The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About240042_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CARQLINA Department of Environmental Qual HD Routine 0 Com taint 0 Follow-up of DW inspection OFollow-up of DSWC review 0 Other Date of Inspection Facility Number Z Time of Inspection IU:GL'7 24 hr. (hh:mm) Total Time (in fraction of hours Farm Status: 19 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:i 25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 0 ❑ Certified ❑ Permitted lor Inspection includes travel andprocessing) ❑, jNot Operational Datee Last Operated:........ .......... .....r... ... __ ...... ....I. .... Farm Name: Wig IN � l i 6�1 Q14• . T fl ... ......... . _.... ..... _.. County: -........�..... ....... tt `_II, - Land Owner Name: ... �JSae........ IsA Lls.arwiqA.... .......... ........ _.... ..... Phone No: ��.�b�...G � 3 3 Facility Conetact:....._. !.�L_�jll3 _ . _ . Title: ...— Phone ...... Mailing Address:._... t 1 �1�� .. izk...S$s!!�4...�W.. �ti1�... �l. _ ... ��!�Sf � l� �e ..............._�� _.... .... Onsite Representative:..�.�.a�i�ln�t�..._ .... ..W _.-.-_ .... _.. _ Integrator:....... ". Certified Operator: ........._.................. _....... .......... ............... Operator Certification Number: Location of Farm: ... ........S�sl6a ... 1Q� . �lr i .. c....... rh...a`.� ...�7, . z �!1;.......p-as _..... ? 11 � .... x� . 4 ....+!`i ..: _.... _....._ ................_...... 4 ... __..... ...._.......... .... _........ ......... ................ _..............--------..._._.............-----....._......_........----.. _.... -...... ._..... .r....... ..-•............ ....................... ..... ..... . Latitude 3U • ` ZZ " Longitude • 1-{(, E ='4-1 Type of Operation and Design Capacity KDestgn Current Design, Currents Design T Cu t uu6n ;` Poultry G .Cau aci Po ulahonr = Cattle Ca aei Po elation": ir ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ !Mel , ❑ Dairy n EdFeeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy I z >�£ Farrow to Wean f Farrow to Feeder � Total Design,Capacity x f 1171 Farrow to Finish fl ` 4 Total ►SSLW ?iQD r .. ..., . ❑ Other Number olvLagoons / H6Iding;Ponds Z k ❑Subsurface Drains Present ` [] Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Hera I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? [I Yes ]A No ❑ Yes EjNo ❑ Yes %No ❑ Yes ® No V ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ Yes JE No ❑ Yes 0 No Continued on back Facility Number: ... x .......... qz_ 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? Yes ❑ No 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ® Yes ❑ No Structures_ (j,ago9ns and/or Holding Ponds 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 ....... ....r ... __...._ ...._ _............. _ ..... �.... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ....... ...... ❑ Yes ......_ No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ® Yes ❑ No lVaste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes F%No (If in excess of WMP, or nmo4ffentering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type _ . C�i(IS A �.W.. :1!bl�i.... ......... _ ..... ............ ......... ..... .... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes $d No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IN No 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes tR No 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes NrNo 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes P§ No 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No For Certified Facilities Ouly 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes QNo 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes $3 No 24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes W No Comirients (refer to question #) Explain any YES,'answers a i&6i.i6y recommendations or any other comments Use d awings4 f facility to better explain sitt2ations: use additional pages as necessary) " 5CA i-j cex-�-Vji 5 h4 �cl;ghef� wiK. Ste. � bu i r g, 41 roads Zose� Edwoxt� nay 4 po;% 6 0(, . i )S &XA(P oh iTl •5�5�� itW-t. . Faeboard ts �es5 '� �� • in� lu�i, awl ]z. ins Qr I�g � lee , � n we►(IS sl��Id I w.aw &A Id up JalJLt1' 6- oK ro .- +3, No Fw►rtw is i A.CA S aarf"�STa� i"" rt� lQve �. a cc. Vtwston of Water Lluattty, Water Vualtly Jection, raCility Assessment Unit 4/3U/97 JAIL-14-199� 15:22 FROM i DEM WATER QUALITY SF' T I01 t TO WIF,{� P.�2�02 Site Requires Immediatc Attention: Facility No.Z— • DIVISION OF ENVIRONI�MNTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: 1995 Time:./ Farm Name/Owner: - ~ �4 (•� i y9-ft' 5_ 0 /mil _ - Mailing Address: I i g 9 SA S- W �C,it H w So A- w h Ae V i Ic' (- 7547:) County: C) U L vw6 u 5 Integrator N D r �> C-bo%f AC_r—sOn Site Representative: Phone: Physical Address/Location : W o O. m or i w Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: I '�'X) Number of Animals on Site: Sao DEM Certification 4Number: ACEDEM Certificati n Number: ACNEW Latitude: 1� Longitude: Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon hay cient feeeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) es r No Actual Freeboard: �Ft. Inche • Was any seepage observed from th agoon(s)? Yes or as any erosion observed? Yes o No Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? Or No Crop(s) being utilized: ex M�.i PA C? Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? tl eet from Dwellings? Yes or No eet from Wells? Yes or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 .Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No Is animal, waste discharged into waters state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or ether similar man-made devices? Yes ®r- If Yes, Please Explain.. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (v umes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes 11�p Addition Comments: U sf S I_ r o' S 4 i� rtw + C r Ya e. L a v- r..- T D t D C o t 7 A e- T co u rJ T' Y A CrEr t T Tz-) -T l _!. — k. 1�) e-14- Ins etor Name �-j r� signature cc: Facility Assessment Unit x Use Attachments if Needed.