100029_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUHTH CAHQLINA
Department of Environmental Qual
II

[] DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
EaDWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
= �3
outine O Com laint O [` OII(t\i--tE ) of l)��' } inti €ctii)n O Rollo-.,°-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facifrty Number Tilne of Inspection ' c 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: ® Registered ❑ Applied for JXcertified Permitted
Total Time fin fraction of hours
(ex.1.25 for l hr 1_ min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes Travel and processing)
0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:. .............
Farm Natue:....�= 3�1a.+�.................'Lf..'A �.......... ,t±n. t. .LL.. .ft city:.. -�}! Cr . ........................... ---a..............
OwnerName:..... ................. .f G ................................... Phone No:....... ......_O v...............,....................
Facility Contact:
,. ..............�.fl...� .N.... �--............, Title:........ ........'.:?. �.�"..Q.........
.............. Phone No:...................................................
l�lailiugAddress: Fa+!-�.;�1.�...... .. lr"..�.L....A..��..................n.5.P........................................................ .......................... ,.
Onsite Representative.../.(!K . ...............(,% R/!5. ...................................... Integrator :...... Ce.ft— 1 A45...........................................
Z
Certified Operator:,.,.., . .�...............................................Operator Cert cat►on Number:. j. �...
....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0• Q4 044 Longitude • Q& .4
Type of Operation Design ; Current Design Current Design Current
Swine _ ;Capacity; Population :::Poultry. Capdcity,Population (attic Capacity Pdpulatton
❑ Wean to Feeder
........
....
ceder to Finish
3WO
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Subsurface Drains Present HE] Lagoon Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenaneelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the open onI
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the wasee management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Spray Field Area
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
Q Yes ®'tiro
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
Z) Yes ❑ No
KYes ❑ No
Confinued on back

r
• Facility Number: — '01
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
2.0
................... .................... ...................................... ... ................................... .... I ........ I..................
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ULNo
❑ Yes ;a No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure J Structure 6
....................................I........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [( No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 21 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? Wyes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes VNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type............�-.?................................................. Ai.z.............. ........................... J�..6.:.......... ................. ,.... ..............................
I ....
.... ...........
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
JO No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
M No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[aYes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[A No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
f0 No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
EJ Yes
19 No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
5ff Yes
❑ No
� • f y . �,5, l j �, �c.� � � f b �� � .� b t • � h �sf �'>~ ,� ,u-�,�c. r s � � � d� `rgs � :�
ww b+t e- * 71U 1 0 A €, nJCs N • �^+ V > i A R € Ia S tJ
� - €-5 t,. b t • S �r v� v�v�� c�-�c,r R � � b ..-�. �� f��t r�.nz-t � f� g
4 : A""SS' . TV
�.1� ✓ i • S cs�vo�+ti �.��.r�iS
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 7 , / e - ,r Jr'
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

' L-16-98 FRI 11:30 PM MARVIN_L.EVANS 19102875090 P.01
R�d-% I
ri665II'aER (.;"
y
6 M rtle He
Ash, N.C. 24'
Phone & Fax (910
a
Farm #96.a
i
i
FARM
Road

NUARY
'1998
a oon Im tion �ietd Reca
�1�
-
ru
w Foitn f4 Each Field per
trop Cycle
Q
racf 01
field #
1
acili
reld Sze a
s
15
_
r
exm OWMr
AarAn L. &
mvy R. Evan
(r i firma on Owal
�-
ersAddress
656 M
eed Rd.. MIvV
i
rrigations Op
oCs �T----- -�
i
ksh, NC 2
20
Ndress
I--
Hers ptwoe81
910 287-3
5
-
I -
emlor`s Phon
.0 I
..
I. .
- -- -... .
rrsm Waste
tltilizaFien t
_
-
s
(7' --�
- LB/ACR B
�4325.95.
1
m
u�
� L�.(1)
(z)
3)
(4}
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8}
f9f
00)i
(11)
A
�
N �
J
m I Date
Start Tirne
End Time
Total
#of Spridders
aw Rate
TOW Volume
Volume
MMeAnalysis
PAN AppliD
Nitrogen
Mirudes
O esaung
(c�UYnin)
(gallons?
r Acre
PAN
bd M) Batartice
W !
(3) -(2)
(6) x (5) x (4)
(gelfacse) (lWIDO0 gal)
(8) x (8 11000
�(iial M)
y
�f A
(i3 10
1
�-....-D
�0.0 2,3
0,00
�----
- 4325.85
UT
0.0
2.3
0.D>)
1 4325,95
l�-
01
0.012.3
D,Da7
1 4325.95
Q)
0
0.01
2.3
0.00
4325,S5
a
0
0 0
2.3
0,00
4325.95-
>
0
0 b
2.3
0.00
4325.95
i
Q.0
0 0.0
-
2.3
2,3
--_
D.DO
0.00
432 i.951
- 4325.95
z
r
_
DI
0.0
2.3
0.00
4325.95
0
D.0
2.3
0,00
' 4325,951
7
a
'
0
0,01
2.3
coo
4-325.95
F
0
0.01
2.3
0 00
4325.35
0
0.0
- -2.3
0.00
4325 95
01
0.0 i 2.31
0.00
1 4325,95
01
0.0 2.3
_ 0.00
_ 025.95
M
0
0.0
2.3
0.00
4325.95
"
0
0.0
2.3
0.00'
43,25,95
.,
01
0.0
0.00
4325.95
Prop Cyde To
li
I
_
-

-JE<BRUARYI 1998
goon Mg4tion
Field Recoro
Ii
Pne Form far
Each Field per p Cycle
r
j
ract #
1
Field 0
1
Eadity #
field Size a
s
15
1
arm Owner'
arum L. d,-try
R. Evans
jmgBhon Operaf
"Same"
Ownem Ad ess
5656 MyrtLe
iead Rd., NW '
Irrigations Opera
om
a
t
ksb, NC 2
20
ress
;
{
Chmer's Phope
#
910 287-32
5
pe rafts Phont
#
T
oastat
I
Recommended RAN
LoacgrigI
LBJACRE =6
4325
+
I
Il (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
1 8
(7)
Date
Sfa+! rime
End Tyne
'Foul
# of 9pnniders
I F1s3w Rate
Total Volume
Volume
Waste Arwiysis
PAN Applied
MCragen
mm/ddNr
I
Minutes
Opemong
gaihitin)
(gOons;
per Acre
PAID!
(tx(acre)
Balance
(6) x (5) x (4)
1 (gatfacre)
pM11000 gal)
(8) x (9) ! 10DO
(blaars
-
Or. -Feb 98
0:00
rf2:30
150
14
9.8
2058L►
1372.0
2.3 3.16
4M.79
12:30
5:30
180
B
9.81
10584:
705.61
2.aj 1,621
4321,17
�A
__-
07-Feb-96
00
2.00 180
?0
9.51
77640
1176-0
2.3 2.70
43'16.47
2:00
5:00 180
8
9.81
141121
940.9
2.3
2. r6
4316.30
06-Feb-99
i
1:OD
3:30
3:30 150
6:30 180
14
1D
9.81
9.8
20580
17640
1372.0
1176.0
2.3
2.31
3.16
2.70
431315
431044
'
13-Feb-98 ,
1:00
4:00
180
12
9.6
21168
1411.2
2.3
3,25
430720
Fe�98
2:0
:Oil
�f
17640
1176..6r-
Z.
_.._..._Z.70--_-
-49-
---
5:00
8:00
180
5
9.8
8820
580A
2.3
1.35
430CS.14
18- 0-98
1 1:00
4:00
180
10
9.8
17M
1176.0
2.3
2,70
� 4300,43
-
�nn
-
0
0.0
0.00
4300.43
0.0
OM
4 300.43T !
I
0
0.0
0.00
4300.43
_
0
O'D
0.00
4300.43
0
0.0
0,001
43DD.143
_
0
0.0
0.0,01
43DO.43
i
0
0.0
O.DO
43C)D.43
`
1)0.0
O.DO
4300.43,
r
r
0
0.01
0.9
4 3DD.431

