100032_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Facility Number Z Date of Visit: 20 01 Time: 1 i 2S
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
IsFarm Name: ............... r o G1,�Wga'r...r !. ' S County: ..... 'Lop
.!^! ::.t .jL` .......................
Owner Name: ............."� ... r!Q........' �►.►. � o �.5...................................... Phone No: ..................... ................... ........ ........... ........ ..._...._ �.
Facility Contact: ............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No: .................. ...... ......
_ ..... .
MailingAddress: ................ .................................................................................................... .......................................
Onsite Representative: g.......... ......... �...........i. 4�' ...GItJG S r�.............................c++i•Mv Jlnte rator:..................................._................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ..................... ............... ......
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ° it Longitude • ° Du
Design., Current- Design • Current _ .. Design Carrot
Swine Ca aci Po uiation Poultry ' Ca aci Po tila6on Cattle° Ca acr ` Pb dilation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy _
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean - -
Farrow to Feeder 10 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design ad
❑ Gilts
Boars Total SAW
Namber`of lagoons,.- ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area
No Li 11011 uig Ponds 15o>ld:T "raps` ❑ Liquid Waste Management System
.'
q Y s
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes &No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes J�rNo
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑'N
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes)'No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JF1'No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ YesIeNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes,,EfrNo
Structure 1 Structure ��jj S ct rc 3 }} Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier1 .� .. `.S.�.J....................................................................
n
Freeboard (inches): 3 1 1
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: I D— 3 Z Date of Inspection a 0
5-, Are #fibre any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 'XNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes�No
(Many of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses as
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,?TNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 'PNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenanceJimprovement? ❑ Yes 00
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑rrPAN ❑ / Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes [moo
12. Crop type u�s 0 6/'a I,A_l _i"eS G.IC Nacu
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes .[!(No
❑ Yes )2]�No
❑ Yes )2'fio
❑ Yes�o
❑ Yes ,f No
❑ Yes ONO
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes W'No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? {iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis &soil sample reports} ❑ Yes
�No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ONO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes J;2'&o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes �No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ,"No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes4No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes�No
NO•violations;o� dgficjencies -* re noted d riiig js;v, A • :Y:oo rv-il1•xeegive 00futtW . .
corses deice: abatif this visit:
Comments (rater toe" ueshon #):-Explaui. any YES answers and/or any recommendations oriiiiny other cotnment�. LL
9 -:
Use Wdrawurgs of >facility to; betterexplaii �sitiia#ion.. ( addlt ugj pages as 0eeessary) T x .
7. kree-lC 4e> be stone i'\ t ecv' 1v1""e to bra e1GVq� i0V\
a q p0d o-r GL)E i n r'e6c;141 P (Anf eal 11'escue f l06A.
y
�J. Need,- r�se4 wtioirkQ�1 �s r�ecesSr. o� Ibacl� Z I�,��a•-,s.
—rA e FR G, I � � y j [r Op 1 n&Ad records a y jPT.
Reviewer/Inspector Name h q:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: l _ jj % . 5/00

Facility Number: — 3 Z Date of Inspection / / z Q d
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes []No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes,E]rNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes1121No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes)21110
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 1204o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ONO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additio> omments an or rawings:
S/00

Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
[}Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance inspection
- Division of Water Quality -Compliance Inspection =
Other Agency - Operation Review s
12 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Folloiv-ue of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection t ! qp 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Ij Permitted )M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not O crational Date Last Operated :
FarmName : ...............9 .�]A. .._.....t`t^rr!`..............._..._.........................._...... County:.........9vve iitck......._...._....................................
Owner ?\'ante: sltj..... L-./L.�h�1 ........`o,4h-S....................................
Facility Contact: .......... !fS...........i .,xrw!nS.... Title:. ......................
Mailing Address: ...... ... LA.W..sS.....�ax L..1!�.:..............I........ ..... ..... .........
Onsite Representative :.................ctw. .&....... w�raids...................._........
Certified Operator:............... rL&... �............
G�, Ix�BjCyS
Location of Farm:
Phone No:....�I1©3-..Qi}2Zb.........................
..................p................. Phone No:...................................................
................... wtwaF'tsj..i..................................... ... Y`f 7.......
Into- ratorWiR.S.............
Operator Certification Number: ... 1.07.3 ....
WI*0 ......... s�.4...... 01 ....... �...}....1.......r•UlL s......sA+-...af......1{...�........................................................................................ ;
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude • �' �"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish Zoo JE1 Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts 1EE
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JJQ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated ar ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. ' If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: [:]Surface Waters []Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: gW , W ?
P( LJ3
9
Freeboard (inches): ZS 2.04
S�e }
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
k1 LPr
^T�
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 1A No
[:]Yes 0 No
Structure 6
1r`6199 Continued on back

s.
Facility Number. b — 31, Date of Inspection r L4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ISO Yes El No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes E4No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ IVitroaen
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Crop type ........... 60.-Y(!!k1I ................ Il!?t+��..figXt*i.+ ............. 5..t1.L....... ......................................................................................................................
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
❑ Yes
No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
M Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[X No
Renuired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
El Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
® Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
53 Yes
❑ No
20-
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
01 No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[0 No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
M No
1P. 1Vo:violations-or deficiencies .were noted daring ' iis-visit:: Y•oti vnJ1.rece_ive nor further
00fresp6'dehee; about: this visit.: : : : :::.: : .:..:..::: ::::.:::::.:: :
Comrriients:(refer to question #): -Explain any YES answers and/or any. recommendations'or any other.comments.
Use drawinis of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
•
Z' Ct ``a1Do� atoms or- � tr►t /ej(4- u1Kt GJail, OT (Ox3w,I•Krdz_ + W3 S�"t O ! A,
�IJ 11U c-Y v'�-ude�,garb.OK 0,it 4A G �c�ocYrS S. oWA be r� ITS}.
CA. A V\ 4 tv�e vli�ar i nc�►try J G,v� vv> owl4� s 51-tD ul s� io e YhS4( ILc d r�^
tS- �escUe � F'elds y � � 5 S�,ou�ri IDS �n�rov��•
i g • Lear` a ������ � � � e ih-�-ot,;r t,� +r�-e. a+rc� 5,
)q • lR�.�Z Sti.m1� e� ti i � �"i��1� : ('a � � . �G��C � r n,/r�rahiz. � '�1.�'I`f••t.� tM`ti � . �
Reviewer/Inspector Name
c
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r, _ Oz ,� _ Date: I Ix(c 1/6/99

N
[j Division of Soi14 d Water•Conservation:-_Operation=Aeview ;
O Division. of Soil and Water Conservation -Compliance Lispectlijn _ =
W u
Division of Water: ala Q€t ty Cornplianyce Inspection
0 Other Agency-_Operatiod Review`°. _
A
- - a
Q Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-uR of DSWC review Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
'____ Time of Inspection I /OZO 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted [3 Certified [3 Con�di]tionallyr Certified © Registered Not O eraEional Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CS.r,Q(....C`4V�Q� County: ..... !'U/�St�il,�.!
Owner Name:............ `] ' r I¢ `� ....- C [a ►'vti PlP hS Phone No:
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:................ ........ Phone No:
MailingAddress:.................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: Ctl u6 k' C Ie^� an S Integrator: ............f{ j ..
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
�3
Latitude �' �° Longitude
Design Current. -Design Current _ Design Current,
Swine Poultry. Cattle
. y Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
�Nuirnber,of.Lagoons . ❑Subsurface Drains Present [] Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Z
Freeboard (inches): 2—, j
........................ ..........................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: o — 3 Date of Inspection �Q
6. AIFT.1cre structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9- Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
H. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
t5.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
o yigla00iis.'or &flciencies were hbted• d(kifi this.visit* • Y:o4 wi�l•Ireeeive ti6 fui-thgr
..... .. ..... .
rorresoofidence. a�aut. this visit.
Comments; {iefer;tq question#): -Explainany YES answers and/or anyrectiminendations or arty other_comments h
UseArawings of facility4wbetter explain situations: (use additional gages as necessary) _ :
U!'o-i [Pdrleoy.1 L rn4b�?'►-�n-f,�P�I7Sp¢G)�oh
cj eea s oil 1AILion s s11du id b' ve 9�-�a��d[ w cdvt_t'.
ske,L, be 6r0t4kf ir, 6r 4o se-0 -� p �c�10 --5-661A
�r�ss Gave, r
t►U► ODn � i � v r� 1G t(e � �,.IarkF �s Sl.o u � a� G' e a' hS-���cDt t h G � � �a DOrf'1S
an be- s&f 4 Gvrretic-fo re�lcr� -�rve-F�ee6o��t 1e✓ens.
m^ekers skow lA 1-mve Some i nv(;cc }Oe &C jolgcoh liquid /eve1.
IReviewer/Inspector Name=`Sp'y/I(�ia`}
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: /O
3/23/99

