710009_INSPECTIONS_20171231

�.AIM
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

a
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit (2l(Roukine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 S 05 Arrival Time: I 9'�o IDeparture Time: County: 0961V J76/L Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ti AU L- STAPLE V
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 6 = Longitude: = ° = 4 0
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
5 zA6 1,5a6s 1 ❑ Non -La er I
Dry Poultry
❑
Layers
❑
Non -La ers
❑
Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑
Turkey Poults
❑
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dahy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0, o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

i
Facility Number: Date of Inspection 15 d5
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier: lJlbtaN/! C.faG,a Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[10 ❑ NA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
G3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
,�
Ll No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ 13ydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside
of Area
12. Crop types) e5cv L & 4- ws
13. Soil type(s) L-S CAIA 1Pa
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
LI No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
� ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
E No El NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
L� N ❑ NA
[I NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
s a1f' #a
jT .A ts5-FC- (x, RR-,t*)FA u. A u o c,4aC-o n�j
Reviewer/Ins p ector Name t �� "f`�' g,t' Phone: L ,t? 7 %
o A GL IJ
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: d
12128104 Continued

= Racility Number: j — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking rop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,61 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ,��/A El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El Yes ❑ OI No NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes <o C1 NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No O NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes El -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
X,
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [3io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04

Type of Visit P, Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: / 1 7fune: 0=
O Not erational O Below Threshold
b Permitted 13 Certified 13 Couditio /�jy Certified 13 Registered Date -Last Operatedp; Above Threshold: _ .... � .
Farm Name; NG .........�'In i 5 _ .._ County: »» » »:.�...».».»..»...
N...! .._. __....._..........._.._ __.-.
OwnerName: ...._. .X..f�F(rt!i�»..�s .. �.._..... �... _ Phone No: ....... .... _. _.. .. ........... .
MailingAddress:.... _._......_...... ...... _ �. .... » ... .. .. ».W .. _W.» .»» »». ..»....»......._ ...... _ ... ...»....... .».....
FacilityContact: ... _.__ _... „„..._W____ .W Title: ....._. _ __. __...._._.. __./yPhone No: , ..._ .......... _.......
Onsite Representative:L�' `�m ,' r ±frCf Integrator:...
Certified Operator:._».....»....».».» ....... ........_....
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
OSwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ' " Longitude • 4 "
Wean to Feeder
Da
✓
Layer
Feeder to Finish
},
❑ Non -Layer
Farrow to Wean
n .
Other
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
r Y Toical Desi
-
Y s R� 3` R. r r
T
Gilts
Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Design "Cuot'
on
r
Y
r �,a
Dbd'SSIr
LW..
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JZNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 040
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes P640
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ;eqo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: {...._. , __ .... .._ .. _. _.... .» . .» »..... » ». _.» ... ............ ..........
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

e acility Number: q —
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses as
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding _ ❑ PAN ❑ ;tydraulic Overload Q Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Prop type r45 ' F !J!e ' 1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designa din the
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes JZ No
❑ Yes Ur No
❑ Yes m No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes Z No
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ZZ No
❑ Yes JZNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Q1 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes PNo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes PNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes 'PINo
Air Quality representative immediately.
:i. - -T �-,._..k'ST 1'V,SS-'# P. -7"S"�k..€' ."i, --' ([.� t�3 51t§
'Comments{refer�ta Fgaestran#)sF.atplara'aunyXFS aasws;d/arany recattot or, atiyat6ir,0{IrulnelltS.
s
.MM
g..s�a.£,..L acC4. ' kfb.zi3t.tytgu.,eNk'.S4s4+_axa s a-»�w-r
t ? 01' $ �i..;".;❑ .ycF.:.i.ie..'"al"xd ."_Copy
❑��.".Rt.Frirna.wl Notes
;L[SS
.0 x
Z 3) UpM rF �,Q,¢ Z s fit- �� �E A� ���5 �r TF ,QQ -��"0loop
A.
J
_' '��v�s%Fg".�,�,�
ReviewerAnspector Name 3s i,, Ss `: a Sk �� l r t ;1 'i' " i l F .F B 1� at. .1 ".hhto.isw€'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _/ Date: / /
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes A No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes 0No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Z No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes '0 No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ONo
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0, No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? [� Yes �No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

IType of Visit 12rCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit ZRoutine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: I I . J5
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted O Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ©Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 5-4,mh 1'd Fe,,--t County: _Pend'✓
Owner Name: �a, U� S'ft�►'t7-t Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ��t V S�G e g LS e'o ' /+ f t
1 -- - - t''1 Integrator: Wn. -r d�` UA D1.,'..-•�'1•--
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 6 " Longitude ' 6 66
Design . Current Design Current Design Current
awme I unpacity, ro ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Poultry Capacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy4
❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'zfNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;'No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ,Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes , /❑�No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: i Z
Freeboard (inches): Zg Z
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: r7 — Date of Inspection OZ
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes '2"No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JZNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Cl Yes ONO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydrauiic Overload ❑ Yes J�fNo
12. Crop type Fe s1,ve G ra Z e
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes XNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
,O-No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reauired
Records & Documents
17,
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
.0[;TVo
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
ZNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
XYes
❑ No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
EErNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
E2 No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oyes
❑ No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector faii to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ONO
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑Tip
10
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
ere .
� . mme q )' "p° � ,n'y S"tiiigi / r e6m p. xny�otheraConinffi tS
4Comments (refer to ueshon�# ,�Ex ,lain an YFS a'uswers=aadlor, an recommendations '
Use drawings:of facrlity�tu better�explain situations.y(use,additional±pages�as�necessary..
. ° ❑Field CODY ❑Final Notes
3 7ke wea.s4,-...q n'ICLGiti -,e, e► 4&;es CR4o 9�oup ,� .Tl-•teee i-f -7raaw, t••,. tZ e~
->�k�h �s q.aa, d �a,,,,4 �d . -rL,;r wa sf a w �� needs 4a be
.pr0Pevr1 y �I���tled . Tk;.r 1, 41 be eerd""a 46 4 ke (,P,0 + u"W, ��.
,I- Ivc t.._, 1 ar�ac�� ✓►-ta�l:e&rs ► 4,i7 be haeo(ed �GGnrca[;►•.5 4o covoern�
14,9pen de.s+cin4.
Reviewer/Inspector Name I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: j — Date of Inspection O Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes UNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ONo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ,ETNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 2No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 2 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �?No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perrnanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an orDrawings:
nee.4s Cq:lc k4 sLtee4s s11i,L✓; 46 w ab 1t
t
"tCrQ-ve woLS de4erm6, d .6 �1�►-� dkou�4i 6e wrJ� G+-ti
l.Z CGerrat ,' t Mf - S ei h )e Isot s 4t eO r! ke,.s b eesi
J �/
J►L Ike Gis-{-f,��,� L q5�e rlay.J ;s w/'JA&i br sed osk we'Volle cwfs,
Apwev 411e we-Oabk s"qe
t 6. � e ►r e ;1 4 tve ree l t,) lv'c L. it ee a s 4e, Le
wdrl? key }geed 4a keareacafds wee,�jy -
Z - ,L acJ a ovt i s a 2-.3 -�'4 Free bay rd rep +� �• �.rr e n�� '.r
r;tcebOard V"C01rd s s�►Aw - 4( 14 ca>-�
co ZS j vv ike � of ' art Se f a ►^t,be-r 21) 2a 4) A-ld 1ce4-c nbc,--
2,S,ZDo1,
1
r8 i� ZS . Th e111°G ✓'� saR a O� �' s G re �+�GTc:� ! 1--t 4ke
1
�f LG %c�� rye -� S�l�� l� ��1� � /lJ�/2.7'^leyl•�- �� •��r r ''�'1 �� e�/ �p/
co.!� Oe>rt 2 4 A,ve d o e, i ah Fa,, i!N 4;Z e
co✓'dtS. '11e2Gf -a "ve Wfh--r-4eJ1N" w/'r�]eh,rror GUr'c
owne,�. Shor�tld tntJes�};yr�-�c. adc�{"'� yeq� �ac>.�c�-:�'esft�e w;�doc,�J
�OPJRn
1 q. Ne ad 4 o vIVA r)e d ►'''la,G4 Zooz_
/Vale 2 �.✓:Ir' a�tae� v" files 7r-o,, we7qetbI& gceeaJe
G�,1GtJJD�iO� sr'jE'G�5•
Na-¢e: Aar �k^v me4eA in ` 4)-r r-efa14 hoed b be %ddnC5ZP1
i vyt +-vLee f ; a(4c 1 ,
T
5100

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
March 19, 2002
Paul Stanley
PO Box 535
Burgaw, NC 28425
Subject: Inspection Report and Irrigation Design Information
Stanley Farms
Facility Number: 71-9
Pender County
Dear Mr. Stanley:
On March 14, 2002,1 inspected your animal operation and the animal waste management system serving
this operation. Please find enclosed a copy of the inspection report for the referenced inspection. Also,
please find enclosed information from your irrigation design which I discovered in our files which
satisfies my comments under item 14 in the comments section of the inspection report; this information is
to be available for inspection. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 910-395-3900 ext. 203.
Sincerely,
W
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Engineer I
enclosure
CC: DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Wilmington Files 71-9
s:\wqs\animals\pender\2002\71-9letter
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone: [phone]
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 Fax: [phone]

El
IType of Visit JR) Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation 1
Reason for Visit A Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification 'O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: --Q� Time: � Q ��
Q Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 13 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or {Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName:.... Z'ny... ....................... ........................... County:.........................................................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: .. ` �.!r.............................................................................. Integrator: .....RV-9.......................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine' ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude • 4 is Longitude 6 «
Design , Current' Design Current`
to Capacity _ Population Poultry Cactty . ]Population Cattle„
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
y ❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Cl Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity""`'`
h.�.. ��....�,._
TotW',SSLW-
„v
Nantber'of Lagoons ' �— ❑Subsurface Drains Present 11OLagoonAres 10 Spray Field Area r
Holding Popds /Solid Traps 1.4
m [] No Liquid Waste Management Syste
�r- , f•. r._ s z�. •� a-t., .rY.i, ,i , P
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any,discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) (:]Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes '0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes JqNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......................................................-----...................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ( [a
5100 Continued on back

` acillty'Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ yes 4 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes P�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes bi No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Cj No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes bErNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence f over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type Gtt5ia& „
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
P. �i •Yi0jiti0ijs:or- 0000 000s •0« Pikjed• 01 109 Ns, visit; - ;Y00 011-Nboiye 4 flittli .
corresnorideiki aNaut this visit: .................................. .
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes -4No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes 15 No
❑ Yes )�No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes (' No
❑ Yes O�4o
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes jffNo
❑ Yes 9No
V � ...,..
Reviewer/Inspector Name ecSdr� ��. '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L. _X _ �_�� Date: Vof- _5 _V 1 5/00

' Facility Number: — Date of I.tispection Q�
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atfor below ❑ Yes 4No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes IVNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes j No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes No
Additional,Comments an or,ra ngs:
(( i
ucl<-
( k4c Ar �Z� Ln
5/00

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Numb r - 9 Operation is'flagged fora wettable
Farm Name: acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Represe tative: �" -V Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 (2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:'
Date of site visit:
Date of most recent WUP: j �o
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #:D hard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of,the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Revised January 22, 1999
Facility Number
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS3
NUMBER NUMBER'•' IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
r7osg 4- 1 k .
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres Dnd having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 9998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA' Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

Division of 5oii and Water Con`se'rvation E•0peration. eyieW � ' 'FC
�'Division of So�I and Water Conservation - Comliane io"
i bt ,;
aDtvtsion of Water Quality -°Compliance Inspection
Other:Agency- Operation Review
1Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 3
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farin Name:2 .County:-...5.!
................................................................................. ..........................................
OwnerName: 1/Glr Phone No:............................................................ ............................ ................................................................................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ..........................................
A
........��4Onsite Representative:.f................................................ Inte;rator:.............I. ! j�.4�....................................,..........
'
Certified Operator* ................................... ...... ..... ........................................ .... . . ........ Operator Certification Number:............ I.......................
,ocati n of 'ar
Pam.......... ......................... .,.,............................... ......... ............... .......s........ ti......k!�(,..........
Lfa
Latitude 0 �16 longitude • 4 66
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
`a
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. ll'discharge is observed, was the conveyance nian-made'
h. II' discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estinialed [low in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): � I 1
.......................................................................
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes I( No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
[�TNo
❑ Yes
[�fNo
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
r.�
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes [jNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ;KNo
❑ Yes MNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [9 No
1 I. Is there evidence f over application? ❑ Ponding ❑Nitrogen ❑Yes 121 No
l
12. Crop type ........Q� !- ...I ....... ra/ I.-.........................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes XNo
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes [% No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes D(No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes CRNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes L�rNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes (rNo
19, Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes PdNo
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ZNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes WNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 5'No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes WNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
0: Xo.V1o]at1onS'0'r. defciericies .were noted durinizAis'visit:. Yoti vivill.ret;eive nog further. . .
.eprrespo{idei}ce:about:thisvisit:,...,..,..,,.........:�.�.�. .. :. .
Comments (refer to question #}: Explain any YES answers and/or- any ;recommendaiions or any. othercomments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
y � ✓ ^ "� ��.'Y% �1,~^ �'��S � � rL �'"'��.,G A,Y
�]Yd
e-e,)- L ` oc4
P`f � �
Reviewer/Inspector Name
e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1�!� S� Date: _,j/ 141Y7 11/6/99

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
I.Routine O Complaint
O Follow-upAf DWQ
inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection
za 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered © Certified
13 Applied for Permit
0 Permitted © Not O eratiunal
Date Last Operated:
* G
Farm Name: a
.......................�...................................................................................................
�� , G Z
D 61e"/
County:........�........................... ...� � ...................
Owner Name:` W, eS TG �� i D ✓
......................................................................................................
.... ... Phone No:
........
7/ 6........r..Zq..3......5....3.......
............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
J
Mailing Address:...... ......... ..�.(.� %..�.....�� � ... ...... ... .. .. �`.°� ...... Z.4 y. ............ ..........................
Z Z....... .�... ..... ...,,:. G/�
Onsite Representatives...... C " .`5 I lDr..... ... Integrator:.........!.!'..`. v.>,-Y).k...........................................
Certified Operator............, G c5 T �I'a✓ ......... Operator Certification Number; .................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 6 66 Longitude • ' 0"
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes [fo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes /Wo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes �6No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Y2�2
'
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 13&o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes o
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes VNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes l�! No
7/25197 I

Facility Number: —
�l
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):
Structure 1
.................. I ..............
S__
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crap type ................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0` No.viO'1Aons-oi deficiencies,were-noted-during this:visit.• You:will r&e' i've•'6-Nrth:er .
::�correspundei>Iceab:outthis:visit:•::�.•.�.•:�•:..:-: ;;�.�:-. ...:: : ; .:.::-:�, .•
12-. 2bfe5&4-- �e 6-trG af0-tis a"� fio14 0A 1a_-)ovn 147i
❑ Yes �rNo
❑ Yes IVo
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Z
............................................................................................................................................. ......
5;3
............................................. .................................... .....❑ .Yes ...�No
❑ Yes "'KNo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNO
❑ Yes o INo
❑ Yes zo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes rN
o
El Yeso
❑ Yes �J_No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �6NO
❑ Yes J�f_No
❑ Y4
1 7/25/97 H

•� p DSWC n fi Fed of ra
❑ A i e Ope tan Review
- -� i y i ;�3'Yl't- �s,•v �3.r. +ni j b. ss �.,,.; �' ,
a � z �� ��;' � DWQ "An�mal�Feedlot Operation Slte Inspection �r G
r
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of UWQ inspection O_Follon'-uo of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection i ti 1
Facility Number I Time of Inspection ` ` L Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: ' S CtI , , _• _.__ Total Time (in hours) Spent onRe%iew S
'- or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: _ �1 L r County:
Owner Name: ».L��lOC.. �_ _._._. _._ Phone No:
1ViailingAddress: Z _.�J
Onsite Representative: Integrator: ..,.„.._.•..M.. �.. _. ,_, ,_
Operator Certification Number:_-_......
Location of Farm:
Latitude 5"I Longitude'
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
type of Operariou'and Design Capacity
Swine
.fit i ' .. .S;i4;;".•«�... hit.. ^r+ =^`v: _
�a f :4_
°;.Nuinberr
Pohl �}'-x..,._..w .Ilumber.:~ :Cattle�..I�uinber
:'�. _
�� ❑ Laver � �� ❑ Dairy
�� ❑ ❑ »� Non Laver Beef
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
EL Farrow to Wean
:: z
er Type of Livestock
Farrow to Feeder
,40
Farrow to Finish
,.�°�a'"�"
Number of Lagoons f HaldrngPonds
U o Wbl,{�, '!
❑Subsurface Drains
Present
:¢ f �
�
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
a p y
5 .
�"'l b
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ -Yes 50 No
?. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M \To
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ Cl Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes Q No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes; [M No
y 4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes CR No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ®tit'
rrainienancelimprovement
Contimzed on back

6. Is facilitynot in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? -
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after i/1/97)?
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures rLanoons and/or Iloldinp Pondsj
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need a naintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Lagoon
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste A lication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type - _ _OL (-A , ._.. -
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for Iand application?.
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the- facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
is Nlo
❑ Yes
R No ' '
❑ Yes
VR No
❑ Yes
2 No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
I$ No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
fia No
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ Yes
9 No
Eq Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
No
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
E'No
❑ Yes
51N6
U,Comssieats��efer to questto� �}-` Ezplatn.any, AYES answers;andlor.anyTecommendat�ons or�any atlier tarrunenfsM:'F,.::'.
.s�drawtn s offaciii`'`to ester ex�latn s,�,�,itt�tt ns e�ac7dia pages asn�,�)�.. �' "�� r;�� � ,�, r
ax Pik, 5�jd be- .:.:.co, cvJ �o ?+sect 4m d wvtu
y4
COYcr Grv� SWJ be, p6,nW 6eP(e a ppl j �n�
22- Lid
ytconls � � 6e morc +c om�1(,t.� . PeO a, ruA numbe►'S s culd be- rrcorQ as
i�1+d i a((S LJkck la�odl, `� LtSa``.}}J-f— r-aymt.+ '1"rn. �r U� Fe,rMS S6vld Sc.+iJ�1 0. WQ5+L�
t it (i �aTior\ Pf a O f6r 0.�l Ot 'lf,W- . i -iC� f/ S 0i1 k)I (C.k IA.J(AS�- i`5 c,_ #,,&J . l
Mason Tvr►u-r ; s cunrr.vtf iy wcq-11 tv%5 orx a ce.l+i PeJ afar comb!n►r! i?a�a'IS C'rJe#1+
T fw is �t 5 lsi o e i= bLk Wc. 64t rw record of &S' t fon .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
4
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 1 1114/96

QFERgTION: BRANCH - 111i;� Fay::919-f 15-6041 ' 7u � 1c "r5 I :1 F. 1'^+'•-_
•
Sire Rcquires Itnsrttcliatr- Arrentio,)
Facility1'uznber: , ` (�_l
sat visn,ATt N REc0R.D
DATE: JI ly 1'7, , I395
C7«ruer. Jamie Ta lox .. _ Farm Name: Papa's Pricte #I
County:
Agent Vi.sidn,g Site: - rind 2gk Pender, WQ- - - , phone: _ 2LQ1 251--4305 _.�
Operator: Jaime ,& Lisa Tay or -- _.. Pflonc: (910) 285--5292 On Sue Representative: Juie Taylor _ _... Phnac:
Physical Address: .3 gu1pas 5w of the ipterrection or Us 421 and SR 1212, Fare Road
is on the right.
Mailing Address. _ 744 Newicirar toad
Wcitha, N(, 28471.
Type of Operation: Swine x pnultry C'amle
Vcsign Capacity- 2600 wean- feederNumber of Vials en Sf;e; 260b dean to feeler
Latitude: ° .. . _..' - Loczgitude. -- a
Type of Inspection; Ground x
Circle Yes or No
hoes the Animal Waste Lzagcan have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot - 25 ye'.r iY houf ;tnrm Eve.;:
(agprwdmately I Foot + 7 Lathes) es or No A tu;� ; s: b�ari: 1� r 7 ._ .,.11,
For !aclEdcs with mvrc than ozic- lagoon, please addres.; the oth et fupc)oas' fr_c tb _, 2 lizi�!f t :'.i:
coa2 -nenti 5C['60n.
Was any 3cep igp, observed from the laaot ln(5)," Ye5 of 1 C Wa.:, of [he a.L-1'. Y
I:: adequatc land availab e for land applscadicn? ku�r. No L, ite cove, crop�,+�c� uat: `., eft . cai
Additional Cor=ents:
Fax to [phone]
s i.gaat m o f ckgtnt

•
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: "� , 1995
Time: 91 ft�
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address:
County: Ce_yt k .
Integrator: rma, a__ _ Phone: _
On Site Representative: r Phone:
Physical Address/Location: aT _ 6,
Type of Operation: Swine Lam' Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: /� _ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' ' " Longitude: 7P- ' . 07 ' Elevation: -------Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) ( or No . Actual Freeboard: o--Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o6 Was any erosion observed? Yes oz
Is adequate land available for spray? es or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yeses
Crop(s) being utilized: Cz�
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwel ings? as or No
100 Feet from Wells? 3e or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes oTG
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o6 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover op)? �or No
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
• ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: . 2" ( , 1995
s
• Time:
Farm Narne/Owns
Mailing Address:
Integrator:
On Site Representative: _
Physical Address/Location:
N
Phone:
Phone: ! lI_a
Type of Operation: I Swine ,Poultry Cattle LtA
Design Capacity:, (o D D Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Y ' —36r '��3 Longitude: 2s2_"_° _ _' Elevation:- Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) (9 or No Actual Freeboard: _Q�LFt. Inches
• Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes ord9Was any erosion observed? - Yes oro
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover cron adequate? -Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: f
•
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? �'e or No
100 Feet from Wells? ?5 r No
Is the animal, waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o�& .
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map -Blue Line? 'Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oeN If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,.
Si na ure
9
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

-M
OPERRTIOI-.I' BPAI-41 H - bil). Fa.x:,919-71S-6048 Ji.11 1a '95 -12 : 12,
Sits Requurs Jmrzc :ante Artcndoo __—_.-._
•
rn
F`aCT-1.i[j1 Number, 71 l/
S 1 E VISITATION RECORD
DATE. 'Tu�I.y 17, - , 1995
Owner: . amie 'TaylorFare name: Papa's Pride #2
County: Pender
Agent Visiting Site: Kder SWCU rxac:
Operator: Jamie & Lisa Taylor, pfloue: (9i4)285-5M92 - On Site Rept'rseutati.vc: Jwnie T'aviur Phonic:
Physfcal Add:zss: .3 M;�1es 4 of the intersection of US 421Ytttrd SR 1212. ftrrt Road
i.s on. tlor - r iuht .
NfaiUnz Address: 744 Newkirk Road
Wathd, NX. 28471
Type of Operarion: Swine X Fauluy _._._ Cattle
Design Capacity: 2600 Wearr-FeedeRumber of Animal., on Site, 26O1) 'dears --- Fcz-cader -_
Latitude: --- - ----Q _. ` " Longitude: V ,'
Type of 7nspecdoa: (bound x . _ Aerial_
Circic Ycs or 'Z,,,7o
Does d' e Animal Waste Lagoon hu-vc suficien[ freehcard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hou storm cv v
(approximately l Foot+ 7 itnchcs) fl�'C) or No Actual Frcrboard: , 1 _ Feet 7 "Inch-s
For far-Mtics with MOM 01,1Ii ont lagoon, plc�se addre.s tlht. ,other !agcons' f_t ecboaid under the
cornzacnU section,
Was any se -page al served from the la oan(3?" Ycs nr :'� tier,,Ls there c�:asiocj�f tL.;Y darn?: �'es c i
Ls adequate land avouablo for land ap?hc;atiou? taor No is the cover crop adequate? Ycs 04-,' �
Additional Comments:
Fa, to [phone] Signataic of Agcr=t

OPERATIONS BRRHCH - WO Fax:[phone] Jul I8 '95 12:12 P.20/23
Site Requires hediatc Attcndon
. Facility Number.� rZ
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: J7uly 17, , 1995
Owner: Zamie Taylor Farm Name: Papa's Pride #2
County: Pender
Agent Visiting Site: meth. -Crook _ -?ender SWCD. P1wkOpC; ��10 i Z3 •43Q5 .�
Operator. Jamie & Lisa Tay.Iar Pl�Ane: (510)28-5292
on Site Representative:. Jamie . Taylor � Phone:
Physical Address: .3 Miles SW of the intersection of US 421 and SR 1212. Farm Road
is on the right.
M&Wng Address: 744 Nevkirk Road - -
Watha, N.C. 28471
Type of Operadon: 'Swine _L Poultry „ Cattle
Desist Capacity: 2600 Wean-F—I'deSumber of Animals on Site; �y2600 Wean - Feeder
Latirude: --° Longitude: o _"
Type of Inspection: Crround X Aerial
9 Circle Ycs or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient $eeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot+ 71nchcs) 6'ej or Na Actual Fmeboard: I Feet 7 Inches
For fa.cilides with more than one Iagooa, please address the other lagoons' f.eeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the ingvon(s)? Yes or No Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes yr N
Is adequate land available for land application? es or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes o4s�
Additional Comments:
Fay to [phone] Signaturc of Agent

�r7{fi
1
1
X-.,
L�J
IT�I .� A1Sff O1
i51 C \
rrrt S 1 , 2l$i1M
r ain � � )1 TM
�"
i L � it't' Mw�l�x ' �'1 �
Ir C • i b c
wil
PO ,4A Rw1
etll �dt JOJ �.
NOSNI R/ 4T
I
st C
n
0 `
all
List ° ICr titl r 6L .� M rm,
41
r ;TnT
_ [f cit f [TC
rJ;
I I SN r i
Lc
�0 1 TTP
'am
;-zrl
tr
or,_ A
IF sr i% lir % jj (/1rj/J
XLI ginC.
7Cl'f
Lt
11 {I(I
A de
TWr3
3'etl 9• T L't . [bT'i - ? ur - ;� °O'wwPwd
L k
d[ii Lrrii"iiTT
/ tr
'../;r•v''Maa?1 � .o[ WRT y • m ° crJ I I °� At
yL+l� eta. A TM iCr
PJDI1!M It 04
Zij

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:.-0-"_1 , 1995
Time: 1�
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address: oil -- \ , ( t To,- I Ka q 64' JL c2a'A, k
County:
Integrator: a-d lottA lotPhone:
On Site Representative: S Q 74 -i �a s-_ _ Phone:
Physical Address/Locadon: e , S_ /
Type of Operation: Swine L-,f' Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site.
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' _' " Longitude: _' 07 ' , 5 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event Q
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) or No Actual Freeboard: " Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes ogl; Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? Y;or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback riteria?
100 Feet from Wells?
gs? Os or No
6F or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or Ca
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes of l
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o'er' If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover cep)? �or No
Inspector Name '
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires lr=ediate Attention
Facility Number:
SITE VISITr 110N RECORD
DATE. July 17, , X995
Owner: Jamie Taylor - Farm Name: Papa's Pride #1
County: Pezdpg
Agent Visiting Site:.. Kenneth Qook Pender SWCD Phone: (910) 259• 43g5
Operator: Jamie_ & Lisa Talor Phone: [phone]
On Site Represcatative: Janie. Taylor phone:
Physical Address: , .3 _miles 5W of the intersection of US 421 and SR,1212. Farm Road
is on the right.
Mailing Address: 744 Newkirk Road
Watha, NC 28471
Type of Operation: '.Swine x , Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 2600 Wean-feed6Number of Animals on Site: 2600 wean to feeder
Latitude: ° " Longitude: o '
Type of Inspection: Ground x Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) (gsi or No Actual Frccboard: 1 Fect 7 Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
cor=ents section.
Was any seepage observed from the la&aon(s)? Yes ore Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes Ora
Is adequate land available for lard application? Fe'sNpr No Is tho cover crop adequate? Yes ota
Additional Comments: -
Fax to [phone] Signature of Agcat

�l Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DfVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED ENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: `�� , 1995
s
Time: s �7
A /
Farm NamelOwner: T;1 C�) a � � r t� � - - - - �L,S 12,
Mailing Address: _al- ! j ' 4,a,.f t_� Q► 1 -1- �,_e�zTN(
County: _ 1 - ,� CQ LA _ - - - - - .• - _ _ - _ _ - -- ,,.
Integrator:
On Site Representative: _
Physical Address/Location:
DA
Phone:
Phone:
Type of Operation: ' Swine 'ti` Poultry Cattle __
Design Capacity:'2 (0 n Z) _ Number of Animals on Site:
'�q UC 5A-S
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 Longitude:1E Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hoar storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 6 or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or-"'2"o ''Was any erosion observed? - Yes oroqo
Is adequate land available for spray? s or No Is the cover cro adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: f� a
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 0 or No
100 Feet from Wells? oes . r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o&
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o 1 o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man=made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o(9 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste managementrecors (volumes of manure, land applied,
ame
S i,6n ature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Imsnediate Attention
Facility Number. 9
S= VISITATION RECORD
DATE, Ju.1y 17 1995
Owner: Jamie Ta for Farm Name: Sasser Farm
County: PeZagr
Agent Visidng Site: E=eth Cggk _ Fender 5WCD Phone: [phone] „
Operator Jamie & .Lisa Taylor _ phone,[phone]
On Site Representative: Jamie Taylor Phone:
Physical Address: .7 miles west of the intersection of 5R 1301 and SR 1300. Farm is
on the right.
Mailing Address: 344_Newkirk Road
Watha, N.C. 28471
Type of Operation: twice x Poultry Carde
Design Capacity: 3600 Finish Number of Animals an Site: 3600 Finish.
Latitude: 0 -' " Longitude: d '
Type of Inspection: Ground x Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately l Foot + 7 inches) �Se ,or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Feet 0 Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o -9 Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes ogf�
Is adequate land available for land application? (?`e or No Is the cover crop es adequate? cr No
Additional Comments:
Fati to (919) 7154559 Signaruze of Agent