670054_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLI NA
Department of Environmental Qual

6 7 1
Division of Water Quality
1 and �Water:ConservatiOfA ; � b €-I_ i it
Other Age cy
Type of Visit ;0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit )S Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Uate or visit: ✓f gIV40 'rime: �Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted [Certified [3Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
Farsn Name: Lerl�.e�l' l.a f®V C...Sak%...T�!'1. County:T?.,.�P....................................................
a 1t r1 1 ii.
Owner Name: ................. a.......................................A........................................ _.......... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:
Mailing Address:
................. Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative:Za'l ........
.... oIokkliiio l ..................................................... Integrator: h?. .��Oh.y .l,' .f.VV.T1
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location 'of Farm:
0 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • �� ��� Longitude �• �� ����
Design Current Design Current Design Current
ti ..
CaPoutry atle aci Population CapacityPopulation Ca i : ' Po ' ulatian
Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -La er
I t;Fr y ❑Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish I Total Design :Capacity:
❑ Gilts
Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagaotts
3
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lag-n Area
Itj Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
ID No Liquid Waste Management System
I '`
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State`? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. II'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: Q' , 3td
..��................... ........................ ..................
Freeboard (inches): 3nj �3
5100
❑ Spillway
Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes i?rNo
❑ Yes
;ffNo
❑ Yes
JJ No
h I�
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
f No
❑ Yes
29 No
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: —S y Date of Inspection / DD Printcd on:. 7/21/2000
1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed`? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? []Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yesj No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes J9 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes jo No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes KNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ]R No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes P'No
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
UNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
P�No
19,
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
J'No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
MNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
[]Yes
IN No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes JTNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes ;9 No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [-]Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 4�No
iQ yigla(ipljs;or. dtfcjencies •ft • cl"g g sy. sit! •You wii� >�eegiye o; #'u>j�t�gr
'Cories oridence: about: this visit .. ...... .. .. .
Cotmnents (refer to question`#):.. Explain"any YES answers and/or any recommendations o`r any other com>inents 1!9FE E! + =E
Use drawirigg of facility to better explain situations. (use•adaitional pages as necessary)
u t,;
rq rv► 11,t ss Levi vi sold . La y6 n s Are 40 �e, c 10 SCA in sre jn) .
AL
F.#_rvt kc6 h4j �4G4 kegs ni e.
.f;ee b,-va,eZ � 400 ethd 4o�/jov^/�J
k4 t
beep done 1611 0V4'' Gt ye.,r 4e6o#- flh� fv enr-- /�jqPi s; u)
Reviewer/Inspector Name q + I
r „ - ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 12,111,09 5100

Facility Number: — 7 Date of Iuspection Z / Q Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor IsYues
2�. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge U/or helow ❑ Yes k No'
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes V No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
ai
5/00

f
0. "
Revised Apri120, 2999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number C7 - Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: S wr rw acre determination due to fail of
On -Site Representative: Part 11 eligibility item(s) F9 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: $�/�!z: exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: _+?'?O pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler,.2. center:.pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE. 4
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational .table in Part 111).
PART It. 75% Rule _Eligibility Checklist and .Documentation of .WA Determination
Requirements.. WA Determination .required .because operation rails -one of the .eligibility
requirements listed below:
F9 Lackofacreage.whichTesulted:in=over-mpplication-�Df.wastewater,(P:AN) on:spray
field (s):accordingfo-farm'sdasttwo years:ofJmgafionTecords:-..
F2 Unclear, -:illegible --or lack of information/map:
F3 Obviousfield-limitations -(numerous:ditches;dailure:-to-deduct3'equirEd_::__...
buffer/setback:acreage;.or.25%':of:total.acreage. identi#idd_in-LAWMP:. iricludes--.
small,-irregularly-shapedflelds fields:lessJhan-5-acresforfravelers`orless-than
2 acres -.for.-stationary-sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP. credits .field(s)'s acreage'in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

