240022_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

ME c a u ar .sue
�,...sue
97
Type of Visit oCCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation S/�J
Reason for Visit J� Routine O Complaint. O Follow up p Emergency Notification_�Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 2 Date of Visit:
0 Permitted 13 Certified !0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered
FarmName: .......................................................... .1 C�%1�..............
Owner Name:........... G O� S{i.�.».»r ., s.... L:G..........»............
Facility Contact:
Title:
F . Time: �
Not Operational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:... lit`'»( ... .......... ....... _.........
W._
PhoneNo: » ................ ».... »» ........ .... ....... ....... ..... --
Phone No: ...................... .....
» » . ...
MailingAddress:...................................................................................
Onsite Representative: Ua1ie- a 0
»... ............................................................................ Integrator
.................... �....»........................
».»».».....»...» »
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.............»» .» ,.»» .
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �a 66 Longitude •
Ded rrent Design Current : De�ga Current
Svnne r Poultry Cci_PoulaoCattle-
Ca CapacityPopulation Po `ilatmn
Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean =
Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
Farrow to Finish
TOt4 Design CapRdty
Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Nui3ibee6f Lagoons i ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Are$ ❑ Spray Field Area � '
Hot" Ponds [Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.)
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............... .................... ................................
Freeboard (inches): 5 Z
5100
❑ Yes _ETNo
❑ Yes Jv4No
❑ Yes e o
A
❑ Yes'pNo
❑ Yes,,E'No
❑ Yes_JMAo
❑ Yes �No
Structure 66
Continued on back

1F$cility Number: Date of Inspection 11 1 d1
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancetimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pond/i�ng ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type ��e,-^'t 0 ,q Yn H 1 `--ram%' `i 11 • C�,, q { '
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0. YiQl 1��4[>js:e def e1end0$ � "re )mQted- 00fi g fbis:visit! - YoU will-feeye 00 fu gr
correspondence. abbot this visit.
!°l• Be sv re -}a L4 s e f.ek w a s4e �n��/,�ld�rJ op
alpf`cL {![�✓1 Q V�IiA Od'1T ie T,K jz1s; s Fe Ta SD✓,%C
ex/,en)s-
/U d+e'. Use c4z,iOkn jtP+ - fo s10P f u-r levc(.
pver'�1�1 G A&c.:1 e,r,o,0sy And •r!:!60rdS 01 r,6 n10141 y kq�-
y
❑ Yes El"No
❑ Yes ,ENo
❑ Yes j2rNo
❑ Yes 914o
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes �To
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes�No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes A!�No
❑ Yes IRTNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �rNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes )ZfNo
❑ Yes 'PlrNo
❑ Yes )2`No
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes &Na
❑ Yes P;Ko
❑ Yes )2rNo
❑ Yes P 4
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name - rlQ
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1 % 19 0 1 e 5/00

Facility Number: -2 Date of Inspection ( p
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ YesNo
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes X No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes/ -Id
es No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ YesXNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes VNO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanendtemporary cover? ❑ Yes /❑ No
JAdditional-Comments.an or Drawings:
5100

_ DRisron of Water Quality
Drviston of Soil'ancl Water Conservattan T
IType of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 24 22 Date of Visit: l l 19-2001 Time: 1t]:55
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - --
Farm Name: Cnasial1arlg0i. At.................................................................. County: QQjujnbm ............................... WIR0 ......
Owner Name:.------------------------- �9astaLF�►>utsJai.�_------------ Phone No: ?AQ4?�SQ----------------------------
MailingAddress: JPQB9.X.3,32.............................................................................................WXt9..VJU<...I.C...................................................... 2,8.472 ..............
Facility Contact: ...........................................................Title: ............. Phone No
Onsite Representative: DsI,Y�eQ4t------------------------------------ Integrator:P�r_etag� F�l[v1s--------------------------•
Certified Operator:TimofhY.R........................... J.Ques .................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1.7.&4{.............................
Location of Farm:
H.wy 701 north from Whiteville to 131 north, Take left at 2nd X-road, SR 1003, go approx.1 mile to farm on right +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 • 25 6 50 Longitude 78 • 461 1 04 6,
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1872
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca aci Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,872
Total SSLW 977,184
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....... I ------------- ------------------------ ..-.......................... ........................... ........................... ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 52

v�io�ior
Facility Number: 24-22
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
4-onrrnueu
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #) Ezplam any YES answers andlor any recommendations ar.any tither comments -
W _
Use drawrngs'of fae►lity to better explam-stuations (use additional pages as necessary) {"Notes_ _
Field Copy Fin,
19. Be sure to use a waste analysis dated within 60 days of application events on the IRR-2's. Tis pertains to some Aptil - May 2001
events.
Note: Use caution with respect to stop pump level.
Overall, the facility, crops, and records are neatly kept.
wer/Inspector Name Stonewall Mathis, entered by Bette Rose '
E
wer/Inspector Signature: Date:

O5103101
Vacility Number: 24-22
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
Continued
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes '®No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number 24 22 Date of Visit: 11-19-2001 Time: 30:55
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ _-
Farm Name: Coastal FarmAl................................. ...................... County: Columbus ................. .............. }?CIS ......
Owner Name:-_______---------____ C9stalF�Cms.1a�-------------- Phone No: 4�Q �41=?„��9-------------------------_._..
Mailing Address: 1?S?.B9Jfi.33_9............................................................................................ W'b1it1~Yilltr...N.C...................................................... ZHU ..............
Facility Contact:........................................................... Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: )(1 Dii,X�21C�CQ4t---.___--------------------._------- Integrator:PxCStAgQ �sICUL�--------------------------•
Certified Operator: Timo y..B.........---•-----••-•--•--,]Qxtc................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1.7.8.46 ............................
Location of Farm:
3.wy 701 north from Whiteville to 131 north, Take left at 2nd X-road, SR 1003, go approx. 1 mile to farm on right
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 25 S0 Longitude 78OF 46' 04 u
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1872
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
-Design Current Design Current
Poultry Cavacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I FI'Non-Dairy
Dairy
ElNon-Layer
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,872
Total SSLW 977,184
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............. ............. ........................... --•--------------------------------------------------------------•--•-----•----------------...............
Freeboard (inches): 52

C untinueu
4 voiv�iv�
t Facility Number: 24-22
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to:questron #) Egpla�n any YES answers and/or any;recommendations or any other comments �$ `tea
Use drawtn s of fscilt to -better ea lain situatici use additional pages as necessa .
g ty _ p ( p r} ) Field Copy ❑ Final Notes ;
-..-- = - -
19. Be sure to use a waste analysis dated within 60 days of application events on the IRR-2's. Tis pertains to some Aptil - May 2001
vents.
Note: Use caution with respect to stop pump level.
Overall, the facility, crops, and records are neatly kept.
wer/Inspector Name Stonewalfmaims Jenteredby'BetteRose
Fie
wer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101 Continued
I
Facility Number: 24-22 Date of Inspection' 11-19-2fl01
Odor Issues
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

- f.
Vrl
Type of Visit •O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 24 22 Date orvisit: 11-19-2001 Time: 10:55
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - -- -- -- -- -- -
Farm Name: QQ8AW.F.ur=.#1................................................................... County: f-dumbim ............................... WJR0 ......
Owner Name:._------------------------ ��F�«+�-------------- Phone No:?J.Q_C42:Z.��fl------------------------------
MailingAddress: F.Q..B.9x.3.32............................................................................................ 1'.4.'h1.tg.Y.ille...N.C...................................................... Z847z ..............
Facility Contact:...........................................................Title: ................... I ........................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: It;atts�Y� efit4t------------------------------------ Integrator:F-reAtAge-FAA=--------------------------•
Certified Operator: ji oft. R.................,�glpes,,,•„•................... Operator Certification Number: ......... ................. ............................
Location of Farm:
4.wy 701 north from Whiteville to 131 north, Take left at 2nd X-road, SR 1003, go approx. l ,mile to farm on right +
71
® Swine ❑ Poultry [I Cattle [I Horse Latitude 34 • 25 ° 50 Longitude 78 ' 4b ll4
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1872
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity - 1,872
Total SSLW 977,184
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal1min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Ident.ifier:------------- 1------------- --------------------------------------------------•---•------------------------- . ------------------------ --- ----------------------
Freeboard (inches): 52

u-3iu.3iul
Facility Number: 24-22
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
c, ununueu
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
,9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
.19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #) vExplam_any YES answers and/or any_recgminendatioAs or. any other comments - s
-
Use di awmgs'of facility to better explainsituation`s (use�additional pages as necessary) Field Copy ❑ FinalNotes
-_
19. Be sure to use a waste analysis dated within 60 days of application events on the IRR-2's. Tis pertains to some Aptil - May 2001
+
vents.
Note: Use caution with respect to stop pump level.
Overall, the facility, crops, and records are neatly kept.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Stonewall Mathis ::- entered by, Bette Rose
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 24--Z2 Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond withno agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lick a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number Z',f 22 Date of Inspection 128/ 2
Time of Inspection ! 0 S0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not O erationaI Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: C oAs4 r< � . � 1 Co /Ur-t �
....................`..t.........�..."'..................................................................... County: ..........................
Owner Name:
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:...... :.13A re 1nte-rator:
....................: T......................................
Phone No:
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
i
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................� T
Latitude 0` �.. Longitude 0 • �� _
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
ElFarrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current .
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischarZes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischtuge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?�
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in oal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notily DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure '_ Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure j
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ............... ..... -
5. Are there any immediate threats to the intcgrity of any of the'structures observed? 6e/ trees, severe erosion.
seepage. etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes
❑ No
3/23/99
0
Continued on back

Facility Number: 2if — .ZZ ]Jute of Inspection
6:-Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Al2plication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oc/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
P' i'V ..061ati6iis'oi- di fde dOc *qre h6ted• during i, s.visjt' • Yoti w l•reb6i,46 rid further. _ '
correspondeirce. about this .visit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Jj No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to;questEon #}: Explain any YES answers andlor'any recommendations or any other comments -
Use drawings of facility #o better esplatn sttuattons: (us'e addii<onal pages as necessary): _ -- _ -
�1 f w
H Sdoec I e ds` CohO�vGi�G/G�{ ;n rcSPc►iSe 70 f liome Gall t Gh S
,T �TQ
/'c�✓GSIi✓L�GtTiYC 4t, T.ieebavl�' Wc,l cL4 Sevcjn
- Lotooe level r1�eetld b� �at�er�C� ;,n 014q ✓tee^.
Sever'4.1 yt ,,ans W;4 O►n -54c r'efr-esek74,,, .;ve r Gl t1Gt';",l
dy,01,v/Qr`d+'-,� Pv jo i7 jqg,vl f •b 6v;ldj rA(T ["")canwQ2(s 4e efze-C4, rel
/Vole= 0 r:4e- PC I sek s 44,57, 10 o,cfes of S�r�yF;�[d rind selid Se}
rys}err► L,)lu a )its celled• Attu S^Vs n:ePlc We-+ceee-sLj,tl be ir, plrcc in2t,lks ;
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: L+ / 41/0
3/23/99

- ..- - - 4 - _ Y Y
Division of Soil and;' ater Conservation Operation Review
13 Division of Soil and�Water Conservahon -Compliance Inspeetran _ 'r �, r
:Division of Water Quahty Cotnplrance Inspection x
-0;Otlier Agency
O Routine O Complaint O Follow-uu of DWO inspection O Follow -tin of DSWC review Ab Other
Facility Number Z Z ate of Inspection 14
rl
ime of Inspection J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted 13 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [Q Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
..........................
c,,,<4 1 F:crri S-*/ Colv/rl6US
FarmName: .....................5................a............................... -County:..........................................................
��++ 11 ........f................. ...................... ...........................
OwnerName: ..................(.it..q.�....ra'r.S..L.4C .. Phone No:.................. ...................................................................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
:Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:...... n� gjIntegrator.
Q. ..... ..................................... ..... �,J
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude �' �� Longitude �• �� �«
Design Current Design: Current Design Current '
Swine
Capacity Po ulation Poaltry _ Capacity Population ' 'Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
F
Number of:Lagoons - ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
_ _
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated au ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass,a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: I
Freeboard(inches): ............ I ...... ............ ................................................................................................................. I..........................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure b
... I ....... I ................
[]Yes ❑ No
Continued on hack
3123199

