670064_INSPECTIONS_20171231

��a 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency , � '° • �;�
Dvision of Water Quality } t
✓✓' ,� r
Routine 0 Coin laint 0 Follow-uL of DIV2 ins ection 0 Follow-n) of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 7 Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered O Certified d Applied for Permit © Permitted KNot Operational, Date Last Operated:-Jl.... 7 ...
Farm Name: [ A.►e C.Y.. M�n�h�!^IG County ........... aN;1 ,L0..........................................
....................................
Owner Name: ..... M..!I $... AWl K61...NA/![/1lNt Phone No: . �.. ,..'........................................
Facility Contact: .t.�... /���(/vl!��.. .... Title:....!!- .. Phone No: ..............
Mailin Address: .? 8(......C.,(�.SrO�l.....9z ..................1�1.��RN�,� /V C .2r$ 7
g................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative:....-5(�✓E 1e�N/N�. 7f.....................................................
.......................................... Integrator:.................
Certified Operator: .................................................. ......... .................................. I ....... .......... Operator Certification Number:....................
Location of Farm:
............ a�G.... ,p......1.!".,4!....1.1.......,+?N...TP......... D......¢�or1N!T��Ni •�- [MI:....S,Fr .. ®. /%Ilrf,�(Isr'.
Latitude ©• 0' ®" Longitude • • �'
Design Current >, Design .: Current-
Y.
Swine' a CapacitPopulation Poultry Capacity 'Population CattleCap
j .
{T
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish'
❑ Farrow to Wean
S50
Q
❑ Farrow to,Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
r ,of Lagoons 1 Holding :Ponds.'`• ]
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ No Liquid Waste Managen
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observer!, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does cischarge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Lagoon Area JU Spray Field Area
System
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding. ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. ,Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
❑ No
El Yes
❑ No
}�
7
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
V
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
3
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
. ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued
on back

Facility Number: 4, 7— [� s
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? XYes ❑ No
Structures (Lavoons,lloldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes. ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft).................................... ................... ................ ................................... .................................... ........................ .............................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
l 1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation pos
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notifyQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maxi win ui 1 el markers'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the Sta , notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.................................................................................................................................................................................:................................................:
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designates in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acre e for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improveme ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste appl• ation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up sit by same agency? ❑ Yes [I No
21. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail t discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does record keeping nee improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'! ❑ Yes ❑ No
No.violations or deficiencies were noted during this: visit. Aou.w' ill receive no further
correspondence ahoitt this visit:. :. -
Cointaents (iefer to question Ezplain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other cortnments 'n
Us :drawings of•fu61hy to better explain situations. (useadditional pages as necessary}
<ft s
_7'&5 �i4C�I1fy �9s 1jorhad Aaqs Irl if` � 4P14eox1Afg76Ly 3yrs. <> IS
�j/LQ�NTC y/ BEiN� Zl5Mq/N7'4,6D A -ND $iL.c_ �t1akA,0/S !s W0,CK/^Jq- Wlrri�
pwfjz-2 ro l'A7-o,06,eL.y CGas6
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Same
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /012JIOf,

e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number I
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
RFCertsed ❑ Permitted
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..... l/Lt APt l t tnJ................. ... _........ ....... County: ...... 40.e S&S r_................ _........ ..........
Land Owner Name: i1'1.!Av!.Y..t:.l N"Cx .....�Y..... .. K:S.. ....... ............. Phone No: .....3. �.L... , 2- 3.-......................................
FacilityConctact:.s C �G� ;rl,(9vi..;},n V........;, Title:., /�2............. Phone No: ...
�Z
MailingAddress: ..... .�........ c[[.t�To.A1...........(rf. ....... ......................... ....K... G,(rA_i7s.........._/..............., ......._.................
Onsite Representative: ./. £U`rt ..k 1l9Y!.LkA..A.�r .............................. In &1A6>.?40.......................................................
,
Certified Operator:...r� ...................... .fit inn /L;i{✓h,,,,,............ . Operator Certification Number: ..... .k_.kZJ.......... _..,
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• =` =" Longitude =• =1 =11
%,enerai
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes O'�o
❑ Yes 01' 0
❑ Yes ❑Ko­
❑ Yes 2<o
❑ Yes U-No
❑ Yes EHg5o
ETees�s ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 4�.......... —.........
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
e o
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
l<o
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
O No
Structu[
se (Lagoons and/or Holding J!gnds)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑-go
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
. ?.. .....�. . 2. �S ...�..... :. ......-3................. .......... _...............
...................
.......
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑'1Go
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[moo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
�'es
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
B-'�Q
❑ No
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
M-N
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ................ Ddf.............. .............................................. .............................................. ..............................................
l6.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
2'FJO
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
['Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
2 Tes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
93-No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑-No'
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
PN'O
For
22.
Cgrtified Facilities Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
9-No'
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
EKcs
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
EY 'es
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

•
•
ALLOW � Site Requires Immediate Attention: S-
' Facility No. -(
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: DL
Farm Name/Owner: i`iArd'ey._Mann,n!a F�n rm-&\, W. 4TELle N A.NN I NC
Mailing Address: t °� ©�cS -. �o� N-r F'►, (Zd cf+cg N os
County: l9+ 3 S L.oL0 - - .--
Integrator: j90s&oW Phone: 3 Z It - -21 Z
On Site Representative: Phone: 3 -zY -.2 y-39
Physical Address/Location: ©W rouNrp„j Qj 1 I rn � s:E. aLls k4wT
Type of Operation:
Design .Capacity:
Swine
30a Sow'S
Poultry , Catde
Number of Animals on Site: 3o o
DEM Certification Number: ACE______,_DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 34 ° 5o ' l`'t.`it Longitude: -77° 31 ' 6'4- 74" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: 5EjL Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes Is the cover crop adequate` Y�r No
Crop(s) being utilized: _
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from DwellingsZ or No'
100 Feet from Wells? (2 or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or(0
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state -by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: e"At4— _ 66-c� 64d y ' /Ylf=!�4=
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.