310756_HISTORICAL_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Ricky Kornegay Farm 31-756
Ricky Kornegay
756 NC 403 W
Mount Olive, NC 28365
919-658-6341
06-09-2016
This plan has been: developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
252-56 -
veloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (w r) 0 D to
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets; the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
/7/4
chnical Specialist Signature Date
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-09-2016 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,088,070 gals/year by a 4,410
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
7369
Incorporated
8843
Injected
8843
Irrigated
7369
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
I Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
7,369
13710
-6,341
7,606,134
-3,518,064
Year 2
7,369
15179
-7,810
8,421,077
-4,333,007
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-09-2016 Source Page I of I

Narrative
6/9/2016
THIS PLAN IS TO ADD CENTER PIVOT TO TRACT 1320 F2, THIS FIELD IS OWNED BY
GROWER.
10/3/2002
REVISED ADDENDUM TO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN:
FACILITY NUMBER 31-756
FARM NAME: RICKY KORNEGAY FARM
OWNER NAME: RICKY KORNEGAY
DESIGN CAPACITY: 4410 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 9/3/97 PLAN COMPLETED BY BILLY HOUSTON OF
DUPLIN SWCD. THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM AND
DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE CALCULATION TABLES. (SEE WETTABLE ACRE
DETERMINATION)
MR. KORNEGAY HAS WRITTEN PERMISSION TO UTILIZE FOR WASTE APPLICATION
TRACT 1320 FI & F2 IF EVER NEEDED. THESE FIELDS ARE DEDICATED TO CROPLAND
AND WITH THE ASSIGNMENT OF APPLCATION WINDOWS AND CROPS BY A TECHNICAL
SPECIALIST MAY BE INCORPORATED IN THE PLAN. THERE IS ALSO ADDITIONAL
ACREAGE THAT MAY BE UTILIZED BY HONEYWAGON IF NEEDED. CURRENTLY, MR.
KORNEGAY DOES NOT NEED THESE ACRES TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF HIS
WUP.
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD
FOR THE USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALL FIELDS
MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR.
KORNEGAY PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC WASTE
ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
----------------------------------------------------------------- - - - -�-- - - - - --
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-09-2016 Narrative Page I of I

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index foreach field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1320
F2
59.70
18.55
NIA
Goldsboro
Com, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
1321
FI
60.10
51,40
NIA
Goldsboro
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 119.80 69.95
L1.
PotentiatLeachin .
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<_ i0
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Lang -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 6/9/2016
PCS Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and I iquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
I Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Read
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(ibs1A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1320
F2
S7
Goldsboro
59.70
18.55
Corn, Grain
130 bu.
2115-6/30
148
0
20
brig,
128
71.01
0.00
1,317.27
0.00
1320
F2
S7
Goldsboro
59.70
18.55
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9114/30
136
0
0
Irrig.
68
37.73
0.00
699.80
0.00
1321
Fl
S7
Goldsboro
60,10
51.40
Com, Grain
130 bu.
2115-6130
148
0
20
Irrig.
128
.71,01
0.00
3,650.00
0.00
1321
Fl
S7
Goldsboro
60.10
51.40
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4/30
136
0
0
Irrig.
68
37,73
0.00
1,939.06
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
7,606.13
..
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
4,088.07
Balance, 1000 gallons
-3,518.06
"
Total Applied, tons
al:" 'P '+''
u
0.00
Total Produced, tons
1}A'?;_w
0.00
Balance, tons
`ah; t 3=';; 1
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
56731?' Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/9/2016 , WUT Page 1 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
07
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(1bs/A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
AppUc,
Metlrad
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field}
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
"Ions
1000 gals
tons
1320
F2
S7
Goldsboro
59.70
18.55
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9114/30
136
0
0
Irrig.
68
37.73
0.00
699.80
0.00
1320
F2
S7
Goldsboro
59.70
18.55
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
149
0
0
Irrig.
149
82,66
0.00
1,533.38
0.00
132.1
FI
S7
Goldsboro
60.10
51.40
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
136
0
0
Irrig.
68
37.73
0.00
1,939.06
0.00
1321
F1
S7
Goldsboro
60.10
51.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
I49
0
0
Irrig.
149
82,66
0.00
4,248.83
0.00
Total Applied,
1000 gallons
8,421.08
?t� .';'.;
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
Balance, 1000 gallons
-4,333.01
fl
WV0.00
Total Applied, tons
=?''"rfi;' {•�i
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
;'`
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/9/2016, WUT Page 2 or 2
5

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1320
F2
Goldsboro
0.50
1.0
1321
F1
Goldsboro
0.50
1.0
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 6/9/2016 - IAF Page 1 of l
NinTP- C%rmkM * mPanc Weer enterP..rl riata

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations foreach source, the numberof animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge mustbe carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated fortheir suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen. ;;tiiization Table
Crop
Maximum
PAN Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120bu
ISO
14.69
49.54
99.08
148.62
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
29.38
24.77
49.54
74.31
Soybean 40 bu
160
15.67
46.44
92.88
139.33
------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- ------------------------------------
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-09-2016 Sludge Pa-e 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Li uid
Design Storage Capacity Da s
Start Date
09/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
89
1
3
147
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
118
1
9
135
1
10
175
1
11
180
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
---•------------------------------------------------ --- - --
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-09-2016 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
L Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for"guidance).
------------------------------- ---- -----------------------------__
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/9/2016 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/9/2016 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into ,water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, Ieakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
---------------------------- _---------------------.....---------- ---
5673 i 3 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/4/20 i 6 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- -
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/9/2016 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): F1, F2
Corn 1: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 Ibs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one�half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): F 1, F2
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25, Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N
should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant
samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely
management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
---------------------
567313 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-09-2016 Crop Note Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): F1, F2
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30 rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
--------- - --- -- --- -- - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
56730 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-09-2016 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

6/9/2016 1:5n-31 PM, 1:600
i

a]
� S
�@IN
'f Agv�t Y C
ate}-yi ..'�� �i'•�"`4`oca.. s.:w. r '�tY` $.1 �, �� is r _ P x�*` 'rt-.� • i _
• f ' .F,! .� o. 5.,, 4' F ;ru 4.+. R•w _ t rs::.x ti'
��_-� ���•-rk�"< �$ -fir 7 r� w +,iV , t - � i � 7J L
.., � . r rya � � r•,�w�'���5�,,.i%''ar''F`'` ���Jr+'ti '� y�"'_ h �"s -..: ^
s. ko hiy➢ .y qr�'�_ .,�'�•Al"v-„+�'�''sy: •aT'Si "S; CM.® ati 1u h 1. ..r�s - 3 ti, -„
` - 1
ary,"�.,,'�y ."t 4f..`
K} 3gF>i`f . rNr rbi<
SHEY011�.•�Yr'"-.�». .� "i� .�3�y �� ;�- �;i� +'Q p -, a�
c-
..� 1�rei�.kti.it„ � � ,�,t� r�`'"`�dr'" ,� ������ ��.'� Ada» � � � � •, :, i -
.� r �:. ' d` �,��'�,sk'if' +� ,�. �Xy* �' �''� nr� {,a ^ s's, a .� ie�'�i'� •..:ti _ ► n �.
��N��•p�s� - ad� }L h5���325
�� '1-t
�h �JJ•�=���- fir• �w t
� N �W p.�i�l �r �-
a., n ni �s�� 'al
w
.L':+.�'2.�%"�{ N'iq i14�i�1✓%/ac � 'r�4flu4z• �l�M �i7 �' ♦� ...•b �N Z M `q _
•iy, k �C
y¢�f
i �• 16f6w�����+� �``6t+�+'�'� "r°'�xK�r E hc` ��1`�l ° f
Y•, � � ,- a, � �� _ �+ �' �� i� a _ i v7

?. �. -}... _ � � .. z. .; s - 1YT .T;f - "� { -•�- - ' k - � : s l a r: -.t. -c •i � ;-� • i ri e �''�� •.
a..y ' L r. .� - w. ~1t ,� -ti �F [ u. ,• a,,f � !s -�� 1��- rr .� f s'� ', r e �i Z •?' 6 - • F ,F �' ! t� �,�,r r.(F �`
�.' - 1 , " ' � r � 'f• H t%F, 1 F iF _ i .ii� � f " f• r.Fi..... e
jt �'j "{ � 1 r �� i�ri C15AY ? J � Y -.i. EI 1 -i • J ; _R
ALC
1P ' a
NC 28328
Clintoni •-923-9954
• mj rn ackson@qLialityequip
• t
�. • f Point:i i i•-78 • e
_ . �u a.,.-+,:,....::�..:'rw::=ice4ie.?i•+.Bh:::smawT-iE6�,
Pivot Welted Area:
15.54 acres ; ,
System- Length:- �
464.1- ft
.Corner- -Wetted -Area: '
NA
Number of Spans:
3 '
End gun Wetted'Area
'3 01 acres;
Degree of Sweep t' �
36£} Degrees
_
$
_. _
Y
Totat Wetted Area, 18 55 acres••°
Endgun Throw:
100:00 ft
�panF# ���,CUFiIUlatli
09.
saris l,G-;� .
w
�� ,•� "., ��,,,. �"_`� ��,-.tz
G L � �Y..:,r�te
Ch i xLrer�Ofgw
5. 4�{�'?
Dame#erg;
f
30 50 / 90 20� i 30'S0 / 9Q 20 35 1588 / 78Q592
z 78 0.79-
.s�� x.c� : 5 F-.: + '•":.-��r r^^^'r:: k- y
y� `Y P p, 35 1577 /'
157r 60 /F181 90 157 60 / Z81 90 s ;35r1576 / 78;0608 4 0 50
780601_
1�� ,+;-""'`"1�°"-�e `a�i�-g-° ,es.t � r `�tJrzr -rw i ;Fi- --� � i - '�-:!� A '? � •; .t,�»-a e` - _ _•.s.. _ _ .-.
^ " X � / o--�{• � Y S�� E J .2 iY� X-r � ` � y� ' �S' ,.._57�./ .�1 - _ t �- f -•• 1 � `-�
r;ig1 / Z34 54 35 1581 % 78.OS20 Q.84
Tu 78:0611
:' , r - ;Tte-r, ?� ..1• r F,%1.•y-"wby^.F�ij'F..k�: '^�.�`c-.agF��nL.3'�_,. ••d,� .n' FTt�-2 s-f i1 80 --i a r 3y S1,JJ./;g 78.- 7
_
044:130µ8T303Q;/30/32
tVc fl
^
_
kid—x�a�`iyy`['�`3r4 - • - -
r s rti >- r'� _
M' � a? k -
:W
A.
a {�..7 ,a•-'k r 3v
sp_ [ r�."c'ty•,�'_;..'3 Y r'Z•{
-�.r, 's's xx`.c'"'i. •� - c-
1 e 4 "r 3°[n t aT i t L?�-
6 �` fi t"raa4• 3-.-'r, .
�e.as's�t- 01-
JL. 'yr3Ff, v -e„-�,r„"-r -
t x'T N 'Et --a•• ` �'`.,m'i..�.1r-rx Ti.45 £t
yi a: 's c s ; g c x {
n YF
l.`,t�;;',n,+-.'f�l •'1 .•-aavr.�:v�,_'r+s
`
a -Sri_ a '�-$`f' S-, . .w _ S'� 'z°� <'"r - ..i '.•.?' i'-_ y _
a `. Y - .4 ..! a� < -� F Kai : �" !"' 7t3 - '. + �; �^' - 'i- ^ a`i•u :' ..c-.- =. _. 2,

