240043_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Division of Soil and Water`Gonsei atron :Operation Review
w -
-[_Division of Soil and;Water Conservation Com Hance ins ectron
p a ]® Division of Water Quality p ^anee-Inspection _ P s
t
Com ll x
D Other Agency O eradod kiview A
y p
a
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-tW of DSWC review at Other
Facility Number 2 3 Date of Inspection 0 ,5
Time of Inspection �5 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Da+�c►�A I.J4rA Ho� Fa-rrv� County: Ca(Vw+D✓S
..................... ...-...-..--..-.............
OwnerName: ............. �a -i LU e) fPhone No:..:....... .............................................................................................................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title::...............
Phone No:
Mailing Address: .•.,•„••,• ....-.
Onsite Representative: D a + � g v"A. Integrator: .............................................
Certified Operator: ....................................
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude 0 ° •4 Longitude • 4 46
"Design Current _ :'Design_ - Ceirrtiii Design Current
%Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population , _Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
—Number-of Lagoons _ ❑Subsurface Drains Present 11171Lagoon Area 10Spray Field Area
- 'Holdin 'Ponds / Solid Traps
g_ p _ - ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System _
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes. ❑ No
Discharge originated at: [:]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5'
Identifier: 1 2— i3
11
Freeboard (inches): ........�" � - 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back
3123/99

Facility,Number:— 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
os
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[:]No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0; Xo•yialaticjtis:or defd6ncies -were hated - during this;visit: • Yoii :will.teceiye iiti further ;
- corres�oiidence. ai7nut this visit.. -
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer_to, question #) Explain anyrYES answers agdlar any=recommendaYions b any other comments:.
Ilse -drawings of facility to _better;explain srtuations (use additional pages as necessary)
44urricone laydl L^gaom i4Stve c4io+i
LgeJ00P"Ls x4rve4u fA j ; lh � � 1 t"s
Reviewer/Inspector Name r °-�a=?'l�W�is:� r :44t, s g__ , $
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1 d 5 Q
3/23/99

JUL-14-1995 15:22 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
WIRO F.O2/Q2
Site Requires Immediate Attention,
Facility No. ,
DIVMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
• ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7- 1 q , 1995
Time: I I ' D a zP1
Farm Na
Mailing
County:
Integratc
On Site Representative. 0i,_3 ZPhone: _ Lfh-�i�� 0 _
Physical AddresslLocation:.-3 ,:I �n�-N),D(, } j,11 L< , , , n 1\1 eSk 17s-6 , a -
/o d
Type of Operation: Swine jZ_ Poultry Cattle 7�'ze croc,3j-�,
Design Capacity: -�/00 S',30 Number of Animals on Site: � 00 mi .
DEM Certification Number. ACE- DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude. f" Longitude: Elevation: ----Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or Actual Freeboard: Ft. � �hes
• Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or8 Was any erosion observed? 0 or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: _aPA} ,r,A_u Q!A .
Does the facility meet SCS mitumum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? es r No
100 Feet from Wells? e 4 Na
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(Q
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes ITT
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of ruanure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
Additional Comments:
)? Yes or No
sP,1xj
inspector Name
Signature
cc. Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.