Facility Number: 2 V — ZZ Date of Inspection
`6. Arelhere structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
.7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
I L Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
mmM
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15_ Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: M.M.&ficieneies iyiere noted during �his:visit: - :Y:oir WRI-ree0*4e Rio futther- • : •-
correspondence. ab. . f this .visit.. . . . .
Ilse -drawings of facility to itietter explain sihiati©ns {use additional pages as necessary)
❑ Yes ' ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
•7'rosk re pnfen- ;vt Cowed &h 10lie -1v tepr] �i �c�� oreeb afd /evil.
• &V fed VrEf4A,),- rGpre yer)4a4,'vc- 4o rv..,.P 4o
in �&-ex hr.�bjc rnahl�er.
Reviewer/Inspector Name G j1GG�/'If71 ?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: F.o�+—�,t.• �t _ _ Date: �D .
3/23199

Facility Number 2 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection M24hr.(hb:m
m)
® Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 113 Not OperationalOperationall Date Last Operated
Farm Name: C oa$- a1f M 5....f. County: ..................
...................................
�................. 1 ..../...........................................I... ----
Owner Name:..... .5 j..r , .l "t I�h1 f j...LL6 , Phone No:
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:............................. ..... Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: *Q&,d Sq M$& Integrator:.....��✓ e
......I... ...........
Certified Operator................................................................................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
�i
Latitude �• �° �•� Longitude �• �� ��°
Design Current Design;, Current
Swine C,
Capacity Population' Poultry° Capacity Population: - Cattle.:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Current;
Po uiition-
Number of Lagoons,; ry ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds iSolid Traps �^ A ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System _
Discharr,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .......... .................. ..............................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes H No
seepage, etc.)
Continued on back
3/23/99
❑ Yes jig No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes IQ No
Structure 6

Facility Number: Zj Date of Inspection
. Are there. structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenafice/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
M
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
I6_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ieI discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: N,6­ 0olatidris.or &fide ties -were ngfed- during this:visit. - Y:oit ;will-r'eceiye rid futther
ctirrespondeRce. abaut this visit. .. . ... .. . ... . ................ ... . ..
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes X No
24 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
1K Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:)No
.
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cotnmetits. (refer•to question #)::Explain any YES answers and/ ar ariyYecominendations or -any otfier.conments x
Use drarnngs_of faeility.to. better. explain sitnations (use°adcLbonal pages as neeessairy)=
2. (..1 of Sk O f j Sa.r v d,? jI 1 14 i 4C 11 a cc ce vi o 19 v
af rvnofl dvrryt� Wa54e a �/Y,601 ah. gdv;ysed onsIle ref,
4-o 6I o d !jG•k An4 f Um JvOt5}e
—pat✓�!l in� G un t'as n'O Q CG) e�. wee 1 s�ot4ld be
cue cep[ �Qr rrla i�'t,nc�io.
Wtis-1c rb qf'% a t.., '411;n 1�4 �- bv�- �r o( Welds, %
Pr+DipGr 6Vf Grp Sho LO� �e rvtq>>'l����e� Whenzrf114y►n' >7G�tr W�1jS.
Reviewer/Inspector Name" a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
GLtiI.`as �
I.2�
�-
Date: q
�C,l n
I�v� lCC ��
�� at►'t
W ��� 3123/99

Division of Soil and Water Conservation [] Other Agency
aDivision of Water Quality
10 Routine idl.Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of inspection `% - -jV
Facility Number EZZF_]_�
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered Aertified [3 Applied for Permit J3�Permitted [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:._,
FarmName:........ 1....:5................. .......................I ........!........../.A.ie...................................... County:.......:.:.✓..?? �. v
Owner Name: ............L.•>vl,t~Z,.S' .........,............... Phone No: .. ....
Facility Contact:..,,�Ar1 , 1��2 f. �i?c7 Title: Phone No•
Mailing Address: k..... ��Z � A 16 . _Z Z_
Onsite Representative:.. 1 ................................ ...' e4 .....4.. Integrator:........ ....................................
y j...._....
Certified Operator;...---L ......... € .... ......... 7-..�.................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
mc
C
Latitude 0.0' =" Longitude =• 0' 0"
Design 4- Current u; Design Current, DesIgxx , Current
Swine aCapacityr Population PouKry Capacity ;Popuiallon CattleCapacrtyrPopu�ation
... a.. z:.. _ _,. r _.
Wean to Feeder
❑Layer ❑Dairy
eeder to Finish
F
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-DairyFarrow
to Wean
arrow to Feeder
°10 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
`` Total D.Sigt Cap�Cit
[I Gilts
❑ Boars
w Total SS W
Nutnberaf Lagovrsl Holduig Ponds
❑ Subsurface Drains Present11IJagoon Area L
❑Spray Feld Area
3 z,�
.... ... ...
❑ No Liquid Waste Management Syste
m
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes i? No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ,0 No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes allo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes U] No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? [RYes ❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes ❑ No
mai ntenance/i mprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes iO No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes MNo
7125/97

1.
Facility Number: -2 — ZZ
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lapoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, gtc.)
9- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes JK'No
Structure I Stricture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...........................
Freeboard(ft): ........... �.............................................................. .-.............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes RNo
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes J,No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes &No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes [dNo
Waste Application tt
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes . t No 3
(If in excess of WMPP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) I
15. Crop type---........F� .~.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... `�ii
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes [21 No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No w
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Yes ❑ No W
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Arlo
Aj
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes [B,NO
21. Did R.eviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes INNo
�pp
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No F
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? J,Yes No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ® Yes ❑ No S
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? Yes ❑ No
0 No,viQ[ations•or"deficiencies: were• doted -during this.AsW You:Vill. i ecei�e no,f iher : -
.. �correspbndepce abau� tilis.visit; ..:... C
C
C�aneuts feria qu shun}Fplatan
y ire ndfor ranns�nr y oth e4mmen�ts
4
�i���aw����of y��'ttetr � �ttu��us�t atlditionals as neeessar3`}<� � k
'ia Syr r
' 1
.;.
c Z/• �� ,v�* �►i��a5 jitw ;4 et �S -c e-0fta lfiWA��A��•�
SPm� �.-�;�(�5' � r •�� Wit'-�,,,.��1 ��
Ii e.Qt� al 6"Oks ->
r �
7I25I97 T V
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
JUL 0 2 1998
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor iff
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Coastal Farms LLC
Coastal Farms 41
PO Box 339
Whiteville NC 28472
Dear Coastal Farms LLC:
June 26, 1998
AL
••
sowk
k4COENR
NORTH C_:AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENMRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS240022
Coastal Farms 41
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Columbus County
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on July 16, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Coastal Farms LLC, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Coastal Farms #1 Farm, located in Columbus
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 1872 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS240022 dated July 16, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any specific
conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow coverage
under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition II.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition II1.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition II1.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS240022
Coastal Farms 41
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit- by contacting the engineer listed below_ for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.
Z
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Columbus County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Columbus County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

1-7
�j FEB 23 1998
}
To: Rich Shiver P.G.
Regional Supervisor
N. C. Dept. of Environmental
Health & Natural Resources
From: R. Coke Gray
Coastal Farms, LLC
Farm Numbers 24-� and 24-22
Subject: Notice of Violation Farm Numbers 24-9 and 24-22
In response to your letter dated February 11, 1996 concerning the
inspection of Coastal Farms 11 2 and 3 and the deficiencies
found, the following action is being taken to attempt to correct
the causes for these violations.
1. Lack of freeboard in the lagoons on Coastal 1,2,3. We have
notified your office, the Columbus County Soil and Water
District office, NRSC and Neil Floyd with the Columbus
County Health Department concerning the condition of the
lagoons. Prestage Farms is working with us as weather and
field conditions allow waste application. They are
furnishing us technical personnel and additional equipment.
Our goal is to lower the lagoons to a more manageable level
within 2 to 3 weeks of February 19, 199a. Then as spring
like weather starts we plan to continue to lower the level
of the lagoon. We are also in discussion with Prestage
Farms about their technical staff overseeing the waste
management of all our farms starting immediately. We also
plan to purchase additional equipment to assist in pumping
as needed.
2. Broken pipe to the Flush Tank on Farm 24--22. Pipe has been
repaired and manager has been instructed to be sure to watch
for flush tank problems.
I hope these corrective actions will be satisfactory to get
us through this very difficult period and keep them from
reoccurring,in the future.
Sine re y,
R. Coke Gray
Coastal Farms, LLC

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
to Division of Water Quality
0 [toutine 0 Coni laint 0 Follow-up of DWQ ins action 0 Follow-uE of DSWC review 0 Other,
Date of Inspection 7 q�
Facility NumberZ'f Z
Time of Ins -clion d' `b 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered © Certified Ci Applied for Permit ® Permitted 113 not Operational Date Last Operated: ...............
Farm Name:.....coiLaWk ....,�� : �........ .�. ... County:....... Ilt�.t7.tl�.......:........... ....................
Owner Name: .......... C4E'M.......-05rM.......... (,LX. .................................................. Phone No:...�.�L � {o'k ..- ......................................
Facility Contact: ... ata.......... Ltd:.z....................................... Title:......./ ....a! ...................... Phone No:
Mailing Address:... �...dim.X.... .. .............................. .. .. ...w1liA- !It 11ri.. .......................................... Z,&.4.17...........
Onsite Representative:...... v ......... ............................................................. Integrator: ...... Prt-&6r........... ............. .................... ....... .......
CertifiedOperator................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
11--p" In......its...ctt...... 9 ....... .R....LS?43..3...IS... r ALI........... H.Wf.... Lab .......................................... A
.................... I .................. I....., .,.. .... ...... .. .... .... .....
Latitude Longitude ®• ����
k A. µ Design ` Current Design Current fDesign $ gGurrent
Swine q Capacity- Population Poultry Capacity Population „Cattle I x Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layei ❑ Dairy
❑❑ Feeder to Finish ,z, Nan Layer ❑ Non Dairy
r
❑ Farrow to Wean 3
10 Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity. (S 7 Z
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW-JE.
�
Number of Lagoons / Holdmg!Ponds ' ; ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ L goon Area ❑Spray Field Area
�... ' '''' ` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System'_.
,.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 155 Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility*not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7125197
Continued on back

Facility Number: 'Ly — ?,Z-
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,ljolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: I ........
Freeboard (ft): ............ .
.........................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?,
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses .
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate rninimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
................................................................
...... -- •...................................................
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Crop type...................................................................................................................................................... .............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0° No'violattions-or deficiencies were-itoted-du' Ping this:visit. Yodvdift receive no further:
coi`respondeike. about-this.visit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
ors �JV4, vt)v�, s oLt.1, s
dorm c )Jv, �ott,-c is r.. wo-S �C Wot /
` povjRJ � h Ayu, �1vC � I` 7,cI tJ[1 YLt, ' WC n 1, oI�t SLlt.,
t� Wa-xv � 0 T -� S ", RA, Cr kj v�[ bc�CR () d � S t -&n -t 61-j 00"s W o a ro
�et boh�Q� ww�tc arouvj -jr4 tot . ir4v P(V4. by 6IJC1 . . }
fO v'evQ' 'Cdv-
q.
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name (;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �jp�„�� Date: �ILyI4$

11JL-14-1995 15:22 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO-
4JIF.O P.02/02
Site Requires Jhnmediatc Attention:
Facility No. Z 4
DIVISION OF ENVIRONIIENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: J-1995
Time:
Farm NarngfOwner. cn25f 2{ r— '2rm5 9- L
Mailing Address: 9- -e Q A2 33
County: (tim bue>
Integrator: YQ S}1 Phone:
On Site Representative: IS Phone-
adf:Ai _ (CJS�FS"`_1,(7�S�i
Physical Address/Location: OK SlZ Kx-`3 " QQu 1 aFLAS [
Type of Operation: Swine -Le—"" Poultry Cattle ri'oa.) k 4 ee&4-r,
Design Capacity: &2—a 50s.O& Number of Animals on Site: AR-_ S�?aJs
DEM Certification Number. ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW_
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(appro)dmately I Foot + 7 inches�e or No Actual Freeboard:�Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oas any erosion observed? Yes o�
Is adequate land available for spray? tTNCA
No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being utilized:. 0121234­4
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 201 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? I& or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes O
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes 06
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by mart -made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? (& or No
Comments: .4�
y
& &LLI t i6jz Leiyr5
Inspector Nime
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.