240012_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality

[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation-Operation Review
[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservatr4n'-Compliance Inspectpcit a,
Division of Water Quality. Cdhplionce Inspection s
Other Agency Operationewr
Q Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review JU Other
Facility Number 12. Date of Inspection Q s
Time of Inspection !0 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last O erated.
Farm Name: 1�►/ ..C.r'Ce e l i)lCS L < County: f`45tO Mbus
.................................. .....
4:1
Owner Name: ....... ......... r.... .. .�..... r w In Phone No: ..__.........._
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................... ......... Phone No: .................................................
MailingAddress: ...................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
T.
OnsiteRepresentative: !qr !!-- Yt ftcC"+ Cgrr6��3 .................. .........
........... ................................,._................... Integra€or;
Certified Operator:................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number................................ .....
Location of Farm:
............... . ...................................................... ....................._........_...............
Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population. ..
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts,
❑Boars Total SSLW
of Lagoons l ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
HolrlgPoncls f Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Impacts
i. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made`? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does dichar e bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ❑No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier: r
Freeboard(inches): ...........r. ................ ................................... .................................... ................................... .................._............... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ❑No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 7-14— 12 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
k (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ❑No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ❑No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ❑No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ❑No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ❑No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes FRj No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
�'Vo Yiq a ignjs'©fir ftfjcjetni #*•*ft hofp(l dutrMg t psylsit'.•You vvjl•reeeive Rio t><i-tix tr
Co.rr@S 6zidenCe.9646t.tWs Alt_'
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recorrin endations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
Hurfie4toe, FloyA LAyeir, A.
Let5aen S o-vz4v:rA1 l'ol-tegli4l rS yod.
�y
Reviewer/Inspector Name �'ft p 1�G W+s1) M r4A it
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1 Q 5
3/23/99

astir)o-
eve
�Y
N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMPLAINTIEMER GENCY REPORT FORM
VVILM17VGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Received by:6b�D rt€-,A G. LFE(-M+N4 C Cl'— Date/Time: I - 2 —q 8 L 1_0_ i n h"
Emergency: Cmwlaint: � County: C-A L 0 1y_R u T _
Report Received From.-
Agency: Phone No.
$
Complainant: r
Address: Phone NO
Complaint or Incident: 1.. �r?.e r- L� L Ca_,r
Ti.aie and Date Occurred:_1 �_ -_ ci
Location of Area Affected:
Surface Waters Involved:_Groundwater Involved: Other:
Other Agencies/Sections Notified: 4 L air - FLg e t+,P u i 1 2. _!vc�r e_ 0,�g r,4, ti „: C 4 1 }r+� b v�
�'�!
znvestigation Details: l 1, ,r
t'W4 L'%-Ou 'r t-t,-a_ V% re-elj3
bvt sL-o� zeL t.. ,lyl ; u ire c� �•.
r a - r
,
G f _ �Uf-75 -r- .,L)ri S !0., Z.. , rAi i
di •ree � S,Q efvc lv� i t-rdyl
l o�q e ,>< -� !� o -L� w a S l e s r tt—t--� w'.1 A .S e t c v-d N ni-i cz
V Investigator:�,,%I-.) Lg�j,S (, . Lute: I
r5,1A-t,3 wRt-QN
EPA Region IV(404)347-4061 Pa4dda 733-35S6 Emergency Mmraganew 733-3867 WUVe Resources 733-7291
Solid and Hazardous Waste 733-2178 Marine Rrhents 726-7021 Water Supply Brunch 733-2321 U.S. Coast Guard MSO 343-a&Z
127 Cardinal Drive Ex[ension, Wilmington. N.C.28405-3845 •Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

tMo
z ��� 0 Division of Soil and Water[ onservation 0 Other Agency s ~F
�� ���(Dtv>tsivn of Water Quality � '
0 Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection 4)Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection + 1
Facility Number Time of Inspection � 24 hr.(hh:mm)
D Registered R Certified 0 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113NotOperafional I Date Last Operated: .---_......_
Farm Name: �.. .s.. �/ Count L A.m.e!`—1-6.m. w.. Q.
Owner Name:................: .%t-�• C..:r �.5,.�!.`.-.........................._............. Phone No:.. Q. ..).....(? .....1.Q. . ............... ........
Facility Contact: ..........................................................................Title:........................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: .... .:.....Z..........L.ts-f......1.!3.. ... ......... +1 .t. .x.. .�. ..i.... .......I......- .2 LU.2—
OnsiteRepresentative:,kAf........ r ...}Al t..._ s.G. L
Certified Operator: ....__ Operator Certification Number:.JQ. ']..2..----...._._�....__....._._....�._._ .._------------.............�.....�_..._. pe .­.
Location of Farm:
.....S.C.�.+�t��rx.s� ....si1�,e s� ...��'a.. 6.��?..�.......��.....1?_.�.�i.l.a-,.�.
...
Latitude Longitude
Design: Current Design great Desagn
Swine Opjacit ' �tion Poultiry Capa. ..... Cattle Capacity! t�%:
[ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy +
❑Feeder to Finish JE1 Non-Layer 1 ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
. .
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other -
❑Farrow to Finish Total.Design Capacity G `
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW )0
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
❑No Liquid Waste Management System
General.
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes B No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance titan-made? ❑Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes El No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes Q No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®,No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes EtNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require &yes ❑No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes 91 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes R No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: ..j — 1 Z
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes 1l No
Structures(Lagoons.tlolding Ponds,Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? $1 Yes ❑No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft). ..........L.. ................. .................................... ................................... .................. ................ .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes 19 No
11. is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes ®No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
(If any or questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes 23.No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? 19 Yes ❑No
(If in excess of WNW,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..h..t?- ............ +.. .,o. .. ............�d.Jrlsr.. .............. R................................ .........___.......................,............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes ll No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? E]Yes ❑No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes �TNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? RYes ❑No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes [)JNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? 10 Yes ❑No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? )&Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes RNo
[] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this.visit. You.aill receive no ftirther .
correspondence about this visit. .
eortmtents(rdfer'to question#j. Explain any YES answers and/or.an}ret<ouunendattons or any ptite�t cci runents
Use drain s ofaciG3
t to better explain situations.ruse additional pages as necessary)
P t s
��w�L lew £ wad it mot, ga�+o... F � q i.�a<a n +—a44
5.
q• Lo�n o,.. (,.e..w.t. sLua, f o :,.� o� ,�.t r �,...r,!� Le a.c.�d
!9_ f.rv {v� -� �?e ••. /�d„��; o•ti Sa�vrnt- SO ��s. Poi e£ ►.1A.( ca�C
of j C/Y y- (.. dT t'c 6 c.�t`V�{N 1^ O r J•n d wo-.S t�d
A L d v-R^r tare S v l rl I .r.. el t1k 4-�
Sod 7/25197
Reviewerflnspector Name t..1 It ► : , , ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
1 pure V 3 , 'r--G �� a
24 r
vcL ,1°d pit t a u r E
iC � C a � �
hieC C 1
c

0 DSWC Animal Feedlot Operate on Revlew
f
®DWQ Anlmai Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
.0 Routine O ComnIaint O Follow-up of DCVO inspection O Follow-up of DSit'C review O Other
Date of Inspection 3 47
Facility dumber N Z
Time of Inspection i Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status- I r -__ Toral Time (in hours) Spent onRe%qew
or Inspection (includes travel and processing) 0
Farm Name: L 'e 4Ln L, '1 r S o s - County: W—a ,Q..
Phone No: 16!�-I.. .Q1_ _ r
h
II'IailiIIg Address: �_1
Onsite Representative: Ila„- Integrator:-Cr,v- r "L- EQ c A S..J xa;_:
Certified Operator. P+-� l j ; c- . _�.... CY Q �� - K-Le _La-vj- Operator Certification Number:-A- �Ia--
Location of Farm:
,tt.q„2ci s ,d9- c S CZ Q..Z 7-9. ....-4
Latitude ©'��®� Longitude •
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
ry-pe of Operarion and Design Capacity
Sine :. . Number.:' . Poultry _... . Number.... Catde..:: Number
T
Wean to Feeder � z_ ? �}µ❑Laver Z.- ❑Dairy I
❑Feeder to Finis? ~ ❑Non-Laver I w:❑Beef
Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder V Y Mn. ...
10 Farrow to Finish -_ ❑Other Type of Livestock
Number of Lagoons 1 Holdin Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present
f Fc R E 6N i-5 "S }s 4x°�r�•5�^ �'°t .e s y: �4e
a r !^ _ ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑-Yes ®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ENO
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface W"ater?(If yes,nortry M Q) ❑Yes ElNo
c. li discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gailmia? OJA
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,noriN DWQ) El Yes EL No
t. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation? ❑Yes IR No
4. Was there anv adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes E No
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑ Yes JK No
r:ate:_^ance�ir.-;nro�e:^c:tt'

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑Yes R No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge(if inspection after 111/97)? ❑Yes 9 No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes &No
Structures (Lagoons and/or HoldingPondsl
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑Yes 01tiro
Freeboard(ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 La_oon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes aN.o
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes ®No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structuies lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? ❑Yes ®,No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes O No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type z
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management?,an? ❑'::s 2 No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes B No
18. Does the cover crop need improvernent? F,Yes ❑No
19. Is there a lack of available imgation equipment? ❑Yes 21No
For Certifier)Facilities Onlv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management P:an readii.avau-ab;e? ❑Yes ONO
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plaa in any wzy? ❑Yes ®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes ENO
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes [9 No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑Yes 21No
Comtiierits(refer to ques4on :,E.rplaui atz�r YE5 aitswe.-s and�or anv re'a •rze daeoDS o;ar o ,canimelts
T_Tse drawzn s=off`aci�z to�l3ettere" ,lain. sitizauons` use addzuanal a esas n,cessar� - _•:� °: ; . �.. ". _.
Q, F;l L ., k,C l z p-. 't �C r 2m 1 r q a C•-L t.J CL :. {�
�Cjl`7 r��t.r r" F J Lt� rt?
�-C r r� �� 2.ry S l L .•-. a n 1
Inca `\j eta
lt] CropS �+Ce�cl �c t' tu,.� � ,�. i �n � i •, � Lc� wl� , Ltn lr�V 'L
t t' S T rxt-� .z t� .: t Cl.p -1 c o- (-c V Q-v-- %r V C f Rase, 1a � a ,jc_ve- �at s{C� a�� r"-y S t� �. : v2 -� I
�-rZ. VI Plc�v.��
1 � hS : C M•v i✓t �lr: r�-•.f. c� C � C E �-'i f�7
r 0 r
` r �1
v .D• a ��•� f , elt� Y.v ,.,-.b -.c �-, � � v rr r � ya � t, r1? Lc . x�:
o r re S . n.ik 1a t1.�' Z cti +,•^, b�a,7,-, �+^ �c v r C�v,• r.1 c. �.J i� rr,
a. In l /vt r'V,• f— n i,c' r' -.�_� h c r , ,A—
f r ti 0- t W 1=a L-Z Ir...�.., - - .tea. ..a n. _C;
Reviewer/Inspector Name aL ,k*"r ' ':; - -�
Reviwertlnspector Signature: r�.�.L �, Date: c
Assessmert Emit 11,:4.196

JUL-14-1995 15:22 FROM DEM WATER. QUALITY SECTICH TO
WiRO P.02i22
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. a -
. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: rl- l , 1995
Time: I
Farm Name/Owner: �� 4 �re�cl �,1 CT�ech L►v e oak _
Mailing Address: RA :i- Snx �� Ci) t u E[� KL_C. -2�Y 7 2
County:_ Colu�Ibu5 -
Integrator. -rob Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: 7- v 3
Physical Address/Location: Tzke SP_toot looc"--h �o Sfz 17g3 _{Urn �e +, on S�i'�ovj
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle 4-, .
Design Capacity: ��h R Number of Animals on Site: 3G
DEM Certification Number: ACE_______ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW_`�
Latitude: Longitude: " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot+7 inches)(9 or No Actual Freeboard: —Z—Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(jg Was any erosion observed? Yes or t'V
Is adequate land available for spray? '�e or No Is the cover cro adequate? Yes o�
Crop(s) being utilized: 1 r _ Ck
•�. -_
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? e or No
100 Feet from Wells? '&or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(9
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or(o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch,flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o 1 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes oo
Additional Comments: j- ut A - U -e
�
Q J tA) Lf L k� T u�1 Je 111
Lj
L d2 Lezu;s
Inspector Nanie Signature
cc;Facility Assessu ent Unit Use Attachments if Needed.