r
Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number -
Part 111. Field by Field Determination
of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER''Z
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
i
�
!
I
f
l
!
I
I
t
FIELD.NUMBER'- hvdrant.-ouil.zone. or:Dointnumbers Tnav be used in place of field numbers denendino on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. if pulls, etc. cross -more -than -one field, inspectorireviewer will have to combine -fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
Pl1=LD.NUM£R2 -must be clearly delineated on Trap.
COMMENTS' -:back-.up fields with CAWMP.acreage_exceeding 75% of its total.acresand having Teceived less than 50%
of its annual PAN as -.documented inthe farm'sprevious -two years' (1997 & 1998) of -in ationTecords; cannot -serve--as1he
sole basis -Forrequiring a WA Determination: _Back -up -fields -must -be noted in the-commentaection and must:be accessible
%by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending -WA 'Determinations -
P1 Plan Jacks Jollowing -information:
P2 Plan Tevision-may:satisfy75% rule based on .adequate .overall .PAN deficit -and by
adjusting -all field -acreage Jo:below 75% use -rate
P3 Other (ielin process of installing -new irrigation system):

J Revised Apra 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MA ATORY WA DETERMINATION
LL
Facility Number �
Farm Name: Cedaf '6"Ve S w FQewt
On -Site Representative: Jo_t1-a-tK 4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: S 1"*"qA"1
Date of site visit:
Date of most recent WUP: Z �/ 97- Ail
Sur' t }
Annual farm PA� 40 pounds
Operauon is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to fail of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) Fl 2 3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption El E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on PI P2 P3 .
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center:pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility fai€ure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
.. .
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and sioned by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and Dz D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and sioned by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and sioned by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption -as verified in Part 111. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11.75% Rule. Eligibility Checklist and. Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination.required.because.operation � falls of the -eligibility
requirements listedhelow:
_ F1 Lack .ofmcreaoe_whichTesultedannvar:2pp€icationmf_-wastewater_(PAN) on�pmy.
fteld(s) ccordingtofarm'slasttwoVe'c62}f�mgauon7e�ords:
F2 Unclear -illegib€e -or lack of information/map.
_ F3 Obvious7teld-iimitations-(numerous:ditches,faifure:to:deductTequired:-...
butTerfsetback-zcreage;-or25%-of tota€:acreaoeddentffiedin-EAWMP..::includes
small;-irreauiariy-shaped fields = fie€cs-lessthan-5 acres-lortravelers:nr.iess-than
2 acres ior.•stationary 3prinklers).
F^ WA determination required because CAWMP credits-5eld(s)'s acreage,in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in tahlp in Pam III

Facility Number 0 gq
Revised Apn7 20, 1999
Part 111. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
L
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTSUMBER NUMBER',2 IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
I
-
I
k I I I I I I k
I II I I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I !
FIELD NUMBER' -hydrant pull,zone, or:point numbers -nay be used in place cf neid numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation -system.- If pulls, etc. cross -more -than 'one field, inspectodreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption_; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER2 - must be clearly delineated oh rn2p. ^ -
COMMENTS' - back-up ne!ds with CAWMP acfe20e�exceeding75% of its total.acres-and havinareceived less than 50%
of its annual PAN 2s •documenied in the farm's-previous-two years' (1997 & 1298) of irrigadonTecords,- c2nnot serve -as -the
..soie basis for requiring 2 WA Deterrninatiort:=Back-unfields-nust,be-noted in the -commentzectionznd mLs;be accessible
by irrigation system_
Part 1V. Pending WA Determinations -
Pi Plan lacks.followinainformation:
P2 Plan revision -may:sabsfy`75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field -acreage -to below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ie!in process of installing new irrigation system):

