240076_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

J •, .� .,.
Type of Visit /- Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine loComplaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number [late of Visit: Time:
O� � 3d
Not O era 'onal I3eloR' Threshold
©Permitted 13Certified1d 0 Conditionally Certified ©Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold•
Farm Name: 1,i "L �'q'� "` i �� _ County: v r►1>l7v t
Owner Name: '-'y Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: w '^� -� Gk � _-
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator Ur
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' �• 0 « Longitude a '
%lesrgn Current Design Current Iiesegn w Curirettt
Srstne_ ; C achy Pa" iilation .. mouaer�ty Po ulstW
❑ Wean to Feeder T : Da'❑Feeder to Finish -_: Non -Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Feederff
_.-
Farrow to Finish Total Diesigt3t Capactty
❑ Gilts ....�
-n
❑Boars Total SSLW r ,
'C.e "-..
Aiumber tsf Lag©ans� subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holdtng Ponds i Soltd Traps No Li uid Waste Mana ement S stem
Discharges & Stream Imuncts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: if z-
Freeboard (inches): 7— 3,1)
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
Structure
Continued

.W.
Facility Number: Z — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes El No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [--]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes,,f5'No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cammeats referta;questo
. - ti s of fifet�tty;tn°b �) ExpiarII array YESyaIIswers andlor sAy recatrutae�adstiumt or snv other'camments. ®µ �• �.
Use lrawi ' ry g etter_expiam AWati6iii Nse addrErOIIeI pales.aS necessary) Field C'opv Final Notes
_d . .:.� _- ms' >• _, _ c : ❑
G��t d v�-d -fh; r ►�joeG.j; a L, /'Ps�oa�►s� 4e qCa•��la� �f a� odor
QMd layrsoti o✓erj�,,,- S sew rlar ev►deyt 6e T-Ckj-
TL,e oda✓ Gpr+-t�la,'�- t�v�il ie'errnd �o -f�� �t.�,'r�'c� �' V
Reviewer/Inspector Name c�L/c 1 ._ = ,;S • = - -- = _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: g aZ
05103101 Continued

�� y❑Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency �n� _� � �� - '
r
10 Routine 0 Com Taint 0 Follow-up of DWQ ins eTtion 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection t t
Facility Number 7 Time of Inspection I : Q O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered E Certified [3 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.... s�...........� # t r:.-— County n.�
a .....cum ri-............. . • .......� .a.l..+�..........,..�s. c ............. ... L....I...O
OwnerName: .... t).a..r.x....1.1................................................................. Phone No:..�.`�..1.Q.. ............3.............3.. .{2...................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone
�No: ...................................................
MailingAddress:.. . .......%&...... .Q..7i,....... .�.I.............I............. ...I............. .tea . ..�. r...C..� ..[, +. ......................... ....z...... N.&.
Onsite Representative:.. a r.r t .11.l..........S....................................... Integrator:... voj. ?! . f..1.....................................................
Certified Operator:... .9_.u.b.F.r.... ............ 5.............................. Operator Certification Number:..... 11..q.71.2.............
Location of Farm:
....�C.�t. lf1..S..l... ....c. .. ..r...04.p.�.,rn.at,.,[>�.l. �.�...... ......tal.trs..f.......T 7K4.:..
11 r
Car in,.. ram,iil� 4Wu Q0q -
Latitude ®' Da Longitude
Design Current
Design Current. z Design Currents }'
Svrme a apacrty Popuilation Poultry x Capacity Population Cattle Capacity 1Populaton;k
..:. . _ A
r. _ .:.... _.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer ❑ Dairy 41
Feeder to Finish
Ix
F ❑Nan -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
r ❑ Other r
❑ Farrow to Finish
;, Tonal Design Capaeity
� ❑ Gilts'.
�
[I (Boars
Total SSL'UV cc
Number of Lagoons I -Holding' Ponds Z
® Subsurface Drains Presen] ❑ Lagoon Area B Spray Field Area
d
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
v
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lago6n system'? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Ilolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: I..R... I ............... ........1.a..5.........
Freeboard (ft):............................................................
10, is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
`'Paste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
l Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
Eq Yes ❑ No
C.Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspecdon with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities_ Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
O-No.violations•or deficiencies.rvere noted -during this:visit. You'wiU recei've-no-ftirther:
:.•correspondence about this:visit:•: ;•::.�.• •.• �. :: :�:: •::.::•_:::: ::-:.:-..•
Cottfs(refer,'to questEoit #) ` Explain any i'IS,a swers andlori3ny rim nmmendattons�or sing other cmretenfs; '
facility
fig&
Ilse drawings a€ necessaty) .
to better exphih sttuat ans (use additional pages-as;Z.
�0 11 n Va o f v i S t ti d vv- ev-, S V +-. 'i`,-o-- t d It c i e.A.. C_ i i S
C.0 f.�Q-c fit%
o r, ..,L.1 In v-tJt 1 e .0 S tkv -,•� 1 `E ' o ow ct ! a �r ie ¢ ri a i. aL o t ut
5 k-o U VdL ie F V V%- oLn ..a d r � CAW—CX e. S o ,.� S 1.6 Lk ,r—
,t.�tz-sfi l �r-isrs .,salts tom{ r-�e�s ti a C
O e.Yu �o r o f -•-�-• { v v e �a {-� �a q 0, via- t i s � t -o ,�•+ e.we-,r� w�e� b
ex %r (7� t 9L 1 S j �n Q a R. r C 0, S ftJ Lt(r
.i
tv � O i-�d.. Ci t S o o vt S
A S e �o fJ �i a D i i 4-,Q
C
c t1+ Q c wi l� 1 i, �r0 I LL,1 j e v� 14--J
� t ► f � sit
J,a
&Vy-; Vp JsS� .
1
7/25197
z _.'
Reviewer/Inspector Nameir
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t 1 ZO 12
is