y4 AH(;H f
+
a oon Irri tior) FIM ReC5"
-�
ne Form fdr Each Field per
p Cycle
i
racl ft i 1
reJd #
l
acili #
'
ield Size t3 s 9 5
Owmrj Marvin i.. &
ucy R. Evans
rigelion Operat
Inigulions
Sartre"
_
is Address 6GSfi M le
ead Rd., NVb'
Opera
or's
h, IBC 2
20
(Address
i
F
�,�
r"s PhcOe # �910 287-
6
rator S Phon
#
f
From Li4i]ization Atari
- . _-- .-
ro T
ecommendee TIAN
LoSCW
i
LBJACRE =8
4300,43
1)
(2) 1 (3)
(4)
5
6
(
Date
Start Time
End Time
ToW
# of Sprinklers Flow Rain;
To4al Vokme
Votume
Waste Ana sis
PAN Applied
Nilrogen
m
Minutes
Operating (gaitmin)
(gaBpns)
per Aare
PAN
Qblaere)
Balance
(6) x (5) x (4)
(gavacre)
pfyi 00D gal}
i8) x (S) l 1 DDO
miscre)
i3 - 10
01-mar--9B
1:00
1:30 30
14 3,6
T_4116
274.4
2.31
OM
429S.80I
2:D0
30
5
9.8
1470
98.0
2.3
0.23
4M.57
_
200
700
60
41 9.S
2352
156.8
231
036
4299.2i
:00
130
30
10 9.8
2940
196.0
2.3
045
4258.76
0
0.0
0.00
4298.76
10_[yiat-98
000
1:00
60
10 9.61
.$
5880
. 392.0
23
090
4297 85
100
2:00
60
_
14;
98
8232
50.81
2.3
1 26
4296,60
�-
-
7UO-----
-
- -- --
--
- --" .
- -
-- -
--429&-1
-- -
9.8
0
0.0
0.9U
4296.15
14-Mar 98
D00
2:00
120
10
98
11760
784.0
23
1.001
4294.34
2a0
-0
1
S464
2,52----42!�C34
-
0
0.0
0 DO
4294.34
0
0.0
D.DO
4294,E
01
0.0
D.DO
4294.34
0
0.0
_
O,DO
0-00
4294.34
D.DO
0 i'T0.0
0
r 0.0
0. DO
0.00
0
0.0
0.DO
O.DO
00
0
0.D
0.00
T 0.00
0
D.o
0.00
D.DO

ers Adckess
56 myriie
dead Rd., NW
I
irrigalions Opera
or's "Sari"
h, NC_ 2_
20
Mdress
1 erls P
e #
91 D 287-5
a
Pperators Phan
rorn Waste
iltihzaiion Plan
{CTOPType
Recommended FIAN
Loa(f n2
,
_
LBlAGRE "B
4294.34
I
w
_
(1) (2)
(3)
_ (4)
(5)
(6)
_ (8)
9)
(10)
(11}
II Date
. Ster1 Time End Trrne
Talal
# of Sprin4ders
Now Rafe
To& Voiume
Volume
sste Art0 sls
PAN Applied
NItr-agen I
} nwyddlyr
Mimrtes
erabng
(gaflrnin)
(,gallons)
per Acre
PAN
(lblacre)
Baiance
x (5) x (4)
(gaviacre)
(Ib/1000 gal)
(8) x (9) f 1000
(Iblacre)
/ A
_10
T^_
----2.70
`---4291.04
14ts� $$
D.Op :00
E8G
9.8
i7G40
5176.0
2.3
1:00 :00
T - 12_
'1d
9.8
16464
1097.E
2.3
2.52
4289,11
0
0.0
0.00
4289.11
0
O U
0.00
_
4289.11
—
0
0.0
0.00
4289.11
r 0
0.0
0.00
42-9.11
02
0.0
_
0.00
0.00
i 0
a.0
0.00
0.00
0
0.0
i 0,00
O.OD I
► ►►
0.00

1998
ion
m
0
r~
07
N
Q
m
H
# 1 Field ;4
15
aMn L. & ucy R.
'3666 Myrtle erad R
NC 2d42D
AN Loading
LBJ14CF?E�=B
I pale I & tt Time i End Time I Total I # of Sprinklers I Flow Rate I Total Vdume f Volume IUti+este Aneyis I PAN Applied [ Nitrogen I
1-
3
i:40
180
:00
60
:00
6D
,1:00
18D
'(2:OQ
18D
3:00
186
1�8(i
12:OD
, 183
18D
180
12D
m
12D
12D
10
9.8 117G0 784.0
14
9.8 2469E 1646A
14
9.8 246961 16464-
S
9.8 2940
196.OT
3
10
9,8 17r>41
9,81 176401
117.6E
1176.0
-
1-4
--'------9:Brt---- -:];
. ......---f646-4-
- --
10
9.8 17640
1176.0
14
9.8 24696
1 1646.4
10
9.8
17640
1176.0
14,
9.8 24696
1646.4
-
8
9.8 14112
940.81
14
8i
9.8 24696
9.8A4112
1646.4 ;
944.8
51
9.8 • &S20
588.0
141
9.8 16464
1097.E
5 9.8 5880 i
392.0
1
42B8.21
2.3
3.79
2.3
3.7'9
2.31
0.45
2.31
0.27'
2,31
2.70
{
2.11
2.70
2.31
2,70
4261.07
2.3
1 3.79
4257.28
2.3'
2.16
4255.12
2.3
3.79
4251.33
2.3
; 2.16
4249.17
i

1999 1 1 .. I
Form
Traci 0 1 Field # �_
iofd Size a s 15
ern Oumer w%4n L. & kjW R. Evans
Cvmeft Addess 656 Myrtle ead Rd,. NW
vner`s Phone 9
f2) f31 f4) (5)
i
n f- 'I }
7
fDate
Start Tim
End Time
Total
0 of SpnnWers
Row Rate
I ToV Volume
Vot>umtn
Vbste Analysis
PAN Apptted
Nitrogen
mnVddkjr
Minutes
(3} - (2)
Operating
(gaIfiiin) (.9wb )
(G) x 5) x (4)
per Acre
fgaiiacre)
PAN t I�cm) �
(MOOD
€ glance
'�rc)
11
I b&,l+. rRw
0:00 :00
�180
� ^_ 14
9.S I ^ 24696 ! 1646-4
2.3
-=3.79 iA�
4.238.08,
:DO :00
180
10
9.8
1764U 1176.0
-- 2.3
2.7E
µ l 4235.38
l 09-Art-$6
0:00
030
:30
14
9.8
T4116
T MA
2.3
0.63'
4234.75
I_24-Jut-98
%
Il'X
ISO
_
10
9.81
14700
980.E
Y 2.3
2.25
4232.49
1:30
:0D
OD 150
:30 150;
14
S
9.8
9.8
245BO
11760
1372.0
784. D
2.3
2.3
3.16
1.80
4229.34
4227.53
:30
:DO
--
150
5
9.81
73£0
-- 49D 0
2.3
1A3
42.26.4t
2` cit19$
:30
f to
- 151)
10 �
9A 1
147D0
, 98D.a
! 2.3
2.25
4224.1� 55
t
1:Op
:30
130
:0b
150
7
~ 14 i
5
9,81
9.8
20580
73b01
1372.01
u A9D.fl
2.3
2.3
3.16
1.13
4221.001
4219.87 ,
lti-Jun-so
p.6u
1:00
lbo
ol
9.51
Iwo
490,01
2.3
1.14$
1:00
.30
150
10
9 B
747 Op
9$0.0
2.3
2.25
4214.69
:30
:00
150
14
9.8
20580
1372,0
2.3
3.16
4211.53
1 27.lurr,98
:D0
nD:30
15D
T10
9,8.
14700
984.0
2.3
2,25
4209.28
1:00
P :OD
120
14 9.8
16464
1097.6
2.3
2.5Y2
4206, 75
I
t3
0.0
ON
4206.75
I
D
0.0
0,00
4206.75
0
0.01
0,00
1 4206,75

DUNE 1998 agoon Img bon Field R
jLne Form i r Each Field
(- iTract #1 3 ield - #-
�_ 2
i iwd Size a res 22, -
- - - arm Owner arvin L 8, ucy R. vans l
i er's Arkfpsc r3FM Merfl, f,-qri Rd N[W
I et's Pho # _f 9 287� 0 j �f ewor's ane # s
i I-- '�.�_ _� ` �rxs fAlasd ubu,.fion pig.
Dale � S%rt Time
End 1 ime
Total
of Span
Flow PEE a
TotalVol=4
Vokym
NeSte A119
AN Apoiec
!Nitrogen
mrrelddJy!
Minutes
Operating
(gaVmin)
(gabr)s)
per Acre
PAN
(Vacre)
Balance
(2)
6) x (5) x 4
(g Vacre)
IM 000 gal)
8) x (9) 110
(Iblacre)
7 I A
8- 1�00
27-Jun-961
^�10 - 250.0
25W
113.61
1 ^i
2.3I
0.26:M
4206.49.
V
V.U!
i U,VU
41Vb."
U
0
0-0
-
0.00
4206.49
Q ;
0
0.4
Q00
4206.49
>
!
0
0.0
0.00
4206.49
w
0
0.0
0.001
4206.49
J
-- - -0
-�:4
_
- - 0:00
..-4206.49-
I
0
0.0
0.00
4206.49
z
0
0.0
0.001
4206.49
�.0
£0
6,49--
0
0.0
0.00
4206,49
a
'
R
0
0.0
1 0.00
4206.49
l DI
0.0
i 0.00' 4205-49
a
0
0.0
0.001 4206.49
0 ,
0.0
0.001 4206.49
Dj
0.0
-
0.00 4206.49
--0.00
0.0
4206.49
0 0.0
0.00 4206-49
r.1
0 0.0
( O.Oti 4206.491
0.26 , 4208.23
OD