r
Facility Number s Date of Inspection Z2
Time of Inspection EE= ?A hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ® Certified [] Conditionally Certified Q Registered 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ............ C¢del..... G.!". L'.....5°. .... Fov!' l............................. County: ..... t!t.S.L '.....................................................
OwnerName: D.................................%! c? .n..:.. ,................................... Phone No:....,...........,.................................................................,....
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:
...................................................
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................
Onsite Representative.�O� d..hn..'.. j.................. ........ [ntegrator'....�.'.l�l.-4... . r".i.�.�j. a�'!!!�S
h. .......... h .. .. ! ...
CertifiedOperator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
................................................................................... ....................... ..
Latitude 0 6 �•' Longitude , 01 64
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Canacitv Population Poultry Ca aci Population Cattle CaDaCitV Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
S
2 2
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
l I
❑Otherr
Total Design Cao4dty
+� tal SS
LW
Number of Lagoons . ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
�..
,Hol5ding°Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 1 Z 3
Freeboard (inches):..........2...5............... Urtk�laW�2...............2.3..................................I..................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes 19 No
hIe�
❑ Yes [0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [? No
❑ Yes Q No
Structure 6
❑ Yes 9 No
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: &— t% MIN (it' Inspection
x
6' Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenahcelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? [:]Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type 6erMuc1'A 4c,4 , Kye , Fescue
M1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'Vo yiolaiiggs:o iic#iciencip• wgre Oote�• . twing this;visit; • Y;ou wiil•ieeeiye ij 1Fe�tftf,
�corresoonde...about.this.visit.'.'.•.• •. • '.'.' ' '
❑ Yes >9 No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes §1 No
❑ Yes 29 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
21 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JO No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes ® No
J9 Yes ❑ Nei
J'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ®'No .
[:]Yes NNo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes Ja No
tomiiEent`s (refer to question #): Explain anylYES,ansrvers and/or,any=recommendations or.any'ot&r. co' mmetitk,
s
Use;drawings of facility to'bettee explain situations i(usk additipnal'pages asmecessaiy)' ` _' ,3 E �: i ' '•
1 F
/1 J / / ) ] A,
14, Tlic PAC,, 1'14`� if ? /k G'}cGE' -r'Or Ci we_-t' oe G.Cr4 �C�rr►ti�laf'AYI. �A.f�e
Fi'v' W �;� cam, b�j h�. lren Fes j4 S 0 1�i. Svc f vs.
15. 3oee vir'e tY +k lesc.ue F;elal Aekid 6- reseealedn�td i►�+� foveD[.
p
0 • one. des 0,T1 IS d t S_;4e- �b ;1� Go�o�es of 4ke- c,4-�er' 4-wo
1aLj,gon aes7nns and keep Vv A 4e re oor4s.
Iq. nleW W6uf4e, JJAV141+ si.I )IS rKedee(, lC2.e,e -:crL)e--Z'J bgsed Q�t
1bs /eAGre ?AN rscv4kc,- -1kAh 4-P�-cI ?AN -For 4he ';e.14. Keep scperA4a
Reviewer/Ins E
pector Name
p Itg'7�'�iD�,�€�e
E 13
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: o Date: • j :''% Qr

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 11 2Z
i
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'? ❑ Yes INo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, ete.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes IN No
Addition [1111Ii1@Ilts all or rawingq.r
G Grof)P:r�� 5eQSon .
Q b441 i ►n G e r r" \c r oP FG,r r1, 4 ke �e v r► re ca,-O(Y.
3/23199

vA `
Lagoon Dike Inspection Report
Name of Farm 1 Facility Dan Manning 67-54 �MurRhy 3531_ A__
Location of Farm / Facility SR I Z21-
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
Structural Height, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
Upstream Slope, zH:1V
Embankment Sliding?
( Check One, Describe if Yes )
Seepage?
( Check One, Describe if Yes )
Erosion?
( Check One, Describe if Yes }
Condition of
Vegetative Cover
( Grass, Trees )
9 / 29/ 99 Names of Inspectors Patrick Grogo
Janet Paith
--aL Freeboard, Feet S"
0.5 Top Width, Feet _ 5
2 to 1 _ Downstream Slope, aH:Iv -3_ tql _
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Did Dike Overtop? Yes _X No
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? Yes _ X No
Engineering Study Needed? Yes X No
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967?
Other Comments
If Yes, Depth of
Overtopping, Feet
f
Yes _ X - No

Lagoon Dike Inspection Report
Name of Farm / Facility
Dan Manning 67-54 Murp4 _ 3531_B_
Location of Farm / Facility
_ SR 1221
Owner's Name, Address
-
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
912912_ Names of Inspectors Patrick Grrosm
Structural Height, Feet
_. ,3' Freeboard, Feet 24„
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
0.5 Top Width, Feet
Upstream Slope, aH:1V
2 to 1 Downstream Slope, aH:1v 3 to 1
Embankment Sliding?
Yes _X_ No
( Check One, Describe if Yes )
Seepage?
Yes 2L_ No
( Check One, Describe if Yes)
Erosion?
Yes _X No
( Check One, Describe if Yes )
Condition of Fzgellot - &[us_
Vegetative Cover
( Grass, Trees )
Did Dike Overtop? Yes X_ No
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? Yes X _ No
Engineering Study Needed? Yes _X_ No
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967?
Other Comments
If Yes, Depth of
Overtopping, Feet
0
Yes _ X No

