710029_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Type of Visit: t, Compliance Inspection V Operation Review /}y5tructure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I�( Arrival Time: Departure Time: County
Farm Name: 'ungia Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Y&�nbm r�lj Y�aLj
io
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
�1. Region:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification ]Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Gent `
Swine C►apacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
Pop. .
Finish
La er
Dair Cow
Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
o Finish 1
F
Dair Heifero
Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
o Feeder
Dr, P,oultr>
Ca aci
pto �-
Non -Dairy
o Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
MI
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Qther
Turkey Puults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters or the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes k
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
[] Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA [] NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continuer)

1764ili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ! E
Spillway?:
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 70 S� a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate Public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �§No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes []No ❑ NA XNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA '6NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? % Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ME
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA M NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes [] No ❑ NA VNE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ElWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

FArili Number: -
Date of Inspection: lR
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [] Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ No ❑ NA to NE
❑ No ❑ NA WNE
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �q No ❑ NA 0 NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA
Other Issues
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes b�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
SePc�ra�e. ��,cpec-4 -Foyry', r Rla-kd s c,ev tctAn iru�S-�,`yc
��n Z �r►a.r der nA Goner . -Uw f' c f Av, �kC.mkii E
ry `� �mW U vt j * S (t sS --jan 12 L Ln oon
�G
aAJ 5 6(o A AW. ` i s cusrec� 4rccns e r� � u wea-
�c��
3 0 At Pb A w6o yNk 16 +D o-6yL 2 &rA VPAW
AAkA
G �VV
picl n� Y&
to Mar Y-A to
l Mil
al, a s -� NJ "VIA. MY, gcu�r�{I w
AAO�+� WUWkoyh
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatut
Page 3 of 3
Phone: Z 1
Date:
2/4/201 S

(Type of Visit: Q-Mompliance Inspection V ;;0_a11_00_w`__up
tiReview O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance J
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Il
Date of Visit: /} Arrival Time: 110 Departure Time: Z %Z County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Onsite Representative:n!"/I 1 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
SwinePo
P h` P•
Wet Poultr Y
Ca aci�
P h'
Po ..
P
Catitle
Cat acit
P Y
Po P•
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dai Cow
W an to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
eeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
[I
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D I'oultr
Ca aci
Po P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[] No ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Yes
FrNo NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Fucili Number: - '� Date of Inspection: I V7137/L
Waste Collectign & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes EJ_No--Q-NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Z_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z �j
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [] Yes [��lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes to❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Apl2lication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Typc(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Y ❑No ❑NA
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA 6'N E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �/ N
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2rNF
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Surve
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA N
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA gNE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Ocility Number: - 2 Date of Inspection: l `3 7,71
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA NE
25. Is thti facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NAFj-_K_E�
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No f NSA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes lo_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Dos (face the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? []Yes EZ(No NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Rev iewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ YesjNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
C6mments refer to uestion'# :,Ex "lawn an ',.YES:afiswers iikndlor, au additional re0ihMehdati6ns 6rart 'other'eo�rments 1,;`; -`
s, slr,ata:.3!q:. ':tls��...:rl..af I,.1 !I,€ L:. [„ ! t:,,lry',
Use,draw,ings, of�;facil�,. +.'to.betfcr,ex .lalnlsrtu twuns (use:,additionall�pagcs
C'S/q c�, .v►, frur 1 C. f onl 4� r Qj (� c��„-t5 r►
ccr�`�� SwSS�� d-ra�.�� -roe,
9 / Sr , .� w (' t r
CA. c SAt,�S J �a�
f
a. nr (( cA r to I-4
ct t/ I-, D viv— 2 r ! -rr • P t L C ac r' e J
P o & I / Ces '...kp, C5,19tvc.i COP/
C�r,5f,n.� La�•_5�, — 9!? f 3ry
Reviewer/Inspector Name: vs o�'I �Vi Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Type of Visit: 71
Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �y
Farm Name: amr-Kh TL� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: {" Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region: k)t�_o
If
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Finish Layer
7eeder
C*attle
DairyCow
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
o Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
Dr. P■oultr► Ca aci P■a
Layers
Dry Cow
on -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the ope/in?
Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? popor
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili umber: - Date of Inspection: $
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No . ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:. Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z 2�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes..,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes C5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ❑ o
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect I d application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pon ng Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN 'QPAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ NA J'NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D Yes [] No
❑ NA ,�NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
D Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ZNE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes D No
❑ NA J2 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA J:�" NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA JZNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA .❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
i
❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[—]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: 9 Z� I
24..Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA
-NE
❑ NA
[. qi
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No [DNA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑ Yes ❑ No CIA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ETNE
❑ Yes 2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
,
❑N
No
❑ NA
NA
ff'NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments "(refer to question #.)Eioliin�'any YManswers'and/or'any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinks'offacility.to better.explain-situations.(use additional pates as necessary). o
fr<5 ' /l� �a ^�[��.^ / th t� 4�y � r n� 1. "'f r,5 �(i %1�i S A/� , / i /i/J'�1� (�fU ��/1 4 / // ,,,0, w s .1
o1 C J[II - 0 !A 5k /1...• �� 1r...��P J r /1�41� � 1 •1 JCL T e� �A� 000. �C��{S . /7/ �/Yr��'+�
C/-� (t" `� Ices �r i�:t� �+�hof4- 0.%
9 � u^. o C I ti -j o �vd S %r
�C)s r r �¢ s
5a,r419 I k1rer, 1120 A, - �ar' rd4 '4 e,( ex vt �,��5 �
t""" S QIG ✓tS )-qrj•, o+- All s4,-, tS . 5 k� _3 G�
51, C�l� �(A // h t% 7 �� 7k5
/' �/1 fti o
5rQr,. 1aSf- irc���f/o,- P"c (rs� (�` /s4,rAle
Qr tom/ �w5 Q� S . Lx5�- + rr, p&
n' On/P1iC•� f
dui wt 5 ego f 4-5 A ok /Lx DfSe453 c`�- Pk
b %r �+vn4- I rJ �� 5 c t.�� r� �..i►cr+ ��/� A+ %
(IV, �/[rn %�� 5 r �, Irr 1 �re91 P- JPf 5 I. - a4
P4.h hri f� � 2 �... �,-�ff+p�t-��J�
l �� I L e l /ts s�� M %� s, +•�vL
t„t'I'Gd A.CrC, 5 C��kG�. 5y �e,- �..,e.R( s� P�.dI S
1 r ` e Rn
A int` 4 ilit� e Vl,)eAA/i't� prff!nf- —9- p� 4wS�
a c err- I � 9n ���tre,r,�.. �-S w� �� 2,� �� ��v S ss "At-aS,,S a
,,..,r`. i s /'n �� 1 t c.�..! d r l �f► G e is S A P/m, � a f e� rr�Q a
Reviewer/inspector Name: i tto /1 Vo -A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 LJ 21412015

Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason^Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up ;, Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:1 Iu O c7 Departure Time: I t Ub County: ?E &,pEOU Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: /C6-0114 3AcL0VkMLL.. Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 91; 8 Z
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current Design
Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
I
ILayer DairyCow
+0
Wean to Feeder
III
INon-LayerIryCalf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. Pmoult . Ca aci Po Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:]Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Lfacillty Number: I I - V1 IDate of Inspection: I1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes ❑�io ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: LPGoord �-jr L
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in); Z ZL-0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental hreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA [] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:)Yes V ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes CNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Fglf/io ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
rNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Ld `"o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
l9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[:]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
rNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
!21. es record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes [—]No
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ZNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes FiNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

EaciRty Nuihber: Date of Inspection: '�-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit. ❑ Yes nNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes [2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
[]Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2(NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require afollow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
2 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
FY No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
a() WASr� WPPtSGAT. O.J RF6,09-D3 ' 1M..Z 5&Mj!(n j-&&�A_ 2-013 T
f36v Wsl.lr ' �olrL ate �oti Imo ►�} ~I'�CL�.1
�I'Vti4LL_ Ca A_ J OV EA—Sf CD UAP ZEEIJ j7R-ZU_U 1 sJD Ca w,.T .' vf.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: rN — 3 00
Date: I
/4/)011

V
Type of Visit ,C,ommpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance V Reason for Visit 'Koutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ! I OS Arrival Time: 66 O Departure Time: County: 9 f00 f 9-- Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Ki-P—OL-TN L3 PGxn� l L��
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = I = Longitude: = ° = i
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
TI s I! JO Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: ='
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes LYNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
�XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

"H ilityNumber: y — a Date of Inspection d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [DNA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: (AC o uN (A Goa-0 Z
Spillway`.:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 31 ).5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
d-N ❑ NA [I NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [ 'es
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes
[]"No [I NA [I NE
[]"/
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes
D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) G - - P) S G D'
13. Soil type(s) l f is 2 F' 6 L-K
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Yes
❑,/No
❑ NA
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:
❑ Yes
lid'/ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
❑ NA
El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VN
❑ NA
❑ NE
3 & IV.0 w5 a ; r "i K ' 3 fii'9F^ �1A. hh" �I ik i l
oCmmments (refer to question #)` , Explainany it Swanswers`and/or,anyxecommendations. any other comments
1%ir�. � ^
lase drawings of lacility+to better explain"situations (usejacidition l p ges,> snneces�s ry): t
'7,) rj iL�65T a rJ t p 6 oa /✓ Z ►J E(-W tir o6t R , Kc-_ t, .o ve W e 6 b y v6 & & rA.7Zr& r vN LAGuON 01kc— "'-L Ox6tCl I
1S,) �fl(� 1� i3CiLY+�J�Ib EEO �-S�PR.CG�,i1.a{„ /�Jr.fl L,innE REG?t.1l.�p, ,
�j,� aCEO ir_�4Goc,:✓ OECyGr,1 F+ram. t.�►Gour.l Z,
�►.}owt�cnr r� PrLoctiss a GCttz+Jc, t,+v• ••,•ETErc F'a XC.e_�rare. LAC:14 J 'F2�nJS�E S,
Reviewer/inspector Name phase: t 9i-)
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q lltdr
12128104 Continued

I'yci* Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAW P readily available? If yes, check E] Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
13Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis 3/Waste
Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
2I No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
LEI N ❑ NA
El NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
No� ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit`?
❑ Yes
�to ❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0 o ❑ NA Q NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
Other issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
Ea<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
EKO ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
Co
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No . ❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Additlonal Comments and/or Drawingsc
12128104

Type of Visit 0 Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit d Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access +j
Facility Number I
Date of visit:
Permitted jQ Certified 13 Conditionally
Certified 13 Registered
Farm Name: ....sw....�...A . �`t �T.S.r�?.`�.! ..4.fi-�........
Owner Name:.......... k`�^�!`?» T :..... _.: 1 N. �4......................
Mailing Address:
Time:
Not Operational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated Above Threshold: ...__._._.._W»..
County: »._....T.4!».........»............».»»........
PhoneNo: ...».........».»......»»........................ ».....
Facility Contact: .._ .... _ ._ ......w .»..».» . . f_�. Title:... __ ___ » ._� _ „. P, one No: __....
Onsite Representative:.._. l•�7/f . +-WZ+ _» ».��. Integrator:J/JL.LI�
CertifiedOperator:._»..»» .»....»�.._....» ._ ___.. _ ...»» » .. »»....»...».»..»..».... Operator Certification Number:..»..._ „ ....... ... _....
Location of Farm:
ASwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 " Longitude • 4 41
`Swine
Wean to Feeder
'.
❑ Layer
Feeder to Finish
p1,,,,Qother
❑ Non -Layer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
,x
T6� J.Des>
Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
.r Cattle' „13
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ? No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes UrNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 1 Squcture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �.�. » » .»» ..._ ��/ » _ .... _ ._...... .».... _... _. .._ ___ ...... _ . ...... » .. ... _. _ ___._.
Freeboard (inches):7 LA
12112103 Continued

•. Facility Number: — Date of inspection Y; V -'�"'"�
T�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
E] Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes 0 No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes Q( No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes VJ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes ❑'No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelrmprovement?
❑ Yes d No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Co and/or Zin
12. Crop type ��KMI,iA� �- Z-E sE60 --
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (dWMP)? ❑ Yes VNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ONO
Odor Usues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes PNo
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
3)uG� S -- fP �� ✓� `r' -4)46 f M„ �u�i✓�jL GU.4i✓ ��in1 /�,er,
NEB p e p
eezel ..14101040
0/0
Reviewer/Ynspector Name &
ReviewerAnspector Signature:
Date:
12/I2103 Cowed

.• Fac3i4ty Number: — Date of Inspection
B je uired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
0 No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
0 No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
V3 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
1Z No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
[21No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,fNo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONo
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Z No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
Yes
❑ No
3I . If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
Z No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ONo
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
Z No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
12 No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
I pa4aA I, c , Al"
%�PI��Anr�o
E ICYza�,
12112103

1.
Type of Visit to Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Faci:lih• Number
0 Permitted © Certified Conditionally Certified © Registered
Farm Name: N
Owner Name: ..� ti: E .
Mailing Address:
Date Last Operate Above Threshold:
County: K�10 rl?
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: CAR �3R2 MG K 5 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude a �
Desi 'n 'Design besigitv.. pCurrent Cg Desegn Current
F n
Swine • Ca achy. P& ulation f o ulation e ❑ttle.:. Ca actty; .-Po ulation
Poult Ca a"
Wean to Feeder ❑ La er `' Dai ,
Feeder to Finish` ❑Non -La -Layer
I Non -Dairy
'h t i. .fit ,— .E; , � .-,_�.i` _<, -' - , � •, E d � , .! 3 �� 7 �f � 3 1
Farrow to Wean
❑ Other �IIi�' E�. s� l ,� a „ .€ E �' ��
❑ Farrow to Feeder '
Farrow to Finish C
i,
Total Design,apactty �r e f f •1
Gilts f
❑ Boars ; TOO SLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area La ❑ S rav Feld Area I
Holding Ponds �IS+nlidTrraps h { ,e b ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IzNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste lle tin & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ZfNo
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 30 4L
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 7 j —2 Date of Inspection r JVYL89
I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
((J(No
seepage, etc.)
`
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Yes
No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
(No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
!,Q No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
XNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Jo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ xcessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
�60
12. Crop type F
13. Do the receiving crops differ with &ose designated in the Certified Animal WaNe Management Plan (CAWM )?
❑ Yes
A No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�Z(No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ko
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
�_,No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
XfNo
Reguired. Rec9rds & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ONo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
ANo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
XeNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
El yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
XNo
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
X No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
X
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
;eNo
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer ta:,question #) Exptain snytYES answers and/or any, reco"mmendatioas or anv,other comments.
drawzsof Estil'lty to better ex l,. iiinsta
s npaiec,essarY) sField Cory al Note „
s� usedd`' it�.0t;-yaP ger11
�a
, 5`
FCo�n nt E�I,O Ii F��ti�a-�lirlpQZx/ �IF_Gr 7,¢7Z29^/C417- 4990( AO y-
NOT�F$ P
Reviewer/Inspector Name00
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 r Continued

4
R Facility Number: —2 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes No
❑ Yes YNO
❑ Yes/No
❑ Yes No
❑ YesXr-1
Vo
❑ Yes No
Additional Comments and/or.'DraHinps,;' ,,. E,. ' � , "' '
/S) E
u�S
- >gf�i G�C�czsrs- /1�FF,p j14,
Low ,vs �5 s
Avg %
sic T�orJ �irt� va
05103101

Type of Visit ACompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: ®Time: =0
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified Cj Registered Date Last Ope ted orAboveThreshold:
Farm Name: ......a�.`..... '~�. ��................................... County:`-d�,":.....................................................
.
OwnerName: ................................................... .................................................................. Phone No:........................................................................................
FacilityContact:............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.....................................................---................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
u,l_ _ �f
Onsite Representative:. ....l:A� Y...................................................... Integrator: ...!l'. .�4.�^..-::�SMA ..............................
Certified Operator:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..... Operator Certification Number:......,,,,,,,,,
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ` " Longitude e t 6d
Cae aCgi PO ution Cae acid Population Xuiri
r Desi Carrent
Swine Poultry. Cattle
on Ca cl �Po `eilalioai?
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑ Dairy
er Feeder to Finish a Non -La Non-Dai
❑ y ❑ Non -Dairy
b i ❑ Farrow to Wean
. ❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
[] Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity .
❑ Gilts E
1 ❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of -Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area . ❑Spray Field Area
Helibng Ponds 1 Solid Traps , ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream ImIRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
+4 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
&NO
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
9,-kjNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
uu
Freeboard (inches):
5100
Continued
on back

Facility Number: —a� Date of Inspection
5. Are -there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes )dNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes gNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Wo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ONO
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes XNo
12. Crop type b2+-vet. ELF, "� +- Qt—_-Zk , T-�
t
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes XNo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
`�INo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
(�� No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
PqNo
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
)UYes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
,V No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
tNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
(iTNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable'setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
R No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
allo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑
9No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ONO
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
t�No
ris'ol....... wire h0 ed• 00109 01s;visit; • X00 w•t ooi*e 40 fu>j-.. .
corres o deit& abaut: this visit:
tip
Reviewer/Inspector Name '�<� rw� ,�QV"V`. gyp: ��"'\ � ..y iE E � �� i:•,� � _EuEJ :.3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

a }
Facility Number: �9� Bute of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below XYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes dNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes KNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ONO
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes eNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ONO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent temporary cover? ❑ Yes 0 No
Additional, Comments an or Drawings:,,- �, �
o \J4< y-e-z" '�_ `,0-- _30
5/00

Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number /
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:tn
Permitted ❑ Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Not O erattonal P
13
Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .....D.Chn.4121..........�.Lif.,E2'tS............................................................... County:......... C/'I Gib.............................. n.......
Owner Name:.... ... �?LD.II It
........... , .e..k'w........................................ Phone No:Facility Contact:ldl .�!h......�P�xi.Q�i9.... Title:.....Irl�fz�%........................................ Phone No: ICJ( cj ate (a..,/......
MailingAddress:...............................................:..................................................................I.nte................................................
e:............... L...K�f'uiY✓1........... grator: Onsite Representativ.........""I'l"""""""""*"""""""**""""""""""'1*6""""""'-'O"*"O""""*"*"*',
Certified Operator:.. . i?. ...........................0.................. Operator Certification Number:.................. 0.......................
Location of Farm:
................................ ...........................................................::...
......:........
..............................................................................................................................I......................
................... ....
Latitude ' ° It Longitude ' 6 «
t f r, Design ,.Current`,.' .
Swine ,. -'Ca act Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
3 &7 Z
Zip
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Current'r ''y '- '` 3, Destgni t',Currenf'
IPnrnilatinn <,Cattle
Number of°Lagootis t<< ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding.PondsSoil
d.Tralis . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes C9 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Watcr of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes j5j'No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes P No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes gNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identilier: LajoOni"l 1,,4oeAAz-
Freeboard (inches):`.�� �11........................................................................
........................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes %No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility ]Number: — 2 Date of Inspections
6. Are there strictures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Xosure plan?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
Cl Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
�fNo
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ONo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t ose 6esigriated in the Certifie Animal Waste Management lan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
T�No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
[Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
XlYes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Rf No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
fNo
18. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
OrYes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
C'No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
rC No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, free board, problems, over application)
❑ Yes
RNo
23, Did Reviewer/] n spector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�rNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[V No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
%No
.... yiQl. 00jis:o'r• iie�icae tes -w� re jik • ¢;tr°t#g • bjs;visat; • Yo0 witi•tebeiye t)o futfte
Torres} 6iiri6&' ab' t f this visit; • • : • • • • .
! � rA �Y -. ' I U �¢ ¢ f '! S rt� 4.. �
Comments (refer�to question #) Explain any, answers andlor anyiieeommenelattons orany other comments �; gift ,�' r�
r ¢, ..;�yE 3 , �5 r ybx ,¢ r' a
I:lse,iltawings of factttty to better eatplatn situations (useladdtttonalrpages astnecessary;) , } ! rj =, s �fi ., <1°r'
vi Of �. �-
/S�, pP[y /gnu (s C'er�rcrta 115-01/5 Atalvsl,s edlaas recur DT�[m� iv'Ii
a
Q ' 4ile' L�GyLS 'S l��Llil C /e /9 qy
Ozlw
Reviewer/Inspector Name
¢
Reviewer/Inspector
Date:
l�1/b�39��9�ZU �rc�r _ex4. 'z 2s
P�h __9A,4- 2y 0

Facility^Number: — date of Inspection -1
ad Issues,
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
-E3-Yrr—❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
J� No
28,
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
Q' No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
rVNo .
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
;T10
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yeso
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional Comments an or Drawin s:. g
tol rafl,111W,
01�
✓r�y
�
.
6
3/23/99

Division of Soil and;Water'Couservatton -
OperaUoh4Review ; P
ivision of soil and,Water'Conservation �
Compliance hi, ction �3i, P t'u ` t it s t .a
!
t
Diyisionof Water Qua[tty -Compliance fnspec4on
,
3 , Pig
;; ��� ��
Other A enc O ation Review
PE .,,.,
y A er'' >
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-u of DW ins ection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified WConditionully Certified (] Registered Not Operational Date Last
Operated:
Farm Name: ..... C^!�.w.S9.t ��h� na... � r w. County ....... t r( t'..................... .+....I,�...�............
................................ +K1
OwnerName :......... 4g y..�,ad ................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................... ......................... Phone No:
MailingAddress:.................................................................................
Onsite Representative: ........................... ��...................................................................... `Integrator:.......rp„....r?........
Certified Operator:.......................................................................,................................I........ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude r-----�0' Longitude • ` 49
Design Current Design Current„ Design Current'
Swine
d .,, t: �, j,r -
a acit Population' Poulfr-y ' Ca achy 1?�o i6lation � -Ca�e Ca acit Po uIation'�'
1
"w [ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other I irk,
ilk"'' Total Design Capacity
Total'-SSLW
}Number°of Lagoons Z ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
:r
' iHoldip Ponds / SoliaiTra s ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [-]Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 1 Z
Freeboard (inches): 3 .............................
............................................................................................................................
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes 16No
Structure 6
.....................................
❑ Yes XNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: Dale of Inspection
i
b. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
M'closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes %No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes VNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ANO
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes !?1NO
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding [I PAN
ElYe s �`` No
12, Crop type nav i
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes �rNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ONo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes No
lb. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ANo
Re uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
10 yiola>lignjs'or cleficienues w re poted• 00-rift tbis'ASI : • Yoti :witl t&Oye ljo #;uttiter' .
Torres• 6fideiice: abauti this visit.
_"_ - E � Y.�FfI _ t
Use;drawrngs of facility, ta,lietter explain situations (use add�ttonal pages as
`:' � f'�'
7 - �'G re_ 5/0t+5 Oq bcGk d f 4,g a uv, 'J-'ZZ ME4 -6 ve Ile,3e4g4ed,
)9 - Nee&( -f-v ref c, Cc.rrA' LV*54<
Vie C'?Pr0jpy1i41_e_ PAN huwt�,-, re'wt M45°°n �( �►1 Sj�+"a�/Y�cor�Jr
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes XNo
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes RfNo
[]Yes &No
❑ Yes RNO
❑ Yes (No
❑ Yes %NO
,�.� pr i�d i-ttt t�: �,d i•. _ T itd.a�il3t :?�4��37 �r H., •t�(�n
RCVIeWCr�nSpeeior Name �� U 5:'Y t.., - s " -. t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature �'� �f� Date. 1 / — ?3 - 791
Al
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Zq Date of Inspection r�3_
Odor Issues
216. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes lro
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes JRNo
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes
,,. _...i
lttona ommentS an /ot D rh�vings
..� .f
3/23/99

V Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Othcr
Date of Inspection 5 Z
Facility Number Z.
Time of Inspection O p Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: ....
Total Time (in hours) Spent onRe%iew ©I
or Inspection (includes travel and processin;)
Farm Name: _14z,. �� �l tt c�. � ..''l u n .. ,c. _......»...... _..... County: ,.&,_-�..i:' Y ......_.... . � I' R-Q.
Owner Name:....._.._.N ,atn�.._ _�1.__ M Phone No:..�q.ti Q..�...�...Z ...... ............. _..
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: L Integrator:Certified Operator: _.Ala _ _..........tom' .. ..... ..... Operator Certification Number: _....I.Sa.. A ......... ...
Location of Farm:
Latitude • ®& u
Ejw_ >�
h OH-fp /!��'�CaSwP�/lad 5
Longitude s ®` ®11 90 L%rn;les -M NC #63 4-3v pas.
1244-rdn Say,
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
type of Operation and Design Capacity
;p� IlC7v 51ccuN..�0 I•�w�i ItS
n5°w x y'g"s:r •ry.. �£ xae '9tS* -:; ""t-R•;t'iw �• x -. 3 <....--.5.' iy, ¢�r
Swine r . Y Number,_ a Paul' i�iuutber ;..�
, ti, }'... ..N urnlier
❑ Wean to FeederLaver
Dairy
Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑Nan Laver I�� ❑ Beef
El Farrow to Wean
fis
-: Farrow to Feeder
s .�� '^,...x„`w�." ...Mai. .�' t.... - �-. •A-x x. � � �3.�, �
Farrow to Finish
❑ Other T e of Livestock n
v�r {
Zx^%k ;..
j x
Z -_ X'i't_, .r+.w...K. x k ,ikY
„i.¢'': ,-•^..:s rs . .•.,„z ....
Number otLa eansJ Haldtn Foods +' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ La oon Area < ❑Spray Field Area
a r r.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes , ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 9 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min? t 444
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 9 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 19 Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after i/l/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures {Lagoons and/or Iiolding_Pondsj
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2
L . _ z C; .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
1 I. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Lagoon 3
13. Do -any of the'structiires lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Annlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type CLOL _..... y
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? -
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only.
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal. Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
29 No
❑ Yes
®.No
❑ Yes
la No
❑ Yes
® No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes
,®.No
❑ Yes
®-No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes BNO
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes O No
JS Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®,No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
0,No
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ Yes
.9�No
❑ Yes
RNo
-
IZ• C arrr,c.t e�roSioK n 6e, e.e- 06 V%S. Latiocv� wall �es�GEi4
ntou �kC O'j y,Jalt�. �v. o-X%L �rCt^ 1 Ye vt�Q'E0.tQ 0.►%y7 bares S P 6t,S
6.-. �a�0a•n. watl. I
I�. �tvi�gC-twft� b0.re a�r@..0.-L ti'^ �tQ..L�'� � W��'k 0.K 0.�p✓��riO4�C C-dVt�r
c.,ry V 1
o r. d; c f1 r v ,...,. ;'�'�j b k; .�-� t 1� t La o c s, r t a. q p e- rs f7.,' #
c nu L a 9-%j e,.-L �v �^[ 5 %�.,r t v d r Gv f F t' e nv +--,r-
"v to Z
- . -CL p e.1 O C-C. V 1%
oQ. to C �+-�� �.-e, s i �v e -v..
a::,pxw, w-w .�"a'a ._ ': �a, _ S--�C"'..
Reviewer/Inspector Name . „l(„l(��,,���,�.�.,,�-�. � - �,
.T
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Q" , _r =mAn Date:
cc. Division of fVater Quality, Water duality .section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
le
Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DW2 ins action O Follow-ug of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection - Z I -
Facility Number
Time of Im.speet.ion i C3 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified Applied for Permit © Permitted 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
i-� I 1
Farm Name: ..............F�. ... �'o �[:<...... (k q.)1.C(.04......�.y � '\ ... County:....... �� ......................�.... R �........
Owner Name. .............. .r'..`...y.....f....id..... ��.�h.�t.Kl!I.......................................... Phone No: ! r � 2�.'. Z.�.�......................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:.................. Phone No:
Mailing Address: .1 U !r e�( -S� >� ����So:�� C C�!..L....................................-........................
-VI
..�,a �Q vt Ci.E!^............ I tor:.......... 7`� G r ....
Onsite Representative:...... .,.........�..... r'.�1............ .... ................. �: '4 � S ..... . ...........
Certified Operator; ................................. '4K oc d. �� �- y�.c�.�!!!................ Operator Certification Number,... � LIq.�......
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0' 0' 0 G° Longitude • s
Designer= Current a
Design Current
...Cattle
.Des�gri Curren
swine"..Capacity
,Populations
Poultry.
Capacity Population
Capacity``, Population,`,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
6
❑ Non -Layer I
Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
3rh..
El Farrow to Finish
zr <.
Total Design Capacity :=
❑ Gilts
ti tTotal
a
SSLW`
❑Boars
t,
of Lag Dons / Haldhnj Ponds` �
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
—NumberEr
r
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes N
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes A(No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes �,KNo
mai ntenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 9No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes )-4�No
7/25/97
NJ

Facilky' Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,lJolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structured Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 2
Freeboard(ft): ..........3.... ...................`I..t..................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ) 40
❑ Yes �6o
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
! .................... 15. Crop type ............ ..�.�..Q.t�.."...�-.�!Lei..a...�.,c.��..... r�.-.r..`..1.1`.:�.............................. ............. ............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onli
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 • No.viQlatioins-or* deficiencies. were noted dur.inj this; visit. - You.rvill receive• izo•ftirther' : -
. corresporardehce AWO tbis: visit.-
IZ. VaDe.4ie b.-/ ReCc.-z7 c✓ +-+d A000A tl
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes WNo
[O(Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNO
❑ Yes �k o
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes /410
Xyes ❑ No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes 'VNo
Xyes ❑ No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes/No
❑fit p No
1G r li�U.rJ� ChQnge A W I Sh04e Lei' "4 cG ct� c Ot++i"r-'t'l C✓U� ivt �.E1�
WorK 04 ,eePK.ejc% pur heKj r��`n9 'Io e,6+t�i,54 bcf4e/a
77, Kte,4 I�'C'curo�5• U4 t" ee kiy tree La4.-) t-evEjS C%Pt S i 4 e
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name ASS :< b
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

%eb, 27. 2014 2:25PM Burrow, & Hall, PA No, 1609 F. 1
Tel: [phone]
RICHARD L. BURROWS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P. O. BOX 816
WALLACE, N.C. 28466-0816
E-MAIL: [e-mail]
February 27, 2014
Mr. Jim Gregson
Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, North Caroline 28425
Re: NOV-2014-PC-0007
I K. Barnhill Topping 1 No. 71029,
Permit No. AWS710029
Dear Mr. Gregson:
Fax; [phone]
By Telefax: [phone]
E-Mail: www.ncwaterquality.org
Mr. Barnhill sought our assistance in responding to your letter of January 23, 2014,
wbich he received on February 11, 2014.
As you may be aware, the farm's waste application records were maintained in the farm
office building. Early in the morning Mr. Barnhill's employee discovered and notified Mr.
Barnhill that someone had broken into the building by forcing the door open, and had taken
some of the farm tools. A further investigation by Mr. Barnhill revealed that the composition
book in which Mr. Barnhill made his handwritten notes of the waste application dates, times, and
pulls/fields, which he then regulax'ly kept on the desk, was also missing. Mr. Barnhill's practice
was to periodically provide a copy of the handwritten notations to Mr. William Burke, who used
the provided data to calculate the final waste application records produce waste application
records in the required )corm. Those calculated printed pages of waste application records were
also maintained in the composition book that was taken.
Mr. Barnhill has asked Mr. Burke to provide him with copies of all of his waste
application records, and will maintain a copies of those records, along with his handwritten
notations, both in his farm office and his home to assure their immediate availability in the
future.
Mr. Barnhill has advised me that he is at a loss as to why someone who wanted to steal
tools, would also take the book containing the waste application records, other than the fact that
the composition book was always kept in a conspicuous place on the desk.

;F?b.27. 2614 2:25PM Burrow: & Hall, PA
No.1609 P, 2
PAGE 2.
Mr. J. Gregson
Although Mr. Barnhill was advised by a DWQ representative that it would acceptable for
the waste application records to be maintained at his home, I have advised him to also keep a
copy of the records in his farm office.
If you wish or need any additional information, please advise.
I am,
Vexy/11Y yours,
Ric rd L, Burrows
cc:. Mr. J. Kenneth Barnhill, Jr.

•
Site Require; 1rnme:1aate KtteauU,l.
Facility No.
DNISION OF ENIVIRON1'VMtiiAL MAINAGE-.'YENT —­Y7
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE. ,11 — o , 1995
Time:'
Farn Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: Q O 00 K _61 z2r L(
County:C�L7
Integrator. V'r I? ki,_ _ Phone:
On Site _R_ epresentative: LAPZ, Phone: ZJ 3-Z-0 7 U
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operarion: S wine _,.)I_ Poultry Carrie
Design Capacity: _ 111 _ _ Number of Animals on Site: 0
DENT Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' ' " Longitude: &- at -_YT Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 2='. hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) 19No Actual Freeboard: I--R. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes orda_�Was anv erosion observed?C�or No
Is adequate land available for sprav? r No Is the cover crop adequate? 42 or No
Crops) being utilized: A Q 2
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wets?ems or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Scream? Yes o(5b
Is animal waste land applied or spray irigated within 25 Fee: of a USGS ivlao Blue Line? 6vor No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by main -made ditch, flushing syste:ti, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or& If Yes, Please Explain..
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes org)
Additional Comments: 2-Z 6-
4 a4
w++ r
e � �-e�c,wa� Gc f� �2��'��i be.•�� J. , ,�1�i�.c.r. ; Ge.� • —
Insuector N
.
Sig ature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit L'se Attachments if Needed.

IN
1 Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. _
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA,TIIO S SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �O , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: 1
Mailing Address: 0 n Z /
County: n
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Locatign: M e OAIC�112e
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE - ' DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does'the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inchesVpagpo
or No A tual Freeboard: �Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed fromn(s)? Yes o o Was any erosion observed?& or No
Is adequate land available for sprayr o Is th cover crop adequate? a or No
Crop(s) being utilized: 4de-63 r
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellin;Por
or No '
100 Feet from Wells?No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? "Yes or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes orb
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by'man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or To If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover, p)? Yes o: 0
Addition Comments: G n e A c4
..�i !] A .�� i% ff ,/ .i!//♦- . ✓'� i��//.P / J!
!` � r_m •-1V, C i. s X'ey c f 7 ""I'af A a ''40.r.// e- /.I b y e/
cc: Facility Assessment Unit - Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention
• Facility Number -
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: July 17 ' 1995
•
Owner: Haywood Debnam Farm Name: DON Farms
County: Emder
Agent Visiting Site: tpff Rn i Fani dAr _,. Phone: (91d.) 259-4305
Operator: Havaraod_ Debnam Phone:[phone]
On Site Representative: Chris Debnam (son) & Larry Colvin, Phone: [phone]
Manager was on site
Physical Address: nn_, ;4 Qt ci r1w of Hu,r 1 i on � � rnxi matF+� 1,85 mile sot���,
junction with Hwy 11 and 53.
Mailing Address: _ pn $acr.i .., .. __.....
Atkinson, N.C. 28421M
Type of Operation: -Swine Poultry _ _ Cattle
Design Capacity: "� �Numbo of A.aimals on Site: 3672
Latitude, o Longitude: U '
Type of Inspection: .Ground x, ,.,.. Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 9 or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Feet 2 Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the Iagoon(s)? Yes or Was there erosion of the dam?. Ye or No
Is adequate land available for land application? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? or No
Additional Comments: House #1 has its awn 1aqoon. Houses #2 &3 share another
lagoon. Each house holds 1224 finishing hogs Lagoon #2 for houses
s 177r -of frieboard.is said got e
fig ,.%he r-Q ity Spoil ?!rnm ,d-4 t ry+ ,1ms_nl;geed M bexm and nos lime fertilizer
and seed and mulch. Lagoon #1 for house 1 needs lime, fertilizer, seed
and MUIChon
blarm on _ i ijgo n i 7 napdsa: +-.n YAo Aaarb-cl . HnrrwA is on site. _
Fax to [phone] - SignAre of Agent