240015_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua!

N.C. DIVISION OF...WATER QUALITY
Water Quality Section
Complaint/Emergency Report Form
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Received by --4e e-, C w A 1, ! �n 44 Date 6 / 1 9 1 D 2- Time r--V
Emergency complaint 4""- City County. C o[ b V S
Report Received From to
Agency 1) W Q — G E-1 Phone No. 1 140
Complainant
Address Phone No.
Check One: Fish MW Spry Bypass Animal NPDES N.D.
Ston»water Wetland rr Other, Specify: ,,�� ll
Nature of Referral �_rv,e[� �nJAS�e bey aep116d '10 APA 4WgT'er2//%7
T�— -
We Owen F-nz, r 4t, #
Time and Date Occurred ��� j+'�Ei i �'y7' i"�'�✓11� _
Location ofArea Affected
Surface Waters Impacted Classification
OtherAgencies Notified
Inves6gadon Detal7s ins' e Of t h e L 0 D Z
hwesSgator �7'd kuW-q 1 M44ll.) S Date 61 Z B j0 'X--
SAWOSISHELLSWEPORT.SHL t9'``1-1 iV ','A- t
EPA Region IV [phone] Pesticides 733-3556 Emergency Management 733-3867 Woldlile Resources 733-7291
Solid and Hazardous Waste 733-2178 Marine Fisheries 726-7021 Water Supply 733-2321 Coast Guard MSO 343-4881
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 0 Telephone [phone] a Fax [phone]

Type of Visit oCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine Ocomplaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0 Z Time: L�
Facility Number 15
18 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted U Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: LnJEt't Fes✓ ` "` County, C /U"-1 btu 5
Owner Name: �oh r, Phone No,
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ,. , L a � 1 0 ")EP1
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ° - Longitude ' 0 ••
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Laver I Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons' I! _J ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La uon Area 10 S rav Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1.'is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ves, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min)
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'' (if yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure i
identifier: 1
Freeboard (inches): 3
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
JVNo
Structure 6
Continued

S
Facility Number: 27y — 1 Date of Inspection n .�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
t 1. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? - ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17_ Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20_ is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
J27yes
❑ No
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
omments.(wre a o� h�.an YES,ans aud//or as y,recommen ions or ain other,'comments j, I
cT�:
.tios.(ijiwvmgs
e iiii-
ofrtacili�ttter`eiplainsituattons. (g5e'atI[ILbtOtlal'PBges'as necessary) {�EQ Field Copv ❑ Final Nt;.
reslve,zded ,t✓� C�•,rt-tPl�:n4 l.v cs�c t��s �ei►� J q��p);�G�
1t�r1;r-•�t�
zq �Z,t �'at ,.�. o�y G1ti !� ren->l �y �e-r' �i�l,� . vAAeh
'Pol
;h e v4 S
wo be��3
qe °��'>°�,ed ��� �p�p1;<<�-�tie,;n �'►el
f,
4 ,c YQQC)� ro,^-� -r� e �cti rrKJ/7��n, i S �id SG Lev 1`--t�z;'t Q�,dc� t Cl /-�U .4ey
"";/e !7 c.+JaS li�tii'li+�� ��Y c1l�� )I ef;-/ ✓e �I�p��r �d �e y'R,r;,.�
1
Reviewer/Inspector Name W_WX4;'R'7V�11 7 T'i=tS "f „
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ._- e,,.-/,/ [�. Date: 6 % O Z_
�\e
05103101 Continued