Lagoon Dike Inspection Report
Name of Farm / Facility Dan Manning 67-54 Murphy 3531 A
Location of Farm / Facility SR 1221
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
Structural Height, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
Upstream Slope, xH:1V
Embankment Sliding?
(Cheek One, Describe if Yes)
Seepage?
( Check One, Describe if Yes )
Erosion?
( Check One, Describe if Yes )
Condition of
Vegetative Cover
( Grass, Trees)
9129/ 99 Names of Inspectors Patrick aQg=
Jan Paith _
3' Freeboard, Feet
0.5 Top Width, Feet —�
2to I Downstream Slope, %H:1v 3_ to l
Yes .X_ No
Yes No
Yes _ X No
Did Dike Overtop? Yes _-X— No
Follow -Up inspection Needed? Yes -2L No
Engineering Study Needed? Yes X No
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967?
Other Comments
If Yes, Depth of
Overtopping, Feet
I
Yes X _ No

Lagoon Dike inspection Report
Name of Farm / Facility n Mapning 67-54 MjArphy 3531
Location of Farm / Facility SR 1221
4
Owner's Name, Address
and Telephone Number
Date of Inspection
Structural Height, Feet
Lagoon Surface Area, Acres
Upstream Slope, zH:IV
Embankment SIiding?
( Check One, Describe if Yes }
Seepage?
( Check One, Describe if Yes )
Erosion?
( Check One, Describe if Yes)
Condition of
Vegetative Cover
( Grass, Trees )
9 / 29199 Names of Inspectors Patrick Grown
Janet PaA.
3' Freeboard, Feet 24"
- j - Top Width, Feet 5
210I _ Downstream Slope, zH: lv _ 3 to l
Yes_ No
Yes _ X No
Yes X- - No
Excellent
Did Dike Overtop? Yes —X— No
Follow -Up Inspection Needed? Yes X _ No
Engineering Study Needed? Yes X_ No
Is Dam Jurisdictional to the Dam Safety Law of 1967?
Other Comments
If Yes, Depth of
Overtopping, Feet
Yes _ No

[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [] Other Agency
6Division of Water Quality
Woutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered [3�C++ertified © Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......5..r.i7i�—........... 0?— ....�:rF� County: i��:�JOc¢rr..................................
........ .................. .... ......
Owner Name: ..... .0.,� 1 .........................../t/ ` >'r4x,*.xL k r.u� Phone No:t......�/.�/7/ ..............................
f �
Facility Contact:......W........�.A. . l�.t.. � ....... I... Title: ��?:: L 1 :........................... Phone No:...,............................................,..
Mailing Address: ... 131,0....... Fipod.rrr..&...,C.l'.t ldrktl.14. .......�.... � .. ............... I.
�............... ............................ ...........
Onsite Representative:... �.,................................................. Integrator:..... ...............
Certified Operator. .......... .... 4i........................ .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.............................
Location of Farm:
= MIMI � C
ME
Latitude Longitude �• �' �"
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Darrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Desrgn Current
'ouitry Capacity Papulatiott .
Dai
Noi
❑ Other
h� Total Design Ca
r
Total
Subsurface Drains Present
No Liquid Waste Managen
General 1
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
V
�. k_ VM, , ]
Area 10 Sprav Field Area
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes 1ffNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ;3 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [ -No
❑ Yes ®, No
❑ Yes 13 No

