100003_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua

0 Division of Soil and'Water; Conservation Operation Review
'El Division of Soil and I ater� onservation ;Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality Compliance inspection _ F
Other Agency Operatid&Revtew
Q Routine Q Com taint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review OUOther
Facility Number 3 Date of Inspection Vitelm
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified ©Conditionally Certified [3Registered Cl Not O erational Date Last Operated: rll P
Farm Name: .......... ._... .._.�[ ...... hY.YT1........ T.r................ County:......&1hh.SJN.x.� ...........................
{ r{
Owner Name: wi........... L.:UJbtviQ................................... Phone No:....�.�i 10�..5.- 737.3................ ........................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................. Title:................... .................. Phone No: .........
Flailing Address: A1�Q 6.;dk R3............ .t....N(...........................
Onsite Representative:......... iut,A.............!~M•:yXl,Y1!V0AS....................... integrator:......
Certified Operator:...................RtdwA...K� ......... ,yyh ...................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
t................................................................................................................................
Latitude �' �' �•
Longitude 0
Design Current
:
Design Current_w-
Design Current
SCapacity elation
.-:Capacity,p
PoulPo
Cttlwne
elation:ae
Capacity Po elationCa `
❑Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
Dairy
Feeder to Finish 31
❑ Non -Layer
I I❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
' ❑Farrow to Feeder
: ❑ Other
`
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
37ez
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Toia1�SSLW
-
tber--.of=Lagoons;. �. ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area],..
Ponds Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r
t r ,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: Z
Freeboard(inches): ........... Tl ............................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes J)-3 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes &No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back
3/23/99

r-.
Facil y Number: tp - 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenatice/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designatedin the Certified Animal
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16..Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Po Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
CO No
Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Rev iewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24_ Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Rio •yi61'afions ;oi•. deficiencies mere noted during 4his:visit: Yoil ;will-eeceiye Rio further • ; ;
. • . • corresnontfence. about this visit. ..................... .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
3123/99

Facilfty Number: Date of Inspection Z G
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
itial mn rawi oments-aor- n rt W — -
--. s on
.:_ .. ,w ww _ _.:. �m � _ _
w
3/23/99

[� Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ODivision of Water Quality
d.Iioutine 0 Comnlaint O Fallow-un of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection •' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered © Certified 0 Applied for Permit ` Permitted 1E3 Not O =rational Date Last Operated :.•„•
Farm Name: 5.�1 Z .1............... County:
Omer Name: .......l�x.►,.........*!.........?.................................... Phone No: .....A. ..... z......7...................
...........
Facilit Contact• �_k:G• .. $ dW� . f. .... Phone No:....... 25a....(?.3.1:3..........
Y �4I........,(�....>✓!Y,ta..�.�17.... Title:........................................................
l
hiailingAddress:.....��.!.......C�f.��.P..W......................................................±.1 �IKI.................................................... .......
Onsite Representative: .....h/dj`.a-w.......................................................
Certified Operator: .......e Nul..... (rti.......... C ^^
Location of Farm:
Integrator: ........... WVI .........................................
Operator Certification Number;..., ! �.y-i'u..........
Latitude ®• �� Longitude ®• �� ®'�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made? ❑ Yes ?9 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E9No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes Q No
3. Is there evidence of past,discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes a No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ZNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 0 No
7/25/97 Continued on back

IP
Facility Number: (f —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons, Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ,...,,al�P................
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type f . 4................................... .. ......................... .... ,.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[j. No.violationsvr deficiencies.were_ntite`d-during this.visit.-:You:Wi11 receive no:furttie'"
correspbtidence about this.visit ......
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ,&No
Structure (i
❑ Yes RNo
[]Yes B No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes 19No
...............................
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes F,41 No
❑ Yes EkNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes iO No
❑ Yes JZNo
t/IM�. (r(£Lc..cv►p-4;j N£� �5 T'U iC�i�o (��ciPc� S�Gc<G5 <J-[.S�/� �--o�l�,/"viC�
?I r7�
7/25/97
ME
Reviewer/Inspector Name��
U
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

0 ..........
❑DSWGr -Op6tition'R6­
Aniil-F�edl6f
Operation Site'. inspection
�Q Routine 0 ComD[aint 0 Follow-up_ of DW2 inspection 0 Follow-up of DS1*VC review 0 Other
-1
Date of Inspection ,, 3c 1.
Facility Number
1
Time of Inspection 5 Use 24 hr. time
0 Q-W Total Time (in hours) Spent onReiieiv
Farm Status: CA P_ 1­L.,V11,A_C JZ� 7- _2 or Inspecrion (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: County:
Owner Naine: kK) !a.,, Phone NO..
Mailing Address: S E I;,
Onsite Representative: •Integ:raton-k
Certified Operator: Operator Certrification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude � I Longitude
JE3 Not Overarional Date Last Operated:
ry-pe of Operation and Design Capacity
wine:N' u b
�-;7­'
m e
C3 Wean to Feed:,
Feeder to Finish I 31s o
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feder
:Q Farrow to Finish
L0 Subsurface Drains Present
Lagoon Area �Spmy Field Area
General
1. Are there any bu5e-s that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
z. If'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is obsc-,ved, did it reach Surface Warcr? (If yes, notice DWQ)
c. lf'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in aml/r.-Ma"
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system! (If yes, notify DNVQ)
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any advz-s.- impacts to the waters of the State other than from a dischar-ge?
5. Does any part of tie waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ Yes
22 No
El Yes
ZINO
E] Yes
El No
F-1 Yes No
[:1 Yes No
[I Yes SNo
El Yes C1 No

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Hnidinl Ponds/
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes (ENO
❑ Yes V1 No
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes ® No
La_aon 3 Lagoon 4
❑ Yes ®.No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
U." Do any -of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste ADDlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
jn c
15. Crop type -bi P ^r' vw. v�-� -
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management D`.an?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?.
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Onlv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes Vi No
El Yes FgNo
❑Yes NNo
© Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes LAN-o
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ® No
Cotrunents (refer to'giiestton i� ExpIau>; any;YES answers `and/or any re omme^da�ons sxr any oche commenEs -
Use diawtrF+=s of fa�iiity to fetter expl"gin situattons_� use:addtuanai pages asnecessa-�) J �� «� �
SO. &ram Sr �,eld.s ►.tied k bz r-egeedeT t?I
1Z. �'ar a,r � C is at ..Vat/ �nQe �o b'� tf-dfZ' .
2- Z. M It,a S r Q to t e l cl vt u i, r v-a a ,� r S i e Q e-
t
s p C ,,L d w ; 1'1 T- �,L c� vti v ..,.t ie zr r3 o n i r r q a. tin ✓� r' Z- c a C-Vt
Er rc, ,n a d a e. r t e£ o� r e s �-a v t cl b i ,.t. CO ,r e T-CL t?—c( > ,, I—,
Vv P- S Cam' . vvt LL Y. a Z. VM ' f_
a C>ti Q,4- w: S z j , c s 1, k e E
Reriewer/Inspector-Name-1Or`t,a-6
Re-riwer/Inspector Signature: o rf , u,� _ Date: q
11/1-1;96

Facilitv Number: _A2--��
Division of Environmental Management Cm 7-
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 'O- 12 -g G
Time:?
General Information:
Farm Name: ,, a� m� 5 s saws County: 1�->ryrz 5 Wo C-�
Owner Name: C �� f n a� . 5 S o its Phone No: 7-5 3 - S
On Site Representative: 4e:c V_, 5 Integrator: M oe
z s3 - 3 l
Mailing Address: 11 q (^r.[� I/ bv�,'F c. Pam% XA�-
Physical Address/Location: � 2 1401 !:S ►M:(, r Lj r s T 14(oZ Ajea& w
�5 1,ce e,•.
Latitude:/�/ 01 Longitude: _7? / 1 z / 3_3
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Sow ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Nursery Q Non -Layer 0 Beef
t4Feeder sylzz`l — 3(ecy
OrherType of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes ❑
Nofr
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ❑
No.❑'
Is erosion observed?:
Yes Z
No ❑
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
No Q
D Man-made Q Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No)ZI
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes ❑
No.0
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: C d c,_ s4 --f Acreage: ZZ• f
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
Nop
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
NoA
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ID
No)
AOI -- January 17,1996

Maintenance
Doe's the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes Cl No Er
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes 12 No 2f
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes)Zf No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No2r
Explain any Yes answers: f eLr.S e_ .th ��►2r.�� _ LJ SR..•,
r CLr>5 16A GT ;u .�, R z.� �/. _` , e er e , J !.y d� C 1rs , Sz-i-d
z2. 1 A Z-n A ,� � GIs 2Z f A�v�c 5 i✓ g
'CIS vim(,
Signature: �� t i�f - Date: — ; 6,
cc. Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawino or Observation
AOI — January 17,1996

JUL-14-1935 15:22 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
W I F,0 F' . 02i02
•
Site Requires Immediate Attention -
Facility No. 1O _J�
DIVISION OF ENVTRON-N ENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
(ILK DATE: �) i 7 , 1995
Time: L� J
Farm Name/Owner. C,Lf ►c,^ 0 So f4 - - - , l .. ��Pv� r►�v _
Mailing Address: _ Ai6- County:
integrator.. l'1 iA a 6y - _ , - _ Phone:
On Site Representative: S)Ork{ _ i �w, ,�+� �� i _ - - Phone:
Physical Address/Location: a I MD e; Wecl S �yo
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 3 7 52� Number of Animals on Site: _
DEM Certification Number. ACE- DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude, Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) gor No Actual Freeboard: Ft. _Cc, Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oi� Was any erosion observed? Yes oro�
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate?Oor No
Crop(s) being utilized: (-oo-vt4l
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?<fevor No
100 Feet from Wells? es or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes `o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or 6 S If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes orvo
Additional Comments: L s_ -CDC-Q`<`;�,� v._ I ePr L-Q-rf _ ►�+� o. �
na
0 �f V"-
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.