r'/5 �Oe �J��;rt5
610
Reviewer/Inspector Name:,;€.(.
;>.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
AA
Date:
4/1 A 1
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

JUL-14-1995 15;22 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
WIF?O _ P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Attend NO
f FacilityNo.
— ------ DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE. VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 , 1995
Time: .000
Farm Name/Owner.
Mailing Address: -:??A t, � e u j 14 a r j Z v
County: �s
Integrator. _ ,. _ _ _ Phone: _
On Site Representative: �,�,� I �Q,��� �� Phone:
Physical Address/Location: L S: 2( l 1 S 6 o , o---
l� w 0
Type of Operation: Swine 4 Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: � ISZ , t�o1 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
f, Longitude: 5 ' _ �� Elevation:
Latitude:34 7Feet
CAVI 15 Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoc*ve suffic' t freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: J--Ft. f -` InchZ t a \
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o No Was any erosion observed? Yes o
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate?Ow No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? r es r No
100 Feet from Wells? e9 r Na
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or U.
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of ruanure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes G 'CJ • �;
Additional Comments: �S b n rz
v «� t ►� r-, S
%,j
Inspector Name
Z
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed. /

Site Requires Immediate Attention: MCI)
e�irr e L_ Facility No. 2
S� DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: q r Zv ' , 1995
T Time: 0
Farm Name/Owner: , ,_L n .,IF
Mailing Address:
County: C"'d iyV, v S- --
Integrator: h. _ Phone:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
Phone:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design .Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' ' It
Longitude: ° ' It
Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot 25 year 24 hour storm event
• (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches �YesNo Actual Freeboard: Z Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?, 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
w 100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
•
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of U;,SGS. Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state -by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with.cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
\4-5 sk -_ -
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
� 5
Signature
�scttachments if Needed.