1'' Faci tty Number: —
6. is ft�eility n complianc any applicable setback criteria in effect at
7. DidltheXacility Kaii.tchave a certi
e char
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard {ft}: Strupture 1 Str ctui.� ? Structure 3
... ......... ................ . ........,............,.......... .... .... .... ..,.,........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
me Xde.si n? es ❑ N
Yes ❑
❑ Yes UNo
pte
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
% �,
.V....5.c-"- F-
15. Crop type .............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
.... ............ I ........................
..
❑ Yes ,Q[. No
❑ Yes W1 No
INS- ►�•
❑ Yes 0 No
. .................... I..........
❑ Yes Iff No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes &a No
❑ Yes Mo
❑ Yes Q$.No
dz-yes ❑ No
,Oyes ❑ No
f1�e5- To
�A}s ..�v/y� y��xc-� fLf•:�L: y-sue./ Sc�24.%�/.--/7.%]w
FLl V^�lI l'JOf�F ��[Y I ! A S /I/ .! , J 3 Ll •� /� L���./JIB /f�J % �/�r�} ! �/J��G'/. 4 /I J �r%.i�
1 i-4 \(,I g^ �. 4 9 1 3 ! ,S./ i I �: (r �� 4 I+'%�I /
2�I r •�.• �t JL ti+, �i JvV ��� K.W�— ��.�&�Le ��0� / �7LG�rrCL� L� . .yip ti G(J vV' `�"' �/ "�•
L OA A. n7i. Rp tF5 , N t �1 �G�ti • v s af, 5 e_p ¢ <ri0'�— lip - Z e►w5 a �zdL l�.�
Reviewer,anspector Name-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: P�X_!r Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

I
FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for. Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number - S
Irrigation Operator 04 14 61 Alkl 10
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan 2' S
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading /
{Iblacre) = (B) 1461
(1) f21 (31 (41 151 (61 f7) (al f9l. 1101 fill
Dare
mmlddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
Ob/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lb/acre)
f81 x f9�
1 aa0
Nitrogen Balance'
(Vacre)
(B) - (1a)
Start Time
End Time
L
# of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gallmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
{6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gavacre)
(71
Q
4-1 -5
; V2
2: 00
?
-V
0
3
� J
f : 0L
u
,
VC-1
So
!
o
. co
2;00
: to
z..
1
)2-aU
D
!`
42
S- - 9
v
'].
3-2ov
n o
-QY
vS- U
�l- G(
uV
rat]
c?
1 2-
! S
GgrOu
Tel o v
,•
0 Y• D
Q
kvu
KI 00
I,
'- 2-0
1
`%
: ,0
=ASQ
1 0
1 L
0 0 V
SD
—
j
Y--OD
`
I57
C - j D
7•�$ •
; O G
K - 0 D
66D
jj-5o6
T. s
V U
- d u
-j -
; P 0
J
o
S
Ua
3 59 U
r. -
- -
8% 00
H. o>
41 W 0
1 UrQ u
J lol./
(aLl DL)
a
E a$ 9
I '.00
t. , 00
1 sivoi1,5
to 41 E0 a
100
1
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigati
JIP.e rZ
vfj

I
FORM IRR-2
N.
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for. Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number -
Irrigation Operator ra .sI u
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone # a �i
From Waste Utilization Plan Zy-e5
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading !� �-1}
f�e�rr,LP, (lb/acre) = (B) Q q \Q
rrl !91 rql W lrt !Rt f71 M !91 rtm 1111
Field 0
3a - �13g
Dale
mm/ddtyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
{!bl1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lb/acre)
8� 1 x i91
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(lb/acre)
(B) - (10)
ii7.�U
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
# of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaUmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gaUacre)
(7)
A
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Crop Cycle Totals I {
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-1
1�
d
13-
A
t
A
Farm Owner
Irrigation Operator
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
1 . I M 0 M l FAM
Facility Number - I .St
Tract #
Field #
Date
mm dd r
Crop yp
Type
Field Size
acres
Irrigation Time
Number of
Sprinklers Operating
p
I K
It
'_ UJ
fit
1 !
!!
6,J
/'' a.3
l '-V
1t
r
z.��
I
i
7•l �l'C, Y
v0
L •00
r
CO
k
!
U
L

FORM 1RR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone H
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
/I Field N I/
A , `r oor
WAI Ar6-
SIC L 14N1P S ly, Cr
/Q
Facility Number I - I &
Irrigation Operator ZAN /1 N &-
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type C Recommended PAN loading
R G i (lb/acre) = (B)
fit 101 171 1d1 1{l rC.i r7i !AY r41 ring ri 1i
Data
mMdd/yr
Irrigation
Waste Analysts PAN `
(IbI1 QG0 gal)
PAN Applied
(Ib/acre)
3 x 9
1U04
Nitrogen Balance
(lb/acre)
(B) - (14)
4(d Q Q
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
pit - (2)
It of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(ga!/min)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(galfacro)
-2 _
eta.
:aa
i,% 10
ea
is 8aoa
5•
-
Q
a
' d
Id.O a
46U..
A /8.
' 16
! ' /;�
•
— -
-: as
d
.�
/,4 7.
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature r Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
W2/
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633. —
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column L1i, following each irrigation event.