Date of Inspection D Z
Qdor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Additional Comments and/or -Drawings;
eCl�>��ed) 'e,a -��e �a�� I�e�. 1�/d.c� i/! 411r
44 ✓ w, J C c* r, i ���r r'�[' G� 1'L' n. -f� E F� rvtc+C� e �? t� W�
4e -1L,¢ a� -�1 i'<<.� i clr+ �P1GZ Gnu ?� r:vc/�{ �L�e.rE . R►�� ��11 +-��c�S �
W"':;;S Cei+nJ o,�jDl i � �O -l�E i f° (� G"i s ,T t..i cns ✓Y�t v+ -�Ji �J'�' '�'q
tv" S 4e w e'S °�, E j rt J C-t ,r�3p � i !�� �+-r Gt F I � wr S G �'� 1 i ✓�Ga -OG r
4,DfJr,vxi�'"�et�t✓i� 7-1�'E t'✓1,nJ��s• �).1LtC�l��r. QW)�vI Gt✓,�e�ve/1
glv+rc� i� I C d ,' 1-%�
S-�rc, ; � 1, f t.v /�� �.j r :z � �'t� r r1 CG{ d Ff -�1, e �i vr�, O . No 1� � :-, d �' •�� a .�'
Dtr'5C,�ViE/G� Qz'1 7�P afy� fIGL?,'GY1
�'.•L° �� o.�� ,'Gl1 %c,G{ j v�� bec � rem r ��; Y-tr� A � :�a,1 L-✓/mod-><e .
�� r��pe��e� ���r-1 ��e alYr,�.�..�, 1 +-��s-le W�.� ,-�e�o(�•1►� ,
i�t�;l-l�v.�-�;.�� i•��o ��t>a Sojl, r7owe✓Pr? oir,i►��:1 wo�S-�e
Iel ',, � ►-� J � � v i o 1 �-1; 6" o-tr -fit, �
VY)o1lf-,- �L l<;j►� o±�-.d �1.� �je✓ �^-� ;
1 6ol f O ►�e I'/,' f . Q L"" V) J L, 4.1 L t
1 S y ,�vl ,+?f vt e )1- ) ►'� 41 i e -1f e m d4 s ) 4 'G p,.o d ci YJ�%
✓? `j I� e c• ,' t'1 J �%D� d � vtn, /'v rt W 1 _ He Sci , 4-AA7L � e- l d!% bee/ J
--,) o f c, leY,G e end I-rd -14et? c✓�Yt� �a �'�s
of t^ c( I lle Yaikl 6 z3m e v'�P t'rl : 11 a^ l�� �l�t r ti, s o c� fe
GCt�ed
Zs-, Anr..�.gi LLlq-foe WIr%i7
Wilts Ot1re'o �/ToJ'"•- J r" Ci
t. z.5 bee, r?o- ad /'-, 4krl ei b rVCR t'1cv-,ct4;Ve.
10o4e '. m,. Owe-t s.,:,r4 -1L ze+ 4c 4wo al.4jeicEn4 -Jo h: J res;61e►1ce
OS/03/01 JG� Lti , C C1 ci S 1 ! qn -�L,e �aO lic&oes Wert 5pr-o, c r OI*Gt
/ a 3->t W e,e �C �

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification Pvbther 0 Denied Access
Facility Number f S Date of Visit:
0 Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified Registered
rn
Farm Name: C'7 �C r
Owner Name: ............ 1 �r ...W ....tti! t'1.....................
Facility Contact:
Title:
MailingAddress:.............................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: .... a'."�.......4"�.l........................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Time: js
Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County. Gojt� �l�s
PhoneNo: ...................... ................ .... ........
Phone No:
Integrator: .lp�'[s a
Operator Certification Number:.,,,,,;
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 « Longitude • 6 Du
Numl►er'(if i,agooms ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field AreaP
Hol Pouds /Soh ding 'd Trsps.. ., ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge oOserved from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Wash Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:....................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 46
5100
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ONO
`h ! G
❑ Yes 121No
❑ Yes,,-eNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes _21'llo
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: �-- )�j Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type 2 r-1.� ado► i' Gt yT re✓►'!td 1 ry 4, Ca r n , i
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWM
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
10 yiol�t iggs :e dgf cienc{" -wore � ted d�triiig �h4s:v�s�ti Yo> w}iI eeeiye Q fu;-th r . .
....
ahout: this visit' AS..............
❑ Yes j2rNo
❑ Yes 1dNo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes 'P110
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,fNo
❑ Yes ''No .
❑ Yes ja'No
❑ Yes 'P�No
❑ Yes 'P11V0
'Yes ❑ No
/❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes JYNo
❑ Y s �'No
s ❑ No
❑ Yes jo'No
❑ Yes JIko
❑ Yes ffNo
❑ Yes JYNo
❑ Yes dNo
[]Yes JZNo
Continents (t efer to question #) Explstn:riny YES answers and/or any: recommendr�lions ar any other`cotmt,
Use'dtawmp of -a_ ty' -.0 tietter a �-
_ .... %per sittia0t {nse additional pages as necessary} - '
IS, Tield IV $S deS'"�f
KCam- 7e>r be.1r'+"`Vdot 1l-, W4,41, -p14✓t Vt_4Acr A,
is wl.os�I rescve :in - 4c 4'.eld� A;3 -'geld tvA berm uolG Gfo)o 3s
h eee54,n v--,4 ke 25 1b , dO c1l+ eor 4e -4t- c ✓o-"-4
[apt '-NeQOI 4o es4cibb"A a �ood s4eino( er 6ermoAA On -c;e6l 10, IUD
4" �a� cu� ,,,,Lat��✓;�t1 �h�'�el� la • /\l eed 447 VAIJ S<Mvt �"
®t s
we11 a 5 wIn;�' oY 4n)I�R1 bvl row CirTll�
�;efds, G,�o,,, ✓
fre
3"4 s TLT �e Cd rt'i crop A 6"1 ed ' Vwed 4,0 'en -SJ'r6 o CA6"Ve —
Reviewer/Inspector Name r - -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date: [ _W 5/00

