710003_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROL INA J
Department of Environmental QuA

(Type of Visit: Cd Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure valuation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 11 Ip Arrival Time: l i w la' i Departure Time: � 4 11 County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: - Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
La er
Design
C►apacity
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D —ryl P,oul
a acit
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Lavers
I Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
I Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
F-Fo—ther
Other
keys
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Appheation Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes � "" ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
to :❑ _NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Zjj - 03 1 1 Date of Inspection: .
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storagc capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? p7fYes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [%3Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: c
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
+t
Observed Freeboard (in): �- 1 f
Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2j'No- ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes FT No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ZrNE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA DINE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ]�:f NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA V] N
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA NE
'
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ZrN E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �] NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA dNE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 2 of 3
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA gNE
NE
❑ NA
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: -03 Date of Inspection: 2 /(
6
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E]rN E
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA &NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑ No D NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No P] NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
—33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ZE1 No
❑ Yes,,ffNo
❑NA ENE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any.YES answers and/or any additional. recommendations or any other,eominents. `
Use drawings of facility to. better-'ezplain'situatiotis (use additional ages 'as necessary):
0 try lj �o C Q i i C N �irr R p �- %�/ -� Rt7, 5 an-- u c✓�s
C 0 r-r- "I' '. R A r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
�'o 7 79 2_(19k
u����o��
Phone: Aq 7?�. ?��y
Date: 2
21412015

1 ypC U1 V 151L. `W-%-U1J1P1KUnUU 1115PC111V11 LJ "PCfaL1UJ11CCV1CW V 7Lf UULUFV ZViSJUK n 11 V ICCnn1cal Asslslance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint (9 41ow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: l02 County: Q n S ion Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: �►�` L WO 0+ f n
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: .1 77.9-6
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity
Wean to Finish
Current
Pop. Wet Poultry
I ILayer
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
I
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Oft Qo
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Dry $oultn
JLayers
WQRsjjgn Current
Ca acit P,o
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layer
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
"Turkeys
Other F—TT—urkey
Other
Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:]Yes [! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [v3 NZov
❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? dyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: oA4 G.o'
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): w�i i !�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[3"&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
e'lgb
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 tbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): 3 512 ,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need 'improvement?
❑ Yes
[n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Cg No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0''NO
❑ NA
❑ NE
ReQuired Records & Documents
�NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[,]'FE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No
❑ NA C�14E
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA E3�NE
❑ NA' E31NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: $`
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility tail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [9- <To
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA 01] E_
❑ NA ErNE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA [EINE
❑ Yes Q44o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:LN@,' ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes CD'lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ffN E
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q'ICIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:. Date: j 1 111)
Page 3 of 3 21412014

IType of Visit 0Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation j
Reason for Visit XRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: I
,p Permitted 13 C ed © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
�� j�/
Farm Name: .... ....».... ��..P�..�1.»..1�...P��1'../.�..�,1�..�:....f .1� ................._
2ip Time: /
Not Operational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operate#jr Above Threshold: ....._. ._...»..
County:
OwnerName: ».» . »_._...».......».......»».». ».....» » ..»».» .».» ». ' Phone No:
?Mailing Address: » . �_...�....... ........ _ _� ..»._. .._ ._.. _. ....__. _ ..._ »_» .. __� .»._......» ._._._.. ....._..............
FacilityContact: ,.,)._» Title:._.... ......_.._. ... _...». _....__. Phone No: _.........» ... ....................... ........
Onsite Representative:.....(._ .....f�! .1' ..._._ ......._...._.....»._».. Integrator:
Certified Operator:.-.......-..-.- ................ .._.... ........
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
¢9Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude * 4 " Longitude • C 69
wine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
- TTeldn
grrent � De�i�n,
ialahon:,. `:Cattle ` '..„`�a. .Catiacith
Discharges & StreamImpa
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: » rt.nW_
Freeboard (inches): 5 Z�
12112103
rent ��
S►�'lhff ..:
❑ Yes 'INo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes PNO
❑ Yes 0
❑ YesgNo
Structure
Continued

i
Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with -required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/unprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑/Frroozen Grouun/d� ❑ Copper and/or 1 Zinc
� ,
12. Crop type `A,56.,1,Di4 (r��L. + ((/d 5 � ter/ 'e
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes W(No
❑ Yes FNo
❑ YesJZNo
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
�5),441Y& l"-AIO.�
Gvi{f_ 4 Z/y
Y
eAv4R;ZA-7-e"-t7 ��'r
/ �
J � Aso
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
.1"JA 0 - q.uruwauau

FadVty Number: -- Date of Inspection /
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �dNo
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes 0 No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;2rNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
26. FaiI to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes Z No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes Z No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ONO
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes )zNo
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
/❑''Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes J(No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ONO
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes �ZNo
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ONO
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required fortes need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes XrNo
❑ Stocking Form Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted daring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
AMP Z'ka'e�-'6
i9o��O,r' Jr7ar� f� tlmP L� d.�
Al
PN �y�va,J yDf tea- �c�,ys Gr��7� g s
12112103

(Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
Permitted © Certified © CoMqozn2
nally Certified [3Registered
Farm Name:
Owner Name: WQ4: , Or
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: 6�—X— '
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Time:
Date Last Operated o bove Threshold: _
County:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: Avoceloex
Operator Certification Number:
swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 06 66 Longitude 00 �� � 4.
Design Current
Design Current Design : Current
Swine, Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle Capacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
--.................
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
i
NtimbernfLa oon
gs z u ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
�.
�. r.
FioldingTonds�l,Solia Traps a _ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System i � ,„ ; _ •:
Discharges &tream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collgetion -& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Stru£t� 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier: .4- �F
Freeboard (inches): 19 10 _
05103101
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Yes
;3'No
Yes
tructure 6
I --]No
Continuer)

r
Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection I/O O
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
❑ No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? -
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
'9>0
No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
SC 6rnm'6hts'Qefer'to`questidn #) Explalivany YES answeri_and/or any recommendations or any-other--•commentst r ! N?
,,Usewi drarigs.of facility to betterexplain.situations .- (useaadditivnal pages`e necessary):, ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
/1,9rZ FZC 4-7-zlOiJ,
} - NkF,o Su,grn;r �r' 04 N�� -5-,1941v- &,P 3VY� / 0,
AZ45-'-_-'0 7,9 401d "-C I.-r- a% 45 57.5-
,94
" �Ck Glxai✓ G✓f1�G5 �/t'� 2 .� jC YIDS52��'
y
..i►'LS /� P TZ� ,� �� N D4S4
Reviewer/Inspector Name JAI
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: D Q
05103101
Continued

Facility Number. — Date of Inspection O 4
Odor ss
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/tempomry cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or4'Draw1ngs.
r it Oak �7 ♦�Lr G'I 1 ! G��l S J �/� R/ �N / ��`/ v/ L�
2 X�,v
J � �N�� G•� o-P,d
/1146 � -
742
L
7a", en a, vo
�J 49:::- 41--111) fev-w-
-0414�1� 19
Ina AW�9
Qom i�: RBI-?r OA),
201
w
05103101

