240013_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental Qual

Type of Visit XCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Time:
Facility Number
Not Operational QBelowThreshold
0 Permitted © Certified 13Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Q County:
Owner Name: dt /_' Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: 4 Phone No:
a
K Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ l lorse Latitude 0 04 44 Longitude a ` 0 �
Wean to Feeder I yUU I 111LJ Layer U D
Feeder to Finish IV,* 0 ❑ Non -Laver ❑ N
❑ Farrow to Feeder
JU Other
itTotal Design Capacity
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ S rav Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Latroon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
`
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
XNo
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Continued

Facility Number. Z — % Date of Inspection / O
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
El Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If anyof questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
El No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
XYes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
'base Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenanceiimprovement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA'A MP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel V4'UP. checklists, design. maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22_ rail to notifi regional DI Q of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
ZNo
(ie! discharge. freeboard problems. over application)
23. Did Reviewer;lnspector fail to discuss redew;inspection with on -sae representative?
❑ Yes
VNo
24_ Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. -
>- �-_ems_-. .-..�. ...:. ..r _:_-rv--_`.'- .•�:�ax:�-.�--•;.�%+- .:� ,.:l:z--..---�": F.Ar�;�"---�-..:
Coniments.(refer to ii). Up] YES YES idiivers nndlor any rttommeuclEations.or auk*, other cotttments
questioa
Use drawings of facility. to better explaui sitnatEoris: (nse adsitttonal'-pages as nary) . ❑Field Copy El Final Notes r
— .1�J✓SPECjrza/� r�0�/C��D �CAL•/s.� � /!1���/✓T f
///
Reviewer/Ins ector Name'-
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: / d
05103101 v Continued

•, P 4
Facility Number: Date of Inspection MO O
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vcgctation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. W-cre any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missine or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shutters. etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
r Uivi��2 GLE,�},J2 n1� �c1
Lzv� UA-5
A)o fzcFo /elm ZRw���} r ow ��a ,�� �,� d�'�
fo '&�
/QF r f7 z i2 ,gip,
Vol(
141V �'
O510.3101

Facility Number Date of Inspection I Lfp
Time of Inspection I : 24 hr. (hh:mm}
[Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .............. :. �1� Yam_.................._... County:._ j11}x�..5......................................._...............
W................................... h
Owner Name:.................Ga iw . .......... ....... cy-il 0.-qu,..................................... Phone No:...� iG ...iz `..3
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: ........�....... ......'�,......................... I................ ........_.�.F k��.....L i.� t... ��.......................... .. C3.......
Onsite Representative 61 w1Lr........................................... Integrator:...................................................................
Certified Operator:.............. rI*$....... ,.,,,,. ,,,,, { � }{ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
...................................... .................... ........ ..................................................................... ............ ............... ._...._......................................... ........................................
Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design :`'Current_ _ " Design Current
Swine - Capacity tyPo Population Capacity -Po ulahon Cattle ._ .Capacity Population-'.
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer JE1Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean &ROD
Farrow to Feeder JEJ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Deign Capacity 3�p
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars -" vTotal:SSL' W
Nutnber'of:Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
;HoldingPonds /-Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
T-•
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) . ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? - ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes P No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
d
Freeboard(inches): ............... f...................................................... ................ .......... .......... .............. ..................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
—
Z t, I cc
i.
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
Yes
❑ No
12- Crop type F-C-Sc.0 Z Li
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those hesignated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0; �vo yWaiioris;or• de#iciendpe •v�ere noted during this;visit: Yoi.t wil. xeeeiye iio tutther
ctirresponcience. about this visit.
❑ Yes [I No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (re€er to question #}. -Explain any'YES answers and/or any. recommendations or any other;coiitments.
Use.drawings of.faeility to better -explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) -
A-,
I tletr e to L 1 S(`
0*� rbzn &X� it Iq i s .k r vv CIA
5,3 O. %U 64, ] rtA- rim n i rt� o t� I JL,_ t-Ir i S Y'CJm l r) 04 G f pi -CM
Onsui — C�' rYG,ir, wa�-Y ov waS�f . wr_Fw Qlvc{: So�m �tS 1.J21� �o
� c k vltini l.a..%tpassi bG� at sc e acc v:wir�r NHS Gro' ,u✓5pV-1 CLPer"
3 W" s alb .
w
Reviewerllnspector Name
ReviewerlInspector Signature. �;L r Date.
3/23/99