,FacgV Number: 'Zq — !S Date of Inspection /1 G
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 'E{No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ;ErNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes J2 Vo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes J2'No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 2 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes ❑ No
Additioomments an or. rawings: --
N
("D r'4) g D e d s4a rd OF Ae des ; cje,4Y4M nroa J 4a s1OrQy e �1 `
?I; ¢"' V clI ve 011 � � Wh"cL1 j'La� e� vs�o{ on OV0 — dcf
� � c/
46" af4e'- MC4'--c1, bV-4 w !l haVe - 'o c$, �� 1 k t,v A 's
C,oxSV/4cvN[, 1_arn La �vJ S��erj?6SoK6OVA+ A
�� °l [�� D! �a`ve
Need -�a be ,s 0 r e o 4c, ke °tea sa �"� �' d used
�a Sam 1es Aral s shotk b�
et WLa Zed t10 �` n, ; o
I° 6 a d4 s a f -/ ke
ev en4S 4C6U / y
5100

Division of Water Quality
"QDivision of.Soil and4ker Couservatton
_Q t]ther Agency"� -
IType of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 24 15 Date of Visit: 11-19-20111 Time: 15:45
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Qweu.Parut........................................................................... County: Calm bjm..-•----------------------..... WJRQ......
Owner Name:.jQbaAndrt3Y--------- - S? l n----------------------------- Phone No: ?a.Q_1�x 4�3------------------------- --
Mailing Address:.77..75..Qld.Stage.did.Jitbw.a3:.8.7.................................................... RivalwomINC .................................................... Z8.45.6 ..............
Facility Contact:---------..........................................•-..----Title: ............................ Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: d9hA_&GinAQR€]L-------------._.---------------- Integrator:PxgstageFaavl� .------------------------.
Certified Operator:G.110.a.G................................... .QW.Cla................................................. Operator Certification Number: 16961.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is on southwest side of Hwy. 87 approximately 3/4 of a mile north of Hwy. 11 intersection.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • & 64 Longitude �t �& �4
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
JE1 Layer
❑ Dairy
N Feeder to Finish
2940
JE1 Non -Layer
I
I0 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,940
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
396,900
❑ Boars
Ei]
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier1.-----------. --------------------------- .......................... ........................... ........................... ----•--•--------•----------
Freeboard (inches): 46

uj!itrjm l t,unrrnaea
Facility Number: 24— IS Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans Winter annual
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
[:]No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer -to -question #) Egplar© any YES answers and/or any recommends#ions or any other comments
Use di aw�ngs of facihty mto better explam:situations (use:addit additional pages as necessary) "
- Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
15. Field 10 is designated for Bermuda in waste plan but there is mostly Fescue in the field. This field with Bermuda crop is necessary to
ake 25 lb. deficiet for the farm in the current plan. Need to establish a good stand of Bermuda on field 10, Need to hay cut material in
field 10. Need to plant small grain in very near future as well as winter annual on row crop fields. Grower says that the corn crop failed.
Need to ensure that you have a good stand of the designated crop to spray on for nutrient uptake.
19. Only one waste sample from March 2001 has a nitrogen value on it which has been used on Aug -Oct 2001 applications. Grower may
have other nitrogen values for after March but will have to talk with his consultant. Larry Long ,with Superabsorb, has a sample dated
9/18/01 which shows fecal and TSS. Need to be sure to take waste samples and have analyzed for nitrogen. Samples analyses should be
used for application events occuring within 60 da s of the date of the analysis.
wer/Inspector Name Stonewall Mathis - entered by Bette Rosewer/Inspector
E
Signature: Date:

V5103161:, Continued
Facility Number: 24-15 Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, mussing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification © Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 24 15 late of Visit: 11-19-2001 Time: 15:45
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [] Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold_ _ __ __ __ __ __ __
Farm Name: Qw94.Farm........................................................................... County: C-9bimbu ------------------------------- WI,Q......
Owner Name:,IQbiR�4lLdI�R---_-_-__._23YgA Phone No: 43.Q.�S4G3------------------------------
Mailing Address: :I.7..7.5.Qld.$tal e.did.Bjgb.4:ay..07.................................................... R11rgtrtl 7P.Ald.NC.................................................... 7,3456 ..............
FacilityContact: ...........................................................Title: ............................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative:,[9i10_G1Ds14YYCDL--------------------------_-__-- Integrator:P�@stAg€ FAIC�LT-------------------------•
Certified Operator: G.lAla.C................................... Q.Y.CAI................................................. Operator Certification Number: lb9.6!1.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is on southwest side of Hwy. 87 approximately 3/4 of a mile north of Hwy.11 intersection. AL
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' & Longitude ' & �u
Design Current
Swine CanaCitV Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2940
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy I _+ I
❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,940
Total SSLW 396,900
Number of Lagoons ID Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ------------- ............. ........................... -----•--------•----------- ---
Freeboard (inches): 46