'h
s r c S on o, o an ater onservn on
y i,�s i ti O'Otber,A eOCy
Type of Visit )0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: /3 0 Time:
Not O erational Q Below Threshold
❑ Permitted ❑ rtified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ! [�!JO?fin% County:��_
Owner Name: �/� t� _ ,, _ ��(/DOT/l ✓ Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite
SIZ9,,
Title:
Phone No:
I ntegratom —Alf
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
' DCSI'n lwltrrent € .','' De5lgn i �pLlrrent a �� F.;; 3i �e5Egt1 Current)
Swine_. -Ca acitv.�Po ulahon Poultry Ca'iicitti .;:Po`ulation`,'"Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver i "i ❑ Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
1U Boars
Number°of Lagoons
Holding Ponds /.Saltd Traps,. z
3❑ a E :.all y Ef �f E f 3 ,i3�d�
Other '
>'
Total Design Capact
ty C
❑ Subsurface Drair
❑ No Liquid Waste
Discharges & Strearn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Stryc re I Sture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
identifier: t�
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
] Sprav Field Area
❑ Yes INO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
X
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
XNo
Structure b
Continued

L
i t
Facility Number: — 51 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 7No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? El Yes ('No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? El Yes V1
11. Is there evidence of over application? gExcessi'onding 0 PAN ❑ Hydraulic Qverlged 1 El 0No
��
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑Yes
o
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
;No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
o
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
7vo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
////
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
El Yes
'PNo
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
XN 0
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
PINO
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
-No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
� No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
F
Nanv other;,commenComments referto question answers andiorany recommendtionor
„:' ° ,
.r;
,•,r
.,a�. .
Ue drawingsoffaciliytobeter czplati situations, (useaddittnal pages asnecessary) Field Conv El Final Notes
€
� r-r, � ,�, , << r .,. ,'e,.€;a + � ,� ,„,
iO/Z3/s/.
0�IPYWRA eadQ / .5 Dre�,4-zNEo �ivorif�-+� ink �� � G•
��pEC-rTo nl �/V A/ZOl
Reviewer/Inspector Name
77
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ,d
05103101 " Continued

ti
Facility Dumber: bate of lnspectinn I iJ/I �f/rJLI
dor lssues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
'°tl:dditional Comments,andlor,Drawings:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes xi No
ElYes XNo
❑ Yes L,Q N0
❑ Yes /0 o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
�,�' pi/fre.�� .�2'.� � s�.✓�oao �✓Dcrzon! :�'�/F��o
05103101

1
Facility Number Date of Visit: ��3 � ( Time:
Q Not Operational Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified 0 Conditi nally Certified © Registered Date Last Operar
o4Qw
bove Threshold:
,�`,, County: p ,Farm Name: ......( ��...`� '...................................... ........................... h'� ................................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title:
MailingAddress:.........................................................
Onsite Representative:,- ) ...........
Certified Operator:... ................................................
Location of Farm:
PhoneNo:.. .................................................
Integrator:......!--- ..............................................................
..... Operator Certification Number:......,,,,,
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude 4 66
Design Current Design : Current Design C
,. Ca aci ` . Pa ulatioii' ' .Poultry Capacity r,Population. Pi di � C city", Ni
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
$
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Nuinbeir` of i. Dons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1113 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area+
Holdh2gPoutls / SohtlTraps❑ No Liq uid Waste Manag ement System
Discha, reel & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
YY��
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?.(lf yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
4No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ........................... .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
Continued on back

Facility Number: — 'j Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes )4No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes �('No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancetimprovement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes t<No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes O No
11. Is there evidence of over application?� ❑ Excessive Ponding (3 PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type loor Al w-T , Sc. aukj�-TR W
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes DfNo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes g�No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
Q�No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
[:]Yes
UfNo
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
K No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
O(Na
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
)kYes
XNo
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
MNo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
JKNo
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
KNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
P(No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0,No
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
MNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
V No
4 YI i ns.or' Oorie}eitipie5 •�►` rp pote#• Oo.itig 01s'visit; - Y:o>y>E wii�teeoiye 00 #?urthor . .
correspondenci anouk this visit.
Use drawings,of#acility to Better eicplain suatipns.
�.►�sp.e_c�+ ��-, � use t��e
�.. il:ll 'ia;
Id/Or an]
CA. VVV 6tiL5 4, ..
� .�
Reviewer/Inspector Name E 4 s!, i ! '•,� - ' ;'E `
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues (Yes
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? El Yes
ona omments and/or Dswings:
ErE 1.
i
Lu
I 11 �-� iJ �G�►�-�l..r� � �� 11� i G v �a Y� b� � OAS C�IG
U S.
10
.
5/00

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION,
Facility Number [ I . -3
Farm Name: 14 Z
On -Site Representative:
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:-5_
Date of site visit: 9/ / 9 00
Operation is flagged for a weffable
acre determination due to failure of
/Prt 11 eligibility items) Ft F2 F3 F4
v.
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this tibased on
exemption Et E2 E4
Date of most recent WUP: 7 ZG -Operation pended for wettable acre
�Z V 3S determination based on P1 P2 P3 .
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds .
Irrigation System(s) -circle : 1. and -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an 1 or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D�D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
v Adequate D irrigation g o eratinparameter sheet including
E3 qu , operating p map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE:75'% exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part I11).
PART 11.75% Rule -Eligibility Checklist and .Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination .required because.operation rails Dne of the .eligibility
requirements listed -below:
F1 Lack.ofacreage-whichTesulteddnnverssnplicabonmfwastewmter_(PAN) on:spray.
field(s) :accordingfofarm'sdasttwoyears mr1mcationze cord s.
F2 Unclear, -illegible, or lack of -information/map.
_ F3 Obviousfield-fimitations-(numerousr]itches,failurefo:deductTequired_-...
bufferlsetbackmcreaoe;-or25%-.ofiota l acreaaeddenti ied:in7rAWMP..:mcludes
small;-in-egularty-shaped fields = fields-less-than-5-acresfor..`travelers:or.less1han
2 acres for.'stationary-sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part Ill. Field by Field Uetermination of 7576 Exemption
Rule for WA Dezerminailon
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'S
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
f
I I
I
I -
.
I
I
I
! -
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
FIELD NUMBER'- hydrant pull, zone, or:point numbers 7nay be used in place of meld numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross -more -than one field, inspectodreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER' -must be clearly delineated or -ma.p.-_
COMMENTS' -back-up fields with CAWMP acFeage-exceeding75% of its total -acres and having Teceived less than 50%
of its annual PAN as -documented in the farm'sprevious-two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigationTecords, cannot serve -as -the
sole basis -for requiring a WA Determination:Back-upfields must -be -noted in the -Comm entzectionand must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
P 1 Plan :lacks .following information:
P2 Plan Tevision Tnay:satisfy7b% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting -all field:acreage:ia below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system):

1 I-
'UG 0 2 z000
FAMILYMURPHY
FARMS
NCDENR
Wilmington Regional Office
Attn. Stoney Matthis
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Mr. Matthis,
Enclosed is the revised Waste Management Plan and Irrigation design for the Charles
Wooten Farm. Mr. Chuck Wooten and I met on 7/26/00 and discussed your recent
inspection of the farm. It seems that Mr. Wooten provided you with an out of date WUP
during the inspection. This would explain the problems that you encountered in making
the acreage add up. Also, I have performed a wetted acreage determination on field 1 as
requested during your inspection. As a result, the acreage in the WUP for field 1 has
been reduced from previous figures.
If you have any further questions or concerns on this matter, please call me at (910) 289
6439 ext. 4556.
Since ly,
raig esterbeek
urph Farms
7/26/00
enc.
Post Office Box 759, Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458, [phone], FAX [phone]

PRODUCER: Caries Wooten - Wooten 1 &2
LOCATION: PO Box 44
Maple Hill, NC
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder - Finish
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 8568
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

�z� w�►ST'E u�rir_r` -roNl�irV = s N';
t356t3 animals X 12 (tons) wastelanimallyear T 16,279.2 (tons) waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
8566 animals X L3 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 19,706.4 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Guide Std. 633) Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 9: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tvpe Per Acre Utilized Application
Wooten
1
FoA
Hybrid Bermud
275
11.37
3126.75
March - Sept.
Wooten
2
BaB
Hybrid Bermudia
275
54.56
15004
March - Sept.
Wooten
1,2
R e rass
50
40.00
2000
Sept. - April
OPTIONAL
Wooten
1,2
R e rass
50
25.93
Sept. - April
Total I 65.931 20,130.75 1
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must he based on realistIajdJd-m,pectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

r
=, W�►STE UTIi.IZ�1 TON PLAN ;" y� "Ij.;
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 65.93 20,130.75
Table 2
Total fi5.93 20,130.75
Amount of N Produced 19,706.40
Surplus or Deficit 424.35
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
1
FoA
Bermuda
0.5
.5-.75
2
BaB
Bermuda
0.5
.5-.75
THIS TABLE 1S NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for ]$Q days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every Id MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation "see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of operation:
This is a revision of an earlier plan, taking into account wetted acres on field no. 1. Field 2
is based on effective wetted acres, as in the original plan. This plan is for hybrid bermuda grass.
This grass will be harvested, on average, one to two times per year for sod. PAN rates based on
North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual rates for hybrid bermuda and ryegrass
lawns and golfcourses.
Page 4

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist'.
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

,t�
'�
� 7�: ,
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
18 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
19 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
20 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
21 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
22 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

Name of Farm: Wooten 1 &2
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Chuck Wooten
(Please print)
Signature: Date: Z,, 4 /c
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Kraig A. Westerbeek
Affiliation: Murphy Family Farms
Address (Agency)
Signature:

�_ BaH V t,iP�J oG gag Fu
_ F'Ra Nob o'
2U off 1
15 ut. f4r:'':;' f :�.
a Fo o- MCC- ,
N F �.
R
GOA Mu
WO Ln
S :r'.. tl{{1'••r.:. y T!FS. "�� ?
GtJ =soli , \ 1 >s r, j,4. -n. _.¢k';f�: ';. i '\, >:, _ r ",,•.' r�l:
Wo Ba6 F+ ": r, , s:!, i?:. .Ku
BaB F. :r' tir:.\.'
B - -.;.�"tea ��. .,. ti .sy' 1.,. '.�r�- �Y;:{ �',��.�• ' •� (1
Fo Mk L:r7, :. f,`l r' i�N:•i :liSy ?{ 'r: !• tl=i��r�c ! i:'.
n: 'r....[ "✓r.:3.
MLr .`.• �uJ '_Jjr1-.S�Ji� .i"fn �v '1,,,, - )))
Gt
Gt Bag / Fo` ;r: - a, :i' r'-.:L•.'' :Mu
Be Fo >re.': t,r. .- `'• `Yr,
Ra
'Lrl
.. • -"i- :.ic:; .'j'Ba8 y:•t;•;�..r:"• :,•''ri: .y .r•`• .•Ln _ .r,l`:
Gt MQ;
ToFo
BaB HaB '5...•,a.i�: alq ;=+i.;tui:.;:y':•tS'r,-_ .:�Jr. r.7. .>:. 1
.. Mk - / '''•� r 'r rrt` x.A rc .,q�.Fk'�, kr' -r` ¢ �-�.��•!i; 3?" .Ppg'�� :?�/ ��-:' ;� ..
WO J- ,:. =�1 •v. _ -.i. • -•fir t ,E •`S t� ,�
Wo FO •��'. "'- .:t r4t1::?` -y'1' .ram ''r'{ I•[�,!' .; it +•• • jj. �3+ 1 .'r,,
Fo .r. d ti _ .�rr ` \ C r t� yir 2• } f' .
Fc
A� � r:\ : r � •y wSVrf 1 BaB1 �,�: � I �' * •�;,.�*r' �•: ''''- ',TI,1•-
MkrLrl
WO
Gt :.' l Ejgg > y ■ �1 j FOAif
wo
Fo
O ;�.r�x • . 5''S •' t �,n t=, r.rr..-,- s.M .J.. �• S'' • n'
� •,. � ,> ,�"•, fgJ1y ,�x r�; �• #ir,• '.tn. • ,%`/j l.•s 't .:y. 1! • sr�Y
wo 1 .. }:•+. lam,' S' O'.l• r ,r' - J -. t!-fA.+, _ ,f.Y./_. ! r` �G e . .
FoA Jr
. .� - f�..\;'�,y+.�rr ,t 157k � �%•` !�i :•5 w A �t;"S-�+'s•
. e _ ���� . ..fig..± i', �yy++�� 4 � of •'.r.'1. ..St'''i r' w � 4.;.
Tp
Wo
w ,F 5 5 ' 1520 - �r ! ri; r• r 1' • . �t E „e �,,y�yt. e_ 1' 7 'S 'z
Wo
FOSt
WQ
-' r
Fo' _. O
!e Hill
r:•; _ e r
ri
YJO. LnA Fb., r .Y,
r � Y '• Y
Ail
Wo r s/ t ..W •fir? w?'i� t�f lt: r.�.
LnA it �I',: �•' ,Y '' rp '.•,'tT' r �F+: • LuMR
1. F.? � t,' •. , 'C�Wy,, .«s +:: �"T'•- •.

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Lmdowner/Operator Name: �. e 5 Daces' ov-- a _Q1% County:
Address: L G t3o r r-f L( r
,A 7 e i C ! `I 5 Dale: 9 1 !p
1
Telephone: (cfIU _ a 54 _y 00
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
EXHIDIT D-1
_A
Fieldl
Number
Approximate
Maxlmnm
Usrable Size
ofFleld2
(acres)
SoU Type
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
hlatlmum
Applicallon
Ilate3
(ln/hr)
h'laxim"I
Applicallon
per Irrigation
Cydd
(Inciles)
_ , a t -'4'r
too
Comments
II.
A
<5
`- _`
t}� bv- A Qr s ,, A a
-.y15
l y
#r 'gi
�N SC i+e nGr6$
j�
Bq
<.5
} ]
(� et5 CrmUf
��
.5' .�
rr
XP t �`) I r.Te 'W-rr-cC I
we4+ej Q1
,Sec attached snap.
21'olaI field acreage minus required buffer Lucas.
3Rcfcr to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guidc, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for We soil and crop used.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996
i C7 'ti

LPAHID3rr D-2
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun gettings
Make, Model and 'Mlle of Egiiipmenl:
3" V se I rC,Q0—e Ale 1so 1.50
yield Not
and
Hydrant No
Travel
Speed
(Nmin)
Application
Rate
(inAir)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (Il) Length (ft)
wetted
Diameter
(feet)
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Are
inches) Gun (psi) Reel (Psi) Patted
Comments
'D- I
a.4
.51
��3
�Ro
300
I
50
9
aL
- a
a
'51
Dr-)%
l b
roc;
I. r I
rG
95
9
- 3
t'I 1
1 U
lolib
3'jCG
l, t$
G
q 5
3 G
I_I , Y
91
at)G
V-1 o
�(4'
I . I
G
-5
a.y
.51
1ol?o
3CO
SO
) .14
15
Li
- lu.
J1 1
2t,13
dip
3
60
95
3r'U
D 'Zb
- t 1
1-1 }
)c)O
9k-10
ter.:_,
1. f
9
? � ;� ,
' # .3 �?
-3-13
a.y
I
qt_t.(
, J
I,1S
s:�
D- 1Ll
a.�-I
SfO
5S0�
I
t-;O
qS
,-15
a.a
.y
ISO
-7Ip
Sao
l,l�d
50
9
330
AU, 5.
I- 1(9
a.7,
k
a30
5g0
30a
1.1$
U
015
33a
&.00 Acre
I Sec attached anal).
2Sltowseparate entries for each ltydraut location in each field.
3Use the following abbreviations for various are patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), Tr (two thirds), 11 (half circle), 'r (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of arc.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

EXHIBIT D-3
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipmesit:
Field Not
and
Line Not
Number of
Hydrants
Welted
Diameter
feel
Hydrant Spacing (ft)
Along Between
Pipeline Pipelines
Application
Rate
Inlhr
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Time
inches a Gun (psi) @ lI drant jr
Comments
'See attached map.
1Show separate entries for each pipeline with hydrants in each field.
NRCS, NC
JUKE, 1996

TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specificalions
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
4 ( 5
perating Pressure at Puenp (psi)
In - S
Design Precipitation Rate {in/hr)
t_1
Hose Length (feet)
9199
XXXXXXxx
Type or Speed Compensation
/+/fie. G •.
XXXXXXxx
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)r�
Putnp Power Requirement (hp)
a
TABLE S - Thrust Block Specifications
Desiener mnv Drovide thrust block details on sonrale sheet.
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA s . A.
900 Bend
Dead End
•6
Tee
'See USDA-MCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-I)D.
EXHdSIt DA
MRCS, NC
JUNF?, 1996

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Nanro: Kra, CN
Company: -n "
Address: sec) VC '4 el , S
Phone, (G11U1 ay-I f"4 ?,q
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs.
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
g.
9.
A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block locations an(
Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
Computations used to detenninc all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all tluusl block configurations required in the system.
Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigallon Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-131).
7lte infonnalion required by this form arc the mininrwn requirements. 11 is the responsibility of the designer to consider all rclevajit factors at a particular site and address them as
appropriate.
Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
MOTE: A butler strip feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.
NRCS, NC
NNE, 1996

!
DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OVERVIEW
This irrigation system is designed with six inch, Class 200 PVC gasket pipe and schedule
80 fittings. The system is designed to accommodate the flow velocities, flow rates and
the pressure requirements associated with a 3" hardhose traveler. Air vents and thrust
blocks are to be installed as indicated on the drawings. Air vents will consist of using a
6" x 2" saddle with a 2" galvanized threaded pipe and an AV 150. The trust block areas
have been calculated and are listed on Exhibit D4 in the plan. The design of this system
requires the use of a 1.18" ring nozzle in the gun. Each pull has a specific arc setting and
travel speed which must be used to achieve the desired application. This information is
given in detail on page 2 of this design. A detail of the hydrant design is also included
and specifies the type and size of fittings. All pipe shall be installed with a minimum of
30" of cover and shall be backfilled in no less than three passes, leaving enough soil
material above original grade to allow for settling. The suction assembley for the power
unit and pump to be used should be a minimum of 6"x30'. A pressure gauge should be
mounted on the discharge side of the pump where it can be seen during startup of the
system.
SYSTEM START UP AND OPERATION
When setting up the reel, make sure it is level and the stabilizer legs are down and
secured. Engage the brake, then disengage the transmission. Pull out the hose at a speed
not to exceed 3mph. Engage transmission before disengaging the brake. Prime the pump
and start engine at idle. Operate engine in a manner not to exceed 50 psi until a solid
stream of water is exiting the gun, air is out of the line and pressure is slowly building on
the gauge. Increase rpm's slowly until desired pressure is achieved. Set all "Murphy"
safety switches to insure immediate shutdown of system if a problem occurs. Also, set
the timer to shut off pump at the time a run will be completed -- but, make it a practice to
idle the system down instead of relying on the safety timer. Check all safety switches on
the reel after each start -up to insure proper operation. Read and review the
manufacturers operator manuals for additional details on start-up procedures. Grower
should walk the entire pipeline periodically to check for leaks or potential problems.
WINTERIZATION
Disconnect both ends of all flexible hoses at the pump and the traveler. Remove drain
plug from gun cart and pull out hose at least half way to purge enough water to protect
from freezing. Wind hose back onto reel and replace drain plug.