Facility Number: Date of Inspection OA
C . -
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e- residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
.Additional ,Comments an ors _rawings: _.
rr`` r rl E-
J {'O
1
�
eVC �� C}rtt� �i c�� 5 , ��fJ�sSCU wc`Ferwn.y t �r,;ti & sor►.� o
It i,v� t'qIQc�.
G vcd k1 t aaW Pm��r Ifs"tWAxk o�
UHC'W �01-
3I23/99

Facility Number: Zvi — 13
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structures (Lagoons, Rol ding Ponds Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft)...........................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Apiffication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
® Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............ ...................... ............................................................. ........................ ............................ ...............................................................................
......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑,Yes
❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No.viola_ tions-or. deficiencie's4e.re'n6ted during this:visit'., :You_ :win receive•noltiri er' :
- : • c6rres'pondepce: about this:visit.. � . , . , . ; . . � ..: ° .. � . � . � , :. � .:... ... , .. .. ... ....... .
4 (r64er to question #) Exporariy rec otnntendattanyather cflriunenfs
"� ?3Ai K+.NO?
aifacthtv-to betteryyexplkmn s taaht ns (use additional pages as,znecesry ��&
� Ya• 3 SIY- i #:' 33� fi:,,
.M
v I S -� W CL 5 Yin. d..P.c. ti v� Y �. P C v� ,(� iU o- c- o f 1 P k g, ti vxv' e c B - l o-Lk s. e• � I F-
C o t es ,--s b v S t_ v �.. v; 1. 0 ,-. G 61 N-Q-a f�[ L ov. 1- 1 S- 91 'a t 3=! S P" •
%A ,� � to � d t,.4ct, , C*- t Lea F h e k o-s� o Jd S e. v ,_CL L vJ a.f 1�t i .� �ti CL r-CL i eftq V
t1 t L L4 a 0. tA-.vt f Et1 V
w (L S O 1s S G r yea-�(r rr �} n .n i +� o f O v. Q S �-t £ a 5 i/�/ ei�-o- It C-R
was obSG�.
waS ��•. twG`Jd; Bork t—hrc i� ld. T4.tie dif•
c
� o �- e � ,,. -i-o � S � � �. d ; �� � �.. � � k I o� � ° � �-a- � �..-• D � t� !,.
e b l
e v. o la-dl- �e p r-e�we..� V r tA,_L _ d iS
c
A,r a ro)L a .n.a_a !tom tie 0. 5 m Its. ; Of { L kA4 t,, ok- k V i L, I - Le eJv 1 c"2�7
1
II�^�
W t� S t!J ti V o l t S n e-S Cr-Y-d !^ o �D .0 w e�r-2 1�x Le-, -
'
Reviewer/Inspector Name11G.RF1 I H::.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q
-0 e..

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
10 Routine d Complaint O Follow-up of DNVQ inspeTtion O Follow-up or DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection t l5
Facility Number Z l 3
Time of Inspection l 24 hr. (hh:mm)
©Registered ® Certified ©Applied for Permit © Permitted JONot Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:...,. ..4r*.1r,3.. .r. c .'K t................................................................ County:.....5. ...u..ti!r±. #.�L,�..................... . W.1.. {i.
OmmerName:....... ..,a ,.......................... . .............................. Phone No:.... .. .. ...L.5... I..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:... 2�..4..5.?......P�t. Pt.V..lr..�J.-......R..A..c�........................ ..Tcx..t..a.:>r....C3..`�..1... ................ ...�..'�.. �.
Onsite Representative:...T.r..n....VtA.D-.%'j........Y............... ............................ Integrator: .... �.�1.!'.�.....
............................................
Certified Operator--.jCj.j...Q ....... P................ ......Q.. .. . y,.�r>r.............. Operator Certification Number.....q..Hy.4 .............
Location of Farm:
h t....�►d ......a ...... ... ..1{?............................................... ........................................................................................................................... _......................
.
..... ................................ ... .... ....... ...
Latitude ' ©� r 3�44 Longitude ®' �' �44
2-4"DesRgn Current :. Design Current, ¢ Design ;Curreritt,j
Swore Capacity.
Po, pulateon Poultry Capacttp Populattoa Cattle Capacity 1'opWatom
® Wean to Feeder Lj p ❑ Layer I '❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish E ❑Non Layer ❑ Nonry
® Farrow to Wean = ''
[I Farrow to Feeder ❑Other .
❑ Farrow to Finish ;8 All
Total Design Capacity, I L4
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars To I k.; 1 G Z $00
.• ...n SSL a -
Number of Lagoons 1 Halding fonds (?� Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ELSpray Field Area
2
F fk�Ff k� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System..
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
® Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7/25/97
Continued
on back

Facility Number: ... Z...L1... Date of Inspection: I I / 1�;
eAddit�6nalComments-W/oi Drawing's"
lq- +V%�E ke k-04 Fv--C�iduS d- &'Ar 1 0
a- r rP- O-vi v %A 0 V, e w a- G'F F a- 0 v.
L 6, V--U- Is . I
DWO, E-',- C r C 0
tA,x-p— bvr-Si }-L Yet Y-4-4 e-.Altt,- t4Nre I V C. V NJ V4 t t, IAJ Zt
I t-V e g-,- Ck kc-t C " y,,; Cv Y M^ 4?- Y— CL C . W
b Q OL w- 0, 1 �-C 1 0 vi -Si p re jr 0- t I v Ct I —
10 t o c. V-L"L d t e.1, - e..r- e. ISS
+-e r. v V" p vv a S 'L-%- e.
A NoEiL4 of VIOCL f-io, t e- v j .
4130/97

W11
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review r w
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection ..:
0 Routine 0 Complaint -OLF011ow-Up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Nunnber Time of Inspection 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction of hours
Farm Status: [3 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit lex: t.25 for l hr 1- min}) Spent on Revicwy
Certified [Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
113 Not O )erational Date bast Operated:..................................................................................................................................... ...........
Farm Name : L . ..(. �./��. '�� Couttty:.. W 1'................................... `S
I..............................
OwnerName: ........... . ?....�L..................C,-i......�`.......................... Phone No:........�G.�.�.'......��.�..L................................
FacilitytJ��/LjG�Facility {.f►t3t:ICt:..... Title: ................................................................Phone No: ...................................................
flailing Address: �7. ty I k �.t✓ `Ll P aiL e ........ `........ Sii!G• —
JL.,..Lr................................
2//f.... /..._....................t............ �..................
Onsite Representative:..{ [` ' � ...........5,� '�..!..�.. .. ... .... Integrator:......, 4�L .,...............................................
Certified Operator: .................................................. ..........
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification -Number: .........................................
Latitude �` �` �:: Longitude
Type of Operation
Design -, Cu' Brent Design ` : Current .
Swine
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
© Wean to Feeder
YO
❑ Layer
u'
Feeder to Finish
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
`.Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'' 0-Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'' Yes El No
Discharge originated at: ❑ La^oon 6--Spray Field ❑ Other
a. it discharge is observed, was the convevan e man-made" ❑ Yes [3No
b. If discharge is ob>erved, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galloon?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagmon systent'? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
3. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 59 Yes ❑ No
tnaintenancelimprovemznt•'
�t/ 1Q19 � Co►rtrrtteed an back

f
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible char��e?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (I,azoons and/or Holding. Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Strucjjtr/l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
JUNo
❑ Yes
FUNo
❑ Yes
Jallo
❑ Yes
Q No
Structure 5
Structure 6
❑ Yes
(Z No
❑ Yes
[0 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D«'Q)
13. Do any of the structure: lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
i
15. Crop typeG-C�
}.............`Z.............. ............................................................................................. .........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ Nvilh those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWNIP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes Pd No
❑ Yes [0 No
Ayes ❑ No
❑ Yes Iallo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes to No
91 Yes ❑ No
[--]Yes �O No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�f
Use` drawings of facihty tit better` explain sittiafions f (use addittanal pages as;�ecesry) � A r �R
C✓}r � �Z �-► tr. b if'tr : "3-t .. �� �i �C r � � J' D �j ? � : c��.R Tv S#�',�, �H- C-(� .
f%r ID
�i✓a��� � _ �Yr_�rs � y' � (� � �i�iT� !'�' fJ<lG �.s '"� � S C �� cLG, rjt{ �
Reviewer/Inspector Name =
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
y d3k
.r
Date:
cc: Divic4wr of l['ater (hualim Water nrralit%- Section. Facilitv A vsffsmertt Unit
4/30/97

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review.
o
�DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection'
O Routine O Complaint. t• ollovv-u } of MV ) inspection O Follow-up of DSIVC review O Other
Date of Inspection
:Fac:i�l�ity-,um�ber
Tithe of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time {in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr'15 min)) Spent on Rei view
Certified Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not O eratianappl Date Last Operated: ........................................................................................
Farm Name: .... ......t./lf.4..�...... [ {}Etnt4'• L.l�..........................................................................
.......... ..............................I................ 7, l� /3u s
Owner Nante:............ 6A,.--f .............. .... l T ................
........... n phone \o:.........'....... 5../.................................
Facility Contact:....................................................�.......... Title: — Phone 1N.................................... .........
All1ailingAddress :...... .l.......G?........f'.L`f '!............ ............ /..... �.....
....:........
Onsite Representative: ... � `........... Integrators...... %V���.................................. ..
................. ..........................
Certified Operator:............................................<................................................................... Operator Certification Number:..............
Location of harm:
Latitude 0 4 0.9 Longitude ' 4 O;r
Type of Operation'
Swine
Design Current Design Current Design.; Current
Capacity.: Population! Poultry•.' Capacity. Population Cattle Capacity Population. "
m Wean to Feeder
if 470
Feeder to Finish
�Ui7
Farrow to Wean
?�
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
et' of Lagoons:Holding;Ponds:
❑ Subsurface Drains Present JjE1 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 1 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. Ii"discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'•' (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lag=oon system" (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30197 maintenance/improvement?
0-Yes ❑ No
Q Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
yn &,
❑ Yes [51 No
{ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
® Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facili.y Number: Z —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft); I�c�pr a Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
l�rr i -1
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......'l�}, GAG t�
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ Yes
ERNo
❑ Yes
ELNo
❑ Yes
10 No
Structure 5
Structure 6
❑ Yes
5T No
❑ Yes
EZ No
❑ Yes
Ed No
❑ Yes
[0 No
Ayes
❑ No
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Onl
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
Eallo
❑ Yes
V No
El Yes
® No
❑ Yes
10 No
91 Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
CO No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�p f �o.,u - u(� f'T� _ _ " � �� frY S � {G--fiph• � �l;fG�,. � y���j �'"� � � LoG�t
AIrD W)-s M 1.5
�bS�,Lve*7 ��n��(r U�� � ��.t►> .vf�7 �d��� rat+��. SU6-sS'T
i +� ETA 2 Lv ^e T
r'�-�z C✓y, tom, b tom. e3-, , T>/ 5
r� `rl �• „rh, i'Vi"""i %� � PdsS � l� l t- e�i ��� >V�T p'•'�-�► -"^' r� dT`hfS'�
�r 4 I'D
�iz�:�•+•� Y✓�t�� 2v>n rF�'�' �' (.?'p � W�tT� Wr A+c i5 �1 � S C �u' <c:c, 5+� �
} � D, t� ra�..a , t,Y., •-ri.rz .4• ara ► ..� �•ri cr,7 �
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ReviewerlInspector Signature: f Date: /` /, j
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
o Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted In Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Seawright ................................................ County: Columbus WIRO
OwnerName: lGaut»........................................ croNdher ...................... Phone No: 03-.3359....................... ........................................................................
FacilityContact:................................................................ ...............Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: UJQ0.Bi9.Axen ue.Ra+ad..................................................................... Tabor..City.KC..........................------...................... 28.46a ..............
Onsite Representative: Gaye.JCrawLb.er......................................................................... Integrator:Mtuph„y-F'amuY.Farms......................................
Certified Operator:Gaye.D................................. QawtbLer ........................................ Operator Certification Number: 16446.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 Longitude ®• ®` ®µ
esigni.711 .yrren es�gn .: -urren � " m -; esign p urren
Swine Capacity Population _ Poultry_ q _ Capaci_ty:j:Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
ean to ee er
400
® ee er to mts
® Farrow to Wean
3500
13 Farrow to ee er
13 Farrow to Finish
Gilts
p Boars
13 aver
p Non -Layer
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? p Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 0 Yes p No
7125/97

aci i Number: Z4_ 13
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
p No
Structures La oons Holdin Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: L.6......................................................................................................................
...................................................
................................
Freeboard (ft):
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
p No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
p No
12,
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
N Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
p No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
p No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
p No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
p No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
Q . oyiu ions -or crencies'were.noo unng rs visi :. ou wr .receive noF u er . - .
:.,cei�Kesponfeae� �Wyut tijis•visit:: ................ ... .. .
Comments (refer to question:#) ' Explain any YjES'answers and/or any recommendations or an other comments
y ;
Use drawiiigs_of facility, to better explain situations. (useyedditi(inalapages as'necessary):
Follow. up visit.was made.to ensure -that problems encounter
ed on 1/15/98 had been corrected
peritor. said,that she had pumped.the rematnmg.waste,in farm ditchesback to the lagoon.' No evidence of waste was found'in the
itches'during this'visit.' -Pools of waste were still'observed in-sprayarea#12. The border's of this field.had notibeen disked,'as
`ecommended by Dave Holsinger; however,,dirt had been piled in certain'ar_eas around the field borders to minimize further runoff
e operator was,instructed to continue monitoring this area.
urmg the`Asit, observations' were also made to determine if problems'encountered'on 5/15/97'inspection had been corrected; - .
-
i'a t ��' F -f zf J r y 7/25/97:
T
Reviewer/Inspector damendrew.G ,.,-.... M7,''
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � � _5 �� �A �� 1 e- I 26

4Y . . . ,
Facility Number: 24_13 Date of Inspection

JUL-14-1995 15:22 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
WIRL P.02/02
•
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRON-N4ENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIO Sr M VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: 4 1L3D _ /„ r'a►� . e .
Farm Name/Owner.
Mailing Address.,,
County:
Integmor. U k4944, Phone:
On Site Representative: C— Phone:
Physical Address{Location:: , _�� �/Ql � , � � M�,
Type of Operation: Swine _� Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site-
DEM Certification Number: ACE_DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ° �' Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches Yes r No Actual Freeboard: P-9-- Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes r No Is the cover crap adequate? Yes tNo
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from DwellVerN(o
r No
100 Feet from Wells
Is the animal waste stockpiled Within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or ether
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific ge with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: � � C 1%� 0.
G a ! !7m a_,
Inspector Name
S
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Ilk
Use Attachments if Needed.