240027_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA J
Department of Environmental Qual

40
Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit efCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 010ther ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z 2 Date of Visit: S z 1 o Z. Time: J 3 0 S
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
M Permitted ©Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: &Jfed l l f 1` r& e Y,",,�+ County:
vr tG
Oer Name: '` " Q d v e l S Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: b' a r
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Worse Latitude ' 6 66 Longitude '
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle CaPaci Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I❑
Dairy
Feeder to Finish
I D 0 O
ILI Non -Layer
I
1E3 Non -Da'
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 S,.7 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: �T
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes 2�No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes _,Z No
Structure G
Continued

s I Facility Number: Z14 — 2 9
Date of Inspection 15 Z % O 2-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-sitc which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes Q✓ No
❑ Yes 0'4No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes A No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? j) ❑ Excessive Ponding El PAN El Hydraulic Overload El Yes ,rNo
12. Crop type Feef"`•ud�] Agti 15r-VArfl 6/'G.VerSCG1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 'ONO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement? Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ONO
Required Records & Documents /
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? El�2 Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ETNo
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes XfNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? [:1 Yes .E]"No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ZNo
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes La,&o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes J2,&o
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes J2�e
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to que§tion #F): Explain any YES answer`s and/or any recommendations or any other• comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): El Field Copy ❑Final Notes
P1 t �J�1C4.
i5 , T ltE'ee r5 U go0A S-fAnD{ Ct�' b2rmu�(c4 CLj� (t� Y►L�i 61r l �� 0�I �"LNew'
5 'f
t-A et-i a,e.�' k�+'� r / S O e !� i ea, T i, iCi Lee �a udot . ' V ew' �G
�s��bf>SLt �e�r`t✓da ®n �+t-��/��� O� >�p��. ��[ c►rr- l-jS L✓h�r_�-,
)�,r%`�� �e� ��{�, �� � - c �� ;r+_ tol es )-14,4,
hloTe: T G0✓70(VC e_d 4117'S l+iS�¢o� i+�T Co%1j,rnG �U�1 Uvi' jolly1 c6lk e 4t
-D;v,'S;e�sv, a�' So<1 4-W,46 C—S5Ert/et�;c• ►IAi�1�rpjUe �-o 2,Bt>1 laf rct�;p %�v,Ec l
j1a ;Y,c rjo reC01As r�Vq' ECG, �cc���5 are ;"1 kE s �;-,r-c% 'I t-e��L1; ee �t�;
Reviewer/Inspector Name 5'_ wa %) t 4) S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z I
05103101
Continued

4 Facility Number: Z-q —2,. Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
/VOIC &—e>04 :n piee4s sure 4tlg4 YCro�rd s 4
We s-e tart a --A ere-, -14 .
05103101
❑ Ye"Jallo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes JO'No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes -01No
❑ Yes j2No
❑ Yes ❑ No

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
0 Division of Water Quality
10 Routine Q Complaint ® Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection
�
Facility Number Z L— I lime of ImT*ction EEon 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ® Certified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:......_
Farm Name:.. .}. ..1.1s...... �� a ............... ... .......... .......................................... _ County: ......
G,. p...x t.,<tx. +.0 $..................... LA....X)
OwnerName . ......... ............................................................. Phone No:...1 Y°i..l.... �......�.,�. Z...:. . 7.. .............
Facility Contact: .... a�.xr►1 ...t...4.i Qr. r...... Title: ......... I .................................................. ... Phone No:.�
Mailing Address: .... .-g..a.n....... L1.9. 1 �..--•..............................I...................... ,,.......................... ....
.g.`�� .�
I (� q!; 1 L tw R of • Ta it o r c; !-y t-J t✓ Z g Lf b 3
Onsite Repre_tentative:..I1$ T-r..telw-.l lti..l t4^.I.S.Q.v.-i&L..:Iolr *ij.s..t�.... Integrator:... u-.,r- f
Certified�C.... ..............._. Operator Certification Number:- --- .._..�.... _.
Location of Farm:
C��...�.s..o..�..�.i�.....,�..i.�..�......a T
Latitude • 0 6 " Longitude "i • ®' © it
Swim
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Number of Lagoon
t Poultry
L k
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
sign; Capacity D
Total SSI,W l3 S40 0 b
ds : ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System .n ^
General
I_ Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
C. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
®,
OI
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [--]No
Continued on back