901 h x (001/, � t '
'-JC5- (D C (5 3 44
oo� X S L'
S l
.J�lirrr
,0o� aS.n E Qt� QL ipp�
ti
• l � �I ��'�n S

0.9
_1

ob
W�ft'7%
IL
bob
- NVO
.^�.Z.1;4,:,;; ;,r� •�.. r . a , ��t ti. �'•.:rM�f;�'ry��;�s �t � �r��� `� � T}^'F��•,S' �r o
jr
or
40
I'V
Y.�
ar
It
-or.
MIN
A,
xv
Mot. -4
4,
, L
-v V
-P 10 i A
j;!
'Aw..
OV­ A.,
Viol 2oe 1 1. p
F ip,.% IPA
;&So7h FZ-1 1%0
O.J.
"JA
go
, Ing. r L
.1yv0.j--7r.W' L_ -9
. on
A
14
%
% or
v.-
- OL •COP
5 oo-
0
rovsk 0.1
Vol A-
Ni- a
%i
RA
M-10 I;F zt
40AW - Y10,
.,7 dF
.k
k!117
21 S
Fj If
. . . .r,
Ilk
X.
j.A
n1j", r
1p W r
mv
L%Y 41
17,
��p•�t W],
14
?I *Tln
, Ir.9
V.4F
o.
d fir ps
- jq
L
INT w4p .4
4
of
o
4V 1
Abr
44#1 lr "A,
vi
741, ki
Ae, -

'0'Di ya 'I of $oiI and Water i
v�sxtin of Water Quality,
149 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 3 Date of inspection DD
Time of Inspection 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted 13 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered JL3 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Cti.arler tyo04�, F -e-i #-1 4WZ count PenONr-
FarmName: _ r ............ y:.....................................................................................
Wo
OwnerName:.........-a..�.e n .4.............. 0..e...'.............................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:.......
MailingAddress:..................................................................1.................................
OnsiteRepresentative:..Gha ce ....... ... 04�eyr
,�......................
CertifiedOperator :................................. .................. .... .......................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:... U� r r't, t
............ Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
............................. ................................................... ........... ............. .... ..
Latitude Longitude �• �' �'
�17Design ;Curren t`.•" Design Current" Design Current.
wine •Ca actt , _Po ulation Poultry Capacity. ,Population Cattle „tCapactty : P.,ogulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
S
B QQ
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ $oars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes rE No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 9 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes 19 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes El No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes fZ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes VfNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes EJ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: Z
Freeboard (inches): ............� Z1 ..................................................................
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc,)
3/23/99 Continued on back

` FaciliV Number: *f — 3 Date of Inspection J 4
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 9No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 1Z No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application?❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
ElYes
DZ No
12. Crop type q � b - ;'I & e,- "v V4, 'r, 4 , S+" q
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
0 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
.1 Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Y� s
r
_WYes
4ONo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ZNo
Renuired Records & Document.~
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®'No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
19No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
&TNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
JR No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
JQ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
M No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
9No
0 o yigla(iorjs:o�- dgficiendoe • Ore• hoteo• 00.irig �hjs'vasat; • Y;o1 wiij•xeeoiye rio fu i- r:
corres oridence: about: this visit.... ' . • • ' • ' ' . ' • • • ... • • • • • • • • • ' •
r,',• ii') I ciol f -f> t •I i ! i
Comments (refer to queshoit #)`. ExplaIn'any YES answers antl/lor any,lireeommendatinns ortany o erl.comnents fifa
Use tlrawings`of facility to liettje`r expiam situations." (use`addihonaltpages as,h&essary)z
4 . C'�C7LJG✓" S�t� k rd W��' k 7'OL./Gi r' r ✓�► I PV � r � r1 f''e A/' A.
f 1
�OSSr%!c 17V/�L�G/►i1Q Sit-t/!�7 tvc4? i��166
re)eIA�"ar► all 14e,4pe) �;kc Lt/�►llf.
1q. �q�r;11;4� re'�de� ✓ W�¢�a`�)� 44re -7e�ef��/1�1-�,�n
bps
be ,map'Ped an eeiti I d.ra��j de�e.-�.,,ned far pulls �rel�
j hazy lol �e w� ��G� �as'e�( o�,-�+.,�sc o����a�y �s, � rower s��o+� 1d sub w► i�' � n��
Reviewer/Inspector Name i' '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: A Qn Date: I q Q?

Facioty Number:' — 3 Dale of Inspection
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below P.Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes JR No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, [-]Yes .0 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes S No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) [:]Yes JM No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes f-75 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes ❑ No
Add
rtiona omments:an or rawmgs:.
►") aa(,'./ dl L .) a s e 1 I n JV ; 4 e n b61 sEd o rr we041 t
`G✓'Q S y✓tcl�s SZtoLI1 ir�G, tfi]S V AG�cG, G S �� /' �V6 Ar
�vt �r�; q�+°� p1G�t Y1�We.-�c� ntG,'CS LG�Gtliq�►ot�,
lrvor �s�t rC� pl(�ZD�
'ZOM 40 : Sv
onewti 1, 1'Lcti��"S y
N O,(x) C
---bot: 12 ,7 Ca 4-,,A
1.tI. 1 1" 1 n � Kok j ovc z.9+05
IS r,;e 1,4 -1 tMee-4s ao hr,ye be-rwtvd.A Sod
i^'ImPGf�'�-�c1� -�p �,11oc� �>' c•v�,s-i-c cr��l;ca-��an.
O/J Sa;1 -�c re�n J -� k�c� W��� ►^�GBrd �.
l�l a-e o Sadg1 eld Foy'
p e,e i a 4 x o; 4 ; � e . ��a I,ve r si t.t to( use cA 1r4 i on � o"�i
1'-e1 ��c yva 1y G✓�7e a�p,p1 y,..l WSSle.

Division, of Soil and Water,Conservation' °Operationj iwfliw ,r '` .r.-°iNtrt a� .€
rj Division of Soil and Water Conservation' :Compliance Inspection t
fk,��. §,+� - E .>> ..i �k �:t .--:lit t r€,.�. t ¢€ € 3li ilE
t € k i, ` ' ' Division of Water, (tuality•, Cninpliance Inspection' 'i i `: 3 f p;;t P [ i 31i { fr�i e
a
iO Other Agency - Ope"ration Reytew,
100 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 1)ate of Inspection M —I
Xpermitted
C'ime of [nspectioia 3 i9a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered E3 Not O erationalLast Operated:Farm N. I ( f Z._ Q,n 4-P-
......................... LC1 ....................
C'1G+ .�._-r.... O t7..... ............... r..`...........4.....County. �...
OwnerName: ...............�=.,..I e.......G....Q'............................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ........................................................ . Title: ........... Phone No:
Mailing Address: ......................................... ...........
C_'' Ie-5 .. !..... Integrator: . � �.......................................................
Onsite Representative: .... 1r .1"'
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A
..................... ............................
Latitude r_�•���•• Longitude =0�'�"
7 F fp€� +il' E ',9Deslgn Current f�i i�€'i� 1���DC51IlE Cllrrent'r€y�. "' ° 'Desigil
Swine Capacity Population Poulfry Capacity Population Cattle - Capacity -Population`.
FIY
❑ ?
Layer ❑ , Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ' ❑ Non -Dairy
[] Other ;
E ' a !� r Total Design Capacity;
r E E 4 ,
Total SSLW
! ; 'Number of.Lagoons.. � € y Field Area
!
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spry
�,Holdiiig�Ponds f Solid Traps ��� EE ;, ❑uid Waste Management System i �3; •;�
Discharges & Stream Impacks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale'? (Iryes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
$ S'
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: I Z
Freeboard (inches): .........��.. ................ .... I ........ -1.0.
........... ............ ........................ ....... ............................ ................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes )6No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes �No
Structure b
.........I .....................
❑ Yes KNO
Continued on back

Facility Number: I — 3 Date of Inspection
)%6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Apelication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type 14v In r;,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NO •yii>latidtis:or dieOciencies .wgre ii0 ed- 00.• ing t, s.v. sit' • Y;ou ;will-toeiye 06 futtbt f
cor'resno�idence: about: tkris visit.:........ .
❑ Yes VNO
�gfyes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes )�rNo
El Yes XNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes,<No
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ElNo
❑ Yes )<No
❑ Yes �fNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ,`1�Vo
El Yes
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes 15.No
❑ Yes �No
❑ YesXNa
3/23199

PF..i
Faclity ]Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
ElNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27,
Are there any dead animals not disposed ol' properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
kNo
28,
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
1No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
�60
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
ArNo
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
Additional Comments $n or r;;awings
1) 5c,tv-5r— "'
io
e �ii5 -1-dd .jC�-[LrSG r.�-�>!a t*
! 8 e 9- 1,6,& e c I- lqS Da P 1.
3/23/99

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
'Division of Water Quality
Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of
Facility Number
Registered #--
Certified Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
Farm Name:.... ..h.°'.v.....S...I"`1 d... .P�"4. G ' ..........
Owner Name: 1 ej �l d a'f �^^
..............................................................................
Follow-up of DSWC review ,.O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: .............
County: al c ✓ I.J � R O
..........................q....................................
.. Phone No:........ 2..v...z s g I U a
......................................................................
Facility Contact:.................................................................... .. Title:................. ..... Phone No:
Mailing Address: L L ...........s -mil ..................... ........ �.....D..I.... 3�,X...........1................................................................ . t.,6.r�......�..��..� ti r z y
Onsite Representative........... �t l ``" g ............................
.... w.��.............�2.Q.................................................. Intc rator:......�. �., / 1, �
�.� .1c Lam. o n ,� �... r, 3
Certified Operator;............�r...........................................'................................... .. Operator Certification Number, ....
.......... `i
Location of Farm:
... .................. ............................................................................................................................................, i
i�n....�.�'.Y.....�J...............". �@ �.....� �..�.�....a`.......:!.�l��Sc�-�:�., o �...�n 4� ..... S�? a.�...s�� s:.
Latitude Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need main tenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 6KNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes VNO
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Wa(cr? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes KNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 'E�No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes WNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes KNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes tNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes )ZINO
7/25/97

Facility Number: —
;. 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
(No
Strgctures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush _Pits, etc.)
less
❑
K'No e
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) than adequate?
Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 1 Z
................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard (ft): .........
...... Z.....'.......................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
�No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
UNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
P(Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
/
�No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
�No
(If in excess of WMP,ro,,r runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........±3r�'.i": I.'.............................................................................................................................................
...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow -,up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For,Cerlified or Permilted Facilities niy
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0- No.viulations or. deficiencies.were,noted-during this;visit., You:vd11 receive•'6Air h:eic
: CO about t]>tis:visa.: ::.
I2 . Re—see-4 Q-ea-6 o„ J,P a� iy5da-q -s4Z
zZ; kip rems_-s 04 F-e-cboa..� le-,"'(6 0" 6;�,
1,/.►6{c. aK��Y 5%:;) loG doaG 60 WQys D� lc9f 4APfhc<f.'a"
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,�No.
❑ Yes )�fNo
❑ Yes r`�No
❑ Yes )dNo
Kyes ❑ No
❑ Yes )z No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Y��� No
' 7/25/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Charles Wooten
Charles Wooten Farm #2
P.O. Box 44
Maple Hill, North Carolina 28454
Dear Mr. Wooten:
October 8, 1998
LTw ?
'A
[D E N R
RECEIVED OCT 1 2 1998
SUBJECT: Acknowledgment Receipt Letter & Retraction
of OV 97-066
Charles Wooten Farm #2
Farm # 71-003
Case No. OV 97-065
Pender County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 1006 in the amount of $500.00 received
from Charles S. Wooten. on October 8,1998.
This payment satisfies in full the civil penalty assessed in case # OV 97-065 and
the Division closed this case file. After father review the Division of Water Quality has
decided to retract the civil penalty assessed in case # OV 97-66 and close that file.
Payments of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for future
violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Shannon Langley at [phone]
extension 581.
f K�p.Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
SLJky
cc: Wilmington kegional_Office-�3
Enforcement/Compliance Files
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] ' ' FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

III Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Follow-up of DSNVC review 0 Other
Facility Number '1 L
Farm Status: Registered [IApplied for Permit
9 Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection [IL'_gi124 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours �
(ex:.1.25 for I hr .15 min)) Spent on Review l—J
or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not O`perational'r- Date Last Operated:.................................._.............».............................1..............._....................................................
Farm Name....... 1CLRSS -...(Il�Q4 l�`.....CACh-lfm...-.# �......._....»» ...._ ....._......_ County:......... Gxtmc........ ..._..... ............... .........»».....»...
LandOwner Name:..�tY)Ih'.....!:f............................................................. Phone q.w .............................................
Facility Conetact:... l.rX!A�Yp.I�i.S...� j Q .....An ............... Title:............................................... Phone No:...��1�1Q� ��1. ��i7�.....»........
Mailing Address: .......�Q.....
sx�s.....7.................................p.................................. .......... .... M �1�{. i.��.t......................... ................ Z�. .........
Onsite Representative:.... 5.... (1A ....l...slr:........................... .......... Integrator: ...... Mvx? ................... ......................................
Certified Operator: .....»»..,........ 1\6.... ............. »................... ............ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ®' ® 64 Longitude ©• 6 © «
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
f
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes M No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 14 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Ex No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Cff No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Facility Number: ...... �......(....
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes $0 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Qg No
StrUctures (Koons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
....... ..,...... _........... ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Qj No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes [:]No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Autlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type..........�[........bED.WA...X1�.......................................� �.�.................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
Comments (refer to question #).�Fxplam any YES answers` andlor any recommendations or any other ,comments „
Use drawings of fcilito betterexP„lain situations., usead:, ges asnecessaryY
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
9PNo
❑ Yes
5a No
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ Yes
C1 No
❑ Yes
fgNo
❑ Yes
PTNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
�3u 5 shA�1� be, e54A6), a artwJ er►mc 6+ f ►"t�ris , Q
fZ. Uhbs-'ar• oln Irtrw wc-0 a� a►rovl I: qLC �i Skould be. E-t 10 0.,..,d rtvr eo'
If
Inrwr �"tal� a-� �#L r\ 5hoojr Et Mojej.
a.w'Y'.;s 410A 6-f aorvt
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�o x
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: % 9-]
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

- 7�\ -.fa 'Y, tFT?'.°4a F-%pE.#.,.._-..y'�(+.
❑DSWC An1ma1 Feedlot Operation Review
�x�,�'��� ®DWQ,Anitmal Feedlot�Operatlon�Stte�Inspection � �� `�� �.� � �� h
�c -, �e� v <' ^ . �', ,F:.,'.^tt&�*'`� `e'� � t" „`n fir. ,,�..9 ';i' �f€�. ,%'�`°'' s e A x;;;�F•c,`�' `_ ,-", �
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection (�
FFacility Number 3
Time of Inspection dt a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm So
tatus• 91 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
® Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:...... .................... ......... .............. _...... .......... ........ ...... .......... .........
FarmName:..... L.6ifiS..... W.Q..JW. ........It :....".w.. ......................................... County:.......... lidu............ ...................... .......................
Land Owner Name:/.. �.. 4��r. � fD,Qtlda............................................... ............... Phone No:... ? F? .'y.....•.... ...............................
Facility Conctact:.... lY�auC S....ljg..P� V...J.3. .................... Title:................................................ Phone No:.. ��.��� zg�1.'.!'a.�?�.... .........
Malting Address:......p.L. ... K....................I..............................................................•........
l `. .......2i�' ..........., ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:..... r o,' ......i i�..r....UIG......................................... Integrator:.........! L./ ....... ...................................................
CertifiedOperator :........... Ctt. .S...... �........................................... ........... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
� t ..._ ty...` .... 1.x........ ..rr....... ......... x iSR.....:. ..r!?•fla ...4 .... ..........� ... �c�... 4
5....sl...e:.....................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude • 6 6 Longitude ©• ©4 «
Qeneral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 1 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes '10 No
❑ Yes j$ No
❑ Yes 'P No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
99 Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number. `x.L...... ..........
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
8. 'Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
® No
Holding
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
12 No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
...........4.t `.1........ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
.......................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
[29 Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
I3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
10 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..............��'4...... Q)a................................ ......... "r........................... ..............................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
153 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONo
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Certified Facilities Only
❑ Yes
No
For
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes{
No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
]No
Comments'{refer to question Explain any YES answers' and/or' any recommendations or any, other comments .��
Use.draw�ngs of facility to better explain situations'{use addthonal pages as necessary} ��
S' �G i5 lr. �rOusS p-� acvt�si��n� R1`r�c�S,
[2. �ipSto�. f,regs or cntuer e.l�,�� c�- �Q�av� �kovf� �e `��d &AJ $fir. Skcdd
6� regec.rk.3 • . .
cc: uevision of water vuattty, water vuanry .section, racutry Assessment untt 4/30/97

Facilitv Number:-71 - &o
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: (v 41
Time: .--1 Z
General Information:
Farm Name: C H A e L t'_5 County:. � N c7E2
Owner Name: Phone No:
On Site Representative:' h i t /S 14 Integrator::_yY
Mailing-Address: fi
Physical Address/Location:�"k.✓
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Sow ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
a Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
Qi Feeder 3G 7
OtherType of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:, (include in the Drawings and Observations the fieeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1-foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes ❑
No 0-
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ❑
No�
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑
• No I
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
Noid
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No
Does the cover crop need improvement?: -
Yes ❑
No �1
( list the crops which need improvement) ,
ll
G�r�hS [ LJC e4
Crop type:. I11G5 m llk4ceager i
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No J6
AOI -- January 17,1996

. a a
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ Nox
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part -of the operation? YesA No ❑
Does record' keeping need improvement? ' . Yes Z No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No;'
Explain any Yes answers: 414E P,n a&" :•i.P�Zr50
c�
�L�+r►,esrr: Sella.dr�c�t� <-.DGasc.S `3�a-,•, .r�i�.c Lt._
/t 'Ole
/'✓ d at �,. . --, Ax r 4,e ogj v 51JC / lhL..'C /d uJ 4 . J
cc: Facility Assessment Unit ,
Drawings or Observations:
Date.
' Use Attachments if Needed

Site Requires Immediate Attention
Y
m
0
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: * July, 19 1995
Owner: Charles Wooten Farm Name:
County: Ponder
Facility Number. "3
Wooten Farms #2
Agent Visiting Site: Kg=th Cook Ponder SWCD Phone: (910 259�305
Operator. Charles Wooten phone,
(g1)259-4900
On Site Representative: phone: .
DL...a;_-T e,4.d..aev: An rrnrimatal v 7. m; 1 PR NW of the intersection of NC53 -and NC50.
i Yf y7iMN+ 4 AMwr.VJ. __ - -�
Farm road is on the left off NC 50.
Mailing Address: —pa Roy A4
Maple Hill, N.C. 26454
Type of Operation: `.Swine , x poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 3672 Finishing. Number of Aaimals on Site.
3672 Finishing
Latitude: ° Longitude: c "
Type of Inspection: C"rround x Aerial
Circle Yes or No
**SEE NOTFS
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour stone event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 'Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Feet Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard undo. the
continents section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagooa(s)? Yes or No Was there erosion of the darn?: Yes or No
Is adequate land available for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Additional Comments: Inspection could not be completed due to inaccessibility,
property unfami liar to office staff.
Site r ires immediate attention. Site visits will require notification in advance.
Fax to [phone] Signature of Agent

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 7/ - )(A .
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
'y A- 0 r 5T s t 1AAL FEEDLOT OPERATIO S SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 9 M 1995
�.G GF'Shl
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: . L: . , 10,Pte Vat' 23�4f�
County:
Integrator. Phone-
On Site Representative: Phone:. 29 79
Physical Address/Location:
l
�Z < - ol,SST s/,� 17,E Ale- C"�
Type of Operation: Swine V Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: I.- Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude:'' �" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have tcient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 ear 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inche ) Yes No Actual Freeboard'_ Ft. Inc es
Was any seepage observed from - a (s)? Yes or N as any erosion observed? Y r No
Is adequate land available fors ray Yes No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:tt 151�eo
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwelling : Yes gt No
100 Feet from Wells Yes r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or oche:
similar man-made devices? Yes D
If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated.on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No I
Additional Comments:.
U//ZL 1A
Inspector Name
S
L-,'nature.
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Attachments if e ed.
Use Ne d

Site Requires Iramediata Attention f
Facility Number.
SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: "July 19
Owner: Charles Wooten ,. Fazm Name• Wooten Fa s #2
County: Pender
Agent Visiting Site: Kenneth Cook- _ Pender SWCD _ -_ Phone: [phone]z305
Operator: Charles Wooten Phone-. 910 } 259--4900
On Site Representative: Phone:
M..,.:...,r e a a...�.� . Annrn�ri ma+ a1 v 2 mi 1 QA Nw of the intersection of NC53 and NC50.
L V'J&44 .&%P . V./.
Farm road is on the left off NC 50.
Mailing Address: Pry nny 44--
Maple Hill, N.C. 29454
Type of Operation: 'Swine �X Poultry ,,..._._ Cattle
Design Capacity: 3672 Finishing. Number of Animals on Site:
3672 Finishing,
Latitude: o Longitude:
Type of Inspection: Ground x Aerial
Circle Yes or No
**SEE NOTES
Does the Aaimai Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard- Feet Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard ander the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the Iagoon(s)? Yes or No Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes or No
Is adequate land available for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Additional Comments: Inspection could not be completed due to inaccessibility,
property unfamiliar to office staff. _
Site requires immediate attention. Site visits will require notification in advance.
Fax to [phone] Stgnamie of Agent

Site Requires lr=ediatc Attention
Faciliry Number.
S1'TE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: July 19 . 1995
Owner: Charles Wooten Farm Name: WootenFarm #1
County: Ponder —•,,,�
Agent Visiting Site: Kexm2= C= ftndar SW= Phone: ,i910) 252=1305
Operator' Charles Wooten phone: -
On Site Reprascatative: _ Phone:
Physical Address: 1.5_miles NE of the intersection of NC 52.,�L d NC 50. Farm road
.is on the right off NC 53
Mailing Address; PO Box 44
Maple Hill, NX. 28454
Type of Operation: Swine X , Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 3672 Finishx"Rumber of Animals on Site: 3672 Finishing
Latitude: ° Longitude: Q
Type of Inspection: ( round x Aerial
0
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient board of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: 0 Fcet 11 _ inches
For facilities with more than one la000u, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments wtion.
Was any seepage observed from the 1agoon(s)? Yes o No Was there erosion of the darn?: Yes o No
Is adequate land available* for land application? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes o No
Additional Comments: Spray fields in extremely poor condition, uneven, roota
and stumps. Native vegetation for cover crop. Liquid Level within 11 inches
of top of dike. Gate was locked at time of inspection.
This site tee fires imrnediate attention. Site visit will require notification in
-.�1..■
advance.
Fax to [phone] Signa=ie of Agent

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 7/
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
.DATE:
Time: / 2-1
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator:
On Site Representative:.^
Physical Address/I
Type of Operation
Design Capacity: 3412 ?1 N C422 41 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:''" Longitude: Z7—'Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25ear 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inche es r No 'A -IL 1 Freeboard:;_ _LInches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes r No as any erosion observed? Yes r No
Is adequate land available for spray Yes r No Is �e cover crap a equate? Yes r No
Crops) being utilized: �5 L_ur45! w_,
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings es r No
100 Feet from Wells es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line S tream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of.-t1he state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes r No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, Iand applied,
spray irrigated on specifiic,acage with cover crop)? Yes No
Additional Comments:
iLoisR
I?Qltio /I
W.4 t e .. I41,LL , /✓G
Phone:
Phone:
// - `IIJAi� PA-- <'i 17 a—,
/-/)Zl
Inspector Name
L
01
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

r r•�
Site Requires Immediate Attention
Facility Number:
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: July 19 . 1995
Owner: Charles Wooten Farm Name; Wooten Farm ii
County:. Pjjnd�r
Agent Visiting Site: Kenneth Cook pander SW= Phone: 9
Operator: Charles wwten Phone: (91Q) 259-4900
On Site Reprcscatative: Phone:
Physical Address: —1 -.5 miles NE of the intersection of NC 5 d NC 50, Farm road
.is on the right off NC 53 '
Mailing Address: Po Bar 44
Maple Hill, N.C. 28454
Type of Operation: Swine x Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 3672 Finish',,RuMbar of Animals on Site: 3672 Finishing
Latitude: o " Longitude: o
Type of Inspection: Ground.. x Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient cboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: 0 Fcet 1 1-- Inches
For facilities with more tf= one lagoou, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o No Was there erosion of tho dam?: Yes o No
Is adequate land available for land application? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes a TIo
Additional Comments: Spray fields_ in extremely poor condition, uneven, roots
and stumps. Native vegetation for cover crop. Liquid level within 11 inches
of top of dike. Gate was locked at time of inspection.
This site re -mores immediate attention. Site visit will require notification in
advance.
Fax to [phone] Signature of Agent

' N
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. ��
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATION SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: .1995
Time: 2�
Farm Name/Owner: !��-�Goe,S z6o r,-ow 1.) Qwa
Mailing Address:
County:���
Integrator: ^ /y!_ U/Z�
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
Phone: //
Phone:
G-
4M, _�. op/sG
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity-, 2 Z f40P 4 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Z7—°Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No .
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 21 ear 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inche es r No Act 1 Freeboard':w, LFt.. Inches
Was any seepage observed from t e lagoon(s)? Yes VNo as any erosion observed? Yes r NoIs adequate land available for spray es r No er crop a e uate? Yes r No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings es r No
lee Feet from Wells es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS. Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of e state,by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes (Do If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specifiZwl&
eage with cover crop)? Yes No
Additional Comments: �/� O �u%IfAe
bV14411, A
Inspector e - Sjeftature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

•
1 Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. j(o
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIO S SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1995
Time:
i4-� iS �. _ / v/�n
Farm Name/Owner: didtY i X1&7�
Mailing Address: - 7,%0 U1 !i / z/ f' AU LL_ Zl/) /t'J/f�pL� LGt- Zb
County:
Integrator: , 1%2 Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical-Address/Location: S,
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design .Capacity: 3622, " 'lop N Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ° Longitude: -71-0' �" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon hav icient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inche) Yes No Actual Freeboard. "Ft. Inc es
Was any seepage observed from a (s). Yes or N as any erosion observed. Y r No
Is adequate land available for s ray Yes No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?. 200 Feet from Dwelling r Yes. No
100 Feet from Wells Ye r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state,by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes r No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: MI l�ae_ )) Vra !tf -i!5&s
Z� /&U') r-, / S
!l
�ISY
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

M■i■ t. II
■Naar 111
■■■1 to
■■■■# �I
■M■■# I
■■■■I I
mount
■■■eI.
■■■EF i,
■o■O� It,
s■MO t"I
Nano 11
MEMO h1t
i
a
wig
1,
'�1
tip
O semi
E I'soml
■: t ANSI
up l imml
■O toil
oil anal
NO f Atm■l
■1± semi
■1 f !■■I
■1 #MMI
ai #■■l
allifl
R1 T'R"
of
■'. Anil
■- Idol
#M■I
■ 1 ;*1■I
91 1 id■I
Sol
ties
So 111■1
1 "tlr'EI
P 1 .41■,'!1
' I "AMLII
t 11M■I
! tomm1
ANSI
goal
Moil
1 I■MN
h 'Remo
It Amol
0 {! '=smol
K # s■■I
111 'semi
11 ':',smog