080019_HISTORICAL_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

HISTORICAL
HISTORICAL
HISTORICAL

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
' and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Walter White
218 Pocosin Rd
Windsor NC 27983
Dear Walter White;
06
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 17, 2000
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Walter White Farm
Facility Number 8-19
Bertie County
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Rankin
1 0.21 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1 000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Washington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
ROGER THORPE FOR
JIM MULLIGAN
Jim Mulligan
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Bertie County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

l
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review © Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit @) Routine Q Complaint Q Roliow tap Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
li acility Number DS 19
0 Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit 3-14-zDnD
r Not Operational Q Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 7:-.02 ............
Farm Name: WAlkt:..WJhittcXAxln ..............................•------•............................................. County: Bgxlac................................................. WARO.......
Owner Name: 124 Alter ................... ....... ....... Whoa.....-- .............................................. Phone No: 25Z-,794726.4....... ............. ........... .........................
FacilityContact: .......................... .......... ........................................... Title: ............... --- ..................... ..... .... Phone No:
Mailing Address: ZUR.0min.Rd,....................................................
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
�Q�asim.Rd..Z.names.N.Qf.'arxdax.xQnaxewxille..........................................................................................................................................................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
300
0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Pdultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 129,90
Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
L If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes- notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat Hooper 252-946-6481 Martin Mclawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

.Facility Number 8 -- 19 Lagoon Number ............. Lagoon Identifier prim ry.... -.......... ....................
0 Active a Inactive Latitude 36 Q5 a5
Waste Last Added Z- n.92........................................... Longitude 76 56 19
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? ®GP5 ❑ Map
GPS file number: 1-031420a
Surface Area (acres): 4,1.........................
Embankment Height (feet): 2,.5...........................
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1 Q00 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ®Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? Q Yes 0 No
Intervening Stream? Q Yes *No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? Q Yes *No Q Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker 0 Yes Q No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 3-14-2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 36.0
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
0 Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage Q Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Sol] Appears to Have Low Permeability
* Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ration equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown with representative 0 Yes 0 No
unavailable
comments Question #2. Appears to be piping to sprayfield - water at same level. Second seep
found in field - possibly rat tunnel. Dike wail 36" high and thin at corner where
problems exist. Informed Mr. White of seeps and recommended contacting tech.
specialist.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Walter White
Walter White Farm
218 Pocosin Rd
Windsor NC 27983
Dear Walter White:
�EHNR
RECEIVED
August 5, 1997 WASHINGTON OFFICE
AUG 0 6 1997
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 08-19
$ertie County
D. E. M.
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operations animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state wi11 subject you to a civil penalty up to 510,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a li uid waste system
30.000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
_�6R
cc: Washington Water Quality Regional Office
Bertie Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled110 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Walter White
Waiter White Farm
218 Pocosin Rd
Windsor NC 27983
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Walter White Farm
Facility ID#: 8-19
Bertie County
Dear Mr. White:
RECEiV®
WASHINGTON WiCE
NOV 19 1996
0.EM :
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted.by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Washington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687. �►�yi
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 �C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

V
Z 1PI 115 893
Receipt for
Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided
7i�-1 Do not use for International Mail
(See Reverse)
Set i ce❑
r��r1�4.,1
Sheet ate o.
POW State an ZIP Curie 6ngc
Postage
y1 l
$
Cerlilied Fee
D
l
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery NF P.
-- -
Retufh Reteipl Showing
1
ttl Whom A [iota delivered
►
r
getUrh gecerpl Showing to Whom.
Dale, and Addressee's Address.
TALFees Paslage
1
y
&
& Fees
Qj l
d
Po5trhO Or bate
tip

Facilirn :Vumber:La-1q
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: l -mot �o
Time:.=_I 5 PNI
General Information:
Farm Name:. i1 1_�)u, l : M L p. n rJ1 On County: G A,�
Owner Name: Phone No:.�UH -
On Site Representative: 1�0 o&LO& SIP Integrator: _ _ --
Mailing Address: l8 l3ocn5 i ,n1 _� _
Physical Address/Location:_ INC 5P. 13 u
\j'
Latitude: 1 1 Longitude: 1 1
Operation Descriptiom, (based on design characteristics)
T'yy'of Swine No. o Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Sow ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Ijlursery ❑ Non -Layer 0 Beef
Feeder ...��
QtherType of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:I (include is the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility In ecti n:
Lagoon
freeboard
Yes V/ ❑
Is lagoon(s) less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
No
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ❑
No U'�
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑
No
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
No
Q Man-made 0 Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No 21�.�c-•
Does the cover crop need improvement?_
Yes ❑
No F❑ U.kkot,,
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: c`tt.uti - Acreaae: 1j 'A _ c;' e-1
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No G/
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No Ur/
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No
ADI -- January 17,1996

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes Z� No ❑
Does record keeping need improvement? 0e v e (cam, 's �er�+s:yze� + 5 `} 5 .0 Yes ❑ No U/
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Manage ent Plan on site? Yes ❑ No �
!JU+ YQt�.1 rLe 4Ws -)Aa 0 _ 06-ta -`-i L
Explain any Yes
Signature:-2 tL.
cc. Facility Assessment Unit
C2
R
Date:i�C
{a ` [� -Ct �
Use Attachments if Needed
-3 la Pn
4iL�JpQ.A-Vnkt
&CLA-
3
AOI - January 17,1996

w
U
O d
jz
U R CL
[7
X? ZPP
cp
� Z
•
I � 1
4
�I
0

221
, ,r
�b
ON
\ :I 1 ■1
I! �
�
1
l
_
III
� , ,
nE - ri
f
� II • Set
el •' �•.
•';r+..
)
�n
Askewviile
:� • `+.
11
�
1L
r
1
re
72-
r
!-•
7 J. G
111343
•
7
J'
Cern' _T
IL
R
•�
o a
n
Al
n
F L
Walter White Swine operation
+ r
��,��°
��, ~1 3 -
Sertie County
Facility No. 08-19 P 0
C Q
— 'rl
134
rr
r�
$t Matthewsch
0 17
3�y
N
\�
�

m SENDER:
yq Complete items 1 andlor 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the
m • Complete items 3. and 4a & b. following services (for an extra
i • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee):
return this card to you.
y • Attach this form to the front of the mailplace, or on the hack If space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address
does not permit.
aim+ • Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiace below the article number, Z ❑ Restricted Delivery
• The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
v delivered. Consult postmaster for fee.
m 3. Article Addressed to: _ 4a. Article Number
a n^11 4b. Service Type
a❑ Registered ❑ Insured
0 o� I pdcos �� certified ❑ COD
5. Signature {Addressee`
❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for
Merchandise
7. Date
--offJ Delivery
LEee!Fs
8. Addressee's Address (Only
and fee is paid)
December 1991 p17.3. [3P0: 1993-352-71� DOMESTIC RETURN RECERPT

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Official 8usin ass PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
USE TO AVOID PAYMENT
OF POSTAGE, $300
Print your name, address and ZIP Code here
Roc.,-EIR —rW a a pc-
Delh'1
H aq CARDA.tNR h�F-NU-!L
WRSAiNG-` ON NC- a-ISki

State of North Carolina
Department of Enviroament, Health,
and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
November 14, 1995
Mr. Walter White
218 Pocosin Rd.
Windsor, NC 27983
Subject: Notice of Recommendation of Enforcement
Walter White Swine Operation
Facility No. 08-19
Bertie County
Dear Mr. White:
MIAA P-a
to
IDEHNR
This letter is to notify you that the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Environmental
Management is considering sending a recommendation for an enforcement action to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management. The recommendation concerns the violation by
the Walter White Swine Operation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1(a)(1) for
construction of an "outlet into waters of the State" which would allow the discharge of animal
waste into waters of the State without a permit.
The Walter White Swine Operation is located on NCSR 1343 (Pocosin Rd.) approximately one
(1) mile east of the intersection of NCSR 1349 and NCSR 1343. A site inspection was
performed by regional staff members on September 28, 1995. This animal operation consists
of an open feed lot and two confinement houses that gravity flow into a lagoon. The inspection
revealed that the lagoon has a conveyance which was discharging animal waste into an adjacent
drainage ditch that flows to an unnamed tributary then to Whiteoak Swamp, which is classified
C Sw and empties into the Cashie River in the Roanoke River Basin. As previously advised this
unpermitted outlet must be eliminated immediately.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present to this Division for
consideration, please respond in writing to the Washington Regional Office within ten (10) days
after receipt of this Notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 10% post -consumer paper

i NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Walter White Swine Operation
November 14, 1995
Page 2
still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement recommendation from this office for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at [phone], ext. 214
or Daphne Cullom, Environmental Technician, at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Roger Thorpe
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Jim Mulligan, Regional Supervisor
WARO
Compliance/Enforcement Files
Central Files
Junius Russell, Bertie County Soil and Water Conservation
Pat Hooper, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation

Site ReQuires Immediate Attention: 5
Facility No.
J
DIVISION OF ENVIRONM.NTAL RANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: o4 - 1995
Time:
Farm Name/owner:
Failing Address: ���� -ccib5 i.LVI S;e— K,'•
County:
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/LQcation: 1 5 �. - a
Type of Operation: Swine C Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: -:3 CAD No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification No: ACE DEN! Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient eeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? {approximately 1 Ft + 7 in} Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft nches
— - , ,._ .
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o 'No
Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes' r No
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes ❑ N
Crcn{s} being utilized: } . nC lC]
Dees the facility meet SC inimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellinas? (�a7 or No 100 Ft from Wells? (Yes)
es or No
d
the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Strea.*�?
es or No
Is animal waste land anplied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft cf a USGS Man Blue
Line? Yes or(Nv) -
Is animal waste discharged into waters cf the to by man-made ditch, flushing
system, cr other s _.. i lar man -:jade devices? Ye or No
If Yes, please ex_ lain: L} 01 l _►{V
r r �r P i r• C•.iy�'
Does the facility maintain equate waste manag went records volumes o; tenure (�
land ap_ ied, sorav irritated on s�ec�ri_ acreage wit". cover crop]? Yes o Ho
pe or Name Si ,ar,ure
cc. Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet �`

S7
ccr(��
tj v
Ill
m

Site Recruires Immediate Attention: S
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONM NTAL Y-ANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: nq -'-"Zy , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/owner:
Mailing Address: ,mil I-c[+�; n L .� 'Sq�; iwCI-
County: EC -A k_
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: I- Phone: - f_
Physical Address/L¢cation: f-;„ . Q
Type of operation: Swine �sC Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: {'a�j - � No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification No: r ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: F
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal waste Lagoon have sufficieneeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately I Ft + 7 in) Yes•or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft polies
was any seepage observed from the laccon(s)- Yes v 'No
was any erosion observed? Yes o Ho
Is adecuate land availatle for spray? Yes r No
is the cover crop adequate? Yes o N
Crops) being utilized: ltJ�.
Does the facility meet SC inimum setb'ack criteria?
es or No
200 Ft from Dwellires? !es or No 100 Ft from Wells? (Es)
the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USES Blue Line Strean?
Yes or Na
Is animal waste land annlied or
saray irrivated within 25 Ft cf a ❑SGS !fan Slue
Line? Yes or(! o )
Is animal waste discharged into
water- of the to by man-made ditch, f_ashinc
s;,,$te:R, cr other _,-'milar man -mace ce'•`roes? Ye or N
If Yes, please expla_n:
r , r'�' 'VC- k!` k1(e
r ��
r
Does the facility maintain
f u)A
�� N5
e rranaae�ment records (volumes of ,«zu_e
land ape'_red, spray ___icated cn
specific acreage with cover crop}? Yes o� Ha � /► {
l
{ � L
InR"E nor Namme
_
S+ r
_:�aGu e
rac_11t�v Assessment Uni-
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

cal

Animal Operations Inspection Form
Date of Inspection: On - '_') I? - 9 ``7
Regional Office:
Name of Property Owner:
Washington
4. Name of Operator: UjaL � . wu'_d�
S. Address: 1 % eoS+ n MCO
LJ" nCsc. P_ 3 QC c;2 q C S�
G. Phone Number: 0 1Ci) —1gtl _ '-� eoL4---D-
[�
7. Description of facility location: 4X C'
� _5e C_ 40n o� tirC�R �3�9 a P NCSQ 3, .
8. Date the facility began operation:
9. Date of last expansion:
Explain: 1; �• Vas +,moo- ���t��
10. Has the facility registered with ❑EM?
1f yes, date registered? t
11. Does the facility have an approved animal waste management plan? N� o
Is one required? I Q S }
Date approved?
12. Has the facility received a CAFO Designation? iv o
If yes, date issued?
13. Type of operation (Examples: swine, farrow to finish, topping, dairy, beef, cattle, poultry,
breeders, layers, broilers, turkey production, etc.):
14. Number and type of animals:
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will b�stab edor confined and fed or maintained
In any 12 month period: ' w;eP- C►-kL�,_ via L5CL
16. Are crops, pasture, or post -harvest residues sustained In the normal growing season over
any portion of the lot or facility?

17. Type of waste management (Examples: 1. type of confinement: free stall barns, sheltered
or limited shelter dirt lots, paved or dirt open lots, houses, or pasture; 2. type of waste
handling: direct spreading In solid form, slotted floor with lagoon or pit, single or multi -cell
lagoon, aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray Irrigation, stockpiling,
contractor disposal, etc.)?
18. Description of other animal operations In immediate vicinity and proximity to same or other
surface waters:
19. Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.:
2o. Approximate depth of groundwater table in the area of the facility or discharge:
21. Proximity of facility to surface waters (provide name and class of surface waters):
U 1 .V4-W ,-
22. Animal waste discharge including photos and witness' names, addresses, telephone
numbers, and statements of fact):
"_P�GLS.-_
I U _
23. Are pollutants discharged into the waters of the state? If so, how? (directly or by man-
made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made device):
24. Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event of less than a 25-year, 24-hour
Intensity (if yes, include a brief listing of incidents and suspected causes):
25. What Is the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation?
26. What is the duration and gravity of the violation?

Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of sampling, field measurements, visual
observations and slope and vegetative cover of land adjacent to water, extent of rainfall and
other factors relative to the likelihood or frequency of discharge of animal wastes and
process wastewaters ). The effect on ground or surface water quality or quantity or on air
quality.
What is the cost of rectifying the damage?
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?
30. Was the violation committed willfully or Intentionally? Explain:
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority?
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?
Staff Time (WARD): $
Staff Time (Central Office): $
Travel: $
Total Cost of Investigation: $
33. Type or general nature of business?
34. What is the violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) or
recalcitrance (stubbornness)?
35. Are there mitigating circumstances?
36. Assessment Factors:
a. iWC:
b. Receiving Stream:
c. Damage (YIN - If yes, Include report from WRC)
37. Include a copy of any Designations letter signed by the Director.
38. Recommendations made to ownerloperator:
39. Recommendations for further DEM action (Re -inspect, NOV, Enforcement Action, Designate,
etc.):
40. Other Comments: