240008_INSPECTIONS_20171231

�r �'■�.A�
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

1
• �4
[] Division aF Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
'�Diviston of Water Quality � �; � �'r:
Routine O Com taint O Follow� of DWins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0 Certified [a Applied for Permit Permitted 10 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
�' County i
Farm Name: l`r ...... �.... ` 1lI `-'. �... . • ................... �-.�.'.'.�...... ............. .......................
Owner Name: f .... Phone No:....... v...�.................... .. .....:.................�................................... ��5 ..... .- . --- ...
FacilityContact: ...
......UZ................... a e:...... ......... Phone No:
l / .
Mailing Address:....r1 . z�Z .S..... .l �!�:�......
Onsite Representative: .... H :...................................... c......... Integrator:......�.��!L��S..........
............................ ........................ ......... ...............................
Certified Operator;.1!.2� I- : !�-� -. ............. Operator Certification Number;.,.... �q ...........
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®•,�� ��� . Longitude ®• 2Z ` 0"
Desire Current Design Current• Design •_Current
» Swme `Capacity Population Poultry ,Capacity Population Cattle, gCapacity 'Population =',
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
( 0
7 4h7
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Non -Layer ❑ Non-
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
A Tata! Design,I
Tot"
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what'is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
F
❑ Yes EBINo
❑ Yes O�No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes [12-No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
!*Yes 19 No
❑ Yes 0!No
❑Yes RNo
Continued on back

Facility number:? —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed?
Structures (Lasoons,11oldina Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes 1O No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):........2.......I.......................-I................................................... .................................... ......................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [ 1No
I L Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ff Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters off the State, notify DWQ)
I5. Crop type ........... . e.......................................... '............................... ........ .1...! ...........................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted_ Facilities_ Only
23. Does the facility fait to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.violations or de'ficiencies.were-noted-during this:visit.- You.rvill receive no further
correspondence about -this'.visit:• : -'.:
{-Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [4.No
❑ Yes [WLNo
❑ Yes EZNo
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes pW No
❑ Yes [ANo
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes [KNo
❑ Yes Gj No
❑ Yes [jkNo
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes ® No
omments;(reter to,quesuon o) ,,Exptam any, r Lb answers anaror any recommenstattons or any outer comments.
Use drawings of facility to better`explatn'situatiiins (use addttional pages`sts,necessary)
C m vd 5" OVVS..r
-2- — 42 117 °aL �205 G+m- o� .� �...—.t`c� S �a V�r k
PA Iil>D + t4,-r,2 leUh
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1� Date:

Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ ins cction O Follow-up of I)SWC review Other
Date of Inspection u 97
Facility Number 2 �,
Time of Inspection C34 Use 2� br. time
Farm Status: Qta�� . ^.
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReAetiv Z ��
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: �Ai-" a= _.. County:��aii� _
Owner Name:Aa Phone Nw(clibb
Mailing Address: �� X ��� 1 �1�L._ M
Onsite Representative: PMMI �A.iZx± 1.,j1L
Certified Operator: 9AYYV A• qkd _ Operator Certification Number: --
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• 0` ®"
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: _.
type of Operation and Design Capacity
•�� '�1 — ,'s`�"`z`s�.'f -� ��"��?"�.=`i"e- ;aa. -� 1 ''�` � � '' M � - .-. -.:;iF.��^, `-`�.�,°�'.E ''4 �.,- >«. ��0" �:`'-. ��.. _' :fie � ���'
1Vtlmbei-�""�
Swine 2_' wN-umbetz Poultry�NnmberCattle<�z`
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Laver Dairy x. ,
3 Feeder to Finish 3�
u
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Beef
Farrow to Wean
4�0' •�`;�
Farrow to Feeder_
Farrow to Finish
❑Other Type of Livestock A
- �.r-as.- `� X„y
- .. �..., .- .... sw �,-:-.ra.,h.':w. .:..
.: k`+"....`n'�-' _�--, ewe. .a.'nb-`.z..: �va.aiS..w`?•w. ,a .�.<.,
Number of Lagdans 1 HoldmgPouds "�"; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present s
❑ Lagoon Area @1 ID Spray Field Area
g.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 91No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes M No'
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? Ai JA
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P No
Tv4. Was there anv adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? [I Yes No
5.. Does any pan of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ❑ No
maintenancelimprovement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/unprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
11 Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
NTVaste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �qn- cU c, . ' .-1:12CEr- —. .
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facilityfail to comply with the Animal_ Waste Management PIan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did ReviewedInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes 'NO
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes fD No
❑ Yes RI No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes tO No
❑ Yes 0 No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ Yes
[SNo
❑ Yes
t9 No
&rtns SW3 be, huz1 " o rov,-O l�ct� � n �ief) iU 4-o {)mvoJ- pe"%6& J►`stYu���
63- No marKw %r �a5 # 1 1 nf�lGa{C. 5�/S40� fwm�z n �Wel s .
[_v Y brat fJivu� itCk) ( v a-Mt1 Sit( Jdi�]Or1 l WuseS.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: ��- Date:
0
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

JUL-14-1595 15 12=' FROM DEM WRTEP, OUAL I T'Y SECTION TO
WIPO. F.02/0
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
W �J� Dfli 9-1
Facility No. ���
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SYFE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: — 1 , 1995
Time: I ( 30 _
Farm Name/Owner: h& 2 e%� A ((T Z f k l itA C l r A C Q c S
Mailing Address: 0"-' FJ0,c-t-0 A C_2te-.S L�JF 60Lr' rJ` 2-$
County:integrator. �7 W S Phone:
On Site Representative: _}}#,"ti _ 0�'�C. i Phone: 5 o CSS— G
Physical Address/Location: rK'� S Q i QY �0 ��•.� _ _uJ. I
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: m_ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' Q ' 36 Longitude: 5-D" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Fact + 25 year 24 hour stoma event
(approximately 1 Foot_ 7 inches) Ye or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. —Inches
• Was any seepage observed from the a oon(s)? Yes r N as any erosion observed? Yes or tiro
Is adequate land available for spray es r No Is the cover crop adequate? Ye or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings_ Yes No
100 Feet fmm Wells?,
r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map BIue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters o estate by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes t -o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management rec ds (volumes of manure. land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Y or No
Additional Corxzments: V S t. G l_C A N l i2 G A-CP'44 [
I T i w.E kwt_ 1 C s A1v [`> ib CL.__ 0 00
Inspector N
Si _nature
cc: Faciliry Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed