100021_INSPECTIONS_20171231

W71 A
NORTH CAROLINA .i
Department of Environmental Quality

ODivision of Water finality . _
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
fI
Tyke of Visit Tompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine b Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facili dumber Date of Visit: Time:
ty
- - - 0 Not O erational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ❑Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ©Registered Date-Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ......... L. k-2N
_.. /.�..r('�".. `r County: �L!Y .............. ..Owner Name: . 1�1`J Phone No:
------
Mailing Address: .._.
Facility Contact: ---Title: .. _. __ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: —� __. .. Integrator.. &
Certified Operator:, , . , . __, Operator Certification Number: _.
Location of Farm:
Swine ©Poultry ❑Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude �• �` �"
Design Current Design Current. DeAgn 1E"!
Swine Capacity Population Poultry CapacityPa elation Cattle Capacity Pay'-. - lion
Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer ❑Dairy
kFeeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean C1Y
Farrow to Feeder Other
Farrow to Finish Total Des- Capacity
Gilts
Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Discharges&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes '`No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a- If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in ga lmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ;glNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes )'No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ZNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):
12112103 Confinued

"a cility.Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ❑No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑Yes ❑No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑Yes ❑No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
11_ Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydra 'c Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑C er and/o c
12. Crop type 0;'
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designate in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan AWNIP)? ❑Yes ❑No
14, a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ❑No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ❑No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ❑No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes ❑No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(ruse additional pages as
' ry)= ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
�� 1 ��f���- ,•,lam /`DS��G�' ����/ff�'G--
/VU lead r-
Reviewerllnspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: r,%
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
TAT
Required Records &Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ❑No
23. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. [I Yes ❑No
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes [:]No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ❑No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes VNa
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes gNo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes J2(No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit?(If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑Yes ❑No
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑Yes ❑No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Stocking Farm ❑Crap Yield Form ❑Rainfall ❑Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
OEM—
�L1�t�� ll/l71P�✓y�. /f!J/�/il�s
7e,9,Vl1�lJl S j
nr
Alo
12112103

Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conser-ation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit ZfCompiiance Inspection d Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine 9rcomplaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Date of Visit: Time:
Facility Number
Not O erational Below Threshold
0 Permitted ©Certi d [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operat or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �I�s/ County: ��
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: ) Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �19RL �l./ �/" Integrator: � LI
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑Poultry ❑Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish ILINon-Layer I ❑Non-Dairy I
Farrow to Wean QQ
Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Wraps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes JxNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. if discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes P'No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes VNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ONo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): 141
05103101 Continued

E
Facility Number: —�j Date of Inspection
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes /No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes [I No
(lf any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
& Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
11. Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload w�yl
No
12. Crop type �/ — Q�f
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes 6 No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ❑No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ❑No
1% Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ❑No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ❑No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes WNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ON
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any 011"i to
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
NS�E -�"e :044Eaz
G
Reviewer/Inspector Name f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: i
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at or belokv ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? V
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ❑No
2& Is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ❑ No
roads.building structure,and/or public property)
I
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s).inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ❑No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/or Drawin-Is:
641C /77-
� �
ARC %
A//
Q
,6E
�Sq 13` o) .
loot; ilorG i see— t
-)
9'iP
05103101

STATE o-
/0-377-
N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMPLAINT/EMERGENCY REPORT FORM
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Received by: 1 J (Z.ID 7L jcF � re/Time:
�—
l3ws3 nr-v Complaint: � County:l
Report Received Frow:
Agency: Phone No.
Ccuplainant: -
Address: Phone No
C=plalnt or Incident: Cs C'k"7{ ,IAI q
Time and Date Occu r-red: f d- I
Location of Area Affected: C Alze'/,. 7� r �✓' .b ._ ✓ - _'� -r
Surface Waters Involved: Groundwater
Involved: Other: 1/
Other Agencies/Sections �Notified:
Investigation Details:
Investigator: -J Date:
EPA Region IV(404)3474062 Pesticides 733 3556 Emergeney Management 733-3867 WAS'e Resources 733-729i
Solid and Hazardous Waste 733-2178 Marine Fisheries 726-7021 Water Supply Branch 733-2321 U.S. Coast Guard MSO 3434881
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington. N.C.28405-3845 •Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