Facility Number; 2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lap-oons.HoldinLF Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.!
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? & Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �.'._ �................................................::..........................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):......................................................................................................................_...............................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
1.3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ................. ...... --................ .......... ........ -....... -...... .......... ----......... ......... ................. ..................... ... ........ ........
-.......................................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWN P)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q Nv.violi ions or deficiencies.were noted -during this, vWt.- You.vkiU irkdve'o further'
corirespoddetkce about tWs—.visit.
V 15 I t U a t
0..(
Ll�* 1. L4 S,> U �
(� �n/� S v 1r-q- &e-ri G � �✓°� 1 l�`�1�c�
"ir ►— -&44--
1
9- Fve.e-61c, 1.. iS
eSf( (L/�ir..�
S i vn L(, b ti-" I,D +J �
1/ S 1
IV la I S '� 1 4 'C 0
t L ! O
Y` '[ �% +� �¢.P►v�
} -tx, r e..- ^ e v a l
.'�+
di t-e . ? i 1 e
lld L-V v.3 -
!-z
to e. d I x Q es E4
of.
S o a v�-a..l. s S
v-a`-�l c..e, i t ca t� t• r�-. i� ct-ct 4 e-Q- -
�,�rt-L
d1 E. �-0 v"-� f�} 0 �I O f
A C I �iv� �.c� Wit)
I
.S.✓� •� T'O rV�-Z.Z.. �1` `-t"+"C�l ;'ta {r L2,�,,., f
7/25/97
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/[ospector Signature: a.�, -AH_ Date:

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
14) Routine O Cotnglaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number L
Time of Inspection ZOj 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Registered ® Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JE3 Not O era tional Date Last Operated :...............
Farm Name: ... 0. ,%.U..... a..,c.ra.............................................................................. County:.....C:Q.Lte.nky.A....................... .LA)..,..—
Owner Name: ...............gA..K.o.kA . ............................................... Phone No:..... ........................
Facility Contact: .j(�.cy�.f..-.}-�..1.�.�rr ......
---•---... Title: .................... _.......................................... Phone No: ......... ........... __....— .....
�........_
MailingAddress: ...p.S}. - y o.� 1..............................................................._...kl!�.t. i ant.i..1.....t...i..G................... ..�'.' 7 7
[uJP"�"`.�Lo 16l q l/t41a.+r �: `` Tdbar 4il� �] C� Z gq C3
Onsite representative:.. IO,- �L���
x * ��r4.._. �... .......................... .... Inte or:.. �.x.. __........--....... —
Certified Operator............................-.--.-----....-------............................................ ................ Operator Certification Number ;--._.... ............ —........ _....
Location of Farm:
.... D.D6.r....a�.� ax...m......... ......Q .,�.. _......�a t!�
Latitude • 4 " Longitude ' "
Current
"ppulation: Poultry
❑ Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons /.;Holding Ponds` 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Ares ❑ Spray Fietd Area fl=
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
_ P
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than tagoonsfhoiding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes [9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
El No
❑ Yes
J�] No
�314
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes E(ND
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes pi -No
Continued on back

Facility Number: Lu —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
El Yes
® No
Structures (Lap o ons,11olding Ponds Flush fits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
KYes
❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: i - `...
_...........................
Freeboard(ft)'.............................. ..... .................................... ................................. . .................................... ......... . .........................
....... ......... _ ................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
RNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
P.No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
FS1 Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
allo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
Xj No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15- Crop type ..... I L L,... . j............................... .av 1 �. ^4 �`........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
JB No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
2Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
I'No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
14 No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,R No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
O Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ No violations or &rlciencies.were noted -during this visit. You.wili receive 'no further..
icykresp¢ndence. about this.visit., .
t-0 b v &w n ('t. c� �(�e�S p ,1. S i 6 C8 n.- . w , .e r S I
t T�^ rt- t` [�J y
L, R I o v Q�S I. w
L 7 C ., I b ta h--� o -. t--v,� Q r c .. e�r a �` (cam y o-o .,/ a L (. I, c o, t-c
c_.e- w 6 r r�i
s. i cti-v` v1 L i. C. °}y 4-++4 ^�J r r ml v ( v 0 (u n 5d
7- . LA tk k e S v w e 4,G ' .� 0!( i t �z� ;l �J+ -Y t r j G r can �-a r ✓v�S C ve -Sri u
� �hCrr r Cr c.-O re�j :t,p V ,( � . � t S i � clij� t �e �{ i q +a^ �aarL<<.-•.0 p�.� vOL e�,
�i~i OE
s=; -� a 1(� lJ .tip ,a ,• v...� o .� t �,�, 1 �t .- [[` P rr e, t e =J -ro°'/25/97
4, N S; 1•i r G r r . �i✓i a .. t.. li i f J . _ L �+t.� -L-�v o _L ., .A �.�� sru L i
Reviewer/Inspector -Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. C i - _I - a - 11 !�<N L 161 Vj ,L—_ . Date:

..r 0%
Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
Routine p Complaint p Follow-up a inspection p o o«-up o review p OtIler
MI(C of Irr"pection
Facility Number
Time of irspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted In Not perationa hate Last Operated:
Farm Name: W..Als.Farm...................................................................................................... County: Columbus WIRO
Owner Name: Harold ................................... Wells ................... .................................. ...... Phone No: 9.111-.652.-2000.....
Facility Contact: W..arras.Miller................................................Title.
Mailing Address: P..O.Rox..487.
PhoneNo: ....................................................
Whitexille.. NlC...................................................... 18472 ..............
Onsite Representative: StolayaJohnson.......................................................................... Integrator:Mu.rlaby.F.amly.Earms......................................
Certified Operator:Waxxerx.L............................. 1.!'1i. Pr................................................ Operator Certification Number: 169,57........ ....................
Location of Farm:
...............................................................I.........................r
Latitude ®* ®° L. Longitude ®• ®L ©44
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to inrs i
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Layer ❑ airy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ on- arty
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,00
Total SSLW 135,000
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds 0 ❑ u sur ace Drains PresFFF1I3 agoon . rea 113 Spray re Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management ystem
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

Vacility Number: 24_27
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .............................. ..................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 20"
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes B No
p Yes N No
N Yes p No
p Yes B No
15. Crop type ...... Coasial.Bermuda-Grass....... Salf.0 -4izlk.M1heat«Baney . ..............................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the' Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q...o.vitf ions.or crencies-were.na a raring . isvtst :. You will receive no er
voi kespoAftiie� 4Wut t�rs-*Wt;......... ...................... .. .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes B No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question,.#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
W_
:.Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional.. pages ss !Ppessa
g y r3'�'
13. Murphy will install marker later this year.
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name Audrey D Oxendyn t,=
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:..

JUL-14-1995 15:22 FROM DEM WATER QURLI7Y SECTION TO
UJ I RCS P . 02/02
Site Requires Immediate Attention: �d
Facility No. "7
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATI NS SITE VISITATION RECORD
10 DATE: 19 , 1995
Time: 1- - co
Farm Na
Mailing
County:
Integrator: G 16#7— Phone:
On Site Representative: AJ Phone:
Physical Address/Location: _ �Je 1p0(P ^11- d� /fZ1-e5 SW7-9 o�
Type of Operation: Swine --v'— Poultry. Cattle
Design Capacity: /too Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification
�Number: ACE DEM Certification Number': ACNEW
,
Latitude: 3� " � 7, 37-3, Longitude: 78 - f Elevation: Feet
FlL6 ; Rp Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour stormy event
(appro)dmately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboards Ft. 6 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes OeWas. any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: efO SZi4L [l
Does the facility meet SCS xninitxxum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings es r No
100 Feet from Wells? e No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is aniatal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes r No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volu f manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
i AM ®�I
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed-