070053_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua

INSPECTIONS,
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

10 Routine ❑ Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 0
Facility Number d
Time of Inspection Tav I Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status:_.:2�1 Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
....�._....- �
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: 6y- County: m �'', f,,+
Owner Name: .. x?d_/1 _ Phone No:
Mailing Address: P jelo
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 'V
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
On Ter.A Cef • L2��d s_ .�: s �` VC 32
Latitude a 4 Longitude • C
[] Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
N�. _ � .:.......:.::......: �.. ....•.. umbel-;::
a ❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
a: Foul.M
PNtimber
IlJ Non -Laver I )
Cattle ; 3
1M
El Farrow to Wean
"'
E:.
Farrow to Feeder
t:.b .. ........-e.>�
....-. „._-:..".u......:...�::
��;�..�s==
t
Farrowv Finish
:m ; � Other Type of Livestock
_.. ,
;=
«..:..
plVuatiier: of I >goons (:Holding Poniis ❑Subsurface Drains Present
ma,..
a oon Area Spray Field Area:
_ u.......... ....::._.::.:...
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenan ceimp rovemen t?
!$ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 12rNo
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes CgNo
❑ Yes 1RrNo
�4 ■
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes 15 No
Continued on back

--6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes IFNa
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after i/l/97)? ❑ Yes QKNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures CL2zoons and/or Holding Ponds -
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures Iack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
V4'aste A�piication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record Steeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes IR No
❑ Yes $ No
►, ■
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,gNo
❑ Yes ❑ No.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Q Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,E9 No
❑ Yes RNo
o in an S an w ant}! A rec endati ran r co t_s_ Comments (refer t question �):. Exgla any. -YES s ers. or any. oil m arts o _y Attie mmen
Use drawiri s of facili .to better ex Iam sttuattons.:(use additiaital `ages as.ueces ;: '�d
1x �Y) .:�;,�,J��,/j Win: �„-.•r .. -:..ram- . I
TLaS
L"A f -04 f-s .-rt421r is s•� Q.,U....�., a ,,,,..�� of 54A -dq tiZ) 1--*� 40-
Trft}}I'L
wee,
T�*<
rrj
N7ti.
61114a—
f"4+a4
C-� 14rP.1 'w A a.r A
C�,vzx
ZQ!/�rtd
4�.�q
�a
��rc�cn . 1l gy
6ee,
f ted,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
w _
Reviwerllnspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/I4/96