UJ/UJ/UR
Facility Nu$Iber: 24-15
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans Winter annual
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comruents (defer to question €# Explarn any YES answers and/or ariy recommendations;or any, ©ther...commentss -
Use deawings of facility to better eua xplain sittions fuss radditional pages as necessary) ��❑ Field Copy [I Final Notes �
_ = = u
15. Field 10 is designated for Bermuda in waste plan but there is mostly Fescue in the field. This field with Bermuda crop is necessary to
►
W
ake 25 lb. deficiet for the farm in the current plan. Need to establish a good stand of Bermuda on field 10. Need to hay cut material in
field 10. Need to plant small grain in very near future as well as winter annual on row crop fields. Grower says that the corn crop failed.
Need to ensure that you have a good stand of the designated crop to spray on for nutrient uptake.
19. Only one waste sample from March 2001 has a nitrogen value on it which has been used on Aug -Oct 2001 applications. Grower may
have other nitrogen values for after March but will have to talk with his consultant. Larry Long ,with Superabsorb, has a sample dated
9/18/01 which shows fecal and TSS. Need to be sure to take waste samples and have analyzed for nitrogen. Samples analyses should be
used for application events occuring within 60 days of the date of the analysis.
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name Stonewall.Mathis entered. by. Bette Rose
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number: 24-15 Date of Inspection 1-19-2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.• Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

�tiDivision of Water Quality =
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency - W
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation {
Reason for Visit O Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification O+ Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 24 15 Date of Visit: 11-19-Z001 Time: 15:45
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ __
Farm Name: Owen.Farm............................................... .......... County: CQhu ba<L9.........•--• ..... MR0......
Owner Name: ,I4huAltdrQ--------.- Qsn-- -------------------- --- Phone No:?�Q-(55:44�3.---------------------------
Mailing Address: 77.7.S..Qld.$t.agt•.Rd..w.ay.8.7.................................................... Rit dw.994M.................................................... 28.45.6 ..............
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title: .......................................... Phone No
Onsite Representative: dflhti G]1U1Q3Y�A Integrator:P�4St3ge PCu1S--------------------------•
Certified Operator: G.iag-C................................... iwca................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1.96.1.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is on southwest side of Hwy. 87 approximately 314 of a mile north of Hwy. 11 intersection. +
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ° Du Longitude • ° «
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2940
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I I[] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,940
Total SSLW 396,900
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rain?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:-------------1.--•--•--•-------•--•--•--•--•-- •--•- -•------
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): 46
neinvin■

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection 11-19-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are.not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Com, Soybeans Winter annual
Uunetnueu
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments refer.:to uestion # Ex Ia�n;an YES answers and/or an -recommendations or an other comments:; { q ) T p
y y ...._�_y _
_
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional. pages as necessary) n ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
v ._ . ,
15. Field 10 is designated for Bermuda in waste plan but there is mostly Fescue in the field. This field with Bermuda crop is necessary to
ake 25 lb. deficiet for the farm in the current plan. Need to establish a good stand of Bermuda on field 10. Need to hay cut material in
field 10. Need to plant small grain in very near future as well as winter annual on row crop fields. Grower says that the com crop failed.
Need to ensure that you have a good stand of the designated crop to spray on for nutrient uptake.
19. Only one waste sample from March 2001 has a nitrogen value on it which has been used on Aug -Oct 2001 applications. Grower may
ave other nitrogen values for after March but will have to talk with his consultant. Larry Long ,with Superabsorb, has a sample dated
/ 18/01 which shows fecal and TSS. Need to be sure to take waste samples and have analyzed for nitrogen. Samples analyses should be
sed for application events occuring within 60 days of the date of the analysis._
wer/Inspector Name Stonewall -Mathis entered°by Bette Rosewer/Inspector
E
Signature: Date:

O5103101� Continued
Facility Number: 24--15 pate of Inspection 11-19-2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

i eedlo erat>,on Re�fiew
• ®.DWQ Anlmal Feedlot Operation Slte lnspectlon
.0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSO;'C revictir O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 1 SHR]Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: L p_—L1 L eJ_ --_--
Total Time (in hours) Spent onResdew Z
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: ,r n , County:
Owner Name:;J, in — At- Lrt—J__ U _ r. Phone No: 0
Mailing Address: __._7 7IS e P.J -111 W. Pi IEI;4 a I L41 0?, r r. �L z-B-456_
Onsite Representative: Integrator: .Pr...o -t—_4- a q P.-. - o- t c
Certified Operator. _j�= : , n,_Operator Certification Number. f L--q .LS
Location of Farm:
.� A S w, 0. 3 �-
LatitudeLongitude • 17I
F -74 0 "
© Not Operational Date Last Operated:
-• I'ype of Operation and Design Capacity
=x �w.. • err -
Srtine� Potilhy \amber
LatitudeLongitude • 17I
F -74 0 "
© Not Operational Date Last Operated:
-• I'ype of Operation and Design Capacity
=x �w.. • err -
Srtine� Potilhy \amber
Number'=f
�_-.
�Cattie
ExrmNuber
❑ Wean to Feeder IEE
ver
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
n-Laver I
` ❑ Beef I
Farrosv
Eto Wean I
CTM`-.'' �".", ts3.c.Y::?--ten- _ ^ 'r x "3.
,x•� �.�9ee�-.x ��4ww.ssrs+.�+'^^.,.:- -.
Farrow• to Feeder
,�"-`
• Farrow to Finish
El Other Type of Livestock
^ A � �
r1\ttmber of.I�$aoons"f.-Haldiin4Ponds: S ❑ Subsurface Drains Present r_-
^a'_+:'l."Y'' FX v� —wYT`i �-. — rt� �.. S.• `ef ' AP�t M
❑ Lagoon area ❑ Spray Field Area 1
General
1. Are there znv buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ED No
? Is any disc:,srae observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 19 To
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made. ❑ yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify W Q) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in 0ailmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon .system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes ® \o
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? . ❑yes No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 10 NO
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes R3 No
rrsintenanceimprovemcni?
Conrirrued on back

6. Is facility not in campliancc with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lazoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2
Lagoon 3
❑ Yes ® No -
❑ Yes Z[No , '
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes E[No
Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed'from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
ZNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
91 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance!unprovement?
29 Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the stnictvres lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
® Yes
❑ No
N-Vaste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or =of entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type - c o r ti.Q .c cy f—
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management P12.n?
❑ Yes
UNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? -
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
19.- Is there a lack of available irigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0No
For Certified Facilities Only-
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes IR No
21. Does dice facility fad to comply with the Animal. Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ® Yes ❑ 1.10
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes EZNo
24. Did Reviewerlluspector fail to discuss review/'tnspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes E9 No
f. QNC S L G G L 0. G 0 �'1 Vj 0. L I ,`JI
13 N GI •r,n ct Y l��y t..) t� t 'C' 'r- 'L S 2ivt� .
ZZ • Mai 2 S o r r- t^1.L A �1.1� ; r� i cI h V o of o v 'r , r r 19 a 6 Y e t4 v E s
C e r,r- Rh Q ems^-si_ C 4. �,i d vi. u r+n b e� rs 1 �.. tj jp v r- a vL IVeL p 3 e
w. Lk V1 0,
i;�e� �►�J� i�� 61 cLe�� tool•
[, o a ex c. e[! e.,., f v e t 0. V--f U Ve-,W- o n
lagoon v.,ca�l). V �J
Reviewer/In
Spector Name
Retdwer/Inspector Signature: tp Date: q 7
:c. Division of Water Oualirr. fiarer Oualiti, Secrion. Facilirr Assessin Unit 1 1/i4/96

•
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. iRl=
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: .� `j , 1995
Time: Ln _
Farm Name/Owner: Z a a
Mailing Address: e u -i '[a
County: Cre4 ij.S
Integrator: le_ Phan
On Site Representative: 7a, d �.c �.� _ Pho ' � Q. - 3 S 7 3
Physical Address/Location: P,efl►... icy -7 y4,) c- M)�=g i2pF o N e Vj _
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: V _ Number of Animals on Site: _ / 5Vy.
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ° '� _" Longitude:° Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) (V? or No Actual Freeboard:-_:I,_.__Ft. o Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or p Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: U A r-' % ,• rfrf s *c 0 —f k a : 'L t- �' ✓'
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes orCO
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or & If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes 00
Additional Comments: tVt&_:S-At 'g,4j0,L J
is ^_ i , G (err,,{ —54 tl
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
c
Sim e
Use Attachments if Needed.