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-u ' of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of inspection 19*1,V 124 hr. (hh:mm)
t] Registered 15sertified © Applied for Permit ,permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.. � � /�!L1................. County: !j"� � s<� ............................
................
r /
Owner Narne:..._5 A(.:r.. ....... �...1. ,..7xn ............................. Phone No: ........ ....�Z...... .�........................
Facility Contact „ , Title ..... Phone No:
Mailing Address:....................,................................
Onsite Representative:--6.-.--- ........a ................... ............ ...........................I............q.....................
Certified Operator ;.......i:....... �..................................................... Operator Certification Number ,.....1,�.�. (3...........
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• e% ®" . Longitude Eia]'
'. Design ,. -,Current
Swine 'Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
z CA)
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Subsurface Drains Present JJ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management
General '
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what'is the estimated flow in val/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Spray Field Area
❑ Yes i. No
❑ Yes JU No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes m No
❑ Yes ® No
19Yes [I No
W Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Z No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
❑'Yes .Q No
Continued on back

j
Facility \umber: 2 — Z
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lai!oons.11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
.9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2
Identifier:
//........ ..............................................
Freeboard(fit):........L..................r.....................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop typet......................................................'..........................................................................................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW;MP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certifiedor_Pennitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Wereany additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.violitions or deficiencies were•notedduring this.visit.- :You*ill receive no f irther
correspondence A out this:visit:
❑ Yes J9 No
❑ Yes ® No
1
Structure.6
❑ Yes 19 No
JSLYes ❑ No
Z Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes 41 No
❑ Yes ,WNo
❑ Yes A No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes W Na
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9 No
E-Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes 91 No
�vw-, �11w u�iG5� R, �gDprtras5 �i7 « .4 s
M9Ct7/�4- lj,.�il �-i r (�v2•t. T) ►v,I�ti.. -'f, wv�/ (�- GYt. �{.7u'i,� �./ZI�O .►.s
7/25/97

0 Routine ® Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection D�
Q 2_
Time of Inspection ' / 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm:Status* ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified C4 Permitted I or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:...... .... ................ .... _ .............. .........._ .... _ ......... ................
Farm Name: t� f.el.��..! �r _ ..... .... County: - ... .........
....» ..... _.
Land Owner Name.- f v � ....., _f.� !lrS l2 �......_..........., Phone Na: ......�?........_...... ........ .......... _...
f
Facility Conctact• lr.S ....�Title:.. YYbltArYi~�L.., Phone No:....... _. .. ......_...
Mailing Add�ets: ..�� ....��Y��.�.. l��,L.. �AN,`�. ��.?��. �41 !�. 1�.�— ......
Onsite Representative:..........,$�.------ �.� Integrator:
Certified Operator: S„ r..!�C ......�_.................... ._..... ........ .._...... .. Operator Certification Number: ............................. ...... ..
Location of Farm:
Latitude �•�� Du Longitude �• �� ���
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
sIN N,�sr� a
�Des�gn Current Design , Current _ Design Current
Ca act . P.,o elation Poultry. � �. Ci aci Po ulatzon R`v- Cattle Y Ci aci ` � Pa ulatioi,
: :.:.,
❑ Wean to Feeder �❑ La cl ❑ Da'
LA Feeder to Finish ! ❑Non -La er �' ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean �� ' �' w k
Farrow to FeederTotal�Desgn Capaciy''
Farrow to Finish � � .z y
r
❑ Other;
Number of IagoonsFlH aiding Ponds .� u` ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
rO Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area .�
r
-General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes B o
❑ Yes LT o
❑ Yes «' o
❑ Yes B<o
❑ Yes
B No
❑ Yes
51,No
❑ Yes
MW
❑ Yes
R<o
Continued
on back