FORM IRFIA
Farm Owner
Irrigation Operator
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
'♦ ` ), AKW, t
Facility Number -
Date
(mmiddlyrl
•• •-
Field Siz
Irrigation Time
—Number of
Operatinq
or, •
. u r
i
i

G gsa X�T. Pk*,l,.W c,,,(A , .
I
FORM 1RR•-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number 1 41 1 -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address /f ItIP-5 /fl C.
Operator's Phone # /d —
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type rC C 4_4 _ DMA Recommended PAN Loading /
r !. Se 41E (iblacre) = (e) /
111 01 M td1 [F1 rR1 M tR1 f9S t i fill
Date
mm/ddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
pb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(iblacre)
e x 9
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
pblaore)
(8) - 00)
Q to, V
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
k of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gal/min)
Total Volume
(gallons}
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acro
{gaUacre}
A
45,
0
a0
-
/-0 ' 00
' ea
fa
-o -9
d
i
—t
-0.
O D
• s
-2 D
o
3-2-0-4
(): oU
!i . # v
1 Lp
7
-a-/ (90 D
u
Z 0
;ZU -
-2-5-
o :
2c?
o
. 2
/ , s'
Owner's Signattre
Certified Operator (Print)
Crop Cycle Totals I I 1
Operator's Signature
(Operator's.Certification No.
f(A�
.l _ .,10
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
z Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (R). Continue subtracting column (10) from column 1) following each irrigation event.
2rZ tl`
rz - cob

FORM IRR-1 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
14
16
14
B
B
04
iA-
Farm Owner Facility Number (� rJ - ,�'•rG
Irrigation Operator (,.
Date
—Arnm A�
Fie- Id—Sjze--
Lan r e s
Irrigation Time
Number of
M.
0 M. j1zL-TW
WAR

•
J � � f
r
h
5
h \
' 4
115.t
h{f
YVEIGWT
01MENSOC AL
ZONE
Ia I, I,xx
WEI
•'
.fIAITnd'
TUpS UPS'2
it
-
I
I
1
.� f 4 v j Y
S 1
-
.,� ti4s
10
See instructions on back. For additional information,
call 1-800-PICK-UPS (800-742-5877).
S369 3648 660
l IF'S :a 1*44.11 NO A WS Utt I.W. W(i i, f FOR -UPS 115E
• 1 i G i 1 1 �' l I'X65 '
IJ I I € I
REFER E NUMB
� � - CO � 7 _—) / _
NAME/�� G 3TELEPI'IONE a
I'j 1... L: - r `z.
STREET ADDRESS _ a
�:'r Lr'r.. )IIJ'z k 1. .
CITY STATE ZIP CODE
LJ
TELEPHONE
,wnlolllAkY tic) s'z � 31Z1
STREET ADDRESS DEPT./FLOOR
a W1,i v)0 1 rvCr r—AID
CAI Y S EAEI: ZIP CODE
$
❑SATURDAY
PICKUP
$
s..nnrm.
DECLARED VALUE
❑
$ AWUNT .. _ _..
$
Ox.xnxer+— wYbkw.!19L
nx aa..a.rrx ... c1oo. >r oY.s.a
C.O.D.
❑
x Cal), wont .. � Jove
uedr .Rk.I CGO".P�-
' " ❑An
Admaion I-Urw rg Cha W wades for certain
$
.
Let See lravIi
•
: z'
$
_, .:::
WL
1 511N' k
nLL Bt.L L ALERICMI TEH
RC erm CFO E%PRESS VaA
G•RP
CFIECxAECJ(M
:1PS 118E
ICti5N1
• �
� ❑
�
❑
,a-s
ACCOMI❑ HSECTX)NB
RECEIVER-SITHIRD PARTY'S UPS ACCOUNT NO, OR MAJOR CREDIT CARD NO I EXPIRATION
1 I
TI IND PARTY'S COMPANY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
STATE ZIP CODE
O :rI III'I'LI 1';; rY HAIL;
ru.�A r: I1 W wlxn v. rtruWAx .Yrrxrry PY [.rxvvJ..x.r. J.rwxYN MY nax.l✓+IYwn Y rFN•r x un Je a Y..1.e0 r.iie Pv lu[lgR
S SSLqud w4 n. m..rM xn.Yt. W I.ruyx v SSpppp li.m .< nun n me wia..aw 9 rr..en tl Ys xlnlbl dYar LY +. rwve
I n. xxx, srw m . Ydt nr xnr YPw xxsaerrnl ..,„..� mrx+x+ . ,
rl.'W.Coo020191125 2/94 M
f

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Dan Manning
310 Fowler Manning Road
Richlands, N.C. 28574
Dear Mr. Manning:
A74
0 •
a
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 10, 1999
F 81 a 7999
Subject: Waste Management Plan Review
Facility Number 67-54
Onslow County
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is requesting a status update concerning your Animal Waste
Utilization Plan (WUP). As of January 28, 1999 your intentions of becoming certified are unclear. As of
December 31, 1997 you are in violation of not obtaining a certified animal waste management plan. Until the
concerns with your Waste Utilization Plan are cleared up with the Onslow County Soil and Water
Conservation District (SWCD) your facility will remain uncertified. Concerns on this plan include an annual
excess of 370 pounds of PAN, the fact one of the lagoons had sludge up to the surface and only 60 days
temporary storage. This plan was certified in August of 1996 and a copy was provided to the District
November 1996. The District asked for lagoon volume documentation and pointed out the excess Nitrogen
(N). Lenfestey responded with a reduction to 550 sows and a volume of 252,751 cubic feet for the two
lagoons. On September 30, 1997, Lenfestey revised the plan to 585 sows and 90 days storage. This time he
used the 0.67 CF/lb AALW without including the remaining revisions in the standard i.e., excess washwater,
extra 25 year storm, etc. According to Onslow County SWCD calculations he does not have even the required
treatment volume. This facility will not be considered certified until this plan is corrected and resubmitted to
the Onslow County SWCD.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. The information requested by this letter must be submitted in
writing to the Division of Water Quality on or before 10 days of receipt of letter. If you have any questions
concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], extension 571.
Sincerely,
/13X avm�y
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office -Division of Water Quality
Onslow County Soil and Water Conservation District
John R. Lenfestey, P.E.
Carroll Pierce
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

v ��.��.� ��� v •.��u�p�amr W ro"ww-up nr v WV mspecnon V reuow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection Ea=24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑Registered El Applied for Permit (ex:L25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
UkCertitied ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last
O'pe`ra'ted:............._._................_....._......._......_............................,.....„.................._................................
Farm Name:.... (..... tw....... e�^�%.................................._....... County:...............�'....r....................
�) t �f Z _...... .............
Land Owner Name: ...ir?,� A-- "\\ ............. _...
...}1!. Ai,ly . ................ Phone No:........`rl.........a1.2?........................................
Facility Conctact:....t afj........h�.✓ N.�. ........ Title:4D.5.5�!?1.i�A:� ................. Phone No: Z�...4 � ........._........ _ / I , �7 __.....
Mailing Address: ...... �J.Q_....� OcU�4 :R! !�. S.�r1lL..f...... _Z2is7�
OnsiteRepresentative:.�lV f,,,,,,,,,,,, , Integrator:....._�.V. .
....Yn.✓erntn%................._....................I.._.........................._...
Certified Operator: .... .i..l.,tk�....(i........................... .T1.1 Y.l..tlr w................ Operator Certification Number:.....l..li(. ........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =*=' =" Longitude =' =, ={f
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Sw oe t Design $, Cu nn may,' Po i� Design y Cd rei `�� Design Cu rent
_-� Ca aci d P'o ulahon .. _fYr�3'- Ca racit Po ulation ., Cattle ,_Ca aciPmin leuo
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Da,
�
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Non -Layer [I Non -Dairy
4 Farrow[o WeancofigLf
'
Farrow to Feeder , a ,
Total Design" Capacity
Farrow to Finish,',
❑ Other ce „TOtal$$LW} ,
"Rics.=.,
` �� t Number o[)i�'a oons % Holdin Ponds ��
<F ,r g � � g 4 ❑Subsurface Drains Present y
„ ,; s f � , g t� ❑ Spra Field Area
9
� ,� ❑ La oon Area �
�53� • IIg"F1.1
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spiny field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 2'o
❑ Yes M-Wo
❑ Yes ETI�o
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes
[roo
v
❑ Yes
[9-90
❑ Yes
B�N/o
❑ Yes
[3No
Continued on back

.} A
Eaciatp Number: .... -� ... ........
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Ql Io
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
[:]Yes
P10
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
MORO
Structures- [I,aggens and/or ,folding PoIId5l
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
U2'1�e's
❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
......................... ...7 ....... ........................... ............................ ............................
............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
2�o
1 I. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Yes
9fo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
,❑
lsCf Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
03-NO
!Yaste A alication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑Xo
(If in excess of WMPA
,,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop fp............................. �.....
type ,.................................... . .............. ................................ ..............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑-N F
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
2rYes
❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Ga'�40
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
EM
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[-10
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
G?<O
Eor Certified Facilities Qnly
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
M<O
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Gj"Yes
[3 No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
[I Yes
E o
Comments (refer to question #)Explam'any YES+answersyand/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawingsAof facility to Better explain situations Y(ttse addiho- ial pages as necessary).
.Lii+-'�ss�ti• -. "4 £. .3Y. 3' A +5.. rta'.�+•
/1 G �%Il1 L i vF.L S/fiQ��E/3Br42� l►Z S � G�g�tJt'. iU42-
. � �� v a mow. �,,�.TS , l A.) �z � c�-�-� z >t c�c�"5 AC_ � #.rra
u t-£D +o w V O t -ram g e A S,, - p ►Aa 0_ ■Nj5r.. n to R
Reviewer/Inspector Namen��>'.y
Reviewer/tnspector Signature:
Date:
-
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Site Requires Immediate Attentio •
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
• ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner; L1W M NNrtiL6 DQi fAoe44 ,>R^l Af *,VhJiNr
Mailing Address: _ 3 t 6 1C,_Q of fl QU ul Al
County: e_..Oc.-J
Integrator: ,r cr�a 6r/h 5' _ Phone:
On Site Representative: M r LL N) Phone:
Physical Address/Location: f>f�r Off' 5 .�.�� � d Y OW (p., &L, /j/7,/
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 6 00 ft5r.O.Number of Animals on Site: 4Z' _
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:.3_q-° S-1 ' %!F" Longitude: 7 7 " 34 ' is/f "
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 .year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes r No Actual Freeboard: _�Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oZgWas any erosion observed? Yes o
Is adequate land available fo ,spray? es r No Is the cover cop adequate? Yes r No
Crop(s) being utilized:
-CX---JQ- , -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?aor No
100 Feet from Wells? , es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS.Blue Line Stream? Yes or�
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 00 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated bn specific acreage with.cover crop)? Yes or,No
�c��s
Inspector Narrie
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

OPERATIONS BRRNCH - I�IQ Fix:919-�715-6048 Jul 25 '95 7 50 P.13/17
Site Requires Immediate Attention _- 2
•
•
•
Facility Number: 7�
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: k �,�G1995
,
Owner: .Q.' Farm Name: D.P•-%�►•R-rG rd'.c r•�•s.•.
County: 0"_e X adw
Agent Visiting Site; �/ri,��r - w 'Phone: • s a --
Operator: .C�• V.,v '4Lo d Phone: j- Yyr
On Site Representative: 0,4,v .ys*r Phone:
Physical Address: e,,eZ SQL- 1,eg4 "I? d,?dcpswc„
rJir%�f�-,@�c ��= icrC��.�-++s! I�'�!1r1��.'.ff �"u•K�L�i1Gur�sGo�i,F
Mailing Address: __,/e f u�.t.i�.,�y,�.,,,,,�.ca�� - — •--�
4 z-c hl fXz ei r
Type of Operation: Swine &�- - Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 4 1 ts" ^� Number of Animals on Site: 1 /,,?j'
Latitude: 3" o Longitude: , 77 a Y ' 9
Type of Inspection: Ground Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot +$ inches) Yes or L Actual Freeboard:.. i Feet � _ Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any se:egage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o to Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes o<R
Is adequate land available for land application? (:�r No Is the cover -crop adequate? r No
Additional Comments: AfA. 40',9•v „/y7��yr�.ri►!-r �',{syr �Fr�►,�r=� .�.w . ,�.�.5
1
ter.,
Fax to [phone] Signatdre of Agent