240010_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H GAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
ro
_,.
O Routine O Complaint O Follovr up oI' I)NVQ inspection ® Follow-up of I)SWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Faci3itE� Nurrtber �
Time of Inspection =24 hr. (hh:mm)
©Registered ® Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name; ..T..&.... L ......1.roc.a.............................................. Cvunty:...C..fl..�.u.:n,�.la..u.�,......................�.r.�.�
Owner Name: Utz Y.x.... ..�. ca .x.r. ....... .a..�..L.Q.:, ..q.�.�r..� ..... Phone No: C Q I O ..... .�. ..q. .................
FacilityContact:
Title Phone 1\0
...........................I...............................................................................................................................
Mailing Address:.. .QS...... ...}Z�..:....... ....�-��1.�.�p.Y.�h.�.�.................... ze'a,g.r
4 J i-•...
Onsite Representative:..�..r...l. ... z. rr wr�.�.t.sx.&.xi .... ... .......�n-� Integrator:..�..a .x..�.�..0................................................
Certified Operators..."T.e....' .x..j......1E.......... ... W.1 Operator Certification Number:...( I,.A.1 z ............
Location of Farm: V IJ
i E �. van n . n w ✓ t"-tr. A J_ ) � •t'e�1/ —
t�. 7 ! L
......WA..� � 1......�..�. � �...:....................................................................................................................._......._........................._.........................
Vr
Latitude _' '�` Zf " Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than faQoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: Ztj—
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons,%Iolding Ponds, blush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..,...... .a... .........Zt-5 ........................................
Freeboard(ft)......................................................................................................................................................... .........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities: Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management PIan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
® No.violations or deficiencies. were noted- during this: visit. You dwill receive 66 ftirih&
eOrregpondehce about~ this_VKU.: :
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
i ! *-U...> u,� :' S f wCLS w► e�-0{ a� ho �._.� £ v .-� t��-+� f 1 o ty ►� s l^ o
p u a i_� o 8 ti C, r e v i C,.,j
17 +� v �` s t t+ f w 0_3 e 1, .e t..rV,.b.t4" t
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: rn _" - , ).H Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
- _ 3 Division of Water Quality
Routine p Complaint p o ow -up of DWQ inspection p FZ
Facility Number
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm !Name: d&L..Farms..Inc........................
O
Bate Of I11spection
Time of Inspection ��� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Not Opera Date mast Operated:
County: Columbus WIRO
Owner !Name:.Terry.&Larry.................... W.iltonghby................ .......... .................... Phone No: 9)1I4-fa4&4.492.................................... ......................
Facility Contact:...............................................................................Title: ... Phone No:
................................................................................................................
Mailing Address: 9R5.Paul..W..Ulnughby.Rd................................................................. EvergrP,m..c................. ..................................... 2843R..............
Onsite Representative: BoUby..Stubba............................................................................ Integrator:.Cap':oll.il.Rmds..I,uc.............................................
Certified OperatorJrrxy.F.................................. Willoughby..........................,.......... Operator Certification Number:1.69R2........ ..,........ ..........
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®a®4 ®�4 Longitude ®a ©®&f
eslgrt. urren es1gn usren
estgn urren
,:-
the Ca acro ulaion oaiitry Capacay 1Pa�ulat�a�i "pacrty EFoputaiaon
�Ciile
0.
0 aYeT '; 0 airy
p on -Layer p on -Dairy
w
0 -.
r
-
fiaio�3aws�gnapat3,552
Its
p Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [3Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [3 Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon [3 Spray Field [3 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [3 Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? [3 Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require [3 Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes N No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? [3 Yes a No
7/25197

aci i . um er: 24_]Q
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Hotding Ponds. Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
identifier: ...................................
Freeboard (ft): I V
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
15"
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(1f any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste A[)Vlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
N Yes p No
Structure 5 Structure 6
15. Crop type Coasta1Bermuda Grass .......................... Soybtans................... ............................................... ............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
.. violations,
©hAednes. ...... gjabquerte1tnciiseYs-iws�ereaot.e...u.rin.gtisvisit;- auwY .receive no e
. .... ...... ..� r. .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes H No
p Yes N No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes g No
p Yes H No
Comments (refer to question #) E"Iaiu any Y I± ' answers acid/or any recommendatrons'or any other comfinent$'
Use lrawin s of 1661i to better explain situations. use additional pages as necessary):
g � p ( p g
,�. Lagoon Q has 15". Minimum of 19" required. Need to pump ASAP. Can apply waste upto 30 days prior to planting. May A6
want to overseed coastal in addition to wheat/ry. e.
16. Need to have plan revised to allow pumping on soybeans. Although no irrigation records shown for soybeans. They are in the
field designated in plan. .
2. Use Irr-I and Irr-2 farms for irrigation.records..Also need.to designate which lagoon you are pumping from.
7/25/97
49*4
Reviewer/Inspector Name _Audrey'"Oxei�d�n
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 5/8/97
Facility Number 24 11
Time of Inspection 10:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Gcrjlflpd... ..................................................... ........ ............ (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 0
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: Jn&,T..�jlJQiughJZy............................................................................................ County: Calumbus..... ................................... MR0.........
Owner Name: La rsy..&Jere.................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: Rt X01.d.4I......_..........._ . _ .._. _. W__:....... J nrumnNG....... ........
w �._ ... ... _... � r
Onsite Representative: Larry,\'41J1(tlqghhy._................................................................. Integrator•. QE�QXI'.a. Ater . �....... ....... .........._.
Certified Operator._—_—_---_ � .�.�...M......_ Operator Certification Number.
;'cation of Farm:
Latitude F 34 • 27 L 23 °` Longitude 78 ' S3 42
13 Not O erational Date Last Operated: .........
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? 0 Yes 0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancerunprovement?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Yes ® No
NIA
❑ Yes ® No
[] Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
(] Yes ® No

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes N No
- 7.` Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1 /1 /97)? ❑ Yes ® No
8_ Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes N No
Structures(Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes N No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
................. _............
..
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes N No
1 I . Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancehmprovement? N Yes ©No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) '
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Aonlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type . .............. Stast�al. CgAu�ta GFs.S .... .................. sa .GSz1a� .c�G .Gx�iz1�..............
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? [:]Yes N No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes ® No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N No
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes N No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? N Yes ONO
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No
..�. .. Y.x :.....
i......s;�c+r:a = �eaci......... ....i. ..........
.....
•. :: ' es=rise'
Asa i1Fa�v" 'Ei# f+[st[i;b R "1xi 5tiIiDS: lit
(. Ems.=:
12. All bare areas on lagoon wall need to be revegetated to prevent erosion.
+
22. Waste sample records need to be kept with the animal waste management plan and irrigation records.
ote: This facility has been combined with 24-10 into one facility under a single animal waste management plan.
- - - - - ____ - ,;:;iA=�:e$ :.a:3S36:$ - - "SSa;.•
-
Reviewer/Inspector Name .:-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

10 Routine Q Com faint Q Folio-w-ue of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 5/8/97
Facility Number 24 10 Time of Inspection 10:00 24 hr. (hb.nun)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Ge>r ell.. __.__..._ ..._.. .._ _ ._ __ .. .. (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 0
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: JAL.)Farms.l c........... _. _ .............._ ..............._........._ .... County: .»....... ........ W-M.___
Owner Name: Jc riry...&.Larzy.................... ........ Phone No: 9.1.044R..A.492......... .......
W.._.»» ...-._...___..
Mailing Address: �Q.P.atll FyillQhe�._ . . _ w� W . __xJCglreJll �i ....... ..._...
Onsite Representative: Integrator: Catrlvi[:i.Eo.Qdv.Jac_...._..._.._ ._.....__._.__
Certified Operator: J.clrlry..F ...............................W..111O.Ughby.......... ........................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude 34 • 27 ' 24 u Longitude 78 • 53 34 K
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: .....................W.......».......................... ..................... _................_........_. ._......-
of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancerunprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes 19 No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? N/A
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4_ Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes D9 No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 0 Yes ® No
maintenancerunprovement?

6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
❑ Yes
® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1 /1 /97)?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
® No
Structures (Laimons and/or Holdini! Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
❑ Yes
0 No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
.................3..............,................ ......
...... _....._ ........._
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
® No
U . Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancefimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
❑ Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes
H No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
ilv irk csl}tji :.:... lam: '�S.I........ I ..... a`r ......... at i.. tlzer:eonai ieiits=- =-= = -- = = - = - x.l ::: = :;
.. 3....p................ -'..
.....l3F{�I .fro' 'defter a 'S [i3 ii7Ii9:- [L (ltiitit7i]4I- 8S-2iC�6
".. .ty.• i?-. (. lam . �' 3. .
22. Waste sample records need to be kept with the animal waste management plan and irrigation records.
Otherwise, facility looked good.
Note: This facility has been combined with 24-11 into one facility under a single animal waste management plan.
1. "�iL _ :;'L...•r W.-'.r:-:y. !.1."Y--:.:: +},£: - '�'r'St%.r`:',-"a2'H'a {it{r ..:.:�`�..:v�`4Lx`f:
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q , 9
U 11

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No..l
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:�_(A u b
Mailing Address:
County: C d L b Lij
Integrator: 0.12 r C�? Lt 5 _ Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: IC-5 e, i _ 16 ` l - t
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle YZ `15 e `7
Design Capacity: 3_S_2 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude.,° 1,0a, Longitude:° �?� ' Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm. event
(approximately 1 Foot 7 inches) Ee or No Actual Freeboard: __�' Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or* Was any erosion observed? Yes or V0
Is adequate land available for spray? e or No Is the cover crop adequate?6 or No
Crop(s) being utilized: ce'?'j +j
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?OR or No
100 Feet from Wells? 6 or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or Co
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes 06
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Addir onal
.11E"
1r??,ze4& ­e— 6�
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.11�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
. ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: -7- 2 , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner. a_CC' (Ao'4 2 to .,
Mailing Address:
County: C-0 . ku", _
Integrator. 0a &ZQ 15 Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle -y.11� S q"
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: �' S Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 6r No Actual Freeboard: L Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? s �ar No Is the cover crop adequate? e or No
Crop(s) being utilized: ( _ o 9Z:j'r4-V -L) o4_ Yn u L) oA -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 6or No
100 Feet from Wells? Y,.ks or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or lie
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes ogi
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
simiiar man-made devices? Yes o(S) If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
I• .._. •.1....
&6k 4— 6 re
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.