Facility Number:...f ..... _
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Q No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes L'fNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Gklqo
Structures (Lagroons and/yr Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ENo
Freeboard (ft). Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [Q'g
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? B Yes [:]No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? oges ❑ No
(If any of questions 942 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
8<0
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
EK
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
�ex�s-1 �K�........._......CTS .....r -
Crop type .........._ ..............—..................._.
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
MKO_
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
UKo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
E o
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
l-ho
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
Q-Ko-
21.21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,
I�vo'
Ur
Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
GKo
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
ETI�o
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
Olflo
Comments {refer to'queshon #� Ekplaiu any YES answers'andlor.'any recommendations or any:other co6rnents
Use'drawings'of facility.to better explain situat�ons'..(use additional pages as necessary} t ,`
i-o `3� 1IrC�
vrb
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc.- Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

N. C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMPLAINT/EMERGENCY REPORT FORM
IMMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Received lIJC.2��te/Tsme: ZC< ` -'`"Or
Ednzyeucy: Ccplai.nt: ✓ County: Sc.fr Cr
Report Received From:
Agency: %//A / /1�e No.
Cmplainant: ter .1.4 3 L.y�jL
Address: Phone No.�
GMWIaint or Incident: Q 140�jz Ywe 'a A4iO4' d6A.P_vt..
Time and Date Occurred: liy�t-�6r-9
Location of Area Affected:,T�:
Surface waters Involved: Grvunu�b after Involved: Other: ✓
Other Agencies/Sections Notified: Z.L<A
i ��fr
Investigator: 1 Date: CU
SPA Region IV (4MU7-M2 Pesticides 733-3S% Emergency Management 7333967 WWe Resources 733-7291
Solid and Hazardous Warts 733-2178 Marine Fuhm" 726-7021 Water Supply Branch 733-2321 U.S. Coast Guard MSO 343-881
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, W-ilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

10 Routine Q Complaint O Follow-u of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 3/4197
Facility Number 10 32
Time of Inspection 10:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours �
Farm Status: Ce>iffied ........ ......... .................. ... ...... ,.._.._.. :. .... (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes traveld ce s'
Farm Name: Blr.�a &ftatcr.Fwma, nr ............ , .. r ........ _. ._..._. County: x�ua�a�xick .. » .... w»............... W.IIi.S.I......._
Owner Name: Sbkley.L.............................. Phone No: 90 84,2-3QX4..........................................................
Mailing Address: 2.8.479 .
Onsite Representative: Chinkt.ClmmQ U......................................... .... .............. Integrator. B.roy .& 0j.C=jimp........................................
Certified Operator: iaxkajL............................ c1cmMOM.... ...... ........................ .... Operator Certification Number:169,9j .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 34 ' 06 43 Longitude 78 ' 06 50 u
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: _ ..m-. -__-. _- .... _ - ._ .... ...._.......... W- .....
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes M No
maintenance/improvement?

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
❑ Yes
® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after ] /1/97)?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
® No
Structures_(La4goons andlor Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
❑ Yes
N No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
W...-..--•� — --. _._ _�.. _............... - -
........... — ............. ..... .....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste_ Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .... S]n1..."iXAia.(.Mcr7x.Bu1ey. bWo......................-....................................................
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
❑ Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N No
For Certified Facilities -Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes N No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in anyway? ❑ Yes N No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No
erosion was observed in a storm water drainage pathway adjacent to the lagoon. Further erosion could create problems for the
► wall. It was suggested to the operator that this be corrected. Otherwise, the operation looked good.
rIq
1W
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - ., - Date: :; ` Z 7 q 'j

JUL-14-1995
15:22 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
WIRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Atten ' n:
Facility No., � 3 �
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:. %— i i , 1995
Time: _L2.�!y
Farm Narne/Owner.
Mailing Address: -S7S -
r -
County:
Integrator: t n� Phone:
On Site Representative: ?"�m ({ w► w m - Phone:
Physical Address/Location: �D cl _Hc j
/77
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 1�.41 0 d Number of Animals on Site: 61e ' 'O C
DEM Certification Number: ACC DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: " �' " Longitude: " Elevation: ------,Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) OY or No Actual Freeboard: 10—Ft. inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or r� Was any erosion observed? Pr No
Is adequate land available for spray? e . or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: I J �► �'S
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 9 or No
100 Feet from Wells? e or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ot9
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line9, Yes 019
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by roan -made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or& If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
L
4 E Dyj&* -D Be-ac--
Inspector Name
no
Signature - — --. -- -
6-1(
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.