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agencys-
_z ;-
p Division of Water Quality
10 Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspec ton p o ow -up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not 0perattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: State.Line.FArm.#LandA2...................................................................... County: Columbus WIRO
Owner Name: Darrell ................................... Swcks................................. ........................ Phone No:
Facility Contact: .................................................................... ..Title: ......... Phone No:
MailingAddress: RU..Ana;.Z1.7........................................................................................... T,abox..Ux i.XC..................................................... 28.46.1 ..............
Onsite Representative: Bab.Ailbrxy................................................................................. Integrator: Marphy..Fainilt.Farms.......................
...............
Certified Operator: &uJbcn.D ............................. sLorks ................................................ Operator Certification Number: 169,7.2.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®0 ®4 ®64 Longitude ®0 ®' ®61
- estgn urrent- Vesign Current.. -Design uurrent
-_
;Swine Capacity. Population :,:Poultry- =Capacity Population= Cattle .Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Fims
13 Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds . ® u sur ace Drains Presen p agoonArea ® Spray to rea
p No Liquid as a Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ® Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes H No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

Yacility Number. 24_76
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (Lap_oons,Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..........F.aim..l........... .......... F.arm.2.......... .................................... ...................................
.......... ..................
Freeboard (ft): 30' 30"
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
IL Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
N Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.....Coasta1Bezmuda.Grass ....... SmaU.GrainkV heat,Bade.................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in me' Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewerfinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
N No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
1.. ovaions.oenies'were-ote . uring this visit., oavt .reeeive noF u e
. _ __ :::_r .:
tnt�iSt. ___ .__. .
Comments (refer to question'#) Eaplai"ny YES answers and/ur-anv,recommendations or any other tomments:_`-
llse dr#)! �Mgsof fac1l ty to,b�etter explw situaiaods (use•addrt ona[ paees as necessary)
1., 5. Bare areas around houses need to be seeded. Areas are not eroding but need a cover.
12. Lagoon on farm .1 has one area that needs to.be filled and seeded. Lagoon•#2 has been seeded -and appears to be establishing.
NOTE: Record'keeping good but use 275 lb/ac on fields. Can use higher nitrogen analysis or disignate which lagoon you are
pumping from.
7/25/97
Reviewer/inspector Name Audrey.�D Oxendme
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No...
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
• DATEA-4 17 1995
Time: 2-4-6
Farm Name/Owner: �] ���e, e- Er�
Mailing Address:
County: C o f uth &.5-
Integrator: /9 0,rd u 5.4, rat-. r Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: r 471 L A�-G d c a r 2 l
a -1 a 6- fo S,� //a 6 yyk 05 8aEik & 6 /66
Type of Operation: 'Swine v Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: JZ 92- Number of Animals on Site: 3 (0
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:3 // ° 04 ' 31 " Longitude: 099 ' '�13 ' 2- 7 " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Oe-Or No Actual Freeboard: 6 Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o No Was any erosion observed?r No
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes 039
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?Oor No
100 Feet from Wells? Or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes 00
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes ME
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man -trade devices? Yes o6 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes 00
Additional Comments:
a
• V G
Inspector Name
Signature
-e
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.