The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About240029_INSPECTIONS_20171231NUH I H UAHULINA Department of Environmental Qual r.f.`. .� --C1DSWC-Animal Fe6MAOp ition Review i$� �$ -_ pectlon QAnimal FeedIotOperationStte.Tn u y .-. Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-un of DSWC review O Other Date of Inspection Facility Number 2 Lg Time of Inspection Z! Use 24 hr. time Farm Status: ITotal Time (in hours) Spent onReAew I or Inspection (includes travel and processing) Farm ?dame: �j t►��,�j��nfm County: Owner Name:..!SLh — _.. Phone No: C_C11065-1"- hfailinb Address: �'�. Qlol x �'� �r n 11�r Z Rif �� Onsite Representative: '-Iw:r :: 'S,-2 t1� Integrator: JPlnlnlo}auk , Certified Operator: Musa !�.%Ytaj Operator Certification Number. WZ-gO Location of Farm: Latitude ®' FT-1` Zs Longitude a ' 45 u ❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ::-- hype of Operation and Design Capacity 2zVt� 1�Tumte ,Poultryf \amber Cattle z: ❑ Weaa to Feeder ❑ Laver ::- ❑ Dairy '= Feeder to Finish ❑Von -Laver ❑ Beef Farrow to Wean 171 Farrow to Feeder ' , Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Type of Livestock 4er T��. V � � e " Number oas of LaQoHoldiii-2.6-il' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present x ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area , General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ?. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes jai No a. If discharge is observed, Nvas the conveyance man-made?.. ❑ Yes No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DW Q) ❑ Yes No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmia? 0 J A d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWG ❑ yes ®No t. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No - 3. «'as there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ❑ No maintenanctimprovemcnt'? Continued on tack 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures {Laeoons and/or Hofdina ponds 9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑Yes No r ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No Freeboard (fr): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes Z No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [KNo 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes RNo (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? E&Yes ❑ No Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes P No (If in excess of W vT, or entering waters of the State, DWQ) }runoff ,notify 15. Crop type - 1YS4Ir� 16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? Yes ANo 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?. ❑ Yes 5ZNo 18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes KNa 19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes % No For Certified Facilities Only 20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No 21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal. Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes No 22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No 23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No 24. Did RevieweVInspector fit to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes JON10 Cnmment�Irefer:tinm�r_ctirsrt 1-FrnT�m'anvYF_C.aricw�reanr3lnraniii-ecr�menc�xtirsnc"�ranv'nthe�crimmeni� ,.:`:;,..a`� a•• 5�.`CFosic►fq, alrco a�o��f( f(.d; Cn i�rc 1s ;1r, 5L C��S S��at;(t}11f rtfA;Ytd k Mljce `1�LL V I of rcxpf i r,1alS Sl1Ei�U � IC)U4lT prpern� r�yO�ranfS 1n G�eSc �rtlCiit+�ttr 'ro dmimlGJ d4QS i0 i•`c8ve YiSk0� E 3 . l�lo ;ruxri[i� i v� lw�oa�� -o i n� icc•� StC�r�lS �S �""''"` P' � (tvP� i, 16- No Ocw' A.vadaA8(t Ab u 4-imj- o� 4�x inz i�bfl Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date. cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14196 -14-1995 15:22 FROM DEM DATER QUALITY SEr-TIOil TO I,JIRO 1 Site Requires Immediate Attention: �s Facility No. DIVISION OF ENVIRONNIENTAL MANAGEMENT • ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE:. � �— _, 1995 Time. Farm Name/Owner: IS "A1/e Mailing Address: _ l-71 S , Qd$-q ,(AtCrt � & kpda , CL Aa&aDo.3 t pjc, z g43.) County: c.t)�.A.LN'VC?VS Integrator 1V4QC Phone: On Site Representative: C 1AA_� S (� [ V �- — I �, 7Phone: Ni Physical Address/Location: Ni1 �S i C 1f I "`� �� S a r- Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: �n0 DEM Certification Number: ACEDEM Certification Number: ACNEW Latitude: 3-1—° 1 �" Longitude: 2L" T7 ' 4-S " Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes No Ac Freeboard: inches . Was any seepage o�rved from the l=rN0 (s}? Yes r No as any erosion observed`? Yes No Is adequate land available for spray? is the cover crop adequate? Qes)r No Crap(s) being utilized: A "l_ Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellinzeso r No 100 Feet from Wells? Is theanimal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes okNo Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o No if Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or vo Additional Cornments: _ IJr,f b5 1—b SiXAk( + inspectore �2S L", Signature cc: Facilin, Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed. Site Requires Immediate Attention: Kk-D Facility No, Z 4- Zaj DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT • ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: �1y zr7 , 1995 Time. 4!h Farm Name/Owner: Mailing Address: County: C-tp � ur- �w ., 5 Integrator: Th Phone: On Site Representative: Phone: Physical Address/Location: Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches Ye or No Actual Freeboard: --4- -Ft. Inches Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion obsen-ed? Yes or No Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized: Does the facility meet SCS minimurn setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No 100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No Additional Comments: Inspector -Name cc: Facility Assessment Unit Signature Use Attachments if Needed.