240041_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

f
M
El D SWGAE_60 Fe"--e-
�dl6f Ope'ra
'-..-MD.WQAiiimal:Fiedt6t.00eati'o-ii"Site'.Ins'i')'e'ction.:
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-ut) of DSWC reviely 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: _)j&;'krr Total Time (in hours) Spent onReiiew
i or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: sko'll— _s� ,
1W4 Counrv: cllumbvs
Owner Name: Phone No: M 1 (1) 53- 3_WQL
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator- Operator Certification Number: _.KP_Z.9Q__
Location of Farm:
Latitude Loucitude
0
[E3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
------- 1'ype of Operation and Design Capacity
M�'
oultry, FNIumber,
e
J� hir..
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Laver
Da'iry
0 Feeder to Finish
❑
ID Non -Laver
"_VflD Beef 1
El Farrow to Wean'
......... ....... xt
E
Farrow Feeder
to
V_
Farrow to Finish
❑ Other Type of Livestock
El Subsurface Drains Present
li11 spray Field Area Lacroon Area
General
1. Are there any butlers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b- If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notiry DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
"[I Yes Eg No
0 Yes
N'No
El Yes
[,K.No
El Yes
§4 No
0 Yes Wo
0 Yes [59 No
[-] Yes C& No
El Yes ®`No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mainteianc-_improvcrncm?
Cartriprized air hark

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? -
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures {La dons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
— L y
10. Is seepage observed from, any of the structures?
11. Is erasion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures Iack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Aulicntion
14- Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
1S. Crop type - Ens L7ermttL� —
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? -
18. Does the cover crop need improvetrient?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management PIan readily available?.
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal. Waste Management PIan in any way?
222. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes 56 NNO r '
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 50 No
❑ Yes 5d No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
K Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes Q No
% Yes Cl No
❑ Yes 1R No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Rio
❑ Yes [$ No
❑ Yes SLNo
Co�meats �re�fer to ques�atr�m}�xplaus�.anyYE� answers andfor any�endawns or azty otfie �rommenfs £ �s z
Use-diawings a"ffac�ty to better Iatri:situa�oas use=ad�ttanal a es.as:neces �'"�� -� w z..
iz- l ;�� �: si���� Ix c`cmwcr} on- [o5xn walk• �►a�r S t) be of
rc5eetk� 'I u f , wA� skaA 6e-, mewj. -sews ter) trmm on arw.s cr\ 4,j- (a,
6, PIA cti sere .
is -No marELlr k �oocn : ►.� ► s f#- �Sp i��ry,p, c��� (S.
$. Cc�S�-ai ber►,.vdc� c,ra� nee 15 i �n�ravcr►�.� 1 p
Gd1,�%are) �av�S f61V1 `iLA COIVMR VS Ce;,n�y D;�{r1� iS Wlvr r� e;. c. cet �ttJ OAh tnr �' t
a
Reriewer/Inspector Name-
ReviwertInspector Signature:
Date:
-7
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facilhy Assessment Unit 11/14/96

L4C —I- Y-1
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. - �1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: rT " 2 4 -, 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
S
A a S Q1 C�
� j
L �R� DI n1 v
Mailing Address:
k. 7 1
S t m g g� Ckje
rta � &W.0
ycc
County: CDC u, nA-BvS _ _ --
Integrator. j N .D C P Phone: B 10) 6 S3- 3 Zo R
On Site Representative: S N A n1 gel VC-4 - Phone:
Physical Address/Location: 1�C.S(Z 1314 ftnfD N"j i �101
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 100 S0w5 Number of Animals on Site: 1. 0 d S 0" S
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 4 Longitude: -7 +8 ` oS Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes o No Actual Freeboard: Ft. _C_ Inches
• Was any seepage observed'from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 0 Was any erosion observed? Yes ore
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye r No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being'utilized: C,0 PrSTA %_ f_,a a "gDA -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellingsea or No
100 Feet from Wells? es or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or'No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes orIQ If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
-spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes org
Additional Comments: P L A 1W►.a
is (L- R ij� s rttA y0 C,_ Dv __iE tj N_E•,-i caAes
Inspector Name
ks s
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DNISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
. FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: r Z o , 1995
Time: 1300
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County: S
Integrator: _ l ►r`c� _ Phone:
On Site Representative: S�"-'�� 5 f Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
0
Type of Operation: Swine
Design Capacity:
DEM Certification Number: ACE
Latitude: ° ' "
Poultry Cattle
Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Longitude:
Circle Yes or No
" Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches es r No Actual Freeboard: '2- Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by than -made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:�..� ��s �-a(te.•-� YP�- �- _ {-�
all v-<-A 0 c
A-o
Inspector Name
Sls
am_ -
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.