070024_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

❑ Di�isinn of Soil and Water Cvnsei-►�ativn ❑ Other Agency
..............
. G Division of Water ualit <;ra:
10 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWO Inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection 5~l9r�S
�
Time of Inspection �24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered F Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not (] crdtional Date Last. Operated:
Farm Name: r.{r. ..... .. "" County "h
-----`�-'................................................................... ........"� 1- °....... ..........
OwnerName: ................... clA.-----..-- �� � ..................................................................... Phone No: ...... .................................................................................
FacilityContact:............................................................................ Title: ................................................ --.............. Phone No:
...................................................
MailingAddress: ........ ___ ............................... ................ ........................ . ......... ... ........... I....... ............ -........................................................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative:...............CtvL.---- �........................---....---...................... Integrator:......... --Ft,--tc.................. .........................
Certified Operator ............ .a�lk P e
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude Longitude �• �0
Swute
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
30
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
:N�ibeir'tif Lagoons I:Haldirig Pods: ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
r »
....-...... .
;. No Liquid Waste Nianagement System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [ILagoon ElSpray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes Rf No
❑ Yes iffNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Ni No
❑ Yes M No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes N No
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site -which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LagoonsMoldintr Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 1 ... .......y..A"...T !........... ...................
['}: r
Freeboard ft............................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
i
❑ Yes
No
X Yes
❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Yes
b(tin
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid Ievel markers?
Waste Anplication
14, Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste ]Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No -violations or deficiencies were' noted during this.visit. You -will receive no further
eorrespondenee dliout this.risit:• ;
❑ Yes (9 No
❑ Yeti 'M No
❑ Yes 1W No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Ny No
ElL_ Yes No
❑ Yes M No
0? Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Coiihments;(refer, fa question #)::Explain any:YES answers and/or any rectirnmendafions or any. 'ather camittents-w
Use driwings.of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pagis'as nccessarv):
p.
/'�s n '7ral.l[."` ►ri1� c�►���-- [1ro.��Ri� �tr�c{ �-R�a+,.� rafStS i� i�s'� �
-4w Jc► -A:n C^1 i r�4c. �Arr ,ws; r�e.airlcl 2 Erases v� rry A .
Irti<;7.� �c, .,a ►..-. t �I' { E •Re � � � l�'n^ � `�'a +.y.�� l l F r,r�5�,�.a� l i ,.■. -}b nQ r. -�ue 1� . 7�''+S
w •�� alto w wt�[ -I-a l7t jrrr5n.� Y"�� f � r
7/25/97
Reviewerfinspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: •-I 1,20

:. :.... .. ..-.. z... .. - ..-. .... ... ---. ...... . ... ................. I ................... ...----.............. .... ..... .. ..
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
Animal Feedlot Operation iteIns In
spection n
=,
0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-uR of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 other
Date of inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection �24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted JE3 Not Operational Bate Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name Trrp �,.....!�....... Fa.. k" County . oea �''cs.�"...................................................
Owner Name: .................f
Facility Contact: .....,.... � �
R! ek-
P-e Title:
-------------------------------------
Phone No:........
illailitig Address:............r Ua �Ol[J...... ...... a.'...:a ....----- -7 Y60
. ......... ....... l ........
�[�, P��
C}nsttc Represej�tati►e:..........................-..................................... Intekratclr:
....................................... .
Certified Operator; .............. ........................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Operator Certifieation Nurnber:......................
Latitude ' ' Longitude ' �' �:4
Swine
........ ....... .....
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
0Laver
Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
1
1700
❑ Boars
........................ I ......
Design Current
Cattle Capacity: -Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity.
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds I0 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEl Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management Sj•stem
C_Anoral
1. Are there any buffers that need niaintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischan-,e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyancz man-made?
b, if dischar_:: is observed, did it reach Surface Water? tlf yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galrmi0
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'' (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system [other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
& is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
T Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
O No
❑ Yes
'XNo
❑ Yes
XN❑
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ Yes
JK No
Continued
on back

�:
",.r
Facility Number:
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
Wo
Structures_ fLa2oon�lloldirta Ponds, Flush Pit,, etc.1
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Yes
❑ No
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 - Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier. -
Freeboard 00................................... I........
M
Is seepage observed from any of the Structures?
❑ Yes
P�tio
IL
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered ►-es, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
XYes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
%' No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type fA r.-'}
15.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management flan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
MNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
hNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
XNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
2l.
Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
JKYes
❑ No
For Certified or 11'ennitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit''
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this:visit,- .You,wi11 receive no further
Orresppndence about this. visit-.-.,'
Comments (refer to question #.): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations o-r any.:other.cotnnMents:.
Use drawings of facilit to better explain stuations, (u-se additional pages as ncessary. )•45,
I3. vaeA_ 4.
22. wQA- 4-
PAO
.fw "..,0Ir�_ � rris .!r'an A"A ,
7/25/97
....... .......... .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ar[r.---- Date: T

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. _ (71 --Dt4
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL F NAGEHE-NT
ANIMALT FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: !j-~QLA , 1995
Time. Q.LA0j/1
Farm Name/Owner:
Count
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: F one:
Physical Address/Location: JA cyu ce-_ 4, { e o on -ice !t
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Desicn capacity: 00 No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude:Longitude: _rU'— LjElevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste'Laaoon have sufficient_, eeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
o strm evert? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Ye or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft Q —inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or
Was any erosion observed? Yes or(Z)
Is adequate land available for spray? GeDsor No
is the cover crow adequate? Yes or No
Crcp(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SC rimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? es r No 100 Ft from Wells", Yes r No
Is the ani.-„al waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or( )
Is animal wasted applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USES Map Blue
L in a? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state an -made ditch, flushing
sv=_te:r, or other similar man -:Wade devices? Yes ❑ No
If Yes, please explain:
Irl
Does the facility maintain ade--ate waste rianaGement records (volumes of manur e
land a_clie�, S^,ra;J irrigated cr1 $7ecif1C acreage wiz:.. cover Crop)? Yes or Na fl
S; cnac_re
cc. Faci-_=y Assessment linz..
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEt3
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments:
Sketch:

OPEMTIO NS BRANCH - WQ Fax : [phone] Jul 25 ' 95 11: 31 P.10f 15
t
� .� Sl1a rsq�ti�asimrsr�als am�io�
Faup nuffm
SlyWITATIPN RECORD
py
Mabg Ad&M-
tv
yftm-
q!%3—Eq90
Pf10ri@:
Iq
. ran ea s-f- n �., �. S �.t. 17•
I
Type of operaliorc
.. W- Poultry Cattle
Dann Capado.. q3D ptga, ; Number of Ankds on 86j., - 50
or u' + u
Ty" of tnspectivn: end. _ _ _ _ Acrfal
Circle Yes or No
000 ft Anima! Weste Lagoon have surd WL fmbowd of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour atom evert
(appra)pmatety 1 Fod * 7hot=) Yap or No
Add Freeboard: Feet 0 Inches
For farAW5 Wh mare than one lagoon, please address the oMartgood feeboard wider the
anualts sedan.
Was airy Seepap observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No
Was there erasion of the dam? Yes or a
b Aftluata And Avawe for land spplicathn? (IiP or No
is Me cover crop adequate? r� or No
Addklwal Com wWw
0
fRQ2�� kLQ"
Signafurc of Pig nt
Fu to (919) 715-US