1

�1-1) ron o)Soil and Water Conservation-Opefation Review
0 Drvisionof Soil and Water Conservation- Compliance Inspection
Div'm*on of.Water Quality Compliance Inspection
13 OtherAgency--Operation Review
Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of D.SWC review Q Other
L____Facility Number Z( Date of Inspection L q
---_ Time of Inspection 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Permitted ❑Certified
y ©Conditionally Certified ©Registered ❑Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CzWV1(x-,`.... °s -. �a S..t.... ..�'r....................................... County: ..... \t+1�......._.......[.... ..... ._
Owner Name: ................ CIt-Y.y.....t&j...rf rw t. �U. ............. Phone No: �9�4•d ftu:�:5 �`.L.. ..
.. . . ..................... ..... .......... .....................................
Facility Contact: ..................
WJK—..�- ....V t .j!w........................Title. ................................................................ Phone No: ............................
Mailing Address: ......i ....Exvhl.....Q,....N�J.....................................I............ ... kLthx............. ............. .41W............
...... .......................... .
�r
OnsiteRepresentative: ........... .�Lv-�......1 wmil........................................................... Integrator:......&.� .............................................................
Certified Operator:................ loaf .................... .....lukrteir........................................ Operator Certification Number:.., ql.......................
Location of Farm:
AL
... :.. a .....S L...Lw}1.......zy i�t-.... .. t�f.... .fi..... ..l3�kz........--.-.......................................
.............-.................................................. -- ---
Latitude •�' �•' Longitude ®• ®+ ®"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder b460 6 ❑Layer ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Nan-Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
11 Boars Total S$LW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagaon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation(If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑Yes C9 No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance plan-made? ❑Yes No
h. If discharge is observed.did it reach: ❑Surface Waters ❑Waters of the State ❑Yes [�No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ElYes 154 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes J]No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes %No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes l]No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: V's. IS00
Freeboard(inches) ..........2Z .. ................................ ....................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

F46cility Number: � —� Date of Inspection t 2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes 10 No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health;or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes Wo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required top of dike,maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑Yes 171 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Ponding ❑Nitrogen El Yes PNo
12_ Crop type .........Nu 4#f x� u ,........sxV.W.��.....4 Y- 1_*.................5.BahlxA!r...fk MIA ............................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? Yes ❑No
I4, Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application?(footprint) ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ❑Yes R No
10. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes W No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes RNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) 59 Yes [I No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) NYes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes FM
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? El Yes 10 No
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes R No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes PNo
0-No.violations-or:deficiexicies:were hated:during'tliis-visit::You�iYl:receive na ftirtlier: . .
correspondence about:this visit:_ . _::....._.:
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings offacility to_better explain situations. use additional pages as necessary):.
-
�,
t . WU} art S;-tt1`. at Qf J�►��� � ��� � �i}�n . �4�W�r. �� n
Vre lb f2 tna"S S q kJt "{6� om ��W' J0 S SAC*- v,&& C.P 1 of �
CS S�ssckl k �KYA 6 w-'k"j, 'ttsI\- N Q Arj,�f i�2 f'11.
rtvoraeA w {� y 1����" � - a,rn. t4cov'ds. LaJoo�ti t�t�,i9r� (t f
$oG�t� uusr- ShOA �¢ kh 'A.rl YGCGv S. tt+r�if:cc Gv d�SYW s 5or.� k,� 'k,kOV L.
1 Yh V-c.Cc+ &'
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1/6/99

Facifity.Number. .�...._..—, �_ ... Date of Inspection:
AdditiorW Comments and/or Drawings:
a r. ow-
I
i
a
4/30/97

[[33 Division of Sail did Water Conservation ❑Other Agency
[ZDivision of Water Quality A
p
e
Q Routine Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Bate of Inspection r
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr.(hh:mm)
13 Registered 8 Certified 0 Applied for Permit JlPerwitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated•
Farm Name: ........ �t�f[ ,.....Ats,I.... s.......L.l._....... ......... County:.. � 4W....k...........
f �`�
OwnerName.......WC ii]n ....... ...... n►..........I—L4.... .... Phone No: ..�i �... ' ..". ......................... . ..........................................
FacilityContact. ...... r ........i)WUW:..............................Title:............................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: .. ..1.......EXtAw&....RJ.......... ..Q.................................................
... �1. ...1 ................................................... ....... ..
�I
Onsite Representative:......pc�t::�....�J ua&............................................................... Integrator:......&PAIX13:3.............................................................
Certified Operator.......... L............V .*........................................................... Operator Certification Number;...:"9a""�......................
Location of Farm:
Ha..iS. !?t�..... d ........ !3. I}.i . ...ALL....NdV.. .. ...............................
. .
Latitude Longitude ®• 0` �"
Desip Current Design Current Desgnn Current
Soin� CapaacitT`Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle $racit . Popnlaon
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer (�Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer 10 Non-Dairy
Z ' Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Cap44y
❑Gilts
❑Boars Totat SSLV
LEE
Q.
Nc+tnber vfLagt3oira 1 Holdingtlfids ®:. ❑Subsulrface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
:.
R ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
�.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes [9 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? U1 Yes ❑No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon (,Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-mane? ❑Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ®Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min? b. -7- I./la+y.
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes [ No
I Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? R)Yes ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require W Yes ❑No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes to No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes 1[No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility N umber: p — ;
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes 91 No
Structures(Laimooms,Holding Ponds_,Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes JA No
Structure 1 Structure? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ...........ls..�P................ .......I................
............ ................................... ..................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes 00 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? Yes ❑No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ) _
15. Crop type .........lreuv.---.................... r!t+J.F,c......._............ilme k.......jc4r..........:...._............................................._.......__..........._...._ ..........I.......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes M No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 56 Yes ❑No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes 19 No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes M No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? Yes ❑No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑Yes No
E3 No-violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit.- You.will receive no further '
correspondence about this visit..,
+Comments(refeir to question C -Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or arty 600..ctibrt#tuer►ts.
Cse''dritwing5 oC facelity to bettei`eAplain situations."(use additinnat ages as necessary): , r
Z. Rv+no R in 5vrvi kid 06Se+ry 0 ''f 6 �ur a( i K#p rt�j•Cep �i 4L� ��Y++� livis�
Xf liar�¢ti �a �ola�[ �.� �«cLra` e• t�,sc.�n se ��Us. �� �M1.l. +R V jA,o�Os�ru d
(LS� d i n +fA� Jul �Z.$. WeLAr ��p-ex vA t., 0���-Lh bit NO 0�Sc-�'�vc f 41�
4o o `1'L.� 5�., t•� �� ~r. �l+hcea- �a �Oot�L (} t� ¢ �umto c.Jazk ..» of �oelr
1� l f p
_Irt3i(� a�6�ry �ii rI � COLMIA a.� WA4 11fi�4� tii[� Ms4e_ rreo, S�WJ� Le. .Sd6[pi[ j1 ek
1Z, 0j"k J44- Wa.0 d� �jwp0.i4 S�oulJ �c &- W j c a.S s�oc t� i� rYsee&4. r4n kserl�j
i tc�aov.. CcftnK s S�tO!![� lei, JvN�O 44 t 4le+ 7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;' '' ,
i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

` Facelt*ty Number:......lf�...—.. . . Date of Inspection: �{
Additional Comments and/or Drawings.
�4. Exc{cs�;t �,or ti.� a�s��v SQrat P��11s zg �i- 3(0 4
1%. Kescve Gyp slusVW lac fnitrWr
22
1. I� .-2:l s1,�J[UL ��ic] �Yoc;r•ru� is{o:..
plAr►- SOII 5 S4�uv�f1 ;` 11�1�4 C"JDL� COJ"r)
1 logo �� I cl(�• •rt.u,4s Ste? �e 14�t �r eucL • S¢fj recc4Z
4/30/97

i
Ile
envirochem Environmental Chemists, Inc.
�T G ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
] P. .Box 1037 [phone](Office) 6602 Windmill Way
CONSULTING 8 4998 wn tsville Beach, [phone](Lab) Wilmington,
pPR 2 North lira 28480 (910)392 a424(Faye) North Carolina 28405
CHEMISTS NCDEHNR:DWQ CERTIFICATE#94,DLS CERTIFICATE#37729
Customer:
NCDEHNR DWQ Date of Report April 21, 1998
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28405 Purchase Order#:
Attn: Rick Shiver
Brian Wrenn Report Number: 8-1092
REPORT OF ANALYSES
Date Sampled: 04/13/98 Report To: hick Shiver
Sampled By: Brian Wrenn Copy To: Brian Wrenn
STREAM: 10-21
PARAMETER Sample ID 10-21 10-21 10-21
1 Fec/I Nut 2 Fec/2 Nut 3 Feel 3 Nut
Lab ID #2394 #2395 #2396
Fecal Coliform,colonies/100ml 200,000 190,909 450
Nitrate+Nitrite Nitrogen„NO3+NO2-N mg/L 0.20 0.31 0.40
Ammonia Nitrogen,NH3-N, mg/L 252 132 2.59
Total Kejeldahl m TKN Nitrogen, 319 177 3.08
g �
Total Phosphorus,P mg/L 41.1 22.5 0.32
Reviewed b and approved for release to the client.

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC 6602 Windmill Way
envirochem : Wilmington, NC 28405
® Sample Collection and Chain of Custody Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Pent• D.E.H-N.R WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Collected By: ;Cart Report No:
Sam le '1 e• .InfluenL Effluent, Well Oil,-Other,.
SAMPLE COLLECTION BOTTLE LAB PRESERVATION ANALYSIS REQUESTED
IDENTIFICATION DATE TIME ID ID NONE I SU HNO NaOH TIRO OTHER
l�-zi t `�1i3 tLLog r-C +� e-
[ Coll
i0�Z l �9 4/AJoG' i N„ �✓ Cc N�•
a� Pew `I/13 i(`•0ir -Lrt (ce
3 5C F, %J41I(� 3C>-10 l/ r C r-e CG i
l 3 ovr �lis 3 WLk is . ✓ iCe,
Maximum holding Time Between Collection and Analysis: BOD 48_Hours, Coliform in Wastewater 6 flours,
Coliform in Drinking Water aftB.ou ,
Transfer Relinquished By: Datefl'ime Received By: Date/Time
1
2
Received with le Vqter Ch' e �ttp 4°C: Yes No Accepted: Rejected:
Delis°ered 117: Received 1 if Date: - Time: D
Comments:.
lot

N W --"'z
-Ahima . W
SWC. Operation Revie
M
�In
"FJ PDWQAniMa1'Feedlot Operation Site Inspecti F.
"-5 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ insEection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection I Z 14T Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: w. Total Time (in hours) Spent onReAew
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: ...... County:.......&J-A(1-S"kK..... ............ .......................
Owner Phone No:Lq I(d\1-6�a:'3 11-.L?......................................
Mailing Address: Kh J---&kJSA--
Onsite Representative: PeAj j
............ ............
Certified Operator: ................................ Operator Certification Number:.................................
Location of Farm:
............
............................ .............
Latitude Longitude 6s
Not U erationai Date Last Operated: ...... ................ .........................................................
type of Operation and Design Capacity
'N be
w
Numbe
�U-
ie tr
a um rm_%
�J-
EJ Wean to Feeder El yer ; 0 Dairy ZEN!"
10 Beef[J Feeder to Finish n-Layer d.V-- dg='�
5 . g
..........
M
Farrow to Wean 4y an s to sr
'M;El Farrow to Feeder -
- -i I I-
01 El Farrow to Finish Ot
her Type of L estoc %
5"
M M
El Subsurface Drains Present
0-
El Lagoon Area A 10 Spray Field Area
. .........
-ON
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? D Yes 9 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? $M Yes D No
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes M No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notif DWQ) Yes El No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min? -3 Cal.bn in
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon.system?(If yes,notify DWQ) 0 Yes 19 NO
i. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes El No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons holding ponds)require Yes ❑No
maimenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes P(No _
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after l/l/97)? Yes ❑No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes NJ No
Structures (LaZoons and/or Iloldina Pondsj
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? Yes ❑No
Freeboard(ft): Lagoon l Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
...... ------- ........... ... ........-_............... ............._......................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes W No
1 l. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? M Yes ❑No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 Nvas answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify➢WQ)
13. Do any'of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? Yes ❑No
(If in excess of'%VMP, or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
1._. r�mu _�....,.........._....._.... �-�/ .......
15. Crop type � .�.... �. -"C�'.............___...._........
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? ❑Yes [,ZNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ®No .:.
For Certified Facilities Only N
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal.Waste Management Plan in any way? Yes ❑No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ) ] Yes ❑No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [)1 Yes ❑No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑Yes �0 No
�seb tuo ettee t�i sttua ans ddt na g� cessary}
ok"xV C OK WO r-mdsiJe clhk Pmm oww-&,Tl won i ► f air Kydi�6�toll g
Gc�7naw A. 6rcC, S wvJ Judi�r rmK . Scm were- ,Ken- fDMjaica( Oa4C or\ sae of
la o n wa l E su es l b�d0r. OV J( o r, asf. Q Excess;ve ftV_ CCJ wo'%Le
P,�� �v1 arov (t on a-ierxof
- her. �lree�n said us e s k has re(
hiS C��`�t�CO�fj(l1 C .'ate rnJ:.�tr c cn incur t,xt. ErroS'on a+'ti°as vet
(ace r� e�soba� s
be o,V 1� ( carvrE� rve�rw .t
1 r,, Veyter no+ }o s Oil
-S 1340 C7�0e5S1 V1 �n 4 S 0
Nt
1 rack t o r- VCftes' VVJ Y16 trcorr)s
se el 5 . a °�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
t�
Reviwer/lnspector Signature: F r____� Date: q7
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

t:6y:c'i''sEi''s :'►i iiiE:�' EiEi'?:'?�':23:F'e:SE?c:E�c92�'9''.is2:S'Eci'SEi'9EEe:9isE:i:::i?i:e :ie:.:.:::::.:.:.:.:•:
'I =°•r• i9eE�s:.2eES;e6%Ease::2Y:�c�.•.•:::::.•.•...:.......:.•:.•.•.•.
`
E:e
E
eie
M 1-
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ ins ection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 3/20/97
EFat:yN umber 10 21
Time of Inspection Y2:45 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Total Time(in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Cc d............................................................................. (ea:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min))Spent on Review 3.5
Inspectionor dprocessingl
Farm Name: �1CQliAt� .Eaxm�x.�ra�............................................................................ County: B ruia"Ack....................................... W..ZRSI.........
OwnerName: MijfRm.................................... Ward........................................................... Phone No: Q1alI5.53z;.7.5...........................................................
Mailing Address: RoiWIC.I.HQX18.4................................._.._......-. . .... .. . ............. .clareadaAM................................................ 28.432..--.........
Onsite Representative: F.er dieXcre m.............................................................................. Integrator:RronnA.M.CanUm..........................................
Certified Operator:.................................................. ...... ............... .. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
SR 134Q.1tt���n►Ea`umt a�ad]klaa�IQica.apt.,�uipmc.GreelZ............................................................................. ...... ............. ... A6
-
Latitude 34 * 07 ' 35 K Longitude 78 • F 25 ' 3010 "
Not Operational Date Last Operated: ......................................................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
---------------------------------
❑Wea7tinish
❑F ❑ -a er Non- ❑D ❑
Fee
4000
❑Other Type of Livestock
1 ❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
General
I_ Are there any buffers that need maintenancefiimprovement? ❑Yes ®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ®Yes ❑No
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) 0 Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 0.3 gal/min
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ)
❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require N Yes ❑No
maintenance/improvement?

,6. Is fgcility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? [D Yes N No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge(if inspection after V1/97)? ®Yes ©No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes No
Structures(Lagoons.and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ®Yes No
Freeboard(ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
..........—..1.5................. ...................................... .................................... ......................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes N No
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes ©No
I
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ©No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquat .markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? Yes ®No
Waste AiDiflication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? 9 Yes ❑No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........... ...................0........................RyYf..................................
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? ❑Yes ®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes N No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑Yes N No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑Yes N No
For Certified Facilities On b
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes N No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? N Yes ©No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ®Yes ©No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? N Yes E]No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑Yes N No
tiijai� € ' esf.cii.ii.ri.ie.f#.e.:.:1e?ia''i?i
:::.. oii tc : i : s : :::; ;:::; : .;.:.::;sec ieiidaii� olereaii:
i . .. .::. :;:::::: .. :.•• ..A .2.Observed run off into roadside ditch from over application in spray fields. Roadside ditch hydrologically connected to Green Swamp
and Juniper Creek. Samples were taken. 3.Medical waste on toe of lagoon wall suggests that lagoon over topped in the past. 5.
Excessive medical waste and dead piglets in and around the lagoon area_ 7_Mr.Vereen said he was the certified operator but the State
as no record of his certification. 9.Inadequate freeboard observed I L/12.Minor erosion on bare spots on outside of lagoon wall.
Channeling from wave action and storm water drainage on inner wall. Erosion areas need to be filled and seeded. Lagoon level marker
Beds to be readjusted to correct movement. I4. Front fields by SR 1340 had excessive ponding and run off Advised Mr. Vereen not to
spray on these fields. 21.Inadequate freeboard,over application on spray fields. 22.Mr. Vereen had no records for waste application.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date:

EDWnF16fQ 6dpera ion R evieW
DWQ Animal Feedlot 06ift-ation Site.Inspe'etio"n
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Foilow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection V7 E6-1-4 T
Facility Number I
Time of Inspection Eff� ' Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: Total Time (in hours) Spent onRe-.iew
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name- ........ County.
Owner buln.._ Phone No:_14110).Aii-lq.71.........
Mailing Address: lol RL
Onsite Representative: Integrator:...
Certified Operator Certification Number:_.........
Location of Farm-.
................................. ......................
Latitude Longitude F Y1 11
F13 7�'\'Dt 0_P:er:2 ti On A�al Date Last Operated: ...................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
b U STY. _N mber
Cattle: —
JEJEl Wean to Feeder ❑Laver 10 Dz.�
El Feeder to Finish ID Non-Laver ID Beef I
NEFa—ijow to Wean 1 4
Ai.�i it. -0-
K
El Farrow to Feeder
­10 Farrow to
Finish er Type of Livestock-
Subsurface Drains Present
JE1 Lagoon Area [[—:] Spray Field Area
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenanc-&improvement? El Yes El No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? W Yes E❑I No
a. If discharge is observed,Nvas the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes M No
b. If discharac is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes,noE-­DWQ) [,a Yes El No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gallmin? m A
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) 0 Yes IS]No
0
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? QQ Yes El No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Ycs ENO
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require P9 Yes [:]No
Continued w,

aDSW�A' iflE IFeecllat Oration Review
.z�.=.a ' k.y�, r m. -
�' �� �DWQ Animal:£eedl.o�Opera#ioaSrte Iuspect>ion_. Y `
O Routine 41 Complaint O Fallow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-uo of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection Ztf-tj
Facility Number Jd Z Time of Inspection JZ:3-0 Use 24 hr.time
Farm Status: .. �L e Total Time(in hours) Spent onReviei}
or Inspection includes travel and processing)
. ..? --
Farm Name;
Owuertiame: .]��_�`�_L._ _ t4�� Phone No: 547q
Mailing Address: 75 X.f _ I&CIh
OnsiteRepresentative: 1+1r-tL�'''' _ ���e %� C Integrator..-90L';n_tk ---
Certified Operator:- .... Operator Certification number:
Location of Farm-
Latitude �•C= 0 : Longitude �• �� _-
10 Not overar-7721-7 Date Lst Operated:
Fype of Operation and Design Capacity
`w .':N '- -. .. .`S.>a
Swine g."Yetmber :Pauiiry ?.:x iiurnber= "" Cattle..:. :>:%�Ntzmber
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Laver ❑Dairy �-
❑Feeder to Finish ❑—Non-Laver I ❑Bee€ `'
m
Farrow to Wean k 4 l _ �
Farrow to Feeder
IM
Farrow to Finish ❑Other Type of Livestock:
tter gntns, k3oltiutY.onds
mh of-La E ❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Axea = ❑Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffz s that need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ®Yes ❑No
a_ If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed,slid it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes 9 No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/mia?
d: Does discharge bypass a la_oon system? (If yes,notify DNVQ)
❑Yes 0No
i. Is there evidence of pas€discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State oilier than from a discharge? Yes ❑No
S. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑ Yes @ No
mzint�:Lznc�'izZnrave::�n C'

5. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑Yes No -
7. Did the facility fail to have a cerdried operator in responsible charge(if inspection after, 1/l/97)? ❑Yes ®No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ElYes Qt No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Hoidin PPonds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑Yes ,S No
Freeboard(ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 La_oon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ®.Njo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes BNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adauaie markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? Yes ❑No
'% aste ADDlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ZI Yes ❑No
(If in excess of V+'NT,or runoff entering waters of the State,notiiv DWQ)
15, Crop type z - `�"�-�
lb. Do the active crops differwith those designated in the Animal Waste Managcment Plan? ❑ Yes 9 No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for Iand application? ❑Yes [-No
18. Does the cover crop need i„tprovement? ❑Yes E No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑Yes K No
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Manage=ent Plan readily available? ❑Yes ®No
21. Does the facuicy fail to comply with the Animal.Waste Maraeernent Plan in any wzy? ®Yes ❑No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? UYes ❑No
23. Does facility require a follow-un visit by same agency? ®Yes ❑No
24. Did Reviewe�rhspector fdi to discuss reviewlinspection with own.:or operator in charge? ❑Yes tK No
Camments jeerer to que�toa� E�Iatn aayYFS..ans�ers�xts3lorativ�comm�adahons:ar any"Qrfier cormmeafs��::;•=:> �- :�-�.-
IIsc-drawmgs of f`acut Ito;etteezDlamsttuation5 use adtitnonal gages.asnec.ssa�v) ��•3T:,_ ` , z
�"'i�(�`,m� �5�,.,+,.d.�_ � ��R�l£.....p55 c�✓�c� �n �-v.�. 4� �(JC�]�. JZ✓If� - �_
ja �:uh S •� •-•j 5 5 s cti c 1016- j Ls
ar' R
Reviewer/InspectorName
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date: —3 - z
cc: Division of Water Quathy, Water Quality Secrion, Facility.•4ssessm err t Unit 1 lll4.96

Y ~ Y K ❑DSWC AnimaI.Feedlot Operation Review
MDWQ Animal Feedlot Op&arioa Site Inspection ...
'O Routine Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSI.;'C review Q Other
Date of Inspection 3 l S 7
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 1460 Use 2- hr. time
.�CX -r'Farm Status: Total Time (in hours) Spent onRevie3v
.LL ......._...--_._�._........_.._....._....
- or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Dame: .. County
Owner dame: [!'��Li�CL.1111A> r. CY.� �� .1rfJ_[lSr]t 1�._-- _ .._ Phone No: „-----
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: . eC.r[t �„ fl— „ . .. _ _._ Integrator:...
Certified Operator:_.._ _.„. _».. _ _ Operator Certification Number:___....._
Location of Farm:
--'� ......_..... '�'..N?n.,....»��ir�..l�f.?.G...r ----�-"�.s.,�,Yaitl+'�.....�..iG:• .»........�............._...._...�.-----...._4
Latitude ©' p� Lonaitude �• ��
to-Not operational Date Last Operated: ._ _ ._.�_ .. ... �.....,_.» .».»._._....__. . _..» »_» _.... _..
--- type of Operation and Design Capacity --
'Snine' x _ PQI t
?timber $� ...µ^ .Number ; CaftIe :: ;umber p
Wean to Feeder
fi`' ❑Dairy❑ ❑Lave �_
❑Feeder to Finish "' '❑\on Lavzr ❑Beef
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder � n
fir- 'r - �. �> ��
Farrow to Finish ❑Other Type of Livestock
xNumber ofLaaoaztsHaldin"gPonds yz 10 Subsurface Drains Present
� �� � ❑Lagoon � . ❑Spray Field area :
a r
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement7 ❑l es [%No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑i-es RNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rain?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes,notif} DWQ) ❑Yes [53 No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? FXJ Yes ❑No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes [A No
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons holding ponds) require [Z Yes ❑No
maintenance/improvement?
Cor-rir:ued on

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes W No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)? V1 Yes []No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes
Structures fLayons and/or Holding Pontlsj
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? Yes ❑No
Freeboard(ft): Lagoon ] Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
..............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ]No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? M Yes ❑:No
12. Do any of the structures need rnaintenancelimprovement? ® Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any'of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? ❑Yes ®No
NN"aste Aunlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? Yes ❑No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type W.... �:f?fiS �_ 1�L� t —. ... _.... Y � ..................................
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? ❑ Yes \o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [9 No
18. Does the cover crop need unproverrient? ❑ Yes ®No
19. Is there a lac{of available imgation equipment? ❑ Yes M No
For Certified Facilities Qoly
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes 2 No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal.Waste Management Plan in any way? Yes ❑No
22. Does record keeping need irnproverrent? �] Yes ❑No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
Cflirments`�refer[o gi�ttou r� *Exptatn ariyS'answersi an` ar.an -:7ecasrimendatto�o�arzyotb.�r corruziel�s-°max ,� �.° 3
1Jse drawtngs offac�i t ►to better expiazn sttuatinns, use itanal pales anecessazy
Ob7erJ� rvr c4 ialc rc c)stje kk ovv&—&?�jk4,Hc:1 Irs�fcay-jjej k. �cLWe d�1t hydad,aial Q
cc��► -6 6rccr\ 5 a Ji �i r MK• Scam were gri n- 4DO tca( w>,;ts{-c, or sloe- Cf
Suit^CS' % '(kvc [tjc4� o'�ef4C-k in `� (DekreSsive tntr'IiCcj t S{e al�c1
J �6-erg but + S�C.�c 1 5 r,rccbr~
�;�lk�-s i V, �.r) C�re and (�c�T a.r'�'a•®l+�r. Ver,�ei� �.:ir� r,�c.s eer
� { txxe sx orn cv+s' c a-�
hi S C(:r'�'i Ai cc�fi m Oq I t1�'vAc. aetx� oke rved !r ;rice art �,�;-, o tv
`' Je C�c�'t�D�� av� S�f1�'�-J�•s`rUrbi�f+C:-c t,v invu:1
c� W4� . Cis ;' [, ��a us�tc 4x cofvcEt t*u�bvu �), -1+
{�� a� 5-ccJrc�. !_a.�.�a�� �.e ue( rvu'r-I -: rued- n be c�
�s� r, Ue}7�11 no f o 5r y c.1
-S R l i4o exc ess,,l Pore ►11 ct rvt���_ �� � � 1
V- �ee�rt? odor iccti rri cry ��� 5- �2 f11,- 1(�Yze.1 �>rL ne cc �s
Reviewer/Inspector]Name ' .' . � =
ReviiFer/Inspector Signature: - f �r1 C T ,h, i!, . ,,Date: ��/97
Division of li ater Quality, lVater Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 1 1:14196

❑DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection a,<
O Routine O Complaint %Follow-up of DWQ ins action O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection p
Facility Number Z
Time of Inspection '� 24 hr.(hh:mm)
[3 Registered (MCertl1ified ©Applied for Permit Ip Permitted 0 Not Q erational Q Date Last Operated: ..--
Farm Name: tiYlx�--• r-2Crm s............................................................ County:......a]�Y'rh'.t� i.L�.....................
Owner Name:...........C.C?Io tfja....$3,.... ... (.Cl7:S..t..-...i..�,t r.............................. Phone\o: ..- `�!t?�... 1.� 7 .......................................
I
Facility Contact: ...... EAr. ...... f .t3n.................................Title:....... ,.................................... Phone
MailingAddress: .... ..... .7<i1! .. .-...1�1fn�................................................. .....As .t....N.L............:................................ .......
Onsite Representative.........hai lq'&..........8P. 4........................................................ Integrator:.......Zpwlc�s....0L.-CAr'0111C...-----...._..........
Certified Operator:,...........POW.14......4U.Gbh....................................... ................. Operator Certification Number,..----.............
Location of Farm:
........... ......................................:................................................................................................................................................................-......................I............
Latitude �•���« Longitude ram• �' �'�
Design Current Design Current Design: Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Populaoet
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ID Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons!Holding Ponds :m ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 69 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a- if discharge is observed, wa,,the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gallmin? N Ilk
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system.?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes [A No
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes 0 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
7- Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes 0 No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: — 2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes (9 No
Structures (La oons.Holding Portds,Flush Pits, tc
9. is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes (Z No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ...n.............................. .................................... ................................... .................................... .............. .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 2 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?. Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .................................................................................................----...-...............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes [,9 No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes 0 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes (M No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes ll No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ❑No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes 9 No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes JO No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes El No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes Ed No
No violations or' deficiencies.were-noted during this visit. You.will receive no further
eorrespOndence about this:visit. .
Cflren retl tntes#1t►n# � atPftan � nsily andfor any>tu9ns c►l #hca• e!l � .
laofacseitdrrs. useddtt ttsi �� � � �yT
r - �ww �y
x a
L �ppp qq ff� -�
ELL
3. C 1�r >liC�. er, p€ Wo�s�e. C-aus-' fx*04.. RvAc� WAS ioloc�Ce,{] � rimy" diSCY ►}j- �,S4 A
{�A.t'I1y�i[{'�C1��. VVV �Jj f
�• 170+�'a+tis Gen V �tJ O�J�S Q't' W RS'� -�'�'4 l l i 1'1 ��'Cb� '�"f'E�W �
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ^,,, Date:

❑DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
O Routine a Complaint O Follow--up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 1�"0� 24 hr.(hh:mm)
0 Registered R Certified l3 Applied for Permit (,Permitted 10 Not Operational
Date Last Operated: ................
Farm Name: .......... f.1.tflr................. ................................... Caunty:.....�r4!Yl... ..........................I..... ...................
p�
Owner Name:............C"6.r....... .... LC............................. Phone No: ..C%Q)A1'.5A.7.4.......
Facility Contact: ....... .ef&�..... V =N..............................Title:..._ yl P ................................. Phone 1So:.it110?- .2"54. 4_..........
MailingAddress: ...Za .........l x ►...... :.......N.l ............................................. .....A......t..N. .:................................................... ��`�z.11.........
�.�,I.�--.... `
Onsite Representative:.... �__.. ��.��f.�-:......................................................... Integrator:..... ta.�....4..�.... �t�.._.........._.._.._.....
Certified Operator........?eA C ............i1.Q m............................................................... Operator Certification Number........................................
Location of Farm:
............................................................................................................................................................................._......... ..... r
Latitude Longitude �• �` �"
Design Current Design ; Current Design Current
$wine• Capacity.-Population Poultry Capacity::PQptilation Cattle Capacity Pope >�
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total Skm
Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds -1 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
❑No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
2. Is any discharge observed`from any part of the operation? P Yes ❑No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon CdSpray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes 0 No
b. if discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes R No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in -at/min' .S
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes El No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes [9 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes M No
7/25/97
Continued on buck

Facility Number: — L
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes ®No
Structures fLnoons,Holding Ponds,Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ...........Nix ............I.............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes No
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes t]No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes ER No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? CR Yes ❑No
(If in excess of WNW,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .............................................................. .................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes [53 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ($No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes [RNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes W No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ER No
E3 No violations or deficiencies_were-noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence. about this.visit.
Cotxtmenisrefrer to question }; Explain any YE5 answers andloir anreirmendati�ns[fit and eca
a
Use rati f facility to better explain sttua. ons (u additipnal pages as �ecessaty}`
pp r� '' 1l, pp - I. _ .•... ---
�- J]U CYS G1Dr�t (3itLkt:r.2S 1f� Se
AdjF} 56,A 6e tm GWJ. `
laas It WO-S jV(a 1 n `GEII d 5 rE1M1R,. ltit7 WL e1���l��i TD Z aT V► Ni. WIS K
�erra"We, a;kV, Owl �, I,�xx,�txs A '}� '���[. Nor• Vertu 5� �a� wa�e� Carr�am V a;Zed
�, dro�,,h- 1?.ecui►vriun�a� bkocki� �,elda,lc� � Pum in wask sr -� ��p,Y �tkds.
W Mr. VUeer. {;h ao�imN 4� �L)m` I �c auf a of 54�4C ksas oYer lY ;nr, ov.� eaUSu�
a014r " CUnvrt' `bra r'Oa�SIEV Ot" 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name F a f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I p

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1995
Time: t/5T
Farm Name/Owner:_ CtL�L F'4'cfyr 5 f Z44ye N �I erk w•
Mailin.gAddress: _ f- �`�/�T Lf 6 ?
County:
/�f�i tiS�t rG�
Integrator: 130e - Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: IYCf'X 13flG JVI'ev,Y
Type of Operation: Swine i Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: °fo0o 5011� Number of Animals on Site: 00 0 '>Di—
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 Y " G-? ' Jam" Longitude: _2&-° Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot+ 7 inches) Yes or No . Actual Freeboard: __VFt. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
SU
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

f
JUL-14 1F5 15:22 FFGM DEM WATER, QUALITY SECTION TO
Wlpa P.e2%02 i
I
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. / _Z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD I
DATE: ��_1 g _ , 1995
I
hJ�,l;L�Dlo� YVI�,� Times . 1 �3 C7 �
. I
Farm Name/Owner. CA&(_0A 6 A V r-A9MS rA- 9& ii{P ML-rb ! WA(�j
Mailing Address o
County: _ (-(nn� w V N,�,,S(.0 a I C.K
Integrator. 1Wim?P. f1 � �
On Site Representative: r 7 Phone: _ -'97vS 4P4_
Physical Addmss/Location: _ fS C_ S fz_ 1310 f­\ c D t-i ON & 1-0 fLC'_�
fJ vim-+ A�37 r A Ay-A A-. -
Type of Operation: Swine `, Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 400Q sate_ Number of Animals on Site: 140
DEM Certification Number. ACE,_____, DEM Certification Number: ACNFEW
Latitude: ° Longitude:,oA5 ° ;t Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(appro)imately 1 Foot 7 inche Yes r No Actual Freeboard: �Ft. Inch s
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon.(s)? Yes CrNo as any erosion observed? cs o N
Is adequate land available for spray? es No Is the cover crop adequate? es o
Crop(s) being utilized: i` roc rus es ar-- k6.4 c
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings Y or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management rec s (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)` , es r No
Additional Comments: S,� I--- ---�b pS- 9 �-� lie L J t 1
inspector Nafne Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.