Y
nu
• s a �
ti�#sh5jisteJnJ;r�k`
._ Qua�ty=Equtpment,:_L'LC
SO4_FaisoriHighway
Clinton:', NC 28328
Office:' 91.0-923=9954, ('2):,9M-Z37-2350
[e-mail]
f

Ricky Komegay
7/ 10/02
nce
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
Wettable Acre Computations
ns
Flaw Rate
F-in-10-i-I
Hose
}lose I.D.
Lane
Acres Per
Time To Apply
Time Per Pull
Model
(ePiVi1
Pressure
Length
(In.)
Spacing
Puli
1 Inch Acre
(Hrs.)
(PSI)
{Ftj
(Ft.)
{Mina
cadmanini 177 130 ® 2.525 257 5.9 t54.8 15.2
100 RING NOZZLE 100R
COMPONENTS:
100R = Body + Cap + Set of 7 Rings
Body Ring Call
#9956-001 #6738.8ii #7872
Specify size when ordering
Complete set of 7 rings only = #6841
l�� ��
,
% [I/ Ffow }h-
0.71" 0.77"
0.81"
Bb' 0.89"
0.93" 0.96"
6738.071 6738-077
6738-081
6738-086 6738-089
6738-093 6738-096
PSI
GPM
ou n
GPM
w. rr
GPM
cu Fi
GPM
r u rr
GPM
DIA FT
GPM
CNA 9
GPM
m Fi.
40
66
208
78
212
91
215
103
224
118
235
134
238
152
742
50
74
220
88
225
100
230
115
240
129
250
150
255
167
260
60
81
235
96
240
110
245
125
260
141
270
164
275
183
280
88
245
104
250
118
260
152
290
177
295
198
300
80
94
255
111
265
127
275
145
285
163
300
189
305
211
315
90
99
265
117
275
134
285
154
295
173
310
201
315
224
325
.100
105
270
124
280
142
295
162
305
182
320
212
325
236
335
110
1 110
275
130
290
149
305
1 170
315L
191
325
1 222
335
1 248
345
r)ianret-n an hu-W o 21' he*" 59 Gur prfwmvnm daa ha Ern e'. i , eider k6ni pW can+i" and may be a6rr dkcW by .rind. p� N&Wk whew c"iara of a#Fw lombn )% 6 W47ion
C.ormoion rrckar m o namm uhm mW61 o hwW candgm aikaib. an =dk*AMrakM
Existinct Hard Hose Traveler Gun Irrigation System
• # of Exterior Lanes....................................................................................................6
• # of Interior Lanes..................................................................................................... 7
• # of Total Lanes.........................................................................................................13
• Lane Spacing.............................................................................................................157'
• Wetted O[Field Verified]..........................................................................................275'
• Lane Spacing as a %.........................................................................:.......................57%
1

Ricky Komegay
7110/02
T-1321 F 1 so. i ac. fi- sAz� yid.
Lane 1
➢ Start End Area [Table EE60 - B]................................................................................ 0.56 ac.
➢ Middle Area [802'(275'/2 + 157'/2)/43,560]...........................:................................3.98 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EE60 - G]............................................................................... 0.45 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.56 ac. + 3.98 ac. + 0.45 ac.)] .............................................................. 4.99 ac.
Lane 2
➢ Start End Area [Table E160 - B].................................................................................0.47 ac.
➢ Middle Area [817'(157')/43,560]..............................................................................2.94 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table E160 - G].................................................................................0.36 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.47 ac. + 2.94 ac. + 0.36 ac.)].............................................................3.77 ac.
Lane
➢ Start End Area [Table EI60 - B].................................................................................0.47 ac.
➢ Middle Area [833'(157')/43,560].............................................................................3.00 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EI60 - G].................................................................................0.36 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.47 ac. + 3.00 ac. + 0.36 ac.)].............................................................3.83 ac.
Lane 4
➢ Start End Area [Table EI60 - B] ........................0.47 ac.
.........................................................
➢ Middle Area [848'(157)/43,560]..............................................................................3.06 ac. r.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EI60 - G]................. ...0.36 ac.
.............................................................
➢ Total Area [(0.47 ac. + 3.06 ac. + 0.36 ac.)].............................................................. 3:89 ac.
Lane 5
D Start End Area [Table EI60 - B].................................................................................0.47 ac.
➢ Middle Area [864'(157)/43,560]..............................................................................3.11 ac.
➢ Stop End Area ['Fable EI60 - G].................................................................................0.36 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.47 ac. + 3.11 ac. + 0.36 ac.)]..............................................................3.94 ac.
Lane 6
➢ Start End Area [Table EE60 - B]................................................................................ 0.56 ac.
D Middle Area [878'(275'/2 + 157'/2)/43,560]...................................................... ..4.35 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EE60 - G]..............................................................................0.45 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.56 ac. + 4.35 ac. + 0.45 ac.)].............................................................8.36 ac.
Lane 7
➢ Start End Area [Table EE60 - B]................................................................................ 0.66 ac.
➢ Middle Area [900'(275'/2 + 157'/2)/43,560]............................................................4.46 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EE60 - G]...............................................................................0.45 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.56 ac. + 4.35 ac. + 0.46 ac.)]..............................................................8.47 ac.
N

Ricky Komegay
7/ 10/02
Lane 8
➢ Start End Area [Table EI60 - B].................................................................................0.47 ac.
➢ Middle Area [900'(157)/43,860]...............................................................................3.24 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EI60 - G].................................................................................0.36 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.47 ac. + 3.24 ac. + 0.36 ac.)].............................................................4.07 ac.
Lane 9
➢ Start End Area [Table EI60 B]................................................................................0.47 ac.
➢ Middle Area [900'(157)/43,560]..............................................................................3.24 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table E160 - G].................................................................................0.36 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.47 ac. + 3.24 ac. + 0.36 ac.)].............................................................4.07 ac.
Lane 10
➢ Start End Area [Table EI60 B]................................................................................0.47 ac.
➢ Middle Area [900'(157)/43,860]..............................................................................3.24 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EI60 - G]................................................................................0.36 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.47 ac. + 3.24 ac. + 0.36 ac.)] ......................... .....4.07 ac.
Lane 11
➢ Start End Area [Table EE60 - B]................................................................................0.56 ac.
➢ Middle Area [143'(275'/2 + 157'/2)/43,860]............................................................0.71 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EE60 - G]...............................................................................0.45 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.56 ac. + 0.71 ac. + 0.45 ac.)]..............................................................1.72 ac.
Lane 12
➢ Start End Area [Table EE60 - B]................................................................................0.56 ac.
➢ Middle Area (321'(27572 + 157'/2)/43,560]............................................... .1.59 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EE60 - G]............................................................................... 0.46 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.56 ac. + 1.59 ac. + 0.45 ac.)]..............................................................2.60 ac.
Lane 13
➢ Start End Area [Table EE60. B]................................................................................0.56 ac.
➢ Middle Area [826'(278'/2 + 157'/2)/43,560]..........................................................2.61 ac.
➢ Stop End Area [Table EE60 - G]..............................................................................0.45 ac.
➢ Total Area [(0.56 ac. + 2.61 ac. + 0.45 ac.)]..............................................................3.62 ac.
i~i�4•i �cs���/H..\!}\lie.i�..}!i}f...V..IftiV iif.11.f.•�fi.Va/i\i•a..l.VHIV.f �/V I,H_}\l.i./.iH isiH ��i���/
T43817 Hort!aq Wang Acres:}......::,H...,......................... ..:...1.75 act
3

Ricky Kornegay
7/ 10/02
W

I
3 /- ?5-K
W1,90
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
10-03-2002
This plan has been prepared for:
Ricky Kornegay Farm 31-756
Ricky Kornegay
756 NC 403 W
Mount Olive, NC 28365
919-658-6341
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beula-ville, NC 28518
252-5,58-2648
veioper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
APR 0 6 2009
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) .understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutisent management plan: which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named. above. I have read_ and. understand the
Rewired Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plait.
0.3 6 ;a_
e (owner) U 0 Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commt3sion.
Plan Approved By. z.
viral Specialist Signature Date
332041 Database Version 2.0` �— Date Priated: 10-03-2002� Cover Page 1� V —
RECENED 1 DENR I DWQ
AQUEFFR-PPr)TFrrjnN AFCfiON
MAR 31 7nn4

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commere-ial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,089,070 gals/year by
a 4,410 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days_
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
9421
Incorporated
16180
Injected
17819
Irrigated
10241
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
10,424
_
4,161,246
-73,176
Year 2
10,342
4,128,416
-40,346
Note: In source 1D. S means standard source, U means us�±r defined. source.— -__.__ ____.�_
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Source Page 1 of 1

Narrative
REVISED ADDENDUM TO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN:
FACILITY NUMBER 31-756
FARM NAME: RICKY KORNEGAY FARM
OWNER NAME: RICKY KORNEGAY
DESIGN CAPACITY: 4410 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 913/97 PLAN COMPLETED BY BILLY HOIJSTON OF
DUPLIN SWCD. THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE Wf TTABL.E .ACRES ON THE FARM AND
DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE CALCULATION TABLES. (SEE WETTABLE ACRE
DETERMINATION)
MR. KORNEGAY -HAS WRITTEN PERMISSION TO UTILIZE FOR WASTE APPLICATION
TRACT 1320 Fl & F2 IF EVER NEEDED. THESE FIELDS ARE DEDICATED TO CROPLAND
AND WITH THE ASSIGNMENT OF APPLCATION WINDOWS AND CROPS BY A TECHNICAL
SPECIALIST MAY BE INCORPORATED IN THE PLAN. 'THERE IS ALSO ADDITIONAL
ACREAGE THAT MAY BE UTILIZED BY HONEYWAGON IF NEEDED. CURRENTLY, MR;
KORNEGAY DOES NOT NEED THESE ACRES TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF HIS'
WUP.
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD
FOR THE USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALI, FIELDS
MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR.
KORNEGAY PLANS TO.APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH. HIS SPECIFIC
WASTE ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS.
332041 — Database Version 2.0-�y „Date Printed:610-03-2002 T Narrative Page I of I

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being.supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied or,
each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total
manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
W Otu I Itili-satinn'I"ahlu
v'o i
'rrpct I
Field
Source
I 1.17,
Soil Series
'Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop...
R
RYE
Avvlic,
eri
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
RCq'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
o
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Anplied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manur
Applie
(Field
lb
1000
al A
tons
1000 uls
tons
1321
FI
S7
Goldsboro
1 60.i
51.4
Corn, Grain
130.0
Bushels
2/15-6/30
1 148
0
20
brig,
128
51.10
0
2.626.43
0,
1321
F1
S7
Goldsboro
1 60.1 1
51.4
Wheat, Grain
I 65.0
Bushels
9/i-3/3i 1
75
01
0
Irrig,
75
29.86
0
1,534.82
0.
Manure Snli&
Total Anntie& ton-,
0.
Total Produced- tons
0.
Balance, tons
0.
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol — means leased. otherwise, owned.
...................................................... ............................................ ....... ....... . _.., .,..... _.
332041 Database Version 2.0
2. Svmbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed: 10/3102
WUT Page 1

111-_ - 11.!1!4- , - T_1_7_
Tt1321
Field
Source
I.D
S it Seri
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
ro
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req`d
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res,
(lhslA)
AFplic,
et od
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manur
Avvlie
(Field
N
N
N
Ibs/
1000
a1 A
on
1000 s
ons
F1
S7
Goldsboro
1 60.1
51.4
Wheat, Grain
65.0
Bushels
9/1-3/31
61
0
0
Imp.
61
24.43
0
1,255.76
0.
1321
PI
S7
Goldsboro
60.1 1
51.4
Sovbeans,Double Crop
*38.0
Bushels
411-9115
1 140
0
0
Irrig.
140
55.89
1 0
2,872.66
0.
Manure Solidr
Total Annfiedj=
Q.
Balance, tons
0.
Notes: 1. In the tract column, svmbol — means leased, otherwise, owned,
2. Svmbol * means uscr entered data.
. ................. .- ._.-._-
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10/3/02 WUT Pale 2
One

dM The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are showy in the following table.
Infiltration mote varies with soils.. If applying waste. nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maxiinum application rate per hour
that may be ;applied to each field selected tr) receive wasteivater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application hate
(inehe5lisour)
Application Amount
(incises)
1321
F1
Goldsboro
0.30
0.96
332041 � Database Version 2.0 � ��Y. Date Printed: 10-03-2002 -- -- IAF Page I of`I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the dumber of wiimals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient,is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting.
Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first tm evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not
be used for sludge application. Ifthis is not possible, care should, be taken not to load effluent application fields
with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface
water moving to utmams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels
may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum •
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ae
Minimum Ayes
:i Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
55 29
110.57
165.86
y 6 ton RYR
300
26.32
27.64
55.29
82.93
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
51931
103.66
155.49
dn
} 332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available `waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Avait3ble storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of riet storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrieits to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. if the avaiable storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls Rr the application o:fnutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the: estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the, structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the st-ucturds temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Staraue Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon 1.i uid
Design Storage Capaci a
Start Date
09/01
190
Flan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
_
2
23
_
1
_
3
39
1
4
68
1
S
96
1
6
113
1
7
82
W
1
_
8
51
1
9
58
1
10
77
1
11
97
1
12
66
2
_-_.. 1
47
r 2
2
56
2
3
87
2
�4
83
2
T 5
90
2
6
111
2—r
7
118
_
2
8
138
2
9
159
2
_
10
128
_
2
it
98
2
12
67
* Available' Capacity is calculated a; of the end of each rlonth.
0 332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Capacity Page I of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. H the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonableproximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroi ing less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than -10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by in. jecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
' 332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Specification Page 1 of 4

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres stabject to flooding, waste
"-s will be soil incorporated on conventionally, tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils -should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than s`vine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer titan 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall -not be applied. closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
332041 Database Version2.0 Date Printed -__-----__---' _--__-- V_-
10-03-2002 Specification Page 2 of 4

14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland. provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates iin a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial wade frmwash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessar i, to protect the vegetation. - Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should.be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge„
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be'Irept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
49 332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Specification Page 3 of 4

Q 21. Highly visible markers shalli be installed tta mark the top and bottom
elevations of the tempo ra ry's torage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be mariaged to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to marls the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rage. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
40 332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Specification Page 4 of 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): FI
Corn I: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with 1he. characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations
should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till.
Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When
planting early in cool, r vet soil, banded phosphorus willbe more available to the young plants. An accepted
practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20- 30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and one-half the
remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 3040 days after emergence. The
total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a s�artcr in the fertilizer program, the
recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples
can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely
management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
Tlie following crop note applies to field(s): Fl
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, non -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain strax, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate plant
populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
<< select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4
seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-9 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 5-10
seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth
should be 1-1 1 /2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the
soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the ball. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally
grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at
planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential
for profitable double crop soybean production.
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Crop Note Page I of 2

-1-
Tf,e following crop note applies to field(s): Fl
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-14ovember 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select it high }fielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs'acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash_
recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should he applied during the
months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases,
insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
332N1 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

Michael F. Easley, Governor
A r�RQG
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 RECEIVED
Ricky T Kornegay
Ricky Kornegay Farm SUN 2 6 2007
756 NC 403 W
Mount Olive, NC 28365 BY:
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310756
Ricky Kornegay Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
Dear Ricky T Kornegay:
In accordance with your application received on 4-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Ricky T Kornegay, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Ricky Kornegay Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 4410 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 111.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms -used for record keeping and reporting. Please nav
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwaterqua1fty.2M t.ocatiow 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper
N,_��nnCarolina
Aftrall'a
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules; standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. - /
Per I SA NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any Violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS i43-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you -wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-395-3900. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ce's)
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS310756

Ricky Komegay
Subject: Ricky Komegay
From: Geno Kennedy <agrimentservices@yahoo,com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 07:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Chester Cobb <[e-mail]>
Chester,
Ricky has picked the Corn in the pumping field we looked at. He really would like you to look at it
before it is pumped again. He wants to pump soon, he has around 29" of freeboard at the present. He
just knows when he starts pumping there will be calls and problems so he wants to have this pow wow
before. Let me know your schedule and we will go from there.
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie "Geno" Kennedy Jr.
President of Operations
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096 Beulaville, NC 28518
Office [phone] Fax [phone] Mobile [phone]
www.agrimentservices.com
r

a

Q`C W A rEjp i
Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� QG
�
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 9, 2004
Mr. Jimmy Kornegay
310 Henderson St.
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Subject: Visits conducted concerning the sprayfield for the
Ricky Kornegay Farm
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kornegay:
Please find the enclosed copies of the memos written regarding the visits conducted
concerning the sprayfield for the Ricky Kornegay Farm. If you have any questions, do not
hesitate to call me at [phone] eA 226.
R
bb
Environmental Specialist If
SAWQSIANIMALSIDUPLIN1200411nfo Request 31-756 complaint
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Ia
hi
Carolina
rm!!tf

OF W A �FR Michael F. Easley, Governor
��� pG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
4] North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
MEMORANDUM
TO: DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-756
FROM: Chester Cobb(i
SUBJECT: Complaint concerning the sprayfield for the Ricky Kornegay Farm
(Facility # 31-756)
DATE: August 9, 2004
On June 22, 2004, 1 received a call from Mr. Jimmy Kornegay concerning waste being applied
to a field in such a way as being detrimental to the row crop (corn) and ruining the land. At the
time I took the call, I thought the complaint was concerning the Byard Kornegay Farm. I
received the call while I was on the road traveling to do farm inspections in Onslow County.
On June 23, 2004, 1 met with Ms. Jo Ann Kornegay concerning the complaint. It was at this
time that I learned that the complaint was concerning the Ricky Komegay Farm. Ms. Komegay
gave me a set of pictures that were taken on May 20, 2004 concerning the sprayfield., The
pictures showed areas where corn was present and areas where there was no corn. Also,
some of the pictures had cattails present. After meeting with Ms. Kornegay, I drove by the farm
and did not observe any waste apply being applied to the sprayfield at that time.
On June 28, 2004, 1 met with Greg Bradshaw (the row crop grower). Greg confirmed that he
had trouble with the corn in places in this field and that he had to replant some of the com
several times. - He also said that he had talked to Ricky about not pumping until he could get the
corn planted. Greg said that he had been leasing this field since 1996.
On July 7, 2004, 1 met with Ricky Kornegay and Geno Kennedy concerning the complaint.
walked the area along the hydrants with Geno and noted in the inspection about V2 acre area
around one of the hydrants that was without corn. Also. noted in the inspection was a soft area
around one of the hydrants. Since the majority of the corn looked healthy, I suspected that
drainage might be an issue for areas of this field and proposed to do a follow up inspection once
the corn had been harvested to better evaluate field. For the follow up inspection, I would also
like to involve technical assistance.
On July 15, 2004, Charlie Stehman, Environmental Regional Supervisor I with the Division of
Water Quality, and I met with James Kornegay, Jimmy Komegay, and Greg Bradshaw
concerning the sprayfield for the Ricky Kornegay Farm. Charlie Stehman and I walked the
sprayfield with Greg Bradshaw and James Kornegay. Minus three areas, the majority of the
cornfield appeared to be healthy. The largest area of the three places where no corn was
noticed was approximately one acre. Pictures were taken. No water or soil samples were
pulled. The representatives were encouraged to call when waste was being applied again.
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2004\31-756 Memo
into Carolina
. �turally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAfhrmative Aclion Employer- 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Groundwater Section
Wilmington Regional Office
MEMORANDUM TO: File
FROM: Charlie Stehman (>-6
SUBJECT: Rickey Kornegay Farm Spray Area (CAFO)
Complaint Visit
Duplin County
DATE: July 16, 2004
On July 15 2004 Chester Cobb and I visited the application area of the Ricky Kornegy hog
farm, in response to complaints that there had been over application in the Spring of 2004, resulting
in poor corn crop germination. When we arrived at the site we observed a healthy corn crop
throughout the whole field with the exception of areas near the hydrants, which may never have been
planted and two other areas approximately one acre each. One of these two areas was characterized
by cat tail vegetation and is apparent on a 1998 air photo.
The complaint comes from Joanne Kornegy who has provided photos of stunted corn and
apparent flooded areas in the corn field. Ms. Kornegy claims that the stunted corn and flooding
results from over -application of liquid hog waste from the Ricky Kornegy farm in discrete areas of
the corn field. She also indicated the farmer tending the corn had to replant as a result of over
application.
At this time it is difficult to draw any conclusion on the claim of over application because
the corn crop appeared healthy at the time of our visit and the very limited amount of area in which
corn was not re- planted. Furthermore, the flooding in photographs provided by Ms. Kornegy did
not demonstrate coloration indicative of hog waste. Accordingly, no enforcement action will result
from the complaint.
We requested that Ms. Kornegy call us immediately when another inappropriate application
event was observed at this location.
SAGWS1CFS\Kamegy Farm.juM MMO

W A rF,9QG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
o�0
William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 9, 2004
Mr. Jimmy Kornegay
310 Henderson St.
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Subject: Visits conducted concerning the spraypeld for the
Ricky Kornegay Farm
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kornegay:
Please find the enclosed copies of the memos written regarding the visits conducted
concerning the sprayfeld for the Ricky Kornegay Farm. If you have any questions, do not
hesitate to call me at [phone] ext. 226.
Sinc ely,
v
ester Cobb
kl
Environmental Specialist II.-
S:1WQS1ANiMALSIDUPLIN1200411nfo Request 31-756 complaint
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 29405 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Now Carolina
Na orally

W TFR
OF
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p -�
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
MEMORANDUM
TO: DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 31-756
FROM: Chester Cobb 1;V(i
SUBJECT: Complaint concerning the sprayfield for the Ricky Kornegay Farm
(Facility # 31-756)
DATE: August 9, 2004-
On June 22, 2004, 1 received a call from Mr. Jimmy Kornegay concerning waste being applied
to a field in such a way as being detrimental to the row crop (corn) and ruining the land. At the
time I took the call, I thought the complaint was concerning the Byard Kornegay Farm.
received the call while I was on the road traveling to do farm inspections in Onslow County.
On June 23, 2004, 1 met with Ms. Jo Ann Kornegay concerning the complaint. It was at this
time that I learned that the complaint was concerning the Ricky Kornegay Farm, Ms. Kornegay
gave me a set of pictures that were taken on May 20, 2004 concerning the sprayfield. The
pictures showed areas where corn was present and areas where there was no corn. Also,
some of the pictures had cattails present. After meeting with Ms. Komegay, I drove by the farm
and did not observe any waste apply being applied to the sprayfield at that time.
On June 28, 2004, 1 met with Greg Bradshaw (the row crop grower). Greg confirmed that he
had trouble with the corn in places in this field and that he had to replant some of the corn
several times. He also said that he had talked to Ricky about not pumping until he could get the
corn planted. Greg said that he had been leasing this field since 1996.
On July 7, 2004, 1 met with Ricky Kornegay and Geno Kennedy concerning the complaint.
walked the area along the hydrants with Geno and noted in the inspection about Y2 acre area
around one of the hydrants that was without corn. Also noted in the inspection was a soft area
around one of the hydrants. Since the majority of the corn looked healthy, I suspected that
drainage might be an issue for areas of this field and proposed to do a follow up inspection once
the corn had been harvested to better evaluate field. For the follow up inspection, I would also
like to involve technical assistance.
On July 15, 2004, Charlie Stehman, Environmental Regional Supervisor I with the Division of
Water Quality, and I met with James Kornegay, Jimmy Kornegay, and Greg Bradshaw
concerning the sprayfield for the Ricky Kornegay Farm. Charlie Stehman and I walked the
sprayfield with Greg Bradshaw and James Kornegay. Minus three areas, the majority of the
corn field appeared to be healthy. The largest area of the three places where no corn was
noticed was approximately one acre. Pictures were taken. No water or soil samples were
pulled. The representatives were encouraged to call when waste was being applied again.
S:1WQSIANIMALSIDUPLIN12004131-756 Memo
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affrmadve Action Employer— 5()%Recyded11096Post Consumer Paper
orthCarolina
,Naturally

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Groundwater Section
Wilmington Regional Office
MEMORANDUM TO: File
FROM: Charlie Stehman Q�6
SUBJECT: Rickey Kornegay Farm Spray Area (CAFO)
Complaint Visit
Duplin County
DATE: July 16, 2004
On July 15 2004 Chester Cobb and I visited the application area of the Ricky Komegy hog
farm, in response to complaints that there had been over application in the Spring of 2004, resulting
in poor corn crop germination. When we arrived at the site we observed a healthy corn crop
throughout the whole field with the exception of areas near the hydrants, which may never have been
planted and two other areas approximaiely one acre each. One of these two areas was characterized
by cat tail vegetation and is apparent on a 1998 air photo.
The complaint comes from Joanne Kornegy who has provided photos of stunted corn and
apparent flooded areas in the corn field. Ms. Kornegy claims that the stunted com and flooding
results from over -application of liquid hog waste from the Ricky Komegy farm in discrete areas of
the corn field. She also indicated the farmer tending the corn had to replant as a result of over
application.
At this time it is difficult to draw any conclusion on the claim of over application because
the corn crop appeared healthy at the time of our visit and the very limited amount of area in which
com was not re- planted. Furthermore, the flooding in photographs provided by Ms. Kornegy did
not demonstrate coloration indicative of hog waste. Accordingly, no enforcement action will result
from the complaint.
We requested that Ms. Komegy call us immediately when another inappropriate application
event was observed at this location.
SAGWS\CFMomegy Fum.juINAMO

E
a
;f
0.6 0 0.6 1.2 Miles
VAA
WIN
S
E
Topographic map of Ricky Kornegay Farm
(Facility # 31-756). Map created from 1983 USGS
Mount Olive Quadrangle.

2000 0 2000 4000 Feet
1IA
101
S
E
Aerial photo of the Ricky Kornegay Farm
(Facility # 31-755). Map created from 1998
Mount Olive DOQQ.

loan 0 1000 2000 Feet
W
Wd
S
E
Aerial photo of the Ricky Kornegay Farm
(Facility # 31-756). Map created from 1998
Mount Olive DOQQ.
PPP ©�c��7ELj TAE- Locwr=DP3 OF TINS ��� ���s {�� ��c�p T#J
SP�t�y F,r E I (ff-r RouQ� ar-
. �F_
�G-TaizrS LjE(LF_ F� EcEy�1 Ora 7/15' 0 4

tw\

' •_
Y- � �
r Fes. r... •, 4- - - -
�•�� .� � s
� " �"
,..a?'
_. .. `c- 1,.`� mow. �- --
. .. 4'� �. - - ,v�.-�� .
- � .. - i'

s;r — �a
- �.- - r.,� •'' - ...-tom
lid
I

.- - �•'_ - ,:, � fir_
-1, R �Nl
W,
�i •Svw�-' a ' � �ll •'� � \. � -h - F_ i�".p f'^'.r'!i ^_ fit. -

•� I �'- i .y ,fit 7. ��
mg
II•N i r`'
_r NOT
ti
Opal
44.
• *%ice � , �
1010"� •'u ,ti '

i
J

blow -
At
.
`mot `� .if � 1 �•� �•�
�/`�?' +�.i � � ,.` • fir?'-� � � �' �—/����� � ., f ' {
t ti r iIL
v

- +0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
(Type of Visit QS compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine ;Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
FacilitvNumber Date of Visit: I 11W ime:
t 0 of O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ❑ CertiFieed ❑ Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated o bove Threshold: _...-------
Farm Name: ..... =�+%T �Q Connh :...... �(�G! �...........__ _...__.... .
Owner Name: .........................f� e-..
�C -- �. Phone No: ................ -- -
Flailing Address: ..... _._._ _.- - __. ...._ _•___.._....— ....... -
Facility Contact: ........_...... _._... Tit • ........ _ Phone No•�`S.r. .-- ...
Onsite Representative: 6',' _ _._. _ _ _. .__ Infe raior: 4�
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
-V.
9 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� �" Longitude �• �� �«
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
4❑
Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
-
Number of Lagoons
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes �No
Discharge originated at. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal./min�?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any par[ of operation? ❑ Yes ff No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ONO
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure i Structure 6
Identifier: ..._.__._...e.__.... .. _._-... . r_... .
=recboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: � — b Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie// trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive P ndmg [],,PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground []Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type ��%1/�. �1,��LAA)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
1 i_ Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
Comments (refer to question i) Explain any YES answers andfor any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Feld Copy ❑ Final Notes
C­ 6!5 Sd� 8� do
Apv-r /2 Aci/lE /7RFA
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i Date:
I2/12103 vi Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection (�
Required Records S Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc_)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25_ Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
29. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
XYes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
N1 PDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
J�Kes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
ZYes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form J?(Crop Yield Form gRainfaU ZInspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Add iti nal Corrime4ts andfor Dr�svzFigs:
�<
!�? �i¢�flf..,p �/PD� � zG:�i2/�' �,✓o ��� �`7`.v ��r/f�s,� �/�Z��.7 C
G,¢/�t7, —� ��,fF Lj�B /i`1 T�fQ�- J�„�nuJ�.�� WA'1 s
12/I2103

Complaint concerning Ricky Komegay Farm (Facility # 31-756)
6/22/04
Received call from Mr. Timmy Komegay (one of Mr. Byard Komegay's sons) concerning
the Ricky Komegay Farm. Caller complained that Ricky was mining the land by
pumping waste in one place. At the time I took the call, I thought that the complaint was
against the Byard Komegay Farm (Facility # 31-322). I received the call while I was on
the road heading to a farm to do an inspection. I had a hard time in understanding the
caller.
6/23/04
Met with Ms. Jo Ann Komegay (widow of Mr. Byard Komegay) for about 4 hours
concerning the complaint. At this time, I learned that the complaint was actually
concerning the Ricky Komegay Farm. She also expressed her concerns on how Ricky
pumps on the field. Ricky is one of Mr. Komegay's sons. Ms. Komegay gave me a set
of the pictures taken on 5/20/04. The following is a summary of the notes taken:
• Greg Bradshaw manages the row crops.
• Ricky Komegay has pumping rights to the field.
• 5/10/04 (Mon.) Greg talked to Byard concerning the com (approx. 15 — 20 acres
of the com had been lost because of how Ricky was pumping on the corn).
• 5/12/04 or 5/13/04 (Wed. or Thurs.) Byard went to check on the com and noticed
poor stand to no stand of com and noticed pink water standing in the field.
• 5/14/04 (Fri.) Byard talked to Ricky about the problem.
• 5/16/04 (Sun.) Byard past away.
• 5/20/04 (Thurs.) Pictures taken of the problem.
• 5/22/04 Supposedly more pictures were taken by another member of the family.
6/28/04
Met with Greg Bradshaw (the row crop grower).
• Has been leasing the field since 1996.
• This has been the worst year. Some com had to be replanted.
• Confirmed what Ms. Komegay said on 6/23/04.
• Said that he does not add fertilizer except to the borders.
6/2 /04
on acted Geno,DKennedy concerning Ricky Komegay Farm and to set a visit date
C(�c (Pj2Rjo`t--RCCE-----UED CrV-L -BHG, /1�6ssR�. Fi2 tcp^
cerlo kni') M y

717/04
Received call from Jimmy Komegay concerning what I have found out about the Ricky
Komegay Farm.
Met with Geno Kennedy and Ricky Kornegay concerning the complaint. Walked part of
the corn field along the row of hydrants with Geno Kennedy. Noted in the inspection
report was a soft area around a hydrant and about %: acre area by another hydrant in
which there was no com. Suspect that drainage is an issue for this field. Com over head
tall and had tasseled out. Would like to do a follow up once the corn has been harvested
to better inspect field. Would also like to have technical assistance involved.
7/8/04
• Called Jimmy Komegay concerning yesterday's inspection.
• Received call from Ms. Jo Ann Komegay.
• Called Mr. Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil & Water District, concerning the
Ricky Komegay Farm.
• Called Mr. Tim Hall, NCDA Regional Agronomist, concerning the field
conditions shown in the field.
Other notes of interest:
• The Ricky Komegay Farm is a 4410 feeder to finish.
• Mr. Byard Komegay gave Ricky pumping rights to this sprayfield for the life of
the operation. See agreement.
• With the passing of Mr. Komegay, his estate is in question (including this
sprayfield). There are supposedly two separate wills.
• Mr. Jimmy Komegay ----- phone # [phone]
• Ms. Jo Ann Komegay------- phone # [phone]
• Mr. Greg Bradshaw --------- cell # 910-290-1434
home # 910-267-1903
• Mr. Ricky Komegay--------- phone # [phone]
Compliance History:
• 9/29/1997 Notice of Deficiency for erosion on wall.
• 10/26/1998 Second Notice of Deficiency for deep erosion cuts on wall, areas
needing vegetative cover, weeds on inside dike wall and rodent burrows in wall.
0 12/18/1998 Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment

ll
Q p

-� -_ � - - - _- �^•s�vy�- may. -- _ -i � - _ _._ _ - - -
~+ • "�' 1 - T 4 fir- -_ s __T - - - -

Piz
, It
Jr
vIt
17�
eL-.

+[F? Tk,' y1 r,a .,K, ill -,ram �•J ;
TAM
IWO', -1
1
1
ti
\.-

��
��
'
,4
r
.�
7�t' — l a.

r`
i

.:�
__
. _. ��
�r
i� • �
`� = y
.�
` � �
f�
I
L ""

M
i

2
\-9 JO 1 K`V I �)- I

3W- RK%,-�
119 -c3 -Cll\

S-- l X91

�
-------------------- '
-
�
�
01
M
L'.A

I• evQr u, hereby give you, R; t�ara�r at_ _r
'(landowne ( pr db ucer )��—
permission to apply the lagoon effluent from your operation
on lzS acres of my land (see attached map showing the
€ield(s) to be -used for the waste disposal). This
permission is granted for the life of the proposed swine
operation.
1 have not and will not give permission to anyone else to
apply their lagoon effluent or litter to the fields and
tracts listed below.
Tract Number
13 ;.o
Field(s) Number
The lagoon effluent is to be applied in a manner that will
not cause a problem with the nutrients leaching out of the
soil and into ground and surface water (lakes, streams, and
drainage ditches).
tl-
The application of the waste will be timed in a manner so
that it will not inconvenience the existing farming
operations.
Tiandowner)
1a-/6 -2? _ —
(date)

M 02:i1prn From -CLERK OF COURT +91D-296-231D T-099 P.001/004 F-831
Administrative Office of the Court
Duplin County Clerk of Court
P.O. Box 189
Kenansville, NC 28349
Phone: [phone]
=BY:_
Fax Cover .Sheet
f
From:
9io -
Fax: 3573�0/9Z-
Date: U Lr 5/
Number es including din this e:
g g page:
Notes:
J, d-,
o ��

''-E; Z004. f02:12Pm From -CLERK OF COURT
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
[phone] T-099 P.002/004 F-831
IN THE GENERAL COURT O JUSTICV ----
SUPERIOR COURT DIVI ION
BEFORE THE CLERK
FILE NO.04 E
W THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF
BYARD G. RORNEGAY,
Deceased.
THIS MATTER COMING ON TO BE HEARD and being heard before Katie
Q. Harrell, Duplin County Clerk of Superior Court, presiding over a hearing held June
15'', 2004, to determine a proper and suitable person to serve as Personal Representative
for the above Estate; all parties were properly notified and were present with their
attorneys; and after hearing the evidence presented and the arguments of counsel the
Court makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. That Byard G. Kornegay died on May 16, 2004, domiciled in Duplin County,
North Carolina, leaving a spouse, Jo Ann Outlaw Kornegay; and six children; namely,
Jimmy B. Kornegay, Byard G. Kornegay, Jr., Gerald Clay Kornegay, Ricky Thomas
Kornegay, Linda Kay K. Lane, and Mary Hazel K. Manuel.
2. That both Byard G. Kornegay, the decedent, and Jo Aran Outlaw Kornegay had
entered into a Premarital Agreement prior to their marriage to each other.
3. That the decedent had properly executed a Last Will and Testament on
February 19, 1991, devising certain property and interests in properties to his spouse, Jo
Ann Outlaw Kornegay, as well as to his six children.
4. That less than a month later the decedent executed another Last Will and
Testament dated March 1, 1991, `revoking all Wills and Codicils" made prior to that
date, thus voiding the one dated February 19,1991. This later Will makes no provisions
for his spouse, Jo Aran Outlaw Komegay.
5. The original Will of March 1, 1991, has not been located, and there was no
evidence presented to suggest the Testator destroyed it with the necessary intent to effect
a revocation of same. as that issue was not before this Court.
6. The decedent was the owner of a safety deposit box located at Wachovia Bank,
in Mt. Olive, N.C. That Pam Minchew, an Assistant Clerk of Superior Court in Wayne
County, inventoried this box on May 24,2004, but there was no Last Will and Testament
discovered within its contents,

. dun-29M2y44 02:12pm From -CLERK OF COURT '- [phone] T-099 P-003/004 F-831
7. That immediately preceding this hearing, Jo Ann Outlaw Kornegay, through
her attorney, John Walston, filed with this Clerk of Superior Court an Application for
Letters of Administration, upon the belief that (1) the decedent died intestate, having
revoked all previously executed Wills, including the two mentioned in this Order, and (2)
the Premarital Agreement is unenforceable pursuant to NCGS 52B-7, specifically
claiming that there was not a fair and reasonable disclosure of properly. Listed in her
Application as persons entitled to share in the decedent's estate are Jo Ann Outlaw
Kornegay, and all six of his children as listed in number one above.
8. The family members have been unable to agree on a personal representative,
although in both Wills mentioned in this Order, the decedent appointed two of his
children; namely, Byard G. Kamegay, Jr., and Mary Hazel K. Manuel. Byard G.
Kornegay, Jr. and Mary Hazel K. Manuel are unable to work together at present
9. Mary Hazel KC Manuel and Ricky T. Komepy, through their attorney, Richard
Burrows, have expressed their intent to have the Will of March 1, 1991 declared the
decedent's Last Will and Testament
10. That to preserve, invest, and manage certain assets of the Estate, including a
hog operation, a Personal Representative needs to be appointed while these other issues
are being litigated in Superior Court
1 I _ Bonnie Robinson is Duplin County's Public Administrator, with more than 20
years experience in handling decedent's estates; she is a disinterested person, and is not in
any way disqualified.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The Clerk of Superior Court has discretion to issue Letters of Administration
to any person of good character who in the judgment of such Clerk would administer the
Estate advantageously to all competing interests, to be effective until such time as the
Superior Court, in its discretion, determines the validity of the Last Will and Testament
dated March 1, 199L
2. The enforceability of the Premarital Agreement entered into between Jo Ann
Outlaw Kornegay and the decedent prior to their marriage to each other is a matter for the
Superior Court to determine. The interest, if any, Jo Ann Outlaw Kornegay will have in
the decedent's estate; and, whether she should be considered as a person entitled to
administer the decedent's estate, will have to be determined once the Superior Court has
ruled on this issue.
3. This Court should appoint a Personal Represenudve to preserve, invest,
manage and otherwise administer this Estate until such time as the Superior Court rules
on the aforementioned issues.

,:5.zp042 gl :IZPM From —CLERK OF COURT
[phone] T-099 P-004/004 F-831
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The Application for Leiters of Administration by Jo Ann Outlaw Kornegay
filed June 15, 2004, is hereby denied.
2. That Bonnie Robinson, Duplin County's Public Administrator, be and is
hereby appointed Administratrix, CTA of the Estate of Byard G. Kornegay.
This OI( day of June, 2004.
CJL, x
Kafie qHarrell
Clerk of Superior Court
Duplin County

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (Iocal, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the, General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
i:2�. -
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District -
Permit File NCA231756
Permit File AWS310756
NDPU Files s

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural. Resources
0
April 9, 2003
Ricky Komegay
Ricky Komegay Farm
756 NC 403 West
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Ouality
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA23I756
Ricky Komegay Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Ricky Komegay:
On March lei, 2003, the North Carolina Division. of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities_in_North Carolina.to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on January 16, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Ricky Komegay, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS310756 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Ricky Komegay Farm, located in DuplinCounty, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 4410 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the _record keening
and nionitorinE conditions in this hermit. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events Form
must,_be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual_ Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water QuWity by no later than March 1st of each yem.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http:#h2o.enrstate.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Acton Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
10-03-2002
This plan has been prepared for:
Ricky Kornegay Farm 31-756
Ricky Kornegay
756 NC 403 W
Mount Olive, NC 28365
919-658-6341
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
252-568-2648
kv�eloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named. above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
D J 6 -z-
e (owner) 0 0 Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: % o � 20
nical Specialist Signature Date 2
a�
C
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Cover Page 1

,Z.�
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,088,070 gals/year by
a 4,410 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
9421
incorporated
16180
Injected
17819
Irrigated
10241
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
10,424
4,161,246
-73,176
Year 2
10,342
4,128,416
-40,346
Note:
332041
In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002
Source Page I of I

%,� Narrative
REVISED ADDENDUM TO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN:
FACILITY NUMBER 31-756
FARM NAME: RICKY KORNEGAY FARM
OWNER NAME: RICKY KORNEGAY
DESIGN CAPACITY: 4410 FEEDER TO FINISH
THIS PLAN IS A REVISION OF THE 9/3/97 PLAN COMPLETED BY BILLY HOUSTON OF
DUPLIN SWCD. THIS PLAN DEPICTS THE WETTABLE ACRES ON THE FARM AND
DISPLAYS THE SAME IN THE CALCULATION TABLES. (SEE WETTABLE ACRE
DETERMINATION)
MR. KORNEGAY HAS WRITTEN PERMISSION TO UTILIZE FOR WASTE APPLICATION
TRACT 1320 Fl & F2 IF EVER NEEDED. THESE FIELDS ARE DEDICATED TO CROPLAND
AND WITH THE ASSIGNMENT OF APPLCATION WINDOWS AND CROPS BY A TECHNICAL
SPECIALIST MAY BE INCORPORATED IN THE PLAN. THERE IS ALSO ADDITIONAL
ACREAGE THAT MAY BE UTILIZED BY HONEYWAGON IF NEEDED. CURRENTLY, MR.
KORNEGAY DOES NOT NEED THESE ACRES TO FULFILL_ THE REQUIREMENTS OF HIS
WUP.
NO WASTE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO A CROP THAT DOES NOT HAVE A REALISTIC YIELD
FOR THE USAGE OF IRRIGATED SWINE WASTE, EXCEPT FOR PREPLANT. ALL FIELDS
MUST MEET MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WHEN USED. MR_
�-' KORNEGAY PLANS TO APPLY SWINE WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS SPECIFIC
WASTE ANALYSIS NOT TO EXCEED THE HYDRAULIC LOADING OF THE SOILS_
ll� 332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Narrative Page I of I

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on
each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total
manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
T tees:. -.,.a:,..- 'T,.L1,. - XF
Tract
I Field
Source
I I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
I Acres
Cron
RYE
RYE
I Unit
Applic.
I Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manur
Apvlie
(Field
N
N
N
l s/A
1000
aVA
tons
1000 pals
tons
' 1321
FI
S7
Goldsboro
1 60.1
1 51.4
Corn, Grain
1 130.0
Bushels
2115-6/30
148
0
20
Irrig,
128
51.10
0
2,626.43
0.
1321
F1
S7
Goldsboro
60.1
51.4
1 Wheat, Grain
1 65.0
Bushels
911-3/31
75
0
4
Irris.
75
29.86
0
1.534.82
0,
0.
Balance, tons
0.
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol — means leased, otherwise, owned, 2. Svmbol * means user entered data.
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10/3/02 WUT Page I

Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
AcreAcres
Use,
Cra
RYE
RYE
UnitPeriod
Applic.
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manur
AppGe
(Field
N
N
IN
lbs/A
1000
al/A
tons
1000 a1s
tons
13211
F11
S7
Goldsboro.
60.1
51.41
Wheat, Grain
65.0
Bushels
9/1-3/31
6E
1 0
0
Irrig.
61
24.43
0
1,255,76
0.
1321
FI
S7
Goldsboro
60.1
51.4
Soybeans, Double Crop
*38.0
Bushels
4/1-9/15
*140
1 0
0
Irrig.
140
55.89
0
2,872.66
0.
0,
Balance, tons
I0.
Notes: I. In the tract column, symbol —means leased, otherwise, owned.
332041 Database Version 2.0
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed: 10/3/02
WL}T Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
`V Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
`1.
Irrip,ation Application Factors
Tract
Field
soil series
Applicab n Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1321
F 1
I Goldsboro
0.50
0.96
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 IAF Page l of I

M
The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic lutes. In most rases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting.
Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must fast be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not
be used for sludge application_ If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields
with high amounts ofcopper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied_ On sites vulnerable to surface
water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels
may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
5519
110.57
165.96
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
27.64
55.29
82.93
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
51.83
103.66
155.49
332041 Database Version 2.0 �� a�Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Sludge Page I of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the fuV
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Des i n Storage Ca ci s
Start Date
09/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
23
1
3
39
1
4
68
1
5
96
1
6
113
1
7
82
1
8
51
1
9
58
1
10
77
1
11
97
1
12
66
2
l
47
2
2
56
2
3
87
2
4
83
2
5
90
2
6
111
2
7
118
2
8
138
2
9
159
2
10
129
2
11
98
2
12
67
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
,-1-1 332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Capacity Page I of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
ti historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 10-03-2002 Specification Page 1 of 4

b. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
�-' will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Specification Page 2 of 4

14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
�_ 332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Specification Page 3 of 4

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between, the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Specification Page 4 of 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): FI
Corn l: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations
should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till.
Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When
planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted
practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and one-half the
remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 3040 days after emergence. The
total amount of is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, the
recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples
can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely
management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): F I
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, non -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate plant
populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4
seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10
seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth
should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the
soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally
grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at
planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential
for profitable double crop soybean production.
332041
Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 10-03-2002
Crop Note Page 1 of 2

L
The following crop note applies to field(s): Fl
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1 /2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash
recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the
months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases,
insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
332041 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 10-03-2002 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

L . 1. L--� � !;L
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number 31`756 County Duy in Year gpp 3
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) Rickv Korneeay Farm
Operator'in Charge for this Facility Rickv Kornegay Certification # 16261
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year ® YES
❑ NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part 11 and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was generated but not
land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I: Facility Information:
Total number of application Fields ® or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): 1 0 Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
60.1
Q. Total number of Fields ® or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application occurred
during the year: 1 Total Acres on which waste was applied 60.1
& Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
6000.21
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and the
permit: 10243
5. - Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken off
site during the year N/A tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
3 ec . t; 3 = 4-3-7_9; — ----
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals at the
facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: Prestaee Farms
Part H: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites ® Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
MAR 2 JpD4
AFACF 3-14-03 1 *NIVR � �d-
No Vr-r-

2.
The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
® Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
s.
There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
® Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4_
There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
® Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5.
There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
® Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAvVMP during the past calendar year.
6.
All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
® Yes ❑ No
7.
Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8.
A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
9.
Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
® Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
lo.
Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
11.
All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
M Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12.
All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
® Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
is.
Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
® Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14..
All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
® Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted_ Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Ricky Korneeav
Permittee Name and Title (type or print)
2/12104
§ignatUe o Permi ee Date
Signature of Operator in Charge Date
AFACF 3-14-03 2

kI�em #� n�Annual certif=Fcation � ud�nce
Actual 12 month average for 2003 by picking up
the numbers for
January -
March, prior to issuance of permit, along with the
numbers for the
permit
period which would represent an annual average.
--2-Y Doing a partial year average (April 2003 -
December 2003). If you
do a
partial year average, that needs to be stated on
the annual
certification
form.
Doing a 12 month average from April 2003 thru
April 2004. If you
choose
to do this, that must be noted on the annual
certification form with
the
stocking information provided to DWQ in May.
Regardless of which option you choose, the Annual
Certification Form is
still due on March 1. Any information that is
submitted to DWQ after
March 1
as an addendum to the certification form, must have
the farm name,
permit
number etc. so they will be able to match it to the
permit.
REGr-N D
MAR o 2 zzzk

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 2, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ricky Kornegay
Ricky Kornegay Farm
756 NC 403 West
Mt. Olive NC 28365
A0Ar4ia
_.%00VW=%%%
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Iq y 0 9 Zo�,c;1
Y_•
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Ricky Kornegay Farm
Facility Number 31-756
Duplin County
Dear Ricky Kornegay:
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Patrick Fussell on 5/18/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your
facility that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of
the following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
VX The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Patrick Fussell the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Patrick Fussell, at 127 Cardinal Drive
Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405-3845, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you
have any questions please contact Patrick Fussell at [phone]. If within 90 days
you are unable to provide Patrick Fussell with -the information you are automatically
required to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2
below, within 180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWO within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to -take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Prestage Farms

P. O. BOX 10162
WILMINGTON, N.C. 28405-0162
September 2, 1999
Geno Kennedy I
Agriment Services, Inc.
P.Q. Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
Re: Repairs to Swine Waste Lagoon for operation 31-756
Dear Geno;
I inspected the lagoon before, during and after repairs were made to the lagoon for
damage form muskrats. The repairs were made as I specified and the lagoon has been
returned to the standards that were in effect when the lagoon was built. The only thing
remaining is for the operator to get vegetation re established in the areas where the
repairs were made.
The problems have been corrected and this lagoon is in compliance with the regulations
in force at the time of its original construction.
Sincerely,
�r
Herbert C. Fox, Jr., P.E.

Plan Amendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards through March 31, 2000
1. If this facility can comply with its existing permit and CAWMP it must do so.
2.
Temporary Addition -of New Sprayfields r)(Check appropriate boxes.)
0 A. acres of cropland. List crop types used:
[) B- acres of hardwood woodland @ 100 lbs PAN / acre added.
d C. acres of pine woodland added @ 60 lbs PAN 1 acre added
3. Summer Perennial Grass (Check appropriate box.)
0 A. Application window extended for acres of perennial grass until first killing frost.
D B. An additional 50 lbs of PAN applied to acres of perennial grass prior to killing frost.
4. PAN�4pplication Increased for Small Grains & Winter Grasses to be harvested (Check appropriate box.)
PAN application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for 51 acres of small grains or winter grasses to be harvested.
0 B. PAN application increased up to 150 lbs per acre for acres of overseeded summer perennial included in 3. B.
5. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box.)
Q A. Prior to December 1 1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 35% reduction of the last analysis taken
prior to the first 25 year 24 hour storm event (Current waste analysis must be used after Dec_ 1" .)
0 B. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN.
6. Required - Maximum Nitrogen Utilization Measures for Small Grains and Winter Grasses,
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
B. Timely harvest of forage to increase yield, and
C. irrigating during periods of warmer weather.
7. Reauired - Irrigation Management Techniques to Reduce Runoff and Pending Potential.
A. Making frequent, light irrigation applications, and
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicted rainfall.
8. The owner I manager is required to manage the movement of animals to and from the facility to minimize environmental
impacts, ensure compliance with the facility's permit and amended CAWMP, and avoid discharge to surface waters.
9. Authorization to use the additional practices included in this amendment expires if a facility discharges to surface Katcrs.
Any discharge is a violation and may result in an enforcement action.
10. The owner / operator is required to keep records of all waste applications.
11. This revision must include a map or sketch of new land application areas.
Facility Number ,3—% - —7 S L
Date�j
Fwe� game
(PRINT)
Technical S*ialfst Signature
Date fl/'1zg
This document must be filed at the SWCD office and be attached to the facilities CAWMP
and be available for inspection at the facility.
(*) New temporary sprayfields must meet applicable buffer and setback requirements Waste must not be applied to wetlands.
1111 7» ooa

�l
Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number - % _
Farm Name: twc-
On-Site Represen tive: e
Inspector/Reviewees Name: a .�
Date of site visit: S [E E9
Date of most recent WUP: .,
Annual farm PAN deficit: -Q[ sq6,32,%ounds
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part ll eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption El E2 E3 E4
�peration pended for wettable acre
determination based on P7 P2 P3
Irrigation Systems)' circle 'I .hard-hoseiraveler, . center=pivot system; 3. linear:move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable.pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE. k
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied -to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational -table in Part 111).
PART 11.75% Rule -Eligibility. Checklist and. Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements.. WA -Determination .required because -operation fails lone of time .eligibility
requirements listedbelow:
_ F1 Lackofzc. age rvt7iclmTesulted�nnver pplicaiionmfwastewater-{P.AN) onepray..
fields)maccording #ofarm'sdasttwoyears:Df imgafion7-ecoQis::_
F2 UnclearjIlegible; or.lack-of infomsation/map: _
F3 Obvious:field :limitationsInumerousbitches;failuretto:deductzregriired
buffer/setback:acrEage; or25% of#otalzacreage-identifie'dih-LAWMP--iricludes�
small, :irreguladyehapedfields= fields lessfhan-:5:bcresfor:travelers'mr-less-fhan:-
2 acres for--stationary;;prinklers).-
F4 WA determination -required because CAWMP.crediisfield(s)'sacreage -in excess
of 75% of time respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

It
Revised April 20, 1999
Facility dumber . at_�.- 2S�-
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS3
NUMBER NUMBER1,2 IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
I I I i i 1
}
FIELD.NUMBER' - hydrant- pull,zone, orpointnumbers may be used in place ottleld numbers depending on UAWMP
and t!p72 'o :1-riGaiio:: -s11st-2m. If pulls, etc. crossTnorethan -one field, inspectorireviewer will have to Combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determinationtor exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination-
FIELD.NUMBER2 - must be clearly delineated.onmap.
C0MliiEr4TS= - back-up fields with CAWMP.acFeage-exceeding 75% of its #otal.acres-and having Teceiled less than 50%
of its annual PA 4{ P. ented-in the farm'sprevious-two_years' (1997 & 1998) of.inigationTecords,-.cannot serve -as the
sole basis -for requ rir, a VVA Datarmination__Back-upfieldsTnust-be-notedin the-commentzectiommridmustbe:accessible
by Irripc3L:r3r? zvsiem.
Part IV. Pending WA "Determinations
- � Jr c Plan lacks following information: &w t L&_r t,ca�
P2 Plan -revision-may_satisfy7S% rule based on adequate overall .PAN deficit and -by
adjusiing-all fieldacreageJo below 75% use -rate
P13 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ricky Kornegay
Ricky Kornegay Farm
756 NC 403 W
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Dear Ricky Kornegay:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 8, 1999
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-756
Duplin County
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements of
completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you of your
unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the conditional certification
has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to an enforcement action. As of
December 7, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising us of the status of your conditional
approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your technical specialist and landowner sign the form
in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter. Please be
advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to
provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure to comply with the
requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,
A""r
"V a"J
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Ricky Kornegay
Ricky Kornegay Farm
756 NC 403 W
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Dear Ricky Kornegay:
OPM
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-756
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers_
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
/or Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]M
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 18, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETLME RECEIPTREQUESTED
Ricky Kornegay
.756 NC 403 W
Mt. Olive NC 28365
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Ricky Kornegay Farm
Permit Number: AWS310756
Duplin County
Dear Ricky Kornegay:
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10G, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 9/22/97,
Your annual permit fee for the period of 9/22/98 - 9/21/99 is $100.00. Your payment was due 11/12/98.' Because
this fee was- not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at4(919A33-7015 ext. 10.
ely, f
J
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Health Department
Permit File
P.O. Box.29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 100% post -consumer paper

REC DIVED
AGRIMENT SERVICES INC NOV . 9
PO BOX 1096 1998
BEULAVILLE, NC 28518 By:
[phone] tel/fatx
11/6/98
Mr. Dean Hunkele
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Hunkele,
This memo is to address the 98 annual inspection that was conducted for Ricky Kornegay on 10122/98 he
had one facility (FN 31-736)'
Farm 31-756 had several deficiencies:
l._ Erosion problems on inner dike walls of the lagoon. (NOD)
2. Muskrat burrowing problems. (NOD)
3. Strormwater diversion has erosion problems at outlet and along side of houses. (NOD)
For the record, Mr. Kornegay did initiate cosmetic repairs on the lagoon and re-seeded/mulched
the entire lagoon to accommodate the first NOD.
-Mr. Kornegay Plans to address the finger washes on the inside tow behind houses and the storm
water diversion, by adding suitable clay material and then compacting and smoothing these areas.
Afterwards, Mr. Kornegay plans to topdress and m-seed these areas. I have put Mr. Kornegay in
touch with the contractor that made similar repairs to the Grey Morgan facility 3I 383.
The rodent burrows will -be addressed after one application occurs to the adjacent wheat crop. By
completing this application the level should recede to a desirable level to make the repairs. Once
level is lowered the mush -rats ►y1 have to be eradicated by trapping, shooting, or poisonine if
allowable. if the muskrats are not destroyed any repairs made will be for not and nesr problem
arras will he generated. if these areas are inundated with waste the contractor will not he able to
get the compaction needed to restore the integrity of these areas. The Division should allow for time
to carry out the steps to solve the problem this may require an extension of the 1211 date; however,
every possible effort (Heather permitting) will be mane to comply with this date.
I hope this'information will address the Notice of Deficiency(s) that were noted, If you have any questions
please feel free to call.
With Kind Regards,
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Technical Specialist
Agriment Services, Inc.
Cc Ricky Kornegay

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
October 26, 1998
Certified Mil # Z 153 115 142
Return Receipt ReaycAed
Mr. Ricky Komegay
Ricky Komegay Farm
756 NC 403 West
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
UWA
Ai • •
RCDENR'
NORTH cAROLJNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANO NASURAL RESOURCES
Subject: SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Ricky Komegay Farm
Facility Number: 31-756
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Komegay:
On October 22, 1998, I inspected your animal operation and the lagoon serving this
operation. During the inspection it was observed that erosion is still a problem on the dike
walls of your lagoon and may threaten the integrity of the clay liner in the future. A Notice of
Deficiency was sent to you on September 26, 1997 for erosion on the dike wall. This is a
violation of your certified animal waste plan and subsequent violations could result in a Notice
of Violation. In addition, evidence of muskrat or other large rodent burrows were observed
on the inner dike wall. These burrows constitute a significant threat to the integrity of the clay
liner if they have not already sacrificed its integrity.
The deep cuts on the inner dike wall along the front side closest to the houses must be
filled and packed with a suitable clay material, then vegetated. Vegetation needs to be
established on other bare areas and weeds managed or removed from the inner dike wall. The
erosion caused by stormwater on the front corner of the dike wall toe needs to be permanently
repaired to prevent migration of the damage up the outer dike wall.
The source of the burrows along the inner dike wall must be eliminated. All damage
by the burrows will have to be repaired by filling and packing with a suitable clay material by
December 1, 1998. The extent of the damage must be accessed and signed off on by a
technical specialist before repairs are made with verification sent to this office. Contact Duplin
Soil and Water or your service company for assistance.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

