Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout240069_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAHOLINA Department of Environmental Quai Routine O Complaint O Follow-up ofDW inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other Date of Inspection -y Facility Number Time of Inspection ; LO 24 hr. (hh:mm) Total Time (in fraction of hours Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review RCertitied ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing) ❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: Farm Name:... , a-ftCounty:.. Land Owner Name: .12 t l SPJ� _-..._ ........... .._ _ ..... Phone FacilityConetact:..._G!tlUf l .... !�.4Y.�.......... Title: _,A4A)AL ...... Phone No: �P-11--7470 Mailing Address: .._,�a...J.... &x.....L!......... _..... .......... .....__..... _....... .... 1 �Yxtt ..1.�f2'.Y. ..L� .... +..., _.........._...... Onsite Representative:.... 1 ... L , S C1�..... ..... _.. ... �...._ Integrator: _ZMWA s... Certified Operator....._...--N?i^ ......_...-.� .... ..... ...... Operator Certification Number: 11.37 ....... . Location of Farm: Latitude ®• ®� 3 T _ u Lanbitude ®' F5 ®'. Type of Operation and Design Capacity fr SiCerrrent Design €C wine Desgn CaacrPkilt n PCurirae-tn!0t 0ry1 - U' Wean to Feeder {❑ Layer ❑ D I 'F Feeder to Finish ❑Non La er ❑Non -Da' KI Farrow to Wean `s x F Farrow to Feeder Total Design CapaCtfy o0 ik4 �0 Farrow, to Finish ❑ Other a... _v._ . Number ofg Ir. agoons'WHnlding Ponds' x ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area � Genes I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ Yes [� No ❑ Yes (V No ❑ Yes [ No Il,l�- ❑ Yes ONO ❑ Yes 0 No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require _ maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JA No ® Yes ❑ No Facility Number: .:fit}...... 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes IN No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate? Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? Structure 4 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Structure 5 Structure 6 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type ....!1 r_. —.... __. ...._ ....._.... �. 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Fortified Facilities QuLy 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes W No ❑ Yes IN No [54 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes 1R No ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ Yes IM)No 51 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes tR No Cohubcnts fer to q-ueshon Explain°ariy YES answers'` and/or:,,any recommend (reation's or any other continents K . Use drawings_of facility to better ezplairi situations ;(use additional=pages as necessary)a Ge cayf fvl OkLK Us►rt) 00.(urniih um pipe, 1 �c'4s . 1 . 5sa,'3af P,r so at�n c�r� not ass JVAkIUR� WCs AID_� &,VO:kWAU + �� of 41AL ins�e4oA . i` Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , XUt.___ Date: cc: Division of Water puality, Water 4uality Section. Facility Assessment Unit dfzniol Site Requires Immediate Attention: 0 Facility No. Z 4 - DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE:- S , 1995 Time: 1 3 0 Farm Name/Owner: Mailing Address: _. 1 n j -- fk rl r5 a (t S c) .-J I ��+°~� S � R ti F A94— LT 1 IC>o ?� Z7-7 — ( A221 County: C-ep L, %j ^--0 G-o Ro p _ r.T C. Integrator: C2 " `._j -4 S Phone: On Site Representative: (s - �'`; res� `�_ Phone: Physical Address/Location: IBC S l 3 j O• s vv i f r-ev-, Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: _ 6 400 Number of Animals on Site:y DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: 'ACNEW Latitude: 3 j_° 3. Longitude: 7 f$ ' [ Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. �, Inches Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or Dwas any erosion observed? Yes or o� Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized: L To Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings Yes o No 100 Feet from Wells. Yes r No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes. or No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o io If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No Additional Comments: C- 4 & w` 13 U )11) >z /l , ttz� STQ f L T-7 o fJ 0. - U_ ,31 Inspector Name Signature cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.