Form for Each Field
FTracl # 1 Field # 1 # Size (ages) 151
ft
Otn Waste UlltzMon Masi I i - . . 7 - -
i19 R/Af_PM--R' iT d?ng &9.
se End Time
Total
0 of Sprinklers ' Flog Rate f Total Volume
I Volume
Waste Analysis
I PAN Applied Nitrogen
l'v hAes
Operatin (gallmfn) (goons)
pet Acre
Balance
x (5} x (4)
s (gaVaae
{Iblf D00 al
(8) x (9 / ]000 I oh/acre)
0:30
150.
14
9.81 20580
1372.D
2.3
3.161 4203.33
�
:00
1501
10
9.8 r 14700
980.0
2.3
Z251 4201.08
:30
j 1501
31
9.8 i 4410
244.0
2.3
0.68 420DA0 I
:00
150
8
9.8 11760
, 784.0
2.3
1.80 4198.60 ,
�0:30
i50
5
9.81 73501
490 0
2.3
1.13'
4197.47
ii:D4
150
10
9.8 14700
980 D
, 2.3
2. 5
_ 4195.22
��030,,
150
14
981 20680
1372 0 2.3
3.16
4192.0.6
. - - - -
150
8
9 8
11760
784 0 . 2,3
1.80
4190.26
110:30
150
14
9 B
20b80
1372.0
2.3
3.16
418711
:00
150
10
9.8
147001
980.0
23
2.27
4184.83
490.0
D
_P60030
15D
8
9.8 0
0.0
2.3
0.00
4183.7
150
14
9.8( 20580
1372.0
2.3
3.16
4180.55
1:30
1501
10
9.8
14700
980.0
2.31
2.25
4176.30
:30
15_D
8
9.8
1 f 760
784.0
2.3
f .80
4178 49
DO
_
15D,
S.
9.8
73501
490.0
2.31
1.131
4175.37
,
0.30
150
10
9.8
147001
980,0
Z.3
2.25)
4173.111
:00
15D
8
9.8
11760
784.0
2.3
1.801
4171.31
:00
50
5 ; 9.S
24501
163.31
2.3
0361
4167.78
0:30
150
10!
9.8
147001
980.0
1 2.3
2 25�
4165.52
:013
150
14
9.8
267050
17803.33
2.3
40.971
4124.56
:30
150
8
9.8
'117601
784.01
2.3
1.801
4122,75
:DO
150
3
9,81
44101
294.01
2.3
0,68
4122.09
0:30 15D
10
9.8 i
147001
950.0
i 2.3
2.25
4119.82
06
15D
8
9.8;
117601
784.0
2.3
1.8D
411a.02
5:30
15D 5
9.6
73501
490 0
:00 I
_
150t 141
9.81
205801
1372.0E
2,31
3.16
4113.741

GULY "CONTINUO
i
[ }2rur
gwri lrrigif.tjon
Field R600rd
'Same'
�
I
ne Form fc
r Each. Field er Crop
fle
Tact #
field #�
1
aalit #
leM Size acres
15
amt Gwnerj
arvin L, &
Ucy R Evans
rriclation o
rater
owner's
Myrtle
-Lead Rd„ UN
nigauons D
ratorhs
h NC 28K20
Ndress
w� s Phoi
e #
310 287-5C
90
emtor's F
hone #
From Waste
Lttifiiation
rop Type
Vecommwx0ad
PAN Loa
ing
LeIACFi
4113,20
,
-
'
�- Date i
Stare Time
End 7irne
I Total
of Spn,nO
Flow Rate
ctal Volarmn
Volume
ante Asia
AN Appli
Nitrogen
mmiddtyr
y
_0
Minutes
Operating
(gaftin)
(gdons)
I per Acre
PAN
(Jtafacxe)
Ratance
6} x (5) x (4
(gal/acre)
XW1000 gaO
8) x (9)14
lucre)
1
!A
l 8-30
�OS-�uI 98
---_� 9.6
_ 20580
4110.04
44
:00 0:30 ^^--
9`30
150
-+so-
� 14
1372.0
r 2.3
r 3.16
_
:30
150
3
W,
1 44-10
294-0I
2.31
0.68
410824
:30 .Go
150
10
9.8
31
2.25-1�
9
09WJuF
1003Q. - - -
-- - .-.1.rn
. I 14i.._.
9.8
.- .20580' .. 1372.0.
_ 2,31
[ �1:00
(l0:30 :00
:34
rm - 1501
150
5
9.8
9.8
11760 784.0E
73350 490.0'
2.3
2.3
1.80
1.13
4101.03
4099.90
:30 :00
150
10
9.S
14700
980.01 2.3
2,25
4097.65
104Us 98
:00 0,30�~
150
10
9.8
14700
980.011, 2.3
2,25'
4095.39
[
OP.30 0:00
150
14
9,51
20580
1372.0 2.3
216
4U= 2.24
j T
:04 :34
150
a
9.8
11760
784.3
2.3
1.801
4090.43
-- P:3,0
t
150
5
9,81
01
0.0
2.3
, 0,00 1
4090.43
11-JW-98,8:00 0,30
Y10;3�] S:CFO
tl50
150
14
10
9.8
9.8
2WQ
14700
1372.0 2.3
880.0, 2.3'
2.161
2.251
4087281
4085-O3
- 0:00 :30
150
8
9.8
11760
784.01 2.3
1,80 1
4083.22
:30 .00
150
511
9.8
7350
490.0 i
2.3
1.131
4082.09
13- JiA-98 :00 0 30
150
10
9.8
14700
980.0
2.3
2.25 .
4079.84
1030 :00
150
8
9.81
117,90
784,0
2,31
'1.80 j
4-078,04
:00 .30
150
5
9.8
7350
490.0
2.31
t l 31
4076 91
_
:00
14
9.
3
3,16 ,
4073-ZE
J
9.8
Oj
0.0
2.3
0,00
4073,761
.._
�-
1
i 1
s.81
0
4.0
2,3
a.oa,
4073,76
J �j Z r�
9'e
0
(��,
2.3
-0.001
40-73:76
S.81
0 ? 0.0
2.31
0.00 4073-76
i
9.8
0 0.0
2.3
0.00, 4073,76
9.81 0 I 0,0
2.3
0.00 4073.76
9.8 0 0
2.3
0.00 4073.76
9.8 0 0.0
2.3,
0.001 4073.76
I
9.8; 0; 0,0
2.31
0.00t 45On,76

l"`1 5P c-r Site Requires Imm diate Attention: NO
Facility No. 10 - Z c�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS STTE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: `t L , 1995
Time: 3�
Farm Name/Owner: aut-itntL Cmmarw C M 14 rtVl� �VA�s
Mailing Address:
County: 'F>K U r.LS
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
. (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) IaY No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue fine Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by roan -made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: rtAs 6E€pa e V r-4 0 ° �,-ooX_s OK.
•
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
(;5 ,J
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed

•
•
07-s4
E,S--Site Requires 1m-mcdiatc Attention: Facility No. _ 10. 29
DIVISION OF EN-VIRONNIEN fAL MANAGEMENT
A.NfMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: � , 1995
4-0
FarmNa7me%Owner:,. Jk-, eeA
Mailing Address:
County.
integrator F,r Nl) Phone:
On Site Representative: i
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine — Poultry Cattle ~
Design Capacity: C 1f 'dumber of Animals on Site: a o ca o wRA/`` �N
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: A.CNEW�_____
Latitude3 4 ° 09 ` -'- " Longitude: 78 _° 30 ' 3 -7 " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or NTa
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboax•d of 1 Fcxst + 25 year 24 hour storm, evert
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No _-actual Frz�;boaxd: .el.
Was any seep-e: observed from the- lagc�on(s)' Yes. .. No Was any erasion obscavt•d`? Yes is.
Is adequate land available for spray? rpor No is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: IttAfrAl
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback crteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? e�r No
100 Feet from Wells? Y6 or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste.discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flashing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oT9 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility tuaintain adequate waste trianagernent records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated an specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes rZ
Additional Comments: 1n- `i
.
Inspector Name"'
Signature
W1
cc; Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.