� t
Z 153 115 142 1
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for Intern tlonal Mail See reverse
5entto
Number
P i let P
�p
Postage
Certdred Fee
�J
Special Delivery Fee
to
Restdded Delivery Fee
OR
Return Reoeipl Showing to
Y
Whom 6 Date Delivered
-
$Regan
R-W SlbwN to +
Data, 6 Addressee's Address
NOW rp sra,
mTOTAL
Postage & FeesD
v
Postmark or Date
U!
mit 2s4u
N
o_
I;YSPS
�I

Ricky Kornegay
October 26, 1998
Page 2
If damage is determined to have sacrificed the integrity of the clay liner, then repairs will
have to verified by a professional engineer.
You must notify this office in writing within fourteen (14) days of the receipt of this notice,
what actions are being taken to correct these deficiencies including a timetable for any repairs.
Failure to do so may result in the facility losing its deemed permitted status and being required to
obtain an individual non discharge permit.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater
to the surface waters of the State without a permit. The Department of Environment and Natural
Resources has the authority to levy a civil penalty of_not more than $10,000 per day per violation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Dean Hunkele, David
Holsinger or Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Dean A. Hunkele
Environmental Specialist
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water -Conservation
Zach McCullen, Prestage Farms
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
S. I WQS 1 ANIMALS 1 D UPUN 131- 756-2. DEF

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
Ricky Kornegay
Ricky Kornegay Farm
756 NC 403 W
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Ilk?
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NITuRAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS310756
Ricky Kornegay Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Duplin County
Dear Ricky Kornegay:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on September 22, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we
are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Ricky Kornegay, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Ricky Kornegay Farm, located in Duplin
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 4410 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS310756 dated September 22, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any
specific conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow
coverage under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition I1.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition I11.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition III.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in - this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535. Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
AnsEqual Opportunity Afflrma'ti�e Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310756
Ricky Korrnegay Farm
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Mike Lewandowski at [phone] ext. 362.
Sincerely,
qL
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina RE, CE, E. V —Eo� D,
Department of Environment, ���
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality;
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 22, 1997
Ricky Komegay
Ricky Komegay Farm
756 NC 403 W
Mt. Olive NC 28365
LT.KMAI
1qT 0 0
A&4�1
�EHNR
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310756
Ricky Komegay Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Ricky Komegay:
In accordance with your application received on September 10, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 31-756, authorizing the operation of an animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit
(attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the
management of animal waste from the Ricky Kornegay Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 4410 Feeder to Finish and the application to a minimum of 59 acres of land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
In accordance with General Statue 143-215.10C, Animal Waste Management Plans shall include
the following components:
- A checklist of odor sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- A checklist of insect sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- Provisions set forth for acceptable methods of disposing of mortalities.
- Provisions regarding emergency action plans.
Your existing Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must include the above elements, by
December 31, 1998. Documentation of the certification must be available to inspectors onsite. Submittal
of the amended certification statement shall be required upon renewal of your permit coverage in 2001.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or'the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this°WC.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762&0535 Telephone [phone] FAx [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative. Action Employer. 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this CO-' or the
General Permit, please contact Mike Lewandowski at [phone] ext. 362.
Sincerely,
/A- Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

.,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Res
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
BY:
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
Application Date:
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name: Rig4 Korneggy Farm
2. Print Land Owner's name: Ricky Korneggy
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: 756 NC 403 W
City: Mt. Olive NC Zip: 28365
Telephone Number: 919-658-6341
4. County where farm is located:
Applicants Initials
icp
0
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified):
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
7. Lessee's / tegrator s nam (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): , Prestagee Farms
31 - 756
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

1'II. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: 31-2�6
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
4410 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? 21 yes; 0 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Trae of Swine No. of Animals Tyne of Foulgy No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: _; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP)-.
4. Number of Lagoons: I ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: _ Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? I'E or NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, Ri-!kv KZanieGAy _ _ (Land Owner's name listed in question I1.2), attest that
this application for RtGu y AgANSCAy FARM . (Farm name listed in question M 1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned tome as incomplete.
Signature
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICA
I,
Date
: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1I.6), attest that this
application for (Farm name listed in question 11.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

I kir-x.y koer-mAy FAptwK
DI)PLI4 Co.
A Y NFIE
-W
C 0 U N
au
J I=
Ck
au
in
LM
wi
tm
LM
LM
um
PAS
I�w
q4 I'a
N
1.
imm
13JA
!224
Ab.- SIM
IJ "
im
P I 5-4k�
lam
im
V- 1XV
1w \C/
im -
- S. " LM
Lin
IL]13"
Am
LW Lam
LIU
N-Pr
2m
im
Im
Uff
un
Lei11 MV
23H
i2m
12D. r
LM
cn
I
im
MIA
ILL.
Im
O
un
Mmww HWUL
Lim
lu
im I

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
RICKY KORNEGAY
756 NC 403 WEST
MT. OLIVE NC 28365
919-658-6341
WA�� QUAi.IY`( 5�CT1
gEP � p �497
�1
Nan Disc1��
Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
4410.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in'an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
4410 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 8379 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
4410 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 10143 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE l: ,ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
I
TOTAL10
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P.and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1321
1
GOA
C
125
136.25
20
29.5
4019.37
MAR-JUN
1321 1--1 1GOA IW 160 1120 IO 129.5 13540
FEBMAR
1.321 1 1GOA DSB 135 1140 0 129.5 14130
JUN-
SEPT 15
1%,991
TOTAL111689.3
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* 1bs,AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE I CROP I UNITS I PER UNIT
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
C CORN BUSHELS 1.25
DSB DOUBLE CROPPED SOYBEANS BUSHELS 4
W WHEAT BUSHELS 2
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
_ACRES
0
LBS AW N USED
0
59
11689.37
59
11689.37
* BALANCE
-1546.375
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal. waste N produced.
Page. 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1631.7 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 8158.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300_pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 27.195 acres of land. If - you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate -of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 65.268 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25s depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor.should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may -make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
i
1 Field
1321
1
1 1 1
1321
1 1
I 1 1
1321
1
1 --1
1
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
Soil Type
Crop
(in/hr)
�
(inches)
GOA
C
1 .50
I
1 *1.0
GOA
DSB
1 .50
I
I *1.0
GOA
1 W
1 .50
l
1 *1.0
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 160.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
MR KORNEGAY'S PLAN REQUIRES THAT TRACT 1321 FIELD #1 BE DIVIDED INTO TWO
EQUAL FIELDS AND PLANTED TO A CORN, WHEAT AND SOYBEAN ROTATION. THIS.
MEANS THAT THERE WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 30.4 ACRES PLANTED TO CORN
FOLLOWED BY WHEAT, AND 30.4 ACRES PLANTED TO SOYBEANS IN A TWO YEAR
ROTATION.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of .the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. I.t is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland_ When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered_
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public -right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site_
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20_ Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the'soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:RICKY KORNEGAY FARM
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: RICKY KORNEGAY
(Please print) �1
4
Signature: Date: ./
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan:
Date:
(Please print)BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affiliation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 277
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: �/ !�- _ Date:
�U^
Page: 12

I, Pyard knrAdga _ hereby give you, ; _,
— Ilandowne (pr ducer)
permission to apply the lagoon effluent from your operation
on 12y acres of my land (see attached map showing the
field(s) to be used for the waste disposal). This
permission is granted for the life of the proposed swine
operation.
i have not and will not give permission to anyone else to
apply their lagoon effluent or litter to the fields and
tracts listed below.
Tract Number
i3.�-p
1:3a�i
Field(s) Number
The lagoon effluent is to be applied in a manner that will
not cause a problem with the nutrients leaching out of the
soil and into ground and surface water (lakes, streams, and
drainage ditches).
The application of the waste will be timed in a manner so
that it will not inconvenience the existing farming
operations.
d2- 6
(date)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources SEP 0 2 W7
Division of Water Quality
F'Y:
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 28, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ricky Kornegay
Ricky Kornegay Farm
756 NC 403 W
Mt. Olive NC 28365
Farm Number: 31-756
Dear Ricky Kornegay:
1 A T4
�EHNFi
You are hereby notified that Ricky Kornegay Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215. IOC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has thirty (30) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section
19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified
by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified
date. Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit
the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions
for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water- Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call Mike -Lewandowski at [phone]
extension 362 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

OCT

I
11

r;-0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Water Quality Wayne McDevitt
Governor Secretary
September 26, 1997
Cedified Mail # Z 312 636 527
R.eWrn Receipt Requested
Ricky Kornegay
Ricky Komegay Farm
756 NC 403 W.
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Dear Mr. Komegay:
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Ricky Komegay Farm
Facility Number: 31-756
Duplin County
On September 25, 1997, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
inspected your animal operation and the lagoon serving this operation. It was observed that erosion on the
wall of your lagoon could eventually threaten the integrity of the structures. All erosion cuts must be
properly filled and all bare areas revegetated. In addition, it was observed that you are growing crops in
your spray fields which are not part of your certified plan. Steps must also be taken to correct this problem.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within fourteen (14) days
of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your certified animal waste management
plan. Failure to do so may result in the facility being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the
surface waters of the State without a permit. The Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil
penalty of not more than $10, 000 per day per violation.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Ricky Kornegay
September 26, 1997
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Andy Heminger, David Holsinger, or
Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Andrew G. Heiminger
Environmental Specialist
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Glenn Clifton, Prestage Farms, Inc.
Operations Branch
1 mington.Files--,
S:1 WQSVMYA131-756.DEF

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Ricky Komegay
Ricky Komegay Farm
756 NC 403 W
Mt. Olive NC 28365
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Ricky Kornegay Farm
Facility ID#: 31-756
Dupli.n County
Dear Mr. Kornegay:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, 14 FAX 919-715�-3060
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 7687 fC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper