240006_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
r�
Department of Environmental Qual

3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Ageney
® Division of Water Quality
«.
�.:
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSW ; review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
FacilityNumber
Time of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Tr?taw,ct�l].......... _. ,. .... >Erb ............................... County:... .o...L].x!!IktJ $.....................j .t
Owner Name:...... .x.x �.t.......... ... ...&.'.r��.................. ...................... I... Phone No:..... ...1?...._ ..`....Q. ..Kt.................
Facility Contact: ...... . . ...... . . ........_..... Title: .... Phone No:
Mailing Address:...91±......... . .........&.ry.......zi.—......................................... r....LL-11..}. 1.c.................
OnsiteRepresentative:.:�(Z f.ar.�.�....�1.�A{�5............................................. Infegrator:...�r.�C.�... .................
Certified....r..............- ............................ Operator Certificationumber;,,-.lA2..... j..... ...........
Location of Farm:
Latitude � • ©° = Cf Longitude � • �U ° ®46
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than tagoonslholding ponds) require
mai ntenanceli mprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 2 q —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons.Rolding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? EJ Yes ❑ N6
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..:_J�..._......... ........... ............................ .............. I...........
Freeboard(ft):........ .......... _................ ... ....... ......................... ................................... ............ ................ ........ ........... ........... ............. ...... ......... ...................
10. Is -seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
1.1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ................. ....._................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail todiscuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[� No.violations or defkieneies_vvere,noted-duiing this' viAC m' 'v411 recei*e-no further:
- Oo resSpbndeko A oidf Ibis. visit..:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
w� ert A,_0911 #) ': li xlalain artrec€rzt�teM4tr
�Q to to ltterexplaitt sttuatrti7uusadIitroa�al pa as
a
F-o ! t n ...a U p vas ; t• wa. s vV-O-dLt
i •-• S e t „� S u e,ln as 014i C z ct Y'-k 4 S
in3 R 5 C{1-, - 1�-v v�? t.�/- I t t � S 4 6 ct--
�-o-� le S � a)i U_ erCo e
w% a.
�10 ue G "; e.y. w i 11 b e t,-,i• r- cw� 1125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name ; `511 IUMM,
Q
N,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: hate: ye

s ❑ DSWC Anim>n
al Feedlot Opefaon Review
a x P-D:WQ Animal Feedloi Operation Site Inspect.on
'' .® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DW2 inspection O Follow-uo of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 1 O : 00 - Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status:YA S=f:l
Total Time (in hours) Spent onRe%7ew
or Inspection ('includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: L t .�.L --. a r . » . Co unty:.. JALF .
Owner Name. T2 a r ic e. i I Phone No:. fad 2, -.. 2.3. 1
Mailing Address: � L. . E j; a u. 2-1 '1 T,, k a v, C _ ' _LLIUL
Onsite Representative: ran. K'.-C l 1 S (-r, c V- C Integrator: AA 1j . EQ. 4 En C
Certified Operator, E c a,, Y D - S t-o Operator Certification Dumber: 1 L 9 :1 Z
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®' p ®� Longitude' ©° ®u
❑ Not Operariottal Date Last Operated:
- - type of Operarion and Design Capacity
el
Swtnea -; 4 Number -.Poultr3' d Cat#ie umber
.K ..�.� .umber
.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Laver
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish`p
❑ Non -Laver
❑Beef
Farrow to Wean
h--.0 ��•aA'g'+r's..i+—{-�_
—�-.G^vT.i�,:�l
"Y^
El Farrow to Feeder
�@S i".
u w zr
`C��vt
... r wr r c
Farrow to Fini5'n
...`._
ther oof f L L
❑ Other OthType Livestock cIc�
� M
"ltiumbet- of Loons f �oldtngPonds _ RSubsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area f9 Spray Field Area
General
1. 1. Are there aav buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 125 Yes ❑ No
?. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operadon? ❑ Yes ®.No
a If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ENO
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
+. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®,NO
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Is Yes ❑ No
maintenancelimprovemcnf?
Continued ore ?park

6. Is facility not mi compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures fLaRooas and/or Iioldine Pondsl
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 La_oon 3
14. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structCzes lack adquata markers to identify start aixd stop pumping levels?
Waste Auplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
I S. Crop type-
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? -
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
Far Certified Facilities Only
24. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal. Waste Management Plan in anyway)
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑Yes
O'No
Yes
12 Nc '
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
91 No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®.No
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
IM No
,Yes
IN No
❑ Yes
O No
❑ Yes
(3No
EL Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
19No
ti
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
13No
❑ Yes
29 No
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ Yes
ONTO
A b o f' , e p� S fa b
U.•-o S S f-; e L4 4 l j. r
T%N a kJ a k 2 'C�1 d r 1 %-e e�-S ? r e�v'1 C V I� U o
12•Mo,j lagoon well- 1`evRT- pra
JCA��i—e e-s
�1 U w 0'�` l� O o +1 W d t �. E'l a ,,� 1 r� a
,r .^^ a { vv— d � , v. a.
� `1. V d d c� +.va st-e Vat Q 6 .c �L � r �; � L� . ,�qk 1 l d v e i-� o v e r
Q�eli4a Eioh. t^-a,rte�� ed { i
b V l 0. r Cr ✓� E� p� � d y,� � I •S � @- l0. � p V.` FiV CM
IV Av. a'=O�0.�e. Uve,V_ cro-� �ee. �tn.tiL-mod r,1 �ietCL
Keel 1• o,.� d�a-d- hex•[t Grtsc `vrft,,.�� Solt ttI J0%Ae. N�l� �er
t4S �vt io
(Xa Gt C� Q_' , w+ q Le- W.-4 ti v+'� Q�v� 0 V ++t [ r H u
Reviewer/Inspector ?fame • +��•:J ' t.
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: C_, - , Q Dare:
cc. Division of Water Qualit}; rater Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

JUL-14-1995 15:22 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
W1R0 P.02!✓2
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONN ENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEI2ATIO S STI'E VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: -�-1
Farm Na
Mailing
County:
Integrator: I- A'Z,
On Site Representative: mee
Physical Address/Location: P
Phone:
Phone:3-%�/
Type of Operation: Swine — Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: $�lo_. Number of Animals on Site: � 60
DEM Certification Number: ACEDEM Certification Number: ACNEW_
Latitude: Longitude: ' —1.Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm. event
(appro)imately 1 Foot + 7 inche Yes r No Actual Freeboard: nehes--
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes r N Was any erosion observed? Yes r No 1
Is adequate land available for spray Yes�r No Is the cover crop adequate Yes No
Crop(s) being utilized: - I.f�� LET lyy[pR T _ -1'2s� /jC&-- S
S m Does the facility meet SCinimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwelling . 'Yes No
100 Feet from Wells es No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 1.00 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes r P'ihe?
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blu Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes Ki9
If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: 10"41 C /.l
Inspector 1V e
N
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.