240075_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CARULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
FDate of inspection �-<4I- t- I
Facility Number Z '[
Time of Inspection rL` r 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time {in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review r7�
Eff Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational {'Date Last Operated: _.. _. .... _ ..... ..... �..f .. �._..
Farm Name: ._ �.. . L�.lb ...........County:.,k,�L11Ch�l�S.._�.. .. �.... .. ..._.
Land Owner Dame:._ �.i,.....h2,Qr._.. c l*5....._ Phone
Facility Conctact: Title: Phone No: _��1`�.q.: �2 ri...._.......
MailingAddress: .....-1 ..... J ? ....................W......�......_................_............Lk�tc.ol.....������...
Onsite Representative:.�.....L�C.7� ...�1.7.�"� _._..... .... ..... .......... _...._ Integrator:...8ML-'?A1S... af —Ca.? irw.
Certified Operator:...... Kp i .... _ ........... .... ....__..........._ ..........�... Operator Certification Number: -&.1 ....... _... _ .
Location of Farm:
` Gt. .. ...... X _.... t. ...... x .._ .tt.. P'Ur
LL+" l7c�..... f�S!:Yh5,.....� X7r)i�u.4.. �?C�....._Il�?.� , ...._....----....._ . _..._ _...._ ....—
Latitude C�' i (� Longitude ®• �©
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
,.:
Y
Swir Design Current Design Current' �� 1)estgn Current
ne ��Ca `ace Po elation'a!ltyY�:a 'aci Po ulat�onCattle C$ acEPo ulattoa :. C,
®Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver 10 Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑Non -La er ❑Non DairyL -A
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to FeederTatalDe5lgn CapaCtly
Farrow to Finish
T
m-
� ❑ Oder .� � �,� - � d �`
AA
3
u
Numbei of Lagoons!kffiildang Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
r «` Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
It
❑ ❑
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes 53 No
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
No
E5 Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number:....._ :.... �....
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 19 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 19 No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds2
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E2 No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes IN No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste
Appfcation
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type _ ..... __...rG'D>..ir�.................. .._....................................._..A,d�...... ........ ........... ....... .................. ........
16,
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
Yes
❑ No
17,
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
FoL
Certified Facilities
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
® Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
eoExplaayYE'wdmdatnthCommens (referthm ier'commeno iuts'
draacility p to better explain situatioris:+(use additional ages as necessary) Use wings of f M
5. Nydnar.#s taccc- 01(,c J;�tW% Skodd Grave berms JOV W &vOOt) 4tu► r
Ib-1Zz. �WMP (Ag v+ot ava�ia.1t of '4� try hS*�eG+im.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
k
>.
,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
a�U,_
/ /
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Site Requires Immediate Attention: 0
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
�p ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
• DATE. dcj I''I , 1995
Time: /I,: kd
Farm Name/Owner:_ e ru /1''1-0
Mailing Address: vi n_ a .7- dr , U /V T_ . 6�v -1 Al G Z �'S` 3 5
County: l-o I
Integrator. -iacz, �_q� n as Phone: q16
On Site Representative: nle_,44 L, Zar Phone:
Physical Address/Location: f.Srri1_ �G�o3 hu�sf/C �c 1, �Iw�f ula �IQ' t•� ��'
F0, ram_ L V D /k t /G L:: q Irl a n SiP cr a h I� Di,7,H
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
C4 w ,a
Design Capacity: 3 �'(� fes-P P. r Number of Animals on Site: Z� O o
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' �_' 3 " IV Longitude: 012—" 0 t` ' J�" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxunately 1 Foot + 7 inches) L`�'"'r No Actual Freeboard. Ft. Inches
• Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or� Was any erosion observed? - Yes oN
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? Ye or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings. es r No
100 Feet from Wells? e or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o No
Is animal waste discharged into wate;!No
of e state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover cro )? Yes o No
Additional Comments: _ j� ._L h �,�%�k ��n e JI-
e .,- Gry - n) Sc-.
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention -
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:7-2-5 , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: 2 t -'-n
Mailing Address: ,?7-7r` t
County: " ��y 3
Integrator: _ (h rourn ,9 Phone:
On Site Representative: D U1 J1 _ Phone: / 4f
Physical Address/Location: j-tt 1%2.-
�7CS• 2 ��3, G
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle 4A5 { �j
Design Capacity: 1/6 Number of Animals on Site: / lv G/
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:, 1' J6 ' 3 " Longitude.7 � ° Ol A Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) es or No Actual Freeboard:Ft. Inches
• Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: i�v � `! 2 : W LA(G 114.' k-ee...A _ S w ir ts -r- a2 T-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 0 or No
100 Feet from Wells? -6s or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oro
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes r�
Is animal waste discharged into waters•of the state by man-made ditch, flushing. system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 0
6 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)?(9r No
Additional Comments: V1u-�_ '� -__ _;k- k
X-se2 a. 4'.4tV (<14e— A r,J /. �-t_ n%%nr cam)r�+ , ki r
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
le
Use Attachments if Needed.